Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Niche - Magazines The category portal for a specific niche.

Magazines Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Color Climax (4) 90.6
2. Penthouse (2) 90.0
3. Watch 4 Beauty (1) 89.0
4. Domination Online Magazine (1) 88.0
5. Naughty Mag (2) 86.0
6. Pure Beauty Magazine (1) 82.0
7. Perfect 10 (1) 82.0
8. 18 Eighteen (4) 77.2
9. Hustler (4) 76.2
10. Playboy Plus (1) 75.0

Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.

View All: Top Rated Sites
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. Color Climax (4) 90.6
2. 18 Eighteen (4) 77.2
3. Hustler (4) 76.2
4. Playboy's CyberClub (3) 72.5
5. Penthouse (2) 90.0
6. Naughty Mag (2) 86.0
7. Watch 4 Beauty (1) 89.0
8. Domination Online Magazine (1) 88.0
9. Pure Beauty Magazine (1) 82.0
10. Perfect 10 (1) 82.0

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit Scoreland

1. Scoreland (0)

Pay
Newbie
82*
xyzzy (4) 07-29-08  12:42pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well-established name in the industry. You know what content you're getting with this site!
- Large model archive, including both natural breasts and silicone-pumped monsters
- Updated nearly every day!
- Good selection of videos and photos, with different resolution offers
- Rewards loyalty; you receive extra sites added to your account the longer you stay, featuring more exclusive content. This is a great idea.
- photo and video clarity is good; even the gonzo-style shoots feel professional and well-shot
Cons: - Site can be a pain to navigate. Way too many options, menus, etc. Some links don't work or crash. Pages are not consistent; some photoshoots have a completely different layout to others.
- maximum of 6 downloads at once
- It's just what you'd expect from reading the magazine. All the photos have pretty much the same style, the language is the same..etc. A little bit of variety would help.
- Scoreland don't choose models for their beauty, but for their bustline. Some of them are just, well, ugly. Sorry girls.
- Varying content on each model. You may browse and find a model you like, only to discover she only has one bad photoset, from 1998.
- Download speed isn't great, for me in the UK. I have a 2Mb/s connection, but sometimes was barely getting 48kb/s, and never more than 500kb/s
- no complete archive of the Score magazines, which I would have liked to see.
Bottom Line: So, if you're a fan of big boobs, Scoreland is obviously the place to be. They've been going for decades now in print, producing the same kind of professional-quality boob pictorials ever since the beginning.

I'd say it's definitely worth giving the site a try. There's a large collection of models (albeit some have very little content), new updates every day or so, and loads of content. And the way that they give you an extra site every few weeks is awesome, it's a great incentive to stay.

The biggest problem with the site is that it just gets boring after a while. Everything looks the same; the models all use the same poses; the lighting doesn't vary much. Even the hardcore all seems vaguely similar. You find yourself watching the vids and thinking, "why didn't they just change the formula a bit?"

I ended up just going through the model list, picking the models I liked the look of, and downloading their content. I barely glanced at the homepage or updates, which is a bad sign.

Don't get me wrong, it's still a professional, entertaining site with great content and regular updates, and it's a must-subscribe if you're a breast fanatic, even if it's just for a month. But after a while, it all just looks the same.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naughty Mag

2. Naughty Mag (2)

Pay
Active
87
WeeWillyWinky (55) 04-07-08  11:20pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Half a million pics+, and lots of video.
- One of the widest ranges of models I've seen, from 18+ to late 60s, from extremely plain to beautiful.
- zips in two sizes.
- choice of size for pictures.
- model index and search function.
- I find the navigation to be easy, because I'm used to it. See cons.
- Access to multiple mag archives: 40+, 30+, Eighteen18, Newcummers, Naughty Neighbors.
Cons: - Pic quality is not top-notch.
- Lots of *very* plain models.
- toys & dildos everywhere.
- Navigation takes some getting used to.
Bottom Line: Naughtymag is noteworthy because of the amount of content it now has and for the range of tastes it caters to. I haven't seen this wide a variety of model types at any other site, though ATK's Natural and Hairy comes close. The focus is on amateur, accessible, next-door-neighbor types. I actually find a good percentage of the models here downright homely (I'm being kind), but that's all part of the amateur niche. That being said, there are many beautiful ladies to look at as well, though the atmosphere is never super-glamorous.

While the pictures have that "magazine-y" look to them, I have to say that the majority of the pics ranging from 2003 to present look pretty good, and some are very good. The lack of clarity is compensated for by the fact that the sets are well-edited and comprehensive. I find that most sets show the models in all the ways I like to see them, without excessive shots of the same pose with barely noticeable differences.

