Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : graymane (31)  

Feedback:   All (715)  |   Reviews (19)  |   Comments (9)  |   Replies (687)

Other:   Replies Received (295)  |   Trust Ratings (32)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 715 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

Word-for word, my sentiments exactly.

I would add ....For my money, BJs should be given a category of only its own. Start off with BJ .....finish (end) with mouthful of the same.


04-03-14  06:21am

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

When I'm social, I'm very, very social -- sometimes to a fault.

Those could be times I would be in the company of one .... or sociably acquiescing a bevy of lovey, amply endowed beauties, all of whom, throwing caution to the wind, are in ready-mode to liberate themselves from any and all sexual inhibitions while sharing the moment.

When I'm not social: (a good example for that might be when a guy unapologetically pisses on my leg.)

I think I'd have to extend that to any other occurrence reaching that magnitude.


03-31-14  11:44pm

Reply
53
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I've had skirmishes several times with webmasters ....the outcome of which I'm proud to say often resolved the problem. I've even reversed my stand if I feel his argument is justified.

Overall, though, I definitely think its in the best interest of webmasters to respond voicing any grievance they might harbor over any action negatively taken by a subscriber.
The worst being simply ignoring a member's plea for help from those who've just taken their money.


03-27-14  11:05pm

Reply
54
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Since none of the poll inquires apply simply to surf "taking chances" .....
I guess I'm free to opt for being "average."


03-23-14  09:41pm

Reply
55
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Ever since, at that early age when I was introduced to nocturnal emissions, and happily my erections wouldn't leave me alone, I simply dreamed a lot.

It was later on I happened accidently upon, a napping damsel lying on her back, her dress had worked its way up to her panties, where her puffy kitty, tight against her raised mound, for the first time ignited and explosive, unforgettable crescendo of pleasure that served masturbation fantasies thereafter that never wore down.

That vision, placing me atop all that heavenly equipment, was a missionary content irreplaceably embedded and would never give up the lead.


03-19-14  08:35am

Reply
56
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What I find interesting about this poll inquiry is that although its tackled much of the obvious "conscious" things a straight male would ask himself, as well as "handle" in those circumstances..... not surprisingly, !00% have made it clear they wouldn't engage in nor have any interest in physically carrying out any phase of a gay encounter.

But what seems to be slid under the rug is the idea of approaching this same collection of data on a "subconscious" level: ...... DREAMS.
Have any of us here experienced a full-blown (pun intended) act of Homosexual activity with his same gender in the course of a dream?

I'm seeing a lot of red faces out there!
C'mon, be honest!
OK, guys, the ball is in your court.


03-15-14  06:30pm

Reply
57
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

You know, Turbo, you've handed me a many of laughs in the course of this association with our common interest in porn, and especially the way its kicked around here at PU.

But this message to which I'm replying, leaves the term "belly-laugh"" in a cloud of dust.
Knee-slapper also falls short.
LOL ain't even in the race.
But for the lack of finding any term that's worthy of mating with this gem ............... I'm reaching in the pot for the closest word that can even come close to laugh effect:
Ever here of the verb called "guffaw"
Jerry Stinfeld eat your heart out.


03-14-14  11:06pm

Reply
58
N/A Reply of YankeeBastard's Reply

Many Thanks, yankee for the "head's up call."
You're as right as rain!
You've given me a whole new perspective on the stuff simply by the thoughtful correction.

Let me throw something at'cha ........
Why don't we see you getting more involved in the other fun-things we have to offer around here?
We could use your talent in our forum, as well as other programs of intense interest that I'll bet you'll ultimately find as mentally intoxicating as we regulars find them.


03-14-14  04:25pm

Reply
59
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Since you bought that up, oh wise one.
I recall seeing it documented somewhere that but a small wad of the stuff is hyper-loaded with protein, as well as more Calcium than a bottle of whole milk.


03-14-14  12:00pm

Reply
60
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

I don't wanna see any of the guy's cum .....period!
The fact that the women are coerced into swallowing the dammed stuff, or even rolling it around their mouths, is so fucking appalling that it defies any sense of a balanced mind.


03-13-14  03:36pm

Reply
61
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What do I think?
It's undeniably "BATE" clear and simple.
And it works.
It's an industry staple that's pretty-well dug-in to porn marketing longevity -- so expect it to hang around for awhile.
Little doubt Hooking porn-watchers on this popular ploy Probably draws hardy guffaws from porn profiteers at their general schmoozing get-to-gathers.
I've never used it.


03-09-14  04:02pm

Reply
62
N/A Reply of nadiencendia's Poll

During my younger years, used to Read'em only to garner some tips and new material to add to story lines in letters I'd send to "special" ladies .....specifically those who was on my wish list to bed-down.

Otherwise, never considered literary porn in any fashion worth reading.
except only for visual properties and/or erotic images .......translation: Pictures and movies.


