Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 129 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Lacy Nylons

26. Lacy Nylons (0)

Pay
Active
79
messmer (137) 02-05-12  08:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Models on the average are easy on the eye. Not porn star quality but not ugly either.

Site updates videos once every eight days. Not great but mentioned under the pros because other Ferro Sites are so much worse when it comes to updating.

Picture sets appear to update every two days.

Videos since 2009 (I counted 114) have been shot in HD at 1280x720p in wmv at a total bitrate of 3320kbps. Videos before that are at 640x480p.

Picture sets can be downloaded zipped, with the individual picture weighing in around 1000x1500px.
Cons: Separate sign-ins required for pictures and videos, because the username and password are generated by Ferro and therefore very convoluted, it is an impossibly aggravating extra task to have to sign in twice to every site you receive as a bonus that also contains pictures.

The huge watermarks in the bottom right hand corner as well as in the left top corner I've remarked upon in previous previews of other Ferro sites, are present here, too, and manage greatly to add to the aggravation factor. I almost didn't bother adding this site because while the technical quality of the videos isn't too bad, they are not worth looking at with that intrusive logo staring you in the face all through the video.

Picture sets are small and not very erotic.

Download and streaming are highly erratic. My downloads started at around 1MB/s, gradually reduced to 200K/s, and then see-sawed back and forth between those two values.

No proper search engine, no model directory or bio.
Bottom Line: This is a site I was prepared to love. After all, who, over fifty, does not like to see models dressed in nylons and garter belt?

And you get plenty of that in this site. For once pantyhose was not substituted in someone's mind for stockings and they stick to the old definition when it comes to nylons.

One idiosyncrasy of this site, or maybe two:

Most models start out naked and then get slowly dressed, rather than the other way around, also very few of them wear panties but walk around commando style under their lovely dresses instead.

This anachronism is jarring to an old-timer because nylons and garter belts belong to an era where no woman would have thought to get dressed without panties and slip.

Both picture sets and videos lack imagination, with the models looking stiff and uninvolved. Of course, it doesn't help that the videos are in a foreign language (Russian? Hungarian? Czech?) so you miss out on the context of the video as well.

Let me sum things up in a highly subjective way (in other words don't take every negative thing I have to say as the Gospel truth):

A. I wouldn't bother with the pictures. The quality is too uneven and the sets are too small. Plus the logo, even if it has been reduced to one only, is still too intrusive.

B. I wouldn't bother with the videos because they lack erotic heat as well as the tease factor, and on top of that they are being ruined by watermarks that are meant to protect their copyright but manage instead to aggravate purists like me who like to look at a clean picture with no, or at most, with a discrete logo.

The separate sign-in for the various sites is just plain dumb. Especially if a distinction is being made between pictures and videos requiring authorization by both.

If I judged this site, or any other Ferro site I got during this past month, for myself I wouldn't give any of them more than a 69 because I look and then throw away ... see humongous watermarks.

However because of their relatively good rate of update, plus the basically decent TECHNICAL quality of the videos, plus the fact that one monthly subscription will give you four sites eventually, I will give it a 79. Of the four Ferro sites I reviewed during the past month this site, despite its flaws, is the best.

BTW, the site is softcore with some toy play thrown in. A plus for me (the softcore part), might be a minus for others.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ferro Network

27. Ferro Network (0)

Network
Active
62
pat362 (367) 12-05-10  09:04am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -CCbill is their CC processor.
-They have a wide variety of sites that target specific fetishes like: anal, mature, shemales, feet, nylon & pantyhose, gays, lesbian and toys.
-They have a pretty impressive library of videos.
I stopped counting at 2000 videos because the content on the other sites did not appeal.
-Some sites offer both videos and photo sets.
-Many of the videos come in a single file but not all of them.(see Cons)
-You can download photosets as a single zip file.
-You can use a download manager(see Cons).
-They rebill at almost half the original cost.
-Some of the videos have little scenarios but it's all in Russian.
Cons: -You have to log in to each site individualy from the main members site everytime you visit that main site. The only redeeming thing is that as long as you go back to the main ferro page and you've log on to a specific site once then you won't have to log in again.
-Once you've logged on to a site then there is no way of going back to the main ferro page except if you use the back button as many times as you did going forward or logging back on to the main screen.
-You can use a download manager but since you can only download about 4 videos at a time then why bother.(I didn't see a difference in speeds either way).
-There is no search option of any kind.
-The updates are not dated so no way of knowing if or when the sites update.
-There is only one video download option.
-Some videos are broken in 3 or more sections.
-The price is way too high for what this network offers.
Bottom Line: -I've been curious about ferro since the moment I heard about the network. The cost always made it a near impossible option for me but since I recently won the top draw then I thought this would be the time.(No you can't use your winning for that but I could buy Christmas gifts with them and that left me some extra cash).

-This network might have been a great find about 8 to 10 yrs ago. All that porn under one roof and such an amazing selection to chose from but this is 2010 and a network that doesn't date their updates, offer better download options, lowering their exorbitant join cost should not exist.

Possibly the best thing about the join price is that it makes it very hard for most porn surfers to join and seeing the content makes me think that's not a bad idea. If they drop their price then more people will be tempted to join this site and franky that would be a bad idea for most customers.

