Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons:
-- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line:
When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.
VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.
OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.
The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).
If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.
I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Quantity, quantity
A few downright amazing pix and really nice looking models.
Cons:
This has the look of a pantyhose fetish site set up by breast men. Leg festishists like a teasing process (see Onlyallsites.com), with a gradual removing of clothes. This site has the skirt off almost always by the third pic. There's precious little leg crossing,hemline hiking, shoe dangling or foot dipping--all prized by leg fetishists.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated:
01-07-1111:09am (Update History) Reason: Minor score change; think I set the bar a bit high to start with...
Pros:
- Mainly pretty, amateur-looking, natural girls
- Some videos have them chatting, which I like
- Great legwear, Wolford tights etc
- Not just tights as the name suggests, stockings also
Cons:
- Last updates seem to be from 6 weeks ago; update schedule AWOL since 2009; actual update material dated 2008
- Quality is not great; older videos at 480x360, newer 640x480 or 700x400
- Same for photo shoots; some at 1500x1000, others seem to be captures at 640x480 or 960x540
- Some videos have ludicrous music over them
- Some - luckily not many - have the cameraman talking and lending a hand - not really what the material here is about
- Listings are basic - just straight list, with thumbnails, of albums and movies; no sort, filter etc
- Not many unshaved girls, and only a couple of girl-girl videos
Bottom Line:
I've got a much bigger list of cons than pros, and given that, my score might seem a little high. Especially as the site is pretty dated looking - content seems to be from 2000-2008, and has the bare minimum of navigation to get round the 200-odd movies, and similar number of photo sets.
However, I do like the material. The girls are cute, unpretentious, pretty without being too glammed-up. Also a few familiar names there, perhaps from before they were so well-known (eg Sunny Leone, Bree Olsen, Mai Ly).
Videos are almost all solo, some good teasing to start with, and as per the niche, some clothing tends to remain on - with panties pulled aside, or tights pulled down but remaining on while the models masturbate; some with toys, others just with fingers.
Oh, and there is some GREAT legwear. I like tights and stockings, but there are some videos here with some impressively patterned Wolfords etc, which is a big turn-on for me. There are a few nylon sites around, but featuring really sexy tights like these seems fairly rare.
I joined on a 3-day trial - well worth it, but you can likely get all you need within that 3 days.
It also comes with access to Amateur Upskirts - some of the same models, but it's more lollipop/pigtails/barely-legal themed, which isn't really my thing.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large collection of pictures and videos with beautiful women in nylons and high heels (few bare legs)
-Emphasis on legs/nylons/lingerie/high heels. Mainly solo girls.
-High quality videos.
-Models talk a lot during the videos.
-Beautiful lingerie, outfits and nylons on the models.
-The models keep their shoes on!
-Frequent updates (2 or video/picture updates per week)
-Fast downloads.
-Great selection of awesome shoes. Mainly platforms and high heels.
-Fairly priced.
-Easy site navigation and simple design.
-95% beautiful girls.
Cons:
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better all the time.
-The site limits the amount you can download in a day.
-Only two lesbian sets.
-No zip downloads.
Bottom Line:
-This is by far my favorite leg/nylon/high heel web site! I have belonged to Altaheels almost continuously since it started. It has practically every component of a leg site that I look for – Super pretty girls with long legs, terrific outfits, fantastic stockings and pantyhose, amazing high heels. For you guys out there who like bare legs, there is some of this here too. Some unique things on this site:
-A bunch of sets with seamless pantyhose! These are always the best!
- Several sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. These are tremendous to us leg guys.
-Tons of different high heels. They range from 6 inch pumps to 8 inch platforms.
-A couple of shoots with some crazy high heels (with like 6 inch platforms and 12 inch heels)!!! I have never seen these kinds of shoes on any other site!!!
-Girls who “talk” or tell a story during the videos! These are very unique among all leg sites. There is nothing more of a turn on then to hear a girl talking to you; trying to turn you on, with nylons and heels? The best! I hate leg videos that just show a girls sitting there like a lump. I want to get to know her a little or just see that she is a real person.
-The overall size of the site content is great.
-The pictures are better than average quality, 700x1000 pixels, about 225 kb. Most sets have 30 to 60 pictures. For me, more important that the size of the pictures is the content.
-The video quality of the older stuff is average, but the newer videos appear to be getting much better. Most of the videos last 5 to 11 minutes.
-The price is a good value because of the content and frequent updates (24.95 for 30 days then 21.95 reoccurring every 30 days). I do see that they do split some of the content to other sites, but this is the one I really like to see.
-For me, the key to this site is the complete overall substance. Sure, blahblahblahlegs.com has a few prettier girls but ALTAHEELS has every girl in super high heels; blahblahblahnylons.net may have higher video quality but half the girls aren’t wearing nylons or lingerie; blahblahblahstockings.ru has nice outfits but the in the videos the girls can’t speak English…. I guess my point is that the pieces of the puzzle that I am looking for come together here.
