Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (137)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2512)  |   Threads Started (146)

1-50 of 2509 Posts Page 1 2 9 16 23 30 37 50 51 Next Page >

05-12-14  07:14pm - 111 days Forgive me Father for I have sinned .....again (6 Posts) - #2
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I grew up in a predominantly Roman Catholic area of Germany and still remember one travelling Friar who had made it his vocation to preach in the Market Square about the evils of masturbation and its inevitable road to physical and spiritual ruin!

One good thing about Mother Church's desire to keep the flock pure was a bulletin board, also in the same square, giving a run down on the movies currently playing in local theatres and the moral damage they might do to the parishioners. Those marked "forbidden" usually drew the biggest crowds and were an invaluable guide to teenage males.

04-28-14  11:01pm - 125 days Do people who like Cuckolds also enjoy Trannys? (10 Posts) - #5
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Cuckolds could be a sub section of BDSM ... the submissive aspect, but I don't see any tie-in with trannies.

04-14-14  11:06am - 140 days "The Interview: ..Just one of the simular real ways I see it done (5 Posts) - #6
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Great job as usual, old pal. And right on target. Those sleezy would-be pornographers and their staged interviews are enough to sour you on porn for good. That's why I like to stick with the more reputable "soft/midpornish" sites ... and hate it once they start going hardcore.

04-06-14  11:12pm - 147 days What sites have provided you with your most watched/viewed videos or pics (8 Posts) - #7
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
This is all in the past:

ATK Natural & Hairy - now a bizarre and overpriced fetish site catering to excessive body hair enthusiasts.

WeAreHairy: see above.

Aunt Judy's: most updates originate in ATK N&H. Uninspiring photography.

AllOver 30: Low erotic value in boring picture sets at present. Most of their photographers copy each other by dressing their models in utilitarian 3 to 4 pieces of clothing, taken off within the first twenty pictures. Sexy lingerie appears to be a thing of the past. Used to be my favorite.

21Sextreme: I used to subscribe frequently because of my interest in mature women but their pool of models has shrunk dramatically to maybe 6 or 7 regulars and with one update a week (Lusty Grandmas) that's not enough!

Sigh! Until the times change I am afraid I am not a member of any site at present. Edited on Apr 06, 2014, 11:17pm

03-16-14  12:37pm - 169 days Striptease - A Poorly Catered for Niche. (260 Posts) - #273
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
By reading some of the posts again I can see that we actually have two different camps when it comes to the subject.

The first camp wants a strip tease in the sense of a woman gradually divesting herself of her clothes in an ordinary setting, while the second camp is more purist and thinks of poles and lap dances and tassels (maybe out of fashion by now).

Needless to say I belong to the former.

03-16-14  12:28pm - 169 days Chapter one: The calm before the storm. And this is not about the weather (25 Posts) - #15
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Hey, graymane, old friend. I just came across your post and am in great empathy when it comes to all the stuff you are going through at the moment.

You have effectively stilled my complaining because I can't even begin to imagine what your day must be like. The thought of all those botched operations and misdiagnoses is enough to give one nightmares.

Your neck and spine operations make me happy that I never considered the option of having surgery in two of my problem areas! I preferred to take pain relievers instead, but the time might come yet when, just like you, I no longer have that choice.

I'm with you in spirit, brother .. just wish I could somehow help. I hope your day today is reasonably tolerable.

Warmest regards,

m.

03-16-14  12:17pm - 169 days "Your porn is not Canadian enough" (16 Posts) - #4
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
The requirement for a certain percentage of Canadian content in Radio and Television was introduced at a time when it seemed that our culture was being swallowed up by Hollywood. Our talent kept going south because that is where the money was and where they had the best opportunity to succeed. This is the reason behind the establishment of the CRTC. In my personal opinion they have not accomplished their goal. Canadian movies and TV shows are being churned out by the hundreds each year but nobody (hardly anybody) watches them.

There have been some break-through movies and shows that were actually quite good but chances are most Canadians will not see them because they still instinctively go for the American shows.

There is rebellious muttering among the unwashed masses about storming the Bastille of CRTC Headquarters and doing away with this inflexible insistence on a certain percentage of Canadian content on what we listen to and view.

