Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 42 Page :    Next Page >

Visit The Classic Porn

1. The Classic Porn (2)

Pay
Active
78
pat362 (365) 03-03-13  09:15am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to some very rare content.
+They update with 2 new movies every day.
+Their offer movies not only from the US but France, Germany and Italy as well.
+Some of their Foreign movies are not dubbed into English but in their original language.
+They have small bio's of both the male and female performers with a link to their movies on the site and also to a dvd site where you can buy some of the dvd's.
+They have some third party advertising but it is usually quite small and rarely located where you can see it without looking for it.
-They offer some pics of the stars but don't expect much.
Cons: -Video quality is rather poor to horrible on a lot of their movies.
-They offer you access to 3 other sites but one has the same stuff as this site, one is mostly stag films and one is gay porn.
-Some of the movies may be made in the US but the copy they have is their European versions so the dialogue is not in English.
-They have a search by keyword but I would avoid it as most of the movies are not properly tagged.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then skipping to the next one.
-Some movies are split into many scenes while others are whole.
Bottom Line: *This is possibly one of the most bittersweet sites that I have ever joined in large part because I love so much of the content and yet really dislike the fact that the quality of the print is so poor that it borders on the unwatchable on many of the titles. Mind you that is not that unusual since the bulk of the content offered by this site is 20 years or older.

*The first and most important thing is that the guys behind this site need to start looking for better copies of their movies and/or try to remaster them to improve the quality. I don't expect that any of the movies will ever make it much above average but that would be more than fine with me as I'm not interested in HD quality anyway.

*The second thing is that they start looking for more titles from their featured stars so that we get access to a wider choice of movies from them. Of course this may be almost impossible to do because there may truly be no copies left anywhere. I hope that this isn't the case because there are many movies that were so amazing that they again deserve to see the light of day.

**I don't know to whom this site will appeal to except people like me who are nostalgic for golden age porn and can overlook flaws in the quality of those videos.

**My score has a lot less to do with quality and more to do with the rarity of the content offered by this site
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit The Classic Porn

2. The Classic Porn (2)

Pay
Active
70
xexbot (36) 11-12-12  09:36am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very cheap monthly fees.
- Tons of classic porn.
- Well known movies, they are generally films with big name stars.
- Have some films grouped by company or regions (French porn form the 1970s for example)
- Can search catalog by year.
- Fairly well managed database of stars, directors, year the film was made, and company that made them. It could be a little better, but this is probably the one thing they do right at this site.
- You also get access to a lot of Gay movies, all classics. Some really great porn mustaches.
Cons: - One of the worst site designs. Very clunky.
- They decided to put their Facebook and Google+ links right above the download links, so you are constantly have to close popups because they are activate by "mouse overs" whenever you try to click on the download links. This is probably the most annoying thing at their site.
- Half their movies are clipped into smaller files, the other half are just whole downloads. There is no consistency to this either, well except that if they clipped it everything just gets named ipod3g_##, so you constantly have to rename every clip you download (or end up with ipod3g_01 through ipod3g_100).
- They advertise films that are supposedly going to be offered soon, but often they never do (they get skipped over, can't be offered after all; I really don't know why).
- Quality is really hit or miss here. The year of the film doesn't really seem to affect this. Old and newer films are often very poor quality.
- No choice of downloads.
Bottom Line: This is a great site if you are looking for a cheap alternative to buying classic porn DVDs or more likely VHS in a lot of these cases. They have a ton of films here, but you may not always find the biggest ones here (or anywhere else for that matter). For example, they have a ton of Christy Canyon's movies, but only one Traci Lords. However, the quality of many of these movies is sub-par just from their origins in time, but at the same time the operators of this website really need to establish some degree of consistency. Occasionally they will post a movie that is almost unwatchable. One of the most annoying things, aside from their poor placement of Facebook links, are how badly they can mess a movie up clipping it. Having to rename half your downloads from this site is something I haven't had to deal with since the 1990s. They took the time to clip it, you are paying them to do so whether you wanted them to or not, the least they could do is title their videos properly. This little faux pas just makes them look as amateurish as their 1960s movies (of which there are only a handful). It is clear that they are just uploading films with no regard towards their customer's satisfaction.

My problem with this site is that after some time (1-2 months)you have probably downloaded everything you want to keep. So, you are enticed into staying because they have a movie you have been searching for "coming soon." Hopefully they actually offer it, but oftentimes the film just disappears out of the "coming soon" list. Then you add to it all the little annoyances like having to close the popups when you accidentally mouse over them, renaming your downloads, and all of this so that maybe you can get a movie or two that you actually want per week. After a few months I found myself going for days and days without downloading from this site. It really ticks you off when the download links don't work for the first few days they offer the movie too, which has happened about every third movie they upload it seems.

The bottom line is that if you are looking for a site with a ton of classic porn, then this is probably the only one worth trying. I recommend it as a one time, one month membership. Get in there and get what you want and get out. They don't seem to care about the problems with their site (post suggestions all you want via their "suggestion box," I am pretty sure nobody reads them). The quality is hit or miss, and you won't really know until you download it. And like many sites these days, if you are using a Download manager you will have about thirty minutes before you will have to refresh the links. Fortunately their largest file sizes are still less than 500mb, so this is only a problem if you are trying to download half a decade worth of movies at a time. They are a good source for classic porn, but until they start addressing some of these issues I wouldn't recommend any long term memberships with them. The only reason they score a 70 is because they do have an impressive catalog, but that is about all they have going for them. What is sad is that their most impressive aspect has nothing to do with the site itself, just the access it provides to all those movies. There biggest problems are horrible mistakes made by web designers and management. As soon as any other company comes along offering this niche, this site will get trounced into oblivion. I have personally emailed Videobox requesting that they at least create an additional, retro site. I would rather pay Videobox and extra $15/mo than to keep paying these guys.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Caballero Classics

