Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
nice girls
there are sets of melissa-ashley and of Trisha Uptown
hi-res pics very good
pussies perfectly shaved
Cons:
old series are very low-res
some videos are boring
after some time you could get bored 'cause it's all a little bit repetitive
web design could be improved
not hardcore at all.
Bottom Line:
Very nice site, if you like beautiful nude girls with shaved pussies.
Forget it id you like hardcore action.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The Image quality on this site is outstanding. In particular resolution and depth of field are stellar. The detail is of 'pore and folicle' at 3506 x 2336.
The predominately 'euro' models are truly gorgeous and well presented in both Solo and Girl-Girl mode.
Some videos are HD at 1280x720 and well encoded.
The update and rentention policy means there is a lot of content available.
Cons:
The sets are split into episodes which tend to be short and of varying progression. Sometimes there is a lot of progress and in others there are many similar images.
Sometimes the action is so rude it gets 'gyno' and not erotic. In particular the 'fists and speculum' series can have an almost sterile edge to them.
Bottom Line:
This is a technically good site with good fit models and commendable rudeness. It undoubtably deserves praise.
For this reviewer however the "frisson per set" ratio was low and gave an overall feeling of detachment.
More smiles, cheekiness. toys that match the outfits, sets and proportions of the models would be nice. If only Suburban Amateurs could deliver Alsscan's technical image excellence.
This is my honest review, not sure why I made it since I suspect the trust rating will get a bashing from fans!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Attractive models.
Updates every day, with a new video everyday.
Great video quality.
No more video rotation.
Lots of content, especially pictures.
Lots of fisting and extreme object insertion.
Very responsive webmaster and cameraman to e-mails.
Good bonus deals from time to time.
Director's blog is very informative.
Cons:
At least 3 of the videos released per week are old material "remastered". Perhaps this is good for new members, but for those who have been visiting this site for years, they can get repetitive if you have seen them already.
New models are only added about every 2 weeks.
The release of content is very random and chaotic, and even though a model may be "released" it usually only starts with 1 pic set and video. It may take upwards of 6 months to a year after to see all her content.
Some models still don't have all their content released who were introduced a LONG time ago.
Amount of extreme shoots like fisting is decreasing significantly over the last 4-5 months.
If you don't like thin models you may not like this site.
Anal fans may be somewhat disappointed, as it's more focused on pussy play.
Plain site design.
Bottom Line:
This is a quality site and used to be one of my favorites. Unfortunately, I can no longer classify it as such. It is still a decent site, but things need to be improved. I'm actually editing this review and this is after the most recent comment I put down on PU. Some things to mention and of importance:
1. As I wrote in my comment, the amount of girls that do extreme is much less than is used to be. Of the last 6 "new models" (which equals 3 months of time since they come biweekly) there is only 1 that has a fisting set. Very disappointing, since they almost always used to do that. I remember Alex talking about how he used to never shoot a girl if she wasn't willing to do all the extreme stuff, and that he was thinking of not being so harsh in the future. Well, he must not be being as harsh now in his standards for shoots, and it shows, unfortunately. Considering that most of the models only did 1 scene out of 4 or 5 that entailed something like fisting, saying that people complained that there was too much extreme just doesn't fly.
2. While it used to not bother me as much, the release of material I now see to be a big problem. Once a new model is added to the site, she only starts with 1 picture set and a video. After that, it is completely up to polls, member requests, etc. that determine when other sets are released. Keep in mind that most models usually have 5 photo sets and 5 videos at least, so seeing all of that can take LITERALLY up to a year or more. That is ridiculous and needs to change. I can't think of another site that has such a terrible system for releasing model content. So even though a new model appears every 2 weeks, it's not a real release of a new model like on most sites. It's just the beginning of a very long process of seeing that model in the scenes she has done. I don't believe the people who run the site even know exactly what's going on and have it all straight, since there have been a few times I have e-mailed them requesting something from a model from years back and get a response about how they forgot about it or didn't even remember the scene existed. I wonder how much stuff hasn't seen the light of day and never will. Big problem here, and very frustrating.
3. If you have never been a member to the site there is plenty to see and look through. There are a ton of models and content goes back years. Almost all of the models are attractive and have nice bodies, I will say that. But, if you like thicker girls you should look elsewhere. Their sister site Alsangels has more of a focus on boobs and meat, but the updates on that site are so low it's only really worth joining if you never have before.
