Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
i like the real guys on this site, its not a bunch of polished studs or young shaved twinks, its real guys that have a bit of hair, a bit of fat, etc. But its also real sex too, and thats what makes it so hot. Especially when they speak in that gorgeous Australian accent. And loads of uncut guys too...man I want to visit Australia now :)
Cons:
video quality online is not the best, but you can also download the videos and the quality is way better. It also has no search box anywhere.
Bottom Line:
i think this site is one of the hottest i have seen for real guys, definitely worth it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Secured a price of $9.95
Cons:
No downloading, streaming only.
Navigation is a nightmare.
Some are pictures only, and the size of the pictures is from the early 90's(today's newest update the photos are 960x 533). One picture set is only four pictures, no video.
IMO the entire GF factor is a farce, although some appear to give the impression they are user submitted.
Bottom Line:
I usually am not compelled to do reviews unless the quality is either exceptional or close to worthless, in this case the latter is appropriate.
Even at 9.95 I feel I overpaid. I do not recommend this site at all unless you want to waste your money.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
No DRM, pre checked cross sells, or download restrictions.
Superb photography and lighting.
Beautiful girls, with few fake breasts or tattoos.
Very little filler material, although older material is lower spec.
Pics are very good, and have much more variety of angles than seen on most networks.
There is a progression from clothed to unclothed, with some great softcore pics.
Streaming in chunks.
The male leads and cameramen mostly keep out of the way. There is occasionally some abuse (choking on Ass Teen Mouth for example), but the focus is nearly always on the models.
No condoms.
Cons:
Expensive
Rip off exchange rate from CCBill.
No zipped photos.
No customer service.
Awful log in. Each site needs a new log in plus captcha, you have to log in again every time you leave, and you get timed out of the site very quickly.
Very few new updates.
Video downloads are only in wmv, but for me that is no con, as I prefer wmv.
Very little ethnic or weight diversity. Models are mainly white and slim.
Homogeneous product. Most of it has the same look.
The most customer unfriendly network in the entire universe (even worse than Ewoks customer services at DeathStar.com).
Bottom Line:
When I first joined this network three years ago I said it had great material but is let down by lousy management who couldn't care less about their customers. Nothing has changed in that respect. I haven't tried to contact customer support this time. I tried three years ago on a number of occasions but never received a reply. I have no doubt that still holds. If anyone has ever received a reply from this place I would be both pleased and amazed to hear from them.
Pictures are still unzipped, and the log in is still ridiculous. You not only have to enter your name and password for each site, you also have to enter a captcha. Why? You have paid money to join a site, you are unlikely to be some sort of computer bot. Furthermore, none of the sites remember you are logged in, so once you leave the site, even if only for a few seconds, you have to re enter you name, password, and new captcha. It is still the most customer unfriendly network I have ever joined.
So why did I join again after three years? For a number of good reasons. For my taste this has the highest download strike rate of any site. In other words I wish to download a higher percentage of updates from this site than from any other. The girls are stunningly attractive, the videos and pics are beautifully lit and shot, and have very good angles for displaying the models.
One thing that for me does not now seem so bad, is navigation. I don't think it has actually improved, but since I first joined I have visited sites with seriously BAD navigation, and in comparison TCC is not so bad. Home pages give you an accurate preview of the material, and most of the time they are very inviting. Most of the sites in the network have a homogeneous samey look to them, with a few exceptions, Hardcore Youth being one. I have seen comments on PU that it is leased content, unfortunately there are still no zipped photos even on that site. Some of the older content on the network looks a bit different and has lower spec.
The models may be white and slim, but they are very beautiful, and at least not so skinny they look like concentration camp victims. There is an accent on anal, but as well as the softcore photos, there is some good straight action too. The majority of the updates are one on one, but there is some dp, and the Double Teamed Teens site is dedicated to that. It does have an overall homogeneous look across the network. Although produced well, it could do with something a little different on occasion, even if that just means changing the location or furniture.
The softcore pictures are very good, but are not part of the video. On most sites they appear to take a series of softcore pictures, then the model starts back with her clothes on. The video and second section of pictures go from here. The male lead enters, quickly takes of the model's clothes, and the action starts straight away.
With usually over 500 pictures to a set for the new updates, and no zipped photos facility, the time and effort to painstakingly store every single one of them becomes such a pain, that you start to ask yourself questions like "do I really need this photo," or "will the quality of my life really improve if I store this one?" At some point I start to spend more time trying to weed out the few that I don't want, than just going ahead and capturing the lot. After a while this whole place becomes the biggest pain in the ass since Vlad The Impaler was assassinated. Given the amount of material on TeenCoreClub, by the time you have manually captured only a tenth of the photos you want, you will need an ice pack on your arm. So this is what they mean by porn giving you a stiff wrist.
Just because there is no one in customer services doesn't mean there isn't anyone at home (obviously there is someone around to pocket the money), and the lack of a zipped photos facility may well be by design. You are going to need more than one month to capture all the photos you need, so it certainly stops everyone joining for one month only, downloading everything, then putting it all on a free download forum. I would rather pay three times as much, and have zipped photos. However, if this is the price I have to pay for their survival, given the quality of the material they offer, I can live with it. I ended my subscription because I knew I didn't have the time or inclination to store each individual picture. In the end I only downloaded a small part of what is available. What I do have is very good indeed, even though they don't have very high definition material. I may return when I have more time to manually save pictures.
Beautiful girls, great camerawork, and some great material, but a number of other networks outscore it by around ten points, both on PU and TBP. That says a lot about its negatives.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some improvement in video qaulity over Young Sex Parties, a sister site in the Serious Cash network. But video quality seems amateurish which is not a plus, unless you like to watch poorly shot home sex videos.
-Easy login. Can save username and password for future logins.
-No DRM.
=Long time before site timeout.
-They have videos of some models that appear to be early in their career. I've seen some of these models at other sites. But the names they use for the models are basically random, having no relation to the names these models have at other sites.
-Down Them All download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get slightly over 2 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Can stream or download movies.
Download choices are FLV, MP4, 3GP (for mobile phones).
Cons:
-I believe joining this network means your email address will be opened to lots of spam. Open a new email address for safety.
-Videos have a home-style, amateur feel.
-Search is poor. Many times you can enter a model's name and get 0 results, even though you copied her name from a video you just saw, where her name is listed.
-Advertising for other sites clutters up the members area pages.
-Videos download with generic filenames such as "movie.flv" or "high.mp4", so you have to rename the videos manually to identify who is in the video. But the model's names are generic, so unless you recognize her from other sites and remember her name, the name of a model is almost worthless.
-No list for models' names at the site. No listing of models' thumbnails to show what the models look like.
-No model bios.
-Models are foreign (Russia or from Eastern Europe). So the language spoken in the videos is usually foreign.
-Navigation is poor
Bottom Line:
The site theme is supposed to be amateur videos that are shot at home by amateurs.
