Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Updates are daily at 2 updates a day
* very unique scenes, credit to them here for actually thinking outside the box literally when it comes to porn entertainment and bringing you scenes that you will of seen nothing like before.
* I was impressed with download speeds here.
* I second what slutty says not bad quality and was quite shocked to see even the lower bitrate version were not all that bad and with amateur stuff you don't often get the ultra high definition scenes.
* Some very very cute girls to be found, very impressed with the quality on czech casting to be honest, 80 girls in total I really liked the look of.
* Great interviews with some of your adult models that you might of sen before, I especially loved seeing Suzie Carina here and hearing what she had to say, you get to know about them and find out more about their personalities. I love Suzie even more after this, amazing girl.
Cons:
* Some simply terrible camerawork.
* not any zip files for the photos so had to manually go through them which was a pain.
* Some not great looking women bu I guess that can be expected with orgy scenes, it would be hard to find so many stunners willing to do it.
* Not exactly the cheapest of networks.
* Can get boring, sounds weird but some of the orgy scenes I did get bored with and felt it maybe stuck on someone I wasn't all that bothered watching for too long.
* site could do with more social interaction, it would be nice to maybe rate the models and comment on scenes.
Bottom Line:
Right thought I'd make a review on my thought on this network. First off its not the cheapest of sites at $29.99 but you do get access to 12 sites.
It gives you 2 updates a day which is fair enough I think and overall there's a fair amount of content all together to keep you busy for a good while.
I have to say the reason I joined this site is because they tempted me in with the pretty Czech girls on the Czech parties preview and when I'd joined I immediately felt disappointed. Mainly I think it was clever previews to entice and then I quickly realized some of the girls were not all that cute to be honest and some of the camera work to left me bored cause it was basically a guy holding a handycam whilst he had sex with these girls, yeah it give the amateur feel which sometimes I love but you do miss on on so much cause the camera stay in one view point for far too long, I ended up being bored to be honest.
Some of the lesbian orgy scenes too was a big join factor for me, I love lesbians and it did look so amazing to have a house full of them and film it. But again some of the women where not really my cup of tea and filmed by a guy you often felt like you are missing on on so much happening elsewere whilst you are stuck watching someone you might not be that keen on when there this real hot girl getting it on behind the camera guy. I think it would be better if they had more camera people, film it in all rooms and edit it at the end of the orgy to just put up the good bits.
Some of the other sites are voyeur sites with watching girls on the toilet and sunbeds, felt a bit weird and unsure if these girls are signed up to it and just pretending they no nothing about the cameras, I probably think this is the case as unsure of the legal aspects of filming people on the toilet. It was interest to see for something different I say that much for it.
Now lastly and this site I was so glad about as its been my highlight and that's the casting videos. Now he the network seemed yeah ok this is different, lots of girls basically being cast with a clothed interview and then they get naked and often seen oiling themselves and playing with themselves whilst chatting. The thing that I loved about it is wow you see some really quality girls, often without all the heavy makeup like you see on loads of sites, just being themselves, it made a real refreshing change to get to know a bit about these models and why they wanted to get into porn basically.
Also the photographs they took, I'm not too gone on photos from porn sites and often just don't bother with them but these were really interesting as they posed in the same poses nearly each time for every girl. I found it great, I love girls posing with the hand by the side and legs together looking straight at you, always have done and its a real rare find to see on a photo shoot, you often never see a model simply doing this, for me it one of my favorite poses. So I've been collected around 9 of these photos in the same poses for each of the girls I liked.
Comparing body shapes and boobs and everything is actually really good I found and really makes you think of what you actually are attracted to in women. I found 80 women here I liked, I went through them all getting these 9 photos and videos, still a few to do actually. Will be something I know I'll definitely look at again which is actually more than I can say for lots of sites so feel now maybe my money hasn't been wasted which is how I felt when I initially joined and got a bit bored about the camera work.
One thing though with the castings I think I should mention is they do sometimes go too far with the pestering the models to go further when they clearly feel uncomfortable about it, watching someone feeling awkward and not into it certainly doesn't make for a hot video. Lots of the girls though are models in the adult industry now so it didn't put them off, but just some I did feel sorry for.
Think I should mention First Videos, Amateurs and Streets sites, often bad camera work but some real gems in there too I found, some really cute girls and I was impressed by a few here and there on these sites.
Overall not too bad network and there are some real gems to be found and very unique scenes, sure there was lots I don't think I'll ever watch again with some of the amateur stuff but certainly don't regret joining and think there is some good to very good stuff on the networks, just takes some finding sometimes.
I've just reevaluated my score after viewing more on the czech amateurs site, very impressed, before I only briefly looked at what was in there now after downloading and viewing some, very good indeed, this is the type of amateur stuff I like and works better than the handy cam orgy scenes. Also some really natural sex in these scenes with real couples. All what I've seen this afternoon I think my 82 was unfair and actually going to go for a 87 after all for the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Almost 800 scenes of nothin' but hardcore banging.
+ Exclusive content.
+ About 100 true HD scenes and large sized vids in general.
+ Professional quality production and lighting.
+ Good full trial price of $3.50 for 2 days (see review below for tips on saving $$ for more time).
+ Good DL speeds, various format options for vids and streaming in browser.
+ High quality pics, all with zips.
+ Good model directory and generally good search.
+ All updates are date stamped for future reference.
+ Multiple language options and a mobile viewing option as well.
Cons:
- Not all HD labelled vids are HD.
- Search options for pics are worthless.
- Content gets a bit repetitive.
- Currently updating 2x per week but starting in 2012 and going back expect only 1 update per week at best.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Some content seen on other sites and some photographers work isn't up to snuff for DDF work.
- As usual, oldest content isn't that high quality.
- Some content recycled from other DDF sites and the date of publication here may not be when it first came out.
- Need more screen cap previews for the vids.
- Since I last joined they've removed some of the earliest content. Granted the quality wasn't the best but still not bad compared to some other major sites today. Wished they had kept it or remastered it.
Bottom Line:
I last joined HoH about 4 years ago. I signed up for the 2 day trial expecting only to be able to grab a year or two worth of material. To my surprise I was done downloading in about 6 hours and I don't use a DL manager or have super fast high speed connections. The lack of updates over the years was about the major downer though. Here's the skinny:
PICS: All scenes have zip downloads and the last few years have pics coming in at 2000 x 1300 pixels. Even the oldest content is roughly 1600 x 1070 in size. The tags for photo search are worthless if there even are any. You can tag individual photos with info for others to see (don't know why you'd do this). No real ability to slideshow the pics. Multiple size options available. Some airbrushing on sets.
VIDS: All scenes have vids with the most recent allowing for wmv and mp4 download options. Some older vids also have divx or quicktime. All but the oldest material has streaming video with ability to jump around to get a good preview. I had consistent DL speeds of about 1.3 MB/sec on multiple channels. At best only about 80-100 vids are in true HD, most HD labelled vids are just HD size. Starting in 2008, the vid sizes get down to medium size (720x400) and the oldest years don't even get that big and come split into the scenes. I wish they had more screen caps in order to preview the vids without having to stream and jump around to decide if I wanted to DL or not.
