Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hard pushed to list any. 400+ galleries
Cons:
Very badly laid out
No formats or catagories
Cannot download in zip format
Sets look like pictures are missing and almost like they only bought 1/2 of a complete set.
HardCore images miss out the cumshot! WTF?
Bottom Line:
Dont bother wasting your money. I am very dissapointed by this site and feel very let down.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Many, many beautiful women
+No toys and almost no “messy” stuff with food or bath goop
+Intuitive interface
+Fast downloads, sometimes over 2Mbps
+Can preview the content of upcoming 3-4 updates on each site
+Earned or purchased ” FastTracks” allow full access to galleries or videos of your choosing ahead of their posting schedule
+VOLUMES of all-exclusive content available now, plus several hundreds of updates yet to be posted (Coming soon --> select “View all sets available for FastTrack”)
+Very user-friendly site/network. You get 10 free “FastTracks” in a calendar month (whole network, not per site); set several viewing and browsing preferences; and go from one site in the network to another with ease once your use/passes are stored in your browser.
+Photos from the past couple of years come in three sizes: 1066, 2048, and 3000 pixels.
+Consistently good lighting and clarity in photos from Jan. 2007 on.
+No DRM
+Model pages list other sites, outside the network, she appears in
Cons:
-Occasional slow navigation and sudden timeouts
-Thumbs with dead links (rare)
-Must train browser to auto-enter use/pass for downloads on subsequent logins (separate for pics and videos); doable with Firefox, but it’s still 18 times for everything in the network: (access + zips + vids) x 6
-Zips before Dec. 2007 require drilling through five levels of folders to get to the images folder (hold cntrl down while drilling to prevent desktop clutter).
-Some unattractive women
-Quite a few women never get fully undressed, like Gemma Massey (too bad!)
-High monthly network access price ($44.95)
-The “fast track” system is rather complicated; note expiry dates and other restrictions
-Boring videos: Only avi, 640x480, 3-6 minutes long. 40-50 per month (whole network) in 2009. (Image quality improves through the years, but it’s never nearly as good as the photos. Sound might be techno muzik, the girl talking, or just the air near the mic.)
Bottom Line:
I thought this network would be nothing but undressing to panties, if that, so I stayed away. But one day at OnlyTease, I tried their search (for visitors) and found nearly 2000 items that were at the “figure” level of nudity.
Now I’m glad that I waited -- and that I finally joined. Mind you, it’s usually the same women who do get fully naked and fun with it: Angel Dark, Elen (the blond Russian with the devilish smirk), Eve Angel, Jana D (Jamie J), Lola, Lucy Stratilova, Misa/Michaela Kaplanova, Mili Jay, Zuzana (Deny Moore), ETC. Considering the volume here, it’s been a bona fide candy store for yours truly (or “drooly,” I suppose).
Special mention goes to “Tammy” (aka Vendula). She’s the BEST.
The “Only” sites are photo sites, and the photos are DAMN good. If most models on this network showed off their asses the way Misa does, I’d be totally hooked! It would have EVERYTHING: great outfits, great stripping, and satisfying full nudity in excellent quality.
But they’d rather specialize at putting foreplay at the forefront, and this they do very well. I found myself grabbing “stripping only” sets of a few girls for whom I have “nude onlys” to combine them with. Kind of like “FemJoy and OnlyTease – together at last!” ;)
Here are some stats on the “Only” network sites: OnlyTease: started July 2002. Around Nov. 2007, began occasional 3000 px photos, which became standard in March 2008. 3 updates per day! OnlyOpaques (dark hose): started Aug. 2006; 3000 px photos most of the time from July 2007; 1 update per day OnlySecretaries: started October 2007, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlySilkAndSatin: started Nov. 2008, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlyCarla: started Sept. 2005, stopped in April 2009 (lots of photosets, all it of tease-stripping) OnlyMelanie: started April 2005, stopped in Feb. 2009 (same as with Carla, but REALLY cute!)
Finally, a little more about those FastTracks. One can be obtained by recommending three sites (not previously listed) that a model is on. (Must be used by the end of the current month.)
NB: You can view the thumbs of a set before deciding to FastTrack it.
I got a few that way, thanks to my application of library and information science, Lucy Lee, Tereza Ilova, etc. in the subject index.
But remember, it’s best not to join at the beginning of a month since you get 10 for free each calendar month. That’s a nice touch!
BUT be sure to download your FastTracked stuff right away, because access to it expires at the end of the month!
You can also buy 10 “Permanent FastTracks” for $9.95. These don’t expire as long as you stay a member, but they can only be used on the site you buy them on.