This is a site that is still good, but needs to make some changes to keep pace with the truly great sites out there. There needs to be a refocus on shooting girls that are willing to do the extreme stuff, and the release of model content needs a complete overhaul.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fantastic quantity of material. The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are excellent and in HD. Newer photo sets come in high resolution. The girls appear to be having genuine fun. They use ample amounts of oil, lotion, various types of fruits and vegtables and many, many types of battery operated devices. Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2006.
Cons:
Navigation is not as good as other sites. (For example, you can't scroll through the images in a set but have to page back out to the set menu and select the next image.) About 1 in 4 releases are actually re-releases of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not if you are back for the 2nd or 3rd time. The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while. The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here. Many of the newer models are not as attractive as models from prior years.
Bottom Line:
OK, bottom line? This is a lesbian and fetish site that is interesting to visit once just to see the show, but it caters to a relatively narrow taste. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. On the surface, that's not at all bad. Many of the girls from older sets and a few from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up. But the majority of recent girls are not particularly memorable and at best rate a notch above amatuer. Maybe after years of visiting this site I'm a little jaded. I apologize in advance if what I'm about to say seems harsh. The success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide. Here are a few of those signature items:
1. There are NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though.
2. Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paraadise.
3. There is an odd fascination with the inside of otherwise unviewable areas on the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uturus looks like. Many models agree to use what looks like an ambroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it niether sexy, nor flattering. In a word, it makes the models clinical.
4. Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that is.
5. Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that here!
6. The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was interesting and might be tasty. That was about 100 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the odd color lollipop they use is.
7. This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
8. Allsscan has a sister site called allsangels. The webmaster/owner has no qualms with showing you a set of girls from auditions in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership in that site much smaller for $25 a month. Sorry, all it does for me is piss me of that these better looking girls should have been but aren't on the site I'm a member of.
Ok, before you send me a nasty email, let me put a thought in your head. ALSSCAN is a bit of a sideshow. Sideshows have an odd combination of allure and freakiness that makes you want to go in to see what is there. I've seen this particular show about 5 times since the late 1990s and every few years I find myself wandering back in to see what the next big thing is going to be. (This time I think it is those emroidery hoop-clothespin things....)
Now, it is clear that the photographers have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having tremendous fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camers.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment. Some of the best photo sets and videos come from annual outings where a dozen or so girls are chosen to go to a tropical island. Once there, they can run around naked and generally have sex with any girl they want...and they do.
So, again, bottom line...interesting place to visit but you might not want to stay for more than a month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hi res photos
Very hot models
Great video quality
Good Download speed
ZIPs for photos
Large amount of content, 230 GB
No DRM or download limits
Exclusive
Update section
Most videos named appropriately
Daily updates!
Cons:
Price is a bit high $30
Very bad site design
Navigation absolutely horrible!
Only 15 or 30 photos per zip in many sets
No large boobed models
A few videos extremely large, but very low quality
Bottom Line:
This is a site has great content, but they do a very poor job at presenting it. The site design is very inconsistent and a headache to get around. The photo sets have a lot of zips because many only have 15 photos per zip. If you want a copy of each photo you need to grab 1667 zip files! Some have many zips per set, others have several sets per zip, they cant make up their minds on this!
The videos look nice. They offer divx, wmv and mpeg4. The videos are mostly in 640x480 or 720x520 your choice. The videos average 15-20 minutes long, and average 350 MB in size. There are 489 videos totaling for 192 GB!
There are about 38 GB worth of photos here if you download the zips and always take the high res. The photo quality differs a bit. Some are about average sized and other are huge at 2336x3504!
There are currently about 200 models and they all look great. They are all small girls, so no big boobs here, unfortunately for me! There is a good bit of fisting a other forms of pussy stretching here, It is a bit like Saphic Erotic in this sense.
Other than the ridicules site navigation the site would be great. The poor navigation cost the site 10 points because it really was a headache to get around. During downloading I frequently had to stop for a while, or look at some of the photos before downloading to remind myself why I has messing with this site. I really wish they would fix this because the content is wonderful!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fantastic array of beautiful girls
- Very detailed and "up-front" photos
- High quality vids, offered in three different formats; 1280x720 HD DivX, 1280x720 HD MP4, 1920x1080 HD WM
- Older models have their videos remastered and published
- Director's blog - you can read and find out what's going behind the scenes and grab some exclusive vid's or photo shoots
- Lots of mqsturbation and self-toying action
- Their castings are featured on video, and photos /w commentary
Cons:
- The website design. I've been a member three times, and it hasn't changed much from when I first joined in 2002.
