Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Monahan (42)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (334)  |   Threads Started (10)

1-50 of 334 Posts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page >

11-19-14  09:43pm - 31 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #758
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I see it differently because if TBP/PU list the site than they are in fact supporting what I consider to be a scam site. You may have a different opinion of what a scam site is but mine is simple. If a site (like yours) which does not show a join price anywhere on their preview section and actually goes out of it's way to make it appear as though it's free than it's scamming people.

Why not choose a site with similar content that TBP shows as being active to talk about instead of trying to get a site that looks fishy reinstated.


I agree with Pat. The PU/TBP site has four levels of business practice notifications:

1. No comments or warnings - I interpret this as no indication of bad practices by the site. (A solid green light)

2. Cross check warnings - I interpret this as a no indication of bad practices by the site except the caution to a member of the site to be aware of cross checked options appearing in the signup process. (A flashing yellow (caution) light)

3. Posting of a site but no evaluations and a notice that TBP does not accept the business practices of the site - I interpret this as acknowledgement of the site but that TBP will not go any further. (A flashing red light (stop and check the situation before proceeding))

4. Not posting a site (such as the one under discussion) - The site fails in one or more respects to qualify for inclusion on the site - I interpret this as being a loud and clear signal that the site should be avoided. (A do not enter sign)

That's why I find PU/TBP to be superior to any of the other review sites and what makes this thread useful in addressing sites that are new or are reactivations of previously dormant sites.

That's also why, in my opinion, a site like AmericanKittens.com with its current business practices should not be included in the PU site unless and until it uses legitimate business practices. Edited on Nov 19, 2014, 09:53pm

11-17-14  02:01pm - 34 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #751
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I don't think pretending to be drunk is illegal per say but I certainly wouldn't want to be the company who shot those types of scenes if they don't also happen to have a video of the girl saying that it's all pretend after the scene/ Otherwise an enterprising young lady with a lawyer could take those fools to court by saying that she wasn't pretending and that she was drunk and they took advantage of her.


I was able to access the site and watched the preview loop. Good quality video, but that's about the only positive thing I can say about it. But that's a personal perspective. I don't get the drunk thing, a girl who is totally skunked isn't my idea of a sexy babe in a sexy scene.

In any case, as I always say different strokes for different strokers.

11-16-14  11:24am - 35 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #746
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Sorry, I asked an editor to take a look and, as Pat predicted, they declined to re-list since the site says it's only opening memberships until Dec 1st.

You can still discuss it if you'd like.

Sorry I couldn't help more.


FWIW, I went to this site's URL yesterday and saw the offer that goes away on 12/1/14. I bookmarked it so I could check it out when I had more time. When I came back the link didn't work, so I assume that the site is closed to new business already.

Also worthy of note, the headline on the site had a comment that it was rated #1 by Rabbits Reviews. Rabbits Reviews has nothing at all on WDGirls.com.

Looks to be like this site is flaky (why else will they close enrollments?) and, contradictorily, is willing to prevaricate in its promotional material.

I think I will give these guys a wide berth and wait until they choose to go mainstream, if they do, and see what TBP has to say when (if) TBP does a review.

09-06-14  12:06am - 106 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #683
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
TessaFowler.com

She's got great knockers and apparently just created a new website.

08-06-14  11:06pm - 136 days Should PU add a thread labelled RIP for good porn sites that have bit the dust? (28 Posts) - #16
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


1. A site's TBP listing page will tell you who the current owner is.

2. A site's TBP listing page (under Content Updates) will tell you the last time a site updated.


1. Yes, but there's no way to know when a change occurs and who the previous owner was.

2. Didn't know that but I do now! That's a great feature. Might be a good idea for me to spend more time reading everything first.

08-05-14  04:26pm - 138 days Should PU add a thread labelled RIP for good porn sites that have bit the dust? (28 Posts) - #14
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Good idea, but two thoughts.

