Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ full trial access
+ exclusive content
+ easy navigation
Cons:
- regular price to high
- low-medium video quality
- not much new things
- girls are not what i expected
- to less videos (arround 90) for that price and quality
- plain site design
if i look at this extra content i am not really unhappy not getting access to that :).
the girls are not that hot as i wished. few of them don`t make me even trying to download the video, but that`s alway`s a question of taste.
all in all i don`t think this site is worth trying it regular. also as a trial it`s nothing what fills my computer and makes me like watching it often.
i like good quality videos, but you don`t find them here :(
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Site has one mission and carries it out nearly perfectly.
- Video is top quality, with some HD. All vids, even as far back as 05, are top quality: at least 2000 kbps.
- Very attractive British models.
- One new vid every day.
- Tons of content. There may be over 800 videos at present.
Cons:
- Scenarios are repetitive.
- No download options. People with slow connections will need a lot of time on their hands.
- Limited nudity.
- Lighting bad in a few vids.
- If silicone were tea, this site would have more than China.
- Longer videos, with a bit more creative thinking, would be an improvement, though five minutes is pretty good for the material as it's currently presented.
Bottom Line:
If you are looking for hardcore, masturbation, toys, etc, you will absolutely loathe this site.
If you find that panties just get in the way of the good stuff and feel that they are more of a nuisance than anything else, this site will cause you to become suicidal with boredom.
If you feel that the thong is the greatest advancement in the history of women's underwear, this site will cause you to go postal on your monitor, and then you'll have to buy a new one.
If you feel that a "panty video" should include: panties around the ankles at all times, panties being sniffed, panties being inserted into various orifices, you are encouraged to avoid this site, in the same way that anyone with taste should avoid a Pauly Shore movie.
If you come to this site looking for porn, you will not find it, unless you're convinced that any woman who would allow herself to be photographed topless is a harlot in service to the Lord of the Underworld.
**
I didn't take points off because of the limited scope of this site, because it doesn't claim to be anything other than what it is. This is a video site, there are no pics; it's a panty-site, there's no hardcore. It's a site directly aimed at the panty/upskirt video collector, with a touch of voyeurism and mild sapphic play. If you're not interested in those things there is no reason for you to visit.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exhaustive and eclectic selection of panty-oriented content
- Some excellent video content
- Decent sized pics: avg 768x1024
- good bonus site on offer
- vids and pics are categorized for search purposes, but not in the actual lay-out of the site.
Cons:
- Non-exclusive material
- lots and lots of boring, dated pic-sets
- pics seem to have been air-brushed to look fresher
- quality is pot-luck, hit and miss.
Bottom Line:
I'm a panty/lingerie enthusiast and I must say things seem pretty dismal at this point all across netland, with a few rare exceptions.
Cute Panty Girls is more or less a grab-bag of odds and ends all tied together and semi-organized. I saw several sets from Panty Plaza and many others are over-familiar. There is some good stuff, but if you're into this kind of material odds are you've seen it before, and you've certainly seen better.
Video content is panty-oriented and fetish oriented. You'll see several high quality hand-job vids, some low-quality spanking vids, casting/strip/interview vids, masturbation, toys, even watersports.
Pic content is mostly lingerie and panties, with focus on glamour/softcore. There are tons of sets, nearly 900 I think, and most of it, for the panty-enthusiast who's been around, is second-rate, not to mention non-exclusive. I have to say, though, there are some diamonds in the rough. I finally got the complete set from a pic I've loved for several years, for instance. Don't know where it comes from, but it's in the top five percentile for the avid undies/lingerie pic collector, of this I'm sure.
Must mention there are two bonus sites. One of them, Jeans and Panties, contains 50 vids (and counting) which can be downloaded in HQ or HD. These vids are tepid in content but the quality is great, and the girls are gorgeous. Good quality pic sets accompany the vids. The other bonus site, Panty Lickers, offers decent quality vids and pics.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
--The 15 different sites on this network try to cover all the sub-niches of panty fetish (up-skirt, young girls, shiny panties, UK panties, etc).
--All but one of the sites have both photos and videos.
--Site navigation is simple, in part because there is not a huge amount of content.
--Some of the material is pretty good--in particular some of the photo sets on Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys
--The flash player gets the job done.
--Photosets have zip files, and are small and download fast (usually in seconds).
Cons:
--One of the biggest problems I had with this site was the generally low resolution of the material, with photos ranging from 900 to 1280 pixels on the long dimension, and as many as one third of the videos below 640 x 480 resolution.
