Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 590 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Nubiles.net

26. Nubiles.net (2)

Pay
Active
92
Denner (233) 11-01-10  08:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Ok, a 92 is within the "Excellent"-deal at TBP/PU - and this site IS excellent!
+ The pick of models is almost getting back to the days of nostalgia, which means: Great.
+ Nubiles-providers of sets and vids has gone through, I believe - a demand from the Nubiles-folks.
+ A fine mix of easteuro models and US ditto - and SOME UK, too.
+ Still better quality in both vids and sets - (Here they outrun Karup's PC, for instance)
+ A great choice in vid-formats: WMV, AVI, MPG, MP4, Mobile - fine service for your own choice. And even most in flash for instance viewing.
+ Zip for photosets in 2 sizes.
+ Updates/reediting vids of some older material.
+ Fast getting used to navigation - AND when your're there it's very user friendly.
+ Fine preview-deals (as a member) of vids via small MPG-files - included thumbs.
+ VERY fine updates - normally 2 sets and 1 vid a day.
+ Nice way of updating three new models at a time.
+ DL manager allowed
Cons: - Regional pricing - via TBP it's CCBill - and more expensive for PUs outside US.
- Some lack of top-teens - too many dull/average looking models.
- Stripped socks and alike (pigtals) - no need for that.
- Need for better hc-performance - too repetitive (see below)
- Useless bonus-sites
- Better search-function wanted.
Bottom Line: OK, this is/was one of my all time favorite site for years - first of all it's a softcore/solo girl/masturbation site - with a touch of hc - aproxx 1/4 - 1/5 of the content is hc. (Some models do not have hc, though).

I go for the easteuro models primarily - no offense US-models - but they (easteuro models) have in Nubiles a certain aura about it - some of the best and long time saved material, I've got from Nubiles - in the soft/masturbation gender...

And that's what this site first is about - that solo girls deals - in strip, posing, masturbation - and here's some very fine material.

BUT, Nubiles (as for young teens)....WHY do the models/your providers of models STILL have to make those girls appear in stripped socks, socks, pigtails ect - just to make them look like teens? They ARE teens and as a fan I'd like to watch more in lingerie and high heels - like the old days - an update in that style more would be great.

Nubiles has now updated some that those older and GREAT sets and vids with easteuromodels - and thank you for that - vids in much better viewing quality, just to name a few: Emmy and Diane (and Aicha, listen to her dirty talk) - keep it coming. Keep those updates of vids coming.

Only VERY few models do not have vids. (thumbs up for vid fans).

Lately Nubiles has come up with new and exclusive models/material - not yet seen anywhere else (Fayina and Anushka) - thumbs up.

Again with solos and hc - some of the hc vids is very much from providers - and very repetitive, alas - we watch this easteuro male-"star" again and again - used at I do not know how many other sites - guy a bit abusive to the models and getting to be somewhat of a bore, generally (repetitive)- it ruins the deal.

Still: Nubiles is a favorite with a lot to offer in - especially - fine solo girl content, fine quality, a damn fine archive for new members and generally Top-of-the-Pops - no one partial to sologirl-material is cheated with the content here...
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Teen Mega World

27. Teen Mega World (3)

Network
Active
87
rearadmiral (326) 12-09-12  08:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large network (nearly 3000 scenes)
- Network updates daily with one scene per day for the network
- Great teen-themed network
- Beautiful Russian and Eastern European models
- Decent proportion of anal scenes (though this is definitely NOT an anal-themed network
- Supports download managers
- No obvious time-outs for downloads
- No download limits
- Several under-served niches are here
- TBP / PU discount ($20 instead of $30)
Cons: - Non-English-speaking models can cause the heat to be turned down a bit
- Several sites not updating
- Download speeds can vary and are generally lower than average
Bottom Line: I know this network has some detractors here but Iím definitely not one of them. This network wasnít even on my list of Ďmust havesí but I joined it to get access to sites that feature under-served niches like young women (18-20) with older men, for example, and Iím glad that I joined. One advantage I have is that while many members here state that the site has lost its edge I have nothing to compare that to so the site still looks great to me. If you join now you likely wonít be disappointed.

The entire network has a theme of promoting young (18-20) Eastern European and Russian models. There are 36 listed sites (but two of them are network duplicates) that offer these models in a variety of niches. The most common niches are here, which is good, but the better news is that several under-served niches are here too. For example, there is a massage site, a nylons site, a voyeur site and an old-and-young site. The network is large, offering just shy of 3000 scenes now.

The network is still active with one new scene being added per day. Thatís one scene per day for the network, not for each site. Several of the sites havenít updated in a while so they may no be updating at all now.

Each site opens into its own page where you see 10 scenes per page. Clicking on a scene you want to see opens it in a new page where you can either stream or download the video. I donít use streaming so I canít really pronounce on it, but the streams arenít offered in different resolutions. The good news is that unlike many other sites the stream doesnít start automatically. The site layout is simple, effective and easy to use.

The downloads are a bit odd in that while there are options those options are limited. Unlike other similar networks where you can choose any number of resolutions in your preferred format this network doesnít offer that. For each scene there are usually options, but each resolution is offered in a different format. So if you want a particular resolution (and file size) you canít choose the format: youíre stuck with the encoding that the network chose.

If photos are available, theyíre well hidden because I didnít see them. I donít normally download photos either so I have to admit that I didnít look that hard.

The biggest advantage for the network is the look of the models. I donít normally take memberships to sites with Russian and Eastern European models but there is no good reason for this, especially since it seems that so many of the newest and most beautiful models are now coming out of Russia and Eastern Europe. This network is no exception: many of the models are new to me and many of them are incredibly beautiful.

This may be a pro or a con depending on your view, but while the network isnít anally-themed (though there is one anal site Ė Anal Angels) there is a decent amount of anal sex here. Iíd prefer more, so that should be an indication for non-anal-fans that the site isnít overwhelmed by anal scenes. Iíd say the proportion is about right.

Some minor positives are that the network offers a TBP/PU discount and it bills through Epoch. They also allow download managers and there are no obvious timeouts on the links. There are also no download limits.

The site does have some negatives. Objectively, the limited download options is a problem (see above). Also, the download speeds can vary quite a bit. Iím used to seeing speeds approaching 7MB/s and I admit that this occurred here, but it was more common to see speeds about half that rate. The lowest speeds I saw were down around 1MB/s but those only occurred at what I assume were peak download times in Europe.

This is a purely subjective negative, but I find that when the models donít speak English that takes some of the heat away from the scene. Iím a big fan of the scene set up and when you canít understand what the models are saying it seems to turn the heat down a bit. This reason alone isnít a deal-breaker because so many of the models are stunningly beautiful, but if you plan to join you should be aware of this.

