Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 85 Page :    Next Page >

Visit The Art Of Pee

1. The Art Of Pee (1)

Pay
Active
55
LPee23 (13) 01-20-14  11:14am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site seems to have started off promising, but never really look flight. They have a total of 13 clips and 13 photosets available for members. They have not been removing content, these are the only ones they ever posted. The scenes are all solo girl peeing.
-models include Clara G, Zafira, and Adrianna Russo
-video resolution: 720x408
-photo resolution: 1500x1000
-membership comes with access to 13 other sites in network
Cons: There is a minimal amount of content. They don't ever seem to have updated after posting their original 13 scenes. There is just not much more to say here. Also, while Wetscape.com is a Tramp Stamp Studios site, it is not included in the network of sites that come with TheArtofPee.com.
Bottom Line: I don't think 13 scenes are worth the price of membership no matter how you cut it. They are decent quality scenes, with recognizable European models, but just way to little to make up a site. The only way I could recommend joining this site is if you were also interested in one or more of the 13 other sites in the network.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit CL Erotic

2. CL Erotic (1)

Pay
Active
74
skippy (36) 10-26-13  10:58am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive, fit and flexible models
Images and videos all the way back to 2000
About 65 models
5-30 sets per model
Exclusive content
All sets are dated
Probably 60+ HD video clips
Sets are nicely done (all studio)
CCBill generates a random username and password, (at sites request) but the site allows it to be saved.
Best site that I know of for the genre
Good honest site in a tiny niche
Minimal cross-selling
Cons: In order:
Image size is 800x1200 MAX!!??
No image size options. What you click is what you get.
Navigation is truly awful!
No zip files of sets!!!??
File numbering is 001.jpg, 002.jpg (making file management diffcult)
Older vids are tiny
Older images are REALLY tiny (800x524)
Many of the models are only partially nude
Some are not nude at all
Updates maybe 2 times a week with partial sets.
Simply too expensive for quantity of material.
Bottom Line: I tripped over a video from this site on Dailymotion.com and, after looking and leaving several times because of the high price, finally decided to see what was there. I was not really disappointed, but it was immediately apparent that this site is not run by any of the big players.
All of the girls are fit, which I suppose they have to be to be flexible like they are. Many are very attractive...some even beautiful The sets are all very similar, with the model starting out clothed in a dance outfit or something similar and then paring down to whatever their personal minimum is. Some of the sets start out with the girl nude. The sets are well done and the girls seem to interact well with the photographer. (suggestion: get a ladder! A full-body straight-down shot of some of these girls would be amazing!) Sets are generally between 25 and 50 images. These are all Eastern European girls, I think, and I have never seen any of them on any other site that I can recall. Kudos to the talent scouts for that.

This site does not have any sex, insertion, masturbation, etc. The models simply flex in incredible ways and give you a nice view. This webmaster has another site called perfectflex.com where there are toys and insertions. Personally, I'm more into the view, but I may and up over at the other site at some point. Clearly he's got models that are willing to pose nude. He needs to up the volume with those models here.

It looks as though there are a few "regular" models that have 20 or more sets. It looks as though this is the "stable" now, as the updates are dominated by these girls but I can't tell for sure because updates only come twice a week.

Now....on the down side...
That collection of 60 mnodels dates all the way back to 2000, so you can get some idea of the volume and frequency of updates.

The images on this site are much too small for today's monitors. I'm downloading 4k images from other sites, so 800x570 is really unacceptable. And as good as some of the older sets are, I'm going to have a hard time keeping images that only fill 1/5 of my screen and are grainy at full-screen. The webmaster really needs to go back and post the larger master images.

Navigation is pretty basic. Click a model, click a set, click an image, click "page back" to go back to set, click another image. No forward or backward, etc.

No zip files???? Come on, really? That makes no sense whatsoever...unless the server can't handle it...

Bottom line: I really like the type and quality of content, but the site really needs a lot of work to attract and keep subscribers in this 2-updates-a-day for $20 world. $39 to sign up? Somebody needs to take a marketing class to learn about elasticity in marking, not just modeling. I would be recommending the site like crazy if it were $19..but have a hard time telling anyone to check it out for $39.

So....my apologies to the webmaster...but if you are interested in this site, keep your money until the price comes down or they offer a mega-pass for all of the super-flexi sites for $39. After this month, that is probably the only thing that will get me back.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Infernal Restraints

3. Infernal Restraints (1)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (306) 05-12-13  02:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 290 scenes
- Updates weekly with the addition of one scene
- Innovative BDSM ‘tools’
- Good mix of mainstream and fetish models
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Photos available
Cons: - Very expensive
- ‘Captcha’ on signup can be annoying
- Need more file resolution options
Bottom Line: This site is definitely NOT for the faint-hearted for three reasons: first, this is probably among the most intense BDSM sites available today, second, the price has to make it one of the most expensive porn memberships today, and third, some of the newest scenes come in at over 3GB in size.

If you like BDSM and are familiar with the Kink.com sites, then think of this as a mashup of Device Bondage and Sex and Submission with the ‘nasty’ factor turned up. The site uses a lot of innovative bondage tools and devices, many of which appear to be made rather than bought. Each scene is between 30 minutes and an hour long and has several ‘chapters’ where the bondage is changed. (Like other BDSM sites, the scenes also include an interview where the model makes it clear that she consents and can stop the scene.) Most of the scenes occur indoors in a dungeon setting, though there are also some scenes shot outdoors. Production values are very good. Many, but still a minority of the scenes, feature some kind of sex act, either oral or vaginal. There is some anal play, but I’ve yet to find a scene with anal intercourse. Since the site is about BDSM I accept that the sex is secondary.

The site has a mix of mainstream models who dabble in fetish stuff (Sasha Knox and Hailey Young, for example) and models who specialize in fetish scenes (Wenona, for example). The models are all under 25, most are petite and with very few exceptions all are Caucasian. One good sign as to how the site treats the models is that there are several who make repeat visits to get abused.

The site currently has 290 scenes available with one new scene being added weekly. As should be expected, the oldest scenes (uploaded in 2006) don’t have the same video quality as the newer scenes. Most scenes have download options for resolution and a few offer different file types too. The most common file type is mp4 though a lot of the older files that say they’re mp4 come in as .rm. The newest uploads have two options for resolutions. I went with the highest which is 1280x720, 7500kb/s and 23fps. An issue that many may have is the file size, which with some of the newer uploads can exceed 3GB. That’s a lot of data if your ISP imposes a limit. The lower resolution is intended for mobile devices and comes in at 480x270, 1400kb/s and 23fps. The obvious problem with this is that there is a wide chasm between the two sizes that really should be bridged with a third option.

Photos are also available as zips but not as singles. New photos are 1200x785 while the older ones are obviously smaller.

Site layout is simple but effective. It looks and functions a lot like a Kink.com site if you’re familiar with them. You can either have a ‘full’ or ‘brief’ view of the scenes on the page and selecting a scene opens a page where you can stream or download the scene and download the photos. There is also a fairly detailed description of each scene which is useful.

