Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
No DRM, no download restrictions, and no pre ticked cross selling dirty tricks.
Established company using Epoch as agent.
No regional discrimination.
A number of sites with a wealth of material and many pretty girls.
Not many tats and fake breasts.
$10 discount through TBP/PU.
Good quality high spec videos with the newer updating sites.
Updates are dated.
Model index.
Reasonable easy sign in. Once you have signed in you can go to any site on the network without going through the process again.
Pics are zipped.
Videos can be downloaded complete or in shorter segments.
The HD quality of the newer videos along with the unglamorous way they are shot, gives a real sense of two people having sex.
Cons:
Awful, truly dreadful, uninspiring home pages, which all look the same. making it very hard to choose clips.
Surprisingly poor selection of pictures. Some look like video caps. Those that aren't video caps, or aren't badly lit, I find to be unerotic. Personally I think they do not make the most of the model.
Too many skinny girls. Teen does not have to mean anorexic.
Navigation is difficult because everything looks the same.
Some sites don't update at all, and the quality is quite poor on these. Private Teen Video and Home Teen Vids for example. Here you get too many close ups, or angles from a distance where you cannot see anything, and terrible dark lighting.
Too many condoms - mainly on the older sites.
The lighting and camerawork is better on the updating sites but the samey uninspired photography and camerawork makes everything, especially the models, look the same.
Little in the way of stripping, showing off the model's body, or build up of plot.
Bottom Line:
It is just a personal thing, but I found this to be the most disappointing network I have visited. The girls are mostly of two types - white blonde and skinny, or white brunette and skinny, with little ethnic diversity. They all look very much alike. The way the videos and pics are shot exacerbates this impression. For some members, the thin girls will be an absolute plus, so I admit this is all about personal taste. I wish I had seen the Exotics4me review before I joined. It is very accurate imo. Add 10 points to the score if you like thin young models but subtract 15 if you don't.
Overall I found the network to be disappointing for photos, They often look like screen caps, and even those that don't do not, imo, capture the full beauty of the model. The one notable exception to this is the sadly defunct Nubiles HD where they have very good high definition photos. I found dimensions of 2048x1360 and 3168x4752 here, were mainly well lit, and made the models look good.
Some sites mostly do high. medium. and low quality videos in wmv, but the specs vary from site to site. High is generally 1280x720, medium is 860x480 and low is 480x270. However sometimes high quality is only 720x576. Some sites do high quality in wmv, medium in FLV and low in MP4 for portable devices, Fuck Studies in addition offers Ipod/Iphone Format and Mobile Format. Photo specs vary. 960x1440, 1024x768, 1280x853, 2048x1360, up to 3168x4752 on Nubiles HD, but once again the quality on the older defunct sites is not so good with specs down to 720x576.
You can download short two minute clips or whole videos. Streaming is available which I found to be good quality and customer friendly.
I think they try to give an impression of individual sites with different content on sites like Tricky Masseur and Beauty Angels, but for me, it is all very much of a muchness. Certainly the newer sites have much better video and picture quality, as well as content. The defunct ones are poor quality by today's standards. Poor in terms of both video and picture spec, poor lighting and poor camera angles. They are also a turn off for me, as they use condoms a lot.
I have tried to be as objective as possible. Obviously this network was not to my taste. I found the samey homogeneous nature of the videos and pics to be uninspiring and seemingly produced by a company that is using a painting by numbers approach. Despite this, if you are into slim young girls TMW will certainly be of interest, and I recommend you check it out. Despite the relative shortage of quality pictures, the video quality on the updating sites makes this a must see for those into a certain type of model, because there is plenty to see and download.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large network (nearly 3000 scenes)
- Network updates daily with one scene per day for the network
- Great teen-themed network
- Beautiful Russian and Eastern European models
- Decent proportion of anal scenes (though this is definitely NOT an anal-themed network
- Supports download managers
- No obvious time-outs for downloads
- No download limits
- Several under-served niches are here
- TBP / PU discount ($20 instead of $30)
Cons:
- Non-English-speaking models can cause the heat to be turned down a bit
- Several sites not updating
- Download speeds can vary and are generally lower than average
Bottom Line:
I know this network has some detractors here but I’m definitely not one of them. This network wasn’t even on my list of ‘must haves’ but I joined it to get access to sites that feature under-served niches like young women (18-20) with older men, for example, and I’m glad that I joined. One advantage I have is that while many members here state that the site has lost its edge I have nothing to compare that to so the site still looks great to me. If you join now you likely won’t be disappointed.
The entire network has a theme of promoting young (18-20) Eastern European and Russian models. There are 36 listed sites (but two of them are network duplicates) that offer these models in a variety of niches. The most common niches are here, which is good, but the better news is that several under-served niches are here too. For example, there is a massage site, a nylons site, a voyeur site and an old-and-young site. The network is large, offering just shy of 3000 scenes now.
The network is still active with one new scene being added per day. That’s one scene per day for the network, not for each site. Several of the sites haven’t updated in a while so they may no be updating at all now.
Each site opens into its own page where you see 10 scenes per page. Clicking on a scene you want to see opens it in a new page where you can either stream or download the video. I don’t use streaming so I can’t really pronounce on it, but the streams aren’t offered in different resolutions. The good news is that unlike many other sites the stream doesn’t start automatically. The site layout is simple, effective and easy to use.
The downloads are a bit odd in that while there are options those options are limited. Unlike other similar networks where you can choose any number of resolutions in your preferred format this network doesn’t offer that. For each scene there are usually options, but each resolution is offered in a different format. So if you want a particular resolution (and file size) you can’t choose the format: you’re stuck with the encoding that the network chose.
If photos are available, they’re well hidden because I didn’t see them. I don’t normally download photos either so I have to admit that I didn’t look that hard.
The biggest advantage for the network is the look of the models. I don’t normally take memberships to sites with Russian and Eastern European models but there is no good reason for this, especially since it seems that so many of the newest and most beautiful models are now coming out of Russia and Eastern Europe. This network is no exception: many of the models are new to me and many of them are incredibly beautiful.
This may be a pro or a con depending on your view, but while the network isn’t anally-themed (though there is one anal site – Anal Angels) there is a decent amount of anal sex here. I’d prefer more, so that should be an indication for non-anal-fans that the site isn’t overwhelmed by anal scenes. I’d say the proportion is about right.
Some minor positives are that the network offers a TBP/PU discount and it bills through Epoch. They also allow download managers and there are no obvious timeouts on the links. There are also no download limits.
The site does have some negatives. Objectively, the limited download options is a problem (see above). Also, the download speeds can vary quite a bit. I’m used to seeing speeds approaching 7MB/s and I admit that this occurred here, but it was more common to see speeds about half that rate. The lowest speeds I saw were down around 1MB/s but those only occurred at what I assume were peak download times in Europe.
