Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-46 of 46 Page :    < Previous Page

Visit Mad Sex Party

26. Mad Sex Party (0)

Pay
Active
78
elephant (65) 08-12-07  05:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: Some very attractive European Girls which is always a plus with me and in orgies and look to be having a fun time indeed.
Cons: Right here we go, very frustrating site indeed, the girls seem to keep their clothes on a lot and just move their panties to a side, why I'll never know, very strange practice and just makes the vids a little boring , I want to see a room full of naked girls getting fu**ed, but just not as good when you hardly see much pussy. Its very obsessed with blow jobs which certainly isn't what I want to see.
Bottom Line: The idea for the site is fantastic, love seeing loads of girls together and wish there was loads of orgy sites on the net, sadly there isn't, so this concept is great. Just needs to get the girls completly naked and have more all girl parties with loads of great sex we can see.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit College Fuck Parties

27. College Fuck Parties (0)

Pay
Active
78
TheSquirrel (53) 05-17-12  01:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Big $15 discount joining through TBP/PU.

No DRM, download restrictions, pre checked cross selling, or dirty tricks.

No regional discrimination.

Join through reputable billing agent (Epoch).

Genuine network, each site has its own identity.

Streaming available.

Original content that is individual and a little outside the usual cookie cutter mass produced porn.
Cons: Little ethnic or size diversity.

Awful photography, camerawork, and lighting.

Videos are so unbelievably long they have to be cut up into 4-6 (sometimes more) 25 minutes or longer segments. That would be okay if it was action all the way, but it is most definitely not. It could simply be edited down to one 30 minute clip. If they did that, they wouldn't get to say they had 398 scenes instead of 80.

When the cameraman finally does focus on someone having sex, it is far too often in gynaeclogical closeups where all you see is two groins. Not only that, there is an inability to keep the camera still.

There is only one download option for WindowsXP and Vista, and one download option for the pics.

Customer sevice was awful. As reported in a forum post, I was locked out of the site for a while due to possible hacking of the membership password. I received no answer to four emails sent over 24 hours asking why, and was only reinstated after Epoch intervened.
Bottom Line: Videos 1024x576 and 768x576
Pics 768x1152 768x1024 768x1039 1066x1600

There are supposed to be various mobile formats available. I don't use them but the following are listed - ipad/ipad2, iphone4, iphone3/ipod, Android.

This is a clone of Student Sex Parties available through Chicki Porn, the difference being you get extra sites through WTF and a $15 discount from joining through TBP/PU.

I found streaming facilities to be reasonable. Here in the UK streaming in the afternoon is often very difficult.

Models are mostly all the same type, namely young and thin. If you are looking for ethnic, size, or age diversity, you'll be out of luck.

Navigation is a little irritating. If you go to "view all scenes from College Fuck Parties," then click on several clips from the same video, there is no way back to the College Fuck Parties home page, without going back to the WTF Pass home page, then clicking on College Fuck Parties. You have to click several back buttons until you get back, or go to WTF Sites. In fact WTF Sites is better than the rather poorly laid out WTF home page.

It's a shame some great models are thrown away due to awful amateur camerawork and photography. You would think being a porn cameraman isn't that hard. It doesn't have to be spot on perfect, as they aren't working for the likes of Terrence Malick, Stanley Kubrick, or Jean Renoir, and never will, mainly because two of them are dead. All you have to do is point the camera in the general direction of the couple, or couples having sex. That's it, that's the job.

Maybe they are trying to make it look like a home movie, but realistically we all know these are professional porn stars. It's a shame because the performers are really good looking, and there is genuine group sex action. I just get the feeling the bits the cameraman has missed out while focussing on the floor, wall, ceiling, or shoes, are all the best bits. Thirty minutes of action with two hours padding, then the cameraman misses all the best bits, or the lighting is so bad, you have to squint to see what is going on.

Lighting seems to be one of the problems across the whole WTF network. For instance there is a video and photo set of one beautiful girl taken outside, where the sun's shadow across railings completely ruins the whole thing. It was like some 9 year old's first video or photo attempt.

The non porn bits take up hours of time. Then finally finally something happens, they are getting their kit off and it's time to wake up. Just as they are about to have sex, for some inexplicable reason the cameraman moves on to show the floor. Very video verite. If there are two or three couples indulging in group sex, the cameraman doesn't know where to go, so focuses on the wall instead, or on another couple who aren't doing anything.

To give you an idea of the padding and rubbish bits, you could watch three episodes of CSI (minus the adverts) in the time it takes to watch all the rubbish. Or to put it another way, think of the padding as the CSI episodes, and the adverts as the quality bits. That's how frustrating and annoying the episodes are.

