Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Best site on Internet for softcore European models.
Huge selection of models.
Many of the models are lovely/gorgeous/beautiful: really, some of the prettiest models I've seen on
any porn site.
Many different erotic photographers have contributed to the site.
Most models have multiple photosets.
Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model.
The photosets are of very high quality (except some from the early years of the site).
With a membership, you get a large number of hours of live webcams per day.
For years they have been posting 3-4 new photosets per day. That is a huge number of updates.
They are constantly coming out with new models, as well as with new photosets of older models(not in age, but as in previously viewed models).
Most models appear to be in their late teens or early 20s.There are many different physical types of European girls: breast size: small, medium, large. Most girls slender, some medium, a few large (not heavy, just big beautiful girls).
Cons:
Met-art has made an art of posting boring videos of beautiful young girls.
Sorry, but that disappoints me.
The videos are a very minor extra, hardly worth watching.
The models are almost all European. There are very few Asian or African or others. To see other types of models, go to a different site.
This is softcore only. If you are looking for hardcore, go elsewhere. No boy-girl sex. No boys at all. A little girl-girl touching, but so mild you wonder why they bother.
Met-art has a posted schedule for the livecam shows. If a model does not appear for her show, you don't find out about the change until you are waiting for the model to appear live, and maybe there is a replacement model, or maybe no show at all.
The same model can have different names. This is a porn problem, but why can't they give a girl a name and remember it?
Search feature for model sets is OK, but could be easier to use.
Bottom Line:
If you like soft-core pictures of beautiful European girls, this is the site to join. The annual fee of $99 is a bargain.
This site (in my opinion) offers, for the same or less money, so much more than competing sites such as:
metmodels: (a sister site to met-art) that has fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets.
hegre-art: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No livecams. No variety of photographers. And is more expensive than met-art.
domai: a nice softcore site, but again: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No
livecams. And the photosets do not have the great quality of the met-art sets.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-outstanding model selection
-large amount of photographers
-models from many diffrent countries
-very good updates(normaly 4 or 5 sets each day)
-site has been doing very good with viedos lately
-no download limits
-photo sets average around 140 pics often more
-models often dont start off nude which makes sets more interesting
-some sets have very artistic look
-most sets have many good shots of the model from various angles
-there is now model info got added sometime in 2008
-huge ammount of pictures something around 600,000 total!
-good amount of models of diffrent bulids, skinny,large breasted,many diffrent skin tones, many models have very nice butts
-for me the site has very fast servers and I have used it on dial-up as well as DSL connections
Cons:
-not all models have a bio yet
-due to there being so many models one that you like may not appear very often
-site layout can be confusing at first
-some viedos are filmed photosets
-cost of site much higher if you pay the monthly cost of $29.95 or $359.40 after a year compared to $99.00 for a year or $8.25 a month.
Bottom Line:
I feel that MET-ART is the best errotic art site on the net. It has the most to offer over any other simular site namely in sheer number of models and cost(if you pay the $99.00 yearly fee).I have been a member of FEMJOY,DOMAI,HeargeArt,and MC Nudes. All of these sites are very good as well but MET-ART is the one that keeps me most happy.AS I said in the cons the site can be a little confusing layout wise but to me its not really a big deal because MET-ART provides what I really like(errotic art) in spades.Another con would be that some viedos are just filmed photosets though I think this is more the artists choice than the sites saying. One artist GONCHAROV has outstanding films that are purely films and there is no camera(photographic)work going on the model is simply moving around as GONCHAROV films. Another con is that sometimes a model may only pose one time and never appear in another set however this quite rare and there are so many models that you are likely to have many favorites and most likely there will be a model that you enjoy pretty much everyday.I see that some people con the site for lacking masturbation ect. I dont agree with this it is not the aim of the site.Masturbation is more like true pornagraphy while MET-ART is errotic art to me those are two diffrent things.This site is for the person with a "sensual" eye one that is most pleased by the female form but not by a direct sexual act. The number one con to me is the pricing. The basic monthly fee adds up to $359.40 if you kept the account open for a year. It is best to try the site for a month and if you like it buy the $99.00 full year fee which ends up being $8.25 a month or the 90 day fee which is cheaper than paying the monthly fee at a higher price for the same timespan. My best advice is to try several errotic sites and find the one that most satisfiies your personal taste. That way you have tried some that you think you like and pick the best one much like when you buy a new car test drive.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Tons of exclusive solo girl content, almost all archived
+ Lots of hot, amateur ladies...all shaved (lives up to the name)
+ Models do a lot: big insertions, fisting, speculum, many do peeing, some anal
+ Girl-girl action
+ Daily video update, photo update every other day
+ Quick downloads
+ Newer videos are HD, 2 res available for newer photos
+ All natural models, few porn stars
Cons:
They are minor, but...