There are a few videos I've seen from this site that I thought were good. But trying to search through the site to find those videos is a time-consuming task, because the search function is crap, there is no listing of models with a thumbnail to identify what the models look like, the names given to the models are apparently random, so even if you know what you are looking for, it's a question of whether you will run out of patience before you find it.
This site is a little better than Young Sex Partes because I think the models are a little more attractive. But the videos don't compare to the high quality videos found at quality teen sites. And the videos are also below the general quality of videos at Teen Mega World -in terms of focus, framing, definition, lighting, costumes, etc. I know they are going for an amateur feeling, but I much prefer professionally shot videos that have high quality.
The site design is poor, making site navigation a problem. This site makes you begin to appreciate how easy some other sites are to use. Where search is useful, where you get nice thumbnails to show you what the models look like (along with a name you can use).
You get about 21 sites included in your membership. Most of the sites feature teen hardcore.
I'm giving the site a score of 68. The site navigation is a problem. I don't care for the amateur feel of the videos. I wish the models were more attractive, or at least presented more attractively. I think there are much better sites available, in terms of how easy the sites are to use, the quality of the contents. The network has lots of hardcore videos (and pictures), so the quantity is good, but it's too difficult to slog through the content to find what I would like.
My score of 68 is based on the amount of content at the network. If I were grading this site on my personal enjoyment of the site, I would give it a score in the 50s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+The content is all exclusif and they add a new scene each week.
+You get access to teen fidelity as well.
+All videos can be downloaded in at least 480p which they increased to 540p in 2008 and most of the videos after that date are also offered in 720p
+The 100 more recent videos are now also offered in 1080p.
+They offer a B.T.S video of each shoot.
+All scenes have an photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution is approximately 900x600.
+Their selection of performers is top notch.
+You can stream the videos online and you can even jump to a specific part of the scene based on keywords.
+They have a playlist editor where you can create your own clips of the scenes.
+You can search based on whether a performer has natural breats or implants.
Cons:
-There is very little not to like about the site except that the number of enhanced performers significantly outnumber the natural ones.
-Another negative is that a good portion of the models have tattoos.many of the models
-The only two performers are Kelly and her husband Ryan.(not an issue for me but could be for some).
Bottom Line:
*I keep returning to this site because they keep putting out some of the best porn I've seen. There's very little that I don't like. That's not to say that all the scenes are as good as the others but there is a certain consistency in regards to quality. They even do some scenario based scenes from time to time which is a nice bonus for people like me who like their porn with a story.
*I didn't find anything really wrong with the site except that I would love to see two or more updates per week as opposed to just one. I know I'd be willing to pay more for that since it would mean a lot more of what I like.
**The only reason why I'm not giving the site a perfect score is because I want to see them hire a few more natural models.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Lots of unique content
+Some so called softmodels in hardcore debuts
+Amateur debuts
+Model profiles
+Easy navigation
+Picture zip archives
+Newer picture sets with 3D pics (anaglyph)
+New vids are in h263 mp4 suitable for a lot of devices without need to install extra codecs, ipod, ipad supported but for me DivX does fine too
+fullvids and parts
+fast download
Cons:
-Could be more content
-Updates are infrequent
-no streaming option
-not 100% POV stuff
Bottom Line:
Well folks as you might see I owe you a review since 2008. So after joining sexy-employee.com again here it is: The site is online since 2006 (Release history at models-, update-, gallery- and videosection)the best unique stuff was released 2006-2008. Especially 2006 sexy-employee has released stuff with awesome big boob models like Brenda, Simi, Petra Mis, Arlette etc. and pornpendant to Scarlett Johansson, Scarlett A. After this golden period still an excellent choice of beauties but its a mix of POV and so called mainstream-studio content. Overall: Worth to join and support those small sites. Also there are rumors that more stuff of the owners private collection will be released if the pornenthusiasts honor the sites efforts with sign-ups. I was told by the owner that 1 Simi vid got 10.000.000 views as illegal uploaded stuff at a major tubesite contrary to the sign up rate nowadays so Mike is very pissed off.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-tons of movies clips. barely even touched the surface of what they got
-downloadable clips, new ones in 720p HD!
-screen grabs as well
-fun site design
-tons of searching and sorting options
-each clip clearly labeled what is in the clip, ie sexy, boobs, ass, bush
Cons:
-not all HD clips
-some movies have frame grabs but not movie clips
Bottom Line:
what a great site. i can be watching netflix and see a boob and go right over to mr.skin and usually its there.
site design is fun. they have "best of" type compilations, polls, playlists. the search feature is great. you can search for a title or celeb, or filter movies by just about everything you can think of.
newer movies have 720p HD clips, older ones have SD. mp4 and wmv are there for download
my only negative other then some titles not being there, is sometimes they have screen grabs of a scene but not a clip
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 290 scenes
- Updates weekly with the addition of one scene
- Innovative BDSM ‘tools’
- Good mix of mainstream and fetish models
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Photos available
Cons:
- Very expensive
- ‘Captcha’ on signup can be annoying
- Need more file resolution options
Bottom Line:
This site is definitely NOT for the faint-hearted for three reasons: first, this is probably among the most intense BDSM sites available today, second, the price has to make it one of the most expensive porn memberships today, and third, some of the newest scenes come in at over 3GB in size.
If you like BDSM and are familiar with the Kink.com sites, then think of this as a mashup of Device Bondage and Sex and Submission with the ‘nasty’ factor turned up. The site uses a lot of innovative bondage tools and devices, many of which appear to be made rather than bought. Each scene is between 30 minutes and an hour long and has several ‘chapters’ where the bondage is changed. (Like other BDSM sites, the scenes also include an interview where the model makes it clear that she consents and can stop the scene.) Most of the scenes occur indoors in a dungeon setting, though there are also some scenes shot outdoors. Production values are very good. Many, but still a minority of the scenes, feature some kind of sex act, either oral or vaginal. There is some anal play, but I’ve yet to find a scene with anal intercourse. Since the site is about BDSM I accept that the sex is secondary.
The site has a mix of mainstream models who dabble in fetish stuff (Sasha Knox and Hailey Young, for example) and models who specialize in fetish scenes (Wenona, for example). The models are all under 25, most are petite and with very few exceptions all are Caucasian. One good sign as to how the site treats the models is that there are several who make repeat visits to get abused.
The site currently has 290 scenes available with one new scene being added weekly. As should be expected, the oldest scenes (uploaded in 2006) don’t have the same video quality as the newer scenes. Most scenes have download options for resolution and a few offer different file types too. The most common file type is mp4 though a lot of the older files that say they’re mp4 come in as .rm. The newest uploads have two options for resolutions. I went with the highest which is 1280x720, 7500kb/s and 23fps. An issue that many may have is the file size, which with some of the newer uploads can exceed 3GB. That’s a lot of data if your ISP imposes a limit. The lower resolution is intended for mobile devices and comes in at 480x270, 1400kb/s and 23fps. The obvious problem with this is that there is a wide chasm between the two sizes that really should be bridged with a third option.
