Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : jberryl69 (12)  

Feedback:   All (630)  |   Reviews (6)  |   Comments (15)  |   Replies (609)

Other:   Replies Received (222)  |   Trust Ratings (27)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 631 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
76
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Because I am a football fan and because I'm a Bronco's fan loyalty makes me pick Denver. So that's who I'm rooting for.

2009 Super Bowl, Indy Colts (featuring the Bronc's currant QB) vs the Saints, everyone picked the Colts to win - NOT!

While the Seahawks are built to win (big time defense), the Bronco's have a great offense. So I'm hoping for decent weather (not too cold, not too wet/snow) there is a chance for the Broncos to win. Besides I loathe the entire Seahawk defense flapping mouth trash display which is their MO.


01-24-14  08:57am

Reply
77
N/A Reply of David19's Reply

Hey David - From me personally there is no attack on Graymane - he's a good PU friend who I like a lot. He also might be our only Octogenarian. Usually if the poll is suggested by someone they will be kudos by having their name mentioned unless the poll was generated by PU.

With regard to me and my responses on PU here is how I try to gauge my responses:

I am sarcastic - just my avenue of humor - but humor is key. I may take issues with the way a poll question is asked but only to point out certain ambiguities in the way or answers that might be offered. But there is no offense trying to made. My motto - "don't feed the trolls" so I try to make sure I'm not one.

I do certainly like PU - and it's members - and most of my time is spent in the forum and answering new poll questions so I do not try and alienate or insult fellow members since I have not found another collegial forum anywhere - not that I go looking for one.

Finally, if my response offense you, please accept my apology. I suppose that since this poll was the first time I had seen your name I might have thought you did not regularly attend this gathering and I'm sorry if I left a bad taste. Thanks for reaching out about your concerns.

Regards,
jb


01-20-14  06:05am

Reply
78
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

As the question is phrased, "photography models" answers it's own question.

01-16-14  04:51am

Reply
79
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

The way most models are presented is usually the face and works their way down. But as Graymane posted the question, what my choice is? The attraction for me is what can she do within my niche, so the face ends up being my beginning point.

For example - Lola Taylor performs well within my niche and is my style of beauty - (both face & tits)

Sara Jay performs well (I guess) within my niche and is butt ugly and ends up leaving me not interested at all.

Vicki Chase is tops, with all facets of her body hot and she is the best within my niche.

In real life, because I don't have a try out phase, legs and ass (especially ankles) have always been my favorite and has nothing to do with my niche. Wish there was a button to see how she fares within my niche.


01-12-14  07:51am

Reply
80
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I'm not clear what "waste ... days" means. Often with a new site I will cull through old material to see if my interests there can be met (which most times I will download vids). Once I catch up, I will look around using other search criteria. If at this point I decide to keep the site, my access is usually limited to a few days, or looking at daily updates, but not necessarily logging on unless there is something that interests me. But regardless of the days of log on, I never feel like there is a "waste...days" since if there is nothing that interests me, I waste nothing.

01-10-14  08:46am

Reply
81
Visit Hardcore Video Network

Hardcore Video Network
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

thks for following up sir

01-09-14  10:41am

Reply
82
Visit Hardcore Video Network

Hardcore Video Network
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Thanks Pat though I had no intention of joining. And honestly I can't even tell you what motivated me to even go look, though I'm sure it's something from the thread Jook started. At any rate, as soon as I hit the page, alarms started to go off so I just thought I'd mention it on the PBP site page. Appreciate your support.

12-26-13  01:05pm

Reply
83
Visit Hardcore Video Network

Hardcore Video Network
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Besides the pop-up it feels like a tube site just from the way it looks upon looking at the front page. And a cheap tube to boot. I didn't really stick around to find out.

12-26-13  05:53am

Comment
84
Visit Hardcore Video Network

Hardcore Video Network
(0)

Smacks

Why does this site smack of being a tube site? Upon visiting it immediately pops up another window ad. TBP needs to review this to see if it actually qualifies to be included.

12-25-13  07:41am

Replies (7)
Reply
85
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

AdultXXXDate is the latest and greatest addition to the online adult dating arena. It benefits from the same enormous database of members as the popular AdultFriendFinder site, while also benefiting from a more intuitive design and layout. With over 34 million members, AdultXXXDate has the largest number of members you'll find on any dating site (on a par with AdultFriendFinder, Passion.com and XMatch.com, all of which share the same database). This means that your chances of finding a sex-date... from review of the Top Adult Dating websites

Well, basic membership is free but the one that counts is $18 per month. Don't think I'll give up my subscription to EA membership for that.


