Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Bang Bros male talent
1-10 of 10 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

03-02-10  05:28am - 1610 days Original Post - #1
audrina69 (2)
Active User

Posts: 18
Registered: Nov 24, '09
Location: los angeles, ca
Bang Bros male talent

Used to be one of my favorite sites. Beautiful girls, no plot or story, just sex. Yeah, the camera guy talked too much at times, but I tolerated it cause the girls were awesome and the male talent was good, Preston, Ramon, JT, Jmac and Jordan Ash did most of the scenes. Only Preston remains and he only does FacialFest. The other male "talent" sucks.....Seth Gamble was there for awhile he was good. Mike Adriano is good, but underused on the site. Carlos and Shaggy are the freakin worse. How those guys are in porn is beyond me.

Anyone else agree that the male talent is an important element of the scenes? Call me crazy, but I love watching pretty girls with guys with big cocks. Not the small, limps one that are all too prevalent on the site recently.

03-02-10  09:43am - 1610 days #2
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I don't really have much in common with anyone who prefers videos that have no plot or story, audrina69, nor have I ever subscribed to Bang Bros so I can't really respond to your interesting post. :-)

I am answering because one guy who is ubiquitous in the business gets on my nerves so bad that I've destroyed every scene that contains him: John? Janeiro. He's ugly, never changes his T-shirt, has played husband and boyfriend so many times because of his ordinary looks that I shudder every time I see him.

03-02-10  10:50am - 1610 days #3
audrina69 (2)
Active User

Posts: 18
Registered: Nov 24, '09
Location: los angeles, ca
I hear you...some sites i just want sex, no story...and others I enjoy, like Brazzers or NA have plot or story in every scene.

But at least we can agree that the guy can fuck up the whole scene.

03-02-10  11:08am - 1610 days #4
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by audrina69:


I hear you...some sites i just want sex, no story...and others I enjoy, like Brazzers or NA have plot or story in every scene.

But at least we can agree that the guy can fuck up the whole scene.


Oh, yeah, we definitely agree on that. And in connection with Janeiro I should have written: "I shudder every time I see him play another amateur!"

03-02-10  02:02pm - 1610 days #5
exotics4me (463)
Active User



Posts: 421
Registered: Jan 12, '07
Location: USA
I'm a member on Bang Bros right now and have been a fan of their content for years. Long enough to know when I used to join it, it was called the Ox Pass not Bang Bros. I don't pay much attention to the male talent though. I thought Ramon was an ass. That's usually my interest in the male talent, if they annoy me or not.

You have to remember when comparing them to Naughty America, Reality Kings, Brazzers, Bang Bros was the first of these to do reality plot porn with the Bang Bus. Seems like Naughty America started with the So Cal Amateurs site which was just about women wanting to do porn. You could try out Innocent High's network. They have decent plots, but all plots in porn get old after the 5th or 6th scene. I hope no future screenwriters are watching porn to get a grasp on storytelling! “You cannot blame porn. When I was young, I used to masturbate to Gilligan's Island.” - Ron Jeremy

03-02-10  03:28pm - 1609 days #6
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I've never been a member of Bang Bros. but wouldn't mind paying for a subscription if you, my trusted PU, re-assure me that their emphasis is not on fake or large breasts. Actually, large I can tolerate, even like, but too many implants spoil the net. :-)

03-03-10  08:49am - 1609 days #7
Cybertoad (102)
Active User



Posts: 2,006
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
I was a member along time, there.
I got bored because it was the same ole same ole plot.

It may be a different local, and yes I know there is only so many ways you can have sex. I think it just seemed to canned.

How many ppl remember Mario Brothers ?
The first one was cool, the second better, then the third was like a repeat and then so on and so on.
Bang Bros started off very random and unpredictable. Now I think they suck a bit in my opinion. Because I already know what the girls gonna say, what they will lead to and then walla. I would prefer just straight sex in this case since the scenes are just rookie to me.

A good example of creativity for me has always been Catalina Cruz, she did random stuff and you never where quite sure where she would go with it. I think the difference is she is a Hardcore class act.. Bang Bros in my opinion is just and act. But in their defense they must do something right they are huge and growing.

03-03-10  10:12am - 1609 days #8
exotics4me (463)
Active User



Posts: 421
Registered: Jan 12, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I've never been a member of Bang Bros. but wouldn't mind paying for a subscription if you, my trusted PU, re-assure me that their emphasis is not on fake or large breasts. Actually, large I can tolerate, even like, but too many implants spoil the net. :-)


Messmer, I don't think they are boob focused. They have about 25 regularly updated sites with 5 more that are archival sites they bought out when the sites went under. They have 2 sites that do tend to lean towards big boobs as their focus, but that is of 25. It's not like Brazzers where every site seems to have "big tits" in the name. You also get much more variety in the models here, white, black, Asian and Latina. They have some of the popular what I would call thin models like Tanner Mayes, average build models like Rebecca Linares and the seem to be required implant models like Eva Angelina.

To me, the thing that separates them, especially if you've never been there are the amateur-near amateur sites. I don't know if you remember the Penny Show. It was a college girl and her two roommates doing an adult version of a talk show. Difference here, Penny interviews the guys and measures the flaccid penis before picking which one gets a chance with her. There isn't a lot of content on it. It only lasted a semester or so, maybe 20 scenes, but it definitely puts a different spin on porn.

They have facialfest.com in the network now. It used to be a standalone site, but went belly up. Bang Bros picked it up and are once again updating it. They advertise 90% of the models as first timers and 90% as never doing another scene. Kind of one of those, "She needed money" sites. The facial part is kind of misleading since it is full hardcore sex not just facials.

The Bang Bus is their flagship site on the network. It's obviously set up, but it is still people (usually one on one) having sex in the back of a van with no tinted windows, as the driver drives around California. People beep the horns as they go by, wave, stare.

What brings me back is the difference in models with the variety of races. They do tend to favor the curvy models, that classic female build with hips and butt. The plots can get old after awhile. I took a year or so off from their network a few years ago. But as I've found out with almost all sites, they all get old after awhile. You won't find a lot of lingerie here. The commentators can be a bit annoying after awhile, but I would rate them right along Reality Kings as the best networks.

Last, the technical parts of their sites are sometimes listed wrong. The Penny Show videos are listed as 500kb as in bitrate, when you download they are 2,500 bitrate, so the quality is pretty good overall too. If I was recommending it, I would do so with the "try just one month at a time". That has worked for me. They have a good tour as well and TBP discount. This network used to be $29.95 back years ago. “You cannot blame porn. When I was young, I used to masturbate to Gilligan's Island.” - Ron Jeremy

03-03-10  10:33am - 1609 days #9
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks, exotics. Loads of good information in your reply. I think I'll give 'em a try for a month. Especially since lingerie appears to be something no one wants or needs any more. :-)

03-03-10  10:37am - 1609 days #10
messmer (137)
Active User



Posts: 2,512
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks for the input, cybertoad. I find the predictability factor high in most sites but maybe, not ever having been a member of Bang Bros. I'll find something a bit different in one of the sites or the other. At least that's my hope.

1-10 of 10 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.