Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
The main thing I can say positive about this sight is the large number of updates and that each update seems to have photos. I would also like to say that most of these updates are well done and very professional.
Cons:
The most glaring problem with the sight is the lack of any search tools. You have to open each update to find out what is in there. All you get is a picture of the girl and her name. No genre nothing. The second problem is the high def. It's not very high def. seems 940x560is the norm. No download options either.The content is not exclusive. I have found much of it at DVD sights like video Z.
Bottom Line:
Great possibilities not realized. I got a headache trying to navigate this sight. Great content badly presented.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good interface, easy to navigate
- Good quality videos
- Pictures decent size and well compressed
- (Almost) daily updates - photos and videos
- Photos and videos come in matching sets
- Plenty of undressing
- Camera angles
- No anal (a plus for me!)
Cons:
- Some videos have music track throughout - no voice - others have bland music
- $=€=Ł regional pricing (use TunnelBear to sign up)
- DMs don't work on videos
- Captcha on login
- Some fake boobs and tans (but not too many)
- Short login timeout
- Bit too much of the guy finishing himself off
- File naming a bit off
Bottom Line:
Although I generally prefer softcore sites, I have grown fond of the kind of tender, sharing, intimate and realistic (if somewhat idealised) sex scenes that the relatively new heartcore genre presents, and babes.com was next on my list to join.
Signup is relatively easy, but with the following caveats:
a) signup and cancel is through their own billing, not CCBill etc
b) they are a proponent of the grossly biased $=€=Ł regional pricing setup - eg $20 in the US, Ł20 in the UK, over 50% more, but I am pragmatic and this is avoided with TunnelBear
c) You need to enter a captcha to log in
d) After which they do try to cross-sell to you other sites
But with that in mind, the site is nice, clean and easy to use when you get there.
The site has been around for about a year and updates with one scene daily - both a video and pictures, a setup which I quite like. During my membership this actually changed to 5 per week rather than 7 - but there's still quite a lot of material, about 300 sets & videos with approx 50/30/20 split between couples, solo and girl-girl scenes.
There is the usual browsing by videos, photos and models; and when going into a scene you get:
- For pictures, a browser-based slideshow, and download of approx 100 pics at a fairly respectable 2.5k
- For videos, a responsive streaming player, and downloads in 4 sizes up to 1080p (I went for 720 and they look very good)
Each model/set/video page also has user comments, and you can follow/like them within the site, and - if you are suitably unashamed of your smut proclivities - do so on FB, twitter and the like.
Most models are American, with some popular girls such as Malena Morgan, Lexi Belle and Hayden Winters; and some of the popular European models like Connie and Ariel. Not much ethnic diversity, although there are some nice latina and asian models; but there is a fairly broad range of ages, including some lovely milf-type models like Nikki Daniels and India Summer.
The theme here, as I suggested, is heartcore - like Joymii, X-Art etc, the focus is on couples scenes, but done in a loving, sharing way. The previous reviewer made some good points, but I think was a little unfair in criticising it for not being hardcore enough - you wouldn't join it if you wanted facials, DP and other more typical porn-y content. The scenes are fairly explicit, though, with closeups of penetration and oral sex, so it does deliver on that front.
That said, it's not without its issues. A commenter suggested that this is what Digital Desire would be if it did hardcore - and it's spot on. The girls are beautiful, the scenes are dreamy and idealised, the focus is soft and videos start with mood music, which fades out about a third of the way in to the sounds of the action. (The music is a particular peeve, actually - if you look at the previews, they have some good, brave choices of interesting music; this does not carry over to the actual videos which have more insipid/nondescript soundtracks which they would be better off without).
And, Like Digital Desire, they are fairly formulaic. It's not a bad formula, but most scenes (or at least the couples ones, which I was most interested in) play out the same way; the guy slowly undresses the girl, there's oral from both of them, there's sex with him and her on top. It's good, and well done, but could do with a bit more variety - and ideally, within the constraints of the genre, a bit more raunchiness.
But conversely, they have hung onto some porn tenets that don't really fit the genre. In far too many scenes, the girl ends up naked, apart from the high heels - I quite like heels in a pinup or glam context, but if I'm trying to imagine a realistic encounter, the shoes would definitely go! And similarly, in almost all cases the guy pulls out and finishes on the girl's belly/boobs/ass - again, there's definitely a time and place for a prominent pop shot but it does take away from the believability of the scene. Also see my comment about photoshopping - wholly unnecessary in the genre.
Despite my misgivings, this is still a good site in the heartcore genre and there's plenty of good material. If I were in the US, I would score this maybe 85 or 86; but there is no excuse for their heinous regional pricing policy, which has to cost them at least a couple of points.
But, pricing issues aside, Joymii remains my favourite - they are more creative with scenes, camerawork, and manage a bit more raunch while still being a bit artsy and trendy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of only a few remaining American public nudity sites
- Low price
- Offers zips for photos
- Bills through CCBill
- May still be updating
Cons:
- Small site
- Very few videos
- Video resolution is low
- Most video links are broken
- Updates may be recycled
- No recognizable models
- Photo sets broken into several zips
Bottom Line:
This is a small site in a rare niche so I thought it would be worth joining at least once. The niche is public nudity in an American setting and those sites are getting harder to find, likely because the material is getting harder to make. Nude in LA doesn’t even exist any longer, and the best American public nudity site – Teasers VOD – was ordered to stop producing scenes by the LA city government a while back so there will be no more updates from them.
This site is definitely small. There are only 33 models here with the look being more to the amateur side of the business. That’s neither a pro or a con, but merely a fact. You won’t find porn stars here like you used to be able to at some other public sites. The models appear to be all in their 20s with varying body types and few with tattoos. Overall, the models are pretty attractive.
There is truth in some advertising, and the name of the site follows that rule: there is only one theme here: models in San Francisco shed their clothes and walk around in public areas being photographed.
For a video collector, this site doesn’t have a lot to offer. Actually, that’s being far too generous. Of all the photo shoots it seems odd that there are only a dozen videos available. That’s bad enough, but it actually gets worse. Of the video links less than half actually work. But that may be the best news because the resolutions are so poor that even what is here is almost unwatchable. The resolution is only 640x360 at 1200kb/s and 15fps. Subjectively they look terrible. They look so bad on a 23” monitor that the watermark is almost unreadable. The technical aspect of the videos is so bad that I haven’t watched them so I can’t comment on their artistic merit. I should also add that the videos are also short – most are about 3mins long.
Things are better with the photos. The number of photos for models varies from less than 50 to just over 1000. The average is about 300 photos per model. The resolutions aren’t too bad with the majority at 1752x2628. Newer photos are higher at 3744x5616, but there aren’t many of those.
The site allows download managers but they aren’t really effective or necessary since the zip files are so small, with most being approximately 6MB. The problem is that for each photo set there may be 10 or more zips. If a model has a lot of shoots then you’ll be downloading a lot of zips – one model has over 60 zip files for her photos. Some of the zips have only two photos in them.
There appears to be a relatively new feature called a “Nude Map” where the model’s route through public areas is mapped on Google Maps. This would be an innovative idea for a public nudity site but I can’t figure out how to get it to work. There is some evidence that this feature isn’t live yet even though it is being heavily promoted.
