Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Monahan (38)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (327)  |   Threads Started (10)

1-50 of 327 Posts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page >

01-09-14  09:51am - 97 days A warning about an email offer that you might get (12 Posts) - #7
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by biker:


I don't join unless it is through TBP. Someone sends me an Email. I just ignore it. I get these specials about once a month. Please return. We have a bargain for you. Special discount. It is all the same BS.


Ditto that. Whenever I get any super duper special offer from any site I immediately go to TBP and PU and check it out. If it's not listed, I'm gone. If it is listed I read the reviews and comments before I even go to the site.

So far only a small number of these sites show up on TBP/PU, and those that do are reported to be dormant.

01-09-14  09:45am - 97 days myporn.com - first look! (62 Posts) - #10
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I really like the new layout and am looking forward to it because it pulls in everything I use the site for (except the forum...which should be separate anyway).

My one concern is that stuff is added to the new site just for "wowsie" and not for legitimate functionality. So far it doesn't look like "wowsie" is the objective.

01-09-14  09:38am - 97 days Advanced economics (26 Posts) - #18
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Interesting discussion. I've been a member of VideoBox for at least 8 years. Their monthly rate is $15.00 regular and $12.00 at PU's special rate.

VB posts 5 full DVD's per day, 365 days a year, which means a member gets access to an average of 150 full length videos per month, or 10 cents per video. The average video has five scenes so the rice per scene is $0.02. Yes, they do have some "crap" but at 2 cents per scene I('m fine with that, especially because they have a lot more superb stuff than "crap.".

jook's point is that his site Trike Patrol charges $30 per month for 4 or 5 updates, total. That's $5.00 to $7.70 per update, which I suspect is a single scene.

How does VB stay in business? I suspect that it's because they have a ton of subscribers; a direct result of their great price. Trike Patrol serves a special niche which means their stuff is probably high quality but it probably has a much smaller subscriber base.

That means Trike Patrol has to cover its costs with far fewer customers.

The economic concept is fixed vs variable costs. VB pays the same fees/royalties for its content whether they have 20 subscribers or 20,000. The only variable cost of significance is servers and bandwith, the cost of which varies by volume of activity.

That means VB makes more per $12 subscriber than Trike Patrol per $30 subscriber simply because VB's costs are spread over a much larger base than Trike Patrol's.

11-17-13  08:48pm - 149 days Can't decide which network (9 Posts) - #9
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Some long term (more than one month) memberships where I felt the content was worth the price based on quality and frequency of updates are:

Twistys (mostly softcore and midcore with some hardcore)
DDF Network (mostly hardcore Eurobabes)
VideoBox (5 hardcore movie updates daily at a really low price)
MetArt (mostly photos, all softcore but superb quality)

05-19-13  12:51am - 332 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #94
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's Chandra West, a Canadian actress who appears in several TV shows and a few movies...but what a babe!


Edited on May 19, 2013, 12:55am Edited by Staff on May 19, 2013, 07:02am

05-11-13  02:34pm - 339 days Pornorganizer, (28 Posts) - #2
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Good post. I have the same question. I've seen "tags" lately on sites that would be great for my collection (which is set up by model name with subdirectories for each model for the source).

But I have no idea how to create "tags" or even if I can. If I could "tag" I would do it by genre (solo, b/g, bj, etc.) by alias(es) and by charachteristics (big naturals, anal, etc.) Edited on May 12, 2013, 08:56am

05-06-13  10:45pm - 344 days Upcoming Movie Thread (1188 Posts) - #1102
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


When I was in high school, I was taught that fiction is supposed to have internal consistency.

That was many years ago.

Since then, movies and comic books have evolved, to where internal consistency seems to be ignored at will. That is especially true in comic book and fantasy/sci-fi.

Although I think that internal consistency makes for a solid approach, I think most people don't give a hoot. They go to a movie to see amazing spectacles, gee-whiz action and explosions.


True. Major examples are each of the James Bond movies.

05-06-13  08:47am - 345 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #615
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Khan, thanks for checking.

Based on the preview sites for primecups.com and fistflush.com, two of DEV8's previously owned sites, it doesn't look like there have been any updates since 2009. However I like the quality of their stuff but couldn't afford the monthly charge. Now that they are finally offering all ten of their sites for a single price, I will sign up to drain what's there. I'll post a comment once I've done some exploration and have something to report.

05-05-13  06:11pm - 345 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #91
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by etna:


Isla Fisher and Melissa George.