1. With the virtual destruction of Twistys.com by the site's new owner. But it continues as if it's the same terrific site. What would be great would be an ownership change report on PU or TBP.

2. With many sites becoming dormant or nearly dormant with few if any new updates, it would be a great addition to the site facts page of TBP to indicate the dormancy and, if there's any back story info available, whether it will be rejuvenated.

05-23-14  07:57pm - 212 days myporn.com - first look! (73 Posts) - #70
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Not being a tekki but being a part of management where I work, I must applaud the patience and thoroughness these guys are putting in.

There always is the temptation to show the world all the wonderful things developed and to "show off" a bit.

I love the concept, all too often lacking in web development, of let's do it right the first time.

The sign in my office says, " whu is it we never have time to do it right the first time but always have time to go in the second time and fix the mistakes?"

01-09-14  09:51am - 346 days A warning about an email offer that you might get (12 Posts) - #7
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by biker:


I don't join unless it is through TBP. Someone sends me an Email. I just ignore it. I get these specials about once a month. Please return. We have a bargain for you. Special discount. It is all the same BS.


Ditto that. Whenever I get any super duper special offer from any site I immediately go to TBP and PU and check it out. If it's not listed, I'm gone. If it is listed I read the reviews and comments before I even go to the site.

So far only a small number of these sites show up on TBP/PU, and those that do are reported to be dormant.

01-09-14  09:45am - 346 days myporn.com - first look! (73 Posts) - #10
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I really like the new layout and am looking forward to it because it pulls in everything I use the site for (except the forum...which should be separate anyway).

My one concern is that stuff is added to the new site just for "wowsie" and not for legitimate functionality. So far it doesn't look like "wowsie" is the objective.

01-09-14  09:38am - 346 days Advanced economics (26 Posts) - #18
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Interesting discussion. I've been a member of VideoBox for at least 8 years. Their monthly rate is $15.00 regular and $12.00 at PU's special rate.

VB posts 5 full DVD's per day, 365 days a year, which means a member gets access to an average of 150 full length videos per month, or 10 cents per video. The average video has five scenes so the rice per scene is $0.02. Yes, they do have some "crap" but at 2 cents per scene I('m fine with that, especially because they have a lot more superb stuff than "crap.".

jook's point is that his site Trike Patrol charges $30 per month for 4 or 5 updates, total. That's $5.00 to $7.70 per update, which I suspect is a single scene.

How does VB stay in business? I suspect that it's because they have a ton of subscribers; a direct result of their great price. Trike Patrol serves a special niche which means their stuff is probably high quality but it probably has a much smaller subscriber base.

That means Trike Patrol has to cover its costs with far fewer customers.

The economic concept is fixed vs variable costs. VB pays the same fees/royalties for its content whether they have 20 subscribers or 20,000. The only variable cost of significance is servers and bandwith, the cost of which varies by volume of activity.

That means VB makes more per $12 subscriber than Trike Patrol per $30 subscriber simply because VB's costs are spread over a much larger base than Trike Patrol's.

11-17-13  08:48pm - 399 days Can't decide which network (9 Posts) - #9
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Some long term (more than one month) memberships where I felt the content was worth the price based on quality and frequency of updates are:

Twistys (mostly softcore and midcore with some hardcore)
DDF Network (mostly hardcore Eurobabes)
VideoBox (5 hardcore movie updates daily at a really low price)
MetArt (mostly photos, all softcore but superb quality)

05-19-13  12:51am - 581 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #94
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's Chandra West, a Canadian actress who appears in several TV shows and a few movies...but what a babe!


Edited on May 19, 2013, 12:55am Edited by Staff on May 19, 2013, 07:02am

05-11-13  02:34pm - 589 days Pornorganizer, (28 Posts) - #2
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Good post. I have the same question. I've seen "tags" lately on sites that would be great for my collection (which is set up by model name with subdirectories for each model for the source).

