Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 31 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Real Spankings

1. Real Spankings (0)

Pay
Active
83
TheSquirrel (53) 02-27-09  02:52pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There is a model index.
They have an updates calendar.
Most of the models are attractive girl next door types (or would be if the girl next door ever really looked like that).
A massive catalogue of material to choose from.
Old and experienced site with a good reputation, and reliable billing agents, so you shouldn't be risking your money.
They do have photos.
No DRM.
No download limit.
No regional discrimination for subscribers.
Very good value at $21.95.
The clips are quite often filmed in real time, without too many cuts or unnatural breaks.
There are usually 2 camera angles. One for the girl's ass, and one for the face.
Cons: Poor and confusing navigation, although it has improved in the past year.
The videos are even at the highest 700 kb/sec rate, not great quality by today's standards. Some of the old clips are very poor quality.
No WMV, only a choice of Flash Player or Real Media.
The clips have watermarks that can sometimes be obtrusive and annoying.
The best spankers have disappeared. The more recent productions have been weak.
They went nearly 2 years without new material, relying mostly on what had already been shot, while they waited to move to a new studio.
Not that many models, few new ones recently. So you see the same faces, (or whatever) a lot of the time.
Far too many clothed spankings, especially in recent years.
Being American the cane is hardly ever used, and then only very lightly.
The photos are posed, and not from the actual spanking clip.
Too much talking.
Some of the clips are cut up into ridiculously short segments, sometimes straight down the middle of the action.
Bottom Line: Bottom line - very appropriate given the niche.
I was last a member of this site about a year ago. I rejoined because my computer got a virus and all my files were wiped out. I wouldn't have joined for the more modern clips. The best spankers Lady D left long ago, and Mr M is not to be seen, most of the time.
The recent clips I find far too light and usually with the model partially or fully clothed. I find this boring. The old clips are by far the best, but the drawback is the quality is quite poor on a lot of these. They are redoing some of them in a new bit rate of 700kb/sec.
The picture quality and sound has improved over the years as the content quality has decreased IMO.
Here is roughly the bit rate over the years.

2001 - 75kb/sec
2002 - 150 kb/sec. Some clips redone in 750kb/sec or 350 kb/sec from here onwards.
2003 - 225 or 450kb/sec.
2004 - 225 or 450kb/sec.
2005 - 225 or 450kb/sec
2006 - 350/700 kb/sec mostly from here.

Despite all the negatives I would still recommend this site as the No.1 choice for anyone who is interested in spanking but has never joined a spanking website. Some other sites deliver harder spankings, but here they are usually around moderate severity, which is reasonably safe, and almost old fashioned, for those who have an interest in this sort of thing. It is not my favourite spanking site because of all the negatives, but I still find it good value. It is almost the Video Box of the spanking world. It is like finding a 3 story warehouse of spanking clips. If you are looking for a clip in particular, it is quite hard to find. At least they have a reasonable model directory and calendar of updates. Last year I would have said this site has the worst navigation in the known universe, with the one exception of my girlfriend's map reading, but things have improved a little. The site now looks like something from the 21st century. A lot of faults, but is worth a look given the price.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rough 18

2. Rough 18 (0)

Pay
Active
60
lk2fireone (194) 09-18-10  03:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Zip file for each photoset.
-Video download formats:
WMV: high, medium, low quality
MPEG
Quicktime
High quality WMV is 1440x810 (6256kbps)
-Updates once a week video/photoset
-Video runtime : 20 minutes to 60 minutes
-Easy login.
-No DRM.
-Very fast response to an email from tech support. But the response was not helpful.
Cons: -Only 1 size for the photos.
-Photos are a visual record of the video shoot, not an original shoot.
-No streaming option to view the videos.
-Some video files download with no estimate of file size or download time.
-The videos are overly long. A single sex scene should last from 10-20 minutes. There are many sex scenes that last 40-60 minutes, and the action gets boring and repetitious.
-It's strange the female model's face and body are not displayed clearly in the photoshoots.
I want to know what the model looks like, and the screenshots do a lousy job of that.
-Site navigation is poor.
-Search is poor.
-There is no simple listing of the models.
-Videos are large files. The high quality video file can be 1 - 2.3 GB or larger, for a video that runs 20 minutes to 60 minutes.
-Volume on some videos is too low.
-Download problems: on my last 2 video downloads, the download stops after downloading about 1 GB, and won't resume. Currently can't download any videos from this site.
Bottom Line: This is a site for mild BDSM (Bondage,Discipline, Sado-Masochism).
I do not care for the niche.
But even if I did like the niche, I believe the site is not very good.
You can't get a good idea of what
the models look like until you play the video. The photosets should give an excellent idea of what the model looks like, but they mostly don't.
Instead of giving clear photos of the face and body of the model, the photos focus on the "action", the girl being tied or abused or whatever, but you can't see her face or body very clearly in most photos. It's just lousy photography. And in many cases, you are not able to tell the model in 2 different videos is the same girl, because you don't get a clear idea of her face and body.