The big question I have about the site that I can’t give a definitive answer to is whether the site is still updating. I think it is, but it appears that it is updating with mostly older material and whether that was shot a while ago and only made available now or whether it is recycled material I can’t say. The latest update was today (April 29) and the copyright on those photos is 2013, but most of the more recent updates have copyrights in 2010 and older. The latest video was uploaded in February and it looks as bad as the rest, which may indicate that it was actually recorded a long time ago. But in fairness to the site, they do have a list of updates and there are updates added at least twice a month. Whether those are really ‘new’ photos though could be open to debate.
The site does actually offer a fairly good value, but only because it is cheap and not because it offers a lot of good material. They offer a $4.95 fee for a week of access that will rebill higher. The good news is that unless you still live with dial-up from the 1990s you can download everything they have in that time. With a decent internet connection you can have everything you want in under an hour. It also bills through CCBill so you can have some confidence that cancelling will be easy. (The page at TBP says that the membership is $4.95 for two weeks, but that isn’t what the site is offering now.)
So can I recommend this site? Yes, but only to someone with a narrow interest in this niche who prefers photos. As a video collector I was badly disappointed, but the photos are decent. (Actually, they’re not ‘decent’ since they feature young ladies naked in public, but you get what I mean.) The small site size and limited offerings are offset by the low price, so if you need a fix of photos of nude models in the streets, this might scratch an itch for you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Reasonable price of $19.95
Exclusive content.
The 59 gorgeous models include a wide variety of ethnicities from Asia, Africa, South America and Europe.
Site updates consistently every 2 days.
Stunning high resolution photos available in 3 sizes.
Zip downloads.
Photo set covers included in zip files.
Some nice background info on the models included.
Additional features include model ratings, comments and add to favourites.
Cons:
The video section is very small; only 13 videos total and only 1 new one added in the last 12 months.
Videos are streaming only.
Many of the photo sets are split in to two parts although they do generally come as consecutive updates.
Zip file naming could be better; model name plus number (e.g. emilya_1_m, emilya_2_m), would be nicer if they could include the photo set name.
Navigation could be better.
Search tool is rather limited.
No file sizes listed for zips.
Download speed seemed a little slow; single downloads seemed to be limited to about 600 KB/sec.
Bottom Line:
Melina.com claim to be professional photographers who travel the world to find the best looking girls whom they claim to be exclusive to the site and 100% newcomers. I certainly didn’t recognise any of the models as being familiar from other sites and even tried cross referencing a few at thenude.eu but came up with a blank so have no reason to doubt their claims. This is primarily a Teen site with the models mostly being aged 18-21. The big attraction for me in this site was the varied ethnic diversity of the models which you seldom find on multi model sites. I loved discovering the dark skinned, dark haired exotic beauties from places like India, Thailand, Philippines, Chile, Venezuela and Brazil to name a few. The site has been online a little over 2 years and to date has 414 galleries (31,000+ photos).
The navigation options are rather limited with a choice of models, galleries or videos. The models page is nicely presented with a good sized preview photo of each model along with her name and number of galleries, pics and videos. The models are listed by rank starting with the highest rated. You can also click on a letter of the alphabet to find models by name alphabetically. There is a basic model search that allows you to search by eye colour, hair colour, ethnicity, tattoos and piercings. The annoying thing about using the search engine or the alphabetical listing is that after you select a model in your results and hit the back button you are always taken back to the default models page so have to click back to the letter of the alphabet or search again. If you select galleries the whole 2 years’ worth of photo sets will be presented on a single page with a preview photo of the set cover so a lot of scrolling involved. Down the right hand side there is a month and year list but clicking on it doesn’t actually take you to that month’s updates. It just expands a list of text links for the dates in that month when there was an update, not very helpful really without a preview pic.
The strength of the site is the photo collection; this is top quality professional photography equal to anything you would find on top photography sites like MetArt. In fact in some ways I preferred the photo sets here to those at Met because the models almost always start off wearing some clothing, lingerie or swimwear so you nearly always get some tease before the nakedness. I don’t really recall seeing any of those plain vanilla nude sets you get a lot of at MetArt. There is a good mix of indoor and stunning outdoors locations. The models here get fully nude including some spreading and close up shots but don’t go as far as masturbation or insertions. The photos are offered in 3 sizes (+1000px, +2000px and up to 5000px).
Anyone who joins this site for videos I’m afraid would end up sorely disappointed. There are only 13 videos and they are streaming only. There are 4 quality levels of streaming; HD720p, 480p, 360p & 240p for mobile. I didn’t find the 720p very sharp when viewed full screen on my 24 inch monitor so have my doubts that it’s true hd. The videos are mostly 2-3 minutes long and are just basically the model dancing around and stripping with background music. I didn’t find them very erotic at all.
For anyone who loves high quality photography I would recommend this site particularly if you have a passion for dark dusky exotic beauties. If you’re only interested in videos I would advise against wasting your money on this site. The poor video section wouldn’t adversely affect my rating of the site as I have little to no interest in them anyway.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
beautiful girls
high quality videos
frequent updates
reasonably priced
fast download speeds
exclusive content
growing site
easy navigation
Cons:
borderline softcore
long intro's
bad camerawork
questionable cumshots
rare facials
Bottom Line:
High quality videos and beautiful girls at a decent price are normally a good thing but if you are looking for hardcore porn like brazzers then I can't suggest babes.com All of the scenes are almost soft core. I watched almost every video available so far and only seen one facial/oral cumshot. a lot of the pop shots are supposedly creampies but there is never any evidence of a cumshot. The camera work sucks hard. They are too busy being artsy fading in and out instead of just focusing on the fucking. They do update often but they are just more of the same boring sex.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A large collection of videos. Site claims 12888 but this number has not changed in days even though they update, as a rule, with at least two videos daily so, take with a grain of salt.
HD videos, 1920x1080p with a total bitrate of 3000+ since late 2011. Date is approximate.
Attractive, mostly young, Japanese models.
Part of a network of five sites.
Zipped picture sets. Pictures are taken from the video but are of better quality than most screen caps.
The most recent set contains 27 pictures, sized 1000x1500px.
Movies and pictures are not pixellated.
Excellent download speed for me, maxing out my connection.
Cons:
Generic porn with no surprises or originality. This comes from an older man, someone younger might disagree with my assessment.
My niche, mature women in sexy lingerie, is disappointingly under-represented.
Most older videos are not in HD but of lower quality, which is normal for all sites that have been around for a while, but this annoyed me because I expected a site calle JAVHD to be all HD.
No model biographies, inaccurate niche listings, eg. I expected to find mature women under “mature,” and not just someone over twenty, unless older Japanese women look exceptionally young. In most sites there are MILFs (over 30) and all that are older than MILFs will be sorted under mature. Which usually means 40 years of age and up. I am still looking for a single 40+ female on this site.
Bottom Line:
Well, as I explained in my comment, Japanese Porn has the reputation of being different, so my expectation of finding something that I hadn't seen before was high. Regrettably, I am finding mostly every day, generic porn .. not bad at all, mind you, if you just started to get into Porn recently .. but for anyone who has been looking at videos for years this site is no better than any other video site and even worse in some aspects. For instance, the preponderance of those microphone shaped wands used to stimulate women's clits, is astounding.
Models are pleasantly (THEIR pleasure not mine) attacked with these monstrosities in every second video, or so it appears. If you don't like dildos or wands you will get annoyed at seeing so many videos containing them.
There are good things too about this site:
I haven't seen a single set of enhanced breasts, so far. I am sure they exist, but it appears that Japanese males have the good sense and taste to reject them.
