Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice discount through TBP.
-Part of a network of 17 Japanese sites. Easy navigation between network sites wihout reentering passwords.
-No download limits.
-Download manager friendly.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded with MP4, MPEG or as small files AVI. Nice quality but not HD.
-Low quality screencaps can be downloaded as a zipfile.
-The Japanese manage to get great looking women into their movies. Paying them well and giving them respect makes hot looking women willing to do movies that are truly hot.
Cons:
-Non exclusive. I have seen some of this before.
-The site is still small despite updates a few times a week.
-Some videos are not nude. I am not refering to the mosaics, I mean they don't take off clothing.
Bottom Line:
This site features videos from Japanese DVD's. Most feature nudity, but some do not. None of the videos are uncensored and without a mosaic.
That being said, some of the videos work quite well and many do not. The problem with flashing even in explicit sites is that all you get is nudity. The ones that work would be great models for non Japanese porn as they take everyday situations, such as school graduations and fill the screen with half naked women as an example. Sometimes they are only topless and then the scene switches to only bottomless. The videos do that with other scenes, such as offices and classrooms. There are many group scenes of gymnastics, track and field, etc as well. This can be hot, but some scenes where women walk down the street seem unreal and staged.
Like other Japanese porn the creativity can make up for the lack of uncensored videos. This site is hit and miss as well as a bit small. If you like Japanese flashing join deluxepass.com. Not only is there a lot more of it in its own site within deluxepass, but it also includes most of what is on this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kink.com is among the best (if not the best) BDSM provider on the internet
- Very user-friendly – easy to navigate and download
- Part of a larger network of BDSM sites
- All exclusive videos
- A mix of settings (some outdoors in Europe and some inside at Kink’s Armories
- Excellent value for the monthly fee
- Very unique content. I’m not aware of any other content quite like this on the web
- Discount access to other sites on the network
- Excellent customer service
- Regular updates
Cons:
None. I mean that. In my last review of this site it was just new and didn’t have a lot of scenes up. Now there are in excess of 90 with more being added regularly.
Bottom Line:
It’s certainly no secret to anyone who has read any of my other reviews of sites on the Kink.com network, but I’m a huge fan of this company. Obviously it’s essential that I’m a fan of BDSM too, and for anyone who is, Kink.com offers the best BDSM sites available.
When I last reviewed Public Disgrace it was a relatively new site to the network that catered to a very unique niche: BDSM and BDSM-related activities outdoors and indoors in public settings. As the site has grown it has continued to serve this niche and serve it very well.
The niche, as you can tell from past reviews, puts a woman in a BDSM situation, with various forms of bondage and discipline, and brings her into public. In my opinion, the site can be divided into two broad but distinct categories: public outdoor with real public looking on, and public but in a controlled environment. The site is relatively equally divided between these two sub-niches.
The public outdoor scenes are very unique. They are shot in Europe, where the religious right obviously hold little influence. A woman in some form of bondage may be made to walk in a public square with her arms bound and her skirt around her ankles. Or perhaps on a bus. Sex is often included, but not normally right out in public, though it is outdoors and the public is nearby. These scenes are very unique and very interesting, though sometimes I can feel a little uncomfortable for the public who happen by.
The second broad sub-niche are scenes filmed in some setting like a bookstore, a bar or a hardware store. These seem to be a bit more staged than the real public ones, and part of that feeling comes from the ability to control access. The result is that there is usually more sex involved. This sub-niche also includes scenes shot at the Kink.com Armories in San Francisco. These scenes are more like a BDSM gangbang. Both of these types of scenes are very well done and are also interesting.
On the technical side, the site offers video in various formats and scenes that are downloadable in segments or as a whole. There are pictures, and zips are available.
For a site with this amount of very unique photos and videos, the price offers excellent value. Once you’re a member of any of the Kink.com sites you can get discounted access to the others. While some sites, like Society SM and their related sites, now offer five sites with one membership, I can’t fault Kink.com for not doing this. The sites within Kink.com are all unique and are easily able to stand on their own.
Public disgrace is an amazing site offered by a company that obviously cares about its product and customers. I highly recommend taking a membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-exclusive and original content
-excellent high resolution photos and videos (latest video is HD)
-regular multiply weekly updates
-comfortable site navigation
Cons:
-not hardcore
-part of the pictures are digital scans
-videos are short, 2-5 minutes only
-on most of the photos and videos the girls are topless only
Bottom Line:
Summer, sun, sea and around the topless girls, not old german ladies with drooped breasts, but young and not only, beautiful, tanned. And nobody prevent us from taking pleasure from the sight, especially if outside of the window cutting wind, it is sleeting and tomorrow early morning must go to the dull work.
Rare and unusual site in our neck of the woods, with giant collection of photos and videos – the girls, topless and completely nudes, all sort of sizes and shapes, from many famous beaches from all corners of the world. They affirm they are one of the oldest site of topless beach erotic, since 1997!