The site allows you to search by category, date or tags. The model directory is good and has background info. There is some blog material and social media stuff but no one appears to do much with it. They also let you customize the site with favorites and similar items if you stick around for the long haul. There are some special discounts for other DDF sites and independent sites that pretty much match what you can find on TBP. However, if you want to join other DDF sites or the DDF network they do offer a 50% off the first month discount. So, my advice is join on a cheap trial and if you want more hit the discounts page, a better deal than what TBP has going.
Generally speaking, DDF puts out a consistent and high grade euro porn product. This site is no different but, if you've seen their sites before, you pretty much know what you're going to get. In that respect, there isn't a lot of imagination that goes into putting the scenes together and so some of the content does get repetitive. Overall, if they hadn't been skimpy with their updates the last 3 years or so I would have scored this in the 90's. So, if you like hardcore of all varieties you can't really go wrong here.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
many models
many good looking models
site navigation is well
Cons:
sometime too many models
models often just looking at ur wallet
you get nothing for free
too expensive
the support is horrible
Bottom Line:
some things are good on that site.
but its just too expensive, too many idiot , and for free jerks in the chatrooms , and the girl only looking at ur money.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+The bulk of their content is exclusif.
+You get to see an excellent selection of young hot looking Eastern European models have hardcore sex.
+All content is dated and they appear to upload with a new scene every 2-3 days.
+You can download the videos in various resolutions from 640x480 to at least 1280x720 for the videos dated from 2006 to now.
+They now also offer true HD resolution 1920x1080 (approximately 150).
+All scenes have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Best reolution is 2000x1300.
+They do an excellent job of tagging their scenes with multiple keywords.
+The ability to select the sites language out of 6 possible choices.
Cons:
-The date on the content is often misleading because they use remastered scenes as new content.
-I'm also pretty sure that they use content from some of their other sites to fill this site's library.
-Some of the scenes could use better lighting and better camera work.
-The porn is rather repetitive and editing is not very good.
-The older videos are split into multiple clips.
Bottom Line:
*There is very little that DDF does wrong so it's no surprise that this site is so good. Their selection of models includes many of the top Eastern European models of the last 10 years and most of them either have hardcore b/g, g/g, b/b/g or g/g/b sex or all of them.
*They do such a good job at tagging their scenes and there are so many keywords attached to them that it's easy to find all of the ones that include a specific fetish, body shape or hair color.
**The one negative thing and this is common for many Eastern European sites and it is that the scenes tend to lack imagination. Too many of the them look like paint by the number porn where there is no variation and little imagination. I also found that the editing is badly done so that there is no natural transition from one shot to the next.
**This is an excellent site but since the cost of the network is so close to this site then it's probably better to join the ddf network for a couple of dollars more and get access to so much more content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Access to 8 bonus sites (6 solo models, 2 multi-model sites)
- Slick navigation – easy to filter by girl/site/keyword etc
- All content downloadable with no download limits/DRM
- Lots of download options for video (by size/format/scene)
- Photos downloadable as zips with lots of different options
- Extremely high quality content covering a lot of different genres
- Ivana is an absolutely fantastic performer
- Long history of updates, all of which are dated
- CCBill – with non-recurring option, no pre-checked cross-sells
- You seem to stay logged in without username/password prompts
- Great value for the amount of content available
- Active Diesel Access forum and visible member support
- Webcams available on bonus sites to suit various timezones
Cons:
Mostly minor. Points marked with * don't personally bother me:
- Ivana is no longer posting hardcore boy/girl updates
- Ivana hasn’t done a webcam since February 2013
- Out of the 8 bonus sites, 4 are no longer updating
- Automatically generated password*
- She's bulked out a little bit – still slim but looks quite different*
Bottom Line:
An incredibly slick website, part of a very polished network. You can join with recurring membership (pre-checked), but also a non-recurring, and also a 5 month membership to all 13 of the network sites.
CCBill confirmation and username/password arrive in separate emails. Inside, you can see updates for all the Diesel member sites that you have access to. These are:
You can click on any of the above to be taken to that specific member’s area, and once inside you see all updates (video and photo) chronologically presented as thumbnails with the title, date, keywords, and who the video stars.
You can also view just galleries or videos by clicking the option on the navigation bar at the top. Pages have two views; ‘Normal’ which displays just the updates, or ‘Advanced’ which allows you to sort by date, rating, most popular or most commented. You can also filter by site, or by keyword (eg, anal, blowjob, cum in mouth, cum on face etc). A good feature is that you can select multiple tags (eg, ‘blowjob’ and ‘outdoors’ for all outdoor blowjobs).
VIDEO:
Content across the site is high quality with older updates having fewer options and are lower quality.
Formats available include MP4 at 1080p (since around May 2012), 720p (since around February 2009), 480p (since the site began), and 360p (throughout most of the archives). A WMV of the largest video size at the time is also available with each movie update.
You can also view the video embedded as a Flash file which you can skip to any point in while it still loads, and even on the Flash video you can select the video quality.
You can also select scenes in a video to play or download. You simply toggle the scenes you want, then can play the selection, or download in various different qualities – I’ve never seen this amount of versatility and customisation on any other website. This is available on all videos.
GALLERIES:
Almost infinite amount of customisation options. On the majority of galleries you can view a slideshow, change the size of thumbnails (with a slider), download as 1000px resolution or the original sized images. In the last week or so, new galleries have the option of downloading images as 1000px, 2000px, 4000px or the original 6000px resolution.
The best feature is customisable zips – you select the photos you want to download (or click the link to select all images) and you can download them in a zip. It suits literally everyone.
THE CONTENT
Ivana is versatile and caters for lots of niches. Earlier content was mainly sex and masturbation. Her sex scenes were all with the same guy, but together they put on a great performance with a perfect balance of sex being hard but romantic. Scenes have her contorted in excitement before ending with a passionate embrace.
Her masturbation scenes are something to behold – Ivana puts everything into each scene and writhes around in excitement.
Later scenes include anal, and there is also a lot of lesbian content too. However, since May 2011 there is no boy/girl content.
Scenes take place in lots of locations – bedroom, bathroom, gardens and pools, and also in outdoor locations such as abandoned buildings and even in public. Most have multi-angles, both POV and from multiple other angles.
UPDATES
Updates on Ivana’s site are weekly with bias towards two galleries for every video posted. There’s normally around three updates every day across the bonus sites included. In the last few updates Ivana has put on a bit of weight – she’s still slim, but her face has filled out in particular and she’s not as boney around the midriff (I could understand people thinking she was too skinny before) and honestly looks very different – I had to double-take to see if it was still her.
WEBCAMS AND BONUS CONTENT
The webcam is exceptional. There is a weekly schedule and comprehensive archive of shows. Ivana’s last show was in February, and is not on schedule to reappear soon. Shows are spread throughout the day, so no bias towards Americans time-wise. Each show is a couple of hours long.
Exceptionally slick member's area like nothing I've ever seen. Updates are not as exciting as they used to be now that she no longer does hardcore. The huge archive will entertain most members.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-20-1310:20am (Update History) Reason: Overhauled the entire review.
Pros:
All original content.
All softcore content.
Lactation content.
Lesbian lactation content.
High quality models.
High quality videos (native 720P) and high quality photos.
Very unique and well produced materials.
iPod playable videos available.
Cons:
No update schedule.
Updates can be sporadic.
Only three videos per month.
Only three photo sets per month.
Few exclusive models.
