Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 87 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Lingerie BBW

1. Lingerie BBW (0)

Pay
Active
50
messmer (137) 07-26-11  10:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Has BBWs

+Has Lingerie (mostly fetish wear)

+Part of a 25 sites Fetish Network (sort of)
Cons: -Video quality is horrible (No HD available). There is not a single downloaded clip that can be viewed in full window without being horrendously blurred as the total bitrate is around 1000.

-Updates every 8 days a small part of a DVD. It can take as many as 12-13 parts to obtain the complete DVD.

-Downloads restricted to 600 kbps and to one file at a time. During this time it is impossible to move around the site or to do any streaming.

-Streaming itself is inadequate at approx 400x300 (didn't stop to get the exact details).

-Most of the extra sites offered are streaming only, from 3rd party providers to boot. with a streaming window that is absolutely tiny and featuring a blurred video..

-Very limited for a fetish site (some BDSM, some TS contents, some BBW, some Female domination, some pantyhose ,,, that's about it. If you are interested in any of these fetishes .. read above re quality.

-Member's page is absolutely horrendous, overcrowded, the most confusing I have ever see
Bottom Line: I have not one good thing to say about this site. It is a total rip-off at $ 29.95 and made me, for the first time ever write to CCBill asking for a refund.

Make a wide detour around this site and all the sites listed with it.

Absolutely worst site I ever joined. I cancelled right away after looking at some samples and downloading enough to give me a fair idea of what LingerieBBW was all about. Now I am waiting for a response from CCBill.
Respond: 16 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Rimbledon

2. Rimbledon (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 01-20-11  08:11am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through vxsbill.com. I don't think I ever used them before, but cancelling was easy.
-Video choices are streaming, downloading the whole video or as clips.
-The videos are available as WMV 720x540, 2160 kbps. Not bad, but not HD either.
-A photo set for each video. Not screencaps.
-Photos are about 2000x1333.
-Comes as part of a network of 14 sites, five focus on anal or have a significant amount of it.
Cons: -The site stopped updating. The last one was 4/30/2009.
-Only 35 videos and photosets.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable.
-Very thin models. Mostly very plain.
-Not much enthusiasm.
-The actual deed is about three minutes of a fifteen minute video. Sometimes they do as little as one minute.
Bottom Line: The name of the site is a play on words concerning rim jobs, aka salad tossing or analingus. A recent PU poll showed about half personally would never do this, but about a third said they do. I personally would not, but as a kinky fantasy, I find it very erotic. Too bad the poll did not cover that.

If you like rim jobs on video, this site has that, but is not the best by any stretch of the imagination.

The biggest negative is that the site is not updating. Presently there are 35 videos and the most recent is from April of 2009.

The other big negative is that there just isn't enough ass licking on the site. The models seem to do as little as possible. The videos are about fifteen minutes long and the time spent on this ranges from one to maybe four minutes. They rarely seem to show any interest. Believe me, there are several better sites in this niche. There are only a few sites that this can be compared to, about five that focus on it that I know of, and this is the weakest.

These are Eastern European models and that may be the difference, as most sites that I have seen have American models who probably are acting. However, I will take transparently fake enthusiasm over bored going through the motions just to get it over with any day. I appreciate some admitted pretense of interest while performing in my fantasy.

The sex that you do see on the site is a bit of cock sucking in the beginning, almost always anal at some point and some vaginal. Most scenes end with a facial cumshot.I don't recognize any of the faces as well known Eastern European pornstars.

As part of a network it is just ok, but don't join for this site.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Society SM

3. Society SM (0)

Pay
Active
65
apoctom (145) 05-15-08  01:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of top models, including Audrey Leigh and Julie Night
- Big archive of scenes dating back to 2004
- All scenes are downloadable& fast downloads (>1MB/sec)
- Zip file option for all picture sets
- No DRM
Cons: - Older videos are 320 x 240 RM and broken into 15 or so clips per update
- All scenes, including newer ones, must be downloaded in parts
- Highest quality for new scenes is 640 x 480 WMV, which is not very high
- High price
- Only weekly updates
Bottom Line: I should probably be used to over-paying for fetish/BDSM content, but it still pains me to fork over $30 a month. In particular, I hoped to have access to the site's archive and download past scenes. This is possible, but after the 5th or 6th RM file, I gave up. These older movies really need to be re-encoded and reposted, especially since new scenes only come 1 per week.

My other complaint deals with the separation of movies and pictures: there isn't any! You have to click through each gallery (often 5-8 per scene) and hunt down the 5 or so movie clips for that scene. If I wanted to download pictures, this makes sense, but if I only want the movies, why make me click through each one? Why not put a movies gallery in each scene?

The site earned its really low rating based on my rating criteria which heavily weights update frequency, ability to download movies in 1 file part, and archive size. While the site scored well on archive size, it really bombed out on update frequency and movie downloads.

If you enjoy BDSM content, I think that there are better sites out there, like Fucked and Bound and Sex and Submission. If you are really tired of those and you have an extra $30 to blow, try Society SM.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Slaves In Love

4. Slaves In Love (0)

Pay
Active
92
picky (6) 11-08-08  02:05pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Slaves are more attractive than any other BDSM site.
High quality Videos.(newer movies only)
Movies have a storyline.
Movies end with sex so you get BDSM and hardcore.
Slaves look as if they are enjoying themselves.
Cons: Older videos are lower quality.
Videos are segmented.
Infrequent updates.
Some updates are pics only.
Bottom Line: One of the best BDSM sites on the net.The tour could be improved but once inside this is a fantastic site for fans of female slaves.The slaves are mostly great looking and always look like the are enjoying themselves.

