Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: pat362 (367)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2911)  |   Threads Started (25)

1-50 of 2911 Posts Page 1 2 11 20 29 38 47 58 59 Next Page >

08-18-14  06:58pm - 2 days MMA Fighter Wanted After Vicious Attack on Christy Mack (14 Posts) - #15
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I can't imagine what she is feeling right now(aside from an enormous amount of physical pain) but I suspect that her psyche was already damaged long before this latest incident with "War Monster". I don't know how else to say that when you consider that she herself admitted that he had beaten her many times before but never as bad. In my book once is too much but how badly did he beat her before? Maybe she can take comfort that this time will be the last one and I hope she can but I have my doubts. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-17-14  09:33am - 4 days sin drive and hardx (4 Posts) - #3
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm seriously considering joining Sin drive in the next few weeks or so I will probably be able to answer all your questions or my review will answer them Long live the Brown Coats.

08-15-14  06:11pm - 5 days Lauren Bacall Dies at 89 (6 Posts) - #7
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^It wouldn't surprise me if a lot of the movie was improvised. It was shot in two weeks which just proves how incredible past actors were when compared with more modern actors. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-14-14  03:33pm - 6 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #45
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Actually read what Mike South wrote.

first Measure B is still in effect as is a statewide OSHA law that makes the use of condoms mandatory. It isnít going to stop AHF from filing complaints against the industry.

What it does do is that it gives us a chance to come up with some meaningful; self regulation



Osha has been pretty active in the last year and they were not using AB1576 for their actions. Like it or not condoms are going to become a reality sooner or later. There are just too many performers catching multiple STI's for the government to overlook it. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-13-14  05:52pm - 7 days Lauren Bacall Dies at 89 (6 Posts) - #3
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
She has one of the most memorable scene in the history of cinema when she tells Boggie's character. You do know how to whistle. you just put your lips together and blow. Now that is pretty impressive dialogue when you consider that she said that in a 1944 movie. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-11-14  06:40pm - 9 days Robin Williams dead at 63 (13 Posts) - #2
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Truly sad. Here is another comedic genius taken at a still very young age. Nanu Nanu. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-11-14  06:39pm - 9 days Upcoming Movie Thread (1202 Posts) - #1226
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^The only warning I'm going to give you is that if you aren't a fan of 80's or before songs than you may have some issues with more than one scene in the movie because quite a few songs are key elements in those scenes.

I am so this added a very pleasant element to those scenes. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-10-14  10:40am - 11 days Upcoming Movie Thread (1202 Posts) - #1224
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't know if any of you were thinking about it but if you were on the fence than let me help you make up your mind. Go see Gardians of the Galaxy because I don't think it's possible for anyone to shoot a more perfect super hero movie. The casting is amazing, the story riveting, the dialogue is perfect, music is incredible, acting is top notch, the effects are flawless. The only thing that is wrong with the movie is that we will have to wait about two years to see a sequel. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-10-14  10:36am - 11 days Straight porn with condoms video site? (2 Posts) - #2
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't think it's a dumb question but sadly you will not be able to find anything that meets your requirements. The only place you can find condom only porn is on the Wicked Picture site. They are the only North American company shooting condom only porn. That's not to say that others don't also shoot the odd condom scene but condom porn in porn is still quite rare. Hopefully this trend will soon change and we get more of that but for now that is the only place where you can see only condom porn. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-06-14  07:34pm - 14 days Is it overall in Porn's best interest to run tube sites out of Dodge? (11 Posts) - #7
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Whether or not we're going down the "tubes" is a subject for debate but they're here to stay. I see both sides of the coin. Tubes do suck business out of the industry but there are always people like us willing to pay for quality and ease of downloadability. Also, most of the major sites have their own tube sites as a means of advertising or pay some tube sites for referral clicks just like PU/TBP operates.


