Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some photo sets are good.
-All sets are high resolution 2000x3000
-Videos are 1280x720
Cons:
-Video quality is not very good and the videos are poorly directed. Ultra softcore.
-Videos have interlacing issues.
-Videos are dubbed with music.
-Some photosets are grainy.
-No updates. Last update was in 03/10/12. Before that date updates were weekly.
-Limited content.
Bottom Line:
The amount of content offered for the 4 years this site has been running would have been covered in a couple of months of updates on other sites.
For the amount of content I would say this website worth it for a one time payment of $10. Since they no longer update and their updates were slow before that. It is definitely not a site I would recommend a subscription to for more than a month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+The best interracial porn site on the net.
+You get a total of 22 sites.
+You can download the videos in wmv format and they have started to offer them in the MP4 format as well. The resolution is at least 640x480 but you now have a large amount of content being offered in 768x432 and even in HD.
+You can stream all the videos online.
+They remastered most of their older content so that you can now get them in the MP4and WMV format and in a higher resolution.
+All content is dated and they update with new content once a week.
+They have 2 sites dedicated to the gay male market.
+Many of the sites offer scenario driven porn.
+They hire some esxcellent performers and there is no lack of hardcore here.
+They advertised the upcoming updates 2 weeks in advance.
Cons:
-Only about 6-7 sites are really updating with brand new content. All of the others seem to offer remastered scenes or might be rotating their older content.
-Some of the sites are meant for a very pecific market so unless you're into that type of fetish then you won't be saving their content.
-They do seem to enjoy facials, blowbangs so if you aren't a fan then that may be a problem.
-It would be nice if they added a black female to white male site.
-They do not tag their scenes so you have to read the synopsis to find out what's happening.
-There is no real search options except name of the model.
-It would be nice if they could drop their price to 30$.
Bottom Line:
**This is the best interracial porn network on the net and if I'm not mistaken, then the only one still updating with new content. If you like to see white women having hardcore sex with well hung black men then this is the place to come. They manage to get some very well known performers to appear on this site and they even get many of them to do anal which is impressive when you consider the size of the equipment some of these guys have.
**I was planning on joining the newtork sometime this year but I got a special offer to join for 20$ so it was a no brainer. I normally join about twice a year mostly because the network is 35$ and they only update about once or twice a month with the kind of porn that I like.
**Aside from maybe adding tags to their scenes and then revamping their search engine too help members find a specific fetish then I can't see anything else they need to do to improve the network.
**The one thing that I'd love to see but I asked and it doesn't seem to be possible in todays porn world is a site like Spring Thomas or Katie Thomas. THose were really great sites because they were dedicated to really cute teens girls having a variety of sexual encounters with black men. The great thing is that these women were mostly known for the stuff they did on their site and didn't do much on other sites or in movies and in the case of Spring. She never appeared elsewhere except here.
**Anyone who doesn't like interracial porn should avoid this network because this is the only type of porn you will find here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Huge network of sites catering to fans of young Eastern European models.
+More than 2800 videos and photosets to choose from.
+You can stream all videos online or you can download them in a variety of format from WMV, FLV and MKV .
+They added High Definition videos in 2011 so you have about 300 or more HD videos.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file and resolution is 960x1440.
+All content is dated and they appear to add one new scene every 2 days.
+The members section is well designed and it's easy to find scenes using tag words, site name or the model's name.
+The TBP/PU discount of 19.95$ is amazing.
Cons:
-I find that a large percentage of the content added in the last 4 months is subpar to what TMW used to offer.
-The vast majority of the sites are dead so content is either months old or more likely years old. The only sites that seem to still be adding new content are Teen Sex Movs, Teen Sex Mania, Creampie Angel and Anal Angel.
-They keep adding new sites to the network but this isn't a positive thing because the content on those sites can be quite good so having only a few scenes and then none drives me crazy.
-They have significantly dropped the number of anal scenes since June.
-A percentage of the content is leased material that is available on many other sites.
-They have advertising for other sites on all their pages.
Bottom Line:
*Let me first say that a lot of what I'm about to write amy be negative but only for returning members and not for anyone just joining this network. Anyone just joining this network will more than get his money's worth. If you're a past member and want to join again then please pay attention to the following information prior to doing so. I was last a member in July of this year and even at that time. I was finding that some of the newer content was not all that good. You can imagine my surprise when I joined again last week and found that now almost all the content is like that.
*The first thing you should know is that if you are into anal then you will want to avoid the network for any new anal scenes. I did the math and they only added 19 anal scenes between June and September while they added 38 anal scenes between Feb and May. Those numbers are a lot worse when you consider that they only added 2 anals since July 21. Anal isn't for everybody so hearing that TMW replaced those anal scenes with standard b/g scenes should be great news but many of the scenes that replaced those anal ones tend to often be badly shot, not well lit, and the action is not very hot. also I'm not so sure that the content is as recent as it could be. The most obvious reason for me saying that is that the latest update dated Oct 5 for their anal-angels site is a scene that was released in March of this year on another site. The girl is cute as always but the scene is not well shot and it's frankly not very good.
*I don't know if I'm correct but my gut feeling is that the syphilis outbreak which hit Europe really hard coupled with Russia pretty much banning production of porn in that Country have significantly affected the ability of TMW to offer a higher quality product. I checked and many of the girls that have appeared on TMW are from Russia so that can't be good for business. The economy still being where it is must also be a huge factor and then you still have content thieves. I think TMW had very little already for release and when they started to run out of scenes then they started looking for content providers that had some unreleased material or had decent prices on already relased stuff and that's what you are now seeing.
*I don't know what the futur holds for this network. I hope they turn things around because it was a great network. All I know is that I won't be returing again until I see serious chnages in their content. of course that is going to be hard since their brand new site is just as bad as their old one so no way of knowing what is new on the network.
**My score is based solely on the fact that I'm a returning member who doesn't like their new stuff. Otherwise the score would be in the 90's.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is the second best site in the Met-Art network behind Met-Art itself. Very large volume of high quality images of truly beautiful women in natural indoor and outdoor settings. See details below.
Cons:
Nothing much in the way of cons as long as you remember it is a nude modelling site. No hardcore here!
Bottom Line:
This site rates up there with the best nude photography sites on the Internet. Tons of photo sets (not much video, though), many, many different models of all shapes and sizes. The collection dates all the way back to 2004 and even the stuff from back then is top notch. And many of the models you know now were on this site before they were anywhere else...although sometimes with different names. With 10 YEARS of stuff, it is a lot of fun looking. (At least 1 new set a day, 50 images per set, that's 3600+ sets and 180,000 imaegs!)
Navigation is good for a site this large. You can search by model or rating or month. Images appear in the same tab, though, so remember to go back rather than close (I wish they would make this more consistent across the Met-Art network..)
Small, medium and large zip files are available for every set since 2004 (although "large" wasn't that large in 2004)
The girls all appear to be comfortable with the photograper. There is a really good mix of full body and close up shots here and, unlike many similar sites, most of the girls are not shy and don't mind, um, showing us the money.
There is a new set every day. Very few of them are continuations of earlier sets and there does not seem to be any common location where the majority of shoots are done. There is a wide variety of photographers and they all have slightly different styles, locations and models. Once in a great while, they will release a much older set, but unlike some other sites, I don't think they are re-releasing anything. For example, a set came out earlier this year of Marketa when she was relatively young. The set may have been 8 years old, but it had never been released anywhere before as far as I could tell. Contrast this with DDG or Earl Miller, who fairly consistently re-release older stuff.
