Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Sites Not Listed On "The Best Porn"
701-732 of 732 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 14 Page 15 16
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

11-15-14  08:07am - 291 days #742
Khan
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 1,712
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by LPee23:


WDGirls.com is now accepting memberships again, although for a limited time only. I would love to discuss this site more, but for starters, could you please re-list it?


Sorry, I asked an editor to take a look and, as Pat predicted, they declined to re-list since the site says it's only opening memberships until Dec 1st.

You can still discuss it if you'd like.

Sorry I couldn't help more. Former Senior Administrator
PornUsers.com

"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure there is one less scoundrel in the world."-Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881)

11-15-14  06:10pm - 291 days #743
pat362 (373)
Active User



Posts: 3,100
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by biker:


^So these people are publicizing a site that is illegal? How do they get away with that?


Personally I think that the drunk thing is mostly for show and the women just pretend to be inebriated. There are so many things that can go wrong with someone who is drunk that it's make shooting scene a waste of time and money. Long live the Brown Coats.

11-15-14  11:04pm - 291 days #744
biker (5)
Active User



Posts: 335
Registered: May 03, '08
Location: milwaukee, wi
^That makes sense. Hard to get people to cooperate when their intoxicated. Pretending to be drunk during sex may be illegal in some nations. Not so much a fictional scene, but one that is supposed to be reality. I aim to misbehave Edited on Nov 15, 2014, 11:10pm

11-16-14  09:51am - 290 days #745
pat362 (373)
Active User



Posts: 3,100
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I don't think pretending to be drunk is illegal per say but I certainly wouldn't want to be the company who shot those types of scenes if they don't also happen to have a video of the girl saying that it's all pretend after the scene/ Otherwise an enterprising young lady with a lawyer could take those fools to court by saying that she wasn't pretending and that she was drunk and they took advantage of her. Long live the Brown Coats.

11-16-14  11:24am - 290 days #746
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 341
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Sorry, I asked an editor to take a look and, as Pat predicted, they declined to re-list since the site says it's only opening memberships until Dec 1st.

You can still discuss it if you'd like.

Sorry I couldn't help more.


FWIW, I went to this site's URL yesterday and saw the offer that goes away on 12/1/14. I bookmarked it so I could check it out when I had more time. When I came back the link didn't work, so I assume that the site is closed to new business already.

Also worthy of note, the headline on the site had a comment that it was rated #1 by Rabbits Reviews. Rabbits Reviews has nothing at all on WDGirls.com.

Looks to be like this site is flaky (why else will they close enrollments?) and, contradictorily, is willing to prevaricate in its promotional material.

I think I will give these guys a wide berth and wait until they choose to go mainstream, if they do, and see what TBP has to say when (if) TBP does a review.

11-16-14  12:19pm - 290 days #747
LPee23 (24)
Active User



Posts: 263
Registered: Jul 14, '13
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Monahan:


FWIW, I went to this site's URL yesterday and saw the offer that goes away on 12/1/14. I bookmarked it so I could check it out when I had more time. When I came back the link didn't work, so I assume that the site is closed to new business already.

Also worthy of note, the headline on the site had a comment that it was rated #1 by Rabbits Reviews. Rabbits Reviews has nothing at all on WDGirls.com.

Looks to be like this site is flaky (why else will they close enrollments?) and, contradictorily, is willing to prevaricate in its promotional material.

I think I will give these guys a wide berth and wait until they choose to go mainstream, if they do, and see what TBP has to say when (if) TBP does a review.


I tried the link, and it is still working for me.

I don't know about the Rabbit's Reviews thing. They were reviewed on Rabbits Reviews in 2013:

https://web.archive.org/web/201303271419...s.com/c15/Drunk.html

They were de-listed there when they closed their site to new members for the first time earlier this year.

While I can't speak for the owners of the site, I can give you the answer that they gave me regarding why they felt the need to close their site to new memberships. They had a large amount of their content pirated and became aware of some members, or maybe hacked accounts, who were posting their content for free. To try to get control of the situation, they felt the need to close off the site. I don't know any more than that. You can say they are "flaky" for closing off their site, but it's better than leaving the industry entirely, which is what many companies have done.

11-17-14  10:02am - 289 days #748
LPee23 (24)
Active User



Posts: 263
Registered: Jul 14, '13
Location: USA
Could you please list/re-list AmericanKittens.com? They are back online with a newly redesigned site.

11-17-14  11:08am - 289 days #749
Khan
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 1,712
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by LPee23:


Could you please list/re-list AmericanKittens.com? They are back online with a newly redesigned site.


