Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 128 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Desyra Noir

1. Desyra Noir (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
PantyhoseAddict (0) 08-03-13  12:58pm
Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content
- Movie size up to 1280x720 pixel (wmv)
- 240+ picture galleries
- 230+ videos
- Mostly good quality on new sets
Cons: - Download limit per day (10 GB) then 6h banning
- Picture size up to 1120x1680 pixel (jpg)
Bottom Line: Desyra is a kinky german milf with a preference for nylon pantyhose and stockings, anal play and insertions. So if this matches your fetish, you're right there. Because this is a single model site, it's clear that there is mainly that one woman (sometimes with a male or a female partner) in the movies and pictures. But if you like her, you'll get nice content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Anal Pantyhose

2. Anal Pantyhose (1)

Pay
Active
72
pat362 (367) 06-30-13  11:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Full access 3 day trial for 8$
+A nice selection of Eastern European models.
+Content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+There are 165 videos which can be viewed online of downloaded a single file. Resolution is 640x480.
+There are 236 photo sets which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution seems to be 1024x768 for all pics.
Cons: -They update with one scene per week but it's either a video file or a photo file so you never actually get both at the same time. Actually it's more common to get only one type of file.
-Some of the models have multiple scenes butthey are all with the same male talent.
-There are two seperate watermarks on the videos. One of the top left of the screen and one on the bottom right.
-The videos are a little grainy and lighting is sometimes an issue.
-The makeup on some of the models does not enhance their appearance but makes them look less appealing than they are.
-Videos are quite short since they rarely get above 15 minutes and many are below that.
-There is a search by model name but you actually get the names of the models for all Ferro sites and not just this one.
(cons continued below)
Bottom Line: (cons continue)
-There is a useless search box where you can enter a model's name and find all her videos or photosets based on the different Ferro sites but you can do the same by simply searching through the models page.
-You can only download 3 videos at the same time.
-The names of the model are not the ones they are known elsewhere on the net.

Bottom Line:
*This is not a bad site but only if you are taking the trial membership. Otherwise I think most people will be disapointed. The overall site design looks dated and could use a facelift. This is nothing new since the site looks about the same as it was when I was last a member a few years ago.

*The premise for the all the scenes is basically that females wear pantyhose and have anal sex. The bulk of the scenes are b/g but there are a couple of g/g scenes with toys or strapons.

*I was actually quite surprised to see that the videos are all quite grainy which is unusual since I have plenty of videos at 640x480 resolution and they don't have that grainy look to them. That mes a lower resolution video look worse than it should. When you add the two large watermarks on oppostite sides of the screen then you compound the problem. At least if they had picked some more discreet ones then I might not be as annoyed with them but these aren't small or discreet.

**I guess if you aren't too picky about video quality and you have 10$ floating in your pocket then you could give this site a try.**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Michelle\'s Nylons

3. Michelle's Nylons (0)

Pay
Newbie
87*
Richard Negus (Disabled) 06-24-13  01:26am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-24-13  01:54am  (Update History)
Reason: More fair review
Pros: Great pics
Good quality updates at regular intervals
Emails subscribers back after request and let's you share videos with her
good quality lingerie pics for an armature site
Cons: The only con I can think of is that her updates can seem to be on random days and times and I would like them in 1080p. I agree with other reviews about the small videos but 720 is okay for me at the moment. Would be great for larger and longer videos in the future
Bottom Line: I would really recommend giving Michelle a try. I have been subscribed for 12 months and simply down to her feedback with me has kept me subscribed for so long. Really good for an armature site in my opinion
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Layered Nylons

4. Layered Nylons (1)

Pay
Active
80
tangub (151) 02-03-13  02:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Choice of CCBill or Epoch for sign up
Exclusive content
Updated 4 times a week (Mon, Wed, Sat, Sun), usually 3 photo sets and 1 video per week.
All content is high res and hd
Photos have a choice of 4 sizes available; standard 711x1066, extra-large 1365x2048, ultra large 2000x3000 and super large 3744x5616.
Downloadable zips in all 4 sizes.
Video download options are hd 1280x720 wmv (20000+ kbps), 640x360 wmv (6000 kbps), 640x360 mp4 (1000 kbps) for smartphone or tablet. There is also a high def and standard def streaming option.
File sizes and run times of videos displayed.
All content date stamped.
Excellent navigation, browse options and search engine
Cons: Regional pricing with CCBill (Epoch was about $2 cheaper for me).
Site has only been online since September 2011 so not a massive amount of content yet; 198 photo sets (26,000 pics) and 53 videos at the time of writing this.
Hardly any full nudity, mostly just topless.
Videos are short, usually only 5-6 minutes.
No model info or bios
Poor preview area; click on a model in the tour pages to try and see what photo sets or videos she has and you are taken straight to the sign up page.
Bottom Line: This site features the unusual theme of girls wearing both stockings and tights (pantyhose) at the same time. I’ve always been a fan of girls wearing stockings and heels but have never really liked tights so couldn’t quite decide where I stand on this unusual niche. This site wasn’t really on my radar but a cheap email offer tempted me to take a look. This site is run by the same company that runs Only All Sites, Only Tease and Art Lingerie so quality was pretty much assured.

There’s currently 79 models on the site, most of them being the same British models that can be found on the other company sites. Many of the popular OT models like Carla, Melanie, Hayley Marie, Lucy Anne and Daisy Watts can be found here. A few Euro models such as Eufrat and Cikita are also present.

The photos are pretty much in the same style you find at Only Tease and have the same natural look to them; thankfully they have avoided the photo-shopped style that was prevalent at Art Lingerie. The photo sets usually start with the model fully clothed before they strip down to their tights and stockings. Those who like a full striptease will be disappointed since the tights, panties and stockings rarely get removed. As a result you will rarely see any full nudity within the site with only occasional glimpses of any pussy and quite often that glimpse is only through sheer tights if the model happens to be wearing them without any panties underneath. To all intents and purposes it’s really just a topless site.

I’m not really interested in videos so only checked out a few. The HD videos look nice and sharp whether downloading or streaming. They provide a screen cap gallery of 18 photos for each video where you can get an idea of the content before deciding if you want to download it. The video style is pretty much the same as I experienced at Art Lingerie. There’s no background music and usually no chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start so they have that same awkward silence. I guess the idea of that is so you can hear the sound of the model running her hand up and down her nylons or twanging her suspender belt.

The navigation is the same as at other “Only” sites, a choice of browsing photos or videos by year and month listing or an alphabetical model index. Under “My LN” you can set your browsing preferences like default photo size, number of thumbnails per page etc as well as managing your favourites. There’s also an extensive search engine with several filters which will be great when the site gets a lot larger but for now it’s hardly needed since the site is still quite small, in fact it only took me 3 or 4 days to download and view everything I wanted here. Overall I enjoyed the high quality content in this unusual niche but I feel the site needs some more growth to make it worth the regular price.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Ferro Network

5. Ferro Network (0)

Network
Newbie
85*
Omne35 (1) 11-21-12  10:54am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large amount of content
-Attractive models
-Fairly wide variety of video styles
-fairly easy to bulk download
-Uses CCBill so it's trustworthy.
-Frequent updates when considering it a consolidated site.

There are a wide variety of sites ranging from pantyhose to shemale to gay to mature. Pretty much something for everyone.
Cons: -Way too many fake cumshots- at least 50% based on a pretty large sample I downloaded. This is always a problem with Russian/Eastern Block videos but it seems more common on Ferro sites. The fake shots annoy me more than if they simply didn't have one at all. After watching quite a few videos you begin to detect when they use a male actor for multiple videos in a one day shooting schedule.

-cost is a bit high for the full package but the content makes it more reasonable.