All sets come in 3 sizes ranging from small to extra-large but the size depends on the age of the set. Recent images are 6000x4000 or so, large enough to be lifesize if printed out at 72dpi. And most images actually look good at that kind of resolution.
Now, if you are looking for ANYTHING other than straight images of unbelieveably beautiful girls, then this might not be the site for you. There are a very few lightweight girl/girl scenes, but there are no sex scenes, no insertions, very little masturbation, no true sex on this site. There may be a few unusual sets from prior years (maybe a girl with her hands tied or something), but this is a 99.9% nude girls site.
I got in this time on a discount because I was a member of Met-Art. Once in Met-Art, it was just $12.50 to join additional sites in the network. Well, I'm dropping the lesser met-art network sites but will keep this one for at least another month or two.
As I mentioned above, overall this is one of the best nude photography sites on the net. Every time I log in, I find myself surfing the site for an hour or more. I don't think I've ever been dissapointed with this site...and for me...that says a lot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Videos are available in a variety of formats including HD. Models are generally very attractive. A few well known models.
Cons:
The advertising seems a little deceptive. There are only about 120 videos on the site, with Videos dating back only to November of 2011. That would be 1-3 videos a week since inception. Videos rarely depict the same imagery as the teaser images they are linked to (in any quantity at least..10 minute video, 5 seconds of a particular angle or shot and that's what they tease you with.).
Bottom Line:
Nope, sorry. Stay away from this one until it gets a LOT more content and they tweak the formule a bit. The advertising showing slick scenes, awesome couples or groups and amazing "first person" angles does not really reflect what is on the site.
This site includes some Porn Pro-like footage with the objective of selling it in more of an X-Art.com format. It almost works, but very, very little of the material is...artsy enough to pull it off and only a few of the participants look like they are enjoying themselves or their partners. Look at the images depicting the scenes and you think holy crap this is going to be hot! What you get when you watch are a lot of OK, moderaately dissapointing sex scenes in very similar bright white settings with entirely too much footage from the same angle (across the bed on the side). It is almost clinical! Several of the videos look like they take place in the same rented villa in Arizona or California someplace. When there are several videos of the same girl, they are all pretty clearly from the same day no matter how hard they try to change things up. And much of the sex, which should be OMG hot, ends up looking like acting...mediocre acting...not that the industry has any really great acting, but the couples should at least be into each other.
There are a few models you would recognize; Zoey and Jessie, for example. I have NEVER seen Jessie or Zoey, two young, vibrant, energetic and attractive models, not entirely enjoying themselves...except here. Here the sex looks like work. (Jessie has a scene where 90% of the time she is getting screwed on a piano bench with her head slamming against a baby grand piano. That So did not look comfortable or fun!)
I rarely find a site that I can't recommend. Unfortunately, I can't recommend this one.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
ð Exciting/Arousing theme~Massage/Rubdown/Handjob
ð Hot Pornstars in sweet,sexy,velvet robes excite
ð Action starts slowly builds to climactic end
ð All Episodes with brief if not major storylines
ð New Male/Female Actors look glamorous,handsome
ð Streaming,Download in Full HD/MP4/DVD/Flash
ð Weekly Updates for Main/Bonus Sites,Except Soapy
ð Very Attractive Monthly Price of $14.95 for HD
ð Excellent Techincal/Customer Support Features
ð New Management brought in good/needed changes
ð Video Duration/Sizes are excellent/convenient
ð Use of FTP is good & works well with downloads
ð Sex is Straight with no anal,gangbang,domination
ð Good Membership Options-Month/Half Year/Annual
Cons:
ð Stories look lame,stereotypical unlike before
ð Many new models inexperienced, amateurish now
ð Photosets poor with Bad Angles,Camera Work now
ð Quality of Male Models suffering & loosing sheen
ð Availability/Quality of Female Talent disturbing
ð Erratic, Inconsistent & Unpredictable Updates
ð Parlor Madam not central character,bypassed now
ð Best Models-Eric/Stephanie/India/Jenner/Seth na
ð European/Latina/Asian models inconspicuous now
ð Offers/Polls are promoting "All Girl Massage"
ð Soapy Massage disbanded,no replacement website
ð Members Forum (Views/Feedback/Update) Disbanded
ð Suggestions for Episodes rarely/not implemented
Bottom Line:
Massage Parlor was one of the top guns & to some it is the final word in Massages/Rubdowns with Happy Endings theme through BJ/HJ/CIM/COA/Swallows. This site probably put the M in Massage themes & were very good at it too.Towards 2007~2011,this site commanded a great following so much so that it had a huge amount of fan following & the best part was that fans had a say in everything the site posted or could express their views in tandem to improve. That's lacking now because ever since ChargePayBV took over the operations, many things have changed some for the better others for the worse! My rating & honest appreciation of this site has taken a rain check & I don't wish to give this anything but mid 70! Fans can become members because it's still great & popular but it's not a chance-less affair! Many fans will love the videos as the theme is fetish but the experience is like a wave, many a crest but several troughs in tow! Take a chance, be a member, have a once if a lifetime experience. After all necessity is the mother of invention!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HD downloads
Good range of models
Lots of content
Fair pricing
Ok-ish update frequency
Cons:
Navigation inconveniences
Cross sales
Bottom Line:
I use to join ztod every couple of months to get the latest movies and, thanks to the pretty good quality of the scenes, I never regretted my decision. ZTOD is a very solid site with loads of content covering almost every niche, so no complaints here.
However, navigation and browsing options of the site are a bit of a drawback. Some examples:
- The model index does not have a "filter by letter" option. You can browse all models alphabetically (which is about 68 pages), but not, for example, display all models starting with "S". Considering the fact that model stage names tend to have different spellings from site to site, finding the model you're looking for can be a bit hard.
(- On the scene selection screen, you can't right click a scene and open it in a new tab, which is quite inconvenient. I usually right click/new tab a few scenes that might be interesting and then check them out one by one.)
Edit: I just found out you *can* rightclick scenes and open them in a new tab by clicking the "x downloads" link below the scene
- Viewing a scene online doesn't allow skipping beyond the buffered part, "into the black". This is the biggest issue I have, because buffering is not exactly fast.
When I downloaded some files today, I got booted a couple of times. The download would just stop and IDM gave me an error message, recommending me to download the file again (which wasn't neccessary though, it would just pick up the download and continue it). I'm not entirely sure if that problem is on my side or server sided. Since I'm downloading quite a lot from other sites, I assume it's server side, but I can't say for sure. I'll keep watching the problem and post a comment in the next couple of days.
Conclusion:
ZTOD is one of the sites that you can't go wrong with. The sheer ammount and quality of the content won't dissapoint you. If you can live with some minor browsing inconveniences, I'd recommend this site.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
There are no DRM, download limits, regional discrimination, pre checked cross sells, or dirty tricks.
Beautiful girls.
Some very orginal and erotic poses.
Good lighting and overall sense of professionalism.
Good quality videos.
Zipped photos.
Easy log in.
Still updating.
Cons:
Same style and angles every time resulting in a mass produced look.
The picture sets contain too many of the same pose and have little continuity.
