Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : troglodite (69)  

Feedback:   All (103)  |   Reviews (38)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (54)

Other:   Replies Received (53)  |   Trust Ratings (35)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 103 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Amy's Girlfriends

Amy's Girlfriends
(0)
Reply of BIGSTEVE's Comment

I'm guessing it's a repeat. I joined her site back when she was known as Liberty Valentine. Seems her webmaster must have sold her content and it is being re-released as new content for other sites. I noticed the same thing with Kitty Karsen's content lately.

06-04-09  07:42pm

Reply
2
Visit Truth Or Sex

Truth Or Sex
(0)
Reply of troglodite's Comment

Just an update - looks like I'm out $39.95 on this one. My credit card company caught the rest of them and they never hit my account, meaning hopefully I won't have to do the whole dispute form thing again. I would dispute the charge with them, but I really don't think it's worth my effort, and hopefully my comments will keep enough people away from these scammers' sites.

06-04-09  06:42pm

Comment
3
Visit Nikki Price

Nikki Price
(0)

Videos

I joined this site about a year ago. Looks like no new content since then if the tour is accurate. Also the videos were streaming flash only. I had a rough time "downloading" them like the tour suggested, but finally a program called ReplayAV worked for me. Just a word of warning, though I will admit I like the vids on the site a lot. Very similar to Brandibelle.com except her site really does offer downloads and is still updating.

06-04-09  06:39pm

Replies (3)
Reply
4
Visit Truth Or Sex

Truth Or Sex
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

I generally do too, but I make exceptions on occasion. Nothing shady had been reported on any of these sites' comments on TBP, so I thought maybe they'd be safe this time. Second time I've been burned that way. First time it has happened with a "Free" trial. Maybe it's time I start sticking to what's safe!

05-28-09  08:33pm

Comment
5
Visit Truth Or Sex

Truth Or Sex
(0)

Buyer Beware - Something Shady here

I don't want to make too much of an accusation yet, as the dust hasn't quite settled yet, but potential buyers probably need to watch out for this site (and others in the network). I joined up yesterday using the "free 2-day trial" option that rebills at $39.95. I noticed that there were 2 boxes to uncheck on the signup form, just like TBP reports in the details. I made sure to uncheck both before signing up. The terms & conditions (which I read) indicated that I would be subject to the $39.95 fee if I did not cancel prior to the end of my trial. No other charges should have been made.

After I placed the order, I got my use out of the sites (which were quite disappointingly small) and determined it was not worth the $39.95 to me, so I went to the cancel form (they don't use CCBill - red flag!) and noticed I had been signed up for an additional free trial (to accessdvdsnow.com) that would have also rebilled at $39.95 had I not cancelled it. Thankfully - I had the option to cancel both trials, so I did. A couple of hours ago, I got a call from my credit card company's fraud department asking me to verify whether 4 separate charges (I think all were $39.95) were authorized by me. I said they were not, so my card was of course reported compromised and thus I will have to have it reissued.

Obviously - I can't recommend that anyone sign up for these sites right now. There's obviously something shady going on if my card was charged for almost $140 when it should have been hit with only a single $39.95 authorization. Stay away for now - I will update if I figure out what is really going on.

05-28-09  02:35pm

Replies (5)
Reply
6
Visit Stunt Cock Tryouts

Stunt Cock Tryouts
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Reply

Thanks for the comments - odd how we both managed to review this network in the same time when it hadn't had any before! I did check out your review before I made mine to try and eliminate much crossover. I didn't check out much of the other sites because the models didn't appeal to me near as much. Not sure where this network is based, but it must not be the Miami/LA scene because I've not seen any of the girls before. I'm guessing it must be Canadian.

01-03-09  09:05am

Review
7
Visit Stunt Cock Tryouts

Stunt Cock Tryouts
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * HD Vids look really good at 1280x720 - just a warning though they're up to 1 GB in size at that resolution for a 30-35 minute video.

* The main actress "Mandy More" is a great star for the show. Even though this site is more about the guys (and yes I know that sounds odd) than the girl, it wouldn't be nearly as interesting if she wasn't a good performer.

