Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Entirely exclusive british softcore "porn" - but with masturbation.
A pretty rare mix of wellknown uk-models and totally amateurs.
Dirty talk in most videos - with british accents, of course.
Ok amount of videos - right now it's: 379
The newer videos and photosets are what most PUs will consider: Fine/ok - even crisp
For Michelle Thorne-fans this is just a great site - she has a LOT of videos and photosets.
One fine bonus-site: Pantyhosed4u.com
One other bonus site - not worth anything.
Old time lingerie - if you like that.
Cons:
The navigation here is almost a bummer - even if there is a search-machine and a model base.
But no way to search for "only videos" or "only photosets.
Price a bit high.
Updates come only once a week - BUT it now includes both videos and photosets.
Too many of the better looking girls have only photosets.
Very broad variation i model-quality/goodlooking - too many on the ordinary site.
A bit slow download.
Only solo stuff (apart from ONE video with bj) - well, only found one after browsing for weeks.
Bottom Line:
Joined the site because I found some stuff from it with Michelle Thorn and Linda Leigh - great britts - and both damn sexy.
The style here is - like the name indicates: Vintage.
That means that the models are all in lingerie from the 50's, 60's and 70's - and some is really outstanding.
The videos are now up to almost 380 - BUT it's only half of that amout that count to something - in viewing quality.
The newer videos are: 1024x760 - older ones goes down to: 640x480 and even 320x240.
All in WMV only.
The photosets are the same. New ones: 1600x1071 - older ones: not worth it.
But the main deal - apart from the outfit (lingerie) is the style in the videos. They are just dirty - for the solo kinds.
Most models does a fine dirty-talk - in a natural way - and in a way I ALMOST never see in US- solovideos.
If it was not for this dirty-talk, my score here would be quite a bit lower.
But listening to Michelle Thorne or even one video with Lucy Zara telling how horny she is and want to get fucked is worth it all.
Alas there are a little too many of the models that looks quite ordinary (not GOOD looking) - BUT still: even some of these girls end up being very sexy in their performance.
And the fact that they only have photosets of Linda leigh and Misty McCain is a bummer - so even if I'm probably not comming back - I can recommend a months membership - AND it looks like the site is growing - and new models are comming in, so who knows - maybe I'll try it again in six months or a year or so...
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ZIP downloads of both 800 and 1600px versions of the galleries offered
+A lot of models
+Star directory with headshots
+There is a model search but it is only accessed on the model directory page
+They have all the picture sets categorized by model, yes, but they also categorize them by magazine issue, going all the way back to their 2001 series.
+Good mix of American and Non-American models
+All updates are archived back to 2004, retaining their addition date (however that date is not displayed on the actual page for the update)
+A little fun addition - feet around the office. A few feet pics every couple of days. This is a leg/feet site.
+Downloads work with download managers
Cons:
-A good portion of the galleries are small...very small
-All images watermarked
-All videos watermarked
-Because LegSex has been around for a while (in magazine form, not so much for the website) they feature girls before their prime, and as such the girls use very old aliases (or other unknown ones). Maxxx=Brooke Stone, Scotti Andrews=Clare, Sheila Rossi=Tina.
-Most models are one-and-done, meaning only one update.
-They have movies, but they are so hard to find. You click the section titled "Move it!". Nope, its not called "videos" or "movies"..."Move it!"
-Downloads have generic file names (scene.wmv, 1600.zip)
-Videos offered only in WMV
-Solo content outnumbers hardcore content by a wide margin
-Update schedule stinks...2-3 updates per week, most are just image updates, not many video updates
-The tour page looks better than the actual members page.
Bottom Line:
Just another porn site...put it that way. Not enough is offered to put it in the same league as DDF Productions' HotLegsAndFeet.
There are some old models on here who I certainly like and were looking for (Sheila aka Tina, Brooke aka Maxxx, Scotti aka Clare, etc.) but the site does not offer much OF THEM. It is one gallery here, one gallery there...and all the galleries are 20 pictures, standard. I think the pictorals are more, but there aren't many pictorals...most galleries are just the pics which were featured in their magazine, in other words, 20 pictures :P.
It says a lot when the TOUR page looks better than the MEMBERS page. The TOUR model directory looks so much better than the MEMBERS model directory.
It also is a pain in the neck that everything is so hard to find. I spend quite some time looking for the movies, briefly going so far as just assuming there were none. Everything is not named properly...Videos section is called "Move it", pictorals are called "Pic-toe-rals". Quit the fancy and just stick with what works.
If you want a Legs and Feet site, stick with HotLegsAndFeet from DDF Productions...its a hell of a lot better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons:
Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line:
If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Mix of asian and non asian models in pantyhose and lingerie
- A terrific, albeit small sight that really 'gets' the slow striptease.
