Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Decent amount of content
Cons:
Where do I start
- Videos crash VLC 50% of the time
- Broken links to WMV videos
- Poor video quality
- Model information almost always limited to one model per video
- Videos that are dreadfully edited (download a 1.1 GB file for the thrill of 5 minutes of sex at the end!)
- Lots of missing screen caps
- Everything is designed to be difficult for anyone with a fast internet connection
- Download speeds acceptable if it doesn't decide to limit you to 3 videos downloading at a time
Bottom Line:
Canceled my membership within 1 day. Downloaded 15 gigs of files and have 3.5 left after eliminating the unwatcheable ones (and that number will shrink, just too fed up to wade through them)
Honestly, just an awful experience...sites like Videobox have issues (new site design is horrible) but at least I never felt ripped off.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Entrypoint to 4 sites, content from one studio so treat as 1 site. Click on thebestporn.com link, girls in the banner/logo are two prettiest girls on site. You might think they're not pretty. That wont matter. After 3 seconds girls faces are no longer inframe. If camera goes for wide shots you wont be looking at their faces. Girls do not need expressions, your eyes will be elsewhere.
Under Welcome message an exact description of what you get, read it, you'll know to decide to join.
Downloads are quick. Didn't use downloader but if you do you'll get the whole site in a few hours.
Girls are not slapped up with makeup like Porn Stars. They actually look innocent. The positions are incredible. I love the fact, take a Gymnast and make her wear PornStar Heels. So corrupt. Second biggest turn on for me.
First is the only thing seperating you from Heaven is a stretched piece of lycra with the gusset under strain and you can see every crease underneath. If only for HD-DVD.
Cons:
Too Expensive, should be $19.99. For $39.99 you need HD, and buy some new leotoards for the girls. I think the leotards are shared.
Sasha's squint is annoying & sexy, a bit Rabbit caught in the headlights, but whose car?
Don't bother with archive site. Archive Photos struggle to fill a cell/mobile screen.
There are only a few Hi(ish)-Res videos, 100MB+. I seem to remember finding 3 over 150MB. Most 10-16Mb chunk files, approx 6-12 each set. Indicates most of content is old. Photosets not high-res. at most 1024px.
Repeating theme is boring. Like watching adverts on TV, Sitting there waiting for the main feature and eventually you realise there isn't one. Mind you it took me 8 days to work it out. I only went back once a week to pick up infrequent updates until my membership expired.
Loads of Girls but some mingers. Navigation basic but works.
Studio environment. You feel like its shot in someones house. Unfortunately it's not my neighbours otherwise I'd become a window cleaner.
Bottom Line:
I couldn't work out was in most shoots they pose next to a camera tripod. Weird, what are they saying, Hey! we have two cameras?
If you like girls who suspend their bodies between two wooden chairs aka Golden Gate Bridge, you'll like this site. Where's the toll gate please.
How did that come about anyway, the chairs? Limited props? They look like old school chairs. creepy.
A few Girls look innocent. Having said that there are some shots where you can tell either the photographers jaw is on the floor, he's drooling or he's got a boner because the girl looks off camera and smiles. They know you're undressing them where the sun shines.
There is something very erotic about these girls. The problem is there's something missing. The poses are too posed, you feel like you're watching girls turn themselves into Rubik's Cubes...they never get to show us who they are. It is almost like they aren't there either.
I've got it. This is how women feel like when they go to the gynaecologists. It's like, please warm that up while I look over here because you look creepy drooling all over my 2nd hand leotard with your camera.
If you got these girls into a studio like inthecrack.com, gave them Estee Lauder makeup, not Avon, film them in HD DVD, I'd pay $39.99. (need to do nude though). Sad thing, none of them will get to the Olympics so this is it for them in Mother Russia / Eastern Block
Don't pay this much. Hate to say it. It's my money and I don't like being ripped off.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-Scenes include some top notch pornstars
Cons:
-Not the promised amount of updates.
-Site keeps logging you out.
-Updates not ready on time.
-Poor support team.
-Some files in standard wmv are still around 1GB downloads.
-Slow site to navigate.
Bottom Line:
The site advertises 3 updates every day, but in reality you get 1 per day(on weekdays only). The support team ignored my questions asking about this. You constantly get logged out and have to re-enter your login details. Site navigation is at a snails pace. Often the wmv file or the pic set is missing from the daily update. Even looking at the scene comments on the site showed lot of members complaints.
This new site has been rushed out without sorting the problems out. This review may seem very negative, but if you joined the site yourself you would realise why. I strongly advise against anyone joining this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DVD quality videos
-Hot content
-NO DRM! All downloadable!
-Great picture sets.
-Story based scenes, sometimes ongoing stories
-Cool settings: Major area of improvement. Sets are diverse and look real.
-Great bargain! $24.95 for this collection of sites is really worth it.
-Great customer service! You can share youre ideas with the staff, which they take very seriously.
-Weekly updates to most sites
-Great girls. Lots of different talent and usually pretty fucking hot.
-FAST DOWNLOADS! (For most people)
Cons:
-Story lines sometimes feel rehashed and some are just boring.
-Pretty bad acting. Some of it has to do with script, some are just bad actors.
-Some girls dont seem into it or just faking it. Again, bad acting.
-Not enough diversity. Black girls are VERY few and far between. The Asian site they had is no longer updated. Nice choice of latina girls, but not much more than that.
-While settings are improved, they could be better and more diverse.
-While the videos are nice, sometimes the colors are too strong and the video seems too produced.
-I THINK there is a daily download limit? There was about 6 months ago when I was last a member, but not sure about not. Not a huge deal, but still annoying.
-They sometimes close down sites without letting you know. They replace them with newer sites, but it gets annoying.
Bottom Line:
Ive been a member of NA, off and on for the last 4 years now, and it keeps getting bigger and better. Alot of the complaints I had were pretty petty, but still worth mentioning. Other than VideoBox, this is the BEST source for quality porn on the internet. The content is excellent, its updated weekly, customer service is very helpful and listens to customer feedback. They are neck and neck with Brazzers, and are getting better.
I hope this review helps. If you enjoy quality porn and hot women, and have an extra $25 to blow, this is a very safe bet.
And if you dont like it, customer service will give you a FULL REFUND!!! But I promise you, you wont want a refund!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- There is a cross-sell on the sign up page but it isn’t pre-checked
- Bills through CCBill
- Great chance to see some new models
- Many familiar porn models appear
- Many download options for newer videos
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- No zips on pics
- Pics relatively low resolution
- No search function
- No specific tags
Bottom Line:
I have to confess that I never expected to be writing a review of a site featuring models with tattoos and piercings, Goth models, punk models and others along that theme. I’m as anti-tattoo as the next guy, except that it turns out I’m not. I’m still anti-tattoo and piercing unless the model goes all the way.