Photos are also available as zips but not as singles. New photos are 1200x785 while the older ones are obviously smaller.
Site layout is simple but effective. It looks and functions a lot like a Kink.com site if you’re familiar with them. You can either have a ‘full’ or ‘brief’ view of the scenes on the page and selecting a scene opens a page where you can stream or download the scene and download the photos. There is also a fairly detailed description of each scene which is useful.
The site allows download managers and doesn’t appear to have any download limits. Download speeds were good.
Logging in requires the username and password be entered each time as well as a two-word captcha. I found one of those ‘words’ was always easy to read, but the second was much more difficult and often caused me to fail to enter it properly. When that happens you go back for a second try but you need to enter your username and password again.
The 800lb gorilla in the room is whether the site is worth the $65 price. Part of me says that it is because the production costs here have to be much higher than a more usual hardcore site. With the more mainstream site you hire a woman and a man and pull out an old leather couch and you can make a porno. No so here. I’m guessing that the models here get paid a premium to do this work and the bondage equipment can't be cheap to buy or make. So in that sense, it might be worth the exceptionally high price. Arguing against the high price is that other BDSM sites must have similar costs and can manage a more reasonable price. Sites like Kink probably have better economies of scale, but this site can’t justify a price that’s double what the competitors are charging. Also, this site has some ‘sister’ sites (Sexually Broken, for example) which appear to use many of the same models, sets and equipment but charge less than half what this site charges.
I know this is a personal thing for me that others don’t share, and I didn’t include this as a con or include it in the score, but I really wish fetish sites put up more behind-the-scenes videos. With so many of the bondage setups used on this site being innovative I’d like to see some of the technical bits of getting the model into them.
If you’re into BDSM that pushes the limits and can justify spending the money, this is site that is worth a visit. With the price as high as it is though, this won’t be a site that I join once in a while to get updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Updates are daily at 2 updates a day
* very unique scenes, credit to them here for actually thinking outside the box literally when it comes to porn entertainment and bringing you scenes that you will of seen nothing like before.
* I was impressed with download speeds here.
* I second what slutty says not bad quality and was quite shocked to see even the lower bitrate version were not all that bad and with amateur stuff you don't often get the ultra high definition scenes.
* Some very very cute girls to be found, very impressed with the quality on czech casting to be honest, 80 girls in total I really liked the look of.
* Great interviews with some of your adult models that you might of sen before, I especially loved seeing Suzie Carina here and hearing what she had to say, you get to know about them and find out more about their personalities. I love Suzie even more after this, amazing girl.
Cons:
* Some simply terrible camerawork.
* not any zip files for the photos so had to manually go through them which was a pain.
* Some not great looking women bu I guess that can be expected with orgy scenes, it would be hard to find so many stunners willing to do it.
* Not exactly the cheapest of networks.
* Can get boring, sounds weird but some of the orgy scenes I did get bored with and felt it maybe stuck on someone I wasn't all that bothered watching for too long.
* site could do with more social interaction, it would be nice to maybe rate the models and comment on scenes.
Bottom Line:
Right thought I'd make a review on my thought on this network. First off its not the cheapest of sites at $29.99 but you do get access to 12 sites.
It gives you 2 updates a day which is fair enough I think and overall there's a fair amount of content all together to keep you busy for a good while.
I have to say the reason I joined this site is because they tempted me in with the pretty Czech girls on the Czech parties preview and when I'd joined I immediately felt disappointed. Mainly I think it was clever previews to entice and then I quickly realized some of the girls were not all that cute to be honest and some of the camera work to left me bored cause it was basically a guy holding a handycam whilst he had sex with these girls, yeah it give the amateur feel which sometimes I love but you do miss on on so much cause the camera stay in one view point for far too long, I ended up being bored to be honest.
Some of the lesbian orgy scenes too was a big join factor for me, I love lesbians and it did look so amazing to have a house full of them and film it. But again some of the women where not really my cup of tea and filmed by a guy you often felt like you are missing on on so much happening elsewere whilst you are stuck watching someone you might not be that keen on when there this real hot girl getting it on behind the camera guy. I think it would be better if they had more camera people, film it in all rooms and edit it at the end of the orgy to just put up the good bits.
Some of the other sites are voyeur sites with watching girls on the toilet and sunbeds, felt a bit weird and unsure if these girls are signed up to it and just pretending they no nothing about the cameras, I probably think this is the case as unsure of the legal aspects of filming people on the toilet. It was interest to see for something different I say that much for it.
Now lastly and this site I was so glad about as its been my highlight and that's the casting videos. Now he the network seemed yeah ok this is different, lots of girls basically being cast with a clothed interview and then they get naked and often seen oiling themselves and playing with themselves whilst chatting. The thing that I loved about it is wow you see some really quality girls, often without all the heavy makeup like you see on loads of sites, just being themselves, it made a real refreshing change to get to know a bit about these models and why they wanted to get into porn basically.
Also the photographs they took, I'm not too gone on photos from porn sites and often just don't bother with them but these were really interesting as they posed in the same poses nearly each time for every girl. I found it great, I love girls posing with the hand by the side and legs together looking straight at you, always have done and its a real rare find to see on a photo shoot, you often never see a model simply doing this, for me it one of my favorite poses. So I've been collected around 9 of these photos in the same poses for each of the girls I liked.
Comparing body shapes and boobs and everything is actually really good I found and really makes you think of what you actually are attracted to in women. I found 80 women here I liked, I went through them all getting these 9 photos and videos, still a few to do actually. Will be something I know I'll definitely look at again which is actually more than I can say for lots of sites so feel now maybe my money hasn't been wasted which is how I felt when I initially joined and got a bit bored about the camera work.
One thing though with the castings I think I should mention is they do sometimes go too far with the pestering the models to go further when they clearly feel uncomfortable about it, watching someone feeling awkward and not into it certainly doesn't make for a hot video. Lots of the girls though are models in the adult industry now so it didn't put them off, but just some I did feel sorry for.
Think I should mention First Videos, Amateurs and Streets sites, often bad camera work but some real gems in there too I found, some really cute girls and I was impressed by a few here and there on these sites.
Overall not too bad network and there are some real gems to be found and very unique scenes, sure there was lots I don't think I'll ever watch again with some of the amateur stuff but certainly don't regret joining and think there is some good to very good stuff on the networks, just takes some finding sometimes.
I've just reevaluated my score after viewing more on the czech amateurs site, very impressed, before I only briefly looked at what was in there now after downloading and viewing some, very good indeed, this is the type of amateur stuff I like and works better than the handy cam orgy scenes. Also some really natural sex in these scenes with real couples. All what I've seen this afternoon I think my 82 was unfair and actually going to go for a 87 after all for the network.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-12-1306:00am (Update History) Reason: addition of "Privacy Addendum:" section in Bottom Line
Pros:
Price: $14.95 per month.
Updates: 2 - 3 daily sometimes an entire movie.