AND redeeming them on the site is a hassle: find the page before the billing page, click to redeem, get authorization code ... sheesh!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill.
-Inexpensive full access trial option of 3 days at $9.95.
-Excellent video quality at 1280x720, 2500 kbps. 29 videos about 20 to 30 minutes.
-Excellent quality screenshots at 2136x3216. One set for each video. Not zipdownloadable.
-Attractive Russian models. Not one was not worth watching. Look to be in their early twenties.
-No DRM or other download restrictions.
-Can use download managers.
Cons:
-Not enough variety in the scenarios. Every one is exactly the same. Girl strips, has her temperature taken anally, does some calisthenics, probed by doctor manually, check out pussy with speculum then she gets dressed and leaves.
-No sexual interaction with the doctor. Some doctors are male, some female.
-Not part of any network, no bonus material.
Bottom Line:
This site is from the same people as nudesportvideos.com and has a lot in common with it. The girls are mostly thin and mostly very close in age, which looks to be in their early twenties. Unlike nudesportvideos, there are a few girls with nice curvy bodies and tits that have some size. Mostly the girls look really good, kind of like the girl next door real amateurs, but Russian style. No fake boobs, tattoos or even bleached blond hair. I would not have complained if they had some makeup used tastefully though.
Nudesportvideos has a primary focus on the girls moving in various ways to show off their bodies. This, in contrast, is basically a medical fetish site. The girls do some calisthenics for the doctor, but don't really put effort into showing off their bodies a lot. The scenario starts with the girl entering the room and then stripping. The balance of the video is completely nude.
The doctors do some ordinary tests such as eye exams or taking blood pressure. There is also some manual vaginal probing, but not any anal. The only anal activity is that each girl takes a thermometer rectally.
There is nothing very sexy about the doctor/patient interaction, but there is quite a bit of pussy on display. Totally softcore, but nonetheless explicit posing.
There are both male and female doctors, but it doesn't really matter. In only one video the female doctor changed her clothes before putting on a lab coat. More of that kind of thing would be a distinct improvement. Some great looking female doctors are wasted here.
A bit more variety in the scenes would also be a plus. Pretty much every scene is the same. The tiny amount of dialog is in Russian, so it is not clear why the girl is there. A suggestion for other scenarios could be having a group of girls being examined at the same time, perhaps taking off uniforms.
Some variety in age would also help.
This site can definitely be improved, but it is true to its niche and it does deliver softcore interesting nudes. I would also think being part of a network would make it a better value for the money. As a trial, it is an ok price, but not at the full price of $29.95 without a lot more content.
The site offers nice video and photo quality and the girls are attractive. The poses can be quite explcit. Overall I can recommend the site, despite its few weaknesses.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots and lots of great looking girls, simply spoilt for choice.
Mega sexy outfits, these girls are very well dressed.
Shed loads of content, thousands of photosets and in choice of sizes too.
Good value for money (for a month, maybe not on an ongoing basis).
Easy to navigate and find what you want.
Cons:
Many of the videos are a bit naff.
The photos although good big size, can be blurry a lot of the time.
For a British site there seem to be too many non-british girls here.
Bottom Line:
Wasn't sure if this site was going to do it for me what with it being very soft core, but I was very pleasantly surprised. I do like my British girl sites and this one is up there as the best of them when it comes to the quality of the girls, there is babe after babe after babe, there really is a glut of great looking girls here and more often than not they are well presented in sexy feminine outfits. My only complaint with the girls is that there seems to be rather a lot of non-british girls which isn't necessarily a problem but when you consider this is supposed to be a british girl site you do feel just slightly cheated, they are however gorgeous so maybe I'm just being picky.
The photosets are great with a choice of sizes and very big pictures, but there's a lot of blurry pictures and not sure why this is, is it the compression or the standard of photography I'm not expert enough to know. The sets can be very repetitive and boring when they needn't be, it's like you get photosets with well over 100 photos and so many shots for a set where the girl is only getting topless or mild nude means a lot of very samey shots, it's almost as if they they are doing all they can to go for quantity over quality at times, several shots of the same pose for every pose just to bump up the figures and boast how many images the site offers.
One thing that gets right up my nose, is the fact they deceive and rate a set as nude when infact the model doesn't get nude, maybe that's intentional as part of the whole 'tease' thing but I'm not convinced, if they don't get nude then don't call it nude as it's misleading.
The videos are ok, but for a site of this size and standing I must admit to expecting better. I surprisingly prefer getting off to these great looking sexily dressed girls teasing and stripping slowly more so than the usual rude straight to it porn, but the general picture quality is lacking somewhat for a site as big as this.