There is certainly discontent among Netflix users who are forced to watch the Canadian version that features far less choices. I automatically click on every Canadian movie "not interested" when asked to rate movies but regrettably that does not do away with them.

The talent has always been there, it's the money to put out a top quality product that is missing.

The recent proclamation that a certain percentage of porn on TV had to be "Canadian" (actors, locations) left me stunned and deeply embarrassed about the idiots in charge of the Canadian Radio And Television Commission (CRTC).

They just managed to make us the laughing stock of the world.

02-08-14  10:54am - 205 days A Modest Proposal (16 Posts) - #4
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
^Pat's version wins, hands down!

02-08-14  10:48am - 205 days So ladies, what follows the tattoo craze? Here's a thought. (19 Posts) - #18
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I wonder if the stocking and garter industry has seen a boost in sales in recent years from producers requiring that their models wear them to hide all their tattoos. I seem to recall seeing more and more models wear them in shoots where I know the model has them on her thighs and legs.


I suppose that might work if they use really dark stockings, made of heavier material than nylon. For some of the models they would also have to be extra long.

02-07-14  11:05am - 206 days So ladies, what follows the tattoo craze? Here's a thought. (19 Posts) - #16
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Personally I prefer all over blue skin, pink skin, whatever, than those awful tats. You've probably all seen the horrendous sight of a body virtually all covered in tattoos.

Orion slave girls from Star Trek, yum!


Being a stockings and garter belt lover I am offended the most when I see the tattoo of a heart (or whatever) peeking out from the top of a stocking. It ruins the whole image ... literally.

02-07-14  10:57am - 206 days ATK/Amkingdom.com?? (12 Posts) - #10
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I see it differently than you because I think that unlike a video starring the same person(s). Photo shoots where the same model is doing about the same thing, in about the same location she has done elsewhere is more duplication than anything else because there's literally isn't much that's different from one shoot to the next. The only exception would be if the shoots are in different locations and/or if the model is wearing different clothes from one site to the next but that last one will soon look like all the others once the model is nude.


I have been leaving comments like that on pretty well all of their sites, as well as on similar sites that feature their type of material. There is nothing wrong with the models being nude at the end of the set, I look forward to that, but the whole journey to nude is missing because the models usually wear three items of clothing and shed those within the first 20 or so pictures, leaving you a hundred pictures of almost identical "nude." This is certainly overkill, and turns what could be an erotic strip into a meat market.

01-29-14  11:12am - 215 days Thoroughly disgusted! (17 Posts) - #15
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Sorry to hear your troubles, messmer (and I thought this would be your disgust with a site).

Whatever you do, don't give a site your "good" address--that is for your normal, day-to-day email--give them your older, spammed-up one. You should also have this for non-porn marketing stuff that requires an email, if only for completion purposes, but not something that would really ever need checking (signing up for a forum, etc.).

And as much as I love PU I still gave them my spam email address when I signed up, and I only check it once every few weeks if that (while hoping Khan never sends pertinent messages that way though I check PU way more regularly). Even "a popular and highly rated" site should not get your normal address since you don't really know what they're doing with it. Better safe than sorry.

Interestingly, at least in the U.S., Google does let you set up a new phone number for free, called Voice, (as long as you have a Gmail account, d'oh!) that I've also used on occasion for sites that have wanted a phone number and I don't feel like giving out my sacred cell #. It comes through my cell phone but I have it ID'ed as "Google Voice" to let me know it's probably a machine or from something/someone I don't want contacting me.

On a side note, on my normal, non-spam email I have gotten the occasional legitimate email tossed into their spam label (Googlespeak for folder). Otherwise little actual spam, and not very serious spam at that--no Nigerian princes or "guaranteed" penis enlargement offers...yet.


Thanks for the tips, turbo. Actually, just like you, I never use my good address in connection with any porn site or Billing Company. My real name goes to the Billing Company, of course, since I do all my transactions through a rechargeable credit card issued to me by my bank. I don't know if CCBill or Epoch etc. actually pass on my real name to a site. The massive Spam attacks were all on my throw-away google account that I had used for years. When this finally irritated me enough I got a new throw-away address, again through Google, and was blissfully left alone until I made my next subscription with the new one.

