Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent quality in videos and photosets
Some great looking models - teens of (only) easteuropean origen. A few more average looking teens.
TEENS: sexy outfits: high heels, neglige and nylons (no socks or whatever)
Zip for photos (photos: 1549x1033)
Videos: AVI only (576x320) - but crisp! (full screen)
Updates looks ok for now - very new site
Updates seems to come almost dayly.
90 vids - a little less photosets
Most softcore - some hc
Good preview
Easy navigation - layout a bit simple.
Exclusive material
Cons:
Softcore videos/photosets has the upper hand
HC secondary - HC mainly in videos
Hardcore sets (video) are a bit strange - (great quality), but a little weird editing - like old softcore fucking-films. BUT some of the videos with everything, bj, threesome, fucking, closeups and so on.
BUT nok like any other average easteuropean site - this one has it's own style.
Download is mostly a bit slow: My average has been 350 Mb/sec.
Bottom Line:
I was taken in by the preview - thanks!
This site (even if it's US-based) has some of the most fine looking easteuro-teens. Some of them has only been seen at FM Teens - and they are just great!
A small, naughty blond: Viktoriya is a soft-star at FM Teens. But here she's doing hc b/g in 2 videos (I'm still thrilled here) and a great vaginal-balls video (6 videos of this doll)
What's great too is, that you do not get disapointed about number of videos compared to photosets - it ads up.
There is now about 90 vids, most softcore, but all in great quality - man, even if the average size is about 200 Mb.
NB: My foremost liking for this site is that these teens are not pseudo-look-a-like with mosyly pigtail and small cotton-socks.
These girl are in high heels and /or nylons - sexy, if you ask me!
This is a new site and the amount is still just average for what we PU's are used to at more qualified sites at around $30.
But it looks like they do a good job in updates - by all means not every day - but ALMOST! And the updates is always with videos - and sometimes with photosets from the same video.
I've "cooled off" here after a week of membership, but I can recommend this site for lovers of euro-teens in sexy outfits in fine quality videos
And the photosets are really fine too (Drooler: you may disagree).
Bottom line: Great site - a bit like FM Teens but without all the pseudo lez-thing. And those solo-videos are among the best in this field of east euro-teens.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content and most of the girls/teens/models are also exclusive for this site.
Have not seem most anywhere else.
Good video-quality - AVI
Fine 1010x1515 photos
Zip
Good download speed
Cons:
High price: $ 39.95
Earlier videos tend too much to sappho
The performance and editing of videos are a little too boring for approx.75%
Slow updates - not sure how often, but certainly not daily..
Bottom Line:
This site is now a gathering of former FM Teens in separate chapters - and expensive chapters where you former had to pay $ 29.95 for ONE.
Now its all here with FM Teens from 1-17.
That means there are at this moment 17 different sites with two girls in each site and with approx 16 videos each. That makes the amount pretty good. (photos are the same in number of sets).
What hits me here are the girls/models. There is a fine variations of easteuropean teens - blonds, brunettes and reds. And some of them are just sexy and pretty. The style is both sweet and sexy - the later videos with some great masturbation-scenes - and with the right/swell sound of a dildo doing it's job.
But else this is just softcore - and even the many lez-scenes seems quite innocent. Except from the small bonus-site (Young Pink Teens) where the two girls from the Issue 8 do some serious licking and dildo-fucking - it's maybe some of the first lez-scenes I really enjoy.
Take a look at the preview - it's pretty good and gives the right idea of what you get - especially when you want to judge the models look.
At first I'd have rated this site a little bit higher, but when you go on things seems to fade a bit because the content and style is the same and the same....
But bottom line: They have some fine, sexy and rarely seen teens here.
If your're into softcore easteuropean teens on video, I can recommend it. The photos are ok, too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Billing by Epoch with no regional pricing
No longer need to subscribe to the separate issues, one subscription of $29.95 gets you access to all the content.
Site updating 2 to 3 times per week with each update consisting of a photo set and matching 5 to 6 minute video.
Latest photo sets look good at 1400 x 2108px (around 70 sets) with the rest still fairly decent at 1008 x 1518px
Recent videos 960 x 540 usually around 4-5000kbps
Good sized collection with 90 models and 790 photo sets, most with an accompanying video
Zip download for all photo sets
Cons:
Navigation takes some getting used to
Zip files all have the file name “images” so need to rename everything yourself.
Only 1 download option in .avi for the videos
No video preview or screencaps, no run time or file sizes listed.