Bottom Line:
Nadine has made many improvements to her site since I was there in early 2012;first, there are a lot more lactation content now;second, the videos and photos are in true HD (iPod/iPhone version also available);third, the number of models and contents have slowly increased since. And the new lactation contents are a fantastic addition.
Nadine is well know for her humongous all natural breasts and that goes for all her other models as well.
Being a softcore site you won't find any explicit contents here. Most models only do topless scenes but a few are fully nude.
Some of these ladies are porn stars so you might recognize them from other sites, but their scenes are exclusive to this site.
These are exclusive and wholly unique videos featuring busty ladies playing and massaging their breasts in all sorts of scenarios.
All videos are well produced, well directed, and shot in very high quality. None of the videos are studio made. All videos have a slight voyeuristic feel. And for the same reason these models give a very intimate and sometimes very playful performance.
The new lactation contents are second to none. This site has become the best softcore lactation site on the web.
Lactation videos feature very busty ladies milking themselves, being milked, drinking their own milk, and using milk pumps.
Lesbian lactation contents have girls milking each other, milking onto each other, and sucking each other dry.
These are all completely original exclusive scenes that are incredibly erotic and are passionately made.
The lactating models are entirely exclusive to Nadine's site, you won't find these lactating models anywhere else.
Videos are shot in true 720P and they look incredible on a 40 inch LCD TV. The iPod versions are made available along with the HD versions and they look just as sharp on the iPod Touch 5.
There are 3 video updates per month. No DRM, no download limits. Very small banner on the corner.
The photos are of very high quality, between 1600x1600 resolution. Each set contains about 60 photos. Photo sets are separated into two updates and they're updated several days apart. All files are zipped. There are three photo sets per month.
Nadine's site has grown beyond Nadine herself. If you were fan of Nadine or have a breast/lactation fetish, you won't be disappointed and you'll find much more.
I whole heartedly recommend this site to all lovers of creative and passionately made porn. This is like the IfeelMySelf of all breasts sites.
It's intimate, sexy, creative, unique, and wholesome.
All the latest video updates can be seen on the News/Diary section and all the photo updates are on the Models section on the welcome page.
For lactation fans out there this is a must sign up site. You've never seen such well made lactation content with such beautiful ladies anywhere. One small downside is that there are only three ladies who are lactating but these three ladies are absolutely gorgeous with huge swollen breasts like you've never seen. And the ladies are clearly enjoying milking themselves.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 1300+ scenes
- Part of a network
- Four updates per month
- Many download options on newer uploads
- Photos available
- Photo zips offered
- Incredibly beautiful models
- Download managers supported
- TBP / PU discount
- Some hard-to-find niches available here
- Owners seem to be actively working to improve the site
Cons:
- Majority of scenes are in clips only
- Relatively conventional for an ‘extreme’ site
Bottom Line:
Zoliboy is, I presume, the main site in the 21 Sextreme network. I make that assumption based on the fact that it is the largest site on the network by far. 21 Sextreme is promoted as the more extreme version of 21 Sextury.
The site has over 1300 scenes uploaded and continues to add four per month, though not necessarily one upload each week.
I’m also a member of 21 Sextury and I don’t know that I’d characterize 21 Sextreme as being more ‘extreme.’ Part of this opinion comes from the fact that a lot of the porn on the more ‘tame’ network has a fairly hard edge. That’s definitely not a complaint as I’m on the record as being a huge fan of 21 Sextury. The Zoliboy site certainly has elements that are less common in porn and may be viewed as more extreme by some. There are watersports scenes (and watersports within sex too), and more female on male rimming than occurs in more mainstream porn, but the entire site itself isn’t all that extreme. It isn’t like every scene on the site has an element that is outside the mainstream. There are a lot of scenes here that are fairly conventional and could easily be uploaded to the 21 Sextury network.
The newer videos on the site offer the same options as across the rest of the two networks with streaming and downloads being available. The downloads are available in both WMV and H.264 formats and in multiple resolutions. My go-to resolution was the mid-grade H.264 which came in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Objectively I know these numbers look low, but subjectively the scenes look better than some with higher numbers from other sites. I did download a few of the highest-resolution H.264 scenes and these come in at 1920x1080 at 6200 kb/s and 50fps. (I don’t think I’ve ever seen 50fps before…). Subjectively these look incredible. They are crisp and clear and will likely look amazing on a big-screen TV. Download managers are supported.
Photos are also offered, with some scenes offering both photos and screenshots. These can be downloaded as singles or as zips. In most of the newer uploads the zips are available in low and high resolutions. The hi-res photos are approximately 3000x4200.
Most of the models on this site are the same that appear throughout this network and 21 Sextury. That’s definitely not a bad thing as so many of the models are incredibly beautiful. The vast majority of them are Russian or eastern European.
One thing I found odd about the site (considering that it is promoted as the main site of an ‘extreme’ network) is that the number of anal scenes here is actually lower than you find on the more ‘tame’ company network. This is both in terms of actual numbers and in proportion to the size of the site. This isn’t necessarily a pro or con – I’m just mentioning it. (Subjectively it is a con but I didn’t take that into account on scoring.)
The site layout is the same as with the rest of this network and the other company network. It is simple and easy to use. It appears that the site owners will be rolling out new filters soon which will (presumably) make it easier to sort scenes by a large number of tags.
The site does have one HUGE flaw, and it is somewhat baffling since this isn’t shared by any other site in this or the related network. The newest scenes offer lots of download options but on scenes uploaded before October 2009 the options are quite different. Prior to October 2009 only WMV files are available. The uploads in September 2009 still have decent resolution (1280x720, 3000kb/s and 30fps) but the problem is that the scenes are no longer available in a single, full scene, format. The best you can get is a two-part scene. Some scenes are in even more clips. I have no idea why the site owners made this choice considering that the scenes are all relatively short (10 minutes, give or take) for the full scene. 2009 wasn’t so long ago that only offering smaller clips made sense. From comments made here at PU it seems that the owners are actively looking to improve their networks. In my opinion making the scenes available as a single download should be high on their list. I’d prefer H.264 but will live happily with WMV but I really dislike having a scene broken down into multiple parts. (In real numbers, approximately 150 scenes are available as single downloads and more than 1000 are in clips only.)
The bottom line is that this is a great site that offers some beautiful models in some hard-edged porn. The newer scenes are available in many different ways but the older scenes are only available in clips. I don’t fully understand the reasoning for spinning off a separate network but given that this is all exclusive material with some of the best production values around I can’t fault the owners for wanting to generate more income so they can continue to make more great porn. When you add in the TBP / PU discount this site and network is a great value and I’d recommend it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very unique, playful style - a true "indie" web site
Unique look and feel
Fairly exclusive European models
57 of the girls are French according to site
A few popular models
True High resolution images to 4000k- crisp images
HD videos for most models
Newer site so no old low res material!
Great search options
Model mouseover summary and "exposure limits" very helpful
Newer models/sets are very good
Coolest "Shop" area I'v ever seen.
A good deal for the price!
Cons:
Collection is not that large, but growing
Information is sparce once at the model pages
Rating system is confusing (model or set?)
Can't search by model score.
Many Models are not very engaging
Many models are pretty but not knockouts
Many models/sets are not nude
Navigation/viewing options are limited
(i.e. 10 models per page, 18 sets per page)
There are a few minor navigation issues (page back does not work so you have to reload a lot)
A few broken/incorrect links (might be in the middle of upgrading )
Set dates are not universally available.
