Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Surprisingly large and diverse network.
There are 11 sites included in the network.
By their count there are 2,676 scenes.
Some unique and strange porn which is why I guess it's named WTF Pass.
The newer scenes on the network have 720p and 1080p quality downloads.
Some of this content is too strange to make up or pass up.
Cons:
No scenes have dates on them and there's no reason to believe any of it is updating.
Strange isn't always a good thing.
Feels like a cheap version of major networks takes on reality porn.
Bottom Line:
This was not as bad as I was expecting. I found interest in several sites and also felt like some of the sites are just blatant cheap ripoffs of bigger, mainstream sites. Below are the sites that come with the network and their number of scenes:
If you are like me the first one that really caught your eye was Panda Fuck. This is a site featuring a stuffed Panda Bear that I believe a man is in. The women masturbate and have "sex" with the panda's foot long dildo or cucumber. The Art Porn looks a lot like Sex Art and X-Art, it also has scenes that are named in ways to make me believe they have updated somewhat recently like, "Quarantined With Hot Girlfriend".
What does impress me about the network is this looks to be all-amateur. In some ways, it reminds me of Teen Mega World or maybe Porn Pros. Some of the scenes do feel generic, but I do believe the amateur aspect helps in that regard. They have a lot of outdoor, exhibitionism, voyeurism scenes too.
A few things to make note of the scene counts on some of the sites is lower than it says. College Fuck Parties which is a good site has older scenes that are split into 4-6 parts. There is a model list and it lists them having almost 800 models. My guessing that it's amateur is based on me not recognizing any of the models. It does look like the prettiest models are on their site The Art Porn. The age of the models is a lot of 18-20 year olds and I haven't seen one over 24.
I do think it's an okay join especially if you like outdoor, orgies and public porn. Nothing really stands out and that's the same feeling I had about Teen Mega World. I would not be surprised if this content is related to TMW. I was debating trying it since I do like orgies. When I was signing up, I noticed a nice surprise, the price was only $8. That probably helped me make the decision to give it a try. There is definitely better porn out there, but if you're looking for something with a sense of humor and even foolishness, this network does a good job on those parts.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some beautiful European models, including many that ultimately made it to the A list.
Cons:
Where do I start?
Bottom Line:
This is where Euro porn B and C and F grade movies go to die. There is a huge amount of content across the network here and virtually none of it is worth downloading. Long unfiltered, uncut "reality" movies that go on for an hour with 5 or 10 minutes of mediocre jittery "home-movie" content embedded somewhere. Girls who look drugged, bored, or in pain. More anal than I ever cared to see in my life. Totally by the numbers porn: undress, blow job, cowgirl, doggie, anal, facial -- repeat.
If that's you're thing go for it.
Note: beware cross-sell sites on signup. They got me. They also try to cross-sell every time you try to enter the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+A network of 9 sites with nearly 1200 videos and photosets.
+They have an excellent selection of models to choose from.
+All the videos can be streamed online.
+All the Videos can be downloaded in WMV and MP4 and resolution for these two formats is at least 576p. The bulk of the videos from 2009 to today are now also offered in 720p.
+They offer smartphone, iphone, ipad and mac versions of their videos.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from set to set but 1600x1067 is common with scenes shot in 2009.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with a little over 15 new scenes per month.
Cons:
-A large percentage of the recent updates is all leased content available on many other sites.
-Resolution for the bulk of the videos is very good but too many of the scenes are not well shot. where the camer is in the wrong place and lighting leaves a lot to be desired.
-A percentage of the updates are the same scene that is cut into multiple sections.
-About a 1/5 of the mains screen is taken up by offers to other sites.
-The network has tendency to use a different name then the one we know them under.
-Many of the models have multiple scenes that are split into the different sites and they often perform the same type of sex scene.
Bottom Line:
*This is a pretty big network with a variety to chose from. I'm going to give more indept info on the different sites so that you get a better idea of what that site offers it's members.
*College Fuck Parties is sort of an orgy type of site where there are multiple partners having sex at the same time and the camera moves around a lot to keep track of the action. The scenes are normally shot in different rooms so this is one of the sites that updates with multiple sections. There are 79 parties and the site updates with a new ones every month. I can't recommend the site because I don't like orgy type porn because the camera has to keep moving to show as much of the action as possible or spend too long on just part of it. Of course if someo likes this type of porn then you should be quite happy with it.