Site Stats : Scenes: 8069 Movies: 1379 Stars: 2840
Good Navigation
Download WMV (160p, 240p, 360p, 480p) MP4 (same as WMV plus 540p, 720p, 1080p)#
Scene information: Video Front Cover shot, Title and Scene number, Date updated, Length in mins,
Size*, number of Images, number of Views, Who's in the scene**, Tag words, Director's name, Rate the movie, Current rating, Scene description***, Comment Section****, Links to other scenes by participants.
Cons:
* File size listed has nothing to do with file size.
** You are forced to use the IAFD database to sort out who is in a scene.
*** Older postings have no description or relevant tags.
**** You're encouraged to comment. Don't hold your breath that your comment will be posted - ever! Not sure what the webmaster does with these - maybe sprinkles them on his cereal in the morning.
# Video quality of older films are of tubesite quality and will never be improved upon with the 480 being the largest size, yet if you're into a specific babe, it may be your only chance to have her in your collection.
Bottom Line:
John Stagliano provides other directors an opportunity to offer their movies through Evil Angel (EA) without relinquishing ownership or profit participation. Thus, rather than a bunch of themed sites or purchased content, Evil Angel publishes DVD video's, generally released one scene at a time.
The EA website lists 33 directors associated with it at this time, including one couple (Le'Wood), three women (Belladonna, Bobbi Starr & Dana Vespoli), and eleven Europeans working there &/or in the States.
Genres:
Gay/Lesbian - While EA does not have straight up gay porn, Joey Silvera has broached this area by offering Shemale / Tranny (393) scenes (a total of 598 on the site) and "Strap Attack" scenes (234). "Lesbian porn" pretty much happens anytime two women kiss though some directors such as Belladonna, Bobbi Starr and John Stagliano feature plenty of girl girl scenes.
Anal - This has become the mainstay penetration act of the porn industry and EA is no exception. Sometimes I think they feel that if there is no anal there is no porn.
Jay Sin leads the way with his over the top anal DVDs, though Mike Adriano has added prolapse eating to his anal tongue fucking sequences (as opposed to rimming) to his prolific anal penetration videos.
Other notable and prolific directors featuring anal are Euro Rocco Siffredi, Christoph Clark, Raul Cristian & Nacho Vidal.
Manuel Ferrara has always had an ass obsession but also a series of DVD's called "Raw" which have the most authentic interaction of the two participants. Jake Malone also had plenty of anal scenes in his releases.
Oral - Hands down best on the Internet is Jonni Darrko's series of oral themed DVDs. The late John Leslie plus Mike Adriano, Joey Silvera and Belladonna have made oral themed movies too.
BDSM - This is not a specific niche that is specialized in though there are 71 Fem-Dom scenes listed.
Certainly Francesca Le and Mark Wood's (Le'Wood) current offerings, "The LeWood Anal Hazing Crew" and "Facial Vi0lation", has sado masochism well represented.
Thinly Plotted Gonzo Porn - Only three come to mine at the moment. John Stagliano's vampire themed "Voracious" and his 2003, groundbreaking feature "The Fashionistas", which swept the AVN Awards. Rocco Siffredi's "XXX Fucktory - The Parody Italian Style", which is mostly in Italian so who the fuck can understand the plot? Yeah, I know - people who speak Italian.
The directors at Evil Angel do not stay strictly in a specific genre so you will find a lot of cross over.
Bottom Line:
One of the best porn sites available at a great price with a variety of niches where you might find something that you like. Highly recommended.
Privacy Addendum:
It was brought to my attention that the EA website has a horrible Privacy policy. Honestly I'd never really read it before and quite frankly it's rather ugly. You can read it at the following link.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
First of all the contend was what was expected.
Many good photographer contribute to this side.
New photos can be shown in medium large and extra size, zip file is only available for one size only.
About 8 pictorials per month, more or less.
Cons:
Downloading the zip file is long-winded and time consuming. The zip link brings you first to a site where you have to accept these (shortend) agreements:
"Dear Body in Mind Member,
To protect the women who share their beauty with all of us from photo piracy we ask that:
1) You agree not to share, email, post ...
2) You agree to allow the photos in your zip to be watermarked ..
..
6) You understand the penalty for copyright infringement is $150,000 ...
7) You understand the criminal penalty ... is 5 years in prison.
..
[x] Yes, I agree not to post photos or share zips"
This has to be done when downloading EVERY, really, every time before you can click the "Download ZIP Now" button.
The second annoying thing is when trying downloading zips in parallel you got the message: "Service Temporarily Unavailable"
Bottom Line:
I can recommend this site only for patient people, someone having plenty of time (retiree) or not interested in downloading images as zips.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Almost 350 scenes to date. The site has been running since 2007
-Very high quality company in general, they seem to be the good guys in porn if you can look past that one non voluntary bruising of a model case that was reported a while back
-Armory in San Francisco proveides for a great site to shoot this kind of material
-Very high production and innovative bdsm ideas
-Great selection and variety of models
-Good amount of hardcore sex included
-Makes a creative mix of the different niches on various Kink sites
Cons:
-Scenes are sort of splitted into "days". That means you get usually 3-4 updates from the same model in similar settings. However the are full length each so this might turn out to be pro when you particularly like the model in question
-Humiliating, slave training, doing chores and so on might not be to everyones tastes even if they are generally into bdsm niche. Often a bit too non sexual in my opinion
-Always the same with Kink: No kind of network subscription or ability to mix between sites available
-Dedicated photo sessions would be nice touch but obviously they'd require lot of extra effort
-On the pricier side when it comes to cost per update
Bottom Line:
The Training of O is a themed site on Kink.com network that focuses on slave training. The material is divided into "training days" of each individual slave trainee where they are tested for different skills like pain tolerance, anal
sex, cleaning the toilet and what not. Usually there is up to four days of each slave's training. Occassionally they throw in an auditioning scene where they are selecting candidates fo their training that are made to look like slave market of some sort. In the end of the training they might be presented to the master of the Armory in their "Upper Floor" setting.
There is lot of role playing and acting involved. Scenes or days may start with the slave waking up with some kind of diary writing, instruction or grade giving and such activity that is nice touch for those who really can get into make believe. Personally I'm more int the actual sex in this scenes so there is quite much overhead in these videos.
When you look past the make believe, you'll find that this site is quite nice mix of much of the non gay niches found on this network in general. There are scenes that look like Hogtied or Device Bondage with some Sex And Submission thrown in. The only difference is that especially lately the penetrating male performer tends to be a gimp kind of guy, usually in bondage himself too and wearing some full body latex suit. Lots of whipping, caning, forced bj's too. Fetishwear, stocks, wooden boxes over the girls's heads, you name it, they probably got it.
