| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Capn:
I also understand your desire for custom made downloadable zips. I guess if I was bandwidth limited, I would want the same. It is just as easy for me to hit one button and peruse later, but I get your point.
|
10-22-09 07:56am
|
Reply
27
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Melissa,
Nice to meet you. Glad ATK has some people "out in the field". Again, you guys are probably the best in the business. I am trying to figure out how to post the rest of my photographer reviews, but I think this site limits each user to 3 comments.
|
10-22-09 07:53am
|
Comment
28
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
|
10-21-09 01:06pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
29
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
|
10-21-09 01:03pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
30
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
|
10-21-09 01:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
31
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Thanks. I like the feedback and I hope the people that run the sites read these.
|
10-21-09 12:55pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
In the end, it is silly to have an otherwise naked girl wearing "Fuck-Me-Pumps", but I guess the foot fetish people like it. No harm, no foul.
It rarely detracts from the scenes for me, but it does nothing for me and looks stupid.
|
10-21-09 08:36am
|
Reply
33
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I couldn't disagree more!
1) If what you are saying is that you are unhappy that you don't have to download 12-15 separate zip files to get a set, you are crazy. The combined zip was their best improvement in years. Their download speed is great.
2) The fact that you are getting more of what the photographer has shot, say 220 images, rather than having them arbitrarily editing this down to 70 is a benefit, not an annoyance. In the old days, a photographer would load film and 36, 72, shots and that was it. They scanned these in and you got what you got. Now with digital, we can shoot as fast as our strobes recharge. You are getting more, not less. You can always hit the delete button.
Why in the world would you want the amount of content you are paying for cut down??
|
10-21-09 06:33am
|
Reply
34
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
fugly's Comment
Yes, they move stuff about > 4 years old to Archives. It is too bad they don't let people from their other sites have free or discounted access to this older material. Then again, that is the whole point...$$$$
|
10-21-09 06:21am
|
Reply
35
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
I don't find this new addition that valuable. The hardcore stuff adds dick to an otherwise solo female site (except the lesbo stuff that is also a distraction).
Photographer J. Ant's Euro models sex scenes are usually ok, but then again, I can download this kind of stuff anywhere. I hate the standard male "stars" with their standard, boring, porn routines. BMB/Wanton is worse. They usually stage most of their cum shots in the still images, using soap or something for the cum. I HATE that. Marco P, has done a better job, but using Dick Nasty? That guy is ancient.
I think the hardcore stuff was put on to attract new users, I think most people that like the site for its amateur, natural women don't like it all that much,
|
10-21-09 06:16am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
peepee's Poll
Huge gaping pussy or ass
|
10-20-09 10:41pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Upside down up and over pile driver. For example, on shoulder with ass up, back against a couch with legs pulled back.
|
10-20-09 10:31pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
The little schoolgirl in uniform is sooooo tired.
|
10-20-09 10:27pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Facials. I don't know why guys like to watch other guys spurt on a gals face.
Shoot the spunk on her pussy or up her pussy or ass, creampie, but wanking off on a face? It does nothing for me and it is never something I do with my partners. I'd much rather cum up a gals tight asshole than jerk off on her lips.
|
10-20-09 10:07pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I don't find Black women in porn erotic and they do not excite me. Especially gals that look like crack whores. Clean, college-looking Black women are ok, but I guess I prefer White women over Black, Hispanic or Asian. Probably conditioning. I don't get the whole taboo thing. Get whatever you are into. If you like Black women, go for it! No disrespect.
|
10-20-09 09:54pm
|
Review
41
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(6)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Site has ton of pictures, tons of models
- New series are updated daily, at least 7 per day
- wide variety of models in terms of size, shape, age
- Site features work of some outstanding photographers (others not so good - see cons)
- specializes in featuring girl-next-door natural models.
- Not loaded with jaded strippers or porn stars
- Many (not all) sets are well shot, with plenty of explicit spread shots. Not for shy people.
- Very high quality jpgs.
- Site tries to supply videos of models with mixed success
- Considering the size of the database, searching is pretty darn good.
- Rating system is crude, but can show some general trends of what is hot and what is not. |
| Cons: |
- New male/female sex videos detract from the site that was great for featuring solo, amateur models. Site is starting to take on a cheap porno feel.
- Too many recycled models. Most models have 10 sets, but lately they have used some models for upwards of > 40 sets. How many different nude sets of one model do you need?
- Increasing lack of American Girl-Next-Door models. This is very disappointing
- Too many Eastern European aspiring porn stars. The exception is work by Sean R. who features an interesting variety of girls from Great Britain.
- Lots of butch lesbians
- Too many of the photographers are unable or unwilling to get good spread crotch and spread ass shots. General lack of good bent over ass and pussy close ups. You can tell the bad ones by the ratings. There are trends.
- They "expire" model sets older than 4 years and recycle these on the ATK Archives site which cost you double if you want to see both.
- No user forum for comments and feedback. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have subscribed since 2001. It is an outstanding site. It could be better, but it is way above it's peers. I am a little disappointed by the lack of new models and the increasing number of recycled models. Some models have over 40 sets and this really is overkill at the expense of them not providing new models. Also, they have less and less American models. I wonder why?
There is a huge range in photographer ability. Some are great at capturing graphic close-up spread shots and ass shots, others are not so good and should be shooting for R-rated Playboy mags. I do not find the new "Action" sets and videos interesting. I can rent cheap porn down the street. They need to concentrate on hairy, girl next door models. The few action shots they provide feature lots of fake cum shots which is pretty lame if you ask me. I'd estimate that 80% of the cum shots in the still sets are staged with lotion. Quite lame for a site that claims it is all about being real and no airbrushing, fake tits, etc.
Site speed and downloading of zips has steadily improved over the years, as has the quality of the jpg files. There is downtime, but I'd guess they are up >95% and fix errors quick. |
|
10-20-09 09:23pm
Replies (9)
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.05 seconds.
|
|
