Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 6435 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Casting Couch X

1. Casting Couch X (1)

Pay
Newbie
75*
pornymike (0) 07-25-15  11:09am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A great conveyor belt of really fresh & cute porn starlets put through their paces for our enjoyment. One of my likes is 'getting to know the girl' before the action starts and this is well done with the interview. My next like is getting to know the body and again this is well delivered as she is asked to strip off and we get to see her in all her natural glory. Yum!
Then as above, she's put through her paces before having a full face splattering of boy batter
Cons: Really, really evil and utterly dishonest cross selling. If you click on one of the (far too many) cross selling ads and try one of the options thinking it's a trailer, you'll get billed for a month of access at a stupidly high rate.
No kidding
Happened to me & when you look in to it, they have a warning on their 'customer service' (good joke) page about people fraudulently trying to get out of accounts they'd 'signed up to'. Ignore it and contact your credit card company for a refund. I did and got just that.
Bottom Line: Good site but beware of the scamming
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Babes Network.com

2. Babes Network.com (6)

Network
Active
80
Pyrenees (24) 07-21-15  02:29am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are many pros to this site.

1) There are 750 videos.

2) There is a update 3-5 times a week.

3) The videos are ALL in 1080p. Yes every single video going back to 2012. So you can see they update often. A very alive site. There are multiple download options.

4) Every Scene has a ZIP file for HD picture and a individual picture gallery if you want to just look and hand pick a few.

5) This site features THE top porn actresses from all over the world. Such as Madison Ivy, Mia Malkova, Dillion Harper and Stoya.

6) This site has a great variety of content. Most of the scenes are 1 on 1. But there is also Threesomes (GGB), Lesbian, solo and recently added IR.

7) The women on this site dress to the nines, the lighting is amazing and the scenes are professionally produced.
Cons: There are some cons to this site.

1) The Navigation is a nightmare. You will have to go page by page to find what you want. If you try to apply a filter it will also filter out what you want. This is unacceptable.

2) The sex is passionate but can seem tame when you compare it to what the majority of porn encompasses today.
Bottom Line: I remember when Vivid first came out it was so revolutionary. Because the sex had such high production quality I would have to compare Babes to Vivid in its heyday. If you like that kind of action then this is the site for you.

My overall personal opinion is if you can get a month for $9 like I did then it is well worth your dime.

One of the things worth mentioning is that they allow comments on the scenes and they seem to even keep the bad comments. That level of transparency is endearing. Hopefully they read them and make changes accordingly.

Things I would like to see to become a year round member.

1) Contract stars who produce more than 2 videos then we never see them again. I think there is a opportunity here to cater to your fan base.

2) Special content that only a year long member has access too. Maybe something with contract stars a little harder (Anal, DP, Deep throat Etc). Imagine having August Ames as a contract star producing 1 exclusive scene a week with harder content. Now that would be reason to join for a year.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Team Skeet

3. Team Skeet (3)

Network
Active
75
Pyrenees (24) 07-20-15  11:30pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are some pros to this site.

1) Some of the top porn stars are on this site, especially the more teenage looking ones.

2) This site updates every single day.

3) This is a Gonzo style site centered on Teenage girls. Each Site associated focuses on a Porn Niche involving teenage girls. Small Girls, Buxom girls, Clothed girls, Curvy girls, sporty girls etc etc.

4) The videos are decent quality. They range 1.5GB to 3 GB in file size.

5) The site offers a lot of discounts to sister sites.

6) If you like POV, clothed sex, average looking models (Real life type), unique camera angles and tattoos then you will like this site.
Cons: There are a few cons to this site.

1) Yes it has top porn stars. I personally feel like the Kelsi Monroe, Keisha Grey, Cassidy Banks and even Piper Peri scenes are lackluster. Its the lack of Lighting, the odd angle sexual positions.

2) I personally only found 20 scenes out of a thousand I wanted. While 90% of their content is HD the specs might be different than what you are used to collecting.

3) After joining I immediately got 28 spam emails. But their customer service is strong and they jumped at the chance to stop this in its tracks.

4) I personally had trouble with their video player but it is possible it was on my side. Even though this was the only site I ever had trouble on.

5) They auto sign you up for another service you might possibly use and have to pay for. I really wish I had to personally apply to join that service.

6) I personally was put off by some of the lighting, camera angles and demeanor of the actors and actresses. A preference thing.
Bottom Line: Of all the sites I gave a score this one has been the most problematic for me personally. But the great communication from the website helped explain to me certain things and as a result I feel we have arrived at a more fair score.

So in summary collectors of teenage looking girl porn may really like this mega site. My personal tastes prevent me from giving it my seal of approval. But I can see how someone would like what they offer (Lots of PoV, lots of Clothed teen sex). Also I doubt you will ever find a business that cares as much about feedback as they do. They have a 100% money back policy. But more importantly they care enough to listen and respond. That is rare!

I was personally let down by the Keisha Grey scenes and I did not download a single one. But you know I have a very specific type of taste so please take that with a grain of salt.

There are some things I would personally like to see change before I can give this site the thumbs up.

1) Stop the spam emails.
2) Stop the auto sign up for things we do not specifically want to possibly join (Advertising is fine).
3) I would prefer a different lighting, directing of sexual positions angles. But this is my own personal taste. When I see a teen with huge Taters I want to see em swinging towards me in doggy. When I see a small girl who can do a split I want to see that split 3-4 ways during coitus. Some girls have a few specific set of skills and like the line from "Taken" I want to see them used vigorously without reservation.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Bangbros Network

4. Bangbros Network (4)

Network
Newbie
100*
bobby23 (2) 07-20-15  02:28am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: I would recommend this site to everyone!! Content is awesome with so much it's impossible to get through. Download speeds were always excellent!! (guess they fixed the problems from a yr ago) Quality is excellent and they somehow manage to keep the file size smaller than both Naughty America and PornPros.
Cons: None of those women are doing it with me.
Bottom Line: Great content, fast downloads and their downloads are small for 1080P. I don't know how they manage, but I hope they keep it up!!! Didn't check out their billing practices, good call with the secondary billing trick.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Pros Network

