Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lurifax (0)  

Feedback:   All (53)  |   Reviews (0)  |   Comments (25)  |   Replies (28)

Other:   Replies Received (33)  |   Trust Ratings (6)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 53 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
26
Visit Oye Loca

Oye Loca
(1)

A warning about CCBill’s usuries to residents outside of the US$ zone…

On many websites I have noticed that CCBill charge in one’s local currency – in my case, in GBP.

I thought that this was a ‘nice’ (and convenient) service.

But, this is a typical example of “THE WOLF CLOTHED AS A SHEEP”!

Working out what it should cost in GBP, and compare the result with what CCBill charges; I found that CCBill is slapping on 39+% above the basic rate of exchange.

More than a week ago I sent an email to CCBill, titled ‘usury’, asking how they could justify this exorbitant fee.

Surprise, surprise, CCBill did not reply – did not even bother with supplying the standard bullshit one is used to from banks…

In summary: they have shown; not only are they committing ‘daylight robbery’ but the 24/7 ‘service’, they brag about, is @ their discretion (And convenience!) but may well be 0/7.

08-02-08  05:21pm

Replies (0)
Reply
27
Visit Porn Access

Porn Access
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review

Having months of experience of both Porn Access and Videobox, you got me mightily confused in your comparison of the two...

I would not even mention the two in the same context, as Videobox is vastly superior to the other.

By all means, take an other month to look at Porn Access...

...after which you may revalue your opinion.

In a separate comment to the site I have accounted for a number of let-downs, which, taken together, explains my opinion about your 'review'.


07-23-07  11:05am

Comment
28
Visit Porn Access

Porn Access
(0)

An exagerated valuation of this site...

Aren't there certain fundamental's that should be met by this kind of operators...?

To qualify for point score in the '70' range - let alone the '80' range - I expect that the company should have a staff, who knows the trade...!

Not so with this lot.

I have subscribed to this site for two months (because I wanted to have a good look at it) and must say that I have not before seen a site as caothic as this.

1. The 'search engine' is of no use. You only get frustrated when trying to use it.
2. Performers are often given names (if any), which are not recognised in the rest of the world.
3. There is no reference to where videoclips come from, which makes it impossible to catalogise or else put the downloads into a workable system.
4. Videoclips are all over the place - more often than not - appearing in three/four places or more.
5. Many times you'll find that they have the wrong videoclip. I have pointed this out to the webmaster many times - in vain.

07-23-07  10:49am

Replies (0)
Reply
29
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of badandy400's Reply

Hello badandy400,

My disappointment with reviews in general is based on the lack of (visible) consistency or accountability in the setting of scores. TBP for example do not show on what criteria they give scores. (‘Porninspector’ does something like it, but not enough.)

On whatever grounds you use (download speed, DVD quality, HD and so on)… If a table is set up - showing the scores (0-10/10, or 0-100/100 etc.) - and the same table structure is used over the board one gets COMPATIBLE results. The AVERAGE gives the score…

Let’s look at what happens when a new factor, like HD, comes in to the valuation;

At present you have no room for manoeuvre. (You have “painted yourself into a corner”.) With a template, as suggested, you don’t have that problem as you simply add HD to the template. – That’s basics in any valuation process.

Your point about Criticising or Creating a review is taken. My reason for not doing the latter is that I have neither time nor interest for it. Besides, I leave that to you guys. You are paid for it (I hope...).

If I have to choose between Camaro and Firebird, I stick to my bike until I have enough money to by a proper car like BMW or Mercedes…

I should not have bothered with Rachel Aziani in my last posting – I had not done so before.
My visit to Rachel Aziani was just a sidekick to AZIANI.com.

My comment to ‘ace of aces’ was as a reply to his childish previous remark, and ‘13’ is the impression I got of his mental age. I do not apologise for it.


08-04-08  05:52pm

Reply
30
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of ace of aces's Reply

Aren't you too young for this?

I get the impression that you can hardly be older than 13 years of age.


08-02-08  06:54pm

Reply
31
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of badandy400's Reply

The intelligent reader would have concluded that I was not 'bitching' about Videobox, but gave an example of how reviewers manage to paint themselves into a corner.

At first I thought "Why bother?", but for your benefit I shall explore;

As I was replying to 'ace of aces' 'review' on this site...what would be the point of making a statement, or comment, to the aforementioned 'review', on the Videobox site?

