Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 42 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Foot Factory

1. Foot Factory (0)

Pay
Active
80
otoh (54) 09-12-11  12:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Unique, interesting themes
- Good, unusual photography style
- Wide variety of models, some well-known
- Good descriptions of videos
- Good value full trial available
Cons: - Low res pics and videos
- Sparse updates
- Set names obscured & unhelpful zip names
- No tagging or categorisation
- Some sets too big
Bottom Line: Yet another infuriating site!

I'll start with a couple of disclaimers. First, I'm not really a foot/leg fetishist as such; however I seem to have become a one by default since the genre (particularly legs) seems to cover eroticism, undressing, nylons and lingerie etc - in short, the whole picture - more than most porn. Second, I'm slightly biased since I'm familiar with the photographer, Ed Fox; I've just had his second book delivered and like his work in Leg Show magazine - which I get occasionally, one of the few printed magazines still worth a look with all the online porn around.

Anyway, at FF, you'll find a good selection of foot-oriented material; sets and videos cover various themes, such as:

- candids of eg girls getting dressed, putting on shoes;
- masturbation scenes, sometimes starting with the girl eg rubbing lotion onto her feet
- quite a few with sex toys
- some girl-girl scenes and a few b/g scenes
- scenarios, eg I liked a couple involving undressing/masturbating during phone calls
- behind the scenes
- some not explicit at all, purely focused on feet
- outdoor or other unusual locations
- plenty of dirty feet

Some themes I didn't like; smoking is common but has never worked for me, and some weirder S&M stuff, eg unseen strangers whose gloved hands abduct or molest girls. And many videos have music whereas I prefer without; however it tends to be ambient/electronic/experimental stuff which although sometimes offputting, is far preferable to the corny faux-sexy music we get so often.

It's worth noting that this is material that leans towards foot fetishism but doesn't focus solely (rimshot) on it - hardcore foot folk may find it strays a bit too much but it's a balance that works for me. And largely I really like the style; it's not as brightly lit as most porn so it may not appeal to some folk; but there is a documentary/voyeuristic style to it which is quite unique, and even the magazine type shoots have a starkness and realism that sets it apart from most glam. The light and shadows make it very erotic - but not at the expense of being too arty, which it's not, or too tame - although there's not much hardcore, there's plenty of explicit midcore.

And there are a great selection of models featured. Some I'm familiar with from the pinup/fetish genre, eg Angela Ryan, Emily Marilyn, Dita von Teese; some porn stars, such as Aria Giovanni, Ryan Keely, Jelena Jensen; and plenty of pretty amateurs that perhaps only appear here.

Roughly 570 photo sets and 230 videos going back to 2004; maybe 150 models. Photo sets are split between 'photos' and 'features' - I think the former are meant to be more candids, and the latter more glamorous, magazine shoots and the like - but it's a vague distinction and there seems to be quite an overlap. Updates are quite sparse at 1-4 per month; but this is clearly stated on the tour so I don't have a problem with that.

Site navigation is fairly standard; a general updates list, photos/videos lists in date order, a model index. Given the number of themes involved it would be nice to have some kind of tagging, but sadly there is none. The layout of the site means that the names of photo sets are obscured which is annoying, especially as zips do not have meaningful names; but at least zips are there and easily accessible. I found some sets too large, maybe > 200 pictures, and really could have been edited; more is not necessarily better. Videos are mostly WMV, some QT, and whereas there's no info about photo sets, most videos have a long and explicit description, particularly discussing the feet - Mr Fox is quite a fetishist.

The biggest issue, though, is the resolution; all pictures sets are just 1024x768 (or less on the shorter side). I'm really not a resolution fiend and don't expect the somewhat daft 80 megapixel sets that Hegre Art is now offering; but Ed Fox is a well-known published photographer and it baffles me that he can't/doesn't/won't muster more than even 1 megapixel. I'd at least like to look at them full-screen and 1024x768 is well under half the size of mine - at least 2000px would be far more appropriate.

Similarly, videos are fairly low; many are DVD size, but older ones seem to be about 450x300 px - although for me a video survives upscaling a bit more than a photo so I don't mind quite so much. But still, a bit of HD would be appreciated and hardly technically challenging to produce now.

As some others have pointed out, once you go to leave the site you get offered a link to a $3/3 day trial; I took this and felt a bit guilty since I did get some good content. But I'd really need a month to comfortably go through everything - I like the material so much that it's only the resolution issue that preventing me from buying a full subscription. And similarly that's what prevents me scoring this higher; even with all the other cons I would happily give this 90+ - but it's still good size archive of great material and hopefully 80 reflects this.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

2. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
89
RustyJ (145) 07-07-11  12:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -One of the longest going sites in the DDF Prod network if not the longest one. The earliest scenes are dated January 2001 which is quite historic when it comes to internet porn
-Number of scenes going at nearly 2000 with your standard DDF Prod caveats of possible cross site content. However this site with it's clear niche is less likely to have content shared between sites and one can almost guarantee any footjob scenes are site exclusive
-Very strong approach on the subject again. Scenes may be solo, lesbian or hardcore but legs and feet are always in the focus of the action
-DDF understands that there should be multiple women in the same scene with a man. This is what 21Sextury.com could learn from
-Everything related to production and technical side is fine. Quality of photos, videos and sets in general is very high. Site works well with multiple download options, tagged searching is great too. Downloads are generally very fast and I repeatedly max out my bandwidth
Cons: -Recycling. With this network it's hard to tell if material is new or old as scenes of all ages are added regularly and it's not uncommon to see a previously removed scene added again
-This is subjective but personally I'm not that much into feet and when it comes to legs, it's good enough that they look good. This site has many scenes where the only female part getting much action are the feet and they are nothing for me. However fans of the niche will 100% disagree
-Casting scenes that are of lower quality and not very interesting
Bottom Line: Feet, legs, socks, pantyhose, stockings and some shoes and boots are the focus here. The rest varies as much as on all the DDF sites from solo girls to group hardcore action. This site has been going for a very long time and if the oldest scenes all the way from the early 2001 aren't worth much in their 320x240 video format, at least they have decent photosets with many legendary stars. Actually the very oldest ones have only photosets with the video starting few months later.