*Pickup Fuck is basically a fake scenario style porn where we are meant to believe that these guys meet a girl on the street, in a café or a bar and after some some time she decides to have sex with one or two guys. The dialogue is all in Russian but they have subtitles. I like their selction of models but I really didn't particularly like their videos. Too many of the scenes are shot in tight spaces like bathroom stalls so camera angles are very limted and when you couple that with many of the shots being POV style then that simply adds to my displeasure, The lighting is also quite bad when they shoot those tight space scenes because they are using the rooms normal lighting. There is often music coming from the club or bar when they do those bathroom scenes. They have 171 scenes.
*Private Sex tapes is a hard one to describe. The girls are all professional porn performers so don't expect to see amateurs in this one but all the videos do have that amateur feel because they are shot by the girl, her real life boyfriend/husband or her sex partner for those scenes. Most couples have multiple scenes and it feels like these are filmed over a long period while the couple is on vacation. The quality of the videos is limited to the camera each couple used and the placd where they shot it. The overall feel is often amateurish because of that. The videos are POV or tripod since they are shot by the couple themselves. There are 40 couple and each has multiples scenes to chose from.
*Hard Fuck girls is well named because it includes the most intense type of porn the network offers. The main theme is forced gang bang sex normally with 3 or more guys. The choice of models is quite good and if you are into this type of fetish then you might enjoy the content. The little scenarios aren't the greatest and unless you speak Russian then you'll have to read the subtitles to know what they are saying. That's if you care. I did enjoy a couple of the videos but I think they use the same camera guy as pickup fuck because a lot of the shots aren't very good. Luckily they don't shoot in dark spaces so you get to see a lot more of the action. The site has only 3 updates this year and 12 in the last twelve months. That's a poor update shedule and when you consider that they only have 35 scenes total so you better be interested in more than this site before joining.
*Porn Weekends is a lot like private sex tapes but the couples are on vacation. The models are attractive and you can almost believe that they are on vacation with their boyfriend/husband. The site's last update was in September 2011 so 86 episode is all you are getting. Be advised that each couple has multiple scenes so all you are getting is the same girl and guy having sex in different locations.
*Dolls porn is all leased content that can be found on many other sites so you should not join for this site. This is the only site that offers only the video. I guess they didn't want to fork over the cash needed to buy the photosets to go along with the video.
*Public Sex is basically the same thing as pickup fucks but usually shot outdoor. The models are attractive and the content appears to be all exclusif. The bad news is that there are only 22 scenes to chose from and the last update was in February so the site is now dead.
*HD Masage Porn is standard b/g porn but here the scene starts with a guy giving the girl a massage. They have a good selection of models and the scenes are well shot. The bad news is that this site only has 21 scenes and the last one was in March so who knows whether they will add more. My gut feeling is no. If you are into this type of porn then it's a great bonus site but I again wouldn't join for just this one.
*Panda Fuck is the last site but you can search for my independant review of that one.
**The network used to be 35$ but I wouldn't have recommended it at that price but our join price is only 20$ so that is a pretty good deal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+You get access to a total of 9 sites.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV, MP4 and they offer versions for smartphone and Ipads.
+All videos come in multiple resolution but 720P at 50fps is the highest possible.
+You can stream the videos in a flash player.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. Resolution is 1600x1067.
+They have a good selection of well known Eastern European models in their late teens early 20`s.
+Content is in a fetish category not well represented so that can be a major plus for fans.
+You get a special priceof 19.99$ through TBP/PU
Cons:
-The premise may seem a creepy to some.
-A giant man in a panda suit doesn`t make for great sex scenes.
-The name given to the performers is rarely the one they are normally known under.
-There are only 26 scenes to choose from and they update about twice a month.
Bottom Line:
*This would be a pretty awful stand alone site because I don't know if the content can really appeal to more than plushie fans. You have a man dressed as a giant panda who entices a young woman normally dressed as a young girl or semi-pretends to be a young girl into having sex with him. The sex often involves a dildo of varying size and color. I know that some may find the content slightly creepy but I mostly found it stupid. I might have had a different view if the man in the suit didn't grunt like a bear through most of the scene. I laughed the first time I heard him and didn't stop laughing since the grunting is through most of the video. It makes it hard to get turned on while you are laughing.