The bottom line is that the positives far outweigh the minor negatives to make this network a good value. Yes, they could offer more download options and the download speeds could be more consistent, but the large network size, the access to under-served niches and especially the stunning models make this a worthwhile membership.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Graphis

28. Graphis (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
My 2 cents (4) 03-20-12  04:50pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The models are for the most part, stunning.
A few of the models, like Rio Fujisaki, and Kasumi Risa can also be found on various hardcore sites, but most of the models, I haven't seen elsewhere.
-Picture and video quality is very good. Not super high resolution, but clear and crisp. (video 1280x720 and pictures 1280x852)
-Photo sets can be downloaded as a zip file, although they tend to be small sets, with only 15-25 photos in each.
-updates come regularly, Monday, Wednesday and Friday, usually with 2 photo sets and 1 video.
-Price is OK. Not a bargain, at &#65509;1,980 (about US$24), but not over the top either.
-Cancelling membership was no problem, just took a couple of mouse clicks. I see a couple of previous comments here about having problems with cancelling, so I assume that the website has since changed things to make it easier on that front.
Cons: Unfortunately there is quite a substantial list.
-Navigation is shocking, with no search feature. You basically have to go methodically through each section to find what you like.
-No model index. Models will have content scattered about the site in little groups, with nothing linking them.
-There is a points system where a certain amount of content is available straight away, then more if you stay 6 months, and more again,(but only photos, from what I can make out), after 1 year.
-When you cancel, you are cut off immediately, so you will need to remember exactly when to cancel.
-No streaming videos, and can only be downloaded in one size and format. (WMV's of about 150mb, for a 5 minutes long video)
Bottom Line: Personally, I would love to be able to give this website a much higher score. It was like a breath of fresh air after too many sites that all start to look the same. I love the high quality softcore, (and it is definitely no more than softcore)videos. I don't really do photos myself, but the ones I looked at looked like similar quality.
It's not a huge site, but I'd take quality over quantity any day. New content trickles in at a steady pace.
I hate the idea of a points system, but having said that, I have done something that I usually never do. After my initial one month, I actually have joined up again with the intention of staying 6 months so I can get the next lot of content. There is no way I will be sticking it out for 1 year though, that would require far too much dedication, as there only seems to be photos at the end of that.
Being a Japanese site, there is of course the issue of their censorship laws, although this site, being very softcore, doesn't focus a lot on the genitals anyway, and it is quite subtly blurred , as opposed to the big square mosaic blocks you get sometimes. Plus, they will show a lot of pubes before the blurring kicks in.
Losing access to the site the instant you cancel your membership, is in my view, a very poor practice, if you pay for a certain amount of time, you should get access for that full time, regardless of whether you have cancelled it's re-billing or not. The only reason I can see for them to do that is they must expect some people to forget to cancel on time, and the automatic re-billing kicks in. Then if you cancelled the next day, you instantly lose access to the site!
The tour page show a fair representation of what is on the inside, so if you like what you see there, the site might be worth a shot. One thing I can guarantee though: you will get frustrated by the layout of the site, with it's poor navigation, and content that you can't access.

So, finally to sum it all up in a few words:
Content, superb.
Website, crap.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tania Spice

29. Tania Spice (0)

Pay
Active
82
exotics4me (463) 11-15-10  12:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Roughly 2/3 of content is not included with Pacino's Adventures.
- Picked up as cross-sell trial with Pacino's Adventures for $4.95 for 3 days, full access.
- May be a couple off, but showing 93 photo sets, 94 videos.
- Weekly update, don't know if these are just sets Pacino has stashed or not.
- Pics are zipped and are 1200 long end on about 60% of pic sets and 1600 long end on the other 40%.
- Covers basic sex niches, solo, girl/girl, boy/girl and girl/girl/girl.
- Bonus sites are hit or miss, same bonus sites as Pacino's Adventures. La Zona Modelos is an above average bonus site and surprising to me, Pam Spice is a bonus site, surprising since she is my favorite of the Pacino models.
- Video quality has some variance and not really for sure the rhyme or reason to it since some of the older videos are 1440 high end in res, while some of the newer are only 720 high end.
- Over 10,000 pictures of Tania, full site is 38.2 GB.
Cons: - Guessing the tech staff thought it would be easier to start the name of each video with ts, for Tania Spice, then the name of the video. The videos that are more than one part, occasionally two parts, are not in order since ts are the first two letters in every video filename.
- Can't say I would join this site for $29.95, really nice as a trial when combined with monthly sub to Pacino's Adventures.
- Pacino is big on the outfits, costumes, only problem is, all of his models use the same outfits, costumes, themes so there is a chance for redundancy which is a shame since his models are very good at tease/strip.
- Just not big enough to be a standalone site, should be included in with the bonus sites on Pacino's Adventures
Bottom Line: I have mixed emotions on all of Pacino's sites. This one doesn't change that. I like the technical quality, wish the pictures were a little bigger, but they are at least at a minimum 1200 long end and are zipped. Considering the varying tech quality of the videos not being based on date of release, it is probably safe to say he shoots or shot the solo models he has, maybe for a year, then they left and he's just slowly releasing the content.

It's interesting how a video released 5 weeks ago is 720 long end, while one released last year was 1440 long end. It's not so much a criticism as it is a heads up, maybe positively or negatively depending on taste, to potential members since the model, in this case Tania, doesn't look much older in her newest set as she did in her oldest set.

The girls with solo sites working with Pacino are also quite different. Tania is one of the more hardcore models he has. She does everything including anal. At first, when I first saw her back on Pacino's Adventures, I wasn't for sure if I would be that much into her because of the braces on her teeth. However, considering the fact that many of these models come from impoverished countries, I can see the other side that says her family probably couldn't afford braces when she was younger.

In terms of personality, she's almost as playful at Gigi Spice. Really pretty hair, no matter which color and as Spencer said in the TBP review, she has a great set of natural boobs. As would be expected, she also has a nice full butt as well. Tania does speak some English in a few of the videos. I don't think she's as much into the girl/girl scenes as Gigi, but she's very good at solo and also in the boy/girl scenes with Pacino.

The settings/themes vary from the expected schoolgirl to baseball player to football player to bathtub to police officer to taxi driver to the unexpected road construction crew worker. So much variation in fact, I think you could put most of Pacino's sites into a costume type genre which is why I wish there was more focus and higher resolution on the pictures.

Like with his other sites Pacino doesn't get in the way like most males in porn. He's rarely heard and if he is, it's not with words like "bitch" or the typical male porn star stereotype. He's rather laid-back and seems to have a calming effect on the models.

Overall, it's a good site, for the $5/3 days cross sell with Pacino's Adventures, it's an excellent deal. However, since it is still a standalone site at $30/month, it's not recommended as a join by itself. Which leads me back to the mixed emotions I started with. If you're joining Pacino's Adventures, the flagship site and get the offer for Tania's solo site, I do recommend it. It took me a day to download the videos and pictures from it and considering her attractiveness, she's very collectible and has several solo sets that end in dripping orgasms.