The biggest surprise for me was how conventional the porn here actually is. I don’t know what I was expecting, but whatever it was I was wrong. This is a typical porn network that just happens to showcase models with a look that is slightly out of mainstream.
The main page is laid out as you’d expect with any network: there are tabs for going to pictures, videos, the individual sites, or sorting by model. One choice conspicuous by its absence is a search function. If it exists on the network I haven’t found it yet. (This lack of search is further worsened by the lack of scene tags. Tags exist, but are too broad to be of a lot of use in specific searches.)
The network is made up of eight individual sites. (Cum on My Tattoo, Fuck me in the Bathroom, Heavy Metal Pussy Party, Joanna Angel, POV Punx, Punk Porn, Punk Schoolgirls and Big Boobs are Cool – I’ll post some stats as a comment on each site’s PU page.) While several of the sites have a reason for being stand-alone, several others could just as easily be grouped together. This is neither positive or negative, it’s just a fact.
Each site is laid out in the same way: the site opens into a page where there are thumbnails for 20 scenes per page. Under each thumbnail is some basic information about the scene, including a scene name, the genre (girl/boy, solo, etc.), the running length, user ratings and the female star.
When you select a scene you get a larger thumbnail and four small thumbnails to give you some idea of what’s in store. Each scene has multiple options for downloads. You can download a trailer, the full scene or the full scene broken down into parts. I have to question the value of offering the scene in parts in 2012, but maybe there are still people with slow internet connections. For each of those options there are usually some choices for file type and resolution. MPEGs are offered (in resolutions up to 1400x800 – 5000kb/s and 24fps – depending on the upload date, of course), as are WMVs in high and low resolutions and a mobile version. These options decrease as you get into older files. Prior to 2010 MPEGs weren’t offered but Quicktime files were. The oldest scenes on the network, which date back to 2007, are often only available in one resolution and only in WMV. The resolution on the oldest scenes is low at 480x360, 1800kb/s and 30fps.
This is being a bit picky, but the way the download options are laid out with the trailer as the first option made it too easy to select that instead of the full scene. It didn’t happen to me, but it required that I pay more attention than I’d normally do when just downloading porn. Even having a trailer as a download option seems odd to me, but at least they could put it lower in the option list.
The site supports download managers and I had no problem with the links timing out.
The network bills through CCBill so you have confidence in that. There is a cross-sell, but it isn’t pre-checked.
If the site has a major flaw it is how they provide pictures. I don’t normally download photos but in this case I was looking forward to doing so. I had flagged several models that I really liked that are rare on more mainstream sites and wanted photos too. I was disappointed to see that zips aren’t available and that even if they were, the resolution isn’t great. The newest photos are 1080x720. I know that isn’t bad, but they could be better. Older photos are obviously a lower resolution. I gave up on getting photos since having to save each one individually seems like too much work for porn. The lack of zips really needs to be addressed.
I know this is highly subjective, but I found most of the models on the site to be very attractive. I do question why some models appear on the site though. Katie St. Ives has a few scenes here and I’d not normally think of her when I think tattoos, piercings, Goth or punk. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll take any of Katie’s scenes when I can get them, but it just doesn’t seem to be a good fit.
Dracken posted a comment back in ’09 that the network appeared to be a ‘community’ site for people who like the Goth / Punk / etc. look and lifestyle. That is true. There are blogs and forums for the look, the music and the life. I’m only interested in the naked chicks so I really can’t comment on the non-porn parts of the network.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent network. It is well laid out, easy to use and offers some great porn. If you’re like me and want to push your porn boundaries a bit then I’d highly recommend starting with Burning Angel. The models are beautiful and the scenes are hot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Incredible amount of movies
* Good variety of content
* Easy to navigate the sites
* Choice of downloading movies in full/split files
Cons:
* Some sites not updated for a long time
* Download limit 3Gb pr day (and they then cut of all access to the sites for 48 hrs)
* No support. Don't expect replies
* They will not give you your money back, even if it is advertised on the sign up page *EDIT: I STAND CORRECTED - LOOK IN FIRST REPLY TO REVIEW TO FIND OUT HOW TO PROCEED SHOULD YOU WANT TO DO THIS*
Bottom Line:
Fantastic looking sites, very good content and amazing amount of download content.
I really wanted to give this site a higher score, but when they have a 3Gb download limit pr day, and if you go over you can't even visit the sites, it gets hard. To enforce a download limit THAT low gets ridiculus when alot of the internet users to day have a capacity to download a lot more pr 24 hrs.
Breaking point for joining site or not:
Are you going to download a lot of movies/ have a high speed internet access? I am sorry to say that it is not worth the money.
Low speed internet/ only interested in certain scenes/ certain chicks? It is worth it
*Edited to take down the score - Reason: I have only been able to access sites 1 off every 3 days. They keep blocking you for 48 hrs if you download more than 3Gb. And there is NO response from support.*
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Exclusive, creative content - Interesting scenarios, funny dialogue, with descent attempts at acting, and interesting camera work and lighting
* 12 exclusive content sites plus 3 bonus DVD content sites - 563 scenes of exclusive content, 23 scenes of bonus DVD content
* Daily updates – 1 or 2 scenes a day
* Matching photo sets for all content (586 sets) – well lit, in focus and thorough
* Newest photos are 2000x3000 and all photos are available in Zip files
* Network wide keyword searching and network inclusive and site specific model lists and updates lists
* Updates lists are sortable by date, views, votes, and staff picks while model lists are sortable by name or votes
* Customizable "My Picks" favorites section
* No DRM
* Fast Download Speeds (1 MB/s)
* Streaming Flash for every scene (in clips only) and screenshots for every scene
* Single file and split file downloads for each scene in WMV or MPEG
Cons:
* 512x288 (WMV, +1100kbps) is less than DVD quality
* Many photos are 600x900 or even 533x800
* Troublesome with Download Managers, sometimes download links do not engage properly on first request causing your manager to download the PHP page instead
* Advertisements are EVERYWHERE
* Scrolling SexInYourCity.com Advertisement is ubiquitous and unbelievably annoying
* Update schedule is network wide; your favorite site can wait two weeks before updating
* Lower, right-hand corner, non-translucent watermark on videos and photos
Bottom Line:
Honestly, this network should get very high marks as it manages to provide interesting, humorous and original content while using many professional porn stars we all know well. The video is well lit and well shot – they play around with different video styles, imitating amateur video in some sites or music videos and so on – though their preferred style is mostly the standard gonzo documentary style. However, they actually do spend quite a bit of time dedicated to chatting with their performers. A number of their sites actually require acting from their stars – this either works or fails miserably, but either way it remains funny.