Bottom Line:
This is the type of site that reminds me how incredibly difficult it must be to run a popular, successful porn site. They do many, many things really well here, but the overall package falls a little short, overall score-wise, of the big players.
This is currently a nude and non-nude modeling site. mostly passive, candid, single model, photography. No sex, nothing kinky in any way with the exception of a very small number of VERY light B&D sets. In this regard, it is kind of like the local strip club....the girls you WANT to see more of are not the girls you ARE seeing more of, if you catch my drift. If you have an appetite for sex scenes, toys, bondage, close-ups, spread legs, anything more than passaive nude modeling photogrpahy, this may not be the site for you at the moment, but check back as it looks like the folks here are making some very positive improvements in both the site and the collection. If you are the type who likes passive scenes, dressing room shots, that kind of thing, then this may be an EXCELLENT site for you. Frankly, there is a lot of variety here and my tastes, admittedly, run toward more engaging solo scenes.
Here are some basics from what I can tell...
About 100 models
About 350 sets
1 new set every 2-3 days
Sets have between 30 and 60 images
Models all seem to be 18-24
Model are, as the name implies, petite.
Most sets are in studio.
The design of this site makes it fun and different. I think the webmasters were trying to incorporate a Moulin Rouge kind of feel, and they came very close to pulling it off. Model thumbnails are shown full sized and they go nude with a mouse-over. Saw the technique in a french body study years ago and it is VERY effective here at showing you exactly what the models look like. Clicking on a model brings a pop-up that shows all of her sets. Once you select a set, you get about 36 images per page, a "stars" score, and a thumbnail slider that allows you to go to other sets of the same model. Very nice concept. In execution, though, the name of the model does not show up on the model page anywhere, only in the hard-to-read thumbnails, the stars scoring is not immediately clear (model or set? SET!), the model bio is not available from here, the sets are not dated here, the cover images are included for sets scheduled for up to a month away (so you click on a model and a set and THEN find that the set isn't on the site yet). Some navigation options are missing, but don't hit back-page here (or ANYWHERE) or you will have to reload your browser. (I also clicked on something once or twice and got dropped into a shell directory where I shouldn't have been...looks like they are in the middle of upgrades.) I love the navigation style here, but it could be much better with a few small tweaks.
When you first look at the site, it really does give a Moulin Rouge feel. The sample images are representatative, so you honestly see what you get.
The photography, though competent, is sometimes a little weak. There are some excellent studio sets, but many sets are passive, so you feel like you are following the model around through her apartment or something. There is a little model interaction with the photographer (and therefore the viewer), but not much. This may be more about the models,as the more popular models are more interactive (it is part of what makes them popular) than the neophytes. But the incongruity between the playful feel of the site and the passive feel of many of the sets is what makes things a little...off here. They need a little more of the sexual energy you find at Twisty's or ALSscan...you usually only get that with the hyper-confident pro-models or with a photographer/shoot team that is ungodly talented. I noticed that many commenters like the passive stuff and frankly have no idea how one would balance the two styles. I have to say, though, that the newer photography is much, much better in terms of interaction and content than the older stuff, so clearly somebody here gets it.
I really want this site to be a success. It is different. It is unique. It is not a formula web site. It deserves to be successful. I could easily and rightfully compare it to an Indie in the movie industry. But the problem with indies is that, although they are often critically acclaimed, they just as often don't get the popular vote simply because they are not following the popular formula or because of one or two faults. This site COULD be a Kill Bill, a Pulp Fiction, A Quentin Tarantino kick-ass example of a web site. Unfortunately, it isn't quite there....yet. Clearly, I am rooting for it, though.
Bottom line: A very unique site that is worthy of a look. With a few tweaks in the site and content, this could be among the top players and it seems as though the webmasters here are figuring that out. I will absolutely be back in a year or so to see how things have progressed.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site.
-Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around.
-Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like.
-Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to
think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are.
-Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models.
-The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl.
Bottom Line:
As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site.
Site statistics:
Number of photosets: 12,534
Number of videos: 1,045 Movies
Number of models: 2,766 Models
Number of contributing photographers: 250
Number of photos: 1,365,839
Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of.
Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world.
The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download:
Low definition, medium definition, high definition.
The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high.
Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today.
One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in-
house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours
daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform.
Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show.
Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are.
I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly.
I am giving the site a score of 99.
How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100?
That would be a fantasy project:
1. They could delete almost all their
videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn.
2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today.
Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams.
For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some old John B Root films are also available on the site. French Beauty and some others are really top class
-French models you cannot find elsewhere. Also many videos and photosets from the big names from France in their early days
-Mostly exclusive content. Some released as DVD's. They claim to have 750 original videos but quickly looking I'd say there's well over 1000 videos although the early ones are almost unviewable by today's standards
-Newer videos are very good looking 720p (.mov) available in multiple formats in lower res too
-Photos in up to 3000x2000 resolution with kind of amateurish and artful feel. Available as zip archives (the actual files are sometimes 9 folder levels deep inside the zip!)
-Good variation between soft and hard content. From solo posing to anal fisting, dap and such
-Compilation videos are good idea. They are like film releases made from scenes of a same theme. Easier downloading
-Reliable billers and no regional pricing
Cons:
-Videos and photosets are separately listed. You have to do some searching to find the matching one if there is such
-Streaming player isn't very good. I couldn't skip forward to parts not yet loaded
-Somewhat mediocre download speeds at little over 3MB/s, sometimes lower, still tolerable. I had some larger 3-5GB compilation type best of files grind to halt or timeouting requiring restart as the downloads are apparently not pauseable
-Site navigation can be a bit clumsy at times, returning blank pages, requesting resending data when navigating with back/forward after filtering and sorting scenes and so on
-Videos can be quite short and skip right into action. Some might consider it a pro
-Condoms. I understand the need but would rather have my porn without
-Compilations feature duplicate content between each other and single scenes (obvious)
-Photos are probably taken during video shoots as they look like they could use more flash light
Bottom Line:
John B Root is a French pornographer of some fame and prestige, or so I think. This site is dedicated to his productions with various models and genres. The sortiment is really wide indeed as the site ranges from soft glamour and casting photoshoots to the most hardcore sex imagineable (DP, double anal, fisting all imaginable orifices), often with the very same girls at some later time. The whole site manages to capture sort of classy feeling that has both glam appeal but also sort of amateurish feeling you get with less used models who seem more confortable and often also seen having honest good time with each other. Mostly it's songle shoots but also complete John B Root films are avialable for download. The single scenes are often released at different times as photosets and videos while the full films come with very large attached photosets and usually a making of kind of film as long as the title itself and photosets from that too. The makin of pieces are necessarily not that sexual in content themselves but interesting watch nonetheless when you can see a small team of mostly actors and actresses travel to an exotic spot and shoot a movie filming each other and working as lighting assistant and such in each others scenes.
Photography is obviously in equal role on this site with videos. The photos are large and quite sharp with kind of amateurish but artsy feel to them. Pictures in zips lack on processing and they could be brighter to begin with. Also the are bit lowish on saturation when compared with leading photo sites and the likes of 21Sextury.com and DDFProd. That's partly post processing issue but the photoshoots could be bit better lit. No such issues with videos, they are bright and crisp. Only complaint is that they are bit on the shorter side and you can often see one cameraman in the picture of another camera. Photos are available as zips but even that could have been executed somewhat better. Some zips have 9 levels of loders before you reach the files while others have the file names start with "\" character making them invisible in Windows until extracted with some app like WinRAR.