Very little ethnic, age, or shape diversity. Models are mainly thin, white, and young.
Few picture or download options. Top quality video is now mp4, not wmv. You have to drop lower in quality to obtain wmv.
Navigation not the best.
No teasing or build up in the pics or videos.
Occasionally annoying male leads.
Although you get some bonus sites, it is a relatively small network.
Bottom Line:
Video Downloads - Best Quality 1280x720 at 4000kbps (4838), High Quality 800x452 at 2500 kbps, Normal Quality 580x328 at 1000 kbps. Recently, for some reason, they changed their "Best Quality" downloads from wmv to mp4. The 4000 kbps wmv is now unavailable, and has been changed to 4500 kbps mp4, so if you want wmv, you have to download a lower quality video.
Pics, and sometimes videos, are ridiculously frustrating because although they choose some original and erotic angles to shoot from, they continually miss out the lower legs and feet, and concentrate far too much on the groin, ass, and upper thigh, turning the models into amputees. I have seen criticism elsewhere on PU, concerning the gynaecological focus of their shoots. A great shame because the models are fantastic, and they think up some original angles to shoot from, then they undermine this eroticism by turning the models into amputees 80 per cent of the time. It is particularly annoying in the pics, where it would appear, feet do not exist.
Although they have great and original angles and ways of shooting models, that mould is set, and they rarely stray from doing exactly the same thing on each shoot, making everything look mass produced.
The pics are adequate but a lot of the time there is little continuity or thought put into the sets. You see a girl starting with clothes, but you don't see much of the strip or lead up to sex. It is like watching six frames from a video, forward winding for four minutes, then watching another six frames, then forward winding, and so on. There are four to eight almost identical pictures of a model in one pose, then four to eight in another pose, with little idea of continuity or progression in the shoot.
Sometimes the male leads can be very irritating. Whether this is by direction or not I don't know. Some continually slap the asses of the models, grunt, groan, and paw their female co workers like they were terrorists abusing their hostages. That can be unerotic for some of us.
Okay, let's be honest, let's come out of the closet. Female genitalia just by itself isn't all that attractive, neither is chopped liver, or any type of roadkill. It is what leads up to that genitalia that is attractive. The whole package, the eyes, the face, the breasts, the legs, the everything. It's the genitalia in context, along with the whole package. I so wish some of these sites would realise that. We've got past the shock of penetration about 40 years ago in Europe, 30 years ago in America, amd 10 years ago in Britain. So we don't need closeups of two thrusting groins and nothing else. We know they're having sex, we get to see it all the time.
I know sites have to keep production costs as cheap as possible, but surely it's possible to see two whole people having sex, and give us some idea of the beauty of the whole girl. It's done professionally, but with little love for the subject. This is true of 99% of porn, both today and in the past so I can't complain too much.
Their visitors preview site probably gives a better preview of what's on offer than the members' home page as there you get a better idea of how the girls look, and what the sets are like.
It may just me being stupid again but once I got into browsing a picture set, I couldn't get back to home again without going through my favourites option.
There is a model search option from the home page (in very small print), but when you access the model using this, the video and picture download options are dead links. You therefore have to look at the date, then go back to the home pages and work out where the model is on the chronologically listed update pages in order to download pics and videos.
It seems there is a six simultaneous downloads limit.
Logging in is easy, and you can return to the site without re entering your password.
The lighting, production and photography are mainly very good. If you go back to the first few girls recorded in 2009 you can see how much this has improved. The early ones look very different, with a different style, angles, and lighting.
You would think by the title of "First Anal Quest" its close relative "Double View Casting," and the comments "real teenagers craving to get their cherries popped," and "no fake scenes no bullshit," these are mostly first timers, but not a bit of it. Some of these girls (for example Britney, Stonell, and Kristina) have been around for a long long time, and have appeared on many other sites featuring Eastern European Girls. Some of these girls have pussies more pounded than when a juggernaut lorry crashed into the local Pets At Home.
All in all it is worth a visit, but very few seasoned downloaders will find any need to stay more than a month, or maybe two.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Top-of-the-Pops in solo girls videos (only solo girls)
+ Exclusive content
+ Vast amount of material – vids and pix sets
+ Several different scenes of the same girl for the major part of models
+ Fine, great video quality – among others: top MP4.
+ Most of older vids are now reedited to up-to-date quality, nice!
+ Daily updates – one day video, next pics ect.
+ Several download options
+ Great download speed - mostly
+ No DRM, no download limits.
+ Zip for pics
+ Easy navigation/download – except update browsing
+ Nice price – except: see below
Cons:
- Regional pricing
- Somewhat repetitive style in video scenes - but what exclusive site does not have that.
- A bit troublesome update-search (see below)
- A little too much going for outdoor scenes
- Confusing model names
- Poor preview (see below)
Bottom Line:
In Focus Girls is probably the best solo-girl-video-site, I've joined for a long, long time. It reminds me a bit of the enthusiasm, I had when first joining the DDF, 1 By Day several years ago.
This site offers a vast amount (1300) of great videos of especially euro girls – the majority well known from other sites. But here you get exclusive scenes, exclusive shots.....oh, yes – some, a few of these scenes are placed elsewhere – but to my knowledge from this site.
And the best deal is, that most – far most – of the girls/models – have more than one scene. Most/some two or three, some even up to 12 different video scenes with the same model – that's really a collectors item.
And the older videos for those well known , favorite models have now been re-edited:
So you get vids from 2006/2007/2008 in fine, fine quality, too. Still a few, very few (2005) are not updated and in low quality.
The navigation is mostly very easy – especially when browsing models – the name, akas are confusing, though. Only about half are using a well know name...so if you want to browse for your favorites, you'll have problems – still they all have fine, big thumbs, so......
The video downloads are in 5 choices:
Four in the fine MP4 (my favorite):
1280x720 - 4Mbit
854x480 - 2Mbit
640x360 - 964Kbit
480x272 - 664Kbit
In PSP
And MPG in parts
And – you get 4 streaming options, too.
At the moment there is almost 1300 videos here – a lot of nice browsing and downloading.
Generally I get a very fine download speed here – 1700-2000 Kb/sec – sometimes (rarely) it's somewhat slower.
It's a little annoying browsing updates: It now goes in pages from 1-108...and if you what like page 66 – you got to have patience clicking and clicking..
The models browsing is much easier: Alphabetic.
Preview: It's miserable and not informative – Strange with such a fine site, so do not let it fool you
Not much into pics – but you get three seizes – and of course zip – best is:
2000x1333.
I hate that regional pricing, but overcame my principals here – and joined – and happy, I did.
This is truly a great site...and seems like the best around when it come to fine looking solo girls. Highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large network
- 21 sites (including a relatively new BTS site)
- All interracial
- Some unusual niches
- Older scenes are being remastered
- Easy to use network
- Supports download managers (IDM)
- Easy access to download and viewing options
- Streaming is available
Cons:
- Not all sites are updating
- Older remastered scenes may be dated and posted as a new update
- No effective search function
- No (that I could find) high-res or HD scenes
- More expensive than comparable sites
Bottom Line:
Dog Fart Network (DFN) isn’t a network that I’d normally have joined, but I’m glad I did. I joined specifically to access one of their unique sites but I found many of the other sites quite good too.