I no longer think that we are going down the "tubes" as you put it because I think we are already there now. The porn industry as I knew it is no more and what is left is a mere shadow of it past greatness. The few remaining studios that manage to carve a tiny bit of profit do so by offering a subpar product that fewer and fewer people are willing to pay for so the writing is on the wall that they will also suffer the fate of their now deceased competitors.

I don't know about you but when was the last time you saw a porn video that was so good that it took your breath away? I know I haven't seen anything like that in years. Porn companies no longer put out quality stuff. It's not a lack of desire but a lack of money. They simply can't afford it anymore.

Tube don't just suck money out of the pocket of producers. It also puts it in the pocket of a very small group of individuals. I don't know if you are aware but most studios don't have a tube site. Most of the major tube sites are all owned by Manwin who is now called Mindgeek and we all know what scumbags these people are considered to be by almost everyone in the porn industry. They are the people who more or less created the Tube Site system by which most companies started to lose huge amounts of money and then Manwin swooped in to either buy their library of movies or the studio itself. In the end it's about the same. You have one gigantic monster eating all of the competitors but not improving the system. I was never a big fan of their movies but Digital Playground used to be known has a leader in the industry. Has anyone heard about them since Manwin bought them and fired almost everyone? Where are all their contract players? DP had to be making huge amounts of money to be able to hire multiples contract girls.

I wish I could be positive and say that the future looks bright but if I see a light at the end of the tunnel then I know it's a train and I can get out of it's way or get crushed under it's wheels. Long live the Brown Coats.

08-01-14  01:46pm - 20 days Should PU add a thread labelled RIP for good porn sites that have bit the dust? (22 Posts) - #7
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Not to throw water on your beautiful post but Club Sandy has been dead for many years now and although Pix and Video is still updating. The current crop of stuff being used for updates is by no means as good as what came before it. Long live the Brown Coats. Edited on Aug 02, 2014, 06:59pm

07-31-14  06:01pm - 20 days Should PU add a thread labelled RIP for good porn sites that have bit the dust? (22 Posts) - #3
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I wouldn't mind one of those but I think it would be a must if through this we could find out which site bought the dead one's content. This way there demise wouldn't be as painful. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-29-14  06:45pm - 22 days Suggestion to review mycherrycrush.com (3 Posts) - #3
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't know if TBP will want to do a review but I can at least add some info that you may not have. This site appears to be quite new but Cherry is not. She has a clisp 4 sale studios (see below link) and I suspect that the bulk of the stuff on this site would be the same as it is on her C4S studio. If that is the case than her claim of hundreds of videos might in fact be closer to less than 100. She has stuff going as far back as 2012 and my gut feeling is that she has been a cam model for about that long.

She is a cute girl but solo stuff with the odd b/g content only with her significant other does very little for me. Especially since it's always in POV. My rule of thumb on solo model site is that if you aren't sure what you will get with your membership than the chances are very high that you will be both disappointed and feel cheated. Her site does not make me feel any differently. In fact since she actually has an icon dedicated to her wish list than you know she is not in it to make her fans happy so much as get them to buy her stuff. Stuff that she should be in abetter position to buy herself since she already got your money from the membership.

**My suggestion is that you buy one of her clips4sale video and if you like what you see than maybe you might like what you'll see on this site.**
http://clips4sale.com/studio/57445/My-cherry-crush Long live the Brown Coats.

07-27-14  10:10am - 25 days Viewing porn (14 Posts) - #12
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Thank You. I guess I'm now going to be spending some money because I want one of these. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-26-14  08:44am - 26 days Viewing porn (14 Posts) - #9
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Thanks for the info. What kind of cable do these things use to connect to a TV and what kind of power supply do they use? Long live the Brown Coats.

07-24-14  04:27pm - 27 days Viewing porn (14 Posts) - #4
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Welcome to PU.