And they are right - their collection of photos and videos, more than 10000 photos and more than 1000 video clips, is excellent. There are two kinds of pictures - high quality pictures and digital scans with low quality, all are divided by galleries and may be downloaded as zip archives. The videos are in few different formats, last videos in HD. The updates here are regular - at least 5 times per week.
For conclusion: very nice site, will be pleased for all funs of natural non artificial beauty, and certainly for voyeurs.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-Nice quality videos. Not HD though.
-Very attractive models. However, many have tattoos and/or are victims of badly done boob jobs.
-No download limits.
Cons:
-No photos.
-Too much masturbation and not enough teasing.
-Small archive and only three updates per month. Needs serious growth for the price to make sense.
-Cannot use Freedownloadmanager.
-Links break constantly. Without a download manager, you must continuously watch out for redownloading incomplete videos.
Bottom Line:
This site bills itself as "porn valleys premier public nudity website", as well as the "winner of best paysite of 2009 at GramPonante.com." I wouldn't go that far in my praise of the site. It features public nudity, with a major focus on masturbation, using fingers not toys.
One of the first things I noticed is that the site is just too small to justify the price. At nearly $30, other sites at that price are considerably larger. With just three updates a month, it hardly is worth a second month's membership. Even worse some updates are boring behind the scenes videos.
What you do get are high quality videos featuring minor porn stars and a few amateurs. Across the board, they are attractive. However you also get tattoos and fake boobs on a large number of them.
The scenes are broken down into several sections that are downloaded only individually. You should be able to download every scene all at once for each model. The first section is an interview scene at an outdoor cafe. Ok if you want to hear the models talk, but any visuals are very brief. The models flash under the table or flash their boobs very quickly. You also get scenes of upskirt, bikini, secluded locations, and indoor masturbation scenes called bonus. The upskirt scenes are the only really hot scenes that feature exhibitionism. The others focus on masturbation. The bikini scenes are so weak that I don't know why they are even on the site. Many of the individual scenes are split into parts that cannot be downloaded all at once.
Although the video quality is much better here, I wish the scenes were more like those at publicflash.com. Those were real teasing, flashing and fun. These scenes give me the feeling of pros getting paid, with no excitement about doing the forbidden. You can easily see that they are in this just for the cash.
There are no photos on the site. However, there is a photographer in every scene clicking away. It can get most annoying as I want to see the model, not the back of the head of some guy. In some scenes they even direct the model on how to pose. I am truly baffled what happens to the photos they take.
The site is good if you like masturbation more than I do. Its really not that bad, just disappointing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I like the site. I am a really big fan of porn that isn't shot in the studio and is more of girls just having fun by themselves - way hotter!
- There currently 81 pages of girls just posing and having fun WHILE NAKED!
- If there is a picture you like you are able to click on it to look at that particular one.
- TONS OF PICTURES
Cons:
- It is kind of a pain to just keep scrolling down and clicking on the next page
- Nothing really happens when you are searching for keywords
- Repetitive, its a lot of the same types of pictures, girls taking pictures of themselves in the mirror WHILE USING THE FLASH...REALLY ANNOYING
- Not much to the site, pretty basic forum style website that incorporates girls being naked
Bottom Line:
All in all its a pretty good site. I personally like these types of pictures because its the natural girls being sexy by themselves. It does get a little annoying with the flash issue but I can look over that. There are some pretty sexy girls on this site while others are ok.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 42 mostly special/rare euro/easteuro-models
+ 1 US as I see it (Alexis Love)
+ Great quality videos in different sizes/formats
+ Special types of scenes - at least a little different from the mainstream.
+ SOME models do great dirty talk in broken english.
+ Some not seen - or not seen much - elsewhere.
+ Entirely exclusive material with lots of personalty from some models (agree with Drooler).
+ SOME models/scenes have this special (kind of fetish) leather outfit - sexy (see preview).
+ Fair price.
+ Logical/easy navigation.
+ Also good download-speed in Europe - get up to 700 Kb.
Cons:
- The photoshoots and the previews does not always give the right picture of what's in the video-scenes.
- At his time only 43 models (but most have 3-4 videos scenes each)
- Only SOME of the models/girls do dirty talk.
- Too many models are numb (do not say a word) in the scenes - a serious con.
- Not enough photos in most sets (BUT: for futher deatail about photos - see Droolers review - this user is a video-nerd).
- Updates come a bit slow.
- Never found a way to use Download Manager.
- Too many outdoor video-scenes.
- Some models (alas, some good ones) only have lez-scenes.
- Only softcore/masturbation.
Bottom Line:
First thanks to The Drooler for finding this special german site - and putting it on PU.
it's the kind of site where a fan of nude/masturbation videos with euro/easteuro girls gets aroused in the first place.
Here is some never seen - or rarely seen - models - and some are doing a great performance in front of the video-camera.