The videos are too long. A single sex scene can last 20-60 minutes. Beyond 20 minutes, I think people tend to lose interest, find the action boring, repetitive, dull. This is
not a movie with a plot, where you have brief sex scenes along the way. Instead, it's a single sex scene that loses it's impact after you watch
the scene for 10 or 20 minutes.
This is basically dull spanking porn.
My fantasy, to improve the videos, would be to have some guy in a leather costume and mask, come into the scene, and bash the male model who is
doing the spanking, with a metal baseball bat. The girl could jump up and down, screaming, "My hero, my lord", until the spanker is unconscious or dead. Then the girl could give her hero a bj or whatever to finish the scene.
This would serve to add color to the scene (the red blood), plus serve as a break in the dull sex scene, and lead to renewed interest in the next
sex scene (the bj or whatever), and remove the idiot doing the spanking.
I don't usually appreciate watching this type of female abuse, even if it's supposed to be consensual.
On a more realistic note, I have seen a few BDSM scenes that were colorful or interesting or erotic. But not at this site. These vids are just boring and overly long.
The scenes can be 1 boy-1 girl, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 boys-2 girls, 1 boy-2 girls, 2-girls. Most common scene is 1 boy-1 girl and 2 boys-2 girls.
This is a site with a small amount of content. Site just started around middle of 2010. You probably have less than 40 videos, plus 40 photosets. With that small amount of content, you would think the navigation would be extremely simple. But searching through the content is difficult. Trying to look through each video or associated photoshoot is difficult.
The site design is clumsy. Sometimes you can't easily find the photoshoot or video that is supposed to be the mate of a video/photoshoot.

I give the site a score of 60, because of the poor site design, poor navigation, boring videos, stupidity in making the video runtime too long,
and other problems.

This site is a waste of time. And very frustrating. And irritating.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Schoool Mistress Fantasy

3. Schoool Mistress Fantasy (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
Jason123 (2) 11-17-11  12:38pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Some beautiful models
Pic resolution is good on more recent releases
Most sets have zipfile downloads
Good forum where the site owner is active
Cons: Site is split into 2 sections with the nude and non-nude kept apart, so you have to go through both to see all a models pics.
Pic sets are also split between the 2 sections and released at difefrent times so you have to wait until the whole set is released
No preview pics on each set so you have to open the gallery to see which set it is
Maximum levels are topless so definitely not for hardcore fans
Older sets don't have zip files
Bottom Line: Some beautiful models and the picture quality is good, so if you're a fan of schoolmistress stuff it's worth a visit.
The tour for this site doesn't seem to have been updated for ages, but the members area is updated with about 3 or 4 sets every Sunday, so don't be fooled by the lack of activity on the tour pages.
I was pleasantly surprised to find some of the top glamour models on the site even though I couldn't see them on the tour.
All in all, it's worth joining for a month or 2.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

4. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Active
96
pat362 (367) 11-28-10  10:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Over 540 videos.
-They update with one new scene each week.
-Very good selection of models.
-Very good chemistry between doms and subs.
-Videos can be downloaded in either wmv or mp4 and each version comes in standard & HD quality.
-You can use a download manager.
-Navigation between each Kink site does not require you to log in each time.
-Membership to one site gives you deals on the access to the other Kink sites.
-Less pain inducing BSDM.
Cons: -The photosets are broken down into four section
and although can can download each section in one zip file. It would be nice if you could download the entire shoot as a single file.

-Their older content did not age well and I find that it contained a little too much pain and not enough sex.
Bottom Line: I did this review in large part because of the last review that was done. I'm not sure what daniel saw that made him give this site such a low score but it can't have been what I saw.

I find that over the years the site has moved away from the intense pain giving BSDM porn to intense pleasure giving. The BSDM is still there but I find that it's more subdued. For me that is a plus because that was the one thing that always bothered me about the older content.