3. Caballero Classics (1)

Pay
Active
50
pat362 (365) 10-07-12  01:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-08-12  06:20pm  (Update History)
Reason: I added some info as to why i can't download content and i dropped my score
Pros: +Access to 10 other sites.
+The ability to stream videos online in a flash player.
+You can download the videos in two different H264 format with 640x480 resolution being the best available.
+Video quality is not that bad when you consider that most of the content is 20 or more years old.
+You get access to some movies not easily found on the net.
Cons: Where to begin?
-The first thing you notice upon entering this site and most of the other sites is that there is a flash player located in the top middle part of the screen which is showing a model currently appearing on one of their cam sites and there is no way to turn that off. That means that I'm wasting my valuable alloted download quota on crap that I don't want. They seem to rotate through different active models in the hope, I guess, of attracting enough customers so that the model can start a private show.
Bottom Line: cons continued:

-The second thing you notice is that no matter where you happen to be in regards to the movie. If you use your back button (which you must) then you are always brought back to the main page. Now the site haseither 134 pages or 201 depending on which section you are(don't ask me I don't know why) but you can only see 13 of those pages identified on the screen. You have to scroll from left to right depending on hwere you want to go. That's a pisser when you are on page 65 and you use the back button and wind one on page 1
-The third thing you notice is the tags on each scene/movie is so bad that it's more a problem than anythign else.
-The fouth thing you notice is that to get to the download section. You have to go through the streaming section first so every time you pick a scene then you have to stop the flash player from loading the video prior to geting on the download section or the video will stream while you are dowloading.
-The fifth thing you notice is that there are many duplicate tiles on the site so the total number of actual movies is a lot less than advertised and I noticed that not every scene from the movies is available.
-The sixth thing you notice is that pretty much every other site in the network has all of the above problems and they all basically share the same content so why even offer other sites?
-The seventh thing you notice (at least I did) is that this content is in part or all available to anyone with a membership to one of Manwin's site. Look in their bonus Content section and you will see that the design is very similar to this one. Of course finding something will be a lot hard but you'd save yourself 20$.

**I'm adding this last one because it happened to me and I've yet to get it resolved. About a week in to me membership. I lost the ability to stream or download videos and I nstill haven't been able to correct that problem after two days. It could be my system but if it is then why is it that I could do all those things in the morning and I couldn't in the evening?
****I finally got my answer and the reason why I can't stream or download content is because I've reached my quota for the month so I will not be able to stream or download anymore from any of the sites. I didn't do the exact math but I gather that I downloaded between 10 and 15 Gigs of data. No clue as to how much I streamed but it can't have been much since I was only interested in downloading the videos to watch at a later date.***I

***Bottom line is that I wish I could recommend this network because I wanted it to be good but It isn't and I don't think it ever will. The people responsible for these sites don't seem to care about putting a decent product.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Vintage Flash

4. Vintage Flash (1)

Pay
Active
89
messmer (137) 06-17-12  03:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-18-12  02:56pm  (Update History)
Reason: After a brief mental struggle I upgraded this site from 82 to 89. It should be rewarded for being different in a conformist world!
Pros: Beautiful British Ladies in alluring retro lingerie and doing a lot of erotic talking. Nice!!

Improved search since my last review.

Excellent streaming is available for those who like to preview a scene or watch it on line.

Updates appear to be steady with one update every 5 – 8 days, containing one picture set, plus screenshots and video of a given model).

Picture sets are available in High Resolution up to 2390x1600.

Videos are available in 720p HD wmv. Lesser sizes and resolutions also available.

4 additional sites: Vintageflash Archive, Pantyhosed4u, VF Academy, The Joy Of Feet
are also available as a bonus.
Cons: Still a very basic outlay since my last review. No model bios, no member forum, pictures are designated as “small” “middle” and “regular” (leaving one guessing as to their dimension until a set is downloaded and studied.) The individual sets are marked “pictures.zip” and nothing within the zip gives any indication of who the model is. So make sure you memorize a model's name before you download and then rename the zip.

Medium watermark on pictures (upper left of the photo.) It is not too intrusive except that I prefer my watermarks (if I have to put up with them) at the bottom right where they are less visible to most.

The tour promises 1920x1080p HD videos but I haven't come across one yet. BTW, I wish the lay-out of the member's page were as clear as that of the tour.

Navigation within the site is awkward with each bonus site requiring a separate sign-in. I am using Firefox to save my user names and passwords between visits to a site, so this was only a problem first time around
Bottom Line: Okay, here it is: I have looked at many sites over the past few years and being a lingerie lover have not found any that would suit me better than this one. The ladies are great, the talk is great, the retro lingerie is great and taking this into account I was prepared to return to this site over and over but there is one big con for me:

Strangely enough I didn't notice last time around or maybe the handful of videos I have looked at are no indication of how things are but all the videos I have looked at during the past three days were way too softly focused for my taste despite the fact that they are shot in 720p HD.

I have been to many other sites in the meantime where the picture in full screen was crystal clear and crisp even at the lower end of HD (720p).

Some members might actually prefer a slightly diffuse picture, so might the webmaster, but my taste runs to “crystal-clear” where every pore can be counted so, until that changes, I am afraid that, once again, I will have to resume my search for the perfect lingerie site.

This one is good, make no mistake about it, you have a choice of 567 picture sets (54410 pictures), 407 videos and 155 beautiful mature models (25 – 40?) at the moment, but it could be much better with sharper videos, renamed picture sets, and an easier way of getting around within the site.

