Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Fake breasts ... again!
1-50 of 129 Posts Page 1 2 3 Next Page >
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

04-07-10  09:32am - 1569 days Original Post - #1
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Fake breasts ... again!

I don't want to rant about "enhanced" breasts again but simply need advice from someone who has been a subscriber to both sites. Between Bangbros and Reality Kings which site contains the LEAST amount of fakes? Thank you.

04-07-10  10:10am - 1569 days #2
TheSquirrel (53)
Active User



Posts: 693
Registered: Oct 29, '08
Location: UK
Please god no! Don't do it messsmer. Not those sites. Anything but those sites. Tats and fake breasts. I'm not going near either of those places.

04-07-10  10:52am - 1568 days #3
Capn (28)
Active User



Posts: 1,692
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
I am amazed that you are even considering it!

Cap'n. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

04-07-10  11:27am - 1568 days #4
TheSquirrel (53)
Active User



Posts: 693
Registered: Oct 29, '08
Location: UK
Anyone considering such a horrible use of money, should think again. I urge you, send it to me instead. I shall spend it on women drugs and alcohol. That way, not one cent will be wasted.

04-07-10  11:33am - 1568 days #5
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Please god no! Don't do it messsmer. Not those sites. Anything but those sites. Tats and fake breasts. I'm not going near either of those places.


Thank you, squirrel. That's a timely statement. I needed your post!

04-07-10  11:40am - 1568 days #6
TheSquirrel (53)
Active User



Posts: 693
Registered: Oct 29, '08
Location: UK
Thank god you pulled yourself together in time.

04-07-10  11:49am - 1568 days #7
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I am amazed that you are even considering it!

Cap'n.


Well, here it is, Cap'n. I am tired of DVD sites that put out the same monotonous, low cost, low quality garbage day after day and that's all of them, even the ones I praised in the past. I am tired of picture sites that promise but don't deliver. I am tired of looking for THE site that would feature mature ladies, wearing tons of sexy lingerie who undress slowly until completely and shamelessly naked!

With the Canadian Dollar being at par I was looking at some sites this morning that feature yearly subscriptions at reasonable rates and the two sites mentioned showed up on the screen. You're right, it isn't really me, my preference would be .. see above .. but I figured by getting something at a good price (parity) for once I might just find some nuggets among the wealth of material.

But I am starting to come to my senses because long term subscriptions are usually not a very good idea. 21sextury is proof of that. I haven't been back in two weeks and have nine - ten months to go. Edited on Apr 07, 2010, 12:05pm

04-07-10  12:06pm - 1568 days #8
nostromo (12)
Active User

Posts: 131
Registered: Sep 22, '07
Location: madrid/spain
I say Bangbros.

Although Reality Kings recently added a scene in BigNaturals with an amazingly hot girl with big natural breasts who goes by the name of Haley Cummings. there is also an older vid with a girl named Jolie Rain that is worth the price of admission. both gals are unuasally sexy and it shows that they dig teasing. Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.

H.L. Mencken.
Edited on Apr 07, 2010, 12:16pm

04-07-10  12:11pm - 1568 days #9
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by nostromo:


I say Bangbros.


Thank you, nostromo, but as you can see above my friends won't let me subscribe to either site!

04-07-10  12:16pm - 1568 days #10
Capn (28)
Active User



Posts: 1,692
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Trust us.

We do have your best interests at heart!

Cap'n. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

04-07-10  12:17pm - 1568 days #11
nostromo (12)
Active User

Posts: 131
Registered: Sep 22, '07
Location: madrid/spain
Originally Posted by messmer:


Thank you, nostromo, but as you can see above my friends won't let me subscribe to either site!


I beg to differ with them. Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.

H.L. Mencken.

04-07-10  12:20pm - 1568 days #12
Capn (28)
Active User



Posts: 1,692
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
I don't doubt it works for you, Nostromo.

We know Messmer's preferences pretty well though.

Cap'n. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

04-07-10  12:28pm - 1568 days #13
malikstarks (8)
Active User

Posts: 84
Registered: Nov 19, '07
Location: Orlando FL
I'm NOT a huge fan of either site but I'm a member at both for only $9.99 each. It's hard to pass up for that price, especially with the massive archives of those two sites.

I still have a link for Bangbros for $9.95 if you change your mind and want to try it out for a month:

http://www.bangbrosnetwork.com/t1/pps=bangfreesp/join.htm

My link for Reality kings no longer works.