12-19-13  12:08pm

Reply
86
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

My "usually" is generally because in most cases I already am ready to join a site and am double checking to see if there is a reason to NOT join.

12-18-13  07:26am

Reply
87
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

"I probably would never do that" should really say, at least for me, "I WILL NEVER do that" since I refuse to piss away money on that type of useless technology.

12-13-13  08:43am

Reply
88
N/A Reply of Capn's Reply

"Quality quite time"? I can't remember what your media preference is but when I read that I think of all the "hiss & awe" and bovine noises most videos have and think "there goes the quite time".

12-12-13  07:15am

Reply
89
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

During the day, I will work on my material - but that is more looking at detail rather then body of work as a whole - I don't find myself getting all that excited during this time. It's more like being at work. At night is when I watch my finished products.

Reviewing/editing and watching. Two different times. Just the way it goes.


12-11-13  06:17am

Reply
90
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends - are we talking about the kind of bdsm that leave marks? Not so much - but some stuff on Kink.com I enjoy.

12-10-13  06:12am

Reply
91
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

99% videos.

12-07-13  06:04am

Reply
92
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I think that shooting in a shower brings a certain amount of static challenges to the videographer, but then that is part of the panache of the scene. Not as distracting or uncontrollable as shooting an outdoor scene where shadow & light are hard to control. While I like the idea of an outside shoot, these are not professional film makers, so their setup & technique is rather primitive, thus the results are mixed. Sound is something that is always sketchy in porn vids since they only use the camera mic to capture.

I guess I'll take the opportunity to mention my biggest pet peeve of porn sound which is the "hiss & awe" European non-talent and the bellowing of bovine female non-talent. Wonder what clown thought that added anything?


12-03-13  06:38am

Reply
93
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

First, it would depend upon who the producer is and their sensitivity to drug use.

If a producer has a zero tolerance level, he'd not book someone he suspects of using. If a producer is ambivalent to drug use, then the criteria might be how it effects the production or his business in general.


11-29-13  06:22am

Reply
94
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I'm in the group where my Playboy was stuffed under the mattress (1960s as a teen) so I'd say it was pretty soft. But then, not much of any porn after I turned 17. I really didn't get to the hard core stuff till the early 1980s with my hardcore introduction to the movie Deep Throat which has, to this day, defined my taste in porn to the T.

11-25-13  05:40am

Reply
95
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Damn Drooler, I hope you don't think that I think I'm right in views. I understand and it was just a tease since all the prior comments were "NO TOYS". Sorry if you misunderstood. No offense intended sir!!

11-24-13  04:15pm

Reply
96
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

not just you but everyone who doesn't like toys

11-24-13  10:05am

Reply
97
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

2 girls, "hard lez" especially WITH TOYS and oral rosebud play.

lol - I sometimes wonder if this is a porn lovers forum or a prude convention.


11-24-13  07:03am

Reply
98
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

^haha - I try to be a collector which is why I edit and hoard the rest. Hmmm - what I mean is (cause I chose "I keep them, but rarely view") my raw footage I view rarely, but my edited favs I view a lot.

11-21-13  12:24pm

Reply
99
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I'm going to have to call this poll on a semantics violation because there is no "should" to it - perhaps "prefer", because that is what you're really asking. I do have to give Cybertoad some slack though since he is a disabled veteran.

Personally once I get down to editing a scene for content the scene is nothing but action. Forget the setup cause it's all about the sex. And while I do not watch solo performances, I would suspect that at least undergarments would be preferred.


11-17-13  07:01am

Reply
100
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

^^ What Marcus said. Going a bit further, what is being considered a link?

Beyond e-mail links, I Google and up pops choices - I suppose when I click on one of them it's a link.

Within a story I'm reading is a reference to a website, like nfl.com . If I highlight that address and right click, I can open up a new tab with that address having been entered. I suppose this might be considered typing in a url.

When I want to go to my Twitter account, all I have to do is type in the first letter or couple of letters and the address is offered to me, or a window of other similar addresses are offered and I can pick the appropriate one. I suppose this might be considered typing in a url.

But honestly, I never type an entire url out.


11-13-13  04:48am


Shown : 76-100 of 631 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.07 seconds.