As a bystander and observer my immediate feelings are to shout at the cameraman "oi you, there are people having sex over there...yes over there....NO, over THERE you fecking idiot, not here!"

Two people having sex, no that's not very interesting, let's have a look at the floor. Even when there is only one couple having sex and nothing else going on, the cameraman cannot keep the camera still, it is beyond his ability. He HAS to move it, he cannot keep his camera pointed in the general direction of two people having sex for more then two seconds. Two seconds, that's it, moving on, nothing to see here, must be something more interesting over there, if not, move camera to side, up and down, jump up and down, or tip diagonally, then back again.

The score of 78 is for basically remembering to remove the lens cap, and for pointing the camera in the right direction some of the time, and for the models.

Every network has its idiosyncracies. One of the annoying ones here is that for some reason the male performers continually pummel and pull the pussies of their female performers as though they were unblocking a sink. Are we supposed to think this is what female partners really find sexy? Only if you're 14, and at that age you're supposed to be too young to view this sort of thing.

Some of the orgies inside are badly lit, but even those on the outside quite often get it wrong. Many times dark shadows across the pics spoil the view. That's okay if you're Ridley Scott.

It's worth a membership for one month, due to the reasonably original, non massed produced material, and for the beautiful, newish porn models. It could have been so so much better.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit College Fuck Fest

28. College Fuck Fest (0)

Pay
Active
76
apoctom (145) 07-02-07  08:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Plenty of content: Currently there are 50 movies of college parties, each around 50 minutes long.
- Membership gets access to entire Perv Network of 20+ sites.
- College party vids are actually hardcore and explicit, not just flashing boobs and drunk girls.
- Exclusively shot video: It appears to be unique and exclusive.
- Lots of download options, which you may need since download managers don't work. (See below.)
Cons: - Not really college chicks: the parties all feature pornstars who pretend to be college chicks and who fuck the CFF guys. They are surrounded by "college guys," but none of them get in on the action.
- Price: membership is at the higher end of porn subscriptions and I don't think that the value is there for pornstars posing as college girls.
- No download manager support: these movies are long and file sizes are over 400MB for high quality. It needs download manager support.
Bottom Line: I would argue that there is a bit of false advertising here. These parties feature pornstars instead of real college chicks. But, the action is nice and fun to watch in an amateur-holding-a-Handicam sort of way. For the price, though, I won't be keeping my membership.

Update: I bumped up the score for CFF because it does contain unique and original content. The false advertising is nowhere near as bad as some sites that claim exclusive content but contain only DVD rips.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Strip Club Exposed

29. Strip Club Exposed (0)

Pay
Active
76
apoctom (145) 07-21-07  09:28am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of hot pornstars featured on this site, including Shy Love and Sharon Wild
- Exclusive videos with a "strip club audition" theme
- Most models have an audition dance and then a "club owner" sex scene.
- Scenes can be downloaded in one big clip or in parts
- No DRM
- Pic galleries available for most scenes
- Good download speeds (about 800 kbit/sec)
Cons: - No updates: site stopped updating prior to January 2007
- Only about 40 unique scenes. All of the scenes are uploaded in clips and then uploaded again as a complete scene, so I only count unique scenes (each girl typically has 2 scenes)
- Pic galleries do not have zip file option
- Tons of ads on the member page
- Videos are very grainy. Perhaps this was to give it an amateur appearance, but it can be distracting
Bottom Line: All in all, this is not a bad site. The setup is unique for a website: videotape strip club auditions. However, since the site features only pornstars, you can't really believe that the premise is real.

Given that, I wish that they had used a better camera during filming. First, filming inside of a strip club (low lighting, lots of background music, etc.) makes for some difficult to watch videos. On top of that, the video is very grainy and blurry. While not a huge negative, it takes away from the scenes.

The worst problem is the lack of updates. Unfortunately, the site stopped updating after about 40 scenes. There are no dates on the updates, but the network updates listing doesn't show any updates for this site since before January 2007. As with many other PervNetwork sites, it was just abandoned.