As trial with PA, recommended
As standalone, not recommended
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit FTV Girls

30. FTV Girls (5)

Pay
Active
82
jd1961 (95) 09-30-07  04:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A Lot Of Material
- Hi Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Many Videos
- Decent DL Speed
Cons: - Much Of The Material Is Somewhat Boring
- NO Hardcore
- Infrequent Updating
Bottom Line: After thumbing through their extensive preview, I was anxious to see the site. I was somewhat disappointed. It's a very attractive site, and easy to navigate. It does have an awful lot of material, photos and videos. But, something is missing. It's not exciting. A bit bland. Some of the sets seem to be nudity optional! Others, the old statue posing. There is no hardcore. That would be fine if the material was highly erotic, but most of it is not. I guess if you never saw a girl nude before, it would be. But for jaded porn surfers, nah! It's not that there isn't good material here, there is, but you have to search for it. The photos are hi-res, at the lower end of the scale (1200px), and zipped for convenience. They do have a page of larger sized photos (2000x3000), but just 1 page.The videos are offered in wmv (640x480), and divx (360x240). Being First Time Videos, the girls are basically presented as the archetypal "girl next door". I don't know about your neighborhood, but the girls nowadays are a little more wild than those presented here!
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit FTV Girls

31. FTV Girls (5)

Pay
Newbie
83*
LePornoisseur (1) 12-17-11  03:43pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Consistent. Not much has changed since I was a member 2 years ago.
-The girls. If you like sexy white chicks that run the gamut from avg. to gorgeous, you'll get something out of FTV. (they have an exotic non-white girl here and there).
-Girls inserting large objects. One unique aspects of FTV is their penchant for having the girls stick massive vegetables and/or fruits inside them. Once in a while they'll shove a hand or fist in there for good measure.
-I was able to download zipfiles of pics rather quickly.
-Lots of hot videos of girls masturbating.
-Little synopsis of the scene and the director describes shooting with the model.
Cons: -The layout is a bit cumbersome. Also, visually they could reconfigure the site so it's more intuitive to navigate instead of just scrolling down...FOREVER.
-The girls' names! It seems more often than not FTV always has the names of the girls listed differently than what they are everywhere else. This is probably a testament to their ability to locate the newest, hottest girls. However, it's a pain in the butt to us pic collectors who would like to organize all of our pics by model. Thankfully there are unaffiliated blogs on the web that list girls by their FTV name AND their porn names.
-The price. They need to lower that price a bit. In my opinion this is good for once every two years but for less than half the price I can get better content.
-The video content meanders a bit. and I'm not a big fan of how they edit by splicing right in the middle of a scene so there's a slight jump in the audio and video.
Bottom Line: I seem to join this site every 2 years or so. I like FTV a lot, but for what it is, they should be commanding a subscription rate of $19.99. Even then, I think that's a bit too high. I give it an 83 because it is solidly a VERY GOOD site. However, there are solo glamor-shot type sites that in my opinion are slightly better, and update more frequently. With my latest stint with FTV coming to a conclusion in a matter of days, I definitely enjoyed my subscription this time around...see you in another two years FTV, maybe.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit In The Crack

32. In The Crack (1)

Pay
Active
83
Drooler (218) 08-25-07  08:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +ASS is the emphasis here
+usually very fine Euro and American women; most are well-known
+117 gallery sets, most of which are of a unique model in two complete scenes
+excellent quality photography, esp from #15 to the present
+zips and individual pics available in small (approx. 800px) and large (1500 to 2400px) sizes, but see the cons!
+OK, collage-like previews of galleries (click ďmodelsĒ link, then click a gallery to see it)
+more recent vids in 640x360, 1280x720, and 1920x1080
Cons: -only 3 new galleries + companion videos per month
-access to all photos costs $24.95; video downloads require purchasing tokens in a complex system based on video size and time length (e.g. a small and short one costs just several, but a large and long one can cost over 200). Purchase examples: 500 tokens for $23.95; 10,000 for $349.95. (:o)
-complete availability of large and small pics starts with gallery #43
-no standard pic sizes; a variety of custom dimensions
Bottom Line: What I like are photos shot straight above a beautiful woman lying belly down, back straight, from the upper thigh to the top of her head, looking back amorously, her delectable ass beckoning. What this site delivers is close, but either full-body length with the womanís face buried in a mass of hair, or just the ass all by itself, nearly every single time! Somehow with this site I almost NEVER get my wish!

But, dear reader, you might get yours: ass in various positions and at many angles (just not my favorite one). Colorful toys shoved into/sticking out of the three most popular orifices. Closeups of cheeks pulled apart, shot from multiple XYZ coordinates. Ditto that for the MOST popular body cavity. This is what we call stretching.

Feminists say that porn objectifies women. This site single-mindedly endeavors to do so, and it succeeds. Our dehumanized pretties include Eve Angel, Alexis Love, Jassie, Sophie Moone, Sophie Paris, Addison Rose, Susana Spears, Mia Stone, Lucy Stratilova, and many more. And it can get very messy, such as with Layla Riveraís toilet session. (Iíll bet sheís a vegetarian.)

The photo quality is so good and the women look so fine, with such detail that you can clearly see the texture of their skin. Itís hard for me to believe how disappointing this site is -- for me, anyway. 200-350 photos per gallery is common here. Why canít I get my wish? I do at lots of other sites. Itís really weird.

And the videos? Fuck that.

Follow-Up:
Now you can join and get everything for $34.95. I've been downloading lots of vids of girls like Susana Spears, Karlie Montana, and Peaches (among others) and the extended ass worship is very nice! Don't need the closeup anus twiching, but some folks might enjoy it. Boosted the score from 70 to 83.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nubiles.net

33. Nubiles.net (2)

Pay
Active
95
messmer (137) 03-21-09  06:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A very big selection of models.

Most are beautiful, within an age range of 18 - 20 (some are older) therefore fitting the name "Nubiles" perfectly.

Picture sets are available in zipped form with most sets (since 2008) giving you a choice between normal (1200x1793) and large size (1600x2400). But since the "normal size" is still quite respectable it is a pleasure to be able to go back past 2008 and sample all the "older models."

Videos are crystal clear, the new ones in wmv format at 3500 kbps. Since there are so many updates (one daily, alternating between stills and videos) I have concentrated mostly on new contents, dating from 2008 until the present.

Older contents is good and while not great by today's standards the mpg videos are still quite palatable.

Much thought has been given to the navigation of the site making it easy to get around.

The webmaster is very friendly and responsive, this is a big plus in my eyes.

Download speed is very good.
Cons: I love this site just as it is. My only con would be in connection with what it is NOT! Most who know me by now also know that I'm slightly out of place in a site that contains models under forty, but then it wouldn't be Nubiles any longer, would it?

Why am I here then? Because when I took the tour of its sister site "Anilos" I found the quality so good that I couldn't resist subscribing to a much younger site, just because it had the same quality of material and much more contents.

Strangely enough I haven't been sorry for a moment. And as you can tell by another review I just put in, I threw all caution to the wind when it came to "Anilos" and subscribed to that site as well. The site owners can thank "Berkley" for that!

I find both sites near perfect and am only stopped from giving a score in the high nineties because the older material doesn't quite live up to my taste for HD and near HD material yet.
Bottom Line: A great site for lovers of nubile women. I find it a very nice mixture of Europeans and Americans, and in contrast to some of my friends here I like the interviews in English as well as the beautiful models that America has in such abundance. Mind you, the Europeans aren't bad either!

I usually skip the hardcore stuff (m/f) but that's a personal preference.

