Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 56 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Beach Hunters

1. Beach Hunters (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 07-02-14  03:02pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Updated: 07-02-14  03:11pm  (Update History)
Reason: Thought score maybe a bit too low, weighing the quantity of the material that the site has to offer.
Pros: Content Quantity. As of July, 2014 Beach Hunters indicates to non-members of amassing well over 3,600 "full-size” video clips. Now that may sound a lot, but take in account these videos are in 3 different formats (avi, mpg, mp4, wmv) counted as separate videos.

Content Categories. Videos and photos are set in categories so that members can easily find material to their preference. Categories are as follows: sex on the beach, foreplay, nudism topless, change room, not straight.

Content Variety. Every body form imaginable, age (within legal limits of course) and sexual orientation is captured on site. Beachhunters' videographers seem to have no scruples on what they capture on the beach; skinny, curvy, wrinkly, morbidly obese, it's all here.
Cons: Photos. Photos are very poor quality screen shots.

Editing. Many clips contain 3 plus minute of no activity, where the subjects are on their backs barely moving an inch. A great deal of editing could be used in the majority of their videos for the lack of activity as well as shaky hands syndrome, however Beachhunters seem to opt in using their editing talents into chunking up their videos in order to extend their library quantity, with no consideration given to their quality. Sadly this seems to be a common practice among these type of voyeur sites.

Sound. Videographers don't seem to be aware of the concept of self-noise, meaning when they move their equipment, it gets fairly loud. Do they know where the volume switch is on their equipment?

Recycling. Currently outside from membership access, I have visited their site to see if they in they had any fresh material worth to join up again and have noticed from their latest screen shots, they are reposting material from years ago!
Bottom Line: If you're into photos and not much into videos, don't bother with this site. However despite the site's extremely poor edited content, they do have plenty of material for at least one month's membership, however due to its recycling of content, I wouldn't go further than that or ever consider going back again.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Beach Voy

2. Beach Voy (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 06-05-14  02:16pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Excellent high-resolution photo sets of gorgeous women.

Predominately Nude.

Mostly exclusive content.
Cons: Has not updated in years.

No Zip Files.

Not many videos.
Bottom Line: This is an image site. Don't bother to put any money down if you're here for the videos, because they're fairly sparse in quantity. Definitely worth at least one month's membership. Wouldn't bother for 2.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Love The Beach

3. I Love The Beach (0)

Pay
Newbie
88*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 06-05-14  07:35am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Updated: 06-05-14  02:35pm  (Update History)
Reason: With a reflective comparison to other voyeur beach sites. A higher score just seemed more reasonable.
Pros: Excellent amount of videos containing some gorgeous women.

Some decent quality in HD videos in their more recent years.

They do not recycle their content.

Great quality in pic resolution, offering true sets.
Cons: Sone of their real old videos (plus 5 years or so) are so tiny, makes one wonder, "Why bother?"

I think in their advertisements, they're really underselling in the amount of nude material available on site.
Bottom Line: I have an affinity for voyeur sites, and from my experience. These guys are the best out there. Worth the money.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Voy Zone

4. Voy Zone (0)

Pay
Newbie
67*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 06-05-14  07:13am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Update Frequency: Updates Daily

Video Resolution Quality: Fairly decent ranging from 720X576 to 1280X720.

Image Quantity: There are an incredible amount of photos on site.

Subject Matter: Some gorgeous women captured in the available content.
Cons: Image Set Quality: Images are random, not at all visually tied together in a given scene and are by average 4X6” in size, pretty small for a pay site. Also to note many of the images are low res versions from other pay sites, such as BeachVoy.

Overall Business Practice: Incredibly poor due to blatant deception in advertisement in updates and distribution/recycling of material.

Video Quality In Terms of Content: Majority of the videos are in dire need of editing, since many of them have minutes of inactivity.

Price: Way over priced considering the content given quantity and quality of material.
Bottom Line: Before even deciding on investing 30 bucks on a month with Voy-Zone.com, I noticed the “Last Updates” indicated on their non-member main page were all given (current month/year, but no exact date of entry) when hovering over them individually with the mouse. Suspicion ran over me, telling that these images/videos were not really updates at all, rather these images were the same and the dates were automatically set to change with the current month. So I waited till the next month passed and sure enough, the same images stayed on page, but their attached month auto-adjusted to the current month.

Video Count: 462 video clips (some are however repeats).

Despite this blatant deception toward prospective customers, I was still curious what content was held within their site, and thought maybe Voy-Zone’s page intro was simply a by-product a lazy web management and thought perhaps they still held some exclusive fresh content that maybe worth while, so I still forked over my 30 bones to see what’s up.

First impressions… Once joining Voy-Zone.com, and logging in, the site’s main page was completely different, filled with actual updates with complete dates of when they were posted. As to whether this material has been recycled from any previous posts, I would consider to be quite feasible, due to the fact there’s a huge gap of time where no posted material is to be found on site! Strangely enough between September 9, 2011 and February 5, 2014, there was absolutely no material to be found inside their video collection. Also to note, what little material that has been left on site posted in 2011 has been reposted in 2014! With this in mind, it’s an easy guess that periodically material is withdrawn from the site, then probably reposted later in the site in order to keep material fresh as well as keeping customers from downloading the majority of their archive in a month’s membership. Also if you’re more into high quality image sets (i.e. related pics of a particular scene), than movies of beach voyeurism, stay clear from this site, the image “sets” here are pretty much random unconnected pics, by average 4X6” in size, fairly poor in resolution given their from a pay site.