BTW – As I was writing this, I looked through my hard drive at some of the videos and there are a couple videos (sam_geo_001, heather202 and celeste_303) which alone would be reason enough to join! Absolutely mind-blowing for leg men!
-I give it a 96. I took some points off because of the download volume limiter and no zip files, but if you are a leg guy; you should definitely check it out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
12-06-1009:43am (Update History) Reason: Score adjusted upward because complaint about slow speeds appears to have been an abberation rather than the rule.
Pros:
Great looking British models.
Sexy vintage lingerie. Latest videos and picture sets are of good quality. Videos at present come in at 1280 x 720 px at 5000 kbps. Picture sets are of good quality as well and are available in zipped format.
Content not overwhelming but 470 Picture Sets and 244 Videos (many of the older ones are, of course, of lesser quality) isn't too bad either.
Love British accents.
Additional three bonus sites.
Cons:
Site does not allow you to stop and then resume a download.
Not download manager friendly. My trusty DownThemAll gave me the same speed as the regular browser downloader.
Awful, inadequate search engine. I saw one picture on the tour and it was this picture that enticed me to subscribe. Do you think I can find that set? Rhetorical question! I suppose I will before the month is up.
Only one update every five days.
The three bonus sites do not offer a great deal of content.
Access to bonus sites requires a separate sign-in.
Bottom Line:
Despite some of the negatives a nice site.
The few videos I downloaded yesterday were great. Lovely vintage lingerie (full size panties, nylons and garter belts, girdles, bras etc.) I am looking forward to downloading quite a bit more of their great videos (at least the newer ones) because just about every one of them looks tempting. The "dirty" talk by the models doesn't hurt either!
The three bonus sites "Pantyhosed4U" (305 photo sets, 138 videos), "VFAcademy" (69 photo sets, 70 videos), and "VintageFlash.Archives" (236 photo sets, 1 video!) are nice to have but aren't big enough, or update often enough, to make subscription to this site worthwhile for more than one month.
I like the mother site (reviewed), it does have its flaws but at least, for once, I don't have to condemn a site out of hand which is refreshing.
Recommended to fans of vintage lingerie and British models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-CCbill is their CC processor.
-They have a wide variety of sites that target specific fetishes like: anal, mature, shemales, feet, nylon & pantyhose, gays, lesbian and toys.
-They have a pretty impressive library of videos.
I stopped counting at 2000 videos because the content on the other sites did not appeal.
-Some sites offer both videos and photo sets.
-Many of the videos come in a single file but not all of them.(see Cons)
-You can download photosets as a single zip file.
-You can use a download manager(see Cons).
-They rebill at almost half the original cost.
-Some of the videos have little scenarios but it's all in Russian.
Cons:
-You have to log in to each site individualy from the main members site everytime you visit that main site. The only redeeming thing is that as long as you go back to the main ferro page and you've log on to a specific site once then you won't have to log in again.
-Once you've logged on to a site then there is no way of going back to the main ferro page except if you use the back button as many times as you did going forward or logging back on to the main screen.
-You can use a download manager but since you can only download about 4 videos at a time then why bother.(I didn't see a difference in speeds either way).
-There is no search option of any kind.
-The updates are not dated so no way of knowing if or when the sites update.
-There is only one video download option.
-Some videos are broken in 3 or more sections.
-The price is way too high for what this network offers.
Bottom Line:
-I've been curious about ferro since the moment I heard about the network. The cost always made it a near impossible option for me but since I recently won the top draw then I thought this would be the time.(No you can't use your winning for that but I could buy Christmas gifts with them and that left me some extra cash).
-This network might have been a great find about 8 to 10 yrs ago. All that porn under one roof and such an amazing selection to chose from but this is 2010 and a network that doesn't date their updates, offer better download options, lowering their exorbitant join cost should not exist.
Possibly the best thing about the join price is that it makes it very hard for most porn surfers to join and seeing the content makes me think that's not a bad idea. If they drop their price then more people will be tempted to join this site and franky that would be a bad idea for most customers.
I debated which score to give this network and I stuck with 62 only because there are still quite a few good videos. You'll just have to do some serious research to find.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Extremely large collection of pictures and videos. I mean, this site has been around forever.
- Caters to leg/nylon/high heel guys. Tons of content for leg-lovers.
-Frequent updates and new models (approximately 1-2 per week)
-High quality videos.
-The downloads come pretty fast (I don’t know much about internet server speed but I would say it is somewhere between amazon and computer support site in India)
-Nice outfits and nylons on the models.
-Good selection of shoes. Nice platforms and high heels.
-Discounts on DVD purchases from their online store.
