Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 128 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Only Tease

26. Only Tease (1)

Pay
Active
80
alamop (6) 07-05-11  01:01am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The content comes tick and fast. I am a member of onlyallsites, which includes the main site, onlytease, as well as onlsecetaries, onlyopaques and onlysilkandsatin. The main site has three new sets every day and the others one per day.
Given the volume, there is usually something every day to enjoy. For this site to appeal, though, you really have to like pretty clothes on pretty girls, and if you do, then there is going to be something there for you. Given the wide range of taste out there though, not every set will press your buttons.
Secondly, the models are often very, very pretty. OT is a British site, and they look for the kind of girl-next-door, fresh-faced models so beloved of 'Page 3' in the UK. That is not to everyone'#s taste, but if you like slim, pretty girls, 22-28, often with larger than average breasts, then you will not be dissapointed.
OT encourages and responds to member input. There's a well-attended forum and the site owners monitor and respond to user requests.
Cons: Video quality is occasionally iffy. Sometimes, shots go out of focus, and the direction is often samey and uninspired, as if the cameraman has a standard script of shots to get through during the session.
Image quality is better, but sometimes sufffers from the same lack of imagination.
Finally, the classification of which sets go where is sometimes bizarre. Onlyopaques has more non-opaque sets than opaque ones, which often seem to end up in onlytease.
Bottom Line: This is a huge, well-run, original site. It does what it says on the tin - tease. 99% of sets have no nudity. Some don't even go topless. You really have to like girls clothed to be in their target market.
If you do though, then you are in luck.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Michelle\'s Nylons

27. Michelle's Nylons (0)

Pay
Active
85
mr smut (40) 05-07-11  11:52pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + unique amateur MILF content
+ weekly updates
+ mostly good picture quality (even for the oldest sets)
+ no download limit, no DRM but clumsy navigation
+ fast server with very good download speed (about 2.5 MB/s)
Cons: - older picture series may only contain about 50 pics and have 1024 pixels on the long side
- only a few sets together with other girls
- videos come as WMV only
- no ZIP files for the picture series
- poor navigation on the member pages
- Billing through CCBILL only but at least no regional pricing
Bottom Line: DISCLAIMER
First of all I have to point out that I'm a fan of Michelle for several years now. Nonetheless I do hope to be professional enough to write an honest review about her second site.

ABOUT MICHELLE
Michelle is a 50 year old girl from the UK now living in Spain. She IMHO is a drop dead gorgeous lady with a very pretty face and a killer smile. Her firm 32FF boobs and round ass are so delicious I would never think that she's already that old not to forget her wonderful legs and smooth skin. If someone would ask me for a prototype of a genuine British or western European MILF I could only name her.
In the beginning she was always shaved but it seems to me that she now wears her pubic hair with pride. She wanted just to grow it and do a shaving special for one of her members but that was months ago.
Michelle loves her little hobby and as one can see it did her good the last 5 years as she now looks more sexy and absolutely self-confident. She simply enjoys to be watched and to tease.

ABOUT THE WEBSITE
Michelle started this site in October 2007 and until now she made more than 200 picture updates (with more than 130 matching videos) showing her in- and outdoors wearing elegant dresses and of course nylons and girdles. She loves short skirts, elegant heels, playful lingerie, nylons and girdles, oral sex, to masturbate using toys or her fingers alone, posing nude outdoors in the countryside and to tease. The updates are different to what can be seen on Southern Charms she may use the same dresses or lingerie but the content differs.
Only a few sets show her together with some other girls mostly her friend Julie who shares her interest in nylons and hot lingerie.

ABOUT THE PICTURES
The preview area gives you a very good idea of what can be found in the member's area. Starting end of 2010 (updates 189 dated 2010-12-18 to 211 dated 2011-05-02) the pictures now have 1280 pixels on the long side. The JPG quality is good enough to blow them up even on a very large screen.
But beware because some of the newer sets contain pictures that aren't sharp enough guess her husband had some trouble with his camera. The latest sets are crisp again. I use one of her landscape pictures as background for my PC and therefore blew it up to 2401x1600 pixels from the original 1277x851 size and the quality is still good.

ABOUT THE VIDEOS
Her videos are mostly 4:3 aspect ratio with 720x576 pixels resolution and come a bit grainy but still enjoyable. I have to sit about 2 metres away from my screen to be able to enjoy her teasing me. The videos show her doing solo teasing, masturbation with fingers and dildos, doing handjobs, blowjobs or having intercourse.

CONCLUSION
This website is recommended for MILF lovers that like to see a nylon lady sharing her passion for sex. The site has some points that would need some improvements but is worth a try.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Art-Lingerie

28. Art-Lingerie (2)

Pay
Active
80
messmer (137) 04-25-11  04:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-17-11  11:07am  (Update History)
Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros: Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.

Good selection of picture sets and videos.

Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.

Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.

Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.

Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!

Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons: The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.

I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.

It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.

Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.

I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line: A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.

I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.

They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.

The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.

It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!

