Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 5588 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Desperate Pleasures

1. Desperate Pleasures (1)

Pay
Active
87
rearadmiral (384) 08-29-15  04:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Unique site
- Large site (600+ videos)
- Broad range of fetishes
- Good mix of model types
- Supports download managers
- Bills through CC Bill
- Some A-list models
- Good mix of body types and ages, amateur and pro
Cons: - Outdated website
- No download options
Bottom Line: I wasnít aware that this site and studio existed and only discovered it when looking for some older man / younger girl porn. This site offers a lot of that but since it was marketed as a fetish site it also offers a lot of other stuff too.

The site claims that its origins come out of the 2008 recession when the site owner turned to porn to make a living. The interesting part of that decision is that if the owner is the guy who is in most of the videos, heís the last person youíd expect to be in porn videos. Heís a typical middle-aged guy with a bit of a belly and an average dick. And he might be the luckiest man alive.

For a fetish site it has a broad range of niches that it caters to. In the early days (around 2012) the scenes were frequently bondage with tickling. This isn't a hardcore BDSM site as with Kink or sites like that; itís much tamer and more playful. As the site progressed there are videos uploaded with footjobs. There are a few biting videos and a few balloon videos (I didnít know those were porn things). The more recent scenes seem to have more young girl / old guy (with the guy being the site owner, presumably). Many of these push the limits by having an incest theme but unlike the major studios that do these scenes with a stepfather/step-daughter, this site goes right for the daddy/daughter thing. To make this even creepier, many of these scenes are what Iíd guess youíd call the impregnation niche. Throughout the site youíll also find regular updates with MILFs and lesbians. Sex with pregnant models is also fairly common.

The site has a good mix of known pornstars and lesser knowns (to me, at least). Some of the models may be fetish models and some of them may be genuine amateurs. With a broad range of models you also have a broad range of looks and body types so there is likely something here for everyone.

Both the scenes and the site have a very amateur feel to them. The site is about as simple as youíd expect from a Ďstudioí that appears to be run by a couple of people who run the whole operation. Remember what sites looked like in the 1990s? Thatís what this site looks like. Navigation is simple as it is all laid out on 28 pages of videos. Each scene has a medium-sized thumbnail which plays a gif so you can get a sense of what the scene offers. There is a search function but I didnít find it to be accurate.

The camerawork and editing aren't up to major studio standards, but that really isn't a pro or a con, it just is. I like the amateur feel that the camerawork brings to the scenes and it isn't bad enough that it detracts from the scene or distracts the viewer unless youíre really fussy.

The site doesnít offer any download options. You get what they offer. All of the videos are in WMV format and all of them are in 1280x720 resolution. The big variable is that the older scenes have bitrates of 1500kb/s while the newer scenes have bitrates of up to 6000kb/s. They all have a framerate of 29fps. Obviously the newer scenes look better.

The site has approximately 600+ videos. It does update but the updates aren't dated (the older ones are) so I canít really say for sure what the update schedule is. The most recent update saw six new videos added at once and it looks like they do a bulk upload approximately once a week.

The site does offer photos but only as a standalone set. The video shoots usually donít have a photo option and the photo sets donít usually offer video. The site is much more heavily skewed to video so if youíre a photo collector you may want to think carefully before joining. The photos are 1200x800 so certainly not high resolution.

The bottom line? Thatís sort of hard to say. Arguing against a recommendation is the fact that the site is pretty amateurish and the video quality isn't up to standard. On the pro side, however, this is some good porn in some unusual niches. I joined to get access to the older guy/younger girl scenes and these are really well done. Iím not into tickling so I canít really comment on those but I have no reason to think that a person with a tickling fetish wouldnít like the site as much as I do. So with the caveat that you need to know what youíre getting Iíd say this is a definite recommendation if any of the fetishes are to your liking. If youíre into couples oriented artcore then you likely wonít be happy here. But if you like your dirty movies with an extra dose of dirty, you should check this site out. This site is definitely on my list to rejoin regularly.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Anal Euro

2. Anal Euro (1)

Pay
Active
95
mbaya (364) 08-27-15  06:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Bill through Epoch
-Full access one day trial is only $1
-HD quality videos are 1280x720, about a half hour long
-Photo sets are zip downloadable
-Very attractive models
Cons: -Only 18 videos. Preview page shows 32
-Anal is not the focus, but is in every scene
-Only one download option for videos, two for photos.
-Photos are screenshots
-Photos are 1050 x590 low quality
-Photos are only landscapes with no portraits
Bottom Line: This review is of the one day trial for only $1. At that price this website is a steal. In stark contrast, I would not recommend joining at the full price of $24.87. As it is a standalone site with no network access, I would never pay that much for so few videos.

The videos are made by the same people as Team Skeet, yet it is not part of that network. The quality is very nice at 1280x720, but there are no other download options. I would hope for 1920x1080 or even 4K.

The photo sets are mere screenshots and seem to be an afterthought. At 1050x590, the quality is not there and they did not think that a few portrait photos would have been a plus.

The models are uniformly attractive and are late teens to early twenties in appearance. The site does not list or tell their ages nor does it tell you where they are from. They appear to be Eastern European, maybe Russian. There is zero dialog in any of the scenes. There is no way to do any searching.

I suspect that the site is stripped down from what you would get at the full join price. I found only 18 videos, but the preview page shows 32, as well as additional download options. The May 13th review by ďThe PaysitesĒ mentions 35 videos. The preview page mentions that discounts were available for other sites, but I did not see any.

It mentions that there are weekly updates, but the ones that I saw were undated.

For $1 you get 18 well done videos of very attractive young ladies doing anal. There were no circus tricks and nothing extreme or rough. I would not have minded if they had scenes like this, but yet this site was well worth the join price. For $1 I can overlook some minor criticisms.

Since there was no download limit, I got all the videos in less than the one day access that I paid for.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Piss Domination

3. Piss Domination (1)

Pay
Active
90
LPee23 (24) 08-23-15  12:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Finally a site dedicated exclusively to POV femdom piss videos!
-brand new site
-weekly updates
-videos in 1080P
-many well known pornstars and dominatrixes
-scenes are consistently great
-zips for photo downloads
Cons: -new site so only 38 videos so far
-"photos" are really screenshots
-occasional slips with the camera work
Bottom Line: I was actually thinking how great it would be to have a site dedicated to POV femdom piss videos and now here it is! This is an excellent site with so much potential!

The clips are generally 5-15 minutes long, and they all follow a similar format. The camera is placed beneath a commode, looking up through the seat. The model opens the lid and spends the majority of the clip talking to the camera, then finishes it off with a pee at the end. These clips are as much about the verbal domination as they are about the actual piss.

Examples of scenarios they play out include the model using you the sub as her toilet, getting caught spying in the bathroom, and being punished by having to drink the model's piss. It's really interesting to see how the different models and dominatrixes play out these scenes. Some like Delilah, who is a career dominatrix, lay on the verbal abuse in such a spectacularly devious way that it is mind blowing. Her scenes with other dominatrixes such as the super-hot Mistress Tangent have a lot of spontaneity. Maybe the scenes on the site are loosely scripted, who knows, but these girls clearly make the scenes their own, improvise, and really let their personality come across.