Older videos only 576 x 320
Only 1 size option for photos
Content not dated
Some of the oldest photo sets look too dark.
Not a con for me but maybe too softcore for some
Bottom Line:
FM Teens features a nice collection of Russian/Ukrainian teen models stripping out of sexy outfits to reveal their cute teen bodies. Whilst a lot of the older content on the site featured 2 girl shoots they’ve had a change of direction and all the content added now and for the last 300 plus updates has been single girl shoots so the balance of content is now around two thirds solo to one third 2 girl shoots. The content is very softcore featuring mainly striptease and posing, I saw little in the way of masturbation or toy play and even in the 2 girl shoots you’re not exactly going to find much hot lesbian action, mostly just striptease and light touching.
As a softcore photo fan myself I loved the collection here with most of the models looking like real teens to early 20s, having slim bodies with small to medium natural breasts so not a site for silicone fans, you’ve definitely got to love the skinny teen look. Whilst you have plenty of the usual teenie style stripped socks and pig tails sets what I really liked here was the large amount of sets where you see the models dressed up in stockings and high heels.
I found the navigation a little awkward here at first. When you first log into the members area you are taken to the updates page where you see thumbnails linking to the latest 33 updates. You click on a thumb, you then get a larger preview pic with the option to “browse gallery online”, “download zip” or “get movie”. It’s only when you click to browse the gallery online you then go to a page where you discover the models name and clicking on her will bring up all her other sets. You then have to go back again to the previous page to download the zip. There’s no direct link in the members area for a model index and it wasn’t until day three of my membership that I actually discovered you can browse the content via the model index from the tour page of the site with the option to sort the models by most recent appearance on the site, alphabetical, by rating or most votes.
I’m not a great fan of video content and the ones I watched here did nothing to change my mind on that. The videos here usually just feature the model doing a sexy striptease followed by lightly caressing her body, nothing much to get excited about. The production is quite amateurish too with no sign of any professional editing and the video camera being operated by somebody who has trouble even holding it still.
Overall I enjoyed the site and my score is for the nice photo collection of softcore teen models in sexy outfits which is my favourite niche.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Richard Kern has had a long and colorful career from his early experimental film work with the 'cinema of transgression' to his current more straightforward "adult" photography. While his photographic style on NNC is more-or-less conventional, there are still fragments of his early days that peak through - back when he was a rebel with this DIY punk aesthetic. This all lends an edgy depth to his work.
There is a nice selection of diverse models with a variety of body types. They're substantially different from the common Eastern European models that we see everywhere.
There are some videos and they're downloadable in a variety of formats (.wmv & .mov), although they're small and low-resolution.
The price is amazing. A subscription is a no-brainer if you like erotic photography with a real girl-on-the-street edge. Indeed, many of these models *were* found on the streets of NYC (Kern provides little comments on how he met them and what they were like).
Cons:
The photo sets tend to be fairly small compared to what we're seeing these days. The newer sets are slightly larger, but the old sets are just tiny. The same goes for the videos - they're very small and the quality is certainly not HD, or anything close.
The site doesn't really track its updates. They claim its updated regularly, but during my subscription, I didn't necessarily see evidence of that. Maybe I was always looking in the wrong place, but I couldn't tell if new stuff was showing up at all.
The site isn't huge. There are over 100 models, but when you compare it to MET or Abby Winters, it's pretty small. However, the site compensates by having unique, interesting content, and a very reasonable membership fee.
Bottom Line:
Kern is definitely an artist, although I don't necessarily count the content of NNC as art, per se. The important thing is, he has a unique eye for interesting compositions with interesting models. It's one of the few sites out there that feature actual American models that don't look like Playboy playmates or porn stars (i.e. fake breasts and all that).
If you like erotic photography and are looking for something different, NewNudeCity is definitely worth checking out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Many fine young Russian (?), Ukrainian (?) women with LOTS of sex appeal
+Exclusive content
+Pics at 1010x1515; good (albeit quirky) size choice
+Very good image quality from Issue 9 up: very few pics are blurry, dark, or color compromised. At least from that point, it seems to be a real priority.
+Zips
+Speedy server!
+No DRM
+Visitor’s preview: good samples of the lovelies and a taste of the clunky way it’s organized, too
Cons:
-Organized, but very awkwardly
-In issues 1-8, images are really amateurish.
-Big watermark gets on the goods!
-More g/g than I care for
+All vids in avi only; a smallish 576x320; some look pretty cheesy.
