1. Street Meat Asia (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- in many scenes, the girls are handcuffed while giving blowjobs or getting fucked
- the girls definitely seem like genuine street whores, not porn-stars
- newer videos (of which there are about a dozen) are in high-quality, as single files |
| Cons: |
- again, the models look like genuine prostitutes, and many are not very attractive
- older videos are split into more than a dozen parts, and cannot be downloaded as a single file. This is extremely frustrating.
- older videos are low quality (384x288)
- very high price for relatively few videos |
| Bottom Line: |
Fairly unique content, but not enough of it and not delivered in a convenient enough way to justify the price. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. JAV HD (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large collection of videos. Site claims 12888 but this number has not changed in days even though they update, as a rule, with at least two videos daily so, take with a grain of salt.
HD videos, 1920x1080p with a total bitrate of 3000+ since late 2011. Date is approximate.
Attractive, mostly young, Japanese models.
Part of a network of five sites.
Zipped picture sets. Pictures are taken from the video but are of better quality than most screen caps.
The most recent set contains 27 pictures, sized 1000x1500px.
Movies and pictures are not pixellated.
Excellent download speed for me, maxing out my connection. |
| Cons: |
Generic porn with no surprises or originality. This comes from an older man, someone younger might disagree with my assessment.
My niche, mature women in sexy lingerie, is disappointingly under-represented.
Most older videos are not in HD but of lower quality, which is normal for all sites that have been around for a while, but this annoyed me because I expected a site calle JAVHD to be all HD.
No model biographies, inaccurate niche listings, eg. I expected to find mature women under “mature,” and not just someone over twenty, unless older Japanese women look exceptionally young. In most sites there are MILFs (over 30) and all that are older than MILFs will be sorted under mature. Which usually means 40 years of age and up. I am still looking for a single 40+ female on this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, as I explained in my comment, Japanese Porn has the reputation of being different, so my expectation of finding something that I hadn't seen before was high. Regrettably, I am finding mostly every day, generic porn .. not bad at all, mind you, if you just started to get into Porn recently .. but for anyone who has been looking at videos for years this site is no better than any other video site and even worse in some aspects. For instance, the preponderance of those microphone shaped wands used to stimulate women's clits, is astounding.
Models are pleasantly (THEIR pleasure not mine) attacked with these monstrosities in every second video, or so it appears. If you don't like dildos or wands you will get annoyed at seeing so many videos containing them.
There are good things too about this site:
I haven't seen a single set of enhanced breasts, so far. I am sure they exist, but it appears that Japanese males have the good sense and taste to reject them.
There is no pixellation, which is great, but this might mean that this site is in non-Japanese hands, which would explain why the porn looked generally so unexciting to me. However, I do like the fact that the action is a bit slower than what we are used to and that the actors (male and female) nibble an ear now and then or dwell on a nipple a bit longer than two seconds, or concentrate on teasing for a while before the action starts. This is a lot more appealing to me then the frantic copulation right from the start that one is exposed to in so many North American videos.
Despite some of my negativity this is really not a bad site at all, and I rated it as such, I am sure many will like it, and the price is right at the moment, but for someone who was looking for a bit of excitement up and above that found in other large video sites it was a bit of a disappointment.
And I am still not sure what the offer to upgrade (under my account) entails. I thought I had it all. I have access to all five sites, there are no restrictions on downloads so what more could there be? |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Asian Sex Club (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A lot of content
-Mixture of video (soft, hard, lesbian, masturbation)
-Lot of photos
-Zip files for pics
-Some Asian cuties you won’t find elsewhere
-Bonus sites decent. |
| Cons: |
-Substandard quality
-Same models, new decade
-"New" content appears shot long ago
-Anemic action
-Some of the models are just plain substandard |
| Bottom Line: |
I had joined this site first about five years ago, and thought “With some tweaks and new content, this will be a great site in a couple of years.” Sadly, that never happened.
It appears that the majority of the content – if not all of it – what shot years ago, and the site is still being updated with it; that’s the main reason for the score. Recent Lily Thai videos and pics appear to have been shot at the same time as the earlier Lily content several years ago, based on the way Lily looks (same haircut, makeup, zit on her ass, etc). Much is the same for about every model. They have about 160 models, but for a site that is over six years old, that is nothing to brag about.
The videos are basically recorded photo sessions for the most part. The action is lame, editing essentially non-existent and the quality bad (dark, not focused well, poor color, you get the idea). That’s the secondary reason for the score.
One of the guys has a problem keeping it up half of the time (I sympathize, but if you’re shooting porn, spring for some Levitra already). I would have appreciated it if most of the two minutes he took to stick it in her tushy would have been cut out. The “softcore” videos are particularly dull, and the hardcore videos are half softcore.
The pics are an improvement over the video, but still of low quality. There appears to be little, if any, culling of the crap photos (model is yawning, half-blinking, or you have a series of 17 photos of basically the same exact pose). Put some flippin’ effort in, ok? Some of the models, sadly, do not go fully nude.
Overall, if you’re an Asianphile like me, the site could be worth joining if you’re into a particular group of the models – overall, I like most of the girls; there is just not the mass of variety and quality you would expect given the age and size of the site. The bonus sites are pretty good. Finally, I’d recommend a video editor to cut down some of the boring stuff, and a download manager, which does work for the most part, on this site (clear your cookies if you get jammed up). |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