If Epoch, CCBill etc. do not pass on real names to the sites then I lay all my past problems at their feet because I received tons of spam under my real name in the past.

01-28-14  06:39pm - 215 days Thoroughly disgusted! (17 Posts) - #11
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


I've had Yahoo mail almost since I've had a computer. I don't know about others but I would assume Yahoo isn't the only one with the ability to create disposable email addresses. Sign up using a throwaway, then delete it once you're done with the site. You can't get spammed if they can't find you!


Sounds like an idea, RB!

01-28-14  06:38pm - 215 days Thoroughly disgusted! (17 Posts) - #10
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jook:


Maybe I'm just lucky, but I don't think so. Almost no spam makes it through to my inbox with gmail. I've used the same address since the inception of gmail (when you needed an invite ) and have subscribed to more porn than I care to remember using the gmail address. The problem used to be worse but I'm guessing that between gmail's filters and my flagging spam over the years, that did the trick.


I thought I had replied, jook, but can't find my response, so here goes again:

Spam hardly ever makes it to my Inbox either because gmail's filter is quite good. Nevertheless I still have to go to my spam folder to see if any legitimate emails were caught by those filters by mistake and then eliminate the works.

01-28-14  06:28pm - 215 days Thoroughly disgusted! (17 Posts) - #9
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Yeah, right, "We don't sell your email address to anyone," so gimme-gimme spammy-spammy wasn't me!

Those slimeballs should be wrapped in Visqueen and set on fire!


I go along with that, Drooler.

BTW, if you get spam at the moment have you noticed the weird names they are using nowadays?

For a while I had all kinds of female friends who wanted to remind me of a past relationship and how eager they were to re-establish contact, they in turn were followed by a couple of weeks, or so, of renewed "You have won 1st Prize" (One even by the Secretary General of the UN!!) or "I need help transferring a large amount of money out of my country and would be more than happy to give you a cut if ... etc.etc." emails.

And now it is spam sent under weird names like (made up by me as an example) "sj'klo." Would anyone even be tempted to look at an email like that?

01-28-14  06:13pm - 215 days Thoroughly disgusted! (17 Posts) - #7
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Lets say I joined a site that oh has a Twist to it and another that must have the Sex of the Century.
Both times these two sites tripled my spam.

Could have been billing as was said but have used these biller's before.


Spammers ! FUCK YOU FUCK FUCK FUCK !

HEHE, One of the few forums I belong to were you can say,
Shit, fuck , pussy and Cock and not get banned !


Young man, you go right now and wash out your mouth (typing fingers) with soap. Appalling manners!

01-28-14  02:41pm - 216 days Thoroughly disgusted! (17 Posts) - #3
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I've had a couple of e-mail addresses over the years which I set up to use exclusively with payment processors. In every case I've ended up getting spam on each address within a couple of weeks.

It's interesting to hear that someone else has had similar problems. Every payment processor I've ever used on my sites has always insisted that they never sell on e-mail lists.

I can't vouch for other sites, but I can assure everyone that I have never even considered selling members' email addresses.


Thanks, Ed. I guess we found the culprit!

01-28-14  11:09am - 216 days Thoroughly disgusted! (17 Posts) - Original Post - #1
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thoroughly disgusted!

I got myself a new gmail address a few weeks ago because I was being overwhelmed with spam at my old one. Everything went well, not a single spam email in almost two weeks, pure bliss, then I subscribed to my first site under the new address and found myself with 25 spam emails the very next day. I know which site I subscribed to (quite a popular and highly rated one) but don't want to leave myself open to any potential legal problems because it could have been the Payment Processor as well. I guess the only way to live without spam is to NOT subscribe to anything!! Arrrgh!!!

01-24-14  12:28pm - 220 days Is it just me .... (17 Posts) - #18
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I agree, partly because I have a few tattoos myself (but not implants ) and I'm not one for imbibing in the whole tattoos-are-ugly trope, and also because I know plenty of real, non-porn women who have tattoos but not all the other body mods seen in porn.

