Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company MindGeek
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 440 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Twistys

1. Twistys (4)

Pay
Newbie
99*
baddaddie (Suspended) 03-25-08  09:28am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (7)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: OFFICIAL NOTICE TO ALL PORNUSERS ....

We have determined that the User who submitted this Review has shared a machine with "Sam Jordan", the webmaster of the site "College Uniform".
-------
Great models
Great photography
Good user support
Daily updates
Lots of Video
Cons: Content not exlcusive
Never enough of the girls you really want to see
Bottom Line: I signed up for a trial and lived on there for 2 year plus, but despite the photography being awesome and the girls great, there was nothing outside the that box, yes I love seeing girls, but after a while, one set looks like another and sadly due to main stream.

The user support is very fast and hot on the heels of any question asked (thumbs up)

I was under the impression that the content was produced for Twistys, but after joining another site after to find that much of the content was the same.

It's still a very good site and worth a look
Respond: 15 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

2. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Active
75
rearadmiral (322) 12-26-11  12:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 39 Sites on the network
- Some interesting niches
- Streaming available
- Downloads in at least two formats and three sizes
- Pics and screencaps available
- Most sites update regularly
Cons: - Several sites update irregularly
- Daily download limit (10GB +/- per day)
- Download limit appears to be applied unevenly to members
- ĎCookie-cutterí porn
- Download manager (Free Download Manager) wasnít supported
Bottom Line: RK bills itself as ďthe Worldís Best Adult NetworkĒ but by subjective and objective measures I donít agree with that. Itís not a bad network, but it isnít the worldís best.

The network is made up of 39 themed sites. The usual porn themes are here, like big breasts, MILFs, and 18-year-old ladies, but there are also some fairly unique sites too. There are three sites that cater to scenes with multiple models in party settings (VIP Crew, In the VIP and Bikini Crashers). These are among my favourites but I can understand why others may not be interested in them.

The sites vary in size, with the more mainstream sites having lots of material (some have over 500 scenes) and some of the niche sites have only a handful of scenes. Each site opens into a separate page that list the scenes with a large thumbnail for each. On the left of that page is a column of filters for sub-themes. The scenes usually have a unique name and the main star is also listed. Opening the page for each scene brings more details and tags. You can access screencaps and pictures (which I didnít download so I canít comment on them) and you can access the video in any of several ways. Streaming is available, as are downloads. Downloads are offered in a few different ways, usually as a WMV and MP4. MP4 is available in larger sizes and smaller sizes for handheld devices. For some reason, even the newer scenes are frequently broken down into shorter clips for easier download, though the full scene is also available.

HD video is available on some scenes, though I didnít download any because of the daily limit.

RK has been around for a long time so the quality of their videos has obviously changed. Older videos are low quality, but I canít fault the site for that because that was the standard back when they were shot. Most of the older scenes are only available in three or four clips, which also made sense back when they were uploaded. It would be nice if the site took the time to stitch them together into one full file now that most people have high-speed internet connections. The newer scenes (in WMV) still arenít great quality: 640x480 @ 1600kb/s and 768x432 @ 1600 are common. Subjectively they arenít bad, but they arenít great either.

Objectively, the site is decent, but not any better than many other networks. RK isnít any better (or any worse) than places like Mofos and Porn Pros. In terms of quality they certainly canít be compared to sites like ALS Scan and Diesel Access.

Subjectively the network isnít all that impressive. Iíll admit that a lot of that is personal taste because Iím not into large breasts and huge asses. Those attributes are better represented than most others. There are sites that cater to my tastes in smaller models between 18 and 22, and I will admit I like the number of relatively unknown models who appear here.

One serious and unforgivable sin, and I realize that this is entirely subjective, is that one scene was mis-labeled. No big deal normally, but I joined the network specifically to see one scene: a Tanner Mayes scene that was categorized as anal. It might be called Ďanalí because she has an anus, but no real anal sex occurs in the scene. I will admit that the guy does insert the head of his dick a couple of times, but that doesnít count as anal sex.

Easily the biggest annoyance with RK is their daily download limit. While the limit itself would be annoying enough, they actually make it worse but applying it randomly. The limit is described in the membership contract using vague language so I emailed the support staff to ask for some clarification but never received a reply. Why bother having a Ďcontact usí button if youíre not actually going to respond to memberís questions? On several days I was cut off from downloading at less than the 10GB 24-hour limit. On other days I downloaded well in excess of the limit. There are PU members who report never having had a limit imposed on them. A site can certainly impose whatever conditions they want, but those conditions should be clear and applied equally to all members. And in 2011 10GB limit is absurdly low.

Another annoying choice that RK made is to not support download managers. I use Free Download Manager to queue up scenes that I want to download so I donít have to sit at the computer for an hour or more, but FDM wouldnít work with this site. I canít say how it works with other managers, but if they bar one Iíd guess they bar them all.

Iíd recommend this site for someone who really wants a particular scene or is really into a specific niche that is represented here. ButÖ anyone who does join should be aware that they MAY have a download limit imposed on them and that download managers donít work. So unless you have a real desire to see a certain scene or model here, RK has nothing special to offer.
Respond: 15 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

3. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Active
80
BubbaGump (18) 01-11-12  06:08pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -- Large Amount Of Content, both in quantity and variety. Enough to satisfy many interests.
-- High Quality Videos.
-- Sexy models. Model-types range from bra busters to thin and petite.
-- Good number of sub-sites with decent content(mostly)
Cons: -- Streaming and Downloading can be hit or miss.
-- No High-Resolution Photos.
-- Repetitive photos in sequences.
-- Downloading Limit of 10 G daily.
Bottom Line: A little background to put things in perspective:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.

With that being said, I have found the site to be somewhat lacking for my preferences, not in content or quality of the presentations, but in the medium available.

If you are looking for sexy models and high quality videos you will not be dissapointed. If you have a bias for high-resolution photography, you are likely to find the site lacking a bit in terms of photographic standards. However, given that I do view many of the images on an Ipad at times, this hasn't been a show-stopper. When viewed on a high-resolution flatpanel monitor, the images are lacking, simply due to the smaller formats and low pixel counts.

The videos themselves are of high-quality and the camera work is fairly decent. Many of the scenes start with the model fully clothed and do not jump right into the action.

Navigating the site is very simple and straightforward. It is designed quite well and is not lacking here, IMO. Jumping from one site to the other is seamless. Getting to the downloads is also seamless and straightforward. Everything is a click away.