-Also a small collection of videos, mostly of slow stripping.
- Clothing and posing are the strong suites of this sight. The women pose erotically IN THEIR CLOTHES - than continue through each phase of undress -
- Host AkirsLane is very friendly. There is also a forum with free previews.
-Also includes some mild bondage pics.
- Each model has from one to a max of about five photo sets. Each set has about 50-75 picutres.
- Good mix of models and body types with light and dark asians, and cute American girls. Also some more mature women.
-Akira Lane, a voluptuous Asian women with nice round hips is featured in dozens of photo sets and
videos herself.
Only 21.95
Cons:
-Quantity is pretty limited with only about 100 or so models, about half of which are asian.
- This is a softcore sight. Some masterbation, but no sex shots
- Most of the clothing is sexy but some may find some of the sets cheesy. For instance, Akira dressed like a stewardess.
No bonus or additional content
Bottom Line:
I made it through the first 45 years of my life without ever craving Asian girls, however on a trip to Las Vegas one year I noticed a bunch of sexy well dressed Asian girls and came back with "yellow fever". As I explored Asian porn sights I found most were pretty hard core.
This off the beaten path sight is one of the few that I have joined more than once. I like it as it takes beautiful asian women, dresses them in classy clothing and slowly strips them. On the way there are a generous number of pantyhose and sexy undergarment shots.
There is a decent amount of content, I counted 120 models, but not enough to last more than a week or so for a hungry downloader.
The videos are similar to the photos with slow striptease being the forte.
Some of the most beautiful asian ladies are to be found here. Both lighter skin Japaneese typss and darker skinned south Asians, Hawaiins etc. Some models may be familiar to those who frequent Asian sights -Mika Tan, Sanny Aung etc.
Of the non Asians, some are familiar faces like Kordelia Devonshire, and there is a good mix of different types here also.
If you like pantyhose and Asians and are seeking a sight that delivers in a very understated erotic way, I highly recommend it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some models have really pretty feet and no how to pose them.
Cons:
Lighting in most cases is extremely poor. One set had a model with gorgeous feet, but most of the shots were made with the sliding door in the background. The light streaming in completely silouhetted the subject. Terrible.
When shooting, the photographer is constantly leaving the feet OUT of the frame! Very frustrating. Your following the models feet. She's posing them really well, you're ready to pop, and GOODBYE, there out of the frame. Start over.
Bottom Line:
Save your money until the photographer gets his lighting and subject down. Hello? FOOT Factory?! I go elsewhere for T and A.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Many, many beautiful women
+No toys and almost no “messy” stuff with food or bath goop
+Intuitive interface
+Fast downloads, sometimes over 2Mbps
+Can preview the content of upcoming 3-4 updates on each site
+Earned or purchased ” FastTracks” allow full access to galleries or videos of your choosing ahead of their posting schedule
+VOLUMES of all-exclusive content available now, plus several hundreds of updates yet to be posted (Coming soon --> select “View all sets available for FastTrack”)
+Very user-friendly site/network. You get 10 free “FastTracks” in a calendar month (whole network, not per site); set several viewing and browsing preferences; and go from one site in the network to another with ease once your use/passes are stored in your browser.
+Photos from the past couple of years come in three sizes: 1066, 2048, and 3000 pixels.
+Consistently good lighting and clarity in photos from Jan. 2007 on.
+No DRM
+Model pages list other sites, outside the network, she appears in
Cons:
-Occasional slow navigation and sudden timeouts
-Thumbs with dead links (rare)
-Must train browser to auto-enter use/pass for downloads on subsequent logins (separate for pics and videos); doable with Firefox, but it’s still 18 times for everything in the network: (access + zips + vids) x 6
-Zips before Dec. 2007 require drilling through five levels of folders to get to the images folder (hold cntrl down while drilling to prevent desktop clutter).
-Some unattractive women
-Quite a few women never get fully undressed, like Gemma Massey (too bad!)
-High monthly network access price ($44.95)
-The “fast track” system is rather complicated; note expiry dates and other restrictions
-Boring videos: Only avi, 640x480, 3-6 minutes long. 40-50 per month (whole network) in 2009. (Image quality improves through the years, but it’s never nearly as good as the photos. Sound might be techno muzik, the girl talking, or just the air near the mic.)
Bottom Line:
I thought this network would be nothing but undressing to panties, if that, so I stayed away. But one day at OnlyTease, I tried their search (for visitors) and found nearly 2000 items that were at the “figure” level of nudity.
Now I’m glad that I waited -- and that I finally joined. Mind you, it’s usually the same women who do get fully naked and fun with it: Angel Dark, Elen (the blond Russian with the devilish smirk), Eve Angel, Jana D (Jamie J), Lola, Lucy Stratilova, Misa/Michaela Kaplanova, Mili Jay, Zuzana (Deny Moore), ETC. Considering the volume here, it’s been a bona fide candy store for yours truly (or “drooly,” I suppose).