EDITING: Many of the movies are riddled with mouth breather moments, that being many of these 3 plus minute clips contain women on their backs barely fidgeting an inch, all the while they could have simply taken a photo which would’ve consumed hundreds of megabytes less than a video… It’s often a wonder at times to think if these guys ever consider the topic of conceptual editing; meaning if nothing is happening in a half minute or so through a scene, hit the pause button or at least edit it out the inactivity in the material later when the footage has been captured. And these guys definitely have plenty of experience in editing software, since much of the footage has been divided into individual clips in order to increase appearance of having more content, a common practice among voyeur sites.

QUANTITY VS QUALITY: To say that all Voy-Zone films are like the ladder would be unfair, there are some nice gems scattered through out and about 1 out of 10 films are hard drive keeper worthy, at least to my standards not sparing the smiles and womanly curves, while the rest are simply mouth breather fillers kept on site, just so that it would appear their collection is immense in size: mission accomplished. As of June 04, 2014, to my count there were 462 video clips, including some repeated material peppered within the sets.

De ‘Rena, who has distributed content on other sites, actually captures the best material on site, but still at times have moments of stagnant mouth breather scenes, also having tendencies of attention deficit disorder (ADD) moments with the camera shifting away from main subject at hand toward random uninteresting views, then shifting back toward main subject; this probably is due to the lack of activity with subjects not being in motion, but for the viewer (at least to me) these odd shifts get quite annoying, and the answer again to resolve these mouth breather moments and odd off-base subject shift, is that good ol’ fashion pause button, patience, and/or perhaps the use of editing software as well. Also repeated posts of the same material are not uncommon to find.

VOLUME: Also another tip, lowering the volume is quite an effective measure in reducing self-noise which is another annoyance entirely on its own.

RATING SYSTEM: Each page does provide users a means to rate the material, however there is no way to see the accumulation of others' ratings. The accumulation of these ratings apparently determine the “Top 7 Video Sets” of the site, but unfortunately there’s no optional page viewing system given to see material rated from best to worst, which would be an ideal feature as well.

In short, this is a pass due to their price is a bit steep considering the limited quantity of quality movies on site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Hidden Zone

5. Hidden Zone (0)

Pay
Newbie
91*
David19 (3) 04-14-14  11:50pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: --This site certainly appears to be the real deal. It is a hidden camera site focusing on videos of nude women in places such as locker rooms and showers.

--The women, at least some of them, are reasonably attractive.

--It is very realistic. Most of the women give no indication that they know they are being filmed in the nude.

--Videos are fairly long and show everything and the technical quality is quite high.

--There is a certain amount of breast action as women fondle their own breasts while washing.

--Updates are fairly frequent and the varying appearances of the women--with some being quite attractive and others not so much--give the site a very realistic feel.
Cons: --One of the site's big "pros"--the fact that it realistically shows ordinary women--is of course also its biggest "con". The women are ordinary in appearance, meaning that a very few might be really hot, most are quite average, and there are certainly many overweight aging women in granny panties. But, of course, that is what you would expect to find in a real locker room spying on real women.

--The locker room and shower sections are the best--the other sections, which include dressing room, beach house, and "upskirt" shots, just didn't work as well for me.

--Another small drawback is that the videos need to be downloaded, which takes time--there is no way to stream the videos.
Bottom Line: With a hidden camera site such as this one, there is obviously no way to be absolutely sure whether the videos are real spy videos of nude women, or simply posed by models. However the very realistic appearance of the women certainly leads me to believe that this site is what it purports to be--real videos of women showering or dressing in the nude while being filmed by hidden cameras.

As such sites go, this one is of quite high quality. Moreover, the videos are ordered by date, and it is clear that the quality of the videos has been increasing, so we may continue to expect excellent work from this site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Newbie Nudes

6. Newbie Nudes (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
GenuineReviews (0) 01-16-14  10:40am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: I honestly cannot think of any pros to be brutally honest!

The site had a 'couple' of attractive women on it from the UK.

The site never crashed and seemed to work just fine.
Cons: Bad value for money:Premium is expensive, yet you don't get much for the money. You have the ability to broadcast your webcam, even though that section of the website is always dead. Remove comments from your pictures and add more friends than non premium members.

Fighting: The forum is full of regular members ripping each other to shreds 24/7 365 days a year. It really is like a mad house.

The pictures are poor: The less said about these the better really.
Bottom Line: Seriously, avoid at all costs.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit I Love The Beach

7. I Love The Beach (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
David19 (3) 03-17-13  01:57am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: This site is mostly focused on women's tits. Pros include the fact that there is a large amount of content--probably tens of thousands of still photos and thousands of videos. The models are generally very attractive and the site is updated frequently. The site does a good job of focusing in on the models' tits and also includes a fair number of videos with the models applying suntan oil to their tits. The quality of both the videos and the still photos is very high. The videos tend to be reasonably long--averaging about two minutes and up to about four minutes. A fair number of videos of models walking on the beach are also shown. There are some fully nude photos and videos as well, although those are not the predominant part of the site. The videos also generally have different resolutions, with different file sizes, for downloads. All sizes of tits are shown on this site although it does tend towards models with bigger tits.
Cons: The site does not include any hardcore sex--indeed it is very softcore. This is a bit surprising because there are other beach sites, perhaps with photography done in more private areas, that do include hardcore. The site is divided into several areas--such as eurobeach and 'south of france topless beauties--some of which are updated more frequently than others. The quality does vary a bit between areas.
Bottom Line: The basic premise of the site is to use ordinary women who happen to have their tops off on beaches as topless softcore porn models. The women have consented to be topless on the beach but not to serve as topless models on a for-pay porn site. The site will not remove the photos of women who appear as models on this site, even if they complain, because they did bare their tits in public. The site does a much better job than most voyeur sites--and even other voyeur beach sites--at portraying its models in a sexually provocative manner. It is clear from the content that all the women, although they may not know they are being filmed or photographed, clearly enjoy showing off their tits in public. Overall this is one of the best sites in its genre.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Life Cam