That said knowing Messmer's taste, I'm not sure either one is for him. Edited on Apr 07, 2010, 12:35pm

04-07-10  12:44pm - 1568 days #14
exotics4me (463)
Active User



Posts: 421
Registered: Jan 12, '07
Location: USA
I don't know fellas, last time we were talking about these networks, I decided to put a comparison together to see how bad the implant percentages would be. Bang Bros is much easier to come up with because they were tired of being compared to big boob networks and labeled all their implant models as "enhanced tits" to show their difference in them and the sites with many implants. On Reality Kings and Brazzers, I just took the first 48 models to come up with a brief, but most likely fairly accurate look at their models. Here are those numbers.

Reality Kings 7 of 48 or 14.6%
Bang Bros 277 of 1624 or 17%
Brazzers 26 of 48 or 54.1%

As you can see this is a huge difference. My guess is that the difference has to do with type of models. For example, Reality Kings has the excellent Mike's Apartment which is about 95% Euro models, very few implants. They also have Mike in Brazil, very few implants on Brazilian women. They also are not afraid to have black, Latina models on any of their sites and these models usually are more likely not to have implants. Bang Bros is similar to RK in the black/Latina part, but only have a small percentage of Euro models. Brazzers is almost all American models. I don't remember them having many Latinas, very few Euro and very few black models. Lots and lots of blonde beach types though.

I'm sure Reality Kings and Brazzers numbers could probably vary +/- 5% as a whole, but I think that's a pretty fair way to at least get something of a view of how those breakdown. I still have a membership going with Bang Bros and have downloaded over 400 GB from them over the last few months. Just opened a new membership at Reality Kings for probably the 12th time in 3 years and intend to stay for a few months on it as well. Last time I was on Brazzers was January 2009, if I remember correctly and downloaded a total of 3 videos, one day signed in, 29 not signed in. “You cannot blame porn. When I was young, I used to masturbate to Gilligan's Island.” - Ron Jeremy

04-07-10  12:48pm - 1568 days #15
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by malikstarks:


I'm NOT a huge fan of either site but I'm a member at both for only $9.99 each. It's hard to pass up for that price, especially with the massive archives of those two sites.

I still have a link for Bangbros for $9.95 if you change your mind and want to try it out for a month:

http://www.bangbrosnetwork.com/t1/pps=bangfreesp/join.htm

My link for Reality kings no longer works.

That said knowing Messmer's taste, I'm not sure either one is for him.


Thanks, malikstarks. I appreciate the link and might sneak in without letting you-know-who in on it!

04-07-10  12:59pm - 1568 days #16
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I don't know fellas, last time we were talking about these networks, I decided to put a comparison together to see how bad the implant percentages would be. Bang Bros is much easier to come up with because they were tired of being compared to big boob networks and labeled all their implant models as "enhanced tits" to show their difference in them and the sites with many implants. On Reality Kings and Brazzers, I just took the first 48 models to come up with a brief, but most likely fairly accurate look at their models. Here are those numbers.

Reality Kings 7 of 48 or 14.6%
Bang Bros 277 of 1624 or 17%
Brazzers 26 of 48 or 54.1%

As you can see this is a huge difference. My guess is that the difference has to do with type of models. For example, Reality Kings has the excellent Mike's Apartment which is about 95% Euro models, very few implants. They also have Mike in Brazil, very few implants on Brazilian women. They also are not afraid to have black, Latina models on any of their sites and these models usually are more likely not to have implants. Bang Bros is similar to RK in the black/Latina part, but only have a small percentage of Euro models. Brazzers is almost all American models. I don't remember them having many Latinas, very few Euro and very few black models. Lots and lots of blonde beach types though.

I'm sure Reality Kings and Brazzers numbers could probably vary +/- 5% as a whole, but I think that's a pretty fair way to at least get something of a view of how those breakdown. I still have a membership going with Bang Bros and have downloaded over 400 GB from them over the last few months. Just opened a new membership at Reality Kings for probably the 12th time in 3 years and intend to stay for a few months on it as well. Last time I was on Brazzers was January 2009, if I remember correctly and downloaded a total of 3 videos, one day signed in, 29 not signed in.


Thanks, as usual, for a very thorough reply, exotics! And for being on the "pro" site along with nostromo. Gives me a chance to think things over and not reject these sites (except for Brazzers) out of hand.

04-07-10  01:04pm - 1568 days #17
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by nostromo:


I beg to differ with them.