-Steaming video and live shows (available at certain times)
-Fairly inexpensive (about $30 per month) for the amount of content.
-Navigation of the site is easy and straight forward. I like sites that allow you to go right back to the home or updates pages without having to go through 50 pages first.
-Wide variety of girls (Caucasian, Black, Asian, Hispanic…..Younger, little older…)
-Approximately one lesbian scene a month.
Cons:
-A lot of the early stuff is so so quality and content.
-No zip downloads
-50% of the girls are good looking, 10% are much less. (Remember – 40% are smoking hot)
-Way too many sets of JB himself in what he calls “POV shoots”. I am a leg man and I want to see hot girls in nylons! I just don’t want to see a guy’s junk being jacked off by an Asian chick every forth photo set.
-Many of the videos just have a girl sitting on a bed or pole dancing in pantyhose. No talking at all. I just think videos that have the girl talk to you, interact with you.
-Some of the photo sets could be larger. They range from 40 to 80 pictures in a set.
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better every day.
-No model or content search engine. I would love to be able to search for “seamless pantyhose” or “2 girls in pantyhose” on the site because of the large content.
-No rating system for pictures or videos.
Bottom Line:
-As any leg guy can tell you, JB Video is one of the oldest and often one of the first leg sites that most of us join (it was my first and I have re-joined dozens of times over the years). So in many ways I feel like I am reviewing the Eifel Tower. It is a great nylon/leg/high heel site with a monstrous collection of pictures and videos. Lots of hot girls in nylons and heels to please any leg guy. I would give it an 85 rating and say that if you love legs; you should join.
-A few suggestions:
-Too few sets with seamless pantyhose! As all us leg guys know; we search for seamless pantyhose sets like the Holy Grail.
-Too few sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. Again, super awesome but few and far between.
-One of the very few leg sites that have videos showing girls changing shoes. An excellent bonus!
-A couple of the DVDs for sale (like Sky and Summer’s Foot Tease, Foot Seduction 14 Goldie and Isabella and Foot Seduction 24 Emily and Darenzia and a couple of the other lesbian videos) are worth the price of admission alone. True masterpieces! There should be more lesbian sets like these! I love these videos because the girls are talking the whole time, talking about their legs and nylons.
-Pretty good shoe collection. Nice sets with 6 inch platforms. I would like to see a few sets with some 8 inch heels.
-Need to get rid of a lot of the “less pretty” girls.
-Way fewer of the “POV” sets of a guy getting a foot job from a girl. These aren’t very good and not very exciting.
I know a will be re-joining JB Video on a regular basis. A very solid leg site and a good value with a few kinks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Gorgeus European women
-Amazing foot fetish action (solo, g/g and some b/g)
-Really huge archive, updated every day (one day with a picture set, next day with the corresponding videos)
-Several video download options
-zip archives for pictures sets
-Part of the ddfprod network
Cons:
-Best days of this site are long gone
-If bought indepentently it's quite pricy
-Some "new" sets are just re-editions of older ones
-Older sets have not been improved since they first appeared and have quite low quality
Bottom Line:
Hot Legs and Feet continues to be my favorite foot fetish site, although I think that it's "golden days" are now over. I remember when I first joined, Sophie Moone was in her full splendor and making tons of videos for DDF; the same could be said about Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Sandra Shine... Now most of those models are retired, working for 21st Sextury or in the US, and the new models that have appeared since then don't have the same sex appeal or charisma. Or maybe it's just me...
In any case, this site works very well for someone who is looking for foot fetish action: it has quite a lot of solo sets; many girl/girl action sets, and quite a few boy/girl sets. It is updated very regularly (three new sets a week, consisting on pictures and video) and in its new sets it offers different download options and qualities. Only good things can be said about directing, lighting, editing, etc. None knows how to capture the beauty of female feet in action like these guys.
My last consideration is a quite obvious one: this site is included in the DDF Productions network deal, so if you are interested, I would recommend joining the whole network for a bit more money, because you will get access to other good sites too.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- good size collection growing since 2005 (about 130 videos, over 200 photo sets)
- nice selection of British regulars, a few new faces
- lots of girls in leather boots!
- regular updates, every 3 days; every 4th or 5th update is video
- photo sets reasonable softcore content
- a few sets/videos slightly stronger
- generally exclusive content
- host responds to emails
Cons:
- poor site usability; no search, just a list of galleries
- endlessly opens up new windows for each link
- one size pics (generally 1000 x 670, 250 dpi)
- no zips!
- video production is poor, content a bit repetitive
- one video format, wmv, typically 128 kbps, 720 x 576
- videos typically 3 minutes only and have large watermarks
- predominantly softcore, a few mild bondage and punishment sets
- there is some non-exclusive content, but I believe this is legacy - designed to pad out the site in earlier days - and not being updated
- no model bios, interaction or shoot descriptions
Bottom Line:
GILB services a niche and makes few bones about it.