-Too much body covering with strings of beads, frilly see-through garments, puzzle pieces, bath goo, smeared-on foodstuffs, knick-knacks balanced on butts, and flowers. Lots of flowers, sticking out of butts, etc. (Why the high price? The FLORIST! These are GOOD flowers. Not cheap!)
Bottom Line:
Here’s what it’s like getting photo zips here. I login and work down to an issue, #13. Two models, but no names, so 2 clicks back up and over to the model rating page, the ONLY place where the names are. Oh, they’re BOTH named Natasha! Ok, “Natasha lighter” and “Natasha darker.”
Back to the issue #13 page, scroll down a few screens, then open to the pages of a gallery of “Natasha lighter.” The address bar shows “13-12,” which helps. Issue 13, Gallery 12. Ohh, nice! Get this one! Then alt-left arrow to get right back to the “gallery list” page -- the only place the link to the zip is. (Click the “home” button inside the gallery and you’ll lose your place; you’ll be at the TOP of the issue page and have to scroll down again, looking for that number 12. No, they don’t label the galleries by number, either.)
Extract the zip. A folder named “images.” Open that to find another folder, named (drumroll) “images” (cymbal crash).
The above, times 20 issues and counting x the number of galleries you download.
It’d be a helluva lot easier if they’d 1. put the model names and gallery numbers where they’re USEFUL, and 2. flatten the navigation. See, you have to go one step above the photo galleries to access the videos, too. It’s “old fashioned” web design, up and down the tree.
All the same, I was very pleasantly surprised by how much I got from this site. And at least content quality improvement is getting priority.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+40 different adorable, natural young women who smile a lot and make eyes at the camera and aren’t usually photographed staring into some mysterious and distant void
+No fake tits, and very little in the way of tats (exception: Vlada, with a big one on her belly and a “V” right above the ...)
+Exclusive content
+Photo quality is pleasing to the eye with sharpness and color
+Variety of indoor and outdoor shoots (though I’m more of an indoor man myself)
+191 photosets and 212 videos to date, usually combined into a single set (the extra vids are b/g hardcore or masturbation)
+Fast downloads of zips and vids that peak between 660-670 kbps (20MB nominal connection; using Firefox)
+Built-in “Doofus Recovery System”: If you accidentally close all windows to the site, you can return without having to log in again
+Nice design and good, straightforward navigation
+Extensive blog area might be of interest
+Visitor’s area gives you a good idea of the content
Cons:
-First post was late Oct. 2007. That’s 10-11 photosets per month.
-Pics are 1549 pixels on the long end; for a site at this price, there should at least be 3000px photos as well. (That would make it more competitive.)
-Some sets have less light than I’d like, but I guess that’s a matter of taste. They’re not overly dark.
-Vids are only downloadable in avi (576x320)
-Vids have gotten shorter than they used to be (approx. 10 min. to approx 5-6 min)
-Models who have the same names: Anna (4), Natasha (3), Tanya (4), etc. require you to give them additional (or alternative) names if you want to keep them straight
-Too much play with the props sometimes: body parts viewed through spaces in chaise lounges, flowers all over the body (or sticking out of the Miracle-Gro), sand all over like tempura batter, a star-shaped dollop of cake icing above the ass -- stuff like that
-They have stopped doing hardcore (OK by me, but maybe not for the die-hards); last time was end of Nov. 2008
Bottom Line:
Because the updates come approx. every 3 days, this site is better to join for the increasing size of its archives than it would be for the updates. And that’s what I’ve done, having not been a member since May of last year.
The girls are lovely for the most part, and as I said, natural in their charms. That’s a big plus for this site.
Some of them have been making their mark at other sites as well. "Anna S" at HegreArt (also at MetArt and FM Teens) is absolutely stunning! "Anna" the extremely alluring dark-eyed brunette is also at FM Teens, TeenDreams (as Tantsi), FemJoy as Paulina, JustTeenSite as Anita, and MetArt as Atena.
While I could list a few more, I'll just have to mention Viktoriya, who has smitten both Denner and I. This girl needs MORE exposure! I have seen her at JustTeenSite as Victa, but that was some time ago. Really, she should appear in oodles of updates at every high-quality softcore site in existence.
One little picky thing they could do is have each gallery open in a new window. It is a picky point, though, as I’ve discovered that right-clicking on a gallery link in Firefox allows for the same thing.