I was reminded of my distaste the other day when I was looking at the photos on Lisa Ann's Twitter feed--ugh! Over sculpted/"toned" jawline and arms complemented by cartoonishly oversized breasts that look like they're almost as much for laughs as they are for lust. Most of her friends in the photos looked the same. They sport Grand Canyon cleavage engineered into dresses which look to be made out of spandex and Kevlar, lest those mammoth mammaries spill out and collapse into a black hole. And they look so hourglass-shaped that you think you're viewing a photo that was skewed in Photoshop or at one of those funhouse mirrors.

Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of the pear-shaped, bottom-heavy female (though I'll let it slide for the more Rubenesque with pee fetishes), but transmogrifying yourself into a real life RealDoll is not attractive to me--it's fucking scary!

Just my angry , but maybe I need to stop complaining and go join AbbyWinters for awhile.


Keep on contributing your 2 cents, turbo, you done good!

01-24-14  12:24pm - 220 days Is it just me .... (17 Posts) - #17
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by biker:


I don't mind large breasts, but the implants are so unnatural. I have stated it before, it looks like two bowling balls stuck in there. I like soft curves, not hard ones that implants produce.


Yep, that's my problem, biker: the bowling ball look! Yet there are guys who drool at the thought of enhanceds, and give them to their wives/girlfriends/mistresses/lovers as a present and those poor, misguided, insecure women end up believing that they really improved their looks, based on the theory that bigger is better.

Wish more women would look into this forum now and then to get a more balanced view as to what is beautiful and what is grotesque.

01-24-14  12:19pm - 220 days Is it just me .... (17 Posts) - #16
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Micha:


On many TGB sites there is a category for ugly women, I think if one were to spend some time there, they might develop a renewed appreciation for beauty.

Beauty, is I've heard, in the mind of the beholder.

Truth be told,most of the women appearing on those sites are not ugly.
A face that is often deemed by others to be ugly, I find as interesting and depicting what I would call character and a sense of fun. Wandering in the shops and malls, I often see women that I do not think are attractive, who seem not to have a shortage of attractive male suitors in attendance. Go figure.

Often, tooling that cyber place, seeking women in various stages of undress, my eye is often caught by faces, bodies and personae that are not runway model material but rather pretty, smart and fun, depicting what I consider to be a great sense of life. They look healthy.
That is what I find attractive.


You spoke right out of my heart, Micha. Couldn't have put it better myself.

01-19-14  10:47am - 225 days I hate that progression .... (11 Posts) - #10
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


There have been any great softcore semi-nude famous models that turned to porn and their careers ended.

THere were many Girl next door ones that guys drooled to get a nip or ass shot. They then went nude and were never heard of.

In porn there is no going back, it clear you jump over the proverbial porn fence often at the peril of your adult career,
Then some jump and become famous, but odds are stacked against it.


Well, that's an unexpected angle to the story, CT. I had no idea that turning progressively "harder" could actually end a model's career. Learn something new every day.

01-19-14  10:43am - 225 days Jb's Blog (54 Posts) - #55
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Just had to post this after admiring your other photos.




Now make that a full figure shot and that picture has my vote!

01-19-14  10:40am - 225 days Is it just me .... (17 Posts) - #12
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by elephant:


But yeah tastes, mine certainly do but one thing I will always hate and to be honest really cannot believe the amount of American girls who look so unbelievably gorgeous and they go and ruin it by having these hideous tattoos, well for me they ruin it, I know some people must like them, I really don't get what is good about them at all an never will. But it does effect it if I favorite a girl, very few tat honeys on my list.

Oh and another thing I don't quite understand with American girls, is having a big booty and how women with huge butts are more favored. I have to say, its not my thing at all.


Tattoos don't bother me half as much as those so-called "enhanced" breasts. You see them mostly in American models and I despise them. Any set or video that features enhanced automatically will get a one out of five or even ten from me, no matter how pretty the face or rest of the figure may be.