There is no pixellation, which is great, but this might mean that this site is in non-Japanese hands, which would explain why the porn looked generally so unexciting to me. However, I do like the fact that the action is a bit slower than what we are used to and that the actors (male and female) nibble an ear now and then or dwell on a nipple a bit longer than two seconds, or concentrate on teasing for a while before the action starts. This is a lot more appealing to me then the frantic copulation right from the start that one is exposed to in so many North American videos.
Despite some of my negativity this is really not a bad site at all, and I rated it as such, I am sure many will like it, and the price is right at the moment, but for someone who was looking for a bit of excitement up and above that found in other large video sites it was a bit of a disappointment.
And I am still not sure what the offer to upgrade (under my account) entails. I thought I had it all. I have access to all five sites, there are no restrictions on downloads so what more could there be?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
very good quality videos, attractive models.
Cons:
full trial is not full. slow downloads a majority of the time. not many updates.
Bottom Line:
I tried to join the trial offer which was supposed to be full. It was not full. they do not let trial members download the videos, only stream. so I joined for one month at a discounted price. they only update once a week for 6 sites which is kinda lame. The quality of the videos are very good but also very large in size. A majority of the scenes are over 1gb to download. Downloading speed on this site was extremely inconsistent. One day I would be a 2mbps and the next I would be at 80kbps. Needless to say download a scene of 1.3gb at 80kbps takes a long fucking time.I know it was not my server because I would download from a different site at the same time at very high speeds. If you're going to join be prepared for infrequent updates and dial-up speed downloads. But also be prepared for great looking videos with very attractive models.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-Gorgeous women (over 3000 models)
-Great sex variety (over 10,500 scenes, most exclusive)
-Great variety in women
-Scenes well-shot
-Files reasonably-sized and look great in 1080p
-At least 1 update per day
-No download limits
-No DRM
Cons:
-Nonsensical file naming
-Navigation is a mixed bag
-Scene search could be better
-Very few "American" scenes in HD (not necessarily a con to me but could be for some)
Bottom Line:
Simply put, 21sextury knows how to make good porn but not how to distribute it.
Pros:
-This site has more gorgeous women than several other sites combined. There is definitely a more Euro focus, but if you like models who are on the thinner side while still having breasts, then this is the place for you. Sometimes, a search of their "chubby" models can be humorous, since some of them could be considered slightly overweight at worst. They do have several of the more popular "American" models (i.e. Gianna Michaels, Faye Reagan) but they tend to be on the bonus sights which are typically only in 480 resolution.
-Though there is a bit of a Euro focus, there is still a lot of variety in the women. They have women ranging from super-thin to the ultra-voluptuous. Many of the women fall in the "athletic" body type, but there is variety in looks (be it hair, breasts, face, etc.) that prevents me from feeling like I am looking at a bunch of clones.
-Most of the videos since 2010 (maybe a little earlier) are 1080, and there is quite a bit of 720 from the years before that. The file sizes are quite reasonable, with a 20 minute video coming in around 900MB
-The videos are well-shot. They tend to set everything up so the model is the main focus, and keep the angles and positions varied throughout.
-There is great sexual variety on this site. Even without subscribing to 21sextreme, this site provides a wide array of sex, even into the kinky categories. Most scenes contain anal in some aspect, but there are a number of hardcore scenes that are vaginal-only. While this may be my opinion and sound odd, the anal is not often treated as "special," and by that I mean that they do not make it a big deal, say "here we go!" or have an upping of the ante to be more aggressive when anal happens; it is simply another hole. There are plenty of DP's and quite a few, though not as many, BGG scenes. If you are not in the mood for hardcore, there are plenty of lesbian and solo videos. NudeFightClub is a different take on the lesbian scenes, as there is only about 5-10 minutes of sex at the end with a majority of the video focusing on them rolling around and pulling each others' clothes off with a minimal degree of aggressiveness.
-The site provides at least one, but typically 2 updates per day.
-The site download speeds are good, there are no download limits, and there is no DRM attached to the file.
Cons:
-The file names are all in some code that makes sense only to them. Renaming files is necessary for future reference. Personally, I found it easy to add downloaded scenes to my favorites to make sure I did not download them twice and/or could remember the name and model.
-The site navigation, while not horrible, still has plenty of room to improve. When you look at a model's scene history, they are in a seemingly random order and it can be annoying to find her most recent scenes. Sometimes filters do not reset even after you click the option, leave the page, and come back.
-While tied to the navigation, the scene search became an annoyance. Originally, they had over 100 options, as well as the ability to search just about anything and in full combination (anal scene, outdoors, long brown-haired model with trimmed bush and medium pear-shaped breasts could be searched and you would still have options) and then they removed it to more generic categories. I find it ironic that they went from more detailed to less, especially when they already had the details in the system.
-If you like the more traditional American porn, there are few scenes and fewer still in any kind of HD. This does not bother me, but anyone looking for this would be better served elsewhere.
All in all, I was a member for a month longer than originally planned and was still finding new and intriguing models and scenes. I have no reservations about joining again in the future, as the girls, sex, and presentation are all top notch. Even the cons are more annoyances that can easily be worked around and do not ruin the experience.
I give this site a solid recommendation and the rating will only increase as the navigation improves.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-High quality videos and photosets. Professionally shot: good lighting, good colors, good sound control, really nice technical control.
-Large number of attractive or gorgeous teen models.
-Easy site navigation.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Streaming options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Download options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-You can select different parts of a video scene to stream or download.
-Nice mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, or group sex.
-There is usually background music for the videos, but it's kept soft, so less distracting
than many music backgrounds.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-Good download speeds. I usually get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download
speed.
-Access to live chat shows that feature a few of the models from the Diesel sites. The models are friendly, strip, masturbate, sometimes have a boyfriend that performs with them (fucking, in other words). Those shows are completely free.
-Content has a posting date.
-Files download with the name of the model and the title of the video, so you don't have
to rename the files.
CONS
Cons are basically minor. Wow Porn is a high quality glamcore site.
-Most of the videos are shot indoors. very few videos are shot outdoors, at the beach, in a park or field. Some people might want more variety in the locations, but I thought the locations were very nice, no cheap apartment setting, no cheap clothing, just a really nice look and feel to the videos.
-Sometimes toys are used. Some PU members don't like toys.
-This is a glamcore site. Some PU members might like a more gonzo approach.
Bottom Line:
Wow Porn and Wow Girls are the newest sites in the Diesel Access network. Starting in early March of 2013, those two sites, which used to be separate from the Diesel Access network, are now included in the network.
I would consider 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn to be glamcore/heartcore porn. Those sites use many of the same models. The video and photo style is basically the same for all 4 sites. You get gorgeous teen models that show off their tight bodies, and many of them engage in hardcore sex, with boys, with other girls, or by themselves (some PU members consider masturbation softcore or midcore, but I think it's hardcore, especially if they are showing close-up views of the vagina, ass, etc.)
The videos and photos are high quality, in terms of definition, focus, lighting, colors, camera-work, etc.
My favorite glamcore/heartcore sites are X-Art and some of the Diesel Access network sites. That's because of the high quality videos and photosets, and the large number of very attractive to really gorgeous models these sites have.
Met-art is my favorite teen softcore glamor site. Again, that is because of the huge number of very attractive to really gorgeous models, and the outstanding quality of their photosets.
If you have access to all the sites in the Diesel Acess network, that means 11 sites in all. They have dropped (eliminated) several of the old sites that stopped updating years ago, and that mainly contained older, lower quality videos and photos (lower definition, lower production values). So they are showcasing the higher quality of their current offerings.