The videos are crisp - CRISP - and as mentioned some of the models do some damn fine dirty talk in a sweet and broken english - with NO interferrence from the cameraman/producer...
Maybe the most sexy are:
Julia (who ask the viewer to fuck her - the words comes easy and very natural)
And:
Lola - in her sexy leather outfit.
There are some other great models, like: Laina Lancer (never seen her before - alas not much dirty talk) - and Monika Benz and Rose la Belle.
Gilda Roberts are doing fine dirty talk - but the videos does not live up to her outsfits according to photosats/previews - too bad!
BTW: See the preview about models
One main BOTTOM LINE: Too few of the models do this dirty talk!
TBP states MP4 - have not found any. There are three different videodownloads:
2 WMV in HD and medium (it says Low for the last, but it's still crisp)
Duration is somewhere between 8 and 20 minuttes - most closer to 20 - a plus.
And there's IPOD - and ok quality streaming.
This site has A LOT of potential if they did more about that great dirty talk - some webmasters/siteowners have stated, that it can be hard to get euromodels to talk in the scenes - but aparently it can be done - so if this Ero Berlin made it a hbit in all scenes this user would come much closer to a 90 in score.
But as it is: an 80...
Going to end after this one month - but will certainly come back - hoping for more of that dirty talk.
And the price of $ 19.95 is ok - and NO problem with regional pricing here - even if it's a Euro based site
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Content appears original
- Fairly easy to navigate
- Can use download manager
Cons:
- Videos poor quality
- Complete vids not available
- Updates very few and far between (doesn't appear to be much new at all)
- Basic design
- Content is poorly directed
Bottom Line:
I have a biased view when it comes to my porn (anyone who doesn't needs professional help imho) and when it comes to sites that rely on pics as much or more than vids it is about the quality and eroticism.
Exhibitionism can be very erotic and not something that has to "hit you in the face" with its bluntness. Unfortunately for UK Flashers, it falls sqaurely into the category of "blunt" in its approach.
Before I get onto the aspects of quantity, I'd like to look at the quality of the content, mostly as it is what is sticking out most to me.
Many of the models are not actually models by trade (yeah, obvious to many that they are working girls, but there are still those out there who believe that they are simply models trying to break into the industry.)
Whilst the models will have a concept of poses etc, a majority of the work and direction is carried out by the photographer. The photographer used for this site appears to have a complete lack of imagination (or interest) and the results are the same poses with the only variation being the location.
As for the poses themselves and the camera angles used? Unflattering on the models to say the very least, amateur in production, completely lacking in eroticism (many are plain seedy.) It's as though a bored 18 year old has gone out with his dad's camera, collared a few girls and led with the direction, "Show us yer gash!" There are user submitted sites out there with more professional content than here!
Harsh? Maybe, but combined with so few updates, a basic and tired design and layout and vid quality from early dsl days, this is a site that I'd struggle to recommend for even half the price that I paid.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Models seem to know what they're doing
- Site created by people who understand the niche
- Good range of models / situations
- Appears natural (not forced or heavily scripted)
Cons:
- Photos cannot be downloaded in .zip format
- Vids have to be watched/downloaded in clips only
- Appears to be no recently update photo sections
- Average number of shoots
- Get impression of recycled content
- Some content non-exclusive
- Site needs some work to bring it up to the standards that other sites have adopted as they have evolved over the years.
Bottom Line:
As a brand new user (not a former site member who's returned) this content all looks new to me, although the odd shoot with 1999/2000 imprinted on it is a bit of a give away with a lot of video quality and a few other artefacts in the background.
If you are a previous member, my advice, stay away there is a very good chance that you've seen all this material already and would be wasting your money reinvesting. This is no Met-Art when it comes to purity of archiving.
For new members though; I'm glad to say that the site is what it sets out to be, with a broad section of models and the producers make the most of the fairly limited number of variables that you can have in public exposure.
However, the site does then begin to let itself down in its presentation.
The design of the site tells you that it has seen little updating to code etc in the years that it has been live. Navigation is reasonable with a rudimentary gallery for each section.
Picture and vid quality then begins to show the age of both the site and shoots, and the lack of .zip downloads for photo galleries and only being able to view vids as clips leaves the site out there with other turn of the millenium businesses that have failed to move on. It is a shame really as with a few basic updates and more shoots this could be a great site that is already aiming well at a niche category.
Overall quality of shoots (other than viewing quality) is good, although it is bizarre that on some shoots where a model has clearly been out for about an hour there are only about 12 pics???? With basic flashing, maturbation, public participation and even oral sex/facials so plenty to go round and the site producers know exactly where to be aiming (unlike some sites who aim for a niche and completely miss as they've no idea or interest in it themselves, so well done there.