Host, Raif, is a genuine enthusiast like most of those attracted to the content. Yet, the site has the tell-tale signs of an amateur.
It's very boot content focussed, but let down in other areas.
From a technical point of view, the media content is poor with no format options. Downloading was at a reasonable speed and there was no daily limit.
The site isn't the prettiest on the eye and not designed for easy use. Searching is non-existent; just a random list of galleries. There are also a few broken links. (Hi Raif, even with my limited knowledge of HTML and CSS I could design a better site.)
That said, the content - if the boot niche is what you are after - is generally good. Scene settings are a bit repetitive, but there has been some thought to content and outfits.
Don't expect anything much stronger than softcore from mainly British models. There's a few insertions, but it's mostly posing or stripping. Some of the bought in content features bondage and humiliation. (I hoped Raif got this properly licensed.)
There are a few familiar faces - Lucy Zara and Frankie - plus a couple of bored looking European girls. Otherwise, the models put on a good show, giving prominence to the boot.
For the content, it's a reasonable $20 a month. Even without zips you could download the whole site in a few weeks.
Raif did respond quickly to an email about a broken link.
I'd want to score GILB higher if only because it's one of the few sites to guarantee good boot content. Other options include Bootiful, which has little or no video content, and features some rather tame stuff even in comparison to GILB. Only Tease does feature quite a lot of boots. It would be interesting if the production team produce an Only Boots site.
Overall though, GILB is let down by amateurish production values, the lack of format options and a clunky website.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Clean and efficient navigation
-All exclusive content
-Classy, artistic pictures and videos
-Acceptable archive size (+300 videos, +3000 picture sets)
-Beautiful models (including Valentina Vaughn, Justine Joli or Dita von Teese, for example)
-Full trial membership
-Pictures are downloadable in .zip format
Cons:
-Mostly solo, softcore content
-Very irregular updates
-Somewhat dark in style and lighting
-Videos with music (I hate that)
-Not a wide choice of formats and qualities for video download
Bottom Line:
So, following my quest for new and exciting foot fetish sites, I joined this site, which I knew mostly because they released a couple of videos as movies in Hotmovies.com. To join, I used a "trial membership" option that appears as an "easter egg" if you try to surf away from their Join page: for 2.95€, I got complete access to the site for three days. Great deal, I am really thankful after my extremely dissapointing experiences with other trial memberships recently.
As for the site itself, well, to enjoy it you have to know what you are going to get, and you have to like that kind of stuff: it's mainly artistic, classy, elegant, somewhat dark foot fetish solo/masturbation pictures and videos. It has an Andrew Blake ring to it, although without the BDSM.
Among the models who work(ed) for this site, you will find some of my personal favorites, such as Justine Joli or Valentina Vaughn, but also a lot of unknown actresses who are just ok. One thing that I hate is that most videos -not all- include a music soundtrack, which silences the moans and groans of the actresses. I really don't like that, it's a complete turn off for me...
On the technical side, the navigation is just good (you can only access the pics and videos in inverse chronological order, with no search options or categories) and the choice of video qualities and formats is minimal -inexistant for older sets. Another big "con" is the low rate of updates in this site: they come irregularly, mostly once every week, but sometimes every two weeks, or every three or four days...
All in all, I was dissapointed with the site, mainly because I am not that much into solo action, and because, although I can enjoy a softcore video once in a while, I prefer it not to be SO softcore. This site is clearly devoted to showing the beauty of the female body, and more precisely female feet, but I also expected it to show some hot f/f or even m/f action. Obviously Ed Fox is a great photographer and a talented artistic director, but it's just not exactly my taste.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Daily updates of the photo section only.
-Good size site with 145 models and 33 guest models. Each has multiple shoots, so my guess is about 600 to 700 photosets.
-Most recent photos are 1200x1800.
-Although primarily a photo site, there are 125 video shoots as well. The most recent update is WMV 864x480, 595 kbps. Very weak and poor quality.
-Nice mix of mostly European and American models with a lot of Asian Americans and Black ones as well. If you love Asian women you will feel that you have died and gone to heaven.
Cons:
-No zipdownloads.
-No easy way to search. Listings for photosets are under the models' names, in the order from the most recent update going back. You can also search by model name and a tiny thumbnail. Videos are listed separately, also in update order or in a separate listng of just videos. Only clips, no whole videos.
-Not updating the videos. There is no date on the site for each video, but the most recent is copyright 2009.
Bottom Line:
Usually after downloading from a site, I gradually lose interest in the content. I get the feeling of been there, done that and it is on to the next website.
That didn't happen here. I wrote a review almost exactly a year ago and was primarily interested in the videos at that time. I did not appreciate the quality of the photography or its degree of erotic value. Gradually over the last year I have come to appreciate more the photos I downloaded and saved.