Updates are a mix of Pics and videos and they update 1 segment of video at a time. With an average of 5 segments per movie this means not many new movies each month.

However this is a site which goes for Quality over quantity and is a must for BDSM fans who enjoy the submission of beautiful women.

This is is a site I join for a month roughly every 6 months to download new material as updates are infrequent.Highly recommended.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dildo And Fisting

5. Dildo And Fisting (0)

Pay
Active
80
pat362 (367) 06-29-09  08:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Access to a network of 9 sites.
-The models are in their teens to early 20's.
-The model selection is quite good with a wide range of body types to choose from
-Navigation within the site and network is easy.
-The sex is raunchy and quite extreme.
-The talking is mostly or all in English.
-Scenes can be downloaded or streamed.
-The downnloads are either regular definition with a 16:9 aspect ratio, 640x480 and 2000 bitrate while hi def is 16:9 ratio, 1280x720 and 6000bitrate
-Photosets can be downloaded in a zip file.
-They currently have 37 scenes
Cons: -The biggest drawback to this site and all other in the network is that you can only download one scene at a time. You can still navigate but you cannot open any other downloads. The average download time is about 20-30 minutes per scene.

-The sex may be a little too raunchy for some peoples taste.

-The model's name are not necessarily the one we know her under.
Bottom Line: -The score would be much higher if it weren't for the "only one" download at a time.

-I thought that they might have improved that since the last time one of us reviewed them but alas they haven't.

-The content for the site is quite good with an emphasis on anal sex with either toys, penises, hands or all of the above.

-I was rather suprised to see what some of the models did on this site since their prior works was far more softcore. (I'm not complaining).

-The price is reasonable for the full access to the network(32.95US).

-The rest of the network is a mixture of hit and miss, but when thy hit they do a very good job.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sicko Games

6. Sicko Games (0)

Pay
Active
65
asmith12 (124) 10-18-07  02:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - unique idea of "real reality" site: models are playing games of stunts for real;
- game idea modeled after shows like Fear Factor;
- it does look as they play for real;
Cons: - when I was a member, there were exactly 5 (five) episodes, and no updates for more than a year; it doesn't seem they made any improvements since.
- way too sick for my taste;
- models are obviously playing for money only, and game atmosphere doesn't feel good;
- models are ugly (well, it's difficult to find pretty models willing to do that sick things);
- while there is sex included in each game played, but it is not related to the game and is booooooring;
- shooting quality is poor
Bottom Line: There is some story behind SickoGames. As it was reported (for example, look in Google for article "FearFactorFuck Morphs Into SickoGames After Legal Threats"), originally SickoGames had domain name FearFactorFuck.com, but they got cease and desist letter from Fear Factor lawyers and as a result indeed renamed site to SickoGames. It looks that at that point site owners actually lost all the interest in site, and stopped making new episodes. Also there were reports of them having problems finding new models (which is not surprising given the things expected from the models).

Site consists of several (there were 5 at the moment) games; each game is played by 3 girls and consists of tasks (there are also 3 guys present, but they don't compete). Each task (which is not too sick) winner gets 2 points, 2nd place - 1 point, and loser not only gets nothing, but should perform a special "wheel of shame" stunt (and that's where things start to go _really_ sick).
There are also 3 sex episodes in each game, but they are not related to the game in any way and just plain boring (not to mention poor cameraguy/lighting quality).

Bottom line: if they would make new games, I'd say that it's a site for lovers of really sick sites with motives of forcing girls doing really sick things (I'm not such a lover, but I'm not judging anybody who is :-) ). But without updates, I don't see much value in it even for such lovers (maybe to pay $25 for 5 episodes once and unsubscribe right after?)
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Society SM

7. Society SM (0)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (322) 03-30-10  04:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Membership in 5 sites for the price of 1
- Huge amount of material
- Download speeds (1MB/s and 1.5MB/s) as advertised
- Many big-name porn stars
- Many beautiful models
- No over-emphasis on one body type – most people will find models they like
- Pictures and video available
- Pictures are available zipped
- No download limits
- One of the best BDSM sites available
Cons: - Videos are broken up into segments (the segments mark a different part of the scene, but no full download is available)
- Video links are hidden within picture galleries, not readily available
- Can get repetitive – same settings, same equipment used frequently
- Older videos are smaller and play in Quick Time
Bottom Line: Society SM (SSM) is one of five sites available through a membership to any one of those five sites. (This includes Society SM, Fucking Dungeon, Cum Bots, Perfect Slave and Strict Restraint.) This bundling seems to be new, and creates an amazing value for BDSM fans. This review will look at SSM specifically, though much of it will also be applicable for the other sites.

SSM is a large site, having been in existence since about 2004. They have over 200 models, and many of those models have multiple scenes on the site. For quantity, this site is a great value.

For quality, this site is also an excellent value. The video is available in two formats, though I only downloaded the .wmv format. Download speeds are advertised at 1MB/s and I achieved those speeds consistently. I’m not a technical guy so I can’t really translate the video into technical specs, but I can say that it is comparable to what is available on other sites.