Anyway am running out of characters so better sum up and say that this site is one of the best I've seen despite it's few negative points, it is well well worth a months subscription to as you get lots for your money and the girls are awesome, but although there appears to be plentiful updates I'm not sure they would justify a permanent recurring sub (that's not me anyway unless I win the lotto). You won't regret joining this site, so if you haven't already then go do it.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
amazing pictures
amazing models
nice site layout
updated daily
and amazing models again, lol because they are so sexy
Cons:
bad videos
needs to be a bit more sexual, ie more nude instead of mainly tease and topless
Bottom Line:
onlytease is an amazing site with possibly the best pictures around but what really lets this site down is the movies, the lighting is poor and does not match the pictures whatsoever, also once the video is better it would be great to see more video updates like the same amount of picture updates.
The girls are amazing but the site needs to push past the PG a little bit more than it is. This is a site I join once every 2-3 months, sometimes a little longer
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content.
Large amount of great and average looking british models.
Fine updates - daily. Either photosets or videos - MOSTLY photosets.
Good mix in styles of different outfits - well, this is a SOFTCORE FETISH-KIND of site.
Zip for photosets.
Photos in ok quality/size.
Ok navigation and layout.
Fair/average price-level.
Cons:
NOT 2009 kind of videos.
Generally low/average video-quality.
Too few videos compared to photosets.
Very softcore - but ok, you can see that from the previews - that's the style of this site.
Marketing-promiss of HD-videos do NOT stick.
Some scenes are a bit stereotype - with re-use of same outfits too many times.
Some models do not even go topless.
Too many videos are photo-shoot-style.
Anoying password repeat when you download.
Bottom Line:
This site sure does a lot for marketing the product.
Wish they'd do the same for the videos and especially the quality os those videos.
At the latest PR-mail I got in March, they claimed:
"Now HD-videos".
Empty words!
Because the new videos are no more viewing-HD or even in bigger file-size or bottomline NOWHERE near HD. BTW the size of those newer files are the same as it's been for the last couple of years.
For a major 2009-site their videos sucks - I normally do not use words like that in a review - but with this site: it's the case.
It's a pity with the whole video-deal at Only Tease, because the concept is/could be very good.
Those videos:
Average file-size: 50-60 Mb.
640x480 (that ought to say it).
Only avi.
But ok, apart from the frustrations about videos in 2009 at this site, the photosets are way better.
Three sizes of zip-download: Standard, Extra and Ultra. From aproxx. 10 Mb over 35 Mb and up to 100 Mb (2048x1056).
And even the standard photo-sizes are ok.
NB: When writing this review and scanning the site again, I now see ONE new video placed today (17th of april 2009) where the size suddenly is more like it: 285 MB - and NOW: wmv. Cheers! - ONE out of 1500.
The video is with one Ashley Massey and the viewing-quality is decent - not more. (and this one is quite boring).
But, ok - if Only Tease - finally - does videos this quality, I'd sneak my score up to 80 - next time. If I ever be back after 3-4 terms - doubt it, though.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill.
-Part of network of 8 sites.
-No DRM or download restrictions. No download problems or broken links.
-Supports download managers.
-76 about a half hour top quality MPEG videos. My computer gives me no details and neither does the site.
-Screenshots that are not zipdownloadable.
-Not the usual pornstars. Very attractive, actress, but not pornactress, types. Not the girl next door and don't appear to be amateurs either. Girls are from Spain or Portugal.
-Exclusive material shot for the site.
-Unusual clothing niche.
Cons:
-The only way to find what is on the site is to check through page after page of updates of the network, listed in date order.
-Only four video options, hi or low MPEG, ipod or flash. No downloading in parts.
Bottom Line:
I really liked the girls you find here. They are generally very attractive, can tease with the best, and have nice asses. The emphasis is on the jeans and the girls butts in them. The only downside I found is that the sex is rather standard. What is different is that the girls usually have their jeans still on, about down to their ankles. The opening teasing is interesting as some of them start out outdoors in public, walking down the street or start with an indoor solo scene. Of course the camera follows those tight asses, with pretty good, well focused camerawork. The sex almost always ends in oral or facial cumshots and can in no way be called creative. I found only one scene with two girls, none with two guys. A nice plus here for a different focus that makes this site unusual, if not unique and pluses for nice looking girls, nice quality and a good quantity of videos and excellent camerawork. The sex is just ok.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ nice uniform content
+ newer videos have good quality
+ no drm
+ no dl limit
+ exclusive content
+ fast dl speed 1,3 mb/s
+ wmv-format
Cons:
- files have no special names
- irritating navigation
- foto sounds in movies
- no more dl the one per time
- medium video quality
- fotosets and videosets are mixed together
- no video preview scenes
- to pricy
- no (few) hordcore videos
- to less videos
Bottom Line:
This site got something, but that something is not enough.