Special mention goes to “Tammy” (aka Vendula). She’s the BEST.
The “Only” sites are photo sites, and the photos are DAMN good. If most models on this network showed off their asses the way Misa does, I’d be totally hooked! It would have EVERYTHING: great outfits, great stripping, and satisfying full nudity in excellent quality.
But they’d rather specialize at putting foreplay at the forefront, and this they do very well. I found myself grabbing “stripping only” sets of a few girls for whom I have “nude onlys” to combine them with. Kind of like “FemJoy and OnlyTease – together at last!” ;)
Here are some stats on the “Only” network sites: OnlyTease: started July 2002. Around Nov. 2007, began occasional 3000 px photos, which became standard in March 2008. 3 updates per day! OnlyOpaques (dark hose): started Aug. 2006; 3000 px photos most of the time from July 2007; 1 update per day OnlySecretaries: started October 2007, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlySilkAndSatin: started Nov. 2008, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day OnlyCarla: started Sept. 2005, stopped in April 2009 (lots of photosets, all it of tease-stripping) OnlyMelanie: started April 2005, stopped in Feb. 2009 (same as with Carla, but REALLY cute!)
Finally, a little more about those FastTracks. One can be obtained by recommending three sites (not previously listed) that a model is on. (Must be used by the end of the current month.)
NB: You can view the thumbs of a set before deciding to FastTrack it.
I got a few that way, thanks to my application of library and information science, Lucy Lee, Tereza Ilova, etc. in the subject index.
But remember, it’s best not to join at the beginning of a month since you get 10 for free each calendar month. That’s a nice touch!
BUT be sure to download your FastTracked stuff right away, because access to it expires at the end of the month!
You can also buy 10 “Permanent FastTracks” for $9.95. These don’t expire as long as you stay a member, but they can only be used on the site you buy them on.
AND redeeming them on the site is a hassle: find the page before the billing page, click to redeem, get authorization code ... sheesh!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Excellent quality photosets available in multiple download formats (standard, extra large, ultra large photos size).
- Very good quality videos available in multiple download formats (HD and High Resolution) as full length movies.
- ZIP downloads.
- Cool website design.
- Pretty easy navigation.
- Daily updates.
- Fast downloading.
- Large variety of models.
Cons:
- Needs Fast/Permanent Tracks for full access to some photosets/videos.
- Old photosets and videos quality is average (Standard and High resolution size).
- No bonus content.
- Expensive.
- No trial option.
Bottom Line:
I have to admit that this sites monthly membership is kinda expensive but I really think that it worths its money. The only problem that I found is that with your membership you don't have access to all photos/videos of their models as some photosets/videos need fasttracks or permanent tracks to be unlocked for view or download. With your membership you get 10 fasttracks per site and if you spent them you can buy 10 permanent tracks for 10 USD. So far from what I saw the hottest models galleries and videos can be seen or downloaded by spending fasttracks or permanent tracks and that's a big con for the site. Photosets and videos quality are great except from some old ones which have standard quality. ZIP downloads are available and videos can be downloaded as full movies. I feel that some bonus content would be cool and a trial option membership is necessary.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
So many videos, so many sites. Yes some of them get cross listed, but for the most part they are providing a lot of specific niche material. I actually think they have a pretty smart business model, charge big up front, because lets face it people are going to rip the sites in a month or so, then lessen the fees as time goes by. It's a pretty smart thing to do. Anyone balking at the price might consider this.
Basically you get a shit ton of nylon sites, which are actually really good sites even if you aren't into the fetish. They have a lot of femdom strapon stuff, some mature stuff, bisexual, and more. The newer vids are pretty good in terms of quality. There's still very little HD at this site because they just started adding some HD stuff. I know that is a peeve for some people. However, the fetish stuff their offering is pretty unique, and sometimes it has to be more about the content than the quality. Most of the models are pretty hot too.
Cons:
There is no BDSM or Cuckold stuff here for some reason. The BDSM I get, but seems like cuckold sites would be right up their alley, or his....;)
Older vids are pretty damn old. Low quality for the low bandwidth days. They get progressively better though.
Very little search and navigation capability.
Like the others have said, you have to manually log in to each site. The problem is you have to do it with a very cryptic username and password they assign to you. That's why everyone is complaining. They're too hard to remember. Type it into a doc and just cut and paste with your browser set to remember the passwords.
Bottom Line:
Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it. Let's be clear. This is a softer domination site, so if you're looking for extreme hardcore BDSM and femdom, not a good choice for you. If you are looking for nylon fetish, feminization, humiliation, men getting ass fucked by men and women, women getting as fucked by men and women,tranny sex, mature sex, masturbation, gay and bisexual sex, then this is a damn good choice.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
02-19-1112:06am (Update History) Reason: Download links now provided to pictures - see my edit notes.