* Very realistic presentation. It has been a while since I wondered about the legitimacy of the reality angle on a site, but in this one it seems real. I haven't seen these guys before, and some of them are adequately in over their head. I found myself watching the interview portion as much as the action, which is rare.

* Pics are available in zip files and look good at 1200x800 or so resolution.

* Access to entire network of 5 sites is granted though they didn't particularly interest me.

* Extensive library of non-exclusive content
Cons: * Some vids on tour haven't been released yet, but they're listed in the "coming soon" area with dates, so there is incentive to keep your membership going if you like the site.

* I would have liked a lower-res wmv version of some of the vids - there are 5 different formats, including Flash, Quicktime, MP4, WMV-low, and WMV-high, but the WMV low versions were still 600 MB+ at times. Minor quibble for sure.

* Download speeds could have been better - I got 200-250 KB/s most of the time.
Bottom Line: I liked this site a lot. I discovered it a while back and made a mental note that it looked worthy of a join, but then I lost the link. Thankfully I re-discovered it recently and joined up the same day, and I wasn't disappointed. The quality of the pics and vids is top notch, and the content in the episodes was engaging and interesting. If you find Mandy hot, you'll enjoy the action, and if you like your reality porn to be truly realistic, you'll enjoy the rest of the action.

My only caution would be to go in knowing that it's not all fun and games for the guys in these vids. Some fail miserably at their "audition", and while I found it all to be entertaining and fun to watch, some people will certainly be disappointed and uninterested.

This isn't a site for those who like their porn straightforward and predictable. For those people, I would encourage them to check out the 4 other sites in the network, or even the vast amounts of non-exclusive content they offer, which includes 1807 pages of 12 vids apiece as of today, all searchable by studio or performer and all available in 5 formats. However, I would encourage you to check out Wittyguy's review of the network for more comments on those vids, as I didn't really spend much time going through those.

Bottom line - I had a lot of fun here, and if they can keep the content coming, I'll probably be back in the future.

01-02-09  07:52pm

Replies (2)
Reply
8
Visit Lacey Little

Lacey Little
(0)
Reply of Mr Fountain's Reply

Sorry I hadn't checked back in a few days for replies. Some good questions my review probably should have covered! There are 21 picsets that pretty much mimic the video sets. The size of the pics is about 800x1200 and each set has between 100-200 pics. They're definitely heavy on the nudity in most of them, and there is a mix of teasy stuff and lesbian and b/g hardcore. At the moment, there are 5 b/g sets, 4 g/g sets, and the rest are solo. I'll warn you there aren't any zipsets, so you won't be able to get the pics easy as they're not direct links (why oh why are sites made this way?).

As for the other sites, I'm going to try and get reviews up of a couple of them in the next week or so. They're all the same in layout and technical details, but the content is slightly different on most of them. Natalie Banks's site is lighter on the b/g stuff, Sophie Cocks is all about the b/g stuff, and Sasha Cane's site is all solo and g/g (she used to be known as Sasha Heart btw). I haven't looked much at the multi-girl sites yet. There ya go hopefully that answered some of your questions. Thanks for the comments :)


12-11-08  08:32pm

Review
9
Visit Lacey Little

Lacey Little
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * New site, but seems to have launched with an acceptable amount of content.

* Very helpful tour tells you how many pics/vids are on the site - and it's not lying!

* Cute model from somewhere in England it sounds like who does everything from tease sets to hardcore b/g.

* Picsets look good and there are plenty of pics in each set.

* Vids are offered in two quality levels and the lower quality actually looks decent. The high-res sets look better than their 640x480 resolution IMO.

* Access to 8 total sites with your membership
Cons: * No zip files for the picsets.

* Some surfers may be looking for more video options. Right now WMV is all there is, which is fine for me.

* Price is $5-10 too high. I'm usually happy to pay $24-29 for a site, and when that's what 90% of the other sites (networks too) out there are charging, it just seems hard to convince myself to spend the extra $5.

* Site is kind of basic and doesn't have much in the way of interaction. No blog, forum, chats, or anything like that right now.
Bottom Line: Nice! That was my first thought when I signed in for the first time. Really it's the first solo model site I've been very pleased with purchasing in a while. There is enough content to keep me interested for a while even though the site appears to be brand new. The main model and all her friends are hot. The vids and pics all look pretty good. The site shows signs of updating. The tour is honest - things aren't being advertised as "super HD quality" only to find something subpar inside.