8. Real Life Cam (0)

Pay
Newbie
89*
4Alina2USA (In-Active) 01-01-13  02:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Clear Cameras/Multi Angle/Easy Secure Payment Options
Cons: Blury Cameras/Out of Range/Too Close in some areas/Freezing Camera Issues/No Thumb Nail View of All Units All Areas Simultaneously with Select Ability
Bottom Line: This is a great experimental site that allows you to view interaction of people in real time 24/7. The cameras are fairly good but not all are equally clear or positioned correctly. When background lighting is too bright the cameras don’t know how to respond and repetitively click through modes which can be annoying. The people are fun to observe and know that they are being viewed but kind of don’t care. In the unit of Alina and Anton I did find it difficult to view because Anton completely ignores Alina most of the time and it’s sad to see her so unhappy most of the time. I guess some guys can’t read clear body language. Hopefully Alina will see the light and find someone who respects her and appreciates her properly as she certainly doesn't deserve to be treated like that. Other than these suggestions and the fact that RealLifeCam technicians need to fix the freezing cameras issues I give this social experiment a solid 9 out of 10 and have already joined the site. I highly recommend this site. Can’t wait for more units to be added.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Upskirt Times

9. Upskirt Times (1)

Pay
Active
60
rayone (11) 11-14-12  07:17am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: large amount of videos and images. Video resolution is 480x640 in the older videos with 4 Mb/s bitrates. The new ones are 1280x720 at 5 Mb/s bitrates. Daily updates: one video and one photo set. The preview pages accurately provide the content in member section.
Cons: The site and the bonus sites are plagued with speed problems (at least from the US, east and west coasts). The download speed are 13 kb/s and lower which makes the download of a typical 50 Mb video to take over an hour. Complains about this with the webmaster remain unresolved.
Bottom Line: The site has a very large amount of content but their download speeds are so slow that the navigation experience is frustrating and video downloads are all but impossible. For this reason the site content is useless and unless their navigation improve dramatically, potential customers should stay away.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Webcam Hackers

10. Webcam Hackers (0)

Pay
Active
70
dracken (246) 10-29-11  04:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 50 videos with updates pretty regularly (every 7 days it seems).
- The scenes are supposedly in HD (1250x720), but in my opinion even the HD looks grainy and rather poor quality (I guess it's all part of the webcam look, but to me they took it a step too far with some scenes looking as bad as a live cam strip show)
- As the title suggests this site is all about girls with webcams. Some of them strip in front of said webcam, some get fucked (sadly only one camera angle) and a few masturbate solo.
- They have the same high quality of models the rest of the site has and I believe all "amateurs" on here have scenes on other sites in the network.
- Most scenes have a bit of a story. A girl talks to her boyfriend and strips for him, a foreign exchange student has sex with her boyfriend, etc. Nothing too crazy, but it all stays in the same theme of a webcam hack and it's rather hot.
- Access to the network is included (tons and tons of good sex scenes here.)
Cons: - Like I mentioned above the videos although good resolution are still a bit on the grainy side and several of them have the webcam specific delay, which really makes the scene hard to get into. Also some scenes have serious color issues (when a girl's vagina looks purple something is seriously wrong)
- Some scenes are very short (5 minutes) and there are some scenes that feel like they belong together in one video but were split into two in order to make the site look bigger. (There is one Madison Ivy scene where she masturbates then another scene where has sex in the exact same place).
- The entire network needs a better way to preview videos. Right now their thumbnails are not very clear.
- Some girls are really not that interesting in solo action. There is one scene where a girl pulls on her labia and asks if we can tell which one she pulls on more. Titillating stuff indeed.
Bottom Line: Overall this site suffers from some limitations that are inherent in the type of content it's trying to produce. When you're trying to generate amateur content you pretty much force yourself to have rather poor camera work, only one angle and sometimes awkward interactions (like I mentioned above some girls do well alone with a camera and some are just weird)

Also they have a scene where two girls get into adult diapers and pretend to be sumo wrestlers. I guess that fits the site and it's rather funny, but I'm not sure if it's content that I want to pay 25 bucks for. I guess you have to look at this site as a bonus along with the much, much better sites like Massage Creep and 18 Years Old.

Aside from the sometimes questionable content I would have loved longer scenes. The average video is around 10 minutes with many running under that. Give the girls some more toys and more outfits and there should be no issue making longer videos.

So, we have rather poor action, short scenes and bad camerawork. So far the site manages to fail on every count possible. We do have several hot models, but why bother trying to watch the scenes here when a click away they are showing off with good lighting and multiple camera angles?

Now don't get me wrong, the premise of the site is good, we need more amateur content even if amateur means pornstar paid to masturbate in front of an expert camera crew. But for the love of God don't settle with actual webcam footage. That is never going to look good, it's just a waste of time and money.

Bottom line: the latest updates on here show improvement. Maybe it's just my hopeful optimism but the camera work seems cleaner and they are starting to focus on sex scenes as opposed to solo masturbation. Also the u8pdates are coming regularly and they seem to really want to push this amateur-like content, which is great.

More HD updates, more hot models and longer scenes and we should have a great site with a unique premise. (please no more adult diapers though... there is no need for that.)