Please don't get me wrong, nostromo. I appreciate your reply as well as the fact that, for many, sites like Bangbros and Reality Kings are quite pleasurable. Who knows, might be for me as well. I must take the tour to see if they have any real MILFS in any of their sites. That could sway me!

04-07-10  01:19pm - 1568 days #18
RagingBuddhist (63)
Active User



Posts: 833
Registered: Jan 23, '07
messmer-

I'm surpised to see you even considering either of those. When you have to ask which is going to be the least offensive to your personal preferences, that should be the clue that the answer is C. Neither of the above. Arguing with some people is like trying to play chess with a pigeon - it knocks the pieces over, shits all over the board, then flies back to its flock to claim victory.

04-07-10  01:32pm - 1568 days #19
Miss Hybrid (4)
Active Webmaster


Posts: 79
Registered: Mar 21, '10
Location: England
i agree with RB

04-07-10  01:44pm - 1568 days #20
Drooler (218)
Active User



Posts: 1,677
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Is internet porn really so much like television, wherein the viewer's principle of choice is what's "least objectionable"? You know the party’s really getting underway when the female boxers take a fisting break.

The next time someone tries to sell you something, ask them, "Do I get a floppy disk with it?" See how they react ...

04-07-10  02:41pm - 1568 days #21
larss (1)
Disabled User

Posts: 50
Registered: Mar 20, '10
Location: London
Originally Posted by messmer:

I am tired of looking for THE site that would feature mature ladies, wearing tons of sexy lingerie who undress slowly until completely and shamelessly naked!


I almost feel embarrassed to mention this site again, as it is the one and only site that I have reviewed, but Miss Hybrid seems to me to be who you are looking for. She does have enhanced breasts, and I am not sure what you mean by mature, but I suggest that you have a look at the previews on her site.

04-07-10  02:44pm - 1568 days #22
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Miss Hybrid:


i agree with RB



Well, okay, then you or RB please give me the url of a site that features pictures or videos of MATURE women slowly stripping in a casual way from fully clothed until naked, with plenty of lingerie thrown in! Smartasses!

04-07-10  02:49pm - 1568 days #23
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by larss:


I almost feel embarrassed to mention this site again, as it is the one and only site that I have reviewed, but Miss Hybrid seems to me to be who you are looking for. She does have enhanced breasts, and I am not sure what you mean by mature, but I suggest that you have a look at the previews on her site.


Mature: over forty! As to enhanced breasts, I hate them so much that I'll never find out if Miss Hybrid looks good in them or not, Larss. Soothing aside to Miss Hybrid: I'm sure you look fantastic but can you make them sag? I love saggies!

04-07-10  03:05pm - 1568 days #24
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Is internet porn really so much like television, wherein the viewer's principle of choice is what's "least objectionable"?


Trouble is, Drooler, that niche material is completely under represented and understandably so. What web owner / web master wants to have a site that caters to about 5 - 10% of Porn Users. No money in that and so, those of us who are not satisfied with content that appeals to the other 90% have a hard time finding exactly what we are looking for .. so we are practically forced to go for what, to us, is second best or "least objectionable" as you put it.

Niche One: sexy and appealing lingerie .. young people are not interested. Cotton thongs are fine with them.

Niche Two: Truly mature women (for those of us over fifty who think that someone in their fifties and sixties can still look darned good.) Again, most younger PUs shudder, they don't want to see Grannies.

Niche Three: Hair! Again, to most PUs hair has almost become a sign of hygienic neglect, almost uncleanness while only thirty years ago it was normal!

Now combine the three for my ideal site and you come up with Zilch! So, what can I substitute? Remember that old commercial: If you don't have Parkay you can always use butter! Except in my case it's been the other way around for far too long. I've had to murmur to myself: Well, if you can't have butter you can always use Parkay! Edited on Apr 07, 2010, 03:15pm

04-07-10  07:01pm - 1568 days #25
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,895
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I have been a recent member of both site and I'd say that Reality has less ladies with implants than BangBros. I can't give you a number because I don't remember. I also prefered Reality Kings content to BangBros. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-07-10  07:27pm - 1568 days #26
hodayathink (18)
Active User

Posts: 312
Registered: Mar 27, '09
Location: Illinois
I've got a $9.95 link to Reality Kings that I'm pretty sure still works (haven't tried it out myself yet):

http://www.realitykings.com/enter.htm?id=freeonesrev

As far as the three major networks mentioned here, I think the reason that Bangbros and Reality Kings have less women with implants is because both companies shoot the majority of their material in Florida and not southern California. SoCal, it seems, is filled with enhanced breasts, whether the girls are in porn or not.