The site allows download managers and doesn’t appear to have any download limits. Download speeds were good.

Logging in requires the username and password be entered each time as well as a two-word captcha. I found one of those ‘words’ was always easy to read, but the second was much more difficult and often caused me to fail to enter it properly. When that happens you go back for a second try but you need to enter your username and password again.

The 800lb gorilla in the room is whether the site is worth the $65 price. Part of me says that it is because the production costs here have to be much higher than a more usual hardcore site. With the more mainstream site you hire a woman and a man and pull out an old leather couch and you can make a porno. No so here. I’m guessing that the models here get paid a premium to do this work and the bondage equipment can't be cheap to buy or make. So in that sense, it might be worth the exceptionally high price. Arguing against the high price is that other BDSM sites must have similar costs and can manage a more reasonable price. Sites like Kink probably have better economies of scale, but this site can’t justify a price that’s double what the competitors are charging. Also, this site has some ‘sister’ sites (Sexually Broken, for example) which appear to use many of the same models, sets and equipment but charge less than half what this site charges.

I know this is a personal thing for me that others don’t share, and I didn’t include this as a con or include it in the score, but I really wish fetish sites put up more behind-the-scenes videos. With so many of the bondage setups used on this site being innovative I’d like to see some of the technical bits of getting the model into them.

If you’re into BDSM that pushes the limits and can justify spending the money, this is site that is worth a visit. With the price as high as it is though, this won’t be a site that I join once in a while to get updates.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit The Training Of O

4. The Training Of O (2)

Pay
Active
93
RustyJ (145) 05-09-13  03:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Almost 350 scenes to date. The site has been running since 2007
-Very high quality company in general, they seem to be the good guys in porn if you can look past that one non voluntary bruising of a model case that was reported a while back
-Armory in San Francisco proveides for a great site to shoot this kind of material
-Very high production and innovative bdsm ideas
-Great selection and variety of models
-Good amount of hardcore sex included
-Makes a creative mix of the different niches on various Kink sites
Cons: -Scenes are sort of splitted into "days". That means you get usually 3-4 updates from the same model in similar settings. However the are full length each so this might turn out to be pro when you particularly like the model in question
-Humiliating, slave training, doing chores and so on might not be to everyones tastes even if they are generally into bdsm niche. Often a bit too non sexual in my opinion
-Always the same with Kink: No kind of network subscription or ability to mix between sites available
-Dedicated photo sessions would be nice touch but obviously they'd require lot of extra effort
-On the pricier side when it comes to cost per update
Bottom Line: The Training of O is a themed site on Kink.com network that focuses on slave training. The material is divided into "training days" of each individual slave trainee where they are tested for different skills like pain tolerance, anal
sex, cleaning the toilet and what not. Usually there is up to four days of each slave's training. Occassionally they throw in an auditioning scene where they are selecting candidates fo their training that are made to look like slave market of some sort. In the end of the training they might be presented to the master of the Armory in their "Upper Floor" setting.

There is lot of role playing and acting involved. Scenes or days may start with the slave waking up with some kind of diary writing, instruction or grade giving and such activity that is nice touch for those who really can get into make believe. Personally I'm more int the actual sex in this scenes so there is quite much overhead in these videos.

When you look past the make believe, you'll find that this site is quite nice mix of much of the non gay niches found on this network in general. There are scenes that look like Hogtied or Device Bondage with some Sex And Submission thrown in. The only difference is that especially lately the penetrating male performer tends to be a gimp kind of guy, usually in bondage himself too and wearing some full body latex suit. Lots of whipping, caning, forced bj's too. Fetishwear, stocks, wooden boxes over the girls's heads, you name it, they probably got it.

The site and it's functionality really doesn't need another round of praise from me. It all works flawlessly and smoothly with download speeds exceeding what most can get through their broadbands. DL managers work fine. Photos are zipped but as with other sites here, the photos are more like a side product taken during shooting video. The sites are not really cheap if you consider the once a week update rate but you can always sign in and wait for a 19,99$ rebate. Higly recommendable site, especially for the variety.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lactation Fantasy

5. Lactation Fantasy (1)

Pay
Active
80
GUY22 (7) 03-19-13  08:12pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Full on Lactation Content.
Lesbian lactation content.
Real Latina amateurs.
Crisp, Sharp, HiDef 720P videos.
High quality photo sets.
Very Passionate webmaster.
Frequent news updates.
Good amount of contents.
Cons: Download speed is awful. Less than 500 KB/s most of the time.
HUGE site banner on the videos.
Updates can be infrequent.
Bottom Line: It's a lactation site. Period. It is exactly what is being advertised. Nothing more and nothing less. One of the few lactation only sites on the web in fact. And Lactation-Fantasy (LF) is TOP notch. It's been around since 2006 and there's no signs of it slowing down anytime soon. In fact the first thing you'll notice is the very passionate webmaster. You're always being informed on what's going on with the site, whether it's maintenance or model updates. Whatever it is you're always in the know.
Almost all videos are shot in 720P (few older ones are not), very high quality videos. All contents are shot in the studio. A bit uninspired at times. Videos are rather straight forward, models come in, does a bit of strip and booty shake, then on with the milking. And the milking action does NOT disappoint. These ladies have milk filled tits like you've never seen. They drip, they leak, they squirt, and before you know it the floors are wet in a pool of milk and the ladies are drenched all over. Got Milk? Indeed. These are REAL moms, real Latino ladies, these are not porn stars. So keep your expectation in check. Some of these ladies are attractive enough but honestly (and I don't want to be mean) some ladies are quite average looking at best. But I guess their swollen milk filled breasts makes up for it. And swollen milk filled breasts are aplenty here. A lot of solo milking action and breast pumps. Lesbian milking scenes feature ladies milking onto each other and sucking each other dry.
This is THE lactation site to go to if you're into it. Lots of content, very professionally made. LF has the most amount of lactation content of any lactation site.
But there was a reason why I left the site. The models aren't really my cup of tea. A lot of these ladies are rather unattractive (for a porn site). But if you like REAL regular women then perhaps you'll enjoy it more than I.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bizarre Insertions

6. Bizarre Insertions (1)

Pay
Active
70
marcdc1 (163) 09-24-12  04:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some hot stars including Alex Dune (who I think is also Alex Devine), Carrie Anne, Sophia Dee, Shannon Kelly,Lexi Bardot and others
- Videos available as streams (.flv) or download (.mp4)
- Categories to help you find what you want (with a niche site though it doesn't help much - nor does that fact that there's only 3 categories)
- Nice organization tool: you can "favorite scenes to find them again easily.
Cons: - Video quality is sub par the highest quality is 640X480 1.16 mbps
- Claims recent updates (March of 20112) but I think that's when it was added to the site not close to when it was shot.
- Content shared with network so video come in from Barbi Sinclair and Dark Caravan. Some of this content gets posted here even through it has nothing to do with "bizarre Insertions".
- Not a very large collection (just over 30 on site; a little over 20 are "on theme"
Bottom Line: I'm afraid I may be scoring low because this site just wasn't my thing (It came as part of a network that I joined).