I debated which score to give this network and I stuck with 62 only because there are still quite a few good videos. You'll just have to do some serious research to find.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Layered Nylons

28. Layered Nylons (1)

Pay
Active
80
tangub (151) 02-03-13  02:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Choice of CCBill or Epoch for sign up
Exclusive content
Updated 4 times a week (Mon, Wed, Sat, Sun), usually 3 photo sets and 1 video per week.
All content is high res and hd
Photos have a choice of 4 sizes available; standard 711x1066, extra-large 1365x2048, ultra large 2000x3000 and super large 3744x5616.
Downloadable zips in all 4 sizes.
Video download options are hd 1280x720 wmv (20000+ kbps), 640x360 wmv (6000 kbps), 640x360 mp4 (1000 kbps) for smartphone or tablet. There is also a high def and standard def streaming option.
File sizes and run times of videos displayed.
All content date stamped.
Excellent navigation, browse options and search engine
Cons: Regional pricing with CCBill (Epoch was about $2 cheaper for me).
Site has only been online since September 2011 so not a massive amount of content yet; 198 photo sets (26,000 pics) and 53 videos at the time of writing this.
Hardly any full nudity, mostly just topless.
Videos are short, usually only 5-6 minutes.
No model info or bios
Poor preview area; click on a model in the tour pages to try and see what photo sets or videos she has and you are taken straight to the sign up page.
Bottom Line: This site features the unusual theme of girls wearing both stockings and tights (pantyhose) at the same time. I’ve always been a fan of girls wearing stockings and heels but have never really liked tights so couldn’t quite decide where I stand on this unusual niche. This site wasn’t really on my radar but a cheap email offer tempted me to take a look. This site is run by the same company that runs Only All Sites, Only Tease and Art Lingerie so quality was pretty much assured.

There’s currently 79 models on the site, most of them being the same British models that can be found on the other company sites. Many of the popular OT models like Carla, Melanie, Hayley Marie, Lucy Anne and Daisy Watts can be found here. A few Euro models such as Eufrat and Cikita are also present.

The photos are pretty much in the same style you find at Only Tease and have the same natural look to them; thankfully they have avoided the photo-shopped style that was prevalent at Art Lingerie. The photo sets usually start with the model fully clothed before they strip down to their tights and stockings. Those who like a full striptease will be disappointed since the tights, panties and stockings rarely get removed. As a result you will rarely see any full nudity within the site with only occasional glimpses of any pussy and quite often that glimpse is only through sheer tights if the model happens to be wearing them without any panties underneath. To all intents and purposes it’s really just a topless site.

I’m not really interested in videos so only checked out a few. The HD videos look nice and sharp whether downloading or streaming. They provide a screen cap gallery of 18 photos for each video where you can get an idea of the content before deciding if you want to download it. The video style is pretty much the same as I experienced at Art Lingerie. There’s no background music and usually no chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start so they have that same awkward silence. I guess the idea of that is so you can hear the sound of the model running her hand up and down her nylons or twanging her suspender belt.

The navigation is the same as at other “Only” sites, a choice of browsing photos or videos by year and month listing or an alphabetical model index. Under “My LN” you can set your browsing preferences like default photo size, number of thumbnails per page etc as well as managing your favourites. There’s also an extensive search engine with several filters which will be great when the site gets a lot larger but for now it’s hardly needed since the site is still quite small, in fact it only took me 3 or 4 days to download and view everything I wanted here. Overall I enjoyed the high quality content in this unusual niche but I feel the site needs some more growth to make it worth the regular price.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

29. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
bigmike (4) 03-08-07  01:41am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *high quality pictures
*attractive models
*good selection from each category lesbian/hadcore/softcore pictures
*good range of coloured stockings
Cons: *some sets can be found on other DDF web sites
*set location is repeated too often
Bottom Line: The quality of this site cant be highlighted enough.It really is superb. If your into stockings/feet then this is the site for you. Fans of pantyhose will be dissappointed because there are limited sets available.
The photography is excellent and the variety of shots(close-ups etc)in each set is enough to keep you interested.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

30. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
90
BostonPJR (72) 03-22-07  06:48pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large archive of models, I can't even count how many. And hot!
- Regular updates.
- Great price for the amount of content.
- Video quality continues to improve. Movies look great, photos look even better.
Cons: - Older material is not always exclusive or highest quality. Only becomes a problem when you see a model you like then realise she hasn't been active for a few years.
- Not all performers seem to be 100% into their performance.
Bottom Line: I really had to put some work in to come up with cons. The site is constantly improving its already great features and does a great job of appealing to a wide variety of foot and leg fetish fans. Some say glam - I say high quality. The models are by and large enthusiastic and kinky.
It's not the number one for pantyhose or shoe fetish lovers, but still plenty here for almost any fan. Lesbian and footjob scenes are particularly hot!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

31. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
92
exotics4me (463) 12-10-07  08:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - High Quality, DDF site
- Pictures go up to 2000 on high end and are available to download in zips.
- Newer movies are HD and there are over 900 video clips
- Site has a classy feel to it, maybe it is because of the emphasis on legs and feet?
- I'm getting some of my best download speeds, over 1100kb/s on a 10M connection
- Just about every great model you know who Europe that are the other DDF sites, and there is a lot of content overall!
Cons: - You know things are good when I start nitpicking on the first con, I'm not going to say the price is too high, but I guess it is just seems that way at first, price on TBP despite having an American dollar sign is in Euros. So, as of now, what is listed as $24.95 on TBP is actually $36.74.
- Older movies are a lower quality than average, this can be a slight negative if your favorite model has a lot of older material.
- More fishnet, can never get fishnet!
Bottom Line: Let me start by saying that I love this site. The quality is top level, very few sites can even match it. The emphasis of leg and feet kind of worried me since I don't have a real leg or feet fetish. The model list pulled me in though. If you can name her and she is a Euro star, she is on here.

The biggest and best surprise for me was the amount of content. I really hadn't seen much of this site before joining. It reminds me a great deal of 1byday, DDF's big site. There is less hardcore here, but you get a new kind of porn from this site. One that lets you look at the women as beautiful. It has a very high tease factor in every video that I downloaded. Which for me is very important.

The HD videos are incredible. My only complaint there is that I have to keep buying external hard drives to store all of the content I download.