Video offerings are top class in quality and 720p .mov has reasonable file sizes although it'd be nice to have 720p also in some streamable format. Besides normal single scene or half a scene videos, they also offer compilations that are videos put together from a number of scenes with similar content or same actress. The idea is good since these are easier to download than individual scenes although it's often hard to preview what you'll get. They obviously have duplicate content with the single scenes but sadly also with other compilations so you end up wasting some hd space. The bigger scenes also seem more likely to timeout while downloading. Some feature films are also available for download, and of course few dozen old John B Root classics directed for Marc Dorcel and others.
You can find many models on this site not really found elsewhere. They also have many bigger names that either started here or did scenes with John B Root at some point of their careers. Famous names include Angell Summers, Liza Del Sierra and some really early scenes by Melissa Lauren. Then there's many hot French actresses who probably never made it ouside France or had longer lasting careers in adult entertainment, personally I recognized Mathilda and Ally but if you've seen early 2000's Marc Dorcel DVD's, you'll likely find other familiar faces too.
Technical side is bit shaky here. The download speeds can vary a lot. I never got anything higher than 3,5MB/s when downloading a single file with DL manager but especially with the bigger files the rate may vary a lot, even stopping at timeswith restart needed so prepare with some time before starting download them. The site design is good looking if not so functional, it might be bit hard finding what you are looking for. The embedded streaming viewer is not that good for previewing, especially the big files as you can not skip forward to what has not yet been loaded. When you sort videos or photosets and try to browse back and forth between them, you often get blank (expired) pages sent to you with need to resend data or have your sorting preference disappear. Using right click and open in new tab helps a lot like it did with 21Sextury when they had similar issues.
All in all it's a bit hard to give rating for this site. Content is great in my opinion but the technical side could use some work, especially the slight download issues. Technically I would have rated this site 80 tops but the content is just great and unique and overweights the issues. Most of my cons are just minor nitpicking after all. French porn is sadly quite limited these days and this site is probably the strongest contender at the moment. Personally I wish Marc Dorcel launched a site in English that qualified for TPB.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+All exclusif content.
+All content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+They started to offer videos in a single file rather than in small clips in 2009. That's about 175 videos out of 469.
+The 185 newer videos are offered in at least 720x408 resolution and they also offer them in 1280x720.
+All the photosets since October 2009 are now offered with a resolution of 2000x1343.
+They hire a good selection of models from most European Countries.
+They now offer Lara latex site with your membership.
+The addition of Lara's site means that you get some lesbian content as well as b/g.
Cons:
-The biggest problem with this site is that they have never considered remastering their older content to at least offer the videos in a single file format rather than in multiple clips.
-Although you now get Lara's site. She does not update very often and the total number of scenes is only 32.
-The performers are only Jim and Lara so you may get tired of seeing only them in the scenes.
Bottom Line:
*I keep returning to this site because they still put out decent suff and I keep hoping that they will remaster their older content. Until they do that then the site will always suffer a lower score than it could get if theyr tried to make some changes. The good news is that you now also get Lara's site included with your membership and that's not bad. Lara is Jim's wife and the person responsible for shooting his scenes in the same way that he's responsible for shooting her's. I wish she would update more often because she is a good performer and she does add some lesbian content which is always nice.
*The site hasn't done any changes since my last review (except adding Lara's site) so I can't really add more info than what's on my previous review. I will only say that Jim is geting older while the models he hires remain at about the same so you are getting an older man with young girls. I guess the same can be said for Lara except that she tends to go for older males and females over younger ones.
I've added a couple of points to my previous score because of the addition of Lara's site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
some good models
good navigation
nothing more
Cons:
intranparent kredit system
loss of ALL kredits without using a chat
a complete rippoff and fraud
incompetent support
Bottom Line:
This site is a complete rippoff and fraud. if you would like to get you kredits stolen without using a chat this is the right site for you. if you complain they pretend to think that you complain about a kreditcard fraud not a kredit loss in their system. after 5 days nothing happens, no answer, nothing.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated:
12-30-1203:26am (Update History) Reason: Added important info about the shortcomings of the search engine
Pros:
Met-Art has a huge number of very attractive models (2700+). A new user could easily spend months going through the entire site. They usually have 4 to 6 updates a day. Excellent photography overall. This is primarily a photo site. They have videos, but they are very soft core. It is also primarily a solo girl site--the occasional "lesbian" sets are really just 2 girls posing together. Another thing worth noting (not necessarily a "pro") is that their Met Live Cams is just their name branded version of Streamate. I don't think there is any advantage to accessing it through their website, and I've only seen one Met-Art model there (Malena Morgan). The main attraction here is the huge volume of quality photos of beautiful naked women.
Cons:
The videos are way too soft core for my taste. They are really just an extension of the photo sets. There is no masturbation and not enough explicitness in the videos for me. The site seems to have a rule against the models touching themselves, so there is no pussy spreading here. Too many models don't do explicit pussy photos. The 2-girl photo sets are not lesbian photo sets--they are pretend lesbian photo sets. There is rarely any actual kissing, and no pussy play etc. I guess the site has a rule against actual sex. I know thats their niche, but it does get annoying sometimes. Many other sites have shown that it can be done tastefully. Some of the photo sets do suffer from less than top quality lighting (this seems to be an issue with some of the European photogs). A lot of the sets have too many redundant photos--by that I mean photos that are nearly identical. This makes many of the sets unnecessarily large. Some user submitted search tags do not seem to work at all.
Bottom Line:
Probably the best soft-core porn site out there, with a huge number of very attractive girls, quality photography, and lots of daily updates.
One month is nowhere near enough time to explore all of the content. In fact, narrowing down the 2700+ models to find the ones you like is the most problematical aspect of Met-Art. Their search engine uses 9 standard tags (e.g. hair color, breast size, etc), and this is useful to a degree. They also have user submitted search tags which potentially could be much more useful. For example, you can search using the term "beach". However, many of the user submitted search tags do not return all sets that have that tag. One example is the term "perfect pussy". Its in the 100 most popular user submitted tags, but when you enter it, only 15 sets are found, all of which have the word "perfect" in the name of the set. It would be very useful if they could get that fixed. Bottom line though, this a must join site, even if you only try it for a month.
Update: I contacted Met-Art support about the user submitted search tags not working. The next day I got an email back from them, stating that they had corrected the problem (I checked, and they did), and as a way of thanking me for alerting them to the problem, they gave me a free two week trial to one of their other sites! Sweet!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The first thing that struck me about this site when I joined was how gorgeous their models are. You would be hard pressed to find any other site with more attractive models. The site is primarily a photo-set site, although they do have quite a few videos as well. Most of the videos are strip and masturbation, although they do have a few lesbian vids as well. The photo quality is very good to excellent overall, although some of the sets do suffer from less than top notch lighting. If you are a fan of Macy B from Met-Art, I have to point out that this site has her best and most explicit work. She is definitely one of my new favs. I joined with their current (as of Dec 2012) discount of $19.95 a month, which is well worth the price. No problems with site navigation or download speeds. They do not permit multi-threaded downloading, but thats not a problem for me, as I dont need the entire catalog.