*Another huge problem is that since the guy is wearing a full panda suit then he can't see much, can't feel anything, and can't properly use the strap on either because of these two limtations. The girl is normally the one doing most of the work. What you wind up with is a little scenario with very little dialogue except for the grunting, a lot of finger pointing, not very good sex, and limited shots of the action because the suit is often in the way.
*I honestly don't know if this type of content can appeal to anyone other than flushie fans so if you aren't one of these than you'll probably want to staw away.
**Normally I would give a bigger score simply because you get access to much better sites but since most of the girls on this site have scenes on the other sutes than I'm treating this one more as a stand alone.**
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Big $15 discount joining through TBP/PU.
No DRM, download restrictions, pre checked cross selling, or dirty tricks.
No regional discrimination.
Join through reputable billing agent (Epoch).
Genuine network, each site has its own identity.
Streaming available.
Original content that is individual and a little outside the usual cookie cutter mass produced porn.
Cons:
Little ethnic or size diversity.
Awful photography, camerawork, and lighting.
Videos are so unbelievably long they have to be cut up into 4-6 (sometimes more) 25 minutes or longer segments. That would be okay if it was action all the way, but it is most definitely not. It could simply be edited down to one 30 minute clip. If they did that, they wouldn't get to say they had 398 scenes instead of 80.
When the cameraman finally does focus on someone having sex, it is far too often in gynaeclogical closeups where all you see is two groins. Not only that, there is an inability to keep the camera still.
There is only one download option for WindowsXP and Vista, and one download option for the pics.
Customer sevice was awful. As reported in a forum post, I was locked out of the site for a while due to possible hacking of the membership password. I received no answer to four emails sent over 24 hours asking why, and was only reinstated after Epoch intervened.
Bottom Line:
Videos 1024x576 and 768x576
Pics 768x1152 768x1024 768x1039 1066x1600
There are supposed to be various mobile formats available. I don't use them but the following are listed - ipad/ipad2, iphone4, iphone3/ipod, Android.
This is a clone of Student Sex Parties available through Chicki Porn, the difference being you get extra sites through WTF and a $15 discount from joining through TBP/PU.
I found streaming facilities to be reasonable. Here in the UK streaming in the afternoon is often very difficult.
Models are mostly all the same type, namely young and thin. If you are looking for ethnic, size, or age diversity, you'll be out of luck.
Navigation is a little irritating. If you go to "view all scenes from College Fuck Parties," then click on several clips from the same video, there is no way back to the College Fuck Parties home page, without going back to the WTF Pass home page, then clicking on College Fuck Parties. You have to click several back buttons until you get back, or go to WTF Sites. In fact WTF Sites is better than the rather poorly laid out WTF home page.
It's a shame some great models are thrown away due to awful amateur camerawork and photography. You would think being a porn cameraman isn't that hard. It doesn't have to be spot on perfect, as they aren't working for the likes of Terrence Malick, Stanley Kubrick, or Jean Renoir, and never will, mainly because two of them are dead. All you have to do is point the camera in the general direction of the couple, or couples having sex. That's it, that's the job.
Maybe they are trying to make it look like a home movie, but realistically we all know these are professional porn stars. It's a shame because the performers are really good looking, and there is genuine group sex action. I just get the feeling the bits the cameraman has missed out while focussing on the floor, wall, ceiling, or shoes, are all the best bits. Thirty minutes of action with two hours padding, then the cameraman misses all the best bits, or the lighting is so bad, you have to squint to see what is going on.
Lighting seems to be one of the problems across the whole WTF network. For instance there is a video and photo set of one beautiful girl taken outside, where the sun's shadow across railings completely ruins the whole thing. It was like some 9 year old's first video or photo attempt.
The non porn bits take up hours of time. Then finally finally something happens, they are getting their kit off and it's time to wake up. Just as they are about to have sex, for some inexplicable reason the cameraman moves on to show the floor. Very video verite. If there are two or three couples indulging in group sex, the cameraman doesn't know where to go, so focuses on the wall instead, or on another couple who aren't doing anything.