But I have no idea how to create "tags" or even if I can. If I could "tag" I would do it by genre (solo, b/g, bj, etc.) by alias(es) and by charachteristics (big naturals, anal, etc.) Edited on May 12, 2013, 08:56am

05-06-13  10:45pm - 593 days Upcoming Movie Thread (1202 Posts) - #1102
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


When I was in high school, I was taught that fiction is supposed to have internal consistency.

That was many years ago.

Since then, movies and comic books have evolved, to where internal consistency seems to be ignored at will. That is especially true in comic book and fantasy/sci-fi.

Although I think that internal consistency makes for a solid approach, I think most people don't give a hoot. They go to a movie to see amazing spectacles, gee-whiz action and explosions.


True. Major examples are each of the James Bond movies.

05-06-13  08:47am - 594 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #615
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Khan, thanks for checking.

Based on the preview sites for primecups.com and fistflush.com, two of DEV8's previously owned sites, it doesn't look like there have been any updates since 2009. However I like the quality of their stuff but couldn't afford the monthly charge. Now that they are finally offering all ten of their sites for a single price, I will sign up to drain what's there. I'll post a comment once I've done some exploration and have something to report.

05-05-13  06:11pm - 595 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #91
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by etna:


Isla Fisher and Melissa George.




Edited on May 05, 2013, 06:18pm

05-05-13  05:00pm - 595 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #613
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Hey Khan,

Not really on topic but I just decided to go to Primecups.com, at one time operated by Dev8, that stopped updating back in 2009. They had several sites with similar site design and production techniques.

It appears that an outfit named perfectgonzo now owns & operates these sites and their join page says they offer access to all their sites for a single subscription. Dev8 never had a combo offer per se but they did offer a site that picked off several updates from each site at the standard $30 per month price.

My question is, have you ever heard of perfectgonzo and are they a trusted (by TBP) site operator?

05-03-13  10:16pm - 597 days Have you noticed .. or panty lovers lament?! (22 Posts) - #20
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by luv lickn clit:


Monahan, I'm guessing you're not a current member at Met-Art, because most of their sets do start fully clothed, and there are very few fully nude sets. I did a count on the last 80 sets (about 3 weeks worth), and 51 of 80 started with the girl clothed (no breasts or pussy showing). Are you thinking of Femjoy?

Despite the high percentage of intially clothed sets, the models typically lose the clothes fast, and there are very few good strip sequences. The photographer Antonio Clemens does the best job of photographing strip sequences.

Messmer, I also counted how many of the last 80 sets had panties. It was only 25 of 80, and maybe half of those had the full frontal shots you describe. Met-Art is a good site, but strip-tease and panties are not their forte.


You nailed it. I was a member of MetArt for over a year but dropped the site in early 2012. The primary reason I moved on was there were few shots with even lingerie in tease situations.

If they have changed their approach I may return.

05-02-13  08:00am - 598 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #89
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
And of course there's Brittney Spears.


05-02-13  07:58am - 598 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #88
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Don't forget Lindsay Lohan. [Although some might classify her as a porn star with this photo:

05-01-13  08:30am - 599 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #607
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's another - a single model site...clubkatrin.com. It features a babe who has a range of names including Katrin Kozy, Kathy Kozy and Katrina Hartlova...and a great set of all natural hooters. Edited by Staff on May 01, 2013, 09:10am (Khan: direct link edited)

04-28-13  11:24pm - 601 days Have you noticed .. or panty lovers lament?! (22 Posts) - #13
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I am the same way, CT. That's why I've never subscribed to sites like MetArt because I assume they are mostly nude studies. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.


You are correct. Almost all of MetArt's photo sets start totally naked.

