Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : greg909 (2)  

Feedback:   All (53)  |   Reviews (3)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (39)

Other:   Replies Received (43)  |   Trust Ratings (9)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 53 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

Yes, it's true that many of met-art's sets are not very sharp at all. More specifically, they often have low depth-of-field (one part of the body is in fairly good focus while everything else is not.)

Lack of sharpness is also more apparent on this site because they offer very large images (sometimes 7000 pixels), so the softness is very apparent. There are, however, a few photographers who offer better sharpness, like Matiss. I just wish it was more consistently good across other photographers' sets. Still, most viewers just wax poetic about every set that's posted there, which makes me laugh.


07-05-15  01:54pm

Reply
2
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(3)
Reply of Nubiles Captain's Reply

Yes, it makes sense. But you still haven't told us what the new "large" will be. Is it 3000 pixels, 4000, 5000? Also, please, please make the new large directly viewable -- not via downloading the whole damn set. Thanks.

07-05-15  01:44pm

Reply
3
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(3)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

Nubiles: your reply is a little confusing. So what exactly is the size (in pixels) of the New large images? And can the new large be accessed directly without downloading the entire set as a zip?

07-01-15  07:33am

Reply
4
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review

I'll also chip in with a couple of "cons". I think that Met-Art gets too much praise for their image quality. Sure, there are some sets--maybe 15%--where the quality is superb. But the majority are just OK or even flat-out bad. There's so much badly focused, dark, grainy crap here, that it's a relief when you finally find a set that's worth saving. Unfortunately, it's the regular contributors each day who are the mediocre ones and the really pro photographers only show up occasionally.

Secondly, I have no problem with the site being soft core, but so many sets here are heavily processed to remove skin detail, hair, etc. What you're left with often just doesn't look like a real girl, and that's what takes me out of Met-Art.


04-28-15  12:16pm

Comment
5
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(3)

Image Sizes

Has Nubiles started to post decent sized images yet? Last time I was there it was still only 2400 pixels.

03-17-15  10:00am

Replies (0)
Reply
6
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(3)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment

Can you download individual high-def images yet? When I was last there, it was all-or-nothing for each set, which made me not want to bother with this site again.

02-07-15  09:10am

Reply
7
Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
(0)
Reply of 2 Free K's Comment

2 Free K: Your comments are exactly the response that the DDOS attackers are trying to achieve. They want to shut down the site and prevent its business; you are helping in that effort. Any porn site that is relentlessly attacked like this is going to be down. They don't have the resources of billion dollar businesses like Wells Fargo bank, so stop making stupid analogies.

Yeah, the ATK sites have been up and down with this problem, but I'm sure these guys have been trying anything and everything to resolve it. I've had my gripes with their content, but they need our support in the long term. We need to fight the attackers, not the victims.


12-21-14  06:19am

Reply
8
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(1)
Reply of Douggie's Review

On the photos side, perhaps someone could post whether things have improved here?

When I look at their preview site, even the small weekly samples they post never look very sharp. And many of the models appear to be the same ones you see on other sites where there's better photo quality. So it doesn't make me want to sign up with Karups.


12-07-14  10:09am

Reply
9
Visit ATK Premium

ATK Premium
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review

Hi Skippy, I wasn't sure if you were reviewing ATK sites generally in this review, or specifically ATK Premium.

The thing I've found with the secondary ATK sites (Premium, Exotics, Aunt Judy's) is that most of their good content is just a duplication from the primary sites (Galleria and Hairy). The primary sites also post MUCH more content each day than Premium, Exotics and Aunt Judy's. So there's little reason to sign up for the secondary ATK sites, except for a small amount of niche content which isn't very good.

On the performance side, I agree. Even when they're up and running, the response time is often slow. All the ATK sites are offline as I write this message, since they presumably all share the same server. I think there's been a number of DDoS attacks recently.


12-07-14  09:57am

Reply
10
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(4)
Reply of skippy's Review

Funny, I did a month's subscription there recently (regrettably) but didn't notice the content aggregation thing. I guess I just didn't pay attention to where the content came from.