- Many videos are just photoshoots or BTS (can get boring), newer masturbation vids feel very forced and often fake
- Site's being redesigned, but still needs a few tweaks
- Many older models have no vids, few photos
- A few too many European models
Bottom Line:
If you're into young, totally shaven girls who are willing to get nasty in front of a camera, then ALS Scan could easily become your new friend. This site shoots some very hot girls, many who have never done any porn or modeling prior, and a few who haven't done any since (that's exclusive!). The focus here is not just quantity, but quality, and new pics are offered in two sizes (around 1300x1000 and 3000x2000), usually with good lightning and crystal clear resolution. New videos are also in big, clear HD (1280x720). The owner/photographer doesn't mess around, and models are quickly undressed and lubed up in the scenes, with lots of toys, fisting, speculum, along with some models who pee, or do some anal; but only what they are comfortable doing, and it pays off in the photos.
My only gripes would be that the videos can get boring, and the newer ones feel too forced if they are masturbation. Yeah, it’s porn, but their older vids would just introduce the model and let her go from there. The owner also frequently talks, even in the masturbation vids, and his voice can be quite annoying, and downright creepy (a frequent complaint by other users). They are also finally putting their old design out to pasture, but the new one isn't perfect (no searching, you can still end up doing a lot of clicking). But the content more than makes up for these things, and as older material is being rereleased and updated, you'll probably end up quite satisfied.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best quality hardcore solo porn site in the web.
- Photo updates past 2 years come in 2 resolutions of 1400x1000 and high 3500x2000 pixels. Excellent photography.
- Excellent video quality most recent updates HD quality. Owner takes pains to improve the quality of the older videos some taken as back as late '90s.
- Tons of material up.
- All shaved but otherwise natural models. All natural breasts and bodies.
- Updates 7 days a week. Photo and video updates on weekdays. One video update each on the weekends.
- Very Attractive Models.
- Includes glamour shots advancing to hardcore solo poses and all sorts of penetrations which include toys, cucumbers, bananas, small bottles, tongs, fisting, speculum, their special 'als rocket' and peeing.
- Behind the scenes uncut video of the photo shoot which shows models true personality.
Cons:
Very few cons.
- Many masturbation videos have a fake, forced feeling to it. Not as natural and laid back as their behind the scenes videos. (Might appeal to some)
- Some of the behind the scenes videos they focus on too much close up of the vagina instead of the whole body and face. The model and the photographer will be busy talking but you get to see only the vagina for maybe 2-3 minutes. (Might appeal to some)
- Older photo update before 2001 not of the best quality.
- Daily photo updates have only part of the photoset but the director of the website states that this is going to change to complete updates soon instead of breaking each scene into parts.
Bottom Line:
The site has been there since 1997 and I have been a member since 2003. I have experimented with lots of other porn sites and very few compare to the quality and solo hardcore nature of this website.
Director who calls himself Alex takes pains to keep the quality. He gives us details of models and happenings in his interesting blog. He responds to most of our e-mails and suggestions personally and promptly despite him being the busy boss.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
many of the girls are hot, the others pretty
excellent video quality
excellent download speed (200-300kb) high speed
no drm
huge collection
update weekly
no goofy music or poor lighting issues
Cons:
no boy/girl
can get a little too extreme, pushing tasteful
Bottom Line:
take the tour! watch all the previews...it'll kill ya'. a must join at some point. most of the girls are your prom queen type and show it all. you see everything up close in high quality and hear every juicy sound. very real feel to it, nothing fake here. no sex scences though, only posing & masturbation. top 5 site no matter what genre.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-Very authentic looking action
-Models are attractive
-Excellent Video Quality
Cons:
-Older photo sets aren't very good quality.
-It's more "Lesbian Love" than "Lesbian Action"...
Bottom Line:
If you like lesbian, this site is a must. At the time I was a member it was VERY reasonably priced, and worth every penny.
The action is excellent, and the women really seem to enjoy themselves.
Recently they have pledged to offer near-HD videos on all their video updates (960x540, not quite 1280x720) but I must admit that for the filesizes, the quality is excellent.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Top-of-the-Pops in solo girls videos (only solo girls)
+ Exclusive content
+ Vast amount of material – vids and pix sets
+ Several different scenes of the same girl for the major part of models
+ Fine, great video quality – among others: top MP4.
+ Most of older vids are now reedited to up-to-date quality, nice!
+ Daily updates – one day video, next pics ect.
+ Several download options
+ Great download speed - mostly
+ No DRM, no download limits.
+ Zip for pics
+ Easy navigation/download – except update browsing
+ Nice price – except: see below
Cons:
- Regional pricing
- Somewhat repetitive style in video scenes - but what exclusive site does not have that.
- A bit troublesome update-search (see below)
- A little too much going for outdoor scenes
- Confusing model names
- Poor preview (see below)
Bottom Line:
In Focus Girls is probably the best solo-girl-video-site, I've joined for a long, long time. It reminds me a bit of the enthusiasm, I had when first joining the DDF, 1 By Day several years ago.
This site offers a vast amount (1300) of great videos of especially euro girls – the majority well known from other sites. But here you get exclusive scenes, exclusive shots.....oh, yes – some, a few of these scenes are placed elsewhere – but to my knowledge from this site.
And the best deal is, that most – far most – of the girls/models – have more than one scene. Most/some two or three, some even up to 12 different video scenes with the same model – that's really a collectors item.