I would not recommend this site alone. However, given its inclusion with the PervNetwork, it might be a good enough value to justify. The content is definitely unique.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Drunk Sex Orgy

30. Drunk Sex Orgy (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 02-14-10  08:06am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill, but no regional pricing.
-Part of network of 17 sites. Most have a similar theme of group sex and some are about a few other fetishes.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download limits or restrictions.
-Three download choices. You can select small size AVI files of about 200MB, medium quality WMV files also about 200MB, or HD 1280x720 500kbps WMV files that are very sharp, but are about 600MB.
-Many attractive, very nicely dressed Czech women.
Cons: -Somewhat slow downloads, about 500 kbps.
-Long videos can be seen as a plus, but there are a lot of parts with wasted time, little or no action, or unerotic videography.
Bottom Line: This site features continuous sex orgy scenes scenes in clubs. You rarely see any actual drinking though. The participants hold glasses, fill them, and pour champaign onto each other. They don't appear to be drunk. The site says the participants are pornstars that mostly do this for the fun of it as they are paid very little. To me it seemed mechanical sex and not very spontaneous. The alcohol did not appear to be a help in loosening up the models.

What you do get is a lot of sex between men and women as well as lesbian sex. The sex is mostly oral and vaginal.

I found the orgy scenes to be a bit unfocused. The camera pans to a couple engaged in some sex act that you didn't see begin and rarely see end. Participants often switch partners, but usually offscreen. The feel is one of getting samples and can be compared to watching trailers. You see action, but you don't get the buildup in intensity that comes from focusing on one scene and just one scene. There is no feeling of progression from lust, to passion, to sex, to finishing. Since the scenes are rather long, most continue into another clip. It is not always easy to find which clips finish the scene that you are watching.

If you like this kind of action, this site is rather large with almost 300 videos in an archive that goes back to 2004.

A big size site, with a large photoset for each video, nice HD quality videos, but for me, it doesn't get an enthusiastic endorsement as to its eroticism.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Mad Sex Party

31. Mad Sex Party (0)

Pay
Active
75
exotics4me (463) 09-24-07  01:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Another of the sites in the Orgy Max network, of fetish sites.
- Movies are 640 on high end and 1400+ speed
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped
- Very believable content, true amateur feel to it
- Getting better speeds on this one than the others, almost 1400 kb/s on a 10 M connection
Cons: - Hey, I saw that guy on the other sites! Same men from their other sites are on this one too.
- Price is a major issue with this network and even as standalone sites, this is a cheaper one by itself, but it will still set you back 30+ in dollars
- Sets are very similar, kind of a "Seen one, seen them all" feel.
- Have no idea what they are saying, not even for sure what language they are speaking. I speak and understand English, Spanish, Portugese and Italian, but have no clue on here!
Bottom Line: I had forgot to review this network and its sites, so I will do this one too since it is one of the more popular sites in the network.

The basis, bunch of guys go to a college party or just a party with nothing but women. Give them women beer until they get naked and have a big orgy. Sounds just like college in the USA! We've been doing this stuff for years here.

One thing I want to add here is that I do like that the men in these videos do not push these women around or try to force them to swallow. They hug the women after having sex with them. They seem to be very geniune and fun-loving men, though I would think so, getting sex from 5 college women per night will make you fun-loving.

This one is a little more organized than Party Hardcore, but I'm now wondering if that is a good thing. This site's sex seems very planned. The girls though do look like that it up to them whether they have sex or not. Some of the sex is very mechanical, which I think is with the paid women. Other parts is very wild. You will see this plain average girl suddenly jump on one of the guys and give him the riding of the century! Which is where the believability of the site comes into play.

Still, unless you love a good drunk room full of girls, I can't recommend it for the price. You actually get pissed at the guys in it for not picking the one really hot woman you notice. It is probably no different than any other orgy site, except the high price. Good content, but not this high.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Student Sex Parties

32. Student Sex Parties (0)

Pay
Active
75
pat362 (371) 12-31-10  10:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-There is a strong emphasis in making the viewer believe that these are regular people having a party that turns into a kind of orgy.
-They have over 50 parties.
-Parties are broken in section because content is over 2hrs long and some over 3hrs.
-All videos come in AVi format with at least standard resolution. Newer videos also include Hi-Def.
-Half of the parties have photosets that can be viewed online or dowloaded in a single zip file.
-The videos are all shot in a wide variety of locations from outside to inside different rooms and apartments.
Cons: -Upadtes aren't dated so no way of knowing if there is a schedule. They only way I can tell is by looking at the dates of the comments. The older videos are at least 2 yrs old.
-The videos are all over 2hrs long and part of that is taken up with the performers appearing to party with drinking, smoking and talking.
-Dialogue is all in Russian.
-Because the videos are shot in a non studio environment then lighting is a problem. many of the scenes can sometime be a little too dark.
-The problem with shooting orgies is that since there are so many perfomrers on screen having sex then the camera cannot always linger in one place of has to shoot from further away to capture most of the action.
-Many of the girls have the same name so you get such and such name with a number,
Bottom Line: -I've never been a fan of orgies because the camera can never stay in one place for very long because otherwise you can't see the rest of the action. The other problem is that only long shots allow you to see all the action and then you miss most of it because there's just too much happening on screen.