If this is your kinda thing then this site does a good job at providing it. That said - if this is your thing I'm sure there are better sites for it than this. (This not being my thing I can't point you to any - sorry).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Training Of O

7. The Training Of O (2)

Pay
Active
95
rearadmiral (306) 08-27-12  04:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge collection of innovative videos
- Unique niche
- Multiple download options
- Photos available
- Beautiful models
- Hardcore sex in BDSM settings
Cons: - Limited search function
- Organization could be improved
- File names vary and are of limited use
- No tags assigned to videos
- Some missing scenes
Bottom Line: TTOO was the first Kink site I joined several years back and it remains my favourite. Most BDSM sites put a woman in bondage and inflict some pain. Some sites have a unique theme (Water Bondage) but the underlying premise is the same. TTOO is different: there is bondage, humiliation and pain, but the premise is the training of a submissive woman. The niche is the making of a sub, not what can be done after the sub is created.

The traditional TTOO shoots are broken down into days, with the normal training regime being conducted over four days. The intensity of the training is increased as each day passes. Bondage, humiliation, demeaning work, pain and training are all here. Sex occurs in the shoots. The sex is very well done but isn’t the main focus: it occurs as part of the training, not just for the sex itself. The end product is near four hours of some intense video per shoot with exceptional production values.

In the past couple of years TTOO has added a new kind of shoot to keep things interesting. This is still about training, but they’ll bring in multiple girls to audition to be trained. These can last from one to four days and involve much of the same kinds of training as the main scenes, but have an extra element of competition. These share the usual high production standards that Kink has. These are innovative and a welcome addition to the site.

The technical stuff is standard for all Kink sites. Each scene has its own page where the video can be streamed or downloaded. Downloads are available in either WMV or Mp4 format. Two resolutions are available for both formats. The highest resolution for both comes in at 1280x720.

Like all Kink sites, TTOO offers photos as singles and zips, but this really isn’t a photo site so I won’t go into any detail.

I’m a HUGE fan of the Kink sites and I may have been blind to some faults because of that. The faults are fairly minor but just look more serious given the overall quality of the site. I think that for a site to be exceptional it has to provide excellent porn, make that easily available to members and has to be well organized. Obviously the first element is the most important, and Kink delivers: this is incredible porn. They succeed in the member access by allowing download managers and having servers that never slow down and give some of the highest download speeds I’ve encountered. Where Kink falls down is in site organization.

To keep this succinct, here are my specific concerns:

- Limited search function – the search function is limited and doesn’t work well. The problem appears that when you search a term the only thing it searches is the scene title, not the performers. So searching for star X won’t get you a scene if the scene is titled “Rope Slut.” You can search the model index but that isn’t great either. You can locate scenes on specific Kink sites but you can’t download them from there. The solution is to take a few key words from the title and go back to the main site page and search those terms.

- File names vary and are of limited use – this is likely subjective, but the file naming convention has no standardization. If you want to have any hope of organizing the scenes into related groups you’ll need to do it as you download. One bright note is that each scene has a unique shoot number as part of the name and that can be searched. The issue is you may download “1234_Bobbi” as the Day 1 scene in Bobbi Starr’s training, and then download “1100_Bobbi_S” as Day 2. The problem is that unless you rename the files as you go, the Bobbi in day 1 might not be Bobbi Starr, and if you’re sorting your files numerically you’re apt to get Day 1 and Day 2 mixed up. In most instances, model’s last names aren’t included as part of the file. I think a file-naming standard that captured the shoot number, model’s full name and day of the shoot would work much better.

The lack of a search function and odd naming are bad enough when dealing with the traditional multi-day shoots, but organizing some of the multi-girl, multi-day shoots is a lot of work.

While this sounds like I’m being overly fussy, keep in mind that TTOO goes out of it’s way to produce multi-day shoots. These are amazing, but grouping the whole shoot together is a lot of work and their own file names make organizing the files difficult.

Other more minor concerns are the lack of tags. I’m not saying that they need tags for everything, but for narrow, specific and hard to find niches they could work. Finally, while rare, there are missing scenes. The training scenes lose continuity when a day is missing.

The bottom line is this: when you weigh the good things about TTOO against the things that need improvement there is no contest. This is compelling, unique porn with stunning models in high-quality scenes. The negatives pale in comparison. If you have even a passing interest in BDSM I’d highly recommend a membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Femdom Time

8. Femdom Time (1)

Pay
Active
65
dracken (246) 06-26-12  05:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 190 movies and photo sets with the last update on 29.05.2012 (it seems like the site updates very infrequently and the quality of the updates can vary a lot. Everything seems to have stopped in 2009 and they are only now resuming updates)
- Videos are around 382x240 resolution and only available as WMV full-length or clips.
- The images are more interesting with 864px × 1,296px high resolution options. Zip archives are also present.
- The site needs a bit more web design love but is workable.
- A nice idea was that each item used in a scene is presented in a separate photo with a description.
- Some cute female models and a lot of corsets and stockings. Also the action varies a lot from scenes where a guy is forced to pleasure a woman to scenes where the male is pissed on or his genitalia is punished in all sorts of odd ways.
- There seems to be a strong focus on heels and feet.
- Decent download speeds
Cons: - Video resolution is a huge downside. Also several images are not really timed well (expect many shots of models blinking or being caught with a goofy look on their faces)Images where the models just sit around without any action are also abundant.
- Updates are sporadic. They promised several new scenes for March and May but so far nothing. All of 2012 saw 3 updates, the last one before that was in 2009. I'm hesitant to call the site completely dead, but they need to show more involvement.
- No search features, also some of the models on the model page are not available on the actual site. Overall the webdesign feels dated and could use a face-lift.
- A personal thing here, but most of the male models didn't seem very interested in what was going on. Most of the time they are completely flaccid and have "far-away" looks on their faces.
- There are some ads in the member's section. Nothing to major, but they are there.
Bottom Line: I'm not normally into bondage, but what attracted me to this site were some of the cute models and the promise of corsets, high heals and stockings. I also liked the idea of a site where the girls would do whatever turned them on and get satisfied by using the guys as basically walking toys.

On one hand the site does have several good looking models, although they tend to skew more towards the mature MILF area than I'd like. They also wear some very exciting outfits and the girls wear clothes in most scenes, even in several scenes where they have sex with the guy, making for some pretty decent shots.

Unfortunately the action is not really what I was hoping for. I had hoped that the women would be at least pretending to have orgasms, instead if anyone comes in the scene it's the guy, while the woman tries to look mean as she is jerking him off. A bit of a let down were also the lesbian scenes where the girls don't interact with each other very much. The entire focus of the scenes here are the males who get analy probed and have clamps placed on their balls... both of which don't really seem to be very pleasing to the girls, but I guess that's the spiel here.

Combine this with what I believe was a complete lack of interest on the part of the male models and the whole site doesn't really sell me on the femdom fantasy. Overall I was left feeling like everyone involved was just there for the money.

