Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Ray O (3)  

Feedback:   All (41)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (4)  |   Replies (35)

Other:   Replies Received (30)  |   Trust Ratings (7)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-41 of 41 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)
Reply of Capn's Reply

Capn:

I also understand your desire for custom made downloadable zips. I guess if I was bandwidth limited, I would want the same. It is just as easy for me to hit one button and peruse later, but I get your point.


10-22-09  07:56am

Reply
27
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)
Reply of Advent's Reply

Melissa,

Nice to meet you. Glad ATK has some people "out in the field". Again, you guys are probably the best in the business. I am trying to figure out how to post the rest of my photographer reviews, but I think this site limits each user to 3 comments.


10-22-09  07:53am

Comment
28
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

ATK Photographer Reviews P - R

Can only Post three comments. There is more...

Paris P (90)
Models: Americans. Pretty gals, many GND types.
Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good.
Direction: Good. Being a female photographer gives her a different perspective. You can tell that the models look comfortable and ready to do what asked. Her framing of shots is excellent.
Face Shots: excellent
Body Shots: excellent
Crotch Shots: Very good
Ass Shots: Very good
Explicit close-ups: good
Overall: A strong photographer.

PKM (80)
Models: Americans. Very similar selection as Alicia S. More to the glam style, lots of make-up.
Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good
Direction: Almost glam style. Lots of dildo stuff. Gets them to pose ok.
Face Shots: good
Body Shots: good
Crotch Shots: good
Ass Shots: good
Explicit close-ups: ok, could use more.
Overall: Good work. I have to wonder what the relation between Alicia, PKM and HMB is. Very similar. Shared models…. Hmmmm

Riley Williams/RWL (90 – 5 = 85)
Models: Americans from the Pacific Northwest. Very many GND types. Mostly college gals. Wide range of sizes, shapes, colors. He recently returned from a break for a couple of years. His later models tend to be overweight.
Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good.
Direction: Excellent. He is a master of posing the models and getting the shots he want. Models always look comfortable and ready to do what asked. He also needs to increase from the scant 70-80 shots per set he provides (-5)
Face Shots: excellent
Body Shots: excellent
Crotch Shots: excellent
Ass Shots: poor to good
Explicit close-ups: very good. He used to do peeing sets, but seems to have stopped this. In general he seems a bit tamer than he was in the early 2000’s
Overall: An American master. He needs to upgrade his model stack a little, but he has the skills. I personally wish he would get more ass shots that were not from a weird angle. Be direct now and then.

10-21-09  01:06pm

Replies (2)
Comment
29
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

ATK Photographer Reviews R - S

Roman K (75)
Models: Russians. His models are cute, but have too much Russian porn-star in them and lack realness. Pros and Ams.
Sets: Moslty indoors. Lighting good.
Direction: good. Not very innovative and his poses are boring.
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: good , mostly at distance
Crotch Shots: poor
Ass Shots: poor
Explicit close-ups: poor , some peeing shots
Overall: Roman is typical of Russian porn. There is a sterile quality and the models do not generate much life as compared to J Ant. Much of the posing is from a distance and there are far too few explicit shots.

Robin W./RWA (80)
Models: United Kingdom. Nice mixture of looks, ages and sizes. Typically shoots the same gals as Sean R.
Sets: Mostly indoors, good lighting
Direction: Very good. Gets them to pose ok. Could be more versatile. Models seem comfortable. Good with a camera
Face Shots: Very good
Body Shots: Very good
Crotch Shots: good
Ass Shots: poor
Explicit close-ups: generally poor
Overall: Good models. It is nice to have a different perspective on the same models that Sean R uses. Robin is much more tame and not very explicit. Score would be better if he included some more ass shots and was a little more explicit.