-If they had just made a kind of party where the girls pick a certain activity and the boys to go with it then we would have had only one scene at a time.

-The location are also a problem. Shooting porn outside is more often a miss rather than a hit. The sun, wind, unexpected outside noises and so forth detract the attention. Shooting insed helps but shooting an orgy means that lighting can only be placed in certain area or it can be seen during the video.

-This site is probably best for people that love any and all things related to orgies and can overlook the problems inherant in tshooting them.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Student Sex Parties

33. Student Sex Parties (0)

Pay
Active
74
slutty (111) 12-04-10  11:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -attractive ladies
-interesting group content
-decent bonus material
-navigation is pretty good, they have a model index, rating system, and member comments
-no DRM
-video quality is good (mpeg-4).
-zip downloads of photosets
-download managers worked for me
-exclusive content as far as I can tell
Cons: -price is a bit high
-scenes are excessively long and large
-download speeds are inconsitent, sometimes poor
-in-browser video player is glitchy
-not a huge site 178 girls in 52 parties
-videos are broken up into pieces, although as one file they would be enormous.
-advertisements on home page
Bottom Line: This site has decent, unique content, however like some other sites from this company it can be a bit hard to get at. The files sizes are very large, and many parts of some of the scenes are just background and chit-chat. It is very necessary with this site to preview the material before downloading the content, as I have several times downloaded scenes with little to no nudity in them at all, let alone sex.

I think if you have the time and the harddrive space this site is a pretty good site for group sex action with euro ladies. However, I gave the site some demerits for the fact that it takes so long to find material you want to download and to download it.

There are definitely some attractive ladies here, and the video quality is generally good - although the camerawork can get a bit iffy at times.

Considering the bonus content available at the time I joined, this site may be worth considering if you are into group sex with euro ladies, however expect to spend a lot of time sorting through what you want to download - and expect to immediately delete some of the content you do. I'm all for having fun and drinking, however I don't think I need a 50 minute clip of some folks boozing, smoking and chatting. If only they had some better editing and made it easier to get at their material I would recommend this site more highly.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit College Fuck Fest

34. College Fuck Fest (0)

Pay
Active
72
BabyGetReal (32) 06-19-10  08:40pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Unlike most of the AllElitePass sites, this one is being updated regularly, once or twice a month.

- A Bargain: My one month subscription cost only $9.95, and had full bonus access to the 90-some other sites at allelitepass.
- Seeing the amazed faces of real college students watching a couple (of porn actors) have sex in the same room is fun.
- Occasional videos with chemistry, arousal, attractive young couples and female orgasms.
- There are about 100 videos (most low to very low resolution).

See my review of AllElitePass for more Pros.
Cons: You are joining allelitepass.com. Some PU members have been billed inappropriately by this company, but I had no problems. See my review of AllElitePass for more Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
- Most of the content is older and very low resolution.
- At one point in time, the resolution gets much better, but it is worse
again in later videos.
- Most of the sex scenes have no chemistry, no fun, no arousal, no female orgasms, and end with the guy jacking off in the girl's face (which I find counter-erotic and dumb).
- The titles and descriptions tell you nothing useful.
- All videos download with the same generic filename so you must rename every download.
- Party numbers are mostly not listed on the site, just titles and dates.
- Still photos are generally unexciting.
Bottom Line: I had subscribed to CollegeFuckFest (CFF) in March, 2009, and enjoyed some of the videos, so I re-subscribed in May, 2010 to see the updates. It was worthwhile this time because of the allelitepass bonus sites, but I probably won't do this again. Although CFF has real updates about twice a month, many of the bonus sites had very limited content (a dozen or two videos per site) and had no updates since 2008. However, I had not explored these thoroughly in 2009, and this time I did, discovering some unexpected gems (see AllElitePass for those).

About half of each video shows a noisy college party, with some hot and some not so hot college girls dancing to loud music, and rarely some boob flashes. The other half shows a couple having sex.
They pretend this is a couple of students attending the party, but the pretense is quite thin. The couple is often older than college
age, sometimes with lots of tattoos and piercings, and these are clearly porn pros. Often some or all of the sex is on a couch in a room full of beer-drinking college students watching the fun. Seeing their amazed faces is fun. I don't think they ever show ordinary college students at the party having sex, or at most they pan quickly past a couple making out, mostly clothed, in a dark corner. Sometimes the couple having sex is in a bedroom or bathroom, but usually with several guys watching, sometimes a girl or two also. In one of the early videos, you can see large signs posted here and there warning that the party is being videoed, and that if you don't want to be seen on an adult website, you should leave.