Pros:
- Good photography
- Fairly unique content
- Pretty models
- Nice outfits and (obviously) great nylons
- Some good mild-fetish wear
- Many location/outdoor shoots
- Some entertaining videos
- Downloading pictures was a mildly diverting intellectual challenge
Cons:
- Arguably not much actual nudity (depends on your definition)
- Max resolution of 1200x800px; videos at 320x640
- Frequent timeouts of login
- Only one connection allowed - eg can't open a gallery while viewing a video
- No zip sets
- No video download
- No model index
- No update schedule, or dating of sets
Bottom Line:
I recently saw some pictures from Pantyhose-X - a German nylon fetish magazine (unsure whether print or only online). The few sets that I saw, I loved, and decided to seek out and join the source. I'm not sure of the details, but reading between the lines, I suspect that some change of ownership has been involved recently; pantyhose-x.com becoming nylon-x-files.com with content from the former. I also rather suspect that the changes are not for the best.
First the good.
This is obviously very nylon-oriented material - and more to the point, it's very fetishistic. By which I mean that it focuses very much on the sheerness of it; in fact in the majority of the sets, the tights don't come off at all. Some of them are gusseted and you don't see that much, other than them pulled up tight into the model's pussy; others are seamless and sheer and there are plenty of closeups of the girls masturbating through and under the nylon. The rest of the clothing is great too - from casual and businesswear, to things like corsets, high lace-up boots, PVC miniskirts etc.
The models too are pretty - not too glam or polished (maybe some peroxide), some girl-next-door types - but great figures and legs (of course!). And the photography is great - with a lot of shoots outdoors and in public places - some quite risqué stuff which is kind of exciting.
My only gripe with the content is my usual - most models are shaved, and given the nature of this style, that you get to glimpse them through the sheer nylon, I can't help feeling that even a trimmed strip or patch of hair would be something more to glimpse.
However...
Although I love the material, the presentation of it is the worst I've come across. Having emailed the webmaster to check, I knew about the resolution (it seems to have suffered in the transition, from the 1800px sets that seem to have been offered by pantyhose-x) and the lack of zips - but figured I'd give it a try.
The members area is very basic, just a list of sets with no dating, model names, or sorting/searching features for the 150 odd sets available.
**Edit** When I first wrote the review, there was no download of anything - not even individual pictures - you could only view on screen in a lightbox-type viewer, which made me mark it down heavily. But the site does now offer download links to pictures; there are still no zips, but this small change makes it easy to download a set with a manager, eg downThemAll.
The site still has issues as in the cons above, but this small change makes it seem far less mean-spirited, and is enough to bump my score from 65 to 75 - it's now recommended if you like this material (and can use a download manager!)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Content is dated.
-Because it's a small site, easy to navigate.
-The nylons the girls wear add dash of color to their costumes.
-Member pages are relatively ad free.
-Can watch videos streaming or download.
-Download speeds are good. I regularly get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Has a link to "free" live cam shows. But these are mainly a waste of time.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 25 videos.
-No regular updates. Last update was 2012-04-05. So it's more like a small archive site.
-Needs more stunt cocks. Only 3 or 4 stunt cocks featured.
-Videos can be streamed, but only one definition: no choice of high, medium or low quality.
-Videos can be downloaded, in high or medium quality. No low quality option. Also, judging from the file size of the download videos, the
quality of the "high quality" files is really more like a medium quality video at other sites. And the file size of the "medium quality" videos is more like a low quality video at other sites.
For example, a video with a run time of 15 minutes has a high quality file size of 558 MB. And the medium quality file size is 170 MB.
-Only one file size for the photos. And since the photosets are a record of the video shoot, the photos themselves have little artistic or erotic
value. But if all you want is photos of naked girls, the pics will do the job.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Photos have a medium-sized watermark on lower right side.
-No biograhical data on the models except for age. But the age given is not tied to any date or video the model appears in.
BOTTOM LINE:
-Theme is girls wearing nylons having sex.
-Small site catering to people with a fetish for nylons.
There is the normal variety of sex shown: masturbation, boy-girl vaginal and anal sex, blowjobs.
Site stats:
Videos: 25
Photosets: 25
The photosets are a record of the video shoot.
Most of the sites in the Teen Mega World network are integrated. So can search for a single model, and the results will include her appearances at all the network sites. Can also search by top rated scenes, your personal favorite scenes, type of sex scene (lesbian, anal, group, squirting, toys, etc.).
Join through the Teen Mega World site for $19.95/month, with the PU discount, which gives access to the NylonsX site.