Wow Porn is an excellent site by itself. Access to the rest of the sites in the network make this a high quality glamcore offering with lots of very attractive teen models.
It's really hard to give this site a fair score. By itself, I'm giving it a 92. If you include the other sites in the network, I'd give it a 95 or more. This is really a high-end glamcore offering.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Divya is a hot Indian babe who has been online for over almost over a year now. She's got a nice website and it looks pretty good. My first impression when i first saw this website "WOW Indian College Babe Website, I Want To See Her Naked".
Front is quite impressive with sample video which show what we can expect inside. Tour page are upto my expectation with showing some nice preview images.
Members area is quit easy to navigate.
movies can all be downloaded as Windows Media and MP4 files. You also have the option of streaming them in Flash. If you want sexy pics, Divya gives them to you without hesitation. Selection of great pictures leading to full-size high-res images, you'll be in paradise viewing this hottie having all her naughty fun. Best thing which i can see in members area are,
full hd content
high res picture
masturbation, shower, dancing, teasing etc
content is fully dated
live flash stream is available
multi format download
Reasonable monthly membership
Cons:
Still a small site but seems to me that amount of content they adding on regular basis mysexydivya.com will become one of the top indian pornstar site.
I love to see live chat session with Divya but they don't have such a option available at this point. I contact support and they say they are thinking of adding live cam session but no time frame they can give me at this point.
No blog or twitter profile or faceboon profile is there to be in touch with divya.
No zip file of picture set, you need to download each pic one by one if you like to keep them for later.
Bottom Line:
Well, bottom line is Divya is bold enough to come online naked in front of millions of viewers. There are not many Indian pornstar sites available in sex industry but Divya is star compare to what is available in market.
Divya is sure to please all you hot-blooded Indian people out there. This stunning dark indian girl has all the attributes you are looking for.
For lovers of Divya Yogesh, this is a good place for you to enjoy and keep in touch with one of the hottest indian babe to ever perform in porn. If the site gets back to updating on a regular basis it will be even better.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
FuckMyIndianGF is one of those sites that claims to bring you homemade Indian gf porn that was purchased from their boyfriends looking to make a quick money or submitted by user itself. You might have to suspend your disbelief to go along with the premise, but you won't have any trouble enjoying the content. What is like about this site with whom i am with for over 6 months now are,
1) huge amount of content. I count and it comes to 4109.
2) picture counts are total 1976
3) real indian content only no latin girls or mexican girl
4) reasonable price for this amount of content
5) trial membership with no restriction with other big sites
6) easy navigation and download section
7) you can see what is coming tomorow and say after
8) customer suppot is friendly and they can guide you for any specific movie you looking for.
9) every day 3 new gf video or you can say homemade video is uploaded
10) some videos are in very good quality which i love to watch
Cons:
Most of the video are missing the theme of GF but they mostly are hidden cam videos.
Quality varies from video to video.
No multiple format download option, mostly are AVI's
Some banners to other site but they don't disturb me when i was browsing the site.
They should need to work on quality of videos in future.
Bottom Line:
The content is good amateur indian hardcore banging and they have done a great job of providing high-quality pics and vids.
FuckMyIndianGF may not bring you exactly what it promises on front end, but it does deliver some sizzling Indian content that will leave you hungry for more. It's definitely worth a look if you like sexy Indian chicks and hot sex in Indian style.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nothing good about this website. They mislead you and if there is a problem, they do not response to emails.
Cons:
In one word, this website SUCKS! They take your money and you never hear from them again. Even asking for help, when the crappy videos they do have inside the site, do not work. They never get back to you when you email them.
Bottom Line:
Don't waste your money. I know the site looks good when you come to it, but take my word, there are absolutely NO user submitted videos inside. And not one of the videos you see when you come to the site, are inside the website. Nothing but a disappointment and waste of money. I am pursuing further avenues to file complaints against this company.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lady D operates another site and there she says she's in her early 60s. On this site there's no reference, but she is very attractive no matter how old she is
- Weekly updates to pix and videos. A commentator said other wise in March, but as of this review there is newly posted content 1/week.
- good mix of group, one-on-one, interracial, girl/girl and solo action, cuckolding, gangbangs.
- dedicated camera man so you go where the action is
- network of sites included (however most of them are small and suffer from the same poor quality video/pictures)
Cons:
- Only about 30 videos. Many videos are incomplete they start well into the action and finish with obvious content not included.
- About 100 picture sets with about 15 pix in each set.
- organization is only chronological and layout is poor (reminds me of late 90s web development.)
- videos are 480X360 1.5 mbps; which makes me thing all this was filmed a while ago and just doled out weekly.
- no real way to interact with Lady D (just email)
- no zip downloads available.
- videos are only .wmv
Bottom Line:
This site is part of a network but it's really not very good. The same models maintain multiple sites with different content in them - so it looks like you're getting more than you are. Finding all of the videos you like by a model is a pain.
The other site Lady D operates mature sex heaven is much better (it's also included with a membership to whoringoutmywife.com). But I haven't found much her to like. The sex is hot, I really wish they'd put some resources into this site - maybe even go back and re-encode some of it, but right now it is not worth a membership. The lack of quality and quantity are abysmal. Granted I got a year membership to the network for $30, but I hardly spend any time looking around because the quality is so poor and the navigation is worse.
Lady D is hot no doubt about that. She has great sex on camera that would burn up your screen, if you could see it that is :(
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site has a faq on how Silvia Saint got into the porn business, a little on her history.
It's straight-forward facts, not a lot of bullshit.
-Site also has a bio page, with short facts on her personal history and physical likes.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. One of the main sites in the network, based on quantity of content, quality of content.
-Silvia Saint is a very attractive blonde, blue-eyed model, great shape,
-PU discount $14.95/month (recurring).
-This site tries to be more accurate, or factual, than the normal porn site. In videos, if
the model is interviewed, she gives her actual age, rather than trying to appear as a teenager. In the categories page, they list 5 scenes at Teen: 5 scenes out of 737 total scenes at the site.
-Models mainly appear natural. Not a lot of implants. The girls with big breasts appear to
be natural, not plastic.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-In the interviews, the girls come across as real people, not putting on airs, not using a lot of fake moans and groans and fake excitement when they masturbate.
-Can watch scenes streaming or download.
-Videos have posting date.
-Female models are listed for each scene.
-Includes network access to the netFameSolutions network, which has massive, good quality DVDs covering many categories.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 2.06MB/sec, which is close to my maximum
download speed (My max download speed is about 2.16 MB/sec).
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Lots of attractive models.
-Easy login.
-Same username and password work for all the sites in the network you have access to. Or
you can use the dropdown box to switch among your bonus sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS:
-Pre-checked cross-sell at signup.
-Many blank thumbnails for the model listings.
-No low-cost longer term (3 month or more) membership option.
-No zip files for photo shoots.
-I don't like their software mechanism for viewing the photos online. The viewer seems slow and clunky to switch from one pic to the next.
-Have to use drop-down lists to select model, category, scene. A simple blank search box would be easier to use, more flexible to use (if they paid a site designer to implement a software search system).
