Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 46 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Student Sex Parties

1. Student Sex Parties (0)

Pay
Active
85
RustyJ (145) 02-09-11  07:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good amount of material with 56 very long parties that consist of multiple scenes
-Very attractive models
-Amateurish feeling with all out hardcore action
-High definition downloads with no limits or DRM on newer videos
-Includes membership to five other sites which are mostly good
-Multiple payment processors available
Cons: -Sometimes the parties are way too long with no sex action going on
-The other side of the coin to the amateurism also affects this site. There are scenes with no sound, cell phone interference noise, wind blowing on the microphone, awkward camera work and just general messing around
-Download speed can be really bad at busy times but up to 5 mgeabytes per second at good times. Downloads limited to two at the time also preventing you browsing the site while they are on
-Background noise on the scenes, radio usually
-Not everyone at the party takes part in action
Bottom Line: The theme of this site is very similar to HardFuckTales which I alos reviewed. While that site is dedicated to three on one scenes with not much fooling around going on, this one features bigger groups of people having sex and doing lots of other things too like playing ball, drinking, dancing and partying. These parties last easily three hours or more and total in 6-10 gigabytes at the best resolution. Along with MyPickupGirls this site is where the main amount of content on this network is.

Some of the parties are like films where there are multiple scenes between different participants while others have lots of fooling around and only one all sex clip. There are also often girls on the scene who don't take part in all of it that kind of reduces the overall feeling. They should just have models who do it all.

Models are all young Russian girls. Some are totally unknown while others are easily recognizeable from many subsites on 21Sextury for example. Here however they all go by some bogus names that are so generic that they often have numbers behind them. Girl you might know as Logan is Eva here and Ioana is Anya_7. I've seen the same names used to numbers well over 10. Are they trying to make following the production of these Russian girls this hard on purpose?

The sounds are the weak point of this site. The recording quality can be bad with cell phone interference or sounds can be missing from some scenes completely. Also some irritating background music on the indoors scenes. There's lots of talking and having fun which is all in Russian but they have included subtitles in English which is nice.

I recommend this site if one is into East European
and Russian porn. The other sites you get also are strongly focused on the same theme. Parties can be long and often deviate from the real action but this is as close as it gets to having some reality porn. Certainly beats having some big brother junk running on your TV.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit College Fuck Parties

2. College Fuck Parties (0)

Pay
Active
78
TheSquirrel (53) 05-17-12  01:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Big $15 discount joining through TBP/PU.

No DRM, download restrictions, pre checked cross selling, or dirty tricks.

No regional discrimination.

Join through reputable billing agent (Epoch).

Genuine network, each site has its own identity.

Streaming available.

Original content that is individual and a little outside the usual cookie cutter mass produced porn.
Cons: Little ethnic or size diversity.

Awful photography, camerawork, and lighting.

Videos are so unbelievably long they have to be cut up into 4-6 (sometimes more) 25 minutes or longer segments. That would be okay if it was action all the way, but it is most definitely not. It could simply be edited down to one 30 minute clip. If they did that, they wouldn't get to say they had 398 scenes instead of 80.

When the cameraman finally does focus on someone having sex, it is far too often in gynaeclogical closeups where all you see is two groins. Not only that, there is an inability to keep the camera still.

There is only one download option for WindowsXP and Vista, and one download option for the pics.

Customer sevice was awful. As reported in a forum post, I was locked out of the site for a while due to possible hacking of the membership password. I received no answer to four emails sent over 24 hours asking why, and was only reinstated after Epoch intervened.
Bottom Line: Videos 1024x576 and 768x576
Pics 768x1152 768x1024 768x1039 1066x1600

There are supposed to be various mobile formats available. I don't use them but the following are listed - ipad/ipad2, iphone4, iphone3/ipod, Android.

This is a clone of Student Sex Parties available through Chicki Porn, the difference being you get extra sites through WTF and a $15 discount from joining through TBP/PU.

I found streaming facilities to be reasonable. Here in the UK streaming in the afternoon is often very difficult.

Models are mostly all the same type, namely young and thin. If you are looking for ethnic, size, or age diversity, you'll be out of luck.

Navigation is a little irritating. If you go to "view all scenes from College Fuck Parties," then click on several clips from the same video, there is no way back to the College Fuck Parties home page, without going back to the WTF Pass home page, then clicking on College Fuck Parties. You have to click several back buttons until you get back, or go to WTF Sites. In fact WTF Sites is better than the rather poorly laid out WTF home page.

It's a shame some great models are thrown away due to awful amateur camerawork and photography. You would think being a porn cameraman isn't that hard. It doesn't have to be spot on perfect, as they aren't working for the likes of Terrence Malick, Stanley Kubrick, or Jean Renoir, and never will, mainly because two of them are dead. All you have to do is point the camera in the general direction of the couple, or couples having sex. That's it, that's the job.

Maybe they are trying to make it look like a home movie, but realistically we all know these are professional porn stars. It's a shame because the performers are really good looking, and there is genuine group sex action. I just get the feeling the bits the cameraman has missed out while focussing on the floor, wall, ceiling, or shoes, are all the best bits. Thirty minutes of action with two hours padding, then the cameraman misses all the best bits, or the lighting is so bad, you have to squint to see what is going on.

Lighting seems to be one of the problems across the whole WTF network. For instance there is a video and photo set of one beautiful girl taken outside, where the sun's shadow across railings completely ruins the whole thing. It was like some 9 year old's first video or photo attempt.

The non porn bits take up hours of time. Then finally finally something happens, they are getting their kit off and it's time to wake up. Just as they are about to have sex, for some inexplicable reason the cameraman moves on to show the floor. Very video verite. If there are two or three couples indulging in group sex, the cameraman doesn't know where to go, so focuses on the wall instead, or on another couple who aren't doing anything.

To give you an idea of the padding and rubbish bits, you could watch three episodes of CSI (minus the adverts) in the time it takes to watch all the rubbish. Or to put it another way, think of the padding as the CSI episodes, and the adverts as the quality bits. That's how frustrating and annoying the episodes are.

As a bystander and observer my immediate feelings are to shout at the cameraman "oi you, there are people having sex over there...yes over there....NO, over THERE you fecking idiot, not here!"