Pictures are very clear, let me add the word, "clean". No blurriness, just clear, well-lit pictures in 2000 resolution. Some of the models really show that they belong on a runway, moreso than in front of a camera with a dildo. Eve Angel's clip with Eufrat, both in nurses outfits, made me want to check in the hospital for a month or so!

The negatives are far and few between. Price will catch US members off guard, but I've been to enough crappy $20 per month sites, that I don't mind putting out the $36 for this high quality content that I keep and watch more than 1 time.

I recommend this site with as much enthusiam as possible!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Vintage Flash

32. Vintage Flash (0)

Pay
Active
82
Denner (233) 07-23-09  06:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Entirely exclusive british softcore "porn" - but with masturbation.
A pretty rare mix of wellknown uk-models and totally amateurs.
Dirty talk in most videos - with british accents, of course.
Ok amount of videos - right now it's: 379
The newer videos and photosets are what most PUs will consider: Fine/ok - even crisp
For Michelle Thorne-fans this is just a great site - she has a LOT of videos and photosets.
One fine bonus-site:
Pantyhosed4u.com
One other bonus site - not worth anything.
Old time lingerie - if you like that.
Cons: The navigation here is almost a bummer - even if there is a search-machine and a model base.
But no way to search for "only videos" or "only photosets.
Price a bit high.
Updates come only once a week - BUT it now includes both videos and photosets.
Too many of the better looking girls have only photosets.
Very broad variation i model-quality/goodlooking - too many on the ordinary site.
A bit slow download.
Only solo stuff (apart from ONE video with bj) - well, only found one after browsing for weeks.
Bottom Line: Joined the site because I found some stuff from it with Michelle Thorn and Linda Leigh - great britts - and both damn sexy.
The style here is - like the name indicates: Vintage.
That means that the models are all in lingerie from the 50's, 60's and 70's - and some is really outstanding.
The videos are now up to almost 380 - BUT it's only half of that amout that count to something - in viewing quality.
The newer videos are: 1024x760 - older ones goes down to: 640x480 and even 320x240.
All in WMV only.
The photosets are the same. New ones: 1600x1071 - older ones: not worth it.
But the main deal - apart from the outfit (lingerie) is the style in the videos. They are just dirty - for the solo kinds.
Most models does a fine dirty-talk - in a natural way - and in a way I ALMOST never see in US- solovideos.
If it was not for this dirty-talk, my score here would be quite a bit lower.
But listening to Michelle Thorne or even one video with Lucy Zara telling how horny she is and want to get fucked is worth it all.
Alas there are a little too many of the models that looks quite ordinary (not GOOD looking) - BUT still: even some of these girls end up being very sexy in their performance.
And the fact that they only have photosets of Linda leigh and Misty McCain is a bummer - so even if I'm probably not comming back - I can recommend a months membership - AND it looks like the site is growing - and new models are comming in, so who knows - maybe I'll try it again in six months or a year or so...
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Tease

33. Only Tease (0)

Pay
Active
88
Jeffrey99 (27) 11-04-08  06:07am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +High Quality photos
+Great mixture in styles of clothing.
+Updated daily.
+Has a nice catalog style. Makes it easy to search for what you want, rather that be full nude or blonde or etc.
Cons: -Really softcore. Too many models that don't even get full nude or if they do, they don't give you a good shot of their pussy.
-Videos are pretty much useless. Seem to be nothing more then behind the scenes videos of the photo shoots.
Bottom Line: I really like OnlyTease and the other Only sites. The one and only huge downside for me was that there were way too many photo sets that were either non nude or only topless. Being a fan of full frontal nudity, it seems 1 outta 5 models/sets would show full frontal nudity. Only Tease does have a option to search for "Full Figure Nude" but the problem with that is, that anytime a model takes off her panties, they label it as full figure nude. Even if they do nothing with the panties down but show ass.

Overall the Only Sites are ones that I'd sign up for once every 6 months for a month. There just isn't enough content to please me to stay a member month after month.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Tease

34. Only Tease (0)

Pay
Active
75
Denner (233) 04-17-09  09:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusive content.
Large amount of great and average looking british models.
Fine updates - daily. Either photosets or videos - MOSTLY photosets.
Good mix in styles of different outfits - well, this is a SOFTCORE FETISH-KIND of site.
Zip for photosets.
Photos in ok quality/size.
Ok navigation and layout.
Fair/average price-level.
Cons: NOT 2009 kind of videos.
Generally low/average video-quality.
Too few videos compared to photosets.
Very softcore - but ok, you can see that from the previews - that's the style of this site.
Marketing-promiss of HD-videos do NOT stick.
Some scenes are a bit stereotype - with re-use of same outfits too many times.
Some models do not even go topless.
Too many videos are photo-shoot-style.
Anoying password repeat when you download.
Bottom Line: This site sure does a lot for marketing the product.
Wish they'd do the same for the videos and especially the quality os those videos.
At the latest PR-mail I got in March, they claimed:
"Now HD-videos".
Empty words!
Because the new videos are no more viewing-HD or even in bigger file-size or bottomline NOWHERE near HD. BTW the size of those newer files are the same as it's been for the last couple of years.
For a major 2009-site their videos sucks - I normally do not use words like that in a review - but with this site: it's the case.
It's a pity with the whole video-deal at Only Tease, because the concept is/could be very good.
Those videos:
Average file-size: 50-60 Mb.
640x480 (that ought to say it).
Only avi.
But ok, apart from the frustrations about videos in 2009 at this site, the photosets are way better.
Three sizes of zip-download: Standard, Extra and Ultra. From aproxx. 10 Mb over 35 Mb and up to 100 Mb (2048x1056).
And even the standard photo-sizes are ok.