Joining directly through the NylonsX site costs $29.95/month, and does not give you anything more than the Teen Mega World membership.
-Most valuable feature is that access to this site is included with a Teen Mega World membership. Teen Mega World, with a PU discount of 19.95/month, recurring, offers a huge network of hardcore teen videos. Many of the videos are good quality, and the network has hundreds of Eastern European teen models, many of which are very attractive.
Giving this site a score of 83. Site deserves that score because it's part of the Teen Mega World network. If the site was a standalone site, the score would be much lower, maybe 70 or less.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great Selection Of Models
- Hi-Res photos, With Zips
- Updates Daily
- 4 Video Formats (4th being HD Where Available)
- True To Fetish Concept
Cons:
- Most Videos Not Hi-Def (Yet)
- Not A Lot Of Strict Hardcore
Bottom Line:
DDF has a solid foothold in the world of website porn. OK, that was a bad joke, but it is very refreshing to see a site that defines itself by a strict genre, in this case fetish, and actually sticks to it 100%. The only fair way to review this site is through the eyes of a heels and hose/foot fetishist. And it does not disappoint. As with every DDF site, the photography is first rate, the models A list east Europeans. The emphasis on "legs and feet" is for the most part tastefully done, and oftentimes erotically subtle. Maybe a little too many "footjobs", but I guess that's obligatory. It's easy to see that the photographers and models work very well together. Everyone understands the concept of the site. The photos are 2000px, crisp and downloadable in zip files. The videos for the most part are normal size, and available in .avi, .mov, and .wmv formats. They are offering a lot of the newer videos in HD wmv, be warned, they are huge files. The site does not offer a huge amount of strict hardcore. If you do have the leg and/or foot fetish creeping around in your psyche, this site is your nirvana! Even if you don't, you'll probably like it as well. First class, professional site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons:
-- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line:
When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.
VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.
OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.
The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).
If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.
I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Nice monthly subscription price.
- Newest photosets quality is pretty cool.
- Videos available for download.
- Downloading was fast for me.
- Access to older archieves.
- Easy to navigate.
- Live cams and access to older webcam shows.
- Photosets collection is huge.
Cons:
- Older photosets quality is about average.
- You can not download photosets in ZIP format.
- There are no download options for videos or photosets.
- Website design is very simple and needs improvement.
- Not enough videos to download.
- No hardcore content.
- Videos quality could be better.
- No bonus sites access.
- Most content is not nude.
- Not sure when updates come.
- Content is not daited.
Bottom Line:
Elise Erotic is dedicated to legs and nylons.
Monthly subscription price is okay but there is no nude or hardcore content to see or download. Photosets collection is huge enough to keep you busy for a while.
Newest photosets quality is very clear but old ones need improvement. You can not download photosets in ZIP format so you will have to download them one by one spending a lot of time.
There are a few videos to download, but surely their quality needs improvement. It would be nice if they could add some more videos to their collection.
Downloading speed was fast for me but sadly there is no bonus sites access.
Website's design needs improvement and in general lines is very simple. Navigation is easy and you will not have a problem to find photo galleries or videos etc.
When you join you will get access to older photo and webcam archieves plus access to live cams.
Content is not daited and I am not sure when updates come.
If you like such content then you can try this one for a month and then decide by yourself.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Does a good job catering to ALL aspects of the
leg and foot fetish.
- Excellent video and picture quality for most of the content.
- Plenty of content overall
- Zip sets in large and small sizes
- Frequent updates.
- Wide variety of models
- Easy to use (and varied) navigation features.
- Distinctive personality touches throughout the site.
Cons:
- No network access
- Older videos and pic sets lacking a bit in quality (definitely in the minority however).
- No site interaction (forums, fellow users)
- A few major inaccuracies in the "search" functions, forcing users to use alternative methods to get to certain content.
Bottom Line:
Overall this site has to be considered one of the top two or three leg and foot fetish sites out there. The videos look great, and have that uniquely bright studio like quality that the Score Group is known for. Obviously the pics are also very good with this being a magazine related site. The content is varied nicely between solo and hardcore; with just the right amount of unpredictability and flair.
HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO SITES OF ITS KIND:
Some might compare this site negatively to a site like HotLegsandFeet. Now I have to admit I have never been a member there (HotLegsandFeet), but I think that Legsex, while not better, should be looked at a bit differently. It really depends on what you're into. HotLegsandFeet focuses almost soley on young Euro models, with heavily airbrushed styled content. Legsex OTH has a much wider variety of models in terms of both age and ethnicity. And while Legsex's content does have high production values, it doesn't come off as being overly staged; they do an excellent job walking that fine line.