Two people having sex, no that's not very interesting, let's have a look at the floor. Even when there is only one couple having sex and nothing else going on, the cameraman cannot keep the camera still, it is beyond his ability. He HAS to move it, he cannot keep his camera pointed in the general direction of two people having sex for more then two seconds. Two seconds, that's it, moving on, nothing to see here, must be something more interesting over there, if not, move camera to side, up and down, jump up and down, or tip diagonally, then back again.

The score of 78 is for basically remembering to remove the lens cap, and for pointing the camera in the right direction some of the time, and for the models.

Every network has its idiosyncracies. One of the annoying ones here is that for some reason the male performers continually pummel and pull the pussies of their female performers as though they were unblocking a sink. Are we supposed to think this is what female partners really find sexy? Only if you're 14, and at that age you're supposed to be too young to view this sort of thing.

Some of the orgies inside are badly lit, but even those on the outside quite often get it wrong. Many times dark shadows across the pics spoil the view. That's okay if you're Ridley Scott.

It's worth a membership for one month, due to the reasonably original, non massed produced material, and for the beautiful, newish porn models. It could have been so so much better.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit In The VIP

3. In The VIP (0)

Pay
Active
84
nygiants03 (162) 01-21-08  10:12pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Newer videos are very solid
-New pics at a quality (900 x 600)
-Great search features
-Well over a 100 videos
-Very large pic sets
-Unique and all exclusive content
-Pretty realistic for a set up plot
-Comes with reality kings network(great)
-Movies are long usually around an hour
-All hardcore: lots of lesbian sex and threesomes
-Zip download picture sets
-Can download full scene, into big clips, and minute clips
Cons: -Older videos slightly fuzzy
-Not enough amateurs
-Older pics lack
-Only 2 video download options. Wmv and mpeg
-Only updates every 2 weeks
-The older videos are not full scene
-Sometimes it takes to long to get going(long club scene, dancing)
-The newer video full scenes are monsters to download( well up around 650 mb per)
Bottom Line: -Most videos end with the signature facial

-Scenes usually start out at a South beach/ Miami club scene. Usually the guy takes the girl/girls back in a limo, and drives to a hotel where they get it on. Some times there is sex in the vip room.

- Site is well developed, been around since January 2003. It will only continue to grow and become even higher quality. Its just lacking in those weekly updates.

- This site is yet another great reality king site. It is a site with many pornstars, very hot video with amy reid in a threesome( one of there top rated videos). Once again itís a great bargain as this could be a paysite all by itself. You get all those other great sites with it. Plus there are lots of pay options.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dancing Bear

4. Dancing Bear (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
FZKK (1) 11-28-10  09:19am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: my first review of anything really. felt compelled to rate this site..a VERY niche site.
many of the women on dancing bear i found attractive. all sorts of different women:
black,blonde,brunette, different body types, lots of variety! some GREAT blowjobs. a bit of hardcore..but with condoms. there ARE downloads but u must use a flash downloader. i found the picture quality fine..not HD, but good.
Cons: the site is slow overall and downloading individual clips can be difficult. the site was having some intermitten problems playin just clips of full movies. support was good, getting back to me quickly and trying to help. it took longer than it should have but i downloaded everything i wanted. appears to be only 2 updates per month on average.
Bottom Line: was surprised how much i enjoyed this site and
i haven't seen anything like this on the net.
price is a bit high but the content is reasonable
and as said this type of site is very rare.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit In The VIP

5. In The VIP (0)

Pay
Newbie
83*
VT71 (0) 08-01-12  10:04am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Price is definitely right
There are many videos
Download speed is decent
Girls are generally good looking
Cons: *Girls are cute with clothes on, then BAM! Its tat city. If you are like me and tire of everyone having tats, this is not the site for you.

* Porn dudes in the videos are the typical 'hey bro' types

* Vids are all the same - girls go from limo to dancing to fucking
Bottom Line: If you don't mind every other person covered in tats, and like seeing a lot of naked women at once, this is a decent site for sure.

I just couldn't get past all the fake tits and tats
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Party Hardcore

6. Party Hardcore (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
pornjunkie (2) 01-30-07  12:34pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Pro #1 - very large content.
Pro #2 - regular updates, once a week.
Pro #3 - overall site update every 8 to 12 months, reviewed layout etc.
Pro #4 - true to its niche and advertising.
Pro #5 - excellent billing format.
Cons: Con #1 - all dialogue is in Czech.
Con #2 - most of the same male strippers appear in the majority of the episodes.
Con #3 - full length downloads are large files, they take time to download and take up lots of space on the hard disk.
Con # 4 - some of the parties take time to get off the ground, so it might take a couple of weeks before getting to the good stuff.
Con #5 - although the quality is good, the camera angles are sometimes very bad.
Bottom Line: The bottom line is that this is one of my favorite sites on the net right now. For my taste and my buck it is a definite winner.

If you like real girls that get drunk and coaxed into public sex with male strippers, then this is the site for you. It should be said that there are "undercover" girls that get things started and encourage the innocent girls to jump in.

It appears that most of the women that attend these parties are aware of what goes on but, like in any night club or bar, anywhere in the world, the quality and willingness of the women varies from night to night or in this case from party to party.

There are a few negative aspects (see cons above) but, in my mind, they are negligible.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Party Hardcore

7. Party Hardcore (0)

Pay
Active
88
asmith12 (124) 05-20-09  06:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ VERY unique idea
++ supposedly amateur girls sucking male strippers in the heat of the party
++ maybe (probably?) there are even REAL amateurs there.
++ action is very hot for supposedly amateur party: stripping, sucking, and up to full sex.
+ decent video quality
+ other OrgyMax sites included
Cons: -- it unclear how much of the action is staged and how much is "real"
- there are no clear markings when one party ends and another starts; took some time to figure it out.
- price
Bottom Line: When I first got to PartyHardcore member zone, I was seriously disappointed. The first clip I've got was some action without beginning and without end, just "out of blue". It took some time to realize that every scene is actually splitted into 4 parts, and that it is completely up to me to find out where the whole scene begins and where it ends. I don't have problems with splitting 2-hour-long movie into 4 updates, but guys, you could at least make it clear that these 4 updates are a part of one big scene.

But when I've got past this initial disappointment and understood how PartyHardcore organizes content, things went much better. First of all, it is a REALLY original idea, not to be found anywhere else. It shows a all-girl party with a few male strippers thrown in. Quite obviously, it starts with the stripper guy stripping, but it doesn't end there. Some girls (most likely professional adult models) start sucking the stripper guys and even fucking them, but the most exciting part of the whole thing is that supposedly amateur girls join them too. It is impossible to judge if there are real amateur girls participating in hardcore action, but it indeed looks rather genuine.