This is a purely subjective negative, but I find that when the models don’t speak English that takes some of the heat away from the scene. I’m a big fan of the scene set up and when you can’t understand what the models are saying it seems to turn the heat down a bit. This reason alone isn’t a deal-breaker because so many of the models are stunningly beautiful, but if you plan to join you should be aware of this.
The bottom line is that the positives far outweigh the minor negatives to make this network a good value. Yes, they could offer more download options and the download speeds could be more consistent, but the large network size, the access to under-served niches and especially the stunning models make this a worthwhile membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The models are for the most part, stunning.
A few of the models, like Rio Fujisaki, and Kasumi Risa can also be found on various hardcore sites, but most of the models, I haven't seen elsewhere.
-Picture and video quality is very good. Not super high resolution, but clear and crisp. (video 1280x720 and pictures 1280x852)
-Photo sets can be downloaded as a zip file, although they tend to be small sets, with only 15-25 photos in each.
-updates come regularly, Monday, Wednesday and Friday, usually with 2 photo sets and 1 video.
-Price is OK. Not a bargain, at ￥1,980 (about US$24), but not over the top either.
-Cancelling membership was no problem, just took a couple of mouse clicks. I see a couple of previous comments here about having problems with cancelling, so I assume that the website has since changed things to make it easier on that front.
Cons:
Unfortunately there is quite a substantial list.
-Navigation is shocking, with no search feature. You basically have to go methodically through each section to find what you like.
-No model index. Models will have content scattered about the site in little groups, with nothing linking them.
-There is a points system where a certain amount of content is available straight away, then more if you stay 6 months, and more again,(but only photos, from what I can make out), after 1 year.
-When you cancel, you are cut off immediately, so you will need to remember exactly when to cancel.
-No streaming videos, and can only be downloaded in one size and format. (WMV's of about 150mb, for a 5 minutes long video)
Bottom Line:
Personally, I would love to be able to give this website a much higher score. It was like a breath of fresh air after too many sites that all start to look the same. I love the high quality softcore, (and it is definitely no more than softcore)videos. I don't really do photos myself, but the ones I looked at looked like similar quality.
It's not a huge site, but I'd take quality over quantity any day. New content trickles in at a steady pace.
I hate the idea of a points system, but having said that, I have done something that I usually never do. After my initial one month, I actually have joined up again with the intention of staying 6 months so I can get the next lot of content. There is no way I will be sticking it out for 1 year though, that would require far too much dedication, as there only seems to be photos at the end of that.
Being a Japanese site, there is of course the issue of their censorship laws, although this site, being very softcore, doesn't focus a lot on the genitals anyway, and it is quite subtly blurred , as opposed to the big square mosaic blocks you get sometimes. Plus, they will show a lot of pubes before the blurring kicks in.
Losing access to the site the instant you cancel your membership, is in my view, a very poor practice, if you pay for a certain amount of time, you should get access for that full time, regardless of whether you have cancelled it's re-billing or not. The only reason I can see for them to do that is they must expect some people to forget to cancel on time, and the automatic re-billing kicks in. Then if you cancelled the next day, you instantly lose access to the site!
The tour page show a fair representation of what is on the inside, so if you like what you see there, the site might be worth a shot. One thing I can guarantee though: you will get frustrated by the layout of the site, with it's poor navigation, and content that you can't access.
So, finally to sum it all up in a few words:
Content, superb.
Website, crap.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Roughly 2/3 of content is not included with Pacino's Adventures.
- Picked up as cross-sell trial with Pacino's Adventures for $4.95 for 3 days, full access.
- May be a couple off, but showing 93 photo sets, 94 videos.
- Weekly update, don't know if these are just sets Pacino has stashed or not.
- Pics are zipped and are 1200 long end on about 60% of pic sets and 1600 long end on the other 40%.
- Covers basic sex niches, solo, girl/girl, boy/girl and girl/girl/girl.
- Bonus sites are hit or miss, same bonus sites as Pacino's Adventures. La Zona Modelos is an above average bonus site and surprising to me, Pam Spice is a bonus site, surprising since she is my favorite of the Pacino models.
- Video quality has some variance and not really for sure the rhyme or reason to it since some of the older videos are 1440 high end in res, while some of the newer are only 720 high end.
- Over 10,000 pictures of Tania, full site is 38.2 GB.
Cons:
- Guessing the tech staff thought it would be easier to start the name of each video with ts, for Tania Spice, then the name of the video. The videos that are more than one part, occasionally two parts, are not in order since ts are the first two letters in every video filename.
- Can't say I would join this site for $29.95, really nice as a trial when combined with monthly sub to Pacino's Adventures.
- Pacino is big on the outfits, costumes, only problem is, all of his models use the same outfits, costumes, themes so there is a chance for redundancy which is a shame since his models are very good at tease/strip.
- Just not big enough to be a standalone site, should be included in with the bonus sites on Pacino's Adventures
Bottom Line:
I have mixed emotions on all of Pacino's sites. This one doesn't change that. I like the technical quality, wish the pictures were a little bigger, but they are at least at a minimum 1200 long end and are zipped. Considering the varying tech quality of the videos not being based on date of release, it is probably safe to say he shoots or shot the solo models he has, maybe for a year, then they left and he's just slowly releasing the content.
It's interesting how a video released 5 weeks ago is 720 long end, while one released last year was 1440 long end. It's not so much a criticism as it is a heads up, maybe positively or negatively depending on taste, to potential members since the model, in this case Tania, doesn't look much older in her newest set as she did in her oldest set.
The girls with solo sites working with Pacino are also quite different. Tania is one of the more hardcore models he has. She does everything including anal. At first, when I first saw her back on Pacino's Adventures, I wasn't for sure if I would be that much into her because of the braces on her teeth. However, considering the fact that many of these models come from impoverished countries, I can see the other side that says her family probably couldn't afford braces when she was younger.
In terms of personality, she's almost as playful at Gigi Spice. Really pretty hair, no matter which color and as Spencer said in the TBP review, she has a great set of natural boobs. As would be expected, she also has a nice full butt as well. Tania does speak some English in a few of the videos. I don't think she's as much into the girl/girl scenes as Gigi, but she's very good at solo and also in the boy/girl scenes with Pacino.
The settings/themes vary from the expected schoolgirl to baseball player to football player to bathtub to police officer to taxi driver to the unexpected road construction crew worker. So much variation in fact, I think you could put most of Pacino's sites into a costume type genre which is why I wish there was more focus and higher resolution on the pictures.
Like with his other sites Pacino doesn't get in the way like most males in porn. He's rarely heard and if he is, it's not with words like "bitch" or the typical male porn star stereotype. He's rather laid-back and seems to have a calming effect on the models.