Edited on May 05, 2013, 06:18pm

05-05-13  05:00pm - 345 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #613
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Hey Khan,

Not really on topic but I just decided to go to Primecups.com, at one time operated by Dev8, that stopped updating back in 2009. They had several sites with similar site design and production techniques.

It appears that an outfit named perfectgonzo now owns & operates these sites and their join page says they offer access to all their sites for a single subscription. Dev8 never had a combo offer per se but they did offer a site that picked off several updates from each site at the standard $30 per month price.

My question is, have you ever heard of perfectgonzo and are they a trusted (by TBP) site operator?

05-03-13  10:16pm - 347 days Have you noticed .. or panty lovers lament?! (22 Posts) - #20
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by luv lickn clit:


Monahan, I'm guessing you're not a current member at Met-Art, because most of their sets do start fully clothed, and there are very few fully nude sets. I did a count on the last 80 sets (about 3 weeks worth), and 51 of 80 started with the girl clothed (no breasts or pussy showing). Are you thinking of Femjoy?

Despite the high percentage of intially clothed sets, the models typically lose the clothes fast, and there are very few good strip sequences. The photographer Antonio Clemens does the best job of photographing strip sequences.

Messmer, I also counted how many of the last 80 sets had panties. It was only 25 of 80, and maybe half of those had the full frontal shots you describe. Met-Art is a good site, but strip-tease and panties are not their forte.


You nailed it. I was a member of MetArt for over a year but dropped the site in early 2012. The primary reason I moved on was there were few shots with even lingerie in tease situations.

If they have changed their approach I may return.

05-02-13  08:00am - 349 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #89
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
And of course there's Brittney Spears.


05-02-13  07:58am - 349 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #88
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Don't forget Lindsay Lohan. [Although some might classify her as a porn star with this photo:

05-01-13  08:30am - 350 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #607
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's another - a single model site...clubkatrin.com. It features a babe who has a range of names including Katrin Kozy, Kathy Kozy and Katrina Hartlova...and a great set of all natural hooters. Edited by Staff on May 01, 2013, 09:10am (Khan: direct link edited)

04-28-13  11:24pm - 352 days Have you noticed .. or panty lovers lament?! (22 Posts) - #13
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I am the same way, CT. That's why I've never subscribed to sites like MetArt because I assume they are mostly nude studies. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.


You are correct. Almost all of MetArt's photo sets start totally naked.

Me, Iove panties and especially when they are played with like a panty wedgie. Here's an example (Kathia Nobili):



I'm also into another use of panties...panty stuffing (Xena Wilkes):



Then there are crotchless panties (love them when the babe leaves them on whilst being porked):



And its cousin, a crotchless topless monokini:

Edited on Apr 28, 2013, 11:41pm

04-28-13  11:03pm - 352 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #83
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Lindsey Vonn (Olympic skier and Tiger Wood's current main squeeze)



And, referring to CT's post (#82), Bob Hope had it right with his theme song, "Thanks for the Mammaries." Edited on May 02, 2013, 07:53am

04-27-13  10:51pm - 353 days I wish (********) was a porn star. (95 Posts) - #79
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Heidi Klum



Megyn Kelly (Fox)

Edited on Apr 27, 2013, 11:34pm

04-26-13  11:12am - 355 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #605
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
How about hitomi tanaka's site? She's the Japanese sensation with an absolutely incredible rack. Her site address is hitomitanakaxxx.com

03-03-13  01:18pm - 408 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #592
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Actually that's great news. I was hoping the site was legit and had some quality. Based on the write-ups for Teasers VOD, I'm going to take the plunge.

03-03-13  08:15am - 409 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #590
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's one that is not listed on PU.

bestpublicflashing.com/

The good news is that the preview site looks great and its biller is the always reliable EPOCH.com.

The bad news is that it looks like they became inactive in November 2011.

While I'm tempted to sign up for a month, I won't until I see some comments from PU members and/or TBP staff first. (Having been burned several times I no longer will sign up for any site "in the blind.") Edited by Staff on Mar 03, 2013, 08:24am (Khan: direct link URL edited/corrected)

02-18-13  08:23am - 422 days Condoms visible. (27 Posts) - #27
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by graymane:



...STOP ... I said STOP ... saturating fuck scenes with so much closeups. The outrageous, absurd, nonsensical, extravagant time cameramen burn up with endless shots of this guy's balls and hairy ass atop a form whose only body part is the mound of a vagina ... simply blows the mind.

The scenes are perpetually starved for more angle shots, of which are so fleeting, because the dumb-ass behind the camera must hurriedly get back parking his lens on the same old balls-an'-ass closeup...