Technically videos are of about average to good quality: recent "normal" videos are 640x360 @1.1kbit/s, HD videos are 1280x720 @3Mbit/s, though I'd say HD ones are rather blurry for this kind of size. Recent pictures are suprisingly clear, though not too big in size.

Bottom line: despite outrageously high price, content (and idea) is absolutely unique, so if you're bored from "same old, same old" stuff, and are excited about the idea of real amateur girls having sex during real party, you might want to try it.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Student Sex Parties

8. Student Sex Parties (0)

Pay
Active
75
pat362 (367) 12-31-10  10:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-There is a strong emphasis in making the viewer believe that these are regular people having a party that turns into a kind of orgy.
-They have over 50 parties.
-Parties are broken in section because content is over 2hrs long and some over 3hrs.
-All videos come in AVi format with at least standard resolution. Newer videos also include Hi-Def.
-Half of the parties have photosets that can be viewed online or dowloaded in a single zip file.
-The videos are all shot in a wide variety of locations from outside to inside different rooms and apartments.
Cons: -Upadtes aren't dated so no way of knowing if there is a schedule. They only way I can tell is by looking at the dates of the comments. The older videos are at least 2 yrs old.
-The videos are all over 2hrs long and part of that is taken up with the performers appearing to party with drinking, smoking and talking.
-Dialogue is all in Russian.
-Because the videos are shot in a non studio environment then lighting is a problem. many of the scenes can sometime be a little too dark.
-The problem with shooting orgies is that since there are so many perfomrers on screen having sex then the camera cannot always linger in one place of has to shoot from further away to capture most of the action.
-Many of the girls have the same name so you get such and such name with a number,
Bottom Line: -I've never been a fan of orgies because the camera can never stay in one place for very long because otherwise you can't see the rest of the action. The other problem is that only long shots allow you to see all the action and then you miss most of it because there's just too much happening on screen.

-If they had just made a kind of party where the girls pick a certain activity and the boys to go with it then we would have had only one scene at a time.

-The location are also a problem. Shooting porn outside is more often a miss rather than a hit. The sun, wind, unexpected outside noises and so forth detract the attention. Shooting insed helps but shooting an orgy means that lighting can only be placed in certain area or it can be seen during the video.

-This site is probably best for people that love any and all things related to orgies and can overlook the problems inherant in tshooting them.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Student Sex Parties

9. Student Sex Parties (0)

Pay
Active
83
elephant (65) 09-04-11  07:15am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: On the majority of scenes I'm glad of the join here, its far from perfect but very few sites are. It is quite unique content and one of the leaders in this party niche in my eyes as the girls are the hottest.

There good variety of girls 232 to choice from but obviously some are in the same movie with others.

There is 67 parties currently to choose from so plenty to keep you occupied.

You get some great insight into the girl's personalities here with them being open and look to be generally having a good time with friends.

Good choice of video downloads

mp4 720p
avi 576p
mp4 432p
mpv 320p
Cons: Huge filesizes, the 720p HD mp4 scenes and they average 5 scenes an episode vary but I found they could be too huge for me sometimes 5gb or more a episode. They do give you and option of avi 576p which seemed around 3/4 of the size of its HD sister. I opted for avi and did tend to preview a scene to see if it was group sex before I download. I have enough girl on boy stuff so unless she was a fav I gave these scenes a miss.

The girls sometimes didn't get naked or have sex which I found annoying on some vids, you go to the hassle of getting a girl there at least tell her to get her clothes off and join in or don't bother turning up. I found some scenes would of benefitted on some behind the scenes direction to tell them to change position or do something else as some scenes drag.

Same guys in nearly every vid, I am not looking at the guys so not a major con but would be good to see them having sex with some other people from the same 3 guys nearly in every vid of the network.
Bottom Line: Overall I rate the site its get some good stuff and nice to see some of my fav girls in something apart from one on one boy/girl sex hardcore. I've always been a fan or orgies, the more girls the better in my eyes but they can be hard to film and do right, few have managed to create classic orgie movies, focusing on the action can be difficult for the best of camera men/women. Here the camera work sure could be improved but I guess it's all done on the premissis that its a home movie of a group of friends have a sex party and the camera crew is them.

Theres some scenes with little nudity or none at all which does get tiresome and I think the site would be improved to have the option of the highlights on one vid and an edited best of, they go to the hassle of subtitling the movies (which is nice) so they could do it.

I would of though preferred more anal scenes here but I guess not every girl is into anal so they let them be natural and do what they want.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Dancing Bear

10. Dancing Bear (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
raffles (0) 05-12-11  12:52pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: 30-40 women in each episode, though only 10-15 (probably paid) perform BJ's.
The male dancers are excellent at approaching the amateurs who usually refuse but it adds to the fun.
High picture quality in videos.
So few CFNM sites that it is nice to have this one
Cons: Women stay seated so we cannot see whole bodies.
Only one or two perform sex.
"Party hardcore" and "In the VIP" are much better because the women dance to rock music so we can see whole bodies in movement.
Party hardcore has about 10 women who perform sex in each episode.
Bottom Line: I do enjoy this CFNM niche but streaming video has too many glitches and not smooth at my cable connection. Very annoying.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dancing Bear