-I hate the random username/password. I can understand the security issue but it's a pain to keep typing in at various points. Eventually all 50 sites have the password saved. God help me if my browser loses them...

Some of the individual sites aren't updated very often and it's not easy to tell which are/are not before you pay for access. Some of them also have very few, if any, videos- just photos. www.foot-orgies.com is an example of that.
Bottom Line: Overall it's worth the price for the first month at least. I don't know if I would continue multiple months once I've downloaded the material I'm interested in. I may sign up once every year or two and get new material.

If you use Free Download Manager turn off the connection attempt limits and uncheck the "stop on error" boxes on the Misc. screen. Once I did that the bulk downloads worked fine. You will still have to right click each video though to get it started.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Tease

6. Only Tease (1)

Pay
Active
90
tangub (151) 08-22-12  11:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A huge site with an archive going back 10 years featuring 792 models in 9900+ photo sets (almost 1.2 million images) and 2300+ videos.
A huge array of outfits, costumes, lingerie, leg and footwear.
Exclusive content
Bonus sites Only Carla and Only Melanie included.
Photos in choice of 3 sizes, 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048 and 2000 x 3000px
Zip download for each size.
Video download options are HD 1280 x 720 and High Res 640 x 360 wmv, HD and High Res streaming options plus an m4v download for ipod.
At least 3 updates every day of the week, some days can be up to 6.
All content date stamped right back to 2002.
All file sizes shown and video run times.
No apparent download limits.
Customizable browse options and excellent search engine.
10 free Fast Track credits provided allowing you to view forthcoming releases of your choice before they are officially released.
Choice of Epoch or CCBill for credit card payments.
Cons: The site is very softcore, any nudity is fairly tame and many models don’t go any further than just topless, some not even that far.
Some repetition of outfits and shoot locations.
Oldest videos poor quality.
Videos quite short averaging 5-6 minutes.
If you prefer your HD videos in a format other than wmv you will be disappointed.
The most irritating thing for me were the zip downloads of the older photo sets (released up until about 2008 I think), after downloading and extracting the zips you have to click your way through 7-8 folders before arriving at the photos, really annoying.
Poor file naming, seemingly random meaningless numbers and letters so renaming required.
Ads in member’s area
Minimum 4 months subscription required to access “VIP member’s area”
Regional pricing with both CCBill and Epoch.
Bottom Line: For anyone considering a membership at Only Tease the main thing to consider is that it is a very softcore site containing very little explicit nudity. The site is all about the clothing, costumes, lingerie and hosiery being worn by the models, teasing and tantalising you with that flash of stocking top or suspender belt, catching a glimpse of their panties up their short skirts or a view of their cleavage down that tight blouse before she slowly removes the items of clothing one by one. You will find almost every type of outfit you could possibly think of from casual wear to business suits, glamorous evening gowns to clubbing wear, various uniforms like college girl, cheerleader, nurse, French maid to sports outfits and even some fictional characters such as Snow White and Alice in wonderland.

Amongst the near 800 models you will find some well known US and Euro models but what I really liked was the amazing collection of British models. Despite being from the UK I don’t buy magazines or patronise the sleazy tabloid press so most of these page three models were completely unknown to me. I was planning to just stick around for 1 month and try to be selective about what I downloaded but there are so many gorgeous models I found it almost impossible to deny most of them space on my hard drive so as a result I’m already well in to my 2nd month. Some of the more popular models have a huge amount of content, in some cases well over a hundred updates, almost like having several solo sites within the site. I loved the collection of Hayley-Marie here with a whopping 171 updates. Bryoni-Kate was another favourite of mine with 90 updates.

With such a huge amount of content you need to be able to navigate around it easily and they do provide plenty of browse and search tools. You can browse either photos or videos by a month and year listing or use the A-Z model index. They also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search for any type of outfit with several filters to refine your search. For example a basic search for “miniskirt” will bring up over 4000 results and you can then narrow your search by adding various filters such as the type and colour of stockings, tights or socks you want to go with it and also the type of lingerie required and then add in some model criteria like hair colour and breast size and whether you require nudity or just topless.

In addition they also have several features in the browse options like “behind the scenes”, “model of the year” and “model of the month”. There’s also a “prestige tease” section where you will find some of the top name models in slightly more glam and photo shopped galleries than the regular OT galleries although they’ve not updated that section since May of this year. There’s also a feature called “Tease at Home” which allegedly features the model being shot in her own home and being allowed to choose her own outfits. You also have the ability to rate the models, outfits and tease factor of every shoot and they have “Top lists” showing the highest rated in each category. Other extras include Wallpapers and there’s a very active forum where members can discuss models and outfits.

I’m not particularly interested in the videos, I did however find the videos here slightly more interesting than those on their sister site Art-Lingerie that I reviewed recently mainly because the videos here start fully clothed so you at least have a bit of anticipation and build up with some teasing and a striptease. They did however suffer from the same flaws IMO, having that awkward silence again with no back ground music and rarely any chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start. I just find it really irritating and amateurish when you can hear every little background noise. Some models do have separate interview videos where they talk about themselves…yawn….boring.

In addition to the regular daily updates, every Tuesday and Thursday they add an additional update which is designated as a “VIP Members” update. Clicking on these tells me I am not eligible to view them until the 1st day of my 4th month of membership so clearly these extra updates are designed to try and incentivize members to stick around longer and spend more money. The VIP updates look to have started around September 2011 so you’d be looking at around an extra 90 updates if you stick around long enough. I’m not sure these extra updates are enough incentive for me to stick around, after nearly 2 months of softcore teasing I’m ready to move on for some naked pussy. A highly recommended site though if you love softcore stripping, teasing, stockings and lingerie as I do.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Art-Lingerie

7. Art-Lingerie (0)

Pay
Active
85
tangub (151) 07-26-12  07:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Choice of billing by CCBill or Epoch
Reduced price $20 cross sale to Only Tease offered through CCBill which I was happy to take advantage of. (Not pre-checked)
A stunning collection of well known top tier models
A paradise for stocking lovers.
A new photo set or video added 7 days a week. (Every 3rd or 4th update is a video)
Photos in 3 sizes, Standard (711 x 1066), Extra Large (1365 x 2048) and Ultra Large (2000 x 3000)
Zips available in each of the sizes
Videos downloadable in 1280 x 720 wmv, 640 x 360 wmv and an ipod version. Streaming also available in HD and standard resolutions
The above stated resolutions apply since the site started so there is no drop off in quality as you go back through the archives.
Easy navigation with customizable browse options and an excellent search facility.
All file sizes and run times listed
User comments and ratings for model and lingerie
Cons: Regional pricing
No model info or bio, a name is all you get, not even an age or country which is the bare minimum I like to know.
Some may find the site too softcore
Awful file naming, just seems like random numbers and letters.
Too much air brushing of photos but hopefully this will change in the future as webmaster appears responsive to customer’s wishes.
I’m afraid this photo lover found the videos here mind numbingly boring.
Few fully clothed sets. I appreciate the theme is lingerie but it would be nice to see more fully clothed sets before they strip down to the lingerie.
“Lingerie” doesn’t always mean bras and panties here. Too many sets start with the model already topless or bottomless or both, wearing only stockings and suspenders
Bottom Line: Art-Lingerie provides an impressive collection of 122 models in a collection of softcore mostly solo photos and videos with the main theme being lingerie with a particular emphasis on stockings. In fact I would go as far as to say every single update involves the model wearing stockings. The site is very softcore and features nudity but doesn’t go as far as spreading or masturbation. When I say “nudity” what I mean is that the models show boobs and pussy but they are never totally naked because the stockings never come off.. The site has been online since May 2009 and with daily updates has already grown in to a decent sized collection with 732 photo sets (58,000+ pics) and 256 videos to date.