The keyword search engine is respectable and easy to use. The updates and model lists are sortable and available both as site specific or network wide. So finding the content is not difficult and though at 500+, making your way through all the scenes would take some time. Deciding if something is worth downloading is easy with both screenshots and streaming Flash at your disposal. Photos can be downloaded in zips and video scenes can be downloaded as one file - no DRM, no download restrictions, and fast downloads (1 MB/s). Unfortunately, this PHP based website isn't exactly Download Manager friendly – you can queue up downloads, but sometimes a download won't engage properly at first and instead you'll just download a useless PHP page. This means time consuming baby sitting of the downloads.
Unfortunately the negatives don't stop there. The videos are all the same size, 512x288, that is less than DVD quality and that is simply too small in this age of HD. If you watch it at that resolution, it is crisp, well lit and well filmed, but as you enlarge it, things get fuzzy. This is a huge problem for what is primarily a video site. The newest photos are huge and great, but you'll find the oldest photos are similarly too small. The second big negative is the ridiculous saturation of advertising. They have every advertisement short of Google Ad Words - many of the ads flash or scroll or act annoyingly in some other fashion. Finding ads presented to me within a site I pay to access is an immeasurable outrage. I seriously am astonished that a network with this much polish still has ads as back-up funding.
If Porn Pros re-encodes their videos to bring themselves into the DVD age (let alone the Blu-ray age) and sends those ads back to the abyss, I recon they'll be one of the finest networks out there. Their content is fun and entertaining, their site is easy to use and they don't even forget us photo lovers. I want to put their score in the 90's – but right now I just can't.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
¨ Multiple Sexual Hardcore Fantasies,700 + scenes
¨ Hot Websites - My Wife/Sister's/Hot Guy/Others
¨ Multiple Download Formats, True HD (1080/720p)
¨ Multiple Updates every week, Latest M/F Models
¨ Live Cams, On Demand Sex Chat,Interactive Option
¨ Teen Models (Victoria/Angelica/Lizz/Erica Hot
¨ Added Sexy Naughty Massage with hot rubdown/sex
¨ Pop Up Ads for Sites - Tonight's GF/Neighbor Sex
¨ Excellent Photosets, Zip Downloads,Best Quality
¨ Excellent Annual Discount Membership~$7/Monthly
Cons:
¨ Login Problems & frequent disconnection issues
¨ D/L Managers (DAP) have disconnection problems
¨ Trends show busty moms/MILF's dominate scenes
¨ Naughty Bookworms/Athletics/MNHLM Update monthly
¨ Photosets run into 20+ pages with 15 snaps/page!
¨ Lots of Fake/Big/Massive Tits & Huge Ass scenes!
¨ Many MILF/Older models typecast with impunity
¨ Negligible Asians ; Ebony/Latina Minimal listing
¨ Scene suggestions/forums hardly acknowledge/act
¨ Male models are very ordinary & often typecast
Bottom Line:
NA is a great site for pron fantasies,no doubt about it because you would never get stories like My Sister's Best Friend or My Wife's Hot Friend as your first teen fantasy anywhere else from a not so teen site but there it is. Almost everyone in porn knows NA like the back of his hand. There's a lot of good content out there in the videos & all of them have a great storyline. The recent My Naughty Massage promises to be a great site hopefully. A great thing here is that you can choose your best fantasy which is a unique & truly amazing concept which may help you find it or recommend something on similar lines anyway! Wives,daughers,sisters,BF's,BFF's,Moms anything that's an animate sexual object is fair game or so they say!
However,the way things go these days,it would seem
that the NA of old would look much better.This is a pure American theme which is why excellent quality Asian/Ebony/Latina girls wouldn't feature much as compared to their Caucasian counterparts! This is a major letdown & seems discriminatory at best. Some other technical issues plague the site as file sizes of 1Gb & above necessitate a D/L Manager like DAP/Flashget which don't run well at all here with intermittent output! Other things like massive photo numbers have to be addressed!
Still,NA should go back to school & focus more on youth, nubile girls & middle aged women.Too much emphasis is being given to the Matures/MILF's & Cougars which isn't great sexual instincts for a high quality site like this. Another thing is even
in these scenes the male models are repeating be it Johnny Castle,Johnny Cage,Danny Wylde etc Rarely do you see a Levi Cash/Xander Corvus/ Marco Banderas/Ryan/Anthony Rosanao who are the newer & latest male pornstars
All in all, this site is well worth the money & it will reward you well because of multiple site updates in a week. In a month, you could well have content to keep you occupied for weeks on end
Be it photo sets or video downloads, NA has in it something to thrill the senses of every age group
assuming that's their intention.Those with a special interest in good hardcore may or may not come up trumps because iconic episodes aren't the
flavor here. Sometimes scenes thrill & at other times they spill but that's about it for NA & its Sister Sites. Should you be keen on great porn go for it!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Supports download managers.
-Newest videos are 720x480, 2750kbps.
-No DRM or download restrictions.
-Easy navigation and search from the network site.
-Very big, you can even call it huge. I didn't see any numbers about exactly how much.
Cons:
-Many videos are clips only, with no whole movie downloads. No streaming option. Newest videos do have whole video downloads.
-States that all material is exclusive. See my review of the silverstonedvd.com site which has many of the same videos. I would love to hear an explanation.
-Updates are not dated. When looking at a site, you don't know how often you will get new material. The network has a listing of upcoming updates though. Most upcoming updates go to pornstarnetwork, another name for the brainpass network, not any individual site within the network.
-States voted best adult network. Takes the comment "Definitely one of my favorite networks out there for the exclusive content and great-looking sites" from Spencers review, then states the score was 10/10. Spencer gave it a 90.0. I didn't see any review by TBP that was 10/10.
I would really love to hear an explanation.
Bottom Line:
I see a lot of high scoring reviews, but my feelings about the network are more like Denner's than any other reviewer. There are a lot of sites, but many could easily be combined as they are about the same topic. Take silverstonevideo. The latest updates are on another site iwantlatina. There are several sites that are basically dead and have not updated in years. My impression of the videos is that although they have some interesting niches, such as tiny asses, you feel that you have seen all of this before. On the network a LOT of the material, maybe half overall, is not even from this decade. The navigation is simple and I really like the network's ability to search. However, within each site you cannot; there isn't even a list of the models. While many of the models are attractive, they are not so outstanding as to be a significant plus because many other video sites do as well or better. Overall this network is about quantity, not creativity. I didn't feel any of the individual sites was all that outstanding. I would even go further and say that many were below the levels of their competitions' comparable sites. While many videos had very good quality, I saw no HD or DVD level material on even the newest updates. The best you get is 720x480 2750 kbps. Nice, but not cutting edge. By the way, a nice plus is that the network does have lots of updates daily. Today there are 6 videos. On the other hand I saw not even one site that had outstanding quality photos-just screencaps. If you are a fan of Peter North, who has been around for years, or of Lexington Steele, who has also been around for years, you will like what they have here. However, does Lexington need 7 sites? Does North need 2? Do you need 7 sites for facial cumshots? My overall impression is that the network needs some new more creative concepts for their sites and better quality videos and photos. A real makeover could make this site much better. Overall I would rate this as an ok network, but not a strongly recommended one.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Girls seem to be mostly genuine amateurs.