Recommended to all vintage lingerie lovers despite the personal drawbacks I listed.
Respond: 18 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Retro Raw

5. Retro Raw (0)

Pay
Newbie
52*
whynot2 (2) 08-12-11  11:26am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -it does provide, to an extent, what it says it does...porn videos, mostly from the late 70s and early 80s
-sign-up seemed to be pretty efficient
-cancelling seemed to go OK, too, at least, I hope so.
-downloading was simple and i'd judge it to be pretty fast
Cons: Here we go:
- as mentioned elsewhere, there is no tagging or search function. You have to pick to DL on the basis of a single screen cap, and a small lo-res image of the (I presume) vhs cover, front and back.
- afore-mentioned images of covers, front and back and low-res...teh zoom fucntion didn't work and saving the pic and trying to zoom it, results in large pixels, long before you can make out faces or read names.
- I found at least two instances where the DL'd clip bore no resemblance to the supposed screen-cap
- many of the screen-caps focus on the parts...you have no idea, who, what face, situation, whatever turns your crank, is in the clip...other than 'parts'
- you can't DL a whole movie. With the selection that's probably not a big deal...but just saying.
- the clips are poorly edited. many, you hit play, and the first thing you see are those parts...maybe later you'll see a face or something.
- ltd selection, and of that selection, lots of Seka and Swedish Erotica.
Bottom Line: As mentioned in a comment, I was led to this site due to a strong nostalgic pull, having recognized a short clip as being from a magazine i had years and years ago. Curisoity overcame me and I went searching.

I totally agree with other reviews...it's not a great site, with a lot of 'compromises' in important areas, such as navigation and content. Other than fulfilling my specific nostalgic yearning, I don't see a lot of value there.

More than many sites I've visited, it is really quite ludicrous to sell access to such a site on a 'subscription' basis...the content that is there you can peruse and make your choices in an hour or two, and be done. And, whatever else might be said, I don't think that there's a lot of new 'vintage' and 'nostalgic' product to be made or found.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Kaitlyn

6. Club Kaitlyn (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
chancler (2) 06-13-11  06:40pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: really hot classic pornstar. No DRM, full trial worked for me, good download speeds.
Cons: not too many videos (less than 50), quality is not real great (its older porn), not even close to all of her movies. No pictures, very amatuerish site
Bottom Line: Just do the trial membership. You should have not trouble downloading all the content on the website. Don't expect any of her really old content before she got implants.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Vintage Classic Porn

7. Vintage Classic Porn (0)

Pay
Active
70
pat362 (365) 04-11-11  07:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nearly 500 videos and 520 phototsets.
-Some pretty hard to find porn.
-You can search by decade or niches.
-Movies can be streamed directly online.
-You can download each movie in low, medium or Hi-resolution.
Cons: -You can download the videos in 3 possible resolutions but since the original material for each video is often awful then that makes the resolution unimportant.
-They offer a description of content in each video but they have omited the names except maybe for a Betty Page's name.
-Pics are for the most part tiny and quality is pretty bad on most of them.
Bottom Line: -I can't think of any reason you would want to join this site except if you are a rabid porn collector who has to have anything associated with the word porn.

-The majority of the content is what I'd call stag porn from the pics to the videos. I guess it's nice to know that a site is keeping these historical documents alive but I can't see anyone willing to pay 25$ to get access to it.

-I picked a bordeline score because there is still a lot of content to be found inside.

-In case anyone is wondering. I got access to this site through a special offer.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Retro Raw

8. Retro Raw (0)

Pay
Active
57
pat362 (365) 04-11-11  07:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -You get access to 139 movies from the 70's and 80's
-They have movies with some of the big names from those eras.
-Movies are broken in scenes that can be downloaded in WMV(low & high quality).
Cons: -No money was spent on restoring or remastering any of the movies so video quality is usually bad to awful.
-They have a couple of classic movies but the overall selection leaves a lot to be desired.
-No search option.
-No scene identification.
-No photos except for the front and back artwork for each movie.
-Content is not dated but based on TBP's last review then they have added about 7 movies since December 2010.
-You can download the scenes in low or high quality but the high quality is so bad that I can't see anyone downloading the low one.
Bottom Line: -I got access to this site because of an amazing offer I received on the weekend so I'm able to review without complaining about the price but I don't think this site is worth $20$.

-This is the type of site that could appeal to anyone who enjoys porn from the golden days but since the people behind it can't be bothered with offering a quality site then stay away. If you don't then you will regret it. I love these type of movies but after downloading a couple of scene and suffering through them then I deleted them and I'm not going to bother downloading any others.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Vintage Flash

9. Vintage Flash (1)

Pay
Active
82
messmer (137) 12-05-10  01:40pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-06-10  09:43am  (Update History)
Reason: Score adjusted upward because complaint about slow speeds appears to have been an abberation rather than the rule.
Pros: Great looking British models.

Sexy vintage lingerie. Latest videos and picture sets are of good quality. Videos at present come in at 1280 x 720 px at 5000 kbps. Picture sets are of good quality as well and are available in zipped format.

Content not overwhelming but 470 Picture Sets and 244 Videos (many of the older ones are, of course, of lesser quality) isn't too bad either.

Love British accents.

Additional three bonus sites.
Cons: Site does not allow you to stop and then resume a download.

Not download manager friendly. My trusty DownThemAll gave me the same speed as the regular browser downloader.

Awful, inadequate search engine. I saw one picture on the tour and it was this picture that enticed me to subscribe. Do you think I can find that set? Rhetorical question! I suppose I will before the month is up.

Only one update every five days.

The three bonus sites do not offer a great deal of content.

Access to bonus sites requires a separate sign-in.
Bottom Line: Despite some of the negatives a nice site.

The few videos I downloaded yesterday were great. Lovely vintage lingerie (full size panties, nylons and garter belts, girdles, bras etc.) I am looking forward to downloading quite a bit more of their great videos (at least the newer ones) because just about every one of them looks tempting. The "dirty" talk by the models doesn't hurt either!