NB: When writing this review and scanning the site again, I now see ONE new video placed today (17th of april 2009) where the size suddenly is more like it: 285 MB - and NOW: wmv. Cheers! - ONE out of 1500.
The video is with one Ashley Massey and the viewing-quality is decent - not more. (and this one is quite boring).
But, ok - if Only Tease - finally - does videos this quality, I'd sneak my score up to 80 - next time. If I ever be back after 3-4 terms - doubt it, though.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Leg Sex

35. Leg Sex (0)

Pay
Active
65
TrashMan (Disabled) 03-05-09  12:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: +ZIP downloads of both 800 and 1600px versions of the galleries offered
+A lot of models
+Star directory with headshots
+There is a model search but it is only accessed on the model directory page
+They have all the picture sets categorized by model, yes, but they also categorize them by magazine issue, going all the way back to their 2001 series.
+Good mix of American and Non-American models
+All updates are archived back to 2004, retaining their addition date (however that date is not displayed on the actual page for the update)
+A little fun addition - feet around the office. A few feet pics every couple of days. This is a leg/feet site.
+Downloads work with download managers
Cons: -A good portion of the galleries are small...very small
-All images watermarked
-All videos watermarked
-Because LegSex has been around for a while (in magazine form, not so much for the website) they feature girls before their prime, and as such the girls use very old aliases (or other unknown ones). Maxxx=Brooke Stone, Scotti Andrews=Clare, Sheila Rossi=Tina.
-Most models are one-and-done, meaning only one update.
-They have movies, but they are so hard to find. You click the section titled "Move it!". Nope, its not called "videos" or "movies"..."Move it!"
-Downloads have generic file names (scene.wmv, 1600.zip)
-Videos offered only in WMV
-Solo content outnumbers hardcore content by a wide margin
-Update schedule stinks...2-3 updates per week, most are just image updates, not many video updates
-The tour page looks better than the actual members page.
Bottom Line: Just another porn site...put it that way. Not enough is offered to put it in the same league as DDF Productions' HotLegsAndFeet.

There are some old models on here who I certainly like and were looking for (Sheila aka Tina, Brooke aka Maxxx, Scotti aka Clare, etc.) but the site does not offer much OF THEM. It is one gallery here, one gallery there...and all the galleries are 20 pictures, standard. I think the pictorals are more, but there aren't many pictorals...most galleries are just the pics which were featured in their magazine, in other words, 20 pictures :P.

It says a lot when the TOUR page looks better than the MEMBERS page. The TOUR model directory looks so much better than the MEMBERS model directory.

It also is a pain in the neck that everything is so hard to find. I spend quite some time looking for the movies, briefly going so far as just assuming there were none. Everything is not named properly...Videos section is called "Move it", pictorals are called "Pic-toe-rals". Quit the fancy and just stick with what works.

If you want a Legs and Feet site, stick with HotLegsAndFeet from DDF Productions...its a hell of a lot better.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Alta Heels

36. Alta Heels (0)

Pay
Active
61
nineinch (8) 06-20-10  08:19pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons: Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line: If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pantyhose Lane

37. Pantyhose Lane (0)

Pay
Active
82
cucuta (6) 05-27-09  06:40pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Mix of asian and non asian models in pantyhose and lingerie
- A terrific, albeit small sight that really 'gets' the slow striptease.
-Also a small collection of videos, mostly of slow stripping.
- Clothing and posing are the strong suites of this sight. The women pose erotically IN THEIR CLOTHES - than continue through each phase of undress -
- Host AkirsLane is very friendly. There is also a forum with free previews.
-Also includes some mild bondage pics.
- Each model has from one to a max of about five photo sets. Each set has about 50-75 picutres.
- Good mix of models and body types with light and dark asians, and cute American girls. Also some more mature women.
-Akira Lane, a voluptuous Asian women with nice round hips is featured in dozens of photo sets and
videos herself.

Only 21.95
Cons: -Quantity is pretty limited with only about 100 or so models, about half of which are asian.
- This is a softcore sight. Some masterbation, but no sex shots
- Most of the clothing is sexy but some may find some of the sets cheesy. For instance, Akira dressed like a stewardess.

No bonus or additional content
Bottom Line:
I made it through the first 45 years of my life without ever craving Asian girls, however on a trip to Las Vegas one year I noticed a bunch of sexy well dressed Asian girls and came back with "yellow fever". As I explored Asian porn sights I found most were pretty hard core.

This off the beaten path sight is one of the few that I have joined more than once. I like it as it takes beautiful asian women, dresses them in classy clothing and slowly strips them. On the way there are a generous number of pantyhose and sexy undergarment shots.

There is a decent amount of content, I counted 120 models, but not enough to last more than a week or so for a hungry downloader.

The videos are similar to the photos with slow striptease being the forte.

Some of the most beautiful asian ladies are to be found here. Both lighter skin Japaneese typss and darker skinned south Asians, Hawaiins etc. Some models may be familiar to those who frequent Asian sights -Mika Tan, Sanny Aung etc.

Of the non Asians, some are familiar faces like Kordelia Devonshire, and there is a good mix of different types here also.

If you like pantyhose and Asians and are seeking a sight that delivers in a very understated erotic way, I highly recommend it.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Foot Factory

38. Foot Factory (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
Rocker (0) 01-26-08  08:56am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some models have really pretty feet and no how to pose them.
Cons: Lighting in most cases is extremely poor. One set had a model with gorgeous feet, but most of the shots were made with the sliding door in the background. The light streaming in completely silouhetted the subject. Terrible.