It seems that after a nearly year-long flirtation with occasional hardcore additions, they’ve decided to stick strictly to the softcore niche. Frankly, I’m glad just because it will be clear that this is a softcore site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Good diversity of models; most (if not all) natural
- Plenty of unshaved models (a pro for me, at least)
- Lots of nylons and sheer underwear
- Interesting mix of amateur and glamour styles
- Good value with no regional bias on price
Cons:
- Undated content - no idea if updating (suspect not)
- Pictures fairly low res; videos derisorily so
- Some sets continuations of a previous one
- Some models' sets mixed with others; or some duplicate sets
- Bad lighting may be a turn-off for some
- Quite a few teen models (I know a pro for many!)
- A couple of fetishes which don't appeal
- No zip sets
Bottom Line:
New Nude City is the last of a few sites I've been meaning to join for ages, and finally got round to trying it. It features the work of Richard Kern; one-time underground filmmaker, latterly occasional music video director and more often nude photographer; I'm quite a fan of his photographs, owning a couple of his published books, and so wanted to take a look at his site.
There are approx 170 models here, almost all of them exclusive, amateur girls; I only happened across three I recognised - Joanna Angel, Karlie Montana and a very young Sasha Grey. Roughly 700 photo sets of 20-120 pictures, maybe 50 as an average; and resolution is fairly low at 1400px. No zip sets, but downloading a set with a manager - I use DownThemAll - is very straightforward so I do not penalise the site for that. Sets are not dated, so there's no way to know if the site is being updated - I suspect not since the total picture count on the home page did not seem to change while I was a member; but the material stretches back over ten years; I recognise some from the books I have. The material is only moderately explicit; there are plenty of spread legs, but only a few sets feature fingers or toys being inserted. There are also some girl-girl sets, but most of the content is solo.
The theme of the site - the city - sees the sets split into categories named after New York areas - Soho, Greenwich, Wall street, etc. I apologise to Mr Kern if I'm missing the point here, but this seems entirely a conceit; I couldn't see any commonality within each category and some sets continue a single shoot but in a different category. There is a model index, though - with a brief bio paragraph of each girl, which is interesting - and a more traditional theme index allowing you to search on eg panties, nylons, blondes, etc. There is a very clear divide into two broad themes, though, even though the site doesn't define it that way; it is probably a by-product of Kern's magazine work - photos from which I suspect feature heavily on this site - having, I believe, shot for Barely Legal and Leg Show.
The first theme, then, is younger amateur girls. Normally I prefer older models and there are a number of models here who are just too young - and too young-looking - for my taste. Having said that, they are interesting; we see them not only posing for the camera; but in the kitchen, brushing their teeth, eating or drinking. Combined with the locations - very ordinary apartments, perhaps the models' own (some are quite messy!) and hotel rooms, there is an intimacy that you don't get with more slick material. All of the models look engaged, as if they are having fun - Kern definitely gets the best out of them. Most sets feature clothing of some sort - again, usually prosaic, apart from the fact that (like me) Kern has a fetish for and fixation with panties, especially the sheer kind - you'll see lots here. Sometimes the lighting is not good; but because of the nature of the pictures, it's forgiven, this isn't a sight that you judge on mere technical prowess, and it fits in with the underground/amateur feel.
Then there are the more glamorous sets; featuring girls with a bit more make-up, perhaps a little older, usually a a bit better lit - and focused more on legs, nylons and lingerie, and more pin-up style poses. There are also a few other fetishes in the mix - eg bondage, smoking, peeing; these don't necessarily work for me but are in the minority. Although they are a bit more glam, they retain the same feel as the amateur girls - the girls are still natural, and engaged with the photographer... and still fixated on sheer bras and panties. Granted, some are a bit dated and look like retro magazine shoots - likely because that's what they are - but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The split between these two themes is roughy equal; I saved a similar number of sets in each - and although some models appear in both kinds of set, the majority are either one or the other.
I haven't yet mentioned the videos - the site states 136 available. The theme is similar, although there are some slightly more explicit ones featuring masturbation and toys. I like the feel of them, the way they are shot... but they are let down technically even more than the pictures, being only a couple of minutes long, and just too small - some at approx 640x360, some at 400x300. The graininess of them fits in with the theme of the site... but they really need to be bigger.
This is another tricky one to score; for me it's very much like Ed Fox's Foot Factory - I love the material, it's unique, quirky and appealing; but let down a bit by low resolution pictures and lack of updates. I'll therefore give it the same score; and say it's definitely recommended - but if you do want something a bit different, I'd suggest Juliland first, which wins over mainly in technical quality and update frequency.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