NAILED IT!!!

The rubber issue has become a big thing because of the amount of time the schlong appears as the primary object in a scene.

It's intuitive. Read the earlier posts that discuss condoms in gay porn and you get the message. Edited on Feb 18, 2013, 09:09pm

02-17-13  08:44am - 423 days Condoms visible. (27 Posts) - #21
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I agree that this subject should be revisited. In the November 2012 election LA County voters passed an initiative that requires condom use in porn productions.

See: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/11/condoms-porn-county-enforce.html

The vast majority of US porn production activity is done in LA County with Miami coming in a distant second.

Being an LA taxpayer I would have preferred the initiative go down to defeat because the huge amount the porn industry pays in taxes presumably saves me paying even more than I do now.

But my feelings about condom use that I expressed a few years ago in this thread haven't changed one bit and I would hope that mine ultimately is the prevailing view.

12-29-12  09:41am - 473 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #549
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Just a little followup on my previous reply (#519 above) ...

It looks lik this one has been relisted now. You may enter your remarks at:
http://www.pornusers.com/review/ilovebitties/

Hope that helps.


I just posted a note. Looks like the site is inactive. Still has promise for historical research for those of us working toward our PhD in Applied Mammary Sciences. ;->

(PhD = Piled high & Deep) Edited on Dec 29, 2012, 11:11am

11-11-12  03:33pm - 520 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #532
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


This one is now added. You may enter your remarks at:
http://www.pornusers.com/review/rylskyart/

We'll look forward to seeing your review.


Strange thing. I went to the new TBP/PU home page for this site and the link to the site does not work. I then typed in rylskyart.com into my browser and the preview site popped in.

Looks like it may be as tame as MetArt.

10-27-12  11:14am - 536 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #520
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


That site used to be listed. The listing was pulled in June when our editors discovered the site was having some technical problems. We'll spot check the site from time-to-time and if/when the problems clear up, we'll reactivate the listing.

Hope that helps.


Yes, it does. I'll hang loose until you complete the check.

10-25-12  11:33pm - 537 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #518
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I just stumbled onto a big natural titties site:

Ilovebitties.com

It looks good in the preview site but I've learned never to sign up for a site that has not first been listed on TBP or PO.

10-24-12  08:36am - 539 days Old VHS porn - do you still have it? (22 Posts) - #23
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Very interesting thread.

I still have all of my old VHS tapes (I'm a pack rat by nature), most of which have not been played in at least 10 years. About 75% are dubbed over from rented tapes so the quality is already somewhat degraded, but this thread has me ready to start a project to copy all the "good stuff" to a dedicated external hard drive and toss the original VHS in the dumpster. It seems like a waste of good material but I have no idea what else I can do with it.

Does anyone know if there's an X-Rated EBay-like site out there somewhere?

08-08-12  09:48am - 616 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #490
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by marcdc1:


Forgive me for asking a foolish question I'm still new and finding my way through both the technology and the social norms.

Why does this thread exist? I recently sent an email alerting the TBP/PU team about a missing site and it was quickly added.

What is the purpose of this thread when a simple email seems more efficient.


I mean no disrespect in my post. Thank you everyone.

Speaking only for myself, I like this thread because I'm subscribed to it and it lets me know not only what new stuff is out there but also what PU policies are regarding sites that are not totally pay porn sites but do contain porn material.

Your question is essentially, why a thread like this? My rebuttal question is, why not a thread like this? What's the harm?

This forum is here to give us porndogs an opportunity to discuss virtually anything at all with each other. As far as I know, there is no other web forum out there like the PU forum.

05-04-12  09:30am - 712 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #452
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Another "new" site...maybe. Scoreland2

The preview site says it's "The best of Scoreland...Remastered," so it looks like it's really not a new site; just a way for the old site to make more money by not posting remasters on it's main site. Edited by Staff on May 04, 2012, 02:48pm (Khan: fixed direct link URL)

05-04-12  09:23am - 712 days Areola reduction surgery?!?! (8 Posts) - #7
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


This is even more disgusting. Scroll all the way down to see the mutilation and butchery being done on these women.

http://www.poustiplasticsurgery.com/case...cone-gel-implants-3/

Wow! What a total shame. In the "before" photo the babe has a rack that totally turns me on. All natural, perfect nips and large areolae.

Butchery is the right term.

05-04-12  09:18am - 712 days Is this a new site trend or is it just getting under my skin? (6 Posts) - #3
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Thanks RA for raising this issue. I don't like it either and for the same reasons, plus, if I'm moving quickly, I may not realize that a "streamer" may be lurking in background only to show up much later when I'm closing down.