When shooting, the photographer is constantly leaving the feet OUT of the frame! Very frustrating. Your following the models feet. She's posing them really well, you're ready to pop, and GOODBYE, there out of the frame. Start over.
Bottom Line: Save your money until the photographer gets his lighting and subject down. Hello? FOOT Factory?! I go elsewhere for T and A.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Anal Pantyhose

39. Anal Pantyhose (1)

Pay
Active
72
pat362 (367) 06-30-13  11:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Full access 3 day trial for 8$
+A nice selection of Eastern European models.
+Content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+There are 165 videos which can be viewed online of downloaded a single file. Resolution is 640x480.
+There are 236 photo sets which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution seems to be 1024x768 for all pics.
Cons: -They update with one scene per week but it's either a video file or a photo file so you never actually get both at the same time. Actually it's more common to get only one type of file.
-Some of the models have multiple scenes butthey are all with the same male talent.
-There are two seperate watermarks on the videos. One of the top left of the screen and one on the bottom right.
-The videos are a little grainy and lighting is sometimes an issue.
-The makeup on some of the models does not enhance their appearance but makes them look less appealing than they are.
-Videos are quite short since they rarely get above 15 minutes and many are below that.
-There is a search by model name but you actually get the names of the models for all Ferro sites and not just this one.
(cons continued below)
Bottom Line: (cons continue)
-There is a useless search box where you can enter a model's name and find all her videos or photosets based on the different Ferro sites but you can do the same by simply searching through the models page.
-You can only download 3 videos at the same time.
-The names of the model are not the ones they are known elsewhere on the net.

Bottom Line:
*This is not a bad site but only if you are taking the trial membership. Otherwise I think most people will be disapointed. The overall site design looks dated and could use a facelift. This is nothing new since the site looks about the same as it was when I was last a member a few years ago.

*The premise for the all the scenes is basically that females wear pantyhose and have anal sex. The bulk of the scenes are b/g but there are a couple of g/g scenes with toys or strapons.

*I was actually quite surprised to see that the videos are all quite grainy which is unusual since I have plenty of videos at 640x480 resolution and they don't have that grainy look to them. That mes a lower resolution video look worse than it should. When you add the two large watermarks on oppostite sides of the screen then you compound the problem. At least if they had picked some more discreet ones then I might not be as annoyed with them but these aren't small or discreet.

**I guess if you aren't too picky about video quality and you have 10$ floating in your pocket then you could give this site a try.**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

40. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Active
85
Drooler (218) 08-01-09  04:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Many, many beautiful women
+No toys and almost no “messy” stuff with food or bath goop
+Intuitive interface
+Fast downloads, sometimes over 2Mbps
+Can preview the content of upcoming 3-4 updates on each site
+Earned or purchased ” FastTracks” allow full access to galleries or videos of your choosing ahead of their posting schedule
+VOLUMES of all-exclusive content available now, plus several hundreds of updates yet to be posted (Coming soon --> select “View all sets available for FastTrack”)
+Very user-friendly site/network. You get 10 free “FastTracks” in a calendar month (whole network, not per site); set several viewing and browsing preferences; and go from one site in the network to another with ease once your use/passes are stored in your browser.
+Photos from the past couple of years come in three sizes: 1066, 2048, and 3000 pixels.
+Consistently good lighting and clarity in photos from Jan. 2007 on.
+No DRM
+Model pages list other sites, outside the network, she appears in
Cons: -Occasional slow navigation and sudden timeouts
-Thumbs with dead links (rare)
-Must train browser to auto-enter use/pass for downloads on subsequent logins (separate for pics and videos); doable with Firefox, but it’s still 18 times for everything in the network: (access + zips + vids) x 6
-Zips before Dec. 2007 require drilling through five levels of folders to get to the images folder (hold cntrl down while drilling to prevent desktop clutter).
-Some unattractive women
-Quite a few women never get fully undressed, like Gemma Massey (too bad!)
-High monthly network access price ($44.95)
-The “fast track” system is rather complicated; note expiry dates and other restrictions
-Boring videos: Only avi, 640x480, 3-6 minutes long. 40-50 per month (whole network) in 2009. (Image quality improves through the years, but it’s never nearly as good as the photos. Sound might be techno muzik, the girl talking, or just the air near the mic.)
Bottom Line: I thought this network would be nothing but undressing to panties, if that, so I stayed away. But one day at OnlyTease, I tried their search (for visitors) and found nearly 2000 items that were at the “figure” level of nudity.

Now I’m glad that I waited -- and that I finally joined. Mind you, it’s usually the same women who do get fully naked and fun with it: Angel Dark, Elen (the blond Russian with the devilish smirk), Eve Angel, Jana D (Jamie J), Lola, Lucy Stratilova, Misa/Michaela Kaplanova, Mili Jay, Zuzana (Deny Moore), ETC. Considering the volume here, it’s been a bona fide candy store for yours truly (or “drooly,” I suppose).

Special mention goes to “Tammy” (aka Vendula). She’s the BEST.

The “Only” sites are photo sites, and the photos are DAMN good. If most models on this network showed off their asses the way Misa does, I’d be totally hooked! It would have EVERYTHING: great outfits, great stripping, and satisfying full nudity in excellent quality.

But they’d rather specialize at putting foreplay at the forefront, and this they do very well. I found myself grabbing “stripping only” sets of a few girls for whom I have “nude onlys” to combine them with. Kind of like “FemJoy and OnlyTease – together at last!” ;)

Here are some stats on the “Only” network sites:
OnlyTease: started July 2002. Around Nov. 2007, began occasional 3000 px photos, which became standard in March 2008. 3 updates per day!
OnlyOpaques (dark hose): started Aug. 2006; 3000 px photos most of the time from July 2007; 1 update per day
OnlySecretaries: started October 2007, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day
OnlySilkAndSatin: started Nov. 2008, with 3000 px photos from the start; 1 update per day
OnlyCarla: started Sept. 2005, stopped in April 2009 (lots of photosets, all it of tease-stripping)
OnlyMelanie: started April 2005, stopped in Feb. 2009 (same as with Carla, but REALLY cute!)