Overall, it's a good site, for the $5/3 days cross sell with Pacino's Adventures, it's an excellent deal. However, since it is still a standalone site at $30/month, it's not recommended as a join by itself. Which leads me back to the mixed emotions I started with. If you're joining Pacino's Adventures, the flagship site and get the offer for Tania's solo site, I do recommend it. It took me a day to download the videos and pictures from it and considering her attractiveness, she's very collectible and has several solo sets that end in dripping orgasms.
As trial with PA, recommended
As standalone, not recommended
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A Lot Of Material
- Hi Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Many Videos
- Decent DL Speed
Cons:
- Much Of The Material Is Somewhat Boring
- NO Hardcore
- Infrequent Updating
Bottom Line:
After thumbing through their extensive preview, I was anxious to see the site. I was somewhat disappointed. It's a very attractive site, and easy to navigate. It does have an awful lot of material, photos and videos. But, something is missing. It's not exciting. A bit bland. Some of the sets seem to be nudity optional! Others, the old statue posing. There is no hardcore. That would be fine if the material was highly erotic, but most of it is not. I guess if you never saw a girl nude before, it would be. But for jaded porn surfers, nah! It's not that there isn't good material here, there is, but you have to search for it. The photos are hi-res, at the lower end of the scale (1200px), and zipped for convenience. They do have a page of larger sized photos (2000x3000), but just 1 page.The videos are offered in wmv (640x480), and divx (360x240). Being First Time Videos, the girls are basically presented as the archetypal "girl next door". I don't know about your neighborhood, but the girls nowadays are a little more wild than those presented here!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Consistent. Not much has changed since I was a member 2 years ago.
-The girls. If you like sexy white chicks that run the gamut from avg. to gorgeous, you'll get something out of FTV. (they have an exotic non-white girl here and there).
-Girls inserting large objects. One unique aspects of FTV is their penchant for having the girls stick massive vegetables and/or fruits inside them. Once in a while they'll shove a hand or fist in there for good measure.
-I was able to download zipfiles of pics rather quickly.
-Lots of hot videos of girls masturbating.
-Little synopsis of the scene and the director describes shooting with the model.
Cons:
-The layout is a bit cumbersome. Also, visually they could reconfigure the site so it's more intuitive to navigate instead of just scrolling down...FOREVER.
-The girls' names! It seems more often than not FTV always has the names of the girls listed differently than what they are everywhere else. This is probably a testament to their ability to locate the newest, hottest girls. However, it's a pain in the butt to us pic collectors who would like to organize all of our pics by model. Thankfully there are unaffiliated blogs on the web that list girls by their FTV name AND their porn names.
-The price. They need to lower that price a bit. In my opinion this is good for once every two years but for less than half the price I can get better content.
-The video content meanders a bit. and I'm not a big fan of how they edit by splicing right in the middle of a scene so there's a slight jump in the audio and video.
Bottom Line:
I seem to join this site every 2 years or so. I like FTV a lot, but for what it is, they should be commanding a subscription rate of $19.99. Even then, I think that's a bit too high. I give it an 83 because it is solidly a VERY GOOD site. However, there are solo glamor-shot type sites that in my opinion are slightly better, and update more frequently. With my latest stint with FTV coming to a conclusion in a matter of days, I definitely enjoyed my subscription this time around...see you in another two years FTV, maybe.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ASS is the emphasis here
+usually very fine Euro and American women; most are well-known
+117 gallery sets, most of which are of a unique model in two complete scenes
+excellent quality photography, esp from #15 to the present
+zips and individual pics available in small (approx. 800px) and large (1500 to 2400px) sizes, but see the cons!
+OK, collage-like previews of galleries (click “models” link, then click a gallery to see it)
+more recent vids in 640x360, 1280x720, and 1920x1080
Cons:
-only 3 new galleries + companion videos per month
-access to all photos costs $24.95; video downloads require purchasing tokens in a complex system based on video size and time length (e.g. a small and short one costs just several, but a large and long one can cost over 200). Purchase examples: 500 tokens for $23.95; 10,000 for $349.95. (:o)
-complete availability of large and small pics starts with gallery #43
-no standard pic sizes; a variety of custom dimensions
Bottom Line:
What I like are photos shot straight above a beautiful woman lying belly down, back straight, from the upper thigh to the top of her head, looking back amorously, her delectable ass beckoning. What this site delivers is close, but either full-body length with the woman’s face buried in a mass of hair, or just the ass all by itself, nearly every single time! Somehow with this site I almost NEVER get my wish!
But, dear reader, you might get yours: ass in various positions and at many angles (just not my favorite one). Colorful toys shoved into/sticking out of the three most popular orifices. Closeups of cheeks pulled apart, shot from multiple XYZ coordinates. Ditto that for the MOST popular body cavity. This is what we call stretching.
Feminists say that porn objectifies women. This site single-mindedly endeavors to do so, and it succeeds. Our dehumanized pretties include Eve Angel, Alexis Love, Jassie, Sophie Moone, Sophie Paris, Addison Rose, Susana Spears, Mia Stone, Lucy Stratilova, and many more. And it can get very messy, such as with Layla Rivera’s toilet session. (I’ll bet she’s a vegetarian.)
The photo quality is so good and the women look so fine, with such detail that you can clearly see the texture of their skin. It’s hard for me to believe how disappointing this site is -- for me, anyway. 200-350 photos per gallery is common here. Why can’t I get my wish? I do at lots of other sites. It’s really weird.
And the videos? Fuck that.
Follow-Up:
Now you can join and get everything for $34.95. I've been downloading lots of vids of girls like Susana Spears, Karlie Montana, and Peaches (among others) and the extended ass worship is very nice! Don't need the closeup anus twiching, but some folks might enjoy it. Boosted the score from 70 to 83.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A very big selection of models.
Most are beautiful, within an age range of 18 - 20 (some are older) therefore fitting the name "Nubiles" perfectly.
Picture sets are available in zipped form with most sets (since 2008) giving you a choice between normal (1200x1793) and large size (1600x2400). But since the "normal size" is still quite respectable it is a pleasure to be able to go back past 2008 and sample all the "older models."
Videos are crystal clear, the new ones in wmv format at 3500 kbps. Since there are so many updates (one daily, alternating between stills and videos) I have concentrated mostly on new contents, dating from 2008 until the present.
Older contents is good and while not great by today's standards the mpg videos are still quite palatable.
Much thought has been given to the navigation of the site making it easy to get around.
The webmaster is very friendly and responsive, this is a big plus in my eyes.
Download speed is very good.
Cons:
I love this site just as it is. My only con would be in connection with what it is NOT! Most who know me by now also know that I'm slightly out of place in a site that contains models under forty, but then it wouldn't be Nubiles any longer, would it?