5. Porn Pros Network (0)

Network
Newbie
97*
bobby23 (2) 07-20-15  02:02am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: I had a three month membership to this site a year ago. It was so good I had to go back. I rarely do that with sites considering there is so much free stuff out there plus I like to try out different pay sites if I'm going to go that route. This site has incredible women, consistent updates and a ton of different content!! They also get tons of women just starting out before they start popping up on other sites.
Cons: It's a shame they make you pay for their other sites, passion/fantasy HD, casting couch-x, etc. They could make them available after a certain length of time the way 21st Sextury makes a new site or two available the longer you're a member. It gives you some incentive to stick around. The biggest problem they have, however, is bandwidth and dropped connections. I know it wasn't on my end bc when they dropped I still had great connections from the bangbros network.
Bottom Line: Great content and a lot of it!! But they could really use some work on the IT side of things. Still one of my personal favorites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naughty America

6. Naughty America (2)

Network
Newbie
70*
bobby23 (2) 07-20-15  01:21am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great content. Women are beautiful, scenes are shot very well, huge selection. Offers Ultra HD, only porn site I've seen that does.
Cons: The site has major bandwidth problems, except for 3 am, thank you insomnia. Connections are constantly dropped, so it would be impossible without a download manager. Some of the older movies are missing photo galleries entirely. The file size is wayyy too large!! I downloaded a 1080 movie from PornPros that was 32 mins and 1.8 GB, another from Bangbros which was 32 mins 1.05 GB. A 33 min 1080 from NA was 2.88 GB!! No noticeable difference between the three on my HD processor, in fact the other two looked a little better (pretty sure it wasn't just the girls lol). So what's with the extra gig?
Bottom Line: You gotta love NA's $5 special, but Bangbros is your best bet for this type of content. Plus it offers some of the harder stuff, but nothing too crazy. It won't fill up your hard drive with it's HD files and it has much better connections and download speeds. PornPros is good too but also has slower speeds and bad connections sometimes. Still it's not nearly as bad as NA. However, all three have great content and lots of it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Hub Premium

7. Porn Hub Premium (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Eugine103 (0) 07-16-15  11:47pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Content is fed by MovieBox, a very old company that I thought died more than 15 years ago.HD content is less than 480 resolution. Navigation is fine and you'd expect it in 2015. Lots of videos, sort of. Download speed is excellent, only because the files are so small from low res.
Cons: Avoid a membership! It does not allow you to download from PornHub! What you get is a membership to a very old website with very old content. HD content plays at less than 480 resolution. There's a large selection but MOST videos are labeled "VOD" which means that you will have to buy credit to watch them!!!! I paid an extra $1 dollar to block ads. Unclear on how to cancel membership.
Bottom Line: The regular pornhub site is free and provides a lot of value even if you have to pay for it. Unfortunately, PornHub Premium is the opposite. You get old video and poor resolution and you'll have to pay for credit to watch most of the videos. Avoid this site. On a scale of 1-10, this site makes videobox a 1000! I'm truly disappointed.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Mofos Network

8. Mofos Network (2)

Network
Active
85
Pyrenees (24) 07-15-15  10:00am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This mega site has some pros.

1) There are a variety of sites for hard to find niches. Such as Babysitter, First Anal, Latina, Girlfriend, Public, Voyeur, Hooker Pick up, Stranded teens, group party sex and freaky sex.

2) You will find scenes from your favorite teenage pornstars on this site. Such as Ava Taylor and Riley Reid.

3) There seems to be a large number of scenes featuring Flexible girls, Petite girls and Buxom teenage girls. The Piper Perri scenes are a must have. So having an abundance of these types of scenes made this a great site for me.

4) There are multiple HQ download options including 1080p and the scenes are crisp at 3-5 GB each. Each scene has photos. You can also download mobile phone versions of the scenes.

5) There is an update almost every day of the week. This is a lot of quality updates.

6) I think Mofos is famous for user contributed content. I can believe it and a lot of those scenes are extra hot because its a couple.
Cons: This mega site does have a few downsides.

1) There is a lot of promoted partner sites. Each time you log on you will be offered something. Also before you watch a video you might get a 10 second trailer from another site. However their deals are REALLY good and I took advantage of one.

2) There are a lot of scenes but the quality of the content drops rapidly after 3ish years back.

3) There are a lot of updates each week but I would say only 1/3 are really great.

4) A large number of the models have tattoos. But you can expect this from user submitted videos in my opinion. Their bad decisions are our quality porn.
Bottom Line: So after reading reviews on MOFOS I was scared to join. Then after enjoying the content I wanted to do a review that was honest. Yes this mega site is one of the smaller ones but it has a lot of scenes that are MUST have irreplaceable scenes.

The bottom line is if you like Flexible, well endowed, hot teenage pornstars. Then this is the mega site for you.

I give this mega site my seal of approval with a suggestion to at least join for one month at a discount if you can get it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Mastermind

9. Porn Mastermind (1)

Network
Active
85
Pyrenees (24) 07-15-15  09:34am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are some pros to this site.

1) If you love seeing teenage girls, with tans, oiled up and given the old in out in out real horror show then you will love this site.

2) Most of the scenes follow formulas so you know what your getting. If you like the formula you will like the site. Example 1 Fucked hard 18 starts with the girl stretching, undressing, massaged, spoon sex, missionary, Standing doggy, doggy, cowgirl and finishes with missionary Cream Pie or Facial. Example 2 Massage girls 18 starts with undressing, boy massaged, Blow job, Cowgirl, Reverse Cowgirl and finishes in missionary with Cream pie or Facial.

3) There are two bonus sites.

4) You get a lot of updates for free from other sites trying to get your business. This is a new experience for me. I got a August Ames scene from Jules Jordan.com for free. Same with a Jynx Maze scene. Who could complain about free great scenes from other sellers?
Cons: There are some cons.

1) Only about 50% of the scenes are in 1080p HD. But they are of exceptional quality of 3-5 GB files.

2) If you do not like the formulas the sites offer then you will hate the sites. Example I am a lover of doggy style which pretty much made Massage Girls 18 a worthless site to me personally.

3) The bonus 2 sites are of mediocre quality and are really small. But I did find a great foursome with Whitney Westgate that was a must have.