BOTTOM LINE:
Silvia Saint is one of the major porn stars. She was Penthouse Pet of the Year in 1996 in the Czech edition. She has probably appeared in over 300 adult films. The site has a large collection of Silvia Saint videos and photosets, as well as featuring many other attractive porn models. The site gives access to Silvia Saint's personal blog, which is updated at least weekly. So if you are a fan of hers, you can read personal messages from her, and read what she is doing and thinking recently. I honestly don't know how many PU members would be interested in this blog. She writes in a simple, friendly style, calling
her fans "darling", blowing them hugs and kisses. So in a sense, if you read the blog, and
you're in the right frame of mind, that could save you a few visits to a hooker, if you
can accept the substitution. The blog also has lots of small pics of many of the models
Silvia is currently working with.
Site Stats:
Movies: 737
DVDs: 304
Pornstars: 481
Pictures: 6660
HD Movies (283)
Older movies (scenes) might have more limited definitions for stream and download:
Streaming: 240p, 480p.
Download: 240p, 480p.
Newer videos have multiple definitions available for streaming and download.
Steaming: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p.
Download: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
I think that the Silvia Saint site is a fine addition to the netFameSolutions network. The
site has a large amount of hardcore DVD content, but the vibe of the site is different from the Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, or Peter North sites. The site features a nice mix of male-female and lesbian videos, with and without toys.
The interview videos, titled "casting" videos, seem to offer a glimpsle of the models as
real people, not overly glamorized or putting on a fake show, but giving a realistic interview with some nudity thrown in, maybe some masturbation as well.
I enjoyed the site. Silvia Saint is a very attractive model, she seems to enjoy sex, is very open, and the site, although hardcore, just seems like a friendly place to visit.
It's hard to rate this site. A lot of the appeal depends on how much you like Silvia Saint. If you are fan of hers, obviously, the site would get a much higher score. If you don't think she's attractive (people can have widely differing tastes), then your personal score would be lower.
I'm giving the site a score of 88. But if you factor in the access to the tons of hardcore DVD material you get at other sites in the Fame network, you could bump the score to the low 90s.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring)
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. This site gives you access to 20+ sites in the network, including the major sites of Devils Film; Peter North; Rocco Siffredi; Silverstone DVD; Silvia Saint.
-Can choose streaming or download for videos.
-There is a photo set associated with each video.
-The photos are shot individually. These are not screen caps. They are good quality photos: not glamor style photos, but decently shot, nicely framed, good lighting, good color, etc.
-You can sort the scenes by category, series, or porn star.
-Wide selection of teen categories.
-They include the posting date of each video.
-They identify the female models in each video.
Cons:
-The general level of model prettiness/attractiveness is poor. These models are far less attractive than the models at Diesel Access network, X-Art, or other teen glamor sites. The Give Me Teens are less attractive than the models at Teen Mega World, or Nubiles.
-The photo sets do not have a zip file.
-Pre-checked cross-sell at sign-up.
-The search is basic, by drop-down list. There is no blank search box where you can enter a porn star's name, or type of sex action, or any combination of factors.
-Search is site-specific. You check a model's name, you get the scenes she is in at this
site, not across the entire network. Have to check each site individually to see if there
is any of her content at that site.
-A lot of the content was shot for Devils Film, so it is also posted at the Devils Film site.
Bottom Line:
The site is teen hardcore DVD videos. The approach is homestyle, not glamor. So you get to
see porn stars who could fit in a trailer-trash movie having sex, with the emphasis on female models (teens or twenties) and guys who appear to get their clothes from a local K-Mart or other cheap discount store going at it.
Site Stats:
Movies: 601
DVDs: 162
Pornstars: 654
Pictures: 87846
The DVD quality is OK to good. The scenes are well lighted, good colors, good sound control (no
extraneous noises, etc.), good focus, good definition.
The definition choices of the videos depend on how old the DVD is:
Older videos:
Streaming in 240p, 480p
Download in 240p, 480p
Newer videos:
Streaming in 240p, 480p, 540p
Download in 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p
Minor point:
The model named Barbara C sure looks like Barbamiska (also known as Barbara, Darya, Dasha, Diana, Elina, Elina Heaton, Mirjam, Pocahontas, Polly, Sally, Stevie, Trinity on different sites).
Is it the same girl?
She appears in two scenes at Give Me Teens:
Ass Full Of Cum #05, Scene #05
18 Year Old Pussy #16 Cream Pie Edition, Scene #05
This is supposed to be a teen hardcore site. But many of the models look to be older than teens. And the models are, on average, less attractive than the models at the glamcore/heartcore sites, and also less attractive than the teens featured at Teen Mega World. Also, a lot of the material at this site is found at other sites in the network. So even if you really like teen hardcore videos, this site is nothing special.
What gives this site value is that it includes access to the netFameSolutions network, which has a massive amount of hardcore videos covering a wide range of categories. Or if you join through one of the other sites in the network, you get access to this site.
To be truthful, I think the network would have more value if they deleted this site, because if you are looking for teen videos, you will have better luck searching through other sites on this network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mandy is very cute. The sets have a professional feel and Mandy is fully nude.
There is an option to email her with suggestions for sets.
There are a little over 40 sets on the site at the time of this review and seven videos.
Cons:
There have only been three updates since March 14 2013.
There are only seven videos on the site and they are short and are photoshoot type videos.
On the main page there is a section titled "Next Updates", however it is blank -- I don't know if any updates are coming up. Last update with April 2, so more than two weeks ago.
There is an option to email Mandy. I sent a message a couple of days ago and I haven't received a reply. The site appears to offer some interaction with the model, but in reality there is none.
The price is around 30/month. I find that a little steep considering the sparse updates and softcore content.
There is a download limit. It seems to top out at about 10 sets a day. Each set is about 25-50 megabytes.
Download options for sets are normal and middle. Normal is about 25-40mb/set and middle is 10-15mb/set, with around 80-100 pics each. Fairly low resolution.
Bottom Line:
Yes Mandy is cute but the site doesn't appear to be updating. Other sites offer some interaction with the model, with messaging, webcam, etc, but this site doesn't seem to have anything like that.
If the site were cheaper I might consider being a member, but it's a higher than average price with below par content.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Candy is a hot MILF who loves sex - that really comes across. She has an easy smile and laugh and is very charming. She is truly photogenic
- a lot of interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some). There are some shoots with her husband so it's not exclusively ir.
- Mix of content: fisting squirting, masterbation, cream pie, etc. it's anything but boring
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
Cons:
- Much of the content is shared with Candy's other site cuckoldmyhusband.com. Since there isn't much content to begin with that's a serious problem. In addition both sites are part of the same network which in it's advertising counts them separately. Granted there are differences but these sites really should just be merged.
- just over 70 videos. Most are under 15 minutes
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200.
- organization is clean but basic. There's no search or tagging functions. However with such slim pickings there isn't much of a need :(
- 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen.
Bottom Line:
This is a bear bones site, which is a shame cause there's certainly potential here. I have a hard time excusing only having such limited content when you've been in business so long. The poor quality and the lack of content are unforgivable.
When I joined there was a deal, 1 year for 30$. So my expectations were low. I certainly was not surprised with what I got.
Even at such a low price I wouldn't recommend. The convoluted organization makes doing these reviews a chore - but I figure if anyone searches for these sites they'll at least benefit from my experience
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Have choice to view videos streaming or download.
Older videos have only 2 choices for definition:
Steaming choice is 240p or 480p.
Download choice is WMV or MP4 file types, on 240p or 480p.
-Newer videos have more choices for definition:
Streaming: 240p, 480p, 540p.
Downloading: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-No download limit.
-No DRM.