Most of these sex scenes are pretty standard stuff with no chemistry, no fun, no laughing, no arousal, and the women don't orgasm. These typically end with the guy jacking off in a facial, which I find counter-erotic and dumb. There are a few exceptions, which are what might make the site worth a one-month subscription (if your taste agrees with mine; see my profile). Also, there are a few gems among the bonus sites (see AllElitePass for details).

CFF#91 New Years' Group Sex Party (April 2009): 3 couples go at it in the same room. One woman with very short hair orgasms hard over and over. Lo-res.

CFF#89 New Years' Party 2009 (March 2009): Two couples go at it in the same room. One of the women orgasms hard many times. Lo-res.

CFF#45 Valley Frat Fucks Part 2 (October 2008): Skinny attractive brunette (I've seen her on many other sites) fucks a nice looking guy. She orgasms to oral. A hot blonde watches and touches a bit. Decent resolution (700 x 400).

CFF#26 Jello Party (June 2008): The jello wrestling is fun. At the end, a pretty blonde with some personality but fake boobs gets into
the sex and has a couple of nice orgasms. Lo-res.

CFF#25 Holly Weird (May 2008): A young attractive couple, seemingly new to the business and so with a little personality and arousal going for them, enjoys sex in a garage. Lo-res.

Out of room here. Continued in a "Reply".
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Spring Break Fuck Adventures

35. Spring Break Fuck Adventures (0)

Pay
Active
70
cblodg (9) 09-14-07  06:04pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of vids
- Some hot girls
- multiple download choices
Cons: - Too many video download options/ videos broken up.
- not entirely sure these situations are real. An example: The one with the guy picking up a girl to "tutor her." He clearly starts doing things that should lead this girl to realize learning is not on his mind. she even states that she is in a relationship, yet continues on. Though the action was hot, just doesn't seem real.
- poor nav
- not easy to tell what is an update
- way more expensive than it should be
Bottom Line: It's a good site, but needs some fixing up. The action, for the most part, is hot and so are the girls.

The cost is high, but for the content you get...
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wild Time Girls

36. Wild Time Girls (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
richard (3) 05-22-07  03:45pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Good content on so video clips
Good quality photos
Updated weekly (give or take a day)
Links to other good sites
Cons: Not exclusive videos (have found some on other sites)
No longer seem to be updating videos
Video clips could be longer (max 5 minutes)
Bottom Line: Not too bad, but seem to be only updating photos these days, and they are not exclusive to this site. If you go to the first couple of dozen updates, you got good quality video clips and photos. Later on, these clips are replaced by photos only, which is a shame, as the site was starting to look good. Also found that some of there 'latest' photo collections were in fact taken in 2003 (I have the original video clip from another site).
On the up side, the other sites linked to this site are well worth spending some time at.
Overall, they made a great start to the site, but have started to drop off lately. Worth a look for the first 20 or so updates, and the other sites are a bonus.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dream Girls Members

37. Dream Girls Members (0)

Pay
Active
66
elephant (65) 08-27-07  07:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Ideas of flashers I like and wild parties
bonus sites
Cons: The quality of the vids is rather poor
Slow site I found downloading
Tends to be made up of feed sites that have vids thats can't be downloaded.
Navigation is very basic as is the site and bonus sites in general
Bottom Line: Not worthy of a decent mark here, poor quality vids in lots of segments is tiresome to download. Wouldn't waste money on full membership, try the trial if you want to see some average quality vids. Theres is some ok stuff, just hard to find I found.

Overall seen much better, needs alot of work and better quality vids in more organized categories.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Extreme CFNM

38. Extreme CFNM (0)

Pay
Active
65
Getreal (Disabled) 10-10-07  12:34pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site is more like a CFNM reality site with lots of pics and videos and exclusive content.
Cons: Though it has a lot of exclusive content it is low quality and tends to be difficult to navigate. The pictures are fuzzy screen caps and the videos are small Quicktime.
Bottom Line: This site needs a lot of work.
I would not recommend this site there are better CFNM site out there for the same money.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Party Wild Naked

39. Party Wild Naked (0)

Pay
Active
65
mbaya (356) 05-27-09  07:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted join price. See below.
-Part of network of 21 sites. However, only 3 or 4 are worth checking out.
-162 videos, 720x480, 2139kbps, averaging about 20 minutes.
-Can download segments as well as whole video. WMV is the only option.
-162 photo sets.
-Genuine amateurs, so attractiveness varies. Very much look like girls you could know.
Cons: -Videos are very grainy and blurry. I would guess that the originals were shot as low resolution and poor quality, despite being upgraded later.
-Download limit of 12 hours of content, which is less than 4GB. If you go over the limit, you get banned for 6 hours.
-No streaming option for videos.
-No update schedule. The videos are not dated. I saw a review from 2007 that had only 2 fewer videos, so I think it is no longer updating.
-None of my download managers worked.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable. Horrible quality screenshots that are 150x100.
Bottom Line: If you go to the webpage you can get an idea of what the site is like. If you x to navigate away, you get an offer of half price, $14.95 per month.