4) Updates are few and far between. As a matter of fact I would guess this site was dead except the bonus free scenes update 3-5 times a week. So there are always new free scenes if you are a member just not where you want them.
Bottom Line: I had wanted to join this site for over 5 years and I am glad I took the plunge. The whole Massage then doggy thing is a real deal sealer for me and I found 50 scenes I had to have in my personal collection.

The bottom line is if you like teenage, lubed, tanned girls (Some of the hottest pornstars like August Ames and Riley Reid) get it dealt to in a reliable formula then this is the site for you.

I give this site my seal of approval. At least for a one month buy where you can fill out your collection.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Fidelity

10. Teen Fidelity (2)

Pay
Active
90
Pyrenees (24) 07-15-15  12:34am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site has many Pros.

1) There are currently 183 Videos in various formats up to 1080p.
2) Almost every scene has a nice trailer, BTS long video and half have solo videos.
3) The video quality is very high with videos ranging 2-3 GB and the picture quality is crisp.
4) This is a TEEN site with some of the most popular teen stars of the last decade.
5) Each scene is fun, it has a script. Nothing is vanilla on this site. There is a common formula (Same actor, multiple pop shots, finish with Cream pie).
6) There are about 400 HD pictures for each scene.
7) There is a little bit of Fetish for everyone. Lactation, Flexible sex, Hymen breaking, Chocking, Deep Throat. And some threesome scenes as well. A mixed bag.
Cons: There are some cons

1) There are usually only 4-5 updates per month.
2) Maybe you do not like to see the same man in each scene?
3) Maybe you like more gonzo and less clothes.
4) Some of the scenes can be very rough sex.
5) If you like a specific niche unless its teen then this site maybe too much of a mixed bag of fetishes. It is very non formulaic.
Bottom Line: The bottom line is if you like teens and a variety of sexual positions/scenarios then this is the high quality site for you. I do not like picture but there are a ton in HD. I enjoyed the Behind the scenes sections they were funny and provided a glimpse into the lives of some of the famous teen porn stars.

I give this site my seal of approval. (The Get my belt series is award winning). Here is a pro tip you can get a cheap membership to this one, porn fidelity and a 1$ trial membership to Kelly Madison. You can easily get every scene you want off of KM during the trial period but DO NOT STREAM there is a stream limit on that site. Instead look at what you like and download it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brand New Amateurs

11. Brand New Amateurs (1)

Pay
Active
80
rearadmiral (376) 07-08-15  05:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateur site
- Inexpensive full trial
- Fast downloads
- Many different ages and body types
- Broad range of scene types
- Simple layout
- Extensive use of niche tags
- No download limits
- Reputable biller
Cons: - Many different ages and body types
- No known update schedule
Bottom Line: Iíve had mixed experiences with amateur sites. This may sound hypocritical but my favorite amateur sites are often those that use models who are in some form of the adult business Ė like cam shows Ė and are getting into videos. These sites (like Exploited College Girls) tend to be less amateurish. Brand New Amateurs falls into the class of being more of a true amateur site. Iím still browsing through the scenes and the only recognizable model Iíve seen is Halle Von.

This can be a pro or a con depending on your personal tastes, but sites that fall closer to the true amateur site tend to have a broad range of model ages and body types. This is great if you have interests that run the range from petite models in their late teens though BBW models to MILFs. This isnít so great if youíre like me and have a narrow range of likes. But since the site many scenes there should be something for everyone.

I canít give a definitive answer on the update schedule as the scenes arenít dated but judging by the dates on the scene comments by members it looks like there is at least one new scene per week.

The site also offers a broad range of scene types which I think is a pro no matter how you slice it. There are solo scenes, some with toys, there are girl/girl scenes, there are boy/girl oral scenes, b/g/g scenes, some rimming scenes and even some anal scenes. And there are several scenes in the rare niche of white male/black female scenes too. Again, something for everyone.

The site has a very simple layout in that there is only one long page with a large thumbnail for each scene. Clicking on the thumbnail opens a new page where you can download the scene or get photos. The site has a limited search function but this is offset by being able to sort by model and the extensive use of niche tags.

Video downloads are only available as MP4s and only in one resolution per scene, but that resolution is high. Most of the scenes are 1920x1280 at around 6,000kb/s and 29fps. There are some lower at 1280x720 with bitrates ranging from 1,500-2,500kb/s and 29fps. The downside to having only one file size is that people with slower internet connections may wish for a smaller file size. The scenes look good with no pixilation but the downside is that since these are shot in someoneís home the production values are what youíd see in a more professional site. Lighting, for example, is sometimes a bit too dark. But it can also be argued that these Ďflawsí add to the amateur appeal.

The site supports download managers but I canít really say if there is a problem with links timing out. I use Internet Download Manager and have a relatively fast connection but the download speeds I saw here were probably the best Iíve ever seen. Iíd see a sustained 25MB/sec download most of the time. Iíve seen other sites only allow 20% of that speed.

One advantage to this site is that they offer a full trial. My worry was that Iíd trigger a download limit but I didnít find one. In one afternoon I downloaded all the scenes I wanted and never saw a limit or had my download speeds throttled. I downloaded 50GB of data in less than three hours so if there is a limit it is very generous.

The bottom line is that this is a good site in the true amateur niche. When you factor in the availability of a full trial at a low cost there is almost no risk to someone joining the site. Given that the site bills through CC Bill the only risk is the membership fee itself, and Iím confident that most new members could easily find lots of porn to make at least the trial membership a good value.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rylsky Art

12. Rylsky Art (2)

Pay
Active
83
tangub (155) 07-08-15  02:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: PU/TBP Discounted price.
High quality photo and video content.
Multiple download and streaming options for videos.
Photos available in 3 different resolutions with a zip download for each.
Regular updates.
Excellent navigation and search tools.
User comments and ratings.
Cons: Sites in the Met Art Network seem to have adopted the worst kind of regional pricing where $1 (USD) = £1 (GBP).
Too many photo sets start out with the model already nude or nearly nude.
Anyone who prefers videos would find the collection rather small here.
Bottom Line: Rylsky is one of the more popular photographers featured on Met Art and this site is devoted to his work having started up in September 2012 and with consistent updates has grown in to a collection of approximately 218 models, 824 photo sets (around 50,000 total pics) and 86 movies. Updates come regularly but not quite daily, averaging about 5/6 sets a week.