I won't bother to mention any other sites in this niche, as to me most of them are not "full service". Meaning they usually will cater to only ONE aspect of the fetish,(such as pantyhose/nylons or feet alone).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site covers everything a "high heel" site should. Platforms, stilettos, hot stockings, bobby socks, you name it. There isn't a better high heel fetish site (softcore) that I've come across on the internet. There could be a better variety of models, but most of the ones they show off here are very nice on the eyes and they can't be seen anywhere else. This site also has an audio story section that is original and a lot of fun to check out, I hope they continue updating this section.
Cons:
- The pictures could be better in quality.
- Too few models to browse, but as this site matures that should improve.
- It's entirely softcore except one set where the photographer apparently has a problem "holding his own."
Bottom Line:
If you're the high heel/leg in stocking type go here and spend your money. You won't find a better selection of long legged women in all sorts of shoes, stockings and outfits. Not to mention the great colors. This is a very enjoyable website.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
* large collection
* zipped videos
* fast downloading
* exclusive content
* photos in zip format
* no drm videos protection
* 4 bonus sites access
* good price
* bonus feeds
* easy navigation
Cons:
* more videos would be nice
* old videos quality is average
* no streaming options for videos
* site design is not so good
* old photos quality is average
* more models would be good
Bottom Line:
a site dedicated to nylons!
when u join u can download lots of content, photos and videos are zipped, there is no drm videos protection and all that at a good price.
u get access to 4 other sites for free, updates are daited and its bonus feeds will make u happy!
unfortunately old photos and videos quality is average and as in the other network sites there are no streaming options for videos.
i think that site design could be better but navigation is good making things simple and easy!
its monthly price is very low if u consider that u get access to lots of content plus access to content of 4 other sites, plus content is all exclusive.
if they could add some more models and improve their design then surely would gain more members.
in general site is very good, needs some improvement but im sure that u gonna love it!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# Only Opaques is hot: a sister site of OT; now they have my money also going to them.
# photosets and models are hot; and have me looking at their sets two hours at a time.
#beautiful models that are on the full figured side and less on the skinny side
#top three softcore picture site that I've been a member of this year- I love these photosets
#not too softcore; Only Tease sister site; i joined this site because i was so taken by Only Tease.
# foot fetish, stocking fetish; boot fetish; foot worship
# updates one photoset a day
# some recent select videos are shot in HD quality
#you can earn fast tracks easily; and see future updates in advance- have not seen this anywhere else
# $19.95 for 30 days- very nice deal for softcore
#Hi rez photos are hi quality in all sizes: 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048; 2000 x 3000
# forums to give opinions; interact with models
# one of the best collection of models I've seen- top five sites for overall quality of models- they are beautiful
Cons:
# get about 8-9 videos per month; secondary to photosets
# Hd quality is not the super HD variety; and is only applied to select shoots.
# site is not huge- been shooting since August 2006
# this site is not for those who only want to see models naked though there are a few exceptions but for the most part- no.
Bottom Line:
Only Opaques is a great site for softcore lovers who lean towards pictures; and who love full figured models in tights; and in both silky and cotton panties. I also like to see beautiful women in pretty dresses; cute pumps; and cute outfits and you get a lot of that as well as well as close ups of boots; shoes; lovely busts toes and feet.
I found out about Only Opaques because I was a member of Only Tease first- and this is one of their sister sites. For one, the selection of models is great- I dont pass over models like I do other sites. I love their clothes; pretty dresses, the way they pose. Its a site for those who enjoy the way a womans body looks like in clothes; lingerie; garter belts; socks.
I'd recommend this site as a starter site for the whole series of OT sites- for under $20.
If you have read my past reviews- you'd see that i have seen a lot of hardcore; Yes, the softcore that Only Opaques offer is hot enough. and enjoyed this as much as hardcore.
Its the same shoot style as OT. But specializes in hosiery. Lots of super close ups of rear ends; big lovely bras; toes encased in silky hosiery; lovely garter belts and tights in your face; snug panties over volutuous bums; boots in your face; lovely tight skirts over vloutuous bums; nice portrait shots; tight opaque tights stretched over silk and cotton panties; some topless shoots; open leg shots in hosiery; bent over- round rear end in face shots and beautiful models.
I respect Only Opaques. The beauty of their models took my breath away and now have taken my money!!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Approx 150 video sets and 200 photo sets
+ All exclusive content
+ Zip downloads for photos
+ No DRM, no download limits
+ On the whole video quality is great, the first 100 videos are only 640x480 but look good. The last 50 are HD 720P but dont look as crisp as they should (see con)
+ Download managers supported and should be used to get good speeds (~300kbps without, ~1mbps with)
+ Latest image sets are 1500x1000 and look nice. Older sets are 1024x768 and are average
+ ~75 photos per set all focusing on anal action with pantyhose
+ Great looking Russians, some famous faces but are hard to spot due to the very unique and natural style of clothing, sets and makeup.