Finally, a little more about those FastTracks. One can be obtained by recommending three sites (not previously listed) that a model is on. (Must be used by the end of the current month.)

NB: You can view the thumbs of a set before deciding to FastTrack it.

I got a few that way, thanks to my application of library and information science, Lucy Lee, Tereza Ilova, etc. in the subject index.

But remember, it’s best not to join at the beginning of a month since you get 10 for free each calendar month. That’s a nice touch!

BUT be sure to download your FastTracked stuff right away, because access to it expires at the end of the month!

You can also buy 10 “Permanent FastTracks” for $9.95. These don’t expire as long as you stay a member, but they can only be used on the site you buy them on.

AND redeeming them on the site is a hassle: find the page before the billing page, click to redeem, get authorization code ... sheesh!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

41. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Active
82
roseman (253) 12-23-11  07:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Excellent quality photosets available in multiple download formats (standard, extra large, ultra large photos size).
- Very good quality videos available in multiple download formats (HD and High Resolution) as full length movies.
- ZIP downloads.
- Cool website design.
- Pretty easy navigation.
- Daily updates.
- Fast downloading.
- Large variety of models.
Cons: - Needs Fast/Permanent Tracks for full access to some photosets/videos.
- Old photosets and videos quality is average (Standard and High resolution size).
- No bonus content.
- Expensive.
- No trial option.
Bottom Line: I have to admit that this sites monthly membership is kinda expensive but I really think that it worths its money. The only problem that I found is that with your membership you don't have access to all photos/videos of their models as some photosets/videos need fasttracks or permanent tracks to be unlocked for view or download. With your membership you get 10 fasttracks per site and if you spent them you can buy 10 permanent tracks for 10 USD. So far from what I saw the hottest models galleries and videos can be seen or downloaded by spending fasttracks or permanent tracks and that's a big con for the site. Photosets and videos quality are great except from some old ones which have standard quality. ZIP downloads are available and videos can be downloaded as full movies. I feel that some bonus content would be cool and a trial option membership is necessary.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ferro Network

42. Ferro Network (0)

Network
Active
94
xexbot (36) 02-09-12  08:19pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: So many videos, so many sites. Yes some of them get cross listed, but for the most part they are providing a lot of specific niche material. I actually think they have a pretty smart business model, charge big up front, because lets face it people are going to rip the sites in a month or so, then lessen the fees as time goes by. It's a pretty smart thing to do. Anyone balking at the price might consider this.

Basically you get a shit ton of nylon sites, which are actually really good sites even if you aren't into the fetish. They have a lot of femdom strapon stuff, some mature stuff, bisexual, and more. The newer vids are pretty good in terms of quality. There's still very little HD at this site because they just started adding some HD stuff. I know that is a peeve for some people. However, the fetish stuff their offering is pretty unique, and sometimes it has to be more about the content than the quality. Most of the models are pretty hot too.
Cons: There is no BDSM or Cuckold stuff here for some reason. The BDSM I get, but seems like cuckold sites would be right up their alley, or his....;)

Older vids are pretty damn old. Low quality for the low bandwidth days. They get progressively better though.

Very little search and navigation capability.

Like the others have said, you have to manually log in to each site. The problem is you have to do it with a very cryptic username and password they assign to you. That's why everyone is complaining. They're too hard to remember. Type it into a doc and just cut and paste with your browser set to remember the passwords.
Bottom Line: Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it. Let's be clear. This is a softer domination site, so if you're looking for extreme hardcore BDSM and femdom, not a good choice for you. If you are looking for nylon fetish, feminization, humiliation, men getting ass fucked by men and women, women getting as fucked by men and women,tranny sex, mature sex, masturbation, gay and bisexual sex, then this is a damn good choice.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nylon X Files

43. Nylon X Files (0)

Pay
Active
75
otoh (54) 01-31-11  12:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 02-19-11  12:06am  (Update History)
Reason: Download links now provided to pictures - see my edit notes.
Pros: - Good photography
- Fairly unique content
- Pretty models
- Nice outfits and (obviously) great nylons
- Some good mild-fetish wear
- Many location/outdoor shoots
- Some entertaining videos
- Downloading pictures was a mildly diverting intellectual challenge
Cons: - Arguably not much actual nudity (depends on your definition)
- Max resolution of 1200x800px; videos at 320x640
- Frequent timeouts of login
- Only one connection allowed - eg can't open a gallery while viewing a video
- No zip sets
- No video download
- No model index
- No update schedule, or dating of sets
Bottom Line: I recently saw some pictures from Pantyhose-X - a German nylon fetish magazine (unsure whether print or only online). The few sets that I saw, I loved, and decided to seek out and join the source. I'm not sure of the details, but reading between the lines, I suspect that some change of ownership has been involved recently; pantyhose-x.com becoming nylon-x-files.com with content from the former. I also rather suspect that the changes are not for the best.

First the good.

This is obviously very nylon-oriented material - and more to the point, it's very fetishistic. By which I mean that it focuses very much on the sheerness of it; in fact in the majority of the sets, the tights don't come off at all. Some of them are gusseted and you don't see that much, other than them pulled up tight into the model's pussy; others are seamless and sheer and there are plenty of closeups of the girls masturbating through and under the nylon. The rest of the clothing is great too - from casual and businesswear, to things like corsets, high lace-up boots, PVC miniskirts etc.

The models too are pretty - not too glam or polished (maybe some peroxide), some girl-next-door types - but great figures and legs (of course!). And the photography is great - with a lot of shoots outdoors and in public places - some quite risqué stuff which is kind of exciting.