As far as DL and Streaming speeds, this is where I give the lowest marks. At times, it was difficult to even stream videos at standard quanity. Most of the time, I was getting nowhere near the claimed DL speed and bit-ratre transfer when I did attempt to download videos at standard resolutions. The times I did try a HD download, I would often timeout and have to restart. On weekends, the problem was particularly noticeable. Slow connections are quite understandable at this time of the week. However, the server seemed to slow to a crawl and would often become asburdly slow.

To sum up, if variety, quality content, and video presentations are your primary interests, it's a safe bet that you probably will not be dissapointed. If transfer rates and streaming connectivity are of paramount importance, I would take this into consideration.

Cancelation: Just a note on this as I know this is one of my concerns when I sign up over the net. When I read reviews, I sometimes hear of extra charges taking place after an order has been canceled. I experienced no issues and giving notice of intent to cancel was no issue and took place as requested.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Grades: (obviously subjective calls, so take that into consideration as well.)

Presentation and Site Navigation: A
Overall Quality of Content: B+
Subject Matter Variety: A +
Content Variety for Varied Interests: A
Standard Video Quality: B
HD Video Quality: A
Scene Content and Videography: B+
Photo Gallery Compositions and Content: C+
Photo Resolution and Image Quality: C-
The Models Themselves: A
The Action: B
DL Speed and Streaming: D-

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My favorite sub-sites within the URL--relative to my interests and not quality:

Dangerous Cuvres, Big Naturals.

Least Favorite: Pure 18 and Cum Fiesta. (Models too thin and young-looking for my tastes)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Other things to note: There is a download limit of 10 GIG daily. This was of no concern to me as I stream videos mostly and did not download much in the way of videos. If you are a massive user of downloadable HD video content, this very well might be soemething to consider. If you aren't downloading HD more than twice a day, it shouldn't be a problem. In fairness to these guys, you would have to be downloading a lot of content every day to hit the max.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Suggestions for improvement:

-- Address concerns with streaming connectvity and download speeds. Slower speeds are to be expected on weekends but not weekdays.

-- Add high-resolution image galleries. The days of CRT monitors have long since passed. 800 pixel-width images images no longer cut it in the day of 2800x1900 high-resolution monitors.
Respond: 15 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Twistys

4. Twistys (4)

Pay
Newbie
57*
Markus (0) 04-17-07  12:12pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (4)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + many girls
Cons: - trashy old models
- poor design
- low quality
- the most content is cheap mass content
- bad navigation
Bottom Line: When you want busty models so visit ..... send me a mail and i give you a BIG list! ;)
You will never miss the poor twistys stuff.
Respond: 14 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Reality Kings

5. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Active
90
SteveO (6) 07-18-10  09:15am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Site looks great and is well put together
- Tons of original and exclusive content
- Calendar with the upcoming weeks updates
- Convenient "download view" window makes it easy to download full video, video clips, or zip file of pics
- You can save you favorite girls and keep an eye out for new updates
- There are 27 sites that each have a different theme
- Hundreds or models and thousands of pics and videos
- Great download speed
- Great price
- Easy site sign up
- You can click on a girl for her basic stats and a list of other shoots available
- Good search function
- Many videos come with some acting
Cons: - The models in pure 18 are pretty much the same models in cum fiesta, big naturals, and a few other sites. The models are definitely under 25 but don't look that close to 18.
- The picture sets seem to be taken at the same time as the video. This isn't always bad but looking at the pics it kinda like oh yea I remember that from the video. I like it when some of the shoots are just for photo.
- Hundreds of pics from each shoot may give you pic overload. i.e. you download 1- zip set and now you have 4000 pics and you don't have the time to look at that many pics
- Some videos come with acting that is often not the best quality but its easy to skip if you don't like it.
- Reality is kind of lacking from the site. Most of the porn seems to be professional.
- Bio on models could be longer
Bottom Line: For less than 20 bucks I think this site as really good. From the second I entered the site I was impressed with how great the site looked and how easy it was to navigate. With 27 different sites, each with a different them, I kinda didn't know where to start. Some of my favorites are Cumfiesta, We Live together, Captain Stabbin, and Mike's Apartment. Most of the porn at these sites have some basic story line to them but the story doesn't really seem to get in the way of the sex.

Again, I really like the layout of the site. When you find a shoot you like the "Download/View" box makes download a snap. I don't use the stream buttons much but streaming seems to be fine. If you like one of the models from the shoot you can click on her name and the site takes you to a short bio about the model and a list of other shoots starring that model. There is a good search function for both model and for type of shoot. If you really like a certain model you can save her and then check her page for updates.

One thing I found funny is the fact that the site is called "Reality Kings" but it seems like most of the content is generated by professionals. Although some of the sites have a more amateur feel than others. This didn't really bother me much because, in my opinion, the content is generally better than amateur type porn anyway.

I also liked the fact that many of the models seem to move from site to site. If I find a model in "We Live Together" I will get to see her in hot girl on girl but I am not likely to see her in M/F action. But if I click on her name I may find that she also models in Pure 18 and has a great M/F seen on that site.

One thing I did find is that some of the girls on the Pure 18 site tend to look like they are under 25 but not really close to 18. I also think that the MILF and Its Real sites are kind of a bore and the content is not so good.
Respond: 14 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mommy Got Boobs

6. Mommy Got Boobs (0)

Pay
Active
95
Cybertoad (104) 06-18-08  10:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Lots of content
- Part of a giant network
-Pics and videos are typically very nice quality-wise.
Download speed consistent in network
Really Attractive models
Good Reasonable price
Pretty Frequent updates
Cons: Some of the older content isn't the best quality and in poor quality format for some reason.
Action seems pretty repetitive.
The site is not the best in the network one would venture its weakest link.
I found that this site in the network was the worst acting just didnt click for me in most scenes wise.
But thats just my own opinion, these are just small knit picks.
Bottom Line: What saves this site from a lower score is the scenes are hot for this type and a good size content.

This isn't the best site within this network, but it is good with potential in the long run. The site features a awkward design I see throughout the network so surfin is ok.
The price is awesome with all of the other sites that you can access.

Older video quality keeps me rating the site higher.
But being part of a huge network keeps its rating high.

The daily updates for the network are awesome and several new sites have been added to the network over the past few months.
As with the network its worth joining two months min.
I may rejoin just because of all the new content.