Why am I here then? Because when I took the tour of its sister site "Anilos" I found the quality so good that I couldn't resist subscribing to a much younger site, just because it had the same quality of material and much more contents.
Strangely enough I haven't been sorry for a moment. And as you can tell by another review I just put in, I threw all caution to the wind when it came to "Anilos" and subscribed to that site as well. The site owners can thank "Berkley" for that!
I find both sites near perfect and am only stopped from giving a score in the high nineties because the older material doesn't quite live up to my taste for HD and near HD material yet.
Bottom Line:
A great site for lovers of nubile women. I find it a very nice mixture of Europeans and Americans, and in contrast to some of my friends here I like the interviews in English as well as the beautiful models that America has in such abundance. Mind you, the Europeans aren't bad either!
I usually skip the hardcore stuff (m/f) but that's a personal preference.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Claimed 647 models! Yes, they are quite nubile; very hot, in their late teens, early 20s
+ Newer full length videos are 1280 x 720 @ 3500 kb/s .wmv (smaller sizes available in .avi, .mp4, .mpg)
+ No download limits, no DRM, download managers are allowed
+ 3 to 4 updates every day, and 3 new models every week
+ Newer photos are 2400 x 1600, with zips for each photo set
+ Download speeds of at least 500 kbs/s
+ Some models do hardcore content
+ Pretty clear breakdown at top of each model's page of what she does; from "topless" to "sex"
+ "Interview" pages give some info on each model
+ Navigation is pretty straightforward, and search engine works well
+ Billing through CCBill, with special PU discount of $24.31/month
Cons:
- Overall repetitive and boring feel, and hardcore in particular, at least for me (see Bottom Line)
- Virtually no girl-girl content (less than a dozen scenes, if that)
- Little anal or fetish content beyond vaginal and lots of toys
- "Bonus" content is negligible, and mostly to advertise other pay sites
- Navigation within photo set pages is a little annoying
- Individual video clips are not highest quality, only 1280 x 720 when you DL the whole video
- Photos are professionally shot, but a few look a bit too Photoshopped, or as if they should not have been been released at all
- Purely my personal preference, but a few too many European models
Bottom Line:
I originally approached this site as a girls only site, even though I was well aware that it had hardcore content. But come on, it's not the guys that are nubile -- it's the hundreds of hot girls! That's the one thing that is indisputable: the models here are young (late teens through mid twenties) and very attractive. Quite a few are American and new, but there are also plenty of Europeans (mostly Eastern Europe, in particular a growing number from Russia) as well as models that have been on quite a few other girls-only sites (Franziska, Sarah Blake, Kacey Jordan, Angelica Black), but none I would really call bona fide porn stars.
For those who like some variety in their model choices, this site might be a tad bland. The focus is on the nubile and skinny females in this world, but not necessarily of all races and elasticities it seems. I would not call the models themselves bland, but I really could not find any variety of girls that would include those of Asian, African, or Central and South American descent. It really was not an issue for me, as there is every hair color to choose from, most are shaven bare, though some still have pubic hair if it matters, plus tattoos and piercings, but nothing over the top. And if these girls simply are not in your preferred age range, you might want to check out their sister (mother?) site, Anilos, which looks to be much the same setup and price structure, though noticeably smaller amount of content.
So, how are all these lovely ladies captured? Well, the equipment and technology almost matches the beauty of the models. Newer videos are 1280 x 720 HD, but only in full length. Videos are broken down into one to two minute clips as well, but if you only download these clips, it's lower resolution. I guess this is good if you want to check out the content of a video before downloading the whole thing, but a letdown nonetheless if you just want that special clip. Videos are well lit, relatively well shot (no "Blair Witch" shake-'em-up contests), and have basically no apparent off camera distractions, spoken or otherwise. There are some interviews where the cameraman speaks, but it's only in interviews where I could find this happening.
Here's where my 81 score starts to really come in; though well shot, videos just did not do it for me. I would say the site is still photo-focused (more on that in a minute) but the videos are not too special for me. These ladies are eye candy, no doubt, but often somewhat reserved in videos, even in the hardcore scenes. I felt it was as much a case as just keeping the models comfortable (the solo, as well as the hardcore, content is never abusive or degrading, if you were wondering) as it was not asking enough of them. They enjoy themselves for sure, but not as much as I was expecting, and it felt as if it was too formulaic and toy focused to really make things stand out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good selection of Europe's best models doing some pretty extreme insertions.
- Very high quality videos, even the pictures have a glossy look to them (may be my eyes playing tricks on me)
- Good amount of content, upwards of 140-150 models, vids are long and the HD ones are huge in file size.
Cons:
- Some of the insertions are more than I like to see.
- A little high for any consideration of more than one month membership at a time.
Bottom Line:
Let me start off by saying that I am lactose intolerant, meaning I get deathly sick if I digest something with a dairy product in it. What does that have to do with this review? Some of the shoots have the women squirting milk out of the butts, you also get the extreme sized dildos being shoved in some of the prettiest women you will ever see, Sophie and Eve are both on here as are 130 more.
My problem comes in that while I like to see these beautiful women enjoying themselves for us to watch, I don't like seeing them look like they are tearing their guts out. I understand it is an original idea and believe me, I still watch! I'm just giving a heads up for those who haven't been on the site. Overall, it is great, tons of teasing to start the videos which are almost all over 30 minutes each. I think the teasing is very important, especially when you know they are going to finally take it off. It builds you up. Videographer is one lucky man/woman on this site. Extreme close-ups, has some speculum vids and pics for you all that have the medical fetish. I really could do without the milk squirting videos, but it is usually only the last minute or so of the video and isn't the main focus.
I very much recommend it, especially if you have never been a member. I think this site shows Peaches in a way that you have probably never seen her. She really gets into her vids on here and is worth the monthly price just by herself. Add those other 140 or so models, recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Discount price of $19.95 available through TBP or $9.95 for returning members via email link
Billing by Epoch with no regional variation
12 bonus sites included with membership
Updated most days
Photos available in 3 sizes with zip download for each.
Videos look great
Great navigation and search features
No download limits
Cons:
Non Exclusive content
Method of downloading the photo zips is a little annoying as each time you select the size of zip you want from the drop down menu the yellow bar security warning in IE pops up to deny you so you have to click allow download then select the zip again, basically 6 clicks of the mouse just to bring up the save box
Little to interest fans of hardcore here
Bottom Line:
As an ex member of the Sexy Babes and Dream Babes sites 4 or 5 years ago I regularly receive emails offering me the chance to rejoin for $9.95 so as they now include their premium sites Babelicious and Babes.tv in the package I decided it’s time to take my first look at these sites. Babelicious is packed with gorgeous babes in high quality photos and videos in mainly solo strip, masturbation and toy scenes. There’s little to interest those looking for G/G or B/G action. Looking through the last 100 video updates I spotted only 1 B/G scene.