-In the public preview pages, you can watch brief sample clips of the videos the site features. You also have access to the drop-down list of the site porn stars, and the thumbnail listing of the site porn stars. This thumbnail listing is much more complete than the thumbnail listing at most of the other sites in the network.
-The public preview pages also gives you the scenes each model appears in, so you can tell how many scenes your favorite models are in.
-Long time before site timeout.
-PU discount at $14.95/month (recurring).
-Thousands of hardcore videos, many of them featuring Peter North.
Cons:
-Search is basic. Have to use a drop-down list to search for porn model, series, etc. A blank search box would be much easier to use.
-Search is limited to just one site. You can't search across the network for content by a model, but have to search site by site, which is time consuming and takes a lot of effort.
-Navigation is basic.
-Uncheck the pre-checked offer, or you will be signed up for a trial membership in some other site.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Movies: 2770
DVDs: 566
Pornstars: 1767
Pictures: 62568
This is a huge site. And access to any one of the sites in the Fame Digital network gives you access to all the sites in the network, which is about 27 sites.
But there are over 20 specialty sites, which have less content, but cater to different niches: Lesbian, Teen, Creampie, Hairy, Indian, Granny, etc.
If you've never been a member before, it's definitely worth visiting, because of the huge amount of hardcore videos, and the wide range of content. And there are sometimes special offers where you can join for as low as $5 for the first month.
Giving the site a score of 87 because of the huge amount of hardcore videos at this site and the access to tons of hardcore videos at the other sites in the network, as well as offering a wide range of material.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Fair amount of content; 121 models, 178 videos, 575 photo sets (approx. 29,000 pics)
Some nice high resolution photos up to 2333x3500px in size
Photos available in zips.
Videos can be streamed or downloaded.
Some basic model info provided.
Cons:
Updates are being rotated.
Zips all have the file name “photo_zip” so you are required to rename every single download yourself.
Only 1 photo size available.
Small square thumbnails don’t properly preview the images.
Photo sizes are inconsistent. The high resolution photos mentioned under pros only make up about 20% of the sets, more than half the sets are a meagre 533x800px or 669x1000 px.
Videos short with the average of the ones I watched being about 3 minutes.
Only 1 download option available for videos usually around 720x576 wmv @ 2000 kbps. (A few of the newer ones come in at 1280x720 @ 8000 kbps)
I had a high failure rate on video downloads, (maybe it was just a bad day)
Very basic site layout and navigation.
No way to search or sort the models or updates.
Typical of most British sites this site is also very soft being mostly topless with occasional mild nudity.
Bottom Line:
The only reason I joined this site was due to a half price email promo offering a membership for $12.50. I thought for that price I can’t really go wrong considering the site featured many of the same British models I enjoyed collecting from sites like Only Tease and St. Mackenzie’s. The content here is typical of the softcore tease type of content you find on most British sites which is what I expected with the emphasis on sexy teasing and stripping rather than explicit nudity. There’s plenty of sexy lingerie, stockings, heels and pantyhose on show here.
Although the site is named Love UK Glamour Girls only about 20% of the content is marked with that site name. When I first joined up I started downloading the oldest updates first from August 2010 which were the nice 3500px photo sets carrying the Love UK site name. As I worked forward through the archives I was surprised when I reached August 2011 and the photo sizes suddenly dropped down to 800px and carrying the site name Mackenzie Girlfriends. I guess they must have stopped shooting new content and started padding the site out with low resolution filler content from another site. Everything dated from August 2011 up until March this year is Mackenzie Girlfriends branded content so in summary you end up with 114 nice sized Love UK Glamour Girls photo sets and 461 Mackenzie Girlfriends sets in much lower resolution. The Love UK sets are all solo shoots while much of the Mackenzie GF sets are shoots featuring two or more models as the name would suggest. Around 145 photo sets on the site feature Mackenzie who is the British model Mackenzie White who also plays the part of Head Mistress Mackenzie at St. Mackenzie’s.
The video quality is fairly mediocre by today's standards apart from a few of the latest ones which play at 720p. As with the photos they are mostly just stripping and teasing and although quite a few videos contain two models don’t expect any hot lesbian action, there’s only a bit of kissing and touching. Many of the videos I tried had a musical backing and in some I could see a flash bulb going off.
Navigation is very basic, you only have “updates” or “models”. Click on updates and you get all the updates listed on one page from the current date at the top to the oldest at the bottom. When I first signed up the oldest updates were from August 2010 but today the archives only go back as far as November 2010. The reason? In their attempt to deceive you in to believing the site is still updating daily each day they are simply removing an update from the bottom of the page and placing it back at the top with the current day’s date. On the model index page the Mackenzie Girlfriends models are listed separately from the main models. Click on a model and you will find a very brief bio listing just her name, height, measurements, hometown and star sign followed by a thumbnail listing of her photo sets and videos and at the bottom of the page a list of links to other sites that she appears on.
Overall I thought there was some ok content for the $12.50 that it cost me but for the full price of $25 quite frankly there are plenty of better sites where you can spend your money if you want to see some of these British girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 27 sites, 832 models, 3034 videos and daily updates.
- For the most part videos come in 3 sizes (WMV high definition(1280x720), FLV medium (700x400) and mobile device ready (usually mp4 @ 480x240), although some scenes have specific apple format)
- All scenes come with zipped photo archives (for the most part image quality is high at 1400x960)
- Easy navigation and while things are a bit basic it's easy to find a particular niche or a particular model.
- Good download speeds while using a download manager (I am located in the US Midwest , not sure how that affected things but I had no issues with time-outs, network errors and everything went down fast)
- There is a forum feature where admins actually answer questions, it's not very heavily used but if you have feedback, questions or issues I have seen them answer within a few hours
- I believe the site is entirely eastern European girls with a strong focus on Russian girls. A lot of very beautiful girls some well know, some less so.
Cons:
- The main issue with the network is lack of consistency, for example some scenes have a quick intro with subtitles, others are just a Russian intro with no translation. Some older scenes use a different streaming model and some scenes are MKV format, some are FLV some are WMV. It's to be expected for a network that's been around for such a long time and has as much content as this one, but sometimes it makes it hard to know what you'll get with each scene.
- As almost every eastern European site out there each video saves as a random name ( try to remember what scene 20.setflash.flv is)
- Navigation while functional is a bit basic and we only have a handful of categories to search by, it would also be nice to see a preview of the scene when hovering over the thumbnail (like 21sextury does)
- The light and camerawork could be a bit improved as it feels somewhat basic and can be pretty different from scene to scene (some have a lot of close-ups some are mostly zoomed out shots)
Bottom Line:
If I remember correctly this network was one of the first sites I ever joined, back in 2008-2009 and since then I come back to it every so often because of the high quality of the girls here. No matter when I join I always find a bunch of videos I'm happy to add to my collection.
They have numerous very hot girls and while they are not named the same way other sites label them, they have most of the big names as well as several girls I have not seen many other places. (Hennessy is Sveta here in some very hot anal action, Monica is Marta B. Sarah is Benta and so on)
The scenes range from solo masturbation scenes (on beauty angels) to lesbian (spread around the multiple networks, but around 100 scenes or so total) to anal and double penetration. A lot of the girls, wear cute outfits with a decent amount of stockings and different looking skirts and tops. Overall there isn't a lot of make-up and airbrushing leaving the girls looking pretty natural and adorable.