Well Done
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

7. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Active
92
pat362 (367) 10-25-12  06:29pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Over 7500 scenes to chose from.
+They have an excellent mix of North American, South American and European performers.
+They have over 500 interacial scenes and over 1100 lesbian scenes.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search using keywords.
+All the videos from 2006 to now can be dowloaded in WMV and MP4 and the resolution is at least 768x432.
+All videos starting in late 2010 are now also available in MP4 1080p HD.
+They update with about 10 new videos per week and all content is dated
+The main pages aren't clutered with a lot of third party advertising.
Cons: -The most annoying thing about this site is that you only see the performers full name on the main page. So if you do a search by keyword then all you see is the models first name which isn't always correctly spelled.
-They do a lot of scenario porn but a lot of it is not as well done as it I'd like it to be.
-The content from sometime in 2004 and before is only available in multiple clips.
-The resolution for most of the videos may be 768x432 but the quality for the videos made from 2008 and before is average at best.
-Their preview section is one of the worst one for this type of site.
Bottom Line: **This is the top rated reality porn site and I can see why it is. They try to hit almost every type of porn and they to do a pretty decent job with most of them. They have a few faults but these are rather minor and are probably not much of an issue for most people.

*If you have been a member of Naughty America, Mofos, Brazzer or bangbros than you know what to expect since tese guys offer about the same type of content. The most obvious difference seems to be in the selection of models. Most sites prefer to stick with models from one or two Countries but these guys try to cover the whole world. They have over 900 scenes with European models, 350 scenes with Brazilian models and so many more with American models of different nationality. The only ethnic group not really represented are Asians.

*Their choice of models is a slight problem for me because I'm not generally a fan of Brazilain models or Brazilian porn so that's 350 less porn scene for me. Then there are the 900 Europeans scenes. They are for the most part good but I've been a member of so many great European sites that I already have many similar scenes starring these same girls so that means that I didn't really bother downloading most of their videos.

*The only thing that I wouldn't mind seeing is an improvement in the acting for the scenario driven scenes. The other sites do a much better job. The other improvment is in making sure that the models full name is visble on every screen so that you don't have to check out a different page to see if it's the correct model.

**If you have tried the other sites like this one then you have to try this one because there is so much content that you are bound to get your money's worth.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

8. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Active
50
User (32) 12-07-08  01:58pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Content looks good from the OUTSIDE
Cons: Downloads very inconsistent. Most videos do not download.
Customer Support is TERRIBLE
Bottom Line: I joined the site with a FULL membership, not a trial. I am a veteran of many sites, but this is the worst I've ever experienced. I was impressed with the array of sites and the fresh faces not seen on many other sites.
I use both Firefox and the latest version of IE for browser. With Firefox I have the ability to use a Download manager, but need not do so if the site is not compatible.
At first, I was able to downolad a couple of videos. I have a very fast connection, so I DL the full files, not the fragmented ones.
Out of about 50 files attempted, I was able to get 5. The rest would DL 4-24Mbps and then quit. I tried with the DL manager and without. I tried with Firefox and with IE.
I contacted their Chat three times and they have some very canned things they tell you to try. NONE of them could fix the issue.
I have asked for a full refund, but am not confident one will be forthcoming.
I also wrote to their Customer Support email address but received no reply in more than 24 hours.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

9. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Newbie
50*
sigh (0) 02-23-11  11:18am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent amount of content
Cons: Where do I start

- Videos crash VLC 50% of the time
- Broken links to WMV videos
- Poor video quality
- Model information almost always limited to one model per video
- Videos that are dreadfully edited (download a 1.1 GB file for the thrill of 5 minutes of sex at the end!)
- Lots of missing screen caps
- Everything is designed to be difficult for anyone with a fast internet connection
- Download speeds acceptable if it doesn't decide to limit you to 3 videos downloading at a time
Bottom Line: Canceled my membership within 1 day. Downloaded 15 gigs of files and have 3.5 left after eliminating the unwatcheable ones (and that number will shrink, just too fed up to wade through them)


Honestly, just an awful experience...sites like Videobox have issues (new site design is horrible) but at least I never felt ripped off.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mofos Network

10. Mofos Network (1)

Network
Active
50
ControllingMind (Disabled) 01-29-09  01:34pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Scenes include some top notch pornstars
Cons: -Not the promised amount of updates.
-Site keeps logging you out.
-Updates not ready on time.
-Poor support team.
-Some files in standard wmv are still around 1GB downloads.
-Slow site to navigate.
Bottom Line: The site advertises 3 updates every day, but in reality you get 1 per day(on weekdays only). The support team ignored my questions asking about this. You constantly get logged out and have to re-enter your login details. Site navigation is at a snails pace. Often the wmv file or the pic set is missing from the daily update. Even looking at the scene comments on the site showed lot of members complaints.

This new site has been rushed out without sorting the problems out. This review may seem very negative, but if you joined the site yourself you would realise why. I strongly advise against anyone joining this site.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Twistys

11. Twistys (4)

Pay
Active
81
Wittyguy (95) 07-25-08  05:07pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - 10,000+ photo sets with about 1200 hardcore and all have zip function. Newest material is 1600x1070, most is 1280x850 and a few are 800x600.
- 2250 vids with about 1000 hardcore with good download speeds in QT and WMV, most come in 640x480 size
- No DRM
- Small watermarks
- Good trial / discount price through TBP (currently you can join at a 2 day trial for $2.26 through Blue Fantasies and other Twisty's sites)
- Access to about 6 sites with membership
- Very good search function
- Several updates every day
Cons: - Mostly non exclusive material
- Updates dont' keep up with other "mega" sites (see "bottom line" for discussion)
- Most of the other sites available are Twisty's clones with the exception of Blue Fantasies, Naughtystaff and Annette Dawn
- Pics only come in one size
Bottom Line: I've been a member at Twisty's in the past and I rejoined on a two day trial membership through Bluefantasies.

There is a ton of content here so if you're rather newish to the porn surfing world you're going to find a lot to like. The content is mostly centered around pornstars in professional style shoots with some amateurish stuff tossed in. However, if you've been around a while you'll recognize most of the sets. There's a lot of material from Vivthomas and pretty much the same material as the Sexy-babes / Dreambabes sites and a few other mega sites. It's been about a year since I was a member at a mega site and quite honestly I only found about 40 "new to me" hardcore sets -- this includes their bonus sites. A lot of their new updates is stuff that other sites seem to have had for a while now.