Really an 85 is a pretty good score from me, and this one could be even higher if they add a few interactive features and drop the price $5. All in all I'm pleased, and I would recommend this site to anyone who finds Lacey and her friends as hot as I do.

12-01-08  09:01pm

Replies (4)
Reply
10
Visit Incredible Pass

Incredible Pass
(0)
Reply of Pornluver's Reply

I have shopped through ccbill before for sites and was considering doing so for this site since I thought that it might work without the shady billing (one of the sites has a vid I really want!). I'm glad to read that someone else beat me to it, but of course I also hope you do get it resolved and are not out any money for trying. I've run into that type of situation before, where the login you get from shopping directly at ccbill isn't recognized on the site. I think it's mostly due to webmasters who switch billing providers, but don't disable the available subscriptions at ccbill.

10-12-08  06:46pm

Review
11
Visit Rookie Slut Search

Rookie Slut Search
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Access to other sites (and you don't have to log in to each one of them)

* Plenty of "feeds" for those who like those extras

* Pictures are well shot

* Cheap full-access trial and PU full-month discount

* Offers streaming and download. 5 speed levels for streaming.
Cons: * Pictures are split into galleries of like 25-30 pics apiece. While there are 14 pages of galleries with 9 per page, each page might be only 1 model.

* No way to save pictures easily (zipsets or direct picture links).

* Videos advertised as HD-quality, and while the resolution of the biggest file is ramped up to 960x720, the 640x480 file optimized for "T1" speeds looks exactly the same. I don't think the source video here was shot in HD, so they're artificially boosting the resolution because HD is all the rage these days.

* Navigation is kind of sloppy. The homepage lists EVERYTHING you have access to - including all the feeds.

* No visible update schedule.
Bottom Line: I'm giving this one a pretty low score, but it really didn't do everything wrong, and it fit my needs pretty perfectly. I'm on a search for every Jessica Valentino video ever made, and I found this site had one and had a 5-buck full access trial so I was all over it. Sadly (and it's a matter of taste), I couldn't find anything else on the site I wanted, so I'm very glad that I didn't have plunge into a full membership. Plus, I can't tell whether the site is updating or not, which is usually a bad sign.

If I had a wish list for this site, I'd have them clean up the home page, removing all the feed-related stuff. Consolidate the galleries so that each one contains one shoot for one model. Stop advertising HD videos since they don't really have them, and make sure to post updates. The combination of all those factors makes for a poor site right now, but it's not stuff that can't be fixed.

Right now, I would recommend that potential members take a look at the tour. If you like everything, go ahead and get a membership, but if just a couple of episodes catch your eye, you can definitely get what you need with a trial. Drive by surfers - you can find better elsewhere.

10-12-08  08:51am

Replies (1)
Comment
12
Visit Sex For Grades

Sex For Grades
(0)

Tour is Misleading

Just wanted to make sure people note the following: The tour for this site says "Get Access To These great bonus sites and more!" and lists the following sites which were NOT given access to with my membership:

I Am Eighteen
Now Eighteen
Teen Rider
Just Over Eighteen
Naughty Teen Club

It was disappointing to me - I was going to join noweighteen.com, but decided to join through sexforgrades.com because noweighteen did not list bonus sites while sexforgrades did. Thankfully the special price for TBP surfers made it hurt less, but tours that lie are one of my biggest pet peeves!

10-05-08  09:43pm

Replies (1)
Reply
13
Visit Incredible Pass

Incredible Pass
(0)
Reply of Lionheart's Reply

Hate to keep seeing people getting scammed by this site and its obviously sketchy billing company. I would join this network in an instant if it weren't for all the billing issues people keep reporting. Other sites make money with memberships, but it sounds like these guys want to make their money through fraud. Just another reason to stick to sites that use ccbill or epoch to handle their billing. Hope you get it resolved :(

10-05-08  09:37pm

Review
14
Visit Liberty Valentine

Liberty Valentine
(0)

79.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: * Model appears to be active in site, which is a good sign for longevity

* Good quality 720x480 vids with decent number available considering the relatively new age of the site

* Sexy British accent!