Me, Iove panties and especially when they are played with like a panty wedgie. Here's an example (Kathia Nobili):



I'm also into another use of panties...panty stuffing (Xena Wilkes):



Then there are crotchless panties (love them when the babe leaves them on whilst being porked):



And its cousin, a crotchless topless monokini:

Edited on Apr 28, 2013, 11:41pm

04-28-13  11:03pm - 601 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #83
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Lindsey Vonn (Olympic skier and Tiger Wood's current main squeeze)



And, referring to CT's post (#82), Bob Hope had it right with his theme song, "Thanks for the Mammaries." Edited on May 02, 2013, 07:53am

04-27-13  10:51pm - 602 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #79
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Heidi Klum



Megyn Kelly (Fox)

Edited on Apr 27, 2013, 11:34pm

04-26-13  11:12am - 604 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #605
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
How about hitomi tanaka's site? She's the Japanese sensation with an absolutely incredible rack. Her site address is hitomitanakaxxx.com

03-03-13  01:18pm - 658 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #592
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Actually that's great news. I was hoping the site was legit and had some quality. Based on the write-ups for Teasers VOD, I'm going to take the plunge.

03-03-13  08:15am - 658 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #590
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's one that is not listed on PU.

bestpublicflashing.com/

The good news is that the preview site looks great and its biller is the always reliable EPOCH.com.

The bad news is that it looks like they became inactive in November 2011.

While I'm tempted to sign up for a month, I won't until I see some comments from PU members and/or TBP staff first. (Having been burned several times I no longer will sign up for any site "in the blind.") Edited by Staff on Mar 03, 2013, 08:24am (Khan: direct link URL edited/corrected)

02-18-13  08:23am - 671 days Condoms visible. (27 Posts) - #27
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by graymane:



...STOP ... I said STOP ... saturating fuck scenes with so much closeups. The outrageous, absurd, nonsensical, extravagant time cameramen burn up with endless shots of this guy's balls and hairy ass atop a form whose only body part is the mound of a vagina ... simply blows the mind.

The scenes are perpetually starved for more angle shots, of which are so fleeting, because the dumb-ass behind the camera must hurriedly get back parking his lens on the same old balls-an'-ass closeup...



NAILED IT!!!

The rubber issue has become a big thing because of the amount of time the schlong appears as the primary object in a scene.

It's intuitive. Read the earlier posts that discuss condoms in gay porn and you get the message. Edited on Feb 18, 2013, 09:09pm

02-17-13  08:44am - 672 days Condoms visible. (27 Posts) - #21
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I agree that this subject should be revisited. In the November 2012 election LA County voters passed an initiative that requires condom use in porn productions.

See: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/11/condoms-porn-county-enforce.html

The vast majority of US porn production activity is done in LA County with Miami coming in a distant second.

Being an LA taxpayer I would have preferred the initiative go down to defeat because the huge amount the porn industry pays in taxes presumably saves me paying even more than I do now.

But my feelings about condom use that I expressed a few years ago in this thread haven't changed one bit and I would hope that mine ultimately is the prevailing view.

12-29-12  09:41am - 722 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #549
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Just a little followup on my previous reply (#519 above) ...

It looks lik this one has been relisted now. You may enter your remarks at:
http://www.pornusers.com/review/ilovebitties/

Hope that helps.


I just posted a note. Looks like the site is inactive. Still has promise for historical research for those of us working toward our PhD in Applied Mammary Sciences. ;->

(PhD = Piled high & Deep) Edited on Dec 29, 2012, 11:11am

11-11-12  03:33pm - 770 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #532
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


This one is now added. You may enter your remarks at:
http://www.pornusers.com/review/rylskyart/

We'll look forward to seeing your review.


Strange thing. I went to the new TBP/PU home page for this site and the link to the site does not work. I then typed in rylskyart.com into my browser and the preview site popped in.

Looks like it may be as tame as MetArt.

10-27-12  11:14am - 785 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #520
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


That site used to be listed. The listing was pulled in June when our editors discovered the site was having some technical problems. We'll spot check the site from time-to-time and if/when the problems clear up, we'll reactivate the listing.