The site consists of content that is very similar to the dreamgirls dvd series that now has over 500 titles and has been around since 1995. The similarity is so strong that I suspect that this material is from those videos. However, this site appears not to be updating.

The videos consist of scenes from Mardi Gras in New Orleans, Fantasy Fest, spring break t shirt contests in Key West, and dancing in clubs. The girls are quite natural looking amateurs, with many being quite attractive.

As you would expect with amateurs, you never know how far they will go in exposing themselves. Some go only topless, some completely nude. Occasionally you get a few seconds of lesbian sex or cock sucking, but that is rather rare and not what the site is about.

If you can get into basically just flashing, you will like the content. BUT, the video quality here is really poor and much is virtually unwatchable. The site has a great concept, but not at all well done.

If you like this material, your choices are very limited. You can buy the dreamgirls DVD's, which can be found for about $10 each for 90 minutes. Another alternative is to go to dreamgirlsvod.com for on demand streaming that can get expensive, or sign up at dreamgirlsmembers.com, which is streaming only with no downloads available.

I would like the site to be much bigger than 62 videos and the quality is just too low. Not recommended.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Boozed Women

40. Boozed Women (0)

Pay
Active
65
Darrow (8) 05-03-10  04:32am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The site appears to have legitimate amateur women at strip clubs. The sex (if any) is confined to oral.

There is access to a network; there is some stuff there that is worth watching.

Can download the clips.
Cons: Really poor video quality. Some of the stuff looks like it is taken from a phone.

Not all of the scenes have sex; some are just women watching male strippers.

The scenes are quite small and the surfing is quite bad. You can't tell, from the thumbnail what the scene is about and whether sex is involved.

For a chunk of the videos, you get repeats of scenes from another one of their sites.
Bottom Line: Not worth the price. If you are into this kind of stuff (amateur women having sex with strippers), there are alot better sites with alot better video.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dancing Bear

41. Dancing Bear (0)

Pay
Active
65
dracken (246) 09-02-09  02:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 20 or at least 15 scenes/parties where male strippers show up, as far as I could tell (navigation made it hard to see all videos) but each video/scene is divided in multiple video clips (around 10-14 each) and there are multiple women/girls who have sex in each larger scene.

- Each scene has screencaps as well as actual photos (around 400 per scene at 800px × 600px each). Couldn't find any zipped files though.

- The scenes are kinda fun as one stripper is dressed as a bear and never removes his mask. Also the girls, look relatively amateur-ish/ new to porn.

- Supposedly updates every Wednesday, but I couldn't vouch for this as I have only been a member for a week and nothing updated yet.

15
Cons: - No downloads of videos.

- Quality for streaming videos is "madman" whatever that means in pixels.

- Had trouble streaming many of the videos. The "madman" quality setting makes the videos very slow. They do look pretty good though...

- The whole site feels like a bad jock related joke. I know I complained about this before regarding some of the Porn Pros sites but it's even worse here. Comments like: "OMFG she swallows!" or "Was it as good for you as it was for me?" or the "Madman" streaming option make the whole site have a run by teenagers feel to it. I guess it's okay if you like that but sometimes it can get frustrating.

- The light and camerawork can get a bit frustrating at times. The quality could be improved.

- The navigation was frustrating and the live cam ads were very poorly placed on the home page.
Bottom Line: Overall I'd give this site a miss. The idea is cool and some of the reactions the girls have to the guy's dick on top of their head made me laugh. Furthermore some of the girls are really cute and the crowd around the stripper could be a real turn-on for people who prefer group sex, nonetheless when you consider the difficulties in streaming the videos, lack of download options, funky navigation, and sometimes frustrating camerawork. It's simply not worth it.

The small amount of content also doesn't help. I felt like the webmasters knew they only had a few videos so they chose to make them streaming because otherwise members would download them in a month and never return.

Also i had a personal problem with the attitude of the people involved in running the website. I like my porn to be funny once in a while but I don't like to feel like I'm watching a bunch of frat boys high-fiving each other. A more mature approach to the site design and the directing of the videos could help improve the overall feel.