Even if one is not into the feet and legs in particular, this site offers lots of videos with enough normal sex to entertain non niche people. Due to the specific foot focus in those scenes too, they are more often site exclusive too and not found on other DDF Prod sites as often as ones on some other sites. DDF also does one thing right if one compares with the "main competitor" 21sextury.com, there are usually more women than men in the hardcore scenes. Of course there's lots of solo scenes too and many that feature maybe only short blowjob in addition to footjob so if those are your thing, you might like this site even more while for me they are just filler.

Quality of photography and video in newer scenes shines here too. The ones available in 1080p are generally very good but as they are updating also with older (sometimes recycled) material, you will see 720p too which is perhaps a bit smudgier than the new content but still nice. Photos are the subjective best in the business and available in three sizes in zips although I cannot see anyone really downloading anything but large size ones these days. The large photosets in zips are usually from few dozen to maybe fifty megabytes so no 600Mb monster zips here.

The talent is nothing new to the ones familiar with DDF and the other European sites. The names may vary from site to site but the girls are the same big Euro names of today and past years with some Americans thrown in between. In case anyone is interested, yes the guys are the same handful you have learned to tolerate on every site and film over past few decades ;)

Technical side is in good order and exactly the same as on the other network sites. After they did away with the individual site designs and interfaces, everything has been clearer and very easy to search. It's also easier to check if the content is duplicate or a re-edit of some other scene from another site. Downloads speeds are not maybe the most consistent I've experienced but generally fast enough to max out the fastest connections with a DL manager.

This site is another cornerstone of the DDF Prod network. Despite the topic, it has much to offer to users more interested in just plain action but also many 100% topic focused scenes.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit California Beach Feet

3. California Beach Feet (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
JakeOLantern (1) 06-01-11  07:19pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Super HQ pics (5k x 3.5k)and videos (HD)
+ 100% exclusive content from what I can tell, these are just girls that the photographer walked up to at the beach
+ Volume of content - goes back 6+ years
Cons: - No choice of pic sizes. Unless you have a 46" monitor this makes it difficult to view online. If you download it though you get penalized by getting locked out of your paid account for 24 hours and you get no warning.
- Daily download limit (everything is huge, so this goes quickly)
- Clunky navigation (its a stretch to call it navigation. Yes it's that bad!)
- High price
Bottom Line: Overall the quality, quantity and clarity of the content is excellent. The girls are hot and they are mostly amateurs the guy walked up to and asked if he could photograph their feet. The dialog in the videos is intesting. The girls talk about their feet as he asks them questions about same.

Navigation is old school thumbnails on a single page that scrolls forever, no menu's, no names for the girls, just a date and 3 thumbs. I found this to be a huge negative. At least put up a model directory.... content goes back to 2004 so there is a lot of content to wade through. It's like a library with no card catalog.

I would have given this a rating of 80 until I got banned from their server with no warning for doing nothing that I don't do on any other site I am a member of, especially in the high end 20-30/month price range... download the content. There was nothing stating anything about a download limit when I joined. Big negative. Seriously. With a fee of 24.95 per month the webmaster could shell up for a better host.

* Excellent quality and lots of content
* Thumbs down to download limits and stone age interface.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

4. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
87
Wittyguy (95) 01-26-11  02:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons: -- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line: When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.

VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.

OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.

The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).

If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.

I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pantyhose Amateurs

5. Pantyhose Amateurs (0)

Pay
Active
75
otoh (54) 12-27-10  03:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated: 01-07-11  11:09am  (Update History)
Reason: Minor score change; think I set the bar a bit high to start with...
Pros: - Mainly pretty, amateur-looking, natural girls
- Some videos have them chatting, which I like
- Great legwear, Wolford tights etc
- Not just tights as the name suggests, stockings also
Cons: - Last updates seem to be from 6 weeks ago; update schedule AWOL since 2009; actual update material dated 2008
- Quality is not great; older videos at 480x360, newer 640x480 or 700x400
- Same for photo shoots; some at 1500x1000, others seem to be captures at 640x480 or 960x540
- Some videos have ludicrous music over them
- Some - luckily not many - have the cameraman talking and lending a hand - not really what the material here is about
- Listings are basic - just straight list, with thumbnails, of albums and movies; no sort, filter etc
- Not many unshaved girls, and only a couple of girl-girl videos
Bottom Line: I've got a much bigger list of cons than pros, and given that, my score might seem a little high. Especially as the site is pretty dated looking - content seems to be from 2000-2008, and has the bare minimum of navigation to get round the 200-odd movies, and similar number of photo sets.

However, I do like the material. The girls are cute, unpretentious, pretty without being too glammed-up. Also a few familiar names there, perhaps from before they were so well-known (eg Sunny Leone, Bree Olsen, Mai Ly).

Videos are almost all solo, some good teasing to start with, and as per the niche, some clothing tends to remain on - with panties pulled aside, or tights pulled down but remaining on while the models masturbate; some with toys, others just with fingers.

Oh, and there is some GREAT legwear. I like tights and stockings, but there are some videos here with some impressively patterned Wolfords etc, which is a big turn-on for me. There are a few nylon sites around, but featuring really sexy tights like these seems fairly rare.

I joined on a 3-day trial - well worth it, but you can likely get all you need within that 3 days.