Highly recommended!
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nubiles.net

34. Nubiles.net (2)

Pay
Active
81
turboshaft (24) 08-13-09  12:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (42), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Claimed 647 models! Yes, they are quite nubile; very hot, in their late teens, early 20s
+ Newer full length videos are 1280 x 720 @ 3500 kb/s .wmv (smaller sizes available in .avi, .mp4, .mpg)
+ No download limits, no DRM, download managers are allowed
+ 3 to 4 updates every day, and 3 new models every week
+ Newer photos are 2400 x 1600, with zips for each photo set
+ Download speeds of at least 500 kbs/s
+ Some models do hardcore content
+ Pretty clear breakdown at top of each model's page of what she does; from "topless" to "sex"
+ "Interview" pages give some info on each model
+ Navigation is pretty straightforward, and search engine works well
+ Billing through CCBill, with special PU discount of $24.31/month
Cons: - Overall repetitive and boring feel, and hardcore in particular, at least for me (see Bottom Line)
- Virtually no girl-girl content (less than a dozen scenes, if that)
- Little anal or fetish content beyond vaginal and lots of toys
- "Bonus" content is negligible, and mostly to advertise other pay sites
- Navigation within photo set pages is a little annoying
- Individual video clips are not highest quality, only 1280 x 720 when you DL the whole video
- Photos are professionally shot, but a few look a bit too Photoshopped, or as if they should not have been been released at all
- Purely my personal preference, but a few too many European models
Bottom Line: I originally approached this site as a girls only site, even though I was well aware that it had hardcore content. But come on, it's not the guys that are nubile -- it's the hundreds of hot girls! That's the one thing that is indisputable: the models here are young (late teens through mid twenties) and very attractive. Quite a few are American and new, but there are also plenty of Europeans (mostly Eastern Europe, in particular a growing number from Russia) as well as models that have been on quite a few other girls-only sites (Franziska, Sarah Blake, Kacey Jordan, Angelica Black), but none I would really call bona fide porn stars.

For those who like some variety in their model choices, this site might be a tad bland. The focus is on the nubile and skinny females in this world, but not necessarily of all races and elasticities it seems. I would not call the models themselves bland, but I really could not find any variety of girls that would include those of Asian, African, or Central and South American descent. It really was not an issue for me, as there is every hair color to choose from, most are shaven bare, though some still have pubic hair if it matters, plus tattoos and piercings, but nothing over the top. And if these girls simply are not in your preferred age range, you might want to check out their sister (mother?) site, Anilos, which looks to be much the same setup and price structure, though noticeably smaller amount of content.

So, how are all these lovely ladies captured? Well, the equipment and technology almost matches the beauty of the models. Newer videos are 1280 x 720 HD, but only in full length. Videos are broken down into one to two minute clips as well, but if you only download these clips, it's lower resolution. I guess this is good if you want to check out the content of a video before downloading the whole thing, but a letdown nonetheless if you just want that special clip. Videos are well lit, relatively well shot (no "Blair Witch" shake-'em-up contests), and have basically no apparent off camera distractions, spoken or otherwise. There are some interviews where the cameraman speaks, but it's only in interviews where I could find this happening.

Here's where my 81 score starts to really come in; though well shot, videos just did not do it for me. I would say the site is still photo-focused (more on that in a minute) but the videos are not too special for me. These ladies are eye candy, no doubt, but often somewhat reserved in videos, even in the hardcore scenes. I felt it was as much a case as just keeping the models comfortable (the solo, as well as the hardcore, content is never abusive or degrading, if you were wondering) as it was not asking enough of them. They enjoy themselves for sure, but not as much as I was expecting, and it felt as if it was too formulaic and toy focused to really make things stand out.

(Bottom Line continued below.)
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Nubiles.net

35. Nubiles.net (2)

Pay
Active
92
Claypaws (44) 08-06-12  11:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: *1100 teen (18+) models (no silicone), 5700 photo sets (100 ish pics each), 600,000 photos, 5700 videos (10 to 15min). -100% exclusive.
*Many attractive models and lots of total stunners, especially in video.
*Updates every day. 3 new models per week. All model's content on consecutive days. Not dragged out over months. I wish all sites would do this.
*4 softcore photo sets and videos per model plus some bg and gg hardcore.
*Photosets in 1200x800 and 2400x1600 with full zips.
*Videos in WMV 1280x720 3600kb/s approx 400MB, MP4 854x480 1500kb/s, plus some lower resolutions and mobile and streaming. No DRM. Samples of all types available in tour.
*Sample of every video and photoset on site available in tour.
*Good model directory and exemplary search facility.
*Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
*Download manager friendly. No download limit. No timeouts.
*Choose CCBill or Epoch.
Cons: * Too much emphasis on toys and masturbation. Even if you like this in videos, photos would benefit from less. If you hit on these themes, this is not a con.
*Photos less good than videos but still better than most sites which offer good video.
*Few repeat visits from models. Very few deviate from the 4 solo photo + 4 solo vid + bg/gg plan.
*Hardly any non-Caucasian or non-slim. I prefer slim Caucasian so this suits me but might not suit everyone.
*"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central. This applies to virtually all sites unless they are specialist fetish sites. Not a con for me.
*Slight discrepancy between what tour quotes for number of sets and videos and what search feature reveals. Figures quoted in pros might not be exact but not far off.
Bottom Line: I have given this site a very high score even though much of its content is not what I want or like. I believe that a score should be based on how well a site delivers what its free tour leads you to expect. An inadequate or misleading tour should detract from the score even when content is good. Excellent delivery following an informative tour should be rewarded.

Nubiles has one of the very best tours around: so good that not everyone might be aware of this. It has access to the full model directory. Click any model and you see exactly what her content is plus two full size pictures and a sample of her video at every resolution and format choice the site offers. If you click "Photos", every set has three free images at 1200x800 and 12 representative thumbs. And every video has a 1 minute streaming sample at a quality good enough to view full screen.

The tour area is the same as the members area but without the actual content. So, when you join, you should be in no doubt what the site has to offer in navigation and content. This is teen girls in mainly solo videos and photo sets with some bg and somewhat less gg. Many of the girls, of course, appear on other sites, including ATK, Femjoy, Karups, MetArt, Twistys and others but the Nubiles content is 100% exclusive. Girls often look younger on Nubiles, even when they were shot later than other sites. This, I believe, is mainly due to subtle makeup and lighting since Nubiles deplores and discourages things like pigtails or holding teddy bears.

You would need to study the tour very carefully, however, to reveal what are the greatest frustrations of the site for me. It has a very strong emphasis on toys and masturbation; and it is geared towards video rather than photos even though it takes a standard 4 solo photo sets and 4 solo videos per model. gg or bg is on top of that.

The webmaster makes his comprehensive instructions to photographers available in the tour. There are some contradictions and ambiguities in it and clarifying those would help the site and its members. Here are a few quotes:

"Videos are just important as pictures." [sic]
"video is more important to members then pictures." [sic]
"At least half of the sets should be fingering and finger masturbation without toys."
"Our favorite content is when a girl plays with toys."
"The best theme is just masturbation and toys, and I dont expect other themes but here are a few ideas." [sic]
"Members do not like toys as they often get in the way of seeing what she is doing down there. Do not give me 4 sets of all toys! "
"No more then 2 sets with toys. Focus on finger masturbation." [sic]

I have joined the site many times (despite my loathing of toys and masturbation content). Using its excellent search feature confirms that the toys and masturbation bias has increased over the past year. I deplore this but some might enjoy it. For me, toys and fingers both get in the way. I wish the webmaster would clarify his intention and ensure that it is clearly described in his instructions to photographers.