Girls are naturally pretty, shapely and with a refreshing lack of tattoos and fake breasts.
No regional price discrimination.
Good download facilites. No DRM or download
restrictions and downloads are quick.
Good quality on the latest videos of 1280x720
Genuine unusual niche network. A bit different to
the usual cookie cutter sites.
No irritating cameraman or obnoxious male who gets
in the way and is disrespectful to the girls. The
girls are the main focus.
Streaming is available and there is a choice of part or full downloads.
Cons:
Very poor for photo fans.
Vid caps are not downloadable. There are some photo files that are faulty and will not download. For hardcore photo fans most of the sites only have softcore photos. There are only a few hardcore photos on the entire network.
Camerawork and lighting is poor in places.
There is too much POV for my taste. In amateur videos if you like to watch the look on the model's face as she has sex on camera for the first or one of the first tines you will be disappointed when all you see is a close up of the two groins, badly lit and out of focus. This is a shame because one moment you get to see the whole girl having sex and the next you get a dark, blurred POV of two groins.
Quite a few of the sites are small and/or dead.
Not many updates even on the more recent sites.
Some material poor quality, especially older stuff.
Minor niggles are the ads at the bottom of the page in the members area, and also the layout, navigation, and model search aren't that brilliant.
Bottom Line:
This is an unusual site for those who say they are jaded about porn, and is something a bit different. The sites either feature Torbe like Torbe In Russia or Torbe Cz, or for instance Josito's Will, where a guy in a wheelchair has sex with beautiful girls. Torbe Couples features amateur couples having sex. Some sites are a bonus but the emphasis is on genuine amateur girls, and niche sites.
Videos come in Quick Time, Ipod, MPEG, and the top rate is WMV at 1280x270.
When my membership ended a couple of weeks ago they advertised 620 total scenes, 250 models, 15,000 minutes, and 900,000 mb.
The sites featuring Torbe have their own idiosyncracies. There is usually a short interview involving Torbe talking to the model. With Priest Damian this is simply changed to an acting bit where Torbe as Priest Damian talks to the girl. After a few minute there is the strip followed by a few minutes of oral then down to sex about 7 to 15 minutes in. The clips are generally about 20-30 minutes. The camera work is unusual. Sometimes it is stationary at the back of the room and you get to see the whole model having sex from almost a voyeur's point of view. I like that. There are not too many quick movements or flashy camerawork. What I hate are the POV sequences. It is the POV close ups where the picture is quite often dark, blurred, out of focus, or jumping around without any purpose. That is annoying. With amateur girls it is often good to look at the whole girl and the look on their faces when they first start to have sex on camera for the first, or one of the first times.
With the poor POV camera view you just see two groins coming together. Not erotic. The lighting is sometimes a problem in the whole of some of the videos too.
Maybe surprisingly Torbe doesn't get in the way too much or become irritating. Yes he sometimes dresses up with silly false teeth and tries to look as ugly as possible, but he doesn't seem the
slightest bit threatening. He comes across more like Benny Hill than Max Hardcore Once the short introduction is over, and the action starts the
main focus is on the girls rather than Torbe.
Some of the sites are dead or have very few updates and are quite small. Here are some examples of the sites.
Doctor Schmutz 26 episodes between 5th sept 2008 to 12 december 2008. Street Bribes 37 episodes between 23 March 2009 to present. Torbe Cz 21 episodes between 15 january 2009 to present. Josito's Will 10 episodes between 12 December 2008 to 14 May 2009. Torbe In Argentina 19 episodes between 19 December 2008 to 20 July 2009.
Possibly the biggest disappointment for me was the lack of picture facilities. Quite a few of the zips did not download properly or not at all. The vidcaps are just one screen of many stills taken from the video but cannot be downloaded. There are very few hardcore pictures.
It's a real curate's egg of a site, but certainly worth checking out, because it is very rare to see so many amateurs with an amateur look having sex.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Big network with sites that cater to most main stream niches.
Daily updates to varying sites. Update calendar is provided.
Excellent video quality even in the lower resolutions. Introduction of 1080p HD downloadable videos a week ago.
Excellent download speed. A huge plus with the new large HD files.
Videos with a lead-in rather than just action from the very beginning.
The price is right.
Cons:
Files could be smaller? An average 1080p video can be 2-4 GB.
No "official" provision for downloading 1024 x 576px, 3036 total bitrate material offered in streaming as HD. The choice is between the smaller non-HD file and the really big (1080p) one.
Intolerance of criticism. One of the recent updates had been offered before under the same name, same model .. same everything and two comments critical of this practice were removed by RK moderators twice.
Bottom Line:
There have been many excellent reviews going into the technical details of this site so I thought I'd offer my personal experiences with this site rather than all the details. For details re. picture quality and resolution, for instance, please consult reviews below.
I find this network rather refreshing and on top of my list because the video quality is excellent. A small tip (and I think it must be okay with the site or they wouldn't allow it): if you really wish to download the streaming intermediary, 1024 x 576, 3036 total bitrate size (marked HD) files this can be done through an add on to Firefox called "Flash and Video Download" or possibly through your RealPlayer movies downloader.
I just wish they would make it easier on us by adding it to the downloadable material listed to the right of the videos. I also find the smaller mpeg (mp4) files generally crisper than wmv. So if you have a slow download speed you will nevertheless find the smallest sized video quite acceptable if you pick mp4. Quality is certainly better than that found on most DVD sites.
I also like the fact that natural breasts beat enhanceds hands down. Exotics4me lists them as 85% natural and 15% enhanced. So far I have found nothing to contradict his estimate.
I love the fact that every video starts with a lead-in, sometimes it's the "hunt" for a model, sometimes there's a bit of a story but it is a refreshing change from Gonzo.
All in all an excellent site that would have rated 90+ with me if it hadn't been for the fact that the site moderator twice removed my comment referring to the fact that one of the updates was a "re-run!"
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Well its a fairly huge site with what appears to be updating daily with 2 updates so theres plenty of bang for your buck here.
Great price has to be mentioned and competes well with similar styled sites on the price front. The variety of sites will keep you busy for a good long while.
Pure 18 is a great site though and I was a member years ago here and it's good to see it's improoved, theres now stories build up to the movies which I really liked and yeah the acting isn't the greatest but they do try and its quite creative.
I wasn't a big fan of lots of the material though, this is a personal thing, I for one don't like women with huge tattoos and fake boobs. I also am not a huge fan of huge butts and big boobs curvy mamas either so my tastes are catered for with the lesbian site We Live Together, there are some gems in there if I ignored the tattoed women on some vids.