Cybertoad's suggestion is a very good one and if it's not possible than can you hook-up your TV to your computer? This way you would get keep your current set-up but be able to watch your porn on a big screen. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-15-14  05:55pm - 36 days NoFagsHere indeed... I'm off! (25 Posts) - #23
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^^I don't see any reason why you should feel bad about what you did. I might have done the same if I had actually looked his user name but I honestly didn't see it until you guys said something about it.

I'm all for welcoming new members but it's hard to be objective when someone uses those words in his user name. If the guy was from the UK and was using it as saying no cigarettes than that is one thing but it's clear by his reply to the change in his user name that he was looking for trouble. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-12-14  09:27am - 40 days Is Porn Losing Its sparkle or Do You Think Its Great These Days (32 Posts) - #28
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by AWpress:


I really disagree. Well, let me qualify that; there is more bad porn than ever, sure. But there is also more good porn than ever. It could be that the ratio is worse now, that's a matter of opinion; either way, there's no denying that the total volume of excellent porn is greater now than at any point in history.

Your statement would have been true 3 or more years ago but 5 years is likely more accurate but you can't say the same for what has been done since then. Of course if you add the porn made prior to that to todays stuff than yes there is a lot more good than bad but I don't know if that's what you meant.

Originally Posted by AWpress:


Back in the 'good ol' days', it was impossible for studios to focus on a niche they were very passionate about- everyone


How far back are you going for your good old days? Are you saying prior to 2000 because you have had plenty of niche porn since then. The same can't be said for prior to that but if that's the case than I wouldn't talk about porn made when the internet was not yet the main way people got their porn fix.

Originally Posted by AWpress:


In general I find this is true with most things. When people say music has gone to shit, for instance, what they mean is that there is more bad music


I don't know about you but most of the popular music made today is so similar to each other that it's often hard to tell who the artist is. I guess taste vary but I don't call the type of music done in the last 5 or so years to be all that good. It's not horrible but will we really be listening to it 20 or more years from now? The fact that artists that have been in the business for 20 plus years are still in high demand tells you that they had talent. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-12-14  09:06am - 40 days NoFagsHere indeed... I'm off! (25 Posts) - #4
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm glad this was pointed out because I honestly didn't even look at the user name he used. It is an offensive term and not one that should be allowed anywhere. Let alone here. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-10-14  04:57pm - 41 days Is Porn Losing Its sparkle or Do You Think Its Great These Days (32 Posts) - #24
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by biker:


One of the reasons I prefer Lesbian over straight is the amount of affection over the slam bang of hardcore.


Add kissing to why I also prefer lesbian porn. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-09-14  05:25pm - 42 days Is Porn Losing Its sparkle or Do You Think Its Great These Days (32 Posts) - #19
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


With all due respect, guys ......

I think the term best associated with this malady touted by the pundits might be called "jaded"



I don't think it is because we aren't complaining about all the porn but what passes for porn today. I can watch a crappy video from the 70's and 80's and I am super thrilled but I can't say the same for most of what I've downloaded this year and if I'm being honest with myself than what I've downloaded in the last couple of years.

I'm more nostalgic than anything else. I feel sorry for the people who started watching porn in the last 5 years because they think it's really good and the women are really hot. some of it is good and some of the women are beautiful but they pale when I compare to older porn. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-07-14  04:25pm - 44 days Is Porn Losing Its sparkle or Do You Think Its Great These Days (32 Posts) - #9
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I don't know if you are aware but you named 4 performers that are no longer active and most haven't been for quite a while now. Some of them will sometime do a new scene but those are so rare that I still think of them as retired. At least when it comes to porn. Many of them went the escort route in the past and have never come back. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-06-14  06:01pm - 45 days Is Porn Losing Its sparkle or Do You Think Its Great These Days (32 Posts) - #6
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Parsnip:


I may rejoin SexArt & TheLifeErotic for a month, but even they are slipping. I can't imagine taking a long term membership to anything again.


Are those sites still able to hire models that are all natural and attractive or is the crop of available talent also suffering? Long live the Brown Coats.