The site and it's functionality really doesn't need another round of praise from me. It all works flawlessly and smoothly with download speeds exceeding what most can get through their broadbands. DL managers work fine. Photos are zipped but as with other sites here, the photos are more like a side product taken during shooting video. The sites are not really cheap if you consider the once a week update rate but you can always sign in and wait for a 19,99$ rebate. Higly recommendable site, especially for the variety.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautiful models
- Exceptionally good production values
- Mix of American and European models
- Mix of solo, g/g, b/g and multiples
- Updates regularly
- Multiple download formats and sizes for videos
- HD available on all videos
- Photos available (as singles and zips in multiple formats)
- Allows download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Cross-sell at sign-up isn’t pre-checked
Cons:
- Anal is very rare
- Models have little variation, so if you don’t like beautiful, petite 18-22 year olds maybe you should avoid the site.
Bottom Line:
I have to confess that I’m always a bit surprised when I find sites like this so good. This really isn’t the kind of porn I usually buy. I prefer harder-edged stuff from studios like Evil Angel and Kink.com. But maybe I’m wrong about my own habits because I really, really like this site. The best comparison I can think of for this site is X-Art: the women are exceptionally beautiful, the production values are exceptionally high, and the sex is sensual. This site is a great option for couples looking for something they can both enjoy.
The site is relatively new, with the oldest uploads being added on August 28, 2012. With 133 videos and 110 photo sets available some may see the site as too small, but that position would be to completely ignore the low price of $20 per month and the overall quality of the site. The site continues to grow regularly with a new video being added every two days and a new photo set being added on alternate days (mostly, anyway).
Videos are available primarily as mp4s (480x360, 640x360, 960x540, 1280x720HD and 1920x1080HD) with one WMV available at 1280x720HD. I downloaded the largest mp4s and those played at a bitrate of more than 7500kb/s and 23fps. Subjectively they look amazing. Keeping with the ‘natural and sensual’ feeling of the site, the scenes are shorter than found on some other sites because they’re a more realistic length. There is some music to start the scene but that quickly fades. None of the scenes were overacted with fake moaning.
The videos have high production quality with lighting, sound and editing all being top tier. An issue some might have with the models is their lack of variation. They are almost exclusively 18-22, petite and Caucasian. If you like that general type of model then it’s safe to say that they are also incredibly beautiful. There is a good mix of American and European / Russian models too. The videos are a mix of solo girl, g/g, b/g and some multiples. In the multiples with a male, the women outnumber the man.
The photos are available in three sizes (12800x800), 2000x1333 and 5600x3600). They’re available as zips or singles. The number of photos per set varies but the average seems to be around 150.
The technical bits of the site are well done too. The layout is simple and effective and you can easily sort by photos and videos, and by tags. Streaming and download links are easy to use. The site supports download managers and I saw some of the highest download speeds I’ve ever had while downloading porn.
Two points which are highly subjective and aren’t factored in to the score: 1) there is only one b/g anal sex scene on the site with both photos and videos; 2) facials are rare here: I like seeing facials and in this case I miss them more since several of the male models are channelling their inner Peter North with massive shots. I’m guessing the lack of facials is because the site is otherwise couples-oriented and most women aren’t as into facials as guys are.
I’m obviously highly recommending this site after what I wrote above. It is some incredibly sensual porn with some stunningly beautiful women who are presented with high production values on a well laid-out site that has fast download speeds. Some may see it as small, but even ignoring the fact that it is growing regularly it is still a great value for the high quality and reasonable price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The content is quality. The photo galleries are zipped and many are availible in various qualities (low/med/hq). The videos are available in multiple formats (wmv/mp4/mov) and qualities as well.
The site offers an array of beautiful women, mostly European with a good dose of Latin & Asian models. Most of the content is female only (solo or all girl), but they have couple (m/f, etc) galleries & videos too.
The site offers search for female talent and content (Red Head, Cum Shot, Dildo, etc) which helped in navigation.
I also loaded my download manager with over 100 links and let it run with no problem. So many sites nowadays have limits or cookies that reset, no problem here. The site also met my internet speed limit, no lag at all.
Cons:
Many of the women listed mid 2008 or before (going back to 2004) have their videos/galleries unlisted from their model page; but in some cases the content is still on the site. For example, Trina Michaels is listed as having 1 gallery, but there is not link to it like the more recent models. I found not only 1 gallery, but 2 so far, not by searching her name, which draws a blank, but by perusing content searches. On top of that, I found 1 video so far.
If you're a fan of male stars you are out of luck, they are not searchable or labeled in any way.
Bottom Line:
It's a good site. Huge and high quality across the board, content wise. If they ever modernize the search ability it would be an A+ in my book.
They update everyday (literally) and there is so much to look at & enjoy, it's well worth the price of admission. Just be prepared to look around. There is a lot to see. :)
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of my favorite glamcore sites.
-The selection of models is outstanding. Most of the models are either attractive or gorgeous.
The photography and videos focus on making the models as attractive as possible, and it really shows.
-Easy login. Username and password can be saved. No captcha required.
-Good site design. Can search site by updates, models, or videos.
-Large thumbnails clearly show what the models look like, what models are in each video or photoset.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Content has date posted to site.
-No download limits.
-Fast download speeds. I get over 2.1 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Download manager works. I use DownThemAll.
-Videos and photo sets are professionally shot. Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control (no random extraneous noises), most of the photos and videos are well-focused.
-Good update rate. Last couple of weeks, they have been adding one video or photoset per day.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is one of the best glamcore sites available. I'm basing that on the quality of the models (attractive to absolutely gorgeous), the high quality of the videos and photosets, how easy the site is to use).
-No search function if want to search by type of sex action, hair color of model, breast size, or other factors.
-If you don't like glamcore (some PU members call this heartcore), you won't like this site. There is no gonzo sex, no rough treatment of women.
-Many of the videos have brief moments where the video is slighty blurry. This is an "artistic effect", which I find stupid and annoying. I want my videos crystal clear, not crystal clear, with occasional blurry shots mixed in.
-Glamcore usually has soft "mood music" in the background. I prefer a video without any "mood music" or any background music.
-Models are white, late teens to early 20s. Some PU members might want a wider variety of models, different races, more of an age spread.
Bottom Line:
This is one of the best glamcore sites on the Internet. The models range from merely attractive to drop-dead gorgeous. The videos and photosets are high quality, professionally shot, to emphasize the beauty of the models. The sex is slow, sensuous, romantic.
There is a mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl. There are a few with 2 boys-1 girl, 1 boy-2 girls, 2 boys-2 girls.
I believe the site contents are exclusive. Although many of the models can be found at other sites, the videos and photosets at the site are exclusive.
There is a nice amount of content. The site has been around a number of years (2009 or earlier?). It used to be called "Beauty is Divine". When it first started, it was strictly a softcore teen glamor site. I don't believe it had any videos, only photosets. Each photoset had a small number of photos, and the models were uniformly lovely. The photography was high quality. Then the site name was changed to X-Art, and they started adding videos, and changing the approach from softcore to erotic glamor, which slowly evolved to glamcore, where the photosets and videos show actual sex.
Photosets can be viewed online, or downloaded.