My only gripe with the content is my usual - most models are shaved, and given the nature of this style, that you get to glimpse them through the sheer nylon, I can't help feeling that even a trimmed strip or patch of hair would be something more to glimpse.

However...

Although I love the material, the presentation of it is the worst I've come across. Having emailed the webmaster to check, I knew about the resolution (it seems to have suffered in the transition, from the 1800px sets that seem to have been offered by pantyhose-x) and the lack of zips - but figured I'd give it a try.

The members area is very basic, just a list of sets with no dating, model names, or sorting/searching features for the 150 odd sets available.

**Edit** When I first wrote the review, there was no download of anything - not even individual pictures - you could only view on screen in a lightbox-type viewer, which made me mark it down heavily. But the site does now offer download links to pictures; there are still no zips, but this small change makes it easy to download a set with a manager, eg downThemAll.

The site still has issues as in the cons above, but this small change makes it seem far less mean-spirited, and is enough to bump my score from 65 to 75 - it's now recommended if you like this material (and can use a download manager!)
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nylons X

44. Nylons X (0)

Pay
Active
83
lk2fireone (194) 06-02-12  11:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM.
-Content is dated.
-Because it's a small site, easy to navigate.
-The nylons the girls wear add dash of color to their costumes.
-Member pages are relatively ad free.
-Can watch videos streaming or download.
-Download speeds are good. I regularly get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Has a link to "free" live cam shows. But these are mainly a waste of time.
Cons: -Small site. Only 25 videos.
-No regular updates. Last update was 2012-04-05. So it's more like a small archive site.
-Needs more stunt cocks. Only 3 or 4 stunt cocks featured.
-Videos can be streamed, but only one definition: no choice of high, medium or low quality.
-Videos can be downloaded, in high or medium quality. No low quality option. Also, judging from the file size of the download videos, the
quality of the "high quality" files is really more like a medium quality video at other sites. And the file size of the "medium quality" videos is more like a low quality video at other sites.
For example, a video with a run time of 15 minutes has a high quality file size of 558 MB. And the medium quality file size is 170 MB.
-Only one file size for the photos. And since the photosets are a record of the video shoot, the photos themselves have little artistic or erotic
value. But if all you want is photos of naked girls, the pics will do the job.
Bottom Line: CONS (continued):

-Photos have a medium-sized watermark on lower right side.
-No biograhical data on the models except for age. But the age given is not tied to any date or video the model appears in.

BOTTOM LINE:

-Theme is girls wearing nylons having sex.
-Small site catering to people with a fetish for nylons.

There is the normal variety of sex shown: masturbation, boy-girl vaginal and anal sex, blowjobs.

Site stats:
Videos: 25
Photosets: 25
The photosets are a record of the video shoot.

Most of the sites in the Teen Mega World network are integrated. So can search for a single model, and the results will include her appearances at all the network sites. Can also search by top rated scenes, your personal favorite scenes, type of sex scene (lesbian, anal, group, squirting, toys, etc.).

Join through the Teen Mega World site for $19.95/month, with the PU discount, which gives access to the NylonsX site.

Joining directly through the NylonsX site costs $29.95/month, and does not give you anything more than the Teen Mega World membership.

-Most valuable feature is that access to this site is included with a Teen Mega World membership. Teen Mega World, with a PU discount of 19.95/month, recurring, offers a huge network of hardcore teen videos. Many of the videos are good quality, and the network has hundreds of Eastern European teen models, many of which are very attractive.

Giving this site a score of 83. Site deserves that score because it's part of the Teen Mega World network. If the site was a standalone site, the score would be much lower, maybe 70 or less.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

45. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
93
jd1961 (95) 09-22-07  07:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great Selection Of Models
- Hi-Res photos, With Zips
- Updates Daily
- 4 Video Formats (4th being HD Where Available)
- True To Fetish Concept
Cons: - Most Videos Not Hi-Def (Yet)
- Not A Lot Of Strict Hardcore
Bottom Line: DDF has a solid foothold in the world of website porn. OK, that was a bad joke, but it is very refreshing to see a site that defines itself by a strict genre, in this case fetish, and actually sticks to it 100%. The only fair way to review this site is through the eyes of a heels and hose/foot fetishist. And it does not disappoint. As with every DDF site, the photography is first rate, the models A list east Europeans. The emphasis on "legs and feet" is for the most part tastefully done, and oftentimes erotically subtle. Maybe a little too many "footjobs", but I guess that's obligatory. It's easy to see that the photographers and models work very well together. Everyone understands the concept of the site. The photos are 2000px, crisp and downloadable in zip files. The videos for the most part are normal size, and available in .avi, .mov, and .wmv formats. They are offering a lot of the newer videos in HD wmv, be warned, they are huge files. The site does not offer a huge amount of strict hardcore. If you do have the leg and/or foot fetish creeping around in your psyche, this site is your nirvana! Even if you don't, you'll probably like it as well. First class, professional site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

46. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
87
Wittyguy (95) 01-26-11  02:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons: -- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line: When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.

VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.

OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.

The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).

If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.

I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Tease

47. Only Tease (0)

Pay
Active
82
Denner (233) 12-18-07  04:40pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Soft, soft and all soft - and still very soft
Great amount of photosets of mostly nice/great looking british girls.
Photos in 3 different qualities for download in zip
Fine resolutions.
Newer videos in ok quality (only ok) 640x480
Ok price
Cons: Too few videos - earlier videos lousy quality
TBP claims 863 videos - could not find that many (see below)
Some may find this too soft - most girls keep the panties on
Bottom Line: This is quite a nice site if you like the very soft stuff for a change.
Most of the quality is good/great with very fine photo-sets, especially the newer sets has high-resolution with zip.
And if you're into typical british girls.
Been here at the site 3 or 4 times before - and still some the photos and a few videos turn me on.