And the older videos for those well known , favorite models have now been re-edited:
So you get vids from 2006/2007/2008 in fine, fine quality, too. Still a few, very few (2005) are not updated and in low quality.
The navigation is mostly very easy – especially when browsing models – the name, akas are confusing, though. Only about half are using a well know name...so if you want to browse for your favorites, you'll have problems – still they all have fine, big thumbs, so......
The video downloads are in 5 choices:
Four in the fine MP4 (my favorite):
1280x720 - 4Mbit
854x480 - 2Mbit
640x360 - 964Kbit
480x272 - 664Kbit
In PSP
And MPG in parts
And – you get 4 streaming options, too.
At the moment there is almost 1300 videos here – a lot of nice browsing and downloading.
Generally I get a very fine download speed here – 1700-2000 Kb/sec – sometimes (rarely) it's somewhat slower.
It's a little annoying browsing updates: It now goes in pages from 1-108...and if you what like page 66 – you got to have patience clicking and clicking..
The models browsing is much easier: Alphabetic.
Preview: It's miserable and not informative – Strange with such a fine site, so do not let it fool you
Not much into pics – but you get three seizes – and of course zip – best is:
2000x1333.
I hate that regional pricing, but overcame my principals here – and joined – and happy, I did.
This is truly a great site...and seems like the best around when it come to fine looking solo girls. Highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-2500 models (no silicone), 24750 photo sets, 2,690,000 photos, 7835 videos. -80% exclusive (see bottom line).
-Many attractive models and lots of total stunners (but I do not like more than 10% of the models here or anywhere else).
-10 softcore photo sets per model per photographer per shoot plus some hardcore.
-Many repeat visits from models.
-Photosets in three resolutions (Not all on older sets): 1024, 1500-1600, 3000 with full and custom zips.
-Updates: 5x12 photosets (80-200pics each) and 2x14 videos (10 to 20 min ave 15min each) videos per week. i.e. 60 photo sets and 28 videos per week,
-Videos in several formats, inc "HD mp4" (1280x720 @ 6Mbps. 1920x1080 starting to appear) and streaming.
-Good model directory and search facility.
-Opt-in for newsletter and promos.
-Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
-Works with Firefox and DownThemAll and FDM (see Reply #1).
-Bills via CCBill - no regional pricing
Cons:
-Links time out after a few hours.
-Some technically flawed colour (but most is good).
-Size not indicated on video download links. So, if you go for "HD mp4", you do not know if it is 720p or 1080p until you have downloaded it.
-Pages can be very slow to load, especially the thumbnail pages, but zip download speeds are good. It is best to choose 20 thumbs per page rather than "all".
-Although download managers are allowed and work fine (tested with FDM), see Reply #1 for some cautions.
- No "mature" models (but site does not claim to have them)
-"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central.
-Some non exclusive content for some photographers such as Fred or Defrancesco.
Bottom Line:
ATK Galleria (ATKG) has been my "gold standard" for about 12 years and it still is. There are a lot of statistics in the pros and cons, above, so it might be more useful if I explain here why I like Galleria so much.
I collect photos and I see it as primarily a photo site, despite its huge number of videos. Nubiles is stronger on video quality. If you prefer softcore teen video, with masturbation or toys, and are happy with 4 vids per model, Nubiles is the place. You might come to ATKG to add to those.
As far as photos go, ATKG operates in the same general genre as KarupsPC, KarupsHA and Nubiles but it has generally better quality and a very much larger quantity: four times as many images as Nubiles, twice as many as MetArt. It seems reasonable that signup gives you access just to ATKG and not to the ATK Network.
One thing I really love is the many repeat shootings for a lot of its models. You get 10 softcore photosets whenever a photographer shoots the model. If she is shot again, and she often is, you get another 10 photo sets. Those may be from the same photographer a year later or from a different one. Hardcore sets, if any, are on top of that count. Riley Reid, for example, has 43 photo sets and 9 videos here. That is 13 hardcore photo sets plus two separate shoots of 10 softcore sets from one photographer and a 10 set shoot from a second. Her videos span the same two photographers and include toys, hardcore, lesbian, behind the scenes and a camshow recording.
All photo sets for each model go up between one day and a week apart. Videos are less predictable and not all models do them.
Of the nearly 25000 photo sets, photographer Fred's 1600 sets and Denys Defrancesco's 1000 sets are largely not exclusive. But the rest are, as far as I can tell. So I guess 80% exclusive overall.
ATKG is nothing like MetArt, Femjoy or any of the artsy sites. Shoots are amateur in style, professional quality but not glossy. Girls are committed and enthusiastic and engage with the viewer. Some toy use but most sets do not involve toys. Almost all start clothed, if sometimes scantily, and end full nude but sometimes get there after 20 images of a 150 image set. The journey is less important than the destination at ATKG but you do get some tease in most shoots and explicit shots with direct eye contact, provocative facial expressions, minimal looking down or away and plenty of finger spreading pussy.