Now don't get me wrong, there are a few shots that are interesting. Seeing a girl blow a guy who is suspended upside down is rather hot, especially since she's wearing a very hot red corset, but the scene just ends. I wish she would have masturbated to a climax or otherwise used him to pleasure herself.

Maybe it's just me and my expectations though so I won't doc points to heaving because of this.

What I will take points off for is the lack of better videos. The majority are low resolution and rather short. Sure the images are hot but the lack of better clips is really disappointing.

Also there is no really easy way to navigate the site. There are a few categories such as Bondage, Other sex, Femdom, but only Female Domination has more than a handful of scenes under it. There is also no search for anal or pee or lesbian scenes. Even worse several of the models are not present on the model page and in return some girls on the model page are not available on the site. Someone needs to update some links.

Overall I feel like there have to be better femdom sites out there or at least ones that update regularly, however if you like photos and the models in the tour look really hot there are some great images in here. As long as you don't expect anything mind blowing.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cuckold Me Now

9. Cuckold Me Now (1)

Pay
Active
50
xexbot (36) 06-25-12  10:33am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I rarely can't find anything positive to say about a site, but this site was really so bad it doesn't have any pros
Cons: Video quality is not quality at all. The average wmv file size at this site is around 20mb or less with many falling around 6mb. Even a large file I downloaded (83mb) was still in a 720x480 frame, was not HD, and it still looked like the picture was getting stretched when you maximized the video window. The smaller files are clearly designed for an old school site and to be played in a very small window (320x240).

The design of the site really looks outdated. I have talked in the past about sites that hearken back to the nineties. In this case, if I didn't know better, I would say the site was designed somewhere around 1979. It actually reminds me of an old Adam and Eve catalog from the 1970s. Basically a page which a bunch of thumbnails, no titles or descriptions for videos, and you don't even get any clue as to the size and quality until you open the page that has the video on it.

Absolutely no search capability or indexing whatsoever.

I have run out of room to keep complaining
Bottom Line: This site is probably the biggest ripoff I have ever personally encountered. I went for it basically because they also included a membership to Romanvideoarchives.com. That turned out be an even worse selling point.

Basically I think a lot of these videos actually do date back to the late seventies or eighties. At least they look like they do. The quality is sub-par, even by 1970s standards. There are times when you can tell they just put the camera there, hit record, and that's the only shot your going to see the whole time, even when the actors move out of frame. It really is pretty bad quality just at the most basic, point-and-shoot level.

This site doesn't seem to be updating, though they claim they are. If they are they are only updating with old videos from the archive, because I have yet to see anything that looks like it was even shot within the last five years. Even webcams have better video quality now than what they were using.

The bottom line here is that if you waste a single cent on this site you're getting burned. I am trying to post this ASAP in the hopes I can prevent some of you from making the same mistake I did. If you are looking for cuckold videos there are far better sites like Cuckoldcream that will cost you about the same amount. They have clearly designed this site for low bandwith users, and file size (and quality) designed for streaming or downloading through a 56k modem (remember those days). I guess if you're feeling nostalgic for a five or ten min video that has been broken down into 2min videos meant to be played in about a four inch window, then this is the site for you. Otherwise, I would avoid this site like the plague.

P.S. Don't let the "tour" or "start page" windows fool you. The page shown above (or for this site here) is not the actual "members" page. Once you click "members" it takes you to the page from the 1970s.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pissing.com

10. Pissing.com (0)

Pay
Active
80
rearadmiral (306) 03-31-12  11:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 31 scenes
- Mix of girl/girl and boy/girl
- Typical Kink quality
- Good mix of porn stars and relative unknowns
- Videos available in multiple formats
- Photos available (singles and zips)
Cons: - Only 31 scenes
- No longer updating
- No clear indication that the site isn’t updating
- Doesn’t have the same BDSM feel that other Kink sites have
- Price is a little high for a small site that doesn’t update
Bottom Line: The ‘streaming’ videos on this site are excellent. Okay, okay, I’ll try to keep the pee jokes to a minimum here.

I know there are mixed thoughts here about sites that are no longer updating. Jpg386’s comment on this page certainly captures the view that a lot of PU members have on the topic. I’m with the members who think that whether a site is updating or not is just one factor in the value equation.

The site is part of the Kink.com family of sites and as such it is offered as a stand-alone site so a membership here does not give you access to any other Kink sites. Being part of the Kink network the scenes are well shot with lighting, sound and editing all being in the top tier of adult sites. Whoever manages the technical stuff sure is a real whiz. (Sorry, I couldn’t help myself…) What certainly helps too is the female talent. There are many well-known porn stars on the site, such as Amber Rayne, Flower Tucci and Annie Cruz, and there are also a lot of lesser-known models. Many of these lesser-known models (to me, anyway) also appear on other Kink sites so I presume that they’re more known as fetish models rather than mainstream stars.

The site is relatively small, offering only 31 shoots. The shoots are shorter in duration then most other Kink offerings, most being less than 30 minutes long. That certainly starts to move the value marker to making this a less than great value. Some of the scenes have a bit of a set-up where the models play a role, and others have no set up and just have people peeing on a woman. The one constant is that the scenes aren’t a peeing free-for-all: there is usually one female model who is the receiver. Having one ‘submissive’ model is really the only link that the site has with the BDSM roots of the Kink family tree. People looking for hardcore BDSM with peeing probably won’t find what they’re looking for here. Neither will people who want to see women peeing on men, because most Kink sites have dominant men and submissive women and that remains true here. Jpg386 commented that the site features “mostly a bunch of lesbo scenes where laughing girls pee on each other.” I don’t agree with that in that of the 31 scenes on the site only six are all-girl. The comment is correct, though, in that the mood in the scenes tends to be a lot lighter and less menacing than on other Kink sites. I’m not really sure why the director opted to be less BDSM-themed; it may be that Kink figured that the site was pushing the legal limits as it was and adding in a BDSM element might make the religious right go nuts. Or more nuts, I guess.

Being a Kink site, the technical stuff is well done. Each scene offers a trailer, photos and video. Video is available as a stream or downloadable as a WMV (HD), WMV, MP4 (HD) and in sizes for mobile devices. I downloaded the WMV HD scenes and they come in at 1280x720 at 7200kb/s and 30fps. They’re in Codec 9. Subjectively they look great.

The photos are available in two resolutions (800x533 and 1200x800). They’re available as singles or zipped. While these resolutions aren’t great, you have to consider that the most recent ones were shot at least three years ago when these would have been excellent quality. Which leads me to the biggest negative of the site…

Pissing.com is no longer updating and hasn’t added a new scene in about three years. I can understand that a site may stop updating and I’m not going to fault a site owner for making a business decision to stop shooting for a site, but I do wish that Kink was a bit more open about the fact that the site is no longer active. Back when Kink stopped shooting for Water Bondage they had a disclaimer that the site was no longer updating (but it seems that they’re trying to revive it). Eventually that disclaimer was removed. Same for Pissing.com. To make matters worse, Kink stopped listing the dates of the shoots so it is almost impossible for a prospective member to know that the site is no longer adding new material. This seems strange for a company that otherwise does everything else right and has a reputation for treating their customers well.