- No search function
- Too much fisting for my taste
- Too much focus on "perfect breasts and no tattoos", come on, let in a girl that have some personality and quirky feautres.
- ALS hasn't published all videos of their older models (instead they sell them on DVD for 49.99 o so), come on.
Give us long time fans everything that was ever made with girls like Joanne, Jana, April, etc to download, and I'll be an happy customer.
- Download speeds. It averages at 150 kbit/s per file, and I ave a 8mbit/s line, and there seems to be a 2 or 3 file downloadlimit.
- Only works in IE
Bottom Line:
I think that ALS has run it course, yes it is still joinable, and it's not a bad site to join (especially if it is for the first time), but as a third time member I must say that I'm not impressed.
It feels like time stood still, and yes, they do HD, but it is so boring to watch.
And most of the new models are rubbish. They should have picked up at least 10 new models that they discarded from the casting sessions (because she looked unhappy or had a tattoo), come on man.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Good quality photography
* Most girls are attractive and display a good attitude
* Good connection speed
* Navigation will mostly be familiar to users of other sites on Met-Art's network.
Cons:
* Streaming videos seem buggy if you want to do anything other than watch them from beginning to end without pauses or skips.
* Lots of strange insertions and weird borderline-BDSM pussy play (may be a pro to some)
* Very little, and mostly mediocre, boy/girl content
* Some videos are basically just the photo sets with a camcorder running (can hear posing instructions etc)
* Navigation options are very lacking and search often turns up irrelevant results. Has a tag system but searches seem to mostly ignore it.
* Model names aren't consistent with other sites, even other sites on the same network.
Bottom Line:
This is a site whose name I've been seeing for a LONG time. If it's not older than some of the girls in its newest sets, I'm pretty sure it's close - I'm fairly sure it debuted in the 90s, though it only specifically shows shoots back to 2005 at the moment, with selected older content relegated to an undated "archives" section.
I've liked a lot of the bits of content I've seen from them over the years, but never felt compelled to join until now. It seems to have recently been taken over by Met-Art. Like many other sites in their orbit of late, they're marketing it pretty aggressively, with a good discount available through PornUsers and an even better one having recently been e-mailed to current and former members of other sites in this network. On the basis of this, I signed up. Unfortunately I have just canceled after only four days (as always, the membership will still run for a total of a month, it just won't renew).
Partly this is because I mostly want boy/girl content and ALS has only recently started (or resumed - I could have sworn they had some in their early days?) shooting such content. I'd say well under a quarter of their recent updates (which occur once a day) have featured straight sex, and this content only dates back a few months.
However, it's hard to say for sure because there is no option to zero in on a particular type of content, other than a search box that seems to mostly pay attention to the (rather arbitrary) set titles. You'll look in vain for a list of categories on which you can click "boy/girl" and get a list of all the b/g content. Search for "boy/girl" and you'll get every set with "girl" in the title, which as you can imagine, is a LOT of them. This needs a rethink.
Once you've found what you're looking for, it's usually... good but not great. Nearly everything about this site is good but not great, actually (except the navigation which is downright bad). The looks of the models are good but not great, the creativity of the sets and shot choices is good but not great, technical aspects like connection speed are good but not great. Unfortunately with the number of sites competing for my dollar, "good but not great" isn't going to cut it. I certainly don't regret signing up, especially at the price they were offering as of a few days ago, but I don't see anything that compels me to renew.
As with network-mate Sexart (for which I would now want to revise my glowing review downwards a little), it seems to promise something amazing and groundbreaking but deliver something that's merely above-average.
Overall, I can honestly say this is a site I'd recommend, but only weakly so. It's definitely worth it at the very low prices on offer in various places lately. You might like it better than I did if you prefer solo or girl-girl action or if you're into things like a cute girl clipping a dream-catcher to her labia. (That kind of weird borderline-BDSM stuff is only in a minority of their sets, but it's conspicuous by the mere fact that it's there at all.) I can't say that's my thing; while I appreciate a more creative approach to porn, that isn't the direction in which I'd prefer to look for it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Great Video scenes but he talks way to much. and he has anoying voice
+ Real HD videos (for new content)
+ Content Isnt deleted anymore
+ Lots of Girl Juices/Cum
+ Exclusive Content
+/- 500k Average speed
+ Download manger accepted
+ No DL limits
+ Scene desciption
+/- Many Girls have a strange red colour in the pussy
+ Best site ive scene for Images
+ Regular Update
Cons:
- No Niches at all!