It also comes with access to Amateur Upskirts - some of the same models, but it's more lollipop/pigtails/barely-legal themed, which isn't really my thing.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Alta Heels

6. Alta Heels (0)

Pay
Newbie
96*
jsmits80 (4) 12-13-10  05:36am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large collection of pictures and videos with beautiful women in nylons and high heels (few bare legs)
-Emphasis on legs/nylons/lingerie/high heels. Mainly solo girls.
-High quality videos.
-Models talk a lot during the videos.
-Beautiful lingerie, outfits and nylons on the models.
-The models keep their shoes on!
-Frequent updates (2 or video/picture updates per week)
-Fast downloads.
-Great selection of awesome shoes. Mainly platforms and high heels.
-Fairly priced.
-Easy site navigation and simple design.
-95% beautiful girls.
Cons: -The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better all the time.
-The site limits the amount you can download in a day.
-Only two lesbian sets.
-No zip downloads.
Bottom Line: -This is by far my favorite leg/nylon/high heel web site! I have belonged to Altaheels almost continuously since it started. It has practically every component of a leg site that I look for – Super pretty girls with long legs, terrific outfits, fantastic stockings and pantyhose, amazing high heels. For you guys out there who like bare legs, there is some of this here too. Some unique things on this site:
-A bunch of sets with seamless pantyhose! These are always the best!
- Several sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. These are tremendous to us leg guys.
-Tons of different high heels. They range from 6 inch pumps to 8 inch platforms.
-A couple of shoots with some crazy high heels (with like 6 inch platforms and 12 inch heels)!!! I have never seen these kinds of shoes on any other site!!!
-Girls who “talk” or tell a story during the videos! These are very unique among all leg sites. There is nothing more of a turn on then to hear a girl talking to you; trying to turn you on, with nylons and heels? The best! I hate leg videos that just show a girls sitting there like a lump. I want to get to know her a little or just see that she is a real person.
-The overall size of the site content is great.
-The pictures are better than average quality, 700x1000 pixels, about 225 kb. Most sets have 30 to 60 pictures. For me, more important that the size of the pictures is the content.
-The video quality of the older stuff is average, but the newer videos appear to be getting much better. Most of the videos last 5 to 11 minutes.
-The price is a good value because of the content and frequent updates (24.95 for 30 days then 21.95 reoccurring every 30 days). I do see that they do split some of the content to other sites, but this is the one I really like to see.
-For me, the key to this site is the complete overall substance. Sure, blahblahblahlegs.com has a few prettier girls but ALTAHEELS has every girl in super high heels; blahblahblahnylons.net may have higher video quality but half the girls aren’t wearing nylons or lingerie; blahblahblahstockings.ru has nice outfits but the in the videos the girls can’t speak English…. I guess my point is that the pieces of the puzzle that I am looking for come together here.
BTW – As I was writing this, I looked through my hard drive at some of the videos and there are a couple videos (sam_geo_001, heather202 and celeste_303) which alone would be reason enough to join! Absolutely mind-blowing for leg men!
-I give it a 96. I took some points off because of the download volume limiter and no zip files, but if you are a leg guy; you should definitely check it out.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit JB Video

7. JB Video (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
jsmits80 (4) 11-30-10  02:55pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Extremely large collection of pictures and videos. I mean, this site has been around forever.
- Caters to leg/nylon/high heel guys. Tons of content for leg-lovers.
-Frequent updates and new models (approximately 1-2 per week)
-High quality videos.
-The downloads come pretty fast (I don’t know much about internet server speed but I would say it is somewhere between amazon and computer support site in India)
-Nice outfits and nylons on the models.
-Good selection of shoes. Nice platforms and high heels.
-Discounts on DVD purchases from their online store.
-Steaming video and live shows (available at certain times)
-Fairly inexpensive (about $30 per month) for the amount of content.
-Navigation of the site is easy and straight forward. I like sites that allow you to go right back to the home or updates pages without having to go through 50 pages first.
-Wide variety of girls (Caucasian, Black, Asian, Hispanic…..Younger, little older…)
-Approximately one lesbian scene a month.
Cons: -A lot of the early stuff is so so quality and content.
-No zip downloads
-50% of the girls are good looking, 10% are much less. (Remember – 40% are smoking hot)
-Way too many sets of JB himself in what he calls “POV shoots”. I am a leg man and I want to see hot girls in nylons! I just don’t want to see a guy’s junk being jacked off by an Asian chick every forth photo set.
-Many of the videos just have a girl sitting on a bed or pole dancing in pantyhose. No talking at all. I just think videos that have the girl talk to you, interact with you.
-Some of the photo sets could be larger. They range from 40 to 80 pictures in a set.
-The older videos are fair quality, but like most sites, getting better every day.
-No model or content search engine. I would love to be able to search for “seamless pantyhose” or “2 girls in pantyhose” on the site because of the large content.
-No rating system for pictures or videos.
Bottom Line: -As any leg guy can tell you, JB Video is one of the oldest and often one of the first leg sites that most of us join (it was my first and I have re-joined dozens of times over the years). So in many ways I feel like I am reviewing the Eifel Tower. It is a great nylon/leg/high heel site with a monstrous collection of pictures and videos. Lots of hot girls in nylons and heels to please any leg guy. I would give it an 85 rating and say that if you love legs; you should join.
-A few suggestions:
-Too few sets with seamless pantyhose! As all us leg guys know; we search for seamless pantyhose sets like the Holy Grail.
-Too few sets of “layered” stockings over pantyhose. Again, super awesome but few and far between.
-One of the very few leg sites that have videos showing girls changing shoes. An excellent bonus!
-A couple of the DVDs for sale (like Sky and Summer’s Foot Tease, Foot Seduction 14 Goldie and Isabella and Foot Seduction 24 Emily and Darenzia and a couple of the other lesbian videos) are worth the price of admission alone. True masterpieces! There should be more lesbian sets like these! I love these videos because the girls are talking the whole time, talking about their legs and nylons.
-Pretty good shoe collection. Nice sets with 6 inch platforms. I would like to see a few sets with some 8 inch heels.
-Need to get rid of a lot of the “less pretty” girls.
-Way fewer of the “POV” sets of a guy getting a foot job from a girl. These aren’t very good and not very exciting.
I know a will be re-joining JB Video on a regular basis. A very solid leg site and a good value with a few kinks.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Footville

8. Footville (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
Kami (2) 10-14-10  11:10pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Muffia network access.
-Despite the foot fetish theme the content does contain your standard variety of porn sex acts in addition to some foot play.
-Picture gallery for each update and zip options.
Cons: -No longer updating.
-No real variety in scene locations with most scenes appearing to take place in the same shoe store backdrop.
-Individuals with real foot fetishes will probably find this content pretty tame for their likes. The foot fetish theme is just not played up a lot in the updates.
Bottom Line: I actually liked this site and wish they still updated. There was a nice variety of women with unique appearances and while the foot theme wasn't heavy it was present and erotic.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

9. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
90
nadiencendia (83) 09-03-10  05:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Gorgeus European women
-Amazing foot fetish action (solo, g/g and some b/g)
-Really huge archive, updated every day (one day with a picture set, next day with the corresponding videos)
-Several video download options
-zip archives for pictures sets
-Part of the ddfprod network
Cons: -Best days of this site are long gone
-If bought indepentently it's quite pricy
-Some "new" sets are just re-editions of older ones
-Older sets have not been improved since they first appeared and have quite low quality
Bottom Line: Hot Legs and Feet continues to be my favorite foot fetish site, although I think that it's "golden days" are now over. I remember when I first joined, Sophie Moone was in her full splendor and making tons of videos for DDF; the same could be said about Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Sandra Shine... Now most of those models are retired, working for 21st Sextury or in the US, and the new models that have appeared since then don't have the same sex appeal or charisma. Or maybe it's just me...

In any case, this site works very well for someone who is looking for foot fetish action: it has quite a lot of solo sets; many girl/girl action sets, and quite a few boy/girl sets. It is updated very regularly (three new sets a week, consisting on pictures and video) and in its new sets it offers different download options and qualities. Only good things can be said about directing, lighting, editing, etc. None knows how to capture the beauty of female feet in action like these guys.

My last consideration is a quite obvious one: this site is included in the DDF Productions network deal, so if you are interested, I would recommend joining the whole network for a bit more money, because you will get access to other good sites too.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Footsie Babes

10. Footsie Babes (0)

Pay
Active
87
RustyJ (145) 09-02-10  05:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -254 scenes and updating regularly
-Close to 50 scenes in very good looking FullHD video, available in either wmv or H.264
-Lots of mainstream hardcore content in the scenes. A standard vanilla viewer could easily edit out the licking and footjobs and get great quality content while saving some disc space
-Not much softcore fooling around. Some but not in the latest scenes
-Hot girls in almost all scenes
-Some light BDSM in scenes every now and then
Cons: -I end up with LOTS of broken video files. It's frustrating to have to reload two gigabyte files
-Photos could be larger
-Maybe I'm confusing niches here but I don't see many boots here. It's probably all about naked feet but I'd love to see some more boots and high heels thrown in
Bottom Line: Normally I would skip a site with a name that's got anything to do with feet as they tend to be seriously focused in nature and you are lucky to see a glimpse of any real action or naked ladies.

This one however is a different thing and I'm happy that 21Sextury comes with a decent site in this fetish as this can really be enjoyed even if one doesn't give a damn about toes and feet. Sure, there is a lot of footjob going on and obligatory toe licking but once that is out of the way, you get good quality Euro action in extremely high production quality with the hottest girls around. This site works for me great, unlike HotLegsAndFeet for example.

I must remind that I don't really care about the subject in name so the rating could be way higher for those who've been desperately looking for foot action with real hardcore. For me it's great to notice that sites I wasn't really expecting anything from turn out quite good.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pussyfoot Girls

11. Pussyfoot Girls (0)

Pay
Active
65
nadiencendia (83) 08-25-10  02:19am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some very well known actresses, such as Cytherea, Katsumi
-Easy navigation, several search options
-Lots of bonus sites in the Filth Freaks network
-Acceptably sized archive (not huge, just big enough)
-Good price (PU discount), full access trial membership
Cons: -Not updating any more
-Video quality is quite low, even in the "high wmw" option
-Video scenes are splitted into 4-6 smaller videos, and there is no full scene download option
-All the content is taken from the (now extinct) Pussy Foot'n series
Bottom Line: If it wasn't for the 1$ trial membership, and considering the previous review by James4096, I never would have joined this site. But 1$ trial memberships are so tempting...

And the content of the site, as if could be guessed by its titled, is basically the scenes from the foot fetish series "Pussy Foot'n". Nothing more, and nothing less. Having watched most of those movies before, the site was quite dissapointing...

The cons are quite big, in fact: the quality of the videos is not great, there are no updates any more... The only thing that I really liked is the site navigation and search options: each scene is tagged, you can look for models by name, scene or chronologically... If it only had good content to go with that good site structure, it would be perfect.

When you join the site you also get access to quite a lot of other sites from the Filth Freaks network, for different niches and fetishes (big boobs, big butts, grannies...). However, none of those sites attracted me the slightest bit, and a lot of them aren't updating any more, just like Pussyfoot Girls.

All in all, my conclusion is similar to James's: this site is not really worth a whole month membership; maybe a trial suscription, to download the few scenes that are really hot, is enough for any foot fetishist. And for the rest, this site offers nothing of interest. The only really great thing about this site is its price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Foot Factory

12. Foot Factory (0)

Pay
Active
80
nadiencendia (83) 07-27-10  02:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Clean and efficient navigation
-All exclusive content
-Classy, artistic pictures and videos
-Acceptable archive size (+300 videos, +3000 picture sets)
-Beautiful models (including Valentina Vaughn, Justine Joli or Dita von Teese, for example)
-Full trial membership
-Pictures are downloadable in .zip format
Cons: -Mostly solo, softcore content
-Very irregular updates
-Somewhat dark in style and lighting
-Videos with music (I hate that)
-Not a wide choice of formats and qualities for video download
Bottom Line: So, following my quest for new and exciting foot fetish sites, I joined this site, which I knew mostly because they released a couple of videos as movies in Hotmovies.com. To join, I used a "trial membership" option that appears as an "easter egg" if you try to surf away from their Join page: for 2.95€, I got complete access to the site for three days. Great deal, I am really thankful after my extremely dissapointing experiences with other trial memberships recently.

As for the site itself, well, to enjoy it you have to know what you are going to get, and you have to like that kind of stuff: it's mainly artistic, classy, elegant, somewhat dark foot fetish solo/masturbation pictures and videos. It has an Andrew Blake ring to it, although without the BDSM.