I will give them Kudos for having a very good search function and model directory. Also I liked the fact that they have upgraded a lot of their older photo sets from 800x600 (which they used to be) to roughly 1020 by 720 or larger now.

The bonus sights, as mentioned, are almost all clones.

Standing on it's own, I'm giving Twisty's a score of 81. If I included bonus sites I'd bump the score up a couple of points more. While the content is good it is nonexclusive and other mega sites do it better with more up to date content. If you're newish to the porn surfing scene then it is well worth checking out; just don't plan to go back anytime soon
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Twistys

12. Twistys (4)

Pay
Active
81
slutty (111) 03-16-09  07:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Attractive women
Huge collection
Zips for all photo sets
Good connection and site organization
Price is reasonable given the size of the site
Cons: Some of the content was not exclusive, you probably have several sets in other places
Most models have several photo sets, but fewer to no videos
Very little of the original content is hardcore. They added a twistys hard section but it doesn't appear to be updated very frequently.
The two bonus sites I looked at had the exact same material as the Twistys main site
Photo quality mediocre
Bottom Line: Honestly I'm not sure why people rate this site so highly. I usually agree with exotics4me's reviews but in this case I must disagree. The models are mostly of the large breasted varietty, which isn't really my cup of tea. I also did not like the style of a lot of the photography (makup, lighting, focus, etc.)
Worth joining if you like softcore pictures of porn stars in soft lighting, otherwise I would look elsewhere. They are good at what they do, I'm just not into a lot of it.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Reality Kings

13. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Newbie
60*
Malkav (4) 11-07-07  07:31pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Incredible amount of movies
* Good variety of content
* Easy to navigate the sites
* Choice of downloading movies in full/split files
Cons: * Some sites not updated for a long time
* Download limit 3Gb pr day (and they then cut of all access to the sites for 48 hrs)
* No support. Don't expect replies
* They will not give you your money back, even if it is advertised on the sign up page *EDIT: I STAND CORRECTED - LOOK IN FIRST REPLY TO REVIEW TO FIND OUT HOW TO PROCEED SHOULD YOU WANT TO DO THIS*
Bottom Line: Fantastic looking sites, very good content and amazing amount of download content.

I really wanted to give this site a higher score, but when they have a 3Gb download limit pr day, and if you go over you can't even visit the sites, it gets hard. To enforce a download limit THAT low gets ridiculus when alot of the internet users to day have a capacity to download a lot more pr 24 hrs.

Breaking point for joining site or not:

Are you going to download a lot of movies/ have a high speed internet access? I am sorry to say that it is not worth the money.

Low speed internet/ only interested in certain scenes/ certain chicks? It is worth it

*Edited to take down the score - Reason: I have only been able to access sites 1 off every 3 days. They keep blocking you for 48 hrs if you download more than 3Gb. And there is NO response from support.*
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Real Wife Stories

14. Real Wife Stories (0)

Pay
Active
90
Toadsith (48) 05-28-08  09:07pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Unique plots for each scene, varied wardrobe choices for models, and good enough acting during plot setup for easy acceptance of fantasy
* Well lit, organized sets, good camera work, good sound
* Many video formats - 640x480 at +1MB/s in WMV, MP4, MPG and iPod/PSP ready MP4
* Screenshots and Video Trailers for all scenes
* Matching 600x900 photo sets for all scenes (500 to 1000 photos each)
* Flash streaming video w/ full screen option
* Network wide advanced search, category search/browse, model search/browse, random scene button
* Weekly updates
* Fast downloads (1.16 MB/s), download accelerator friendly
* User comments, ratings, favorites, forum
* Full access to Brazzers Network (19 other sites) and 40 bonus sites with streaming content
Cons: * Small site (only 19 scenes)
* Most models fit the classic porn star look (84% silicon implants and 44% blondes), not much variation
* No high definition video
* No high resolution photos
* Small, opaque watermark in right corner of videos (transparent on photos)
* Category listings have varied accuracy (they do not always include all the scenes they should)
Bottom Line: Real Wife Stories focuses on sexual fantasies revolving around married women in extramarital relations. The models have the porn star look; happily, the wardrobes arenít all porn star stock & trade and the site matches the set to the story and has everyone at least adlib lines that make sense.

Good camera work & lighting so everything is easy to see. The models are at ease and adopt their characters while showing off their talents Ė though overacting is the norm. Nothing here is subtle but the scene setup means it doesnít need to be. You get different positions with oral sex to start (often for both parties) and the finale is external but the target varies, not just facials.

On the technical side, videos & photos are a bit small for a wealthy network (640x480 | 600x900) but the content is crisp Ė though in high motion scenes some dithering is visible. Many preview options (trailers, screenshots, matched photo sets) gives a very thorough feel for a scene prior to download.

The site is too small to stand on its own (19 scenes) but since they have already established a tangible theme and done it well it indicates that the site will continue to grow and thrive. As a member of the Brazzers Network itís a part of tons of content thatís all categorized & searchable. User interaction is great with everything from ratings to a forum at their disposal. Despite its technical limitations, the siteís character and the included network make it nothing short of excellent.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Wife Stories

15. Real Wife Stories (0)

Pay
Active
90
roseman (253) 08-21-08  09:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 09-01-08  05:39am  (Update History)
Reason: A bit overrated
Pros: - Awesome website design.
- No DRM videos protection.
- Navigation is very easy.
- No download limit.
- Exclusive content.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Multiple download formats for videos.
- ZIP download option for photosets available.
- Streaming option for videos offered.
- Helpful customer support.
- Network access (21+ bonus websites).
- Bonus content.
- Members forum board and frequent updates.
- Great scenes / girls rating system and information.
- Great monthly subscription price.
Cons: - Photosets quality could be even better.
- Few annoying adds in members area.
- No HD videos quality offered.
- Site needs growth.
Bottom Line: Real Wife Stories is another great adult website offered by Brazzers Network.
When you join you will gain network access to Brazzers which means that you will have access to 21 websites with tones of content plus some bonus streaming websites. So I believe that you will not be dissapointed.
Members can download videos in multiple download formats (.wmv, .mpeg1, .mpeg4 and .iPod/PSP). Quality is very good in here but surely HD would be better. You can even steam videos online if you are not a download maniac. Photosets and screecaps can be downloaded in ZIP format, making it easy and simple. Quality is good in here as well but it could be even better, at my opinion.
Website design is very good and navigation is very easy. You can find your favourite scene by using network search feature or by browsing by letter. Customer support is very helpful if you face any kind of problems.
There is no download limit or DRM videos protection. Content is exclusive and downloading was very fast for me (most hours of day). Site's content is not huge at the moment as it's new (32 scenes in total) but it updates weekly so i am sure that it will grow in time.
Every scene is daited and there is a cool girls / scenes rating system. There is a members forum board as well where you can have some fun and exchange opinions or suggestions with other members.
Monthly subscription price is very good (20 USD) for the network content offered. There is lots of variety and tones of content so I don't think that you will ask for more. Trial option offered.
In conclusion, Brazzers team keeps rolling and I am not sure for how long their members can take it. Highly recommended.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babes Network.com