My issues with this site is that the images are not particularly good quality and you barely get to see each model in their nakedness; as soon as they're undressed, they are being banged by some dude, who never goes away. Waste of my time. This is strictly a hard core site.


12-07-14  09:21am

Reply
11
Visit Village Ladies

Village Ladies
(0)
Reply of poppadopolis's Review

Wow, 1000 pixels. Even your phone takes much bigger pictures than that. I won't even bother going to site for a look. Thanks.

12-07-14  09:09am

Reply
12
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

ALSSCAN now have you enter your credit card details while still in the porn site's domain (Metartnetwork). Yes, I know it's an HTTPS transaction, but why is the site taking credit details themselves? They also have pre-checked cross sales. None of this makes me trust them very much. Met-art still has you enter your credit card AFTER you reach CCBILL.

10-23-14  08:25am

Reply
13
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review

One of the things that really annoys me about Femjoy is that the thumbnails they post to represent each set is VERY misleading. Many of the sets are poorly lit, not very sharp, have the wrong color balance, and the model is miles away from the camera. Yet the editors on Femjoy take the best shot in the set (there's usually only one that's any good) and crop it significantly to look like the model is much closer. Then they pump up the light levels (which they don't do for the photos themselves) and adjust the color to a more accurate balance. As a result, the set's thumbnail looks very inviting, but you're really disappointed when you see the set itself. Don't be misled by their Updates page -- the actual content is rarely like it.

09-01-14  05:09pm

Reply
14
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of Parsnip's Reply

Let's make a distinction between "fine art nude" and porn. We are talking about porn in Abby Winters. Sure you could shoot f2.8 in fine art. But let's not deceive ourselves here.

08-24-14  08:34pm

Reply
15
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of abbywinters's Reply

OK AW, here's the thing. I have posted reviews of your site before. But nothing ever changes. I really want your site to succeed, because the concept appeals to me -- natural young girls without silly makeup and silly clothes.

But endless shots of just a pussy (or more often, a hand covering a pussy) are not appealing unless you can see the girl who it belongs to... in reasonable focus. You so rarely get both clearly in the same shot.. unless she's 50 yards away. No, I don't want you to shoot with wide angle -- it obviously distorts the body and faces. But I think you should be shooting at f16 in acceptable ISO ranges (below 400). This, of course, means you need strobes. Oh, just think of it... the wonderful, natural girls you get with the technical clarity of Sean R. People would be signing up around the world!! But as it is, sure, you can quote some good comments, just as any movie publicists can quote a good review from at least somewhere. Use lights! It doesn't make the girls less natural -- it just takes them out of the grainy, murkiness and makes them more real.


08-24-14  08:29pm

Reply
16
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of CatSteppings's Review

I suspect this review is a plant by Abby Winters. Either that or perhaps you've never visited many porn sites! The photography is absolutely awful; it lacks fine detail in most sets, and shot without decent lighting. It is true that the models are great, but that's not much use if the pictures are worthless. Often, the only clear in focus unobstructed picture of both face and pussy is the last one in the set where the model is standing.

From what I can gather, most of the photography is by ex-models from the site. They seriously, and I mean SERIOUSLY need some professional photographers on the site. If they did that, and increase new sets by about 400 percent, then they'd be a good site.

Great concept , poorly executed.


08-14-14  04:01am

Reply
17
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(1)
Reply of Loki's Comment

Yes, they're claiming that "there's a shortage of unshaved girls", which sounds absurd. I did read elsewhere that ATK weren't paying their photographers on time, so perhaps those contributors are now holding back their work. Of course, we don't know the full truth of this, but my guess is that photographers like Sean R have a whole stash of great new sets ready but won't send them till ATK hands over the money.

05-01-14  07:57am

Reply
18
Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

I'm guessing this disappointment comes mostly from the video perspective. As a photos man, let me give you a different perspective...