Cons:
A fair number of their models are somewhat shy, and do not do any explicit pussy photos. This applies more to the earlier than the recent models. Another minor quibble is that some of their videos are released in parts, each about 5 to 7 minutes long.
Bottom Line:
Gorgeous European girls posing nude! Mostly a photo site, but more video as of late. The discount price is a great deal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Plenty of content
+ New video and pics are decent quality
+ Network access
+ Model List
+ Search by niche
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Easy cancellation link
+ HD, Streaming and IPOD videos
+ Video available in parts
+ Customized DVDs available
Cons:
- 1990s style layout and navigation
- Abysmal download speeds
- Erratic update schedule
- No download acceleration with download manager
- Huge watermarks on just about everything but mature.nl content
- Files not named
- Not Opera compatible
- Blank model pages???
- Only one file type on newer content (wmv)
The only search on the site is by niche. 25 categories: Anal, Asslicking, Bigbutt, Biglady, Bigtits, Blowjob, Cum, Facials, Fisting, Gangbang, Groupsex, Hairy, Interracial, Lesbian, Masturbation, MILF, Old & Young, Old & Young Female, Pantyhose,Pissing, Public, Shaved, Solo, Threesome and Toys. Some of the more extreme niches have very few sets.
The model list, which has thousands of models, pops up a thumbnail of each model when pointing to the name. Some models have no video, especially in the oldest sets. With nothing dated outside of the update pages, there's no telling what you're going to find on a particular model.
Pictures:
Click on one of six thumbnails on a model's page and a strip of thumbs appear on the left that have to be scrolled through to get to the page jumps. Found it particularly annoying that clicking on the first thumb didn't always take you to the first picture in the set. Newer pictures are 1440 on the long side, older ones are 1024 long side.
With more than a few blurry shots, poorly lit and oddly framed pictures, there doesn't appear to be much editing on what's posted.
Video:
More than adequate quality files - HD: 1280 x 720 @ 4700+ kb/s, Streaming (From one sample): 720 x 406 @ 768 kb/s, Ipod: 320x240 @ 700+ kb/s
Since the download speeds averaged around 250 kb/s, I was surprised that streaming was even possible. Some one gig files took 3 hours to download - with a download manager. No acceleration was allowed and FreeDownloadManager reported that resuming broken files wasn't guaranteed. I never got to the older mpg files mentioned on TBP, so no comment there. The watermarks do get a comment - On most of the niche sites they were excessively large. Yeah - I get it - you've branded your product with a ridiculous distraction. Thanks.
Various:
Using a download manager (FDM), all pictures download as showPicture.php, all video as V3GetMovie.php. Right clicking to save video and they're merely numbered. Pictures are still showPicture.php. Utterly ridiculous.
I found several models whose link goes to a page with no content. WTF???
I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but this site seems to shoot anyone who will take her clothes off. You know it's bad when you find yourself on a model's page and you say, "Holy shit!", out loud.
Each scene has a link to add it to a custom DVD. Clicking takes you to a page where it shows you how many minutes of content you can still add. Averaging three scenes each and costing €27.95 (including shipping), they aren't cheap.
I gave this site a 68 based mostly on the amount of content available. Beyond that, it needs a lot of work to bring it up to 2012 specs. The clumsy, flash-based navigation, the lack of proper file names, the S-L-O-W download speeds and the sporadic blank pages are annoying as hell. I don't know that I'd recommend this network to anyone but the most ardent mature fan. For over fifty dollars a month, I expected better than this.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hot euro girls, several girls i havent seen on other sites and several first time auditions.
POV style videos so you can feel your the star.
Fast download speed with no daily download limit or shaping.
Streaming options are also available on most girls but i prefer to download the HD videos.
Some sexy massage videos are also included which is great for massage fans like myself
Cons:
Old site design, they should update to a modern look.
Need more updates with new girls.
I would like to see some costumes and some more kinky action but understand with auditions its hard to make the girls do new things.
Only white euro girls, would love to see mr dreamstash shoot some black an asian girls.
Bottom Line:
I came across this site recently when searching for a model: Alena Hemkova. This was one of the few sites that had a video of her and the only site i hadn't been a member of. The site layout is old but the videos are still great. For someone who loves POV then this is a must view sites. Some of these girls are 10s and theres over 20 girls on the site that i would consider 9 rating. Previous reviewers here were saying the site is not working, i was able to signup and was given a discount after the first month. If you love POV of white girls then this site is for you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Obviously a very professionally run site. Nothing to complain about the nuts and bolts
Cons:
One man's meat is another man's poison. This is undoubtedly true but all men know a beautiful woman when they see one and they are going to see very few of them on this website. I have never seen so many average-looking females thrown together. Most are plain, many are almost ugly and – what is worse – few are genuinely sexy. The whole set-up is more reminiscent of nudism in the 1960s than modern erotica or porn. It beats me why anyone should want to see these plain janes without their clothes on.
Bottom Line:
The models are neither beautiful nor sexy. Many look so incredibly softcore that it is doubtful that they would know what to do with a penis if they ever came across one.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-unlimited freechat
-most of the girls are $2
-some newbie americans girls
Cons:
-newbie american girls dont stay long
-regular porn now boring
-addictive and expensive
Bottom Line:
well now im bored of regular porn. these webcams are amazing. i only chat with americans so its kinda fun to seek them out. most will do what you ask, some wont. it seems this is their 1st site they join when tryng out cams before they go to mfc if they get popular, so if you find a good girl dont waste any time in freechat. other times they just give up. not tipping doesnt seem like a problem with the girls here
video and sound quality varies among the girls, but thats not a website problem, thats the girls trying to use their crappy macbooks
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some attractive, obviously euro (I assume mostly Czech models), some I’ve seen many I haven’t
-Content has some interesting themes, castings, outdoor action, etc.
-Video technical quality is reasonably good, most are downloadable in two options 3000 kbps wmv and 1100 kbps mp4. I thought the mp4 actually looked pretty good even with the quite low bitrate and most of the videos I downloaded were in that format.
-Reasonably sized site, will review overall number in BL, 10 total sites.
-Good update schedule, 1 a day seems typical
-Reputable biller, I had CCBill
-Have subtitles, which is sort of a con in some scenes
-DL managers work (I used DTA), no DRM, get to choose login/password
-Content looks entirely exclusive to me
-Plenty of diversity in body types (which could also be a con I suppose)
Cons:
-Somewhat pricy compared to other sites
-Camerawork is poor, particularly the HC scenes which are mostly self-shot, and pretty bad for self-shot
-Some of the scenes make you a little uncomfortable; I’ll elaborate on that later
-Model quality is highly variable. I realize this is subjective, but there are quite a few, umm, not such attractive ladies here
-Scenes can get repetitive, and castings in particular are not very erotic
-Download speeds are inconsistent, varied for me between 300 KB/s and 1 MB/s
-Navigation is very basic, and a pretty major flaw. No real model index, some scenes are just given numbers, thumbnail previews are quite small for my laptop.
-No forum, ratings, or any other interactive elements
-Pretty much no photos
-Very little diversity in ethnicity
Bottom Line:
Overall I think this is a reasonable site, although it has some pretty major flaws. The major flaws being the ones I mentioned in the cons, and some of them really detract from the site. I find the self-shot scenes to be particularly irritating, and there are way too way too many of them here for me.