In the VIP sites too, just don't get those vids, 20 girls dancing and then 2 some of 3 somes in the end, seems dissapointing, I'd love to see them all get completly named and orgy it up, don't know if that ever happened I never watched them all, my guessing it never does. But yeah I found this to much teasing with clothes on and flashing a bit here and there, no really too exciting in my eyes so I moved on quick from this site.
File sizes too are too big for me. Explained below
Navigation isn't the best and model index is in alphebetic first letter only so all names beginning with S are jumbled in S category and hard to search.
Bottom Line:
Its a good site and for some they would find it well above average for me I liked some stuff from the Euro Sex Parties of my fav euro stars and the reason I joined really, maybe would of liked to of seen more from some of them but there is a couple of excellent Sasha Rose flicks in there.
Mikes Apartment too I really like and another reason for joining, especially for Dominika, blimey o'Reilly she is hot, would loved to of seen more of her.
Also I did like some we live together girls too but nothing to write home about.
Lots of the sites don't interest me much but overall I do not regret the join and as I say some people will love this site, great range and if you like American girls mixed in with some cute European hotties then you might adore what the Reality Kings do here.
One thing I'd change though is up the resoluion on the medium quality vids, the highest is too large for me at in excess of 2.5gigs but some of the next ones down are too low at 400mb. Some of the 2005 stuff too is in 3 or more parts so they were not greatest of quality.
Too many tats as mentioned and you gotta lot of those type of girlies here, that said its hard to choose none tattoo girls only in America as it sems 90% of porn actresses seem to have them.
There must be tattoo parlours making some good trade over there in America.
I gave it a above average score here mainly cause it's got variety and lots of people's tastes will be catered for.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Good selection of videos with a wide range of niches to suit every desire.
Good quality format (on newer videos)
Easy site navigation.
User Forum.
Price.
Cons:
Customer care is sh#t.
Old videos terrible quality.
'Brazzers vault' videos seem to take a day to download because it's soo slow (why???).
Constant spam in my email box.
Bottom Line:
The videos are good (even though they seem to use uk porn star keiran lee in nearly all the shoots, maybe they have shares in him?!). The site is easy to access. Plenty of choice for every taste (bar extreme fetish). Unfortunately no matter how good the site is the people behind it are crooks. Bad news is the customer care is REALLY SH#T. The payment processor manstermed.com give away your card details to its affiliates who then take money from you from sites you've never heard of. Complete thieves. Join using a credit card if you must. Oh and have a good spam filter on your supplied email because you WILL recieve lots long after you've left them. Its on this basis that i can only award it 50 out of 100. Shame.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Recent 1080P videos are EXCELLENT Quality
+ Photo sets with 99% of scenes
+ Great value yearly membership
+ Zipped photo sets
+ Multiple video quality download options
+ Mostly very good download speeds
+ Download manager compatible
+ Clean easy to use interface with filter and search options
+ Great looking models
+ High production values
+ 29 sites included in membership (Not all updating)
+ Approx 4000 scenes, all scenes from last 2 years available in Full HD, 12 mbit 1080P.
+ No regional pricing
+ Monthly live shows
Cons:
- 1080P only available for elite members
- Not much variety in content
- First years worth of 1080P content is badly BROKEN
- Download speeds not consistent
Bottom Line:
Before reading the rest of the review, answer me these questions three:
Hate fake boobs?
Hate overuse of makeup?
Hate over-produced commercial porn?
Deduct 50 from the score, move along nothing here to see.
Still reading? OK, good you will very much like this network.
After my extremely positive first look (See my comment), some cracks are starting to show. The download speeds, while generally excellent, are very erratic. As I write, I have 2 files downloading which are struggling to go above total 500 Kbps. A few days ago using the same connection, downloading 2 files from the same site I was getting total speeds of 10,000 Kbps. The speeds have been bad for the last 24 hours, looking at their forums this is a recurring problem that rears its ugly head every couple of weeks.
My second big issue is with the 1080P videos. It seems they screwed up big time with the encoding profile. What this means is that for all 1080P videos on the site from early 2009 to mid 2010 (That's a LOT of videos) you cannot play them at all in Windows Media Player and in MPC-HC you cannot seek (jump to different parts of the video). Playing them in VLC seems to work OK but the problem for me is that I watch all my grot on my big living room TV. Attached to this TV is a ultra low power HTPC, which thanks to DXVA, can normally play high bitrate 1080P videos without a problem. VLC does not support DXVA and without it my PC is not powerful enough to play them. I could fix the files but as a purist I like my videos as downloaded from the site, pure and unsullied.
Those are really my only issues with the network. The download speeds I am willing to forgive as long as it doesn't get worse. The broken videos are what knocked a good 15 points of the score, turning it from a truly excellent site to merely a great one.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They update with over a dozen new scenes per week.
+They hire some of the top US performers.
+They now add one live Brazzer shoot every month and you can even purchase live shoots from their other sites like Twisty's, wicked and Mofos.
+You can download the videos in WMV, MPG4, ipod, HD720 and HD1080.
+You can download the photosets as a complete zip file and resolution varies based on the year of release. The ones from 2009 to now are 1600x2500.
+They shoot scenario style porn.
+They show upcoming updates.
+They have a jump to action option on their streaming system where you simply click on the fetish and the viedo will star from there.
+You can use a download manager.
+Download speeds are amazing. I can normally download a medium quality video in less than 2 minutes.
Cons:
-The same performers tend to have multiple scenes on the site and many of them are similar in nature.
-A large percentage of their performers have tattoos and/or implants.
-They often use the same male performers so if you aren't a fan then you won't enjoy many of the videos.
-Their search system could use the option of searching for both the performer's name and a particular fetish. This is more important with performers with multiple scenes since you might have to search over a dozen of different videos to find the one you want.
-They don't hire that many ethnic performers but I don't think it's a question of choice as much as availability.
Bottom Line:
This is my favorite site of all time. I wrote a couple of cons but I can't say that they bother me all that much. I wish they would hire less performers with implants and/or tattoos but so many girls have them these days that the pool of all natural performer is getting smaller all the time.
*It's true that many girls have multiple scenes and that they do pretty much the same thing in many of them but that isn't always a bad thing and the number of girls with multiple scenes isn't as large as those with only a few. I guess I must love this site since this is the only one who's membership I have kept for over a year and I don't plan on cancelling it any time soon. The fact that I only pay 10$ a month for it is a part of why.
*I don't know if I can really add anything that other reviews haven't already said so all I'll do is say that if you want to see porn starring most US performers than this is one of the best site for it. If you want to see many US MILF's do porn than this is the site you want. If you want to see US perfromers do anal then again this is one of the best site for it.
*If you prefer to see European performers or you enjoy interracial porn then don't join this site because there is simply not enough content to satisfy your needs.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice discount through TBP.
-Huge network of sites with a similar theme.