--Many of the photo sets and videos are named using a name that consists only of numbers and letters (e.g. 008ch). To make matters worse, on many of the sites, the models don't even have names. There are no model pages with links to all of a model's sets and videos--you have to find them among the single list of photo sets and/or videos.
--This is archival material that is really starting to show its age (older hairstyles, etc).
--Roughly 50% of the material is non-nude or non-fully-nude.
--The sites have updates, but the total number of photo sets and videos doesn't change, so it certainly appears that they use some type of content rotation system.
Bottom Line:
As a guy who loves to see a hot girl in a sexy pair of panties, I am often disappointed by the lack of attention paid to them on many standard softcore porn sites. So I decided to look around and join a panty site. I don't really like the British approach to "knickers", so I settled on All Panty Pass.
This is a collection of 15 individual sites, each of which focuses on a different sub-niche of panties. The sites are listed below, each followed by 2 numbers: the first being the number of photo sets they had when I was a member, and the second being the number of videos they had (my membership expired about a month ago).
I'll just cut to the chase and say that the site was really disappointing. This is archival material that is starting to show its age. Overall photo/video resolution is low, the file naming system and lack of model names is ridiculous, and the general quality of the panty content is good but not great.
The first thing I discovered when I entered the site and went to Panty Honeys was that a significant number of videos are low resolution. The first 3 I clicked on were all 320 by 240--so small as to be basically worthless. Just as I was starting to think I had been totally screwed, I clicked on one that was 640 by 480. The resolution of the videos is actually quite variable (Panty Honeys had 10 different resolutions among the 66 videos), both within an individual site, and across sites. The best site for video was Jeans and Panties, where they were all 720p. Most of the sites have some 720p, but the amount varies. The 2 biggest sites (Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys) each had a significant number of videos that were below 640 by 480 (20 out 66 on Panty Honeys). The videos are all downloadable with no DRM. The flash player works well and let's you scan through quickly.
The photo sets are the best feature of the sites. They are generally well lit and focused. However, the resolution is low (usually 1280 or 1024 pixels on the long dimension), and many are non-nude. Because of the small size, many zip files are less than 10 MB, and download within seconds.
The weirdest site was the Virtual Panty Girls, which consists of animated photo sets and a few animated videos. It must have taken a lot of time to create this material, but I didn't find it erotic at all.
Navigation is simple, and each of the sites has the same layout. The opening page shows the latest updates and upcoming updates, and has links to pages for all photo sets and all videos. When you go to the photo or video pages, there is a row of thumbnails across the top for individual photo sets or videos (varying from about 5 to 9 thunbnails). There is also a list of number links for the next page of photoset/video thumbnails. Because there are so few thumbnails on each page, there are more pages and clicking than there need to be. Each site also has a link to the main All Panty Pass page, which has links to the individual sites.
As noted above, many of the models are not given a name, and there are no model pages where you can find all of girl's photo sets and videos on each site. This along with the number/letter filenames means that once you've downloaded the material to your hard drive, you really don't know what is what. Forget about a search feature on the sites and network...they don't have one.
About one-third to one-half of the material is non-nude, or non-fully nude. Even though the focus is panties, I do want to see what's underneath, so this was very disappointing.
With the low resolution, aging material, and plain Jane site navigation, the site has the look and feel of a site that is 10 years old. The price was $21 and change for a month, and while I didn't feel screwed, I think they would generate more revenue if they lowered that to $10 or $15 a month.
Bottom Line: There is some content here worth downloading, but the cons outweigh the pros, and I find it difficult to recommend this site.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- True to the niche
- Very pretty girls.
- Lots of content, updated regularly.
- Good quality video, and quality seems to be improving steadily.
- These girls seem to really love smooching with one another. Can't blame them for that now can we?
Cons:
- Too much outdoors material. Kinis are for sunning and swimming, panties are for indoors. Or maybe I'm just crazy?
- Too many tats. Tattoos are nasty, dang it.
- Pic quality needs to be taken up a notch or two.
- *Some* of the best quality vids are DRM protected.
Bottom Line:
TNV rates a higher score than its sister site, Virginal Visions, because there is so much more material here and because the vids are more varied and of higher quality, generally speaking. I think the pics are better (content-wise) at VV, but that's because I'm an old schooler when it comes to ladies' skivvies.