You have uniform content at that site with nurse-, police, maid-, school- and nununiforms. That looks quite good. The newer videos are in wmv format and are quite sharp to watch and the download speed of the videos is up to date wit1,3 mb/s. there is no donload restriction and the content is as far as i can see totally exclusive.
The videos themselfs are mastrubation videos with few pissing videos. The girls looks quite good and natural.
But sadly, that alone didn`t raise that site to a good site status.
The cons are heavy.
If you download the videos with a downloadmanager you are forced to download only file by file, because all of the videos have no special names. The given filenames are like „1_cl“. That sucks very hard, even if the downloadrate is up to the modern standard.
The navigation is totally confusing. You are not able to check out videos by themselve. Alle the files are mixed together, therfore you have to click through every single file to see wether it is a fotoset or a video file. That is an absolute no go.
Even the video quality is only average and therfore not up to date.
As soon as i can see there are no hardcore scenes. The only boy girl scene i saw was a mastrubation scene (which even bores heavy).
The moaning and growning in the videos is stimulating, but beside the videos are sometimes used to take foto shoots, and hearing „click click“ while watching is totally disturbing.
The ammount of videos is not very high. You got aproximatly 80 videos and not to see through the update planer which comes next.
The bonus content is standard.
For what you get ist he price of 24,95$ to high. A price below 10$ would be fitting.
All in all the site is close to bad but of the nice contentet scenes average.
Might recommend
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Full access trial membership.
-Bill through CCBill.
-The newest videos can be downloaded in one file. DVD quality AVI but 640x480.
-306 photo sets. Zipdownloadable 1505x1000. Mostly if not all screenshots.
Cons:
-Not many models, about a dozen. They each have multiple videos and photo sets.
-Most videos on the site, 127 out of 143, are not downloadable as one link and are 320x240.
-Not download manager supported. Very slow downloads.
-The models are not much to look at but most have nice legs. Two models have too skinny, shapeless legs.
-The site is in English, but the actors speak a Slavic language that I don't recognize. Some may see this as a plus as many sites blab too much and this can detract from the eroticism.
-No model information or search engine. There is no way to easily find videos of a particular model, except by scrolling through all the videos on the site. The contents are listed as the site updates.
-There is no update schedule.
-Uninspired sex. I was expecting an emphasis on the leg and nylon aspects, but that seems to be unimportant here. I want legs and great girls, not dull sex while wearing nylons.
Bottom Line:
This site is not better than the usual for the genre; it may even be weaker than the others. I have yet to find a good site with a legs and nylons theme. Even for a trial I was expecting more. The visuals were just not exciting. I was expecting a lot more of great legs in nylons with attractive models, but this site just doesn't deliver that elusive quality that makes a site work. Uninspired sex with plain models, with too many low quality videos that you need to download in parts. Not recommended even as a full access trial.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
This review will repeat at the other OT sites as they are all part of 1 network (I joined for $44.95 per month to all 5).
OnlyTease is a teasing site (Not a porn site - no hardcore, minimal full nudity, light play, softcore content). Most of the models are British. Videos average around 40-70 megs per peice and there will be 1 video per photoshoot. Most if not all photoshoots will be shot in both film and video (posted separately on the site). Videos last 4-6 minutes mostly and are almost always the same - striptease. Sometimes there is music and sometimes talking/teasing.
Photos are well done. Most sets are available via Zip download in 3 different formats - up to very high quality - 50-70meg zip files for 100 photos.
Models - Many beautiful women are available here. Many models will appear on other sites - ie Kate Harrington or Lucy Zara - many will not. For many, you will only find them on the OnlyTease family of sites.
Cons:
Content is generally the same. Do not join the site looking for moaning and groaning etc. This is about all types of hosiery and outfits on sexy girls...doing sexy British girl type things! That's it! Videos could be longer...scenes could be more original!
Bottom Line:
This site has one of my highest ranks because it's f'ing fantastic at what it aims to be.
OnlyTease has the largest collection of this kind of tease on the net. Some of the content is boring...some is just f'ing hot. Women like Emma Harper, Natalia, Natasha Marley, Nikki F, Sophia Smith...there are hundreds of models - they are just so sexy...sometimes this hits the spot.
You will not be disappointed if you have the funds to spare. All of their sites are worth joining.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+High Quality photos
+Great mixture in styles of clothing.
+Updated daily.
+Has a nice catalog style. Makes it easy to search for what you want, rather that be full nude or blonde or etc.