Although as I mentioned in the cons they provide zero information about the models I think most regular subscribers to softcore glamour sites will instantly recognise many of the models here. I found many of my favourites here from the US (Celeste Star, Carli Banks, Faye Reagan, Georgia Jones, Shay Laren) and Europe (Ariel, Cikita, Eufrat, Jenni P) as well as some of the popular British models from Only Tease such as Bryoni-Kate, Carla and Hayley-Marie.

The navigation makes it really easy to get around the site and download the content. Browsing via the model index will display all of a model’s photo shoots and videos on one page and what I like is that all the download links for zips and videos are right there on the page, all you have to do is scroll down and click, click, click to grab all the zips, no need to mess around opening every single gallery. If only every site made downloading content this simple. If you are more selective about what you download you also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search not only by model’s hair colour or breast size but even down to the style and colour of the stockings she is wearing.

With regards to the photos I won’t go on about the photo-shopping too much here as plenty has already been said on that subject in previous reviews and comments on this site. Although my preference is for natural looking photos I’m probably more tolerant of the airbrushed look than messmer and didn’t really let it spoil my enjoyment of the models and lingerie too much. In fact I quite liked some of the sets where it looked like they filtered out some of the colour to give them an almost retro look. My main complaints would be too few fully clothed sets and possibly too many that start wearing nothing but stockings. As the theme is lingerie I also think it might be nice to see some photo sets where the model starts naked and then dresses up in her lingerie and stockings which is something I enjoyed seeing at Petites Parisiennes.

The HD videos here are excellent quality and even the lower res 640 x 360 ones I checked out had an average bit rate of 6-8000 kbps so looked fairly decent even when on full screen. Unfortunately as my preference is for photos I found it difficult to appreciate the videos here and the ones I have watched so far nearly sent me to sleep. The videos I’ve watched pretty much all take the same format, you have a model dressed in lingerie, sometimes only stockings and suspenders, the model doesn’t speak, there’s no background music, the only noises you here are the sounds of the sofa or bed creaking as the model moves around on it or the sound of her heels on the wooden floor as she’s walking around. It almost seems like an awkward silence in my opinion. I know a lot of people don’t like background music in their videos but for me if the model is not going talk or interact in any way then some music would help create a better atmosphere. And of course there’s no sexual action to get excited about either. The model will just sit or lay there caressing her hands up and down her stockings and over her breasts, she might remove her shoes, then perhaps her bra or panties if she’s wearing any to start with, you might get the odd close up shot of a pussy and her hand glancing lightly over the top but nothing even close to a masturbation scene. Videos usually range from 5 to 10 minutes in length.

Overall I enjoyed the site and would recommend it for fans of softcore glamour and stocking lovers as long as you can tolerate the photo-shopping.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Art-Lingerie

8. Art-Lingerie (0)

Pay
Active
75
messmer (137) 07-22-12  05:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site has maintained its emphasis on beauty since my last review. Not one bad looking model to be found.

Videos can be downloaded at 720p and lower. 720p would be my preferred size as the picture is good (albeit not as crisp as I would like it) and the file size is relatively small.

Picture sizes available in three resolutions. This review will have to be a one pointer because I have not downloaded one single set so far, therefore I cannot quote any picture dimensions.

Downloads have been at my top speed.

Daily updates. Usually two - three picture sets in a row, then a video.

If you are near the end of your subscription it might be worth your while to look at the coming updates because you can get five freebies (fast tracks) of material that has not yet been published, A very nice and generous touch.

Very nice, user friendly, lay out. Models and outfits can be rated, comments are possible and are not censored, to my knowledge.
Cons: It could be such a terrific site if only they put away the air brush, body make-up and photoshop for good and went with natural! For an ultra high resolution fan this can be so aggravating. I look at the models' faces and bodies, and all the small imperfections that make them the persons they are have been carefully removed until they look like someone from Madame Tussauds' Wax Museum. One can admire them but they are not erotic.
Bottom Line: Because the choice of lingerie sites is so limited I subscribe to Art-Lingerie now and then. I am limiting myself to the download of videos to escape the "improvements" in the picture sets, even though I am a collector of both.

To those who like the Only Tease, Only Satin etc. sites (and their picture sets) this site is highly recommended. You will find some more of the same, except there's more nudity here, but with none of the raunchiness found on other, similar sites. You will also find the same, user friendly home page and search engine as in the "Only ... " sites.

To the 58% who, like me, are craving something more crisp, more natural in their picture sets and more natural coloring (a bit too warm for my taste) in their videos, I would recommend waiting for a while before subscribing, just to see if the webmaster will give serious consideration to their preferences.

Until the unnatural softness and coloration of the pictures is fixed I can give this site no more than a 75.
Respond: 22 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Vintage Flash

9. Vintage Flash (0)

Pay
Active
89
messmer (137) 06-17-12  03:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-18-12  02:56pm  (Update History)
Reason: After a brief mental struggle I upgraded this site from 82 to 89. It should be rewarded for being different in a conformist world!
Pros: Beautiful British Ladies in alluring retro lingerie and doing a lot of erotic talking. Nice!!

Improved search since my last review.

Excellent streaming is available for those who like to preview a scene or watch it on line.

Updates appear to be steady with one update every 5 – 8 days, containing one picture set, plus screenshots and video of a given model).

Picture sets are available in High Resolution up to 2390x1600.

Videos are available in 720p HD wmv. Lesser sizes and resolutions also available.

4 additional sites: Vintageflash Archive, Pantyhosed4u, VF Academy, The Joy Of Feet
are also available as a bonus.
Cons: Still a very basic outlay since my last review. No model bios, no member forum, pictures are designated as “small” “middle” and “regular” (leaving one guessing as to their dimension until a set is downloaded and studied.) The individual sets are marked “pictures.zip” and nothing within the zip gives any indication of who the model is. So make sure you memorize a model's name before you download and then rename the zip.

Medium watermark on pictures (upper left of the photo.) It is not too intrusive except that I prefer my watermarks (if I have to put up with them) at the bottom right where they are less visible to most.

The tour promises 1920x1080p HD videos but I haven't come across one yet. BTW, I wish the lay-out of the member's page were as clear as that of the tour.

Navigation within the site is awkward with each bonus site requiring a separate sign-in. I am using Firefox to save my user names and passwords between visits to a site, so this was only a problem first time around
Bottom Line: Okay, here it is: I have looked at many sites over the past few years and being a lingerie lover have not found any that would suit me better than this one. The ladies are great, the talk is great, the retro lingerie is great and taking this into account I was prepared to return to this site over and over but there is one big con for me:

Strangely enough I didn't notice last time around or maybe the handful of videos I have looked at are no indication of how things are but all the videos I have looked at during the past three days were way too softly focused for my taste despite the fact that they are shot in 720p HD.

I have been to many other sites in the meantime where the picture in full screen was crystal clear and crisp even at the lower end of HD (720p).

Some members might actually prefer a slightly diffuse picture, so might the webmaster, but my taste runs to “crystal-clear” where every pore can be counted so, until that changes, I am afraid that, once again, I will have to resume my search for the perfect lingerie site.

This one is good, make no mistake about it, you have a choice of 567 picture sets (54410 pictures), 407 videos and 155 beautiful mature models (25 – 40?) at the moment, but it could be much better with sharper videos, renamed picture sets, and an easier way of getting around within the site.