There are "themes" such as Uniforms, Lingerie, Upskirts and Panties, Babes, Amateurs, Coeds, Masturbation, Toys, Foot fetish, Nudism, Lesbian, Watersports, Action. But some of those are pretty loosely defined. I often cannot even tell what the softcore theme was when I look at the downloaded set.
Take lingerie. The girl may be wearing some under some everyday clothes or she may start in it. She strips via a short tease but without the emphasis on the sensuality of the lingerie that you would get on a fetish site.
ATK's tour gives away a massive amount of actual content. Click the "visit site" link from this PU page, go to the bottom right of the page you arrive at and click the ATKingdom thumbnail. It takes you to their free site on which you will find about 80 full size (3000x2000) images from Galleria, 80 from ATK Hairy and some from Premium, all from their most recent sets and changed every week. There are no sample videos there, suggesting a bias towards photos. At the top of the page from "visit site", you have the whole model directory, which shows how many photo sets and videos every model has.
ATKG shows the work of 97 photographers from around the world. Its women are shaved, aged between 18 and 45, but most are young. There are only 15 models aged over 30. 1300 aged 18-20, 1030 21-23. Some models have tattoos or piercings but there is no silicone here. Most are Caucasian girl-next-door types (only 5 black and 11 Asian) and there is a separate site for ethnics - ATK Exotics - with a separate subscription. Some of the Galleria models also appear on the other ATK sites but without duplication of actual photo sets or videos. e.g. she might be shaved here but have hairy sets on ATK Hairy. Note that, if a model is on ATK Petites, membership there gives you her Galleria content too. But not vice versa.
I highly recommend ATKG as a large and high quality source of explicit softcore photo sets, in overtly sexual and amateur (but not amateurish) style. It will specially appeal to anyone who wants everything they can find of a loved model. I believe 96 is valid for what the tour area makes clear you will find.
But if your main thing is softcore video, score 86. There is bg and gg but it does not come over as a hardcore site. If you prefer those, score 80. And there is none with a story line here. It is plain sex. As I am not interested in bg, gg or video, it is hard for me to evaluate them. If you want fetish themes, score 76.
I have joined many times over 12 years. "member < 1 month" applies just to this join.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Fantastic models
-Varied photographers
-Crisp Clear images
-Large sets
-4 daily updates
-Many new models
-Sensual poses and vibrant sets
-Continual improvements in models and average quality
-Superb Lighting
-Create Galleries
-Re-rate artists and models
-Amazing Value
Cons:
-Recent Majoly (artist) sets
-Some boring videos
-Occasional quality lapse
-Met-cam models moved to private cams
-PSP videos low res
Bottom Line:
The best artistic nude website online, there is no competition for Met-Art because they are easily in a league of their own. The reasons for this are an absolutely huge amount of archived sets and huge collection of models. New models are regularly added with increasing quality. New models that get rated highly are very quickly brought back for follow up photo shoots (usually 2 more). Completely amazing website, one you should check out as you have probably stumbled upon many great sets from them anyway.
Photo quality in the website is extremely good with models, artist and locations being of high standards. Artistic and photo quality is excellent, artists like Voronin and Ingret are masters at lighting and produce superb sets with wonderful colour contrast along with clear high megapixel photos. The actual set locations are great and varied on their own, although there is some reusing of set location there is usually a fair gap between those updates. Models are very attractive but of course people have different likes and dislikes and Met-art has the huge range to cater for anybody. I think there is plenty of variety for new models also.
The site does have a few minor negatives including movies and some artistic “choice”. Movies themselves are up and down, quality is fairly good but content varies from sexy to sterile. In some cases watching videos of existing photosets can be a bad thing. Other times videos are very nicely put together, some videos you can hear the sound of the camera clicking and the artist speaking and this may put off some people who prefer music, although many include music. Older videos tend to be sexier and racier. Another very big issue currently is the artist Majoly who seems to be bringing the quality of the site down, his recent works appear as if he has taken some shots of attractive models in good locations and then passed them through a very aggressive Vaseline filter making them look awful, thankfully most artists are not like this.
Content on the site is almost beyond quick description. There are so many great sets in the archives dating back almost 10 years. They will post up a preview of the four updates coming for the next day. You can rate on each model and each artist and then change your vote at a later stage, which I do quite a bit. There is a brief bio for the model which I think is sufficient, more community feedback, such as commenting on sets or voting on upcoming sets is something to look at. After a year with this site I still check it daily for content. It’s very much worth a yearly membership, especially considering the huge amount of existing photos you may need to download. I’ve still got hundreds of models to rate and I try to rate every new set, which again emphasizes the content and introduction of new models, 39 new models in January 09 alone. Its amazing value and I will continue to subscribe given what I have seen in the past year. I’m glad to be a subscriber.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
#membership special is only $19.95 a month
#these women are shot as if they are royalty
#models personify godesses: Athena, Diana, Venus etc..are well represented by these models in the flesh- they models are beautiful, just made me gasp to look at them.
#pics come in 681 x 1024, 1024 x 681; 1362 x 1248, 1248 x 681; 2000 x 3008, 3008 x 2000; 2912 x 3468, 3468 X2912.