The site claims to update daily with 5 photo sets and 2 videos per week but over the last few weeks they’ve been missing a few days with the update count for September being 22 out of 30 days and for October 22 out of 31 days. Latest photo sets are being added in 3 sizes, 1000, 2000 and 3500 px with a zip for each and video updates currently at 1280 x 720 @ 3500k with wmv being the only download option plus a flash streaming option.
The pictures here generally look crisp, colourful and well lit even in the highest resolutions, sometimes a little too much photo shopping. The largest size photos are a little inconsistent and can range from 2500px to 4000px, only exception being a few sets that are were only available in 1000px added around December 09 to January 10.
There’s currently 270 models here dominated by Eastern Europeans with a few British and American girls thrown in including some of my favourites like Georgia Jones and Carli Banks. There’s plenty of search and browse options to help you easily find who you’re looking for and you have the ability to rate every model, scene and photo set out of 10. Current top ranked model by members is a British girl named Sasha with 34 photo sets and 11 videos. I don’t recall coming across her before and I really enjoyed her videos. I loved the way she talks dirty in her British accent while striping and mastubating which you seldom hear on sites these days dominated by Eastern Europeans, such a shame she had to go and ruin her sweet body with those awful implants though.
The biggest negative about the site is the non exclusive content. I recognised many of the sets from sites like Teendreams and ATK Galleria although I found myself downloading the sets again here to get them in the higher resolutions. Now that this site is the main focus in the network with regards to updates maybe they should consider a Babeslicious exclusive section similar to twistys Overall a decent site with updates most days and a ton of content over the network of bonus sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Truly beautiful models. They claim over 300
+ Site is very much weighted to photosets.
+ Generally good photography over 30000 images
+ Very 'Japanese' : On the positive side it has a novel approach for westeners and in some respects it is quite appealing.
The translations can be quaint.
The models are treated with respect
and seem to be enjoying the experience.
+ Videos - Over 100 of them.
Short, very softcore & I actually quite liked them.
Not so much that I would bother to download any though.
Cons:
- Galleries are updated daily, I think, but a gallery is only 15 photos & is not offered in a choice of resolutions. ( Typically 1300 x 900 )
- Confusing navigation, not helped by...
- Very 'Japanese': Layout is not intuitive and with the restrictive....
- Points system controls which models, photos & zips you are allowed access to
and possibly even the size of image you are allowed to access.
Although how the system works is very Japanese & quite inscrutable! :0/
Basically what it comes down to is that it will take a year continuous subscription to get access to all the site content!
Seeing greyed out stills & small thumbnails shows that whilst this is more of the same good quality, it is nowhere near enough to make me want to invest a years worth of subscription for it.
- Videos - Short & very softcore : Some may see this as a minus.
** Failed to respond to cancellation request in 2 working days. Lowered score to a 'not recommended status'
Bottom Line:
Right, let me say at the outset, I really did want to like this site.
On balance I do but there are some heavy caveats.
I have listed some points above as both positive and negative.
The 'Japanese'ness of the site is quirky, but will soon become a terminal irritation. Photosets are random pictures rather than a cohesive photoset with any progression and are very short on quantity, although the quality is good.
A lot of the clothing used is western, which I found a little disappointing.
I was expecting to see at least some more traditional Japanese attire. I would have hoped it would have been 1 trad set per model. The kimono does appear but very infrequently.
I would have thought a lot higher of this site if it had been all available upon subscription. As it stands, 'cheated' is too strong a word, 'deprived' suits as a better word for my feelings on this.
It is understandable that they wish to encourage long term membership.
The way they have weighted the points though, it isn't really worthwhile.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.
Cons:
-Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.
Bottom Line:
After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.
My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.
The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.
The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.
However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.
Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.
I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.
Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.
While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.
With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ HD Videos (new content only)
+ High res Images (again new content only)
+ Good Looking girls
+ Ok Navigation (no search engine)
+ Tones of updates (twice daily)
+ Large Archive (not sure if exclusive)
+ fast download speeds around 400K
+ Download manger accepted
+ No DMR
+ Many formats (divx, wmv, Quick time, MPG, Flash
+ 9 preview images for video's (with a zoom feature! "see 1b.")
+ Nice scene descriptions
Cons:
- 90% of girls are from europe (Like most other sites now days!)
- The Categories never works properly (e.g. lesbian - licking pussy "see 1a.")
- Not many Niches
Bottom Line:
Bottom line: I got bored realy quickly because im not a fan of euro chicks.
BUT if you like euro chick i recommend it 100%
1a. The Categories never works properly (e.g. lesbian then select licking pussy which gives "Sorry, no results found!"
1b. in the veiwing window theres a great zoom feature which allows you to see an image upclose without opening a new window or tab OR even changing the page. This is an amazing feature and all sites should have it. Its that good.
Improvement: Fix the navigation and add a good search engine that searchs desciption aswell ass title and add more niches
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
+New site search, but...(see cons)
+New site design - provides better update list, and better organization overall.
+1by-night is eliminated and merged into 1by-day - thank god. It was rather annoying to have two sites with different content not together.
+Downloads work with all Download Managers
+Plethora of formats and qualities - Quicktime 720p, WMV 1.5mb/2.5mb, Flash low/high, DivX 2.5mb, VCD Mpg 1mbps
+Videos high quality
+All (yes, all) videos come with associated image sets, all of which can be downloaded in ZIP format
+Every model has a individual page, with a headshot, linked updates and bio information.
+Alphabetized pornstar directory
+All updates are tagged with date AND time
+Updates page is nice - click a month and get all the updates for that particular month
+Decent update schedule (2 updates/day)
+Countdown timer shows time until next update
+100% Exclusive content
Cons:
-Site search is not very good. I searched "Lucky" in hopes of finding Lucky videos but got like 20 results all over the place.
-Videos watermarked
-They add updates like they are magazine issues, which I think is rather dumb. It is a waste of time for something no one cares about.
-Extras are weak. Yes, if you signed up for the 7-in-1 deal recently you get 7 sites (I didn't), but they are not linked on the "Extras" page, rather you are given junky wallpapers and dumb videos of outtakes, or "bloopers".
-They just updated their site again, and while the new site provides a better interface overall, they eliminated 6 years of content (videos, images and girls all together)! People woulnd't otherwise realize that DDF has been around since 2001 and there was a lot of good content from girls who are rather hard to find (e.g. Stepanka Cisarova), and that is all gone.
-The timeout period is now rather short, meaning you will be putting in your login/pass quite often, yuck.
-Expensive! $35/mo!