If SSM has one failing, it can be blamed on an embarrassment of riches. The site is so large that the number of models and scenes using the same settings, equipment and techniques actually starts to become a bit boring. The number of settings is limited, and the equipment used (even though it is innovative and creative) remains a constant throughout many of the scenes. For many scenes, the only variable is the model herself. Don’t read this as me saying “one negative aspect to this site is that it offers too much porn,” since that isn’t possible. But they could use different settings. The scene with Julie Night, for example, is shot outdoors and has a completely different feel to it. More outdoor work, or more in a setting other than the dungeon would be great.

As for the models, they are top notch. Many popular porn stars seem to have passed through SSM’s dungeon. I’m a big BDSM fan and always appreciate seeing a mainstream porn star on a BDSM site to see their reactions. One important thing to note is that this isn’t a site that degrades women. There is nothing inherently degrading about being a sub, and these Doms know this. It is fun and interesting to watch some of these women explore a unique sexual interest.

If you’re a fan of BDSM my recommendation is that you get a membership to SSM. You won’t be disappointed. Maybe a bit bored eventually, but not disappointed.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Training Of O

8. The Training Of O (1)

Pay
Active
93
RustyJ (145) 05-09-13  03:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Almost 350 scenes to date. The site has been running since 2007
-Very high quality company in general, they seem to be the good guys in porn if you can look past that one non voluntary bruising of a model case that was reported a while back
-Armory in San Francisco proveides for a great site to shoot this kind of material
-Very high production and innovative bdsm ideas
-Great selection and variety of models
-Good amount of hardcore sex included
-Makes a creative mix of the different niches on various Kink sites
Cons: -Scenes are sort of splitted into "days". That means you get usually 3-4 updates from the same model in similar settings. However the are full length each so this might turn out to be pro when you particularly like the model in question
-Humiliating, slave training, doing chores and so on might not be to everyones tastes even if they are generally into bdsm niche. Often a bit too non sexual in my opinion
-Always the same with Kink: No kind of network subscription or ability to mix between sites available
-Dedicated photo sessions would be nice touch but obviously they'd require lot of extra effort
-On the pricier side when it comes to cost per update
Bottom Line: The Training of O is a themed site on Kink.com network that focuses on slave training. The material is divided into "training days" of each individual slave trainee where they are tested for different skills like pain tolerance, anal
sex, cleaning the toilet and what not. Usually there is up to four days of each slave's training. Occassionally they throw in an auditioning scene where they are selecting candidates fo their training that are made to look like slave market of some sort. In the end of the training they might be presented to the master of the Armory in their "Upper Floor" setting.

There is lot of role playing and acting involved. Scenes or days may start with the slave waking up with some kind of diary writing, instruction or grade giving and such activity that is nice touch for those who really can get into make believe. Personally I'm more int the actual sex in this scenes so there is quite much overhead in these videos.

When you look past the make believe, you'll find that this site is quite nice mix of much of the non gay niches found on this network in general. There are scenes that look like Hogtied or Device Bondage with some Sex And Submission thrown in. The only difference is that especially lately the penetrating male performer tends to be a gimp kind of guy, usually in bondage himself too and wearing some full body latex suit. Lots of whipping, caning, forced bj's too. Fetishwear, stocks, wooden boxes over the girls's heads, you name it, they probably got it.

The site and it's functionality really doesn't need another round of praise from me. It all works flawlessly and smoothly with download speeds exceeding what most can get through their broadbands. DL managers work fine. Photos are zipped but as with other sites here, the photos are more like a side product taken during shooting video. The sites are not really cheap if you consider the once a week update rate but you can always sign in and wait for a 19,99$ rebate. Higly recommendable site, especially for the variety.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exclusive Club

9. Exclusive Club (0)

Pay
Active
70
MargulisAZ (84) 06-30-09  05:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some good spreading, gaping, and extreme shoots.
Decent movie download options (full movie included).
Good amount of screen caps per video.
Forum and blog are kind of cool.
A few really hot models.
Cons: Very slow download speeds (100 kb/s).
Low amount of content (46 shoots)
Infrequent updates (once per week).
Small amount of content added with updates (either 1 vid or 1 photoshoot).
Broken links abound on site.
Only 1 or 2 videos per girl.
Many unattractive models.
Expensive for quality of content.
Bottom Line: Overall I was disappointed with this site. It has some potential but definitely needs a lot of work. I joined for the Sam update since I love gaping pussies and she is probably the best one on there in my opinion. Wish there was more of her, but as with all the models, you are only going to get a couple photo shoots and a couple videos. Here are some points of interest:

1. According to the webmaster members should get around 300 kb/s on downloads, but I never got above more than 125 or so, always hanging around 100 kb/s. Downloading the best quality movie on some girls took 3 hours.

2. Updates only come once a week, and even that update is only 1 set for a model. Not 1 whole model, just 1 set for a model. So, one week you might get a picture set of a model, then wait another week for 1 movie for a model, etc. In other words, don't expect a lot of new content here. The site has been out for years and there are only 46 main models to choose from, each of which only have a few photo sets and 1 or 2 videos. There is a vault with extra content in it from the older days but most of this is very poor quality, and often times the links don't even work to download the stuff.

3. Broken links. Unacceptable as far as I'm concerned on a site that I pay for. Only this site and Simon Scans have I seen so many broken links. If you go into the vault and try to download some of the older videos, many just link you back the main page of the site. I even found this to happen on some of the newer content as well. Nothing is more frustrating than seeing something that makes you think, "this looks hot, let me download it", only to find that you aren't going to be downloading a damn thing when the link is busted.