BTW I always turn my speakers off all the time. If I want sound, I'll switch them on again, but only then.

04-13-12  11:19pm - 732 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #447
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Just a note to let you know the TBP Editors are looking into this one. Seems the site is non-English but does have an English version of the tour. Our editors have written the webmaster. What they find out will decide if the site can be listed.

I'll let you know if/when that happens.


Thanks. If they choose not to reply to the TBP Editors then that's a, sort of, backhanded way of saying theirs may not be a good site on which to spend my money.

Jack.

04-08-12  10:53am - 738 days Which Female was born to be the Best Pornstar (48 Posts) - #47
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Venus (aka Venus Knight, Angelica Costello and a few other names) is gorgeous with a great rack (even though it had some aftermarket adjustments made) and a totally erotic style.

04-07-12  04:48pm - 738 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #443
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Another site not listed is melissateen.com which features Met Art model Koika, AKA Maria Kusnetsova or Melissa Kusnetsova . She's the model that got a lot of exposure in the 2006-8 time frame on Met Art with the impossibly puffy areolae and a very sweet innocent face. (No, she's NOT Jelena Kusnetzova, the tennis player.)

I;m thinking about joining the site because her Met Art stuff is gentle softcore, very gentle, and I've seen about a half dozen clips where she's doing a lot more stuff like finger inserts and one rather heavy lesbian scene where there is some great nipple sucking going on.

My hesitation is the price; 29.95 Euros (about $40.00 US) which is way over my maximum price point. That's why this post; I'll never sign up for any site without some info from PU or TBP, especially one this expensive.

There are 11 other sites listed that come with the membership, all with decent preview sites with great looking content ranging from soft to full hard core content.

03-03-12  08:50pm - 773 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #441
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
In doing a search for Jana Jordan/Jana Foxy content, I ran into a new (to me)site - Take Her Easy. There are 3 "bonus sites" listed in the signup:

Pussy Eating Club (listed on TBP with no review)
Petite Teen Confessions (listed on TBP with no review)
Big Tit Perverts
(not listed on TBP) Edited on Mar 03, 2012, 08:59pm

02-27-12  09:15am - 779 days Question about ALS site (6 Posts) - #7
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I'm a video guy because I love the action; but I also grab a lot of photos of my favorite babes.

Yes, ALS has a ton of similar photos in a set, but I like that because I can cull out the ones that I really don't need to save. I'd rather make the call on what pix are keepers than rely on some anonymous horndog that doesn't necessarily share my tastes in porn.

11-13-11  09:40am - 885 days No porn for you ! (13 Posts) - #13
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:



* P.S.: Here's a simple Wikipedia graphic to illustrate my point. Generally, the more tolerant of porn, then the freer the country.

Very interesting. I wonder what's up with Australia.

I saw more PTA* on Bondi Beach than in my local "gentlemen's club" last winter (their summertime) yet they restrict porno? I suspect there's an oops in the map.

*PTA = pussy tits and ass

11-13-11  09:32am - 885 days Penn State Scandal (16 Posts) - #13
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
My opinion is that the situation has not been fully disclosed because there's more, a lot more, that we don't really know yet.

For example, is it possible that JoePa played by the rules and reported the matter to the police and the police, who are for all intents and purposes, part of the University, covered it up?

I really suspect there's a whole lot of rot under the surface that has yet to be disclosed and that Paterno is simply the sacrificial lamb. Why else was the University President fired?

11-09-11  10:42pm - 888 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #420
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
How about paulraymond.com? Edited by Staff on Nov 10, 2011, 06:32am (Khan: corrected direct link URL syntax)

11-06-11  09:00pm - 891 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #415
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Here's another site not listed on PU.

secretease.com/ - Secretease

It looks like a softcore site ("midcore" really because it's got insertions in the preview site) focused on secretaries in varying states of undress.

The pricing seems reasonable at $15 per month. Edited by Staff on Nov 07, 2011, 07:12am (Khan: corrected direct link URL syntax)

11-05-11  01:38pm - 892 days Threads Listed in TBP/PU That Appesr To Be Inactive (1 Posts) - Original Post - #1
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Threads Listed in TBP/PU That Appesr To Be Inactive

I don't know how to communicate apparently inactive sites to TBP/PU management so I'm starting this thread.

MFLGirls.com appears to be out of business.