16. Babes Network.com (7)

Pay
Active
82
otoh (54) 04-30-13  05:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good interface, easy to navigate
- Good quality videos
- Pictures decent size and well compressed
- (Almost) daily updates - photos and videos
- Photos and videos come in matching sets
- Plenty of undressing
- Camera angles
- No anal (a plus for me!)
Cons: - Some videos have music track throughout - no voice - others have bland music
- $=Ä=£ regional pricing (use TunnelBear to sign up)
- DMs don't work on videos
- Captcha on login
- Some fake boobs and tans (but not too many)
- Short login timeout
- Bit too much of the guy finishing himself off
- File naming a bit off
Bottom Line: Although I generally prefer softcore sites, I have grown fond of the kind of tender, sharing, intimate and realistic (if somewhat idealised) sex scenes that the relatively new heartcore genre presents, and babes.com was next on my list to join.

Signup is relatively easy, but with the following caveats:
a) signup and cancel is through their own billing, not CCBill etc
b) they are a proponent of the grossly biased $=Ä=£ regional pricing setup - eg $20 in the US, £20 in the UK, over 50% more, but I am pragmatic and this is avoided with TunnelBear
c) You need to enter a captcha to log in
d) After which they do try to cross-sell to you other sites

But with that in mind, the site is nice, clean and easy to use when you get there.

The site has been around for about a year and updates with one scene daily - both a video and pictures, a setup which I quite like. During my membership this actually changed to 5 per week rather than 7 - but there's still quite a lot of material, about 300 sets & videos with approx 50/30/20 split between couples, solo and girl-girl scenes.

There is the usual browsing by videos, photos and models; and when going into a scene you get:
- For pictures, a browser-based slideshow, and download of approx 100 pics at a fairly respectable 2.5k
- For videos, a responsive streaming player, and downloads in 4 sizes up to 1080p (I went for 720 and they look very good)

Each model/set/video page also has user comments, and you can follow/like them within the site, and - if you are suitably unashamed of your smut proclivities - do so on FB, twitter and the like.

Most models are American, with some popular girls such as Malena Morgan, Lexi Belle and Hayden Winters; and some of the popular European models like Connie and Ariel. Not much ethnic diversity, although there are some nice latina and asian models; but there is a fairly broad range of ages, including some lovely milf-type models like Nikki Daniels and India Summer.

The theme here, as I suggested, is heartcore - like Joymii, X-Art etc, the focus is on couples scenes, but done in a loving, sharing way. The previous reviewer made some good points, but I think was a little unfair in criticising it for not being hardcore enough - you wouldn't join it if you wanted facials, DP and other more typical porn-y content. The scenes are fairly explicit, though, with closeups of penetration and oral sex, so it does deliver on that front.

That said, it's not without its issues. A commenter suggested that this is what Digital Desire would be if it did hardcore - and it's spot on. The girls are beautiful, the scenes are dreamy and idealised, the focus is soft and videos start with mood music, which fades out about a third of the way in to the sounds of the action. (The music is a particular peeve, actually - if you look at the previews, they have some good, brave choices of interesting music; this does not carry over to the actual videos which have more insipid/nondescript soundtracks which they would be better off without).

And, Like Digital Desire, they are fairly formulaic. It's not a bad formula, but most scenes (or at least the couples ones, which I was most interested in) play out the same way; the guy slowly undresses the girl, there's oral from both of them, there's sex with him and her on top. It's good, and well done, but could do with a bit more variety - and ideally, within the constraints of the genre, a bit more raunchiness.

But conversely, they have hung onto some porn tenets that don't really fit the genre. In far too many scenes, the girl ends up naked, apart from the high heels - I quite like heels in a pinup or glam context, but if I'm trying to imagine a realistic encounter, the shoes would definitely go! And similarly, in almost all cases the guy pulls out and finishes on the girl's belly/boobs/ass - again, there's definitely a time and place for a prominent pop shot but it does take away from the believability of the scene. Also see my comment about photoshopping - wholly unnecessary in the genre.

Despite my misgivings, this is still a good site in the heartcore genre and there's plenty of good material. If I were in the US, I would score this maybe 85 or 86; but there is no excuse for their heinous regional pricing policy, which has to cost them at least a couple of points.

But, pricing issues aside, Joymii remains my favourite - they are more creative with scenes, camerawork, and manage a bit more raunch while still being a bit artsy and trendy.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Twistys

17. Twistys (4)

Pay
Newbie
95*
Horny Ryan (Disabled) 02-19-07  11:45pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - diverse content
- tons of hot chicks
- high quality pics & vids
Cons: - lots of repeated sets
- videos are all the same
- seen these girls many times
Bottom Line: its a great site to have in your monthly stack. i keep a membership just to see what's new. Nice style and lots of content, even if it doesn't always get me off.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Twistys

18. Twistys (4)

Pay
Active
86
skippy (42) 07-11-12  02:41pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge collection of photos and videos. Good navigation. Good scoring/rating and review system that isn't inflated by webmasters or users, a full decade of material available. Newer videos are excellent quality. Models come in all shapes and sizes. Nearly every big-name model you've ever heard of. Mostly US models who actually speak!
Cons: Waaay to many ads for other sites. Cross selling at sign-up verges on fraudulent. (I unchecked the cross sales, had a problem and clicked submit again and the other offers rechecked themselves and cost me money...really ruined the initial perception of the site.) Also, the log in page is linked to a pay chat site and there is a live front-room chat in progress WITH SOUND! Some smart marketing gu decided to do this to get your attention, but it is annoying as hell!
Bottom Line: Do you remember the original Danni's Hard Drive? You know, before Danni sold it? Well, that site was abused and mismanaged after being sold, but Twisty's is practically an exact replica of the original Danni site. There is a HUGE collection here that spans over a decade. New material is very good. Most of the models are big american names either in nude photography or porn. Wide variety in the sets locations and models. And people seem to be having fun.