The photos come in 3 sizes with the largest size going up to 3744 x 5616px, a medium size at 1365 x 2048px and a small size at 682 x 1024px. A zip is available for all 3 sizes and as is normal for sites in the Met Art network the zip file names always include the date of the set, the name of the model and title of the set which I love. One of my pet hates are sites that make you mess around having to rename everything you download. The majority of the photo sets are solo and fairly softcore although most sets do give you some spread and close up shots with occasional finger insertions. There is a small number of two girl sets and also a few backstage sets.

The videos have up to 6 download options 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p, WMV and Divx avi. The 1080p videos that I downloaded were in mp4 format with a 5000 kbps bitrate and looked excellent on my 24 inch monitor. This is primarily a photography site with photo sets outnumbering videos by about 10 to 1. Average run time of the videos is around 5 minutes. I have to admit I've always found the videos of Met Art Network sites rather boring and this site was no different for me.

The layout and navigation of the site is pretty much the same as other sites in the Met Art Network that I've previously had memberships to with all the usual search features and settings options including the user defined tags. There is user interaction in the form of ratings and the possibility to leave comments. Quite often you will see the Photographer Rylsky replying to feedback from users.

The only reason I joined this site was because of an email promo I received a couple of years ago when the site was fairly new with the offer price of $7.99, surprisingly the link still worked even after a couple of years. Other than cheap email offers I have to say that the Met Art Network sites have lost me as a customer as long as they persist with the $1 = £1 regional pricing. The site was ok for what I paid but in general I like to see models starting out in a bit more clothing with a bit more tease but I knew what to expect here so I can't really complain too much.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Tushy.com

13. Tushy.com (1)

Pay
Active
87
rearadmiral (376) 07-06-15  05:12pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Rare plot-based, softer-edged anal site
- Excellent quality scenes
- Updates weekly
- A-list porn models
- Several scenes listed as first anals
- Multiple download options
- Supports download managers
- Photos as singles or zips
Cons: - New and still small
- Expensive for the current size of the site
- Some issues with download managers
- Site wonít remember username / password
Bottom Line: Tushy.com is a rare site that features anal sex in plot-based scenes that border on having couples appeal. The site is clearly aiming for a different market from many other anal sex sites where the goal there is more to turn the event into an endurance test for the model. Here there is a short scene set-up followed by some sex where there is some chemistry between the models that just happens to have some anal sex thrown in for good measure.

As another PU member has pointed out, this site looks a lot like another site in quality and feel. Tushy.com is run by Greg Lansky who is also behind Blacked. For those who donít know Blacked, it is a site that offers high quality, plot-based interracial porn. The fact that Lansky is behind this new site gives me a lot of hope that it will be as good as Blacked. (The only worry that I have is that has Lansky stretched himself too far in opening another site? Will Blacked be lower quality and will Tushy not hit the lofty mark set by its sister site? I hope that both remain excellent quality.)

Because the site is new it is still quite small with only 12 scenes uploaded. The site does update with the addition of a new scene each week. The site still charges the full rate even though theyíre new and small. (I prefer the model used by Swallow Salon where the price is lower presumably in part to reflect the small size. I also understand that the porn that Tushy.com produces Ė anal and expensive production costs Ė is far higher than oral scenes on one set.)

As with all good porn sites, this one offers some choice in how members can access the scenes. Scenes are only available in MP4 format and in various resolutions: 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480p mobile, 360p mobile and 270p mobile. Streaming is also available in RESOLUTION. I downloaded the 720p scenes as they were the best compromise between size and quality and those come in at a high bitrate of over 8,000kb/s and a framerate of 29fps. Subjectively they look great and Iíd recommend testing a few of the 1280p scenes before you immediately go for a higher resolution.

Streaming is also available but I canít tell the resolution. It looks to be HD though. Trailers are available for each scene too.

Photos are available too. They look more like stand-alone photos rather than screencaps, which is what Iíd expect of a site that pushes quality. The photos are available as singles and zips and the zipped photos come in at 3000x2000.

The site supports download managers but I did encounter a problem initially. When you click to download a scene a pop-up with the download options comes up. Selecting the resolution started the download outside my manager. I wasnít a big deal to get it to download with the DM and then cancel the other download. This only happened on the first day I was a member and that issue hasnít recurred since.

Several of the scenes are listed as being first anals. As a collector of that specific niche itís great that this site may be offering more of that.

While all the scenes look like theyíre exclusive to this site I canít say for sure. The two most recent updates have the word ĎExclusiveí splashed across the thumbnail leaving me to think that the others may not be exclusive. I buy a lot of porn, and specifically a lot of anal porn and Iíve never seen these scenes before.

I mentioned that most of the scenes have a softer feel to them than in a lot of other anal sites. The exception to this is the one scene I joined to get access to, and thatís a very rare anal scene from Kacey Jordan. Iím only aware of one other anal scene sheís done (for Dirt Pipe Divas) so no one is going to call her an anal queen. Maybe sheís playing this as part of the role in the scene, but she doesnít look too comfortable throughout the lengthy anal sex part of the scene. But most, if not all of the other scenes are like this.

The bottom line is that with the current size of the site itís hard to argue that it offers good value for the monthly fee of $30 but the value equation has to take into consideration the quality of whatís offered here too, and itís fair to say that this is excellent quality porn. Itís also worth noting that the site continues to grow. I know that not everyone will agree with me, but I think value is more about quality than quantity. If you like softer anal scenes you really should check out this site.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tushy.com

14. Tushy.com (1)

Pay
Newbie
80*
Cum Play John (3) 07-05-15  08:40am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is a gorgeous site that I would give a 98 to -- for what they are trying to do -- except for the low video count of 10 current videos, with 1 weekly update.

However, if you care about HQ glamour anal of a sort never seen before (and I include Wow Girls, XArt and First Anal Quest, with their polished sensibility), then this may be a site for you worth investing $30 to support.
Cons: Small video collection for $30.

Could have better cum play / post-cum head sequences, instead of joining all the other porn sites on Earth in cutting away right after the facial. Also, could have an optional POV view -- particularly during the facial moment.