While the videos are of poor quality, the photo sets are nicely done. There is plenty of tease, as you might expect from a site with pantyhose in its name. Many of the outfits are quite classy and the stripping sequences work for me. While softcore, they often, but not always, go to full explicit. Sometimes there is complete nudity, but mostly you see before and after pussy shots of stripping off pantyhose. Some sets do not feature explcitness and the model stays clothed.
The model selection is first rate. You will recognize some familiar faces, but by no means all. Many are simply gorgeous, with great legs that are showcased in pantyhose. Many have nice breasts as well. Overall, very much glam in style, but with much more nudity and explicitness than for example Only Tease. The quality of the Asian women makes this site stand out. While the Americans and Europeans are also first rate, the Asian women alone make this site worth trying.
As far as a comparison with other pantyhose focused sites, much better looking models, more teasing and more delivery of explicitness. I feel it is the best in this niche.
I found the site to be fun and worth a shot if you are into softcore. Definitely a good value for a reasonable price. If they would make the photos zipdownloadable and added a decent way to search, I would not hesitate to give this site a score in the 90's.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons:
Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line:
If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Medium-big size archive
-Good video quality (not great in older videos)
-Cute girls, some classics like Cytherea, Sunrise Adams or Jewel Valmont aka Ava Vincent.
-Easy navigation (by model, by type of action, by date...)
-Different styles and types of foot action (hardcore, lesbian, solo, etc.)
-Regular updates (they really do come daily)
Cons:
-Very few download options
-Most models are just average, not ugly, not impressive
-A lot of the sets are solo action (Meet X, X self-sucking, X soles on glass, etc.)
-Best known actresses have very few sets or videos
-A bit high-priced (29.95$ a month) for this times of crisis.
Bottom Line:
I was really hoping this to be a great, great site like Hot Legs and Feet (my all time foot fetish favorite, as some people at PU may know). And it wasn't. Foot Fetish Daily is not bad, but it's not great either. It offers a good number of pics and videos, with some really hot girls like Daisy Marie or Nicole Ray, for example, but you also get a huge amount of solo sets with anonymous models whose name, face and body you probably forget the next minute.
On the pro side, Foot Fetish Daily gets you access to at least a part of the Kick Ass Video archive (the ones who make Barefoot Confidential, the longest running and most awarded foot fetish video series, if I am not mistaken).
I don't see FFD as a long membership kind of site, even if it is true that it is updated daily. Unless, that is, that you like foot fetish solo videos, which are not my cup of tea: in that case, this may be the perfect site for you...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
fetish content with stockings and office girls
Cons:
old material with bad quality
content is double on the site
videos are cut in length
3rd party material
no zip files
files have no different names (bad to sort on the pc)
less pictures
less videos
Bottom Line:
NEVER AGAIN - HANDS AWAY
After contacting the wabmaster three times (took him almost 2 weeks) i got a refund.
Lucky i did not have to pay for this!!!
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- down and dirty masturbation
- vids are reasonable quality, lighting ok
- provides access to a range of other Ferro Cash sites
- navigation straightforward, easy to get to content
- seemed like it would get regular updates
Cons:
- selection was small: don't believe the tour come on
- bored looking models: clinical, disinterested
- repetitive scenes
- mostly East European girls, so not much in the way of understandable talk
- zero interaction with models
Bottom Line:
There's plenty of better sites giving you solo or girl-girl masturbation which are better value than this. Twistys or Suze would do.
On the plus side, you do get access to a big load of other content. However, that content is much the same.
It would be nice to have the girl come on to the camera. But, on sites like these I get the feeling that most of the "models" are street pros who are bored stiff. There's no need to speak English, but a bit of lust directed at the camera would help.
This was not money well spent and I will be steering clear of Ferro Cash sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- tasteful stuff, videos and pictures
- good amount of stuff
- the "right" kinky viewing angles for nerds in pictures and videos
- mostly european-style, well-proportioned models
- site seems to update regularly
Cons:
- videos not in HD, video-quality varies according to release date
- picture resolution varies, not state of the art of today
- picture-sets not as zip-files
- explicit download-limit of 3 GB per day
- defacto download-limit is clearly much less and lesser, you download 10 or 12 videos and your account gets disabled, account then has to get reanimated by sending email to webmaster, this game repeats every day
Bottom Line:
Site has some good approach but needs to strain according to content quality and customer friendlyness.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content
Very attractive girls
Large archive
Frequent updates
Good communication
Cons:
Some older content is non-nude
Videos need some work
Updates sometimes late
Bottom Line:
Nylon Stockings online is run by Lynne, a blonde MILF who has featured on several mature websites.