Sean R. (95)
Models: United Kingdom. Nice mixture of looks, ages and sizes. A whole lot of variety from freaks & skanks to moms to GDN types.
Sets: Mostly Indoors. Lighting Outstanding
Direction: Excellent. This guy knows how to get the models to pose to get the shots he wants. At the same time, the models seem comfortable.
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: poor. Rarely shows good shots of the breasts and full body shots.
Crotch Shots: Excellent
Ass Shots: Excellent, he is one of the few that can really frame a female ass and associated nether regions to get the greatest shots.
Explicit close-ups: Excellent
Overall: The premier ATK photographer today. Lots of shots, lots of poses. He knows how to frame a shot and get the right lighting. Others should sit up and take some lessons from Sean. He is a master at explicit photography. His weakness is that he universally fails to take many pictures of the models full bodies and breasts. Yes, they are there, but you have to look at a lot of shots to get an idea of what their bodies, in total look like.

10-21-09  01:03pm

Replies (2)
Comment
30
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

Review of ATK Photographers T-Z

Tom Mayes TMI (75 – 5 = 70)
Models: Americans. Nice variety of models. Plenty of GND-types.
Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good.
Direction: poor. Not very innovative and his poses are boring. He seems to be afraid to get close to the models so his work feels distant, cold. A lost opportunity here. He also needs to increase from the scant 75-80 shots per set he provides (-5)
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: good, but everything looks like he shot from across the room. Get closer, they don’t bite (unless you are lucky)
Crotch Shots: poor
Ass Shots: poor, none. Doesn’t seem to think this perspective is too important.
Explicit close-ups: poor / none
Overall: He has room for improvement. His older work was better.

Vladimir Fillit VLF (80)
Models: Russians. Very cute selection. A little bit too pro and glam. You would not confuse these with Americans.
Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good
Direction: Gets them to pose ok. Wide variety from standing, laying down, sitting
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: very good
Crotch Shots: very good
Ass Shots: good
Explicit close-ups: good, more spread shots would be nice
Overall: Good work, would rate higher if he tried to get more shots from behind

Walter K (WAK) (85)
Models: Russians. Very cute selection with nice variety. A little bit too pro and glam. You would not confuse these with Americans.
Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good
Direction: Gets them to pose ok. Wide variety from standing, laying down, sitting
Face Shots: very good
Body Shots: very good
Crotch Shots: very good
Ass Shots: very good
Explicit close-ups: very good, more spread shots would be nice
Overall: Good work. About on par with the other Russians. Marginally better than VLF.

10-21-09  01:00pm

Replies (0)
Reply
31
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)
Reply of james4096's Reply

Thanks. I like the feedback and I hope the people that run the sites read these.

10-21-09  12:55pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of nadiencendia's Poll

In the end, it is silly to have an otherwise naked girl wearing "Fuck-Me-Pumps", but I guess the foot fetish people like it. No harm, no foul.

It rarely detracts from the scenes for me, but it does nothing for me and looks stupid.


10-21-09  08:36am

Reply
33
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)
Reply of Capn's Comment

I couldn't disagree more!

1) If what you are saying is that you are unhappy that you don't have to download 12-15 separate zip files to get a set, you are crazy. The combined zip was their best improvement in years. Their download speed is great.

2) The fact that you are getting more of what the photographer has shot, say 220 images, rather than having them arbitrarily editing this down to 70 is a benefit, not an annoyance. In the old days, a photographer would load film and 36, 72, shots and that was it. They scanned these in and you got what you got. Now with digital, we can shoot as fast as our strobes recharge. You are getting more, not less. You can always hit the delete button.

Why in the world would you want the amount of content you are paying for cut down??


10-21-09  06:33am

Reply
34
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)
Reply of fugly's Comment

Yes, they move stuff about > 4 years old to Archives. It is too bad they don't let people from their other sites have free or discounted access to this older material. Then again, that is the whole point...$$$$

10-21-09  06:21am

Reply
35
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)
Reply of TheRizzo's Comment

I don't find this new addition that valuable. The hardcore stuff adds dick to an otherwise solo female site (except the lesbo stuff that is also a distraction).