My view. Not bad; with a bit of work it could be great, but not bad.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- around 200 scenes and 196 theoretically amateur European girls. Videos are good quality (can't remember if it was 720 or 640..something around there) and the photos are really nice at 2912px × 4368px (saved a few) But there are no zipped archives and the videos come in 3 small Wmv clips that have to be glued together (or a bunch of smaller mpeg clips). So not the download friendliest website out there.
- you get access to at least 4 other websites including welickeachother and bustyadventures.
- each scene has a trailer, which really helps get a feel for the video before downloading it.
- good quality and most models look very cute and very amateur-ish. Many hot scenes and there is some variation including anal and outdoors sex. Also the pick-up of the girls is rather funny/ cool. Sort of like an interview but it seems less scripted. The English doesn't help though most models and the cameraman having poor grammar...
Cons:
- last update was June although they promise to update every Wednesday.
- the lack of download options got to me eventually, as well as the sometimes slow download speed and crashes during downloads.
- not all girls do hardcore (not a huge drawback but it's still frustrating at times)
- not all photo sets show hardcore action.
- the English (or lack of it) can get frustrating.
- some models are better looking than others. There is a nifty model search that helps select good looking ones, though.
- no way of selecting what kind of scene you want to watch (anal, outdoors, etc.)
Bottom Line:
Let me start by saying that this site is clearly for fans of European women, they all have a very distinct look about them, which turns some men on and can turn others off. Make sure that you really like European women before joining this site, the models here dress European and they talk and walk like Europeans.
Also don't expect too much variety, almost each video starts with the guy approaching a girl, asking her to flash him, they then have sex (anal or vaginal) usually outdoors but in a more secluded spot and then they leave on their own ways. There is a lot of fucking with clothes on (I'm a sucker for that). A lot of thigh high pantyhose and a lot of action from one or two positions as they don't have a bed or couch to "act" on.
Is this good or bad? It really depends on the user. I found it hot as hell but other people might find the action boring and repetitive.
Either way be warned that the site is not the most user friends as it doesn't offer a full clip of the action (main reason I left, that and the lack of updates) Instead they have two options of clips 3 WMV's or a bout 10 MPEGS.
On the positive side their streaming works well and between the screenshots and the trailer you can really get a good idea of what you're about too watch. Also most trailers and screenshots are really arousing...so that's a bonus :)
All and all I'd recommend this site as it's very different from the usual porn. The girls have a certain unique look and the fact that they keep their silly little fur jackets on while getting fucked makes the whole scene much more arousing. However the user friendliness and the bad English are some speed bumps on how fast you should sign-up...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Attractive models. Many are “names” from the Euro porn side of things.
+All exclusive pics and videos (109 vids and 90 photo galleries)
+Vids play in Flash or download in 3 sizes: wmv 1280x720 or 640x360; or iPod. Nice quality!
+Model personalities come out in vids, sometimes a lot, sometimes just a bit. They speak in their broken and accented English, and come on to you. It’s sexy!
+Downloads quickly climb to approx. 730Kbps
+Navigation from models list page is easy
+Login maintained after closing browser and rebooting. Convenient!
+Visitor’s section gives you a good taste. Try the video samples!
+Good monthly price of $19.95, which might not last past Sept.
Cons:
-Only 37 models
-Some photoshoot content is non-nude or semi-nude
-19 of the zip download buttons (no galleries to view) only download zips from other galleries. Why lead the user to think that a video has a unique photo zip when it doesn’t? Flaky!
-Pics are only 1622x1080 as portrait, 1080x723 as landscape, but sometimes they’re the opposite. A given pic might be one size in the gallery, but the other in the zip. It’s completely unpredictable. And annoying!
-Galleries open in small scrollable window instead of a whole page. But you can use the “move” button to drag window to top left of screen and then resize -- each time.
-Gallery thumbs are all 125x125, so you can’t tell if a pic is portrait or landscape without opening it, nor how much more there is to see vs. the thumb (not WYSIWYG)
-Gallery names sometimes don’t match zip names. Confusing!
-Photoshoots don’t always match content of videos
-Generally, there’s not enough light in both pics and vids indoors
Bottom Line:
For me, Eroberlin has been long awaited. It was supposed to come out in the spring, but apparently there were considerable delays.
It kind of reminds me of FTV Girls. There’s non-nude or semi-nude content, sometimes a bit of lez content, and sometimes toys in the pics (often in the vids). There’s a fair amount of “public” shooting. They like to end one shoot and start another in the same gallery. And the regular photo sizes are about the same, too.
I’d say this site does better with the videos than the pics in quality and available dimensions. The vids have no quick-cut editing or effects or annoying techno music. The only sound is straight from the shoot (sometimes with a bit of someone off camera, but not much). You get a sense of being with the girl for anywhere from 8 to 30 minutes.
The only problem is that sometimes you have to contend with noise from unexpected sources. A helicopter. A noisy, and very persistent, fly. Things like that.
But pics are important, too, and on this count the site is pretty muddled up. Why not have at least 3000 pixels in size on the long end in both orientations and stop this mixing of different sizes all willy-nilly?