P.S. The score reflects mu hope that the site will improve, right now I would not join this network just for the violation series of sites.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit British Doggers

11. British Doggers (0)

Pay
Active
50
dracken (246) 09-16-11  04:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Maybe 11 videos and 78 photo sets of various quality (mostly really bad stuff, videos are around 320x240 and images are around 768px × 1,024px)
- They have zipped images and some hardcore action, some stripping, all outdoors
- The site came bundled in a network deal so I guess I didn't technically spend money on this particular site.
- Navigation worked okayish most of the time and the whole using the site experience was adequate (downloads worked, I didn't get kicked out suddenly and the links worked)
Cons: - Very few videos and few images. To make things worse the quality of most images and all videos is very poor. The scenes have inadequate lighting and for the most part mediocre camera work.
- No diverse options when downloading size or quality wise. In fact, overall the site looks like it was made 10-15 years ago and never updated the technical side
- Some sets look recycled from the '70 some look like they belong on a different network (I swear I saw a bangbus set on here) I don't think there is anything remarkable or interesting about the content, it seems all non -exclusive image sets from diverse places and poor quality clips.
- Nothing British about the models, no apparent rhyme or reason to the scenes. No modes page or way to easily browse the scenes.
- They have adds for other sites in the members section
- While they do daily updates it looks like they simply recycle content, the newer content looks just as bad as the old, with no foreseeable improvement.
Bottom Line: I don't know what you're interested in but this site doesn't have it, trust me you're probably better off with a Google image search. I have seen preview pages for some sites that were way more impressive than the members section of this site. Why? Well let's take a quick tour

The video section is a joke, 11 scenes at 320x 240 resolution with very, very generic porn action. Even more interesting the oldest video is from august this year and the most recent is from September, combined with the fact that all scenes look like they were filmed before digital cameras were invented it's pretty obvious they are recycling content.

The photo section is a bit better, we have around 80 sets with anywhere between 20 to 100 images each. Some look like behind the scene photos (the girl smiles next to a guy with a flaccid penis) some look like screengrabs from a hardcore movie and the rest look like old discolored photos you might find in your dad's collection.

The action in the scene is all over the place, there are some scenes where the girls don't even take their clothes off, some DP, some stripping outdoors, some dildo... overall a hodgepodge that doesn't make any sense. You have anything here from Hillary Scott deepthroating a dude to stuff that would maybe be at home on Met-art if they decided to give up on good quality, HD photos.

So the content is poor, the quality of the images and video is bad,the website navigates like an amateur project put together by someone with minimal HTML knowledge. There is no way to find specific categories of action or particular models, to get to the scenes you have to click the images, but not the texts, although they are links as well. Oh and don't even bother with streaming the videos, of navigating the images with their image browser that is also a joke and will break on you.

Overall there is nothing here that redeems the site. I got it as a special deal when I joined a network and was just impressed at the poor quality. If I had paid to be here I would demand my money back, it's simply a poor site. Maybe the sites they offer as bonus are better (I didn't check those out so maybe those are awesome and worth it... but I doubt it.)
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Expose

12. Public Expose (0)

Pay
Active
60
rearadmiral (316) 05-25-11  12:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - $5.95 2-day trial membership with no restrictions
- Bills through CCBill
- Approximately 120 videos
- Multiple video download options
- Some attractive models
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Mediocre quality videos
- Videos are all short duration
- Very small photo sets
- No photo zips available
- Small site
- Not part of any network to improve value
- No known models (to me, anyway)
- No updates since January 2010
Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of public nudity and I’m always looking for sites with good material. Unfortunately, Public Expose isn’t one of the better ones I’ve seen. It’s small, with only about 120 videos. The TBP review says that there are 148 videos, and it is correct that there are 148 videos on the site, but for some reason, there are many duplicate videos that even use the same name. There are approximately 120 unique videos here.

Having access to 120 public nudity videos shouldn’t be anything to complain about, but these videos are all quite short. They range in length from under one minute to just over five minutes. Most of the videos follow the same format in that an Eastern European woman is seen in some sort of an outdoor setting (fully dressed) and she flashes for the camera. If full nudity exists on this site, I’ve yet to see it. There are several scenes of two women flashing and making out a bit.

This may be subjective, but I found the scenes to be almost un-erotic: the models are mostly shy about flashing and many of the shoots are simply outdoors near other people. When I contrast some of the Eastern European public shoots available on ALS Scan and Public Disgrace, those on Public Expose come off looking pretty shabby. Certainly the women on Public Expose aren’t bad looking, but they aren’t great either. I don’t follow many Eastern European models, but I still didn’t recognize any of them.

Technically, the site was probably average when it was started several years ago, but it is well below what the average porn customer would expect today. Video resolution is quite low. It varies depending on which type of file you want and ranges from a low of 320x240 for a very low-res mpeg4 to ‘high’ of 720x540 (at 128kb/s) for a DivX avi file. I downloaded the DivX files simply assuming that since they were the largest they’d give the best quality, but if this is the best, it isn’t very good.

There are photos available, but the photo sets are very small – less than two dozen pics in some cases. That may be good news, though, when you learn that there is no zip option available.

If there is any good news about this site, it’s that they have a full trial available for just $5.95. Given that there are only 120-ish small videos on the site anyone with a half-decent internet connection can download every video in the five day trial period. And further taking from the value is that the site hasn’t updated in over a year.