4. The scenes themselves mostly revolve around solo masturbations and examination videos which involve some stretching and gaping, along with speculum use. The scenes are decent, but there just needs to be more of them, and at an increased pace.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Action Girls

10. Action Girls (0)

Pay
Active
79
SnowDude (214) 07-24-07  07:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The site offers a unique niche that you won't find anywhere else, not even close
-Although the site started with a "post-apocalyptic" theme, the creators have branched out into new ones including a fitness fetish and a series set in the old west
-The production values are extremely high for a porn site, with lots of action, realistic props and sets, and a really smooth feel to all of the content
-While many sites might eventually rotate out some series or videos, it's all still included
Cons: -The quality of the videos on the site is downright awful and picture quality is only average at best
-Navigating the site is like touring a disaster area with different sorting methods but no real order to the site overall
-The site mostly exists as a teaser for the DVDs that they make, which is the only way to get the content at high quality
-The price is far too much for what you get in return and you are paying for the high cost of production which has risen numerous times over the years.
Bottom Line: Before diving into my review, I must admit that I signed up for the trial membership without any intention of joining for a full month. For me, there isn't any porn site that's worth over $25 a month and that's including multi-site networks. What I found in the site didn't change my mind on the price, but I felt it was only fair to admit I went into the trial already holding a bias.

The navigation for the site is downright awful, although it does allow you to sort the content according to the plot, date, or girl you want to find. Despite this, I found it very confusing and basically thrown together each time new content is added. When looking for content including Veronika Vanoza, for example, a couple of her videos were noted but it directs you to other girls' pages where she isn't the feature star.

Just about all of the content produced for the site is still there and you can view it chronologically so you can catch up. However, all of it plays at very low quality (less than 300kbps in most cases) and although the picture quality is average, both seem very substandard for this type of site.

In my opinion, the high price is due to the high cost associated with the prodcution of Action Girls, which would be perfectly fine if you got to see it in HD. However, what you end up with is a test drive of the lowest level ride in the place along with a hefty bill for your trouble. Join the trial for a look if the niche interests you in the least, but for me that's the end.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tushy Massage

11. Tushy Massage (0)

Pay
Active
84
dumpington (5) 05-04-07  01:48pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Beautiful nude women getting massage
Occasionally dominant lez giving massage
Love those beautiful female asses!
Cons: Becomes mechanical if not done right
Ignore tushies to go right to crack too often
Bottom Line: These should all be incredibly erotic as a lesbian massaging the beautiful body of a not-necessarily-lesbian girl is NICE!!! But too often it seems like the sex is part of the price of the massage, and that's not interesting. Also, a girl's pretty behind is sexy enough without ignoring it for instant analingus instead! They need to give more loving attention to those pretty butts!
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Slaves In Love

12. Slaves In Love (0)

Pay
Active
90
asmith12 (124) 10-17-07  01:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - maledom/femsub submission and sex;
- in most cases both male and female models seem to enjoy it, so "Slaves In Love" is not just a name;
- creativity; most clips are real videos with a story behind;
- stills/video quality is quite good;
- one of masters/owner seems to be professional composer, so music in clips is outstanding.
Cons: - more than half of updates are stills-only (no video);
- less updates compared to kink.com sites (such as sexandsubmission); still ok though.
Bottom Line: One of the very few decent sites originating from Russia; video clips are in Russian but with subtitles in English. It seems that originally it was created by a composer guy (which explains role of music in some clips), but currently I'm not sure he's also with the site (would be a pity).

Usually they create very intimate and really loving atmosphere, with masters using BDSM implements not as a tool to abuse, but more as a tool to reach mutual excitement (though recently they got a new master which is a bit more into abusing his slaves; not exactly my cup of tea, but overall they're still very loving).

More than a half of updates are stills-only, but the rest are parts of pretty long stories with real (obviously, BDSM-oriented) script behind; scripts are usually extremely well-thought (and IMO create better storyline than, say, costumed porn videos by Private - and it says a lot).

Bottom line: highly recommended for lovers of Safe, Sane and Consentual BDSM niche (opposed to sites simulating rape and violence).
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cuckold Me Now

13. Cuckold Me Now (0)

Pay
Active
50
xexbot (36) 06-25-12  10:33am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I rarely can't find anything positive to say about a site, but this site was really so bad it doesn't have any pros
Cons: Video quality is not quality at all. The average wmv file size at this site is around 20mb or less with many falling around 6mb. Even a large file I downloaded (83mb) was still in a 720x480 frame, was not HD, and it still looked like the picture was getting stretched when you maximized the video window. The smaller files are clearly designed for an old school site and to be played in a very small window (320x240).

The design of the site really looks outdated. I have talked in the past about sites that hearken back to the nineties. In this case, if I didn't know better, I would say the site was designed somewhere around 1979. It actually reminds me of an old Adam and Eve catalog from the 1970s. Basically a page which a bunch of thumbnails, no titles or descriptions for videos, and you don't even get any clue as to the size and quality until you open the page that has the video on it.

Absolutely no search capability or indexing whatsoever.

I have run out of room to keep complaining
Bottom Line: This site is probably the biggest ripoff I have ever personally encountered. I went for it basically because they also included a membership to Romanvideoarchives.com. That turned out be an even worse selling point.

Basically I think a lot of these videos actually do date back to the late seventies or eighties. At least they look like they do. The quality is sub-par, even by 1970s standards. There are times when you can tell they just put the camera there, hit record, and that's the only shot your going to see the whole time, even when the actors move out of frame. It really is pretty bad quality just at the most basic, point-and-shoot level.