07-06-14  06:00pm - 45 days Is Porn Losing Its sparkle or Do You Think Its Great These Days (32 Posts) - #5
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I think one of the main reason why sites that offer pee type content are closing is because in many ways watching someone pee is not sexually stimulating for most people so the overall number of interested parties is already lower than for other types of fetish. By default that means that those sites were already disadvantaged over other sites with a bigger fan base and when the World economy took a dive in 2008 than they were sure to suffer the most. Tube a torrent sites have done the rest.

Cost of production was never an issue as it's probably one of the cheapest thing to shoot but you still need to make a profit to be able to pay for those shoots. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-06-14  09:00am - 46 days Is Porn Losing Its sparkle or Do You Think Its Great These Days (32 Posts) - #2
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I wish I could say that porn was losing it's sparkle because that would at least mean that there was still some but if what I've seen so far this year is any indication than the sparkle is all gone. All we are left with now is mediocre stuff made by mediocre people who do a shitty job of copying the stuff people better than them made in the past.

I'm actually getting to the point where I don't want to join any site because I fear that I'm going to be more disappointed than anything else with the content and I'm not talking about new sites but some of my favorite ones.

Here is part of why I'm dissatisfied.

1-Many of the models being promoted tend to have tattoos which of itself isn't always a problem but these women tend to have them in the wrong place and/or they have some very large ones.

2-Too many of the new models are just too wooden in their performance or can't fake an orgasm and that reduces the heat level of any scene they appear in.

3-Too many of the models are in porn to get noticed and by default allow them to increase their escort rate or they simply didn't realise what porn was like and they disappear before they make a splash. In either case us fans get teased but never get satisfied.

4-We are losing too many established performers because of a lack of jobs and that means we are stock with only new girls and I have already said what is wrong with that.

5-Too many porn scenes go for the extreme stuff rather than the passion and we are stuck with mediocre porn with an emphasis on clinical views of genitalia being penetrated rather than two people enjoying their bodies.

6-Where as kissing gone? There was a time when two people having sex would actually kiss each other. These days I see more girls licking another girls ass than actually kissing her mouth. I'm no scientist but if it's a choice between kissing a girls mouth or her ass. The mouth is always going to win.

7-There are new trends like rosebud porn. Most medical students will never see a woman's innards but we are stuck at having to watch two or more girls play with their own or their partner.

8-Where have all the good male performers gone. I know not everybody cares about that but I always did because if there is a guy in the scene than I prefer that he not look like a refugee from a puck rock concert. I always apply the same rules for guys as I do for girls and that includes tattoos. If he as a ton of them then it's going to be a distraction. It also doesn't help that they aren't very good actors and don't seem to know what to do with a woman. Mind you if rumors are correct than too many of them seem to come from the gay side of the industry which might explain why they don't know what to do with a woman. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-05-14  06:21pm - 46 days Interesting article about X-Art and their copyright defence (18 Posts) - #18
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^You are luckier than me because none of my old favorites manage to put out more than a couple of decent scenes per month. I use to join about a dozen different site just a few years ago and now join about once or twice a year and manage to get about 6 to 10 videos that I may keep long term. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-05-14  09:07am - 47 days Interesting article about X-Art and their copyright defence (18 Posts) - #16
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Not even back then. The porn made in the 80's was so much better than most of the stuff made after the 80's that it's not even funny. There are so few good porn scenes made today that like you I'm not even joining sites that want me for a member for 5$. I keep getting these offers and I can't be bothered to part ways with less money than I spend on coffee during one week. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-05-14  09:03am - 47 days Google says no more porn ads. (36 Posts) - #34
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Let's beginning to analyze what you wrote. I'll use the US for my post.

1-Of course the internet wants to be live TV. Once upon a time there were only 3 channels to chose from and they each shared in the great pie of TV advertising. Than Fox came unto the scene to make it 4 networks and then a few more joined the party. Not long after Fox there appeared this magical thing called cable and that opened up some amazing new territories that network TV could never venture into.