The site breakdown is as follows:
-Casting: 364 scenes, I assume 364 different models. Basic casting site, usually girl walks in, chats for a bit, gets undressed. In some scenes there is masturbation, toy, oral, and HC. I would estimate 30-40% of the material has some HC or oral aspect to it.
-Streets: 60 scenes, seems like more or less 60 different models. Mostly consists of them “finding” a girl, followed by sex in a public place
-Swingers: 16 scenes split into parts (70 total videos), group action.
-Amateurs: 43 scenes, mostly POV, amateurs, generally very poorly filmed.
-Gang Bang: 12 scenes, as the name implies, appears inactive no updates since March
-Sharking: 20 scenes, mostly involving them running around pulling shirts off women, short scenes, while I am sure it is probably set up, it did make me feel sort of icky
First Video: 22 scenes, amateur HC material, probably the best shot of any of the sites
Parties: 7 parties, 24 videos, typical party material with HC, also typically the most attractive ladies don’t get involved.
Lesbians: 8 scenes, large lesbian groups, appears to be inactive
As I said previously, the main thing that detracts from this site for me aside from the poor camera work is the sort of uncomfortable aspects to some of the scenes. I would assume most of these uncomfortable scenes were set up, but it still ruins the eroticism of it. The sharking site, and the casting site in particular are the worst offenders in this regard. Some of the casting scenes that go beyond nudity are a little odd, with the cameraman pulling out his member and trying to get the women to get him off in some fashion (in some of them the women refuse), while I have seen stuff like this before, in this case it really did seem like some of the women were actually not comfortable with the situation.
Other than those aspects, it is an interesting site, with sometimes interesting material. If you are particularly interested in some of the women here (the best way I could find out is via EBI although many aren’t listed), it may be an okay site to join for you. However, be prepared to get that icky feeling from time to time, and to spend an awful lot of time digging through it all. There are some attractive ladies here, even a few that I thought had retired, and some Czech models you will likely have seen elsewhere, but the navigation issues, and the general ick factor make it a difficult site for me to recommend.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
High quality video and photos of sex scenes and solo scenes. Many Met-Art models but less softcore.
Cons:
Not enough content, although it is improving. Navigation is not consistent with Met-Art.
Bottom Line:
This is basically all the stuff that the photogrpahers wanted to shoot for Met-Art, but the relatively softcore nature of that site prevented them from publishing it. Or...to put it another way...it is a way for Met-Art to expand thier network and make more money without having to use anything more than ask the assets they already have to have sex, which many of them do on other sites anyway.
The emphasis is on glamorous sex scenes but there are a lot of solo acts and decent photo sets with all kinds of toys. The girls, of course, are awesome....as usual for this network. The only problem is that there still is nowhere near enough material.
Navigation is fine for a small site, but when it gets big, they will need to switch over to the same system they use for Met-Art. For this site, you have to page forward and back to get anywhere quickly, or you can follow the "back to gallery" links...which ever is your preference. I have accidently left the site many times because I thought I was on Met-Art.
The cross-advertising is still very frustrating.
They cross-advertised based on models and photographers, so at the bottom of a page, you will see a link back to Met-Art or one of the other sites in the network (all charging separately).
I was fortunate enough to see this site for $12.50 because I was already a member at Met-Art. Look for bundle packages and consider doing one $12.50 secondary Met-Art site at a time because there just isn't enough content here for you to keep all four $12.50 sites for long.
Overall, this is a pretty good site, especially if you get in on a package deal. But it won't be a great site until they get a lot more content.
You see a nice girl on one site, there is a picture of her from another set at teh bottomfg
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Met Art going hardcore, kind of, maybe.
- As would be expected, the pictures are excellent quality, but there are some sets with excessive blur, also happens on Met sometimes.
- The videos are romantic takes on sex. Not for sure if I should have put that in the cons or pros. Will further in BL.
- The models are all attractive and especially so if you like the slimmer build models.
- Very good DL speeds.
- Original themed series scenes.
- Navigation is good, but I'm going to guess it's just because the site isn't that big yet. I expect this navigation will be a real pain in the ass in a few years.
- Videos and picture sets combined have at least 1 update per day on average.
Cons:
- Careful what you wish for. Normal sex doesn't always translate into erotic.
- I honestly have trouble keeping up with, figuring out the different series'. Will further this too in BL.
- 2 months as a member and I will be keeping 4 videos and all of the photo sets. Pretty much the same pattern I have on Met-Art.
- Model variety would be a major plus. Pretty, white and slim is good, but it sure gets repetitive.
- Passion is "eh" believable.
Bottom Line:
I was one of the ones with very high expectations on this site and was lucky enough to get the first promo they sent out which gave 2 months access for $19.95. I don't feel ripped off at all, but as my previous comment said, I don't get it.
It's probably the last thing Met-Art wants to hear, but I prefer the photos to videos on Sex Art. I'm going to try and break the site down into sections so it's clear.
They have your basic video scenes. Just like Met, they give each scene a name so this can be a bit confusing when you add in the scenes that make up a series.
There are 60 of these as of 9/14/2012. The types of scenes:
Boy/girl: 18
Girl/girl or all girl: 23
The rest are solo.
My first problem. As you can see, the boy/girl group is the smallest of the three. When I hear hardcore, I still consider it boy/girl. Second problem, some of this goes into a realm of artsy that I couldn't imagine being interested in. The two examples off the top of my head, a man and woman full body-painted like tigers, having sex in a jungle themed room. One with the women in "chrome" from head to toe. You lost me at nude sex covered with paint and chrome.
Second group of scenes are in the series "Girls Love Sex". And just to keep it under some theme, there are 20 scenes in each season. Yep seasons. Like a television show. They have finished season 1 and 2, but season 3 hasn't started. So there are 40 scenes here. Now don't expect these to be much about sex. It's different models talking, some teasing and very light masturbation. Most of these scenes are less than 5 minutes.
Problem here? Watched 10 and swore to never download one again. These remind me more of Behind the Scenes sets on other sites, just repackaged as it might be porn.
Should be noted, August season is listed as "coming soon August". It's mid-September and there's nothing new.
Third group is Kamikaze Love, which is a full movie or a continuous series, hell I don't know, but I do know it says "New episodes every week" but there hasn't been a new scene added in this section since July.
This is a problem to me because I've got two sections of scenes that aren't updating, so I don't know if they just tanked the ideas or what. Either way the Girls Love Sex and Kamikaze Love are both disappointing to me.
So back to the main section of scenes. These scenes are okay. If you like the softer hardcore, you might be into these, but it's all a little too lovey dovey for my taste in porn. I'm all for passion and cutting back on the abusive scenes, but most of this just jumped to the opposite pole of the abusive porn.
The pictures, just like with Met-Art, are the best part. You get three sizes of zips to choose from. I'm basing these numbers off the newest photo set added, 1024x683 (small) 2048x1365 (medium) and 5616x3714 (large).
The videos are HD with decent bitrate and are relatively short in duration, so the files at least aren't huge. The ones I have watched are nice and clear.
It just seems to be trying to be too many different things. Like the old saying, jack of all trades, master of none. I thought for sure there was going to be something kinky in the Girls Love Sex series since some of the titles go into bondage subjects, but it was just the model talking about bondage.