If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nylon X Files

29. Nylon X Files (0)

Pay
Active
75
otoh (54) 01-31-11  12:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 02-19-11  12:06am  (Update History)
Reason: Download links now provided to pictures - see my edit notes.
Pros: - Good photography
- Fairly unique content
- Pretty models
- Nice outfits and (obviously) great nylons
- Some good mild-fetish wear
- Many location/outdoor shoots
- Some entertaining videos
- Downloading pictures was a mildly diverting intellectual challenge
Cons: - Arguably not much actual nudity (depends on your definition)
- Max resolution of 1200x800px; videos at 320x640
- Frequent timeouts of login
- Only one connection allowed - eg can't open a gallery while viewing a video
- No zip sets
- No video download
- No model index
- No update schedule, or dating of sets
Bottom Line: I recently saw some pictures from Pantyhose-X - a German nylon fetish magazine (unsure whether print or only online). The few sets that I saw, I loved, and decided to seek out and join the source. I'm not sure of the details, but reading between the lines, I suspect that some change of ownership has been involved recently; pantyhose-x.com becoming nylon-x-files.com with content from the former. I also rather suspect that the changes are not for the best.

First the good.

This is obviously very nylon-oriented material - and more to the point, it's very fetishistic. By which I mean that it focuses very much on the sheerness of it; in fact in the majority of the sets, the tights don't come off at all. Some of them are gusseted and you don't see that much, other than them pulled up tight into the model's pussy; others are seamless and sheer and there are plenty of closeups of the girls masturbating through and under the nylon. The rest of the clothing is great too - from casual and businesswear, to things like corsets, high lace-up boots, PVC miniskirts etc.

The models too are pretty - not too glam or polished (maybe some peroxide), some girl-next-door types - but great figures and legs (of course!). And the photography is great - with a lot of shoots outdoors and in public places - some quite risqué stuff which is kind of exciting.

My only gripe with the content is my usual - most models are shaved, and given the nature of this style, that you get to glimpse them through the sheer nylon, I can't help feeling that even a trimmed strip or patch of hair would be something more to glimpse.

However...

Although I love the material, the presentation of it is the worst I've come across. Having emailed the webmaster to check, I knew about the resolution (it seems to have suffered in the transition, from the 1800px sets that seem to have been offered by pantyhose-x) and the lack of zips - but figured I'd give it a try.

The members area is very basic, just a list of sets with no dating, model names, or sorting/searching features for the 150 odd sets available.

**Edit** When I first wrote the review, there was no download of anything - not even individual pictures - you could only view on screen in a lightbox-type viewer, which made me mark it down heavily. But the site does now offer download links to pictures; there are still no zips, but this small change makes it easy to download a set with a manager, eg downThemAll.

The site still has issues as in the cons above, but this small change makes it seem far less mean-spirited, and is enough to bump my score from 65 to 75 - it's now recommended if you like this material (and can use a download manager!)
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

30. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
87
Wittyguy (95) 01-26-11  02:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons: -- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line: When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.

VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.

OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.

The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).

If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.

I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ePantyhose Land

31. ePantyhose Land (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
tasha (1) 12-30-10  01:25pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Quantity, quantity
A few downright amazing pix and really nice looking models.
Cons: This has the look of a pantyhose fetish site set up by breast men. Leg festishists like a teasing process (see Onlyallsites.com), with a gradual removing of clothes. This site has the skirt off almost always by the third pic. There's precious little leg crossing,hemline hiking, shoe dangling or foot dipping--all prized by leg fetishists.
Bottom Line: Worth a trial look.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Pantyhose Amateurs

32. Pantyhose Amateurs (0)

Pay
Active
75
otoh (54) 12-27-10  03:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated: 01-07-11  11:09am  (Update History)
Reason: Minor score change; think I set the bar a bit high to start with...
Pros: - Mainly pretty, amateur-looking, natural girls
- Some videos have them chatting, which I like
- Great legwear, Wolford tights etc
- Not just tights as the name suggests, stockings also
Cons: - Last updates seem to be from 6 weeks ago; update schedule AWOL since 2009; actual update material dated 2008
- Quality is not great; older videos at 480x360, newer 640x480 or 700x400
- Same for photo shoots; some at 1500x1000, others seem to be captures at 640x480 or 960x540
- Some videos have ludicrous music over them
- Some - luckily not many - have the cameraman talking and lending a hand - not really what the material here is about
- Listings are basic - just straight list, with thumbnails, of albums and movies; no sort, filter etc
- Not many unshaved girls, and only a couple of girl-girl videos
Bottom Line: I've got a much bigger list of cons than pros, and given that, my score might seem a little high. Especially as the site is pretty dated looking - content seems to be from 2000-2008, and has the bare minimum of navigation to get round the 200-odd movies, and similar number of photo sets.

However, I do like the material. The girls are cute, unpretentious, pretty without being too glammed-up. Also a few familiar names there, perhaps from before they were so well-known (eg Sunny Leone, Bree Olsen, Mai Ly).

Videos are almost all solo, some good teasing to start with, and as per the niche, some clothing tends to remain on - with panties pulled aside, or tights pulled down but remaining on while the models masturbate; some with toys, others just with fingers.

Oh, and there is some GREAT legwear. I like tights and stockings, but there are some videos here with some impressively patterned Wolfords etc, which is a big turn-on for me. There are a few nylon sites around, but featuring really sexy tights like these seems fairly rare.

I joined on a 3-day trial - well worth it, but you can likely get all you need within that 3 days.