The porn models vary more in the way they approach these clips, and that is cool to see. Some of them lay on the verbal abuse just as thick as the dominatrixes. Many go a bit lighter as they play out the scenarios, some tend to be more degrading, while others tend to be more seductive. Arianna stands alone at the opposite end of the spectrum from the dominatrixes, and her clips are incredible! She is all smiles and she seems to have a soft spot for the viewer. In one clip she can't help but slip her subtly trembling fingers inside her piss covered pussy to take pleasure in what she had just done. She says, "I hope you enjoyed that as much as I did."

Anyway, like I said before, seeing these girls pee is amazing, but the best part is seeing their personalities and the way they feel about pissing come out as they talk to the camera.

Despite this being a new site with a long way to go to build an extensive content library, I was generous with my score. This type of site so badly needed to be made, I am glad someone finally did it!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Fucking Machines

4. Fucking Machines (1)

Pay
Active
95
mbaya (364) 08-23-15  09:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Top notch models. Many are well known porn stars. Some others are doing their very first porn scene here.
-HD 1280x720 quality videos for an incredible past eight years worth of updates.
- 1029 videos and a photo set for each one.
-Nice mix of ages and ethnicities.
-Excellent camerawork
-Easy cancellation through the website.
Cons: -Photo sets are not zip downloadable.
-Photos donít capture the action well.
-Photos from the most recent update are only 1200x800
-No 4K quality video downloads
Bottom Line: This is a website from Kink.com, which puts out some of the highest quality porn. The video quality, attractiveness of the female models and camerawork are consistently top notch.

This site is one that I have never joined before, although I have been a member of most of their other ones.

I was not sure if I would enjoy videos of solo action, as that really does not appeal to me. My major complaint about other solo action sites is that the models are acting and do masturbation by the numbers. This type of scene would be totally too fake for my taste.

In contrast, this site is real, and I mean VERY real and there is no acting. The models cannot fake what goes on here. Porn stars are generally very jaded from doing so many scenes and not much gets them off. This site does that and more and in spades. Even the most skeptical viewers will find the videos focus on genuinely getting the models off.

They end up drenched in perspiration from the intensity of the action and are literally shaking. Most times they have multiple orgasms. Believe it or not, one scene is advertised as having 57! It is true as I counted them. No acting even in that scene and definitely no attempt at faking it.

What exactly do you get here? The videos show a kind of machine similar to a power drill, but with various sized dildos mounted on them. Sometimes they use two or three of them at a time. One scene even has four. There are several different machines and various sizes of dildos, ranging from normal size to huge. There is mostly vaginal penetration, but some scenes are anal only and many are of double penetration. There is even a scene or two with penetration vaginally, anally and one going in and out of her mouth.

Often niche sites tend to be formulaic and that can be a turn off here too. However, there are scenes that involve light bondage and feature more than one model. A few scenes were shot in Japan and have a different feel to them. Most of the models are familiar porn stars, but some are newbies who have never done porn before. There is a nice mix of ethnicities and ages. The site does not get stale as much as you might think.

The site started in 2000 and updates every seven days, so there is plenty to see here. I counted a massive total of 1029 videos. The oldest are of lesser quality as you would have expected, but are still watchable. The photo sets are not zip downloadable and not very interesting, as they do not capture the action well. Oh well, no site is perfect.

I was pleasantly surprised that I really enjoyed the action here.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Passion HD

5. Passion HD (1)

Pay
Active
70
Pyrenees (26) 08-18-15  08:20pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are some pros for this site.

1) 124,000 + HD photos usually 200+ per scene
2) The photos can be downloaded all at once in a zip
3) 302 + scenes
4) Updates multiple times a week
5) Some of the greatest talent in the industry
6) Each scene has a nice trailer and screen caps
7) Multiple site discount savings of over 50% this is a great deal if you want all their material.
Cons: This site has some cons.

1) Can be hard to log in the first time.
2) Only 31.4% of the scenes are in 1080p MP4 HD. Those scenes are up to 2 GB in size but average 1.20 GB.
3) Does not take advantage of Talent
4) Some scenes have washed out look
5) Massage scenes and bondage scenes are very brief on the massage and bondage.
6) Only 4% of the scenes have anal.
7) About 20% of the scenes are threesomes with only a couple of DP's (Featuring Holly Michaels).
8) I hope you like Holly Micheals she is in 46 scenes or over 15% of the site.
9) A lot of the material here is from the site PornPros only it is not in nearly as good of HD. You may consider just going to PornPros.
Bottom Line: So this site (And its entire network) have been on my radar for a long time. I know what your thinking but you like brutal sex. Well I enjoy Heart core as well =). I was excited to join but had log in problems as soon as I attempted to log in. Then I was blocked for multiple log in attempts. I had to contact support but in fairness they responded very fast fixing the issue.

I am one of those people who like to download for my own collection. I was very excited because of the level of talent on this site. I was instantly disappointed in Passion HD. Even their most recent scenes are only 1.4 GB large in 1080p MP4 HD. This is a far cry from the quality I am used to. The greatest sin of this site is BOTH Sensi Pearl scenes (The MAIN reason I joined) are only in 480p MP4. This is one of the biggest let downs I have ever experienced. Combined her solo scenes are 450 MB ... I am horrified.

I mentioned earlier they have some of the best Heart core talent ever assembled. This includes August Ames, Riley Reid, Sensi Pearl, Alexis Adams just to name a few. But the problem is they do not direct them properly to show off their talents. There are scenes with super flexible girls but you would NEVER know it after watching the scene, likewise with big breasted girls they usually do not let em get shown properly in doggy style and that is a crime against humanity. About 10% of the scenes on this site are massage but it is the briefest massage you ever saw. This site could have been so much more.

Lets talk about scene quality. I downloaded all of their quality options for their 68.6% of scenes that are not in 1080p MP4 HD. The 1080p WMV and MPG options may as well not exist. They are much more bleached than the original scenes, slightly grainy and have periods of terrible pixelation caused by HORRIBLE encoding. On top of that these scenes have visual lag and distortion when you skip.

In my conclusion I cannot at this time suggest anyone place membership here. I even turned down the exceptional discount offer to their other sites which tells you just how disappointed I am in their work. I got in for $9 and the bottom line is it was not worth it.

Now if you just want to stream or enjoy pictures you may be VERY happy with this site.

What needs to change before I can suggest this site?

1) Release ALL of the content in 1080p MP4 HD. Even if it is only 1.25 GB in size I want that HD MP4 file.

2) In the future make use of the talented performers known assets. If they love anal DP those ladies, if they are flexible then highlight that for 10 mins in every position if they have great tata's then show them bounce in multiple positions. Use what is right in front of the camera.

3) I would like for every scene to be re-encoded to at least 3 GB of quality especially the Sensi Pearl scenes but I know this will never happen.

For a site with so much potential it is all for naught if none of these changes are made.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Castings

6. Brutal Castings (1)

Pay
Active
70
mbaya (364) 08-17-15  03:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The best quality video download option is 4320p 8000k. This is considerably better than the usual 1080 HD.
- Photos come in at 1920x2880 Exceptionally sharp and clear. There is a photoset for each video.
-Updates are once a week, which is fine for a specialty niche site.
-There is a discounted monthly join price of $14.95 through the TBP link. This is not mentioned on TBP.
-Part of a network of 46 BDSM/spanking/fetish websites.
Cons: -Very repetitious. Each scene is a clone and all that changes is the model. A few times the male talent changes, but mostly it is the same man over and over. The same set, the same dialog, the same action.
-There are so far only 20 videos. A year from now this site will be MUCH bigger.
-The photos are screen caps and there is no zip download option.
-Nearly every model has tattoos and some have a lot. This is a major turnoff for me.
-Much of the network is no longer updating. Those sites have been dormant for some time and have very low, unwatchable quality videos. I found the network of little value.
Bottom Line: Before I say anything further, I want to thank fellow PUer Pyrenees for mentioning this site. Without him I would not have known that this site existed. He is truly a man of vast knowledge about porn.