-No download restrictions. A nice plus considering the sheer quantity that is available.
-Nice photosets with three choices of photo quality, including ultra large.
-Some HD quality videos, but not enough.
-Mostly very attractive models. However, about one third were not. Seem to be classy women that you might see or even know. I didn't see a single boob job.
-Very active member forum that takes requests from members.
Cons:
-Glamour type photography. Often the women have too much makeup and seem very stiff. They don't often seem into what they are doing.
-Most videos are not at all erotic. Not much in the way of sensuous movements. Rubbing an arm or a leg is not teasing.
-Many videos and photo sets don't even get to topless.
Bottom Line:
The site sells itself as 100% erotic, 100% tease and 100% exclusive. They also say they are about the erotic, not the extreme. In order to be erotic without being explicit, they need to appeal to the members ability to be mentally stimulated. Without explicit photos and videos, the models themselves have to be special in a way that other sites don't often attempt.
Since this is so unusual in pornland, comparisons are difficult, if not impossible. The question to be answered is, do they succeed? Is their goal of being erotic successful?
I was a member of onlytease.com in 2006. I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of heat I saw. However times change and so have my tastes in porn. Since I love nice legs and pantyhose, I felt that maybe I should give the network a try at the newly discounted price.
I found quite quickly that the network is a LOT larger than what I had subscribed to in 2006. The quality of both the videos and the photos has greatly improved. Navigation is easy, but the search function is still inadequate.
Did they reach their goal of being erotic? Yes and no. Yes some of what you see is truly great and I love it a lot. However, the site promises a lot more than it delivers. I thought the tease referred only to the content, but the site itself could be a lot better.
Regarding the outfits, the models all too often wear pants or use opaque pantyhose. I like dresses showcasing great legs that look like legs, in other words sheer pantyhose. I don't much care for cheerleaders or bunnies either.
Overall, problem number one is that nearly all the videos simply do nothing for me. In all fairness photo sites usually have poor videos. What I feel the problem here is that the models don't have much of a feel for teasing. For the most part, European models get into this type of photo and video modeling without first doing any stripping or other live shows. They may be quite beautiful, but don't master the art of sensuous movements. For example, I see a lot of scenes with hands rubbing arms or legs, but very little in the way of quick flashes. I rarely see a glimpse of panties that seems to be an accident or are intended to build up my interest. The strip sequences are usually quite dull and often end without being even topless. A lot of sizzle, but very little steak. There is an active thread in the forum about whether models who will not even do topless should be on the site.
In my opinion,the site is very much hit and miss. You would have to go through a lot of photo sets and videos to find the true gems. If you have the time and energy, you may fall in love with the site. As for me, I am happy to find a few truly enjoyable downloads, but the site is just too much work.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very good Videosclips for Reality Freaks!
Many Sites, many exclusive Clips, all in HD or Mpeg.
Superspeed Download with 16 Mbit/s!!!
I have 30 GB downloaded at the first day :-)
Site is Downloadmanager compatibel.
Girls looking very good.
Very easy Navigate on the Site. Clips can download in one file with one Click.
Cons:
Beware of Cross-Selling!
Look what you click on it!!!!
Bottom Line:
I love this Site because I love reality Videos.
The Girls are the best of the Internet.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-New network by Reality Kings. Interface, site design is very similar.
-Currently, 7 sites. Around 120 scenes. Last addition: Naked Movie.
-Did not notice any download limit (got 50 full scenes in 3 days).
-Preview options: trailer and full-episode flash streaming.
-Nice flash streaming option (not available at Reality Kings).
-Content: "sex life" (Molly's Life, Kristin's Life, My Sexy Life), Vignettes (Cum Fu, Footville, It's Real), movie parodies (Naked Movie).
-Video options: full movie (720x480 1400kbps), split in 4 parts and MP4/iPod format (not for Cum Fu).
-Videos are 40 minutes long on average (Naked Movie and "sex life" can go over 60, vignettes around 30).
-Images are 900x600. Zip files. Around 400 pictures per set.
-Good network navigation plus breadcrumbs within updates.
-Users may tag scenes and photos with keywords (keyword set is limited).
-5 updates per week (It's Real updates monthly, rest were updating weekly).
-Full trial when joining Reality Kings.
Cons:
-Requires a separate membership from Reality Kings.
-New network. Still few updates and sites.
-Metadata isn't always accurate: missing descriptions, repeated or missing performer names.
-Performers cannot be listed alphabetically, only by release date.
-Flash player could be even better: hard to manage the thumbnail scrolling; became unresponsive some times.
-Ads on every page: integrated into site (only image, but marked as advertisement).
-Half of the sites have nothing but screen captures for pictures.
-I had the feeling downloads were slow. I'm downloading much faster from Reality Kings. Trial related?
-Got a great price deal but had to go through an unknown payment processor.
Bottom Line:
On a technology level, the main difference between Muffia and Reality Kings is the addition of a Flash player for all scenes. I didn't start with Reality Kings until my Muffia membership expired and I just can't stand that buggy WMV streaming anymore. I got used to the full scene streaming they offer here and it was perfect to easily find the scenes that were worth downloading. Hope they get the streaming there soon. I didn't come across any 15 full episode download limit like they have at Reality Kings but I downloaded only slightly more per day and I did notice things were coming down slower. Just a feeling, though.
Does this network offer something original? Molly's Life is a spin-off of We Live Together (Molly still appears there every couple weeks) and Kristin's Life is a spin-off from Milf Next Door (Kristen Cameron has 86 scenes there). Didn't check both sites thoroughly but it doesn't look much different from what is already available at Reality Kings. My Sexy Life follows Phoenix Marie around while she has sex with many well known US porn stars. I'd certainly recommend this network to fans of any of these women: you get one new scene of them every week and you'd probably care very little about talking cameramen/camerawomen, abuse of POV and endless introductions as long as your favorite star is there. The remaining sites are very niche sites: "Asian" models in various vignette scenes (Cum Fu), a foot fetish site with euro models (Footville), prosthetics (It's Real) and movie spoofs (Naked Movie).
I don't get this new trend among porn networks of releasing a separate second network that requires an additional membership. I'm sure they know what they are doing but it looks weird. Funny thing is Reality Kings has also released new sites within their original network since they launched Muffia (CFNM Secret or Hot Bush, I believe). I got a really cheap 3-day trial when joining Reality Kings for the first time; otherwise, I'd never have joined this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is going to be a long review, but this site deserves it.
The Good:
1) The main Ferro Network site is massive, I mean stunningly massive. Fifty-four main sites and four bonus sites. Even if you aren't into a lot of the kinks they offer, you'll still be pressed to get through all the ones you are into!
2) Picture quality is outstanding. A lot of care went into resolution, camera position and final selection of photos that actually make it onto the site. The picture size is large but not those massive, bloated monsters that are a bit slower to download.