Bottom Line:
Overall, an excellent site which is devoted to keeping pace with the rest of the porn world, maintaining a fresh looking website that is pleasing to use. I'm not going to say that this is the MOST pleasing site I've used, but it is one of the more pleasing ones (I put Brazzers at #1). There are not many things the site does wrong, where I can dock points from the rating:
Download manager, check
Image gallery Zip's, check
Multiformat video downloads, check
Pornstar directory with headshots, check
Update history page, check
Respectable update schedule, check
etc.
The places where I did dock the site points is:
1) the site search is poor. It needs work to improve accuracy. Yes, if you search for a unique term (or name) you will get what you want. But a lot of the names of the girls are a bit generic, so the accuracy is not there because the search function searches names, tags, and text describing updates. So for example, when I search "Lucky", a rather generic term and the alias on 1By-Day of the highly popular "Lucie Theodorova", I get 26 results, yet there are only 3 Lucky updates, 2 of which show up as result numbers 21 and 23, and the third is the most recent update to the site and, as such, has not been added to the search. This is absolutely unacceptable. Not only should updates be IMMEDIATELY available in the search results, but the ones I want should be #1, #2, #3, etc. not #20 or so. On the flip side, when I search for more specific terms like "Tiffany" it works fine. In short, they need to fix the search function so that it has advanced search functions, like "search names only" or something.
2) They removed terabytes of content which was dated prior to July 2007! Up until recent when they changed the site again, all the content was available on the "Archive" page, saying to members that "hey we are devoted to adding new HD content, but for those of you who want the really old material we made, you can still get it". I can understand that it was very low quality being encoding long ago during the days of poorer internet connections, but there was no need to remove it. Burying it in the "Archive" page was the probably the most logical decision they made, one which I wish would have been upheld in this new site. What a joke.
3) It is expensive! $35/mo is a lot. Which is why I only buy access once every so often just to catch up on new updates.
Are either of the first two (huge) negatives reasons to cancel or not buy membership? Not really. For me, considering I previously downloaded all the old content that I wanted, its just upsetting to know they removed all that content. For most newbs to the porn world, they would never know the difference. Its just a disgruntling thought for purists like myself.
One last note, the watermark has been changed. Before it was more ominous and in the corner, now its more subtle and closer to the center.
Again, good site, maybe a bit pricey for some, but you get a lot of good, high quality content.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site has stunning looking girls around the age of 18, 19 or 20 and it has alot of 3-somes, good camerawork and light. This site is updated almost every week.
Cons:
Although the girls are awesome to look at I mis some major things. I mis passion. I mis the girls talking to eachother. Although there are alot of sexual positions there is hardly any really good analingus. Most of the time during the 3-some one of the girls is waiting her turn. You never see two girls licking another girl together. I love scenes where two girls lick another girl and then kiss eachother during the licking. This is hardly the case on this site. Unfortunately there is no build up. They start on the bed or the couch and then the action starts.
Bottom Line:
This site could be awesome if the girls interacted more with eachother and act a little bit. The problem with these young girls is also that they lack experience. They wait for directions in stead of diving into the action and enjoy the sex. I don't think the actors are real life lesbians. East European girls look great but I really mis conversation before and during the sex.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
*1100 teen (18+) models (no silicone), 5700 photo sets (100 ish pics each), 600,000 photos, 5700 videos (10 to 15min). -100% exclusive.
*Many attractive models and lots of total stunners, especially in video.
*Updates every day. 3 new models per week. All model's content on consecutive days. Not dragged out over months. I wish all sites would do this.
*4 softcore photo sets and videos per model plus some bg and gg hardcore.
*Photosets in 1200x800 and 2400x1600 with full zips.
*Videos in WMV 1280x720 3600kb/s approx 400MB, MP4 854x480 1500kb/s, plus some lower resolutions and mobile and streaming. No DRM. Samples of all types available in tour.
*Sample of every video and photoset on site available in tour.
*Good model directory and exemplary search facility.
*Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
*Download manager friendly. No download limit. No timeouts.
*Choose CCBill or Epoch.
Cons:
* Too much emphasis on toys and masturbation. Even if you like this in videos, photos would benefit from less. If you hit on these themes, this is not a con.
*Photos less good than videos but still better than most sites which offer good video.
*Few repeat visits from models. Very few deviate from the 4 solo photo + 4 solo vid + bg/gg plan.
*Hardly any non-Caucasian or non-slim. I prefer slim Caucasian so this suits me but might not suit everyone.
*"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central. This applies to virtually all sites unless they are specialist fetish sites. Not a con for me.
*Slight discrepancy between what tour quotes for number of sets and videos and what search feature reveals. Figures quoted in pros might not be exact but not far off.
Bottom Line:
I have given this site a very high score even though much of its content is not what I want or like. I believe that a score should be based on how well a site delivers what its free tour leads you to expect. An inadequate or misleading tour should detract from the score even when content is good. Excellent delivery following an informative tour should be rewarded.
Nubiles has one of the very best tours around: so good that not everyone might be aware of this. It has access to the full model directory. Click any model and you see exactly what her content is plus two full size pictures and a sample of her video at every resolution and format choice the site offers. If you click "Photos", every set has three free images at 1200x800 and 12 representative thumbs. And every video has a 1 minute streaming sample at a quality good enough to view full screen.
The tour area is the same as the members area but without the actual content. So, when you join, you should be in no doubt what the site has to offer in navigation and content. This is teen girls in mainly solo videos and photo sets with some bg and somewhat less gg. Many of the girls, of course, appear on other sites, including ATK, Femjoy, Karups, MetArt, Twistys and others but the Nubiles content is 100% exclusive. Girls often look younger on Nubiles, even when they were shot later than other sites. This, I believe, is mainly due to subtle makeup and lighting since Nubiles deplores and discourages things like pigtails or holding teddy bears.
You would need to study the tour very carefully, however, to reveal what are the greatest frustrations of the site for me. It has a very strong emphasis on toys and masturbation; and it is geared towards video rather than photos even though it takes a standard 4 solo photo sets and 4 solo videos per model. gg or bg is on top of that.
The webmaster makes his comprehensive instructions to photographers available in the tour. There are some contradictions and ambiguities in it and clarifying those would help the site and its members. Here are a few quotes:
"Videos are just important as pictures." [sic]
"video is more important to members then pictures." [sic]
"At least half of the sets should be fingering and finger masturbation without toys."
"Our favorite content is when a girl plays with toys."
"The best theme is just masturbation and toys, and I dont expect other themes but here are a few ideas." [sic]
"Members do not like toys as they often get in the way of seeing what she is doing down there. Do not give me 4 sets of all toys! "
"No more then 2 sets with toys. Focus on finger masturbation." [sic]
I have joined the site many times (despite my loathing of toys and masturbation content). Using its excellent search feature confirms that the toys and masturbation bias has increased over the past year. I deplore this but some might enjoy it. For me, toys and fingers both get in the way. I wish the webmaster would clarify his intention and ensure that it is clearly described in his instructions to photographers.