- Bare Basic navigation (not the worst ive scene but very basic
- Tons of old content deleted(This alone lost them 10 points!)
- Selecting a model only gives you Images not video
- Download speed jumps up and down all the time (from 50k to 600k)
Bottom Line:
All in all this site could be outstanding but with such bad navigation and such a basic layout it may take you days to find what your looking for.
This site could be a contender for some of those top sites and the work involved to make it outstanding is so minior it give me a feeling like they dont even care.
They have all the great old content they just dont put it on the site. I mean my god they have Great HD videos but not even a decent video Niche search.
They have a weird colour scheme aswell its like a disney site or something.
Would i recommend this site? if you love pictures Yes its perfect for you, if you like videos theres just no point joining.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- High volume of videos.
- Vids good quality.
- Frequent updates.
- All models are shaved (this could be a con for some).
- Pics are very nice, what few there are, though not big: 900x1350 on the high end. Many are much smaller.
- Masturbation vids are some of the best I've seen, if you're into that.
Cons:
- If you access the English version of the site only, there are approximately 370 pictures. If available pics are rotated, as happens on some Asian sites, I will update review.
- Music tracks on many videos are a definite negative.
- Site frequently caters to what I will call the "girl unwilling/uncomfortable" fetish, which I find disturbing and offensive at times.
Bottom Line:
The Japanese version of g-Queen, which you can access by manipulating the URL in the address bar and re-entering username and password, contains roughly 60 full picture sets (almost all NOT zipped), while the English version contains less than 400 pictures altogether.
The videos available seem to be the same in both versions. There are about 100 models with three to five vids each, and these are each separate episodes, often with different costumes and settings, rather than one long vid broken into bits.
These are not hi-def vids, but are nice enough. They come in at an average of 2000k, 640x480. The videos are lengthy, sometimes up to fifteen minutes. Music spoils most of the videos wherein a particular model is being introduced; but masturbation vids do not seem to have the music track - though I've only downloaded about a dozen of these.
There is one video featuring a beautiful model getting herself off on the edge of a glass table. This is hands-down the most erotic masturbation vid I've ever seen. Other masturbation vids seem genuine and quite graphic. Bear in mind I am no afficianado when it comes to masturbation videos.
I'v seen a few vids where the model is being poked, caressed, and digitally stimulated by an off-screen male. The models often feign discomfort and unwillingness, sometimes in a histrionic fashion, sometimes more subtly and convincingly. In either case it does nothing but bother me.
One video features a girl giving head to and then riding on a clear plastic dildo protruding from a male's open fly. This was erotic and strange, in a mostly good way. I have yet to see a straight girl-boy sex scene, though if I do I will update this review. There are 45 lesbian videos on offer.
The main thing to remember is that g-Queen is all about shaved girls, and these girls are made to appear almost uncomfortably young and naive. Also remember this is mainly a video site.
I would* recommend this site to video lovers who like Asians and are into tease/masturbation scenarios which take a long time to unfold and are DEVOID of anything street-oriented. Innocence and cute-ness are the order of the day.
Decidedly NOT recommended for picture lovers.
*The above recommendation applies only if you are willing to shell out about twice the price of the average adult site subscription. The truth is, g-Queen is way over-priced for what is on offer.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent photo quality
Excellent high definition video quality (Later shoots)
Attractive Babe type girls
Regular updates
Cons:
Vaginal shots are garish (Candy red) which is very unnatural looking.
Excessive focus on fisting
Many older videos are flagged as no longer available
Bottom Line:
This site really is taste dependent. You have to like candy red vaginal shots and excessive fisting which I don't. Also, for some reason, many of the older videos are shown as no longer available for viewing. I guess the site owners don't want to spring for the extra cost of storage.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
As promised, the site offers a good number of really cute Japanese girls shaved nice and smooth. If you like Japanese girls and/or shaving there is something for you here. Everything I've seen has been uncensored.
Cons:
Oh, how I wanted to love this site. Unfortunately the English language interface is barely developed. Navigation is a pain and there is not much offered in the way of previews for the videos. On top of that, unless you hunt through the Japanese links, you only get four preview pics per model as well. Video quality is good but not great for newer videos and decent at best for the older stuff (though that is to be expected to some degree). Another HUGE con for me is the ~ 1.5 GB daily download limit, presumably to make you think twice about bailing after the first expensive ($49) month.