Among the models who work(ed) for this site, you will find some of my personal favorites, such as Justine Joli or Valentina Vaughn, but also a lot of unknown actresses who are just ok. One thing that I hate is that most videos -not all- include a music soundtrack, which silences the moans and groans of the actresses. I really don't like that, it's a complete turn off for me...

On the technical side, the navigation is just good (you can only access the pics and videos in inverse chronological order, with no search options or categories) and the choice of video qualities and formats is minimal -inexistant for older sets. Another big "con" is the low rate of updates in this site: they come irregularly, mostly once every week, but sometimes every two weeks, or every three or four days...

All in all, I was dissapointed with the site, mainly because I am not that much into solo action, and because, although I can enjoy a softcore video once in a while, I prefer it not to be SO softcore. This site is clearly devoted to showing the beauty of the female body, and more precisely female feet, but I also expected it to show some hot f/f or even m/f action. Obviously Ed Fox is a great photographer and a talented artistic director, but it's just not exactly my taste.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Footsie Babes

13. Footsie Babes (0)

Pay
Active
82
nadiencendia (83) 07-23-10  02:55am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 07-23-10  02:56am  (Update History)
Reason: This is a new review, I don't know why it was catalogued as "expired review"...
Pros: -The archive is not huge, but big enough (248 scenes)
-Exclusive sets, mostly
-Gorgeus European models (including Sophie Moone, Blue Angel or Eve Angel)
-Excellent video quality and different download options
-Reasonable price: 19.95$ with the PU offer, and you also get this site in the 21st Sextury pack (which is probably the best option)
-Good artistic look in all the videos
-All-in-one zips for pictures
-Some variety in the type of sets: mostly solo and b/g sets, with some g/g
Cons: -Only 1 update a week
-No bonus content
-The style in the videos is elegant, but a little repetitive at times
-Some models do not look like they are enjoying themselves too much
Bottom Line: I was totally convinced that at some point I had made a review of this site, but apparently, I hadn't. So here I go. I was a member of this site some years ago, when it first opened and it worked as an individual site, and I am now a member again, thanks to the 21st Sextury pack offer. When it was just the one site, I remember that I used to get a little frustrated, because the updates were too slow (they used to "slice up" the sets through a whole week) and I didn't get any extra content. Now, with it being a part of this site-pack, it's easier to be patient and wait for the updates to come.

After visitting other few sites in this same niche, I think Footsie Babes is up there with Hot Legs and Feet and Foot Fetish Daily, as one of the top foot fetish sites available anywhere, probably in a close third place (HL&F being my absoluto favorite). It has classy and sexy models with beautiful feet, the quality of the videos is great, and the size of the archive is acceptable.

The bigger problem with this site, as with most 21st Sextury sites, is that it updates quite slowly (at least for my standards): just one update a week is not enough, and it can be really frustrating if you opt for a short membership and you don't like one or two of the last updates, for whatever reason.

And I have to say, that although it is difficult to say why, Footsiebabes tend to dissapoint me a little with their scenes. They have gorgeus models, they have good material, and yet, they tend not to hit the exact spot when dealing with foot worship, footjobs or foot fucking. I think the directors and editors should take a look at DDF and Kick Ass for inspiration on how to treat feet in a video, and also on how to set the appropriate mood for the scene... Anyway, I am well aware that this is just my personal taste, and other users may love the 21st Sextury way of doing foot fetish videos...

My bottom line, to sum up, is quite simple: I like this site, but I recommend getting access to it by getting the whole 21st Sextury pass, not as an individual site. If you are a foot fetish man like myself, you will enjoy it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exclusive Foot Fetish

14. Exclusive Foot Fetish (0)

Pay
Active
60
rayone (11) 07-17-10  02:35pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very amateur looking models (about 120 as of this writing) The pictures are of good quality (few sets at 1920x1320 resolution), most are just reposts of previous sets at lower resolution (about 80 sets with about 100-120 images per set at 1280x1024).
There is an archive section of image sets of about 40 models (between 10-50 images per set at lower resolution)
Cons: Navigation is simple.
No zips of the sets and the webmaster has gone through some pains to make sure that images can be downloaded one at a time (unless you know more than most folks about html and can download them in batch mode).
Very little in terms of updates. About 12 new models in more than a year, that averages out to less than 1 per month.
No movies or clips of any kind
Outrageously high price (29.95/month) for what is being offered. The site is probably worth more like 14.95
Bottom Line: Nice looking models which appear to be real amateur (girls who probably feel comfortable showing their feet but nothing else). However, the fact that most are willing to pose in their underwear makes it more "interesting". No Zipz for the image sets, No movies or clips, extremely high proce for such a low amount of content. If you enjoy beautiful looking girls and their lower extremities, you are 'much,much' better off subscribing to stes like noemisworld, feetjeans, These sites offer a lot of more content, better image quality at a much lower price.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Alta Heels

15. Alta Heels (0)

Pay
Active
61
nineinch (8) 06-20-10  08:19pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: hot leggy models
intimate situations
models talk to camera
Cons: Download limit disables your account. They should at least warn you that you are approaching limit.
Limited selection.
Model Tiffany removed and yet she is still shown on the front page (before joining)
Instead of consolidating sites to bring more content for less money, they decided to split off content to multiple sites.
No ZIP files for pics.
Bottom Line: If you are into intimate videos of leggy women, then this site has some better models.
On the other hand, they are taking a rip off the customer approach with download limits that shutdown customer accounts, and splitting up the content.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Foot Fetish Dreams

16. Foot Fetish Dreams (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
schlemihl (2) 04-12-10  03:56am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - tasteful stuff, videos and pictures
- good amount of stuff
- the "right" kinky viewing angles for nerds in pictures and videos
- mostly european-style, well-proportioned models
- site seems to update regularly
Cons: - videos not in HD, video-quality varies according to release date
- picture resolution varies, not state of the art of today
- picture-sets not as zip-files
- explicit download-limit of 3 GB per day
- defacto download-limit is clearly much less and lesser, you download 10 or 12 videos and your account gets disabled, account then has to get reanimated by sending email to webmaster, this game repeats every day
Bottom Line: Site has some good approach but needs to strain according to content quality and customer friendlyness.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

17. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
90
largeun (9) 08-03-09  07:45am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The dude below me gave the stats so I will concentrate on content, service and overall 'delivery of goods'.