11. Dancing Bear (0)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 11-14-11  04:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 80 scenes with 2 new scenes added each month.
- Videos are available as MP4 and WMV as well as ipod format. 1280x 720 HD
- Images as well as screen-caps available in zipped archives. Photos are 2,000px × 1,333px and screencaps are around 720px × 406px. (around 1000 images per scene, but not all are very good... some blurriness here and there)
- The theme of the site is a gigolo stripper giving a good time to a supposed bachlorette or birthday party . Basically one or two dudes and a bunch of girls who will clap, giggle and cheer each other on. It all ends up being fun and very different, almost an orgy site, but with a unique spin
- The scenes have sex, multiple blowjobs and facials as well as some lesbian sex and various strange stuff (the guy puts his cock on a bun and the girl licks mustard off of it for example)
- Good looking models, a lot of cute girls getting facials.
- Decent navigation, they also offer a preview trailer for each scene.
Cons: - The site is a bit shady when it comes to billing. Don't go for the 2 day trial since it's not really worth it as far as I can tell. Also if you only get this site the category search as well as the suggested videos will lead you to the main Bangbros site which costs extra. This means that I can't really use the category search to navigate only dancing bear.
- The fact that they have a lot of images for each scene means that they show you everything they shoot, without filtering the bad images. So if you download the zipped images expect some blurry shots, and a lot of images that look identical to each other.
- Not all females present get into it and there are several girls who you don't even see naked. Guess it goes with the theme of the site, but it could be a con.
- Some male models wear a bear head the entire time or a luchador mask, a bit silly and can make the scene feel somewhat awkward.
- Some of the older scenes don't have category tags so it's hard to say what you get
Bottom Line: I joined this site as part of the bang bros network back in 2009, and I remember being extremely disappointed back then. They had few scenes, rare updates and the action was mostly BJ. In fact if you go to the first few scenes on the site you can see that most of the videos are about a dude stripping down with occasional BJ's behind a towel. Overall the site didn't really work well.

That has all changed since. Now they have around 75-80 scenes and are updating twice a month with about an hour worth of content each time. Despite the fact that the scenes are longer they feel a lot faster. The guys don't spend a lot of time stripping and they usually get to the first BJ within a couple of minutes.

Another nice change is that now almost all videos feature a sex scene, oftentimes with the girl still dressed. We also get several cum-shots, including cum on food which is then eaten (Icing on the birthday cake seems to be a favorite) They also added a bit of lesbian content and I hope they keep pushing that area as it would be nice to see some of the girls in the background going at it.

Speaking of background girls there are several who will never get naked or perform oral on the dude, so don't expect every girl present to show their boobs. Also on average there are only two facials per scene so no bukkake orgy here. Speaking of orgies, there is no anal, DP or rough deepthroating, everything feels more playful and funny than intense, rough sex.

In fact I'd say that is the most unique feature of the site, it all feels like a joke, a party that got a bit out of hand in a sexy way. They seem to really drive that point home and have several scenes where we see some shocked friends or co-workers who seem to say "oh Mary she is always so crazy, but I never thought she'd eat frosting of a guys balls."

Overall the vibe works well, and is helped by the fact that all the girls look like amateurs. They giggle, gag on the penis and overall act very realistic. Don't expect professional porn starlets here.

That being said most of the models are very cute and the main girl (the birthday girl or the bride to be) is usually very cute and attractive.

Unfortunately the site is really not up to it's potential unless you purchase a bangbros membership. The category search function leads you to videos on the network and you are encouraged to pay. The suggested scenes are extra and encourage you to pay for a bang bros membership. There is an ad next to the streaming video for the full membership and so on.

Also, due to the nature of the videos there are some strange scene cuts. In one scene we go from a blow job to a man doing cartwheels and rotating his cock like a helicopter for 5 minutes. I mean it's funny, but if you were getting into the action these scene breaks can be a bit odd. It's also strange when one girl is getting fucked and 10 sit around, some clapping a few looking bored, etc.
I would have preferred it if every girl got naked and maybe there was some light lesbian kissing in the background instead of fully clothed girls looking around and cheering at random intervals.

Bottom-line: As a bonus site to another network this site is awesome and a great value. As a stand alone, well you should make sure you really like the content. For me the whole amateur/ this could be a real party vibe made it interesting but then again I really enjoy porn that strays from the mainstream.

I'd say if you're uncertain consider a bangbros membership and go for that since it has this site as a bonus along with other nice goodies.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Party Hardcore

12. Party Hardcore (0)

Pay
Active
85
Darrow (8) 05-03-10  05:13am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: 1) This is a rarely explored niche; mostly amateur women having sex with strippers in front of (lots) of other women.

2) Can download the entire collection (and I have)

3) There is always lots of women giving blowjobs, and a number fucking the stippers; occasionally there is even anal. This is a lot further than you typically get with the few "girls at a party" site.

4) Not all of women are amateurs. There are some professionals; occasionally you will see one on one of the sister sites. Most are amateurs, however.

5)The women are on average pretty in a "girl next door" manner, but there is a variety. Some women are smoking hot, and some are truly ugly; I like this as the occasional ugly girl having sex tends to confirm that these are amateurs.

6) Both the video quality and the content has improved in the last two years.

7) access to Orgymaxx's straight sites; good selection of sites in somewhat unusual niches.

8) Recent price reduction was nice.
Cons: 1) The video quality could be better.

2) The direction and camerawork is sometimes odd. The camera (and film) has cut away from two people fucking and/or sucking in order to focus on clothed women dancing; sometimes it is done for coverage, but often it just looks like they want to show us clothed women in a porno site.
Bottom Line: Overall an excellent site that has become my favorite. I don't stay a member, but I rejoin every four to six months.

The orgymaxx membership is a bonus (it would be perfect if they had an anal/dp focussed site; but that is just me.)
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Party Wild Naked

13. Party Wild Naked (0)

Pay
Active
65
mbaya (356) 05-27-09  07:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted join price. See below.
-Part of network of 21 sites. However, only 3 or 4 are worth checking out.
-162 videos, 720x480, 2139kbps, averaging about 20 minutes.
-Can download segments as well as whole video. WMV is the only option.
-162 photo sets.
-Genuine amateurs, so attractiveness varies. Very much look like girls you could know.
Cons: -Videos are very grainy and blurry. I would guess that the originals were shot as low resolution and poor quality, despite being upgraded later.
-Download limit of 12 hours of content, which is less than 4GB. If you go over the limit, you get banned for 6 hours.
-No streaming option for videos.
-No update schedule. The videos are not dated. I saw a review from 2007 that had only 2 fewer videos, so I think it is no longer updating.
-None of my download managers worked.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable. Horrible quality screenshots that are 150x100.
Bottom Line: If you go to the webpage you can get an idea of what the site is like. If you x to navigate away, you get an offer of half price, $14.95 per month.

The site consists of content that is very similar to the dreamgirls dvd series that now has over 500 titles and has been around since 1995. The similarity is so strong that I suspect that this material is from those videos. However, this site appears not to be updating.

The videos consist of scenes from Mardi Gras in New Orleans, Fantasy Fest, spring break t shirt contests in Key West, and dancing in clubs. The girls are quite natural looking amateurs, with many being quite attractive.