People might not like downloading a zip expecting a pic to be 1622, as it was in the gallery, and then finding out that it’s 1080 in the zip. I know I don’t.
So 3000 px dimensions all around would really help the site. And the score, which I've nonetheless bumped up from 78 to 83 after getting feedback from the webmaster.
It really is a damn nice softcore video site, so to be fair I've notched it up on that basis.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. A Kink.com site, one of the most user-friendly group of fetish sites on the web. Quality of videos/photography is in the upper tier of all fetish sites on the web (and I've checked out most of them over the last few years).
2. Gangbang and public humiliation theme with the spice of some bondage, spanking, rough sex similar to others found on Kink.com websites.
3. Quantity of videos is smaller than other Kink websites, but improves with regular updates.
4. Lots of outdoor action with an audience sometimes participating.
5. Interesting before and after interviews with models gives a good understanding of this type of consentual sex.
Cons:
I could suggest minor ways to improve the shoots to fulfill my fetish preferrences, but I can't begrudge the overall attempt by the producers to include a variety of material in scenes (some of which I'm not particularly interested in), but it's fun searching for the stuff I like with fast forward.
Bottom Line:
Overall a worthwhile user friendly site for fetish fans, especially public outdoor and gangbang, at a reasonable price $29.95/mo USD.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Great Quality Video and Pictures
-Clips are at least 2 minuets or longer
-Content is Exclusive
-Easy Navigation/Attractive Layout
-Price is Justified
-Videography and Editing Are Superb!
Cons:
-Updates are too small/rare
-Could have a broader variety of women body types/shapes
Bottom Line:
Ilovethebeach.com is the best nude/topless beach voyeur site on the internet. It has great quality video and they even re-released their old videos in higher SD resolution (I re-downloaded them all :)). Not only that their HD video (which is growing) is real HD video. The site is easy to navigate and the layout is attractive.
The ONLY problems I see with the site are that they do not update often enough and with enough material when they do. I would be happy with more video of the same women, since most are attractive. On this note it is true that they could go for more variety in body shapes. Also, they could have more fully nude clips. There are some but they are not as prevalent as topless video (although in recent months they have dramatically increased the number of fully nude videos, especially in the HD categories).
If you have never joined this site and like to look at naked women on the beach the price is definitely worth the admission. Between this and Beach Hunters I would recommend this site. However, you probably won't be staying month to month as the updates are too scarce to justify a long term commitment.
Yet, despite its flaws this is one of my favorite sites on the internet.
EDIT: After watching several of the new HD vids I can say that the videos are definitely containing more of a variety of women (something lacking in the early videos).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-No DRM or download restrictions.
-Supports download managers.
-All exclusive content.
-47 beautiful quality WMV HD at 1280x720, 7158 kbps. Competes with the best available on the internet.
-Can stream or download as WMV HD, MP4, ipod MP4, or lesser quality WMV as 960x540, 2140 kbps.
-Both clips and whole movie options.
-Photosets for every video. Zipdownloadable screenshots, 1200x675.
-Updates once a week.
-Discounted membership for joining other kink.com sites.
Cons:
-In spite of the growth this site has had, it is still too expensive at $29.95.
-The outdoor scenes did nothing for me. They are more like exhibitionism than really hot sex.
Bottom Line:
The videos here come in three types.
The one I enjoyed the least were shot outdoors in Eastern Europe, and just did not work well. I like exhibitionism, but not these videos. They seem to lack a focus. I couldn't figure out if they want to be an exhibitionist site or a sex focused site.
However the other two types of video were excellent. One was of BDSM gangbangs held at the armory that is often seen in other kink.com sites. The two themes combined lends a feeling of depravity that the participants, the girls and the viewer can really get into. The girls are humiliated in a very sexy way. Highly recommended if this is something you might like.
The other type of video is shot on location. Sometimes they are gangbangs in a lesbian, biker or heterosexual bar, or in a bookstore, pastry shop etc. I am sure the location was closed to limit the involvement to those who are preselected and tested for disease, but the spontaneous amateur feel is intense. Also highly recommended for those this may appeal to.
My general feel here is that the site has the best HD quality, adequate quantity, and a very unusual intensely erotic theme. Very highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discounted join price. See below.
-Part of network of 21 sites. However, only 3 or 4 are worth checking out.
-162 videos, 720x480, 2139kbps, averaging about 20 minutes.
-Can download segments as well as whole video. WMV is the only option.
-162 photo sets.
-Genuine amateurs, so attractiveness varies. Very much look like girls you could know.
Cons:
-Videos are very grainy and blurry. I would guess that the originals were shot as low resolution and poor quality, despite being upgraded later.
-Download limit of 12 hours of content, which is less than 4GB. If you go over the limit, you get banned for 6 hours.
-No streaming option for videos.
-No update schedule. The videos are not dated. I saw a review from 2007 that had only 2 fewer videos, so I think it is no longer updating.