DFN has 21 sites that cover a wide range of niches. The overall theme that runs through the network is interracial sex, specifically black men with white women. One site does feature white men and black women. The sites range from fairly standard porn, straight b/g, b/b/g, anal, etc., legal teen oriented sites, cougar sites, through sites that feature glory holes, and a couple of sites with some unique themes – Wife Writing and The Minion. Both of these are unique sites.
The network is simple in layout and operation: the homepage shows all 21 sites. You enter each site through that link and all the sites share the same simple layout: five scenes are listed per page and there is easy access to all the pages. One thing I particularly like about the sites is that on each page, beneath a large thumbnail of each scene, all the viewing and downloading options are available. So many other sites require the users to click through several pages before getting to the download or viewing links; DFN’s choice to keep it simple is appreciated.
Speaking of the downloading and viewing options, DFN has more than most other sites. While only two formats are offered (WMV and MP4) those are usually offered in more than one size. I download WMVs and those are offered in two ‘sizes’ – both come in at 640x480 with the only difference being that the larger ones are 4500kb/s versus the smaller ones at 1500kb/s. Both play at 30fps. Some of the older videos are a lower resolution. Oddly, for 2012, the site still allows users to download the videos in segments. While I’m sure that few people still need to do this, I’m sure that those who do appreciate this option.
While the resolutions are somewhat below standards, they still look crisp.
Streaming is also available in two resolutions that appear to be similar to the WMV downloads.
Speaking of older videos, DFN appears to be moving to remaster a lot of their older scenes. This is both good and bad, depending on how you look at it. The ‘bad’ is that they seem to use the remastered videos as updates rather than posting new videos as often. I don’t hold the opinion that this is necessarily bad because it gives access to fairly decent quality videos of stars from the past decade. I consider that to be good.
The site also offers photos, and like the videos there are several options. Interestingly, the options are for good resolution photos (1067x1600) taken during the video shoot, lower resolution screencaps and these things they call ‘panels’ which are photos that contain four smaller photos. The higher resolution photos are available as zips but the other two sets are singles only.
The site supports download managers. I use Internet Download Manager and had no problem with links dying on me over a period of over an hour.
One glaring problem with the network is the lack of an effective search function or the use of tags. There is a search function, but it has serious flaws. It allows you to search for a word or words in the title or description of the scene but that can be a rather blunt tool. For example, I searched the term “anal” and got a number of hits but many of the scenes had no anal sex in them. The site producers frequently refer to a woman’s “birth canal” in the scene descriptions and that phrase was captured in a search for anal scenes. This could be solved by a smarter search engine, but it would probably be better solved by tagging scenes with niches.
Any potential member is obviously going to make their own decision on value, but in DFN’s case some people may jump to a conclusion based solely on price. The issue is that DFN charges $35 per month, which is more than most comparable sites. Is it worth $35? My opinion is that it is. I think we’ve become accustomed to lower prices but the market has changed and we all may need to rethink the value equation. In this case, you get access to over a thousand exclusive scenes with decent production values and fast downloads (with no obvious limits, I might add). I think that’s good value. (As an aside, I’m not sure where the upper limit on pricing is, but I note that last week TBP posted a review of a BDSM site, Infernal Restraints, that commands $65 per month. I’m a BDSM fan, but that seems a bit steep.)
One potential concern that has been expressed before is that several of the sites do not appear to be actively updating with new material. I’m fine with this as long as the network is updating and the remastering continues.
The bottom line is that I certainly recommend DFN. Its top-quality porn, and specifically interracial porn, with top porn stars that’s well produced and easy to access at a fair price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Well the good eh?
-Beautiful Japanese women
-No download limit
-Easy to download galleries and videos
Cons:
The bad...
-If you are a collector type of person like my wife and I, then be very disappointed. I mean very, very disappointed or pissed, whichever one you fancy. The gifts or presents on the site for loyal customers is ONLY open to people IN Japan. No one else. My wife was crushed....
-Pictures are rather small in size. Kind of odd for a site that relies on galleries to draw in customers.
-Point system kind of ruins the site as you are limited to only a handful of items to browse through, need about 6 months in for a stage 1 pass (half way access) and 16 months for a stage 2 (true full access). Neat idea, but should be used for something much more engaging.
-Customer service is slow and they try to avoid answering questions. Example: I sent 2 emails about the present system and both times they told Japan only, I wanted to know why they could not be sent outside Japan (If they said something about shipping or being unlawful I would have been fine). Wife tried 3 times and got the same.
Bottom Line:
I would recommend it for those who love Japanese women. My wife says no as in her words; "Too little for too much time and money"
Your choice mate
Any questions, ask away as we'll still hang around this site till we reach stage one to see if anything new pops up.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
*1100 teen (18+) models (no silicone), 5700 photo sets (100 ish pics each), 600,000 photos, 5700 videos (10 to 15min). -100% exclusive.
*Many attractive models and lots of total stunners, especially in video.
*Updates every day. 3 new models per week. All model's content on consecutive days. Not dragged out over months. I wish all sites would do this.
*4 softcore photo sets and videos per model plus some bg and gg hardcore.
*Photosets in 1200x800 and 2400x1600 with full zips.
*Videos in WMV 1280x720 3600kb/s approx 400MB, MP4 854x480 1500kb/s, plus some lower resolutions and mobile and streaming. No DRM. Samples of all types available in tour.
*Sample of every video and photoset on site available in tour.
*Good model directory and exemplary search facility.
*Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
*Download manager friendly. No download limit. No timeouts.
*Choose CCBill or Epoch.
Cons:
* Too much emphasis on toys and masturbation. Even if you like this in videos, photos would benefit from less. If you hit on these themes, this is not a con.
*Photos less good than videos but still better than most sites which offer good video.
*Few repeat visits from models. Very few deviate from the 4 solo photo + 4 solo vid + bg/gg plan.
*Hardly any non-Caucasian or non-slim. I prefer slim Caucasian so this suits me but might not suit everyone.
*"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central. This applies to virtually all sites unless they are specialist fetish sites. Not a con for me.
*Slight discrepancy between what tour quotes for number of sets and videos and what search feature reveals. Figures quoted in pros might not be exact but not far off.
Bottom Line:
I have given this site a very high score even though much of its content is not what I want or like. I believe that a score should be based on how well a site delivers what its free tour leads you to expect. An inadequate or misleading tour should detract from the score even when content is good. Excellent delivery following an informative tour should be rewarded.
Nubiles has one of the very best tours around: so good that not everyone might be aware of this. It has access to the full model directory. Click any model and you see exactly what her content is plus two full size pictures and a sample of her video at every resolution and format choice the site offers. If you click "Photos", every set has three free images at 1200x800 and 12 representative thumbs. And every video has a 1 minute streaming sample at a quality good enough to view full screen.
The tour area is the same as the members area but without the actual content. So, when you join, you should be in no doubt what the site has to offer in navigation and content. This is teen girls in mainly solo videos and photo sets with some bg and somewhat less gg. Many of the girls, of course, appear on other sites, including ATK, Femjoy, Karups, MetArt, Twistys and others but the Nubiles content is 100% exclusive. Girls often look younger on Nubiles, even when they were shot later than other sites. This, I believe, is mainly due to subtle makeup and lighting since Nubiles deplores and discourages things like pigtails or holding teddy bears.