Unless you’re a huge fan of public nudity and want to add this notch to your belt, I’d avoid it. It isn’t a bad value at the trial price if you go in with your eyes open and realize that you don’t get much for that fee. Just remember to cancel your membership before the trial ends.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit They Didn\'t Know

13. They Didn't Know (0)

Pay
Active
53
lk2fireone (194) 03-31-11  03:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Multiple choices for downloading a video: High, medium, or low quality.
But the quality of the "high quality" video is not very good.
-Content is dated.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login.
-Very easy switching between network sites (Do not need to re-enter your login information, just click on a hot link).
-Long time before site timeout.
Cons: -Archive site. Last update was 2009-02-07.
-Small site.
-Models are not named in the videos.
-No model bios.
-Default filename for downloading videos is "high", "medium", or "low",
for high, medium or low quality selection. So have to manually rename videos for sorting or saving.
-But that's not a big problem, because due to low quality of even the "high" quality videos, who wants to save these videos anyway? The models
in the videos are not named, the videos are poor quality (in terms of erotic quality and video technique). I'm watching one video with a guy and
a girl, and it's not until 4 minutes after the video starts that you can easily see the face of the girl. Until then, the heads of both the guy and the girl are mainly cut out of the frame, and it's not until the 4 minute mark, when the girl drops to her knees to give the guy a blow job, that you can clearly see the girl's face.

CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION
Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED:
-The site design has a hot link for each video, named: "Watch Picture Gallery", which is what the site calls the photoset. But every video link that I clicked on to see the "Watch Picture Gallery" led to a Picture Gallery with no pictures. So I do not think this site has any photosets. Which is OK, because I was expecting the photosets to be low quality anyway, based on the rest of the network offerings for photosets.
-Videos are supposed to be viewable in flash stream. But some links to watch the video in flash stream don't work. I kept waiting for minutes for some videos to load and play, but all they did was keep loading, without playing.
Again, this is not a big problem, because I was just testing the site to be able to write this review, and I already decided the site was basically worthless. If I had really wanted to watch these videos, I might have been frustrated.
-Slow download speeds. This is the first site in the network where I did not get my maximum download speed. Instead, I was often getting about one-half of my maximum download speed of 620-630 KB/s.

BOTTOM LINE:
The site theme is voyeur porn. The girls and couples are supposedly unaware they are being captured on film. So if that idea/niche turns you
on, maybe you will get extra satisfaction from the videos. I would prefer videos that are erotic, or well shot.
Because these are supposed to be voyeur videos, many of them show the girl apparently in the distance. She is only a small part of the frame. So you often don't see her close-up, in good detail. I guess this is supposed to add to the voyeur-sexiness of the filming, but I would prefer to see the standard closeup of the girl, where I can clearly see her face and body, instead of seeing some person in the fucking distance.
These are really cheaply made videos. Most of the videos are shot with the model by herself or with a guy, in a car, at a lake or meadow. The choice of shooting the model in a car makes for lousy camera angles, terrible framing of the girl (head or other body parts often cut out of the picture). Or the car seat or roof blocks your view of the girl. The lake and meadow locations are very windy, so there's a lot of microphone noise. Controlling lighting for an outdoor scene is more difficult than for an indoor scene. The girl's face and body goes in and out of shadow constantly, so you don't get a really clear view of the girl.
Video specs:
High quality:
Frame width x height: 1280x720
Total bitrate: 4320 kbps
The bitrate is very high, and would support high definition video. But I would classify these videos as "crap" videos. Pardon the French. Lousy
video technique. Not naming the models in the videos. Minimal erotic appeal.
Number of videos at site: 44
Videos run from 5 minutes to about 17 minutes.
-Bottom line: the site can be considered a bonus site as part of your Teen
Mega World network. But the site itself has little value. It would be better if they just eliminated the site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Flash

14. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
85
mbaya (356) 12-03-10  01:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount for joining through TBP.
-Nice balance of attractive models of all ethnicities, ages and body types.
-Constantly adding new clips. About an entire video per week.
-A very large archive at 205 videos.
-Some pornstars. Besides those that Rearadmirable recognized there is a great scene with one of my favorites, Laurie Vargas. She started in porn scenes three years before she appeared here and Amber Rayne one year before she appeared here. Neither has this sites videos listed in their video histories that I read about online.
Cons: -All videos come as clips only. There should be an option for downloading the entire video.
-Low quality non zipdownloadable photos.
-Many older videos are of such low quality that they are not worth downloading.
Bottom Line: Thanks to Rearadmiral's review I decided to go back to this site. His review is a very complete and accurate description, so I will try to avoid repeating what he said. I was last a member in August 2008. I liked the content, but the videos were not up to the quality I wanted. On an HD screen they were quite grainy.

Since March of 2010, the newest videos are shot in 1280x720, 4220kbps. Those are the specs for HD, but they aren't very sharp. There is a poll question on the site about an upgrade to 1920x1080. They have upgraded the older videos, but they could be much better.

What I really like here is the sense of fun on the site. The camera woman Kyndra, or Special K as she also calls herself, is unabashedly a lesbian and loves her work. She makes her models feel sexy by continuously complimenting them throughout the videos. Her style is much more that of a facilitator than of a director. She doesn't really tell the models what to do; she suggests in a way that makes them feel that they are daringly having naughty, exhilirating fun. They seem to get a natural high, a special thrill from showing off. The level of joking, smiling and laughing makes the site stand out from other flash sites. She makes them want to ever do more by continuously interacting with them. You get the feel that the two are having a conversation. The danger is that sometimes Kyndra is at the point of saying too much. A blabby camerawoman can get as dull as any blabby cameraman. However, she generally seems to say just enough to make the videos a hot experience for us viewers.

The videos range from flashing in secluded locations to opening up in front of total strangers who give their consent. Sometimes the models enter into work locations such as repair shops, stores , etc. The lighting there can be hit or miss. I feel that most of the best videos are shot outdoors. While there is a lot to be said about the daring spontaneous nature of the content, you also have some downsides. Lighting may prevent the viewer from getting details in closeups and sometimes the camerawork is a bit of a drawback. Kyndra is holding the camera in her hands, not a stationary tripod. The videos reflect her being unsteady, especially if she gets enthusiastic or nervous about getting caught. Flashing in public is illegal, as I am sure you know. . This leads to too much camera movement with not enough focus. Sometimes there is a lot of wasted video until a good location is found, so you may find yourself fast forwarding a bit.