Just so it is clear where I am coming from, I am not a fan of BDSM or fetishes. I do like forceful sex though. The BDSM seen here is no comparison in roughness to some sites, in fact it is BDSM done rather lightly. Kink does much harder scenes. As far as rough sex I would say it is at the mid level and no comparison to many harder sites, for example Face Fucking/Facial Abuse.

Every scene follows the same scenario, even at times the same script. The model comes for an interview. There is a very tame casting tape and then there is a lengthy discussion as to what she wants for her future in modeling. She is asked to strip down to her bra and panties. At that point she refuses to take those off and the casting agent gets agitated and ties her hands with rope he conveniently has in his back pocket. He then takes off her bra and panties, He fingers her and forces her to suck his cock, followed by vaginal. There is never any anal on this site.

The scenes are generally quite passionless. In the PU website review by AK he states that ďThose concerned with the reality aspects will be happy to hear that the acting isnít good enough to make anyone think that the scenes arenít completely choreographedĒ. The models never act surprised and generally just go with the flow as events unfold.

The reason that I mention this is that Ava Taylor has stated that her scene here convinced her to leave porn. In that scene, she shows a degree of discomfort, but never surprise. She has claimed that she was lied to by the site ownership and that it was to be a simple blow job scene. This may be true, as I just donít know. All I see is a scene where she is passively just very accepting of whatever is happening. Next issue. If they lied to her then what about the other models? In some other scenes the models sometimes seem into the action, agreeing by saying ďYes MasterĒ and ďOk I will do what you wantď. In some scenes the models seem emotionally uninvolved and passive. Do they lie to models as to what to expect during their scenes? It is unclear. Apparently they told them something about what to do as the scenes are virtually choreographed clones.

I would have given the site a higher score, but there are two major negatives. With only 20 videos it is simply too small. The other negative is the number of tattoos to be found here. There is enough ink to write a book.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit 1,000 Facials

7. 1,000 Facials (1)

Pay
Active
80
bkreidercrhl (7) 08-12-15  07:18am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The women featured on 1,000 Facials are typically young (20's), consistently attractive and eager to get their faces jizzed. They are exciting facial targets to bust a nut over. The girls are generally good cock suckers who capably prepare a dick for their facial cum shot.

Since the scenes are shot in POV, when the girl take a big load it inspires excellent you are the man fantasy. Johnny Fender consistently delivers a face full of guy gravy. He typically delivers heavy wads to the girls forehead, commonly extending into her hair, followed by spews to both checks starting from the corner of her mouth. His gunk is thick and paste like which leaves every drop to be admired
Cons: All too frequently the male talent, outside of Johnny Fender, deliver feeble loads. Since I would not be proud to serve it up, the fantasy is destroyed and leaves me limp. With exciting exceptions,Johnny avoids the girls eyes. Although his thick goo leaves the entire load on the girls face for admiration, the downside is you rarely enjoy eyebrow or chin hangers.

I would prefer to see more MILFs and GILFs getting their faces creamed. The fantasy works with the girls, but more age appropriate facial cum targets is preferred stimulation for doing the deed.

1000 Facials appears to have stopped updating as of May 2015.
Bottom Line: I am a collector of facial cum porn and have subscribed to 1,000 Facials multiple times through the years. My evaluation is highly focused upon facial cum shots. Since this is the claimed porn niche, I believe this to be appropriate.

The site features consistently attractive young women, getting their faces creamed in POV. When the lady takes a big load it makes for excellent stimulation for doing the deed.

Johnny Fender consistently delivers a massive load and his scenes are among my favorite. I have numerous scenes featuring other studs in my collection (through the years) delivering big spews often including eye cum. Unfortunately the load volumes of many scenes are feeble. It destroys the fantasy, if I would be disappointed to bust it.

There are numerous scenes with quality facial cum shots that satisfy even the most demanding critics. You need to search for them. 1000 Facials appears to have stopped updating as of May 2015.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Drone Hunter

8. Drone Hunter (1)

Pay
Active
75
rearadmiral (384) 08-10-15  11:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Mofos network
- Innovative and unique concept
- Most scenes have an outdoor theme
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Small site
- Hasnít updated in four months
- Typical Mofos / Brazzers model look
- Site will log you off after an hour
Bottom Line: I suppose that with the popularity of drones it was only a matter of time before someone started using them in porn. The concept is unique and it does add to the scenes but for whatever reason the concept seems to have died since the site hasnít added a new scene since April 2015.

In all of the scenes the drone footage is just edited into footage shot by a regular camera. The one possible exception to that is the one lesbian scene which may be all drone footage. In all of the scenes the drone is played up as being surreptitious video that the female model doesnít know of.

The most common scene setup is where the male talent is bringing a girl back to his place and he contacts the Ďdrone hunterí to shoot some secret video of them having sex. There is usually some fake communication between the male talent and the drone operator. A few of the scenes use the scenario where neither the male or female talent know theyíre being viewed by the drone.

The site is quite small with only nine videos uploaded and it looks like it will stay small because it hasnít updated in months. Given that each scene has to be set up to allow access for the drone there is an outdoor or voyeur element to each scene. Perhaps that part of it caused some problems in filming. It seems reasonable to think that a drone hovering over a rooftop patio or looking in a hotel window might attract some unwanted attention. On the other hand, if you like outdoor or public scenes this site certainly has that.

The biggest advantage to the site is the fact that itís part of the Mofos network so youíll have access to a lot of other sites. Also, because Mofos is one of the leading porn sites you can expect their level of quality in the site. There are tags on the scenes but with only nine scenes that really doesnít add anything.

The downside to this being part of the Mofos network is that many of the scenes feature models with the signature Mofos/Brazzers look: big breasts (often fake) and other body mods. One of the models had enough collagen injected into her lips that she looked pretty silly, and to my eyes anyway, not very sexy.

The scenes can be streamed and downloaded. The streaming is available in three resolutions (up to 1080p) and there are six options for downloads: 272p, 368p, 480p, 720p and 1080p in MP4 format and a 480p in WMV. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at 8000kb/s and 29fps. With those specs youíd expect them to look good and they do, on both a 24Ē monitor and a 50Ē TV.

I used Internet Download Manager and didnít have any issues with the links timing out. If they do time-out that happens after a reasonable delay. One annoyance is that the site itself will kick you out approximately once per hour and require that you sign in again.

I canít say that Iíd recommend this site unless you really have a thing for drones because itís just too small and looks to have gone dormant already. But if youíre interested in the site and you join the network to get it then the real value is in the network itself which has over 2000 videos available. When you consider that you get 2000 scenes for the low TBP discount price of $15USD it really is a good deal.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit English MILF

9. English MILF (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
guy7414 (0) 08-04-15  01:44am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: She's sexy, cute and very erotic. Nice big ass, great legs, and a slim waist. The solo picture sets are very erotic, if not a bit short on pictures.
Cons: Not a lot of replay value. In an expired review on this site that was penned by "messmer" he commented on the 150 picture sets. That review was written in June of 2011 and four years later there are still 150 photo sets.