I took a look at the 30 most recent updates and Half the girls are newbies to this site and a large part of them are newbies to Kink. As well many of these are up and coming girls in the biz.

This site is for people that like lesbian porn with a BSDM twist and anal sex.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Firm Hand Spanking

5. Firm Hand Spanking (0)

Pay
Active
89
cucuta (6) 05-03-09  04:13pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - The models here are the best looking anywhere
- the spankings are in the moderate to hard category
- very good emphasis on the showing both front and back angles of scene
- videos are of excellent quality with short scenerios and set ups
- also have many continuing series like spanked stewardesses
- many of the girls are in progressively better videos beginning with soft spanking and moving up to harder ones
- some reality based scenes - school paddling in Texas take off. Some of these are very imaginative.
- some of the ladies are both tops and bottoms
- there are MF and FF scenes. About evenly split.
- This is one of the older sights on the web. There is a large archive of older stuff and movies from models
- Most models are nice and curvy on the rear. There are many videos featuring Amy Denson, Shannon Carson etc from the old days.
- Almost all models are either pretty or gorgeous.
- There are some bonus areas - spanking in movies, photo shoots only etc.
Cons: - Spankings are from medium to hard, but not usually super hard like Dallas, RGE or Mood.
- Latley many of the models are recyled from other sights. Although Samantha Woodley is gorgeous she is featured in dozens of videos, many repetitive.
- The guys (spankers) on this sight are horrible. One guy in almost all the videos is super fat and talks in a boring monotone.
- I would like to see a little more post spanking rubbing etc.
- Picture sets are not always satisfying
Bottom Line: This is one of the standard sights to join if you are a spanking fan. I come back about once a year and gobble up everything they have.

The women are slways beautiful. Samantha Woodley, AJ Rutherford, Michaela McGowen, N. Peachey are awesome have great butts and get spanked pretty hard. You can see that are in slight discomfort but not really in pain or crying like some other sights.

Also the clothing and scene set ups are great. The series where Samantha and McGowen dress like stewardesses is really hot and if you have traveled much by air lately you probably would like to spank an air hostess or two.

There are probably 30 good models and many movies to enjoy with a variety. I like several of the other models also. Two of my favorites are Natasha Edwards who is a pretty honey blonde with a nice body and snotty attitude and another petite blonde named Rachel Young whose rear always gets turned super red.

Overall, if you are a spanking fan this sight should be in your top 3 or 4 stops. It is a bit on the "glam" side rather than reality but is clearly an niche leader.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Her First Punishment

6. Her First Punishment (0)

Pay
Active
85
Jay G (65) 10-25-08  09:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Large quantity of old Russian spanking videos (I recognize old videos from "Nettles" and other sources I used to watch on video). Striped and red asses abound.

2. Many of the girls are pretty and there are some "lineups" of pretty girls getting ready for spanking (I have a fetish for groups of naked & semi-naked women, especially in "lineups").

3. Sadistic spanker also seen at Discipline in Russia site is also in these videos (He doesn't play "patty-cake" or hold back with his spanks).
Cons: 1. Videos are second rate in technical quality and many have choppy editing for no apparent reason.

2. Some advertising for this site is misleading, showing videos that are NOT yet available to members.
Bottom Line: Altogether an OK site for a spanking enthusiast who enjoys collecting old spanking videos.

There are many better sites out there, but this one is OK if you've been to the others and enjoy collecting a variety of older spanking videos.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dallas Spanks Hard

7. Dallas Spanks Hard (0)

Pay
Active
95
Jay G (65) 04-06-08  06:29am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. For spanking enthusiasts who like absolutely beautiful "next door girls" getting spanked and having their beautiful red asses exhibited with great photos & videos this is a great site. Having belonged to most of the top spanking sites on the web, I'd give this the award for best video and photography of red-assed spanking with an excellent variety of views and accent on the act of spanking.

2. About one hundred of the most attractive women I've seen, in all the spanking sites I've belonged to, get hard spankings and exhibit gorgeous red asses here.

3. At about $20 USD, this is a wonderful bargain-niche site for spanking enthusiasts.

4. Responded very quickly to a tech issue that came up. Excellent compared to many web-sites I've belonged to that ignored member e-mails.
Cons: 1. Only spanking, otherwise no erotic content here.