Cons:
- Short scenes ~15 min long each
- Large watermarks. Worse on the older 640x480 clips
- HD videos use too low a bitrate (3mbps) resulting in noticeable artifacts and graininess.
- No choice of download formats, just one full clip in wmv for each scene
- No streaming
- Photo sets are separate from the video even if they are shot at same time and obviously the same scene
- Some videos waste a lot of bandwidth on unnecessarily high bitrate audio at 320kbps.
- The site has a update log but not all content is listed. On the video and picture update pages the content is not dated making it hard to see how often the site is updated
- Very basic interface. No search, no model index, no scene description, only a single scene thumbnail, no streaming. Basically no real way to see what you get before downloading the video.
Bottom Line:
Here we have another classic example of a group of people that know how to choose the models, how to dress a set, direct the action, get the best angles, choose sexy clothing and makeup etc but have no idea how to wrap a usable website around it. I am not a massive fan of the analogy but I do feel a couple are apt when summing up this type of site which, unfortunately, I tend to see a awful lot. Would you set up shop selling a Bugatti Veyron other super cars in a dealership that looks like it used to be a McDonalds? Or design the packaging of a new all singing, all dancing smart phone to resemble a tin of Tesco value beans? In a market that is overflowing with porn it is hard to choose to stay a member of a website that makes it hard to consume its, admittedly good, content. Given a single (tiny) thumbnail and the generic model names, I have no way of knowing if I like the model or scene setup without downloading the whole scene. And when I do find a model I like I have no way of searching for more of her scenes.
Bottom line: Plenty of sites polish turds. This site wraps a diamond in a natural unpolished turd. I wouldn't mind the diamond but I am not too keen on getting my hands dirty in order to get it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Medium-big size archive
-Good video quality (not great in older videos)
-Cute girls, some classics like Cytherea, Sunrise Adams or Jewel Valmont aka Ava Vincent.
-Easy navigation (by model, by type of action, by date...)
-Different styles and types of foot action (hardcore, lesbian, solo, etc.)
-Regular updates (they really do come daily)
Cons:
-Very few download options
-Most models are just average, not ugly, not impressive
-A lot of the sets are solo action (Meet X, X self-sucking, X soles on glass, etc.)
-Best known actresses have very few sets or videos
-A bit high-priced (29.95$ a month) for this times of crisis.
Bottom Line:
I was really hoping this to be a great, great site like Hot Legs and Feet (my all time foot fetish favorite, as some people at PU may know). And it wasn't. Foot Fetish Daily is not bad, but it's not great either. It offers a good number of pics and videos, with some really hot girls like Daisy Marie or Nicole Ray, for example, but you also get a huge amount of solo sets with anonymous models whose name, face and body you probably forget the next minute.
On the pro side, Foot Fetish Daily gets you access to at least a part of the Kick Ass Video archive (the ones who make Barefoot Confidential, the longest running and most awarded foot fetish video series, if I am not mistaken).
I don't see FFD as a long membership kind of site, even if it is true that it is updated daily. Unless, that is, that you like foot fetish solo videos, which are not my cup of tea: in that case, this may be the perfect site for you...
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
For those who like to boil before they burn, there is no doubt this is the best site for leg/hose/stocking fetishists on the entire WWW.
Quantity and variety are excellent. The models are beautiful. Pic resolution is fantastic.
Cons:
A general sameness about all image sets despite the variety of models and outfits
Videos are generally a snooze. One model (a really pretty one named Nicole) actually says something along the lines of "Let's get this over with" in one of her vids; the boredom shows. Models could actually heighten the excitement of the whole thing by talking to the viewer (esp fetish talk).
Most notably: While conceding that OAS reliably serves the majority of men who prefer buxom/voluptuous models, there are precious few models for those of us who prefer the slender-but-shapely supermodel or petite types.
Needs more foot dipping, shoe-dangling, crossed legs shots. Lot of us leg fetishist prize those shots, guys.
Bottom Line:
If you go in for a real leg tease that starts subtly and works its way to a boil, there is no better site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-17-1111:07am (Update History) Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros:
Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.
Good selection of picture sets and videos.
Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.
Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.
Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.
Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!
Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons:
The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.
I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.
It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.
Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.
I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line:
A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.
I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.
They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.
The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.
It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!
If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very sexy models
- Literally loads of content
- High quality pictures and downloadable videos
- Nice feet and shoes
- Decent site design
- Easy navigation
Cons:
- A bit expensive
- Could be more 'sex' scenes
Bottom Line:
If you're into feet, legs and shoes you must see this. It has to be the highest quality foot fetish site on the web full stop.
There is loads of content to browse with all pictures and videos sorted by date or model. The quality of both pictures and videos are impressive even at full screen and can be downloaded easily. The women look fantastic, most are genuine models with perfect bodies and feet.