-None of my download managers worked.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable. Horrible quality screenshots that are 150x100.
Bottom Line:
If you go to the webpage you can get an idea of what the site is like. If you x to navigate away, you get an offer of half price, $14.95 per month.
The site consists of content that is very similar to the dreamgirls dvd series that now has over 500 titles and has been around since 1995. The similarity is so strong that I suspect that this material is from those videos. However, this site appears not to be updating.
The videos consist of scenes from Mardi Gras in New Orleans, Fantasy Fest, spring break t shirt contests in Key West, and dancing in clubs. The girls are quite natural looking amateurs, with many being quite attractive.
As you would expect with amateurs, you never know how far they will go in exposing themselves. Some go only topless, some completely nude. Occasionally you get a few seconds of lesbian sex or cock sucking, but that is rather rare and not what the site is about.
If you can get into basically just flashing, you will like the content. BUT, the video quality here is really poor and much is virtually unwatchable. The site has a great concept, but not at all well done.
If you like this material, your choices are very limited. You can buy the dreamgirls DVD's, which can be found for about $10 each for 90 minutes. Another alternative is to go to dreamgirlsvod.com for on demand streaming that can get expensive, or sign up at dreamgirlsmembers.com, which is streaming only with no downloads available.
I would like the site to be much bigger than 62 videos and the quality is just too low. Not recommended.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- very nice models
- high resolution pictures 3000pix
- high resolution videos 1280 HD
- all picture sets are in zip files too
- all videos in avi, wmv and mov
- easy to navigate in members section, sorted by updates and models
- regular updates - 2 pic sets (80-100) and 3 videos (5 minutes) or 3 pic sets and 2 videos
- most sets are taken on public beaches
- the swimsuites are extreme small :-)
Cons:
- the videos from the first year sometimes look like made from an amateur, some shakes...
- a few pictures are unsharp
Bottom Line:
It is the best bikini pay site i visited. Very good looking models in extreme bikinis and beachware are posing at public beaches, in most sets are stripping so the models are nude at the beaches - i would not miss this page
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill.
-Full access trial option.
-High quality videos. Choice of WMV 720x576, 3424kbps or Divx 720x576, 1024kbps. Well over 300 videos, but it is hard to get a handle on how many due to the confusing site setup. The same is true for the photosets.
-Videos have a choice of format and can be streamed also.
-No DRM or any other download restrictions
Cons:
-Very short clips. Most are about two minutes.
-All video files have the same name. Makes using a download manager impractical. It is download manager supported, but why?
-MANY broken links or no link at all.
-Most videos are almost all back and side shots. Not enough frontal shots or closeups. Many videos shot on a diagonal, killing any feeling of eroticism.
-Too many men in the videos. I have no interest in seeing guys' dicks while I am trying to focus on a girl.
-Many if not all of the photosets are not exclusive. I know I have seen many of them before on other sites. Not zipdownloadable either.
-Confusing navigation.
Bottom Line:
Unfortunately this site is sheer quantity with little worth watching. Filmed on Russian nude beaches, some of the videos appear staged and almost all are too tame to even bother with. As you would expect with a voyeur themed site, the attractiveness of the girls varies quite a bit. While some are cute, many are not worth downloading or even filming. The attitude appears to be, if I can film it I will post it on the site. I also did not appreciate that you do not get complete access to all the photos. You get more for every day you are a member. This makes it hard to know exactly how many photo sets are on the site. This increasing access may make them think you will stick around longer, but I felt burned. Why be stingy? If the content is worthwhile and we get updates, we have reason to stay. To sum up my feelings, nice quality videos, but weak content. I just don't see any reason to become a member, not even for the three day trial.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- HD clips
- A lot of bigtitted women. And it's all natural of course (with a few exceptions).
- Some of the women there are better looking than pornstars or supermodels. Incredible!
Cons:
- If it had hardcore too, it would be the best site in the world.
- I'm not sure, but is it really legal to view that?
Bottom Line:
Fantastic women, topless on sunny beaches. Just like Heaven on Earth.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Lots of HD content
-Great site for big boobie lovers
-Easy navigation
Cons:
-No boobie variety
-Expensive $$$
Bottom Line:
This is a simple site that shows lots of high quality pics & vids of women topless on the beach. But I was very dissapointed because of the complete & total lack of boobie variety. Lets make one thing clear...Ilovethebeach is obsessed with huge breasted women & thats about all they feature. Myself I love athletic college age girls with smaller perky boobies so I felt very left out. Its just a matter of personal preferance and its a shame they don't have more variety to make everyone happy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM or download limits.
-Supports download managers with excellent download speeds. Mine was 2500kb.
-Videos available as excellent DVD quality MP4 or as WMV 1280x720,7158kbps.
-Videos can be streamed. Downloads come as clips, while whole videos can be zipdownloaded, and in a few cases can be downloaded as whole videos as well as in clips.