The three bonus sites "Pantyhosed4U" (305 photo sets, 138 videos), "VFAcademy" (69 photo sets, 70 videos), and "VintageFlash.Archives" (236 photo sets, 1 video!) are nice to have but aren't big enough, or update often enough, to make subscription to this site worthwhile for more than one month.

I like the mother site (reviewed), it does have its flaws but at least, for once, I don't have to condemn a site out of hand which is refreshing.

Recommended to fans of vintage lingerie and British models.
Respond: 14 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Pornstar Legends

10. Pornstar Legends (0)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (306) 06-16-10  03:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to approximately 200 “classic” porn movies from the 70s, 80s and early 90s.
- A good selection of titles from each of those decades
- Website is well laid out with good ability to sort titles
- Scenes can be sorted by film title, star name or general theme of scene
- An opportunity to get access to scenes from many well known porn stars
- Decent, but not great, download speeds
- Full access trial
- Some bonus sites available
Cons: - Due to the age and quality of the originals, some files are grainy
- Doesn’t appear to be any titles not widely available elsewhere
- Some models only have photos on the site
- No ability to sort by production date (that I could find)
- The bonus site offering classic porn has the same offerings as PSL
Bottom Line: Good God, some of these women have pubic hair! I remember that! Yes, pubic hair, the relative rarity of anal sex and the gentle treatment of women seem to be the key differences between porn from a couple of decades ago and porn of today.

I stumbled on PSL after TPB did an initial review a short while back. I’ve been thinking of taking a membership to a “classic” site but I wanted to be sure that I’d be getting value for money. PSL certainly delivers value for the price.

An obvious issue with any older porn is the quality of the originals. Some of the files here, especially the older ones on the site, are poor quality. I can’t fault PSL for this because the scenes have obviously been digitized from old film or video. The newer scenes on the site (from the late 80s and early 90s) are generally very well captured and don’t look much different from new standard definition material being shot today.

The biggest plusses of the site are access to about 200 film titles ranging from the 1970s to the 1990s. There may be stuff from earlier, but I wouldn’t necessarily recognize it as such. Let’s just say that there are scenes where Ron Jeremy looks like he just graduated from high school. Having access to the films, of course, also gives access to a number of great stars from the same eras. The obvious stars like Ginger Lynn, Amber Lynn and Christy Canyon are there, but so are some stars that I had forgotten about. Candie Evans was a big favorite of mine and I had forgotten about her until I rediscovered her here. And I had forgotten how stunningly beautiful Shauna Grant was when she did porn. She is the equal to any A-lister since then.

The site doesn’t have a search function, but it does have multiple ways to sort the material that is there. You can sort by complete DVD, by star or by theme. These work well.

The site also has pictures, which don’t appear to be zipped.

Speaking of pictures, one of the reasons I joined this site was because it advertised Tammi Ann was on it. She is, but only in photo form. Most models have a scene or two (at a minimum) here, but a few only offer pictures. That wasn’t clear when I signed up.

The bottom line is that this site offers decent value and I’d recommend it if you like classic porn. There is a good selection of material, though most of it is also available on other sites. The site offers useful and effective ways to sort through what they have to find what you want. I hope they continue to grow and put the effort into maintaining the site, though I realize that there are a finite number of titles available.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lady Suspender

11. Lady Suspender (0)

Pay
Active
85
messmer (137) 02-04-10  07:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Mostly Mature Amateur Models. I did recognize some models from Pro sites but they are few and far between.

+ Exclusive contents.

+ Sticks faithfully to its niche of catering to girdle and old-fashioned lingerie fetishists.

+ No Download Restrictions.

+ Pictures can be downloaded zipped.
Cons: Picture sets are relatively small and are basically just repeating what you can see on the video clips.

Torturous search to find all the parts of a video since they come in small chunks over a period of time.

Very confusing and old-fashioned interface.

If I remember right video was at 640x480, 1000 bitrate, a bit underpowered for 2009 but not bad.
Might have improved in the meantime. I will let you know in a comment when I re-subscribe to this site.
Bottom Line: I felt the need to make this quick new review because I was not entirely fair to this site in my previous one.

Because, at the time, I was only a member for one month I assumed that full DVDs could only be obtained by ordering them at outrageous prices (by North American standards) from this site.

I have discovered in the meantime that, with enough patience, all the parts of the DVD can be obtained with the membership .. so I retract my remarks re. "shilling" and will up the score at the same time.

Not only that, but I find that I retained quite a few clips from this site because they have kept their appeal to me over the past year, something I can't say for every site I have subscribed to.

I would recommend this site to lovers of mature amateur women and especially of mature apparel like girdles, slips, nylons, full nylon panties, garter belts etc.

Don't expect hardcore. This is a very soft core site, catering primarily to the fetish mentioned above. It contains some mild lesbian and spanking scenes and a lot of intimate fitting of various foundational garments that allow the (female) fitter to do a bit of lusty groping. There is nudity but it is of the discrete kind, no "gapes" to be found here.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Color Climax