As far as the photos, most are not at all related to the videos. As best as I can tell, none have been added since I was a member over two years ago and the lack of quality is evident. They are not zipdownloadable and come in at about 600x800.

My general impression is that the site is REAL reality television at its best. These videos surely beat the usual garbage that gets that title. At the TBP discounted price it definitely is worth a membership.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Flash

15. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (316) 11-24-10  06:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Among the best in the niche
- Mostly amateurs with a few well-known porn stars
- Updates regularly
- Exclusive content with U.S. flashing
- Some European flashing (which likely isn’t exclusive)
- Wide variety of body types, from full-figured, to large-breasted to petite
- Some variation in race and age, though most are younger white models
- Two options for file size
- Currently 105 full scenes
- Pictures available
- Excellent value for price ($14.95 USD per month)
Cons: - Videos broken down into smaller segments
- No option to download complete videos
- Some models are a bit too tame
- Highest resolution video isn’t up current standards (the best is now 1280x720 which compares well to the older videos at 630x470)
- Pictures not available in zip format
- Picture resolution is average (1024x768)
- Site isn’t well organized
Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of public flashing and nudity and there are few sites that do it like I like it. There are sites that offer European public nudity that offer more videos and are better organized, and there are sites that have American public nudity that are more risqué (Nude in L.A. comes to mind). This is a personal opinion, but those sites lack or don’t show the models being nervous and excited at the same time. Those sites treat public nudity as being an everyday occurrence. Not so with Public Flash. This site has a bit of a corny set-up for each and then moves into various open or public venues. Panties and bras are slipped off and then the model walks through various locations and flashes. Full nudity happens, but is rare. This may sound simple, and it is, but for fans of public flashing and nudity this is a site worth looking at.

As for the models, there is a decent variety. Most fit the typical porn mold by being young (18-25) white and petite. But there are some models who are fuller-figured, larger-breasted, older or different skin tones. Most of the models are amateurs (or at least that I haven’t seen before) but there are a few big name porn stars who appear, presumably early in their careers. This includes Aubrey Addams, Amber Rayne and Faye Runaway.

The site, like the models, is fairly amateur. Searching isn’t really an option, but since each segment has a big thumbnail you can see whether that model might be to your liking on the main page before you click the link. My biggest complaint is that there are no full length videos: each of the scenes is divided up into smaller segments. I realize why they do this for updating purposes, but once all the segments are posted I wish they’d offer a link for the full video.

The videos are offered in two resolutions, but only in wmv format. The best format isn’t bad, but it isn’t HD. The current best is 1280x720, though older videos haven't been updated and are still at 630x470. There are pictures available too, but they are not available in a zip format for easy capture.

Updates are fairly regular – appearing every few days – but each update is only two segments of the full video. It takes a couple of weeks for an entire video to be posted.

Still, for all the flaws, I’m willing to cut this site some slack. I may be wrong, but I suspect that this is one of the hardest niches to work in due to the risk. This isn’t filming sex in the back of a panel van or on a set in someone’s living room: these scenes put the models and crew at some legal risk in our Puritanical culture. The outcome is some fun video to watch as nervous young women flash in public.

This site offers decent value for the monthly fee if you like this niche.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Newbie Nudes

16. Newbie Nudes (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
spot (0) 04-07-10  05:05pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: The only thing I like about the site is that its easy to navigate and find things.
Cons: * Way too much fake content. Web pics end up on the site daily, as well as fake pictures (Regular pics, family pics end up being posted regularly with the poster asking guys to put their dicks on them or cum on them and re-post them - i.e. smells like revenge pics of some sort).
* No mechanisms in place so that fake people cannot post.
* No fine tuned control over your own pics/vids unless you pay. If you post content with a free membership, you cannot remove your individual posts. If you want to remove, you must delete your account.
* Chatroom interface is horrible.
* Too expensive for what you get.
Bottom Line: Don't let the advertisement of the "the world's best amateur nude community" fool you. They advertise that they have over 2.3 million members and get over 4000 pics a day, but they dont tell you how many of those are from fake accounts or how many of those pics are webpics/fakes. Sure there are some amateurs there, but some days it seems to be totally drowned out by fake posters and web pics.

Try a free account out for yourself and make your own conclusions, but there are much better amateur sites out there, that are actually amateur and are moderated to better enforce that.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Love The Beach

17. I Love The Beach (0)

Pay
Active
85
brucelee (8) 03-15-10  01:48pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -exclusive and original content
-excellent high resolution photos and videos (latest video is HD)
-regular multiply weekly updates
-comfortable site navigation
Cons: -not hardcore
-part of the pictures are digital scans
-videos are short, 2-5 minutes only
-on most of the photos and videos the girls are topless only
Bottom Line: Summer, sun, sea and around the topless girls, not old german ladies with drooped breasts, but young and not only, beautiful, tanned. And nobody prevent us from taking pleasure from the sight, especially if outside of the window cutting wind, it is sleeting and tomorrow early morning must go to the dull work.
Rare and unusual site in our neck of the woods, with giant collection of photos and videos – the girls, topless and completely nudes, all sort of sizes and shapes, from many famous beaches from all corners of the world. They affirm they are one of the oldest site of topless beach erotic, since 1997!
And they are right - their collection of photos and videos, more than 10000 photos and more than 1000 video clips, is excellent. There are two kinds of pictures - high quality pictures and digital scans with low quality, all are divided by galleries and may be downloaded as zip archives. The videos are in few different formats, last videos in HD. The updates here are regular - at least 5 times per week.
For conclusion: very nice site, will be pleased for all funs of natural non artificial beauty, and certainly for voyeurs.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Indian Hidden Cams

18. Indian Hidden Cams (0)

Pay
Active
95
bbiillyy (34) 02-17-10  11:22am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Indian Hidden Cams promises that once you’re within the membership area of their website you are going to get private shoot indian voyeur videos of the most intimate actions of naughty indian couples caught on film. Tour page shows what they got and as an indian porn lover i just cant wait to go into members area.