The vids I looked at are 640X480, 2000+ kbps. These are the newer "casting couch" or interview vids and they look excellent.

I would certainly recommend this site to picture collectors, and amateur pictures in particular, but not to those who are interested in photography as art. This ain't art, it's naughty pictures. People mainly into video are best advised to look elsewhere.

It's too bad this company is crapping out on their trials. Why they would want to damage their rep in this way is a mystery to me.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Playboy\'s CyberClub

3. Playboy's CyberClub (3)

Pay
Active
70
badandy400 (67) 03-28-08  03:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: It's Plyboy!
Decent prices
Loads of photos
Good download speed
All models are just what you would expect from Playboy
Exclusive, other than magazine of course
Some videos, obviously not seen in magazine
Different photo size options
Cons: NO ZIPS
Movies not downloadable
Does not give access to other Playboy sites
Must call to cancel, see Bottom Line
Navigation can be a pain
Does not support download manager, well most of them
Bottom Line: First of all it is Playboy, so you should expect HOT women in non degrading photos. It is pretty much an extension of the magazine. The photos look nice and there certainly is a lot of them.

Playboy is against downloading of their content, I was told this over the phone. And so far they have lived up to this. This is an extremely hard site to download from. Download Them All for Firefox is the only method I have found so far, other than manually clicking "save as" for thousands of photos. The videos can not be downloaded so far either. So obviously there will be no handy zip files to grab.

Also, canceling is extremely invasive and personal. If you try to cancel you MUST call them and TALK to a real PERSON, not a machine and not on the website. Of course you can join conveniently over the net with your credit card, they dont want to scare you away from joining. But, they do not want you to leave, they will have a woman talk to you and try to sell you on a discounted rate. She worked on me! :) The discounted rate is 10 bucks a month. So it is easy to stay here and end up forgetting about it for awhile and still be getting charged because you dont want to tell a woman with a sexy voice "no."

If they would change these two things it would be worth another 20 points, but as it stands the content is not worth these hassles. Dont get me wrong though, the photos are nice and I love looking at them. They just need to work on costumer friendliness.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Scoreland

1. Scoreland (0)

Pay
malikstarks (8) 08-16-08  05:48pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)

"Loyalty Program" Makes Site a Must Have

I have to hand it to Score, after getting there asses kicked relatively speaking by many of their online rivals they have finally caved in and provided a way to get all of their sites for one monthly fee.

Under their new loyalty program, if you sign up for Scoreland and keep it for a full month you are given a choice of sites you can subscribe to free of charge (you can pick one). Now not all of the sites are available to choose from after the first month, (you are given a choice of about five) but eventually if you keep the site long enough you can obtain them all. With PU discount that means all of their websites for 19.99.

I think this is a smart and sensible approach, to be honest most of thier top tier sites (Scoreland, Leg Sex, 18eighteen, etc.) are worth the price for at least one month. Now with this new discount program, I think it makes Scoreland virtually a must have and keep.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Scoreland

2. Scoreland (0)

Pay
messmer (14) 07-30-08  08:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (1)

Site Logo too obvious and intrusive!

Scoreland suffers from the same malaise as 40plusmagazine.com, XL Girls and some others. Their watermark is usually placed on top and too big making IT the first thing that attracts your eye rather than the model herself. It's very distracting and I am surprised that subscribers haven't screamed long and hard about it. A smaller discrete watermark at the right or left bottom of a picture would still let everyone know where the set came from. No need to deface pictures like that.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hustler\'s Taboo

3. Hustler's Taboo (0)

Pay
buzmeg2 (0) 06-28-08  07:46pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Not Satisfied

I've joined this site expecting the usual Hustler quality. I was mistaken. Though the movies require you to submit your credentials the submission doesn't work, it constantly states that my account is no longer active. The link for customer support "If you have problems viewing the movies" takes you to the cancel subscription form at epoch.com.

I was hoping that maybe the images would be good. Though the pictures are well taken of very pretty girls there are few images per series, some with as little as 8.

I've already submitted a request for a refund and the cancelation of my subscription. It took me a grand total of 30 minutes to reach this decision.

My advice - STAY AWAY FROM THIS SITE!!!

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Porn Stars (77)
2. Softcore (19)
3. Celebs (8)
4. Stories (1)

View All : Niches


Magazines @ TBP
1. Watch 4 Beaut... 87.6
2. Pure Beauty M... 86.3
3. Gent Online 76.5
4. Swank Mag 76.5
5. Looker Girls 70.6

View All : Magazines Reviews


Niche RSS Feeds
1. New Magazines Activity
2. New Magazines Reviews
3. New Magazines Comments

You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader).



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.