12. Color Climax (0)

Pay
Active
76
slutty (111) 02-01-10  06:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *Great variety of content
*Attractive models of all ages, shapes, and sizes
*I believe all of their content is exlusive, although they have released some of it to dvd.
*Good classic videos and classic pictures. The quality wasn't great, but considering the era the content is from I found it pretty good (see below for tech. details)
*Decent download speeds
*Download managers work, although getting to the section to download a video scene can be a bit troublesome - see cons.
*Great for any fan of ladies with actual bush
Cons: *Zips only downloadable if you are a "VIP" which requires a multiple month membership.
*Photo quality is typically pretty poor - 760x540 or so seems pretty typical.
*Video quality is mediocre and in .mov format (720x580 1700 kbps was the best I saw)
*Aweful, aweful navigation. Some of the worst I have seen. The "theatre" section is reminiscent of seventeenvideo's video section. One very small thumb on the right of a random scene in the video (not even always a good view of the model)
*They have an integrated movie player, so you have to load the scene in order to download it - similar to MrSkin, however no matter which browser I used I was unable to "seek" in the video. Maybe it is a Win 7 problem, dunno.
*They recycle content, as is mentioned in the comments section. I'm not sure how much of the "new" material is all that new. I sort of doubt any of it is. One of the videos I downloaded from that section is of a model that left the business in 2003.
Bottom Line: *I know I have a lot of cons, but I think this site is actually pretty good. If you are a fan of Anna, Gigi, Vivian Schmitt or older "classic material" it might be worth joining for a month.
*It is unfortunate that you have to get a multi-month membership in order to download zips. And that navigation and video downloading is so painful. If you join, and want to get your money's worth, I would expect to spend a lot of time digging through the material. When I was looking for videos, I would play video games and look at the videos while waiting for the games to load, since I couldn't seek in the videos I had to wait sometimes a couple of minutes with the video running to find out who was in the scene.
*The site is mostly hardcore with some lesbian.
The best thing about the site, in my opinion, is the wide variety of content. They have content ranging from the old Amsterdam peep shows (1960s or 70s I think) all the way up to the 2000s.
*I must say some of the older material does make one a bit nervous about the models ages, even though the site says it is fully 2257 compliant, you sort of wonder how that can be proven for material produced in the 70s?

If they fixed some of the navagation problems, posted all their content instead of cylcing it, and got rid of the whole "VIP" membership thing I would probably give it a much higher score.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Vintage Erotica

13. Vintage Erotica (0)

Pay
Active
94
jd1961 (95) 12-24-09  09:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge Library Of Videos
NO DRM
Top Notch Streaming
Categorized Into Decades
Beginning To Digitally Restore Films
Screencap Previews
Cons: Not All Vids Have Download Option*
Some Vid Labeling Erroneous
Photos Are Mostly Screencaps
Some Films Are Silent
Bottom Line: This is a difficult site to grade because with the problems mentioned, it has a ton of very hard to get material. The material (meaning video/film) covers the whole 20th Century. Up to the 1940s, the offerings are sparse, but after that increase greatly in volume. Something like 7500 films all told. These are all derived from the mammoth "Blue Vanities" collection, that you may remember from video stores. (By the way, if you go to the Blue Vanities review here, it just redirects to this site).

The 1970s section to me is the most impressive. You have all the "Swedish Erotica" series, "Diamond", "Pretty Girls", "Dirty Movies", "Diverse Industries", "Screw", "Playmate", "Lasse Braun", "Collection", "Pleasure", and a whole lot more. Back in the day, this stuff cost a fortune, if you had a projector. Back then they were released as silents. Soundtracks have been added here (but not all of them). You will only hear the soundtrack after you download---the streaming versions have generic soundtracks, or even a projector sound no doubt because of the copyright infringements! There are so many of these loops, shorts, and stags that a month hardly scratches the surface.

There are problems however. A lot of the videos are streaming only. I solved this easily by downloading them with the latest RealPlayer, and then converting to another format. A bit time consuming, but worth the effort. Another problem I encountered was mislabeled films. Sometimes the film will have the title in the film, so you can label it that way.

The streams here for me have been flawless. A good way to preview what you want to download. The videos are DRM free. Download speed is average (ie:500 kb/s). They are offered in MPEG, with 2 different sizes: 720x480; 320x240. they do not label their video with technical detail. They have a page where digitally restored films are available. Obviously this is a slow process; as of this writing they have 41 done. Look great though. Forget the photo section---pretty much all screencaps.

Updating has slowed down recently, haven't seen one in 3 weeks. Maybe they're on vacation or something. They claim to still be processing the videos to get them online, which is probably true.

I give this site a high score chiefly because of the incredible hard to find content. If you're looking for that cheap porno thrill---move on, you won't like it. If you are a collector of vintage porn, this is the mother lode.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pornstar Classics

14. Pornstar Classics (0)

Pay
Active
94
jd1961 (95) 10-01-09  01:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very Large Library
-NO DRM
-Ability To Edit Scenes
-Good D/L Speed
-Great Extra Site (Caballero)
Cons: -Only One Video Format (.wmv)
-Not Many Photos
-Star Index Could Be Better
-Only about 4 updates a month
Bottom Line: Pornstar Classics is for the lover of the good old days. If you weren't alive in the good old days, you may find it interesting, but of course the film/video is aged. This site has improved a lot since I was a member a few years ago.

I don't count the aged look of the film/video as a negative, because this is a classic site. Some of the stuff is about 40 years old. Personally I sort of like it, because it brings me back. All the old great stars are here: Ginger Lynn, Annette Haven, Johnny Wadd, Tina Russell, etc. In the old days, this stuff was very expensive, first as film, then early VHS. It was difficult to collect a lot. Now it's all at your fingertips. They have tons of full features, but also a lot of the old "loops", like the Showgirl series.

The main extra site here is Caballero Classics, a great extra. They have a huge library as well, all their own titles. All told, so far they have about 700 films. They only update about 2 films every 2 weeks though.

They only have .wmv available here, but in 3 sizes, the largest being 640X480 927kbps. It's too bad they don't have many photos---scans of the old mags would be great if they could manage it. I'm downloading here at 1.2MB/s. The star index needs to be improved, but is functional.

A great feature of these sites is the Videobox style scene editor. All sites need this.