01-19-14  10:32am - 225 days The Way You Get Internet Porn is About to Change (37 Posts) - #30
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Yea, I agree, people are angry, rude and often just don't give a shit about their fellow man/woman.
Very hard at times to grow up in a polite country where we respected our elders, and held doors open and said please and thank you. Thats why I like my adult material especially the intimate stuff and stripping why rare, gives a soft sexy look that is slowly being taken over by POV shots of labias for 20 minutes no face not body just pussy play . Oh well guess I have said enough on this.


Can't argue with that statement, CT!

01-18-14  11:05am - 226 days The Way You Get Internet Porn is About to Change (37 Posts) - #27
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Life was so easy back in 1979.
You could own a gun and people didn't freak out, you could by a playboy and it was fun not dirty. You could go to bars to hang out with friends and not be considered a drunk.

You could rob a liquor store and keep the money, lol ok not the last one seeing who is paying attention.

Some good stuff has occured but seems we are making problems where there are none. Guns, booze and porn have been around hundreds of years together living fine. Then everyone wants to regulate and criminalize what good people do. And not stop the bad people.

The people whom deal in human trafficking,sell and use drugs and run illegal arms, all occur with little sins of ending. And laws never stop the bad guys.

Kinda like in South Cal, the who condom thing, whose business is it ? Its not the governments right to pry into my life.

PS I brought the booze thing as they are now considering changing regulations on alcohol consumption, and also how you protest against law makers is in the lawmaker hands as we speak. As I have said you regulate one Right, and you open the flood gates. I do doubt porn will be open as it is. just too much going on to leave it out of the playing field,


I think one of the big reasons why Government tends to intervene more than in previous decades is because our society has turned angry, confrontational, lawless (look at all the cases of road rage, mass shootings, bullying (cyber- and otherwise). The reason? Who knows? Some blame the Internet and applications (phones etc.) that allow you to be your nasty self anonymously and the fact that you are no longer interacting with your fellow man in person.

Is it any wonder (to touch upon one of your favorite subjects) that in the light of all those senseless mass killings in movie theaters, schools etc., governments are tempted to impose stricter controls? And, of course, Governments being governments they do tend to get carried away with their righteous causes. Good thing we get to vote every 4 (in your case), 5 years.

01-17-14  03:00pm - 227 days Is it just me .... (17 Posts) - #3
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by FibiLove Co:


You have gotten used to that level of beauty, there is nothing special about them anymore.
Seems like you are starting to acquire more exquisite tastes. I deleted a tonne of pics I had because the girls just don't look as good as I once thought they did.


I think you hit the nail right on the head, FL, because I did the same thing:

"What did I ever see in HER? Delete!" and that particular model was slumbering in a folder called "Favorites!"

01-17-14  02:45pm - 227 days Jb's Blog (54 Posts) - #50
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Just another voice telling you how much I enjoy your blog, JB!

01-17-14  02:37pm - 227 days The Way You Get Internet Porn is About to Change (37 Posts) - #25
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


We had a similar topic not to long ago, where I hate to be the I told you so guy LOL.

But once we start taking away rights whether you agree personally with those rights or not. But once you allow it, other rights will follow.

I am not going to rehash the topic, but lets just use the word ban, and Constitution. Once you get on the band wagon to allow the government to edit your rights it will not be long until what we have here getting into our bedrooms.
We as citizens of any country need to not ever allow our governments to remove rights.

If we continue to allow any rights removed then we deserve whats left. I see a day when Porn will outlawed and ISP fined for allowing it if we do not say no to allowing the governments to strip our rights, EVEN if you do not agree with the right allowing it sets precedence to go hog wild.

Our freedom of speech could be next possibly and my post would be banned LOLOL.



We had a Prime Minister in Canada (Pierre Elliot Trudeau) some time ago who stated quite firmly: "The State has no business in the bedrooms of a nation!" No one, since then, has tried (at least overtly) to contradict him. Sure hope it stays this way. And it's good to see you again!

01-17-14  02:26pm - 227 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - #18
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by biker:


You never know what tasty treat is waiting for you on Adult Friend Finder.

Sorry. Couldn't contain myself.

I have been riddled by AFF on and off for years. I'm surprised you have just seen them.

When I was saturated with popups it wasn't just porn. The popups wanted me to buy anything from TV's to toilet paper or the "You're the Lucky Winner".