Glamour rimming would be a dream as well. If the man rims the woman, can't the woman rim the man?
Bottom Line: I am overall thrilled with the sensibility of this new site, which has a kind of sophisticated artful well-lit anal I've never seen before.

The women talk conversationally as if they were models talked into doing this; it's extremely realistic and thrilling to watch the slow-paced nature of the man's anal investigation of the model.

And the models are to-die-for gorgeous. This is the kind of dream fucking most straight men only dream.

I'd say a little more attention to closed-leg anal penetrations, and not just the spread eagle sort, a little more of the from-behind-and-above angle would be nice.

I'd keep up the hot talk, whatever new features you add. Have them talk about how to do rimming well, how to give head well, how tight it feels in their ass. While it's an anal and not a blowjob site, I think you could bring the same intimacy to the blowjob and fetishize tonguing the cock peehole more.

You have to really want to underwrite this dream to give them $30 a month to enjoy these videos.

But I will say it is money well spent -- particularly if their models stay this hot.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Swallow Salon

15. Swallow Salon (1)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (376) 07-05-15  07:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Affiliated with Amateur Allure
- Inexpensive
- Beautiful models giving incredible blowjobs
- Updates with one scene per week
Cons: - Very small site
- Not enough female nudity
- Only one video choice
Bottom Line: I know Amateur Allure has attracted some very different reviews. I fall solidly in the fan group as AA is likely my favorite adult site on the internet. So when AA posted an update on that site that had a slightly different look and had a watermark for Swallow Salon I immediately headed over there and joined too. I canít say for certain, but it looks like Swallow Salon is affiliated with Amateur Allure and done by the same guys.

Like AA, SS is formula-driven. Some people really dislike this but I think that if you have a good formula why mess with it? The premise is that the male talent is visiting a salon where beautiful women give amazing blowjobs and swallow cum. Also like AA, SS uses just one set Ė in this case itís an enclosed small space with thin opaque coverings and there are multi-colored lights outside to create an interesting effect. The male talent is usually seated for most of the BJ with the model kneeling in front of him. They usually swap to him standing at some point before the cumshot. Like AA, SS features some of the most beautiful models in porn (who are usually just beginning their careers so theyíre still fresh) giving some amazing blowjobs. Most of these blowjobs transcend the ordinary and are closer to cock worship with lots of licking and good use of the tongue. There is lots of eye contact too. Every blowjob ends with a cumshot in the mouth and the model playing with it for a few seconds before swallowing it.

The biggest negative for the site now is its small size. There are only nine scenes available now. The site is growing slowly with a new scene being added every week. To be fair to the site, they do compensate for the small size by offering a low membership fee of $16 USD. I like the site enough that Iíll just keep a recurring membership at that price.

Two subjective complaints I have about the scenes are that the models wear a short and sexy white smock that you might see in a place that gives blowjobs, but in most scenes we never really get to see the model without it. Yes, they will hike the short smock when on their knees, but with the stunning looks of the models here they really need to have the remove the smock for the latter part of the scene. The second subjective complaint is that unlike AA where the blowjob transitions to sex before going back to the blowjob for the finish, SS only has sex in one scene. That isn't too bad given the quality of the blowjobs, but personally Iíd like to see some sex too. With the model naked.

There is only one option for downloading each scene. The scenes are all MP4s with most of them at a relatively low resolution of 960x540. The bitrate is fairly high (pushing 7,000kb/s) though and the framerate is 29fps so those scenes still look very good. The most recent update was in 1920x1080 with the same bitrate and framerate so maybe all future scenes will be at that higher resolution.

I know many readers might question my score, but given the high quality of the scene offered here I think itís justified. The low price offsets the small size and I hope the site continues to grow. Iím usually willing to put my money where my mouth is and say that if I like a site Iíll add it to my list of sites I rejoin regularly, but Iíll go one step further here: I like this site (and the low fee) enough that Iíll just stay a member. If you like sensual blowjob sites with beautiful women this is definitely worth subscribing to.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Life Erotic

16. The Life Erotic (2)

Pay
Active
80
skippy (52) 07-02-15  01:22pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Generally high quality material
Beautiful, natural models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Very "artsy" site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good navigation
Cons: Very "artsy" site.
Very little eye contact with camera
Creative edge takes precedent over practicality
Landing page focus is on cross-selling live site
Entire site including all sets are very dark!
Many sets in black and white or oddly tinted
Many shorter sets
Many models only have a set or two
There are more tattoos here than other Met-art sites. (not always bad, but not good on otherwise beautiful models)
Seems like some is B-roll from other sites
Bottom Line: Stats (Deduced):
About 1500 photo sets
About 500 videos
About 320 models
1 new update a day
Some older sets are not exclusive
The site has been around since 2009 but some of the sets pre-date that.
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, some tattoos, etc.

This site is, to a large extent, sort of an evolution of the "girl in the woods" theme with the idea that you are observing a model in a more natural environment instead of a studio environment. Often the idea is that the model doesn't really know you are there or doesn't pay much attention to you, the viewer. About 50% of the sets are solo girl in a straight modeling scenario. Many of these sets are of very, very attractive girls that are just standing or in other conservative poses. Another 40% are female masturbation sets that range from boring to pretty interesting. And the remaining 10% are girl/girl scenes. I need to say that the majority of these are very conservative sets with few money or close-up shots. (There are some Oh My God models, but they are not necessarily doing OMG things....) There are notable exceptions, though. It depends on the model, I guess. There also is a wide mix of eye contact. Some sets have models that never make any eye contact with the camera at all. Earlier sets are better, but the quality of those sets is not as good. Oh, most of the sets start out with the model(s) clothed. I noticed some models remained clothed for 75% or more of some sets.

The first thing that strikes me about this site is how dark it is. Everything is dark. The site, the sets, the lighting, the videos, EVERYTHING! Older sets are a little better in this regard, but you will generally think there is something wrong with your display. Newer images are dark, contrasty, very shadowy. Distracting. Annoying. Generally awful. I batched a couple of sets through Photoshop and auto-adjust increased the brightness in most images by 50% or more. That is a heck of a lot and it is not accidental. They are deliberately turning down the brightness on these sets. You have to work to make images this dark. Really work.