So is the site worth a look? I think so, but a person should consider the value for themselves. I’ve had memberships at similar themed sites before and can say that the Kink way of doing things means that Pissing.com is pretty much the number one site for number one. (Sorry again… that’ll be the last joke.) There are 31 great scenes that look good and are available in most ways a member would want them. I do hope that they’ll reactivate the site some day, and until then I do wish they’d be more open about the site’s status. Until they start filming again, they should lower the price to better reflect the true value of a small, inactive site. But even with that caveat, if you like this niche, I’d recommend the site for sure.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lingerie BBW

11. Lingerie BBW (0)

Pay
Active
50
messmer (137) 07-26-11  10:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Has BBWs

+Has Lingerie (mostly fetish wear)

+Part of a 25 sites Fetish Network (sort of)
Cons: -Video quality is horrible (No HD available). There is not a single downloaded clip that can be viewed in full window without being horrendously blurred as the total bitrate is around 1000.

-Updates every 8 days a small part of a DVD. It can take as many as 12-13 parts to obtain the complete DVD.

-Downloads restricted to 600 kbps and to one file at a time. During this time it is impossible to move around the site or to do any streaming.

-Streaming itself is inadequate at approx 400x300 (didn't stop to get the exact details).

-Most of the extra sites offered are streaming only, from 3rd party providers to boot. with a streaming window that is absolutely tiny and featuring a blurred video..

-Very limited for a fetish site (some BDSM, some TS contents, some BBW, some Female domination, some pantyhose ,,, that's about it. If you are interested in any of these fetishes .. read above re quality.

-Member's page is absolutely horrendous, overcrowded, the most confusing I have ever see
Bottom Line: I have not one good thing to say about this site. It is a total rip-off at $ 29.95 and made me, for the first time ever write to CCBill asking for a refund.

Make a wide detour around this site and all the sites listed with it.

Absolutely worst site I ever joined. I cancelled right away after looking at some samples and downloading enough to give me a fair idea of what LingerieBBW was all about. Now I am waiting for a response from CCBill.
Respond: 16 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Rimbledon

12. Rimbledon (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 01-20-11  08:11am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through vxsbill.com. I don't think I ever used them before, but cancelling was easy.
-Video choices are streaming, downloading the whole video or as clips.
-The videos are available as WMV 720x540, 2160 kbps. Not bad, but not HD either.
-A photo set for each video. Not screencaps.
-Photos are about 2000x1333.
-Comes as part of a network of 14 sites, five focus on anal or have a significant amount of it.
Cons: -The site stopped updating. The last one was 4/30/2009.
-Only 35 videos and photosets.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable.
-Very thin models. Mostly very plain.
-Not much enthusiasm.
-The actual deed is about three minutes of a fifteen minute video. Sometimes they do as little as one minute.
Bottom Line: The name of the site is a play on words concerning rim jobs, aka salad tossing or analingus. A recent PU poll showed about half personally would never do this, but about a third said they do. I personally would not, but as a kinky fantasy, I find it very erotic. Too bad the poll did not cover that.

If you like rim jobs on video, this site has that, but is not the best by any stretch of the imagination.

The biggest negative is that the site is not updating. Presently there are 35 videos and the most recent is from April of 2009.

The other big negative is that there just isn't enough ass licking on the site. The models seem to do as little as possible. The videos are about fifteen minutes long and the time spent on this ranges from one to maybe four minutes. They rarely seem to show any interest. Believe me, there are several better sites in this niche. There are only a few sites that this can be compared to, about five that focus on it that I know of, and this is the weakest.

These are Eastern European models and that may be the difference, as most sites that I have seen have American models who probably are acting. However, I will take transparently fake enthusiasm over bored going through the motions just to get it over with any day. I appreciate some admitted pretense of interest while performing in my fantasy.

The sex that you do see on the site is a bit of cock sucking in the beginning, almost always anal at some point and some vaginal. Most scenes end with a facial cumshot.I don't recognize any of the faces as well known Eastern European pornstars.

As part of a network it is just ok, but don't join for this site.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ripping 4 Fun

13. Ripping 4 Fun (0)

Pay
Active
90
mbaya (356) 12-29-10  06:40am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill without regional pricing
-Unusual, maybe even unique premise for a website.
-Very hot English pornstars and models with sexy accents. There are a total of 156 on the site. Some that I recognized were Lucy Zara, Lolly Badcock, Angel Long, Cate Harrington, Rio Mariah, and Satine Sparks.
-Has a little ethnic variety. There was one Indian and five Black models.
-Excellent quality videos, but not HD. There were 287 videos, WMV only at 960x540, 4066kbps.
-High level of enthusiasm by the models.
-Models talk dirty directly at the camera.
-Most videos are hypnotic. It is difficult to turn away.
-270 photosets, zipdownloadable at 959x1442. Not screencaps, real photos.
-Updates every five days with a new video or photo set.
-Has a forum where they take suggestions, however it is not very active.
Cons: -Too many scenes only go to panties. This may be unfair, but many do go to full nudity. Why not all or at least most?
-Too much focus on destroying clothes that have already been removed.
-Only WMV for downloading or streaming with no options as to quality.
-Videos averaged about five minutes each.
Bottom Line: In spite of a few negatives, this was a thoroughly enjoyable website. I found the videos to be hypnotic, even addictive. That is rare in porn, at least for me.

The premise here is that sexy English pornstars and models cut and rip off their clothes while talking directly to you the viewer. The models show a high level of enthusiasm and the fun factor here is contagious. The direction and scripting are excellent for the most part.

The best videos have the women talking dirty about showing you what they have under their clothes and how much they enjoy putting on a show for you. At their best, these videos go to full nudity with a fair amount of tease, both visually and with words. I loved the scenes where the model pops the buttons on her blouse to reveal her bra, or even better her massive tits. I also loved scenes where the model rips or cuts off her panties to show it all. Unfortunately these are only about 25% of the videos.

The rest show only the models going as far as panties. While these can be hot, I found them to be somewhat unsatisfying. Great models with great bodies, but I was left wanting more. These videos are still very watchable though.

The focus is more on destroying great looking clothes than on stripping. Great if this is your fetish or maybe even if you have a fetish for certain clothing, but I do not. I want more full nudity, not scenes where too much time is spent on destroying either sleeves or clothing that has already been removed.

The outfits range from ordinary street clothes to officewear, to just about anything else you can name, even three scenes with bridal gowns. A few scenes have two models who strip each other. The clothing looks expensive and looks great on these women. The models look very sophisticated and classy.

The videos have several constants. One is great looking models. Another is a high level of dirty talking directly at the camera and you the viewer that builds up suspense. With very sharp, but not HD video quality, I found watching these to be very addictive. Even when they do not go to full nude, I could not take my eyes off the screen.