* Performs camshows on occasion
Cons: * Very teasy content - really mostly topless. Nothing pink to see yet (unless you buy an extra-cost zipset). This will be fine for some folks, but meant I was a bit bored.

* Extra-cost zipsets only available to members, which means if I decide I want to buy it in a couple of months, I'd have to join the site again

* Site is young, and at the current rate it will take a few months to build up content

* Pictures not zipped for easy download
Bottom Line: I gave this site a 79, which puts it in the "does some things good, some things poor", though I don't know that it really does anything poorly. I mean sure $24.95 seems a bit much right now for the 20ish vids and picsets that are available (an estimate - I was a member about a month ago and 16 were available), but the pics look good, the vids look good, and Libi looks great. There's just not a lot here just yet. It would be nice to see archived camshows, some longer and more revealing vids (with less of them being photoshoot vids), zip files for the picsets, and altogether just more sets of everything and this would be a pretty good site!

All in all, Liberty is a hottie, and her site appears to be in good working order for the time being. If she continues to build up content, I could see her site gaining popularity in the coming months. Hopefully she doesn't go the way of so many other solo models and stops updating before the site has a chance to be great.

My one big gripe would be the extra-cost zipsets. These are always disappointing to me because it usually means that you're not likely to see content in her paysite that is more revealing than what is in the zipset. I know a lot of models probably make some good cash off of that trick (the "spunky" and phil-flash sites sure have enough of them that they must be profitable), but my porn budget, while probably above average, still doesn't usually allow me the luxury of a $39.99 charge for what usually amounts to a single set of photos with usually a short vid attached. Peachez is a good example of a model who has established a pattern with her site's normal content, but sprinkles in some wilder stuff on occasion. She has resisted the urge to go the zipset route, and her fans still clamor desperately for her next wild video to come out. Liberty Valentine could do the same, and I think her site would catch my interest a little more. As it stands, I have to recommend that you wait a month or two to let some content build up before you join, and know ahead of time that the content is going to be pretty soft, with expensive upsells to the more interesting stuff. If you're ok with that, you just might love Liberty Valentine.

08-04-08  07:09pm

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit GND Cali

GND Cali
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Decent number of picture sets (43 so far) at good resolution.

* Zip files for all photo sets in both low and high resolution options.

* The videos that are there look pretty good at 640x480.

* Cali is pretty hot, and she does appear to be somewhat active in the site. She posts blogs and will allegedly be doing camshows soon, but we've all heard that before (from other models).
Cons: * Video content is very slim so far - just 4 vids - one is an interview and another is her doing her toenails (boring!) A screencap on her tour showed the filename was set39.avi - unfortunately that didn't mean there were 39 vids like I assumed!

* Several non-nude sets sprinkled in to the mix, not to mention that none of the content really goes beyond topless. I hate when a tour doesn't tell you that!

* Only other feature of note (if you subscribe to JUST cali's site) is access to the forums, which I'm not bothering to join (they want you to email them with your username and real name - what's wrong with registration?).

* Pet peeve - can't choose your own login info. It becomes more of a problem if you subscribe to the multi-site option since it asks you for a password somewhere between a billion and a zillion times as you change sites.
Bottom Line: This site isn't all bad, though I definitely think I focused more on the bad than the good. I paid the extra 10 bucks to get the multi-site access, and I kind of regret that I did, because the story here is the story throughout all of the sites. Content is non-nude to topless in all but a few cases, and only the solo girls have videos (I'll probably review 1-2 of the others at least). Once I joined, I realized it wasn't really the type of site I really care for. It's overly tease-oriented and picture-focused. I much prefer a video-focused softcore-hardcore type of site.

I hate randomly generated user/pass combos. That means I have to write it down or store it someplace I can easily look it up and copy/paste into the login form (I don't like using the browser to memorize passwords if possible). That's annoying.

The theme of this network of sites is girl-next-door types of models who submit their own content to the webmaster to post on their behalf. Thus it will only be as good as the models who are submitting content. It looks like they just got on their feet, so that's an explanation for why the content level is so low so far. That excuse won't work for too long though. I'd wait a couple of months to check this site (and its sister sites) out unless you really like Cali's look and prefer soft/topless content.