Photosets from the last few years have about 100+ photos per set.
The earliest photosets had 25 or fewer photos per set.
Download options include a zip file in three definitions:
1200 pixels
2000 pixels
4000 pixels
Videos can be streamed online or downloaded.
Download options have choice of many definitions:
The download choices for one recent video include:
MP4 (all devices and mobile)
1920x1080 HD (1431 MB)
1280x720 HD (784 MB)
960x540 SD (549 MB)
640x360 SD (152 MB)
Apple Quicktime
1920x1080 HD (1431 MB)
1280x720 HD (784 MB)
960x540 SD (549 MB)
640x360 SD (152 MB)
Windows Media
1920x1080 HD (1478 MB)
1280x720 HD (867 MB)
960x540 SD (589 MB)
640x360 SD (158 MB)
BOTTOM LINE:
If you like tender young teens, in gorgeously photographed photos and videos, then this site is worth visiting.
As I said, this is one of my favorite glamcore teen sites.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and has a raunchy focus.
The gils are amateur and attractive
- network has about a dozen sites in it, but much of the content is shared between them.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
Cons:
- Small number of models.
- No posted update schedule :( Since new posts are undated I can't even guess. It seems to me they're taking content that was shoot 10 years ago and claiming it's new updates
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200. (From the view I bothered to look through, mostly screen shots of videos.
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- video chunks are added one at a time; so some videos look incomplete.
Bottom Line:
This whole network has been one long disappointment. I didn't have high hopes (with $30/year I wasn't expected the world't best website). That said they managed to fall below my low expectations.
The girls on the site are plenty hot, and the content itself is raunchy (I do so love raunchy porn). But the quality is poor, the updates are lacking, the organization is nearly non-existent. When I look for good things to say - I have a hard tie coming up with anything.
If interracial is your thing you should look somewhere else - there just isn't enough her to be bothered. Even with the ridiculously low price the frustrations don't make it worth it.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+The content is all exclusif and they fill a niche that is poorly represented.
+You get access to 20 hetero/lesbian sites and also 2 gay sites.
+They are remastering their older content.
+You can search by model name to find all the videos she shot for the different sites.
+They now update their Blacks on Blonde site with 2 videos per week as oppose to just one.
+They update with about 3 videos per week.
+They list the upcoming updates for each site and give the date on which content will be uploaded.
+They still manage to hire some really hot looking performers who always do great scenes.
Cons:
-Only about half a dozen of the 20 or so sites are still regularly updating with brand new content.
-They started to offer some older content in HD (their term) but the source material is of a lower resolution and the finish product is not really HD and they had to reduce to size of the video in the process.
-This is Interracial porn so if you aren't into this then that is amajor con for you.
-They do not tag their scenes and the synopsis is not always accurate so you may have to view part of the video prior to downloading.
Bottom Line:
*I keep returning to this network of sites and I'm never disapointed with the content. I'd be happier if the join price was lower and they may have to drop their price one day or suffer a drop in paid members. If they had multiple sites all updating with actual brand new content then I could understand why they charge a lot more than many other sites but the reality is that only a couple of sites are still updating on a weekly basis while most of the others offer remastered content. You still get the never before seen video but those are getting to be rare for me and I suspect the same for any returning members.
*In case some of you have never read another review and don't plan to do so then this network is dedicated to interracial porn. In this case it's almsot exclusively black men/women with white men/Women. It would be nice to see some white men with black women and maybe that will happen but if thats what you want then skip this network.
**The one great new thing that's different from the last time I was a member is that their site Blacks on Blondes is now updating twice a week as opposed to only once per week. I'm adding an extra point to my score this time for that reason. I don't know if that will be enough for people interested in this type of content but it was for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.
Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.
The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.
That's about it for the "Pros" list.
Cons:
Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.
No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.
Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.
It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it.
Bottom Line:
This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.
If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.
The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.
The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.
The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
--The 15 different sites on this network try to cover all the sub-niches of panty fetish (up-skirt, young girls, shiny panties, UK panties, etc).
--All but one of the sites have both photos and videos.
--Site navigation is simple, in part because there is not a huge amount of content.
--Some of the material is pretty good--in particular some of the photo sets on Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys
--The flash player gets the job done.
--Photosets have zip files, and are small and download fast (usually in seconds).
Cons:
--One of the biggest problems I had with this site was the generally low resolution of the material, with photos ranging from 900 to 1280 pixels on the long dimension, and as many as one third of the videos below 640 x 480 resolution.
--Many of the photo sets and videos are named using a name that consists only of numbers and letters (e.g. 008ch). To make matters worse, on many of the sites, the models don't even have names. There are no model pages with links to all of a model's sets and videos--you have to find them among the single list of photo sets and/or videos.
--This is archival material that is really starting to show its age (older hairstyles, etc).
--Roughly 50% of the material is non-nude or non-fully-nude.
--The sites have updates, but the total number of photo sets and videos doesn't change, so it certainly appears that they use some type of content rotation system.
Bottom Line:
As a guy who loves to see a hot girl in a sexy pair of panties, I am often disappointed by the lack of attention paid to them on many standard softcore porn sites. So I decided to look around and join a panty site. I don't really like the British approach to "knickers", so I settled on All Panty Pass.
This is a collection of 15 individual sites, each of which focuses on a different sub-niche of panties. The sites are listed below, each followed by 2 numbers: the first being the number of photo sets they had when I was a member, and the second being the number of videos they had (my membership expired about a month ago).
I'll just cut to the chase and say that the site was really disappointing. This is archival material that is starting to show its age. Overall photo/video resolution is low, the file naming system and lack of model names is ridiculous, and the general quality of the panty content is good but not great.
The first thing I discovered when I entered the site and went to Panty Honeys was that a significant number of videos are low resolution. The first 3 I clicked on were all 320 by 240--so small as to be basically worthless. Just as I was starting to think I had been totally screwed, I clicked on one that was 640 by 480. The resolution of the videos is actually quite variable (Panty Honeys had 10 different resolutions among the 66 videos), both within an individual site, and across sites. The best site for video was Jeans and Panties, where they were all 720p. Most of the sites have some 720p, but the amount varies. The 2 biggest sites (Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys) each had a significant number of videos that were below 640 by 480 (20 out 66 on Panty Honeys). The videos are all downloadable with no DRM. The flash player works well and let's you scan through quickly.
The photo sets are the best feature of the sites. They are generally well lit and focused. However, the resolution is low (usually 1280 or 1024 pixels on the long dimension), and many are non-nude. Because of the small size, many zip files are less than 10 MB, and download within seconds.
The weirdest site was the Virtual Panty Girls, which consists of animated photo sets and a few animated videos. It must have taken a lot of time to create this material, but I didn't find it erotic at all.