I give this a high score because the material is so great. Only the old timers may like this site, but newbies may want to check out what Dad was watching!
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Vintage Flash

15. Vintage Flash (1)

Pay
Active
82
Denner (233) 07-23-09  06:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Entirely exclusive british softcore "porn" - but with masturbation.
A pretty rare mix of wellknown uk-models and totally amateurs.
Dirty talk in most videos - with british accents, of course.
Ok amount of videos - right now it's: 379
The newer videos and photosets are what most PUs will consider: Fine/ok - even crisp
For Michelle Thorne-fans this is just a great site - she has a LOT of videos and photosets.
One fine bonus-site:
Pantyhosed4u.com
One other bonus site - not worth anything.
Old time lingerie - if you like that.
Cons: The navigation here is almost a bummer - even if there is a search-machine and a model base.
But no way to search for "only videos" or "only photosets.
Price a bit high.
Updates come only once a week - BUT it now includes both videos and photosets.
Too many of the better looking girls have only photosets.
Very broad variation i model-quality/goodlooking - too many on the ordinary site.
A bit slow download.
Only solo stuff (apart from ONE video with bj) - well, only found one after browsing for weeks.
Bottom Line: Joined the site because I found some stuff from it with Michelle Thorn and Linda Leigh - great britts - and both damn sexy.
The style here is - like the name indicates: Vintage.
That means that the models are all in lingerie from the 50's, 60's and 70's - and some is really outstanding.
The videos are now up to almost 380 - BUT it's only half of that amout that count to something - in viewing quality.
The newer videos are: 1024x760 - older ones goes down to: 640x480 and even 320x240.
All in WMV only.
The photosets are the same. New ones: 1600x1071 - older ones: not worth it.
But the main deal - apart from the outfit (lingerie) is the style in the videos. They are just dirty - for the solo kinds.
Most models does a fine dirty-talk - in a natural way - and in a way I ALMOST never see in US- solovideos.
If it was not for this dirty-talk, my score here would be quite a bit lower.
But listening to Michelle Thorne or even one video with Lucy Zara telling how horny she is and want to get fucked is worth it all.
Alas there are a little too many of the models that looks quite ordinary (not GOOD looking) - BUT still: even some of these girls end up being very sexy in their performance.
And the fact that they only have photosets of Linda leigh and Misty McCain is a bummer - so even if I'm probably not comming back - I can recommend a months membership - AND it looks like the site is growing - and new models are comming in, so who knows - maybe I'll try it again in six months or a year or so...
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lez Love

16. Lez Love (0)

Pay
Active
77
monty2222 (19) 07-13-09  12:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *50 Viv Thomas DVDs available for download in 500x370 resolution and 700-800 bitrate
*250 vintage lesbian clips from various old American and European adult films, each clip is about 5-15 minutes long
*Several hundred other clips in other categories
*About 500 erotic stories (Not the pro that should ever make you join a site, but they're not a con so I list 'em here)
*Thousands of images, in the following categories: Vintage, kissing, breast, oral & 69, bondage & fetish, soft, series, strap-on & dildo, and miscellaneous.
*A Viv Thomas scene and a 'vintage' scene added each week
*Update log where you can see the past months' updates.
*Download managers supported, no download limit
*The three sections (Videos, images and stories) and their subcategories makes it easy to navigate around
Cons: *Only the Viv Thomas scenes sneak up to mediocre in terms of image quality
*The 'vintage' clips have a resolution on par with Viv Thomas section, but image quality suffers from poor source material. Each clip about 5-15 mins long
*The 100 'kissing' clips from various porn movies, are low quality and short (No more than a few mins at most)
*150 'web video classics', popular lesbian clips from when dial-up was the norm, quality is as low as back then and they're only a few minutes long. Maybe a bit of nostalgia value for those who surfed for porn back then
*50 'main gallery' clips from various sources, including three scenes from Little Mutt. Clip length from 2-30 minutes. Except for a few newer scenes and clips, most of this could just as well have been put in the other categories.
*The most recent updates to the image section was in June 2008 (the vintage category), but the other categories not since 2005. Consists mostly of scans from old magazines and such, poor-to-average quality.
Bottom Line: Certainly, the main thing Lez Love has going for it is the 50 Viv Thomas DVDs you can download, the rest of the site's content is in my opinion little more than curiosity pieces for fans of early lesbian porn.
Viv Thomas nearly always produces good scenes with hot European models. If you're into lesbians and haven't seen any of his stuff, you're really missing out and owe it to yourself to give 'em a shot.
Lez Love is a cheap way to get a large sample of his material, though the image quality might be higher at his own site, that's on my to-do list to find out.
The vintage video category is the only other part of the site that's being updated, but unless you're really interested in 70ties and 80ties lesbian porn (both American and a host of European countries), the original image quality is generally too poor and the scenes are taken out of the context of the movie they were in, so all you get is some murky minutes of a pair of lesbians rubbing and kissing each other and that's it.
The remaining three video categories (kissing, web video classics and main gallery) have clips that are of even lower quality than the previous two and it will inevitably overshadow whatever hotness there might be in the clips.
All video clips only have one download option and comes with at least a title (where it's taken from), length and file size, many also have a brief description of what happens in the scene or what makes the clip special/noteworthy. In the Viv Thomas section, the models in each scene are also named.

Quality in the image section is generally as good as can be expected when scanning in old photos, magazines and such, which isn't very good. All the image updates here are at least one year old and most are three or four years old, which also lowers the quality you can expect to find.