Sorry but no can do. Site looks to be a free site now and we do not list free sites. Former Senior Administrator
PornUsers.com

"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure there is one less scoundrel in the world."-Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881)

11-17-14  11:51am - 289 days #750
LPee23 (24)
Active User



Posts: 263
Registered: Jul 14, '13
Location: USA
It's actually not free, although it looks that way. Trust me, I just paid $15.00 for a membership. It says free to join, but that just gets you the ability to browse the thumbnails. You have to buy a membership to actually access the content.

11-17-14  02:01pm - 289 days #751
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 341
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I don't think pretending to be drunk is illegal per say but I certainly wouldn't want to be the company who shot those types of scenes if they don't also happen to have a video of the girl saying that it's all pretend after the scene/ Otherwise an enterprising young lady with a lawyer could take those fools to court by saying that she wasn't pretending and that she was drunk and they took advantage of her.


I was able to access the site and watched the preview loop. Good quality video, but that's about the only positive thing I can say about it. But that's a personal perspective. I don't get the drunk thing, a girl who is totally skunked isn't my idea of a sexy babe in a sexy scene.

In any case, as I always say different strokes for different strokers.

11-17-14  06:23pm - 289 days #752
pat362 (373)
Active User



Posts: 3,100
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by LPee23:


It's actually not free, although it looks that way. Trust me, I just paid $15.00 for a membership. It says free to join, but that just gets you the ability to browse the thumbnails. You have to buy a membership to actually access the content.


I can't speak for the amount you paid but they clearly say on one of their pages that you can join for free simply by entering some basic info. Long live the Brown Coats.

11-17-14  06:40pm - 289 days #753
Khan
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 1,712
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by LPee23:


It's actually not free, although it looks that way. Trust me, I just paid $15.00 for a membership. It says free to join, but that just gets you the ability to browse the thumbnails. You have to buy a membership to actually access the content.


How about this ...

Since they're so unclear at to if they're a free site or a pay site, they'll need to contact the TBP Editors themselves if they want their site relisted. That way they can directly answer any questions the editors have. Former Senior Administrator
PornUsers.com

"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure there is one less scoundrel in the world."-Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881)

11-17-14  07:29pm - 289 days #754
LPee23 (24)
Active User



Posts: 263
Registered: Jul 14, '13
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I can't speak for the amount you paid but they clearly say on one of their pages that you can join for free simply by entering some basic info.


Yeah, but if you do that, you will find that the free membership just gives you the ability to preview the thumbnails.

11-18-14  05:53pm - 288 days #755
pat362 (373)
Active User



Posts: 3,100
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^What you describe sounds like a scam site and I see no point in talking about a scam other than to advise people to stay away from it. Long live the Brown Coats.

11-19-14  08:30am - 287 days #756
LPee23 (24)
Active User



Posts: 263
Registered: Jul 14, '13
Location: USA
That's fine if that is your opinion. It would still be valuable to have it listed so that others can refer to it and the experiences of others.

11-19-14  06:35pm - 287 days #757
pat362 (373)
Active User



Posts: 3,100
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I see it differently because if TBP/PU list the site than they are in fact supporting what I consider to be a scam site. You may have a different opinion of what a scam site is but mine is simple. If a site (like yours) which does not show a join price anywhere on their preview section and actually goes out of it's way to make it appear as though it's free than it's scamming people.

Why not choose a site with similar content that TBP shows as being active to talk about instead of trying to get a site that looks fishy reinstated. Long live the Brown Coats.

11-19-14  09:43pm - 287 days #758
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 341
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I see it differently because if TBP/PU list the site than they are in fact supporting what I consider to be a scam site. You may have a different opinion of what a scam site is but mine is simple. If a site (like yours) which does not show a join price anywhere on their preview section and actually goes out of it's way to make it appear as though it's free than it's scamming people.

Why not choose a site with similar content that TBP shows as being active to talk about instead of trying to get a site that looks fishy reinstated.


I agree with Pat. The PU/TBP site has four levels of business practice notifications:

1. No comments or warnings - I interpret this as no indication of bad practices by the site. (A solid green light)

2. Cross check warnings - I interpret this as a no indication of bad practices by the site except the caution to a member of the site to be aware of cross checked options appearing in the signup process. (A flashing yellow (caution) light)

3. Posting of a site but no evaluations and a notice that TBP does not accept the business practices of the site - I interpret this as acknowledgement of the site but that TBP will not go any further. (A flashing red light (stop and check the situation before proceeding))

4. Not posting a site (such as the one under discussion) - The site fails in one or more respects to qualify for inclusion on the site - I interpret this as being a loud and clear signal that the site should be avoided. (A do not enter sign)

That's why I find PU/TBP to be superior to any of the other review sites and what makes this thread useful in addressing sites that are new or are reactivations of previously dormant sites.