The photo sets are genuine photos, not vidcaps. But the webmaster requires that they should mirror the videos. This tends to result in each photo set rather closely being a kind of rehearsal for the video, with less spontaneity and engagement. They are often less well lit, colour balanced and focused than the videos and frequently less good than the same model's photo content on other sites.

I think it would improve the site's content if photos could be freed of the constraint to match the videos. Why not have the toys and masturbation in the videos, where they add interest, and keep them out of the photos, in which they are mainly an obstruction to the view and always look unnatural? That said, the site does have some excellent photo sets too, and some girls have all their photo sets free of toys and even of masturbation. But they are not the norm.

The videos are almost invariably better than elsewhere. Video is technically excellent. 1280x720 wmv is very sharp to view and well lit.

I mentioned the search feature. It is superb. You can search on 15 Attributes (inc boobs, pussy etc), 15 Outfits (inc lingerie, glasses etc), 9 Actions (inc toys, hardcore) and Actions can EXCLUDE too, so I can find photo sets without toys! You can access and even run the live search feature in the tour. WYSIWYG!!!

All photo sets and videos start clothed, even if frequently this just means a bikini or bra and panties, and get fully nude partway through. None start out nude. There is some teasing but probably not enough to satisfy lingerie or tease enthusiasts. It is not a fetish site; the emphasis is on the girls and most of them are hot.

Despite its missing the mark for me, I frequently rejoin. I recommend Nubiles to anyone who enjoys quality teen content, especially if you like toys and masturbation and are aware that, though no slouch in photos or hardcore, its strength lies in its solo video.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Burning Angel

36. Burning Angel (1)

Pay
Active
88
rearadmiral (326) 11-24-12  10:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - There is a cross-sell on the sign up page but it isnít pre-checked
- Bills through CCBill
- Great chance to see some new models
- Many familiar porn models appear
- Many download options for newer videos
- Supports download managers
Cons: - No zips on pics
- Pics relatively low resolution
- No search function
- No specific tags
Bottom Line: I have to confess that I never expected to be writing a review of a site featuring models with tattoos and piercings, Goth models, punk models and others along that theme. Iím as anti-tattoo as the next guy, except that it turns out Iím not. Iím still anti-tattoo and piercing unless the model goes all the way.

The biggest surprise for me was how conventional the porn here actually is. I donít know what I was expecting, but whatever it was I was wrong. This is a typical porn network that just happens to showcase models with a look that is slightly out of mainstream.

The main page is laid out as youíd expect with any network: there are tabs for going to pictures, videos, the individual sites, or sorting by model. One choice conspicuous by its absence is a search function. If it exists on the network I havenít found it yet. (This lack of search is further worsened by the lack of scene tags. Tags exist, but are too broad to be of a lot of use in specific searches.)

The network is made up of eight individual sites. (Cum on My Tattoo, Fuck me in the Bathroom, Heavy Metal Pussy Party, Joanna Angel, POV Punx, Punk Porn, Punk Schoolgirls and Big Boobs are Cool Ė Iíll post some stats as a comment on each siteís PU page.) While several of the sites have a reason for being stand-alone, several others could just as easily be grouped together. This is neither positive or negative, itís just a fact.

Each site is laid out in the same way: the site opens into a page where there are thumbnails for 20 scenes per page. Under each thumbnail is some basic information about the scene, including a scene name, the genre (girl/boy, solo, etc.), the running length, user ratings and the female star.

When you select a scene you get a larger thumbnail and four small thumbnails to give you some idea of whatís in store. Each scene has multiple options for downloads. You can download a trailer, the full scene or the full scene broken down into parts. I have to question the value of offering the scene in parts in 2012, but maybe there are still people with slow internet connections. For each of those options there are usually some choices for file type and resolution. MPEGs are offered (in resolutions up to 1400x800 Ė 5000kb/s and 24fps Ė depending on the upload date, of course), as are WMVs in high and low resolutions and a mobile version. These options decrease as you get into older files. Prior to 2010 MPEGs werenít offered but Quicktime files were. The oldest scenes on the network, which date back to 2007, are often only available in one resolution and only in WMV. The resolution on the oldest scenes is low at 480x360, 1800kb/s and 30fps.

This is being a bit picky, but the way the download options are laid out with the trailer as the first option made it too easy to select that instead of the full scene. It didnít happen to me, but it required that I pay more attention than Iíd normally do when just downloading porn. Even having a trailer as a download option seems odd to me, but at least they could put it lower in the option list.

The site supports download managers and I had no problem with the links timing out.

The network bills through CCBill so you have confidence in that. There is a cross-sell, but it isnít pre-checked.

If the site has a major flaw it is how they provide pictures. I donít normally download photos but in this case I was looking forward to doing so. I had flagged several models that I really liked that are rare on more mainstream sites and wanted photos too. I was disappointed to see that zips arenít available and that even if they were, the resolution isnít great. The newest photos are 1080x720. I know that isnít bad, but they could be better. Older photos are obviously a lower resolution. I gave up on getting photos since having to save each one individually seems like too much work for porn. The lack of zips really needs to be addressed.

I know this is highly subjective, but I found most of the models on the site to be very attractive. I do question why some models appear on the site though. Katie St. Ives has a few scenes here and Iíd not normally think of her when I think tattoos, piercings, Goth or punk. Donít get me wrong, Iíll take any of Katieís scenes when I can get them, but it just doesnít seem to be a good fit.

Dracken posted a comment back in í09 that the network appeared to be a Ďcommunityí site for people who like the Goth / Punk / etc. look and lifestyle. That is true. There are blogs and forums for the look, the music and the life. Iím only interested in the naked chicks so I really canít comment on the non-porn parts of the network.

The bottom line is that this is an excellent network. It is well laid out, easy to use and offers some great porn. If youíre like me and want to push your porn boundaries a bit then Iíd highly recommend starting with Burning Angel. The models are beautiful and the scenes are hot.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babelicious

37. Babelicious (0)

Pay
Active
86
tangub (151) 10-31-10  04:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Discount price of $19.95 available through TBP or $9.95 for returning members via email link
Billing by Epoch with no regional variation
12 bonus sites included with membership
Updated most days
Photos available in 3 sizes with zip download for each.
Videos look great
Great navigation and search features
No download limits
Cons: Non Exclusive content
Method of downloading the photo zips is a little annoying as each time you select the size of zip you want from the drop down menu the yellow bar security warning in IE pops up to deny you so you have to click allow download then select the zip again, basically 6 clicks of the mouse just to bring up the save box
Little to interest fans of hardcore here
Bottom Line: As an ex member of the Sexy Babes and Dream Babes sites 4 or 5 years ago I regularly receive emails offering me the chance to rejoin for $9.95 so as they now include their premium sites Babelicious and Babes.tv in the package I decided itís time to take my first look at these sites. Babelicious is packed with gorgeous babes in high quality photos and videos in mainly solo strip, masturbation and toy scenes. Thereís little to interest those looking for G/G or B/G action. Looking through the last 100 video updates I spotted only 1 B/G scene.

The site claims to update daily with 5 photo sets and 2 videos per week but over the last few weeks theyíve been missing a few days with the update count for September being 22 out of 30 days and for October 22 out of 31 days. Latest photo sets are being added in 3 sizes, 1000, 2000 and 3500 px with a zip for each and video updates currently at 1280 x 720 @ 3500k with wmv being the only download option plus a flash streaming option.