Skimpy sets. I usually praise "economical" sets, which get a lot done without 175 pictures, but these sets are too skimpy. I've already gone through 30 sets, and that was after "pre stimulation" looking at "Busty Brits".

The bonus sites of the same woman, "Daniella In Pantyhose" and "Lycra Ass" are not very good. A lot of screen caps.

The videos are uninspiring, particularly the softcore ones.

The $29.99 premium price tag suggests a lot more, including updates. I will immediately request a refund.
Bottom Line: I like the girl. It's the only reason I'm giving it a 65. They list an update on August 1st, and it's three rehashed "video stills".

There are a lot better sites with unending content out there for $29.99. Avoid this one.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Erotica X

10. Erotica X (2)

Pay
Newbie
80*
hugow (4) 08-03-15  12:54pm
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive women
Quality photography and videos.
"Women-friendly"
Cons: Performances are ultimately rather ho-hum.
Website navigation and UI is so bad that I felt that I was back at some Russian site 10-15 years ago, but with bigger, prettier photos. ie. Lipstick on a pig. It was so bad that it hastened my departure from this site.

Examples include not being able to go back to search results once you click on one of the results; losing your place in the model pages if you click on any particular model, etc.; baffling dead-ends.
Bottom Line: In the scheme of pornsites, I suppose this one rates a "Very Good." However, I found it quite disappointing compared to other top shelf erotic sites like X-Art. The models are beautiful and the quality of the photos and videos is technically good, but the performances themselves were, for the most part, pretty ho-hum standard fare. Overall, disappointing considering the good press this site has received elsewhere.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Girls Do Porn

11. Girls Do Porn (1)

Pay
Active
75
rearadmiral (384) 08-03-15  06:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateurs
- Many stunning young models
- Nearly 300 scenes
- Multiple viewing options
- Fast downloads
- Bill through reputable billers
Cons: - Terrible site design
- Expensive if you want HD
- No model names or info
- No unique identifiers for scenes
- Site defaults back to page one
- Better porn options are available
Bottom Line: GDP is a site that reviewers either love or hate. Itís a site that has squandered its potential. The problem with the site is that it has some beautiful amateurs in some pretty good porn let down by one of the worst site layouts on the internet. If anyone can learn anything from this site itís how not to design a webpage.

The real value of the site is in the models themselves: they are true amateurs and most of them are really quite beautiful. That depends on a bit of a subjective assessment of course since most of the models are Caucasian, young (18-22) and fairly petite. The porn itself is very good, if somewhat formulaic. Most of the scenes follow the same formula of interview, blowjob with the model clothed, some sex in specific positions, more oral, usually more sex and finally finishing with the guy jerking off on the modelís face as she kneels in front of him.

There are currently close to 300 scenes available and the site does update. I canít be specific about the update schedule because the scenes aren't dated but it appears that at least one new scene is added per week.

The scenes are available in streaming at resolutions called high, medium, low and mobile. The downloads are available in 720x405, 1280x720 and mobile. Paying for a premium membership adds downloads in 1920x1280 and 4K on the newer scenes. I downloaded the 1280x720 versions and they come in at 6000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good on a 24Ē monitor and 50Ē TV.

Where things start to fall apart for the site is the site design itself. Describing the issues that the site has seems a bit overwhelming because there are just so many but Iíll hit the highlights:
ē The models aren't named and there is no biography given
ē The scenes have no unique identifier at all. Iíve read on other forums where members will refer to a scene by a shoot number but Iíve never seen any unique information for a scene.
ē Scenes canít be opened in a new tab so you have to open them in your main browser window, but when you click to go back you get taken to the first page again and have to re-select the page you were on. To make matters worse, when you do finally get back to the page you just left the eight thumbnails are all in different order. I ended up downloading several scenes more than once.
ē Only eight anal scenes.

The membership options aren't simple either. In the past you were required to stay for a second month to download HD files but now you can just pay to get the additional access immediately. I opted for the base membership because Iím happy with the 1280x720 files but to access the behind-the-scenes and Ďdeletedí scenes you need pay the additional amount. I figured it would be worth it but there are only 38 BTS scenes and five deleted scenes.

The site bills through Epoch or CC Bill so you can join with confidence that your information will be secure and you can cancel easily.

The site had some of the fastest download speeds that Iíve seen from porn sites. It was rare for me to see less that 20MB/s and most times I was seeing 25MB/s. I downloaded a lot in my first few days and if there is a download limit (which I donít think there is) itís high enough that only a serious porn glutton would hit it.

So is it worth joining or not? The site itself is deeply flawed and could be easily improved; the improvements would be like picking low-hanging fruit so that leads me to the conclusion that the site owners aren't really interested in improving things. To be fair to the site owners though, they might be putting their efforts into recruiting the models. The models are really the true value of this site: most of them are true amateurs and are really good looking. They appear to be having fun too. So when I balance the good and the bad I have to give this site a cautious recommendation: the porn is very good but the site is very bad. But, if you go into the deal with your eyes open armed with knowledge of the flaws youíll be okay. Unless you absolutely must have HD or 4K or have a big thing for BTS or deleted scenes you can save yourself some money and take only the basic membership. So the recommendation is a definite maybe. I likely wonít rejoin and hereís something Iíve never done in a review before; Iíll suggest a better alternative: you can get very similar porn on a much better site at Exploited College Girls.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Jenna

12. Club Jenna (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
HughJarse (0) 08-02-15  01:49pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: There is a large amount of movies to choose from.
All downloads were fast.
Cons: Not Club Jenna - it's Moviebox who bought the domain name (false advertising).
Most videos are Video on Demand (i.e. you have to pay extra)
Most included videos are 640x480 res, fairly old and probably available elsewhere.
You can buy extra channels at a premium.
Bottom Line: The site is a lie and overpriced for what it is. Best porn should state that Club Jenna's site closed down years ago.
All the other sites they bought resolve to the same place - Moviebox.com.
I would have given a lower score if possible the on principal that there's nothing but a few streaming movies of Jenna.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit BBW Secret

13. BBW Secret (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
bbwadmirer (0) 07-29-15  10:34am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ???
Cons: Accd. to MY experience (7-28-2015), the bonus site access for BBW Secret does NOT belong in the "Other Good Stuff" category!

The bonus site access is NOT free, you have to pay an additional $0.95 for ONE DAY's access to EACH of the 2 bonus sites (BBW Pickup & Busty Work), then the full $30 (or thereabouts) for the 1st month to each of them...so if I wanted all 3 sites for ONE month, I would have had to pay close to $80 - 90!

Maybe my computer is slow (it's DSL), but I tried to download ONE movie, & my Firefox downloader told me that it was going to take almost FOUR HOURS to do it! Why are the movies so damn large? All of them were well over 500Mb, & that doesn't include their HD stuff. I don't need anything THAT large & fancy, I can tolerate low def movies, in fact, I would prefer them. I eventually gave up after a few hours & 2 failed attempts at downloading a single movie.
Bottom Line: BEWARE -- you do NOT get what is currently advertised: I was led to believe that I was getting full access to 3 sites for the price of subscribing to BBW Secret. Look at the very bottom of the introductory page & you will see what I mean.

I FEEL CHEATED!!!