It also comes with access to Amateur Upskirts - some of the same models, but it's more lollipop/pigtails/barely-legal themed, which isn't really my thing.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Alta Heels

33. Alta Heels (0)

Pay
Newbie
96*
jsmits80 (4) 12-13-10  05:36am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large collection of pictures and videos with beautiful women in nylons and high heels (few bare legs)
-Emphasis on legs/nylons/lingerie/high heels. Mainly solo girls.
-High quality videos.
-Models talk a lot during the videos.
-Beautiful lingerie, outfits and nylons on the models.
-The models keep their shoes on!
-Frequent updates (2 or video/picture updates per week)
-Fast downloads.
-Great selection of awesome shoes. Mainly platforms and high heels.
-Fairly priced.
-Easy site navigation and simple design.
-95% beautiful girls.
Cons: -The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better all the time.
-The site limits the amount you can download in a day.
-Only two lesbian sets.
-No zip downloads.
Bottom Line: -This is by far my favorite leg/nylon/high heel web site! I have belonged to Altaheels almost continuously since it started. It has practically every component of a leg site that I look for – Super pretty girls with long legs, terrific outfits, fantastic stockings and pantyhose, amazing high heels. For you guys out there who like bare legs, there is some of this here too. Some unique things on this site:
-A bunch of sets with seamless pantyhose! These are always the best!
- Several sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. These are tremendous to us leg guys.
-Tons of different high heels. They range from 6 inch pumps to 8 inch platforms.
-A couple of shoots with some crazy high heels (with like 6 inch platforms and 12 inch heels)!!! I have never seen these kinds of shoes on any other site!!!
-Girls who “talk” or tell a story during the videos! These are very unique among all leg sites. There is nothing more of a turn on then to hear a girl talking to you; trying to turn you on, with nylons and heels? The best! I hate leg videos that just show a girls sitting there like a lump. I want to get to know her a little or just see that she is a real person.
-The overall size of the site content is great.
-The pictures are better than average quality, 700x1000 pixels, about 225 kb. Most sets have 30 to 60 pictures. For me, more important that the size of the pictures is the content.
-The video quality of the older stuff is average, but the newer videos appear to be getting much better. Most of the videos last 5 to 11 minutes.
-The price is a good value because of the content and frequent updates (24.95 for 30 days then 21.95 reoccurring every 30 days). I do see that they do split some of the content to other sites, but this is the one I really like to see.
-For me, the key to this site is the complete overall substance. Sure, blahblahblahlegs.com has a few prettier girls but ALTAHEELS has every girl in super high heels; blahblahblahnylons.net may have higher video quality but half the girls aren’t wearing nylons or lingerie; blahblahblahstockings.ru has nice outfits but the in the videos the girls can’t speak English…. I guess my point is that the pieces of the puzzle that I am looking for come together here.
BTW – As I was writing this, I looked through my hard drive at some of the videos and there are a couple videos (sam_geo_001, heather202 and celeste_303) which alone would be reason enough to join! Absolutely mind-blowing for leg men!
-I give it a 96. I took some points off because of the download volume limiter and no zip files, but if you are a leg guy; you should definitely check it out.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Vintage Flash

34. Vintage Flash (1)

Pay
Active
82
messmer (137) 12-05-10  01:40pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-06-10  09:43am  (Update History)
Reason: Score adjusted upward because complaint about slow speeds appears to have been an abberation rather than the rule.
Pros: Great looking British models.

Sexy vintage lingerie. Latest videos and picture sets are of good quality. Videos at present come in at 1280 x 720 px at 5000 kbps. Picture sets are of good quality as well and are available in zipped format.

Content not overwhelming but 470 Picture Sets and 244 Videos (many of the older ones are, of course, of lesser quality) isn't too bad either.

Love British accents.

Additional three bonus sites.
Cons: Site does not allow you to stop and then resume a download.

Not download manager friendly. My trusty DownThemAll gave me the same speed as the regular browser downloader.

Awful, inadequate search engine. I saw one picture on the tour and it was this picture that enticed me to subscribe. Do you think I can find that set? Rhetorical question! I suppose I will before the month is up.

Only one update every five days.

The three bonus sites do not offer a great deal of content.

Access to bonus sites requires a separate sign-in.
Bottom Line: Despite some of the negatives a nice site.

The few videos I downloaded yesterday were great. Lovely vintage lingerie (full size panties, nylons and garter belts, girdles, bras etc.) I am looking forward to downloading quite a bit more of their great videos (at least the newer ones) because just about every one of them looks tempting. The "dirty" talk by the models doesn't hurt either!

The three bonus sites "Pantyhosed4U" (305 photo sets, 138 videos), "VFAcademy" (69 photo sets, 70 videos), and "VintageFlash.Archives" (236 photo sets, 1 video!) are nice to have but aren't big enough, or update often enough, to make subscription to this site worthwhile for more than one month.

I like the mother site (reviewed), it does have its flaws but at least, for once, I don't have to condemn a site out of hand which is refreshing.