The photo sets are genuine photos, not vidcaps. But the webmaster requires that they should mirror the videos. This tends to result in each photo set rather closely being a kind of rehearsal for the video, with less spontaneity and engagement. They are often less well lit, colour balanced and focused than the videos and frequently less good than the same model's photo content on other sites.
I think it would improve the site's content if photos could be freed of the constraint to match the videos. Why not have the toys and masturbation in the videos, where they add interest, and keep them out of the photos, in which they are mainly an obstruction to the view and always look unnatural? That said, the site does have some excellent photo sets too, and some girls have all their photo sets free of toys and even of masturbation. But they are not the norm.
The videos are almost invariably better than elsewhere. Video is technically excellent. 1280x720 wmv is very sharp to view and well lit.
I mentioned the search feature. It is superb. You can search on 15 Attributes (inc boobs, pussy etc), 15 Outfits (inc lingerie, glasses etc), 9 Actions (inc toys, hardcore) and Actions can EXCLUDE too, so I can find photo sets without toys! You can access and even run the live search feature in the tour. WYSIWYG!!!
All photo sets and videos start clothed, even if frequently this just means a bikini or bra and panties, and get fully nude partway through. None start out nude. There is some teasing but probably not enough to satisfy lingerie or tease enthusiasts. It is not a fetish site; the emphasis is on the girls and most of them are hot.
Despite its missing the mark for me, I frequently rejoin. I recommend Nubiles to anyone who enjoys quality teen content, especially if you like toys and masturbation and are aware that, though no slouch in photos or hardcore, its strength lies in its solo video.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+++ massive model archive
+++ up to 3 updates per day
++ lot of contributing photographers (+180)
++ big hdv video archive
++ images up to 4000 px
+ functional site
+ Iphone / PSP compatible
Cons:
--- download limit & partially slow
--- search function is unhandy
-- just one good photographer (Stefan Soell)
-- bulk photography
- hard to get in the mood
- they make you feel how hard they want your money
Bottom Line:
After X-art, I was seeking for another compelling site full of nude teens with a higher rate of updates and a solid archive.
Femjoy looked familiar to a couple of other sites I've seen before, which gave me a "related-to" feeling but didn't care for the moment.
They have a huge archive for galleries and HD videos is an acceptable quality. It was a little hard to get into the right mood by all the functional and plain and passionless presentation of the girls.
Stefan Soell seem to be the best of all contributors there, at least for me.
Femjoy is a good site for outdoor fans and those who like young girls being naturally naked.
Don't expect the girls doing anything fancy, they don't!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of content considering how old the site is
- Updates are posted daily
- Video quality is excellent if you have the storage & bandwidth to go for the "HD" versions
- Most models are very attractive (and young)
- Download speed is very good. I can get combined 1000KB/s bursts if I have 2 connections open
- Images are high resolution, most sets I've checked out so far are at least 1600px
- "Coming soon" page shows you what's about to be posted up to ~3 weeks in advance
Cons:
- Navigation is horrible. If you click on a video/photo update, there's no way to go straight to the model page to see what else there is
- Photo quality is inconsistent (some sets underexposed, some overexposed)
- They seem to be moving away from the "harder" stuff, i.e. peeing, fisting, speculum
- 30GB daily DL limit. Hitting it locks you out for 24 hours
- Good luck trying to use a DL manager
Bottom Line:
If you enjoy solo girl action, this site is probably right up your alley. Like most other sites in this genre, the formula gets very repetitive quickly. What's nice about this site is that there's some unique stuff that you don't always see (fisting, peeing & speculum). Unfortunately they don't seem to be shooting those types of scenes anymore.
The most frustrating part of this site is the navigation. There's no way to see what the filename of a video is before downloading it, so you'd better leech everything from a given model at once or you might end up downloading the same video twice (or you'll have to rename everything you save). I also can't figure out why they don't just make the model names clickable so that you go to the index page. They do have a good search function though, it lets you find image sets & videos by type of action and other model characteristics (hair color, etc)
Also, they don't forbid DL managers, but the implementation of their site makes it difficult to use. I finally got mine working by switching browsers (Safari & Speed Download 4 on a Mac).
If they fixed their navigation and went back to shooting some of the edgier content, I'd let this one renew. But as-is, it's definitely been worth a 30 day stint.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content.
- No DRM Protection.
- No Download limit that I experienced.
- High Def Videos (some of the best I've seen) available in WMV at 1280 X 720, 4000 kbps or 852 X 480, 2000 kbps, older wmv videos are 640 X 480, 1500 kbps. Flash streaming, Quicktime format at 860 X 540, 2000 kbps, and MPG in parts at 448 X 256, 1000 kbps.
- High def pictures (1333 X 2000, smaller sized available for viewing if you want) available to download via zip plus in browser slide shows.
- Gorgeous euro models that are mostly all natural.
- Great solo scene content ranging from fingering, toys, to peeing (more in bottom line).
- Updates daily with one picture set, one video scene every other day unless on sundays.
- Great and accurate search feature which can break down scenes to which type, where the scene was shot (location), and model features which include hair color, body type, breast size, and amount of pubic hair
- Good model index for easy viewing, plus image and scene index.
Cons:
- Picture sets are accompanying photo shoots that contain the same outfits and locations of videos made at a different time (meaning, these photos and videos are basically the same content).
- Some of the older material videos are smaller in resolution, but they are still average quality, they seem to have jumped to higher res quickly and there is not much of these.
- I heard model names differ here from the usual models' names so finding a model you already know can be a bit of a burden.
- Would be nice to add a forum for active communication and community.
- You can rate episodes but there is no way to view the scenes in rated format to see which were most popular and so on.
Bottom Line:
This site is by far in a class of it's own. I know this is really my first taste of Euro women showcased in a site but I can't recommend this more for a start or an addition. They update well and I have not seen an unattractive model on this site yet. While being mostly solo with a few lesbian type scenes, I think it's up there in the solo euro women niche. The models are stellar (I think they are all mostly well known in the euro porn community) and there are a lot of them, about 159 different models at the time of this review.
The videos are caught in high quality definition and are done very professionally. There is no chitter chatter amongst the camera man and the model. The models are dressed in very colorful and stylish clothes while being shot in well lit and warm colored locations (if inside). The outside locations are well thought out and are usually always shot on a bright, sunny day. The content can vary in content, while the majority being a solo scene involving a toy or their fingers, while there are fisting scenes, pissing, and speculums. The solo scenes are done great with the model stripping then masterbating till orgasm. They seem pretty realistic but I'm sure a few are faked (what can ya do, it's porn) but overall, they are really hot. The fisting scenes always involve another female doing the fisting to the model and never get too extreme. They usually start the same, with a strip, some masterbation, then the fisting. The peeing vids are usually quite quick, with the model already nude, and peeing somewhere. The speculum's are usually the same, but some are full strips then speculums, however, a lot just get right in to it. There are quite a few sybian scenes as well, shot like the others, a strip scene then sybian action. The scenes are focused (pun pun) well and shot correctly, expect some of the hottest and best solo stuff here and a lot at 13,460 scenes.