All of these things have one thing in common. They all have ads that generate profit for them. Networks have more of them but they are much bigger and by default cost more to operate.

2-If you think the porn made today is les nasty than what they were making a decade ago than you clearly haven't watched any new stuff. I will say that there is a lot less being made now but Tube Sites are responsible for that.

3-You don't need a license to operate a porn site at this moment so your statement is incorrect. It may be that some day you will need one but who knows when or if it will happen.

4-In a sense you are correct that there is controlled news and entertainment but it's certainly not controlled by the government. If it was than Fox news would not exist while the Democrats are in power. The people that control news and entertainment are in fact filthy rich corporations out to do one thing. Make obscene amounts of money. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-04-14  05:40pm - 47 days Happy 4th of July !! (4 Posts) - #3
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Happy 4th of July. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-03-14  06:46pm - 48 days Google says no more porn ads. (36 Posts) - #30
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I don't want to attack you but that sentiment is exactly why the US is up shits creek when it comes to gun deaths. We aren't talking about freedom of speech or freedom of religion where often the worst that can happen is that someone's feeling are hurt. We are talking about allowing anyone and I mean anyone to buy weapons that are designed to kill as quickly and as efficiently living things and sadly these living things tend to be other human beings.

No ones freedom should include the right to own an assault rifle with large magazine and a large part of the reason is that when you own a weapon and you don't like Catholics, Jews, Blacks, Hispanics blondes, brunettes or girls under the age of 12 than all you have to do is buy bullets walk outside and start shooting at whatever target annoys you.

A man walked into a school and shot 20 children under the age of six and you are telling me that it was his freedom to own those guns? You are certainly not going to tell me that he was mentally unstable and he shouldn't have had access to those weapons because nowhere in the constitution does it say that only sane people should have those guns. I'd be willing to bet that mostly mass shootings involved a person that was mentally unstable. Long live the Brown Coats.

07-01-14  07:03am - 51 days Google says no more porn ads. (36 Posts) - #23
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Many people ignorantly look at firearms and think ending the use ends violence, no it ends your constitutional right.


It's the standard statement that is heard from almost every person that is pro gun but I think that it's an incorrect one as it implies that the Founding Fathers wanted every American to own a gun when they wrote the Constitution.

Let's say for argument sake that it's exactly what they wanted. The weapon of choice in the 1600 to 1700 was a musket rifle. A very nice and efficient weapon but by no means was it an easy weapon to use, reload and fire. A bow and arrow was probably an easier weapon to use and you could shoot a lot more arrows than you could load and fire a musket. Range and damage inflicted was where a musket was superior to bows.

I'm Canadian so it's understandable that I have a different view on guns than my US neighbor because most Canadians don't own a gun and those that do tend to keep it at the firing range. A Rifle is more common but again the number is still quite small when compared with the total number of people living in Canada.

Enough of my rant on guns.

I don't think you can use the argument that Google wanting to remove porn adds is an attack on your First Amendment Rights. It's only one corporation doing this. I agree that it's a huge one but the last corporation to have drawn a line in regards to porn was the technological fight between VHS and Beta. We all know who lost that battle and why they lost. No porn adds on Google does not prevent anyone from joining a porn site. All it does is make it harder for honest porn sites to advertise but it also makes it hard for dishonest tube sites from advertising which might be a good thing for porn. I'm willing to bet that Google will bring porn adds back the day it starts to hurt their pocket book. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-28-14  06:17pm - 53 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (639 Posts) - #679
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I did some quick research and I think you should avoid this site. Most of the pics I saw were all tagged 2011 so they are 3 yeas old and frankly this site feels more like some kind of escort site than anything else. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-22-14  12:25pm - 60 days "A Rosebud By Any Other Name..." (25 Posts) - #19
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Of course if the legal age for doing porn was 17 then many studios would shoot 17 year old girls. How many of them currently don't shoot 18 or 19 years old on moral grounds? None because they don't really care. Condoms have been used in porn for at least 30 years and some studios like Wicked have used them since day one but it has taken a law for studios to start talking about using them.

