| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Lingerie Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
cakeweasel's Review
A short note to backup my review: their front promo page has not changed in at least 2 years, as far as I can tell.
|
02-05-10 03:52pm
|
Review
2
|
Lingerie Videos
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Quite good content; they have made some effort to collect videos with various kinds of lingerie, like their name says.
- For the detail minded, they even categorised according to the type of lingerie (stockings, corsets etc).
- The exclusive stuff always seems to be solo, but is well filmed.
- Support did actually respond - didn't help, but did respond ;) |
| Cons: |
Site is an abysmal piece of crap.
The navigation is pretty much useless: the only kind of list you can get is in some random order. They do have categories, but those also just lead to randomly ordered lists.
No streaming preview.
There seems to be no way to search by title.
They have short clips which you can painfully use to preview, but there is no link to the full video! To find that you have to navigate through their crappy lists.
The only way you will be able to use this is to blindly download full videos in the hopes they might be good. |
| Bottom Line: |
Terrible site ruins good content. |
|
02-05-10 03:50pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
3
|
Fassinating
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fair number of pretty girls
Fairly hardcore without getting into horrible stuff
Has good-quality photo previews of the video scenes so you can check it out without downloading the whole thing |
| Cons: |
Sold my email address to spammers
[I gave them a unique address and got spammed on it]
Lack of imagination and variety in the scenes
Site
Some average looking girls
Site navigation is a bit minimal |
| Bottom Line: |
Fairly good site, one of the better, but the selling my email is annoying. |
|
11-02-08 01:24am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
4
|
Asshole Fever
(1)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
To be clear. Most sites do NOT do this. A few do it some time after you unsubscribe. These guys are noticeably worse than others.
|
05-06-07 10:34am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
The reviews are good, even excellent. But the simple fact you tell us which sites have cursed DRM is worth a lot of money. Hence I picked individual site facts.
This is also a clean and well-designed site, with not too much promotion. Congrats.
|
05-04-07 11:11pm
|
Review
6
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Girls are mostly hot AND pretty.
Lots of anal and DP action.
Pretty good site layout with good speed.
High quality video, with NO DRM (other dumbass sites take note)
Earlier movies manage to strike a balance where the women seem to be into the depravity.
Lots of toys. |
| Cons: |
Gets pretty samey after a while. They could use some more fantasy type stuff with different scenes, clothes, lingerie, etc etc.
Later videos are getting too hard and have more slapping, spitting etc which is starting to turn it into another trash site. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first porn site I really thought was worth the money, and subscribed for several months on end. Add a bit more variety and it would be perfect. |
|
05-04-07 11:08pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
7
|
Asshole Fever
(1)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Not a bad site, with lots of hardcore anal. There seems to be quite a lot of movies now. They make some effort to change around costumes, though there's no real fantasy stuff. |
| Cons: |
IMMEDIATELY sold my email address to spammers! I use unique addresses for each site from sneakemail, so I know who sold it. Of course many porn sites seem dodgy in this respect but these guys were really blatant about it.
Many of the girls are not that pretty - they have that used b-grade look, despite lots of makeup
It's too rough for me - they really treat them pretty badly. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not bad, but not that good either. |
|
05-04-07 10:54pm
Replies (2)
|