As far as content goes, it's pretty much a case of what it says on the tin. Most of the content consists of picture sets of women undressing from fully clothed to just nylons and suspenders. Sometimes these are removed also, but others, the suspenders are unfastened to allow the nylons to fall naturally down around the model's ankles (am I the only guy in the universe that finds that a massive turn-on?!?).
The explicitness of nudity varies between sets. A lot of the admittedly huge archive before 2009 consists of non-nude content, with slightly stronger stuff coming at the beginning of last year. In terms of explicitness, I would put the site somewhere around the Fets.com range.
Videos appear on the site only very occasionally and the quality isn't very good at all for this day and age.
Very occasionally (and this happened when I was a member back last year) the two-weekly updates seem to dry up for no reason. For example I am typing this at 2330 local time and today's update has yet to appear. That said the communication from the website owner has in the past been very prompt in responding to queries. The same could be said for the member guest book on the site.
Bottom line? I really like this site; there are some fantastic looking models who really look like they're into it, and I feel the glitches are very minor. If you're a leg man like me I urge you to take a look!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice discount through TBP.
-Huge network of sites with a similar theme.
-No download restrictions. A nice plus considering the sheer quantity that is available.
-Nice photosets with three choices of photo quality, including ultra large.
-Some HD quality videos, but not enough.
-Mostly very attractive models. However, about one third were not. Seem to be classy women that you might see or even know. I didn't see a single boob job.
-Very active member forum that takes requests from members.
Cons:
-Glamour type photography. Often the women have too much makeup and seem very stiff. They don't often seem into what they are doing.
-Most videos are not at all erotic. Not much in the way of sensuous movements. Rubbing an arm or a leg is not teasing.
-Many videos and photo sets don't even get to topless.
Bottom Line:
The site sells itself as 100% erotic, 100% tease and 100% exclusive. They also say they are about the erotic, not the extreme. In order to be erotic without being explicit, they need to appeal to the members ability to be mentally stimulated. Without explicit photos and videos, the models themselves have to be special in a way that other sites don't often attempt.
Since this is so unusual in pornland, comparisons are difficult, if not impossible. The question to be answered is, do they succeed? Is their goal of being erotic successful?
I was a member of onlytease.com in 2006. I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of heat I saw. However times change and so have my tastes in porn. Since I love nice legs and pantyhose, I felt that maybe I should give the network a try at the newly discounted price.
I found quite quickly that the network is a LOT larger than what I had subscribed to in 2006. The quality of both the videos and the photos has greatly improved. Navigation is easy, but the search function is still inadequate.
Did they reach their goal of being erotic? Yes and no. Yes some of what you see is truly great and I love it a lot. However, the site promises a lot more than it delivers. I thought the tease referred only to the content, but the site itself could be a lot better.
Regarding the outfits, the models all too often wear pants or use opaque pantyhose. I like dresses showcasing great legs that look like legs, in other words sheer pantyhose. I don't much care for cheerleaders or bunnies either.
Overall, problem number one is that nearly all the videos simply do nothing for me. In all fairness photo sites usually have poor videos. What I feel the problem here is that the models don't have much of a feel for teasing. For the most part, European models get into this type of photo and video modeling without first doing any stripping or other live shows. They may be quite beautiful, but don't master the art of sensuous movements. For example, I see a lot of scenes with hands rubbing arms or legs, but very little in the way of quick flashes. I rarely see a glimpse of panties that seems to be an accident or are intended to build up my interest. The strip sequences are usually quite dull and often end without being even topless. A lot of sizzle, but very little steak. There is an active thread in the forum about whether models who will not even do topless should be on the site.
In my opinion,the site is very much hit and miss. You would have to go through a lot of photo sets and videos to find the true gems. If you have the time and energy, you may fall in love with the site. As for me, I am happy to find a few truly enjoyable downloads, but the site is just too much work.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Quite good content; they have made some effort to collect videos with various kinds of lingerie, like their name says.
- For the detail minded, they even categorised according to the type of lingerie (stockings, corsets etc).
- The exclusive stuff always seems to be solo, but is well filmed.
- Support did actually respond - didn't help, but did respond ;)
Cons:
Site is an abysmal piece of crap.
The navigation is pretty much useless: the only kind of list you can get is in some random order. They do have categories, but those also just lead to randomly ordered lists.
No streaming preview.
There seems to be no way to search by title.
They have short clips which you can painfully use to preview, but there is no link to the full video! To find that you have to navigate through their crappy lists.
The only way you will be able to use this is to blindly download full videos in the hopes they might be good.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Mostly Mature Amateur Models. I did recognize some models from Pro sites but they are few and far between.
+ Exclusive contents.
+ Sticks faithfully to its niche of catering to girdle and old-fashioned lingerie fetishists.
+ No Download Restrictions.
+ Pictures can be downloaded zipped.
Cons:
Picture sets are relatively small and are basically just repeating what you can see on the video clips.