-Photosets for every video. Can be zipdownloaded. They are screenshots that are 1200x675 and very sharp. Mostly landscapes.
-Exclusive material. Some are known pornstars, many are not.
-Mostly very attractive women. Better than the overall quality on sexandsubmission.com.
-Mostly the girls seem to be really into the action. They don't come across as fake, just going through the motions until it is over.
-Updates at least once a week. Sometimes they update in only 3 or 4 days. Should grow fast if they continue.
-Very active member forum with suggestions for future shoots.
-Discounted membership for joining other kink.com sites.
Cons:
-The site is still young and small. With 20 videos it is growing fast, but seriously needs growth.
-At the moment it is still too expensive.
-The same male actor in all of the outdoor videos. Boring guy, not my cup of tea. I don't generally care about male actors, but I just don't like him. The videos need a variety of males.
-The outdoor sex videos could have more interaction with the public. In a few of the videos they are included in some way, but mostly they are there doing nothing erotic, such as walking by. In some cases they have their faces blurred. This makes the videos have a real feel to them, but I can see this done better.
Bottom Line:
This is only my second site that I would rate as 90. Very few sites have the type of appeal that this one does for me. The videos come in two types. Those shot in the US are shot in the same armory as is used in other Kink.com sites. These are a combination of bdsm and gangbangs. On the forum there is an ongoing discussion among the members as to whether or not these fit the theme of "public". I thought they were exceptionally hot and don't care if they fit the theme. I would definitely join just to see these. At the moment the site has 20 videos and 7 of these are the gangbang ones. The other 13 involve bdsm, humiliation, and sex in public. Shot in Eastern Europe, they are very interesting, but not as much as the gangbang videos. Overall the site is very hot, with great quality videos and pictures. It most definitely works for me. If you like light bdsm with a focus on male domination and sex, I expect you will love this site.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+If you have seen any of the videos, then you know what to expect.
+Normal Girls Gone Wild content. Alot of flashing and alittle bit of lesbian play.
Cons:
-Pricey $$, frankly for the content it's a rip off.
-ALL videos are streaming. If you do work around it to get it to download, it has DRM. So you'll have to go through more hassles to remove that.
-Videos are crappy quality. Was probably decent 5-6 years ago but to today standards, not up to par.
-Photos are pretty much nothing but screen caps and pretty poor quality at that.
-Videos they have available in the members area are not the ones shown on the main page. The ones in the members area appear to be 3-4 years old and are the ones that they can't make any more money on.
Bottom Line:
This has to be one of the biggest ripoffs I've ever seen for a adult site. $30 for a site with crappy screen shot photos and only lets you stream videos? That may have been okay back in the early days of the internet but not in the year 2008. It's been a bit since I was a member and I don't remember the exact size of the videos but once blown to full screen, they weren't very good.
If you want Girls Gone Wild content, Amazon has Blu Ray dvd's for $13-$20 and regular dvd's are even cheaper. You'd be better off buying a few of those for the same price as a month of this site. I can guantee that the quality will be light years beyond whats available on the website.
Again sorry for not being specific on video and photos sizes. I've just recently started paying attention to those details.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I like the group party thing. It's a nice change of pace from a traditional porn scene. I'm impressed that they can get that many people together in one place.
Good length of videos. I've never once thought, this video is too long or this video is too short. They break out parties into several parts so you can easily know if one part isn't your thing and move on to another portion of the party.
Nice variation of scenes. Lesbians, boy-girl scenes, multiples, blowjobs, facials, cum-swallowing......and on and on and on.
Cons:
Fake party scenes. Now, I understand that most college parties aren't really sex-laden fuck festivals with people willing to be filmed but come on, we know it's not a real party.
A lot of established porn girls. This is probably just my con because I really really like real amateur porn like Brokeamateurs.com. But, BSB is one of my alternates in my off months when I need a change of pace.
Ahh, almost forgot, one thing that pisses me off on this site is that they are apparently part of a larger network of sites. So, they spend a lot of screen space trying to get you to sign up for their other sites. It's kind of annoying.
Bottom Line:
Overall, cool site. This is one I join maybe once or twice a year just to check out, whack off and move on. Nothing really there to keep me as a long-term member. But, hey you can't please everyone all the time. If you like group party sex with girls in their teens and early 20's then you'll really enjoy this site. For me, it's a two month per year membership kind of site. One of my many "alternates" to my "stay long term" sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kink hits another home run.
- Very unique videos if you're into bondage and voyeurism together.
- Videos, sound, locations, models are all up to Kink's usual standards (which is to say excellent)
- Download speeds are decent.
Cons:
- Site is small as it just opened (as of the date I'm writing this).
Given it's current size the price is a bit high.
Bottom Line:
Kink has knocked another one out of the park.