One interesting aspect to me is that the shots on TeenMegaWorld feel a lot more natural and innocent, almost home made/ amateur-ish, which for me makes them a million time more interesting, but it really depends what you're looking for.
A lot of the scenes have pretty basic lighting and there is a nice mix of far shots as well as close-ups, but they don't feel over produced.
Another nice aspect is that most of the girls have multiple shots so you can find them in both solo action as well as anal sex. Overall I'd say the network has a nice mix of the action giving you a good range (but don't go in expecting all anal or all solo stripping shots)
As mentioned above some of the minor complaints I have about the network are mostly related to consistency, I would like the beauty angels site to be all solo action as opposed to the occasional hardcore sex scene. I know I can filter by the solo tag, but why have a different network if the action is the same as teen mania or fuck studies? Also I'd like to see all lesbian scenes have their own site and maybe some new updates for some older sites, which seem dead at this point.
I would also like all scenes to be in the same encoding and same resolution and save with the model's name instead of the cryptic 11.setflash (interestingly enough older scenes do save with the model's name and the video resolution, not sure what changed in the internal structure of the site)
But these are small complaints which barely affect the enjoyment of the action which is great. If you're looking for natural looking girls in both softcore and anal action this network is probably one of the best sites you can join. I mentioned their main competition (21sextury) but that network feels a lot more geared towards mainstream looking pornstars with a lot of make-up and giant boobs. Teen mega world is perfect for anyone looking for hot, innocent looking teens in hardcore scenes and at this point it's one of the few Eastern European networks still updating daily with quality content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Perfect balance of video and gallery content
- Well-known, established model with regular updates since 2012
- Bryci’s now doing hardcore, with plenty of updates already
- Extremely pretty with exceptional body and large (if fake) boobs
- Immediate access to Bella Pass network including 6 bonus sites
- Consistent, high quality of content throughout the site
- Content is downloadable, videos have lots of download options
- Regular, dated updates (including recent ones in preview area)
- Tons of bonus content like bio, blog, candids, behind the scenes
- Easy navigation either via Bella Pass or her own site
- You seem to stay logged in without username/password prompts
- CCBill with no pre-checked cross-sells – good value for money
See my Bella Pass review for in-depth thoughts on the network as a whole.
Cons:
Points marked with * don't bother me personally:
- No ZIP files for photo galleries
- Video previews are a bit limited
- Regional pricing
- If you want hardcore, might be worth waiting a few months*
- Automatically generated username/password*
- Download limit of 20gb per 24 hour period*
- Bryci has fake boobs*
See my Bella Pass review for in-depth thoughts on the network as a whole.
A note on Bella Network's piracy policy: Bella Network has a very strict piracy policy. They are extremely clear with this when you join. Sometimes legitimate members MIGHT get blocked - Bella have have made improvements to their customer service so that this can easily be investigated and rectified.
Bottom Line:
I’ll cut to the chase and say this is one of the best amateur solo model websites I have ever joined.
It has all the benefits of a solo model website (personality, insight into the model etc) while being part of a slick, regularly updated network.
Membership includes access to the following bonus sites:
Katie Banks - very similar to Bryci, with content being softcore Talia Shepard - you’ll probably like Talia if you like Bryci - softcore Hunter Leigh - beautiful model, relatively new. Nudity but no toys Lexi Mason - extremely petite, relatively new to Bella Ava Dawn - site no longer updating but has over 50 videos Monroe Lee - super-curvy but site no longer updating
If you like Bryci, Talia Shepard and Katie Banks are from the same mould. Bryci’s site is currently the only one with hardcore content, but both Talia and Katie’s sites are comparable size-wise to Bryci’s.
You can browse content from the whole network, or just Bryci’s site using a drop down in the top right. You also have a very good search function where you can search by niche or by site.
Bryci has the usual sections for photos and video content, but in addition to this:
BIO: A hugely comprehensive biography. Features her essential statistics but also a very, very in-depth profile with information about her and her site.
CANDIDS: 71 candid galleries featuring Bryci. Some are her out and about or on holiday, many are self-shot pics featuring her in various states of undress.
BLOG: Regularly updated and from what I can tell, actually written by Bryci. Includes personal updates, previews of forthcoming galleries etc, and various candid photos.
BABECHAT: Video web chat featuring models from Bella Network. Bryci doesn’t seem to be on the schedule, but Talia Shepard and Katie Banks make frequent appearances. She might be just taking a few weeks off, though, as there are plenty of videos of her in the archive.
WALLS: Lots and lots of stylised wallpapers.
PHOTOS:
Currently 308 galleries, approximately 80 photos each. If you hover over the gallery thumbnails they animate to show a sample of images inside. You can sort galleries by most recent or by name.
All images are downloadable, feature a small, translucent watermark and can either be viewed at 1500px or 4000px. Zips are not available, and batch download programmes are prohibited, which is a big mark against the site as it’s hugely time-consuming to download images. You can’t right-click thumbnails and download link because the high-res images are placed onto a web page, so you’d download this, not the image. It makes the concept of even downloading a sample of images quite a bewildering prospect. The majority of the points deducted from giving the site a perfect score are because of this, and I’m not even a huge photo collector.
Currently there are no hardcore galleries. Most galleries feature Bryci enjoying her own company in the form of strip-tease and/or masturbation with or without toys. She’s extremely charismatic in front of the camera and oozes confidence. Most updates are shot in and around the house in the bedroom, bathroom etc, but any updates outside are well-lit and still very polished.
VIDEO:
Currently 341 videos including webchat archives and behind-the-scenes. The video pages again feature animating thumbnails, but the animation generally only shows the first part of the video. Webchat archives and BTS are mixed in with the standard videos which is a minor niggle. You can either stream a Flash video (skipping to any part as it loads) or download the video in a number of sizes/formats:
* As of March 2013, WMV is no longer being added, but it is still available on older updates
Videos are excellently shot. The majority are softcore with Bryci stripping and playing with toys or masturbating, recent videos feature hardcore. Currently there are six hardcore videos (since March) so although there’s not too much at the moment, it’s being added frequently so will build up quickly.
The first two were artistically shot (in the dark or behind shower curtain), and although and the next was poorly lit, the others are well shot. Most hardcore has so far been POV, but the most recent had a version shot POV, and one from a second camera. Bryci’s foray into hardcore is confident and assertive, and although already impressive, I’m sure technically the videos will improve in terms of lighting, angles etc as more and more content is added.
Most videos are in the region of 10-15 minutes long. Webcam videos are also mixed in with video updates and are around an hour long.
SUMMARY:
Bryci is wonderful, and her site does her justice. There’s a lot of bonus content on her site, and plenty of relevant bonus sites you’ll like if you like Bryci. The difficulty of saving images is a big mark against the site, while most other criticisms are minor at best.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Lots of different models
-Plenty of categories to choose from (~80)
-Tons of scenes (over 5000)
-Daily updates
-Camerawork is well done
Cons:
-Not a lot of variety in models (see below)
-Scenes are not too varied (see below)
-Sort functions are limited
-Videos are only 720 and can be big
-Natural, balanced models can be hard to find in recent updates
-Ads every time you are logged in
Bottom Line:
To go into some more detail about my (seemingly) conflicting pros and cons:
-There are a lot (almost 2000) of models on this site. However, especially more recently, they seem to be either a fake-breasted "MILF-ish" variety, super slim 18-year old, or big-asses. As always, there are exceptions, but they seem few and far between.