Recommended to fans of vintage lingerie and British models.
Respond: 14 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Ferro Network

35. Ferro Network (0)

Network
Active
62
pat362 (365) 12-05-10  09:04am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -CCbill is their CC processor.
-They have a wide variety of sites that target specific fetishes like: anal, mature, shemales, feet, nylon & pantyhose, gays, lesbian and toys.
-They have a pretty impressive library of videos.
I stopped counting at 2000 videos because the content on the other sites did not appeal.
-Some sites offer both videos and photo sets.
-Many of the videos come in a single file but not all of them.(see Cons)
-You can download photosets as a single zip file.
-You can use a download manager(see Cons).
-They rebill at almost half the original cost.
-Some of the videos have little scenarios but it's all in Russian.
Cons: -You have to log in to each site individualy from the main members site everytime you visit that main site. The only redeeming thing is that as long as you go back to the main ferro page and you've log on to a specific site once then you won't have to log in again.
-Once you've logged on to a site then there is no way of going back to the main ferro page except if you use the back button as many times as you did going forward or logging back on to the main screen.
-You can use a download manager but since you can only download about 4 videos at a time then why bother.(I didn't see a difference in speeds either way).
-There is no search option of any kind.
-The updates are not dated so no way of knowing if or when the sites update.
-There is only one video download option.
-Some videos are broken in 3 or more sections.
-The price is way too high for what this network offers.
Bottom Line: -I've been curious about ferro since the moment I heard about the network. The cost always made it a near impossible option for me but since I recently won the top draw then I thought this would be the time.(No you can't use your winning for that but I could buy Christmas gifts with them and that left me some extra cash).

-This network might have been a great find about 8 to 10 yrs ago. All that porn under one roof and such an amazing selection to chose from but this is 2010 and a network that doesn't date their updates, offer better download options, lowering their exorbitant join cost should not exist.

Possibly the best thing about the join price is that it makes it very hard for most porn surfers to join and seeing the content makes me think that's not a bad idea. If they drop their price then more people will be tempted to join this site and franky that would be a bad idea for most customers.

I debated which score to give this network and I stuck with 62 only because there are still quite a few good videos. You'll just have to do some serious research to find.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit JB Video

36. JB Video (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
jsmits80 (4) 11-30-10  02:55pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Extremely large collection of pictures and videos. I mean, this site has been around forever.
- Caters to leg/nylon/high heel guys. Tons of content for leg-lovers.
-Frequent updates and new models (approximately 1-2 per week)
-High quality videos.
-The downloads come pretty fast (I don’t know much about internet server speed but I would say it is somewhere between amazon and computer support site in India)
-Nice outfits and nylons on the models.
-Good selection of shoes. Nice platforms and high heels.
-Discounts on DVD purchases from their online store.
-Steaming video and live shows (available at certain times)
-Fairly inexpensive (about $30 per month) for the amount of content.
-Navigation of the site is easy and straight forward. I like sites that allow you to go right back to the home or updates pages without having to go through 50 pages first.
-Wide variety of girls (Caucasian, Black, Asian, Hispanic…..Younger, little older…)
-Approximately one lesbian scene a month.
Cons: -A lot of the early stuff is so so quality and content.
-No zip downloads
-50% of the girls are good looking, 10% are much less. (Remember – 40% are smoking hot)
-Way too many sets of JB himself in what he calls “POV shoots”. I am a leg man and I want to see hot girls in nylons! I just don’t want to see a guy’s junk being jacked off by an Asian chick every forth photo set.
-Many of the videos just have a girl sitting on a bed or pole dancing in pantyhose. No talking at all. I just think videos that have the girl talk to you, interact with you.
-Some of the photo sets could be larger. They range from 40 to 80 pictures in a set.
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better every day.
-No model or content search engine. I would love to be able to search for “seamless pantyhose” or “2 girls in pantyhose” on the site because of the large content.
-No rating system for pictures or videos.
Bottom Line: -As any leg guy can tell you, JB Video is one of the oldest and often one of the first leg sites that most of us join (it was my first and I have re-joined dozens of times over the years). So in many ways I feel like I am reviewing the Eifel Tower. It is a great nylon/leg/high heel site with a monstrous collection of pictures and videos. Lots of hot girls in nylons and heels to please any leg guy. I would give it an 85 rating and say that if you love legs; you should join.
-A few suggestions:
-Too few sets with seamless pantyhose! As all us leg guys know; we search for seamless pantyhose sets like the Holy Grail.
-Too few sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. Again, super awesome but few and far between.
-One of the very few leg sites that have videos showing girls changing shoes. An excellent bonus!
-A couple of the DVDs for sale (like Sky and Summer’s Foot Tease, Foot Seduction 14 Goldie and Isabella and Foot Seduction 24 Emily and Darenzia and a couple of the other lesbian videos) are worth the price of admission alone. True masterpieces! There should be more lesbian sets like these! I love these videos because the girls are talking the whole time, talking about their legs and nylons.
-Pretty good shoe collection. Nice sets with 6 inch platforms. I would like to see a few sets with some 8 inch heels.
-Need to get rid of a lot of the “less pretty” girls.
-Way fewer of the “POV” sets of a guy getting a foot job from a girl. These aren’t very good and not very exciting.
I know a will be re-joining JB Video on a regular basis. A very solid leg site and a good value with a few kinks.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Only Tease

37. Only Tease (1)

Pay
Active
72
messmer (137) 10-18-10  01:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-19-10  10:50am  (Update History)
Reason: This site is starting to seriously annoy me. Today's video update was at an unacceptable 640x480px at 1469 total bitrate. Lousy picture!
Pros: At present 657 models, 913.663 images and 1854 videos according to their tour .. that's a lot.