The second thing I noticed was how hard the webmasters are trying to get you to go to the live site. When you get to the landing page, you don't see a single girl on the site you are paying for. instead you get a full page of images from the two live-cam sites that seem to be taking over the Met-Art network. You have to scroll down to see the contents of the site you already paid for. The webmasters are apparently experimenting with where best to put these live-cam ads as they can be found in different places on the various Met-Art sites. This is the most intrusive placement, right at the top of the main page and present on every page on the site. Stop it! Really. Just stop.

Another thing is the almost complete lack of playfulness, compassion or interaction with the viewer in many of the sets. Some of these models have all of the expressions of a check-out girl at K-Mart, meaning none. Even models that normally shine are somehow less expressive here. This is not in any way erotic as the name implies.

And the last thing to note is how inconsistent many of the sets are. More recent sets seem to follow that dark theme for the most part, but some sets are not like that at all. Some sets are very short, some are filled with close-ups, some are not. Some girls are almost entirely fully clothed for the whole set, some are not clothed at all. Some have eye-contact, many do not. You can tell if you are familiar with other Met-Art sets that some of these sets seem like they might have been B-roll or too weird to put on Met-Art. For example, there is an outdoor set of Lorena, beautiful Met-Art regular, where she is entirely covered in red mud in every single image. Really? Has to be a B-roll.

Navigation is generally good. There is an options section that allows you to set defaults for image size, number of thumbnails on a page, etc. like some other Met Art sites. The search function has user defined tags, which helps if you are looking for a particular trait that others are likely to define, like ginger or spread. But it could be better.

Bottom line? Good site to visit once, I guess. I personally don't like it anywhere near as much as other Met Art sites like Met-Art itself or Errotica Archives. You can actually see the weird evolution/devolution from a site similar to Met Art in the beginning to a site that now looks more like a bad graphic novel than a soft-core porn site. There is a decent amount of material here and some of it is pretty good, but be prepared to sift through a lot of dark, odd and often slightly off pictures to find things that really float your boat.

I wish I could be more enthusiastic, but this site just doesn't live up to Met-Art standards.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Bopping Babes

17. Bopping Babes (1)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (358) 06-28-15  10:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -New updates every other day.
-561 videos, about 7 minutes each. The site is decent size and actively growing.
-The 2015 videos have 5 download choices with the best quality being 4K.
-The biller is CCBill. Trusted and reliable.
-The models talk to you, but not while they are actually stripping.
-No download limits.
Cons: -The 4K videos did not play in Windows Media Player. They did play using VLC, but with severe stuttering.
-All videos have music that is either hip hop or techno crap. I found this distracting as well as too loud.
-All videos have the same sequence: blouse, skirt, bra, panties. Too formulaic.
-The photos are 1600x900 low quality screenshots. Only 103 photosets compared to over five times as many videos. I saw only landscapes and no portraits. Very uncreative.
-Far too many models are either fake blonds or have excessive tattoos.
-Zero ethnic variety, with only white British models. Other UK based websites include black or Indian models. None from any other European countries either.
Bottom Line: As I discovered ďBoppingĒ means dancing. This website specializes in videos of British women stripping while dancing. Most if not all are porn stars.

The models are all white, with no ethnic variety. On other UK based sites, I have seen black or Indian models and I would expect the same here. There arenít any from other European countries either.

Far too many of the models have tattoos, which is most definitely not to my taste. In some cases the tats are small and not distracting, but there are many that have so many that it is a major deal breaker. Not hot in my book. There are also a pretty fair number of fake blonds, also not my taste. When you factor in that there are other models that I simply donít find appealing, you start with 146 models and only about half interest me at all. There are 561 seven minute videos so that leaves about 250 to 300 or so that I like. That is a good number that includes some knockout models who know how to make stripping truly erotic.

The videos are very sharp, with the most recent coming in at 4K. Unfortunately, I could not get these 4K videos to play on Windows Media Player, but they did using VLC, but with stuttering. In all fairness, HD 1920x1080 works for me so I did not care much.

The photos are zip downloadable, but are only screenshots at 1900x600. Only landscapes and not worth saving.

The models strip out of costumes such as nurse, flight attendant, policewoman, construction worker, student, cheerleader, maid, or office worker. Some strip out of ordinary everyday clothes too. Only a very small number strip out of a bikini or other stereotypical stripper clothes. I liked the choices of costumes.

However, the sequence is always the same: Top or blouse, bottom or skirt, bra, panties. An occasional other sequence would have been hotter. There are very few videos that offer any teasing previews, such as showing panties while still wearing a skirt. Too formulaic and the videos could have easily been improved. Typical problem with porn as they get a great idea, in this case stripping, and then the creative process stops.

I like that the models talk to you and even give jerk off encouragement. Nice interaction wit the viewer. I love hearing them talk as you get a break from the music, which is mostly hip hop or techno crap and played too loud.

For me the bottom line here is that the videos that work are excellent, but could be a little more explicit. In spite of the many videos that do nothing for me, many are quite excellent. With updates every other day the site is growing and I would recommend joining in spite of some glaring weaknesses.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pure Mature

18. Pure Mature (1)

Pay
Active
79
Wittyguy (105) 06-25-15  05:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (57), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + About 215 scenes of exclusive milf / mature hardcore action featuring mostly attractive gals.
+ All scenes have vids and about 98% have pic sets with zips.
+ Multiple download options on vids and vid quality is good. All vids have at least one HD download option.
+ Good download speeds for me (about 3-4 MB/sec).
+ Decent price of $18 month through TBP.
+ Bills through Epoch.
+ The inbrowser video player works well.
+ Good production values across the board.
+ Model directory seems complete.
Cons: - Not really a picture site (see below).
- Downloaded files and vids poorly labelled (just numbers).
- Too much music in the earlier produced vids.
- No real search function or tags. No model information.
- Pretty much M/F hardcore, not much anal or 3 way and zero solo or lesbian if you're into that.
- A bit too "heartcore" for my tastes.
- Updates only once a week.
- As one sort of expects with the older actresses, there is a lot of silicone to look at.
Bottom Line: Wasn't really sure what I'd be getting here when I signed up other than a more mature line of starlets. Overall, it's pretty much a straight M/F hardcore site featuring pornstars in their late 20's to late 40's. The girls are mostly attractive pornstars (no BBW) and the production value is good to excellent across the board (no amateur feel to it). Here's the specs:

PICS: Like I said this isn't really a picture site. The pics dating from the beginning to late 2014 have portrait resolution of 1500x2700 but only have landscape resolution of 1500x840. What went wrong there? Others are a hodge podge of different sizes (a lot of 1000x1500 though). The most recent pics are all 1000x1500. The pics mostly look like HD screen grabs so there is some blurriness and cropping is questionable at times. A lot of scenes are shot in bright light or white backgrounds which causes some pixelation and washout. Most of my downloads were done in hopes that I could salvage some stuff that would look good on my monitor as opposed to looking forward to editing the sets later.