You would need to study the tour very carefully, however, to reveal what are the greatest frustrations of the site for me. It has a very strong emphasis on toys and masturbation; and it is geared towards video rather than photos even though it takes a standard 4 solo photo sets and 4 solo videos per model. gg or bg is on top of that.
The webmaster makes his comprehensive instructions to photographers available in the tour. There are some contradictions and ambiguities in it and clarifying those would help the site and its members. Here are a few quotes:
"Videos are just important as pictures." [sic]
"video is more important to members then pictures." [sic]
"At least half of the sets should be fingering and finger masturbation without toys."
"Our favorite content is when a girl plays with toys."
"The best theme is just masturbation and toys, and I dont expect other themes but here are a few ideas." [sic]
"Members do not like toys as they often get in the way of seeing what she is doing down there. Do not give me 4 sets of all toys! "
"No more then 2 sets with toys. Focus on finger masturbation." [sic]
I have joined the site many times (despite my loathing of toys and masturbation content). Using its excellent search feature confirms that the toys and masturbation bias has increased over the past year. I deplore this but some might enjoy it. For me, toys and fingers both get in the way. I wish the webmaster would clarify his intention and ensure that it is clearly described in his instructions to photographers.
The photo sets are genuine photos, not vidcaps. But the webmaster requires that they should mirror the videos. This tends to result in each photo set rather closely being a kind of rehearsal for the video, with less spontaneity and engagement. They are often less well lit, colour balanced and focused than the videos and frequently less good than the same model's photo content on other sites.
I think it would improve the site's content if photos could be freed of the constraint to match the videos. Why not have the toys and masturbation in the videos, where they add interest, and keep them out of the photos, in which they are mainly an obstruction to the view and always look unnatural? That said, the site does have some excellent photo sets too, and some girls have all their photo sets free of toys and even of masturbation. But they are not the norm.
The videos are almost invariably better than elsewhere. Video is technically excellent. 1280x720 wmv is very sharp to view and well lit.
I mentioned the search feature. It is superb. You can search on 15 Attributes (inc boobs, pussy etc), 15 Outfits (inc lingerie, glasses etc), 9 Actions (inc toys, hardcore) and Actions can EXCLUDE too, so I can find photo sets without toys! You can access and even run the live search feature in the tour. WYSIWYG!!!
All photo sets and videos start clothed, even if frequently this just means a bikini or bra and panties, and get fully nude partway through. None start out nude. There is some teasing but probably not enough to satisfy lingerie or tease enthusiasts. It is not a fetish site; the emphasis is on the girls and most of them are hot.
Despite its missing the mark for me, I frequently rejoin. I recommend Nubiles to anyone who enjoys quality teen content, especially if you like toys and masturbation and are aware that, though no slouch in photos or hardcore, its strength lies in its solo video.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Lots of beautiful models
- High res, high quality photos
- Contemporary, modern feel to the site
- Contemporary themes - decor, clothing etc - to the sets
- Interesting magazine section
- Good TBP price
- Frequent updates - apprx 4/week
Cons:
- Would prefer a bit more age/ethnicity variation
- No zips of highest res photos
- Most videos aren't exciting
- Most videos have music track with no live sound
- Regional pricing
- Dictates username and password; times out quickly
- Search is very basic, just the set name; no filtering etc
Bottom Line:
W4B has been on my list for a while - I've always liked their cover shots, being a bit glam/arty/sexy - and the TBP price made it too hard to resist - it has a regional pricing discrepancy, but at 50% off I figured it was churlish to avoid it on principle.
The first thing you notice is that the site design is very clean, modern, contemporary; like some of the more arty sites around etc Joymii etc; it makes you feel a little less sordid about browsing online porn and, although admittedly I passed that hurdle some time ago, it's still nice to use an attractive site.
There are the usual listings available; namely:
* Models - approx 300
* Photos - approx 1000
* Casting - about 100 more photo sets, but very plain with no scene
* Videos - approx 200
Given that the site is a reasonable size, it's a shame there's no other browsing modes; it would be good to search sets by theme, or models by age, figure, etc... but it's just about manageable.
The models are all very attractive, and natural - there are few, if any, fake boobs here. It is, however, almost exclusively an East European site, with the large majority of models being Czech - but it is what it is so although I'd like to see a bit more variation, it's not really a complaint as such. Each model has some basic stats, links to their galleries, and some of the more popular ones have bios. There are lots of popular and well-known models there, including Ariel, Tess, Caprice, Melisa - but plenty more new to me.
Each picture set consist of about 70 pictures, and are available in 1K, 2K and 5K. As others have noted, there are no zips available for the max 5K size - however, I don't see why they bother with the restriction since it is extremely trivial - 2 or 3 clicks - to fetch the full 5K set with a manager like DownThemAll. Some of he pictures don't actually warrant that resolution; but many do and are generally very sharp.
The material itself is a bit more glam, a bit more raunchy, than you'd see the same models doing at eg Met Art; partly in the level of explicitness with plenty of close up shots and some sex toys; and partly just in the attitude of the model. This is what tempted me to join; and although I still feel the same, I think they very much choose the best shots for the cover - I was expecting a bit more glam-fetishy, like some of the milder material at Juliland, but some of the sets are are a bit too drawn out (I'm actually a big fan of the 25-pic sets at Juliland; there's no filler). And I'll echo tangub's suggestion that all the clothes usually come off a bit too soon; would be good to have a bit more teasing. But these are still fun, sexy sets, with a bit more character than some other art-nude sites - featuring lingerie, and some unusual indoor and outdoor locations (some very public!) Most of the newer sets have an accompanying BTS videos, which are interesting.
Videos I found less inspiring; including general pouting, and some more explicit with masturbation - but they tend to be short, 5-6 minutes, and mostly have a soundtrack all the way through, with no actual sound; there is some clever, arty editing in some of them, but although I like that sort of thing, it's a bit style-over-substance - there's a reason we are watching this stuff, after all, and I found I kept fairly few compared to the photos.
The other part of the site is an aspiring-to-playboy-type magazine area; consisting of articles in categories such as other porn stars/sites, erotic art & photography, and luxury life such as cars, boats and the like. I actually think this is quite a nice feature; it lends to the classiness of the site ('I only get it for the articles, really') and I found some good links and material there. Some may dismiss it as filler, but I think it's good to see a site adding a little extra value.
Overall this is a good, solid site, and although not quite as different/unique as I'd hoped, and left me a little cold, it's still hard to fault - especially for $15 (or a bit more). If you like this kind of site, and if what you see on the tour (pictures-wise, at least) appeals to you, it's recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Alot of content.
-Videos look good. No true high def but still nice.
-Tig Ole Bitties Everywhere!
-Alot of girls you cant see much of elsewhere
-Several download options.
-Quick site navigation
-Good site design.
-Supports DL manager
-No DL limits
-Regular updates
-Fast downloads
Cons:
-Updates are regular but you dont get much idea whats coming up.
-Alot of newer content IMO is not as good as it once was. (HUGE down for me)
-Not alot of known girls. Both a good thing and bad thing.
-Many recent girls are below my porn standards
Bottom Line:
KEEP IN MIND THIS REVIEW IS VERY SUPJECTIVE!
