Sans the piece on Max Hardcore (cuz I ain't familiar wit' the fellow) I'm otherwise completely in accord with JBerry's comment. Couldn't of expressed it any better.
So what's missing here, Mister marcdc?
If your answer is the kitchen sink, then a Cuban cigar for the gentleman...please.
Now this is what I call a Comprehensive review. Inclusive of all the T's being crossed and the I's dotted, in what arrives at as close to a near flawless site report as one can muster. Good job fellow!
Already crowding two other major league players for Tuesday's bankroll, the token value on this review will really make'em sweat.
Although graymane isn't going for his plastic for this MILF-fox, I'm otherwise convinced Julia Ann's standing will feel a noticeable upshot because of this power-packed review.
With due consideration directed to, and distance of respect I've garnered for, in the sheer joy of following your extraordinary writing skills, I have to say compliments coming from one so learned as you simply amplifies that joy that much more.
PS....
I have to say, though, the terms associated with Shakespeare you used having to do with the words "iambic pentameter" has me stumped.
Even Google can't come up with a comprehensively sensible meaning.
Again .... your reply to this review is appreciated.
Of course, you do know I was only kidding about dining solely on leg hair........ gross indeed.
let me clarify by saying, after the strands are extracted, you put them on salads .... you know, where a dressing of some sort would set off the flavor.
Ditto, my good friend. Always better the second time around.
Wish I could express the enormity of appreciation I'd prefer to get over to you and the others who respond so positively to my stuff.
When Webster finally releases a few more good adjectives, you'll be the first to know.
Many thanks, Otoh. Appreciate you taking the time to pass on your valued thoughts. But hey! you're one of PU's major torchbearers of late.
You're all over the place around here. .... an' we love-it!
Thanks, Mess .....As you well know, your thoughts are very much appreciated. maybe your kind words will inspire me to step up my activity with reviews. Might interest you to know, despite the slings-an-arrows you rained down on this site in your past, excellent review, It was instrumental in my decision to go with them.
How did I like the leg-hair, you asked?........ Well, they were delicious, of course. Gotta let your imagination run wild, like pulling out the leg hairs with my teeth...... lotta proteins there, big guy!
Thanks, Squirrel. Appreciate the time out you took to pass on this thoughtful message. Happy I could be of some help.
I notice just recently your forum activity had dropped off some.
We miss your stuff when you ain't around, champ. I hope all is well, and, as always, wishing you the best.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
1) Hair is paramount. If'un you like hair on broads, then here you won't be disappointed.
2) Site boast of having millions of pictures. Well, bully for them. I'd have to say that might be a bit of a stretch.
3) Claims to be 12 times the size of any other hairy site. Does it also mean 12 times the cost?
4) zip files for downloads. Small watermarks on pics, larger on videos. No DRM.
5) Promotion touts of having 1577 models.
Well, I guess if they say so .....
6) 5,549 videos. Could be, but the 30 days I was there they musta been in hiding.
7) Updates appear to roll in as promoted.
8) HD on more recent shoots.
9) Some very pretty gals are in the lineup, European, Asian, Latina and American; predictably, a lotta plain-Jane's are there, too. Then there are those who're are just plain ugly.
10) You have solo, soft core, toy, boy/girl hardcore, and lesbian.
.
Cons:
1) Sometimes I'd corralled a beauty only to suddenly see her wander off somewhere.
2) Poor selection of medias, having WMV pitted against two other unknowns.
3) Streaming went smoothly, however, Buffering was unceasingly long and tedious.
4) From my viewpoint, I thought the video-shoots and directing sorely lacked the quality subscribers deserved.
5)Same-'olé-same-'olé .....what with too many and long closeups, and particularly ones that dwell on the genitalia. I can only assume The guy shooting just falls asleep at his camera. The man must belong to a damed good union.
6) Small watermarks on pics, bigger ones but none obtrusive on videos
7) Maybe it's my lack of electronic wizardry, but I simply couldn't find the combination to opening pics on a full screen.
Bottom Line:
Prepare to stare at a lot of hair.
Hair here, hair there, hair everywhere.
Nary model dare to be hair-bare, and that's fair
(jus' thought I'd throw that in)
I went for this $21 deal because I strongly favor seeing natural hair where it's supposed to be on women. It's sexier, more erotic, and adds that important element of realism to the scenes.
This site does a very good job of giving us that, but sadly, eroticism falls woefully short. For one thing, the girls move around too much. No sooner than I get into a clip than the model jumps up and leaps onto something else. Another erotic spoiler is the over-use of smiles ....I know readers don't share or agree to that, but when a gal is in the throes of sexual release, smiles ought to be minimal.! They're necessary I know, but porn isn't Comedy Central and I just don't find them compatible with serious porn.
Cameramen and directors here tend to follow the same old trend that shooting genital closeups are gold. When, for crying out loud, will these numb-nuts wise up and give us a break, already?..... Thanks to vaginal over-exposure I think I now know more about the female pussies than my x-wife's gynecologist.