Cons:
-Really softcore. Too many models that don't even get full nude or if they do, they don't give you a good shot of their pussy.
-Videos are pretty much useless. Seem to be nothing more then behind the scenes videos of the photo shoots.
Bottom Line:
I really like OnlyTease and the other Only sites. The one and only huge downside for me was that there were way too many photo sets that were either non nude or only topless. Being a fan of full frontal nudity, it seems 1 outta 5 models/sets would show full frontal nudity. Only Tease does have a option to search for "Full Figure Nude" but the problem with that is, that anytime a model takes off her panties, they label it as full figure nude. Even if they do nothing with the panties down but show ass.
Overall the Only Sites are ones that I'd sign up for once every 6 months for a month. There just isn't enough content to please me to stay a member month after month.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The fittest women of any Naughty America site
- Women wear athletic attire, like running shorts, or spandex. (It's hot.)
- Has a positive, "All-American" feel to it
Cons:
- Action often takes place on bleachers, which isn't very realistic.
- Plot & dialogue are predictable.
Bottom Line:
This is my favorite Naughty America site. Why? Because the women are so athletic and fit. There are a lot of site these days that shoot marginal women, but this isn't one of them. The women are well-cast as "athletes."
The site isn't perfect. I'd like to see them shoot away from the bleachers a little more. Perhaps they could shoot on location somewhere. And the plot is the usual gym/workout pickup.
But, the sex is just fantastic. When you have young male and female performers in great shape going at it, you have, IMO, a fine site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
--Good downloading capability
--Quality picture
--Mostly hot women
--Funny/goofy acting
Cons:
--Repetitive story line
--Streaming isn't always completely fluid
--Lots of fake boobs
--Scene is way, way too long
Bottom Line:
Although I've had some problems with Brazzers and the way I've been billed, I still have been giving this site a chance. To be honest, it gets the job done ... but that's about it. Downloading the scene worked great, but when I watch streaming video, it is often quite choppy. The picture is crystal clear, which would work to Brazzers' advantage if they didn't use such dull scenery. It's always the same kind of doctor's office scene. And speaking of "the same," most of the chicks I've seen on this site have fake boobs. I prefer natural, but what are you going to do. Another thing: the scene was A) way too long, and B) it took forever to get to the sex. I was almost four minutes into the movie before I actually saw any kind of sex. I guess the bottom line is that this is decent, same ol', same ol' porn -- like I said, it gets the job done -- but it could be much better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1 Lots of sexy looking girls young and old (not too old of coarse)
2 most pic sets of each model come in 3 sizes.
3 I found good navigation
4 daily regular updates are good in both pics and movies.
Cons:
1 password needed every time you download a movie. very enoying especially when its a computer generated user and password when you join. lots of copy and pasting if you don't have a good memory!
2 pic resolutions seem cloned in a lot of the sets. meaning its a normal size small pic then blown up in size. very grainy and washed. not all but many.
3 this site needs to find photographers who know how to take picturs and movies. if the camera person isn't standing on their heads or listing to the side the pictures appear blury and washed. kind of very enoying if i say so!tipical for a porn site to assume what the subscribers like to see.
3 movies are lame. not exciting. lots of strip tease now hard core. I like a good strip and tease myself thats why I joined. however if you are looking for panties and clothing tease, I know lots better sites.
4 types of panties, and dresses and other outfits the models all seem to where. you will see the same outfits on lots of models no veriety.
Bottom Line:
bottom line for me is, I came, I saw, I will be leaving. untill they get photographers who know how to take a good clean clear picture in real high res. I wont be back.
its a good site for the first time visitor and one who loves that sexy lady looking at you type pic.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I can't add too much here that hasn't been said before (that'll come later), but here goes:
Photography is excellent.
Image sizes are big, high-resolution, at least for the newer sets.
There is a very good selection of models -- essentially something for everyone.
There is just a ton of content -- you'll get your money's worth, that's for sure.
The site is well-organized, with videos easy to find and zip files for the images.
Cons:
Difficult to add much here, either, but here's my perspective:
This is really my "bottom line," but the thing you need to grasp is that this is REALLY soft-core. More about that, below.
The re-use of garments is a real downer, as some just aren't that "sexy" to begin with, and plenty of them just aren't flattering at all, especially on some models.
While most models wind up topless, some don't even do that. And I'd say that a few might even be better off if they didn't go topless, anyway.
So, the site "needs work." New/better outfits would help, as would some kind of attitude to "make every shot count," rather than just publishing thousands of ho-hum shots.