This is a standalone site. You don't get any extras either. If you think this may be for you, I very definitely recommend givng the site a try.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Teach Me Fisting

14. Teach Me Fisting (0)

Pay
Active
84
RustyJ (145) 12-14-10  05:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -304 scenes of material on a very well defined topic and updating weekly
-61 scenes in nice 1080p with rougly the same number in perfectly ok 720p
-Newer sets have high resolution photosets available with enough pixles for the largest of the screens. Other scenes have equally nice photography in slightly smaller image size. All zipped.
-Mostly very good looking East European and Russian models
-An occassional baseball bat here and there to bring variation to the slightly monotonous content ;)
Cons: -Server issues resulting in corrupted video files and image zips. Zips are less affected while video files are often rendered unviewable
-A niche site. Some may find the contents very monotonous as is often the case with these. On the other hand to some this might be a goldmine
-Don't count on getting this immediately. You need to do little research to find out which subscriptions give which sites as the main content and which as a bonus
-Action can be a bit messy which may not be to everyones liking
Bottom Line: The name of this site is a bit misleading as it appears little teaching is needed here. Or maybe it's just that the teachers are so good that taking fists, giant dongs and baseball bats to all holes is as easy as it looks like on this site ;)

Models are mainly the same that on the other sites of this network, I'd say 90% East European and Russian. That is perfectly ok to me as I prefer them to other options.

There is content from 2005 and the current updates are weekly. The older videos suffer from low quality as can be expected. These days the content is mostly g/g while originally there was more b/g scenes, maybe a little more with that teaching aspect visible. The newer content is however a bit more varied and suffers less from the "same old sofa in every scene" syndrome than the older content.

All in all this site is very nice part of the network because it offers something no other site there has.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit It\'s Real

15. It's Real (0)

Pay
Newbie
59*
Kami (2) 10-14-10  10:29pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Unusual and unique content.
-Picture gallery with every update and zip files of the pics are available.
-Part of muffia.com
Cons: -No longer updating. Last update was in July 2009.
-Fake "freak of nature" content (ex. fake penises, fake nipples, etc..)
-Only 21 updates and 3 of them are pictures only.
-Like all muffia sites the search options do not work but its not like there is much to search through...
Bottom Line: I'm not really a fan of porn sites with fake body parts nor is the content of this site particular tantalizing. Would not be able to recommend this if it wasn't attached to the muffia network and even then I don't recommend.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Enslaved Gals

16. Enslaved Gals (0)

Pay
Active
80
RustyJ (145) 09-06-10  05:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Updating again since July 2010
-A decent DVD quality content all the way from the beginning
-Good variation of the BDSM theme. There are ropes, corsets, collars, gags, cages, tweezers
-The latest scenes offer something new and entirely different for the network. In their other fetish content the clothing hasn't really had a significant role. Hope they keep the updates coming while upping the quality
Cons: -No photosets worth downloading. The sets are very small. There are larger screenshot sets but they understandably are of lesser quality
-Average quality (DVD) on even the latest scenes
-79 scenes is not very much
-American porn screaming. "Oh yeah!", "Fuck yeah!", "Oh god!" and so on.
Bottom Line: This is one of the sites you are given access to once you've been 21Sextury subscriber for one month. As I'm always looking for something more than regular action, this was also one of the sites I was really waiting to get access to.

I had considered this one a dead archive site with the last updates in 2008 but just a month and half ago they seem to have come back to life. However the quality of the new sets is not up to HD standard they claim them to be and are actually regular DVD size. I wonder if they've bought these from somewhere to get more updates since their other content is FullHD these days. Also it's easy to spot the obvious difference between the old and the new scenes. The latest ones are all lesbian with stong focus on latex clothing (nothing wrong with that) while the older ones are mostly b/g sex in bondage.

Another difference from the network's main sites is the fact that this is not Euro material. Sasha Knox, Jada Fire, Bree Olson, Sasha Grey and many others on this site are well known American stars.

At the moment the site has 79 scenes, six of those are new updates from this summer. It delivers well the main theme of sex in bondage and fetish gear with the no holes barred hardcore attitude.

All in all a nice bonus site with not that much content but also none of it is really weak.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Society SM

17. Society SM (0)

Pay
Active
82
pat362 (365) 08-07-10  09:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Access to 4 other sites with one membership.
-Nearly 250 models to chose from a surprisignly
varied choice of models which a large portion of them are well known pornstars.
-site offers at least 4 new scenes per month.
-Over 350 scenes to choose from.
-Navigation from one site to the next is only a click away.
Cons: -scenes are broken down in sections so no way to download a complete video.
-There is no separate section for pics & videos so you have to check every page to find the ones that contain the video and the ones with pics.
-Most of the content involves one man trying to make the girl cum often using only his hands or a vibrator. That can get repetitious quite fast.
Bottom Line: I must confess that I didn't really want to join this site/network but somehow I thought that joining this site would give me access to the one that I really wanted and the main reason why I didn't want to join is because of the amazing review rear admiral did. He hit on all the key points.

I suspect that our score differ in large part because I don't think a site that offers videos only in sections deserves a score of 90 and above

If a sites chooses to offer videos then they should at the very least be downloadable as complete scenes.

I found that the camera angles in the videos was often focusing in the wrong place and I would have wanted more intereaction with the performer and more girl on girl BSDM.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Femanic

18. Femanic (0)

Pay
Active
70
artnoir (17) 04-16-10  07:16pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Explicit content
+ Exclusive content
+ Piss vids are great
+ Excellent video quality (varies between 960x540 .mp4 / 720x404 .avi / 640x480 .avi - high bitrate on all files though )
+ Access to lezpoo.com
+ A couple of nice chicks like Sasha, Rhonda, Tereza (Jana Mrazkova), the rest are decent at best
Cons: - Limited contents
- Most of the vids are split into parts (especially new videos, which can be split into 12+ parts)
- Awful website design and functionality
- Not a lot of attractive girls (given the contents I guess that's understandable, but why does it have to be that way?
- Actually not as exciting as I though it would be
- Not that much pissing
- A considerable amount of puke and spitting (For me this is a con, for others it might be a pro)
- Limited downloads (may depend on your connection though) My limit was 4 simultaneous downloads
Bottom Line: I've sparsely come across clips from this site and it's sister site in the past couple of years and was quite amazed by the quality of the videos considering the niche.

Reassuringly all the videos are of great quality, though in different formats.

You can easily download the whole site in an evening and enjoy it. After that Recycle bin is knocking on your door.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Society SM

19. Society SM (0)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (306) 03-30-10  04:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Membership in 5 sites for the price of 1
- Huge amount of material
- Download speeds (1MB/s and 1.5MB/s) as advertised
- Many big-name porn stars
- Many beautiful models
- No over-emphasis on one body type – most people will find models they like
- Pictures and video available
- Pictures are available zipped
- No download limits
- One of the best BDSM sites available
Cons: - Videos are broken up into segments (the segments mark a different part of the scene, but no full download is available)
- Video links are hidden within picture galleries, not readily available
- Can get repetitive – same settings, same equipment used frequently
- Older videos are smaller and play in Quick Time
Bottom Line: Society SM (SSM) is one of five sites available through a membership to any one of those five sites. (This includes Society SM, Fucking Dungeon, Cum Bots, Perfect Slave and Strict Restraint.) This bundling seems to be new, and creates an amazing value for BDSM fans. This review will look at SSM specifically, though much of it will also be applicable for the other sites.