Mostly beautiful girls. Sexy lingerie and hosiery.

Frequent updates.

Excellent picture quality offered in three different resolutions (largest 2000x3000px).

Zipped downloads.

Easy navigation and elaborate search engine.

Most recent videos are in 720p HD with a bitrate over 10000.
Cons: The most disappointing con: I found a real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos and her most recent video, published as recently as August 2010, is in 640x480 AVI format (approx 50MB) and of horrible quality.

In general the older videos, and you don't have to go back far, are just terrible. I have watched plenty of videos with the same technical specifications on other sites that were much better in clarity and quality.

Catering to a younger crowd only. There are tons of picture sets featuring thongs and stay ups but very few featuring full back panties or camisoles etc. There is not one mature face in the crowd.

Picture sets in general spend too much time on the fully clothed.
Bottom Line: Quite frankly the eighty I gave this site is for the technical quality of its picture sets and for its elaborate search features.

The high resolution picture sets are great even though most did not appeal to me because they are too "young" for my taste when it comes to lingerie. See above.

I am managing to get my money's worth from the recent HD movies because, even though they might not exactly feature the lingerie I was craving to see, I love the girls and their British accents!

A good tease only site for softcore lovers, especially younger ones who grew up with thongs and stay-ups and pantyhose. For me it is a disappointment. Too bad I really had high hopes!
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

38. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
90
nadiencendia (83) 09-03-10  05:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Gorgeus European women
-Amazing foot fetish action (solo, g/g and some b/g)
-Really huge archive, updated every day (one day with a picture set, next day with the corresponding videos)
-Several video download options
-zip archives for pictures sets
-Part of the ddfprod network
Cons: -Best days of this site are long gone
-If bought indepentently it's quite pricy
-Some "new" sets are just re-editions of older ones
-Older sets have not been improved since they first appeared and have quite low quality
Bottom Line: Hot Legs and Feet continues to be my favorite foot fetish site, although I think that it's "golden days" are now over. I remember when I first joined, Sophie Moone was in her full splendor and making tons of videos for DDF; the same could be said about Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Sandra Shine... Now most of those models are retired, working for 21st Sextury or in the US, and the new models that have appeared since then don't have the same sex appeal or charisma. Or maybe it's just me...

In any case, this site works very well for someone who is looking for foot fetish action: it has quite a lot of solo sets; many girl/girl action sets, and quite a few boy/girl sets. It is updated very regularly (three new sets a week, consisting on pictures and video) and in its new sets it offers different download options and qualities. Only good things can be said about directing, lighting, editing, etc. None knows how to capture the beauty of female feet in action like these guys.

My last consideration is a quite obvious one: this site is included in the DDF Productions network deal, so if you are interested, I would recommend joining the whole network for a bit more money, because you will get access to other good sites too.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Girls In Leather Boots

39. Girls In Leather Boots (0)

Pay
Active
74
bootsulike (7) 08-03-10  02:54pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - good size collection growing since 2005 (about 130 videos, over 200 photo sets)
- nice selection of British regulars, a few new faces
- lots of girls in leather boots!
- regular updates, every 3 days; every 4th or 5th update is video
- photo sets reasonable softcore content
- a few sets/videos slightly stronger
- generally exclusive content
- host responds to emails
Cons: - poor site usability; no search, just a list of galleries
- endlessly opens up new windows for each link
- one size pics (generally 1000 x 670, 250 dpi)
- no zips!
- video production is poor, content a bit repetitive
- one video format, wmv, typically 128 kbps, 720 x 576
- videos typically 3 minutes only and have large watermarks
- predominantly softcore, a few mild bondage and punishment sets
- there is some non-exclusive content, but I believe this is legacy - designed to pad out the site in earlier days - and not being updated
- no model bios, interaction or shoot descriptions
Bottom Line: GILB services a niche and makes few bones about it.

Host, Raif, is a genuine enthusiast like most of those attracted to the content. Yet, the site has the tell-tale signs of an amateur.

It's very boot content focussed, but let down in other areas.

From a technical point of view, the media content is poor with no format options. Downloading was at a reasonable speed and there was no daily limit.

The site isn't the prettiest on the eye and not designed for easy use. Searching is non-existent; just a random list of galleries. There are also a few broken links. (Hi Raif, even with my limited knowledge of HTML and CSS I could design a better site.)

That said, the content - if the boot niche is what you are after - is generally good. Scene settings are a bit repetitive, but there has been some thought to content and outfits.

Don't expect anything much stronger than softcore from mainly British models. There's a few insertions, but it's mostly posing or stripping. Some of the bought in content features bondage and humiliation. (I hoped Raif got this properly licensed.)

There are a few familiar faces - Lucy Zara and Frankie - plus a couple of bored looking European girls. Otherwise, the models put on a good show, giving prominence to the boot.

For the content, it's a reasonable $20 a month. Even without zips you could download the whole site in a few weeks.

Raif did respond quickly to an email about a broken link.

I'd want to score GILB higher if only because it's one of the few sites to guarantee good boot content. Other options include Bootiful, which has little or no video content, and features some rather tame stuff even in comparison to GILB. Only Tease does feature quite a lot of boots. It would be interesting if the production team produce an Only Boots site.

Overall though, GILB is let down by amateurish production values, the lack of format options and a clunky website.