The picture sets are in great quality but are mostly the same content from the videos. So, the outfits and locations are the same as the videos. It would be great if the could get some seperate shoots besides these. Plus, the fact that they are so well shot and great in quality, this would make this site so superior that I don't think many would have any complaints. The amount should be the same as the video scenes for photo sets.
I like this site a lot and I think it is set up nice in design, being easy on the eyes and in navigation. For the true porn collectors, the fact the the video names when downloading can be a burden to some due to the fact that you may have to rename because they are named in numbers originally, the overall content is superb despite this. This and the fact that the photos are close in content to the videos are why I can't give this place a 100. They update daily with new models plus ones returning and the videos are shot absolutely stunning, this place is highly recommended for lovers of all young woman, not only just euro models.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ No technical or login problems.
+ exceptionally good quality HD pics and videos.
+ Zip files.
+ Ample number beautiful models.
+ Frequent updates.
+ Picture images are done well, with multiple frames and poses.
Cons:
+ My major compliant is this site is chiefly a nude photo shoot. Models do very little except smile.
Videos, although sexy, are mostly rapid-fire takes of subjects who are too often changing positions. There are also too few videos for the number of models on hand.
Although most media formats were availsble, I found them complicated and download speed to be agonizingly slow. Hardcore is non-existent, as well as a dire shortage of erotic behavier.
Bottom Line:
I was given a combo, Met Art and this site for supposedly a discount. However, $29.95 is still too much. I'm getting woefully little I wanted or expected from this deal. For those who fancy superb photography and video of sexy ladies... then this is their bag. But I wouldn't recommend it to guys who want to get a rise out of what they're looking at --- So with that in mind, I wouldn't bother to unzip my fly.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very high quality, pics are huge (biggest I've seen, upwards of 4,000), vids are also very high quality.
- Plenty of sexy Euro models
- Decent nagivation, comment section that webmaster also posts on
- Updated daily + bonus sites!
Cons:
- Music in vids, no, no, no!
- Not 100% exclusive
Bottom Line:
Overall I was happily surprised with with Babelicious. The bonus sites are much better than most network sites have. My biggest problem was that I had seen some of the material on other sites, but I can at least say Babelicious' duplicate material is of higher quality. Kind of like getting your favorite cd in remastered version.
The bonus sites are bonuses for a reason, none look to have a whole lot of work put into them, but really they aren't bad at all. One thing that was a little frustrating was having to sign in on each site, no big deal to most, but I try to use odd screennames and passwords, and sometimes forget them. That is just minor though.
The quality of the pics will really blow you away. Maybe there are bigger pics out there, but I haven't seen them if there are. The bonus sites will give you the b/g sections if you prefer hardcore which is something that I am glad to see more and more of these model (solo, g/g sites offering) it shows that reviews are being read since that is usually a big complaint of lack of b/g content. Now we need to discuss this music though. I probably saw my first porn in the late 80s/early 90s. It was from my uncles porn stash. I still haven't got that music out of my memory, bom-chi-chi-wa-wa. I much prefer hearing the women's sounds than music. Outside of that, I would call this site a site to watch. It is a little confusing at first, but with time you get used to switching from site to site. I recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Currently 41 videos (avg 20 mintues)
-Automatic access to a network of 12 exclusive sites as well as an additional 15 non-exclusive.
-The actresses are all 18 to 25yrs old.
-The videos come in wmv format and can all be downloaded: low, medium or hight quality.
-They offer a flash version for streaming.
-The photosets average 140-160 pictures and they can be downloaded in zip format.
-Navigation is made easy.
-30$ for this Network is not too excessive.
Cons:
-Some of the videos have an amateurish look to them
-Good Luck in identifying the performers without doing some research.
-Although you get a total of 28 sites, I'd say only 3 maybe 4 are worth it.
-The blow jobs are too noisy and there is an excessive amount drooling.
-Updates are infrequent and hard to date.
Bottom Line:
Gag-n-Gape has been on my wish list for a long time because it's one of the sites where I can see some of the girls I really like do hardcore.
There are many really good looking girls on the site, but due to a lack of proper makeup and crappy lighting, they don't appear as gorgeous as they do on other sites.
I think the best thing they could do is extend the lenght of the videos to 30mins, add more
foreplay, change the sytle of the blow jobes to be less like Max Hardcore, use some makeup and better lighting.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Quite attractive girls, surprisingly young and relatively inexperienced. (I said "relatively")
Great camerawork, as on most of the Pink Visual sites. This means you get to see all of the girl looking attractive rather than too many close up gynaecological shots.
No condoms.
NO DRM.
You get pictures, good ones, and lots of them.
No download limits, apart from only a limited amount of episodes being available for download.
The DVD quality is really good, although only the newer clips have that.
Cons:
Excruciating navigation. Older clips are cut up into tiny pieces - sometimes 7-9 without any picture clue as to where you are in the clip.
An awful lot of talking followed by a an awful lot of oral, especially on the old clips.
Only a few clips are relesed for download each month. You have to be a member for a month then they release some more. Then you have to stay for another month to have access to the next batch.
Older clips are poor to average quality and not available for download.
The men talk too much, are occasionally irritating, and make some unpleasant comments about the girls or at least treat them a little less than respectfully.
There is the cheap and nasty trick extra site sign up box, so I deduct 5 marks for that.
If you cancel they offer you a discount, plus access to other sites. Shame they don't do that for loyal customers.
Bottom Line:
I was a memeber of this site as it was a member of the Pink Visual organisation. I thought it worth doing a review as TBP have just done one.
The TBP review said they were no longer updating, although they were when my membership lapsed, but that was 2 months ago. There are still a lot of episodes to keep you happy.
For me what is the best thing about the site is the attractivenes of the girls (although still too many tattoos - arghhh!) and the camerawork which brings out the best of the models. The whole site gives an appearance of quality.
The older clips are more annoying because with the lousy navigation and shorter clips you can just find yourself continually streaming all the talking and more talking.
Even for the photo enthusiasts the navigation is a pain.
You get a $10 discount if you join through TBP, which is what I did.
The DVD quality on the Pink Visual sites have dimensions of 1068 by 600 with bit rates of around 5000. Below this there is the 852 by 480 dimension with bit rates of around 2500. Toadsith suggested I put in more tech, so I have tried. You tech boffins will know what that all means. Personally I think the top rate is very good, and even the rate below that is quite good.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