I ended up keeping almost 6 gigs of video and 261 zipped pic sets. The pic sets are numbered up into the 800's, so I obviously didn't get anywhere near all of them. Newer vids come in at 1000 to 1600kbps, 640x480, and run from 15 to 20 mins, and you can usually get them in one file. I don't know if 20 minutes is the 'whole' video in any particular case, but these files are big enough. Most of the pics are small, but the bigger ones are 1024x768. Despite their size they are very nice, for the most part.
I don't care for the fainting vids. There's something creepy about a guy feeling up a girl while she's out cold. I know it's fantasy, but it still bothers me.
The site is very softcore and heavy on soft-lesbianism, and only recommended to those who appreciate pretty girls getting it on in their underwear.
One more note: when I joined the site it was having technical problems: pics not opening, links not working, etc. I emailed the webmaster and by the next day everything was fixed. There was even a message posted at the site about maintenance problems which were being attended to. Good work, and good customer service. Few points extra for that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good looking models.
- High-quality pics.
- Vids look OK.
- Interesting style, lots of mirrors, costume-play.
- Regular updates.
Cons:
- Navigation is terrible to practically non-existent.
- Use of the term "Lolita" in at least one set title, which I believe is considered unacceptable nowadays and should be.
- Sets are poorly organized and contain tons of the same shots over and over, some turned sideways, some turned upside down, just to beef up the quantity of pics and to tire your patience for no good reason.
Bottom Line:
I need more characters to do justice to how poorly put together this site is. Navigation? What's that? You have what seems to be two main pages with thumbs leading to the galleries. Both pages are over-long. None of the galleries are numbered. There are no model lists or browse features whatsoever. Vids are offered on the right-hand sidebar of one of the main gallery pages.
All pic sets are contained on one page each, with big thumbnails. Some sets have over 200 pics. Every set I looked at so far is made up of a few choice views of the model repeated over and over and over, with tiny variations. These sets could be trimmed by seventy percent and you wouldn't lose anything. They need someone who knows how to coordinate photo sets.
To add to the tedium someone has decided to have each pic open in a new window. Maybe I'm just an idiot but I can't see how to change this. Each pic has to be closed out in order to view another one, unless you want to keep a thousand windows open. To make things even worse, each set is numbered identically: "b_001" to b_ whatever". Always a "b", never a different letter.
This site is way softcore and caters more to the voyeur than the panty/lingerie lover. "Peeks" is what you get most of the time. There is a truckload of tease and very little pay-off, though there are a few sets which contain full nudity. The quality of some of the pics is offset by the sheer tedium caused by this site's lack of organization and concern for the customer.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Love the site, it's updated with a new movie everyday. has large high quality movies and short clips of babes doing the nasty in stockings, lingerie and my fav latex.
oh, also has some HD content and pictures.
Cons:
A bit pricy, but worth it to me.
Bottom Line:
Not sure what to say but, if you like hot chicks in stockings, pantyhose, lingerie or latex it's a great site to be a member of.
but you need a fast internet connection for some of the movies because all the full clips are 200mb + it takes me a long time to download on my slow connection. I usually stick with the short clips but sometimes like a movie part so much I need to download the whole thing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Quite good content; they have made some effort to collect videos with various kinds of lingerie, like their name says.
- For the detail minded, they even categorised according to the type of lingerie (stockings, corsets etc).
- The exclusive stuff always seems to be solo, but is well filmed.
- Support did actually respond - didn't help, but did respond ;)
Cons:
Site is an abysmal piece of crap.
The navigation is pretty much useless: the only kind of list you can get is in some random order. They do have categories, but those also just lead to randomly ordered lists.
No streaming preview.
There seems to be no way to search by title.
They have short clips which you can painfully use to preview, but there is no link to the full video! To find that you have to navigate through their crappy lists.
The only way you will be able to use this is to blindly download full videos in the hopes they might be good.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-USA porn stars trying on panties but rarely having sex.
-Cumshot always on panties/ass/back of model.
-100% exclusive original unique content.
-Some big names, like Courtney Cummz or Jenna Haze (2 scenes).
-Some attempts at reality porn: simple scripts and locations.
-60+ videos. WMV or Quicktime in various resolutions.
-Max resolution: 65% 854x480 2000kbps; 35% 640x480 1000kbps.
-Video length varies a lot: from 4 up to 30 minutes.
-18 photo galleries: 75% 1200x800; 25% 600x400.
-100 pictures on average per set; 50% landscape, 50% portrait.
-Full access to other sites from this company (not updating).
-Free tour lists all updates with release date and trailer.
-ccbill.
Cons:
-Erratic updates: 1 in Jan/09, 1 in Feb/09, 3 in Mar/09.