Finally, I didn't really enjoy the way the scenes were structured. I realize this might be a very personal thing but I prefer it when a scenes has only a few actors that go all the way. The very design of this site means that the male stripper will be walking around and random ladies will suck on his penis for a few minutes before he moves on. This can be hot but when a cute girl is replaced by one that doesn't do it for me I kinda feel bored...if that makes any sense...

Anyhow, the last two points are rather personal so I will try not to deduct any points from the final score for that. I just wanted to convey that the site was a tad bit disappointing in what it offered.

On the bright side Dancing Bear comes as a bonus in a bunch of other network deals so it may be worth checking out like that; otherwise, unless you have a really big fetish for dudes in bear costumes or sex at a party this is not really worth the membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dancing Bear

42. Dancing Bear (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
raffles (0) 05-12-11  12:52pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: 30-40 women in each episode, though only 10-15 (probably paid) perform BJ's.
The male dancers are excellent at approaching the amateurs who usually refuse but it adds to the fun.
High picture quality in videos.
So few CFNM sites that it is nice to have this one
Cons: Women stay seated so we cannot see whole bodies.
Only one or two perform sex.
"Party hardcore" and "In the VIP" are much better because the women dance to rock music so we can see whole bodies in movement.
Party hardcore has about 10 women who perform sex in each episode.
Bottom Line: I do enjoy this CFNM niche but streaming video has too many glitches and not smooth at my cable connection. Very annoying.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Horny Birds

43. Horny Birds (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
porndotcomsucks (0) 03-14-12  09:08pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Videos quality and content was good.
Speed of the site is good.
Cons: Site advertisement miss leading (only 14 videos on site).
Member for month and 0 updates.
Almost entire site is an upsell for other sites.
Bottom Line: If your into this type of content and don't mind that almost every link is just a link to an offer to purchase something else its not that bad. The content is good but after four weeks and 0 updates there is no reason to renew your subscription
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Student Sex Parties

44. Student Sex Parties (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
Jaimes (3) 11-10-13  01:48pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Cute girls.
Girls (for the most part) don't look like porn stars.
Exclusive content.
Bonus sites with WTF pass.
Cons: Unbelievably bad camera work on the majority of videos.
Photo albums are often incomplete AND redundant.
Often videos contain girls that don't get naked or only topless.
Distracting and annoying subtitles and MOVING watermarks.
Other peoples niche chocolate in my porn peanut butter.
Bottom Line: STUDENT SEX PARTIES has every single problem that modern porn is guilty of:a propensity to try to satisfy too many niches that should NOT be part of porn sought by the demographic that seeks orgies: I would say MOST of this demographic do not want to see CFNM,(clothed females naked males)urination or worse.(seriously, what kind of a twisted twist wants to see girls getting "sick" in porn) We want to see naked girls! Often girls don't even get naked, or the camera is at an angle so we only see men's butts. Not a pretty sight.Also,girl's stripping (one of the most erotic ingredients to good porn) is often either completely missing, avoided or badly botched in extreme close-ups. Speaking of camera work. Hire a professional please! None of their "frat boys" seem to know a thing about head space or framing and the constant attention-span whiplashes often made me sea sick. In some videos it was so bad, it ruined the video and I deleted it. The ONLY time the camera seemed to stop for any period and hold still, was for the many, many, many blow jobs. Then there is the distracting subtitles (who cares what inane things they say! And trust me, they say quite a plethora of inanities)and ESPECIALLY the site's little MOVING postmark that mar EVERY single video. The downloads were incredibly slow.(one site took me 2 months to get through-often wasting hours only to find that that video could not download and I had to try a different download option) As to the rest of the "bonus" sites. Only ONE reason I even bothered to look at any of them: to find girls that didn't get naked in Student Sex Parties for "completion." Sometimes I did. Many times I was frustrated. Oh,one more thing:WTF stop insisting these parties are real and not staged with porn actors. Stop insulting our intelligence so you can get away with all of the stupidity above! Overall, a few decent picture sets and video, but A LOT of garbage to wade through. If you are OCD like me and a completest, you will have many hours editing the videos to subtract the redundant, gross and annoying watermarks.Not worth more than a month of your time.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Male Strippers Unlimited

45. Male Strippers Unlimited (1)

Pay
Active
59
gaypornolover (38) 12-08-12  02:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Uh... I'll try to be positive!