Oh yeah!! The "lucky winner" is huge at the moment. It seems every time I open an old familiar site I am a lucky winner if only I complete a survey!!! Now if only someone could tell me how to turn the darn things off. It never happened with Windows 7.

01-17-14  01:24pm - 227 days Is it just me .... (17 Posts) - Original Post - #1
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Is it just me ....

... but I find that most models in my formerly favorite softcore sites (Anilos, All Over 30, ATK Aunt Judy, ATK Natural & Hairy)are not as beautiful as they used to be? Am I jaded, a natural born whiner, or is there something to my observation?

01-17-14  01:18pm - 227 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - #16
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by biker:


I was getting a lot of popups on my old XP and the final solution was returning to my default settings on my Mazilla Firefox. I don't know why they started and they came from every direction faster then I could close them. I tried everything until changing to default cured it.


In the Firefox I downloaded for Windows 8.1 "block pop-ups" was set as the default. I started doing some house cleaning by removing all extraneous stuff that came with my HP desktop. Maybe that will help!

Help! Adult Friend Finder is, all of a sudden, following me from site to site! Even this one! I scanned my computer just a couple of minutes ago and it didn't find any little bots that could give me a hard time. How did I acquire this site? I've never gone there .. ever. Edited on Jan 17, 2014, 01:28pm

01-17-14  01:14pm - 227 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - #15
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I figure everyone by now knows the Microcrap Rule: Only every other operating system works well. Windows 95 was great / Windows 98 only so-so - XP was awesome / Vista, well we know how that turned out - Windows 7 (which I use) works well / Windows 8 .... you know the rest.

I also don't really understand why HP does all this crap to their computers. I also got an HP laptop and it came loaded with a bunch of worthless programs that just generated popups and demands for updates. If you're completely clueless about computers this software might have some value but if you're just trying to get stuff done with real software then it's pointless. Like Exotics I just deleted the HP stuff or permanently shut it down and made my life easier.


I agree. At the moment I am in the process of removing all unnecessary HP programs and trial ware!

01-17-14  11:46am - 227 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - #12
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


I use Firefox and an addon I found called NoScript. While it really helps in limiting popups, it isn't seamless and takes a bit of managing, it's the best I've found for controlling crap - especially if I go to a squishy site I've not visited before and protects me from them running vicious scripts up my computer's ass.

This is not an unconditional recommendation - you can try it out and see if you are okay with it. Freeware with begging.


I used "noscript" in my previous computer, JB, but could not get myself to like it. It limited the enjoyment of my browsing too much.

01-17-14  11:45am - 227 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - #11
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by wackyphill:


I use Windows 8 (Now on 8.1) and it works great. Popups have nothing to do with Windows, they would be from other software on your PC.

You can upgrade to Windows 8.1 for free and boot directly to the Desktop bypassing the start menu screen entirely if it bothers you.


How do you boot directly to the Desk top? I do have Windows 8.1, it came pre-installed. Thanks. I have another question directed to you and other knowledgeable PUs: Is "Windows Defender" sufficient when it comes to protection or should I download AVG (or Norton etc.) again.

01-17-14  11:39am - 227 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - #10
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I have Windows 8 too. Absolutely despise it. The first day I used it, I said this at least 30 times, "Where is the damn start button?" I didn't get the touchscreen laptop though, same reasons as JB. Wait until you get the 8.1 update. It leads to more frustration, "Oh there's the start button just when I was getting used to not having a start button".

Really, I'm being a bit hard on it. It is fast though I hate the "apps".

On the ads, I really don't know off the top of my head. I had a lot of HP pop-up crap when I first got it, so I just removed all the HP software from the hard drive and fixed that, but I then started getting more pop-ups that included surveys. Found that problem was caused by a software called "Relevant Knowledge". Which I guess came installed on my laptop. Have you downloaded anything from CNet downloads? I download a lot of software from them and they've for whatever reason (money), decided to put extra software in the package you download and are using porn site level trickery to get you to install those other software programs.