VIDS: Download speeds were good for me. With earlier vids you get options 1080 mpeg or wmv or 480. Starting in 2014 you also get 720 resolution options. This mostly a "heartcore" site which means lots of bright background lighting. The older vids show a bit of pixelation because of this but it improves over time. Also, through late 2013, the theme was "heartcore" (aka - porn for mimes) meaning that no one in the scene makes any real sex noises. Apparently the producers noticed that and thus incorporated random porn synthesizer music into various parts of the scenes to take it down another notch. The music goes away for the later vids (late 2013 onward) and the action gets more heated but there are no real story lines or conversation in the vids. The camera work is decent though and you do get some nonstandard views which is welcome.

NAV: As noted, it's pretty basic. You can only search according to model, date or ranking. If you are looking for something specific in a scene then you'll have wade through everything to find it because nothing is tagged.

MISC: There is a fair amount of POV style shooting here (run by remote or a cameraman, not the herky jerky hand held stuff done by the guy). The scene shifts in the vids can be a bit choppy at times too. Otherwise, the main theme is heartcore or heartcore with a slight edge. No real slapping or spitting here which is fine by me but it's almost too tame, especially if you've seen some of the actresses other work. As a comedian once said, "If the sex ain't dirty, you ain't doing it right."

If you're looking to add to your mature video collection it's worth taking a look at. Otherwise I'd say it's OK. If you're into pics then I'd say move along. Average is the site so average be my score.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Fidelity

19. Porn Fidelity (1)

Pay
Active
95
Pyrenees (24) 06-24-15  09:21pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are many pros.

1) The scenes are shot in such a high quality it is hard for me to compare it to anything else in the industry. Maybe a High Gonzo with passionate sex like you would see from sweet sinner. It is truly spectacular to watch one of their scenes.

2) There are a TON of scenes and you get access to two websites. For 2$ more you get access to a third long enough to download every scene. The first site is Artistic sex scenes, the second site features frisky teens and the third features husband and wife lovemaking with a well endowed lady.

3) There is a wide variety of fetish scenes and even some romantic scenes. There is a little bit for everyone. Including choking, deep throat, lactation, pregnancy, threesomes, bondage, spanking. But somehow they pull it off in a high handed manner that lets you know everyone is enjoying themselves.

4) The porn industry has given them several awards for their produced material (Like "Get my belt" series).
Cons: There are some very minor things.

1) Since the subject matter is broad you may not find every scene following the same formula you are interested in. I loved the flexibility of the women, the good doggy styles shots, the cream pies and how he likes to finish in missionary.

2) There are a lot of threesome videos if that is not your thing. I would say about 20%.

3) The older videos are not in 1080p but they still look nice if you consider how old they are. The Teens site has all 1080p.
Bottom Line: The bottom line is that Porn fidelity has been one of the best websites I have become a member of in years. I was blown away by the content, the directors touch and the scripting of the scenes. It feels like how Vivid should be in modern times to be honest. Simply amazing stuff. This site is amazing. Why are you not a member yet?
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Web Young

20. Web Young (0)

Pay
Newbie
76*
drbart (3) 06-20-15  02:05pm
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Hi Quality videos with very good cinematography. "Tasteful" girl girl sex scenes (in other words not the makeup smeared screaming freaky sex you see on julesjordan or evil angel) . Lots of the top talent here. Website is very polished though navigation could be better. Joined here for 9.95 as a fathers day special price which was not bad at all.
Cons: The usual upsell. Fameassist is the one that did the billing and not as good to manage as with ccbill or epoch. Videos here are polished but also a bit overdone with schmaltzy music, soft focus scenes much like penthouse from the 80s90s. One of the keys to erotica videos is letting the talent be the star. Just get out of their way and let us watch. No need for the overdone schmaltz. (though still better than sites with blurry scenes etc) . content is low here which is strange as I thought webyoung was site I joined back around 201 or so. Maybe its different or maybe cleared out the old stuff. In any case not alot here. I ran out of favs to download after a day. There were about 4 sites in my memberships but still not a lot. They should hook up with more sites.
Bottom Line: Nice for the niche market of girl girl sex scenes (clearly a need and demand for that!) . But the music and lighting got a little too sappy for me. Olus content is low so this would best work with network of sites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit JAV Model

21. JAV Model (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
drbart (3) 06-19-15  10:52am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: This is one of the few japanese adult video sites with at least some of the videos in hi def. If you like pretty asian women you wont be disapointed here. Some are truly stunning (Emiri Okazaki, Rina Rakuwa and of course Tina Yuzuki). There are lots of different themes and fetishes. Though they dont show genitalia, they can get into some really wild kinky acts here (sometimes a bit shocking for some). And the ladies work hard here performing numerous times in each feature. If you are into the asian ladies prepare to have about 70 gigabytes ready at least. If you are less choosy it could get close to a terrabyte in downloads here. I am a bit picky and it was still about 50gigs in a few weeks
Cons: Videos are very long (1 or 2 hours) and no choices I saw for just getting the sections of each. No photosets. Videos are the same as available on other JAV sites and as such the style of filmaking is ok. Lots of build up to sex with fellatio being the main thing. Models often only take off some of their clothes. If you are looking to admire their beautiful form it doesnt happen that often. Navigation is ok but its hard to find out if a favorite model has new videos.
Bottom Line: top shelf JAV site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Watch 4 Beauty