2. Has some (but not too much) of the annoying spanker talk so prevalent on spanking web-sites. ("Have you learned your lesson?" kind-of talk).

2. Uses Real Player, a less desirable video format for me, and seems to download very slowly compared to other sites.

3. Updates twice a month now with a full scene.
Bottom Line: Definately a gem of a niche site for spanking enthusiasts, this site offers the most attractive "next-door" type girls I've seen in porn for a good price. But it is totally limited to spanking and contains no other erotic content.

I'm a "pretty face & butt" fetish guy who loves extremely naturally pretty girls getting hot red asses. At about $20 this is well the membership.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bad Tushy

8. Bad Tushy (0)

Pay
Newbie
100*
Jimmyboi (Suspended) 01-17-08  06:19pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great content
Downloads fast
Tons of movies
They listened to my request
Always updating
Responded to my emails
Cons: No man on man with female action. *shrugs* But really can't complain.
Bottom Line: Been a member to many sites this site out does everyone this site is a true winner, very real spankings canings and school shoots.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Real Spankings Institute

9. Real Spankings Institute (0)

Pay
Active
87
ramscrota (12) 01-04-09  02:07am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Spankings quite severe and real
- Attractive, young girls
- Most girl have pubic hair.
- Good navigation
- Pics & vids each set.
- Sets not just in isolation: set within context of aims of the 'Real Spanking Institute', which gives shoots greater focus.
- Range of implements used: paddles, canes, straps, broad perspex plastic canes (real brutes of things. At least one really good scene with this)
Cons: - School uniform seems to dictate that standard shool underwear is but, white, baggy things which come out of grandma's wardrobe. Would have greater appeal of far more girls were caught wearing 'non-regulation' underwear.
- Not enough nudity.
- Use of hands for spanking. Get real! A hand spanking really does "hurt me more than it's going to hurt you." With all the wonderful implements available, why use hands?
Bottom Line: This is a convincing site. The introductory information presents the site within the context of how prison was not working for young female inmates, so the Government set up the Real Spanking Insitute as an experiment to bring these troubled young women back onto the straight and narrow. (Good to know the US Governent has some sensible policies. Someone should have a word in the ear of our man in Australia, Kevin Rudd, about this policy!)

The spankings vary in severity, according to the girl's misdemeanors, scenarios framed according to how much punishment and nudity the model has opted for.
On this point, the pay for the girls varies according to the severity of the spanking, and the amount of nudity they show.
I'm surprised at how little full nudity there is - If their butts are going to be beaten to a pulp, (which many of the girls obviously opt for) I can't understand why they don't go fully nude and get paid more.
There are, however, some really good scenes - and at least a few full nude scenes where the girls get a fairly severe buttock padding.
overall a good site, if you like this sort of thing.

One of the models featured is Jessica, whio also has her own site: Spanking Teen Jessica.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Her First Punishment

10. Her First Punishment (0)

Pay
Active
85
DutchDoctor (8) 03-27-07  12:31am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1. Very severe punishments;
2. Girls are very pretty;
3. Real tears, which is quite unique for spanking movies;
4. Girls are mostly completely nude
Cons: 1. Spankers are quite young;
2. No erotic atmosphere;
3. No much OTK.
Bottom Line: When you prefer realistic almost sadistic spankings, this is the site for you. One can feel that this is filmed at Russia or Eastern Europe, which gives a cold atmosphere. Would be impossible to treat those girls in this way in Western countries.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

11. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Active
89
dumpington (5) 05-04-07  02:14pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Very pretty women
Excellent sub/dom feel
Girl/girl spankings are hot!
Girl/girl bondage is nice!
Girls enslaving other girls is excellent!
Girls enjoying the bodies of other girls without their consent is yowzers!
Cons: Occasionally too mechanical
Occasionally no intro, which appears mechanical
Too often the girl doing the spanking shows little attraction for the girl she's spanking!
Occasionally lacks a lesbian "feel"
Bottom Line: This kind of category should be impossible to mess up, as a dominant woman tying up and then spanking a pretty submissive girl before having sex with her is foolproof! But occasionally they somehow mess it up, either by stressing the punishment angle too much (which evaporates the feel of any lesbian eroticism), or the dominant woman seems uninterested in the pretty captive woman before her, and doesn't seem to care that she's now got a pretty slavegirl to fondle and enjoy, whether he girl likes it or not. How you can possibly mess up one of these Whipped Ass videos is beyond me, but some of the unimaginative directors/writers they hire manage to do exactly that.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

12. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Active
84
nygiants03 (162) 12-11-07  11:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -55 pages of porn dating back since july 28, 2001
-update once a week
-well over 350 scenes
-usually over 200 pics per scene
-good orgasms
-quite a few erotic scenes on here that would be sure to turn anyone on.
- lots of vibrators and dildos
-download as much as you want
-wmv, real, or ipod download
-can download all clips in zip folder
Cons: -no full scene download
-old videos have way over 20 clips and are like a minute
-newer videos have around 6 clips
- to many fake tits/pornstars
-you can stream videos, but they are slow
-pics are not that good, low pxl
-older videos are very poor, almost not even watchable
-a lot of the models are not that attractive
Bottom Line: -clothespins, spanking ass, hogtied, forced orgasms, Face/titty slapping, nipple torture, caning, strap ons, latex. hotwax, suspension, footworship, clamps, etcÖÖ are all part of the site.

-Id rate this sites light to moderate as far as bdsm is concerned as Iíve seen sites with have alot more torture. There is no needle play, or extreme pain being seen on these scenes. You donít see any bruises or cuts after any of the spanking. Some models allow more pain then others.

The newer video tend to get away from the whole whipping ass theme though. The older videos tend to have more ass whipping which causes red ass. Now a lot of the video donít even contain it.

-There are also quite a few squirters on the this site.

-lots of seen before models such as sasha gray, venus, harmony, Dragon Lily, Sandra Romain, sasha sparks, Penny Flame, and Eva Angelina.

-Not one of kinks better sites, atleast in my opinion. However thatís still not a major downfall as kinks has some of the best bdsm sites on the entire net. You really have to experience all there sites, and this is a good starting point. A little pricy at around 30 dollars, but you will have enough content to last you a while.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

13. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Active
90
visor (7) 03-15-08  07:32am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large lesbian bdsm site, featuring strap ons and anal
Some 'plotted' scenes (schoolgirls, bad secretaries etc.) add interest
Generally good doms
Interviews add a personal touch
High quality video (wmv hd added recently)
Cons: Post shoot interviews somewhat predictable and repetitive
Model search not easy, bio's patchy with incomplete info
Old videos small and can be just RM
Bottom Line: For lesbian dom-submissive lovers - particularly those into anal, this is the site for you! Also offers discount to other Kink.com sites (like Hogtied, Sex and Submission and Fucking Machines).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

14. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Newbie
65*
alCapone (2) 08-20-08  06:49pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Picture size is nearly o.k.
no DL limit (at least I couldn't found any)
price is fair
good navigation
You can search for more scenes by the girls name
really good preview pages
Cons: always the same content
most of the girls are really slutty (not my taste)
boring scenes
Bottom Line: Sadly, all the king.com stuff/sites are the same. I have no glue, why they call this site "wipped ass", cos most of the time non of the girl get's wipped.
I get soo pissed, by seeing everytime the same.
They put a vibrator in the snatch, and the girl screams, like she get's hard raped. Come on, this is boring.
Either it's a BDSM page, or it's a lesbian page.
If it's a BDSM page, than stop this boring scences
The girls sometimes get fucked by the smallest dildo you can ever found, but scream, like an elaphant is getting in. Sometimes the dildo is even no longer in the girl, but they still scream
Sorry, but thats really too much for me.
Of course, the girls should never get really hurt, it should always just a imagination, but if a girl always scream "ohhhhh, ohhhh, it hurts soooo much", even she is not getting touch than is a bit too much imagination.
They are also not able, to show the right part; if a girl get's fucked, you will see her arms, her face, her foods...., but only half a second of the snatch.
Few years ago, I was amsed of this kinky.com stuff, but nowadays it's terrible.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

15. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Active
87
nostromo (12) 07-14-09  08:37am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very good looking videos fron june 2007 onwards.
- videos come in gret looking mp4's which weigh around 1G-1.5G and last around an hour. The other formats: Windows Media HD (wmv) -the files weigh around 700mb's-, Smaller Screens-iPod (mp4) and Most Compatible (wmv)don't look as good as the mp4's. So if you have enough space download the mp4's which look great.
- i like the variety of the costumes and, particularly, the very sexy latex costumes.
-No male talent. Very good looking subs -for the most part- and doms. When they wear makeup is not overdone.
-Good customer support.
-The preview gives you a very close idea of what you are going to get. This seldom happens in most sites, IMHO.
- there are live shows which i must admit i didn't watch.
-The forum is ok.
-the actresses seem to be having fun.
-You can stream the videos in High, medium or low resolution.
-they offer you discounts to join the rest of the network sites
-very good production values.
- NO REGIONAL PRICING.
Cons: -Videos prior to June 2007 come in zips, and they dont look good to me at all, unless you are very interested in the story, i wouldn't download them.
-I don't know if you picture-lovers are going to like this site as much as the video-lovers. Pics come in 800x1200. You can download them in zips.
-It can get repetitive.
- i'd like to see humiliation without so many toys and stuff.
-If you've been a member to other kink sites the drill looks familiar, something very difficult to avoid, understandably so. Most of the actresses work in the other kink sites.
Bottom Line: I must say that i like this site very much. there are very good looking dom's and subs, and if you add to that the crisp looking videos you have a winning combination.

Maitresse Madeline, Isis Love, Harmony, Sandra Romain in latex outfits..., i think i like that. And some of the subs: Wenona, Riley Shy, Bobbi Starr, Sunset Diamond, Samantha Sin, etc, are pretty.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

16. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Active
90
pat362 (367) 12-20-09  10:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Almost 500 scenes available.
-Post 2003 scenes can be downloaded as a whole.
-Newer videos can be downloaded in HD(WMV & MP4).
-Videos can be streamed.
-One new scene per week(average)
-A good selection of doms and subs.
-Surfing and download speeds are very good.
-They have some truly good looking models.
-Members get a 10$ reduction in price to all of their other sites.
Cons: -Many of their older videos have a level of BDSM that may not appeal to everyone.
-Photosets can only be downloaded in sections but that's no big deal since they aren't worth downloading in the first place. They are meant to give you a slight idea of what's inside the video.
-Some of the interaction between dom & sub lacks chemistry.
Bottom Line: This is my second visit at Whipped Ass and I prefer the direction they seem to have gone with their content. I always felt that their older material had a level of pain inflciting that left me more cold than turned on. It's not too say that their new stuff is tame but there seems to be less intense whipping and caning that left marks on the skin of the models. They also seem to have less verbal abuse.

It's surprising to see some of the models they are able to get for their shoots. I'm not sure if this is because of the change in the level of BDSM, but I'm not complaining.

This is my favorite site within the network and I have no problem recommending it to anyone that likes their lesbian sex mixed in with BDSM.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

17. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Newbie
65*
daniel bum (In-Active) 11-22-10  09:34pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lots and lots of videos, one per week since 2003, go figure.
Excellent video quality, WMV, WMV HQ, and Super Quality mp4 264. Those girls and women always deliver some incredible intense performances. To me the older videos are the best but those are not available in HD. A pity.
Cons: In 2010 the quality of this site has gone down at all levels, technically and artistically. The action became too repeatetive, they are over using most of the women and they are doing basically the same routine over and over. Plus, the video picture quality is not as good as it used to be. I used to be a regular member of this site. Not anymore.
Bottom Line: If you're a first time member you'll have lots of fun because this site is BIG, it has a giant video library and I bet you wont have enough space on you hard drive to storage all your download. For potencial returning members I do not recommend this site, it is always the same. Pretty boring.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whipped Ass

18. Whipped Ass (1)

Pay
Active
92
pat362 (367) 10-20-12  06:37pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They have over 1900 scenes to choose from.
+They manage to hire some really hot models all through the years and get them to do some intense BSDM.
+They update with one new scene each week.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in the mp4 format with a resolution of
+All the videos from 2007 to now are offered in HD with the mp4 and WMV format.
+There is a calendar where you can view the upcoming shoots for all their sites.
+A membership to one site gives you discounts to the other Kink sites.
Cons: -I think my biggest issue with this site is that the BSDM is sometimes a little too intense for my taste.
-There are some doms that aren't as good as others or the chemistry between them and the sub is just not there and that tends to ruin the scene.
-They have some pics but they do such a poor job with them that they are almost worthless and you can't download the entire photoset into a single file because they split the sets in 3 or more parts.
-The quality of the videos for their eartly stuff ison the poor side of things. That's most of the stuff prior to 2006
Bottom Line: *This is a Kink site so if you have been a member of any of their other sites then you know that these guys take their porn seriously and try to offer the best porn possible. That's probably why they are still dishing out top quality porn and able to hire the top girls. Even in these hard economic times and in the era of tube sites.