SSM is a large site, having been in existence since about 2004. They have over 200 models, and many of those models have multiple scenes on the site. For quantity, this site is a great value.

For quality, this site is also an excellent value. The video is available in two formats, though I only downloaded the .wmv format. Download speeds are advertised at 1MB/s and I achieved those speeds consistently. I’m not a technical guy so I can’t really translate the video into technical specs, but I can say that it is comparable to what is available on other sites.

If SSM has one failing, it can be blamed on an embarrassment of riches. The site is so large that the number of models and scenes using the same settings, equipment and techniques actually starts to become a bit boring. The number of settings is limited, and the equipment used (even though it is innovative and creative) remains a constant throughout many of the scenes. For many scenes, the only variable is the model herself. Don’t read this as me saying “one negative aspect to this site is that it offers too much porn,” since that isn’t possible. But they could use different settings. The scene with Julie Night, for example, is shot outdoors and has a completely different feel to it. More outdoor work, or more in a setting other than the dungeon would be great.

As for the models, they are top notch. Many popular porn stars seem to have passed through SSM’s dungeon. I’m a big BDSM fan and always appreciate seeing a mainstream porn star on a BDSM site to see their reactions. One important thing to note is that this isn’t a site that degrades women. There is nothing inherently degrading about being a sub, and these Doms know this. It is fun and interesting to watch some of these women explore a unique sexual interest.

If you’re a fan of BDSM my recommendation is that you get a membership to SSM. You won’t be disappointed. Maybe a bit bored eventually, but not disappointed.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wicked Hearts Boutique

20. Wicked Hearts Boutique (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
RichardM (2) 03-30-10  02:33pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Hundreds of high quality videos available, recent ones are HD (1280*720) but older ones are still great at (640*480).
+ The Mistresses/models are very beautiful
+ It stays very true to it's femdom theme
+ Nice and simple layout, with easy download links
+ Good value at ($20/£13)
+ Exclusive and niche content
+ No watermarks in the videos
Cons: - While gorgeous, not a large number of models
- The fetish themes on offer can be hit and miss
- No continuity between video updates
- For non/in between subscribers there's no info about what content has been updated, i.e. previews.
Bottom Line: Wicked Hearts Boutique focuses on female domination POV clips i.e. talking directly to the camera. There are no guys in the scenes, and happily none rustling behind the camera either. Instead what you get are typically one takes themed toward a particular fetish, such as masturbation instruction, sissification, foot fetish, cuckolding, verbal humiliation, chastity. If this sounds like your cup of tea you're in for a treat, well punishment, at the hands of the Boutique Mistresses.

It's admittedly an usual fetish, and some of the sites that cater to it have poor production values. Wicked Hearts is not one of these though. The videos are well lit, with clear sound. The presentation is pleasantly simple, there's no schizophrenic editing or awful music, just the ladies, center frame, dishing it out verbally. The main dommes are Maitresse Madeline, Selena, and Trisha Uptown with a further section for guest dommes. Madeline and Selena make up about three quarters of the content, so if for some reason you don't enjoy one of their persona's it's a large chunk of content annexed. In the guests section there a dozen or so other Mistresses with a handful of clips each. As the site itself puts it, they're there to "demonstrate their power over men" each with their own distinctive style. The guests add some welcome, and needed, variety to the proceedings.

The site started around the middle of 08, and with a couple of clips added every week, there are now hundreds of clips to enjoy. One of the quirks of fetishism is that it can be divisive. Personally I love the masturbation instruction clips. Depending on your taste there's likely a fair amount of videos that you won't watch. Each video has a title, description, an image preview, and then the fetish tagged next to it so at least filtering the kinks is easy.

The site briefly toyed with clips linked together (parts 1,2) but they are predominantly standalone. So they might put you in chastity one week and then, well, again next week. It would be cool if they linked a few together occasionally to help sell the fantasy further. The tour pages are a bit barren, if you're between subscriptions there's no preview of what's been added. If I saw they'd added clips with the smokin' hot Starri or Mistress January in their guest section I'd leap to rejoin. As for membership, I joined for a couple of months about a year ago and again recently, both times I had no problems subscribing or unsubscribing.

With it's own distinctive style, the Wicked Hearts Boutique delivers unique content to a niche but devoted audience. If you like this genre you should definitely give the site a try, but be warned you'll probably quickly become transfixed under the gaze (and heel) of the lovely Selena, who seems to delight in coming up with new and cruel ways to mess with you. The Wicked Hearts Boutique exudes an aura of high class, with beautiful women, just the kind of qualities you'd want in a Mistress.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Femanic

21. Femanic (0)

Pay
Active
70
BadMrFrosty (56) 03-09-10  07:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: If this were a normal porn site I would think the models are very attractive, the thing that makes this site so amazing is that these beautiful women do the nastiest things.

Content is great for those that are into this sort of fetish. Pissing, food play and puking are the main themes.

Membership includes access to their sister site. As the site is not listed here and the content is controversial I won't mention it in this review. I have listed it as a pro because it doubles the amount of content available.

The technical aspect of the content is pretty good but not normally HD. There are 1 or 2 720P MP4's on the site but they are not regularly updating in HD although the quality of the 480P videos is still good.
Cons: Download limits. Having a limit per 24 hours is bad enough but also having an hourly limit makes it a real chore to download the content.

Updates used to be a full scene once or twice a week. Recently a update counts as a 5 minute clip from a scene. They are usually posting clips from several scenes at once so it can take weeks for a full scene to be available.

Older content is not only poor quality technically (looks like it was transferred from VHS) but also very old. Some of the scenes are from the mid 90's and haven't aged at all well.

Scenes are not accompanied by photo sets.

In some of the scenes the ladies seem to have downed a couple of bottles of vodka beforehand, I don't know why but that makes me feel kind of uneasy.
Bottom Line: There are 2 things that would instantly get this site a score of 80 from me:

1. Get rid of the download limits.
2. Update complete scenes

The (newer) content itself is excellent, I don't know of any other sites that have this sort of quality of women pissing and throwing up over each other, it's like a car crash, you know you shouldn't look but something makes you anyway :)

If this is the sort of content you are into it is worth a membership but beware, beware, beware the download limits.

Did I mention the download limits??!?!!?
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Life Spankings

22. Real Life Spankings (0)

Pay
Active
93
Jay G (65) 02-18-10  12:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. A great variety of spanked models (77 girls at this time) including girls with butts of various sizes (for lovers of skinny butts as well as fat butts). Several of the girls like Angel, Destiny, and Sara extremely pretty with a next-door-girl look, not the over-makeup porn-star look.

2. 780 videos are VERY well filmed from a variety of angles during the spanking session to include nice shots of the whole body, the spanked butt, and the facial reactions. Videos are well lit in nice surroundings. 551 picture galleries.