07-25-08  12:14pm

Replies (0)
Review
16
Visit Love Abbie

Love Abbie
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Abbie looks good on camera - picsets in general are well done, especially in high-res.

* Vids are high-quality and look pretty good for the most part.

* Semi-regular updates appear to be happening.

* Access to 4 other sites (though this one seems to be the only one updating lately).
Cons: * No camshows or forum interaction from Abbie since February, indicating that Abbie might not be involved much anymore.

* Too many of the vids seem to start mid-action, with her already naked and playing with herself, or right before she's about to start a bj.

* Lots of links to other paysites all over the place.

* Abbie's inconspicuous absence from the site means the only real usable sections are "pictures" and "videos" You can't get much use out of "live cam" or "forums" or "contact" without someone around to be on the other side.
Bottom Line: This site does some things pretty well, but following the pattern of other sites in this network, it just seems lazy and neglected in several ways.

The content certainly looks good when it comes to technical statistics. Abbie looks amazing in the picsets in particular. The vids would also be great I think, but they seem to start in the middle sometimes. It's almost like walking into a movie theatre 15 minutes late in that you miss all the preliminary stuff. This won't bother some people, but it kills the suspense for me. A lot of the best solo girl sites know exactly how to prolong the tease before getting down to business. This isn't one of them.

There's a lot of animosity on the forums towards a lack of updates or participation from webmaster or model. Judging by the news, there *have* been updates, but I question the validity of the dates based on what I've read in the forums. Certainly the site could benefit from a regular update schedule and better-produced videos. With those two things taken care of, I could see myself checking back every few months to see what's up, but I would suggest approaching this site with caution at the present time.

05-31-08  04:03pm

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit Ashlee Exposed

Ashlee Exposed
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Ashlee has been a well-known softcore model for a few years - she finally puts out some hardcore stuff in this website, though it's all just BJ's!

* The content that is available looks good in high-resolution.

* Access to 4 other sites with a membership to this one.
Cons: * Ads for other websites all over the place

* Pet peeve of mine - all 5-6 of the BJ vids start abruptly with no build-up or talking or anything at all. They're all POV too.

* One picset and one video update since 11/07.

* Vids are short.
Bottom Line: This was a disappointing site for me. I had seen Ashlee in several of her previous sites (allashlee.com, ashleeandserena.com, hdbadgirls.com, etc) and was excited to see she was putting out a site with some hardcore stuff. Unfortunately, it's the most basic, easy to shoot hardcore you can find. The vids start with her already on her knees, sometimes already in the act. And since they're all in POV style, there's just no variety. Her other non-bj vids look a lot better, and feel a bit more complete, but I still felt like I expected more. Her previous sites all had a lot more personality to them. This one is just very basic and bland.

As for the content - 21 high res picsets, 6 picsets of vidcaps, 22 vids (although several of them are part1 or part2 of one episode - probably about 15 total different scenes).

The site isn't updated anymore, and I can't really recommend it unless you're a big fan of Ashlee who really wants to see her on her knees or just wants to complete your Ashlee archive. Sadly, you'll get a lot more Ashlee for your money with a trip to allashlee.com.

05-31-08  03:43pm

Replies (0)
Review
18
Visit I Dream Of Erica

I Dream Of Erica
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Erica is super-hot and has a cute southern accent!

* High-res pictures look good

* Vids offered in several bitrates, and they look pretty good for the most part!

* Cam shows are archived (though there's only 5 so far)

* As of 5/30, you get access to 4 other sites as well (Barely18barbie, youreroticparadise, love-abbie, and ashleexposed).
Cons: * Not a lot of vids and they're pretty short and tame in some cases.

* Update schedule is sketchy - just one update since 5/13 (about 17 days ago) - for a newer site that is worrysome.

* According to forums, Erica has been a no-show for several scheduled camshows, which is also a bad sign.
Bottom Line: Erica's site currently has 5 webcam archives, 6 "cam" vids, and 11 high-def vids. For picsets, 14 cam sets, 11 high-res photoshoots, and 3 sets of candids. It's not a lot of content, but what is there certainly looks good. The majority of the content is soft nude stuff, with only a couple of the vids having any real solo-play action. Personally, I like my solo-girl sites to be a little harder, but it will cater well to those who like their softcore stuff to be more on the teasy side.