*This site is designed for people who like g/g porn but with the bsdm aspect added to it. The level of bsdm varies from video to video so it's hard to say just how intense it is but it feels like it has gotten a liitle more intense in recent months. Of course that could be because the performers being hired are more into it so the dom will give her sub a lot more then she might some a newbie.

*Anal penetration is common in many of the videos so that's something to consider if you aren't into that. There is some fisting but it is on the rare side so it shouldn't be an issue for most people.

**I tend to join about once every year or so but I would probably join more often if the level of bsdm was not as high as it is. My tolerance for it is rather low so more sex and less whipping would be great.

***The only people that should avoid this site are those that don't know what the words dom and sub mean or don't like bsdm.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bad Tushy

19. Bad Tushy (0)

Pay
Newbie
69*
maxheadroom (Disabled) 12-08-08  08:39pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of pictures.
Cons: What they have advertised on the free site is not entirely what you get when you pay. When I joined they showed 25 or more pages of previews, yet when I became a paying member, there were only about 15 pages available. The site is misleading and close to being false advertising.
Bottom Line: If you like mostly f/f spankings without any sex, then this site might be worth a try.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Spankings

20. Real Spankings (0)

Pay
Active
80
Jay G (65) 05-02-07  04:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Just joined Real Spanking again for about the fourth time in four or five years because it still has some of the best spanking on the internet when it comes to good hard belt, strap, paddle, or hand action. Great spankers and a few great spankees.

2. New design allows you to look over a long gallery of girls' faces and click to get to the scenes each girl has done - a GREAT feature.

3. Site has girls spanked on tight jeans as well as bare bottoms, great for a jeans enthusiast like me.
Cons: 1. The great variety of sessions, but it also has a great variety of quality (from excellent to very boring) and it takes lots of time to find the wonderful gems among all the boring stuff.

The reaction of the girls is important. Watching a totally stoic, silent girl get spanked (even if she's pretty) is not a turn-on for me. But then there are great sessions with passionate, vibrant, and loud reactions. However, you have to really spend time looking for them.
Bottom Line: I keep coming back to this site, despite its flaws, because it has some of the best, strong spankers on the internet (not mild patty-cake stuff here).

The quality varies from boring to excellent with a wide variety of girls from "OK" to "really cute."

I enjoy variety of scenarios and actually look forward to see girls get apanked with jeans on as well as with with bare butts. I like the strong reaction some of the girls give (yell a little...hey, it hurts!), but am bored by the quiet and strong models who often just stoicly wait for it to be over.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Spankings

21. Real Spankings (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
lost (0) 07-31-07  07:02pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: The girls are hot and the staff really use imagination on how to punish them. Great reactions and set up to stories.
Cons: Need easier way to search through all videos
Bottom Line: I love this site and keep coming back over and over again. If you love spanking you should check it out!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Spankings

22. Real Spankings (0)

Pay
Active
86
cucuta (6) 05-05-09  06:48pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - One of the all time stalwarts among spanking sights
- Long reliable track record.
- A huge number of girls. The large majority are very young and cute looking.
- Each girl is given an introductary spanking that is moderate and an accompanying interview - some never make it past this stage others move on to harsher and harsher spankings
- there are a variety of different themed shoots. The best are "school paddling" which is a realistic and I mean realistic reenactment of school paddling. These are GREAT and worth the price of admission.
- There is also a faces series which shows a lot of reaction shots that I like.
- Level of spanking is from moderate to severe. There is also a variety of implements used. Hand, small paddle, belt, graduating up to big paddle, lexon paddle, and canes.
- There are some cute new girls here as well as many legendary spankees. Kaylee a punky girl with a great butt and a perpetual smirk on her face was "discovered here".
-
Cons: - they were not adding content as much in the last few years. I rejoin about once every 18 months.
- The biggest criticism is that sometimes it tends to get mechanical and one spanking looks like the next.
- Also they do two or three shoots a day and the girl starts out red at the beginning of the scene.
- They seem to cut the scene right as soon as the spanking is over. I like to see post spanking rubbing and there are only a few of these.
- Picture sets are fairly limited.
- A little too much chatter sometimes
Bottom Line: This sight once dominated the spanking scene and is still among the top five or so. The girls are cute and the spanking pretty hard. There is a good mix in the type of girls, but most fit the 18-23 year old mold. One exception is the wife of Coach Daniels. She is a middle aged blonde women who both dishes out and takes some real hard ones.