I have previously declared (nearly) all and every 'problem' I have with the 'Rachel Aziani' site... Although I could add that it is a bit too repetetive, but then again, that is just how it is with all the single model sites.

If anything, I should add to my original comment to 'ace of aces' 'review': What "hardcore"? The closest to it I have seen would not even shock a religious fanatic.

As for 'bitching' about Videobox...

1. I don't really have much critisism about the site, but what I have, I shall account for when it comes to that - probably in September this year.

2. As I mentioned before, I am not happy with the inflation of points given to websites by reviewers in general. Unfortunately I have not found a proper forum, where to vent and/or discuss these matters. As it stands, the whole point system is, if anything, ridiculus.

More often than not, sites are not compatible on the same criteria - although they are given points as if they were.

As an example;

Presently I am subscribing to xmovies.com, which TBP has given a score of 86.3. (I cannot make out what the 86.3 relates to.)

In comparison with Videobox, which has a TBP score of 98.0 one is led to believe that Videobox is vastly superior to xmovies.com. I, however, do not see it in such easy terms.

Whilst Videobox is outstanding in it's quantity of videos as well as how they handle their data base, it is comparably shortcoming in other aspects, where xmovies.com excels like website speed, download speed and quality of video clips, and not least; an actual, working and polite customer service (24/7!).

Between the two, I have come to the conclusion that, for the best result, one should work the two places in tandem. AMEN!


08-02-08  06:44pm

Reply
32
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of ace of aces's Reply

A "review" should be as objective as possible.

Else it is not a 'review' but an opinion.

Having got your point of view clarified, I shall not bother any further to read any of your "reviews" as I can se no value in them.


07-02-08  04:10pm

Reply
33
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of ace of aces's Review

What a load of rubbish! (If the '99' is out of 100.)

I have previously complained about the trend among all (professional) website reviewers.

'Ace of aces' have obviously fallen into the same trap.

A typical example is 'VideoBox', which is given 98/100 by TBP.

Shortcomings @ 'VideoBox';

1. Not all videos are of DVD quality.
2. Many 'updates' are 'recycled' old videos.
3. ...and last, but not least: No HD quality to be seen anywhere!

In conclusion I ask; would an adjustment (improvement) with regard to the 'shortcomings' only be worth 2% - or less?

Obviously not.


07-01-08  05:00pm

Reply
34
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of nygiants03's Comment

Hi,

TBP has got the figures wrong.

Presently there is a trial offer @$4.95 for both the Aziani sites.


07-01-08  04:19pm

Comment
35
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)

Funny Server

You have better believe it! They have put a timer on the server, which means that 75 minutes after you have logged in the site freezes - regardless of what you were doing.

1. Very annoying as one has to start all over again (after a new sign-in).

2. Makes shit of your download managers normal capacity.

An other 'funny' thing about the site is that the server seems unable to upload faster than 1.1MB/s.

07-01-08  04:16pm

Replies (0)
Reply
36
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)
Reply of Vegas Ken's Comment

What is the euphoria about?

OK, the price is fine but…

A: There is a daily download limit xMB, which is not mentioned anywhere – I think – and that xMB include the entire bunch of sites… I.e. a little bit from here and a little bit from there – adding up to xMB and you are out for 24 hours.
B: The server they use for uploading (to discount customers only?) must be 10-15 years old – offering a measly (up to!) 750 kB/s. Very frustrating if you have a download capacity of 20MB/s!
C: My download manager (IDM) does not seem to work with rk.com – and that is a first.

Besides,
1. I am sick and tired of seeing all the commercial crap that clutters each and every page.
2. More of the ‘sickening stuff: “voted World’s Best Porn Site” – That must have been done by someone with very little experience of what is on offer out there!

AMEN!


05-24-10  11:22am

Comment
37
Visit Sexy Nubiles

Sexy Nubiles
(0)

Trial membership

Trying to 'Join' and select the trial membership ($7.95) I could not find that option.

Can anybody tell me 'how to'?

05-23-07  08:07am

Replies (2)
Comment
38
Visit Simpson Twins

Simpson Twins
(0)

Single site = crazy price!

To anybody, who considers to join this site, I recommend them to do it via www.allteenrevpass.com, where you shall get a much more goodies for the $$$…

11-08-07  04:10pm

Replies (1)
Comment
39
Visit Teen Topanga

Teen Topanga
(0)

Single site = crazy price!