As you would expect with amateurs, you never know how far they will go in exposing themselves. Some go only topless, some completely nude. Occasionally you get a few seconds of lesbian sex or cock sucking, but that is rather rare and not what the site is about.

If you can get into basically just flashing, you will like the content. BUT, the video quality here is really poor and much is virtually unwatchable. The site has a great concept, but not at all well done.

If you like this material, your choices are very limited. You can buy the dreamgirls DVD's, which can be found for about $10 each for 90 minutes. Another alternative is to go to dreamgirlsvod.com for on demand streaming that can get expensive, or sign up at dreamgirlsmembers.com, which is streaming only with no downloads available.

I would like the site to be much bigger than 62 videos and the quality is just too low. Not recommended.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Student Sex Parties

14. Student Sex Parties (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
Bolingbroke (2) 11-11-11  07:45am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - The site has a large content with currently 72 parties
-It contains longer scenes with some partying, which creates a more personal atmosphere than just bedroom sex. It also leads to the performers looking more like real students getting together.
-The site offers different file sizes, including HD quality
-They have young, attractive girls, who look natural and not pumped up with botox and silicon
-There's a variety of party themes / locations (Halloween, Xmas, locations sauna, hut)
Cons: -They are using the same guys over and over again, which gets a bit boring after a while. They should use some variety like with the girls.
-The camera work is often rather unprofessional with shaky pictures, bad lighting etc.
-The movies are sometimes not in a great quality, even if you watch them HD, they still appear a bit grizzling
Bottom Line: In spite of the negative points mentioned above, this is a very good site.
The best thing is that most of the parties don't look fake. The first of the four to five vids of each scene is some kind of warm up with the girls and guys meeting and talking to each other.
Unlike many party sites, where this looks very clumsy and fake, they appear to enjoy themselves on this site.
With mebership to this site you get bonus membership to currently 5 other sites, most of which are also good.
To sum it up, this is a very good site, which I can highly recommend.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Student Sex Parties

15. Student Sex Parties (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
Jaimes (3) 11-10-13  01:48pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Cute girls.
Girls (for the most part) don't look like porn stars.
Exclusive content.
Bonus sites with WTF pass.
Cons: Unbelievably bad camera work on the majority of videos.
Photo albums are often incomplete AND redundant.
Often videos contain girls that don't get naked or only topless.
Distracting and annoying subtitles and MOVING watermarks.
Other peoples niche chocolate in my porn peanut butter.
Bottom Line: STUDENT SEX PARTIES has every single problem that modern porn is guilty of:a propensity to try to satisfy too many niches that should NOT be part of porn sought by the demographic that seeks orgies: I would say MOST of this demographic do not want to see CFNM,(clothed females naked males)urination or worse.(seriously, what kind of a twisted twist wants to see girls getting "sick" in porn) We want to see naked girls! Often girls don't even get naked, or the camera is at an angle so we only see men's butts. Not a pretty sight.Also,girl's stripping (one of the most erotic ingredients to good porn) is often either completely missing, avoided or badly botched in extreme close-ups. Speaking of camera work. Hire a professional please! None of their "frat boys" seem to know a thing about head space or framing and the constant attention-span whiplashes often made me sea sick. In some videos it was so bad, it ruined the video and I deleted it. The ONLY time the camera seemed to stop for any period and hold still, was for the many, many, many blow jobs. Then there is the distracting subtitles (who cares what inane things they say! And trust me, they say quite a plethora of inanities)and ESPECIALLY the site's little MOVING postmark that mar EVERY single video. The downloads were incredibly slow.(one site took me 2 months to get through-often wasting hours only to find that that video could not download and I had to try a different download option) As to the rest of the "bonus" sites. Only ONE reason I even bothered to look at any of them: to find girls that didn't get naked in Student Sex Parties for "completion." Sometimes I did. Many times I was frustrated. Oh,one more thing:WTF stop insisting these parties are real and not staged with porn actors. Stop insulting our intelligence so you can get away with all of the stupidity above! Overall, a few decent picture sets and video, but A LOT of garbage to wade through. If you are OCD like me and a completest, you will have many hours editing the videos to subtract the redundant, gross and annoying watermarks.Not worth more than a month of your time.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Slut Party

16. Real Slut Party (0)

Pay
Active
93
rearadmiral (320) 05-08-11  03:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Mofo Network (10 sites in total on the network)
- Approximately 80 scenes
- Scenes are lengthy (most around an hour)
- Multiple download options (HD, SD and mobile)
- 2 levels of HD available 1080p and 720p)
- Streaming available
- Some amazing looking girls
- Better than average download speeds
- Discount through TBP
- Updates weekly
- Interesting mix of known porn girls and lesser-known models
- Photos available
- Download managers work
- Lots of fun to watch
Cons: - As with most Ďpartyí sites, most of the guys are annoying (but not as bad as with other sites)
- Hand-held camera can be a bit shaky in some scenes
Bottom Line: It goes without saying, obviously, that a large part of satisfaction in a site is subjective. If a site does all the technical bits well, it isnít going to matter too much if you just donít like the theme of the site. So having stated that, I really like Ďpartyí sites like these, and this is one of the better ones Iíve joined.

The site is probably big enough to be a decent value on its own, but it is part of a bigger network. This specific site has about 80 videos posted and each of those is about an hour long. Each of the scenes has a unique setup that is actually interesting to watch. I didnít find myself constantly skipping ahead to the sex. There is a mix of indoor and outdoor video shoots, with the outdoor scenes usually being shot by a pool so there are lots of skimpy bikinis around. The first half of the video is taken up with the set-up and the second half is the sex.

The lighting is usually very good Ė the outdoor scenes arenít washed out and the indoor scenes are mostly lit properly. The camera work is better than average for these kinds of sites. Adding to the professional look of the scenes is the fact that this obviously isnít a group of self-centered guys who decided to make a porn site Ė the director always makes sure that the girls are the focus of the attention.

This site, and the Mofo network generally, have the technical bits right: all the scenes are available in three different sizes. The HD is available in 1080p and 720p (and they look great!), the SD video is available in MPEG4, MPEG and WMV. And thereís also an option for mobile users. I didnít list this as a con above, but given the length of these videos the files sizes are huge. Some top out at over 5GB for the 1080p. There are photos available too, with zips as an option

Another possible issue for some people is that there is very little variation on the type of model in each scene. If your tastes are like mine this is no issue here because the overwhelming majority of the models are petite and young. I donít think there are any black or ethnic models, and no one over 25 either. But if youíre a fan of models like Tanner Mayes and Micah Moore and girls who have that body type, youíll certainly like the girls here.