For example, I downloaded a music editing software from CNet, it came with an installer. When I opened it, it said, Basic installation (recommended)
Custom intallation

I clicked custom which let me deselect a box that said, "Allow toolbar and search to be changed" or something like that. So I got around step one of the trickery. Then step 2 popped up, "Would you like to install something something candy". This is where the frustration came in. At the bottom, the only choices are "Accept" and "Decline". Traditionally when you click decline when setting up a new software it means you don't want the software and installation stops. In this case, clicking decline just meant I didn't want this advertised software and let me move on to step 3 which was once again an offer of another software. I believe I had to click decline 4 times before it finally installed the software I had downloaded.

I mention this possibility since you got a new computer and I know when I get a new computer, I have to start putting media players, music editors and so on, on it and thought maybe they had tricked you. I wouldn't think that if it hadn't happened to me 2 times.

I ran malewarebytes (free) and it found several "pup" software programs. Once those were removed the ads stopped. Though it also could be something the maker of the computer put on it at the factory. Check your control panel and see if anything possibly unwanted is installed.


Thanks, exotics. I uninstalled most HP (not needed) software and am getting far fewer pop-ups. I am going to check to see how many more programmes I can find that might contribute to the problem. I have Windows 8.1. It came pre-installed. What a learning curve if you don't believe in reading owners' manuals. There is nothing intuitive about this OS!!

01-17-14  11:32am - 227 days I hate that progression .... (11 Posts) - #8
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I am still of the same opinion I was when you last posted on this issue.

I do appreciate you may find it difficult or impossible, but personally, I have no issue in focussing solely on the work at hand.
It is how well the model performs in the current photoset / video that concerns me.
What she does before or after is of no consequence for me &
I would not let it destroy my enjoyment of her.

Cap'n.


I know you and I feel differently when it comes to this subject, Cap'n, but here again is the reason why it is such a big deal to me:

"There goes the illusion of an amateur housewife doing something shocking on a temporary basis. Now she is a paid pro."

It's my fault, I shouldn't get carried away with illusions when it comes to soft porn.

01-16-14  06:53pm - 227 days Hey guys (9 Posts) - #3
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by gaypornolover:


Took a break from PU for a few months - disabled my account and wasn't expecting to come back... had an issue with the site which I won't go into here but which has been resolved to my satisfaction.

Anyway I missed you guys too much and just wanted to say hi x


Glad to see you back, GPL!

01-16-14  06:51pm - 227 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - #5
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


No! I refuse to touch my screen - it's filthy!!


How come? Or dare I ask, JB?

01-16-14  06:49pm - 227 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - #4
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


No, brother ...... but keep us posted on further problems you might incur so some others of us will stay with what they have.


Believe me, I did NOT want Windows 8 but that's all they had in the store. I don't know if it's a new Windows default or not but I am really being bombarded by ads ... and by reputable companies (Amazon etc.) too. It seems that all of them not only by-pass Firefox' attempts to control them but they even pop up on my desk top if it is idle for a few moments. I have tried to find something under the Windows 8 defaults but haven't found it yet. Oh, well, they seem harmless enough, just a nuisance.

01-16-14  06:43pm - 227 days I hate that progression .... (11 Posts) - #4
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by graymane:


Damned, Mess ..... you pulled my exact same thoughts right out of the vacant cavity between my ears.
Yes... what you're saying will get to you! especially those of us who are so drawn to the strikingly rare innocence of a young beginner whom we've been privy only to viewing skin reaching the boundaries of the taboo, flaunting those stunning features in erotic actions and the kind of creative attire that keeps us begging for more.

we follow her as she gathers more and more attention before many of her fans are making waves of bolder substance that's washing up on the decks of the studio paying her bills.
We'll never know the immense pressure put on these girls to give in ...... even if her private part's exposure is slow and only progressively spoon-fed to us in small increments, the finality is inevitable and only a question of time ....... and as jberry put it, (only in his unique way) It's all in following the money.


Afraid both you and JB are right, graymane. The majority of Porn Users seem to like the progression from soft to hard otherwise all my favorite models wouldn't choose that path. Follow the money is exactly what it's all about.

01-16-14  01:44pm - 228 days Is anyone using Windows 8? (29 Posts) - Original Post - #1
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Is anyone using Windows 8?