I am VERY disappointed in what BBW Secret had to offer. I haven't checked out the other 2 sites that they say come with it (BBW Pickup & Busty Work), but after what I went through w/ BBW Secret &'m not going to waste my time nor my $ on them. either.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old And Young Lesbians

14. Old And Young Lesbians (0)

Pay
Newbie
97*
asseaterjs (0) 07-25-15  05:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Awesome niche site for exclusive old and young lesbian sex video and pictures. The site offer a variety of ages with concentration on girls in their later teens through early twenties and older ladies in their fifties and sixties.

A huge plus is the majority of newer scenes include lesbian asslicking, my personal favorite!

The ladies come across as sexy amateurs, not the cheesy pornstars that look like their acting and not very well. The lesbians look like their actually just enjoying each others bodies and the cameras just happen to be there.

The site has frequent updates and, one or two per week is common. There is a huge archive of their films and other mature content available.
Cons: The price is high (but worth it)

The search function will not catch all the content so if you want to see everything you're best bet is to watch them all and scan them.

It would be nice to have more info on the ladies and the scenes before watching them.
Bottom Line: If you can get past the price and enjoy old and young lesbians there is no better site, by a long shot.

You will have all the content you want for a long time and more coming all the time.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Casting Couch X

15. Casting Couch X (1)

Pay
Newbie
75*
pornymike (0) 07-25-15  11:09am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A great conveyor belt of really fresh & cute porn starlets put through their paces for our enjoyment. One of my likes is 'getting to know the girl' before the action starts and this is well done with the interview. My next like is getting to know the body and again this is well delivered as she is asked to strip off and we get to see her in all her natural glory. Yum!
Then as above, she's put through her paces before having a full face splattering of boy batter
Cons: Really, really evil and utterly dishonest cross selling. If you click on one of the (far too many) cross selling ads and try one of the options thinking it's a trailer, you'll get billed for a month of access at a stupidly high rate.
No kidding
Happened to me & when you look in to it, they have a warning on their 'customer service' (good joke) page about people fraudulently trying to get out of accounts they'd 'signed up to'. Ignore it and contact your credit card company for a refund. I did and got just that.
Bottom Line: Good site but beware of the scamming
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Porn Hub Premium

16. Porn Hub Premium (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Eugine103 (0) 07-16-15  11:47pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Content is fed by MovieBox, a very old company that I thought died more than 15 years ago.HD content is less than 480 resolution. Navigation is fine and you'd expect it in 2015. Lots of videos, sort of. Download speed is excellent, only because the files are so small from low res.
Cons: Avoid a membership! It does not allow you to download from PornHub! What you get is a membership to a very old website with very old content. HD content plays at less than 480 resolution. There's a large selection but MOST videos are labeled "VOD" which means that you will have to buy credit to watch them!!!! I paid an extra $1 dollar to block ads. Unclear on how to cancel membership.
Bottom Line: The regular pornhub site is free and provides a lot of value even if you have to pay for it. Unfortunately, PornHub Premium is the opposite. You get old video and poor resolution and you'll have to pay for credit to watch most of the videos. Avoid this site. On a scale of 1-10, this site makes videobox a 1000! I'm truly disappointed.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Teen Fidelity

17. Teen Fidelity (2)

Pay
Active
90
Pyrenees (26) 07-15-15  12:34am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site has many Pros.

1) There are currently 183 Videos in various formats up to 1080p.
2) Almost every scene has a nice trailer, BTS long video and half have solo videos.
3) The video quality is very high with videos ranging 2-3 GB and the picture quality is crisp.
4) This is a TEEN site with some of the most popular teen stars of the last decade.
5) Each scene is fun, it has a script. Nothing is vanilla on this site. There is a common formula (Same actor, multiple pop shots, finish with Cream pie).
6) There are about 400 HD pictures for each scene.
7) There is a little bit of Fetish for everyone. Lactation, Flexible sex, Hymen breaking, Chocking, Deep Throat. And some threesome scenes as well. A mixed bag.
Cons: There are some cons

1) There are usually only 4-5 updates per month.
2) Maybe you do not like to see the same man in each scene?
3) Maybe you like more gonzo and less clothes.
4) Some of the scenes can be very rough sex.
5) If you like a specific niche unless its teen then this site maybe too much of a mixed bag of fetishes. It is very non formulaic.
Bottom Line: The bottom line is if you like teens and a variety of sexual positions/scenarios then this is the high quality site for you. I do not like picture but there are a ton in HD. I enjoyed the Behind the scenes sections they were funny and provided a glimpse into the lives of some of the famous teen porn stars.

I give this site my seal of approval. (The Get my belt series is award winning). Here is a pro tip you can get a cheap membership to this one, porn fidelity and a 1$ trial membership to Kelly Madison. You can easily get every scene you want off of KM during the trial period but DO NOT STREAM there is a stream limit on that site. Instead look at what you like and download it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brand New Amateurs

18. Brand New Amateurs (1)

Pay
Active
80
rearadmiral (384) 07-08-15  05:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateur site
- Inexpensive full trial
- Fast downloads
- Many different ages and body types
- Broad range of scene types
- Simple layout
- Extensive use of niche tags
- No download limits
- Reputable biller
Cons: - Many different ages and body types
- No known update schedule
Bottom Line: Iíve had mixed experiences with amateur sites. This may sound hypocritical but my favorite amateur sites are often those that use models who are in some form of the adult business Ė like cam shows Ė and are getting into videos. These sites (like Exploited College Girls) tend to be less amateurish. Brand New Amateurs falls into the class of being more of a true amateur site. Iím still browsing through the scenes and the only recognizable model Iíve seen is Halle Von.

This can be a pro or a con depending on your personal tastes, but sites that fall closer to the true amateur site tend to have a broad range of model ages and body types. This is great if you have interests that run the range from petite models in their late teens though BBW models to MILFs. This isnít so great if youíre like me and have a narrow range of likes. But since the site many scenes there should be something for everyone.

I canít give a definitive answer on the update schedule as the scenes arenít dated but judging by the dates on the scene comments by members it looks like there is at least one new scene per week.

The site also offers a broad range of scene types which I think is a pro no matter how you slice it. There are solo scenes, some with toys, there are girl/girl scenes, there are boy/girl oral scenes, b/g/g scenes, some rimming scenes and even some anal scenes. And there are several scenes in the rare niche of white male/black female scenes too. Again, something for everyone.

The site has a very simple layout in that there is only one long page with a large thumbnail for each scene. Clicking on the thumbnail opens a new page where you can download the scene or get photos. The site has a limited search function but this is offset by being able to sort by model and the extensive use of niche tags.

Video downloads are only available as MP4s and only in one resolution per scene, but that resolution is high. Most of the scenes are 1920x1280 at around 6,000kb/s and 29fps. There are some lower at 1280x720 with bitrates ranging from 1,500-2,500kb/s and 29fps. The downside to having only one file size is that people with slower internet connections may wish for a smaller file size. The scenes look good with no pixilation but the downside is that since these are shot in someoneís home the production values are what youíd see in a more professional site. Lighting, for example, is sometimes a bit too dark. But it can also be argued that these Ďflawsí add to the amateur appeal.

The site supports download managers but I canít really say if there is a problem with links timing out. I use Internet Download Manager and have a relatively fast connection but the download speeds I saw here were probably the best Iíve ever seen. Iíd see a sustained 25MB/sec download most of the time. Iíve seen other sites only allow 20% of that speed.