Hope that helps.


Yes, it does. I'll hang loose until you complete the check.

10-25-12  11:33pm - 786 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #518
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I just stumbled onto a big natural titties site:

Ilovebitties.com

It looks good in the preview site but I've learned never to sign up for a site that has not first been listed on TBP or PO.

10-24-12  08:36am - 788 days Old VHS porn - do you still have it? (22 Posts) - #23
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Very interesting thread.

I still have all of my old VHS tapes (I'm a pack rat by nature), most of which have not been played in at least 10 years. About 75% are dubbed over from rented tapes so the quality is already somewhat degraded, but this thread has me ready to start a project to copy all the "good stuff" to a dedicated external hard drive and toss the original VHS in the dumpster. It seems like a waste of good material but I have no idea what else I can do with it.

Does anyone know if there's an X-Rated EBay-like site out there somewhere?

08-08-12  09:48am - 865 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #490
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by marcdc1:


Forgive me for asking a foolish question I'm still new and finding my way through both the technology and the social norms.

Why does this thread exist? I recently sent an email alerting the TBP/PU team about a missing site and it was quickly added.

What is the purpose of this thread when a simple email seems more efficient.


I mean no disrespect in my post. Thank you everyone.

Speaking only for myself, I like this thread because I'm subscribed to it and it lets me know not only what new stuff is out there but also what PU policies are regarding sites that are not totally pay porn sites but do contain porn material.

Your question is essentially, why a thread like this? My rebuttal question is, why not a thread like this? What's the harm?

This forum is here to give us porndogs an opportunity to discuss virtually anything at all with each other. As far as I know, there is no other web forum out there like the PU forum.

05-04-12  09:30am - 961 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #452
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Another "new" site...maybe. Scoreland2

The preview site says it's "The best of Scoreland...Remastered," so it looks like it's really not a new site; just a way for the old site to make more money by not posting remasters on it's main site. Edited by Staff on May 04, 2012, 02:48pm (Khan: fixed direct link URL)

05-04-12  09:23am - 961 days Areola reduction surgery?!?! (8 Posts) - #7
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


This is even more disgusting. Scroll all the way down to see the mutilation and butchery being done on these women.

http://www.poustiplasticsurgery.com/case...cone-gel-implants-3/

Wow! What a total shame. In the "before" photo the babe has a rack that totally turns me on. All natural, perfect nips and large areolae.

Butchery is the right term.

05-04-12  09:18am - 961 days Is this a new site trend or is it just getting under my skin? (6 Posts) - #3
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Thanks RA for raising this issue. I don't like it either and for the same reasons, plus, if I'm moving quickly, I may not realize that a "streamer" may be lurking in background only to show up much later when I'm closing down.

BTW I always turn my speakers off all the time. If I want sound, I'll switch them on again, but only then.

04-13-12  11:19pm - 981 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #447
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Just a note to let you know the TBP Editors are looking into this one. Seems the site is non-English but does have an English version of the tour. Our editors have written the webmaster. What they find out will decide if the site can be listed.

I'll let you know if/when that happens.


Thanks. If they choose not to reply to the TBP Editors then that's a, sort of, backhanded way of saying theirs may not be a good site on which to spend my money.

Jack.

04-08-12  10:53am - 987 days Which Female was born to be the Best Pornstar (48 Posts) - #47
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Venus (aka Venus Knight, Angelica Costello and a few other names) is gorgeous with a great rack (even though it had some aftermarket adjustments made) and a totally erotic style.

04-07-12  04:48pm - 988 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #443
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Another site not listed is melissateen.com which features Met Art model Koika, AKA Maria Kusnetsova or Melissa Kusnetsova . She's the model that got a lot of exposure in the 2006-8 time frame on Met Art with the impossibly puffy areolae and a very sweet innocent face. (No, she's NOT Jelena Kusnetzova, the tennis player.)