In the videos some of the girls try to talk a little dirty and some with succes - but you got to be content with a little strip and some boobs - and that's it. But some of it is still rather erotic.
You won't find many sites like this.
They used to have more videos, but a lot seems to be gone - but that's not a big deal, 'cause some of the old ones was in pretty bad quality.

Still they try to renew themselves - with a new design and better navigation. And they have new stuff with some of the sexiest models like Lucy Zara (she's a doll - have her own site, but that site is NOT worth the money.

Still, I was more exited the first times around - and the updates of videos are a bit slow.

But ok, for a niche-site with this kind of softcore Only Tease is worth a visit.

But I still hate generated login/passwords
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Tease

48. Only Tease (0)

Pay
Active
85
squirrel (8) 08-31-08  10:14am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: I can't add too much here that hasn't been said before (that'll come later), but here goes:

Photography is excellent.

Image sizes are big, high-resolution, at least for the newer sets.

There is a very good selection of models -- essentially something for everyone.

There is just a ton of content -- you'll get your money's worth, that's for sure.

The site is well-organized, with videos easy to find and zip files for the images.
Cons: Difficult to add much here, either, but here's my perspective:

This is really my "bottom line," but the thing you need to grasp is that this is REALLY soft-core. More about that, below.

The re-use of garments is a real downer, as some just aren't that "sexy" to begin with, and plenty of them just aren't flattering at all, especially on some models.

While most models wind up topless, some don't even do that. And I'd say that a few might even be better off if they didn't go topless, anyway.

So, the site "needs work." New/better outfits would help, as would some kind of attitude to "make every shot count," rather than just publishing thousands of ho-hum shots.
Bottom Line: And thus, my bottom line: Again, this is just really, really, REALLY soft-core. I'm sure everyone's tastes are different, but I'd think that most folks would find easily half of the site contents to be "not sexy at all in any way" -- fully-clothed shots in not-really-very-sexy outfits. Other folks might bump that up to something like 70% or 80% -- it's just a veritable ton of stuff that, at least to me, is "tossable."

So, does the rest of the content make up for all of the tossers? "Well, only just barely." Again, there's just an overall "lack of sexiness" in a lot of it. Some sets would be great if it weren't for the ill-fitting outfits that don't flatter the models. And so on.

In the end, there is some really great content here. Probably well worth a month's subscription. But there's a TON of stuff you'll have to throw away in order to find the jewels you'll want to keep.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Elise Erotic

49. Elise Erotic (0)

Pay
Active
72
roseman (253) 08-13-07  02:11am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Nice monthly subscription price.
- Newest photosets quality is pretty cool.
- Videos available for download.
- Downloading was fast for me.
- Access to older archieves.
- Easy to navigate.
- Live cams and access to older webcam shows.
- Photosets collection is huge.
Cons: - Older photosets quality is about average.
- You can not download photosets in ZIP format.
- There are no download options for videos or photosets.
- Website design is very simple and needs improvement.
- Not enough videos to download.
- No hardcore content.
- Videos quality could be better.
- No bonus sites access.
- Most content is not nude.
- Not sure when updates come.
- Content is not daited.
Bottom Line: Elise Erotic is dedicated to legs and nylons.
Monthly subscription price is okay but there is no nude or hardcore content to see or download. Photosets collection is huge enough to keep you busy for a while.
Newest photosets quality is very clear but old ones need improvement. You can not download photosets in ZIP format so you will have to download them one by one spending a lot of time.
There are a few videos to download, but surely their quality needs improvement. It would be nice if they could add some more videos to their collection.
Downloading speed was fast for me but sadly there is no bonus sites access.
Website's design needs improvement and in general lines is very simple. Navigation is easy and you will not have a problem to find photo galleries or videos etc.
When you join you will get access to older photo and webcam archieves plus access to live cams.
Content is not daited and I am not sure when updates come.
If you like such content then you can try this one for a month and then decide by yourself.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Leg Sex

50. Leg Sex (0)

Pay
Active
89
malikstarks (8) 02-19-08  10:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Does a good job catering to ALL aspects of the
leg and foot fetish.
- Excellent video and picture quality for most of the content.
- Plenty of content overall
- Zip sets in large and small sizes
- Frequent updates.
- Wide variety of models
- Easy to use (and varied) navigation features.
- Distinctive personality touches throughout the site.
Cons: - No network access
- Older videos and pic sets lacking a bit in quality (definitely in the minority however).
- No site interaction (forums, fellow users)
- A few major inaccuracies in the "search" functions, forcing users to use alternative methods to get to certain content.
Bottom Line: Overall this site has to be considered one of the top two or three leg and foot fetish sites out there. The videos look great, and have that uniquely bright studio like quality that the Score Group is known for. Obviously the pics are also very good with this being a magazine related site. The content is varied nicely between solo and hardcore; with just the right amount of unpredictability and flair.

HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO SITES OF ITS KIND:
Some might compare this site negatively to a site like HotLegsandFeet. Now I have to admit I have never been a member there (HotLegsandFeet), but I think that Legsex, while not better, should be looked at a bit differently. It really depends on what you're into. HotLegsandFeet focuses almost soley on young Euro models, with heavily airbrushed styled content. Legsex OTH has a much wider variety of models in terms of both age and ethnicity. And while Legsex's content does have high production values, it doesn't come off as being overly staged; they do an excellent job walking that fine line.

I won't bother to mention any other sites in this niche, as to me most of them are not "full service". Meaning they usually will cater to only ONE aspect of the fetish,(such as pantyhose/nylons or feet alone).
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 129 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Layered Nylons (1)
2. Michelle's Nylons (1)
3. Anal Pantyhose (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.29 seconds.