10-17-11  08:51am - 912 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #400
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I just found MONDOLABIA.COM [http://mondolabia.com/] that is devoted to lovely, large, long and lickable labias.

At $25 per month I'm tempted...but my rule is never to sign up for any site before it is officially recognized by Porn Users/TBP.

Burned before but never again. Edited on Oct 17, 2011, 10:05am

09-22-11  08:56am - 937 days the Official ABRACADABRA Thread (32 Posts) - #16
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
There are two acronyms that a call center for a software help line told me about.

Diagnosis of a problem - PEBCAK - Problem Exists between Chair and Keyboard.

Case identification:

"this case ID is ten T." ID:10T (idiot)

08-21-11  06:44pm - 968 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #370
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Another site - http://www.magic-erotica.com/

Strange insertions (watermelon?!?)


08-20-11  10:20am - 970 days Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn" (634 Posts) - #369
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Actually, that's one we had listed. The editors deactivated the listing early this year when a spot-check found all the graphics on the site to be broken.

Given your post here, I asked them to recheck it. Looks ok now so the listing is back to active. You can enter remarks at: http://www.pornusers.com/review/atkarchives/

Thx for the nudge to recheck it.

I suspect that they haven't resolved all of their problems quite yet. In the preview site their link to "Model Directory" is broken.

I'm wondering if the site is in pre-retirement mode and exists only to attract a few more dollars in subscriber money before shutting down altogether.

08-15-11  08:40am - 975 days Need a new site to join any suggestions? (8 Posts) - #3
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
21Sextury.com has virtually everything from young adult to milfs and natural mammaries to bogus boobies. The search feature is very good and can put you into a selection of stuff that matches your criteria.

And the PU/TBP price is only $20 to start and goes down to $10. Give it a go.

08-15-11  08:35am - 975 days I now have a great service with my credit card for my online purchases (5 Posts) - #4
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Thanks Jay.

I called Chase about this feature and, lo and behold, they also have it. The sign-up option is buried in their security page but it's there.

For those who have a Chase card and who use online banking, go to your account summary screen, find Customer Center then Account Alerts. There you will find the various email alert options, among them an email alert for on-line/phone charges.

This is a terrific feature that all credit card issuers should promote.

Again thanks Jay for bringing this up.

08-14-11  08:38pm - 975 days I now have a great service with my credit card for my online purchases (5 Posts) - #2
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I have cards issued by Chase and B of A. Is either of them your card issuer?

My fail safe method is to have a card that I use exclusively for porn and on which I set a very low credit limit ($80). Whenever I buy a membership to a site, I pay the amount charged electronically from my on line bank account.

That way an attempted large charge is stopped because it's over limit. That has happened once or twice a year.

But I would much prefer the notification process you describe.

08-14-11  08:31pm - 975 days Our administrator .what a guy! (7 Posts) - #7
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
I'm a moderator on a travel oriented website's message forum and can tell you two things. One is how so many people think it's an easy gig (no way) and when a post has to be deleted, the wrath of a member scorned can be far worse than that of a woman scorned.

Khan's approach is superb. You never know when he deletes a post and as a result the forum remains a friendly interchange of our favorite subject at a very professional level. It's been that way for a long enough time that it's easy to identify the primary factor.

08-07-11  10:12am - 983 days Tattoos on Women (110 Posts) - #80
Monahan (38)
Active User



Posts: 327
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by elephant:


Yeah I have noticed many more girls are doing the tat thing, sometimes it really pains me to see it, some are just stunning stunning girls with what would be a body to die for then they go a ruin it by scrawling the tattoos on them, some are well I have to be harsh simply hideous and a total waste of beautiful skin. Do they get told to have them by directors, possibly, I don't know but many a time I have seen some would be top ten a list material only to glance at their body and see the huge leg, breast, near pussy tat, my alltime worst places for these things.

All that said I guess it's up to them, it's them that have to live with them, just not my bag on when I conjure up in my mind a image of a perfect beautiful women, she is tatless.


I agree, almost. A gorgeous babe with a discretely small tat is OK by me (example - Anastasia Christ. In a group grope scene the little butterfly tat above her left tit makes her easy to spot.)

Even Jana Jordan's big tattoo on her left foot is OK because it doesn't fuck up her gorgeous body. (But her new aftermarket tits removed her one amazingly sexy feature; her superb nipples capping her original breasts.)

But what I really don't get are the murals that destroy the otherwise natural beauty of the babe.

And I can't help but think what the tats will look like in 30-40 years when she's out of the biz and her skin is starting to sag. UGH.

1-50 of 327 Posts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.1 seconds.