The image quality at ATK Galleria is very good (on average) and the girls are HOT with a wide variety of niches every month. There are also more galleries each day on Galleria than ANY site I'm aware of. What really confuses me is how Nubiles gets such higher ratings than Galleria, when Nubiles has fewer updates, lower image quality, and hands in front of the pussy on almost every shot. I guess it's down to videos again, but I'd prefer Galleria any day of the week.


03-26-14  11:29am

Reply
19
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review

I might add that for those of us more into the still pictures, they are mediocre quality at best on this site, and usually miss the best action. As for the videos, great quality, but far too much other stuff like dildos and glasses for my liking.

03-19-14  11:01am

Reply
20
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(3)
Reply of EverNight's Review

I did a subscription here recently. The HUGE turnoff for me is that FTV Girls is one of those sites where you can only download the bigger images as a zip file -- the entire gallery or nothing. So it's a loooong download, followed by unzipping, followed by editing and copying, etc. I gave up after a while -- far too much effort.

Also, as the reviewer said, every set is repetative.


03-19-14  10:48am

Comment
21
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)

WARNING: This site is affected by a Serious Virus

ALSSCAN is currently host to the Ransom Trojan (a.k.a. "Homeland Security" virus). Go there and you will pick up this virus! Be warned.

11-24-13  12:19pm

Replies (1)
Comment
22
Visit Club Seventeen

Club Seventeen
(1)

Mini-Review

OK, maybe I'll submit a full review when time permits, but I just did a signup after the recent "95" rated review for this site... and I am sorely disappointed.

Honestly, for a site that's been around so long, you'd think that certain basics would have improved. (I did an earlier subscription a couple of years ago.) My major disappointment: the photos are not just smaller than most top sites -- they are very lacking in fine detail and resolution. Honestly, you could take sharper, higher quality pictures with a cell phone these days. I really don't know WHY Clubseventeen manages to take such aweful, soft and blurry images. And it applies to almost every set. I just gave up after a while.

Other issues: the preview pages give the impression that tons of galleries are added across the many categories. But actually, it's only the main (white shaved teens) categories that get regular updates. Others like "unshaved teens" and ethnic teens only get a handful of galleries each year, if that.

Oh, and navigation sucks. You can't even tell which page you're on because the "1,2,3...Last" links don't highlight the current page.

The girls are truly hot. If only Clubseventeen photographed them in sharp, high-quality images, they'd have a much better site. But things never seem to improve there. Rating: 55.

11-07-13  04:36pm

Replies (1)
Reply
23
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of s1vus1's Review

I would rate AW much lower than "81" these days. I did a month recently to see if things have improved, but alas, they're worse. Yes, they use a lot of "Euro-girls" now, many of which are very hot. It's just that every other site uses them too, so AW has lost one of the few advantages they once had: unique models. Furthermore, updates are very, very poor for the price they charge. They try to fill in with those (low res) behind-the-scenes sets, and recycled "one year ago" sets, but sites like met-art or ATK have more sets in one day than AW has in a week... and the photography's better on those other sites too. Now that AW has more sets in bigger sizes, it's much more obvious how aweful their photography is, riddled with poor focus, grainyness, motion blur, etc. And as always, the "goods" are only seen properly in those closeups where the girl's face is missing. There's usually a hand or a dildo in the way. Sorry, AW, never again.

04-24-12  07:42am

Reply
24
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(0)
Reply of Karup's Reply

Good to hear. I hope you will also use a low enough compression that it doesn't strip all the fine detail out. This is a problem on many sites where they boast about big sizes, yet the actual detail is no better than smaller sizes due to too much filtering. I look forward to checking the site out in the future.

12-01-11  09:48am

Reply
25
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(0)
Reply of Karup's Reply

Well it doesn't say what those concerns were. But the biggest concern for most of us is when exactly will Karup increase your images sizes to meet today's expectations (i.e. 3000x2000 or higher)?

11-30-11  06:26pm


Shown : 1-25 of 53 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.53 seconds.