This site doesn't seem to be updating, though they claim they are. If they are they are only updating with old videos from the archive, because I have yet to see anything that looks like it was even shot within the last five years. Even webcams have better video quality now than what they were using.

The bottom line here is that if you waste a single cent on this site you're getting burned. I am trying to post this ASAP in the hopes I can prevent some of you from making the same mistake I did. If you are looking for cuckold videos there are far better sites like Cuckoldcream that will cost you about the same amount. They have clearly designed this site for low bandwith users, and file size (and quality) designed for streaming or downloading through a 56k modem (remember those days). I guess if you're feeling nostalgic for a five or ten min video that has been broken down into 2min videos meant to be played in about a four inch window, then this is the site for you. Otherwise, I would avoid this site like the plague.

P.S. Don't let the "tour" or "start page" windows fool you. The page shown above (or for this site here) is not the actual "members" page. Once you click "members" it takes you to the page from the 1970s.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Thin Fetish

14. Thin Fetish (0)

Pay
Active
68
BostonPJR (72) 07-04-08  01:29pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - This is a hard-to-find niche and thinfetish is the most recent site to highlight it.
- The girls are mostly young, attractive and skinnier than the usual fare on the next-best sites like Hegre.
- Forum has posts from defunct sites of long lost forgotten skinnies- some quite extreme -for the real thin beauty lovers out there.
Cons: -Two, count 'em, two videos!
- Has not updated since March. It's pretty much being kept alive by the forum. But it's basically life support at this point.
- Variety is lacking and half of the (six) women are hardly beautiful by any conventional opinion. Others aren't quite as thin as you'd expect, or hope for.
Bottom Line: If you're desperate for new content of girls so skinny you probably won't find them anywhere else, then thinfetish is worth a look. In our ballooning society, it's 900 times easier to find bbw and bw (minus the b for beautiful) porn sites, than one that appreciates the girls on the other end of the sexy spectrum. And for that reason only, thinfetish is a site I'd still recommend. If only to grab all the content you can before this site shuts down completely. There are some sexy models that I wish I could find somewhere else (like the sexy bald Kate), but as for this site, it's days are numbered.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Femanic

15. Femanic (0)

Pay
Active
70
BadMrFrosty (56) 03-09-10  07:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: If this were a normal porn site I would think the models are very attractive, the thing that makes this site so amazing is that these beautiful women do the nastiest things.

Content is great for those that are into this sort of fetish. Pissing, food play and puking are the main themes.

Membership includes access to their sister site. As the site is not listed here and the content is controversial I won't mention it in this review. I have listed it as a pro because it doubles the amount of content available.

The technical aspect of the content is pretty good but not normally HD. There are 1 or 2 720P MP4's on the site but they are not regularly updating in HD although the quality of the 480P videos is still good.
Cons: Download limits. Having a limit per 24 hours is bad enough but also having an hourly limit makes it a real chore to download the content.

Updates used to be a full scene once or twice a week. Recently a update counts as a 5 minute clip from a scene. They are usually posting clips from several scenes at once so it can take weeks for a full scene to be available.

Older content is not only poor quality technically (looks like it was transferred from VHS) but also very old. Some of the scenes are from the mid 90's and haven't aged at all well.

Scenes are not accompanied by photo sets.

In some of the scenes the ladies seem to have downed a couple of bottles of vodka beforehand, I don't know why but that makes me feel kind of uneasy.
Bottom Line: There are 2 things that would instantly get this site a score of 80 from me:

1. Get rid of the download limits.
2. Update complete scenes

The (newer) content itself is excellent, I don't know of any other sites that have this sort of quality of women pissing and throwing up over each other, it's like a car crash, you know you shouldn't look but something makes you anyway :)

If this is the sort of content you are into it is worth a membership but beware, beware, beware the download limits.

Did I mention the download limits??!?!!?
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pissing.com

16. Pissing.com (0)

Pay
Active
80
rearadmiral (322) 03-31-12  11:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 31 scenes
- Mix of girl/girl and boy/girl
- Typical Kink quality
- Good mix of porn stars and relative unknowns
- Videos available in multiple formats
- Photos available (singles and zips)
Cons: - Only 31 scenes
- No longer updating
- No clear indication that the site isn’t updating
- Doesn’t have the same BDSM feel that other Kink sites have
- Price is a little high for a small site that doesn’t update
Bottom Line: The ‘streaming’ videos on this site are excellent. Okay, okay, I’ll try to keep the pee jokes to a minimum here.

I know there are mixed thoughts here about sites that are no longer updating. Jpg386’s comment on this page certainly captures the view that a lot of PU members have on the topic. I’m with the members who think that whether a site is updating or not is just one factor in the value equation.

The site is part of the Kink.com family of sites and as such it is offered as a stand-alone site so a membership here does not give you access to any other Kink sites. Being part of the Kink network the scenes are well shot with lighting, sound and editing all being in the top tier of adult sites. Whoever manages the technical stuff sure is a real whiz. (Sorry, I couldn’t help myself…) What certainly helps too is the female talent. There are many well-known porn stars on the site, such as Amber Rayne, Flower Tucci and Annie Cruz, and there are also a lot of lesser-known models. Many of these lesser-known models (to me, anyway) also appear on other Kink sites so I presume that they’re more known as fetish models rather than mainstream stars.