-Very little pussy penetration: handjob or blowjob at most.
-For a panties site, there's too much emphasis on blowjobs.
-Very few of the models masturbate; lots of panty touching.
-Most scenes are POV; last scene had a cameraman, though.
-Always the same guy; he talks a lot.
-Guy often jerks himself off for a long time to finish scene.
-Not enough panty variety: same panties in some scenes.
-Panties not always match bra; most of the time, no bra at all.
-Regional pricing.
Bottom Line:
I came across Panty Pops while browsing the Panties niche section here. I'll try to join some of the sites but this was the first one, mainly because I knew most of the USA stars, it had a low price and network access. Scenes are always very similar: there's a model and a pile of a dozen panties; she teasingly tries on some of them, following instructions from the guy that is filming her; the guy takes out his cock and some blowjob and cock-panties interaction ensues. Absolutely no penetration except a handful of scenes.
I don't get why there's so little penetration. It's not that the site is deceiving since it's true to its name: the guy eventually pops on the panties and ass, with the model always lying flat on her stomach. It's the fact that all models are seasoned porn stars who have done lots of regular boy-girl scenes. It looks weird to see the guy not pull the panties apart and get down to business. That's what I was hoping to see but it happens in less than 10% of the scenes. On the other hand, almost every scene contains some blowjob. Since this site seems to be a one man job (performing, filming, editing, etc), I couldn't help but think it is just an excuse for this guy to enjoy some quality time with a few USA porn stars. Are blowjob-only rates lower?
Another thing I found weird was the panties reuse from scene to scene. Looks like the guy buys them by the dozen at Victoria's Secret (lots have the Pink collection logo) but he makes them last for several scenes; many of them are tried on by 4 or 5 different models. It looks cheap since they are probably bought for less than 5 USD each; it also brings a sense of déja vu. Models must have some panties of their own: why not ask the models to bring them on set and try them on camera? That would bring a higher variety of panties to the scenes and they may also have matching bras.
Despite its shortcomings, I feel the content is very unique, the cast is often stellar and it's more than decently produced and packaged to recommend it to anyone interested in this niche. Don't expect much from the other sites in the network: they are no longer updating; there were also a couple more sites that have been taken down and are not accessible any more.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- frequent updates every 2-3 days
- a few hd videos
- some very erotic content especially the fainting videos
-you can zip download pics, pics looks fairly good
-over 20 extra streaming cams and galleries( nothing to write home about)
- lots of content
- mostly good looking girls
Cons:
- only 2 full length movies as of now. Supposedly it says more will come soon
-older videos in lots of clips
-almost all videos are in wmv video format, some avi
- site navigation is very difficult
-hardly any of the girls are big boobs. only one girl that i see with a d cup
-mostly all softcore even though there is some lesbian oral
Bottom Line:
Video categories by girl, panties, nude, girl play, girl on girl, parties, fainting, long play, and special
-37 party videos , 58 long play videos ,38 by girl, 82 girl play videos , 154 girl-girl videos , 42 fainting videos , 73 panties vidoes, 8 nude videos, 2 special
-Pic categories by girl, panties, nude, girl play, girl on girl, panties
-The full videos are 403 mb and 652 mb long
-the upcoming pics and vid section is empty
-Lots of lesbian videos, a few solo, a few of a guy touching the girl which is during the fainting videos, and many other softcore vids and pics.
-The fainting videos are of a girl pretending to be passed out and a guy taking advantage of her by rubbing her body and touching and kissing her.
-site has lots of content and potential. Lots of young girls in erotic situations, and natural settings but the videos are all over the place with different clips it makes it very annoying and confusing. If they can fix that and put give every a video a full scene option and more download options this site will be Great!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Have you ever thought you'd died and gone to heaven? Well if, like me, you thrill at the sight of a nice pair of female legs emerging from a skirt - "in the most delightful way!" - then this site will certainly prove as addictive to you as it has to me. I wouldn't even really describe myself as a "porn user", because these are everyday scenes, but just aimed straight at someone with a strong panty fetish. These girls know exactly what to do to tease and show, and they love doing it.
Cons:
I have tried, but I really can not think of any. My mouth just starts to salivate at the very thought of what I know I shall enjoy seeing, and I have never yet been disappointed. Maybe it's just me, but to me this site is Paradise, and there are many scenes which I'm sure will stay etched in my brain for as long as I have one!