I was a member of Score for over a year from June 2010 to July 2011 or so. This was my first visit back since then, and I was extremely disappointed. Dont get me wrong, there was a good bit of decent content avaiable, but most of the girls Score has shot over the last year seem below what I look for. Socre has always shot some heavier girls, which is fine with me usually, but lately, alot of the heavier and older models they shoot arent that good looking IMO. I found myself watching previews to see if the vids were worth downloading...and many werent after watching those previews.
Long story short....Score has gone downhill IMO. Ive heard others say similar things, but thought Id give it a chance because I wanted to see Eva Notty's content (which is very good). But this time, my stay ends after a month, and I doubt Ill join again anytime soon.
Dont get me wrong...Im sure alot of guys will like some of the stuff I dont. And I wouldnt consider my money completely wasted on them....but given what else is offered for the same price around the internet....Im not sure its worth more than a month anymore...to guys like me anyway. Other sites offer more frequent updates with hotter women at the same price.
SCORE IMO just isnt the same anymore...at least by my taste. The site in general is probably in the range of a 70-80 overall score, but the 69 is in terms of over the last year, which I think is pretty mediocre for them.
Bottom line...check it out if you like big tits. You may like some of the stuff I didnt. If you are anything like me though, you probably wont stay longer than one month.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge selection of models doing just about anything a guy could want. Excellent navigation. You can set favorites and leave feedback, which influences the scores models get. Many outstanding models. Good mix of photos and videos. Also a good mix of body shots and close ups. Probably one of the best all-teen sites around.
Cons:
Not much in the way of cons. Maybe a few more outdoor sets. Maybe a few more two-girl three-ways...
Bottom Line:
Bottom line? There is something for just about everyone here. Well worth a visit. Although this is a teen site, there is a decent variety of shapes and sizes and a good mix of solo, guy/girl and girl/girl sets. The set locations themselves are basic but not distracting. This isn't glam stuff, but the girls are nicely done-up. Some of the girls you will recognize as they are popular models elsewhere but there are a few exclusives and a few really show their best stuff here. (Just look up Zoey, Malena or a girl named Ebbi and you will see what I mean.) Navigation is great and there doesn't seem to be any really poor images or videos. The site sorts models by popularity (score) but politely stops in that category at about 9 for the benefit of the models. It also sorts by update date and model name. Note that many of the models have different names here than they do on other sites so you have to sift through them if you are looking for anyone in particular. One nice touch is that on most model's pages, there are a few large images, nude and non-nude wallpaper images and collections across all sets titled "ass". "boobs", "legs" and "close-ups". I have been a member here several times over the years and the quality has been consistent on each visit, perhaps a little better this last time. Overall, very good general teen site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
§ Sexy,Erotic,Titillating themes,Passionate Stories
§ Low Membership Price,Large Bonus Site Access
§ Login,Ease of Access,Stable Site Design,Quality
§ Movie Stream Option is fast,steady & reliable
§ Multiple Movie Formats-Fair HD,WMV,MKV,IPod,Mobile
§ Excellent Membership Option - 3M/6M/12M Discounted
§ Fast/ Access/Response by Customer/Tech Support
Cons:
§ Older videos not HD & latest not real HD Formats
§ Erratic/Unpredictable Update Schedule,No support
§ Streaming in Non-HD,poor quality in full screen
§ Model/s quality is abysmal,new faces are absent
§ 90% Bonus Sites Non-Updating;Discontinued Sites
§ Reduced Footage/Bad Story lines/Quality Suffers
§ Comments section untutored,clutter, death match
Bottom Line:
TM started out as an excellent site over 3 years ago but with all that's happened,it's hard to say what went wrong! When sites start to compromise on one thing, it affects other things & leads to an overall disaster in the offerings.This is true for many but it's a site worth trying out if you like fetish & bizarre themes. However be warned as bonus scenes are with themes like Anal, Solo, Masturbation, Toys. The themes are strongly European though but the site is taking a beating. Go for it if you wish to see some cheap thrills!
Only the older content scores
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
[+] HQ Pictures
[+] HD Videos
[+] Good Photo Shoot Quality
[+] Nice Models/Newest Girls
[+] Growing Content since 2001
Cons:
[-] High Price
[-] No Hardcore
[-] Navigation/Design Could Improve
Bottom Line:
INTRODUCTION
In the Crack is all about capturing, both on videos and pictures, some of the hottest models most intimate body parts. This website focuses on softcore from striptease to solo masturbation with both pussy and anal insertion.
MODELS
[+] The good about In the Crack is the models and how sexy they can be on camera. Whether you enjoy them on videos or pictures, the girls are pretty, sexy, gorgeous and know how to flex their body in the sexiest positions you'll ever see. They also perform solo masturbation after they gave you a teasing striptease.
CONTENT
[+] There is an update every 3 days or so and it goes back to 2001 so the archive contains almost 700 scenes of 60 minutes each. The girl usually stripteases gradually until she gets completely naked after which she masturbates with dildos and sex toys both vaginal and anal. There are no hardcore scenes as the website focuses on softcore only with some lesbian scenes. The action takes place both inside and outside with nice and luxurious sets.
[-] There is hardcore sex at all. The content type is limited with softcore, masturbation and female lesbianism. It may also feels redundant after a while...
VIDEOS
[+] Each scene is downloadable in different quality formats including a HD version up to 1920x1080. One scene is about 60 minutes which is good for a solo performance.
[-] There is no streaming option so you have to download a scene entirely as you can't download individual parts of the video.
PICTURES
[+] Each gallery has over 150 high quality pictures offered in both small and large sets via thumbnails clicking or .ZIP sets. The shots are very good and professional.
NAVIGATION/DESIGN
[+] It is simple and user friendly. One can't really get lost in it as it is very basic. The website is fast as well as the download speed. You can browse the models database using a powerful search tools with filters such as their age, nationality or the shooting location. You also get a sneak preview of the next updates.
[-] The design could improve a little although it is clean a new template could not hurt considering that they've been using the same design for a very long time.
PRICE/ACCESSIBILITY
[-] Unfortunately, In the Crack is too expensive for what it offers. There is only membership option at $35/month. You get no special offers or bonuses or even rewards such as discounts for loyalty.
CONCLUSION
Despite all the pros, there are some cons that may harm In the Crack's potential. The content is very good for what it is meant to deliver, the models list is impressing and the quality is very good but the lack of variety and hardcore sex might get you bored after a while unless you are a softcore fan and don't really care about hardcore. The price is kind of high for what it gives.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Attractive, mostly natural models
- Good mix of US/European models, broad-ish age range
- Clean, modern design
- Videos and photos come in matching updates
- Consistent updates - 2 photosets + 2 videos per week
- Modern, tasteful, interior locations
- Atmospheric, well lit and creatively shot videos
- Some cute interviews
- At least as yet, no anal material (could be a con for some)
- 4 sizes of pictures, up to 5K+
- Quality improving
Cons:
- Needs better filtering options
- Regional pricing
- Would like to see a few asian/ethnic models
- Some fake boobs
- Site too AJAXy - a bit glitchy with back etc
- Volume resets to max for each video
- Picture sets lose something that the videos have
- Video is 720; some folk may want 1080
Bottom Line:
This site is a bit of a departure for me - I'm usually into softcore photography but every so often I have a hankering for a bit more action. However, I prefer something a little more... arty is the wrong word, because we're still talking about smut here - but perhaps balanced. There are a few of these contemporary, tasteful (again, previous comment applies) sites around now, such as X Art - I went for Joymii since at least to me it somehow seemed to have a bit more character, and focused less on the 18-21 models, I prefer a broader range.