The site is relatively small, offering only 31 shoots. The shoots are shorter in duration then most other Kink offerings, most being less than 30 minutes long. That certainly starts to move the value marker to making this a less than great value. Some of the scenes have a bit of a set-up where the models play a role, and others have no set up and just have people peeing on a woman. The one constant is that the scenes aren’t a peeing free-for-all: there is usually one female model who is the receiver. Having one ‘submissive’ model is really the only link that the site has with the BDSM roots of the Kink family tree. People looking for hardcore BDSM with peeing probably won’t find what they’re looking for here. Neither will people who want to see women peeing on men, because most Kink sites have dominant men and submissive women and that remains true here. Jpg386 commented that the site features “mostly a bunch of lesbo scenes where laughing girls pee on each other.” I don’t agree with that in that of the 31 scenes on the site only six are all-girl. The comment is correct, though, in that the mood in the scenes tends to be a lot lighter and less menacing than on other Kink sites. I’m not really sure why the director opted to be less BDSM-themed; it may be that Kink figured that the site was pushing the legal limits as it was and adding in a BDSM element might make the religious right go nuts. Or more nuts, I guess.

Being a Kink site, the technical stuff is well done. Each scene offers a trailer, photos and video. Video is available as a stream or downloadable as a WMV (HD), WMV, MP4 (HD) and in sizes for mobile devices. I downloaded the WMV HD scenes and they come in at 1280x720 at 7200kb/s and 30fps. They’re in Codec 9. Subjectively they look great.

The photos are available in two resolutions (800x533 and 1200x800). They’re available as singles or zipped. While these resolutions aren’t great, you have to consider that the most recent ones were shot at least three years ago when these would have been excellent quality. Which leads me to the biggest negative of the site…

Pissing.com is no longer updating and hasn’t added a new scene in about three years. I can understand that a site may stop updating and I’m not going to fault a site owner for making a business decision to stop shooting for a site, but I do wish that Kink was a bit more open about the fact that the site is no longer active. Back when Kink stopped shooting for Water Bondage they had a disclaimer that the site was no longer updating (but it seems that they’re trying to revive it). Eventually that disclaimer was removed. Same for Pissing.com. To make matters worse, Kink stopped listing the dates of the shoots so it is almost impossible for a prospective member to know that the site is no longer adding new material. This seems strange for a company that otherwise does everything else right and has a reputation for treating their customers well.

So is the site worth a look? I think so, but a person should consider the value for themselves. I’ve had memberships at similar themed sites before and can say that the Kink way of doing things means that Pissing.com is pretty much the number one site for number one. (Sorry again… that’ll be the last joke.) There are 31 great scenes that look good and are available in most ways a member would want them. I do hope that they’ll reactivate the site some day, and until then I do wish they’d be more open about the site’s status. Until they start filming again, they should lower the price to better reflect the true value of a small, inactive site. But even with that caveat, if you like this niche, I’d recommend the site for sure.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teach Me Fisting

17. Teach Me Fisting (0)

Pay
Active
80
mr smut (42) 11-27-09  11:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + exclusive content and network access (limited for the first 2 months)
+ weekly updates on Friday
+ Site seems to have no download limit
+ lots of fisting and even some double vaginal or anal fisting
+ over 250 unique scenes and 193 different models
+ the newest videos are also available in full HD as WMV or H.264
+ good mix of well known models and some newcomers or one timers(?) as well
Cons: - you have to enter a captcha code every time you login
- pictures are only 1280 pixel on the long side
- some older videos are only 448x336 pixel large
- photo series sometimes have only very few pictures
- models are often heavily rouged I like a more natural look
- no model bios not even measurements are given
Bottom Line: This is a site dedicated to fisting content only and it's a quite nice one. I was happy to see that this one is diectly available for me too after I joined Lusty Grandmas. It's fun to explore the huge archive using the beta version of the new user interface even though it still needs some work.

Lots of the scenes contain crazy stuff like insertion of huge dildos or baseball bats and female assitents fisting the models. As already stated in my review on Lusty Grandmas this is real hard stuff and maybe not everybodys taste. I only wonder why so many of the younger models seem to speak no english at all.
Also I was distracted by some of the comments the guys filming the models made.

Within the last few days I experienced some problems when downloading content from this site. Sometimes the downloads won't start or what's even worse stop after already having downloaded some hundred megabytes. Guess I'll try to make my download manager work with this site.

For someone being interested in stuff like this I'd recommend to have a look at it. The download problems costs some points but the content is 100% o.k. as far as I'm concerned.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teach Me Fisting

18. Teach Me Fisting (0)

Pay
Active
84
RustyJ (145) 12-14-10  05:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -304 scenes of material on a very well defined topic and updating weekly
-61 scenes in nice 1080p with rougly the same number in perfectly ok 720p
-Newer sets have high resolution photosets available with enough pixles for the largest of the screens. Other scenes have equally nice photography in slightly smaller image size. All zipped.
-Mostly very good looking East European and Russian models
-An occassional baseball bat here and there to bring variation to the slightly monotonous content ;)
Cons: -Server issues resulting in corrupted video files and image zips. Zips are less affected while video files are often rendered unviewable
-A niche site. Some may find the contents very monotonous as is often the case with these. On the other hand to some this might be a goldmine
-Don't count on getting this immediately. You need to do little research to find out which subscriptions give which sites as the main content and which as a bonus
-Action can be a bit messy which may not be to everyones liking
Bottom Line: The name of this site is a bit misleading as it appears little teaching is needed here. Or maybe it's just that the teachers are so good that taking fists, giant dongs and baseball bats to all holes is as easy as it looks like on this site ;)

Models are mainly the same that on the other sites of this network, I'd say 90% East European and Russian. That is perfectly ok to me as I prefer them to other options.