All that said, there are a few things that I feel obligated to point out. First, most of the models, though popular are..um..more mature. Among the most highly scored models, you'll notice Kayden Cross, Jana Cova and Heather Vandeven, all looking good in their most recent sets, but probably well into their 30s. Nothing wrong with mature, well endowed models, but the site seems to be pretty heavy with them. To be fair, the site also has some very popular younger models including Malena Morgan, Zoey and Melisa Mendini. One thing about a site that has been around this long is that you can find sets that span a models entire professional career. For example, if you like Sasha Grey, there is a terrific collection here from 2009 and before. But in general you won't really see any knock-out new discoveries here as the stable is mostly pros, many of whom have had more than a little work done. A few of the more popular models are still unaltered, though...thank god.

The sets are generally good. They are not overly staged, there is a decent variety of indoor and outdoor sets, the mix of full-body and close-up shots is good and the lighting is correct. The models are mostly solo, some with toys, but there are a few girl/girl scenes and two and three way sex scenes. One kind of cool thing about some of the videos is that since many of the girls are american, they actually speak! And oh my god what some of them say! Trust me, you WILL be answering out loud when Shawna Lenee, Tori Black or Kasey Chase ask you questions in their videos. This kind of interaction with the audience (ie directly at YOU) is unlike any other site I've seen since...well...the original Danni.com. Very cool!

This is billed as a network, but the other sites that you get free access to are really the same sets that are in the main site, just repackaged into categories like "Euro" and "GirlPlay". There are a couple of other mystery bonus areas that include additional models, most of which are intermediate level ametuers. The site is constantly advertising other sites like Brazzers, Mofos, Wicked and Babes, all available for an additional and sometimes hefty fee. Very distracting and annoying.

They have a girl of the month theme with a series of photo and video shoots released throughout the month.

Overall, this site is well above average with a huge selection of images and videos. The girls are Mmostly mature, large breasted and in many cases enhanced a bit. The images are good but not too glam-ee and, from what I can tell, not overly touched up. I got in on a "Please come back" special rate. Absolutely, positively worth a visit at least one a year.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Playboy Plus

19. Playboy Plus (2)

Pay
Active
68
lk2fireone (194) 03-10-13  10:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discount through PU. $14.95 instead of $29.99/month.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Can view photosets as slide show or download the zip set.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Good download speeds. I'm getting 1.3 MB/sec, my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Choice of download version quality: Many videos have a WVGA480, HD720, and a HD1080 version.
Cons: -Uncheck pre-checked cross-sell.
-Search could be better. Search term "Christine Maddox" returns any photoset with the name of "Christine" as first name or last name, instead of specifically returning only photosets with the name of "Christine Maddox" included.
-Also, either they are missing photos of past playmates, or the search does not return all the photos of those playmates. For example, the annual photoguide of past playmates of the year photos are sometimes not included in the search result. There are other past photos of playmates and models that are either not on the site, or not returned by a search of the model's name.
-Some bugs in the navigation or site structure. You play a slide show of Susie Scott, and it only plays a few of the 24 photos in the set, then stops. Can't get it to play/show all the photos in the set.
-Photoset of a playmate does not include the data sheet.
Bottom Line: -Back in the 1960s and 1970s, Playboy was the premier "gentleman's magazine". Penthouse was a close second. Both those magazines were renowned for their nude photography, as well as their articles and fiction and interviews. They were money-making machines that brought their founders vast wealth. Those days are history. Both Playboy and Penthouse have flirted with bankruptcy in recent years.

This is supposed to be a softcore glamor photo and video site. Given the Playboy name, you would expect to find superior, high quality photos and videos of their models.

-I don't know why, but there are superior copies of their onsite photos available elsewhere. Years ago, I belonged to a newsgroup, and I collected the photos of most playmates.
You look at the photos at this Playboy Plus site, and the photos just don't have the same impact as the photos that I collected. The basic image is the same, but the images I collected from the newsgroups were more striking.

-Some photos are mis-labeled. You play a slide show of a photoset, and instead of identifying the model(s) in each photo, the label shows the title of the photoset. So you have to know from other sources (or your own special knowledge) who these models are.

-No choice of download version quality for zip photosets. This is surprising. For a photo-oriented site, the only option I see is for one definition of a zip file download, not the standard 3 definitions that many photo sites have of low, medium, and high quality.

-The quality of the "high definition" video files can be poor. For example, the video for "stacy-fuson-paymate-of-the-month-vid-01.mp4" is 1920x1080, total bitrate is 6049 kbps, which would seem to indicate a high quality, high definition video. But the frame rate is 7 frames/second, which might explain why the video is a poorly defined video picture. I've seen the DVD which this video is made from, and the video is much sharper than the video you download from Playboy Plus.

Let me be clear. Watching the downloaded video is like watching a shitty version of the video you should be watching.

The streaming version of that video is better quality, but nowhere near the quality of Metart, Diesel Access network, or other fine sites. The video quality of a streaming video at Playboy Plus is actually below the quality of the Teen Mega World videos.

That is amazing to me. Don't the people running this site realize the video quality of their videos is so poor, compared to the better sites on the internet?

Maybe they are blind to the poor quality of their photographs, which is not as bad as the quality of their video downloads. But the obvious degradation of their video download files is pathetic, for a site that is supposed to empasize the beauty of the female form.

The site does not use DRM. But the poor quality of the video files I have downloaded, in effect, means you can not save a high quality video file. And I am going to sign up for a new membership to a newsgroup, because I believe I will be able to find better quality photos of past playmates from a newsgroup than I can find at this Playboy Plus pay site.

I don't believe my expectations for this site were too high. But what I've found at this site, in terms of photo image quality, and video image quality, is a massive disappointment.

Not all videos are as bad (poor definition) as these 2 videos of Stacy Fuson. The videos of Erika Eleniak are better. Not great, not as good or defined as high quality sites like Metart or Diesel Access, but still better than the Stacy Fuson videos.