Bottom Line:
With your membership you also get joint membership of two other sites on a similar yet varied theme, filmed by the same brilliant cameraman. Pantyhose Amateurs is one, Michelle Lynn is the other, each one equally superb. There are even bonus sites generously added to the package. In conclusion I'd like to add that I joined originally for one month only - and that was so long ago now I can't even remember the date! We all like different things of course, but this Super-Site is definitely "My Bag"! If it is your bag too, then I recommend you to try it, and I'm sure you'll love it too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nice, no GREAT site, if you like very softcore - once in a while (if not, do not bother to read on).
Some fine and fabulous looking british girls/women with a sexy attitude, some sexy talk (NOT all) and hot lingerie.
Good amount af ok-quality videos - some newer ones in almost HD.
4,5,6 or more videoclips of the same model - great plus...
Easy navigation
Fine updates - daily - it looks like.
Way over 1000 clips at this stage.
Some very exclusive videos of topmodels like Laurena Lacey (she just got a site of her own, almost) and a doll like Annalease.
You can download more than two videos at the same time...
Cons:
Site-design is very simple - and not exiting (but here it's the videos that matters)
No photosets
Most videos only in MPG - a few newer once in WMV.
Earlier videos a bit overexposed or generally not very good quality.
Scenes are mostly quite repetitive.
Some video-clips has disturbing background sound - some even sound like rain and thunder (like in Mickey Newburys songs)
Bottom Line:
Cannot not help it, but I really like this site - even if the content is very soft.
No masturbation, no close-up pussy clips, no hc, but some soft lez. Panty Amateur seems like a sister-site to Panty Maniacs - also british, but based in the Netherlands. And IT IS - a sistersite - or a co. -site.
But compared to the better scored PM this Panty Amateurs has quite a lot more. Foremost a far bigger content, better updates and some much better videos than PM.
First of all the great looking star, Laurena Lacay (here: Lorena) has 10 different videos and none is the same as the three at PM - and far better.
And the big titted and famous Petra here has 17 videoclips - she is also a knockout.
The same goes for a lot of other great british models where the amount of different videos with different outfit for the model is better than the "mothersite" - PM.
Sizes are typical a little under 100 mb which makes it more userfriendly to download.
WMV: 960x540.
No stream.
And no photosets.
Of course it's a bit annoying the way these videos stop before total nudity or masturbation, but ok, this is meant to be softcore and fetish panties - and if you can do with that, this site is great.
Of course I'd like to watch some of these great british model going more hc or just full nudity with some masturbation, but alas!!
Some of the models - but not the "finest" - apears on for exampel Suburban Amateurs with harder content (masturbation) and some in the somewhat similar Only Tease...
Still Panty Amateur is a great site - if you can do with this kind of very softcore...
But, man - I'd like to watch Laurena Lacey or Petra or Annalease in some harder stuff.
Anybody knows where - if at all?
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Young attractive girls
-Good amount of content
-Good quality videos
Cons:
-Updates once every blue moon
-There's ads eventhough you pay
Bottom Line:
First off this is like an advanced manual pleasure site. That is you won't see any penetration or much else.
The cam is POV, and high quality at that and you basically watch a girl grind on the guy, give him a handjob with her panties, and simple things like that.
As far as I could tell there's no download limit. I downloaded 4 files simultaneously while browsing the site and no problems. The same can be said with daily limits.
The big downfall to this site is that there's no search feature to find a certain girl by name or anything. Not a big deal, but it would be nice to see it.
The videos are high quality, the girls are pretty attractive, there are a few screen caps, but lack of updates are can be annoying as well as a steep price just to watch a half-naked girl jack off a guy without much else.
IT goes without say that unless this is your cup of tea you'll probably pass right by without a second thought.
Rating of 74 due to the quality, background work, the girls, lack of updates, as well as a few smaller things. After a year you should have a slightly better site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-some decent orgasms
-amateurish girls
-680 x 1024 pics are solid
-decent panty stuffing action
- lots of pics per set
Cons:
-Only 8 straight videos
-21 lesbian vids
-36 solo vids
- Only 90 pic sets
-videos are fuzzy
-overpriced
-no bonus material
-no updates
-girls are not very attractive
Bottom Line:
-Cant say that its amateur, but the girls in the videos I have never seen before.
-Videos basically of sniffing panties and panties being rubbed on pussy. There is some pussy licking action, and only 2 sex scenes.
-Videos range from about 12mb to 100mb.
-Videos around 10 minutes
-All videos split into 4 parts. But some of the parts are bad links.
I'm into this kind of material, but I am very disappointed. Should of known from the low TBP score that the site was bad news. Stay away, they ask for to much money.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