The greatest thing I got from Lez Love was when I stumbled upon a certain blonde in some scenes in the Viv Thomas section. The only scene I've ever seen with her previously was way back before I started creating my porn stash, it blew me away back then, but her name wasn't mentioned anywhere so I didn't know who she was. And then suddenly here she was in all her glory, sexiest face I ever seen and breasts that are somehow just so mesmerizing my heart skips a beat and I get vertigo, it's was like finding a dear long lost friend. The blonde I'm talking about is Silvia Saint. That's who's material I'll be out chasing now. :-)
I recommend Lez Love for those who want a large sample of Viv Thomas DVDs relatively cheap ($19.95) and those with a more than keen interest in vintage lesbian porn.
They also have an excellent forum for fans of lesbians, but that's also available for non-members

Feel free to ask away if there's anything that's unclear or comment if there's something I missed or there's something you never want to see in my reviews again. ;-)
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Color Climax

17. Color Climax (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
Cooter37 (0) 04-21-09  10:51am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (3)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: great 70's and 80's pornvideo and pics good qualitylots of content
Cons: video downloads in quicktimewaiting for renew to download more contentprice is a little steep
Bottom Line: If you like classical porn this site is awesome. However you have to wait for your account to renew to download some of the stuff like zip files or newer videos.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Kay Parker Online

18. Kay Parker Online (0)

Pay
Active
65
Xororos (14) 03-22-09  10:26pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: A modest collection of Kay Parker clips available for download. Other than that, none. I'm giving the site a 65 rather than a 50 simply because KP is so great.
Cons: This is a very simple HTML website with 48 downloadable videos. All the videos are clips from movies and the quality ranges from poor to average. The format varies from clip to clip. Some are .mpg, but most are .avi.

Content wise, there isn't anything unique here. All of these clips are floating around elsewhere online and available for free. The only thing you get by subscribing is the ease of finding them in one place.

There is a rather pathetic little photo gallery filled with tiny, low-resolution pictures that were obviously pulled from a Google image search. Do one yourself and you'll find everything available here.

Finally, there do not seem to be any updates to the site.
Bottom Line: The most frustrating thing about this site is that it should be so much better. Kay Parker is a classic and she deserves a decent site. This isn't it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lady Suspender

19. Lady Suspender (0)

Pay
Active
75
messmer (137) 03-08-09  01:07pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A site that is reasonably true to its niche.

Mostly mature amateur models.

Picture and Video quality, while not outstanding, is reasonable. New videos are 640x480 at 1000 bitrate.

Picture sets are zipped, however ... see below.
Cons: The more I look and download the more I realize that the site is actually nothing but a tease to encourage you to purchase their DVDs. at a steep price in my opinion. I saw one that sold for 35 British Pounds.

Video segments are poorly organized and it takes a lot of searching to find part one or part two of a series. Once all the parts are found it usually amounts to no more than a ten - fifteen minute excerpt of a Video that has no beginning or end for the above mentioned reasons.

Most picture sets are duplicates of the incomplete videos and can be downloaded zipped but beware, most sets are small and still require multiple zips .. one per page of pictures.
Bottom Line: I must confess to having mixed feelings about this site. On the one hand it is refreshing to see mature women in old-fashioned underwear, something very appealing to someone over fifty, well, appealing to me, anyway and I'm enjoying the "teases", as frustrating as they are in their incompleteness.

On the other hand, however, I have seen some of the models on other mature sites and, most importantly, I really don't like having spent a subscription fee just to be used by a site shilling their products.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Suze Classics

20. Suze Classics (0)

Pay
Active
82
Wittyguy (95) 01-22-09  06:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Good $10, 7 days full access trial
+ Also get full access to suze.net and suzevideo
+ Definite retro porn from the 80's and 90's
+ Pics remastered up to 1200x850 with zips
+ Good quality vids
+ Exlusive updates (er, "retrodates" perhaps) 3-4x a week
+ No DRM
Cons: - No video and pic set overlap (aka - no pic sets and vids of the same scene)
- No real HC photosets
- Site still smallish
- Prechecked cross-sale(s) on sign-up page
- Advertising on the pages but no too annoying
Bottom Line: If unshaved muff and names like Raqueal Darrian, Savannah, Christi Canyon and Teri Weigel bring back fond memories then this site might be worth donning your smoking jacket, trimming your 'stache and sitting back to go stroking with the oldies. This site features porn US stars from the 80's and 90's.

Here's the basic breakdown:

Pics: There are about 110 sets and all have zip. Three sizes going up 1200x850. All are basically digitally scanned photos from the original pic or negative and there is a smallish transparent watermark. Surprisingly there was very little graininess so the quality was good for what they were. The original lighting and cropping sometimes suffered though. The sets are somewhat small (most having less than 50 pics). I counted one true hc set but there were a few psuedo hc sets (no penetration) from the days when the skin mags couldn't show that stuff. This is defintely glam porn so if amateurs are your thing you probably won't be too into this.

Vids: About 75 vids using WMV player only. 3 sizes to choose from (300k, 1 gig and 2 gig) and they're about 15 minutes long. The largest sized out at 720x540 and they streamed for me around 350 kbs. Almost all the scenes are HC and remastered from the original film or tape. Again the quality on the remasters was very good but the original lighting and directing sometimes left something to be desired. Still there was some hot action here.

I'm scoring this site on it's own at an 82 simply because it's still growing, the original quality was sometimes suspect and for some reason this site did less for me than I expected it would. As I noted, you also get full access to Suze.net and Suzevideo. When you consider the network as whole, I'd score it around an 89 or 90 because the other two sites save it (See my comment on the suze.net page entitled "Site Stats Update" for what the network currently contains).

They have also added a forum but it's still relatively new, not real informative and the only person from Suze who seems to contribute is Holly Randall (she seems to be running the show now). There is a model directory but it doesn't have much background info on the models themselves. There is also a search function for various sex acts and poses.

If you're into retro porn, the 7 day trial price makes it worth checking out. For me, it was more of reminder of how much better porn is today than it was years ago but there is still some decent stuff there.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Village Ladies

21. Village Ladies (0)

Pay
Active
63
WeeWillyWinky (88) 11-11-08  03:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A fair amount of nice pictures.
- Site is mature and contains nothing sleezy or trashy.
- The basic premise of the site is good.
Cons: - A large percentage of the pics have been moved into a separate archive, which requires a separate membership.
- No videos.
- No zip-files.
- Small pictures (avg. 600x800 up to 749x1123), of fair to middling quality.
- Very small thumbnails.
- Pages load slowly.
- Sliding sidebar which moves as the scroll-button is moved. Very annoying.
- Some models in dire need of a dentist.
Bottom Line: Woody Allen opens one of his films with an old joke: Two women are at a restaurant and one says, "the food here is lousy.", and the other replies, "Yeah, and such small portions."