3. The sessions include spanking over jeans and tight pants (my favorites) as well as a variety of other outfits, then spanking with panties up, then bare-bottomed. The spanker, Mike, is a likable middle-aged guy who starts with medium friendly spankings but seems to get more intense as the model comes back for more shoots.

4. Very regular updates usually every three days.

5. Excellent response to emails (answered mine in a day)
Cons: 1. A niche-type spanking site follows a predictable formula that I like, but doesn't have too much variety of content. The variety and quality of models is excellent, but the scenes are very predictable and could be boring to some.

2. No sexual content, only straight spanking.

3. Older videos, in Real Video format, are much poorer in quality.
Bottom Line: At $22/month USD, this site is well worth the money for true spanking enthusiasts. A nice variety of girls, some very pretty, get soundly spanked with excellent videography that includes good clear shots of the spanking from a variety of angles.

The girls have interesting personalities that come across better on this site than most other spanking sites, a quality I really enjoy. Angel, for example, has a clever and friendly mannerism that would make her a fun actress, not just a spanking model.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sexy Settings

23. Sexy Settings (0)

Pay
Active
72
kkman112 (12) 01-18-10  09:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Regular Updates (~2/week)
Pro-amateur to amateur European models
Model Index
Cons: No categorization
No search
Sex (see detailed review below...)
MOV
Older videos are cycled out with new updates
Bottom Line: I wanted to like this site, I definitely like massage videos and there definitely seems to be a lack of sufficiently good videos in that genre. Unfortunately this site disappointed on a few points. First, it is supposed to be a "bondage" site, but not sure I would call this even light bondage. Videos sometimes show them being tied but many are just tied to begin with and with little to no respect for the bondage. They are typically tied with light rope or even a sheet that I guess they could probably struggle out of easily. They never struggle against it, it's just a forgotten element of much of the content. Previous updates last year used to claim high quality and I believe some claimed high definition, but it is not HD. ~840 x 480 for most and here is the worst part... MOV format. I have had so much trouble just keeping the players from crashing it is not even funny. Although the models seem to really orgasm in the massage/manhandle videos, the sex videos are rather disappointing. It is just the guy who started the site having sex with the models but they don't seem to enjoy it much and are typically much shorter than other videos (hint, hint). I suppose the only major thing that is going for this site is the manhandle/massage content and the somewhat amateurish appeal. No search, no categorization (beyond use of your browser's search function). I still have about half-year on my subscription (I like longer non-recurring subs), but I don't visit often. If videos were in a more playable format and HD resolution it would have bumped the score up a bit. Not the worst site out there but definitely not the best.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teach Me Fisting

24. Teach Me Fisting (0)

Pay
Active
80
mr smut (40) 11-27-09  11:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + exclusive content and network access (limited for the first 2 months)
+ weekly updates on Friday
+ Site seems to have no download limit
+ lots of fisting and even some double vaginal or anal fisting
+ over 250 unique scenes and 193 different models
+ the newest videos are also available in full HD as WMV or H.264
+ good mix of well known models and some newcomers or one timers(?) as well
Cons: - you have to enter a captcha code every time you login
- pictures are only 1280 pixel on the long side
- some older videos are only 448x336 pixel large
- photo series sometimes have only very few pictures
- models are often heavily rouged I like a more natural look
- no model bios not even measurements are given
Bottom Line: This is a site dedicated to fisting content only and it's a quite nice one. I was happy to see that this one is diectly available for me too after I joined Lusty Grandmas. It's fun to explore the huge archive using the beta version of the new user interface even though it still needs some work.

Lots of the scenes contain crazy stuff like insertion of huge dildos or baseball bats and female assitents fisting the models. As already stated in my review on Lusty Grandmas this is real hard stuff and maybe not everybodys taste. I only wonder why so many of the younger models seem to speak no english at all.
Also I was distracted by some of the comments the guys filming the models made.

Within the last few days I experienced some problems when downloading content from this site. Sometimes the downloads won't start or what's even worse stop after already having downloaded some hundred megabytes. Guess I'll try to make my download manager work with this site.

For someone being interested in stuff like this I'd recommend to have a look at it. The download problems costs some points but the content is 100% o.k. as far as I'm concerned.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Need A Pee

25. Need A Pee (0)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 09-29-09  03:24pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - There are many videos (151) at various sizes the most recent ones are all 16:9 Widescreen and come in 864*480 around 30mb | 864*480 around 50mb | 1280*720 - 80.6mb The older videos are a bit fuzzy especially at the very small resolutions but they tend to be only a few mb.

- 33 sets of photos around 100 images each at 1200 dpi * 1200 dpi The photos for the most part were awesome. The best part of the site by far.

- many other bonuses such as a blog, a forum (pretty active too), audio stories and a free by-weekly webcam show. All and all quite a large mount of bonus and the model (Rebeka Dee) puts a lot of effort into keeping in touch. Much Kudos for her effort to stay close to her fans.

- every video is of model peeing, usually outdoors, sometimes peeing herself. Usually the girl seems forced to pee and there is no toilet around (hence the name of the site)

- pretty decent variation in videos, very interesting for pee fans
Cons: - there is something that lacks from the videos on this site. There is a lot of variation as Rebeka pees her tights, her underwear, into glasses and cups and on a glass table. There are also a bunch of "debut girls" peeing and a few models peeing public. But that is about it. The models don't play with themselves very much and the whole scene is usually focused only on peeing. Rarely do we have the model talk or strip before peeing. Then again this might be a bonus of you only enjoy seeing a girl pee. I just wish she would include access to her regular solo site with this membership or give us more sexy videos.


- although there are quite a few other models guest staring they don't have a page of their own or some sort of model search. Also a search just in general would have been nice.
Bottom Line: This site is definitely something else. If you like peeing, especially outdoors peeing and don't care that you probably won't see a boob in any of the videos this is the place for you. There are all sorts of peeing related scenes, even some golden showers with cute girls (the best were in the photo section and only a few of them; mostly it's girls peeing themselves or urinating in public and one or two guys being peed on by Rebeka).

The site offers a lot of bonus content and the main model really tries to be close to her fans, which makes this a great solo site in my opinion. But offering her regular solo site as a bonus would have made this deal a million times better.

More diversity in the action within the videos could help a lot. A little foreplay, maybe some slow stripping. Maybe also more dialogue. The webcam archives are the only place Rebeka really talks. Also a search by model and more golden showers could help, but maybe that's just me.
Oh, if you join make sure to check out the video where she starts off playing with a dildo and ends up pissing. It's the best on the site and more like it would have been appreciated.

I really enjoyed this page and felt like the models were having a good time doing the shots unlike other pee sites were the girls look miserable. All and all if you like pee or seeing a girl wet her panties this is a great site to check out (especially if you like how Rebeka looks) but if that is not your cup of tea this site won't change your mind.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 85 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. The Training Of O (2)
2. Lactation Fantasy (1)
3. The Art Of Pee (1)
4. Infernal Restraints (1)
5. Cuckold Me Now (1)
6. Femdom Time (1)
7. Bizarre Insertions (1)
8. CL Erotic (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.16 seconds.