A roundup of the content: this is hardcore/midcore content; a mixture of solo, GG and GB scenes. Each scene has one movie update - generally about 10 minutes, available in a few formats up to 720p - and one photo update, consisting approx 50-70 pics, a good online viewer and 4 sizes of zips up to 5K or so. Updates come fairly consistently at about 2 pairs per week, and there are approx 150 of each, featuring perhaps 70 models. The models are both US and European, with many popular girls - the former including Holly Michaels, Marie Macray, Dani Daniels, Shyla Jennings, Karlie Montana, Celeste Star (a favourite); the latter including Caprice, Eufrat, Ariel, Connie (Josephine here, another favourite).
The site itself is generally good - although note it has regional pricing; $20=£20 does not compute. It's odd since sister site Femjoy doesn't seem to; either way, I was somehow able to circumvent that - I have no idea how! The form just suddenly decided to offer me the $ price. Once joined up, the site has a clean, contemporary design; which actually hides a few shortcomings. It's a bit too AJAX-heavy (pages which change without the actual URL changing), which leads to glitchy back button behaviour and the like. Links time out so if you have a page open for a while you need to refresh for the download link to work. The filtering is also quite lacking; the only real choices being 'Popular' and '2-3 some' - the latter including B/G and G/G material, which for some folk is quite a big distinction; it could do with a few more options there.
What sets this site apart, though, is the quality of the videos. Although they don't go up to 1080p, they are really sharp; but over and above that, they are just so well done. Gone are the gaudy colours of most porn; these are well lit, bright, but muted and subtle. The videos usually start off with a little music; it's fairly unobtrusive and fades out after a few minutes. The camera angles are often creative and interesting; lending a bit more context to the scene; showing closeups where necessary - but not necessarily of the obvious bits, but better for it!
The locations too are good - I don't mean to come across all metrosexual, but I find the interiors (not *those* interiors) in most porn really offputting; all those chintzy bedspreads, or faux-deluxe regency-type interiors... here we have bright, spacious rooms, nice contemporary furniture, lots of natural light. And similarly, although the models tend to be naked more often than not, where they do undress the clothes are nice, casual and flattering - nothing tacky or faux-glam.
None of which gets in the way of the explicitness - there's plenty to see, but the hardcore is done to make both partners seem to genuinely equally enjoy it; if you had a likeminded partner, this is something that's easily couples-friendly to watch. And on top of all that, they seem to be getting better at it; the newer videos have more character, and although they still use toys, they are relying less on them than the earlier videos.
On the other hand, the photos, although I can't quite put my finger on it, are missing something. Technically they are good - the same locations, models etc, sharp pictures, well-lit and high resolution. But somehow they don't have the same atmosphere; they don't have the same creative angles, selective focus and closeups that the videos do. For instance, I like a bit of context, something that helps put myself in the scene - in one video the model is masturbating while on a steamy phone call, it's very exciting; the corresponding picture set features the same model, outfit, location; but no phone, and mainly just posing for the camera. The photos are obviously shot separately from the videos; I just feel they could could bring a bit more to them. But again, they are technically good and I found plenty to keep.
This, then, is an easy one to score, agreeing with both TBP and the previous reviewers; although let down on a few small fronts, I really like the content, and I may well be a convert to the genre. Suspect I shall find myself at Orgasms.xxx sometime soon!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- exclusive content
- (very) good looking models
- regular updates
- each pictures set has its corresponding movie
- crystal-clear HD vids (WMV / MOV)
- handheld encodes
- up to 5MP pictures in excellent quality
Cons:
- navigation could be improved
- models "bios" are lacking real portraits and a proper index
Bottom Line:
joymii is one of the first attempts at making a X-Art look-a-like alternative, by the makers of Femjoy.
What is it, in a few words ? Hardcore done in an artistic, intimate way. Read : no closeups in your face all the time, no constant speak...
So let's get to the point : is it a success ?
Almost.
Don't get me wrong, this is a very good site with very few flaws.
The main drawback is : as of today, it is yet another X-Art site, nothing more, nothing less.
So if you like the aforementioned site, then you will most likely enjoy this one.
The other "issue", for me, is the navigation. It is quite complete yet sketchy. You can't :
- filter the updates per month, year
- easily find a model without browsing all of them
What are the differences from its main competitor you'd ask ?
It's a pro site, content-speaking (not that X-Art isn't, far from that) but the atmosphere seems rather dull in comparison and the setting is often "dry".
Of course not everyone looks for that kind of ambiance, so you might enjoy this one better in the end.
It's also a pro site, design-speaking. And there, it surpasses its main competitor with few more features, like a more evolved rating system.
In the end, is it worth your money ?
If you like what you see as a guest on the site, then yes, you'll like what's inside as the only thing lacking is the download feature.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Let's face it, Mistress T's just looks classy. Everything about her and her sight is just top notch. The site layout has an almost Victorian look to it, but Mistress T herself is a very contemporary, modern woman.
The video quality is just okay. It is clear that she is doing a homemade production here, but this in no way detracts from the quality of the content. The real selling point here are these videos. She is very good at providing accurate descriptions with tags such as forced blowjob, forced bi, cuckolding, etc. It's not too hard to navigate through these and there are search capabilities.
The videos themselves vary, which is also a major selling point. Mistress T likes to roleplay, so you get a lot of solo videos of her playing various roles, such as your step-mom or sister, telling you what to do and how to do it. Other videos include subs and cucks, and she proceeds to put them through their paces.
On top of everything else, Mistress T is pretty damn hot!
Cons:
Slooooow downloads. Less than 1mb/sec, usually 800k/sec for me. You're probably going to want to use a download manager, which I have had no problems with on her sight.
You have to pay extra for unlimited downloads, otherwise you are limited. Though I don't necessarily agree with these practices, I also understand it may be an issue of limiting the load their server has to deal with. Just be aware of this when you sign up.
Could use more guest appearances. It is primarily Mistress T you are coming to see, sure, but occasionally she does pull in a transsexual or a second or third male. It would be nice to see her bring in some more women from time to time, or even dominate some women.
Bottom Line:
As far as fetish cites go Mistress T is certainly raising the bar not only for solo artists like herself, but for larger production companies like Kink.com too.
There is a much more personal connection with the performers in sites like this. Within a few days you get to know MT very well, and every time she tells you to eat your own cum, you get a little closer to doing it.
Whether you are just looking for some really good kink, or perhaps you need a pseudo-dom in your life, then Mistress T's site is definitely something you want to check out. Aside from the slow download speeds, there really isn't much to complain about here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I have been in this website for more than a month and have found the videos to be of high quality. The models are quite hot and their moves will get you hard in no time. Amazing amateur video collections, which will never let you bore for a single second.
Cons:
It would have been great, if there was a scope of more videos there. Even a better way of knowing the arrival of new videos, as they were uploaded on the site, would have been great.
Bottom Line:
A thumbs up for the collection that they have, hoping to get more in the future.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Access to the Teen Mega World network.
-Low membership price of $20/month with PU discount.
-Large number of attractive models.
-The models speak in Russian or similar language, but there are subtitles to show what they are saying.