#live Met cams ( about 12 models a day); are everyday at these times:12 midnite, 5am, 8am, noon,3pm, 6pm, and 9pm; user can give feeback in realtime to met cam model.
# 2 hr webcam session per model.(in real time with model in Russia)
# movies come in DIVx;Quicktime;mpeg;wmv,ipod about every 4-5 days
#this is not just a nude site. Met art utilizes acessories very well: models wear necklaces and jewelry, earrings, shoes, belts, bracelets. You see hosiery, lingerie, ballerina outfits and more..
# offers private webcam chats for $2.50 a minute without admin.
Cons:
#there is not really a variety of themes in the vids; won't see dress up or masterbating, public nudity
#has trial memberships, be carefull when joining to select the month membership and not like $16.99 trial amount for three day trial for two sites membership and 19.99 for three day trial for three site membership unless you want to try the sites out for three days.
# specialty site; you will get your nudelover fix.Will have to go elsewhere for other genres.
#webcam for dial up connection can be choppy at times.
Bottom Line:
Met Art has very stunning and striking photosets. If I had to describe the models. They would be queens, royalty, princesses and goddesses personified and represented with these models. some of the models were so striking that they took my breath away- just great top of the line sets.
I joined this site a few days ago for the fourth time and was surprised to see the price of $19.99. I suppose this special is to help promote their other two sites Metmodels, and Errotica Archives which is offered for $19 if you join them seperatly (their banners are prominent right after joining). The idea I suppose is that they lowered the price to make it possible to have 2 memberships for just $40. I just checked. you can select two of the three for $49, or all three for $59.99.
I have the metcams on another webpage as I speak.-- just got a hello back from the model Neela, very nice. Works well even with dial up ( is what I have) and can be resized to full screen mode by pressing f11. You can tip the models and make an offer for a private webcam chat at $2.50 a minute.
I give this site a 96 because $19.99 is really a great deal to have access to their stunning models and webcam sessions that run 7 days a week. The interaction feature is nice..
I have no idea when the price will go back to what it was when I last joined which was $29.99 so I'd say that this is a real good time to jump on board and try out this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautiful, beautiful girls.
- Tons and tons of content, updated regularly.
- Good quality video, numerous DL options.
- Exhaustive browse features
- Decent search function (could be better)
- Options for member involvement.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Niched galleries of each model: ass, breasts, legs.
- a few super-sized pics for each model, wallpapers
- Zips in small or large size.
- Bonus sites, and these accrue with long-term membership, and they aren't just the usual bullshit.
- Search lets you sift softcore from hard.
- What the hell else do you want?
Cons:
- Model's directory is all laid out on one page and this seems counter-productive, as it sometimes takes a good while to load and because, let's say you want to start with the Z's: I bet you can't scroll all the way down to the bottom without being smitten by some ridiculously cute girl along the way. Try it. Go 'head.
- I would like to be able to search by letter, as in ATK and other places. You can search by model name, but what good is that unless you already know which girl you're looking for?
- Alexis doesn't allow pm's. Doesn't she love me?
Bottom Line:
Though the content isn't absolutely to my tastes (my tastes are admittedly way out of fashion), I can still be objective and say that Nubiles is among a small handful of sites which are truly head and shoulders above the rest in every way. I ran out of room in the pros section and had to edit it. The nits are minor.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam
Cons:
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better.
Bottom Line:
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.
As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.
The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!
I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.
It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
424 updates of 284 models & 26 lesbian updates downloadable
Videos in WMV 640x480 778kbs-1Mbs -> 2Mbs@ 12/05
Playtime of '07 videos: 53-119 minutes/upd.
2007 Avg. photos/upd. 244
Update photos: 700x1052 to 797x1200
Supersize photos: 179 sets of 2000x3000 to 2800x4200, ~30-60 photos/set
Totals 03/04-now: WMV video, >237 GB, update photos, >63,400
5 color code for activity
12 updates not yellow|orange|red
No video watermark, DRM
Download manager accepted
Cons:
Download limit 5 GB/24 hrs.
Exceeding download limit means loss of access for 24 hrs.
Video resolutions could be higher.
It would be nice to have more girl-girl.
It's too difficult to find many cons for this site. :)
Bottom Line:
FTVGirls went online September, 2002. Evident is a commitment to quality established early that still surpasses many sites. For instance, the WMV video resolution started out at 640x480 (nearly impossible to find elsewhere then). Several "highly-regarded" sites still try to sneak by with 320x240.
The women are from 18 to 24 y/o, except for twelve 25-32. While the site creator talked about giving the "girl-next-door" experience, I've yet to see any models there who would qualify as the average girl-next-door. All of them are lovely, and most are stunningly so. There is a range of physiques on the site, but the appearance of all is above the average on the site from whom (in spite of it's initials) one can't get a root beer float.