Navigation is simple, and each of the sites has the same layout. The opening page shows the latest updates and upcoming updates, and has links to pages for all photo sets and all videos. When you go to the photo or video pages, there is a row of thumbnails across the top for individual photo sets or videos (varying from about 5 to 9 thunbnails). There is also a list of number links for the next page of photoset/video thumbnails. Because there are so few thumbnails on each page, there are more pages and clicking than there need to be. Each site also has a link to the main All Panty Pass page, which has links to the individual sites.
As noted above, many of the models are not given a name, and there are no model pages where you can find all of girl's photo sets and videos on each site. This along with the number/letter filenames means that once you've downloaded the material to your hard drive, you really don't know what is what. Forget about a search feature on the sites and network...they don't have one.
About one-third to one-half of the material is non-nude, or non-fully nude. Even though the focus is panties, I do want to see what's underneath, so this was very disappointing.
With the low resolution, aging material, and plain Jane site navigation, the site has the look and feel of a site that is 10 years old. The price was $21 and change for a month, and while I didn't feel screwed, I think they would generate more revenue if they lowered that to $10 or $15 a month.
Bottom Line: There is some content here worth downloading, but the cons outweigh the pros, and I find it difficult to recommend this site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
The main thing I can say positive about this sight is the large number of updates and that each update seems to have photos. I would also like to say that most of these updates are well done and very professional.
Cons:
The most glaring problem with the sight is the lack of any search tools. You have to open each update to find out what is in there. All you get is a picture of the girl and her name. No genre nothing. The second problem is the high def. It's not very high def. seems 940x560is the norm. No download options either.The content is not exclusive. I have found much of it at DVD sights like video Z.
Bottom Line:
Great possibilities not realized. I got a headache trying to navigate this sight. Great content badly presented.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good interface, easy to navigate
- Good quality videos
- Pictures decent size and well compressed
- (Almost) daily updates - photos and videos
- Photos and videos come in matching sets
- Plenty of undressing
- Camera angles
- No anal (a plus for me!)
Cons:
- Some videos have music track throughout - no voice - others have bland music
- $=€=£ regional pricing (use TunnelBear to sign up)
- DMs don't work on videos
- Captcha on login
- Some fake boobs and tans (but not too many)
- Short login timeout
- Bit too much of the guy finishing himself off
- File naming a bit off
Bottom Line:
Although I generally prefer softcore sites, I have grown fond of the kind of tender, sharing, intimate and realistic (if somewhat idealised) sex scenes that the relatively new heartcore genre presents, and babes.com was next on my list to join.
Signup is relatively easy, but with the following caveats:
a) signup and cancel is through their own billing, not CCBill etc
b) they are a proponent of the grossly biased $=€=£ regional pricing setup - eg $20 in the US, £20 in the UK, over 50% more, but I am pragmatic and this is avoided with TunnelBear
c) You need to enter a captcha to log in
d) After which they do try to cross-sell to you other sites
But with that in mind, the site is nice, clean and easy to use when you get there.
The site has been around for about a year and updates with one scene daily - both a video and pictures, a setup which I quite like. During my membership this actually changed to 5 per week rather than 7 - but there's still quite a lot of material, about 300 sets & videos with approx 50/30/20 split between couples, solo and girl-girl scenes.
There is the usual browsing by videos, photos and models; and when going into a scene you get:
- For pictures, a browser-based slideshow, and download of approx 100 pics at a fairly respectable 2.5k
- For videos, a responsive streaming player, and downloads in 4 sizes up to 1080p (I went for 720 and they look very good)
Each model/set/video page also has user comments, and you can follow/like them within the site, and - if you are suitably unashamed of your smut proclivities - do so on FB, twitter and the like.
Most models are American, with some popular girls such as Malena Morgan, Lexi Belle and Hayden Winters; and some of the popular European models like Connie and Ariel. Not much ethnic diversity, although there are some nice latina and asian models; but there is a fairly broad range of ages, including some lovely milf-type models like Nikki Daniels and India Summer.
The theme here, as I suggested, is heartcore - like Joymii, X-Art etc, the focus is on couples scenes, but done in a loving, sharing way. The previous reviewer made some good points, but I think was a little unfair in criticising it for not being hardcore enough - you wouldn't join it if you wanted facials, DP and other more typical porn-y content. The scenes are fairly explicit, though, with closeups of penetration and oral sex, so it does deliver on that front.
That said, it's not without its issues. A commenter suggested that this is what Digital Desire would be if it did hardcore - and it's spot on. The girls are beautiful, the scenes are dreamy and idealised, the focus is soft and videos start with mood music, which fades out about a third of the way in to the sounds of the action. (The music is a particular peeve, actually - if you look at the previews, they have some good, brave choices of interesting music; this does not carry over to the actual videos which have more insipid/nondescript soundtracks which they would be better off without).
And, Like Digital Desire, they are fairly formulaic. It's not a bad formula, but most scenes (or at least the couples ones, which I was most interested in) play out the same way; the guy slowly undresses the girl, there's oral from both of them, there's sex with him and her on top. It's good, and well done, but could do with a bit more variety - and ideally, within the constraints of the genre, a bit more raunchiness.
But conversely, they have hung onto some porn tenets that don't really fit the genre. In far too many scenes, the girl ends up naked, apart from the high heels - I quite like heels in a pinup or glam context, but if I'm trying to imagine a realistic encounter, the shoes would definitely go! And similarly, in almost all cases the guy pulls out and finishes on the girl's belly/boobs/ass - again, there's definitely a time and place for a prominent pop shot but it does take away from the believability of the scene. Also see my comment about photoshopping - wholly unnecessary in the genre.
Despite my misgivings, this is still a good site in the heartcore genre and there's plenty of good material. If I were in the US, I would score this maybe 85 or 86; but there is no excuse for their heinous regional pricing policy, which has to cost them at least a couple of points.
But, pricing issues aside, Joymii remains my favourite - they are more creative with scenes, camerawork, and manage a bit more raunch while still being a bit artsy and trendy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of only a few remaining American public nudity sites
- Low price
- Offers zips for photos
- Bills through CCBill
- May still be updating
Cons:
- Small site
- Very few videos
- Video resolution is low
- Most video links are broken
- Updates may be recycled
- No recognizable models
- Photo sets broken into several zips
Bottom Line:
This is a small site in a rare niche so I thought it would be worth joining at least once. The niche is public nudity in an American setting and those sites are getting harder to find, likely because the material is getting harder to make. Nude in LA doesn’t even exist any longer, and the best American public nudity site – Teasers VOD – was ordered to stop producing scenes by the LA city government a while back so there will be no more updates from them.
This site is definitely small. There are only 33 models here with the look being more to the amateur side of the business. That’s neither a pro or a con, but merely a fact. You won’t find porn stars here like you used to be able to at some other public sites. The models appear to be all in their 20s with varying body types and few with tattoos. Overall, the models are pretty attractive.
There is truth in some advertising, and the name of the site follows that rule: there is only one theme here: models in San Francisco shed their clothes and walk around in public areas being photographed.