But...fills a niche.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Foot Factory

40. Foot Factory (0)

Pay
Active
80
nadiencendia (83) 07-27-10  02:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Clean and efficient navigation
-All exclusive content
-Classy, artistic pictures and videos
-Acceptable archive size (+300 videos, +3000 picture sets)
-Beautiful models (including Valentina Vaughn, Justine Joli or Dita von Teese, for example)
-Full trial membership
-Pictures are downloadable in .zip format
Cons: -Mostly solo, softcore content
-Very irregular updates
-Somewhat dark in style and lighting
-Videos with music (I hate that)
-Not a wide choice of formats and qualities for video download
Bottom Line: So, following my quest for new and exciting foot fetish sites, I joined this site, which I knew mostly because they released a couple of videos as movies in Hotmovies.com. To join, I used a "trial membership" option that appears as an "easter egg" if you try to surf away from their Join page: for 2.95€, I got complete access to the site for three days. Great deal, I am really thankful after my extremely dissapointing experiences with other trial memberships recently.

As for the site itself, well, to enjoy it you have to know what you are going to get, and you have to like that kind of stuff: it's mainly artistic, classy, elegant, somewhat dark foot fetish solo/masturbation pictures and videos. It has an Andrew Blake ring to it, although without the BDSM.

Among the models who work(ed) for this site, you will find some of my personal favorites, such as Justine Joli or Valentina Vaughn, but also a lot of unknown actresses who are just ok. One thing that I hate is that most videos -not all- include a music soundtrack, which silences the moans and groans of the actresses. I really don't like that, it's a complete turn off for me...

On the technical side, the navigation is just good (you can only access the pics and videos in inverse chronological order, with no search options or categories) and the choice of video qualities and formats is minimal -inexistant for older sets. Another big "con" is the low rate of updates in this site: they come irregularly, mostly once every week, but sometimes every two weeks, or every three or four days...

All in all, I was dissapointed with the site, mainly because I am not that much into solo action, and because, although I can enjoy a softcore video once in a while, I prefer it not to be SO softcore. This site is clearly devoted to showing the beauty of the female body, and more precisely female feet, but I also expected it to show some hot f/f or even m/f action. Obviously Ed Fox is a great photographer and a talented artistic director, but it's just not exactly my taste.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pantyhose Lane

41. Pantyhose Lane (0)

Pay
Active
85
mbaya (356) 06-27-10  08:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Daily updates of the photo section only.
-Good size site with 145 models and 33 guest models. Each has multiple shoots, so my guess is about 600 to 700 photosets.
-Most recent photos are 1200x1800.
-Although primarily a photo site, there are 125 video shoots as well. The most recent update is WMV 864x480, 595 kbps. Very weak and poor quality.
-Nice mix of mostly European and American models with a lot of Asian Americans and Black ones as well. If you love Asian women you will feel that you have died and gone to heaven.
Cons: -No zipdownloads.
-No easy way to search. Listings for photosets are under the models' names, in the order from the most recent update going back. You can also search by model name and a tiny thumbnail. Videos are listed separately, also in update order or in a separate listng of just videos. Only clips, no whole videos.
-Not updating the videos. There is no date on the site for each video, but the most recent is copyright 2009.
Bottom Line: Usually after downloading from a site, I gradually lose interest in the content. I get the feeling of been there, done that and it is on to the next website.

That didn't happen here. I wrote a review almost exactly a year ago and was primarily interested in the videos at that time. I did not appreciate the quality of the photography or its degree of erotic value. Gradually over the last year I have come to appreciate more the photos I downloaded and saved.

While the videos are of poor quality, the photo sets are nicely done. There is plenty of tease, as you might expect from a site with pantyhose in its name. Many of the outfits are quite classy and the stripping sequences work for me. While softcore, they often, but not always, go to full explicit. Sometimes there is complete nudity, but mostly you see before and after pussy shots of stripping off pantyhose. Some sets do not feature explcitness and the model stays clothed.

The model selection is first rate. You will recognize some familiar faces, but by no means all. Many are simply gorgeous, with great legs that are showcased in pantyhose. Many have nice breasts as well. Overall, very much glam in style, but with much more nudity and explicitness than for example Only Tease. The quality of the Asian women makes this site stand out. While the Americans and Europeans are also first rate, the Asian women alone make this site worth trying.

As far as a comparison with other pantyhose focused sites, much better looking models, more teasing and more delivery of explicitness. I feel it is the best in this niche.

I found the site to be fun and worth a shot if you are into softcore. Definitely a good value for a reasonable price. If they would make the photos zipdownloadable and added a decent way to search, I would not hesitate to give this site a score in the 90's.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Alta Heels

42. Alta Heels (0)

Pay
Active
61
nineinch (8) 06-20-10  08:19pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons: Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line: If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Office Girls

43. Office Girls (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Magnifico (0) 05-21-10  01:44pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: fetish content with stockings and office girls
Cons: old material with bad quality
content is double on the site
videos are cut in length
3rd party material
no zip files
files have no different names (bad to sort on the pc)
less pictures
less videos
Bottom Line: NEVER AGAIN - HANDS AWAY
After contacting the wabmaster three times (took him almost 2 weeks) i got a refund.
Lucky i did not have to pay for this!!!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Only Tease

44. Only Tease (1)

Pay
Active
94
Mr Fountain (50) 04-28-10  03:09pm
Rookie Badge  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: # I have been a member for about ten times and still am excited enough about it; taken my breath away enough to do another review.