22. Watch 4 Beauty (2)

Pay
Newbie
90*
drbart (3) 06-19-15  10:06am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some extremely beautiful models (eg: Sapphira), Hi Def images, great photography, locations (lots of outdoor shoots).
Also currently joined via Epoch which is easy to cancel and manage membership.
This is mostly solo nude modeling but they do spice it up with some wild ideas (peeing, toys etc.) so its not like met art where the sets get repetitive. The videos are very nice quality plus they are not superlong ones that are mostly filler. Not short either but not so long that most of what you download is filler.
Their forums are managed well and you will get responses on requests or comments.
Cons: Updates about every other day which would be ok but they dont seem to have too many models. Most are very good looking but not a lot of variety.
limited video download size and formats.
Bottom Line: For nude modeling site still one of the best. All you have to do is compare Sapphiras images here with hers on playboy (or for that matter on met art)and there is no comparison.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Cum Perfection

23. Cum Perfection (1)

Pay
Active
95
bkreidercrhl (7) 06-17-15  07:56pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful women get cum blasted and high definition photography examining each wad and drip. Almost all of the women are facially beautiful and glammed with lip stick, eye makeup, commonly extended lashes, earrings, ponytailed, garters, stocking and heals. The guys commonly spew close up right below the lady's nostril, all too often the nostril becomes the destination of the blast, the majority of the spew is through her eyes and into their hair. I am surprised that the girls consistently handle nostril shots and bubbles. The extended eye lashes although unnatural make for exciting photography when caked in goo. Close up video of the girls face, hair and tits with dripping goo is amongst the best facial porn on the market.
Cons: The sister site included is called "Cum for Chloe". Chloe is a blonde cutie with a great attitude for taking facial cum. Unfortunately the male paring does not work. This dude pops pitiful loads that do not do her justice.

Ironically blow bangs are not at the same standards as the one or two on one. The guys uncork frequently marginal loads and even when someone unleashes a gem, the closeup video does not compare with the rest of the site.

Condom swallows do not push my button.
Bottom Line: A small site that is growing featuring beautiful women getting their faces creamed. The close up video surveying each wad on their face, hair and tits is amongst the finest in facial cum porn.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Driver XXX

24. Driver XXX (1)

Pay
Active
80
rearadmiral (376) 06-08-15  01:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Nubiles.net group
- A-list models
- Many download options
- Supports download managers
- Rare niche
Cons: - Small site
- Updates irregularly
Bottom Line: Iím a big fan of car-themed porn so when I saw this site listed at TBP I signed up. I didnít realize that it was bundled with Nubiles.net at the time I subscribed but that worked out well because this site is quite small so having access to Nubiles made the membership worth it.

The main theme of the site turned out to be a little different than I had expected. I like watching road-head scenes and I expected that here but didnít get that. While most of the scenes take place in cars they mostly occur in the back seat when the car is parked. Some of the scenes have the model outside leaning up against the car.

The site is quite small and wouldnít be a good value if it wasnít bundled with a bigger site. There are currently only 11 videos available. To make things worse, the last update was three weeks ago. It appears that it is in an update cycle that feeds into Nubiles-Porn, the Nubiles site where they separate out all of their hardcore scenes for those of us who prefer those.

While the site is currently quite small it is fair to say that the porn on offer is very high quality. The models are the biggest A-list girls working Ė but itís important to note that since this site is affiliated with Nubiles that you can only expect models who fit into that category. The models are all young (18-20) and petite.

As with other Nubiles sites, there are many download options. There are five MP4 choices (1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360, 480x270) and a lone WMV offering at 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4s and they look great. If you normally download the highest resolution available you may want to check the 1280x720 first because they look really good.

Pictures are also available and aren't just an afterthought. The photos can be downloaded as singles or as zips. There are three resolutions available for the zips: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800

Apart from the small size and irregular updates there aren't any serious problems with the site. One minor quibble I have with a couple of the scenes is that they end to reveal that the girl has been tricked and used for sex. I find that adds nothing to the scene. It reminds me of early Captain Stabbin videos where the scene closed with the girl going for a swim, being tossed a life ring and then the boat sailing away. Only two of the scenes here use that closing and I hope that future scenes avoid it.

Iíd recommend the site but suggest that if youíre interested in a membership you consider that what youíre buying is access to the Nubiles.net network and youíll also happen to get access to this site with a fairly rare niche.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jock Foot Fantasy

25. Jock Foot Fantasy (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
jusblkdk (0) 06-02-15  12:50pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: GREAT CONTENT
Cons: VERY SMALL PICTURE GALLERY. PICTURES ARE VERY SMALL. POOR VIDEO QUALITY. VIDEOS STILL IN 4:3. YOU CANNOT FULLSCREEN VIDEOS FROM THE WEBPAGE. VIDEOS ARE IN SEGMENTS. BEFORE DOWNLOADING ALL THE SEGMENTS TO ONE VIDEO, YOU ARE BLOCKED BY A "BANDWIDTH CONTROLLER". THEN YOU CANNOT ACCESS YOUR ACCOUNT. WASTE OF MONEY. ADMINISTRATOR FROM THE "CONTACT" DOES NOT REPLY BACK TO EMAILS.
Bottom Line: The website needs a major layout update. The videos are low quality and are chopped up in segments. After figuring out how to make the video play in the browser without downloading, the video is very small and you cannot make the video full screen. Videos are broken into 5-15 segments of 3 min video. After like 7 downloads you are blocked from the website. The administrator says the "bandwidth control" locks you out. So you get banned from your own account that you paid money for. After being blocked, the site is useless. Im still blocked, and the aministrator is NOT answering emails. So you basically just giving money away. I DON'T RECOMMEND THIS SITE TO ANYONE. Unless you have money to just give away. Today is only my 2nd day of the membership and i have no access. when i login, its says its invalid.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 6435 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Babes Network.com (6)
2. 21Sextury.com (6)
3. 18X Girls (4)
4. DDF Network (4)
5. Bangbros Network (4)
6. Twistys (4)
7. Blacked.com (3)
8. Wow Girls (3)
9. Team Skeet (3)
10. X-Art (3)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.73 seconds.