I was expecting something groundbreaking, but I hate saying this, two women or three women being passionate with each other isn't new. The top Euro sites (21Sextury, DDF, Viv Thomas, Sapphic Erotica) have been filming passionate girl/girl scenes and solo scenes for years. This leaves Sex Art with less than 20 of the more rare, but not unheard of passionate boy/girl scenes. These scenes make up 1/5 of their current total videos. Is it possible that Met overhyped this site and built too high of expectations? Sure.
I have 4 close female friends, who are open to porn, but they say they despise the very hardcore scenes on many sites. After watching a few of the scenes from Sex Art, they all, not one, but all four said something to the effect of "It's too soft". I was just making sure I wasn't being a pig. A few of the scenes are really good.
I have no idea why the solo scenes are on here. The models on here aren't noted as top solo models, though Malena Morgan does a good job in her scenes. I don't know, maybe they should consider older female models? I don't remember 18-22 year old girls being very sensual. I also think they could work on the male talent. The most recent male is so effeminate, I had to look at the pictures to make sure it wasn't another girl/girl scene. You're not reinventing the wheel by having obviously sensitive, passionate people have sensitive, passionate sex.
I'll try it again in a year or two and give the 80 as a benefit of the doubt since it's Met, but also notice the numbers, the amount of no longer updating sections and decide if the photos and small amount of boy/girl scenes are enough to warrant a subscription.
No New Messy Wrestling
Robert Rosenberg & Come On Jugs have been Removed. Mad Sex Orgy & My Fettish - just repeats.
Bottom Line:
This used to be my ab fab site on the web! The site's hay day was 2004 - 2006 and whilst still good is a shadow of its former glory. Mad Sex Orgy,Messy Wrestling & My Fettish have no new updates. Robert Rosenberg & Come On Jugs have just gone! Drunk Sex Orgy seem to have one new party followed by a repeat. Only Partyhardcore has not been watered down yet.
I used to have a monthly sub in 2004-06 which cost a lot, but the girls looked amateur and despite the picture quality and site was just fabulous.
Today I join once a year & feel v sad that Tainster the new owners are giving us just enough to tempt me back. The models look like pros and the quantity of new good content is at an all time low.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
HD Cams
Many Girls available
speaking English
Euro teens
non Pros , mostly Amateur Girls (Girl from the neighbourhood) Teen Girls
Cons:
I recognized the site first time in 2002.
i got a member there in 2007 first time.
Before, after u pay to renter the site (something under 20 €)u got a lot in free chat, many girls online doing shows, u didnt need to pay more. 24 hours a day.Just the cam quality was a bit poor.
In 2008, they changed the layout of the site, also they changed that girls just talk in freechat, for more you need to pay more now in private rooms.
So if you want to join the site in his sense, it will be an expensive matter.
Also a lot of good, sexy long-established girls left the site, and the new girls doesnt have the qualitiy in their shows.
that change is a reason for me, not to join this site anymore.
If they will go back to the style it was before 2008, i immediatley would go back there.
Bottom Line:
Clubseventeen (Seventeenlive)is worship, but in that
hustler style, thi site is not worth it to register at.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models ON EARTH!
Spectacular imagery and sets
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Good navigation
Cons:
Only one thing in the CON category:
obnoxious cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
One minor annoyance: The user defined keywords are not particularly useful.
Bottom Line:
This is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period. Navigation is also very good.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. FOr example: Mila, with 44 sets, always looks like she is enjoying herself. Fergie, with only 16 sets, is a little more conservative but can melt ice with her looks. Wait...loking at the site while writing a review can be very distracting....
OK, there is rally only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. It seems that Met Art is now part of a network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives and Erotic Beauty. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each oif these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the owners want to maximize revenue. I can even appreciate that some owner/photographers hire a model for a day or a weekend trip, shoot many, many sets and then break the sets up over multiple sites, again, to maximize revenie (Met-Art and Met-Models, now Erotic Beauty, comes to mind) What I find offensive is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model supposedly exist. It is one thing to list other sites on the model page, but it is simply obnoxious baiting to put a clickable image of the model at the bottom of the page and only include a small reference to the name of the other site. This is the only site I've ever seen that uses this relatively deceptive practice and I absolutely hate it. (Can you tell?)
Now, in-spite of that trashy cross-selling tactic, the guys at met-art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join one. And, to be fair, these sites appear to have plenty of unique sets spread around to each of the sites.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I come back every year and will probably succomb to the cross-selling and try one or more of the other sites...and will review them when I do, of course!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
hegre-art.com is a spectacular erotic photography (softcore) site with some interesting and remarkable features. The girls are beautiful and the photography is always stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent, but the signature component to this site is probably the very well done erotic massage and tantra massage shoots and videos. Navigation is generally very good and the images come in a wide range of sizes up to 10,000k. The models are predominantly european, with a few well known US names mixed in. Oh, and the site is an excellent value for the money compared to other similar sites.
Cons:
Couple of small things. First, it is too difficult to get to the larger images for each set and when they load, you cannot move through them because they each load to a separate page. The page-back navigation is a little clunky, too, as it usually does not immediately take you back to where you were before. Oh, and I was completely unable to get the site to work on Internet Explorer 9, although it works fine on Chrome. Something about cookies, I think. Not a hige deal as I use several browsers but it might be for others. Generally, if you can get into the previews, you can get into the site.
Bottom Line:
This site is dominated by really well done single model erotic photo shoots and softcore single-model videos, but most of the models are absolutely beautiful and the photography is among the best on the planet. The models are probably mostly 20-30 with a few really outstanding 18 year-olds. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all shapes, sizes, ethnicities and colors, but generally very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here.) There is full nudity, but many models are conservitive, meaning they don't all do close-ups, spread eagles, etc. There are very few sex scenes and I can't recall a single toy or vibrator on the entire site. There are a lot of beach scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. The result is more of a veuyers nude-beach fantasy than a photo shoot intended solely to get you off.
Perhaps another, much more esoteric way to put it is that this site is like a fine wine store. You can get a great buzz on fine wine, but part of the experience is appreciating the wine as you do. If you are just looking to get drunk quickly, go to the liquor store and buy some mad-dog. If you can appreciate this analogy, this site may be right for you. If not, skip it and go straigth to a hard-core site.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionaly done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. Lookout, though, there are a few of these sessions with men.
Navigation is generally very good, with the option for thumbs, slides or something called journal, which takes all the images in a set and stacks them at roughly screen size.
There are, according to the site, over 200,000 images in 3300 galeries. The collection dates back as far as 2002. The images from that timeframe, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
The site seems to use mostly eastern european models with a few nearly exclusive resident models. Look up Anna S, an apparently French stunner, or Luba, a long-time regular.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want a lifelsize image of Melissa Mendini standing against a white wall in nothing but high heels for the back of your closet door? (assuming you can print it.) Well, here's the place to get it and many, many more like that. The only problem is that you can't get to these large images via the thumbs. You have to go to slides, click through the slides, preview the image you are interested in and then choose the size. You can also go to the journal, wait for all the images to load, then scroll down and choose your size from there. There are, on average, about 6 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for some really beautiful women to look at for a while. I would also recommend this site to anyone who likes Met-Art, or Femjoy.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