There is a fair amount of variety in the scenes with lesbians, couples and single models although it would be great to see a few more 'sex' scenes.
The site isn't cheap but you get what you pay for here and that's quality DDF content. Good stuff!
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Gorgeous models. Most, if not all, look to be Eastern European which I love. The content looks like it's actually been shot by someone with a foot fetish. You guys know what I mean. I've seen so much supposed foot fetish stuff where you can tell that neither the photographer nor the male performer are in to feet at all. This is absolutely not the case here. Incredible quality stuff.
Cons:
As some others have said, the site could use some more actual sex scenes, but honestly, the quality of the softcore stuff is so good that I can't imagine anyone really complaining about this.
Bottom Line:
Well worth the cash in my opinion. I've joined several ff sites over the years and this one just blew me away. One of the only sites I've ever stayed with for longer than a month.
If you don't love this site, you do NOT have a foot fetish.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Extremely large collection of pictures and videos. I mean, this site has been around forever.
- Caters to leg/nylon/high heel guys. Tons of content for leg-lovers.
-Frequent updates and new models (approximately 1-2 per week)
-High quality videos.
-The downloads come pretty fast (I don’t know much about internet server speed but I would say it is somewhere between amazon and computer support site in India)
-Nice outfits and nylons on the models.
-Good selection of shoes. Nice platforms and high heels.
-Discounts on DVD purchases from their online store.
-Steaming video and live shows (available at certain times)
-Fairly inexpensive (about $30 per month) for the amount of content.
-Navigation of the site is easy and straight forward. I like sites that allow you to go right back to the home or updates pages without having to go through 50 pages first.
-Wide variety of girls (Caucasian, Black, Asian, Hispanic…..Younger, little older…)
-Approximately one lesbian scene a month.
Cons:
-A lot of the early stuff is so so quality and content.
-No zip downloads
-50% of the girls are good looking, 10% are much less. (Remember – 40% are smoking hot)
-Way too many sets of JB himself in what he calls “POV shoots”. I am a leg man and I want to see hot girls in nylons! I just don’t want to see a guy’s junk being jacked off by an Asian chick every forth photo set.
-Many of the videos just have a girl sitting on a bed or pole dancing in pantyhose. No talking at all. I just think videos that have the girl talk to you, interact with you.
-Some of the photo sets could be larger. They range from 40 to 80 pictures in a set.
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better every day.
-No model or content search engine. I would love to be able to search for “seamless pantyhose” or “2 girls in pantyhose” on the site because of the large content.
-No rating system for pictures or videos.
Bottom Line:
-As any leg guy can tell you, JB Video is one of the oldest and often one of the first leg sites that most of us join (it was my first and I have re-joined dozens of times over the years). So in many ways I feel like I am reviewing the Eifel Tower. It is a great nylon/leg/high heel site with a monstrous collection of pictures and videos. Lots of hot girls in nylons and heels to please any leg guy. I would give it an 85 rating and say that if you love legs; you should join.
-A few suggestions:
-Too few sets with seamless pantyhose! As all us leg guys know; we search for seamless pantyhose sets like the Holy Grail.
-Too few sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. Again, super awesome but few and far between.
-One of the very few leg sites that have videos showing girls changing shoes. An excellent bonus!
-A couple of the DVDs for sale (like Sky and Summer’s Foot Tease, Foot Seduction 14 Goldie and Isabella and Foot Seduction 24 Emily and Darenzia and a couple of the other lesbian videos) are worth the price of admission alone. True masterpieces! There should be more lesbian sets like these! I love these videos because the girls are talking the whole time, talking about their legs and nylons.
-Pretty good shoe collection. Nice sets with 6 inch platforms. I would like to see a few sets with some 8 inch heels.
-Need to get rid of a lot of the “less pretty” girls.
-Way fewer of the “POV” sets of a guy getting a foot job from a girl. These aren’t very good and not very exciting.
I know a will be re-joining JB Video on a regular basis. A very solid leg site and a good value with a few kinks.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
* large collection
* multiple videos formats
* photos in zip format
* no drm videos protection
* message board,webcam shows,stories,audio clips
* fast downloading
* 4 bonus sites access
* exclusive content
* daily updates
* good price
Cons:
* sites design needs improvement
* hard to navigate
* more videos would be nice
* older photos quality is average
* no streaming options for the videos
Bottom Line:
this site is one of me favourites.
members can download photos in zip format and videos in multiple formats making downloading very easy. there is no drm videos protection.
there is a cool members message board and when u join u get access to 4 other sites for free plus u have access to webcam shows,stories and cool audio clips.
getting around is a bit confusing plus sites design needs improvement. older content quality is about average and some more videos would be good :)
this is a very good site if u like pantyhose content,needs a few improvements but still its awesome!
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