Recommended to all vintage lingerie lovers despite the personal drawbacks I listed.
Respond: 18 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Nylons X

10. Nylons X (0)

Pay
Active
83
lk2fireone (194) 06-02-12  11:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM.
-Content is dated.
-Because it's a small site, easy to navigate.
-The nylons the girls wear add dash of color to their costumes.
-Member pages are relatively ad free.
-Can watch videos streaming or download.
-Download speeds are good. I regularly get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Has a link to "free" live cam shows. But these are mainly a waste of time.
Cons: -Small site. Only 25 videos.
-No regular updates. Last update was 2012-04-05. So it's more like a small archive site.
-Needs more stunt cocks. Only 3 or 4 stunt cocks featured.
-Videos can be streamed, but only one definition: no choice of high, medium or low quality.
-Videos can be downloaded, in high or medium quality. No low quality option. Also, judging from the file size of the download videos, the
quality of the "high quality" files is really more like a medium quality video at other sites. And the file size of the "medium quality" videos is more like a low quality video at other sites.
For example, a video with a run time of 15 minutes has a high quality file size of 558 MB. And the medium quality file size is 170 MB.
-Only one file size for the photos. And since the photosets are a record of the video shoot, the photos themselves have little artistic or erotic
value. But if all you want is photos of naked girls, the pics will do the job.
Bottom Line: CONS (continued):

-Photos have a medium-sized watermark on lower right side.
-No biograhical data on the models except for age. But the age given is not tied to any date or video the model appears in.

BOTTOM LINE:

-Theme is girls wearing nylons having sex.
-Small site catering to people with a fetish for nylons.

There is the normal variety of sex shown: masturbation, boy-girl vaginal and anal sex, blowjobs.

Site stats:
Videos: 25
Photosets: 25
The photosets are a record of the video shoot.

Most of the sites in the Teen Mega World network are integrated. So can search for a single model, and the results will include her appearances at all the network sites. Can also search by top rated scenes, your personal favorite scenes, type of sex scene (lesbian, anal, group, squirting, toys, etc.).

Join through the Teen Mega World site for $19.95/month, with the PU discount, which gives access to the NylonsX site.

Joining directly through the NylonsX site costs $29.95/month, and does not give you anything more than the Teen Mega World membership.

-Most valuable feature is that access to this site is included with a Teen Mega World membership. Teen Mega World, with a PU discount of 19.95/month, recurring, offers a huge network of hardcore teen videos. Many of the videos are good quality, and the network has hundreds of Eastern European teen models, many of which are very attractive.

Giving this site a score of 83. Site deserves that score because it's part of the Teen Mega World network. If the site was a standalone site, the score would be much lower, maybe 70 or less.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Ferro Network

11. Ferro Network (0)

Network
Active
94
xexbot (36) 02-09-12  08:19pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: So many videos, so many sites. Yes some of them get cross listed, but for the most part they are providing a lot of specific niche material. I actually think they have a pretty smart business model, charge big up front, because lets face it people are going to rip the sites in a month or so, then lessen the fees as time goes by. It's a pretty smart thing to do. Anyone balking at the price might consider this.

Basically you get a shit ton of nylon sites, which are actually really good sites even if you aren't into the fetish. They have a lot of femdom strapon stuff, some mature stuff, bisexual, and more. The newer vids are pretty good in terms of quality. There's still very little HD at this site because they just started adding some HD stuff. I know that is a peeve for some people. However, the fetish stuff their offering is pretty unique, and sometimes it has to be more about the content than the quality. Most of the models are pretty hot too.
Cons: There is no BDSM or Cuckold stuff here for some reason. The BDSM I get, but seems like cuckold sites would be right up their alley, or his....;)

Older vids are pretty damn old. Low quality for the low bandwidth days. They get progressively better though.

Very little search and navigation capability.

Like the others have said, you have to manually log in to each site. The problem is you have to do it with a very cryptic username and password they assign to you. That's why everyone is complaining. They're too hard to remember. Type it into a doc and just cut and paste with your browser set to remember the passwords.
Bottom Line: Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it. Let's be clear. This is a softer domination site, so if you're looking for extreme hardcore BDSM and femdom, not a good choice for you. If you are looking for nylon fetish, feminization, humiliation, men getting ass fucked by men and women, women getting as fucked by men and women,tranny sex, mature sex, masturbation, gay and bisexual sex, then this is a damn good choice.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lacy Nylons

12. Lacy Nylons (0)

Pay
Active
79
messmer (137) 02-05-12  08:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Models on the average are easy on the eye. Not porn star quality but not ugly either.

Site updates videos once every eight days. Not great but mentioned under the pros because other Ferro Sites are so much worse when it comes to updating.

Picture sets appear to update every two days.

Videos since 2009 (I counted 114) have been shot in HD at 1280x720p in wmv at a total bitrate of 3320kbps. Videos before that are at 640x480p.

Picture sets can be downloaded zipped, with the individual picture weighing in around 1000x1500px.
Cons: Separate sign-ins required for pictures and videos, because the username and password are generated by Ferro and therefore very convoluted, it is an impossibly aggravating extra task to have to sign in twice to every site you receive as a bonus that also contains pictures.

The huge watermarks in the bottom right hand corner as well as in the left top corner I've remarked upon in previous previews of other Ferro sites, are present here, too, and manage greatly to add to the aggravation factor. I almost didn't bother adding this site because while the technical quality of the videos isn't too bad, they are not worth looking at with that intrusive logo staring you in the face all through the video.

Picture sets are small and not very erotic.

Download and streaming are highly erratic. My downloads started at around 1MB/s, gradually reduced to 200K/s, and then see-sawed back and forth between those two values.

No proper search engine, no model directory or bio.
Bottom Line: This is a site I was prepared to love. After all, who, over fifty, does not like to see models dressed in nylons and garter belt?

And you get plenty of that in this site. For once pantyhose was not substituted in someone's mind for stockings and they stick to the old definition when it comes to nylons.

One idiosyncrasy of this site, or maybe two:

Most models start out naked and then get slowly dressed, rather than the other way around, also very few of them wear panties but walk around commando style under their lovely dresses instead.

This anachronism is jarring to an old-timer because nylons and garter belts belong to an era where no woman would have thought to get dressed without panties and slip.

Both picture sets and videos lack imagination, with the models looking stiff and uninvolved. Of course, it doesn't help that the videos are in a foreign language (Russian? Hungarian? Czech?) so you miss out on the context of the video as well.

Let me sum things up in a highly subjective way (in other words don't take every negative thing I have to say as the Gospel truth):

A. I wouldn't bother with the pictures. The quality is too uneven and the sets are too small. Plus the logo, even if it has been reduced to one only, is still too intrusive.

B. I wouldn't bother with the videos because they lack erotic heat as well as the tease factor, and on top of that they are being ruined by watermarks that are meant to protect their copyright but manage instead to aggravate purists like me who like to look at a clean picture with no, or at most, with a discrete logo.

The separate sign-in for the various sites is just plain dumb. Especially if a distinction is being made between pictures and videos requiring authorization by both.

If I judged this site, or any other Ferro site I got during this past month, for myself I wouldn't give any of them more than a 69 because I look and then throw away ... see humongous watermarks.

However because of their relatively good rate of update, plus the basically decent TECHNICAL quality of the videos, plus the fact that one monthly subscription will give you four sites eventually, I will give it a 79. Of the four Ferro sites I reviewed during the past month this site, despite its flaws, is the best.