3) Movie quality is also excellent in hi-res. After downloading a movie, then opening it, I could enlarge it to full-screen on my 18" screen and not loose any resolution quality.A lot of care went onto filming as well insofar as set decoration.
4) LOTS of other good aspects, but I'm limited in character count here!
Cons:
The Bad:
1) Navigation stinks. No way to search by model, date of update, etc.
2) My biggest beef is thumbnail size for both pictures and movies. I actually downloaded one of the thumbnails and opened it in Photoshop to get an exact height and width: 47x70 respectively. Absolutely horrible. I do not know why Ferro Network makes the thumbs so small, but its annoying as hell.
3) Once you join Ferro Network with your username/password, you have to sign into each and every site in their network one at a time. Very frustrating and time consuming.
4) You have to download and install a small driver in order to watch the movie after download. Its annoying, but everything works fine once installed.
5) The four 'bonus sites' are total crap. Low res movies and pictures not worth even signing it to see. One of the bonus sites wouldn't even load.
Bottom Line:
Even with the cons, its hard to beat this network of sites. Yes, it costs $85, but the amount of content you have access to is astounding. Tens of thousands of movies and videos in high quality, high res format is pretty sweet.
The models are fresh and clean without belly button rings and giant fake tits, fake hair, fake fingernails, facelifts, asslifts and all that other bullshit that seems to reign here in the American porn market.
The models also seem to genuinely enjoy their work, which is also refreshing.
The average quality porn site costs about $30 a month, but for $85 you can join over fifty quality sites. Its well worth the investment. So nix the Starbucks Cappuccino for a couple weeks and you've saved enough money!
One tip to enjoying the Ferro Network: Once you join, go ahead and join all the sites you know you will be interested in right off the bat. Let IE or Firefox store the saved user/pass and THEN go back and explore the sites at your leisure. This will save you a lot of trouble later when you've got lube in your left hand! :-)
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-- Best erotic photography I have come across so far. Clearly professional-level photography. Perfect lighting. Non-forumlatic and dynamic poses.
-- Classy and conservative style erotica. No extreme stuff, bizarre angles, or depictions of rough sex/choking the models etc.
-- Layout and menus are up their with the best.
-- Photo galleries are put together niceley. No repetitve content in each gallery.
-- Plenty of HD content for those into videos.
Cons:
-- I really struggle to find negatives beyond the nit-picking variety. I guess the only thing I could offer in terms of tangibles is the price. Obviously, the premium price for the network is higher than others.
Bottom Line:
My score is somewhat biased as I am a photography buff and my review is based on what the site means to me. buff so I appreciate the professional work at this site. There is a tremndous amount of high-quality photo content at this site. The galleries are well laid out and the models are all beautiful.
The details in the high-resolution photos are quite stunning. In many cases, you can count peach fuzz hairs.
Clearly, this is not the typical site that offers a large amount of photos where the majority of them are simply repetitions of the same pose as the model stands in front of a muslin and the camera and lighting is set on rapid fire.
Most every gallery I have browsed so far demonstrates impecible lighting and technical expertise. The artists clearly put a lot of thought into the work. There is photoshopping evident, but it is not overdone to the point that the colors are over-saturated and the images look unreal or the models plastic. IMO,
DDF is one of those sites that qualifies as art as well as it does porn.
The models themselves range from petite to busty, depending on what site you view. I have only browsed a few videos. However, the presentations should appeal to most of those itnerested in videos. There are quite a few HD selections to choose from.
The models appear quite engaged most of the time and do not look like they are just standing around bored while scratching their butt.
The site does demand a premium price. But considering the amount of content and the number of sites offered in the network, I find it palitable. For me, it is worth the admission price.
If you are a photography fan, I would not hesitate to reccomend it. It is a must see. If you are into videos, you will likely find the content appealing as well. But for me, the site shines in the photo department.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Huge amount of content. Lots of sites with hundreds of scenes
-Very high quality of videos as of late. The older ones are decent but the new ones are so good, I actually think 1080p is a good download choice
-Cheap, especially after the initial two months. I can see myself staying as a member for a while.
-Lots of beautiful European models. That's what I like.
-Frequent updates (around 20 a week) and a calendar showing the future schedule.
-Focus on hardcore and B/G material is strong.
-Zoliboy.com. I had no idea what that was before joining but it turned out to be great fun. Lot's of crazy stuff there.
-21Sextury also has couple of decent quality fetish sites. Dominated Girls, Enslaved Gals and Mighty Mistress are no kink.com but quite nice anyway.
Cons:
This is mostly nitpicking but here goes:
-Streaming is quite useless, no skipping and many older scenes have no streams.
-Pictures are way too small. It's especially glaring when coming from DDF Prod.
-A bit too fancy site design. Scripting and such take control from browser navigation and clicking back often takes you somewhere else you thought it would.
-Loyalty program. Why not just let us pay for first three months immediately. 3-4 of my "really want" sites ended up delayed for me and I had no idea what I was getting when I subscribed
-Download issues. This one is nasty. Downloads often hang when they reach 99% resulting in a wmv that cannot be skipped or fast forwarded. Tried on two different PC's, both on IE and Firefox. No issues with other sites.
Bottom Line:
With 9.95$ you can just about buy a decent pint up here. I lose count of my pints every month so the price from the third month on is insignificant.
That money gives me 40 sites from the 3rd month on, some great (Club Sandy, Aletta Ocean Empire, Asshole Fever, Anal Teen Angels, DP Fanatics, Zoliboy.com), some not that great and some not even updating. There are also some sites with totally same theme. And yet there is more than enough great material for anyone with some kind of normal life.
With some sites you can quickly get a good overall feel, what is available and browse through it. That is not the case with 21Sextury. There's almost 10.000 scenes available at the moment.
This would be close to 100 rating for me if I had instant access to the sites I had wanted. Also downloading issue really bothers me. When getting 2-3 GB files, reloading takes time. They state that they have put some mechanisms (timeouts, delays?) in place to prevent DL manager abuse. I wonder if that might affect regular downloading too as I've never experienced the issue on other sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-29-1104:18pm (Update History) Reason: Speed is generally much better than first experienced. And the longer I am with this site the more I discover its depth and how much I like it!
Pros:
+ 7250 DVDs, 62000 Videos (Scenes).
+ 1080p HD Videos (251 at present).
+ 59 Extra Sites.
+ Good Navigation.
+ Speed is good for me most of the time but tends to fluctuate.
+ Zipped Picture sets.
Cons:
- Very unfriendly when it comes to my Firefox DTA, speed tends to be blazing at around 4MB/s but will shut down every 20 seconds or so and report a server error until I click on resume.
This forces me to stay with the download all the way. Downloads are fine with the ordinary Browser Downloader. At first I experienced much slower speeds but this must have been a fluke because now they do approach my maximum speed.