The biggest problem I see is that the site is already showing signs of neglect. Honestly, I've been a member of several of the webmaster's other sites in the past, and they all seem to build up a little bit of content, then they're done forever. A quick look around at some of the other sites you get access to will show the same, as none of them seem to have gotten much bigger than erica's site is currently. Hopefully I'm wrong, because I think Erica is absolutely beautiful, and after going through all the content that's currently there, I'm dying to see more. Unfortunately, given the track record of other sites from this company, I just don't expect much. I recommend it only if you're dying to see what content Erica has up currently or are interested in a couple of the other sites you get access to.

05-31-08  03:20pm

Replies (0)
Reply
19
Visit Minxxx Studios

Minxxx Studios
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Reply

No music on vids that shouldn't have music. There's a few with music like the ones on Dream Taylor's site where she's dancing, but that makes sense :)

04-20-08  02:00pm

Review
20
Visit Minxxx Studios

Minxxx Studios
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Some unique content from Canadian hotties you might recognize from other sites.

* Nice looking vids in several of the sites (though calling them "high-def" is a little bit of a stretch sometimes)

* Good variety - 3 hardcore single model sites, 1 group sex site, 1 solo scene site, 1 lesbian site, 1 mobile video site, and 2 general teen hardcore sites are all featured in the network.

* Simple design makes everything easy to find

* Trial is full-access
Cons: * Some content repeats across multiple sites, reducing the total amount of content available

* Network is still small - hopefully it has plans for growth still.

* Pictures, where available are not easy to download. There are no zipfiles here.

* Scene previews in a lot of cases are limited to just 1-2 screenshots, which sometimes doesn't help you figure out whether or not you'll actually like the scene.
Bottom Line: Considering the size, simple design, and jumbled quality I saw throughout these sites, I might have ranked the network a little high at 80 (very good), but some of the content made up for it for me. I recognized several of the girls from their appearances on other solo model sites or networks - Gwen from privategwen.com is featured in several movies on highdefteenmovies.com and barely9teen.com. Angie from cuteangie.com is featured on highdefteenmovies, in a hardcore scene nonetheless (first one I've seen her in!). I also spotted Julie from tastyjulie.com in a couple of scenes, though they were repeats from her own site. Plus I enjoyed the content at the solo model sites and was able to find several young hotties I liked scattered throughout the network, so the content was a big plus for me. The sites just need some work to fix up the rest of it.

Is it worth it? If you're not much into the canadian chicks you've seen around the net, probably not. There are some good scenes here, but I might suggest holding off a couple of months to let some more content build up before dropping $30. However, the trial is a perfect option if you just want a couple of scenes. It is a full access trial.

04-18-08  08:02pm

Replies (2)
Review
21
Visit Dream Taylor

Dream Taylor
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Cute girl who doesn't tease you to death - there are some nice full sex scenes here

* Some of the vids are decent resolution at 1000kbps+ and 720x480.

* Despite its relative newness, there is a decent amount of content at 8 video scenes (4 of which feature boy-girl action) and 13 photosets.

* You get access to all of the sites in the Minxxx Studios network.

* 2-day trial is full access.
Cons: * Photos are only medium resolution (800x600 or so) and there are no zip files to be found here.

* Site organization didn't seem to be a priority. Everything is linked from the front page. There aren't separate sections for picsets or videos. If the site grows large (I hope!), it will get cumbersome to navigate.

* Video format isn't uniform throughout the site - there are a few that are lower-res mpg only. Also, some are offered as a full download while others must be grabbed in parts. Some offer both options. Really a mixed bag. Almost looks like the site was put together with content that was already shot and used elsewhere.
Bottom Line: Dream Taylor has a look that I like, and when I see one of these new sites pop up with a young hottie like her, I usually can't resist taking a look. All in all I was pleased with the content, knowing it's a pretty new site. If it (and the rest of the sites on the network) keeps growing, then I think it will be a pretty worthwhile purchase for someone who is into solo teen sites.

As it stands, there wasn't a lot to complain about the site, but there wasn't a lot that was worthy of excessive praise, so I thought a 75 (Average) score pretty much describes it perfectly. With a little TLC and some growth, I could see the score increasing significantly. The network isn't great, but I'll be keeping my eye on it and watching for some general improvements.