That's also why, in my opinion, a site like AmericanKittens.com with its current business practices should not be included in the PU site unless and until it uses legitimate business practices. Edited on Nov 19, 2014, 09:53pm

11-20-14  02:40pm - 286 days #759
LPee23 (24)
Active User



Posts: 263
Registered: Jul 14, '13
Location: USA
I am in contact with the webmaster, and I will pass on your feedback. I think they are honestly trying to succeed - maybe trying too hard and deviating from the norm - but it is what it is.

11-20-14  06:07pm - 286 days #760
pat362 (373)
Active User



Posts: 3,100
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^It's not rocket science. If you are a person or group of persons who own content and would like to make some money from that content by offering it to people on the net than all you need to do is make sure that your site has an icon called "join". This icon would automatically bring up a join page where a possible customer knows how you want him or her to pay to get access to that content. Now if as you say they are trying too hard to succeed than you might want to tell them that they are wasting their time because they are driving in the wrong direction. Long live the Brown Coats.

11-20-14  06:19pm - 286 days #761
LPee23 (24)
Active User



Posts: 263
Registered: Jul 14, '13
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


Now if as you say they are trying too hard to succeed than you might want to tell them that they are wasting their time because they are driving in the wrong direction.


Yes, I hesitate to be so direct, but this is the case. While I have requested that the site be re-listed for the sake of discussion, I will be refraining from reviewing them because they have too many issues to work out. It's kind of hard to tell them this, because they have invested a lot in moving in this direction, but I fear your instincts are right. The site does have amazing content, and an awesome landing page. However, they have moved to a "Netflix" style model in which the content is not supposed to be downloadable. Before you all complain about this, believe me, my head is in the same place as yours. I just feel for them a little because they spent a lot of time and money building a custom code base to make this happen. I wish them the best of luck. It's kind of hard to say it now, but honestly customers want downloadable content...

02-27-15  09:52am - 187 days #763
elephant (67)
Active User



Posts: 335
Registered: Jan 11, '07
Just wondering why girlsgonewild.com isn't on the site. "Women are like tricks by sleight of hand, Which, to admire, we should not understand." WILLIAM CONGREVE

02-27-15  10:38am - 187 days #764
Khan
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 1,712
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by elephant:


Just wondering why girlsgonewild.com isn't on the site.


In Dec of 2013 we got a notice that the site was having legal (bankruptcy) problems. If they've sorted it out now, the webmaster/site owner is welcome to contact us to get it re-listed. Former Senior Administrator
PornUsers.com

"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure there is one less scoundrel in the world."-Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881)

03-01-15  07:26am - 185 days #765
elephant (67)
Active User



Posts: 335
Registered: Jan 11, '07
Originally Posted by Khan:


In Dec of 2013 we got a notice that the site was having legal (bankruptcy) problems. If they've sorted it out now, the webmaster/site owner is welcome to contact us to get it re-listed.


Oh right. Thanks for the info Khan. The site looks quite good now to be honest I was tempted to join then noticed it was featured here so wanted to see why. "Women are like tricks by sleight of hand, Which, to admire, we should not understand." WILLIAM CONGREVE

03-01-15  11:21am - 185 days #766
Monahan (42)
Active User



Posts: 341
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by elephant:


Oh right. Thanks for the info Khan. The site looks quite good now to be honest I was tempted to join then noticed it was featured here so wanted to see why.

That could be a problem. The site looks great with some good stuff, but without any upticks by TBP/PU, I'm not willing to drop $29.99 to find out the site is no longer updated and/or has crappy servers that make downloading a pain in the butt.

If the site is really good, they will satisfy the TBP folks that they have emerged from bankruptcy and are fully back in business.

Be patient.

03-18-15  01:26am - 168 days #767
lk2fireone (196)
Active User



Posts: 1,569
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I do a search for 18xgirls.com at PU and get 0 results.
This site used to be listed at PU.
It seems that if you no longer cover a site, it would be more informative if you still list it, with a description that the site is no longer covered--possibly with a short reason why. Or that PU does not accept the business practices of the site.

03-18-15  08:36am - 168 days #768
Khan
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 1,712
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I do a search for 18xgirls.com at PU and get 0 results.
This site used to be listed at PU.



We disabled the listing late Saturday night (14-Mar-2015) when we received a report that the site had been hijacked by an underage content provider.

We don't list sites with underage models, real or just advertised as such.