The main reason 2257 exists is because too many 17 years old were getting into the industry and it was next to impossible to track these young men and women, Now that there is a law and the producer is responsible if the person he shoots is underage then he has no excuses. In return he has the protection of said law since he can show that he has all the legal papers issued by a Government agency. Tracy Lord did porn at 15 and she managed to do that because she had a drivers license saying that she was 18. She couldn't do it today because someone would find out that she isn't and producers would be protected from themselves. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-21-14  11:18am - 61 days "A Rosebud By Any Other Name..." (25 Posts) - #16
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Parsnip:


I don't get the analogy with sport - unless fans are being sexually aroused by watching close-up detail of deliberately inflicted injuries,


Where to start with this. Maybe I missed a post but where did anyone say that watching football has the same effect as watching porn? The analogy between extreme sex acts and playing football is that most football players only think of the money they will make from playing football without considering the possibility of long term health problems the same way that most porn performers do when shooting porn. It's hard to know if both players and performers would still do what they do if they were truly informed because it's never been attempted.

Originally Posted by Parsnip:


The are two crucial quotes in the article, one is that "everyone is pressured to do anal", the other is "they make you sign a waiver before doing this kind of scene".


Yes it's true that every performer is pressured into doing anal and once upon a time women could say no and still get plenty of work but those days are gone. In fact doing anal will in no way guarantee that you get tons of offer but if a woman is really smart than she can make a few large sums of money for her first(s). The sad reality is that there are now too few studios shooting porn and way too much available talent that few people actually make a decent living from porn. Most women and some men do porn to get the chance to be a pornstar escort as opposed to a regular escort.

As for the waiver thing. I believe this is for rosebud anal only. I'm not aware of any waiver a girl has to sign prior to doing regular anal but frankly you are shit out of luck in either case because a performer is on her own when it comes to on-set accidents. How many performers have ever sued a porn company? Long live the Brown Coats.

06-18-14  06:30pm - 63 days "A Rosebud By Any Other Name..." (25 Posts) - #8
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by biker:


Look at sports. There are football linemen that take 15 minutes to get out of bed,


You are correct but just because it happens doesn't mean that it should and I'd like to point out that the league is being sued for large sums of money because of what you wrote. There are plenty of football players with long term injuries that have little if any money to take care of these problems.

I'd also like to use your post to address what others wrote.
I don't believe that most of the performers are truly aware of the long term harm in attempting or even doing multiple rosebuds. They are for the most part very young women who don't look at the long term harm of most of what they do on film. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-15-14  12:18pm - 67 days Upcoming Movie Thread (1202 Posts) - #1223
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I'll never fault Cameron for anything he does (movie wise)because he has a vision and he's willing to give it all to make it happen. I'm sure he is not the only one but how many directors in Hollywood can say that they have such an amazing a track record.

Titanic was impressive but it pales in comparison to his earlier movie The Abyss. That was an impressive movie. Filming under water in an unfinished reactor is just mind blowing. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-15-14  12:10pm - 67 days Happy Father's Day (2 Posts) - #2
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I second the sentiment. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-15-14  12:09pm - 67 days Google says no more porn ads. (36 Posts) - #12
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Although I agree with everybody that this is a corporation trying to play the moral card when their business practices are far from moral but is anyone really a loser in this particular decision? Let me explain. I rarely use Google for porn search because 99.9% of all my results are tube and torrent sites. The days where I could enter certain key words and actually get decent links are long gone.

It's much better for a porn site to go the route of TBP/PU or similar review sites. I know you'll say there are no other sites similar to TBP/PU and you are correct but there are still some decent porn review sites. Sites might as well save whatever money they were using for U because they might get a lot more traffic and it's great for customers because they can get access to some great deals by using the TBP/PU links.