BTW, the site is softcore with some toy play thrown in. A plus for me (the softcore part), might be a minus for others.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit My Sexy Legs.net

13. My Sexy Legs.net (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
3bro (0) 02-05-12  01:55pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good quality pictures for leg and nylon fans with a girl next door appeal.
Seems to be updated regularly.
Cons: Video content is boring.
No zip-file content.
Bottom Line: I gave this site 50 which is poor but this is not the site's fault, the content quality deserves a higher rating. The real reason I have submitted this review is that I have been left highly displeased at the problems with access to the website therefore please take the following as a warning. I joined the mysexylegs.net around a week ago. I was happy with the content however for reason's unknown, my access to both the site and it's billing partner MSL Enterprises ceased entirely, and I was left with a screen message that stated "internet explorer cannot display webpage". After emailing MSL with this, I was told that this issue was probably my web browser. I tried a different browser to no avail. After contacting MSL Enterprises I was eventually advised that the firewall had been activated possibly by too many log in attempts. I am in the habit of saving my automatic log ins as I go, so I don't know how this happened. MSL Enterprises swiftly resolved the firewall issue however I was unable to access the actual members area beyond the homepage with either the new or the old passwords. Again I contacted MSL Enterprises and again I was advised that the issue was probably PC / web browser related and there was nothing more they could do. I asked about a partial refund and this was refused with the same advice about changing my web browser or PC. About this MSL Enterprises were adamant as they advised me that they had been able to log in with my user-name / password on three different devices with no trouble. I would advise anyone therefore to avoid mysexylegs.net simply because you might not be given the full month's subscription period you have paid for. You take your chances...Shame as the site itself was quite good.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

14. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Active
82
roseman (253) 12-23-11  07:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Excellent quality photosets available in multiple download formats (standard, extra large, ultra large photos size).
- Very good quality videos available in multiple download formats (HD and High Resolution) as full length movies.
- ZIP downloads.
- Cool website design.
- Pretty easy navigation.
- Daily updates.
- Fast downloading.
- Large variety of models.
Cons: - Needs Fast/Permanent Tracks for full access to some photosets/videos.
- Old photosets and videos quality is average (Standard and High resolution size).
- No bonus content.
- Expensive.
- No trial option.
Bottom Line: I have to admit that this sites monthly membership is kinda expensive but I really think that it worths its money. The only problem that I found is that with your membership you don't have access to all photos/videos of their models as some photosets/videos need fasttracks or permanent tracks to be unlocked for view or download. With your membership you get 10 fasttracks per site and if you spent them you can buy 10 permanent tracks for 10 USD. So far from what I saw the hottest models galleries and videos can be seen or downloaded by spending fasttracks or permanent tracks and that's a big con for the site. Photosets and videos quality are great except from some old ones which have standard quality. ZIP downloads are available and videos can be downloaded as full movies. I feel that some bonus content would be cool and a trial option membership is necessary.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Anal Pantyhose

15. Anal Pantyhose (1)

Pay
Active
72
BadMrFrosty (56) 11-15-11  02:55am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Approx 150 video sets and 200 photo sets
+ All exclusive content
+ Zip downloads for photos
+ No DRM, no download limits
+ On the whole video quality is great, the first 100 videos are only 640x480 but look good. The last 50 are HD 720P but dont look as crisp as they should (see con)
+ Download managers supported and should be used to get good speeds (~300kbps without, ~1mbps with)
+ Latest image sets are 1500x1000 and look nice. Older sets are 1024x768 and are average
+ ~75 photos per set all focusing on anal action with pantyhose
+ Great looking Russians, some famous faces but are hard to spot due to the very unique and natural style of clothing, sets and makeup.
Cons: - Short scenes ~15 min long each
- Large watermarks. Worse on the older 640x480 clips
- HD videos use too low a bitrate (3mbps) resulting in noticeable artifacts and graininess.
- No choice of download formats, just one full clip in wmv for each scene
- No streaming
- Photo sets are separate from the video even if they are shot at same time and obviously the same scene
- Some videos waste a lot of bandwidth on unnecessarily high bitrate audio at 320kbps.
- The site has a update log but not all content is listed. On the video and picture update pages the content is not dated making it hard to see how often the site is updated
- Very basic interface. No search, no model index, no scene description, only a single scene thumbnail, no streaming. Basically no real way to see what you get before downloading the video.
Bottom Line: Here we have another classic example of a group of people that know how to choose the models, how to dress a set, direct the action, get the best angles, choose sexy clothing and makeup etc but have no idea how to wrap a usable website around it. I am not a massive fan of the analogy but I do feel a couple are apt when summing up this type of site which, unfortunately, I tend to see a awful lot. Would you set up shop selling a Bugatti Veyron other super cars in a dealership that looks like it used to be a McDonalds? Or design the packaging of a new all singing, all dancing smart phone to resemble a tin of Tesco value beans? In a market that is overflowing with porn it is hard to choose to stay a member of a website that makes it hard to consume its, admittedly good, content. Given a single (tiny) thumbnail and the generic model names, I have no way of knowing if I like the model or scene setup without downloading the whole scene. And when I do find a model I like I have no way of searching for more of her scenes.

Bottom line: Plenty of sites polish turds. This site wraps a diamond in a natural unpolished turd. I wouldn't mind the diamond but I am not too keen on getting my hands dirty in order to get it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Tease

16. Only Tease (1)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 10-30-11  07:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of content. You get around 3 updates every day and the archives go back all the way to 2002. According to their specs they have over 1 million images... pretty crazy. They started adding high quality images at the end of 2007 and now all sets are available as 1,066px × 711, 2,048px × 1,365 or 3,000px × 2,000px
- They also offer videos (although they are around 5 minutes each and I wouldn't call them the highlight of the site)
- Tons and tons of models and an incredible amount of outfits (anything from Halloween costumes to secretary, nurse and night gowns) Tons of stockings and any type of underwear or stocking that you can think off.
- A pretty active forum with many members and wembasters posting all sorts of behind the scenes info.
- Pretty decent search function that lets you find several per-selected categories quickly (want to find all girls with petite breasts, or all girls in a Dorothy costume?)
- If you get onlyallsites you have a network with a few similar sites.
Cons: - This is a very softcore site. If I had to compare it with anything mainstream I'd say it's Maxim with a bit more boob.
- Videos are rather awkward (they don't have any sound and many of the girls look very nervous as they stare at the camera. In one video I watched you can hear some crows in the background, another one some car sounds... the whole thing just felt amateurish and awkward )
- Some photo sets are mislabeled and the girls don't even get nude/ show their breasts.
- They have pretty big ads on the main page and there seems to be no way to get rid of them. Also they have a bunch of "interactive" ads to their live camera shows which can get frustrating.
- They have a few shots with two girls, but they never really touch each other or kiss. It just feels like a bit of a waste.
- More model related search options would be nice. I'd like to see all models in a certain age range or of a certain ethnicity/ hair color etc.
- Some inconsistencies in how sets are saved
Bottom Line: First of all don't join this site expecting hardcore action. In fact don't even expect to see every model fully nude. This site is one of the most softcore ones I have ever joined (including playboy and met-art).

Another huge downside is that the videos are not up to modern standards. They are all very short (under 10 minutes)often not very high quality and I found them to be rather awkward.

Let me explain what I mean about awkward videos. Most of the scenes I watched featured the model introducing herself then trying to dance to nonexistent music. You can hear noises from the outside (as well as camera noises) and most of the girls seem confused as to what they should do. They rub themselves, but don't really play with their breasts or vagina. They try to dance and pull their hair up, but somehow it just feels like they were given no direction past "look sexy"

The scenes are not helped by the fact that the camera usually just sits in one position, instead of doing some panning or close ups. This site is all about stockings and costumes, so why the heck not zoom onto the girls feet or pan on their buts. Also I understand that the site is softcore, but I think it would be just fine to show the girls slowly let their hands go towards their vagina, you know, imply that they are sexual and willing to pleasure themselves... just saying.