There is content from 2005 and the current updates are weekly. The older videos suffer from low quality as can be expected. These days the content is mostly g/g while originally there was more b/g scenes, maybe a little more with that teaching aspect visible. The newer content is however a bit more varied and suffers less from the "same old sofa in every scene" syndrome than the older content.

All in all this site is very nice part of the network because it offers something no other site there has.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Femanic

19. Femanic (0)

Pay
Active
70
artnoir (17) 04-16-10  07:16pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Explicit content
+ Exclusive content
+ Piss vids are great
+ Excellent video quality (varies between 960x540 .mp4 / 720x404 .avi / 640x480 .avi - high bitrate on all files though )
+ Access to lezpoo.com
+ A couple of nice chicks like Sasha, Rhonda, Tereza (Jana Mrazkova), the rest are decent at best
Cons: - Limited contents
- Most of the vids are split into parts (especially new videos, which can be split into 12+ parts)
- Awful website design and functionality
- Not a lot of attractive girls (given the contents I guess that's understandable, but why does it have to be that way?
- Actually not as exciting as I though it would be
- Not that much pissing
- A considerable amount of puke and spitting (For me this is a con, for others it might be a pro)
- Limited downloads (may depend on your connection though) My limit was 4 simultaneous downloads
Bottom Line: I've sparsely come across clips from this site and it's sister site in the past couple of years and was quite amazed by the quality of the videos considering the niche.

Reassuringly all the videos are of great quality, though in different formats.

You can easily download the whole site in an evening and enjoy it. After that Recycle bin is knocking on your door.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teach Me Fisting

20. Teach Me Fisting (0)

Pay
Active
82
MargulisAZ (84) 03-02-08  08:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of content.
Regular updates.
Quite a few quality looking models.
Easy site navigation.
Every scene has pics and video.
Quite a few bonus sites with membership.
Cons: Same shoot location every time - a couch.
Model quality has gone down some over the last 6 months.
Camera man and Zolli talk frequently during scenes, which could be a turnoff for people who do not want to hear this.
Updates are broken up and released in parts over a week's time, instead of just delivered at once.
Bottom Line: Being a huge fan of fisting, I was really excited when this site launched. It's been up and going for a decent while now, so by this time there is a ton of updates to sift through and every one of them delivers on the fisting. Well, there is of course some scenes where there isn't full fisting, but at least they try.

Model quality is pretty solid but I will say it has gone down over the last 6 months somewhat. Still, there is enough content that you should have no problem finding more than a few attractive girls making a hand disappear. Also, expect all euro models. And yes, a lot of them you have seen before, but not all.

Zoli usually makes his presence felt in every scene, so if you hate hearing people other than the models talk you could be very annoyed with this. I personally find him pretty funny, so it doesn't bother me too much, but some it could.

Video quality is pretty good and site navigation is good. There are enough thumbnails for the video to know whether you want to download it or not, and there is a preview clip of every scene which helps a lot also.

All in all it's probably the best fisting specific site out there, but in reality it's not that hard to accomplish that feat since most of the sites for fisting are pretty lacking. Still, it holds it's own regardless and gets my recommendation.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cucciolo Page

21. Cucciolo Page (0)

Pay
Active
92
djwolf (61) 04-03-07  02:22pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - High quality pictures
- Lots of downloadable video clips
- Fully exclusive content
- Big updates twice a week
- Good quality camerawork in videos
- Hot looking women and nice heels
- Plenty of variety
Cons: - A bit expensive
- Some older pictures lack sharpness
- No full length video option
Bottom Line: This is a really great site for trampling fans.
The content is exclusive and there is plenty to download. All the content features women trampling on a guy, often more than one at a time.
There are loads of pictures and probably at least 500 video clips in quality wmv format, they last around 1-4 mins. The videos play great in full screen mode. The camera angles are nice and show good close-ups of feet and shoes as well as full body shots.
The women are all european with great bodies and wear some nice clothes including sexy high heels. There's plenty of barefoot action too.
There isn't much wrong with this site to be honest. It may seem a bit pricey at $29.95 but it's money well spent if you like quality trampling content.

Follow-Up:
Site has improved with new first video shoot, PPV and theater sections. Still updated regularly with quality content. Price remains unchanged.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Woman Worship

22. Woman Worship (0)

Pay
Active
82
djwolf (61) 04-01-07  11:36am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - High quality pictures and videos
- Downloadable video clips
- Updated about 3 times a week
- Good looking women with nice feet
- Realistic looking videos
- Fairly cheap price
Cons: - Basic site design
- Older videos are removed
- No full length video options
Bottom Line: This is a pretty nice site for any foot fetishists or leg lovers out there. The site features men worshipping women's legs, feet and shoes. There is also some trampling.
There is a fair number of quality pictures and video clips. When I was a member there were around 1500 pictures and 40 video clips which are 2-4 mins long on average. The videos are in real media format and look nice and crisp. The acting is one of the most realistic I've seen in a foot fetish site. Most of the women look pretty and have nice legs and feet, they also wear some nice high heel shoes, stockings and sexy outfits. It's a real shame that they remove older video clips as this limits the amount of content. If this wasn't the case it would get a much higher score. I still enjoyed it and would say it's worth joining for the cheap price of $15.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit BBW Superstars

23. BBW Superstars (0)

Pay
Active
86
sullivan (32) 07-12-07  06:38pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (21), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large collection of quality BBW material, in 4 sections: (1) a 'reality' bangbros-style section of the site, with great sex-scenes; 24+ movies, 30 min. each.