This site alone is a good enough value to justify the membership, especially when you join through TBP/PU and get the discount. But there are nine other sites (including a MILF site and a gangbang site) that only increase the value of the membership. If you like watching petite young lasses party and enjoy themselves, then this is a site definitely worth checking out.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Male Strippers Unlimited

17. Male Strippers Unlimited (1)

Pay
Active
59
gaypornolover (38) 12-08-12  02:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Uh... I'll try to be positive!

+ Reasonably quick downloads (though I've seen better)
+ I don't use a download manager as such but it allowed me to download a dozen movies at a time without any issues - which is unique in my experience and should mean it's download-manager-friendly
+ Quite a lot of content
+ No download limits
+ Billing by Verotel
+ A few good bits in among the dross
Cons: - Some awful quality content
- Almost all non-exclusive content
- Some content is merely trailers from other sites
- Weird mix of gay and straight
- Navigation is a mess, search almost non-existent, layout awful
- Some content has nothing to do with stripping
- Some content is tame - not even full-frontal nudity
- Uses several different video formats, some of which I've never heard of and couldn't get to work
- No streaming or in-browser footage - download only
- Some truly awful amateur footage is more or less unwatchable
- A lot of content is from movies or TV shows - I wonder if copyright is being respected here?
- Photos are very difficult to download and view
- Much more photo content than video
Bottom Line: I love male strippers - stripping really turns me on and the sensual act of removing the clothing is such a turn-on. Sadly you see surprisingly little male stripper content and so much gay porn skips straight to the action without seeing the guys removing their clothes.

Things didn't start well with the infuriating log-in with a Captcha code, and when I got into the site I was kind of confused as the layout is messy and amateurish - it looks like a site from about 15 years ago.

There is a bar at the top of the home screen showing several different categories of content. Great I thought, there's lots of video content here.

Incorrect - all of the above links lead you to photos only - this is a much more photo-based site than I expected. This was a disappointment as I prefer videos and I didn't feel that it was made clear in the preview than it was mainly photos.

I clicked on the photos and I was amazed at the poor quality. A lot of them are tiny - some are as low as 320 x 240 and awful quality. Many are simply blurry vidcaps.

They are simply presented as a page of thumbnails. Most pages have no slide shows and although there is a link to download it all, it doesn't work.

I checked out their FAQ pages and it confirmed that this was not a fault... I quote
"Because of the pop-up photo viewer interface we use for the galleries, it's a little tricky to save the photos to your computer."

Considering the photo viewer is awful - the pop up photo viewer is primitive and doesn't even appear on all pages - this is incredibly poor.

I soon realised that video content is simply bunched in together in one section. No categorisation or searching is possible, so you just have to go through this cobbled-together list of content.

The site uses at least five different video formats. I managed to download and view the MP4 and WMV files, but the AVI, FLV and MKV files were not playable on Quicktime or Windows Media Player.

Again, this is an acknowledged issue; quote

"Because our video clips are collected from various different resources and platforms, they don't all have the same video format. That's why you might find some of the video clips won't play on your computer or the sound is missing."

They recommend you download VLC Media Player, which I couldn't get to install, or K-Lite Codec Pack which they said was harder to use so I didn't try. When every other site I've used has familiar file types any player can play, I don't want to have to download unfamiliar software for this one site.

The video content is a really odd mix - I'd say only about half of it is actual strip shows, and some of them have obviously been shot by amateurs at nightclubs etc so video and sound quality are poor and audience members are in the way of the camera.

The rest is clips of foreign movies with bits of nudity (not always even full frontal!), or people stripping off or having sex in public for a dare (often heterosexual couples and again amateur quality) or even trailers from other sites!

The only good thing I can say about this site is I did manage to find a few clips that were of strippers and were of decent quality.

In the main though this is largely non-exclusive, poor-quality content which is often not even really male stripping at all. I would be surprised if all the relevant copyright owners, especially of the non-porn movies, had licensed material to this site but I may be wrong.

I feel my rating is generous and is based on the bit of good content I did manage to find. Other than that this site is a misleading, badly-designed mess of poor quality non-exclusive content and as such must get the lowest rating I have yet to give on this site. Avoid!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit College Fuck Fest

18. College Fuck Fest (0)

Pay
Active
72
BabyGetReal (32) 06-19-10  08:40pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Unlike most of the AllElitePass sites, this one is being updated regularly, once or twice a month.

- A Bargain: My one month subscription cost only $9.95, and had full bonus access to the 90-some other sites at allelitepass.
- Seeing the amazed faces of real college students watching a couple (of porn actors) have sex in the same room is fun.
- Occasional videos with chemistry, arousal, attractive young couples and female orgasms.
- There are about 100 videos (most low to very low resolution).

See my review of AllElitePass for more Pros.
Cons: You are joining allelitepass.com. Some PU members have been billed inappropriately by this company, but I had no problems. See my review of AllElitePass for more Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
- Most of the content is older and very low resolution.
- At one point in time, the resolution gets much better, but it is worse
again in later videos.
- Most of the sex scenes have no chemistry, no fun, no arousal, no female orgasms, and end with the guy jacking off in the girl's face (which I find counter-erotic and dumb).
- The titles and descriptions tell you nothing useful.
- All videos download with the same generic filename so you must rename every download.
- Party numbers are mostly not listed on the site, just titles and dates.
- Still photos are generally unexciting.
Bottom Line: I had subscribed to CollegeFuckFest (CFF) in March, 2009, and enjoyed some of the videos, so I re-subscribed in May, 2010 to see the updates. It was worthwhile this time because of the allelitepass bonus sites, but I probably won't do this again. Although CFF has real updates about twice a month, many of the bonus sites had very limited content (a dozen or two videos per site) and had no updates since 2008. However, I had not explored these thoroughly in 2009, and this time I did, discovering some unexpected gems (see AllElitePass for those).