Giving the site a score of 68. I believe the quality of the photos at the site is inferior to what you will find at high-quality sites like Metart and MPL Studios and Femjoy.
And the quality of the videos is even further below what you will find at those other sites.

Comparing the photo and video quality of this site to high grade sites on the internet, you begin to realize the Playboy brand has really fallen from its former quality standards.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

20. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Active
88
messmer (137) 10-10-10  11:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Big network with sites that cater to most main stream niches.

Daily updates to varying sites. Update calendar is provided.

Excellent video quality even in the lower resolutions. Introduction of 1080p HD downloadable videos a week ago.

Excellent download speed. A huge plus with the new large HD files.

Videos with a lead-in rather than just action from the very beginning.

The price is right.
Cons: Files could be smaller? An average 1080p video can be 2-4 GB.

No "official" provision for downloading 1024 x 576px, 3036 total bitrate material offered in streaming as HD. The choice is between the smaller non-HD file and the really big (1080p) one.

Intolerance of criticism. One of the recent updates had been offered before under the same name, same model .. same everything and two comments critical of this practice were removed by RK moderators twice.
Bottom Line: There have been many excellent reviews going into the technical details of this site so I thought I'd offer my personal experiences with this site rather than all the details. For details re. picture quality and resolution, for instance, please consult reviews below.

I find this network rather refreshing and on top of my list because the video quality is excellent. A small tip (and I think it must be okay with the site or they wouldn't allow it): if you really wish to download the streaming intermediary, 1024 x 576, 3036 total bitrate size (marked HD) files this can be done through an add on to Firefox called "Flash and Video Download" or possibly through your RealPlayer movies downloader.

I just wish they would make it easier on us by adding it to the downloadable material listed to the right of the videos. I also find the smaller mpeg (mp4) files generally crisper than wmv. So if you have a slow download speed you will nevertheless find the smallest sized video quite acceptable if you pick mp4. Quality is certainly better than that found on most DVD sites.

I also like the fact that natural breasts beat enhanceds hands down. Exotics4me lists them as 85% natural and 15% enhanced. So far I have found nothing to contradict his estimate.

I love the fact that every video starts with a lead-in, sometimes it's the "hunt" for a model, sometimes there's a bit of a story but it is a refreshing change from Gonzo.

All in all an excellent site that would have rated 90+ with me if it hadn't been for the fact that the site moderator twice removed my comment referring to the fact that one of the updates was a "re-run!"
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

21. Reality Kings (5)

Network
Active
87
elephant (65) 08-09-11  01:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Well its a fairly huge site with what appears to be updating daily with 2 updates so theres plenty of bang for your buck here.

Great price has to be mentioned and competes well with similar styled sites on the price front. The variety of sites will keep you busy for a good long while.

Pure 18 is a great site though and I was a member years ago here and it's good to see it's improoved, theres now stories build up to the movies which I really liked and yeah the acting isn't the greatest but they do try and its quite creative.

Biggest pro of the site for me was Euro Sex Parties.
Cons: I wasn't a big fan of lots of the material though, this is a personal thing, I for one don't like women with huge tattoos and fake boobs. I also am not a huge fan of huge butts and big boobs curvy mamas either so my tastes are catered for with the lesbian site We Live Together, there are some gems in there if I ignored the tattoed women on some vids.

In the VIP sites too, just don't get those vids, 20 girls dancing and then 2 some of 3 somes in the end, seems dissapointing, I'd love to see them all get completly named and orgy it up, don't know if that ever happened I never watched them all, my guessing it never does. But yeah I found this to much teasing with clothes on and flashing a bit here and there, no really too exciting in my eyes so I moved on quick from this site.

File sizes too are too big for me. Explained below

Navigation isn't the best and model index is in alphebetic first letter only so all names beginning with S are jumbled in S category and hard to search.
Bottom Line: Its a good site and for some they would find it well above average for me I liked some stuff from the Euro Sex Parties of my fav euro stars and the reason I joined really, maybe would of liked to of seen more from some of them but there is a couple of excellent Sasha Rose flicks in there.

Mikes Apartment too I really like and another reason for joining, especially for Dominika, blimey o'Reilly she is hot, would loved to of seen more of her.

Also I did like some we live together girls too but nothing to write home about.

Lots of the sites don't interest me much but overall I do not regret the join and as I say some people will love this site, great range and if you like American girls mixed in with some cute European hotties then you might adore what the Reality Kings do here.

One thing I'd change though is up the resoluion on the medium quality vids, the highest is too large for me at in excess of 2.5gigs but some of the next ones down are too low at 400mb. Some of the 2005 stuff too is in 3 or more parts so they were not greatest of quality.

Too many tats as mentioned and you gotta lot of those type of girlies here, that said its hard to choose none tattoo girls only in America as it sems 90% of porn actresses seem to have them.
There must be tattoo parlours making some good trade over there in America.

I gave it a above average score here mainly cause it's got variety and lots of people's tastes will be catered for.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brazzers

22. Brazzers (4)

Network
Newbie
50*
big johnny (1) 12-13-09  05:04am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Good selection of videos with a wide range of niches to suit every desire.

Good quality format (on newer videos)

Easy site navigation.

User Forum.

Price.
Cons: Customer care is sh#t.

Old videos terrible quality.

'Brazzers vault' videos seem to take a day to download because it's soo slow (why???).

Constant spam in my email box.
Bottom Line: The videos are good (even though they seem to use uk porn star keiran lee in nearly all the shoots, maybe they have shares in him?!). The site is easy to access. Plenty of choice for every taste (bar extreme fetish). Unfortunately no matter how good the site is the people behind it are crooks. Bad news is the customer care is REALLY SH#T. The payment processor manstermed.com give away your card details to its affiliates who then take money from you from sites you've never heard of. Complete thieves. Join using a credit card if you must. Oh and have a good spam filter on your supplied email because you WILL recieve lots long after you've left them. Its on this basis that i can only award it 50 out of 100. Shame.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brazzers

23. Brazzers (4)

Network
Active
80
BadMrFrosty (56) 02-17-11  02:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Recent 1080P videos are EXCELLENT Quality
+ Photo sets with 99% of scenes
+ Great value yearly membership
+ Zipped photo sets
+ Multiple video quality download options
+ Mostly very good download speeds
+ Download manager compatible
+ Clean easy to use interface with filter and search options
+ Great looking models
+ High production values
+ 29 sites included in membership (Not all updating)
+ Approx 4000 scenes, all scenes from last 2 years available in Full HD, 12 mbit 1080P.
+ No regional pricing
+ Monthly live shows
Cons: - 1080P only available for elite members
- Not much variety in content
- First years worth of 1080P content is badly BROKEN
- Download speeds not consistent
Bottom Line: Before reading the rest of the review, answer me these questions three:

Hate fake boobs?
Hate overuse of makeup?
Hate over-produced commercial porn?
Deduct 50 from the score, move along nothing here to see.