04-07-10  07:56pm - 1568 days #27
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I have been a recent member of both site and I'd say that Reality has less ladies with implants than BangBros. I can't give you a number because I don't remember. I also prefered Reality Kings content to BangBros.


Thanks for that input, Pat. Very helpful!

04-07-10  08:02pm - 1568 days #28
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


I've got a $9.95 link to Reality Kings that I'm pretty sure still works (haven't tried it out myself yet):

http://www.realitykings.com/enter.htm?id=freeonesrev

As far as the three major networks mentioned here, I think the reason that Bangbros and Reality Kings have less women with implants is because both companies shoot the majority of their material in Florida and not southern California. SoCal, it seems, is filled with enhanced breasts, whether the girls are in porn or not.


I never thought of the subject of "enhanced" in geographical terms, hodayathing, but I'm sure you have a point. Most stars and porn stars are found in Southern California and most have implants. They can improve a clothed silhouette but not a naked body. Thanks for pointing out to me that both RK and BB are located in Florida. Might see some different faces in their videos as well because of that? Or not?

04-07-10  10:17pm - 1568 days #29
Drooler (218)
Active User



Posts: 1,677
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


Trouble is, Drooler, that niche material is completely under represented and understandably so. What web owner / web master wants to have a site that caters to about 5 - 10% of Porn Users. No money in that and so, those of us who are not satisfied with content that appeals to the other 90% have a hard time finding exactly what we are looking for .. so we are practically forced to go for what, to us, is second best or "least objectionable" as you put it.

Niche One: sexy and appealing lingerie .. young people are not interested. Cotton thongs are fine with them.

Niche Two: Truly mature women (for those of us over fifty who think that someone in their fifties and sixties can still look darned good.) Again, most younger PUs shudder, they don't want to see Grannies.

Niche Three: Hair! Again, to most PUs hair has almost become a sign of hygienic neglect, almost uncleanness while only thirty years ago it was normal!

Now combine the three for my ideal site and you come up with Zilch! So, what can I substitute? Remember that old commercial: If you don't have Parkay you can always use butter! Except in my case it's been the other way around for far too long. I've had to murmur to myself: Well, if you can't have butter you can always use Parkay!


Oh, sure. What I like is uncommon enough that I've spent years churning my own butter, if you'll pardon the expression.

Too bad that I don't like bondage and such. I don't know if that niche goes over the 10% satisfaction rate for the general porn-using population, but maybe it does. You know the party’s really getting underway when the female boxers take a fisting break.

The next time someone tries to sell you something, ask them, "Do I get a floppy disk with it?" See how they react ...

04-08-10  01:15am - 1568 days #30
larss (1)
Disabled User

Posts: 50
Registered: Mar 20, '10
Location: London
Originally Posted by messmer:


Trouble is, Drooler, that niche material is completely under represented and understandably so. What web owner / web master wants to have a site that caters to about 5 - 10% of Porn Users. No money in that and so, those of us who are not satisfied with content that appeals to the other 90% have a hard time finding exactly what we are looking for .. so we are practically forced to go for what, to us, is second best or "least objectionable" as you put it.

Niche One: sexy and appealing lingerie .. young people are not interested. Cotton thongs are fine with them.

Niche Two: Truly mature women (for those of us over fifty who think that someone in their fifties and sixties can still look darned good.) Again, most younger PUs shudder, they don't want to see Grannies.

Niche Three: Hair! Again, to most PUs hair has almost become a sign of hygienic neglect, almost uncleanness while only thirty years ago it was normal!

Now combine the three for my ideal site and you come up with Zilch! So, what can I substitute? Remember that old commercial: If you don't have Parkay you can always use butter! Except in my case it's been the other way around for far too long. I've had to murmur to myself: Well, if you can't have butter you can always use Parkay!


So what you are looking for is over forty, saggy breasts and unshaven pubes?

How about allmilfs.com ? Not looked at it too deeply myself as I prefer slightly younger (30ish) and less hairy.

04-08-10  08:54am - 1568 days #31
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by larss:


So what you are looking for is over forty, saggy breasts and unshaven pubes?