Some of the better videos featured the girls changing outfits or answering fan questions. Both of these types of scenes are much, much better. If the girl is actually doing something (like putting on new stockings or laughing over "sexy" questions) the video actually becomes interesting. Otherwise I feel it's just an exercise in awkward silence.

I wish that instead of the silent stripping scenes we have now they would give us some behind the scenes videos of the photo-shoots. I think that would end up being much sexier than seeing a girl twirl to the sound of a camera recording.

Anyhow this site is not about the videos, it's all about gorgeous photos and they truly deliver when it comes to images. The site offers some pretty impressive high resolution images along with tons and tons of good looking models in many varied outfits. You can find any type of stocking, underwear and skirt combo you can think of. They even have a pretty large selection of Halloween themed costumes.

Uniforms, secretary, cheerleaders, tennis, ballet, gym outfits, all kinds of socks... you get the idea.

Unfortunately they don't have a lot of variation in the locations they shoot and almost all sets are extremely brightly lit. I would have liked some more outdoors scenes as well as more mood light (a fireplace or a bathtub with candles or what not) After browsing the site for a few hours I could recognize the setting for the secretary scene and there seems to be a snow white outfit that at least 7 models use, also don't even get me started on the red riding hood or the hooters girls.

More cosplay outfits, more corsets and shoes, more locations for the scenes and more focus on mood would help.

Now don't get me wrong, I am listing all my cons here, but in the end I saved thousands of images from this network. The models they have are exclusive and extremely hot. Also they usually have more than five sets with each model so if you really like a girl you can see her in multiple outfits and often with multiple hair styles as well.

Another nice thing is that they focus a lot on the girls faces and some of the models are incredibly cute.

I do wish they had a better model index though. Right now the model page has one image for each models and the photo is not always very clear. Also it's almost always a full body shot, which makes it hard to see the girls face.

So the bottom line is that the site is great if you want softcore glamor shots of girls. As a bonus you get some videos and access to a pretty active community that discusses the girls, talks about upcoming features and, as far as I can tell webmasters who actually listen to the users.

There are some downsides and they need to do some more work, add more navigation options (maybe a quick way to sort the top rated models, or an improved thumbnail system). Better directed and edited videos and a few less ads in the member section would also be nice.

Nonetheless overall this is a great glamor site. If the girls played with toys or with themselves more this would be an incredible place. Right now I'd say it's great for anyone very interested in different outfits and stockings and okay for the great majority. A solid 80 for their target market, a 60 or so if you want more nudity and hardcore action.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only All Sites

17. Only All Sites (0)

Network
Newbie
83*
tasha (1) 10-11-11  10:30am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: For those who like to boil before they burn, there is no doubt this is the best site for leg/hose/stocking fetishists on the entire WWW.
Quantity and variety are excellent. The models are beautiful. Pic resolution is fantastic.
Cons: A general sameness about all image sets despite the variety of models and outfits

Videos are generally a snooze. One model (a really pretty one named Nicole) actually says something along the lines of "Let's get this over with" in one of her vids; the boredom shows. Models could actually heighten the excitement of the whole thing by talking to the viewer (esp fetish talk).

Most notably: While conceding that OAS reliably serves the majority of men who prefer buxom/voluptuous models, there are precious few models for those of us who prefer the slender-but-shapely supermodel or petite types.

Needs more foot dipping, shoe-dangling, crossed legs shots. Lot of us leg fetishist prize those shots, guys.
Bottom Line: If you go in for a real leg tease that starts subtly and works its way to a boil, there is no better site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ferro Network

18. Ferro Network (0)

Network
Active
89
PornoPro (10) 09-25-11  05:02pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is going to be a long review, but this site deserves it.

The Good:

1) The main Ferro Network site is massive, I mean stunningly massive. Fifty-four main sites and four bonus sites. Even if you aren't into a lot of the kinks they offer, you'll still be pressed to get through all the ones you are into!

2) Picture quality is outstanding. A lot of care went into resolution, camera position and final selection of photos that actually make it onto the site. The picture size is large but not those massive, bloated monsters that are a bit slower to download.

3) Movie quality is also excellent in hi-res. After downloading a movie, then opening it, I could enlarge it to full-screen on my 18" screen and not loose any resolution quality.A lot of care went onto filming as well insofar as set decoration.

4) LOTS of other good aspects, but I'm limited in character count here!
Cons: The Bad:

1) Navigation stinks. No way to search by model, date of update, etc.

2) My biggest beef is thumbnail size for both pictures and movies. I actually downloaded one of the thumbnails and opened it in Photoshop to get an exact height and width: 47x70 respectively. Absolutely horrible. I do not know why Ferro Network makes the thumbs so small, but its annoying as hell.

3) Once you join Ferro Network with your username/password, you have to sign into each and every site in their network one at a time. Very frustrating and time consuming.

4) You have to download and install a small driver in order to watch the movie after download. Its annoying, but everything works fine once installed.

5) The four 'bonus sites' are total crap. Low res movies and pictures not worth even signing it to see. One of the bonus sites wouldn't even load.
Bottom Line: Even with the cons, its hard to beat this network of sites. Yes, it costs $85, but the amount of content you have access to is astounding. Tens of thousands of movies and videos in high quality, high res format is pretty sweet.

The models are fresh and clean without belly button rings and giant fake tits, fake hair, fake fingernails, facelifts, asslifts and all that other bullshit that seems to reign here in the American porn market.

The models also seem to genuinely enjoy their work, which is also refreshing.

The average quality porn site costs about $30 a month, but for $85 you can join over fifty quality sites. Its well worth the investment. So nix the Starbucks Cappuccino for a couple weeks and you've saved enough money!

One tip to enjoying the Ferro Network: Once you join, go ahead and join all the sites you know you will be interested in right off the bat. Let IE or Firefox store the saved user/pass and THEN go back and explore the sites at your leisure. This will save you a lot of trouble later when you've got lube in your left hand! :-)
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Stocking Stars

19. Stocking Stars (0)

Pay
Active
70
dracken (246) 09-18-11  12:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Over 100 scenes most of them with image sets and videos (Movies come usually as WMV at 640x 480, but some have MPEG formats at smaller resolutions. Also some scenes are available as clips or 320x 240 resolution. Images were around 768px × 1,024px)
- A great variation in models (some Russian teens, some more mature models, a lot more Asian girls than similar networks so that was a nice surprise)
- The tour gives a good impression of the action inside the site, some lesbian (2-3 scenes) a little anal (more of the recent stuff has it, I'd say maybe 20 scenes overall) and mostly hardcore boy girl with focus on outfits/ stockings, including some footjobs and guys cumming on the girls feet. Overall a lot of variation (which is good and bad at the same time)
- Some hot models that really seem into it
- Full network access with a few more sites that are very similar.
- Download speeds were very good and I didn't have any trouble navigating the site. (No dead links, no sudden sign-outs)
Cons: - The site updates randomly, the latest scene on 03/04/11 the one before on 12/12/10 (3 or 4 videos in December last year, with not much before then)
- The site is really not focused on images (some sets only have the girl stripping and none of them have a zipped folder download option)
- More and better quality video options would be nice (the camera work is not always the best (awkward angles and poor lighting really hurt many of the videos))
- The whole site feels like it has 3 very different types of content(I'll elaborate in the bottom line, but overall there is a kind of strange break between various scenes.)
- Navigation, while it works is not the best. No search options, no way to tell what happens in the scene, no model index. The site is basically a page that shows all the sets movies and pictures mixed together on one page. It's simple to the point where it's frustrating, especially when a photo set shows up but you have to hunt for the movie.
- Some sets are mislabeled
Bottom Line: This has gotta be one of the strangest sites I have joined in a while. The members page is a black screen with thumbnails of the movies and the photos all together on one page, mixed with each other to the point where it's hard to understand what exactly you're getting (a few of the older sets are also mislabeled or several of the girls have the same name)

Basically I wanted to get the scene with Brigitte white from the preview tour. I click on the movie of the model called Brigitte only to realize that it's another model, of course the thumbnail was so unclear and they had no preview images so I only realized I had the wrong video after finishing the download. I go back only to realize there is no Brigitte movie... I think. Not sure since there is no way to search for a particular model or type of scene. Even worse, they have no zip archive... but they do have a slideshow option so there's that. But wait, a bunch of the photos are actually not hardcore action, just the girl getting undressed. Maybe I could stream the scene instead, alas no streaming available on this site. At least the downloads went incredibly fast, got a 400 mb scene in just a minute or so.