The pictures here generally look crisp, colourful and well lit even in the highest resolutions, sometimes a little too much photo shopping. The largest size photos are a little inconsistent and can range from 2500px to 4000px, only exception being a few sets that are were only available in 1000px added around December 09 to January 10.

Thereís currently 270 models here dominated by Eastern Europeans with a few British and American girls thrown in including some of my favourites like Georgia Jones and Carli Banks. Thereís plenty of search and browse options to help you easily find who youíre looking for and you have the ability to rate every model, scene and photo set out of 10. Current top ranked model by members is a British girl named Sasha with 34 photo sets and 11 videos. I donít recall coming across her before and I really enjoyed her videos. I loved the way she talks dirty in her British accent while striping and mastubating which you seldom hear on sites these days dominated by Eastern Europeans, such a shame she had to go and ruin her sweet body with those awful implants though.

The biggest negative about the site is the non exclusive content. I recognised many of the sets from sites like Teendreams and ATK Galleria although I found myself downloading the sets again here to get them in the higher resolutions. Now that this site is the main focus in the network with regards to updates maybe they should consider a Babeslicious exclusive section similar to twistys Overall a decent site with updates most days and a ton of content over the network of bonus sites.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Graphis

38. Graphis (0)

Pay
Active
59
Capn (28) 08-16-10  12:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Truly beautiful models. They claim over 300
+ Site is very much weighted to photosets.
+ Generally good photography over 30000 images
+ Very 'Japanese' : On the positive side it has a novel approach for westeners and in some respects it is quite appealing.
The translations can be quaint.
The models are treated with respect
and seem to be enjoying the experience.
+ Videos - Over 100 of them.
Short, very softcore & I actually quite liked them.
Not so much that I would bother to download any though.
Cons: - Galleries are updated daily, I think, but a gallery is only 15 photos & is not offered in a choice of resolutions. ( Typically 1300 x 900 )
- Confusing navigation, not helped by...

- Very 'Japanese': Layout is not intuitive and with the restrictive....

- Points system controls which models, photos & zips you are allowed access to
and possibly even the size of image you are allowed to access.
Although how the system works is very Japanese & quite inscrutable! :0/
Basically what it comes down to is that it will take a year continuous subscription to get access to all the site content!
Seeing greyed out stills & small thumbnails shows that whilst this is more of the same good quality, it is nowhere near enough to make me want to invest a years worth of subscription for it.
- Videos - Short & very softcore : Some may see this as a minus.


** Failed to respond to cancellation request in 2 working days. Lowered score to a 'not recommended status'
Bottom Line: Right, let me say at the outset, I really did want to like this site.
On balance I do but there are some heavy caveats.
I have listed some points above as both positive and negative.

The 'Japanese'ness of the site is quirky, but will soon become a terminal irritation. Photosets are random pictures rather than a cohesive photoset with any progression and are very short on quantity, although the quality is good.
A lot of the clothing used is western, which I found a little disappointing.
I was expecting to see at least some more traditional Japanese attire. I would have hoped it would have been 1 trad set per model. The kimono does appear but very infrequently.

I would have thought a lot higher of this site if it had been all available upon subscription. As it stands, 'cheated' is too strong a word, 'deprived' suits as a better word for my feelings on this.

It is understandable that they wish to encourage long term membership.
The way they have weighted the points though, it isn't really worthwhile.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

39. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (356) 02-21-10  09:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.
Cons: -Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.
Bottom Line: After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.

My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.

The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.

The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.

However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.

Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.

I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.

Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.

While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.

With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Joy Mii

40. Joy Mii (1)

Pay
Active
77
Parsnip (10) 11-05-13  10:13am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-25-13  09:41am  (Update History)
Reason: Increasing amount of anal material on the site
Pros: - Very attractive models
- The site corporate style with brightly colored videos is refreshing
- Stunningly beautiful films, the "joy" in the title is well chosen
- All exclusive content, I think.
- Very quick and reliable downloads, always maxes out my internet connection (around 2 MBytes/sec).
- Multiple sizes and resolutions of photos & videos, although I only ever download the highest. Recent videos are true HD.
Cons: - Earlier material had highest video resolution of 720p, but very good quality. EDIT - see below, all available at 1080 now.
- Little variety of models - almost all white, slim, 18 - 25.
- I was going to say that so far Joymii has held the line against including ugly mysoginistic male-oriented material like anal. Sadly, they have just cracked, and are increasing the amount
- As someone else said, the photos don't quite match up
- Well known models, but all seem to be under different names which is irritating
Bottom Line: Joymii is another very good, genuine glamcore/heartcore site. They update pretty much every other day, not quite alternative photo sets & videos, but more or less. Most videos have accompanying photo sets. It features a mixture of BG, GG and solo material, a fairly even mix these days, all shot with the same bright sunny style.
It doesn't have quite the artistic quality and variety of, say, SexArt, but within its limitations, the films are beautiful to watch. There is some fairly wild sex, but it is all bright and happy looking. My wife generally prefers the BG films here to those on SexArt, this site was her favourite. It is simply reliably very good, with very few duds - I kind of prefer the riskier peaks & troughs of SexArt, but I liked both. We had planned on renewing, but have decided to cancel due to the inceasing amount of anal on the site. These sites need to understand that while anal, dp and similar gross-out stuff might appeal to men on their own, it is a HUGE turnoff for most women, and therefore to most couples. Having much of it will drive the site straight down to mainstream porn, it seems really silly of these sites to rob themselves of their USP.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit 1 By Day

41. 1 By Day (0)

Pay
Active
85
s1vus1 (13) 12-26-07  12:45pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + HD Videos (new content only)
+ High res Images (again new content only)
+ Good Looking girls
+ Ok Navigation (no search engine)
+ Tones of updates (twice daily)
+ Large Archive (not sure if exclusive)
+ fast download speeds around 400K
+ Download manger accepted
+ No DMR
+ Many formats (divx, wmv, Quick time, MPG, Flash
+ 9 preview images for video's (with a zoom feature! "see 1b.")
+ Nice scene descriptions
Cons: - 90% of girls are from europe (Like most other sites now days!)
- The Categories never works properly (e.g. lesbian - licking pussy "see 1a.")
- Not many Niches
Bottom Line: Bottom line: I got bored realy quickly because im not a fan of euro chicks.

BUT if you like euro chick i recommend it 100%

1a. The Categories never works properly (e.g. lesbian then select licking pussy which gives "Sorry, no results found!"

1b. in the veiwing window theres a great zoom feature which allows you to see an image upclose without opening a new window or tab OR even changing the page. This is an amazing feature and all sites should have it. Its that good.