In my judgment, I'd recommend this site for all who wants to see hair. Otherwise, it's just plain-old generic porn.
Admittedly, I got a bang-for-my-buck for what I paid, but I don't think I'd opt for thirty.
Jus' gimmie a gal who's flat on her back; her dress resting across her upper thighs, giving me only a panty-peek of the crotch area of her full cotton/silk panties.
I wanna see her body in motion ... esp. coming from the hips. I wanna see her pelvis bumping and grinding ... either from being f..ked or doing a convincing solo routine.
I wanna see an un-smiling face expressing a sexual tension thats at least close to believable.
So yes, I'd "generally like to join sites with similar content" IF I CAN EVER FIND ONE WITH THE CONTENT I WANT.
You gotta follow these gals from the site's inception. And you're right, Sandra is hot! She was much hotter at the beginning -- as her early pics will show; but something went on amongst the trio that seemingly divided their interest in some aspects of the series.
I think Sandra got married and/or ultimately become somewhat jaded.
Ella is the one that pretty-much consumes my attention. And following her sets from the early age she began doing this stuff, all I can say is she's done such a number on my porn habits, I've all but put everybody and everything else on the back-burner.
Her expressions and many of her poses are corny, but the damned girl has an uncanny way of growing on you. An' I ain't the only one. She's developed a global following thats more than done her country (Russia) proud.
All her picture sets are floating around all over .... but unfortunately I haven't been able to find her recent ones -- except through host and tube sights. If you come across something, please let me know.
Sorry 'bout the absent "cock option", Gaypornolover.
Lesson learned!
But should it be of any comfort to our highly valued Gay friends out there, the same can be said effecting all our straight viewers.
To wit ....
Upon close observation, one will notice the choice spelled
p-u-s-s-y wasn't optional to them, as well.
OK, so I'm a legg-man. Always have been.
The shapelier, fuller and slightly muscle-lined they are, the more attention a pair gams draw from me.
Although I have equal preference for a nice ass, it's how the combo comes together forming that symmetrically round oasis that captures my affections... one accentuates the other.
But legs win in a single run-off.
Absolutely ......
Many ,however, that I avoided would've been downloaded if I had a dicipherable softwear editing device.... And knew how to use it.
Otherwise, too much stuff to wade through grttin' to the good part.
I go back occasionally..... and I wish I'd devote the time to do it more regularly, because I'm often delightfully surprised to see that the number of new hits to my old threads continues and some have swollen rather dramatically, which is a great source of satisfaction.
Many times I pick up on interesting stuff I missed from others during the initial postings.
Then there are wonderfully stimulating old threads that really warrants reviving....... and oftentimes should be.
Yeah, I check it out occasionally.
Lets face it, even animated characters do a better job than a helluva lot of phony crap shoved at us from live ones ... (that is, if you wanna giv'em credit for even having any life).
I call it jus' goin' through the motions.
I figure the key word associated with the existing state of INTERNET PORN could well be termed "complacency".
For As long as the cash-cow doles out the obscene profits piling up in the laps of these porno conglomerates, the longer the industry of porn will sit on its collective asses and stagnate in the status quo.
I'd venture that if the porn purveyors and their bozo-team of incompetences don't shape up and give us better quality, then we might find a hot new genre soon stepping right in ... and maybe for the first time collectively getting the lazy asses of the now seated power-structure to move into gear.
Same goes for dialog-repetitive actresses who still possess a dire vocabulary limitation -- hence finding themselves out beating the bushes looking for a real job.
Of course, these are jus' my opinions .
A little far-out I might admit, in which case we'll simply blame it on senior apathy.
You're oh-so right guys....
"Annoying", irritating" "etc.," .... all certainly better fit the point of the poll question.
"Offend" was clearly a poor choice of word to use.
Heads-up crowd we have here.
Thanks, all, for settin' the old man straight.
If a performer is going to use any words in a phase representative to this poll question, then no, I'd rather that she/he just shut-the-hell up.
This is because that kind of expression is so obviously phony, it subtracts the very values
I'm paying to see.
I know they have to give that segment of those who crave that sort of thing enough to appease their selfish appetite, which is OK, but don't just arbitrarily take the easy route and toss it in everything you're marketing.
The word "shit" is so egregiously offensive that the subhuman webmasters who're so brain-damaged and insensitive to its liberal use in a scene's dialog that some form of hurt ought to be put on his damed pocketbook.
Their common sense is so twisted out of kilter and skewed that they don't possess the capacity to give an iota as to how useless its utterance is to good erotica.
Permit me, my friend, if you will, to reason that there is indeed a revolving, outspoken, fixed, and determined resolution that remains paramount with your New Year's agenda ..... to wit:
"the continued, laborious search for that mature site with women in lingerie slowly stripping from fully clothed to fully naked."
I rest my case.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