To make things even more confusing there seem to be 3 types of scenes on the site. The very first 20 or so scenes feature English speaking girls, dialogue (mostly stuff along the lines of: "Those are hot stockings, you make me hard, I am cumming now.") and a lot of focus on the stockings, cumming on the stockings and rubbing the penis on the stockings (These scenes are all named "ss_model name" and are very similar to what the preview tour promises, just see the trailers to get an idea of what these scenes look like).

The next bunch of videos named "was_model name" seem to be pretty generic hardcore Russian porn. No talking, no music, guy walks in and within 30 seconds the girl is blowing him. The models are also not as cute in my opinion, they look more generic Russian porn-like, and there is not nearly enough focus on stockings.

Finally the last kind of videos which only have the model name are little story scenes (girl dressed up as bride, girl dressed up as secretary, etc.) and have horrible, horrible music. I swear I have never heard such poor choices for porn music.

Scattered among those rather generic and boring types of scenes there are some real gems. I found one scene where the girl tries on several pairs of stockings in front of a guy before having sex, I also found a really good video with a bunch of behind the scenes type of directions and an adorable model in crotchless panties.

Sadly there is no easy way to tell which scene will be interesting/ different and which one will be a 15 minute close up of a girl's back in doggy style. Some scenes have the girl look straight at the camera as she puts on stockings or plays with herself, some are nothing but poor close-ups of genitalia. Overall a rather strange mash-up of scenes that feel like they belong on different sites.

Aside from the strange discrepancies in the content the site was overall average. Navigation was sub-par but the large network makes up for it ( check out like legs and secretary hoes since both have a bunch of stocking material). Download speeds were very fast, but the lack of more download options/ better quality videos brings the score back down. The models were okay, with no exceptionally ugly or beautiful girls standing out. Overall a nice mix of English and Russian girls (they are missing out on some really cute girls though, no Aspen, no Payton or Flick, no Amai Liu or Sasha Grey).

Another unhappy point is the technical quality of the videos. Sadly, I think none of the videos looked as good as the preview page made them appear. The lighting is not always optimal and sometimes the camera guy focuses on the wrong things (please no close up of a dude's face while he's jacking off.) also I think the three preview videos are a bit misleading since most of the content, especially more recent stuff is not really representative of those trailers (In my opinion)

That being said there are some nice gems hidden here and if you do join I recommend Whitney and Anne as their scenes were some of the more interesting ones. Also make sure to check out the rest of the network.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Foot Factory

20. Foot Factory (0)

Pay
Active
80
otoh (54) 09-12-11  12:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Unique, interesting themes
- Good, unusual photography style
- Wide variety of models, some well-known
- Good descriptions of videos
- Good value full trial available
Cons: - Low res pics and videos
- Sparse updates
- Set names obscured & unhelpful zip names
- No tagging or categorisation
- Some sets too big
Bottom Line: Yet another infuriating site!

I'll start with a couple of disclaimers. First, I'm not really a foot/leg fetishist as such; however I seem to have become a one by default since the genre (particularly legs) seems to cover eroticism, undressing, nylons and lingerie etc - in short, the whole picture - more than most porn. Second, I'm slightly biased since I'm familiar with the photographer, Ed Fox; I've just had his second book delivered and like his work in Leg Show magazine - which I get occasionally, one of the few printed magazines still worth a look with all the online porn around.

Anyway, at FF, you'll find a good selection of foot-oriented material; sets and videos cover various themes, such as:

- candids of eg girls getting dressed, putting on shoes;
- masturbation scenes, sometimes starting with the girl eg rubbing lotion onto her feet
- quite a few with sex toys
- some girl-girl scenes and a few b/g scenes
- scenarios, eg I liked a couple involving undressing/masturbating during phone calls
- behind the scenes
- some not explicit at all, purely focused on feet
- outdoor or other unusual locations
- plenty of dirty feet

Some themes I didn't like; smoking is common but has never worked for me, and some weirder S&M stuff, eg unseen strangers whose gloved hands abduct or molest girls. And many videos have music whereas I prefer without; however it tends to be ambient/electronic/experimental stuff which although sometimes offputting, is far preferable to the corny faux-sexy music we get so often.

It's worth noting that this is material that leans towards foot fetishism but doesn't focus solely (rimshot) on it - hardcore foot folk may find it strays a bit too much but it's a balance that works for me. And largely I really like the style; it's not as brightly lit as most porn so it may not appeal to some folk; but there is a documentary/voyeuristic style to it which is quite unique, and even the magazine type shoots have a starkness and realism that sets it apart from most glam. The light and shadows make it very erotic - but not at the expense of being too arty, which it's not, or too tame - although there's not much hardcore, there's plenty of explicit midcore.

And there are a great selection of models featured. Some I'm familiar with from the pinup/fetish genre, eg Angela Ryan, Emily Marilyn, Dita von Teese; some porn stars, such as Aria Giovanni, Ryan Keely, Jelena Jensen; and plenty of pretty amateurs that perhaps only appear here.

Roughly 570 photo sets and 230 videos going back to 2004; maybe 150 models. Photo sets are split between 'photos' and 'features' - I think the former are meant to be more candids, and the latter more glamorous, magazine shoots and the like - but it's a vague distinction and there seems to be quite an overlap. Updates are quite sparse at 1-4 per month; but this is clearly stated on the tour so I don't have a problem with that.

Site navigation is fairly standard; a general updates list, photos/videos lists in date order, a model index. Given the number of themes involved it would be nice to have some kind of tagging, but sadly there is none. The layout of the site means that the names of photo sets are obscured which is annoying, especially as zips do not have meaningful names; but at least zips are there and easily accessible. I found some sets too large, maybe > 200 pictures, and really could have been edited; more is not necessarily better. Videos are mostly WMV, some QT, and whereas there's no info about photo sets, most videos have a long and explicit description, particularly discussing the feet - Mr Fox is quite a fetishist.

The biggest issue, though, is the resolution; all pictures sets are just 1024x768 (or less on the shorter side). I'm really not a resolution fiend and don't expect the somewhat daft 80 megapixel sets that Hegre Art is now offering; but Ed Fox is a well-known published photographer and it baffles me that he can't/doesn't/won't muster more than even 1 megapixel. I'd at least like to look at them full-screen and 1024x768 is well under half the size of mine - at least 2000px would be far more appropriate.

Similarly, videos are fairly low; many are DVD size, but older ones seem to be about 450x300 px - although for me a video survives upscaling a bit more than a photo so I don't mind quite so much. But still, a bit of HD would be appreciated and hardly technically challenging to produce now.