For a video collector, this site doesn’t have a lot to offer. Actually, that’s being far too generous. Of all the photo shoots it seems odd that there are only a dozen videos available. That’s bad enough, but it actually gets worse. Of the video links less than half actually work. But that may be the best news because the resolutions are so poor that even what is here is almost unwatchable. The resolution is only 640x360 at 1200kb/s and 15fps. Subjectively they look terrible. They look so bad on a 23” monitor that the watermark is almost unreadable. The technical aspect of the videos is so bad that I haven’t watched them so I can’t comment on their artistic merit. I should also add that the videos are also short – most are about 3mins long.
Things are better with the photos. The number of photos for models varies from less than 50 to just over 1000. The average is about 300 photos per model. The resolutions aren’t too bad with the majority at 1752x2628. Newer photos are higher at 3744x5616, but there aren’t many of those.
The site allows download managers but they aren’t really effective or necessary since the zip files are so small, with most being approximately 6MB. The problem is that for each photo set there may be 10 or more zips. If a model has a lot of shoots then you’ll be downloading a lot of zips – one model has over 60 zip files for her photos. Some of the zips have only two photos in them.
There appears to be a relatively new feature called a “Nude Map” where the model’s route through public areas is mapped on Google Maps. This would be an innovative idea for a public nudity site but I can’t figure out how to get it to work. There is some evidence that this feature isn’t live yet even though it is being heavily promoted.
The big question I have about the site that I can’t give a definitive answer to is whether the site is still updating. I think it is, but it appears that it is updating with mostly older material and whether that was shot a while ago and only made available now or whether it is recycled material I can’t say. The latest update was today (April 29) and the copyright on those photos is 2013, but most of the more recent updates have copyrights in 2010 and older. The latest video was uploaded in February and it looks as bad as the rest, which may indicate that it was actually recorded a long time ago. But in fairness to the site, they do have a list of updates and there are updates added at least twice a month. Whether those are really ‘new’ photos though could be open to debate.
The site does actually offer a fairly good value, but only because it is cheap and not because it offers a lot of good material. They offer a $4.95 fee for a week of access that will rebill higher. The good news is that unless you still live with dial-up from the 1990s you can download everything they have in that time. With a decent internet connection you can have everything you want in under an hour. It also bills through CCBill so you can have some confidence that cancelling will be easy. (The page at TBP says that the membership is $4.95 for two weeks, but that isn’t what the site is offering now.)
So can I recommend this site? Yes, but only to someone with a narrow interest in this niche who prefers photos. As a video collector I was badly disappointed, but the photos are decent. (Actually, they’re not ‘decent’ since they feature young ladies naked in public, but you get what I mean.) The small site size and limited offerings are offset by the low price, so if you need a fix of photos of nude models in the streets, this might scratch an itch for you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Reasonable price of $19.95
Exclusive content.
The 59 gorgeous models include a wide variety of ethnicities from Asia, Africa, South America and Europe.
Site updates consistently every 2 days.
Stunning high resolution photos available in 3 sizes.
Zip downloads.
Photo set covers included in zip files.
Some nice background info on the models included.
Additional features include model ratings, comments and add to favourites.
Cons:
The video section is very small; only 13 videos total and only 1 new one added in the last 12 months.
Videos are streaming only.
Many of the photo sets are split in to two parts although they do generally come as consecutive updates.
Zip file naming could be better; model name plus number (e.g. emilya_1_m, emilya_2_m), would be nicer if they could include the photo set name.
Navigation could be better.
Search tool is rather limited.
No file sizes listed for zips.
Download speed seemed a little slow; single downloads seemed to be limited to about 600 KB/sec.
Bottom Line:
Melina.com claim to be professional photographers who travel the world to find the best looking girls whom they claim to be exclusive to the site and 100% newcomers. I certainly didn’t recognise any of the models as being familiar from other sites and even tried cross referencing a few at thenude.eu but came up with a blank so have no reason to doubt their claims. This is primarily a Teen site with the models mostly being aged 18-21. The big attraction for me in this site was the varied ethnic diversity of the models which you seldom find on multi model sites. I loved discovering the dark skinned, dark haired exotic beauties from places like India, Thailand, Philippines, Chile, Venezuela and Brazil to name a few. The site has been online a little over 2 years and to date has 414 galleries (31,000+ photos).
The navigation options are rather limited with a choice of models, galleries or videos. The models page is nicely presented with a good sized preview photo of each model along with her name and number of galleries, pics and videos. The models are listed by rank starting with the highest rated. You can also click on a letter of the alphabet to find models by name alphabetically. There is a basic model search that allows you to search by eye colour, hair colour, ethnicity, tattoos and piercings. The annoying thing about using the search engine or the alphabetical listing is that after you select a model in your results and hit the back button you are always taken back to the default models page so have to click back to the letter of the alphabet or search again. If you select galleries the whole 2 years’ worth of photo sets will be presented on a single page with a preview photo of the set cover so a lot of scrolling involved. Down the right hand side there is a month and year list but clicking on it doesn’t actually take you to that month’s updates. It just expands a list of text links for the dates in that month when there was an update, not very helpful really without a preview pic.
The strength of the site is the photo collection; this is top quality professional photography equal to anything you would find on top photography sites like MetArt. In fact in some ways I preferred the photo sets here to those at Met because the models almost always start off wearing some clothing, lingerie or swimwear so you nearly always get some tease before the nakedness. I don’t really recall seeing any of those plain vanilla nude sets you get a lot of at MetArt. There is a good mix of indoor and stunning outdoors locations. The models here get fully nude including some spreading and close up shots but don’t go as far as masturbation or insertions. The photos are offered in 3 sizes (+1000px, +2000px and up to 5000px).
Anyone who joins this site for videos I’m afraid would end up sorely disappointed. There are only 13 videos and they are streaming only. There are 4 quality levels of streaming; HD720p, 480p, 360p & 240p for mobile. I didn’t find the 720p very sharp when viewed full screen on my 24 inch monitor so have my doubts that it’s true hd. The videos are mostly 2-3 minutes long and are just basically the model dancing around and stripping with background music. I didn’t find them very erotic at all.
For anyone who loves high quality photography I would recommend this site particularly if you have a passion for dark dusky exotic beauties. If you’re only interested in videos I would advise against wasting your money on this site. The poor video section wouldn’t adversely affect my rating of the site as I have little to no interest in them anyway.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
beautiful girls
high quality videos
frequent updates
reasonably priced
fast download speeds
exclusive content
growing site
easy navigation
Cons:
borderline softcore
long intro's
bad camerawork
questionable cumshots
rare facials
Bottom Line:
High quality videos and beautiful girls at a decent price are normally a good thing but if you are looking for hardcore porn like brazzers then I can't suggest babes.com All of the scenes are almost soft core. I watched almost every video available so far and only seen one facial/oral cumshot. a lot of the pop shots are supposedly creampies but there is never any evidence of a cumshot. The camera work sucks hard. They are too busy being artsy fading in and out instead of just focusing on the fucking. They do update often but they are just more of the same boring sex.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