There is a large network of related sights to this one and they usually run specials if you want to join more than one. They have individual girls sights for the lithe Brandi, the red headed step child Jessica and new recruit Bailey.

There is also a bulletin board where you can ask questions and make suggestions.

Navigation is good with a list of all the girls' pictures. When you click on their face, you get a list of all their videos with a brief preview.

You can also sort by different scenerio type - these include School paddlings, Naked school paddlings, school canings, Faces, cheerleaders, multiple girl scenes, and probably a half a dozen more.

Another way to sort is by implement - cane, paddle, lexon paddle, hairbrush etc.

I have joined this sight probably every 18 months for the past five years, plus grabbed freebees when I can. If you are a spanker, this is probably stil a top four or five sight.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Spankings Institute

23. Real Spankings Institute (0)

Pay
Active
85
Jay G (65) 01-21-07  01:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1. Large variety of girls, some of whom are very pretty.
2. Schoolgirl theme with schoolgirl skirts and panties, then bare-bottom spankings.
3. Spankings range from moderate to quite severe.
4. Variety of spanking impliments.
5. Usually good view of faces are included, as well as the sore backside.
6. Very reasonable price, less than $20 USD/mo
Cons: 1. "You were a naughty girl" lectures are distracting, time-consuming and very boring after a few videos. Shorter spankings without lectures would improve the site.
2. Only real video, not MPEG or WMV.
3. Only schoolgirl uniform spanking, no tight jeans (my favorite) or other costumes.
4. Only punishment fetish, no sexual content.
Bottom Line: For moderate to severe spanking of uniformed "schoolgirls" at a reasonable price, this is a good deal. Be warned: the verbal lectures are really boring and time-consuming. "Real Spankings" main website is a site with more content and variety, but also slightly more expensive. If you love the "uniformed schoolgirl" spanking fetish and don't mind the long lectures, this site is for you.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Girls Boarding School

24. Girls Boarding School (0)

Pay
Active
94
DutchDoctor (8) 03-27-07  12:10am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Good atmosphere and ambience;
2. Most of the spankings are quite severe;
3. Girls are very natural and very pretty indeed;
4. Price is reasonable;
5. Almost daily updates.
Cons: 1. Movies are in Real Media, not my preference;
2. It's spanking only, no other sexual activities;
3. Not always completely nude.
Bottom Line: When you like Girls being spanked in Boarding Schools, this is exact what you'll get. No bad acting with laughing and talking, these girls have a bad time indeed.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Spanked And Abused

25. Spanked And Abused (0)

Pay
Active
71
roseman (253) 06-24-07  02:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Network access
- Multiple download formats for videos
- High quality photos
- Cool girls ratings system & nice request scene feature
- Full access trial
- Bonus feeds
- Good looking fetish content
- No DRM videos protection
- No download limit
- Exclusive content
Cons: - Small collection
- Updates come slowly
- Website design could be better
- Navigation needs improvement
- Downloading wasnt't very fast for me
- Expensive monthly sub price (for what you get)
- Photosets can not be downloaded in ZIP format
- Videos quality could be better
- Would prefer some more videos download options
- Content is not daited
- Few annoying adds / links in members area
Bottom Line: This is a site dedicated to spanking and fetish in general.
Site's collection is very small at the moment (less that 30 videos and photosets to download) and surely needs lots of growth to worth a try.
Videos can be downloaded in two formats (.mpg and .wmv) or as 1 minute clips, personally I would prefer some more download options for them.
Videos don't have DRM protection and there is no download limit so you can download as many scenes as you want.
Photosets quality is awesome but can not be downloaded in ZIP format.
Website design could be better and navigation surely needs improvement. As for the other sites of this network you will need some time to understand how things work. Also there are a few annoying adds and links in members area.
When you join this site you will get access to 8 more sites for free and few bonus feeds. Monthly subscription price is kinda high but trial's price is awesome plus it gives you full network access.
Content is mostly exclusive and generally looks good and special. There is also a cool request scene feature where you can request a scene that you would like to see and a nice girls rating system.
If you like such content you can give this site a try but keep in mind that it's content is good and special but it's collection needs lots of growth.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 31 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Whipped Ass (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.17 seconds.