I;m thinking about joining the site because her Met Art stuff is gentle softcore, very gentle, and I've seen about a half dozen clips where she's doing a lot more stuff like finger inserts and one rather heavy lesbian scene where there is some great nipple sucking going on.

My hesitation is the price; 29.95 Euros (about $40.00 US) which is way over my maximum price point. That's why this post; I'll never sign up for any site without some info from PU or TBP, especially one this expensive.

There are 11 other sites listed that come with the membership, all with decent preview sites with great looking content ranging from soft to full hard core content.

03-03-12  08:50pm - 1023 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #441
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
In doing a search for Jana Jordan/Jana Foxy content, I ran into a new (to me)site - Take Her Easy. There are 3 "bonus sites" listed in the signup:

Pussy Eating Club (listed on TBP with no review)
Petite Teen Confessions (listed on TBP with no review)
Big Tit Perverts
(not listed on TBP) Edited on Mar 03, 2012, 08:59pm

02-27-12  09:15am - 1028 days Question about ALS site (6 Posts) - #7
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I'm a video guy because I love the action; but I also grab a lot of photos of my favorite babes.

Yes, ALS has a ton of similar photos in a set, but I like that because I can cull out the ones that I really don't need to save. I'd rather make the call on what pix are keepers than rely on some anonymous horndog that doesn't necessarily share my tastes in porn.

11-13-11  09:40am - 1134 days No porn for you ! (13 Posts) - #13
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:



* P.S.: Here's a simple Wikipedia graphic to illustrate my point. Generally, the more tolerant of porn, then the freer the country.

Very interesting. I wonder what's up with Australia.

I saw more PTA* on Bondi Beach than in my local "gentlemen's club" last winter (their summertime) yet they restrict porno? I suspect there's an oops in the map.

*PTA = pussy tits and ass

11-13-11  09:32am - 1134 days Penn State Scandal (16 Posts) - #13
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
My opinion is that the situation has not been fully disclosed because there's more, a lot more, that we don't really know yet.

For example, is it possible that JoePa played by the rules and reported the matter to the police and the police, who are for all intents and purposes, part of the University, covered it up?

I really suspect there's a whole lot of rot under the surface that has yet to be disclosed and that Paterno is simply the sacrificial lamb. Why else was the University President fired?

11-09-11  10:42pm - 1137 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #420
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
How about paulraymond.com? Edited by Staff on Nov 10, 2011, 06:32am (Khan: corrected direct link URL syntax)

11-06-11  09:00pm - 1141 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #415
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's another site not listed on PU.

secretease.com/ - Secretease

It looks like a softcore site ("midcore" really because it's got insertions in the preview site) focused on secretaries in varying states of undress.

The pricing seems reasonable at $15 per month. Edited by Staff on Nov 07, 2011, 07:12am (Khan: corrected direct link URL syntax)

11-05-11  01:38pm - 1142 days Threads Listed in TBP/PU That Appesr To Be Inactive (1 Posts) - Original Post - #1
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Threads Listed in TBP/PU That Appesr To Be Inactive

I don't know how to communicate apparently inactive sites to TBP/PU management so I'm starting this thread.

MFLGirls.com appears to be out of business.

10-17-11  08:51am - 1161 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (720 Posts) - #400
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I just found MONDOLABIA.COM [http://mondolabia.com/] that is devoted to lovely, large, long and lickable labias.

At $25 per month I'm tempted...but my rule is never to sign up for any site before it is officially recognized by Porn Users/TBP.

Burned before but never again. Edited on Oct 17, 2011, 10:05am

09-22-11  08:56am - 1186 days the Official ABRACADABRA Thread (32 Posts) - #16
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 334
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
There are two acronyms that a call center for a software help line told me about.

Diagnosis of a problem - PEBCAK - Problem Exists between Chair and Keyboard.

Case identification:

"this case ID is ten T." ID:10T (idiot)

1-50 of 334 Posts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.11 seconds.