Improvement: Fix the navigation and add a good search engine that searchs desciption aswell ass title and add more niches

All my reviews are non profit and 100% honest
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 1 By Day

42. 1 By Day (0)

Pay
Active
88
TrashMan (Disabled) 01-23-09  04:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: +New site search, but...(see cons)
+New site design - provides better update list, and better organization overall.
+1by-night is eliminated and merged into 1by-day - thank god. It was rather annoying to have two sites with different content not together.
+Downloads work with all Download Managers
+Plethora of formats and qualities - Quicktime 720p, WMV 1.5mb/2.5mb, Flash low/high, DivX 2.5mb, VCD Mpg 1mbps
+Videos high quality
+All (yes, all) videos come with associated image sets, all of which can be downloaded in ZIP format
+Every model has a individual page, with a headshot, linked updates and bio information.
+Alphabetized pornstar directory
+All updates are tagged with date AND time
+Updates page is nice - click a month and get all the updates for that particular month
+Decent update schedule (2 updates/day)
+Countdown timer shows time until next update
+100% Exclusive content
Cons: -Site search is not very good. I searched "Lucky" in hopes of finding Lucky videos but got like 20 results all over the place.
-Videos watermarked
-They add updates like they are magazine issues, which I think is rather dumb. It is a waste of time for something no one cares about.
-Extras are weak. Yes, if you signed up for the 7-in-1 deal recently you get 7 sites (I didn't), but they are not linked on the "Extras" page, rather you are given junky wallpapers and dumb videos of outtakes, or "bloopers".
-They just updated their site again, and while the new site provides a better interface overall, they eliminated 6 years of content (videos, images and girls all together)! People woulnd't otherwise realize that DDF has been around since 2001 and there was a lot of good content from girls who are rather hard to find (e.g. Stepanka Cisarova), and that is all gone.
-The timeout period is now rather short, meaning you will be putting in your login/pass quite often, yuck.
-Expensive! $35/mo!
Bottom Line: Overall, an excellent site which is devoted to keeping pace with the rest of the porn world, maintaining a fresh looking website that is pleasing to use. I'm not going to say that this is the MOST pleasing site I've used, but it is one of the more pleasing ones (I put Brazzers at #1). There are not many things the site does wrong, where I can dock points from the rating:
Download manager, check
Image gallery Zip's, check
Multiformat video downloads, check
Pornstar directory with headshots, check
Update history page, check
Respectable update schedule, check
etc.

The places where I did dock the site points is:
1) the site search is poor. It needs work to improve accuracy. Yes, if you search for a unique term (or name) you will get what you want. But a lot of the names of the girls are a bit generic, so the accuracy is not there because the search function searches names, tags, and text describing updates. So for example, when I search "Lucky", a rather generic term and the alias on 1By-Day of the highly popular "Lucie Theodorova", I get 26 results, yet there are only 3 Lucky updates, 2 of which show up as result numbers 21 and 23, and the third is the most recent update to the site and, as such, has not been added to the search. This is absolutely unacceptable. Not only should updates be IMMEDIATELY available in the search results, but the ones I want should be #1, #2, #3, etc. not #20 or so. On the flip side, when I search for more specific terms like "Tiffany" it works fine. In short, they need to fix the search function so that it has advanced search functions, like "search names only" or something.
2) They removed terabytes of content which was dated prior to July 2007! Up until recent when they changed the site again, all the content was available on the "Archive" page, saying to members that "hey we are devoted to adding new HD content, but for those of you who want the really old material we made, you can still get it". I can understand that it was very low quality being encoding long ago during the days of poorer internet connections, but there was no need to remove it. Burying it in the "Archive" page was the probably the most logical decision they made, one which I wish would have been upheld in this new site. What a joke.
3) It is expensive! $35/mo is a lot. Which is why I only buy access once every so often just to catch up on new updates.

Are either of the first two (huge) negatives reasons to cancel or not buy membership? Not really. For me, considering I previously downloaded all the old content that I wanted, its just upsetting to know they removed all that content. For most newbs to the porn world, they would never know the difference. Its just a disgruntling thought for purists like myself.

One last note, the watermark has been changed. Before it was more ominous and in the corner, now its more subtle and closer to the center.

Again, good site, maybe a bit pricey for some, but you get a lot of good, high quality content.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sapphic Erotica

43. Sapphic Erotica (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
tintintin (0) 04-16-08  03:42pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: This site has stunning looking girls around the age of 18, 19 or 20 and it has alot of 3-somes, good camerawork and light. This site is updated almost every week.
Cons: Although the girls are awesome to look at I mis some major things. I mis passion. I mis the girls talking to eachother. Although there are alot of sexual positions there is hardly any really good analingus. Most of the time during the 3-some one of the girls is waiting her turn. You never see two girls licking another girl together. I love scenes where two girls lick another girl and then kiss eachother during the licking. This is hardly the case on this site. Unfortunately there is no build up. They start on the bed or the couch and then the action starts.
Bottom Line: This site could be awesome if the girls interacted more with eachother and act a little bit. The problem with these young girls is also that they lack experience. They wait for directions in stead of diving into the action and enjoy the sex. I don't think the actors are real life lesbians. East European girls look great but I really mis conversation before and during the sex.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nubiles.net

44. Nubiles.net (2)

Pay
Newbie
78*
arangon (Suspended) 12-10-08  04:38pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Huge site
- Model Descriptions and Interviews
Cons: - Content is a bit boring
- lacking of an editorial line (no real niche)
- Slow Downloads
- Not real HD in 1920x1080
Bottom Line: Big disapointment for me. I was expecting something much more exciting. It's like stepping out of a Mc Donalds: you're still hungry and you ate sh**.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit FEMJOY

45. FEMJOY (1)

Pay
Active
80
adrenalinrush (5) 02-02-10  07:00am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ massive model archive
+++ up to 3 updates per day
++ lot of contributing photographers (+180)
++ big hdv video archive
++ images up to 4000 px
+ functional site
+ Iphone / PSP compatible
Cons: --- download limit & partially slow
--- search function is unhandy
-- just one good photographer (Stefan Soell)
-- bulk photography
- hard to get in the mood
- they make you feel how hard they want your money
Bottom Line: After X-art, I was seeking for another compelling site full of nude teens with a higher rate of updates and a solid archive.

Femjoy looked familiar to a couple of other sites I've seen before, which gave me a "related-to" feeling but didn't care for the moment.

They have a huge archive for galleries and HD videos is an acceptable quality. It was a little hard to get into the right mood by all the functional and plain and passionless presentation of the girls.

Stefan Soell seem to be the best of all contributors there, at least for me.

Femjoy is a good site for outdoor fans and those who like young girls being naturally naked.

Don't expect the girls doing anything fancy, they don't!
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Errotica Archives

46. Errotica Archives (1)

Pay
Active
78
graymane (31) 10-18-10  08:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + No technical or login problems.
+ exceptionally good quality HD pics and videos.
+ Zip files.
+ Ample number beautiful models.
+ Frequent updates.
+ Picture images are done well, with multiple frames and poses.
Cons: + My major compliant is this site is chiefly a nude photo shoot. Models do very little except smile.
Videos, although sexy, are mostly rapid-fire takes of subjects who are too often changing positions. There are also too few videos for the number of models on hand.
Although most media formats were availsble, I found them complicated and download speed to be agonizingly slow. Hardcore is non-existent, as well as a dire shortage of erotic behavier.
Bottom Line: I was given a combo, Met Art and this site for supposedly a discount. However, $29.95 is still too much. I'm getting woefully little I wanted or expected from this deal. For those who fancy superb photography and video of sexy ladies... then this is their bag. But I wouldn't recommend it to guys who want to get a rise out of what they're looking at --- So with that in mind, I wouldn't bother to unzip my fly.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babelicious

47. Babelicious (0)

Pay
Active
88
exotics4me (463) 04-30-07  10:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Very high quality, pics are huge (biggest I've seen, upwards of 4,000), vids are also very high quality.
- Plenty of sexy Euro models
- Decent nagivation, comment section that webmaster also posts on
- Updated daily + bonus sites!
Cons: - Music in vids, no, no, no!
- Not 100% exclusive
Bottom Line: Overall I was happily surprised with with Babelicious. The bonus sites are much better than most network sites have. My biggest problem was that I had seen some of the material on other sites, but I can at least say Babelicious' duplicate material is of higher quality. Kind of like getting your favorite cd in remastered version.