03-08-14  12:17am

Reply
63
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What pisses-me-off big time is the practice of these assholes pumping up the volume promoting all the goodies we'll get by joining ......yet won't tell you what the price is until you commits by pushing the "join" button.
I suspect this is but one of the many ploys they use to authorize more information from you even though you don't commit to join.


03-05-14  03:29pm

Reply
64
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

How grand it would be to be gifted with your technical expertise, JB ....
I marvel over how easily you seem to whiz-through stuff even the pro's might stumble on.

Should I harbor that good fortune, I too wouldn't have any "issues."
I salute you, my friend.


03-03-14  03:21pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Its like the overkill of "smiles" during a supposed erotic porn shoot.
I mean, have you ever had your partner giggling, or with a smile painted on her face while you're banging her brains out?


03-01-14  07:31pm

Reply
66
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I suppose it would be alright, only if you turned her over on her belly and went in from the rear.

Somehow, going at it missionary style would give me the feeling akin to riding a camel bare-back.


02-25-14  08:13pm

Reply
67
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

Count on almost always at least once a day for me.

The next poll might well follow by asking how much time usually results from matters pertaining to those visits..... i.e. ..forum activity via threads/posting, perusing and/or doing reviews, studying latest TBP, making comments ....etc..


02-15-14  08:35pm

Reply
68
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Unless lengthy clips contain a sizable amount of what I want ... and really like, I skip over it.
My purpose for that is simply to conserve space on my hard drive.
On the lone site from which I mostly download, and maintain an ongoing membership, I simply pack a lot of those big files in their favorites..... avoiding the hassle of dumping it on my C-drive.


02-14-14  12:31am

Reply
69
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

made plenty of sense to me.
When they give way sensibly doing softer, hot tease, to launching head-on (pun intended) into raw, over-the top- porn .... well, somehow, it thereafter leaves my flag at half-mast.


02-11-14  04:53pm

Reply
70
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Preferably looking as young as the law allows..
But clearly, without exception ... over the legal age.


02-10-14  12:51am

Reply
71
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Try Positions I see on porn? .... not hardly (pun intended)
Partly because I'm not into gymnastics; If that should throw you, It's really broken down to mean I don't possess the supple abilities doing it upside down, nor the other wild demonstration of positions outside the norm we see with paid porn.

I'm die-in-the-wool "missionary." If she wants more than that, I have friends who'd gladly accomadate her wishes.


02-03-14  02:43pm

Reply
72
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have to say mostly I act on impulse ..... especially if I haven't had anything going for awhile:
Exemplifying, lets say (metaphorically) I'm motoring along on cruise control until something I'm especially looking for has it's thumb out. And if the bearer of said thumb comes off as trustworthy, approvingly and/or passionately has what I want, as well as what I don't want, feels right, and among other things, like the cost belatedly and unexpectedly popping up in Euro-currency after commitment....... then I'll lastly act on my intuition as to whether sit on it, go for the plastic, or ride on down the road.


01-30-14  03:55pm

Reply
73
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Just yanking'ya chain, CT ..like the others' response, I didn't have a clue what you was asking us about..
I just threw the John & hooker bit in for some light humor.. But the idea probably deflated in quick order because it drew enneadic response.

I did a through thread on genital toys for men about two years ago, with special emphasis on visual-electro stimulation.
My motivation for bringing this up was because of the simplicity of jumping on this undertaking until the source's goal meets fruition, wherein, via connecting you/me with a configuration (probably head gear), sending and receiving real-time erotic sensations with our favorite porn star, progressively creating visually identical sensations to actual foreplay, followed by intercourse and culminating into mind-blowing orgasm.
This, my friend, leaves no doubt in my mind this process is already waiting in the wings to make its appearance anytime. ..... if, indeed, it already hasn't.

Oh yeah, CT ...... I brought up the fact sensation from vibrators, as well as other sundry high assortment of mechanically operable masturbating devices, do far exceed the existing, antiquated but magically equipped five-fingered marvel that's served us for so long.

But guess what? the "attachment" is so strong, I was shouted down and run out of town


01-28-14  10:09pm

Reply
74
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Is this a form of negotiation between a John and a hooker on settling for how much, for how long, what she'll do or not do, and if the package includes
dinner and wine at a nice eatery?

It appears to be worded in German, or a reasonable facsimile........ :=)


01-28-14  02:21pm

Reply
75
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

I had a gut feeling this poll question was gonna come back and bite me in the ass!

Fact is, I summited this poll a while back, during a time when it seemed Internet Porn was wringing it's hands because rumors were getting around of heavy-weights in government having their foot in the door of the porn industry's livelihood.
I reckoned I took too big a bite out of the proposed validly of this rumor, subsequently, because I opened this can of worms, we have open house for those who wanna kick 'ol graymane's ass.

Of course that myth rode off into the sunset, like all of its predecessors which come and go from time to time.
So happens this poll actually came at a time when the business of porn couldn't be healthier.


01-27-14  03:48pm


Shown : 51-75 of 715 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.73 seconds.