Bottom Line:
Unless you know Japanese, I sadly would not recommend. The download limits and under supported English site don't really warrant the cost. It's a shame too, there are some real cuties on here and I love the concept, but the execution on this one didn't work for me. If they linked this with other network sites and brought the cost down, I could almost over look these things, but not for the cost of membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice European and American solo and lesbian girls
-The sex is good and hard
-No men (except for the director, whose voice features in most movies)
-Variety of set locations, inside and outside
-Range of movie sizes, up to HD for many
-Movies are reasonably filmed and edited
-No music soundtrack (always a good thing)
-Zipped picture sets
Cons:
-A lot of fisting. If fisting isn't your favourite thing, this site may become boring fast
-Lots of movie downloads are just filmings of photo shoots - and anyone that has seen a photo shoot will know that the reality can be boring and show the falseness of the situation
-Many of the movies are just 'behind the scenes' features
-Some movies are not even porn - they are just naked girls in public locations acting goofy
-Entire photo sets are spread over several updates
-Male director talks during movies (that has lost 20 points alone). He also sounds gay, and I believe he is called Alex. (Yes, indeed.)
-Design/Navigation is terrible
-Proper porn movie content is not as huge as other similarly priced sites
Bottom Line:
If you like lots of fisting in your solo or lesbian porn (and I'm sure many guys out there do), and like hearing a male voice giving instruction and encouragement to the girls, then I would recommend this site to you.
As well as the fisting content, there are a couple of nice tribbing scenes too, and most of the girls generally seem very convincing and genuinely enjoying the sex - although there are clearly some 'actors' here not genuinely getting off. There's some anal too - but not in most scenes. And there is some peeing that tries to pretend it is 'squirting' (does anyone really believe that?) as well as some honest peeing, and a few apparently genuine orgasms where white girl goo is seen oozing from the open pussy (although after a fisting session you can't be sure it's not just lube).
There are better looking sites out there, offering more variety with better navigation and bigger content - but if you are looking around for something new, and can cope with the negative points mentioned, it might just be worth a look.
Highly recommended to guys that enjoy hearing a male voice (and especially a gay-sounding one) talking while they wank. The score leaps to 85 for those people.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Exclusive content
+ Some seriously clean shaven Asian teens
+ Mostly cute models
Cons:
- A navigational nightmare
- Expensive as hell
- 640x480 resolution wmv files only
- Majority of videos don't have live sound
- Pictures only 835 pixels on the long side
- Not download manager compatible
- Everything is right click and save - buttons aren't really buttons
- daily download limit of 1.5 gigs - yeah only 1.5 gigs
- Limit of 2 downloads at once
- a pathetic 190k/s download speed
- weekly? updates of ? videos (I don't read Japanese) - seemingly erratic schedule at best
- Pictures have a ridiculously huge watermark, videos a large watermark that jumps around to all the corners
- As of this week, they've added non-asian models
Bottom Line:
Another site that's hard to wrap up, mostly due to the fact that the English site is still mostly in Japanese. You hit the tabs to see where it takes you and hope you can remember which tab is which. Unless I couldn't find them, only the older videos have accompanying picture sets. Newer videos can be previewed on another page with only four pictures. As nothing is dated, it's hard to tell where the dividing line between old and new is.
This site definitely leans towards the Japanese sense of erotica. That could be either a pro or a con, depending on whether or not you can appreciate the deviations from Western porn. There are strange masturbations, off camera men prodding and probing the models, some peeing scenes and even some hint of the Japanese art of bondage. There are some girl/girl and multi-girl scenes, most of which are limited to what is best described as prodding and probing - no real sexual contact involved.
Most models do sets of four separate scenes, each running an average of 10 to 15 minutes. There are models who have done more than one set, but the awkward navigation and my inability to read Japanese makes it next to impossible to post any numbers. For some reason, the girl/girl sets are mostly a one or two video deal. The resolution leaves something to be desired. All of their videos, even the oldest, are 640x480 at 1600 kbps. That might have been cutting edge when the site started - in 2010, they're falling behind the times.
There's some kind of VIP club - special content for people staying with the site for 3 months or more. But, considering the site updates so infrequently and costs $50 to join and renews at $44 a month, I can't imagine any content worth putting out almost $140 to see.
Adding non-Asian models on a site that's supposed to feature "shaved Japanese pussies" is just plain wrong. You can go to plenty of other sites to see shaved models - for a lot less money.
In the end, if you don't care about how much it costs, the bandwidth limit or snail slow download speed, it IS a unique site with unique content. It's that uniqueness alone that prompted me to give them a 60.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