Excellent quality and fast download speeds(4MBit) 1280x720
Multi formats
Decent sets
Nut burstingly horny babes
Good support (now)
Good camera work
Classy and pro presentation
Exclusive content
'Casting' shorts are a great addition
Stockings (about fukin time)
Cons: REGIONAL damn pricing
Not enough updates
Some 'movement' of content from other DDF sites and some recycled older low res quality, although both are not repeated content
Not enough ethnic babes
Too many solos and same 'format' dudes
Not enough location shoots although the shoots are classy
Older films are low res and many models not repeated again
Bottom Line: If you're into legs n shit, like I am, then this site is the leader in it's genre/field.
Stunning babes wearing hot gear in cool locations and emphasis being on feet and legs they do not disappoint.
The exclusive content is one of it's attractions. You will get the odd 'known' babe but the scenes are still exclusive.
I could do with more variety in terms of ethnic babes, guys who don't 'machine-gun' rump the babes as sometimes it's nice to 'see' the sex, maybe some better location shoots and re-introduction of babes from their back catalogue would be a winner.

The regional pricing stinks and I for one am really fukin sick of this shit. You can't call a 'small person' a midget any more unless you want your nuts torched and your house sold in compensation, but you can charge what the fuk you like when it comes to us in the UK.

I love this site but due to their slow updates and regional pricing it's not one I would stay a member of on a monthly and regular basis.

I also believe, much like other 'umbrella' sites, that there should be a discounted membership for those who want to sign up to all the DDF sites. It makes sense and keeps the variety and update aspect manageable.

Had it not been for the updates and regional pricing practices I would have thrown a few more points on the overall score. And until sites realise that we ARE their income streams and they stop treating us as if they are doing us favours then maybe the scores would grow and sites would establish a long and loyal paying customer base.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Legs and Feet

18. Hot Legs and Feet (0)

Pay
Active
84
nostromo (12) 07-03-09  08:18am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - as of today: pics come in 2000x 1331 or 1331x2000.
- Videos: Good looking 1280x720 4162kbps Wmv. Downloads in: Dvix; mpg; quicktime, and Wmv in hi resolution -as stated above- and in a nice 852x480 2000kbps. New videos weigh around 500-800 mb's.
- Due to their camerawork we get to watch female legs in rather pleasing perspectives, thus, enhancing their appeal.
-boy vs girls scenes of: Aneta keys with his boyfriend, i believe, a rather ugly guy, this one comes in 704x396 2500kbps ; Sophie Moon, this one comes in 704x528 2650kbps, what a treat is to watch this women in a b/g scene!
-The girls are not loud and are very skilled teasers. male talen't don't batter the women.
- Very good customer support, although they could even reply faster to e-mails.
- Vids of stunning women such as: Zuzana Drabinova; Veronica De Souza, two of them riveting on account of being recent, and therefore looking great; Ines Cudna, Verona aka veronica fasterova; Susana Spears; Maya, LEA TYRON, GOOGLE HER!
Cons: -Disgusting regional pricing. They apply double standards when it comes to billing their members. i took that into account when i scored the site.
- Videos prior to 2007 don't look good.
-Pictures and videos watermarked.
- Some of the models look downright bored. i assume that the notion of men aroused watching them rubbing their feet bores them stiff.
- they should revamp the quality of their older videos since the models are amazing.
-Downloads didn't come fast for me.
Bottom Line: - if you're a leg man or you like good looking women you can't miss this site. Barring their freaking regional-pricing practices the site is next to perfect.

-You can add to the above list of stunning models: Monica Sweetheart; Merylin Sekova; Silvia saint (three episodes); Simony Diamond in boy/girl scenes; Regina Ice; Peaches, Kathia Nobili and the list goes on.

-i'd like to add that there are a ton of girl/girl scenes.

- you can stream the vids.

- this is a pro i couldn't add above: to the best of my knowledge, there are no DL limits and i belive that you can use a DL manager if you so choose.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Eat My Feet

19. Eat My Feet (0)

Pay
Active
65
Lionheart (47) 06-16-09  11:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (37), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Great foot fetish movies
+ Excellent quality of pictures
+ Beautiful models
+Exclusive content
Cons: - Movies are broken down into parts. (3-6)
- Photo sets are not available in a zip option.
- Movies do not mention girls in the scene.
- Unsure when next update will happen.
- Poor editing.
- Lack of constancy in movies and overall in website. (See Review)
- Poor--decent quality of movies
- Not a lot of content
Bottom Line: I have seen the content of FM-concepts for awhile, I had never purchased any of their DVDs or movies from their website but their movies always seemed like great foot fetish movies. After joining this site, I can say I am very disappointed with the overall presentation of the site.

The good things the site does well are the the movies and the pictures. The movie content is great, the girls do a great job the foot fetish content and the scenes vary in different locations and with a few different themes(Bondage,"Amateur") to keep the movies interesting; Also all the girls that have been casted are all very beautiful. The pictures are of great quality models names are listed in the photo sets, my huge complaint is that there is no zip option making the task of getting the whole set feel like a chore.

The site does more things wrong the right unfortunately. The movies set up is very poor, there are no names of the actresses or the name of the movie in which the scene is from. Which makes the task of finding out the names of the girls almost impossible if you do not recognize them. The photo sets name the girls, why don't the movies?

The scenes are broken down into smaller clips, but is very inconstant with the way they do it. Some scenes have 3 or 6 clips. In the first 3 clips one girl will worship the other girls feet, and in the next 3 clips the girls will switch roles. The problem here is that some scenes only have 3 clips so you never get to see the other half of the clip. Why did they not include the other half of the scene?