About half of each video shows a noisy college party, with some hot and some not so hot college girls dancing to loud music, and rarely some boob flashes. The other half shows a couple having sex.
They pretend this is a couple of students attending the party, but the pretense is quite thin. The couple is often older than college
age, sometimes with lots of tattoos and piercings, and these are clearly porn pros. Often some or all of the sex is on a couch in a room full of beer-drinking college students watching the fun. Seeing their amazed faces is fun. I don't think they ever show ordinary college students at the party having sex, or at most they pan quickly past a couple making out, mostly clothed, in a dark corner. Sometimes the couple having sex is in a bedroom or bathroom, but usually with several guys watching, sometimes a girl or two also. In one of the early videos, you can see large signs posted here and there warning that the party is being videoed, and that if you don't want to be seen on an adult website, you should leave.

Most of these sex scenes are pretty standard stuff with no chemistry, no fun, no laughing, no arousal, and the women don't orgasm. These typically end with the guy jacking off in a facial, which I find counter-erotic and dumb. There are a few exceptions, which are what might make the site worth a one-month subscription (if your taste agrees with mine; see my profile). Also, there are a few gems among the bonus sites (see AllElitePass for details).

CFF#91 New Years' Group Sex Party (April 2009): 3 couples go at it in the same room. One woman with very short hair orgasms hard over and over. Lo-res.

CFF#89 New Years' Party 2009 (March 2009): Two couples go at it in the same room. One of the women orgasms hard many times. Lo-res.

CFF#45 Valley Frat Fucks Part 2 (October 2008): Skinny attractive brunette (I've seen her on many other sites) fucks a nice looking guy. She orgasms to oral. A hot blonde watches and touches a bit. Decent resolution (700 x 400).

CFF#26 Jello Party (June 2008): The jello wrestling is fun. At the end, a pretty blonde with some personality but fake boobs gets into
the sex and has a couple of nice orgasms. Lo-res.

CFF#25 Holly Weird (May 2008): A young attractive couple, seemingly new to the business and so with a little personality and arousal going for them, enjoys sex in a garage. Lo-res.

Out of room here. Continued in a "Reply".
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Party Hardcore

19. Party Hardcore (0)

Pay
Active
80
exotics4me (463) 09-24-07  01:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Fetish Network included, this site is sort of the headliner site.
- Movies are pretty good quality 640 on high end, around 1400 speed.
- If you have an exhibitionist or voyeur side this one is for you!
- Pictues were a surprise, over 1200 on high end even on old sets and are zipped
- Download speeds are just above average in the USA
Cons: - The price! This network costs 39.95 Euros, I didn't realize there was a big difference in the Euro and Dollar, it ended up around $55 for the network for one month.
- This site itself has a great idea, but they may overuse the male stripper parts.
- The download speeds are inconsistent, going from 900 kb/s on one video to 400 kb/s on the next to 1200 kb/s on the next.
- Not enough actual sex going on.
Bottom Line: I had seen the previews of this site for the better part of a year. My wife loves exhibitionism and voyeuristic material, and I do to a point as well. The video we had watched as previews were all action-filled 30 second clips. So, I decided to just join the entire network, instead of just one site.

The basis for this site is that there are women, usually what you would call average looking, and they are at an all male strip club. Male strippers tease them until an orgy breaks out.

Now for the problem, some of the videos are just the male strippers dancing around naked. Now this is no use to me. I'm not talking about 5 minutes, but 15-20 minutes of men dancing around while stripping. Not good.

It does get better, there are paid women there to get the women turned on. The paid women grab the male strippers and start giving them a blowjob in front of other women, who then decide to try it for themselves. This part of the video is great. Some of these women seriously blush, they look away and laugh too.

The quality is very good, videos look good and so do the pictures. There is one problem though, you have 12 male strippers having sex at one time. There is always this one really sexy woman having sex, but the cameraman is trying to get all 12 in the video. Other than that, this site is pretty good. I can't say I recommend it unless you are really into the group sex. Navigation is plain, scroll, click, download. If you like group sex, it is one of the best!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Dream Girls Members

20. Dream Girls Members (0)

Pay
Active
66
elephant (65) 08-27-07  07:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Ideas of flashers I like and wild parties
bonus sites
Cons: The quality of the vids is rather poor
Slow site I found downloading
Tends to be made up of feed sites that have vids thats can't be downloaded.
Navigation is very basic as is the site and bonus sites in general
Bottom Line: Not worthy of a decent mark here, poor quality vids in lots of segments is tiresome to download. Wouldn't waste money on full membership, try the trial if you want to see some average quality vids. Theres is some ok stuff, just hard to find I found.

Overall seen much better, needs alot of work and better quality vids in more organized categories.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Drunk Sex Orgy

21. Drunk Sex Orgy (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 02-14-10  08:06am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill, but no regional pricing.
-Part of network of 17 sites. Most have a similar theme of group sex and some are about a few other fetishes.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download limits or restrictions.
-Three download choices. You can select small size AVI files of about 200MB, medium quality WMV files also about 200MB, or HD 1280x720 500kbps WMV files that are very sharp, but are about 600MB.
-Many attractive, very nicely dressed Czech women.
Cons: -Somewhat slow downloads, about 500 kbps.
-Long videos can be seen as a plus, but there are a lot of parts with wasted time, little or no action, or unerotic videography.
Bottom Line: This site features continuous sex orgy scenes scenes in clubs. You rarely see any actual drinking though. The participants hold glasses, fill them, and pour champaign onto each other. They don't appear to be drunk. The site says the participants are pornstars that mostly do this for the fun of it as they are paid very little. To me it seemed mechanical sex and not very spontaneous. The alcohol did not appear to be a help in loosening up the models.

What you do get is a lot of sex between men and women as well as lesbian sex. The sex is mostly oral and vaginal.

I found the orgy scenes to be a bit unfocused. The camera pans to a couple engaged in some sex act that you didn't see begin and rarely see end. Participants often switch partners, but usually offscreen. The feel is one of getting samples and can be compared to watching trailers. You see action, but you don't get the buildup in intensity that comes from focusing on one scene and just one scene. There is no feeling of progression from lust, to passion, to sex, to finishing. Since the scenes are rather long, most continue into another clip. It is not always easy to find which clips finish the scene that you are watching.

If you like this kind of action, this site is rather large with almost 300 videos in an archive that goes back to 2004.

A big size site, with a large photoset for each video, nice HD quality videos, but for me, it doesn't get an enthusiastic endorsement as to its eroticism.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit College Wild Parties

22. College Wild Parties (0)

Pay
Newbie
79*
OMF456 (4) 10-15-08  03:32pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: I like the group party thing. It's a nice change of pace from a traditional porn scene. I'm impressed that they can get that many people together in one place.