As some others have pointed out, once you go to leave the site you get offered a link to a $3/3 day trial; I took this and felt a bit guilty since I did get some good content. But I'd really need a month to comfortably go through everything - I like the material so much that it's only the resolution issue that preventing me from buying a full subscription. And similarly that's what prevents me scoring this higher; even with all the other cons I would happily give this 90+ - but it's still good size archive of great material and hopefully 80 reflects this.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ferro Network

21. Ferro Network (0)

Network
Newbie
92*
moby69 (0) 08-15-11  08:43am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: excellent quality of pics and videos..
beautiful russian models..
very hot and amazing scene each time..
between 6 and 10 movies and photo-sets every days..
(For that..the price of membership is justified)
Cons: no models directory...
Bottom Line: if you are amateur of russian porn..this sites are for you..
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Lily Wow

22. Lily Wow (0)

Pay
Newbie
63*
grimmaronw (3) 08-03-11  02:02pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good quality pics and videos.

- Nice sized pic and vid galleries.

- Nice stocking foot pics.

- A lot of footjob and b/j videos and pictorals
Cons: - Annoying music in all of the videos. Audio is almost always muted in favor of it.

- Lily is thin, but wears stockings much to big for her. While stocking wrinkles are sexy, the ones she puts on almost seem to droop off of her legs.

- Videos seem to drag on most of the time and the aformentioned music makes it worse.
Bottom Line: Lily has an average stocking/pantyhose/feet site going on. She runs the gamet from tease to hand/footjobs to hardcore sex. Unfortunately, all the videos on the site play music that is meant to be sensual, but ends up being annoying because the audio of the actual scene is almost always muted. So you can't hear the nylons shusshing, voices, or moans. And even when you can hear them, the music is so distracting that you can't enjoy them. Finally, she should check if the stockings she wants actually fit before buying them as many times they are unforgivingly loose around her legs.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Stockings Babe XXX

23. Stockings Babe XXX (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
grimmaronw (3) 08-03-11  01:45pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Great stocking and pantyhose pics of various styles, colors, and consistencies.

- Hardcore stocking sex videos and pictures.

- Very personable attitude on camera.

- The price is right.
Cons: - Slow to update. Was the reason why I quit.

- Needs a cameraman instead of her husband(?) holding the camera for POV or in a fixed position for shots that are too tight.

- Julie seems to be "hands off" with the site. No replies to emails.
Bottom Line: Julie is a very hot mature stocking sex amateur who shows what she's got and gives exactly what she promises you. Her site has a lot of potential, but she needs to update more and get some more camera angles going. She probably won't hit the level of Lady Sonia, but if stockings and stocking sex is your thing then this is a great site for the money.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Natasha\'s Nylons

24. Natasha's Nylons (0)

Pay
Newbie
58*
grimmaronw (3) 07-29-11  01:59am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great pair of legs
- Nice quality shots
- Many nice quality videos at no additional charge
Cons: - Misleading banners and promotional pictures (namely on the OfficeGirl.net site) with hardcore b/g content. As of 7/29/11 there are no sets or videos with hardcore b/g. It never truly gets dirtier than the occasional pussy shot and dildo play...and the dildo isn't used for insertion 9 times out of 10.

- The pics you'd get as a member only serve as an extension of the free pics you can get from the promotional sites as they are nearly all tease pics. This would be okay if the site were promoted as a tease site, but is promoted as a nylon sex site.

- Pic galleries are non-DL manager friendly. If you want the pics, you have to right-click and d/l each one individually.

- Has a saucy Scots accent, but only speaks in exactly one of her videos out of about a couple dozen.

- Has a nasty and disinterested look on her face in many of her videos.

- Bad communication.
Bottom Line: Natasha has a lot of potential as a leggy MILF that knows her assets. However, her site relies on bait and switch tactics to rope you in by showing her in hardcore orientations such as b/g and b/g interracial sex, but the actual content is softcore teasing and is on par with what you would see from a softcore leg tease site like Akira Lane's or Sandy's Nylons, but pretends to be at the level of the Michelle's Nylons site. And like I mentioned above, this would be fine if the promotion of the site reflected it. The hardcore pics shown in the free area of the site don't even exist in the members area. If you ask about the pictures, you are ignored or given a nasty reply.

So I will tell you what she doesn't want to tell you - THIS IS A SOFTCORE TEASE SITE! If you see the banners of her doing reverse cowgirl...don't believe it. If you read the sample pictorals promising cumshot endings...don't believe it. If you see a sample pic set looking like she's about to plunge a dildo inside her...don't believe it. She does not cater to the hardcore nylon sex enthusiast as she claims. Save your $22 for someone with just as saucy legs but delivers on what they promise.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

25. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
89
RustyJ (145) 07-07-11  12:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -One of the longest going sites in the DDF Prod network if not the longest one. The earliest scenes are dated January 2001 which is quite historic when it comes to internet porn
-Number of scenes going at nearly 2000 with your standard DDF Prod caveats of possible cross site content. However this site with it's clear niche is less likely to have content shared between sites and one can almost guarantee any footjob scenes are site exclusive
-Very strong approach on the subject again. Scenes may be solo, lesbian or hardcore but legs and feet are always in the focus of the action
-DDF understands that there should be multiple women in the same scene with a man. This is what 21Sextury.com could learn from
-Everything related to production and technical side is fine. Quality of photos, videos and sets in general is very high. Site works well with multiple download options, tagged searching is great too. Downloads are generally very fast and I repeatedly max out my bandwidth
Cons: -Recycling. With this network it's hard to tell if material is new or old as scenes of all ages are added regularly and it's not uncommon to see a previously removed scene added again
-This is subjective but personally I'm not that much into feet and when it comes to legs, it's good enough that they look good. This site has many scenes where the only female part getting much action are the feet and they are nothing for me. However fans of the niche will 100% disagree
-Casting scenes that are of lower quality and not very interesting
Bottom Line: Feet, legs, socks, pantyhose, stockings and some shoes and boots are the focus here. The rest varies as much as on all the DDF sites from solo girls to group hardcore action. This site has been going for a very long time and if the oldest scenes all the way from the early 2001 aren't worth much in their 320x240 video format, at least they have decent photosets with many legendary stars. Actually the very oldest ones have only photosets with the video starting few months later.

Even if one is not into the feet and legs in particular, this site offers lots of videos with enough normal sex to entertain non niche people. Due to the specific foot focus in those scenes too, they are more often site exclusive too and not found on other DDF Prod sites as often as ones on some other sites. DDF also does one thing right if one compares with the "main competitor" 21sextury.com, there are usually more women than men in the hardcore scenes. Of course there's lots of solo scenes too and many that feature maybe only short blowjob in addition to footjob so if those are your thing, you might like this site even more while for me they are just filler.

Quality of photography and video in newer scenes shines here too. The ones available in 1080p are generally very good but as they are updating also with older (sometimes recycled) material, you will see 720p too which is perhaps a bit smudgier than the new content but still nice. Photos are the subjective best in the business and available in three sizes in zips although I cannot see anyone really downloading anything but large size ones these days. The large photosets in zips are usually from few dozen to maybe fifty megabytes so no 600Mb monster zips here.

The talent is nothing new to the ones familiar with DDF and the other European sites. The names may vary from site to site but the girls are the same big Euro names of today and past years with some Americans thrown in between. In case anyone is interested, yes the guys are the same handful you have learned to tolerate on every site and film over past few decades ;)

Technical side is in good order and exactly the same as on the other network sites. After they did away with the individual site designs and interfaces, everything has been clearer and very easy to search. It's also easier to check if the content is duplicate or a re-edit of some other scene from another site. Downloads speeds are not maybe the most consistent I've experienced but generally fast enough to max out the fastest connections with a DL manager.

This site is another cornerstone of the DDF Prod network. Despite the topic, it has much to offer to users more interested in just plain action but also many 100% topic focused scenes.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 128 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Layered Nylons (1)
2. Anal Pantyhose (1)
3. Only Tease (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.2 seconds.