The editing is really poor in the site as well, based on the movies that I have seen most have a "story" going on. Two girls studying see a each others feet and go at it. The way the editing is done ignores the whole "story". The girl will be in the middle of saying something then, cut end of scene. Very often the girls will be in one position then when the clip ends and the next starts they will be a total different position.

The website design the very plain, the movies are are just thrown into a page, and the site has about 65 pages. Not that impressive when you see that each page 9 movies on them. Also the when you go to the photo set the site gives you about 8 pictures per page, which is about 5-8 pages per photo set.

I really wanted this site to be great, I love foot fetish content and really hoped this site could deliver. I am fine with the movies and the photo sets i got from the site, but the lack of effort from the web designers is really holding the website back. Check out this site if you want, just do not have high expectations. It feels like the site owners just threw a bunch of content together and made a website.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Leg Sex

20. Leg Sex (0)

Pay
Active
81
cucuta (6) 05-24-09  05:28pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A good sized archive of pictures. Probably 400-700 models
- A large variety of model types from every category (young/old, vanilla/ethinic, skinny/voluptous etc.
- picture sets are sorted by either model or by "specialty sets" including peeping Tom, Socks, Panty pudding, undercurrent, hose beast etc.
- There is a real paper and ink magazine (remember those) that goes with the site and you can also navigate that way.
- Models go from good to excellent
- Content also has a large variety including sets featuring generic stripping, toys, and boy/girl, girl/girl scenerios.
- There are sets with slow peeling of clothes and many photos in various stages of undress.
- Well maintained site - includes forum, frequent updates, what's new, etc.
Videos are presented by model or directly in video window. There are both short and long videos and most can be either downloaded or viewed streaming.
- Got in on the 19.95 special
-Picutres are avaiable in medium or large size (800 vs 1600)
Cons: - Picture quality was not always up to current standards. Many pictures are small and washed out looking.
- Also many pictures look highly air brushed. Others have white clothes on white background which lose definition.
- Many models have only a single 20 picture photo set. Others have only a single 60 picture photo set. Very few have more than one or two photo sets, so when you find a model you really like you don't have the quantity of her to go after.

-Pictures appear out of sequence. The girl many strip down and the next ten photos have her with here clothes on again.

- I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights/
Bottom Line: I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights and came away a bit disappointed. I am a photo guy not a video guy and about half the pictures are too old and washed out to be useful. The most recent content is much better and there are about 5 or 6 models that hit it right on the nail - Extravagant lingerie or tight clothing, slow stripping, nice posing in clothes and out.

My bottom line is I think in this age of specialization, this sight is too broad based. Are they a lingerie/glamour sight? Are they a foot fetish sight? (What is a leg fetish anyway)
Are they a standard photo sight? Are they a pantyhose sight?

I don't want to trash LEGSEX because I got some really good photos out of it - just not enough.
For example I am just about done with my membership and I have downloaded 403 pictures from LEGSEX. I went to my Only Tease directory and the total from there was 1,919.

I think it is worth the discounted price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Leg Sex

21. Leg Sex (0)

Pay
Active
65
TrashMan (Disabled) 03-05-09  12:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: +ZIP downloads of both 800 and 1600px versions of the galleries offered
+A lot of models
+Star directory with headshots
+There is a model search but it is only accessed on the model directory page
+They have all the picture sets categorized by model, yes, but they also categorize them by magazine issue, going all the way back to their 2001 series.
+Good mix of American and Non-American models
+All updates are archived back to 2004, retaining their addition date (however that date is not displayed on the actual page for the update)
+A little fun addition - feet around the office. A few feet pics every couple of days. This is a leg/feet site.
+Downloads work with download managers
Cons: -A good portion of the galleries are small...very small
-All images watermarked
-All videos watermarked
-Because LegSex has been around for a while (in magazine form, not so much for the website) they feature girls before their prime, and as such the girls use very old aliases (or other unknown ones). Maxxx=Brooke Stone, Scotti Andrews=Clare, Sheila Rossi=Tina.
-Most models are one-and-done, meaning only one update.
-They have movies, but they are so hard to find. You click the section titled "Move it!". Nope, its not called "videos" or "movies"..."Move it!"
-Downloads have generic file names (scene.wmv, 1600.zip)
-Videos offered only in WMV
-Solo content outnumbers hardcore content by a wide margin
-Update schedule stinks...2-3 updates per week, most are just image updates, not many video updates
-The tour page looks better than the actual members page.
Bottom Line: Just another porn site...put it that way. Not enough is offered to put it in the same league as DDF Productions' HotLegsAndFeet.

There are some old models on here who I certainly like and were looking for (Sheila aka Tina, Brooke aka Maxxx, Scotti aka Clare, etc.) but the site does not offer much OF THEM. It is one gallery here, one gallery there...and all the galleries are 20 pictures, standard. I think the pictorals are more, but there aren't many pictorals...most galleries are just the pics which were featured in their magazine, in other words, 20 pictures :P.

It says a lot when the TOUR page looks better than the MEMBERS page. The TOUR model directory looks so much better than the MEMBERS model directory.

It also is a pain in the neck that everything is so hard to find. I spend quite some time looking for the movies, briefly going so far as just assuming there were none. Everything is not named properly...Videos section is called "Move it", pictorals are called "Pic-toe-rals". Quit the fancy and just stick with what works.

If you want a Legs and Feet site, stick with HotLegsAndFeet from DDF Productions...its a hell of a lot better.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pussyfoot Girls

22. Pussyfoot Girls (0)

Pay
Active
69
james4096 (126) 03-02-09  11:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Easy to find scene. All on one page with actress name and thumbnail
- Part of a large network with diverse content.
- Video downloads available in 2 sizes of wmv and also in mpg
- Decent sized library and few repeats of models
- Non distracting and clean design (with the exception of the ads on the right)
Cons: - Below average video quality(400 x 300, 1Kbps)
- Photos are just screen caps and poor quality.
- Not exactly exclusive content
- Site not updated as advertised
- Does not offer full scene download, videos are split into about 5 parts.
Bottom Line: Pussy Foot Girls is a site offering videos of girl-on-girl scenes that focus somewhat on feet.
A typical scene shows two female professional porn stars involved in foreplay and foot-licking and then pussy licking and using toys on each other. Again these movies are all lesbian, no dicks.
All of the content seems to be ripped from the DVD series "Pussy Foot'n" and does not seem to be updated anymore.