Good length of videos. I've never once thought, this video is too long or this video is too short. They break out parties into several parts so you can easily know if one part isn't your thing and move on to another portion of the party.

Nice variation of scenes. Lesbians, boy-girl scenes, multiples, blowjobs, facials, cum-swallowing......and on and on and on.
Cons: Fake party scenes. Now, I understand that most college parties aren't really sex-laden fuck festivals with people willing to be filmed but come on, we know it's not a real party.

A lot of established porn girls. This is probably just my con because I really really like real amateur porn like Brokeamateurs.com. But, BSB is one of my alternates in my off months when I need a change of pace.

Ahh, almost forgot, one thing that pisses me off on this site is that they are apparently part of a larger network of sites. So, they spend a lot of screen space trying to get you to sign up for their other sites. It's kind of annoying.
Bottom Line: Overall, cool site. This is one I join maybe once or twice a year just to check out, whack off and move on. Nothing really there to keep me as a long-term member. But, hey you can't please everyone all the time. If you like group party sex with girls in their teens and early 20's then you'll really enjoy this site. For me, it's a two month per year membership kind of site. One of my many "alternates" to my "stay long term" sites.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Mad Sex Party

23. Mad Sex Party (0)

Pay
Active
75
exotics4me (463) 09-24-07  01:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Another of the sites in the Orgy Max network, of fetish sites.
- Movies are 640 on high end and 1400+ speed
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped
- Very believable content, true amateur feel to it
- Getting better speeds on this one than the others, almost 1400 kb/s on a 10 M connection
Cons: - Hey, I saw that guy on the other sites! Same men from their other sites are on this one too.
- Price is a major issue with this network and even as standalone sites, this is a cheaper one by itself, but it will still set you back 30+ in dollars
- Sets are very similar, kind of a "Seen one, seen them all" feel.
- Have no idea what they are saying, not even for sure what language they are speaking. I speak and understand English, Spanish, Portugese and Italian, but have no clue on here!
Bottom Line: I had forgot to review this network and its sites, so I will do this one too since it is one of the more popular sites in the network.

The basis, bunch of guys go to a college party or just a party with nothing but women. Give them women beer until they get naked and have a big orgy. Sounds just like college in the USA! We've been doing this stuff for years here.

One thing I want to add here is that I do like that the men in these videos do not push these women around or try to force them to swallow. They hug the women after having sex with them. They seem to be very geniune and fun-loving men, though I would think so, getting sex from 5 college women per night will make you fun-loving.

This one is a little more organized than Party Hardcore, but I'm now wondering if that is a good thing. This site's sex seems very planned. The girls though do look like that it up to them whether they have sex or not. Some of the sex is very mechanical, which I think is with the paid women. Other parts is very wild. You will see this plain average girl suddenly jump on one of the guys and give him the riding of the century! Which is where the believability of the site comes into play.

Still, unless you love a good drunk room full of girls, I can't recommend it for the price. You actually get pissed at the guys in it for not picking the one really hot woman you notice. It is probably no different than any other orgy site, except the high price. Good content, but not this high.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit College Fuck Fest

24. College Fuck Fest (0)

Pay
Active
76
apoctom (145) 07-02-07  08:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Plenty of content: Currently there are 50 movies of college parties, each around 50 minutes long.
- Membership gets access to entire Perv Network of 20+ sites.
- College party vids are actually hardcore and explicit, not just flashing boobs and drunk girls.
- Exclusively shot video: It appears to be unique and exclusive.
- Lots of download options, which you may need since download managers don't work. (See below.)
Cons: - Not really college chicks: the parties all feature pornstars who pretend to be college chicks and who fuck the CFF guys. They are surrounded by "college guys," but none of them get in on the action.
- Price: membership is at the higher end of porn subscriptions and I don't think that the value is there for pornstars posing as college girls.
- No download manager support: these movies are long and file sizes are over 400MB for high quality. It needs download manager support.
Bottom Line: I would argue that there is a bit of false advertising here. These parties feature pornstars instead of real college chicks. But, the action is nice and fun to watch in an amateur-holding-a-Handicam sort of way. For the price, though, I won't be keeping my membership.

Update: I bumped up the score for CFF because it does contain unique and original content. The false advertising is nowhere near as bad as some sites that claim exclusive content but contain only DVD rips.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit College Fuck Fest

25. College Fuck Fest (0)

Pay
Active
80
troglodite (69) 08-26-07  09:17pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (35), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Site is (or at least used to be) fairly unique in that you have a lot of sex that happens in front of a crowd of rowdy drunken college students.

* They've gone back through their catalog and updated the vids to meet today's bitrate standards(2000k, 400x300 - yes the resolution is lacking a bit but they do look good).

* For a couple of years, there wasn't much new coming from this site, but lately they're adding new content once again and it fits right in with the old.
Cons: * Vids contain a lot of party footage in addition to the sex, so they can be kind of large (500-700 MB sometimes), but this really isn't a big negative.

* Pics are just screencaps, but honestly they're obviously not the focus here.

* Not all of their old content has survived - some of the older stuff has disappeared. Seems like there has always been right around 60 scenes available for download.
Bottom Line: The "reality-porn" genre isn't really my reviewing specialty, but since I do join these sites on occasion, I thought I'd pass my observations along.

I *think* this was the first paysite I ever joined several years ago, and really not a lot has changed here. While some networks have steadily added more content often at the rate of 1 scene a week, this one has always had about 60 episodes. If you joined several years ago, there will be new stuff here, but not a whole lot of it. Thankfully, they are updating with new stuff once again, but a lot of the girls are ones you may recognize from 4-5 years ago. Like most reality sites, the girls are actually professionals like you might see on a Bangbros site or Realitykings, but they do add a bit of reality by filming the scenes in a party setting, which does feel pretty genuine and makes things a bit more interesting at times. The production values are fine and the content looks good, so there's not a lot to complain about, other than the lack of growth. If you ask me, it's definitely worth a look if you've never joined before and are interested in the genre. You do get access to the rest of the sites on the network, which is a great bonus, although many of the bonus sites either no longer update or are simply scenes ripped from DVDs.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 46 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Male Strippers Unlimited (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.19 seconds.