Porn is in deep financial trouble in large part because people can easily find free porn just by Googling for it. Advertising has not helped prevent that so the fact that sites can no longer advertise on Google should not affect their bottom dollar. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-11-14  06:27pm - 70 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #42
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Although a dental dam law may get pass sometime in the future. The current AB1576 does not consider oral sex when it mentions protection and that is the one being talked about. There is no doubt that performers are developing an STI through oral sex but since most of them will also have vaginal and possibly anal sex with the infected partner than the fact that they may have contracted the STI through the oral part of the scene is mostly academic.

As much as the industry keeps saying that AB 1576 is going to be bad for business. The truth is that Wicked is in the top 3 most profitable porn studios right now and all their movies have condoms in them so condoms isn't the real issue.
Having to pay for the test isn't even much of a problem. The simple truth is that the industry would rather talk about anything other than the fact that Manwin who owns most porn publication has well as almost every tube site has been screwing with the industry for nearly a decade to the point where no one makes huge amounts of money. You have the odd studio who still makes a profit but most can barely stay afloat and that includes some big players. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-10-14  05:53pm - 71 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #37
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Here's why AB1576 had to exist and more importantly has to be implemented.

http://www.mikesouth.com/ Long live the Brown Coats.

06-06-14  06:27pm - 75 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #36
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^&^^Here are the problems with allowing "real couples" to go bareback in their penetration scene.

1-How could you prove that the two performers are in a real relationship? I'm not taking the word of a producer who has a vested interest a scene bareback and I don't think an OSHA inspector will.

2-Even if you could prove it then how could you prove that they are in an exclusive relationship? There are currently plenty of performer in relationships and they do shoot the odd scene together but they also shoot with plenty of other performers so.

3-Allowing real coupes to shoot bareback scenes won't change the fact that producers still have to pay for the STD test and that is by far the main reason why studios are fighting this law. Long live the Brown Coats.

06-01-14  01:11pm - 81 days blowjobs with condom (6 Posts) - #2
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
You'll have a big problem with this type of fetish because I don't think it's required in any Country so no one shoots BJ scenes with condoms. May be one day they will but don't hold your breath. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-31-14  06:44pm - 81 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #27
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I'm going to take you at your word and assume that what you wrote is the truth so first let me ask you who's rights are being violated with the condom law? I mean it doesn't prevent anyone from shooting with anyone else. All it does is force studios to use condoms during the penetration part of their scenes. I know some have made the argument that the rights of performers to shoot their scenes bareback is being violated but since so many performers now escort and I assume most use a condom than where is the problem with them also using one while doing porn? Especially since it's been proven that you can no longer trust the STI test performers have. Some have used the excuse that condoms cause friction and this can add to the possibility of them getting an infection but Wicked has been using condoms for decades and no one has ever complained so that excuse is hard to accept.

Now as to your choosing to not wear a seatbelt. Why would you do that? A seatbelt is meant to save your life in the event of an accident so you are telling me that you don't care whether you live or die simply because someone in the past made a law based on scientific studies that seatbelts saved more lives than they cost. You do know that makes absolutely no sense. I'd also like to point out that enforcing seatbelt laws probably cost government more money than not doing that because people who used to die in car accidents, prior to seatbelt laws, now survive and cost more money for their medical treatments and rehabilitation. Long live the Brown Coats. Edited on May 31, 2014, 06:50pm

05-31-14  08:10am - 82 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #25
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


California,

This is not like seat belts and helmets where the lack of use affects everyone. Its in at the privacy of a studio and art is being done does the government need or should have that right ? I say no.