+ Reasonably quick downloads (though I've seen better)
+ I don't use a download manager as such but it allowed me to download a dozen movies at a time without any issues - which is unique in my experience and should mean it's download-manager-friendly
+ Quite a lot of content
+ No download limits
+ Billing by Verotel
+ A few good bits in among the dross
Cons: - Some awful quality content
- Almost all non-exclusive content
- Some content is merely trailers from other sites
- Weird mix of gay and straight
- Navigation is a mess, search almost non-existent, layout awful
- Some content has nothing to do with stripping
- Some content is tame - not even full-frontal nudity
- Uses several different video formats, some of which I've never heard of and couldn't get to work
- No streaming or in-browser footage - download only
- Some truly awful amateur footage is more or less unwatchable
- A lot of content is from movies or TV shows - I wonder if copyright is being respected here?
- Photos are very difficult to download and view
- Much more photo content than video
Bottom Line: I love male strippers - stripping really turns me on and the sensual act of removing the clothing is such a turn-on. Sadly you see surprisingly little male stripper content and so much gay porn skips straight to the action without seeing the guys removing their clothes.

Things didn't start well with the infuriating log-in with a Captcha code, and when I got into the site I was kind of confused as the layout is messy and amateurish - it looks like a site from about 15 years ago.

There is a bar at the top of the home screen showing several different categories of content. Great I thought, there's lots of video content here.

Incorrect - all of the above links lead you to photos only - this is a much more photo-based site than I expected. This was a disappointment as I prefer videos and I didn't feel that it was made clear in the preview than it was mainly photos.

I clicked on the photos and I was amazed at the poor quality. A lot of them are tiny - some are as low as 320 x 240 and awful quality. Many are simply blurry vidcaps.

They are simply presented as a page of thumbnails. Most pages have no slide shows and although there is a link to download it all, it doesn't work.

I checked out their FAQ pages and it confirmed that this was not a fault... I quote
"Because of the pop-up photo viewer interface we use for the galleries, it's a little tricky to save the photos to your computer."

Considering the photo viewer is awful - the pop up photo viewer is primitive and doesn't even appear on all pages - this is incredibly poor.

I soon realised that video content is simply bunched in together in one section. No categorisation or searching is possible, so you just have to go through this cobbled-together list of content.

The site uses at least five different video formats. I managed to download and view the MP4 and WMV files, but the AVI, FLV and MKV files were not playable on Quicktime or Windows Media Player.

Again, this is an acknowledged issue; quote

"Because our video clips are collected from various different resources and platforms, they don't all have the same video format. That's why you might find some of the video clips won't play on your computer or the sound is missing."

They recommend you download VLC Media Player, which I couldn't get to install, or K-Lite Codec Pack which they said was harder to use so I didn't try. When every other site I've used has familiar file types any player can play, I don't want to have to download unfamiliar software for this one site.

The video content is a really odd mix - I'd say only about half of it is actual strip shows, and some of them have obviously been shot by amateurs at nightclubs etc so video and sound quality are poor and audience members are in the way of the camera.

The rest is clips of foreign movies with bits of nudity (not always even full frontal!), or people stripping off or having sex in public for a dare (often heterosexual couples and again amateur quality) or even trailers from other sites!

The only good thing I can say about this site is I did manage to find a few clips that were of strippers and were of decent quality.

In the main though this is largely non-exclusive, poor-quality content which is often not even really male stripping at all. I would be surprised if all the relevant copyright owners, especially of the non-porn movies, had licensed material to this site but I may be wrong.

I feel my rating is generous and is based on the bit of good content I did manage to find. Other than that this site is a misleading, badly-designed mess of poor quality non-exclusive content and as such must get the lowest rating I have yet to give on this site. Avoid!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Key West Flashers

46. Key West Flashers (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
richard (3) 05-22-07  03:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Very little
Cons: Low quality images and video.
Could take better photos with a cheap mobile phone.
I could, and have, taken better photos myself (and thats saying something)
Bottom Line: Wouldn't even go back if it was free!!
The photos on the site are too small and a good deal are not even in focus. The resolution of the photos is also too low, so you can not enlarge them without losing quality (which is limited to start with). For a pay site, you expect them to use high quality cameras for good, sharp images. In this case it seems thay have used a cheap mobile phone. As for the videos, there are none as far as the wet t shirt contests go, and only a few small, short clips in the mile high section.
There is a note saying that videos of the wet t shirt contests are coming, but as the photos were taken in 2002-2003, it seems that they are not rushing to put them in any time soon.
The only good thing about this site is ..... NOTHING
They also claim that you can get a refund if not 100% happy with there site - but when I applied for the refund (yes, it is that bad) they did not even reply to my e-mails. There are a lot better out there (I have yet to find worse!) so go find them, and stay away from this site.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-46 of 46 Page :    < Previous Page


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Male Strippers Unlimited (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.15 seconds.