(2) A BBW dvd section that actually has some top-notch material (not stale junk), and lots of it; 90+ movies, ~20 min. each.

(3) A Plompers 'magazine' section w/ great photo shoots, a mix of American and European models.

(4) A section of bbw 'extras' (mostly movies, mostly blowjobs)

Regular updates
Cons: Some of the feature models on the reality section are not so pretty in the face (though most are sexy enough)

More of a BBW than a big breast or big ass site.

$30 a month is a bit too expensive now.
Bottom Line: I always wanted BangBros to do a BBW site; that may not ever happen, but BBW Superstars fills that void quite nicely.

$30 seems like a bit much, but for it you're getting at least 3 sites worth of material; and as these guys are clearly committed to sticking around and growing, this will become more and more worthwhile as time passes.

The video quality on the reality site is super-duper; better than Bang Bros. And the crew of guys is less obnoxious; just a bunch of sweet, dumb bbw-lovers. (Trivia: the scenes all seem to be shot in the Las Vegas area.)

I was surprised by the BBW DVD section, since they don't really advertise it on the tour (nor does TBP mention it). The quality is a little lower than the reality material, but there's still some great stuff to be found (a redhead I've been obsessing over this week, in particular).

I'm confused by the Plompers part of the site, because it seems like a selection of European models' photosets, combined with a handful of American and British models' videos. Well, I don't get it, but I like it.

And if you save up your pennies, you will too. This is definitely in my top 3 of BBW sites.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Training Of O

24. The Training Of O (1)

Pay
Active
88
Jay G (65) 05-27-09  05:37pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. With a little of everything in the BDSM department, "Training of O" has sex, bondage, spanking, pain, humiliation, and lots of commentary from the participants.

2. One of the high quality Kink.com sites with above average camera work, many good looking women, and a desire to try something "different."

3. Lots of content accumulated over the last three years.

4. Painstaking about the consentual nature of these sexgames, one gets a lot of commentary from the beautiful subjects of these sex games. They're probably mostly in it for the money, but they sure have been "trained" to give interesting perspectives on BDSM.
Cons: 1. Slow, slow, slow, slow.....you get hours of "training," but only a small percentage is actual sex or spanking. Without fast forward I would fall asleep.

2. Lots of kinks that I fast forward through include wearing wooden boxes on a pretty girl's head, shoveling dirt, licking the floor, shining boots, and too many more to mention. I'm pretty kinky, but still find only 20% to 30% of the content sexy.
Bottom Line: Worth a try for pretty girls, kinky content, and attempts at lots of different content at a fairly reasonable price ($29.95/mo USD). I like other Kink sites better, but variety is the spice of life, and this site is spicy enough to be worth a look.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mandy Is Kinky

25. Mandy Is Kinky (0)

Pay
Active
80
exotics4me (463) 06-20-08  11:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Goth heavy site that doesn't go too far overboard with the extreme/1,000 piercings with 212 tattoos look.
- Best reason to join is the bonus sites you get with it. You get over 30 21 Sextury sites with it!
- Pictures on this site are your normal 21st Sextury quality, but not huge resolution, still they do have zips and they are one of the better photography studios when it comes to being a big company.
- Every set has a video and picture set, around 40 of each.
- Some of the higher tier models that you wouldn't expect on a niche site like this, Simony Diamond and Zafira were two that surprised me being on here.
- I see improvement in the 21st Sextury sites stability, good download speed and has yet to be down.
Cons: - These cons will only apply to this site, some of the costumes are a little too far out there for my taste. Examples, a third fake eye on the forehead?
- Video quality still needs to be improved, videos are topping out at 450 high end, pretty good 1,200 bitrate.
- Just sort of a warning for those considering this site, some of it is pretty extreme, gagging, gaping, etc..
- Biggest fault right now is that it just doesn't have a lot of content and at that, most of the content is very similar.
Bottom Line: I joined this site after one of the 21st Sextury webmaster/reps answered a comment I left about the bonus sites.

To kind of backwards, let me say that I am on my second month of subscription and might even let it go for a 3rd month. Mandy is Kinky isn't anything that great, slightly above average, mainly because I like the models they have and have something of a goth/geeky fetish.

This site is not for you if you are into glamour only, as it does go into the dark underworld of near violent sex. I wouldn't really call it a BDSM site, but there is plenty of choking, gagging, gaping orifices and so on.

I've always been a fan of 21st Sextury picture sets, though the resolution could be a little higher, I have always thought they really capture the models in good sexy poses and I usually like their color schemes. Though most of the color on this site is black and silver.

The videos are very hardcore. I'm talking eye shadow dripping down the faces of the girls, 2 on 1, so this is not for those looking for a site like Club Sandy.

The star of this site is Mandy Bright, who is a quite attractive model in her own right. Having said that, some of the zany costumes were a little much for me to enjoy. I really have no desire to see an alien woman having sex. Kind of felt like an episode of Futurama gone wrong.

If I was just recommending this site alone, I doubt that I would recommend it, but as a whole, with the more than 30 bonus sites, I recommend giving it a try!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 87 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Infernal Restraints (2)
2. Lactation Fantasy (1)
3. The Art Of Pee (1)
4. The Training Of O (1)
5. Bizarre Insertions (1)
6. CL Erotic (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.19 seconds.