Photographer J. Ant's Euro models sex scenes are usually ok, but then again, I can download this kind of stuff anywhere. I hate the standard male "stars" with their standard, boring, porn routines. BMB/Wanton is worse. They usually stage most of their cum shots in the still images, using soap or something for the cum. I HATE that. Marco P, has done a better job, but using Dick Nasty? That guy is ancient.

I think the hardcore stuff was put on to attract new users, I think most people that like the site for its amateur, natural women don't like it all that much,


10-21-09  06:16am

Reply
36
N/A Reply of peepee's Poll

Huge gaping pussy or ass

10-20-09  10:41pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll

Upside down up and over pile driver. For example, on shoulder with ass up, back against a couch with legs pulled back.

10-20-09  10:31pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

The little schoolgirl in uniform is sooooo tired.

10-20-09  10:27pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

Facials. I don't know why guys like to watch other guys spurt on a gals face.

Shoot the spunk on her pussy or up her pussy or ass, creampie, but wanking off on a face? It does nothing for me and it is never something I do with my partners. I'd much rather cum up a gals tight asshole than jerk off on her lips.


10-20-09  10:07pm

Reply
40
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

I don't find Black women in porn erotic and they do not excite me. Especially gals that look like crack whores. Clean, college-looking Black women are ok, but I guess I prefer White women over Black, Hispanic or Asian. Probably conditioning. I don't get the whole taboo thing. Get whatever you are into. If you like Black women, go for it! No disrespect.

10-20-09  09:54pm

Review
41
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - Site has ton of pictures, tons of models
- New series are updated daily, at least 7 per day
- wide variety of models in terms of size, shape, age
- Site features work of some outstanding photographers (others not so good - see cons)
- specializes in featuring girl-next-door natural models.
- Not loaded with jaded strippers or porn stars
- Many (not all) sets are well shot, with plenty of explicit spread shots. Not for shy people.
- Very high quality jpgs.
- Site tries to supply videos of models with mixed success
- Considering the size of the database, searching is pretty darn good.
- Rating system is crude, but can show some general trends of what is hot and what is not.
Cons: - New male/female sex videos detract from the site that was great for featuring solo, amateur models. Site is starting to take on a cheap porno feel.
- Too many recycled models. Most models have 10 sets, but lately they have used some models for upwards of > 40 sets. How many different nude sets of one model do you need?
- Increasing lack of American Girl-Next-Door models. This is very disappointing
- Too many Eastern European aspiring porn stars. The exception is work by Sean R. who features an interesting variety of girls from Great Britain.
- Lots of butch lesbians
- Too many of the photographers are unable or unwilling to get good spread crotch and spread ass shots. General lack of good bent over ass and pussy close ups. You can tell the bad ones by the ratings. There are trends.
- They "expire" model sets older than 4 years and recycle these on the ATK Archives site which cost you double if you want to see both.
- No user forum for comments and feedback.
Bottom Line: I have subscribed since 2001. It is an outstanding site. It could be better, but it is way above it's peers. I am a little disappointed by the lack of new models and the increasing number of recycled models. Some models have over 40 sets and this really is overkill at the expense of them not providing new models. Also, they have less and less American models. I wonder why?

There is a huge range in photographer ability. Some are great at capturing graphic close-up spread shots and ass shots, others are not so good and should be shooting for R-rated Playboy mags. I do not find the new "Action" sets and videos interesting. I can rent cheap porn down the street. They need to concentrate on hairy, girl next door models. The few action shots they provide feature lots of fake cum shots which is pretty lame if you ask me. I'd estimate that 80% of the cum shots in the still sets are staged with lotion. Quite lame for a site that claims it is all about being real and no airbrushing, fake tits, etc.

Site speed and downloading of zips has steadily improved over the years, as has the quality of the jpg files. There is downtime, but I'd guess they are up >95% and fix errors quick.

10-20-09  09:23pm

Replies (9)

Shown : 26-41 of 41 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.55 seconds.