One advantage to this site is that they offer a full trial. My worry was that Iíd trigger a download limit but I didnít find one. In one afternoon I downloaded all the scenes I wanted and never saw a limit or had my download speeds throttled. I downloaded 50GB of data in less than three hours so if there is a limit it is very generous.

The bottom line is that this is a good site in the true amateur niche. When you factor in the availability of a full trial at a low cost there is almost no risk to someone joining the site. Given that the site bills through CC Bill the only risk is the membership fee itself, and Iím confident that most new members could easily find lots of porn to make at least the trial membership a good value.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rylsky Art

19. Rylsky Art (2)

Pay
Active
83
tangub (155) 07-08-15  02:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: PU/TBP Discounted price.
High quality photo and video content.
Multiple download and streaming options for videos.
Photos available in 3 different resolutions with a zip download for each.
Regular updates.
Excellent navigation and search tools.
User comments and ratings.
Cons: Sites in the Met Art Network seem to have adopted the worst kind of regional pricing where $1 (USD) = £1 (GBP).
Too many photo sets start out with the model already nude or nearly nude.
Anyone who prefers videos would find the collection rather small here.
Bottom Line: Rylsky is one of the more popular photographers featured on Met Art and this site is devoted to his work having started up in September 2012 and with consistent updates has grown in to a collection of approximately 218 models, 824 photo sets (around 50,000 total pics) and 86 movies. Updates come regularly but not quite daily, averaging about 5/6 sets a week.

The photos come in 3 sizes with the largest size going up to 3744 x 5616px, a medium size at 1365 x 2048px and a small size at 682 x 1024px. A zip is available for all 3 sizes and as is normal for sites in the Met Art network the zip file names always include the date of the set, the name of the model and title of the set which I love. One of my pet hates are sites that make you mess around having to rename everything you download. The majority of the photo sets are solo and fairly softcore although most sets do give you some spread and close up shots with occasional finger insertions. There is a small number of two girl sets and also a few backstage sets.

The videos have up to 6 download options 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p, WMV and Divx avi. The 1080p videos that I downloaded were in mp4 format with a 5000 kbps bitrate and looked excellent on my 24 inch monitor. This is primarily a photography site with photo sets outnumbering videos by about 10 to 1. Average run time of the videos is around 5 minutes. I have to admit I've always found the videos of Met Art Network sites rather boring and this site was no different for me.

The layout and navigation of the site is pretty much the same as other sites in the Met Art Network that I've previously had memberships to with all the usual search features and settings options including the user defined tags. There is user interaction in the form of ratings and the possibility to leave comments. Quite often you will see the Photographer Rylsky replying to feedback from users.

The only reason I joined this site was because of an email promo I received a couple of years ago when the site was fairly new with the offer price of $7.99, surprisingly the link still worked even after a couple of years. Other than cheap email offers I have to say that the Met Art Network sites have lost me as a customer as long as they persist with the $1 = £1 regional pricing. The site was ok for what I paid but in general I like to see models starting out in a bit more clothing with a bit more tease but I knew what to expect here so I can't really complain too much.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Tushy.com

20. Tushy.com (1)

Pay
Active
87
rearadmiral (384) 07-06-15  05:12pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Rare plot-based, softer-edged anal site
- Excellent quality scenes
- Updates weekly
- A-list porn models
- Several scenes listed as first anals
- Multiple download options
- Supports download managers
- Photos as singles or zips
Cons: - New and still small
- Expensive for the current size of the site
- Some issues with download managers
- Site wonít remember username / password
Bottom Line: Tushy.com is a rare site that features anal sex in plot-based scenes that border on having couples appeal. The site is clearly aiming for a different market from many other anal sex sites where the goal there is more to turn the event into an endurance test for the model. Here there is a short scene set-up followed by some sex where there is some chemistry between the models that just happens to have some anal sex thrown in for good measure.

As another PU member has pointed out, this site looks a lot like another site in quality and feel. Tushy.com is run by Greg Lansky who is also behind Blacked. For those who donít know Blacked, it is a site that offers high quality, plot-based interracial porn. The fact that Lansky is behind this new site gives me a lot of hope that it will be as good as Blacked. (The only worry that I have is that has Lansky stretched himself too far in opening another site? Will Blacked be lower quality and will Tushy not hit the lofty mark set by its sister site? I hope that both remain excellent quality.)

Because the site is new it is still quite small with only 12 scenes uploaded. The site does update with the addition of a new scene each week. The site still charges the full rate even though theyíre new and small. (I prefer the model used by Swallow Salon where the price is lower presumably in part to reflect the small size. I also understand that the porn that Tushy.com produces Ė anal and expensive production costs Ė is far higher than oral scenes on one set.)

As with all good porn sites, this one offers some choice in how members can access the scenes. Scenes are only available in MP4 format and in various resolutions: 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480p mobile, 360p mobile and 270p mobile. Streaming is also available in RESOLUTION. I downloaded the 720p scenes as they were the best compromise between size and quality and those come in at a high bitrate of over 8,000kb/s and a framerate of 29fps. Subjectively they look great and Iíd recommend testing a few of the 1280p scenes before you immediately go for a higher resolution.

Streaming is also available but I canít tell the resolution. It looks to be HD though. Trailers are available for each scene too.

Photos are available too. They look more like stand-alone photos rather than screencaps, which is what Iíd expect of a site that pushes quality. The photos are available as singles and zips and the zipped photos come in at 3000x2000.

The site supports download managers but I did encounter a problem initially. When you click to download a scene a pop-up with the download options comes up. Selecting the resolution started the download outside my manager. I wasnít a big deal to get it to download with the DM and then cancel the other download. This only happened on the first day I was a member and that issue hasnít recurred since.

Several of the scenes are listed as being first anals. As a collector of that specific niche itís great that this site may be offering more of that.

While all the scenes look like theyíre exclusive to this site I canít say for sure. The two most recent updates have the word ĎExclusiveí splashed across the thumbnail leaving me to think that the others may not be exclusive. I buy a lot of porn, and specifically a lot of anal porn and Iíve never seen these scenes before.

I mentioned that most of the scenes have a softer feel to them than in a lot of other anal sites. The exception to this is the one scene I joined to get access to, and thatís a very rare anal scene from Kacey Jordan. Iím only aware of one other anal scene sheís done (for Dirt Pipe Divas) so no one is going to call her an anal queen. Maybe sheís playing this as part of the role in the scene, but she doesnít look too comfortable throughout the lengthy anal sex part of the scene. But most, if not all of the other scenes are like this.

The bottom line is that with the current size of the site itís hard to argue that it offers good value for the monthly fee of $30 but the value equation has to take into consideration the quality of whatís offered here too, and itís fair to say that this is excellent quality porn. Itís also worth noting that the site continues to grow. I know that not everyone will agree with me, but I think value is more about quality than quantity. If you like softer anal scenes you really should check out this site.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tushy.com

21. Tushy.com (1)

Pay
Newbie
80*
Cum Play John (3) 07-05-15  08:40am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is a gorgeous site that I would give a 98 to -- for what they are trying to do -- except for the low video count of 10 current videos, with 1 weekly update.

However, if you care about HQ glamour anal of a sort never seen before (and I include Wow Girls, XArt and First Anal Quest, with their polished sensibility), then this may be a site for you worth investing $30 to support.
Cons: Small video collection for $30.

Could have better cum play / post-cum head sequences, instead of joining all the other porn sites on Earth in cutting away right after the facial. Also, could have an optional POV view -- particularly during the facial moment.