Bottom Line:
And thus, my bottom line: Again, this is just really, really, REALLY soft-core. I'm sure everyone's tastes are different, but I'd think that most folks would find easily half of the site contents to be "not sexy at all in any way" -- fully-clothed shots in not-really-very-sexy outfits. Other folks might bump that up to something like 70% or 80% -- it's just a veritable ton of stuff that, at least to me, is "tossable."
So, does the rest of the content make up for all of the tossers? "Well, only just barely." Again, there's just an overall "lack of sexiness" in a lot of it. Some sets would be great if it weren't for the ill-fitting outfits that don't flatter the models. And so on.
In the end, there is some really great content here. Probably well worth a month's subscription. But there's a TON of stuff you'll have to throw away in order to find the jewels you'll want to keep.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Joined this for something new and different, ended up very happy I did
- Pictures are 2000+ on high end
- Videos are better quality for the XVID format than WMV and are 640 high end
- You will get your fetishes filled here, pantyhose, panties, upskirts, high heels, office girls, hair pulled up with glasses, well those are at least some of my fetishes that this site fills!
- Price is not bad considering the amount of high quality pictures
- Pics are downloadable in zips and the speed is very good
- One word fellas, Gemma! Look her up if you haven't seen her, I am pretty sure I now have a new fetish called, Gemma!
Cons:
- Well, they don't get all the way naked! Take that as a con that is really a pro because some of these models nearly make me beg to be fully nude. On a side note, I didn't expect full nudity, though there is some, but very little sexual contact.
- Navigation has a few problems, I kept closing the site when closing a picture.
- I really don't see me keeping the videos, but I will keep all of the pictures
- Something I always note on these fetish type sites, it can become repetitive as most of the sets are similar
Bottom Line:
My first exposure to this site was from an ad on twistys, that is when I clicked the preview and I saw Gemma Massey. I literally threw my credit card at my computer! What a beautiful woman she is.
I have seen Gemma before on M&B, but never like this. Most of the models on here are making great eye contact with the camera, very seductive, which is a good thing, the only thing is, you will be wanting to see more! Some of the models on here do go completely nude, while others go topless, but you won't see any sexual positions in full nudity.
I was okay with this. I love the office girl look and this site has tons of office girl content. I would like to see them put glasses on more of the models, but hey, that is just me. I always had that fetish of the sweet girl peeking over her glasses with her legs crossed, nice short skirt and thigh high hose and there goes my credit card again!
I think this site is doing a great job as far as staying within their niche. It is definitely more for the picture lovers than the movie lovers.
The quality of pictures is very good, 2000+ on high end, good fast downloads on the zips, but as noted, the movies did very little for me.
I like being teased in pictures, but not in videos. Pictures have a voyeuristic way about them, which works with the tease. Overall, I recommend it to anyone who likes that classy look in women, that has any fetish that has to do with hose, skirts, panties, because they deliver on these fetishes!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# OT proved me that teaser/ strictly softcore can be 'hot enough' The shoots of the models were so stunning that I lost it two times the first day.
#hot in-your-face upskirt shots
# UK based site that masters the theme of beautiful models in dresses, outfits, upskirts, hosiery, garter belts, foot fetish and panties- their sister site's focus on hosiery and secretaries.
# many models have British accents
#outfits range from classy dresses, to uniforms (cheerleaders, race car driver) to hi end lingerie.
#many models go topless
#only 24.95 a month
# if I set the settings to ultra large; the hi rez photos made the breasts look like they were coming out of the screen at me, just great photography
#chioce between hi rez (around 65 mb) and lo rez vids about3 to 6 minutes long
#pics: 1000 x 667, 667 x 1000; large 1365 x 1248; 1248 x 1365 pics; 3000 x 2000, 2000 x 3000
#614,633 pics, 1,437 vids
#has a forum for members to choose preferences, fav models, voice opinions on shoots
Cons:
# specializes in clothes to the exclusion of hardcore.
# this is not an all inclusive site
# vids show models flirting, and primping seductively in their clothes. Starting the vid fully clothed and strip down to lingerie. again, yet no hardcore vids here for hardcore lovers.
Bottom Line:
Only Tease is for those who really appreciate how a woman's body looks in clothing, hosiery, stockings and garters, panties, dresses and outfits.Upskirt lovers will love this site as well.It is also a great site for foot fetish lovers as many pics do focus on close ups of shoes and feet in stockings. It makes for a well rounded, and hard hitting softcore site.
Though I did notice some of the vids and shoots the models did strip naked but these are exeptions to the softcore theme that occur every now and then..
There may not be hardcore here; but that does not mean its not sexy.