Still reading? OK, good you will very much like this network.

After my extremely positive first look (See my comment), some cracks are starting to show. The download speeds, while generally excellent, are very erratic. As I write, I have 2 files downloading which are struggling to go above total 500 Kbps. A few days ago using the same connection, downloading 2 files from the same site I was getting total speeds of 10,000 Kbps. The speeds have been bad for the last 24 hours, looking at their forums this is a recurring problem that rears its ugly head every couple of weeks.

My second big issue is with the 1080P videos. It seems they screwed up big time with the encoding profile. What this means is that for all 1080P videos on the site from early 2009 to mid 2010 (That's a LOT of videos) you cannot play them at all in Windows Media Player and in MPC-HC you cannot seek (jump to different parts of the video). Playing them in VLC seems to work OK but the problem for me is that I watch all my grot on my big living room TV. Attached to this TV is a ultra low power HTPC, which thanks to DXVA, can normally play high bitrate 1080P videos without a problem. VLC does not support DXVA and without it my PC is not powerful enough to play them. I could fix the files but as a purist I like my videos as downloaded from the site, pure and unsullied.

Those are really my only issues with the network. The download speeds I am willing to forgive as long as it doesn't get worse. The broken videos are what knocked a good 15 points of the score, turning it from a truly excellent site to merely a great one.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brazzers

24. Brazzers (4)

Network
Active
99
pat362 (367) 11-27-11  11:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: +They update with over a dozen new scenes per week.
+They hire some of the top US performers.
+They now add one live Brazzer shoot every month and you can even purchase live shoots from their other sites like Twisty's, wicked and Mofos.
+You can download the videos in WMV, MPG4, ipod, HD720 and HD1080.
+You can download the photosets as a complete zip file and resolution varies based on the year of release. The ones from 2009 to now are 1600x2500.
+They shoot scenario style porn.
+They show upcoming updates.
+They have a jump to action option on their streaming system where you simply click on the fetish and the viedo will star from there.
+You can use a download manager.
+Download speeds are amazing. I can normally download a medium quality video in less than 2 minutes.
Cons: -The same performers tend to have multiple scenes on the site and many of them are similar in nature.
-A large percentage of their performers have tattoos and/or implants.
-They often use the same male performers so if you aren't a fan then you won't enjoy many of the videos.
-Their search system could use the option of searching for both the performer's name and a particular fetish. This is more important with performers with multiple scenes since you might have to search over a dozen of different videos to find the one you want.
-They don't hire that many ethnic performers but I don't think it's a question of choice as much as availability.
Bottom Line: This is my favorite site of all time. I wrote a couple of cons but I can't say that they bother me all that much. I wish they would hire less performers with implants and/or tattoos but so many girls have them these days that the pool of all natural performer is getting smaller all the time.

*It's true that many girls have multiple scenes and that they do pretty much the same thing in many of them but that isn't always a bad thing and the number of girls with multiple scenes isn't as large as those with only a few. I guess I must love this site since this is the only one who's membership I have kept for over a year and I don't plan on cancelling it any time soon. The fact that I only pay 10$ a month for it is a part of why.

*I don't know if I can really add anything that other reviews haven't already said so all I'll do is say that if you want to see porn starring most US performers than this is one of the best site for it. If you want to see many US MILF's do porn than this is the site you want. If you want to see US perfromers do anal then again this is one of the best site for it.

*If you prefer to see European performers or you enjoy interracial porn then don't join this site because there is simply not enough content to satisfy your needs.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Twistys

25. Twistys (4)

Pay
Active
92
nadiencendia (83) 07-28-10  11:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Amazing ammount of content: many more pictures than videos, but that's quite usual, isn't it...
-Good update rythm: two-three picture sets and two videos a day
-Really beautiful girls (mostly American big-titted actresses, but also some European cuties)
-Easy navigation and different search options
-Good picture and video quality, specially in recent sets
-No download limits
-Good pricing, considering the content they offer
-Full trial membership (I received a special 1$ discount for "old customers: best deal ever).
Cons: -Downloads are at times a bit slow
-Content may be too softcore for some viewers, specillay after a while (and the hardcore part of the site is really minimal)
-Not all content is exclusive
-Some company ads, not too annoying though
Bottom Line: I rejoined this site thanks to a trial membership offer that I received in my email, for being and "old customer": 1$ for three days, renewable at 14.95$ a month. Probably the best invested buck in my whole life.

The archive is huge. That's probably Twisty's most salient quality. Being one of internet's "classics", it has so much content (more picture sets than vids, but that's quite usual, isn't it) that you would need months to download and browse it all -specially considering that download speeds aren't always the best. The quality of the videos varies depending on their release date, newer videos being offered in three different qualities.

The models/actresses are mostly American girls with huge tits -a lot of them, fake-, but you will also find a handful of sets by some of our favorite European models, such as Sophie Moone, Eufrat, Eve Angel or Nella (here as Nellie Hunter). Most girls are absolutely stunning, so no complains there.

The only possible dissapointment about Twistys is that it is too softcore, or too regularly softcore: most sets and vids are solo masturbation sets, very beautifully lit, acted, filmed and edited. This is great, but it can get a little too repetitive once you've watched it a dozen times with a dozen different girls, and the bunch of lesbian or hardcore videos available are just not enough to balance this feeling.

But this is just to say something bad about a good site: good in ammount of content, in quality of pics and videos, in model selection and even in price, if you are lucky enough to get a discount (PU's offer or other one). It could be a good holiday idea, to get a Twistys one month membership and download as much as you can...
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 440 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (9)
2. Babes Network.com (7)
3. Naughty America (7)
4. DDF Network (6)
5. VideoBox (6)
6. Reality Kings (5)
7. Bangbros Network (5)
8. Evil Angel (5)
9. FTV Girls (5)
10. Wow Girls (4)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.17 seconds.