Glamour rimming would be a dream as well. If the man rims the woman, can't the woman rim the man?
Bottom Line: I am overall thrilled with the sensibility of this new site, which has a kind of sophisticated artful well-lit anal I've never seen before.

The women talk conversationally as if they were models talked into doing this; it's extremely realistic and thrilling to watch the slow-paced nature of the man's anal investigation of the model.

And the models are to-die-for gorgeous. This is the kind of dream fucking most straight men only dream.

I'd say a little more attention to closed-leg anal penetrations, and not just the spread eagle sort, a little more of the from-behind-and-above angle would be nice.

I'd keep up the hot talk, whatever new features you add. Have them talk about how to do rimming well, how to give head well, how tight it feels in their ass. While it's an anal and not a blowjob site, I think you could bring the same intimacy to the blowjob and fetishize tonguing the cock peehole more.

You have to really want to underwrite this dream to give them $30 a month to enjoy these videos.

But I will say it is money well spent -- particularly if their models stay this hot.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Swallow Salon

22. Swallow Salon (1)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (384) 07-05-15  07:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Affiliated with Amateur Allure
- Inexpensive
- Beautiful models giving incredible blowjobs
- Updates with one scene per week
Cons: - Very small site
- Not enough female nudity
- Only one video choice
Bottom Line: I know Amateur Allure has attracted some very different reviews. I fall solidly in the fan group as AA is likely my favorite adult site on the internet. So when AA posted an update on that site that had a slightly different look and had a watermark for Swallow Salon I immediately headed over there and joined too. I canít say for certain, but it looks like Swallow Salon is affiliated with Amateur Allure and done by the same guys.

Like AA, SS is formula-driven. Some people really dislike this but I think that if you have a good formula why mess with it? The premise is that the male talent is visiting a salon where beautiful women give amazing blowjobs and swallow cum. Also like AA, SS uses just one set Ė in this case itís an enclosed small space with thin opaque coverings and there are multi-colored lights outside to create an interesting effect. The male talent is usually seated for most of the BJ with the model kneeling in front of him. They usually swap to him standing at some point before the cumshot. Like AA, SS features some of the most beautiful models in porn (who are usually just beginning their careers so theyíre still fresh) giving some amazing blowjobs. Most of these blowjobs transcend the ordinary and are closer to cock worship with lots of licking and good use of the tongue. There is lots of eye contact too. Every blowjob ends with a cumshot in the mouth and the model playing with it for a few seconds before swallowing it.

The biggest negative for the site now is its small size. There are only nine scenes available now. The site is growing slowly with a new scene being added every week. To be fair to the site, they do compensate for the small size by offering a low membership fee of $16 USD. I like the site enough that Iíll just keep a recurring membership at that price.

Two subjective complaints I have about the scenes are that the models wear a short and sexy white smock that you might see in a place that gives blowjobs, but in most scenes we never really get to see the model without it. Yes, they will hike the short smock when on their knees, but with the stunning looks of the models here they really need to have the remove the smock for the latter part of the scene. The second subjective complaint is that unlike AA where the blowjob transitions to sex before going back to the blowjob for the finish, SS only has sex in one scene. That isn't too bad given the quality of the blowjobs, but personally Iíd like to see some sex too. With the model naked.

There is only one option for downloading each scene. The scenes are all MP4s with most of them at a relatively low resolution of 960x540. The bitrate is fairly high (pushing 7,000kb/s) though and the framerate is 29fps so those scenes still look very good. The most recent update was in 1920x1080 with the same bitrate and framerate so maybe all future scenes will be at that higher resolution.

I know many readers might question my score, but given the high quality of the scene offered here I think itís justified. The low price offsets the small size and I hope the site continues to grow. Iím usually willing to put my money where my mouth is and say that if I like a site Iíll add it to my list of sites I rejoin regularly, but Iíll go one step further here: I like this site (and the low fee) enough that Iíll just stay a member. If you like sensual blowjob sites with beautiful women this is definitely worth subscribing to.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Life Erotic

23. The Life Erotic (2)

Pay
Active
80
skippy (52) 07-02-15  01:22pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Generally high quality material
Beautiful, natural models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Very "artsy" site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good navigation
Cons: Very "artsy" site.
Very little eye contact with camera
Creative edge takes precedent over practicality
Landing page focus is on cross-selling live site
Entire site including all sets are very dark!
Many sets in black and white or oddly tinted
Many shorter sets
Many models only have a set or two
There are more tattoos here than other Met-art sites. (not always bad, but not good on otherwise beautiful models)
Seems like some is B-roll from other sites
Bottom Line: Stats (Deduced):
About 1500 photo sets
About 500 videos
About 320 models
1 new update a day
Some older sets are not exclusive
The site has been around since 2009 but some of the sets pre-date that.
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, some tattoos, etc.

This site is, to a large extent, sort of an evolution of the "girl in the woods" theme with the idea that you are observing a model in a more natural environment instead of a studio environment. Often the idea is that the model doesn't really know you are there or doesn't pay much attention to you, the viewer. About 50% of the sets are solo girl in a straight modeling scenario. Many of these sets are of very, very attractive girls that are just standing or in other conservative poses. Another 40% are female masturbation sets that range from boring to pretty interesting. And the remaining 10% are girl/girl scenes. I need to say that the majority of these are very conservative sets with few money or close-up shots. (There are some Oh My God models, but they are not necessarily doing OMG things....) There are notable exceptions, though. It depends on the model, I guess. There also is a wide mix of eye contact. Some sets have models that never make any eye contact with the camera at all. Earlier sets are better, but the quality of those sets is not as good. Oh, most of the sets start out with the model(s) clothed. I noticed some models remained clothed for 75% or more of some sets.

The first thing that strikes me about this site is how dark it is. Everything is dark. The site, the sets, the lighting, the videos, EVERYTHING! Older sets are a little better in this regard, but you will generally think there is something wrong with your display. Newer images are dark, contrasty, very shadowy. Distracting. Annoying. Generally awful. I batched a couple of sets through Photoshop and auto-adjust increased the brightness in most images by 50% or more. That is a heck of a lot and it is not accidental. They are deliberately turning down the brightness on these sets. You have to work to make images this dark. Really work.

The second thing I noticed was how hard the webmasters are trying to get you to go to the live site. When you get to the landing page, you don't see a single girl on the site you are paying for. instead you get a full page of images from the two live-cam sites that seem to be taking over the Met-Art network. You have to scroll down to see the contents of the site you already paid for. The webmasters are apparently experimenting with where best to put these live-cam ads as they can be found in different places on the various Met-Art sites. This is the most intrusive placement, right at the top of the main page and present on every page on the site. Stop it! Really. Just stop.

Another thing is the almost complete lack of playfulness, compassion or interaction with the viewer in many of the sets. Some of these models have all of the expressions of a check-out girl at K-Mart, meaning none. Even models that normally shine are somehow less expressive here. This is not in any way erotic as the name implies.

And the last thing to note is how inconsistent many of the sets are. More recent sets seem to follow that dark theme for the most part, but some sets are not like that at all. Some sets are very short, some are filled with close-ups, some are not. Some girls are almost entirely fully clothed for the whole set, some are not clothed at all. Some have eye-contact, many do not. You can tell if you are familiar with other Met-Art sets that some of these sets seem like they might have been B-roll or too weird to put on Met-Art. For example, there is an outdoor set of Lorena, beautiful Met-Art regular, where she is entirely covered in red mud in every single image. Really? Has to be a B-roll.