Last time i been to this site 1 and half year back and now its totaly change website huge archive of pure indian hidden cam videos. Into is good some exciting nice clip as preview which makes me horny and i got craving to get into members area once agian after long time.

Members Area is very nice now compare to what 2 years back. Professionaly designed and i think control by any content manegement system.

- 572 Indian Voyeur Video
- 400 Bonus content white stuff but very good..
- Updates log are now available which is good
- Video run time now available which is good
- Comment option is available so i can write...
- Nice quality videos. Atleast Pure INDIAN...
Cons: hmm this is hard part....

No multi format video download. Only 1 option.

The quality of the videos varies quite a bit and there are several different formats. You'll find some great-quality Windows Media files and you'll also come across some MPEGs, AVI files and even some Flash files that aren't quite as impressive. One thing about hidden-cam sites is that you're usually dealing with lower-quality stuff, but the poor quality of some of the clips actually helps with the realism of the content.

Download speed needs to be little slow i can say... but ok...

Couples now need HD camera if they shooting their own sex video so atleast quality will be good :)
Bottom Line: Compare to what i have seen 2 years back its much much better. I can say they are on right track. Lots of content available.

I can give this site a tribute showing the secret sex of real indian couple or self shoot video of real indian couple sharign with this world. I love to watch these real indian housewife sex atleast they are doing what they like to do not acting like a hookers :)

Friends, if you love to watch sex of authentic indian housewifes or real indian girls then this site is right on top. go get the access and see it...
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit X Nudism

19. X Nudism (0)

Pay
Newbie
87*
El Nino (3) 02-02-10  05:34pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - I like the site. I am a really big fan of porn that isn't shot in the studio and is more of girls just having fun by themselves - way hotter!
- There currently 81 pages of girls just posing and having fun WHILE NAKED!
- If there is a picture you like you are able to click on it to look at that particular one.
- TONS OF PICTURES
Cons: - It is kind of a pain to just keep scrolling down and clicking on the next page
- Nothing really happens when you are searching for keywords
- Repetitive, its a lot of the same types of pictures, girls taking pictures of themselves in the mirror WHILE USING THE FLASH...REALLY ANNOYING
- Not much to the site, pretty basic forum style website that incorporates girls being naked
Bottom Line: All in all its a pretty good site. I personally like these types of pictures because its the natural girls being sexy by themselves. It does get a little annoying with the flash issue but I can look over that. There are some pretty sexy girls on this site while others are ok.

Final word: I would go back again
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit RedClouds

20. RedClouds (0)

Pay
Active
70
RagingBuddhist (63) 11-30-09  12:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + For about 48¢ a week, you get to see a bunch of amateur pictures
+ No recurring billing
+ 11 Forums: •Fun&Shots BB •Sam's Place Community BB •Explicit BB Our other Community BB •MalePlicit BB •Toy Test Center BB •Discussing Sexuality •Lesbian World •Gay World •Fetish World •Poli BB •Photo Classifieds
+ Can upload content and enter contest for cash prizes
Cons: - Navigation is just bad and not too intuitive. Tabs and lists, tabs and lists... and NO SEARCH FUNCTION! Some of the links don't make much sense - you have to click and figure out what's going on.
- A randomly placed watermark - "Shown at www.Redclouds.com" on every picture. Small, but never in a corner.
- Clicking on some pictures takes you to a censored version that says it's only for Redcloud members. Login again and you may or may not get to see the picture.
-Upsells - Tabs and ads prompting you to join the archives section (funbags.com), the video section (homeclips.com) and a date finder (matchmotion.com) - all at extra cost, of course.
-Average picture size is 800 pixels on the long side - with very few exceptions
Bottom Line: Even at this ridiculously cheap price, I have to say that this was a disappointment. I gave it a 70 only because it's true to it's niche - it's decidedly amateur and I can appreciate that. But the navigation is confusing and, even though I didn't expect anything close to Hi-Def, the content is average at best. You can browse the TGP sites and see that there are a lot of amateurs with cameras that shoot with better resolution than what's on this site. Why aren't they here? I'm also not a fan of upsells in members areas. It's all easily written off because it is so cheap, but I know I won't be back.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit RedClouds

21. RedClouds (0)

Pay
Active
80
picdude (5) 11-01-09  08:30am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge variety of amateurs from all types of race and age
Genuine and exclusive amateur pictures
Regular daily updates
You can upload your own photos
Best contributions can win monthly money prizes
Picture quality is average to good
Pictures are pre-screened and users can report illegal pictures easily
Submissions may include picture comments to build up a story
Active bulletin board with additional picture posts and interaction being posters and viewers
Users can comment on and rate posts
Overview of each days fresh posts
Find more posts by a user
No recurring charge
Very low yearly charge $25
Cons: Photo quality is a mix
Types of post not put into categories (ie young, mature,sex,toys etc)
No selection of picture size
No search option
Only posts from the last month is shown (others are archived at a tie in site (extra payment)
Tie in sites often confuse navigation especially if you have no access
No way to bookmark onsite your favourite posts
Bottom Line: This is the third time I've joined this site (last time was about 2-3 years ago) and the price makes it an easy decision to make.
The layout has been slightly improved but with it the regulars column has been removed.