It's the exact same thing. I don't know if you are aware but motorcycle owners bitched and fought tooth and nail for decades trying to prevent the government from passing any kind of helmet law. The most common statement was usually that it's their right to go without a helmet because it's their life and they can do what they wanted with it. That is only true if you live alone on a desert island but you can't say that if you don't. One person's actions affect more than themselves. It affects their family and friends as well as complete strangers who's life is affected when that free person crashes his bike and requires the services of paramedics, doctors, nurses, polices officers who will have to deal with someone who didn't care enough about the others to wear a helmet while riding a high speed vehicle.

It's no different for the condom debate because the people in the porn industry don't live on a desert island where their actions affect only themselves. In fact it's much worse because unlike a bike helmet. One infected person will automatically infect at least one more person by not wearing a condom. Since so many porn performers now escort on a regular basis than their actions can also infect non-performers.

Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


There will come a time and I will laugh my ass off when you will be sued for not wearing a condom during sex.

Rant Over.


You must already be laughing your ass off because I'm sure that people are getting sued, as I write this, because they did not wear a condom during sex and infected their sexual partner. If not that then guys are getting a nice lawyers letter stating that they are now the father of a beautiful baby and must start paying child support. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-28-14  06:10pm - 84 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #19
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^You'll have to show me where this law prevents anyone other than porn performers from doing what they want with their genitals because all it does is make sure that all performers wear a condom during vaginal or anal penetration.

The biggest California porn studio has been using condoms for penetrations scenes for decades and no one prior to the last 2-3 years had any issue with them. In fact Manwin bought Wicked knowing that they only shot porn with condoms and Manwin is part of the group who's against condoms. Is there any logic in that? Long live the Brown Coats.

05-26-14  05:23pm - 86 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #17
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I won't comment on the level of regulation for anything else but I have no problem whatsoever with the government getting involved in the porn industry. Performers are getting infected as we speak because some of the people in charge are to cheap and uncaring to want their performers to wear a condom during penetration. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-25-14  06:15pm - 87 days Upcoming Movie Thread (1202 Posts) - #1221
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^No they weren't. The only reason why Titanic became the hit that it was is because there was a love story between two beautiful young people. You take that out of the movie or girls decide that it's not a believable love story and Titanic becomes the most expensive flop in the history of cinema. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-25-14  06:11pm - 87 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #14
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Kink.com has been thinking of moving out of San Francisco for a while now,


I don't know if they will move but I don't think condoms has anything to do with it since office space is at a very high premium in San Francisco and converting the armory in office space would make Peter Acworth countless millions of dollars. Of course if he choses to sell/convert the armory and move to Las Vegas to open a new studio than he is a major idiot because whatever money he will make from the armory will quickly get eaten up opening a new studio in Las Vegas. Not to mention that he will never be able to offer the same type of porn he currently does because the armory gives him multiple studios to shoot from, kitchens and dinning rooms office space for the staff and finally it also has sleeping quarters for staff and performers. None of these things will be possible anywhere else.

Now if Acworth wants to leave porn than selling/converting the armory is a great way to make a huge pile of money but that's it. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-24-14  12:10pm - 89 days Credit card porn guidelines in US (20 Posts) - #5
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I never use logic when discussing what you can and cannot buy with a credit card because it would be an exercise in futility. What I will say is that there are still some sites with a large percentage of water sports but as far as I know they are all Eastern European in nature. I'm not certain but I think that seeing blood and/or fecal matter in your content is likely to get you blacklisted by every CC Processor. The first because whatever you are shooting is likely to be dangerous to the health of the performer and the later because anything containing fecal matter is considered scat porn and that is probably illegal to show on the net and sell. I'm not saying that it doesn't exist but that I certainly wouldn't want to own a studio that offers this type of content. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-24-14  11:59am - 89 days AB 1576 passes committee (44 Posts) - #10
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,911
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I don't know if you are aware but Acworth is one of the people who is so far up shit creek with OSHA because of serious violations that he's now spent the last year or so spewing BS to try and discredit anyone pro-condom bill. Long live the Brown Coats.

1-50 of 2911 Posts Page 1 2 11 20 29 38 47 58 59 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.29 seconds.