How about allmilfs.com ? Not looked at it too deeply myself as I prefer slightly younger (30ish) and less hairy.


Sounds just about right to me, larss, except you forgot the sexy lingerie!

04-08-10  09:06am - 1568 days #32
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Oh, sure. What I like is uncommon enough that I've spent years churning my own butter, if you'll pardon the expression.

Too bad that I don't like bondage and such. I don't know if that niche goes over the 10% satisfaction rate for the general porn-using population, but maybe it does.


LOL. I like the expression! have never given BDSM a thought myself but must say that I do like bondage a la Kink.com. I've never subscribed to one of their sites and it wouldn't be my first choice but a review yesterday made me take a tour and it touched a libidinous chord, so, who knows. I might end up there yet. Lingerie clad grannies are too hard to find.

04-08-10  09:22am - 1568 days #33
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by larss:


So what you are looking for is over forty, saggy breasts and unshaven pubes?

How about allmilfs.com ? Not looked at it too deeply myself as I prefer slightly younger (30ish) and less hairy.


BTW, I eagerly went to allmilfs.com, saw what I liked and when I tried to subscribe I got the join page for AllOver30, a site I already subscribe to. But thanks for the thought!

I have the same problem with them that I have had with so many other sites, not enough lingerie shoots, not enough really mature ladies (even though I love models in their thirties and forties as well) and let them know it in no uncertain terms. They are the Parkay I referred to in another post. I like them, I like their models, but most photo sets are shot for an audience with a taste different from mine. So if I want a set that really appeals to me I have to be content with one, at the most two, a week.

04-08-10  10:20pm - 1567 days #34
turboshaft (24)
Active User

Posts: 1,933
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Oh, sure. What I like is uncommon enough that I've spent years churning my own butter, if you'll pardon the expression.


Lol...yum! Oh wait, I mean "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

04-20-10  07:03pm - 1555 days #35
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,895
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't know if this is truly a change of direction but I certainly hope it is. If nothing else that it is a step in the right direction.

http://www.adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=41316 Long live the Brown Coats.

04-20-10  07:13pm - 1555 days #36
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't know if this is truly a change of direction but I certainly hope it is. If nothing else that it is a step in the right direction.

http://www.adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=41316


Welcome news, Pat. Should send the link to Naughty America and Brazzers, among others.

04-20-10  07:28pm - 1555 days #37
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,895
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by messmer:


Welcome news, Pat. Should send the link to Naughty America and Brazzers, among others.


I agree with you. I think that every talent agency and studio should have a sign that says if they aren't real then it's no deal. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-20-10  10:19pm - 1555 days #38
Cybertoad (102)
Active User



Posts: 1,993
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Or like in Mad Max, return to thunderdome.

Break a deal............spin the wheel .

01-23-13  08:18am - 547 days #39
jberryl69 (12)
Active User



Posts: 969
Registered: Nov 27, '10
Location: neverland
I came across this person in a Yahoo article about Katherine Webb to compete on 'Celebrity Diving' - the article mentions Playboy model Kendra Wilkinson whom I'd never heard of, but being the curious soul I am, did a Google and found photos of her and then looked at Google's video's and found a 2003 home-made sex tape. She is of the vein of the Hilton & Richie "personalities".

Which brings me to WTF was she thinking that blowing those breasts up makes her more appealing?



Not having any hips, she looks .... bloated. If it ain't grits, it must be a Yankee.

If you're going to lay her head over the pool table and fuck her throat, get your fucking hand off her throat!

01-23-13  08:50am - 547 days #40
hodayathink (18)
Active User

Posts: 312
Registered: Mar 27, '09
Location: Illinois
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


I came across this person in a Yahoo article about Katherine Webb to compete on 'Celebrity Diving' - the article mentions Playboy model Kendra Wilkinson whom I'd never heard of, but being the curious soul I am, did a Google and found photos of her and then looked at Google's video's and found a 2003 home-made sex tape. She is of the vein of the Hilton & Richie "personalities".

Which brings me to WTF was she thinking that blowing those breasts up makes her more appealing?



Not having any hips, she looks .... bloated.


It worked enough to get her into Playboy, which in turn led to her becoming a full-fledged celebrity, so they made their money back many times over. Sometimes it's mainly a financial decision, and not a cosmetic one.

01-23-13  09:44am - 547 days #41
jberryl69 (12)
Active User



Posts: 969
Registered: Nov 27, '10
Location: neverland
Well, you are correct, but I just really wonder had she not done that if she still could have made the financial gain. I think all she had to do was blow Hefner and muff dive his GFs. Maybe I should turn myself into a freak to make money.