I just bought a new computer with Windows 8 as the operating system and am being swamped by pop ups even though Firefox is configured to stop all of them. Anyone have similar problems and how did you get rid of them?

01-16-14  01:11pm - 228 days I hate that progression .... (11 Posts) - Original Post - #1
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I hate that progression ....

... in a solo model from relative innocence to prostitute. I know that there are many people who like to see their model get progressively bolder and "harder" but, for me, it is a real turn off to see a favorite going from showing a bit of pink to a blow job. The latest one is Sally T. (All Over 30)

I honestly can no longer enjoy her previous sets knowing that she ends up doing hardcore. There goes the illusion of an amateur housewife doing something shocking on a temporary basis. Now she is a paid pro.

Don't mind me and don't bother answering .. I know I've voiced this complaint before but SALLY T??? It was bad enough to see Annabelle Brady turn pro.

01-11-14  11:00pm - 232 days myporn.com - first look! (73 Posts) - #31
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Hey, CT, welcome back, old pal! Good to see your name in this forum again!

01-11-14  02:56pm - 233 days What's the right amount of "free"? (34 Posts) - #6
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by FibiLove Co:


The idea would work well if you are in the business of selling good suspense thrillers. Where you would get someone really interested and then leave them hanging wherein they would definitely want to see the end.

You are trying to sell something to someone who is not interested in paying no matter what. The people who pay for porn don't need to see half a movie to know if the quality is good, I think snippets from different sections would work just fine.

There is no need to give away more content to try to lure people who like free content. They just don't believe they should pay and that won't change.


Re. your last paragraph. Any sample could be streaming only and wouldn't encourage anyone but the most determined freeloaders!

01-11-14  12:32pm - 233 days What's the right amount of "free"? (34 Posts) - #3
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Looks just about right, Rick. Half a movie would be enough to give us a good idea as to quality. I would suggest that the half always start from the beginning because I like to see the leading up to the action and how much of that is in the movie. If they jump right into the action I usually don't bother with the video.

Same as to the galleries. To me 10 free full size images would be enough but please don't let the advertised site start in the middle or toward the end. To me it is important to see how much and what the model is wearing at the very beginning of a set.

Personal preference only!

01-09-14  06:03pm - 234 days Advanced economics (26 Posts) - #21
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


So far as I am concerned, the biggest hit was the change of emphasis.

Inflating the price dramatically just added a few nails to its coffin, so far as I am concerned.

Cap'n.


I would love to see the statistics as to their user base before the switch and after, Cap'n. It must have looked to them, maybe by measuring downloads, maybe by the enthusiastic approval and pressure tactics of "hairy-all-over" fans, that the switch would gain them more customers if they made the site a true fetish site. That's why I am torn about which of my two theories is the right one.

m. still in

01-09-14  02:07pm - 235 days Advanced economics (26 Posts) - #19
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


That's odd for ATK, since their other (and considerably less hairy) sites still appear to be $30/month.

But shouldn't it be the opposite? Lower price because of money saved on shaving supplies, waxes, and laser treatments?


I only had two explanations as to why ATK's other sites are still $ 29.95:

One) The site is so popular since they made "extreme hairy" their policy they can afford to raise their price, or

Two) The site lost so many subscribers since they switched to "extreme hairy" that they had to up their prices to make any sort of a profit.

As someone who dislikes thick, coarse stubble on a woman's legs I hope it was the latter and that they will eventually switch back to a more moderate way of presenting natural women.

01-08-14  07:23pm - 235 days myporn.com - first look! (73 Posts) - #5
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Nice preview,Rick. I think it will turn into a very exciting site!

01-08-14  12:46pm - 236 days Advanced economics (26 Posts) - #15
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


The only site I can think of above this is In The Crack, at $35/month...but maybe that's because it's Canadian.


Both "We Are Hairy" and ATK's "Natural And Hairy" have gone from $29.95 to $34.95 during the past couple of months. Possibly because it is getting harder to find hairy models these days.

1-50 of 2509 Posts Page 1 2 9 16 23 30 37 50 51 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.25 seconds.