The mix of amateurs and voyeur aspects will appeal to many and couples may find it great fun to explore. Though those used to glossy/professional pictures will find it fustrating (there are some very good pictures though)

The types of pictures posted are 70% explicit nude posing/playing with toys, but there are plenty of oral sex,full sex and multiple partner picture posts to keep everyone happy.
Male only pictures are clearly marked.
Pictures can be edited (by the poster) to obscure faces, though this does not happen in the majority of cases.

The site has a free non-explicit site Voyeurweb which maybe worth checking out first.
There is also a homemade video sister site which needs to be purchased separately.
There is an archive site which is available to members for a discount which is well worth joining if you enjoy the Redclouds site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit UK Flashers

22. UK Flashers (0)

Pay
Active
60
bacardiancoke (22) 10-25-09  11:01am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Content appears original
- Fairly easy to navigate
- Can use download manager
Cons: - Videos poor quality
- Complete vids not available
- Updates very few and far between (doesn't appear to be much new at all)
- Basic design
- Content is poorly directed
Bottom Line: I have a biased view when it comes to my porn (anyone who doesn't needs professional help imho) and when it comes to sites that rely on pics as much or more than vids it is about the quality and eroticism.

Exhibitionism can be very erotic and not something that has to "hit you in the face" with its bluntness. Unfortunately for UK Flashers, it falls sqaurely into the category of "blunt" in its approach.

Before I get onto the aspects of quantity, I'd like to look at the quality of the content, mostly as it is what is sticking out most to me.

Many of the models are not actually models by trade (yeah, obvious to many that they are working girls, but there are still those out there who believe that they are simply models trying to break into the industry.)

Whilst the models will have a concept of poses etc, a majority of the work and direction is carried out by the photographer. The photographer used for this site appears to have a complete lack of imagination (or interest) and the results are the same poses with the only variation being the location.

As for the poses themselves and the camera angles used? Unflattering on the models to say the very least, amateur in production, completely lacking in eroticism (many are plain seedy.) It's as though a bored 18 year old has gone out with his dad's camera, collared a few girls and led with the direction, "Show us yer gash!" There are user submitted sites out there with more professional content than here!

Harsh? Maybe, but combined with so few updates, a basic and tired design and layout and vid quality from early dsl days, this is a site that I'd struggle to recommend for even half the price that I paid.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Newbie Nudes

23. Newbie Nudes (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
Krick (0) 10-19-09  07:53pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: + Hundreds and Hundreds of new pics and vids uploaded daily. No matter WHAT your looking for, you should be able to find it.

+ Easy to navigate, basically idiot proof

+ Site Support generally takes care of user issues quickly and effectively.

+ Chat rooms, forums, and blogs make this less of a "porn" site and more of what it's labeled as, an "amateur nude community"

+ Extensive user profile/blog search utilities.

+ Verification process for users, so you can know who is real and who isn't.

+ Reasonably priced, while still having excellent services available for non-paying members.
Cons: - Easily abused by people posting web pics, or promoting other pay sites.

- "Voting" system flawed for pics and vids

- Only 3 chat rooms available

- Annoying "pop-ups" for non-paying members.

- While I would like to list abusive members as a con, that would be like holding the pub your at responsible for the drunken idiot that spilled your drink.
Bottom Line: I've been a member of NewbieNudes for over 4 years. Having been a member of other sites of this nature, I would have to say that NN is far above all others. Granted, if your looking for perfectly shaped women with perfect hair and nails posting pics that are expertly lighted and posed, you'll find precious few here. BUT, if you want to see real pics and vids of REAL men and women, this is it! I've loved my time posting and viewing the other REAL people on this site, as well as making several very close friends. I have and would highly recommend NewbieNudes.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Newbie Nudes

24. Newbie Nudes (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
jacq (0) 10-19-09  05:50pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: it's a site that i came to long ago (way more than 12 mos) to perv?? make myself feel better??? who know's but i was there for a long time before i even discovered the chat/forum... to me now... it's just not a porn site...it's full of real people with real friendships .... it's a place where you can be yourself... a place where you can lose yourself or find yourself... vent... cry ... laugh ... whatever.. i have made many friends there ... i could go on and on...
Cons: there can be assholes anywhere you go!!
Bottom Line: bottom line... it's not just a nude site or a porn site...it's alot of real people that have real feelings that care.... remember the fire???
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Newbie Nudes

25. Newbie Nudes (0)

Pay
Newbie
84*
Kensington Gore (1) 10-19-09  05:39pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Devoted community that genuinely enjoys the amateur porn scene.

- Clean,vibrant layout that makes it easy to navigate.

- Plenty of categorises which are being added to,refined and improved constantly.

- Low tolerence of scammers and fakes.

- Friendly moderation set up in chat rooms,no tolerence for abusive behaviour therein.

- Some truly erotic and down right dirty pictures can be found on this site so it has something for everyone.

- Growing collection of user submitted videos.
Cons:
- Forums can get rather wild with a minority spoiling an otherwise fun place.

- Obviously fake web porn pictures tend to crop up now and again.

- Voting system may need some modification or even removal for something less contentious.
Bottom Line: You will be drawn in by the sheer wanton abandon of user sexual exploits in NN.
In both picture and video form and give it some time and you will also be taking part in a well established "wild" but otherwise friendly community.

Chat rooms are also another place where you will have the opportunity to become more closely involved with the community,which offers more than just amateur erotica...but let's not pretend that's great all by itself ;)

All I would say is if NN could sort out the niggles like the more erratic happenings in the forum and the upset about the voting system this place can and will grow into something of a gold standard for Amateur Erotic websites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 56 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Upskirt Times (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.19 seconds.