To give you an idea of the padding and rubbish bits, you could watch three episodes of CSI (minus the adverts) in the time it takes to watch all the rubbish. Or to put it another way, think of the padding as the CSI episodes, and the adverts as the quality bits. That's how frustrating and annoying the episodes are.
As a bystander and observer my immediate feelings are to shout at the cameraman "oi you, there are people having sex over there...yes over there....NO, over THERE you fecking idiot, not here!"
Two people having sex, no that's not very interesting, let's have a look at the floor. Even when there is only one couple having sex and nothing else going on, the cameraman cannot keep the camera still, it is beyond his ability. He HAS to move it, he cannot keep his camera pointed in the general direction of two people having sex for more then two seconds. Two seconds, that's it, moving on, nothing to see here, must be something more interesting over there, if not, move camera to side, up and down, jump up and down, or tip diagonally, then back again.
The score of 78 is for basically remembering to remove the lens cap, and for pointing the camera in the right direction some of the time, and for the models.
Every network has its idiosyncracies. One of the annoying ones here is that for some reason the male performers continually pummel and pull the pussies of their female performers as though they were unblocking a sink. Are we supposed to think this is what female partners really find sexy? Only if you're 14, and at that age you're supposed to be too young to view this sort of thing.
Some of the orgies inside are badly lit, but even those on the outside quite often get it wrong. Many times dark shadows across the pics spoil the view. That's okay if you're Ridley Scott.
It's worth a membership for one month, due to the reasonably original, non massed produced material, and for the beautiful, newish porn models. It could have been so so much better.
* Slightly better than average looking girls (matter of taste)
* Higher than usual frame rates, this results in smoother and sometimes more lively videos
* Really adds to the WTF in the WTF network
* Rather easy navigation. On the verge of being too simplistic
* Good rating and commenting system
* Plenty of information given with every video
* MANY different formats and frame rates to choose from
* Mobile phones and tablets are supported with their own files.
Cons:
* Most of the info given with every video is only on the page of the video itself.
* Not many people rate the videos
* might be too strange for most as it's an, let's say, acquired taste.
* Galleries are not really interesting but are downloadable in ZIP files.
* Could use some diversity, even though it's quite strange the novelty wears off quite fast.
* Doesn't add much to the network if you're really not into this sort of thing.
* Not much content yet. 21 videos at time of writing this review.
Bottom Line:
This is something different. I will try to be as objective and normal about it as possible though it's quite a task...
All right. So, this website is about cute girls (mostly eastern European) having sex with a guy in a panda-suit. I'm not sure if it's supposed to seem like the panda is a stuffed animal or an actual panda but does that really matter? No.
It's still strange. Unless of course, you are into "furries".
So, the scenes don't differ that much from each other, which is a shame because the novelty wears off quite fast because of this and thus doesn't really add much to the already existing WTF network.
However, the website is solid and easy to navigate. Something even a bit simplistic.
18 Screenshots per page to click on. Each one will take you to the designated download page for that specific video.
This is where it becomes interesting. The download options seem infinite as you may choose not only between different formats but also between different frame rates.
These are the options:
Windows 7:
720p 50fps
720p 25fps
576p
432p
Win XP / Vista:
576p
MacOS (same for AppleTV):
720p 50fps
720p 25fps
432p
320p
Though, these are just suggestions. As you can probably imagine you can play the different formats on different platforms. But they are good suggestions.
The galleries, which are offered with each video, are not really worth mentioning. Which is the only thing worth mentioning.
Downloads are fast and managers are allowed. The average speed I got was about 7 Megabytes per second.
Also, the videos are DRM-free. So that's always a big plus.
The comments and ratings have a solid system as well, though like with most websites, is often overlooked and not used. This is really up to the users but the they could create a little more incentive to get people to start rating and commenting more. You just have to go by the screenshots and descriptions now.
A fun and more recurring thing you see is the tagging system. They add tags to the description of the video so you can click on that tag, like Big Boobs, and are shown more videos with this tag. It's an easy way of navigating through many videos.
All in all the website is a solid one which offers something strange to the already existing WTF network. The WTF network can finally (sort of)
live up to it's name.
Would I recommend getting a subscription with the network over this website? No. But if there are other websites within the network that caught your eye, it's fun to try it out.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