Just for the benefit of those who don’t know Kink’s work, they are a BDSM-themed group with a number of sites. Because of the twists that they add to the BDSM theme the sites tend to be very innovative, like Fucking Machines or Water Bondage. The tone of the videos isn’t demeaning though like you get with Max Hardcore or some of the stuff from Sweet Entertainment Group. Kink goes out of its way to make it clear that this is all consensual, but they also do that in a way that doesn’t interfere with the overall fantasy of the scene.
Public Disgrace is the newest addition to the Kink stable. The theme is public humiliation, public bondage and public sex. If that is something that you’re interested in, this site warrants a look. As of today (October 7, 2008) there are only nine videos posted. While that doesn’t seem like a lot you have to consider the production values of those nine scenes. Kink’s standards are second to none in the industry. Consider that Kink bought and uses a huge old armory in San Francisco. They take their business seriously.
As it stands now with the nine available videos, they can be classed into two distinct types. There are the videos shot (apparently) in Eastern Europe using Eastern European models on public streets, buses, etc, and then there are the videos shot in Kink’s armory in San Francisco. Obviously the American authorities would be less likely to turn a blind eye to a bound girl walking naked down the street, so the ‘public’ element in the American videos means bringing in a bunch of guys to have their way with a bound woman. I know this sounds like just a gangbang, but adding bondage adds a whole new and unique element. (Check out Sarah Jane Ceylon’s video for proof of that)
As for the Eastern European videos that are truly public, I find that there is a bit of a cringe factor. I have no idea how many of the people watching are warned, but I suspect that Kink does go to some effort to make sure that no minors are around and that no one who doesn’t want to be exposed to this is exposed. There is a bus scene with Valentina Blue that has to have the cooperation and consent of everyone on the bus. If Kink does get those permissions they keep them hidden so as not to spoil the public fantasy.
Price will be an issue, and I agree with that. Right now the price seems high for only having nine videos available. (I’m assuming that Kink will follow its normal weekly update schedule.) I can’t argue with someone who says that the price is too high right now, but I can add this: if you like this kind of material, you will not find better on the ‘net. If you have only a passing interest in this, then the value may not be there. If, like me, you have an interest in this, the value is there even with only nine videos right now.
Overall this is an excellent site that will undoubtedly get larger over time.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- TONS of content - Meatmembers Network
- Girls are pretty damn hot for the Content
- Quality has improved.
- Premise is very good and is sold very well. The male talent does indeed look like amatuers and preform to that level. This gives a very seedy feel to the performance.
- Over 145 episodes
- Download Manager friendly (FlashGet)
Cons:
- Quality is still not close to industry standard
- Pics and Caps aren't always included.
- Some pic sets have zips, other don't
- Needs FULL SCENE download option
- Needs Higher Picture Quality
- Needs Zips for all Photo and Cap sets
Bottom Line:
This site would get a very strong 90+ if they produced DVD quality downloads. The site looks to be kept up to date by an amature web developer. There is no consistency in the content that is delivered and format is kept.
The Network is strong.. I really like several of the 45 sites included in the package. Some haven't been updated in years (2006) and others update a couple of times each month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic.
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments.
Cons:
-Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos.
Bottom Line:
Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Is Part Of a Huge Network access (19 + websites).
Few Bonus Feed Areas Too.
Several download formats for videos.
Navigation Good But Average.
Downloading was average 400k per file 220 up to 5
Items seen only here.
No Banwidth Limit same as Network
No DRM videos protection.
Very Attrative Looking Site.
Hot Girls, very playful.
Cons:
Site is Severely Repetitive Niche'
Average Download Speed ( could be slightly better)
At Times Camera Shakes
Navigation and site the same as network.
About 50 Videos So Far.
Bottom Line:
Ok This site is another well produced Brazzer Network Quality site,
However I am being tougher on the bigger sites now days since they rake in the cash to do a excellent job not just a good one.
The site really doesnt meet the overall network feel. While I agree it's new. Talk in the forum shows that the Network is even considering dropping that extra site.
Heres MHO, a girl goes out in the city etc, is sexxy playful and teases guys and gives random sex and BJ TJ's around town.
Ok now once youve done that in the park, in and alley, and at a store etc, youve pretty much covered the jist of the site. The fantasy doesnt hit the same mark as the other sites in the network.
What makes the site hard to watch is at times Camer Shakes, feels like and episode of Cops.
While its part of the mistique here, its just to much to watch. And street shooting is very hard to pull off and stay at the top of your game.
Bottom Line, its a fun site its hard-core and playful. But it rough around the edges, and repetitive for my liking. Video HD is remarkable though given this is done outside so that a huge plus. "awsome" Downloads were average 400k on the west coast at most times on my 5mb conection.
ToadMix's Take: Join for the network, not the site its self. Its a good site, true its new, I do not see time changing much. Would be better spent finding a new Nich'.
Oh Say perhaps. Make a solo section that Brazzers doesnt have anywhere That would really complete this network.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
