| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Anilos
(1)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
**Maybe the best website I've seen from a "collector" standpoint. Well done, owner/webmaster.**
Attractive older women, most in their 30s and 40s.
Good download speeds (can saturate my 6Mbps DSL).
Not only allows but encourages download managers.
Multiple video formats (MPG, MP4, MOV, WMV, and Flash).
Two sizes of photos in downloadable ZIP files or galleries.
Some surprises here and there in models you might not have seen before (we're looking at you, Scarlet).
A fair price with the PU discount for what is possibly considered borderline niche material (older women). |
| Cons: |
It's a matter of taste, but most content is masturbation. I'd wager 30% or less is hardcore MF content.
Another matter of taste, but there seems to be quite a few fake boobs.
The HD videos are less sharp than those offered from some other sites, but the reduced sizes seem very reasonable for the quality. Probably a decent tradeoff.
The high-res photos are the same. They don't offer the incredible resolution of some of the artsy softcore sites, but they're still high quality and probably a reasonable tradeoff on size/bandwidth. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've never seen a website set up to allow me to grab the pictures and videos of particular models so easily. I used a download manager and could click on the woman's name/image, go to her associated page, and, by using the filter option for downloading specific items, I could right click and add that model's pics and videos links to the download queue simultaneously. No individual clicking on links, no wading through multiple pages to get to each separate set, and no dead links a couple of hours after adding them.
From their FAQs:
"Download as much as you can, we encourage that."
Again, well done, Anilos.
FWIW, and if the webmaster (or other sites' WMs) is reading this, I didn't have much interest in the Nubiles.net sister-site, but this approach encouraging customers to add to their collections will make me join.
Recommended. |
|
04-15-12 07:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Club Tug
(2)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Allows download manager (DTA)
- Decent download speeds when accessible.
- Some photo sets are zipped. |
| Cons: |
Some truly unattractive women. 50% or more if I had to guess. Not beer-goggles women. I mean actual homely and/or fat and homely women. It's easy to pick out the (attractive) pros' videos because they're the ones you don't squint and scroll past.
***HORRIBLE VIDEO QUALITY***. The highest setting looks to be 640x426 @ 2700kbps WMV, and most vids are around 100MB. Think 1998. Remember the old free Bang Bus clips you'd find in xxx galleries? Yep, that bad.
Add to that poor lighting, bad angles, etc.
Seriously, the video quality is so bad that sometimes I only knew the guy had orgasmed because I saw a change in the woman's stroking tempo.
Joined on Saturday morning. Their server was overwhelmed and inaccessible by 9am and I couldn't view any pages until that evening. Fortunately:
Very little content available. Divide that by half (unless you like homely women in low-res videos) and you've got an entire network that you can browse and download in less than 1/2 a da |
| Bottom Line: |
Avoid.
Overpriced and outdated. Fortunately I clicked through to the signup page and then attempted to leave. I was offered 10 days for $10 and decided to try it.
I still feel a bit ripped off because one day is all you need. Clubtug has 13 pages with 12 vids each. Cumblastcity, seemomsuck, and over40handjobs have less than a dozen pages total with 12 vids on each page. I'd give you an exact number, but the server is inaccessible again.
UPDATE 1/22/12- Total pages of the four sites mentioned above is 30, with 12 (fewer if it's the last page) vids on each, and many repeats between sites.
My DTA queue has just over 200 videos lined up for download and I've seen every page. If I saturated my DSL line I could've had the entire network (well, all I wanted) downloaded in a few hours.
BTW, many of those other sites have repeats. Maybe only 35% of the videos are worth getting after you factor in the ugly girls and the redundancies.
I can only go on my opinion, and no one can account for personal taste. I like clavicles, tan-lines, and almost-invisible hair in backlit photos of thighs. Other people won't find that appealing. But dang there are some unattractive women on this site. More power to you if that's your thing, but I'm guessing you could find an ugly woman site with higher quality videos and photos.
That said, the photos are occasionally decent, although they're web-viewing size only. It doesn't redeem the site, but it should be mentioned. Unfortunately not every video has photos, and those that do aren't always zipped and available for downloading unless you're willing to click and save each individual photo.
Not recommended. |
|
01-21-12 06:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
3
|
Mommy Blows Best
(0)
|
|
06-27-12 06:32pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
4
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
An update:
I've figured out what looks to be a workaround for a download manager, but I won't post any hints until after my month has run out. Sorry if that seems jerkish, but I don't want them "fixing" it until my time is up.
So, technically, "download managers: yes, should work" is accurate. Using them isn't simple or intuitive, which ultimately means they are discouraged.
Comically, even at the blazing 150KB/s speeds they provide, it's probably possible to download all ~350 videos in their "high WMV" format in a month. Let that give you some idea of the size and quality of the clips. One can assume Private has access to their own original DVDs, so it makes no sense why most of the clips should be so small and of such poor quality.
I was initially impressed with the compact size of their 1080p encodings until I reached a fast-motion and/or high-contrast section. Size-wise they did a good job, but the quality suffered greatly (single pass?) and I decided I'd rather download non-HD without their artifacts and blockiness rather than waste time on their subpar HD material.
There are ads for other sites (Reality Kings was one IIRC) inside the members area. I'd mark 20 more points off their score for this if I were allowed to. Paying members shouldn't have to look at non-related site ads. If you want to double-dip with advertisements then you should reduce the price. Ad-free price and ad-supported price, perhaps?