Torturous search to find all the parts of a video since they come in small chunks over a period of time.
Very confusing and old-fashioned interface.
If I remember right video was at 640x480, 1000 bitrate, a bit underpowered for 2009 but not bad.
Might have improved in the meantime. I will let you know in a comment when I re-subscribe to this site.
Bottom Line:
I felt the need to make this quick new review because I was not entirely fair to this site in my previous one.
Because, at the time, I was only a member for one month I assumed that full DVDs could only be obtained by ordering them at outrageous prices (by North American standards) from this site.
I have discovered in the meantime that, with enough patience, all the parts of the DVD can be obtained with the membership .. so I retract my remarks re. "shilling" and will up the score at the same time.
Not only that, but I find that I retained quite a few clips from this site because they have kept their appeal to me over the past year, something I can't say for every site I have subscribed to.
I would recommend this site to lovers of mature amateur women and especially of mature apparel like girdles, slips, nylons, full nylon panties, garter belts etc.
Don't expect hardcore. This is a very soft core site, catering primarily to the fetish mentioned above. It contains some mild lesbian and spanking scenes and a lot of intimate fitting of various foundational garments that allow the (female) fitter to do a bit of lusty groping. There is nudity but it is of the discrete kind, no "gapes" to be found here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 24 videos, the most recent of which go all the way up to an impressive resolution of 1920x1080, and down to 320x 240 if you want the video fast. And the videos DO download fast. this network has one of the fastest download speeds I have seen.
- 32 photo sets at 1440px × 810px with zipped archives available. Each set has around 200+ photos and they look very good.
- the girls are very varied and you can see them in several scenes around the network. We have girls from the barely legal category all the way to borderline MILF. Which is really nice.
- each scene is focused on the girls legs and the panties they are wearing. There is an impressive variation in the girls outfits and stockings are ripped open quite often AKA the sex is pretty energetic, but much tamer than the Facial Abuse stuff.
- the girls often play with themselves before the sex scene, there is oral sex, I believe some anal and some groupsex as well, so that's nice and varied.
Cons:
- a network wide search would have been nice. I really like Amai Liu and I would have liked to find all her scenes at once. Also a category search for videos would be nice. Something to allow me to select anal scenes without having to browse the thumbnails...
- you can see the difference between the older sets both in quality of video as well as how beautiful the girls are. The site is definitely improving, but I only enjoyed the more recent stuff, to be honest...
- sometimes the preview thumbnail was not the bets shot out of the scene. I'd like it if there was a way to maybe make the previews interactive (roll mouse over) or if there was a model page or something similar...A lot of hot girls didn't stand out like this...
Bottom Line:
As part of the network and with the discount from PU this site will be interesting for any leg lover. However the fact that there are only 24 videos doesn't make it a must. It's more of a nice bonus if you joined the network for another, bigger site.
However, many scenes are well done and the variation makes it interesting. After a few more updates this site will be a really great place for anyone who wants to see girls having sex in pantyhose. If you're looking for more softcore stuff, this isn't really the place for you. The girls won't strip for half the video and turn around showing off their but through pantyhose. Sex and cumming on stockings is the big draw. Also there aren't any footjobs, really, which in my book is a big bonus, but some people might dislike it.
Finally, I'd like to say that I noticed a tendency of having more Asian models among the recent updates. Which is also a good thing in my opinion, but maybe others will disagree. Up to personal preference I guess.
Bottom line: not a deal maker here but definitely a nice bonus to an overall decent network for those who prefer hardcore porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
With over 34,000 images, Elise Erotic can boast a huge catalog of fetish images, dedicated primarily to lovers of pantyhose, stockings, heels and feet. Most recent images are 1177×1704 pixels and of a generally high technical standard. Updates appear on a regular basis, each one split over two weeks.
There's no doubting Elise looks fantastic in hose and heels – she has great legs – and there are some really excellent galleries, the location shoots being particular highlights. A wide variety of outfits means there should be something for everyone, but if not, you can always contact Elise with your own request.
Although the premise of the shoots hasn't changed, there has been a recent trend towards more nudity. Whereas previously Elise's vagina would be only barely visible through various types of sheer material in one or two images per set (if you were lucky), now there's some clear frontal nudity creeping in, although still a far cry from spreading or hardcore.
Cons:
When the site was founded, Elise had a beautiful, natural figure, but using the gallery dates as a guide, at some point in late 2003 she underwent surgery and returned with some really horrible and pretty weird-looking breast implants. Although (thankfully) they're never fully revealed – sheer tops are as far as Elise will go – they don't suit her at all. The huge library of pre-op images only serves as a reminder of what a beautiful, natural figure she once had.
