Wet N Messy Fetish Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. I Need 2 Pee (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ 357 videos, 1 new one every Tuesday.
+ unique content
+ Videos are of women wetting their clothes, mostly after not being able to get to a toilet.
+ The women often remove their outer garment and show how wet their panties are. |
| Cons: |
- Of course the videos are contrived. How else would a woman who needs to pee have a cameraman following her.
- Sometimes the acting is really poor (maybe all the time).
- Some of the videos are very poorly done.
- Almost no nudity, but that is the intended goal of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
. If you want to see nudity this is not the site for you, there are only two pussies exposed in the entire set of videos and both of those are inadvertant and brief; they might be called cameo appearances.
. In a day when so many other sites have gone to more frequent updates or higher quality videos, this site has only gone from their initial 320x240 videos to the current 640x480 and remained at one update per week (Tuesdays).
. This is really a narrow niche |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. I Am Peeing (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- This site is dedicated to women peeing.
- it has about 200 videos and 150 picture sets though the resolution is low.
- most scenarios are girl gets naked and pees in a bathtub, though many are elsewhere indoors and a few are outdoors.
- there are a few girl-girl interaction pee videos.
- Membership gets you access to many other sites in the porngreen network which has a good variety of other porn, though everything I checked out is low resolution. |
| Cons: |
- Neither pictures nor videos are high quality.
- Some of the content is posted elsewhere
- The last dated post in the main area is 2010-07-18
- download speed is slow. |
| Bottom Line: |
I did not see any reason to be a member more than once.
This site is average for peeing sites though the ones I checked out have some different content they also have some of the same videos.
I gave it a 79 because of the extra sites which does add a little variety. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Water Bondage (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 274 scenes
- Approximately 70 scenes available in HD
- Most available in three formats/sizes
- Pics available (singles or small sets of zips)
- Part of the Kink network
- Good support service (a question was answered via email within a couple of hours on a weekend)
- Good mix of known and less known models
- Very high production values
- Very innovative |
| Cons: |
- No longer updating
- No major quality improvements from 2003 until 2007
- Scenes are no longer dated
- Last update in 2007 (I think, scenes aren’t dated)
- No discount price offered |
| Bottom Line: |
I had last joined Water Bondage in 2008 and it hasn’t updated since then, but I wanted to get more scenes and higher quality now that I have a faster connection. The fact that I went back to a site that offered me nothing new probably says a lot about what I think about this site. For BDSM fans, this is an extremely well done and innovative site that offers lots of material. Its part of the Kink.com network, which, in my opinion, sets a high standard for other internet porn sites.
The site offers 274 scenes dating back to about 2003. Older scenes tend to be fairly simple and short, with many at about 15 mins long. Older scenes are a lot more complex with different setups and are usually over an hour long. As you would expect, the resolutions for the older videos isn’t great by today’s standards. The videos are available in two formats: wmv and mp4. For most of the time the site was updating there was only one resolution of wmv available: 640x480 / 1900kbps. There are two sizes of mp4s available. One is for IPods and such, while the other is labeled as ‘best quality.’ I don’t know how to find resolutions for mp4s, but subjectively the larger file wasn’t much better than the SD wmv.
At some point towards when the site stopped updating they did start to offer higher resolution videos. For most of the last 70 or so updates on the site there is the option of wmv HD at 1280x720 / 7150kbps. SD is still available, as are the two sizes of mp4.
There are pics available too. The resolutions for these didn’t change through the whole run of the site: they are 1200x865, not bad, but not particularly sharp. Zips are available, and in the longer scenes the zips are broken down into the themes in the scene.
For all the dated technical issues, this is still a very interesting site. I’m not aware of any other like it where models undergo BDSM treatment in water. In most of the videos there are several ‘scenes’ within the video, with bondage while being sprayed with water to machines and toys being used, and in most cases some complete immersion in water tanks while bound. There is a good mix of models too. There are surprisingly many A-listers here, as well as some well known fetish models and also some lesser known girls. There are body types for every taste.
Given the size of the site, I don’t consider that it isn’t updating to be a serious drawback. There are issues though: for much of the life of the site there were no real technical improvements until the very end. One pet peeve of mine too is that the scenes used to be dated, but they aren’t now. That troubles me since I wonder if Kink is trying to hide the fact that the site isn’t updating. Finally, Kink doesn’t offer any price discounts for members of other Kink sites like they do with most others. Paying $30 for a site that doesn’t update seems a bit steep.
But… it is still an amazing site and a decent value considering the quality and quantity. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