Navigation is generally good. There is an options section that allows you to set defaults for image size, number of thumbnails on a page, etc. like some other Met Art sites. The search function has user defined tags, which helps if you are looking for a particular trait that others are likely to define, like ginger or spread. But it could be better.

Bottom line? Good site to visit once, I guess. I personally don't like it anywhere near as much as other Met Art sites like Met-Art itself or Errotica Archives. You can actually see the weird evolution/devolution from a site similar to Met Art in the beginning to a site that now looks more like a bad graphic novel than a soft-core porn site. There is a decent amount of material here and some of it is pretty good, but be prepared to sift through a lot of dark, odd and often slightly off pictures to find things that really float your boat.

I wish I could be more enthusiastic, but this site just doesn't live up to Met-Art standards.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Bopping Babes

24. Bopping Babes (1)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (364) 06-28-15  10:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -New updates every other day.
-561 videos, about 7 minutes each. The site is decent size and actively growing.
-The 2015 videos have 5 download choices with the best quality being 4K.
-The biller is CCBill. Trusted and reliable.
-The models talk to you, but not while they are actually stripping.
-No download limits.
Cons: -The 4K videos did not play in Windows Media Player. They did play using VLC, but with severe stuttering.
-All videos have music that is either hip hop or techno crap. I found this distracting as well as too loud.
-All videos have the same sequence: blouse, skirt, bra, panties. Too formulaic.
-The photos are 1600x900 low quality screenshots. Only 103 photosets compared to over five times as many videos. I saw only landscapes and no portraits. Very uncreative.
-Far too many models are either fake blonds or have excessive tattoos.
-Zero ethnic variety, with only white British models. Other UK based websites include black or Indian models. None from any other European countries either.
Bottom Line: As I discovered ďBoppingĒ means dancing. This website specializes in videos of British women stripping while dancing. Most if not all are porn stars.

The models are all white, with no ethnic variety. On other UK based sites, I have seen black or Indian models and I would expect the same here. There arenít any from other European countries either.

Far too many of the models have tattoos, which is most definitely not to my taste. In some cases the tats are small and not distracting, but there are many that have so many that it is a major deal breaker. Not hot in my book. There are also a pretty fair number of fake blonds, also not my taste. When you factor in that there are other models that I simply donít find appealing, you start with 146 models and only about half interest me at all. There are 561 seven minute videos so that leaves about 250 to 300 or so that I like. That is a good number that includes some knockout models who know how to make stripping truly erotic.

The videos are very sharp, with the most recent coming in at 4K. Unfortunately, I could not get these 4K videos to play on Windows Media Player, but they did using VLC, but with stuttering. In all fairness, HD 1920x1080 works for me so I did not care much.

The photos are zip downloadable, but are only screenshots at 1900x600. Only landscapes and not worth saving.

The models strip out of costumes such as nurse, flight attendant, policewoman, construction worker, student, cheerleader, maid, or office worker. Some strip out of ordinary everyday clothes too. Only a very small number strip out of a bikini or other stereotypical stripper clothes. I liked the choices of costumes.

However, the sequence is always the same: Top or blouse, bottom or skirt, bra, panties. An occasional other sequence would have been hotter. There are very few videos that offer any teasing previews, such as showing panties while still wearing a skirt. Too formulaic and the videos could have easily been improved. Typical problem with porn as they get a great idea, in this case stripping, and then the creative process stops.

I like that the models talk to you and even give jerk off encouragement. Nice interaction wit the viewer. I love hearing them talk as you get a break from the music, which is mostly hip hop or techno crap and played too loud.

For me the bottom line here is that the videos that work are excellent, but could be a little more explicit. In spite of the many videos that do nothing for me, many are quite excellent. With updates every other day the site is growing and I would recommend joining in spite of some glaring weaknesses.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pure Mature

25. Pure Mature (1)

Pay
Active
79
Wittyguy (105) 06-25-15  05:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (57), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + About 215 scenes of exclusive milf / mature hardcore action featuring mostly attractive gals.
+ All scenes have vids and about 98% have pic sets with zips.
+ Multiple download options on vids and vid quality is good. All vids have at least one HD download option.
+ Good download speeds for me (about 3-4 MB/sec).
+ Decent price of $18 month through TBP.
+ Bills through Epoch.
+ The inbrowser video player works well.
+ Good production values across the board.
+ Model directory seems complete.
Cons: - Not really a picture site (see below).
- Downloaded files and vids poorly labelled (just numbers).
- Too much music in the earlier produced vids.
- No real search function or tags. No model information.
- Pretty much M/F hardcore, not much anal or 3 way and zero solo or lesbian if you're into that.
- A bit too "heartcore" for my tastes.
- Updates only once a week.
- As one sort of expects with the older actresses, there is a lot of silicone to look at.
Bottom Line: Wasn't really sure what I'd be getting here when I signed up other than a more mature line of starlets. Overall, it's pretty much a straight M/F hardcore site featuring pornstars in their late 20's to late 40's. The girls are mostly attractive pornstars (no BBW) and the production value is good to excellent across the board (no amateur feel to it). Here's the specs:

PICS: Like I said this isn't really a picture site. The pics dating from the beginning to late 2014 have portrait resolution of 1500x2700 but only have landscape resolution of 1500x840. What went wrong there? Others are a hodge podge of different sizes (a lot of 1000x1500 though). The most recent pics are all 1000x1500. The pics mostly look like HD screen grabs so there is some blurriness and cropping is questionable at times. A lot of scenes are shot in bright light or white backgrounds which causes some pixelation and washout. Most of my downloads were done in hopes that I could salvage some stuff that would look good on my monitor as opposed to looking forward to editing the sets later.

VIDS: Download speeds were good for me. With earlier vids you get options 1080 mpeg or wmv or 480. Starting in 2014 you also get 720 resolution options. This mostly a "heartcore" site which means lots of bright background lighting. The older vids show a bit of pixelation because of this but it improves over time. Also, through late 2013, the theme was "heartcore" (aka - porn for mimes) meaning that no one in the scene makes any real sex noises. Apparently the producers noticed that and thus incorporated random porn synthesizer music into various parts of the scenes to take it down another notch. The music goes away for the later vids (late 2013 onward) and the action gets more heated but there are no real story lines or conversation in the vids. The camera work is decent though and you do get some nonstandard views which is welcome.

NAV: As noted, it's pretty basic. You can only search according to model, date or ranking. If you are looking for something specific in a scene then you'll have wade through everything to find it because nothing is tagged.

MISC: There is a fair amount of POV style shooting here (run by remote or a cameraman, not the herky jerky hand held stuff done by the guy). The scene shifts in the vids can be a bit choppy at times too. Otherwise, the main theme is heartcore or heartcore with a slight edge. No real slapping or spitting here which is fine by me but it's almost too tame, especially if you've seen some of the actresses other work. As a comedian once said, "If the sex ain't dirty, you ain't doing it right."

If you're looking to add to your mature video collection it's worth taking a look at. Otherwise I'd say it's OK. If you're into pics then I'd say move along. Average is the site so average be my score.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 5588 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 18X Girls (4)
2. Twistys (4)
3. Blacked.com (3)
4. Wow Girls (3)
5. X-Art (3)
6. VideoBox (3)
7. Nubiles.net (3)
8. Hard X (2)
9. Mile High Media (2)
10. Erotica X (2)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.78 seconds.