# Only Tease is one of the most erotic brands of softcore I have seen; a must see database for softcore and panty, hosiery, and foot and shoe fetish lovers.
#Prestige section which is premium quality glamour
#711 x 1066; 1365x2048; 2000x3000 photos

# enormous amount of photos over 850,000

#collection of models and overall photo quality
#price: only 24.95 a month
# offers fastrcks that members can use to see future updates Each membership starts with about 10 to see 10 future shoots or vids
# I look at all of the updates; just a solid amount of models-
Cons: # the same set is usually the same for a lot of the photo shoots

# this is not a hardcore site. Its a niche site dedicated to softcore, hosiery, and foot fetish.

videos are outnumbered about 4 or 5 to one
Bottom Line: The power of Only Tease- I've done so many reviews; even redoing and updating a review for the main site Only Tease; and I have spent a lot of time doing so.

I hope that softcore lover geared towards erotic softcore photos and videos won't miss out on such a fine database of gorgeous and mostly uk models. For only 24.95- its a great buy. I hope people won't miss out- but some will because they may think that softcore is too soft to be erotic but OT has proven to be the opposite of that Its taken my breath away just as much as some of my prior fav site reviews.

I have spent around 24.95 x 10 months for Only Tease member ships or about $250
without thinking much about it and probably will keep the 24.95 a month going though I should join the multi month or only all sites to save a little.

plenty of panty and bum closeups, uniform; tennis, ballerina, cheerleader; hosiery; premium prestige section shich is where they have the models pose in the nice sets. Vids are done both inside and outside and usually consist of the model primping and stripping their clothes off
but I would suggest Only Tease membership for any softcore lover- its really a reliable site in terms of overall quality and I have still yet to see all of the updates- more than I have time to look at.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lick Nylons

45. Lick Nylons (0)

Pay
Active
65
bootsulike (7) 04-26-10  05:04am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - down and dirty masturbation
- vids are reasonable quality, lighting ok
- provides access to a range of other Ferro Cash sites
- navigation straightforward, easy to get to content
- seemed like it would get regular updates
Cons: - selection was small: don't believe the tour come on
- bored looking models: clinical, disinterested
- repetitive scenes
- mostly East European girls, so not much in the way of understandable talk
- zero interaction with models
Bottom Line: There's plenty of better sites giving you solo or girl-girl masturbation which are better value than this. Twistys or Suze would do.

On the plus side, you do get access to a big load of other content. However, that content is much the same.

It would be nice to have the girl come on to the camera. But, on sites like these I get the feeling that most of the "models" are street pros who are bored stiff. There's no need to speak English, but a bit of lust directed at the camera would help.

This was not money well spent and I will be steering clear of Ferro Cash sites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Foot Fetish Dreams

46. Foot Fetish Dreams (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
schlemihl (2) 04-12-10  03:56am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - tasteful stuff, videos and pictures
- good amount of stuff
- the "right" kinky viewing angles for nerds in pictures and videos
- mostly european-style, well-proportioned models
- site seems to update regularly
Cons: - videos not in HD, video-quality varies according to release date
- picture resolution varies, not state of the art of today
- picture-sets not as zip-files
- explicit download-limit of 3 GB per day
- defacto download-limit is clearly much less and lesser, you download 10 or 12 videos and your account gets disabled, account then has to get reanimated by sending email to webmaster, this game repeats every day
Bottom Line: Site has some good approach but needs to strain according to content quality and customer friendlyness.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Nylon Stockings Online

47. Nylon Stockings Online (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
Auxilia (4) 03-22-10  04:29pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusive content
Very attractive girls
Large archive
Frequent updates
Good communication
Cons: Some older content is non-nude
Videos need some work
Updates sometimes late
Bottom Line: Nylon Stockings online is run by Lynne, a blonde MILF who has featured on several mature websites.

As far as content goes, it's pretty much a case of what it says on the tin. Most of the content consists of picture sets of women undressing from fully clothed to just nylons and suspenders. Sometimes these are removed also, but others, the suspenders are unfastened to allow the nylons to fall naturally down around the model's ankles (am I the only guy in the universe that finds that a massive turn-on?!?).

The explicitness of nudity varies between sets. A lot of the admittedly huge archive before 2009 consists of non-nude content, with slightly stronger stuff coming at the beginning of last year. In terms of explicitness, I would put the site somewhere around the Fets.com range.

Videos appear on the site only very occasionally and the quality isn't very good at all for this day and age.

Very occasionally (and this happened when I was a member back last year) the two-weekly updates seem to dry up for no reason. For example I am typing this at 2330 local time and today's update has yet to appear. That said the communication from the website owner has in the past been very prompt in responding to queries. The same could be said for the member guest book on the site.