Flashing, nudity, masturbation, fingers, toys, other objects, orgasms, interviews, and other activities are seen on this site in a wide variety public and not-so-public locations, mostly in the southwest but a few in Hawaii or Portugal, plus a handful of contributors locations. All is original and, AFAIK, exclusive content. For the vast majority, the site title applies. Perhaps a dozen I'd seen before, which is forgivable because they're so damn cute. :) And, the models enjoyment is obvious and multi-faceted. Four have even returned to share their pregnancies. FTVGirls is a superb and unique site dedicated to young womanhood, their lives, personalities, beauty, and their sexuality...well, minus the men where applicable. :) Long may it reign.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easy navigation, plenty of updates.
Very professionally done site. A ton of nice looking eager beavers. The site is definately the top of the amature sites that feature female solo masturbation. They dont get too artsy like some of the others do. I dont know if youre like me. Simple is better....girl laying on bed...decides to get off....Actually gets off. Shes not shoving cucumbers in her snatch. Not pretending to get off on an over sized butt plug.
Cons:
They need to work on the videos themselves. The rating would have been higher if this were the case. As with most amature sites....the video people move way too much....so much its almost sickening. Concentrating on this will bring them much more in terms of a viewing audience.
Bottom Line:
The best amature site out there....doesnt have the artsy stuff that ftv does....doesnt do the sick and twisted stuff that als scans does. But does offer a little more then matts does.
I dont look at the photos so I couldnt grade that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
sweet blonde girl
hot lesbian action with her friends
wow she do bondage
100% homemade videos in full lenght
she had answer personal member emails and fullfile member update wishes
pics have fantastic resulution
Cons:
at the moment not to much content
Bottom Line:
feel like in a never ending dream! So Mangy is my beautiful girls! Don't ask me what I like most about them, I simply love EVERYTHING! I wish I could marry Mangy! Big kiss and keep up your great site,
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Scenes between the girls are passionate and have a more intimate feel than girl-girl scenes on most other sites. The sex is genuinely hot!
- The girls are young, beautiful and natural looking.
- Scenes are well lit, in focus and have few distractions.
- A rarity in most sites, the sound quality is actually good.
- Recent addition of HD feature is great for those with speedier connections.
- Easy to navigate and good search features.
Cons:
- Not all content is exclusive.
- DVD and other paysite ads are distracting.
Bottom Line:
Sapphic Erotica is THE place for genuinely erotic girl-girl action. The price is great and there's more than enough content to last through a month's membership. One of the few rare sites you can sign up for and just let renew.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautiful models
- Exceptionally good production values
- Mix of American and European models
- Mix of solo, g/g, b/g and multiples
- Updates regularly
- Multiple download formats and sizes for videos
- HD available on all videos
- Photos available (as singles and zips in multiple formats)
- Allows download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Cross-sell at sign-up isn’t pre-checked
Cons:
- Anal is very rare
- Models have little variation, so if you don’t like beautiful, petite 18-22 year olds maybe you should avoid the site.
Bottom Line:
I have to confess that I’m always a bit surprised when I find sites like this so good. This really isn’t the kind of porn I usually buy. I prefer harder-edged stuff from studios like Evil Angel and Kink.com. But maybe I’m wrong about my own habits because I really, really like this site. The best comparison I can think of for this site is X-Art: the women are exceptionally beautiful, the production values are exceptionally high, and the sex is sensual. This site is a great option for couples looking for something they can both enjoy.
The site is relatively new, with the oldest uploads being added on August 28, 2012. With 133 videos and 110 photo sets available some may see the site as too small, but that position would be to completely ignore the low price of $20 per month and the overall quality of the site. The site continues to grow regularly with a new video being added every two days and a new photo set being added on alternate days (mostly, anyway).
Videos are available primarily as mp4s (480x360, 640x360, 960x540, 1280x720HD and 1920x1080HD) with one WMV available at 1280x720HD. I downloaded the largest mp4s and those played at a bitrate of more than 7500kb/s and 23fps. Subjectively they look amazing. Keeping with the ‘natural and sensual’ feeling of the site, the scenes are shorter than found on some other sites because they’re a more realistic length. There is some music to start the scene but that quickly fades. None of the scenes were overacted with fake moaning.
The videos have high production quality with lighting, sound and editing all being top tier. An issue some might have with the models is their lack of variation. They are almost exclusively 18-22, petite and Caucasian. If you like that general type of model then it’s safe to say that they are also incredibly beautiful. There is a good mix of American and European / Russian models too. The videos are a mix of solo girl, g/g, b/g and some multiples. In the multiples with a male, the women outnumber the man.
The photos are available in three sizes (12800x800), 2000x1333 and 5600x3600). They’re available as zips or singles. The number of photos per set varies but the average seems to be around 150.
The technical bits of the site are well done too. The layout is simple and effective and you can easily sort by photos and videos, and by tags. Streaming and download links are easy to use. The site supports download managers and I saw some of the highest download speeds I’ve ever had while downloading porn.
Two points which are highly subjective and aren’t factored in to the score: 1) there is only one b/g anal sex scene on the site with both photos and videos; 2) facials are rare here: I like seeing facials and in this case I miss them more since several of the male models are channelling their inner Peter North with massive shots. I’m guessing the lack of facials is because the site is otherwise couples-oriented and most women aren’t as into facials as guys are.