That joke applies pretty well to Village Ladies. For instance: I could complain that a considerably large percentage of the pictures have been moved to a separate archive which I can't access; but at the same time it would be silly to complain since ninety percent of those pics would do nothing for me anyway. But complain I will, hence the reference to Woody's joke.

As soon as I entered the member's section, disappointment and tedium ensued. First, no zips. Second, the thumbs loaded slowly and were so small I could hardly make out the image. Third, I clicked on one link in the model's index and was taken to a page which invites you to join a separate site where the older pics are now stored. On return to the model's index, that link was now yellow (visited) as were all the links to sets I would not be able to access. The sudden over-abundance of links to sets I could not access was somehow insulting, as if a joke had been pulled on me.

While beauty is certainly in the eye of the beholder, I found *very few* attractive models here. There's nothing wrong with being homely, but if you agree to being photographed, and to having those photos featured on a site where people are paying to obtain access to those photos, and if the intention of those photos is sexual titillation, then you should be prepared to hear some unflattering comments. Unflattering comment follows:

If you have broken teeth, missing teeth, gray teeth, or brown teeth, keep the smiling to a minimum, visit a dentist, or re-consider posing for adult pictures. This comment refers to some of the models, not all of them, of course.

***

This site has been online for a number of years and now costs more than a lot of premium sites. If you have a yen for less-than-glamorous mature amateurs, Aunt Judy's is a much safer bet than this.

Read Duke's review (TBP reviewer). He does a lot less pussy-footing than me, and his five year old review needs precious little updating.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Color Climax

22. Color Climax (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
f84815 (4) 11-10-08  03:53pm
Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Classic Porn from my youth
-Quality, average against new porn, but not bad compared with similar stuff.
Cons: -only Quicktime and mp4 video type.
-No download manager support.
-No regular updates, while I've be a member 1 update
Bottom Line: If you like older stuff vids and pic then join for a month. It isn't worth much more than that.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Candy Manson Online

23. Candy Manson Online (0)

Pay
Newbie
96*
anthonyhopkins (0) 07-27-08  12:45am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: more than 30 different candy manson scenes, besides bunch of pornstar movies, unlimited download, decent speed, no limitation. what else do u expect
Cons: at this moment i have not experienced anything bad, maybe photo database is not as large as i expected but movies section is one of the best i have ever seen
Bottom Line: it is worth it, 19 dollar for a month, high quality, unlimited download, i would definitely recommend it
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Caballero Classics

24. Caballero Classics (1)

Pay
Newbie
65*
nelbertram (0) 04-19-08  03:15am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Original content
70's 80's and 90's films - some classics
Cons: Segments are not in same format therefore can not join them.
Some clips can only be played with KM player (available to download on site). However this player affected other programmes on my pc with the effect it kept crashing.
No response to question when asked if there was a solution or if they would ensure all future films were to be in same format.
Expensive in comparison to other sites.
Bottom Line: This site and the similar one called "Pornstar classics" are very disappointing. There is no doubt in my mind that they have the content to make this a fantastic site but they need to address the flaws outlined above.
The lack of response to questions demonstrates they are only interested in getting the initial membership and then ignoring members.
If the content was not good I would have scored this site at 50.
My other disappointment was not cancelling straight away as by the time I did cancel i had gone into another month. Hard lesson to learn but I will in future pay attention more carefully.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Color Climax

25. Color Climax (0)

Pay
Active
89
exotics4me (463) 01-07-08  06:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Classic site that has more content than I imagined
- Newer content that helps those of us who weren't even born when some of this porn came out
- Site navigation is pretty straight-forward, continued in cons.
- Videos are very good quality 720 on high end
- No obsession with facials, which is a good thing for me. The site brings a different view to porn that is a breath of fresh air to current times formulaic approach.
Cons: - As others have mentioned, the videos are in quicktime. Will explain more in BL
- I can't understand anything they are saying in the movies, but the language is probably better this way than with English voiceovers
- Some of the content is really seriously vintage stuff, not that it is a bad thing, but it is a harsh reminder at times of how far porn has come
- My download speeds are not good, only 700 kb/s on a 10M connection, about 300 kb/s lower than my average on other sites
Bottom Line: One of the biggest selling points for me is that we don't have the typical porn of current times, where the man absolutely has to give the woman a facial. The sex in these videos comes across as less staged.

The photos aren't bad, though we aren't talking Met-Art level here. The photos are available in zips. The video part, the VLC media player plays these without having to load the resource hog quicktime player. I also can recommend Windows Media Classic to watch the QT videos on. Both of these are my preferred video players anyway, so it doesn't bother me to not have WMV files.

My only real complaint is that some of the content does go way back in time. The site really does separate "classic" from "vintage" with most classic porn these days being from the late 80s. Some of this looks to be from the early 70s, maybe earlier.

A comment on the language, not for sure what they are speaking, maybe German? Either way, if dialogue in your porn matters, make sure you can understand the language. Like the old saying goes, all women moan in the same language, and that is really all that matters to me.

Overall, I am happy with the site, and really don't have many real complaints about it. I would imagine someone really into vintage porn would love it even more. A better search engine really wouldn't help since I don't any of these models by name. DL speeds did bother me. Still I recommend it to those into older porn, and those just looking for something different.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 42 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. The Classic Porn (2)
2. Vintage Flash (1)
3. Caballero Classics (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.17 seconds.