The pics are so large and hi rez that you can smell these beautiful models freshly pedicured feet. The models will seductively taunt you putting their toes, garter belted rear end, plump breasts will be in your face. Also the models almost sit on your face with some of the views you get with some of the upskirt shots.
overall a great site; and masters the softcore/ teaser genre
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
All the girls are babes, slim but with a femanine soft look and some nice boobs real and otherwise.
Some nice stripping scenes, hot babe, oiled skin, stripping out of her cowboy outfit, great!
Cons:
Get the stripping but distant girls with guns and flame throwers are a bit boring.
Just as you are enjoying watching a hot babe massaging her boobs the view changes, then it changes again, then again, then again, etc.
Lots of shots from a worms eye view looking up doesn't show off the assets of these hot body girls to their best.
Bottom Line:
Its very soft core, bit like Playboy with guns, etc.
Loved the look of the girls,very hot. Don't really get the guns, etc. Oiled up girls stripping off sexy outfits is where this site is at its best.
Lets face it when Veronika Zemanova is rubbing something round her boobs it cound be a gun or just about anything else, it would still look hot.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Stays within its 'niche'
+ Frequency of updates
+ Quality of photography
+ Friendly community forum
Cons:
- Very few video updates
- A couple of dead links (or missing updates)
- Design could be improved
Bottom Line:
# I joined 'College Uniform' wondering what to expect. Having joined many other uniform sites and being left disappointed, I was surprised to find a site that actually met (in fact exceeded) what was advertised on the homepage.
# Navigation was a litte confusing at first, but the content of the photo galleries made up for this. The photographs were of high quality and the galleries were plentiful.
# The limited selection of videos was disappointing but what videos there were exceeded expectations. Bit-rate was average with good sound.
# The friendly forum community was frequently visited by the webmistress who added previews of future updates, answered member questions. There is even a section for uniform requests!
# Worth pointing out that nudity is limited to topless only (to me this was the preferred option based on the niche.)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Stays unswervingly true to the uniform niche
- Beautiful models who know how to pose
- Jana Mrazkova! Yum.
- Hi quality pics, and lots of them. 38 gallery pages plus 7 bonus pages. Pics average 1000x1500 and they weigh in at nearly one meg each.
- Zip files for pics: a must for this type of site
- frequent updates
- Member forum and responsive webmaster
- Classy site in every sense
- Inexpensive trial gives you plenty of time to peruse the content
Cons:
- Vid section is still small and quality is not on par with pics: avg 770-880 kbps, 640x480
- Navigation issues: Top navigation bar not showing up most of the time for me. You will need your back button if you have the same problem
- Quite a few links not working, but webmaster will fix if notified
Bottom Line:
The strength of this site lies in the photo sections, and, as with LVpanty, the only reason I didn't rate it a 90 or higher is because the video section is not on par with the quality of the pics.
A too-brief pass through the material at this site can give you the wrong impression right from the start, as it did for me. A lot of the time the picture sets are broken up into separate galleries, with fully-clothed or mostly-clothed galleries coming first and the stripping content coming afterwards. There is plenty of skin here, though the only nudity is bare breasts. The undies are sublime. Upskirts and downblouse pics abound, and this site would be nirvana to a leg-man.
Subtlety is the key word here. It's decidedly on the soft end of softcore, and it's certainly not porn, at least not by my definition; but while the photos don't necessarily excite me they still manage to impress the hell out of me, and I'm not terribly interested in uniforms.
I posted a message about a misdirecting gallery-link in the forum at College Uniform and there was a response within two hours, as well as a fix. And this was on Christmas morning, no less.
I would highly recommend this site to people who are very interested in the niche, or just people who appreciate excellent photography and beautiful women. Those looking for anything beyond what the site promises will most likely be disappointed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Soft, soft and all soft - and still very soft
Great amount of photosets of mostly nice/great looking british girls.
Photos in 3 different qualities for download in zip
Fine resolutions.
Newer videos in ok quality (only ok) 640x480
Ok price
Cons:
Too few videos - earlier videos lousy quality
TBP claims 863 videos - could not find that many (see below)
Some may find this too soft - most girls keep the panties on
Bottom Line:
This is quite a nice site if you like the very soft stuff for a change.
Most of the quality is good/great with very fine photo-sets, especially the newer sets has high-resolution with zip.
And if you're into typical british girls.
Been here at the site 3 or 4 times before - and still some the photos and a few videos turn me on.
In the videos some of the girls try to talk a little dirty and some with succes - but you got to be content with a little strip and some boobs - and that's it. But some of it is still rather erotic.
You won't find many sites like this.
They used to have more videos, but a lot seems to be gone - but that's not a big deal, 'cause some of the old ones was in pretty bad quality.