Blow my wanker up. If it ain't grits, it must be a Yankee.

If you're going to lay her head over the pool table and fuck her throat, get your fucking hand off her throat!

01-23-13  09:46am - 547 days #42
davel60 (3)
Disabled User



Posts: 11
Registered: Jan 21, '13
Location: USA
This is exactly what I am looking for... Some real porn experts. I have been a member at a big site for several years, but have found the quality control going south along with increasingly poor customer service issues.

01-23-13  10:39am - 546 days #43
Capn (28)
Active User



Posts: 1,692
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Hi Dave,

You will find a great cross section of tastes expressed on here.

The real strength of this community is it's civil & tolerant nature.

Cap'n. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

01-23-13  11:32am - 546 days #44
Cybertoad (102)
Active User



Posts: 1,993
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Originally Posted by Capn:


Hi Dave,
You will find a great cross section of tastes expressed on here.
The real strength of this community is it's civil & tolerant nature.
Cap'n.


Welcome Dave, ya its a mix basket of fruits and nuts were mostly nuts around here. .
But seriously its a good group of people, with diverse cultures, orientations, and geographic location.
And some of us can even tie our own shoes all by our selves !

Hehe, anyhow welcome stay awhile , and maybe do some reviews that always helps everyone !

CT

01-23-13  05:33pm - 546 days #45
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,895
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


Well, you are correct, but I just really wonder had she not done that if she still could have made the financial gain.


Although you might be correct. About the only way she could have met Hefner was if she was a Playboy Bunny so we are back to why she got implants. I think I have given up trying to figure the reasons behind girls modifrying their bodies. Long live the Brown Coats.

01-23-13  05:34pm - 546 days #46
pat362 (367)
Active User



Posts: 2,895
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by davel60:


This is exactly what I am looking for...


Let me add my welcome to the others. I hope we get to interact on various subjects. Long live the Brown Coats.

01-23-13  07:25pm - 546 days #47
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 95
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


It worked enough to get her into Playboy, which in turn led to her becoming a full-fledged celebrity, so they made their money back many times over. Sometimes it's mainly a financial decision, and not a cosmetic one.


The fact that she gained financially through having fake breasts speaks of a certain unhealthiness in how society perceives how women look. In the before picture her breasts are in proportion to her body and she looks healthy and natural, in the after she looks like one of those blow-up sex-dolls.


01-24-13  05:43am - 546 days #48
jberryl69 (12)
Active User



Posts: 969
Registered: Nov 27, '10
Location: neverland
Originally Posted by Reveen:


The fact that she gained financially through having fake breasts speaks of a certain unhealthiness in how society perceives how women look. In the before picture her breasts are in proportion to her body and she looks healthy and natural, in the after she looks like one of those blow-up sex-dolls.




Hear hear!! If it ain't grits, it must be a Yankee.

If you're going to lay her head over the pool table and fuck her throat, get your fucking hand off her throat!

01-24-13  10:59am - 545 days #49
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Reveen:


The fact that she gained financially through having fake breasts speaks of a certain unhealthiness in how society perceives how women look. In the before picture her breasts are in proportion to her body and she looks healthy and natural, in the after she looks like one of those blow-up sex-dolls.


I think Barbie is behind the fake breast craze. They all want to look like Barbie .. which is fine when they are fully clothed but take off those clothes and it's a horror to most. I tie my theory to the fact that enhanced breasts are mostly popular among North Americans where the dolls were the most prevalent and popular. Because of this most red-blooded American males don't want to see small to medium breasts any more because they remember their youth and Barbie's "super size me" plastic breasts!

01-24-13  11:40am - 545 days #50
Reveen (0)
Active User

Posts: 95
Registered: Apr 06, '09
Originally Posted by messmer:


I think Barbie is behind the fake breast craze. They all want to look like Barbie .. which is fine when they are fully clothed but take off those clothes and it's a horror to most. I tie my theory to the fact that enhanced breasts are mostly popular among North Americans where the dolls were the most prevalent and popular. Because of this most red-blooded American males don't want to see small to medium breasts any more because they remember their youth and Barbie's "super size me" plastic breasts!


Hmmm do they also pattern themselves after the Ken doll?

1-50 of 129 Posts Page 1 2 3 Next Page >
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.