_No DRM.
-Easy site login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-Update rate: 1 video and 1 photoset weekly.
-Good download speeds. I get around 1.34 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Good site design. There is a listing of all the site models, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the model looks like. And there is a listing of all the videos of that model at the network. By clicking on the image for any video of that model, you bring up the video itself, without having to re-enter your login information. So the models and videos of each model are integrated, and you don't have to search each network site separately.
-Zip files for photosets.
Cons:
The cons are minor.
-The zip files for photosets only have one size-quality. Can not choose between low, medium and high quality photos.
-In some of the early videos at this site, the stunt cock gives a massage that is completely amateurish. The stunt cock is supposedly a real
masseur, and his performance as a masseur is just unbelievable.
-The script/sex action is basically the same foe each video. It would be nice if there was some variety in the action.
Bottom Line:
-Site statistics:
-Videos:
-92 videos.
-Video runtime about 25 - 35 minutes.
-High quality file size about 900MB - 1.2GB.
-Photos:
-92 matching photosets-one for each video shoot.
-The photosets are screenshots of each video shoot.
The photosets can be used to show what the model looks like, and what the action of the video will show. But there is no erotic value to the photos, in comparison to a photo site like Metart or MPL Studios.
The theme of the site is a stunt cock giving a professional massage to a teenage girl. And during the massage, because the masseur is so expert, the girl becomes aroused and the stunt cock has sex with the girl.
The videos are professionally shot. The videos are shot inside a room, which gives good control over the lighting and sound. So the lighting is good, there are no random noises intruding on the soundtrack. The model is in focus, not a lot of blurry images. The camera-work shows the sexual action clearly.
This site is an excellent addition to the Teen Mega World network. Over the past year, since my last review, they have added 52 videos, which averages out to 1 video per week. So the site is definitely growing. And some of the girls are not just attractive, but really cute.
I gave this site a score of 67 last year, because I couldn't stand the acting and arrogance of one of their main stunt cocks. But reviewing the site this time, the site has grown so much, and that particular stunt cock has improved his acting/massage skills, that I am giving the site a score of 91 this time. Not only is that stunt cock less annoying, but they are also using new stunt cocks. And some of the girls are just yummy.
The site score reflects the value of this site, but also reflects having access to the Teen Mega World network. In my opinion, the Teen Mega World network is one of the best networks for hardcore teen videos, because of the large number of attractive models, good quality videos, good site design, good download speeds, and low membership price (using the PU discount).
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ GREAT content if watching girls get banged by huge dicks is your cup of tea
+ girls are extremly sexy and seem to enjoy the scenes
+ lots of scenes
+ user friendly
+ membership comes with various sites like cuckold sessions / watching my mom go black / watching my daughter go black / gloryhole sessions / blacks on blondes / blacks on cougars / candy monroe / spring thomas / ruth blackwell, etc...
Cons:
- older vids offer poor video quality
- the cuckhold site would be better, in my opinion, if there were more pussy eating and creampie eating
Bottom Line:
All in all this was a terrific web site. I enjoyed most of it's content. New content comes with a great quality. Older vids are somewhat meh as in image quality but the content is always great. It comes with tons of sites, most of them being worth a few downloads. In a month you won't have the time to see everything you wish you could have. I loved this site and will try it again. =)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The models are for the most part, stunning.
A few of the models, like Rio Fujisaki, and Kasumi Risa can also be found on various hardcore sites, but most of the models, I haven't seen elsewhere.
-Picture and video quality is very good. Not super high resolution, but clear and crisp. (video 1280x720 and pictures 1280x852)
-Photo sets can be downloaded as a zip file, although they tend to be small sets, with only 15-25 photos in each.
-updates come regularly, Monday, Wednesday and Friday, usually with 2 photo sets and 1 video.
-Price is OK. Not a bargain, at ￥1,980 (about US$24), but not over the top either.
-Cancelling membership was no problem, just took a couple of mouse clicks. I see a couple of previous comments here about having problems with cancelling, so I assume that the website has since changed things to make it easier on that front.
Cons:
Unfortunately there is quite a substantial list.
-Navigation is shocking, with no search feature. You basically have to go methodically through each section to find what you like.
-No model index. Models will have content scattered about the site in little groups, with nothing linking them.
-There is a points system where a certain amount of content is available straight away, then more if you stay 6 months, and more again,(but only photos, from what I can make out), after 1 year.
-When you cancel, you are cut off immediately, so you will need to remember exactly when to cancel.
-No streaming videos, and can only be downloaded in one size and format. (WMV's of about 150mb, for a 5 minutes long video)
Bottom Line:
Personally, I would love to be able to give this website a much higher score. It was like a breath of fresh air after too many sites that all start to look the same. I love the high quality softcore, (and it is definitely no more than softcore)videos. I don't really do photos myself, but the ones I looked at looked like similar quality.
It's not a huge site, but I'd take quality over quantity any day. New content trickles in at a steady pace.
I hate the idea of a points system, but having said that, I have done something that I usually never do. After my initial one month, I actually have joined up again with the intention of staying 6 months so I can get the next lot of content. There is no way I will be sticking it out for 1 year though, that would require far too much dedication, as there only seems to be photos at the end of that.
Being a Japanese site, there is of course the issue of their censorship laws, although this site, being very softcore, doesn't focus a lot on the genitals anyway, and it is quite subtly blurred , as opposed to the big square mosaic blocks you get sometimes. Plus, they will show a lot of pubes before the blurring kicks in.
Losing access to the site the instant you cancel your membership, is in my view, a very poor practice, if you pay for a certain amount of time, you should get access for that full time, regardless of whether you have cancelled it's re-billing or not. The only reason I can see for them to do that is they must expect some people to forget to cancel on time, and the automatic re-billing kicks in. Then if you cancelled the next day, you instantly lose access to the site!
The tour page show a fair representation of what is on the inside, so if you like what you see there, the site might be worth a shot. One thing I can guarantee though: you will get frustrated by the layout of the site, with it's poor navigation, and content that you can't access.
So, finally to sum it all up in a few words:
Content, superb.
Website, crap.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Excellent quality and HD
Massive content .
Awesome interface and navigation.
Cons:
Scenes are similar and same consistency.
Looks like many scenes at the same places.
Lots of close ups, ( too many my opinion )
Bottom Line:
Knowing there was a more recent review I tried to think of a better approach then saying the obvious
and repeat what was just said three weeks ago.
I agree with the previous review, therefore I will
share my experience.
Good.
The site is an amazing experience, it is easy to use and navigation is simple and intuitive.
The quality is awesome and brings out incredible details.
The site download speed was good and no problems with my downloads at all. Picture quality was equally impressive with great details and contours were clear.
This site sets a great example of simplicity and ease and invites the user to surf without feeling like your chopping branches through the jungle to get the the fruit. This site is about ease of use and providing a great experience.
The bad:
I found the site repetitive and for myself why the site is amazing the scenes were after awhile same ole same ole. Now some may not agree, this was my "own" experience. I also did not like the place of scenes often seemed to be around the same places. There is not allot to say wrong about this site. To be far many sites are the same in content. I this being the site is based on a niche makes it seem more so.
Hard to compete with such and awesome review before this one. So I chose more personal review input.
CT Take:
Join for sure, it is worth the money and time and after this you will wish other sites ran like this one.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