Still they try to renew themselves - with a new design and better navigation. And they have new stuff with some of the sexiest models like Lucy Zara (she's a doll - have her own site, but that site is NOT worth the money.
Still, I was more exited the first times around - and the updates of videos are a bit slow.
But ok, for a niche-site with this kind of softcore Only Tease is worth a visit.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get over 100 episodes each with a video that can be downloaded or viewed in browser in two different formats (WMV & MPEG) and in segments or one file
-Most picture sets are very high quality and downloadable as zip files
-Updates have come regularly, averaging about an episode per week since the site began two years ago
-With your membership you get full access to all 17 Brazzers Pass network sites all for under $20 a month and if you cancel after a month you're offered a 50% discount
Cons:
-The oldest vids on the site are of lower quality than the most recent ones, running as low as 500 kbps which is a bit below standard these days
-Most of the girls, especially in recent episodes over the last year, have fake tits which I hate but others may love
-I found the plots about as lame as they get which, again, may not bother anyone, but I like the performers to at least try to make it erotic
-If you don't like the sex scenes here, the rest of the network offers exactly the same
Bottom Line:
Having reviewed over a dozen sites on the Brazzers Pass network, it's hard not to get a bit repeitive since the sites share a lot of attributes. The quality of vids and pics rates among the best in the business and offer a number of interactive features. That said, some are definitely better than others and for me this one ranks in the middle of the pack.
Like other sites on its network, navigation is simple and easy, both on the individual site and the entire operation. The integration of the two is seamless and has options beyond anything I've seen elsewhere. You can cut your videos into segments, stream or download them in multiple formats, and even get the hi-res picture sets in a zip file.
The main focus of the site deals with a medical fetish, although it's not one for those who take the fetish to sophisticated ends. Here the girl is the doctor, some random dude the patient, and after a quick "check up" they are fucking in pure vanilla fashion. Occasionally they switch it up and have the girl be the patient or a nurse, but the sex is always pretty much the same.
In the end, I wasn't very impressed here and the trend towards fake breasted girls over naturally endowed ones is disheartening. You'll definitely get your money's worth if this sort of thing turns you on since you get 100 episodes and the full network access. For me though there has to be some attempt at realism to be erotic and those ridiculous nurse outfits in particular ruined my mood completely.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ very fast dl speed over 650 kb/s
+ good - medium video quality
+ do drm
+ no dl limit
+ exclusive content
+ 22 extra sites with dl possibilities
+ flash and wmv straming viewing possibility
+ dl in one part or splitted in up to 16 parts
+ much nylon content
Cons:
- regular price is much to high
- trial is only limited
- to few videos at this page (20)
- only wmv dl
- no possibility to see all the sides updates at one/have to change to sites to dl the updates
- older files of other sites are not possible to dl in one part
- not regular updates (last 13.08.2007)
Bottom Line:
this site belongs to a network. the networks give you access to 22 extra sites. the network gives you the possibility to download hundreds of videos.
the network is good but this special site is only average.
the eastern europe content is nice to see but the video quality is too mixed.
some of the stuff is in bad video quality, but most of it not and nealry everything is downloadable.
the variety of different sex styles is good and mostly contained with teen style 18+.
the dl speed possibility is really quick and there is also no problem to use a dl accelerator.
this specific site has only 20 videos but the quality of them is only average- low.
therefore and because of the access to 22 more sites makes me rate this side to a 79.
make more updates on the single site then this site gets a 80+.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent, extensive and unique niche content for a new member.
Has a Message Board with a list of weekly updates forthcoming each week.
Very large historical archives of episodes.
Cons:
Download as much as you can during the off hours. All of the sites on the Naughty America Network have extremely slow download performance.
Updates are never on time. Never!
The webmasters are like schoolkids, always taking holidays and long weekends. Updates always lag behind other sites. Always!
"Senior" Members always flame the hell out of anyone with a legitimate complaint about the sites. I never bitch, but those who do are damn near threatened with assault and death.
Bottom Line:
Of all the sites that I have ever been a member of, the Naughty America sites have absolutely the WORST on time weekly update record. The webmaster has an excuse every single week as to why the updates are not posted as scheduled. No other site or group of sites has this kind of awful update record. The content is excellent and new members will find a huge variety of episodes to download for a couple of months. But the downloads are extremely slow.
The Updates schedule on the Message Board is worthless. It is already past midweek on 15 November of 2007 and not one site (out of a more than a dozen) has an update posted yet this week. If you enjoy being frustrated while waiting for the weekly updates each and every single week of the year, this is the place to be.
Unprofessional and childish website management. The paying customer is never right and will be publicly abused and ridiculed whenever possible.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