The bonus sites are bonuses for a reason, none look to have a whole lot of work put into them, but really they aren't bad at all. One thing that was a little frustrating was having to sign in on each site, no big deal to most, but I try to use odd screennames and passwords, and sometimes forget them. That is just minor though.

The quality of the pics will really blow you away. Maybe there are bigger pics out there, but I haven't seen them if there are. The bonus sites will give you the b/g sections if you prefer hardcore which is something that I am glad to see more and more of these model (solo, g/g sites offering) it shows that reviews are being read since that is usually a big complaint of lack of b/g content. Now we need to discuss this music though. I probably saw my first porn in the late 80s/early 90s. It was from my uncles porn stash. I still haven't got that music out of my memory, bom-chi-chi-wa-wa. I much prefer hearing the women's sounds than music. Outside of that, I would call this site a site to watch. It is a little confusing at first, but with time you get used to switching from site to site. I recommend it.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Gag N Gape

48. Gag N Gape (0)

Pay
Active
85
pat362 (367) 11-03-08  01:21pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Currently 41 videos (avg 20 mintues)
-Automatic access to a network of 12 exclusive sites as well as an additional 15 non-exclusive.
-The actresses are all 18 to 25yrs old.
-The videos come in wmv format and can all be downloaded: low, medium or hight quality.
-They offer a flash version for streaming.
-The photosets average 140-160 pictures and they can be downloaded in zip format.
-Navigation is made easy.
-30$ for this Network is not too excessive.
Cons: -Some of the videos have an amateurish look to them
-Good Luck in identifying the performers without doing some research.
-Although you get a total of 28 sites, I'd say only 3 maybe 4 are worth it.
-The blow jobs are too noisy and there is an excessive amount drooling.
-Updates are infrequent and hard to date.
Bottom Line: Gag-n-Gape has been on my wish list for a long time because it's one of the sites where I can see some of the girls I really like do hardcore.

There are many really good looking girls on the site, but due to a lack of proper makeup and crappy lighting, they don't appear as gorgeous as they do on other sites.

I think the best thing they could do is extend the lenght of the videos to 30mins, add more
foreplay, change the sytle of the blow jobes to be less like Max Hardcore, use some makeup and better lighting.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pure Cherry Girls

49. Pure Cherry Girls (0)

Pay
Active
80
TheSquirrel (53) 11-28-08  10:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Quite attractive girls, surprisingly young and relatively inexperienced. (I said "relatively")

Great camerawork, as on most of the Pink Visual sites. This means you get to see all of the girl looking attractive rather than too many close up gynaecological shots.

No condoms.

NO DRM.

You get pictures, good ones, and lots of them.

No download limits, apart from only a limited amount of episodes being available for download.

The DVD quality is really good, although only the newer clips have that.
Cons: Excruciating navigation. Older clips are cut up into tiny pieces - sometimes 7-9 without any picture clue as to where you are in the clip.

An awful lot of talking followed by a an awful lot of oral, especially on the old clips.

Only a few clips are relesed for download each month. You have to be a member for a month then they release some more. Then you have to stay for another month to have access to the next batch.

Older clips are poor to average quality and not available for download.

The men talk too much, are occasionally irritating, and make some unpleasant comments about the girls or at least treat them a little less than respectfully.

There is the cheap and nasty trick extra site sign up box, so I deduct 5 marks for that.

If you cancel they offer you a discount, plus access to other sites. Shame they don't do that for loyal customers.
Bottom Line: I was a memeber of this site as it was a member of the Pink Visual organisation. I thought it worth doing a review as TBP have just done one.

The site used to be called "Teens For Cash."

My membership lapsed at the end of September.

The TBP review said they were no longer updating, although they were when my membership lapsed, but that was 2 months ago. There are still a lot of episodes to keep you happy.

For me what is the best thing about the site is the attractivenes of the girls (although still too many tattoos - arghhh!) and the camerawork which brings out the best of the models. The whole site gives an appearance of quality.

The older clips are more annoying because with the lousy navigation and shorter clips you can just find yourself continually streaming all the talking and more talking.

Even for the photo enthusiasts the navigation is a pain.

You get a $10 discount if you join through TBP, which is what I did.

The DVD quality on the Pink Visual sites have dimensions of 1068 by 600 with bit rates of around 5000. Below this there is the 852 by 480 dimension with bit rates of around 2500. Toadsith suggested I put in more tech, so I have tried. You tech boffins will know what that all means. Personally I think the top rate is very good, and even the rate below that is quite good.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

50. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
99
messmer (137) 12-05-10  04:11pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Friendly, involved and supportive Webmaster.
+Amazing models, amazing quality.
+Excellent growth since my last review. I counted 134 models today who, on the average, posed for seven to eight sets and videos. Not shabby for a site a year old. Growth has accelerated even more since Nov. 11, 2010, when the site decided on three updates a day, seven days a week.
+Now includes downloads for portables.
+All videos, except for a very few are of HD quality at 1280x720 at 5000 kbps. Videos are available in various formats, HD MP4, HD WMV, DVD MP4, DVD WMV plus iPOD/iPHONE MP4.
+Picture sets are available zipped in Standard Resolution (1024), High Resolution (1600) and Super High Resolution (3000+). Custom zip available.
+Excellent HD streaming of videos.
+Excellent search. Search by category or hone in on something that meets your taste exactly, it's all there.
+Allows you to filter out themes you don't care for, has a voting system, allows for comments good and bad, has a forum. Continued:
Cons: Super High Speed for me (anywhere from 2.5 MB/s to 3 MB/s.

*********************************************

Can't find one darn thing wrong with the site, except that | would like to see every model come wrapped in erotic lingerie but seeing that someone else expressed their distaste of all those lingerie sets in a comment .. we must give Kudos to the Webmaster for looking after his strange taste as well! :-) Just kidding, friend!
Bottom Line: I love this site. So far as I am concerned they started with the intention of making theirs the best hairy site possible and have added enough bells and whistles in the year they have been in existence that they achieved top dog position in this short time.

I would have given a hundred but I'm still smarting from that one non-confidence vote I got last time I gushed over a site. :-)

Highly recommended to all hairy fans. You are getting the best in the niche.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 590 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. FTV Girls (5)
2. Teen Mega World (3)
3. 18X Girls (2)
4. Watch 4 Beauty (2)
5. Zero Tolerance On Demand (2)
6. MC Nudes (2)
7. Nubiles.net (2)
8. Perfect Gonzo (1)
9. HDV Pass (1)
10. My Naughty Massage (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.22 seconds.