The other major negative is the site design, which is woefully out-of-date and does nothing to enhance the user experience; photo sets aren't dated and zip files, the links for which aren't on the gallery pages, are few and far between. There is also a complete lack of meaningful supplementary content. There are a handful of tiny videos in an antiquated format, an ancient guest book page and a few member galleries. The live chat has been off-line for as long as I can remember and the last webcam show was in 1999.
Bottom Line:
Elise Erotic really is hit-and-miss. On the positive side, Elise has great legs and there is a huge number of images. Unfortunately there is also a general lack of imagination and variation when it comes to shoots, so while the outfits may vary, the locations rarely do.
The trend towards more nudity is welcome, but it's about eight years too late. Personally speaking, the less of Elise's fake tits I see the better, seriously, she's a lot sexier when she keeps them covered up. Given the strengths of the older galleries, when Elise was a more natural-looking, girl-next-door type, a few more daring shoots back then would've been just the ticket.
Say what you like about the subject and Elise herself, there's no arguing that the website itself is dreadful. Quite apart from it appearing to be designed fifteen years ago, the navigation is misleading and in some cases dysfunctional. For example, currently there are twenty-six main galleries but the left-hand navigation only extends to twenty-four, and on some pages to only twenty-one, so it's easy to miss the latest additions. Each main gallery is divided into (on average) nine separate shoots, but none are dated. Only the most recent galleries have zip files but their download links are located on a different page entirely.
It's annoying that each set is posted in two halves, on average fifty/sixty images at a time over a period of a week. But here's a tip; although the HTML navigation pages for each gallery go on-line in two halves, all the images are uploaded in one go, so if you use a download manager or guess at their URLs, they're easy to find. That means you can view all the images in a set without a long wait, but effectively reduces the number of site updates to a paltry two per month.
In terms of video, the site is light years behind what everyone else is doing. With three exceptions, all thirty-six clips are presented in Real Media versions 3 and 4, formats that all but died out back in the last century. In addition, they're all the size of postage stamps, none larger than 320×240, including the most recent posting in Windows Media format. The video content itself is acceptable, in fact Elise's voice reminds me of Jodie Foster and she has a fun, personable nature, but the technical aspects of the video let the whole side down.
Would I recommend the site? Err... tough call. It's inexpensive to join and if you don't expect much you'll probably be pleased with the huge number of photos, especially if you're a fan of the genre. Recent shoots have more spice, and that'll hopefully continue, but if you're looking for video content you'll be sorely disappointed and if you're troubled by disfigured chests, look away or concentrate on the older material. For a month or two the site is worth a try, but probably doesn't have much mileage. If you're a fan of Elise, rejoin every twelve months or so, with just one month's subscription you'll be caught up in next to no time.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hard pushed to list any. 400+ galleries
Cons:
Very badly laid out
No formats or catagories
Cannot download in zip format
Sets look like pictures are missing and almost like they only bought 1/2 of a complete set.
HardCore images miss out the cumshot! WTF?
Bottom Line:
Dont bother wasting your money. I am very dissapointed by this site and feel very let down.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The dude below me gave the stats so I will concentrate on content, service and overall 'delivery of goods'.
Excellent quality and fast download speeds(4MBit) 1280x720
Multi formats
Decent sets
Nut burstingly horny babes
Good support (now)
Good camera work
Classy and pro presentation
Exclusive content
'Casting' shorts are a great addition
Stockings (about fukin time)
Cons:
REGIONAL damn pricing
Not enough updates
Some 'movement' of content from other DDF sites and some recycled older low res quality, although both are not repeated content
Not enough ethnic babes
Too many solos and same 'format' dudes
Not enough location shoots although the shoots are classy
Older films are low res and many models not repeated again
Bottom Line:
If you're into legs n shit, like I am, then this site is the leader in it's genre/field.
Stunning babes wearing hot gear in cool locations and emphasis being on feet and legs they do not disappoint.
The exclusive content is one of it's attractions. You will get the odd 'known' babe but the scenes are still exclusive.
I could do with more variety in terms of ethnic babes, guys who don't 'machine-gun' rump the babes as sometimes it's nice to 'see' the sex, maybe some better location shoots and re-introduction of babes from their back catalogue would be a winner.
The regional pricing stinks and I for one am really fukin sick of this shit. You can't call a 'small person' a midget any more unless you want your nuts torched and your house sold in compensation, but you can charge what the fuk you like when it comes to us in the UK.
I love this site but due to their slow updates and regional pricing it's not one I would stay a member of on a monthly and regular basis.
I also believe, much like other 'umbrella' sites, that there should be a discounted membership for those who want to sign up to all the DDF sites. It makes sense and keeps the variety and update aspect manageable.
Had it not been for the updates and regional pricing practices I would have thrown a few more points on the overall score. And until sites realise that we ARE their income streams and they stop treating us as if they are doing us favours then maybe the scores would grow and sites would establish a long and loyal paying customer base.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