Bottom line? I really like this site; there are some fantastic looking models who really look like they're into it, and I feel the glitches are very minor. If you're a leg man like me I urge you to take a look!
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

48. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Active
75
mbaya (356) 03-21-10  08:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Huge network of sites with a similar theme.
-No download restrictions. A nice plus considering the sheer quantity that is available.
-Nice photosets with three choices of photo quality, including ultra large.
-Some HD quality videos, but not enough.
-Mostly very attractive models. However, about one third were not. Seem to be classy women that you might see or even know. I didn't see a single boob job.
-Very active member forum that takes requests from members.
Cons: -Glamour type photography. Often the women have too much makeup and seem very stiff. They don't often seem into what they are doing.
-Most videos are not at all erotic. Not much in the way of sensuous movements. Rubbing an arm or a leg is not teasing.
-Many videos and photo sets don't even get to topless.
Bottom Line: The site sells itself as 100% erotic, 100% tease and 100% exclusive. They also say they are about the erotic, not the extreme. In order to be erotic without being explicit, they need to appeal to the members ability to be mentally stimulated. Without explicit photos and videos, the models themselves have to be special in a way that other sites don't often attempt.

Since this is so unusual in pornland, comparisons are difficult, if not impossible. The question to be answered is, do they succeed? Is their goal of being erotic successful?

I was a member of onlytease.com in 2006. I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of heat I saw. However times change and so have my tastes in porn. Since I love nice legs and pantyhose, I felt that maybe I should give the network a try at the newly discounted price.

I found quite quickly that the network is a LOT larger than what I had subscribed to in 2006. The quality of both the videos and the photos has greatly improved. Navigation is easy, but the search function is still inadequate.

Did they reach their goal of being erotic? Yes and no. Yes some of what you see is truly great and I love it a lot. However, the site promises a lot more than it delivers. I thought the tease referred only to the content, but the site itself could be a lot better.

Regarding the outfits, the models all too often wear pants or use opaque pantyhose. I like dresses showcasing great legs that look like legs, in other words sheer pantyhose. I don't much care for cheerleaders or bunnies either.

Overall, problem number one is that nearly all the videos simply do nothing for me. In all fairness photo sites usually have poor videos. What I feel the problem here is that the models don't have much of a feel for teasing. For the most part, European models get into this type of photo and video modeling without first doing any stripping or other live shows. They may be quite beautiful, but don't master the art of sensuous movements. For example, I see a lot of scenes with hands rubbing arms or legs, but very little in the way of quick flashes. I rarely see a glimpse of panties that seems to be an accident or are intended to build up my interest. The strip sequences are usually quite dull and often end without being even topless. A lot of sizzle, but very little steak. There is an active thread in the forum about whether models who will not even do topless should be on the site.

In my opinion,the site is very much hit and miss. You would have to go through a lot of photo sets and videos to find the true gems. If you have the time and energy, you may fall in love with the site. As for me, I am happy to find a few truly enjoyable downloads, but the site is just too much work.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lingerie Videos

49. Lingerie Videos (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
cakeweasel (1) 02-05-10  03:50pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Quite good content; they have made some effort to collect videos with various kinds of lingerie, like their name says.
- For the detail minded, they even categorised according to the type of lingerie (stockings, corsets etc).
- The exclusive stuff always seems to be solo, but is well filmed.
- Support did actually respond - didn't help, but did respond ;)
Cons: Site is an abysmal piece of crap.
The navigation is pretty much useless: the only kind of list you can get is in some random order. They do have categories, but those also just lead to randomly ordered lists.
No streaming preview.
There seems to be no way to search by title.
They have short clips which you can painfully use to preview, but there is no link to the full video! To find that you have to navigate through their crappy lists.
The only way you will be able to use this is to blindly download full videos in the hopes they might be good.
Bottom Line: Terrible site ruins good content.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Lady Suspender

50. Lady Suspender (0)

Pay
Active
85
messmer (137) 02-04-10  07:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Mostly Mature Amateur Models. I did recognize some models from Pro sites but they are few and far between.

+ Exclusive contents.

+ Sticks faithfully to its niche of catering to girdle and old-fashioned lingerie fetishists.

+ No Download Restrictions.

+ Pictures can be downloaded zipped.
Cons: Picture sets are relatively small and are basically just repeating what you can see on the video clips.

Torturous search to find all the parts of a video since they come in small chunks over a period of time.

Very confusing and old-fashioned interface.

If I remember right video was at 640x480, 1000 bitrate, a bit underpowered for 2009 but not bad.
Might have improved in the meantime. I will let you know in a comment when I re-subscribe to this site.
Bottom Line: I felt the need to make this quick new review because I was not entirely fair to this site in my previous one.

Because, at the time, I was only a member for one month I assumed that full DVDs could only be obtained by ordering them at outrageous prices (by North American standards) from this site.

I have discovered in the meantime that, with enough patience, all the parts of the DVD can be obtained with the membership .. so I retract my remarks re. "shilling" and will up the score at the same time.

Not only that, but I find that I retained quite a few clips from this site because they have kept their appeal to me over the past year, something I can't say for every site I have subscribed to.

I would recommend this site to lovers of mature amateur women and especially of mature apparel like girdles, slips, nylons, full nylon panties, garter belts etc.

Don't expect hardcore. This is a very soft core site, catering primarily to the fetish mentioned above. It contains some mild lesbian and spanking scenes and a lot of intimate fitting of various foundational garments that allow the (female) fitter to do a bit of lusty groping. There is nudity but it is of the discrete kind, no "gapes" to be found here.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 128 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Art-Lingerie (2)
2. Layered Nylons (1)
3. Nylons X (1)
4. Anal Pantyhose (1)
5. Only Tease (1)
6. Vintage Flash (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.16 seconds.