I’m obviously highly recommending this site after what I wrote above. It is some incredibly sensual porn with some stunningly beautiful women who are presented with high production values on a well laid-out site that has fast download speeds. Some may see it as small, but even ignoring the fact that it is growing regularly it is still a great value for the high quality and reasonable price.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
1-Great quality content and download options.
2-Huge selection of models.
3-Girl/Girl pairings that I watched seemed very authentic and unforced.
4-Great attitude from models in all the scenes I watches. They all seemed to really enjoy themselves and showing off for us.
5-Lots of good toy play.
6-Fast DL speeds.
Cons:
1-Navigation could be improved a bit.
2-Some scene types got a bit repetitive or had a lot of posing instructions from camera operators.
3-Nothing major here, almost feel like the points above are nitpicking.
Bottom Line:
Great quality site with lots of attractive ladies. If you want hardcore action go elsewhere, but if beautiful shaved young women sharing the enjoyment of their bodies is your thing, check this site out. I thought it was well worth joining and definitely earned its reputation as one of the best.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models ON EARTH!
Spectacular imagery and sets
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Good navigation
Cons:
Only one thing in the CON category:
obnoxious cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
One minor annoyance: The user defined keywords are not particularly useful.
Bottom Line:
This is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period. Navigation is also very good.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. FOr example: Mila, with 44 sets, always looks like she is enjoying herself. Fergie, with only 16 sets, is a little more conservative but can melt ice with her looks. Wait...loking at the site while writing a review can be very distracting....
OK, there is rally only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. It seems that Met Art is now part of a network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives and Erotic Beauty. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each oif these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the owners want to maximize revenue. I can even appreciate that some owner/photographers hire a model for a day or a weekend trip, shoot many, many sets and then break the sets up over multiple sites, again, to maximize revenie (Met-Art and Met-Models, now Erotic Beauty, comes to mind) What I find offensive is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model supposedly exist. It is one thing to list other sites on the model page, but it is simply obnoxious baiting to put a clickable image of the model at the bottom of the page and only include a small reference to the name of the other site. This is the only site I've ever seen that uses this relatively deceptive practice and I absolutely hate it. (Can you tell?)
Now, in-spite of that trashy cross-selling tactic, the guys at met-art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join one. And, to be fair, these sites appear to have plenty of unique sets spread around to each of the sites.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I come back every year and will probably succomb to the cross-selling and try one or more of the other sites...and will review them when I do, of course!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Long interval before site timeout. Useful if you want to browse site, or download files, and you pause between downloads.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark occasionally appears in videos at bottom right corner.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark at bottom right corner of some photos. The watermark is so small, you have to examine each photo, to see if it's there or not.
-Soundtrack on most videos, especially the recent ones, is clean, without a lot of extraneous sounds.
-The video quality is some of the best I've seen: great focus, crystal-sharp video, good tracking of the sex action, professional lighting, excellent colors: skin tones, etc.
-There is an alphabetical listing of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what each model looks like. A really helpful feature that makes searching through the model list so nuch easier.
-Easy site navigation. Helpful, useful hot links to get a model's appearances (videos and photosets).
-The member pages are clean, with no ads.
-No DRM.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor.
-No model biography.
-Occasionally they change the name of a model, but forget to change the title of the video or photoset she appears in. For example, the photoset named "Beata and the mirror", features the model currently named Belka, who was, evidently, named Beata earlier.
-When the models speak in a foreign language, there are no subtitles to translate. But the words spoken don't have a lot of value, anyway. The sex is what counts.
-If you post a comment, I don't see any way to edit it, for typos or whatever.
-The high-quality file size can be large. A video with a runtime of 23 minutes 12 seconds has a high-quality (1080p) size of 1.6 GB in MP4, and
1.9 GB in WMV. So you need a lot of hard drive space if you want to keep the high-quality files.
-The model page is clean, with no ads. But it would be even better if they simplified the layout. Don't post 2 different thumbnails of the model's last appearance. That's just confusing.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
A single listing of each appearance would be more intuitive and easier to understand. Also, don't put two hot links for posting a comment on tha model page. Keep the comment link at the bottom of the page, but don't put a second comment link near the top of the page: it's not needed, and just gets in the way. Keep the model page simple.
-Some of the photosets and videos may be at other networks. 2 photosets and 1 video from Nubiles were posted at 18OnlyGirls in some sort of cross-
advertising deal.
Also, some photos and videos at 18OnlyGirls were posted earlier at the Teen Mega World network. This is not cross-advertising, but 2 different networks buying the same content from the same supplier.
The video titled "Waiting To Be Ravaged", featuring Anisiya, was posted 2012-06-10 at 18OnlyGirls. The same video was posted on 2011-02-17 at teensexmovs, a Teen Mega World site. At teensexmovs the video is titled "Anisiya". The video at 18OnlyGirls has more definition choices for download, and the runtime was chopped from 24:46 to 23:12 minutes:seconds.
But the video is basically the same.
However, the model is so cute, and the scene is so hot, that I didn't mind getting a higher-definition version of the same video. And they also made the 18OnlyGirls video have better lighting, better colors, in addition to the higher definition.