There are 83 videos that are usually 30 minutes or less featuring known actress such as Richelle Ryan, Flower Tucci, Kinzie Kenner, and Jessica Darlin. Each scene is split into 5 minute pieces and has 1 page of screen caps. The quality of the movies is definitely not DVD quality but not terrible.

Joining the site gets you access to the Filth Freak network of sites which has similar styled sites focused on different niches like Latin, Asian, milf, Black, butts, shemale, etc.

If you like feet and lez scenes or just the Pussy Foot'n series and are looking to join a diverse network this might be worth checking out for $29.97. However if you are a true foot fetishist, then skip this site. It is for the casual foot fan and only has a minor focus on feet. There are better networks out there anyway.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exquisite Feet

23. Exquisite Feet (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
Mike1056 (1) 12-10-08  02:51am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of content
SOME zip files
Good price (I'd only get the trial membership,
though)
Cons: Content is horrible
only some of the content (the newer stuff) is
zipped
As though a pornstar didn't take her site
seriously
Videos aren't very good
Bottom Line: There are sites that I come back to every so often (depending on how regularly they update) just to get the updates. This won't be one of them. Before I go any further with my review, there's something you should know: I only have a slight foot fetish. I don't really get into the shoes or stockings or anything. Not into trampling, crushing...just bare feet. I'm also getting REALLY into the photography sites. I love the quality of images you'll find at sites like Just-Nude.com, Domai.com or Met-Art.com Even with them not really trying to pose seductively, the quality of the images alone is enough! That said, I have a Nikon Coolpix L16 Digital Camera that I bought at Wal-Mart for $100 this past summer, and the quality of pics I get from that far surpasses many of the pics from exquisite feet. A lot of them are blurry and some of the sets have only a few (as in less than 20 and even less than 10!) pics in them. Only about half of them are zipped leaving me to have to click/save each individual pic on the rest of the site. I had to put my username and password in the download manager to download the zips and videos they do have. The videos are not really all that great, and it seems to be one part foot fetish, one part bdsm. That's awesome if you like BDSM and have a foot fetish, but again, the quality suffers. I would advise you to stay away from this site, but if you're curious enough to get it, please, please, please, please, please do yourself a favor and just get the 3 day trial membership. I got it all downloaded in three days and there's really no reason you couldn't either. Just make sure it's 3 days when you're going to have time to actually work at it because it's going to take some work! It's sad that a pornstar didn't take her site any more seriously than this. My rating is 60. If I were to go to another Foot Fetish site, it would be Cute Girl Feet. For $35/month, you also get access to 30 other sites including BFT Girls (Barefoot Teen Girls) and Teen Foot Club. The quality is there!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Golden Feet

24. Golden Feet (0)

Pay
Active
79
mr smut (42) 12-07-08  04:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + exclusive and unique fetish content (see text)
+ Sarah is one gorgeous mature amateur
+ over 4 years of content or >340 picture series and 33 videos
+ regular updates on Sunday
+ ZIP files for the newest sets
Cons: - some navigational issues
- video quality could be better though it is improving
- older picture sets contain large and disturbing watermarks
Bottom Line: Lady Sarah is a very gorgeous woman being +50 and she is into several fetishs like foot fetish, foot jobs, nipple play, bj, g/g and b/g including dildo penetration, multiple strange insertions (like rhubarb or asparagus) intimate piercings, watersports (watch her pee and you will know how much), enema, role play etc.

The picture sets are unique and often shot in exclusive locations. Some sets have been shot in a whorehouse, a swinger club, her private playroom, on beaches, in her Finca in Spain, hotel rooms etc. Sarah will always wear exclusive lingerie or elegant dresses and matching heels. She often appears together with some of her friends or admirers.

Image sizes vary over time. The oldest sets from 2004 have a very low resolution but newer sets have 1,024 pixel on the long side for portray and 1,300 pixels for landscape orientation. The new videos are 640x480 wide and have an acceptable quality (keep in mind that this is an amateur site).

The site's design itself is plain and the navigation bar behaves strange when you use Firefox as your favourite browser. Galleries open in a new tab with a list of thumbnails in a frame on the bottom of this tab and the picture in a larger frame above.

I'm happy to see that the watermarks are now of relative normal size and that ZIP files are available for newer sets. This is something I asked the webmaster to do because I think it's a must nowadays.

For anyone heavily interested in foot-fetish or general fetish stuff as written above this site is really worth a try. I joined this site for the 5th or 6th time just to be able to write this review and I'm happy to see that the site gets better with time.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Buy My Socks

25. Buy My Socks (0)

Pay
Newbie
92*
feetman09 (0) 10-25-08  03:04pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -High definition videos!! The new videos are especially awesome because you see every hair, sock lint, polish in HD... and the feet do look really stinky! Lots of closeups of the feet, which I really love

-The models: All are girl next door types... they seem really nice and really into what they do which I think is important.

-Huge amount of content in the members area... the site has been around for like 8 years or something... there is just a ton of content to look at it and browse through, definitely worth the money.

-I ordered socks from the model Eden. Wow, talk about exactly what was advertised! They were really communicative and prompt with the order... so awesome!
Cons: Well, it seems that I am so highly praising the site... but there is one or two things that I wish was a bit better...

- there is so much content that sometimes I wish there was a better way of grouping to find what I like... maybe with keywords search or something...

-Some of the models haven't had updates for a while, but at least the site has been adding new models pretty frequently...
Bottom Line: If you are into stinky feet, POV, sessions, domination etc. this site is definitely for you. The picture sets are awesome with great angles, and the video clips are creative and high quality. There is a ton of content, and the girls are cute too! I have been a member for 5 months, and I am happy with the site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 42 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.14 seconds.