Our editors have written the site about this matter. Former Senior Administrator
PornUsers.com

"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure there is one less scoundrel in the world."-Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881)

03-19-15  07:20am - 167 days #769
Khan
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 1,712
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Just a quick followup ...

The site 18xgirls.com has been relisted. The site owners worked with us to address the "implied underage" issue.

You may leave your remarks at:
http://www.pornusers.com/review/18xgirls/

Hope that helps. Former Senior Administrator
PornUsers.com

"Make yourself an honest man, and then you may be sure there is one less scoundrel in the world."-Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881)

03-19-15  01:49pm - 167 days #770
lk2fireone (196)
Active User



Posts: 1,569
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Khan, thanks for the update on 18xGirls.
I'm currently a member of Teen Mega World.
Since 18xGirls has a lot of content that is available at Teen Mega World, I probably won't be joining 18xGirls anytime soon.

07-21-15  02:17pm - 43 days #772
Jay G (67)
Active User



Posts: 89
Registered: Jan 12, '07
Location: USA
Went to Woodman Casting X from Porn Users and was enchanted by The "Wake Up and Fuck" section which had beautiful natural women asleep at the hotel who were woken up and romanced by Pierre Woodman & a friend or two.

However, as I pointed out in my "bate & switch" comment, these videos are NOT available on the Woodman Casting X web site despite being on the introduction page. It is a separate subscription that is paid separately from Woodman Casting X.

Despite this, I gave into temptation and joined the site & could review it if it is listed as a separate site. This would also help those who like the videos but don't realize that it is a separate site with a separate payment despite what Best Porn & Porn Users would lead one to believe. I understand the confusion because it took awhile for me to finally figure this out myself.


Also, Congratulations to Amanda on her new position. Hope you will have great success in continuing the tradition of Porn Users.

Jay Wisco Jay G

07-23-15  06:01am - 41 days #774
Amanda
PornUsers Staff




Posts: 8
Registered: Jul 02, '15
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by Jay G:


Went to Woodman Casting X from Porn Users and was enchanted by The "Wake Up and Fuck" section which had beautiful natural women asleep at the hotel who were woken up and romanced by Pierre Woodman & a friend or two.

However, as I pointed out in my "bate & switch" comment, these videos are NOT available on the Woodman Casting X web site despite being on the introduction page. It is a separate subscription that is paid separately from Woodman Casting X.

Despite this, I gave into temptation and joined the site & could review it if it is listed as a separate site. This would also help those who like the videos but don't realize that it is a separate site with a separate payment despite what Best Porn & Porn Users would lead one to believe. I understand the confusion because it took awhile for me to finally figure this out myself.


Also, Congratulations to Amanda on her new position. Hope you will have great success in continuing the tradition of Porn Users.

Jay Wisco


Hi Jay!

Thanks for the kind words!

If you refer to post #301, #305, #306, #325, #328, #336 and #343 of this same thread you can see why Wake Up And Fuck doesn't have its own listing. Basically, it doesn't meet the standards for its own review. If that happens to change, though, I'll be sure to update this thread.

Thanks! "The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me?"

07-23-15  11:30am - 41 days #775
Pyrenees (26)
Active User



Posts: 81
Registered: Feb 25, '15
Location: USA
It appears Lupus Pictures is down for the count. You guys might want to contact them to see what the deal is. I was JUST about to join so I could review them and they say the site is down.

http://www.lupus-spanking.com/v2/main.php

Just in case you guys decide it is time to remove them.

On a site note there is a huge lack of good spanking porn in HD online. I mean spanking (Really hard) then sex. Really Kink is the only one I know of. I already own all of their material. I think there is a area of opportunity some good director could cash in on. Someone give me Blacked.com Director email lol =). 1Ti 6:17 Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy;

07-23-15  02:28pm - 41 days #776
Pyrenees (26)
Active User



Posts: 81
Registered: Feb 25, '15
Location: USA
Here is a very sad update. I contacted Lupus Films and here was my reply.

"Hello Pyrenees

Most of the ‘Lupus Spanking’ content is still available at http://videos.spanking.com/studio/2302/RGE-Films/?vod=84518.

Regards,
Mike, Support"

While I am happy I got a response. I suppose it is a good thing the content still exists? But to be frank I do not know anyone who would pay $30 per movie (Or $3000 total) for the exact same content that used to cost only a $30 subscription. This business model makes me very sad. This means I will never be able to collect this content. They may as well have deleted it all. So PU and TBP webmasters. You can remove Lupus Films from the site. It has been destroyed. 1Ti 6:17 Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy;

701-732 of 732 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 4 6 8 14 Page 15 16
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.11 seconds.