- Many videos are only available in avi, or mpg format but wmv is also available, except for the HD content which is in mp4.
- Talking about HD, I think most people would not even be aware that there is such a thing. I stumbled across them by hitting the "advanced search" link and seeing 1080p HD listed right beside the small window listing "videos" on the new page.
- Had to sign back into the site twice in the space of an hour.
Bottom Line:
I like this site. It has plenty of good stuff, some of it previously unseen by me and that's unusual for what is primarily a DVD (Video) site. Especially a site so closely related to Videosz.
HD videos are of nice quality!
Their ordinary videos are not bad but could stand an upgrade. By comparison to other DVD sites and this, strangely enough, includes Videosz, they don't appear to be quite as sharp and clear.
But I am only a couple of days into my subscription so maybe I have just looked at the wrong videos so far.
It requires a bit of time to get used to the basic lay-out of the site but what's wrong with clicking a few buttons to see what's behind them.
Picture sets are generally small and taken from the beginning of a video shoot. They are, however downloadable in High Resolution at 1600x1200p size. In other words better than the general vidcaps.
All in all a good subscription at a fair price through TBP. Recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Epoch is the billing company.
-Get a confirming email on signup.
-Currently a discounted price of $17.87/month.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I average 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Videos have date they were posted to the site.
-Nice selection of attractive teen models.
Cons:
-Most of the cons are basically minor.
-Thumbnails of other sites that are being advertised are present on the members pages.
-Need to un-check the pre-checked offer at signup.
-Large watermark bottom right side of videos.
-Most of the videos at the Rub A Teen site were previously posted at Tricky Masseur(TeenMegaWorld network). But Rub A Teen offers those videos in a higher definition.
The Team Skeet network focuses on teen hardcore videos. The video quality is high grade. The videos are mainly professionally shot. Good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc.
You get a choice of several definitions for both streaming and downloading.
For streaming, you can choose low, medium or high definition.
For download, you can choose 1080p, 720p, or lower definitions. They also offer a file for iPods.
You also get photosets of many of the videos. The photos are good quality. Below what you will find at major photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. But better than screen caps.
Minor nitpick: The site Innocent High features models that are supposed to be in high school. But because of the models' ages, it would be better to name them College Pros. None of the models I saw showed any innocence or hesitation about fucking and sucking their brains out.
The network has over 1,000 videos. The average runtime is between 20-30 minutes. Many of the models are real teens. Some models appear to be in their early twenties. There are a large number of very attractive young girls. So for a reduced price of $17.87/month with the PU/TBP discount, you gain access to a large number of hardcore teen videos that are professionally shot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Pros
Large number of videos
Multiple sites included in a single membership (list below in comments)
Regular updates (on some of the included sites - others are stale)
Recent videos are HD
Search by
category ( I counted 136 categories to choose from )
included site
model
Cons:
Cons
Some of included sites have not updated for a couple years
Download choices are not clear about size of video - what do the following really mean:
Low Quality H.264
Medium Quality WMV
Medium Quality H.264
High Quality WMV
Ultra High Quality WMV
Ultra High Quality H.264
The older - no longer updated sites - have very low quality video
There are also “bonus” sites, which appear to be even older and not updated.
Was it just me, and my tastes in porn, or did I just get bored with this site (network of sites) very fast. The older guys in the Grandpas Fuck Teens, really were old turn offs for me. (of course if I ever had a video of my own - I am sure I would be even worse than any of them were - so who am I to complain)
I have long had an interest in pee fetish, and was very hopeful about the Zoliboy site. There are some interesting videos there, and I did like some of them very much, but there were also too many videos of old guys pissing on younger women, which just didn’t quite work out for me. 3 guys standing on a platform showering a girl below in pee, just isn’t what I wanted. But I do understand that pee videos are a small niche, and everyone has their own preferences. You might really like this.
It took me a while to figure out that when one selects to view a video, there are a number of short clips from each video presented, as well as the entire video as a single clip.
Net result of being a member for the past three weeks is that I realized that this site is just not what I wanted. I can’t exactly describe what it is about it that does not match my thoughts, but something which I had hoped for, something nebulous, just wasn’t there, so I have canceled my membership.
The fetishes were maybe a little to “strong” for me. The “use” of women, for example in the Teach me fisting site just wasn’t for me.
If you like this site great! I just felt uncomfortable with it. I have tried to be objective - in that the site does what it says - and if you like what this site offers, then it is well built and works fine - it just didn’t work for me.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Top notch content
-Hottest women in the industry
-Nice variety of girls TO AN EXTENT (See cons)
-Good lighting and camera work for the most part
-Great download speeds
-HD videos and standard both look really good
-Nice location variance
-13 Updates a week
-HUGE collection
-Staff very receptive to suggestions
-Fully Downloadable content
-No daily download limit (at least I dont think)
Cons:
-HD videos arent as good as other sites, but not bad
-While they offer a better variety of hot girls than Brazzers and BangBros, they still dont seem to use enough ethic girls. Mainly all white chicks
-Site ideas are basically all the same, but not a big deal.
-SOMETIMES scenes randomly disappear, but its pretty rare
-Older videos, aside for some remastered scenes, look pretty rough by todays standard.
-May be too soft for some
Bottom Line:
Overall, in my opinion, NA is the best of the big 4 networks (NA, Brazzers, BangBros and RK) at this point in time (March 2012). Obviously, opinions vary, but I love what they are doing right now. I am not into the super hardcore stuff, so this stuff is right up my alley. A few years ago I was really on the fence about them and thought they were heading downhill, but they really upped the production value and dont hire uggos or grandmothers anymore. All the girls they hire are either very in demand or hot up and cummers.
I seen the previous review before this one, and I have to comment on it briefly. Yes, this site wont appeal much to those who are into the super hardcore stuff, but IMO, its silly to judge a site for something it doesnt try to be. NA is like the Playboy of hardcore porn. Its fairly straight forward and regular, but thats what it sets out to be. The preview area of the site doesnt suggest in anyway that its anything other than that, so I cant see how people can complain that its not hard enough. Thats like walking into Kentucky Fried Chicken and getting pissed because they wont serve you a hamburger.
NA is great for what it is. If you are into harder stuff, there are many other sites that will appeal to your tastes better. But it does annoy me when people complain about a site not doing something it never claims it does. It would be one thing if they promised "extreme hardcore porn", but they dont.
Beyond that, the only real complaints I have is that it doesnt offer more ethnic women. No, they dont promise that either, but when it comes to girls, its a bit different. Even their Latin site hardly gets updated anymore.
Bottom line: If you are into basic, straight forward hardcore porn that isnt over the top, but offers high quality content regularly and consistent updates, this site is absolutely for you. But if you love the real raunchy hardcore (regular DPs, gaping, etc...), do not join...and if you do, well, go order a hamburger at KFC.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