04-18-08  07:42pm

Replies (0)
Review
22
Visit Brooke Marks

Brooke Marks
(0)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Personality abounds here - some very "entertaining" content

* Decent number high-res videos up that look pretty good

* Updates fairly often, though seemingly not on any set schedule.

* You get access to camshows by several other models (including Misty Gates and Blue-eyed Cass among others)
Cons: * Content is 99.8% non-nude minus the very occasional nip-slip - but as long as you know that going in it shouldn't count against her much.

* Pics aren't easy to download - you have to right-click each one to save it.
Bottom Line: Brooke's site is very easy to like if you're into the super-hot non-nude model thing. It's not usually my favorite style of site, but occasionally I find one that looks good, and in this case, it worked out. Brooke is as hot as they come, and her site is full of her silly personality. She takes nothing very seriously here, except the quality of her site. You can tell she has taken the time to put together some funny stuff, and it gives you a pretty good insight into her personality. At the same time, there's still plenty of the normal stripteases, dances, and teasing going on here. A lot of her camshows have been archived into her video section, which is always a nice bonus.

I'm guessing her site may have been more active at one time. Updates do still happen from week to week in the form of a picset or video, but camshows seem to be fairly rare unfortunately. However, it's definitely not a neglected site, and that is a very welcome thing these days.

Bottom line - I give it an 85 based on Brooke's hotness, her silly personality which bleeds throughout her site, and the high-quality pic and video sets which make up the bulk of her content. If you are looking for a good non-nude solo-model site, this one should be high on your list!

03-23-08  08:11pm

Replies (0)
Reply
23
Visit Melissa Midwest

Melissa Midwest
(0)
Reply of apoctom's Comment

They're very....incomplete I guess you could say. They're poorly lit, poorly shot, and in some cases, don't even have a "big finish". They're not really artsy, but closer to amateur. She's got some pretty high-quality solo sets on her site, but the new HC stuff isn't as good imo. She's pretty timid in those scenes, and I'm pretty sure there's not a third guy holding a camera, so the camerawork isn't ever the best. I think there's only a handful of scenes with HC content.

12-18-07  03:53pm

Reply
24
Visit Just Jannah

Just Jannah
(0)
Reply of bootiger's Comment

It looks like you can right click in Firefox. I tested (the tour - not members area) and right clicking in IE gives you a "property of justjannah.com" window while right-clicking in Firefox works like normal. Still - the act of disabling right click is enough to tip you off that the site is gonna be all about making money. I've had the site bookmarked as a "might-join" for a while, but I'll take it off now!

12-13-07  10:51pm

Review
25
Visit Cute Tanya

Cute Tanya
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Access to other sites in the network
* A few video options (full vid mpeg, clips in wmv, etc)
* Bleh I can't even think of a third.
Cons: * Content on the tour is not found in the site. The tour implies that there are 9 vids available, while there are only 5.
* The content that is found in the site (only 5 vids) is weak and low quality.
* 51 pages of un-galleried pics makes for very un-friendly usage.
* Does not appear to be updating (at least not in the 3 weeks that I have been a member).
Bottom Line: Yet another site in this network that just appears to be severely misrepresented by its tour. Site is accessed after logging in by clicking on her site's thumbnail from the network's portal site. From there, you are offered her 5 video sets, which consist of her mostly fully clothed dancing around and doing some teasing. The tour shows a screenshot of a vid titled "My BF Pops" which looks like the uh...end of a lapdance, but the vid isn't on the site. It's stuff like this that just frustrates me to no end on some sites. Add to this the fact that there have been no changes to the site since I've joined and it's not a good formula. Oh and if you're a pic fan, you're probably going to be just as frustrated in that section, as there are no easy ways to download any of the pics. You have to click on the thumb of the pic, then right-click/download, which is annoying enough when the pics are all in a single gallery. When you have 51 pages of 20 pics apiece that aren't organized into galleries, it's even worse.

I don't recommend this site unless you just wanna pop in for a quick look while visiting one of the other sites on the network. Don't let the tour fool you!

12-10-07  09:28pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 103 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.67 seconds.