-There is the ability to select a lot of different categories, but there is no ability to perform combinations. The site only allows a type of scene, type of model and location combination. So, if you want "Brown Eyes" and "POV" you are out of luck.
-There are a ton of scenes to select and many sites to choose from. However, most of the scenes follow a standard format of: build a brief story, remove clothes, oral, few positions, cumshot. It is hard to describe, as that is porn in a nutshell, but there are times when the positions, order, and general happenings feel nearly identical between the scenes, especially when on the same sub-site (of which there are 37, raging from MILFs to Teens).
Pros:
-There are typically 2-3 updates per day
-The camerawork and overall presentation of the videos was well done. While I felt that there was some tedium in the action, I appreciated the angles and framing that they used. I never felt that they stuck with a view too long, especially extreme closeups or extreme angles that I personally find tiresome.
To elaborate on my cons:
-The HD videos are only 720 instead of the 1080 available on many other sites. A few of the videos were very large, especially for the length of video (1GB for 22 mins).
-There seems to be a lack of models who are thin and/or athletic and have breasts (even moderately-sized ones). I kept getting the feeling that most of the C and above size breasts were silicone or on a "thicker" model. While I do not mind that every once in a while, I felt there were too few models to fit this gap in their offering.
-There as a popup ad after each login that had to be closed and was quite annoying.
Maybe a con for some:
-There is not a lot of harder material if you are into that. There are only 4 DP scenes and only about 340 anal scenes, so people who like a little more than b/g or g/g might find the content lacking.
Overall, I bough a month membership when it was on sale and did not regret my purchase. I enjoyed the month on the site, but I had reached my fill by the end of the month. I would recommend the site if you want to sign up for a month on sale, but I plan on check out their direct competitors (RK, Bangbros, NA) before signing up again.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Almost 800 scenes of nothin' but hardcore banging.
+ Exclusive content.
+ About 100 true HD scenes and large sized vids in general.
+ Professional quality production and lighting.
+ Good full trial price of $3.50 for 2 days (see review below for tips on saving $$ for more time).
+ Good DL speeds, various format options for vids and streaming in browser.
+ High quality pics, all with zips.
+ Good model directory and generally good search.
+ All updates are date stamped for future reference.
+ Multiple language options and a mobile viewing option as well.
Cons:
- Not all HD labelled vids are HD.
- Search options for pics are worthless.
- Content gets a bit repetitive.
- Currently updating 2x per week but starting in 2012 and going back expect only 1 update per week at best.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Some content seen on other sites and some photographers work isn't up to snuff for DDF work.
- As usual, oldest content isn't that high quality.
- Some content recycled from other DDF sites and the date of publication here may not be when it first came out.
- Need more screen cap previews for the vids.
- Since I last joined they've removed some of the earliest content. Granted the quality wasn't the best but still not bad compared to some other major sites today. Wished they had kept it or remastered it.
Bottom Line:
I last joined HoH about 4 years ago. I signed up for the 2 day trial expecting only to be able to grab a year or two worth of material. To my surprise I was done downloading in about 6 hours and I don't use a DL manager or have super fast high speed connections. The lack of updates over the years was about the major downer though. Here's the skinny:
PICS: All scenes have zip downloads and the last few years have pics coming in at 2000 x 1300 pixels. Even the oldest content is roughly 1600 x 1070 in size. The tags for photo search are worthless if there even are any. You can tag individual photos with info for others to see (don't know why you'd do this). No real ability to slideshow the pics. Multiple size options available. Some airbrushing on sets.
VIDS: All scenes have vids with the most recent allowing for wmv and mp4 download options. Some older vids also have divx or quicktime. All but the oldest material has streaming video with ability to jump around to get a good preview. I had consistent DL speeds of about 1.3 MB/sec on multiple channels. At best only about 80-100 vids are in true HD, most HD labelled vids are just HD size. Starting in 2008, the vid sizes get down to medium size (720x400) and the oldest years don't even get that big and come split into the scenes. I wish they had more screen caps in order to preview the vids without having to stream and jump around to decide if I wanted to DL or not.
The site allows you to search by category, date or tags. The model directory is good and has background info. There is some blog material and social media stuff but no one appears to do much with it. They also let you customize the site with favorites and similar items if you stick around for the long haul. There are some special discounts for other DDF sites and independent sites that pretty much match what you can find on TBP. However, if you want to join other DDF sites or the DDF network they do offer a 50% off the first month discount. So, my advice is join on a cheap trial and if you want more hit the discounts page, a better deal than what TBP has going.
Generally speaking, DDF puts out a consistent and high grade euro porn product. This site is no different but, if you've seen their sites before, you pretty much know what you're going to get. In that respect, there isn't a lot of imagination that goes into putting the scenes together and so some of the content does get repetitive. Overall, if they hadn't been skimpy with their updates the last 3 years or so I would have scored this in the 90's. So, if you like hardcore of all varieties you can't really go wrong here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gorgeous models performing exactly as advertised.
Expert videography and photography
High quality files, both video and audio
No download limits
The free membership to the other sites is a real value.
Cons:
Most of the sequences are too baroque for my taste: too many odd toys and props.
Ghastly-poor file naming habits: costs the user a lot of time cleaning up.
Bottom Line:
ON EDIT, May 2013: I remained a member of this site for several weeks until my membership lapsed. File names were never improved in any way at all. Excepting his public posts here, he owner/webmaster never responded to any of the messages/emails I sent concerning the filenaming problem, or on other topics.
ORIGINAL REVIEW: Wow, this is a fabulous site for those who take an interest in the subject matter. Gorgeous models, excellent images- soaking wet. Most of these models are familiar from other European sites and at times it's a surprising pleasure to see a famous star get down and dirty with herself in this way. While updates are not frequent, given the availability of willing models and the quality of the output this is understandable. Free membership in the sister sites is a major bonus.
(FWIW my very fast late-model Mac can have a hard time playing some of the largest "MP4 HD" videos. I find the .wmv files to be more reliable and of perfectly good quality.)
If it weren’t for the file names I’d give WAP a much higher score than it received here*. However, videos and pictures are so badly named as to require a lot of time at the back-end, so to speak, and this really needs to be corrected.
Image zip files all decode to folders named "Images". Not "Goldilocks - Three Bears": "Images". The images in that folder are named "001.jpg", "002.jpg" and so on. The next zip expands the same way, and the next. You can imagine the mess this creates: a pile of folders named “Images1” “Images2” and so forth, with no idea what's in them.
If all of these "001.jpg" files ever get intermingled by user error (trashed accidentally, for example), it's game over for you. The image files should carry the model's name and shoot title.
It's easy to create a zip file which expands to a folder's real name; perhaps it takes a little more effort. Given the slow rate at which content is produced at WetAndPissy, that effort would be nothing at all.
The net result of this is spending a LOT OF TIME back on the site, figuring out what the real name of what you've downloaded is, so you can file it away correctly. (I just happened to download my files in update sequence and thus had a chance at figuring out the real names of all those "Images" folders from the updates webpages. If I'd chosen any other method (favorite models, random choices), it would have been much much worse.)
As to video files, they are inconsistently named and because of this almost equally hard to square away after downloads.
Prepare to spend a lot of time 'on cleanup' after downloads from this site.
If WAP puts a bit more effort into this one serious problem, they'd be a really fabulous place to visit.
*This is the second site I've joined on the basis of a good TheBestPorn review, and the second where the owners can't be bothered to properly name their files. Given the trouble this can cause, I feel TBP needs to make this matter a review criteria.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