Their search/actress links are next to useless. It's almost like they don't know who is in their scenes and instead used broad catch-alls to connect names to scenes. "That lady is blonde and it looks like she's got a tattoo on her ankle," someone at Private.com must've said, "and Kathia Nobili is blonde and she has a tattoo on her stomach, so let's put them both under the Nobili link." Horrible.
And more points off for way too heavy a focus on their not-really-that-erotic snow/beach niche scenes. I bet they are ~15% of all the clips on the site.
(Frankly, I suspect no real time was put into this site and they just ripped whatever movies they had left in a cardboard box after breaking down their 2007 AVN awards promo booth. The website probably started with the moving of some folding chairs and a crumpled up vinyl banner.)
Hey, look at them having sex in the snow! Hey, more snow! Oh good, a snowmobile for them to have sex on. Look, a beach! More beaches! Wow, even more beaches! Hey, a boat! Another boat! Awesome! Oh good, snow again. Holy crap, that guy is wearing a bigfoot costume with the crotch cut out (yep, seriously). C'mon, Private. You were classy. You were the best. Act like it.
I can't say it enough- Don't join. Not even for a month. You'll be disappointed.
|
06-19-11 06:01pm
|
Reply
5
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Ignorance. Sorry. KB/s.
Thanks and I'll try to edit the main review.
|
06-11-11 04:31am
|
Review
6
|
Private.com
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- That feeling you get the very first time you log on as a member to the website of one of the older, classier purveyors of adult material who has shown the ability to combine eroticism, beauty, and proper cinematic techniques to create some of the better adult films in circulation since the '60s.
- Um...
- Not constant login requests like a few other big name sites.
- If a grad student were researching "how companies unintentionally encourage the pirating of their material" then I'd recommend visiting this website. I think it could be an extremely useful example. |
| Cons: |
- 250KB/s max on a 6Mbps DSL connection. ~150KB/s most of the time.
- You're not allowed to queue downloads, so you'll only be able to get whatever you sit and monitor and click (and re-click when it fails) to download. Maybe you'll be able to get 8 scenes per day.. Maybe twelve?
- Constant "503 Service Temporarily Unavailable" errors if you try to look at other pages after beginning a download. The site supposedly allows four connections, but I ran into trouble with less.
- Repeated "size mismatch" errors when using download managers.
- A laughably small collection of movies for a 50 year old company.
- 350 movies wouldn't be so bad if they were decent quality, but most are comparable to early 2000's VCDs. Yep. That poor. I'd estimate only 25% or so are HD.
- You'll be lucky to download the HD movies without the connection failing or the speed dropping to 0kbps, and, when it does, you'll be lucky to resume. If you can, guess what? You start over. Hooray |
| Bottom Line: |
Videobox has almost 300 Private videos available, consistently fast connection speeds (600kbps+), and the .264 quality is better than Private.com's standard quality. Not to mention you can use download managers at VB and queue up dozens of movies to view later. It looks like they offer HD now, too, so there is absolutely no advantage to joining this site. It's a frustrating waste of money.
Seriously, don't do it. You'll be disappointed that the site even exists and you'll think to yourself, "Wow, I just wasted $30" or "I could've put that money towards a _______ membership."
Consider yourself warned.
A bad experience.
A waste of money.
Stay away. |
|
06-10-11 10:49am
Replies (14)
|
Review
7
|
Sapphic Erotica
(1)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful, clean women as convincing lesbians.
- Great speeds (can saturate my 6Mbps DSL)
- Allows full use of download managers. Downthemall in my case, and the site didn't restrict me from setting up videos to download overnight. Well done, sapphicerotica.com.
- No gonzo mascara-running, gagging, put-a-foot-on-her-head-while-penetrating-her nonsense.
- Very few fake breasts. Two thumbs up. The women are young, slim, and (mostly) natural.
- Did I mention beautiful women smooching on other beautiful women? |
| Cons: |
- Some scenes are a bit too "charged" to be convincing. Being so immediately orgasmic is likely a medical condition.
- Some scenes are a bit silly. Not typical American XXX silly, but a bit much. I enjoy looking at four gorgeous women in tennis outfits coming in after a vigorous match and stripping/licking, but it's a bit unbelievable. |
| Bottom Line: |
- A great site. Seriously. Especially the older stuff, and especially for the price. I think it's one of the few sites that everyone who enjoys XXX and finds women attractive should join at one time.
- Flashiness and web design are personal style preferences, but I really like the simplicity of the site.
- A pretty good model index.
- "Clean" was used above, but I can't stress enough how nice it is to see attractive models who look like they've used shampoo within the last eight hours on a site.
- The approach that some of the older, wonderful oral scenes used is being a bit neglected. Now there seems to be lots more fingers and toys and anal-licking. That's fine, but when you join and see the older vids and the girls sucking their lover's entire labial folds into their mouth and really dwelling on them... well, you'll see. The older videos have something the new ones lack.
- Most women are fairly unknown, so it's a bit odd to see big stars in a few scenes. Kathia Nobili (although in my top 5 favorites) and Nessa Devil seem very out of place.
- Probably 90% of the women are completely shaved in their pubic area. A personal preference thing, but I'd like for more of the women to have hair down there. Nothing unusual or fetishistic, but just natural and trimmed adult women. |
|
09-08-11 05:03am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
8
|
Strapon Fuckers
(0)
|
|
04-02-10 01:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
9
|
Strapon Moms Fuck Guys
(0)
|
|
04-02-10 01:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.33 seconds.
|
|
