Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Allicide (3)  

Feedback:   All (6)  |   Reviews (3)  |   Comments (1)  |   Replies (2)

Other:   Replies Received (4)  |   Trust Ratings (8)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-6 of 6  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Mason Wyler

Mason Wyler
(0)
Reply of Rick's Reply

Rick,

Please, don't get me wrong. I'm new to this site and from what I can tell the ratings are very fair. I went to some of the other review sites and more often then not it is obvious they are PAID reviews. How can you claim to be an unbiased review site if you allow banners and advertising? I think you guys are great. I plan on adding more reviews.


02-08-10  03:20pm

Reply
2
Visit Mason Wyler

Mason Wyler
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

It wasn't specifically directed toward Spencer. Perhaps I should let him know. I just noticed that most of the primary reviews on here for gay sites are done by females or straight men. Don't get me wrong I'm a writer. I believe any good writer can be objective but there is a difference in writing an article and reviewing. It isn't that I think sexual orientation should limit a person's ability to review the site but as a primary review I would think the reviewer should have an interest in the material. You might ask someone who knows nothing of baseball to cover the game but the coverage will be missing the essential element of interest. I notice that your favorite sites are straight sites. I would ask you are you more likely to trust a review posted by a gay man or by a straight man with similiar taste? Again it isn't a slight to Spencer's review but he does essentially say that he guesses the content is what is expected. I think he did a fine job. I just think the primary review should be done by someone with interest toward which the site is based. I wouldn't trust a food critic with no sense of taste to tell me if the food was good in a resturant. They might give an accurate review of the ambience and service but the important element is going to be lacking through no fault of their own.

02-07-10  11:59pm

Comment
3
Visit Mason Wyler

Mason Wyler
(0)

Issues with reviews

No offense, but why are straight men and women reviewing gay material? It isn't going to hold the same appeal. It is like having a resturant critic without taste buds. You can see the food and smell the food but you miss the most important element.

02-07-10  11:38am

Replies (6)
Review
4
Visit Randy Blue

Randy Blue
(0)

97.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Frequent updates
Quality production values
Attractive models
Cons: Gay for Pay performers
Bottom Line: The sites is well orgainized with a wealthy of videos and pictures for the price. The site features handsome men of all sexual orientations but is unique in that nearly all of its "gay for pay" performers end up exploring all avenues of gay sex. Sites often feature "gay for pay" performers in top only and limited sexual contact scenes but Randy Blue seems to have an unwritten rule that says if you want to do more than solos then you need to be open to all aspects of gay sex. That is a plus because if a performer is featured often then members are sure to see them in a variety of pairings and sexual activites.

The site features solos, threesomes, and groups as well as the standard pairings. It is also one of the few sites that still has regular live shows where the members can direct the performers.

For the price Randy Blue is easily the best new content gay porn site and I highly recommend subscribing.

02-07-10  11:27am

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit Cocksure Men

Cocksure Men
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Frequent updates
Variety of model types
Professional camera work/direction
Cons: Some bareback scenes
"Gay for pay" performers
Bottom Line: First, the cons listed above are dependent on personal taste. I list them as cons because some people consider them as negatives. The scenes are always well shot with energetic performances from the models, regardless of orientation. The bareback scenes are clearly advertised and not the focus of the site. The scenerios allow the viewer to watch a "mini-movie" rather than have 2 performers simple jump into the sex without dragging on the exposition. The variety of models assures that in a given month the viewer is likely to see a video with a bear, a jock, a cowboy, a biker, a twink, etc. all matched in interesting an appealing scenes. With performers that also work for major studios featured monthly and exclusive models the talent is top notch for the price of the latest DVD. I recommend the site to anyone interested in quality gay porn with top notch performers.

02-06-10  11:30am

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit Cody Cummings

Cody Cummings
(0)

69.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Video quality
-Regular updates
-Part of a suite
-Reasonable price
Cons: -Repetitive content
-Focus on one performer with limited sexual range
-Niche appeal
-Self grandizing blog from the perfomer
Bottom Line: The site is well put together and frequently updated. The site is heavily promoted as part of the Next Door Suite. There is where the positives end. The site focuses on Cody Cummings, who after 3 years in the business, refuses even minimal male to male contact. Don't get me wrong the men are free to blow him but all they are likely to recieve in return is a head pat or shoulder grab not to exceed 15 seconds. There are better sites that fullfil the "straight" guy seduced fantasy without leaving you feeling one partner was generally unsatisified with the experience. Check this site for find them. The site could be excused if not for the attention that females recieve. Do not advertise equality of sexes and then elevate the status of one over the another. This isn't a bisexual site. It is essentially an vanity project devoted to one persona. The "gay" content is ONLY present to allow it to be promoted on gay blogs. Many women will love the site no doubt because it caters to the fantasy of having a man choose them above other pleasures. I would not suggest subscribing. If you like what you see in the previews then I suggest watching the preview again. Save your money. I subscribed for months and the previews were often more interesting than full video. The preview will feature a few moments that will be the extent of Cody's enthusiasitic input into the scene.

02-06-10  11:07am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-6 of 6  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.89 seconds.