To anybody, who considers to join this site, I recommend them to do it via www.allteenrevpass.com, where you shall get a much more goodies for the $$$…

11-08-07  04:03pm

Replies (0)
Comment
40
Visit Texas Twins

Texas Twins
(0)

Single site = crazy price!

To anybody, who considers to join this site, I recommend them to do it via www.allteenrevpass.com, where you shall get a much more goodies for the $$$…

11-08-07  04:04pm

Replies (0)
Comment
41
Visit Trixie Teen

Trixie Teen
(0)

Single site = crazy price!

To anybody, who considers to join this site, I recommend them to do it via www.allteenrevpass.com, where you shall get a much more goodies for the $$$…

11-08-07  04:00pm

Replies (0)
Comment
42
Visit Trixie Teen

Trixie Teen
(0)

Single site = crazy price!

To anybody, who consider to join this site, I recommend them to do it via www.allteenrevpass.com, where you shall get a much more goodies for the $$$…

11-08-07  03:59pm

Replies (0)
Reply
43
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of Wittyguy's Reply

Thanks Wittyguy.

I do not spend much time in this club and am therefore not well versed in moving around.

Could you let me know how I reach "Sites that Charge More in Eur than US"?


08-04-08  02:15pm

Reply
44
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of jd1961's Reply

Well, I don't agree with you about the Japanese videos in general as the 'hairsuite' is not to my liking.

But do I agree with you about the male fuckers in American porn videos.

I could not for my life call them 'performers' as they obvioulsy - not beleiving their luck - fuck for pleasure. And to add to their disgrace, some of them seem to have obtained an ego larger than Rhode Island.

Where does the business get all these disgusting freaks/creepes from?

I really feel sorry for the girls who have to put up with it...

If that is the power of the 'mighty'$, I am immensely thankful to my parents: that I was not born or bred in the $ zone.


08-02-08  08:14pm

Reply
45
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of messmer's Comment

Hello fellow pornuser,

It surprises me that anybody actually listen to any of the sound crap, which is added on to porn videos.

It must be @ least thirty years ago when I found that the usage of the 'mute' button vastly enhanced the viewing of porn videos.

...and so it is going to be - for ever!


08-02-08  07:49pm

Comment
46
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)

US$ versus £ (and others?) + ?/24

A warning about CCBill’s usuries to residents outside of the US$ zone…

On many websites I have noticed that CCBill charge in one’s local currency – in my case, in GBP.

I thought that this was a ‘nice’ (and convenient) service.

But, this is a typical example of “THE WOLF CLOTHED AS A SHEEP”!

Working out what it should cost in GBP, and compare the result with what CCBill charges; I found that CCBill is slapping on 39+% above the basic rate of exchange.

More than a week ago I sent an email to CCBill, titled ‘usury’, asking how they could justify this exorbitant fee.

Surprise, surprise, CCBill did not reply – did not even bother with supplying the standard bullshit one is used to from banks…

In summary: they have shown; not only are they committing ‘daylight robbery’ but the 24/7 ‘service’, they brag about, is @ their discretion (And convenience!) but may well be 0/7.

Fuming about the above, I sent an email to Videobox, asking for an alternative payment agent, which is mentioned on their website, but is very elusive when it comes to do the business.

Like what has happened inumerable times before during the last two years, I have tried to contact Videobox - as a subscriber or 'outsider' - I had no reply. I.e. the 24/7 'service' is more like 0/365.

08-02-08  07:33pm

Replies (4)
Reply
47
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

It was a few years ago when I last was a member to 'videobox'. Hence I am not sure about exactly how it happened.
However, I am sure it was when doing the editing in 'Windows movie maker' and therefore, I believe that it happened in conjunction with dragging the clip into that application.

I may go back to 'videobox' in a couple of months time...


04-07-08  09:48am

Reply
48
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of Boobs4ever's Reply

Could you elaborate on your last reply?

I haven't a clue what you mean.


09-07-07  01:59am

Reply
49
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of Boobs4ever's Reply

Hmm...

That's OK - if that is all one wants to do, but...

The problem I mentioned in my original comment comes up when you want to do further editing in the middle of a video clip.

That's when you get the 50-90 bits of the video clip - all to be dragged down to the Time Line in MS Moviemaker.

- A right Royal Pain In The Ass


09-04-07  08:36am

Reply
50
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of Boobs4ever's Reply

Interesting!

Please let me know the procedure you follow when editing.


09-04-07  03:44am


Shown : 26-50 of 53 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.83 seconds.