So I don't think the duplicated content is bad, especially when the content at 18OnlyGirls is better quality.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 1032
Number of photosets: 1278
Number of models: hundreds
The site preview gives the following statistics:
Number of films: 8,545
Number of images: 384,314
Number of models: 507
I don't know where the site preview is getting it's figures, because I counted the number of videos (movies), and it's far smaller. Also, based on the number of photosets, and the average number of photos in the ones I counted, the number of photos at the site in photosets is far smaller.
Having said that, you still get 1,032 videos, and 1,278 phosets.
-There are two types of live shows: "Diesel Girls Live", and "24/7 Live Channel".
"Diesel Girls Live" features Diesel models who put on a live show. The show is free, and worth watching. Only a few of the Diesel models participate, each show lasts 2 hours, and you get 1, 2 or 3 shows per day.
The "24/7 Live Channel" is a link to models who chat in both public (free) and private mode (paid). The public or free mode is basically worthless. The private (paid) mode is expensive. It's probably cheaper to go to a strip club than to pay for the private shows.
-This is a hardcore teen site. Many of the models are as cute, attractive, even lovely, as you will find anywhere. In the last few years, they have
offered excellent quality videos. The older photosets were not excellent, even when the models were attractive or cute. But the photos I've seen recently are really outstanding, and compare to what you get at Metart or MPL Studios, two sites that specialize in high-quality photos. This is mainly a video site. But if they can post outstanding photosets in the future, as they seem to be doing now, this will be a photo site as well.
I'm giving the site a score of 95. You have some of the most attractive teen models you can find. You have outstanding quality videos. The recent
photosets have improved greatly. The site is easy to navigate. You have fast download speeds. And you don't have to wade through a bunch of junk
to find the worthwhile content: you have great videos and photosets of lovely girls all over the site.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-- Extremely large amount of photo content.
-- High-quality photos/videos.
-- Outstanding site layout and user interface.
-- Custom features--user-defined zip files, preferences, settings etc.
-- Daily, high-quality updates.
Cons:
-- Could use a little more diversity in ethnicity(latin, afro, etc.)
Bottom Line:
I would classify this site as tastefull and traditional erotic nude photography. There are hardcore photo and video sets but the main emphasis is on erotic/nudes and exposing the model's natural beauty. No extreme stuff here and everything is in good taste.
Most of the models are of the young, early twenty-something variety. Although the majority fit a cerain profile--thin, well-toned etc, you can find a large diversity of model types spread around the very large number of photosets, once you discover the search feature. This is one of those sites that could keep your interest for quite a long time. There is no way you could manage to get through all of the content in a one-month period.
The only thing lacking is a more diverse representation of ethnicities. If it wasn't for this, I would not hesitate to give the site a perfect score.
The site layout and design is about as good as it gets. Serach utilities, custom zip downloads, and a number of other features are available. Everyting seems to be where it should be and you won't get lost in the large amount of content available.
The videos are of high quality and available in HD, but the emphasis is on photography. The quality of the photography ranges from semi-pro to professional, with most belonging to the latter category. The technical quality of the photos themselves ranges from eye-popping, HD quality to so-so, depending on the skill and experience-level of the photographer. There were times I was thinking, 'I would love to see this or that photographer shoot this model.' It is hard to classify this as a negative, however. It is unrealistic to expect every photoset and photographer to meet one's own personal demands regarding tastes and likes.
The number of photographers is also pretty diverse and you get a good range of styles. You can use the search function to display all sets from the photgraphers you like. In fact, there is so much content that, after a while, you can pick out the photographer just based on poses, settings, lighting, etc.. Most of the photographers seem to be into their work and are not just running around with a camera, trying to churn and burn content.
You will come across a few poorly-done photosets(blown-out images, overexposed, poor lighting, etc). But these are usually older sets and are the rare exception, rather than the norm.
The content is mostly unique. Although you will find a number of professional models here that you have seen elsewhere, the majority will likely be completely new to you.
The only people that probably would not like this site are those into extremes, either in model types or images. There is hardcore action, but no action like atm or other in-your-face kind of stuff.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Discount through PU
-Huge site with over 2000 models and over a million photos. Archives go back to 1999.
-Nearly every model is absolutely drop dead gorgeous with few exceptions.
-Models are natural in that there are no tattoos or implanted breasts. Most are shaved, but many are not.
-Six updates daily.
-Zipdownload photo option with three choices, large, medium and small
-Three video download choices, MP4, AVI and WMV. The AVI is the best quality. HD quality at 1280x720.
-No download limits. Works with download manager.
-Great search engine. Without it, the site would be unnavigable. Even with it, many searches provide over a thousand photo sets. This can be daunting if you are trying to get to them all.
-User rating system for photographers, models, photo sets and videos. You can search by ratings.
-Wonderful, very complete tour that lets you see what you will get.
Cons:
-Not very fast downloads. I got speeds of about 600KB and my FIOS conenction maxes out at 2400.
-The largest photo files are huge, ranging from 200MB to over 1GB. Individual photos can be as much as 6MB.
-Close to zero ethnic variation. Nearly all models are thin Eastern Europeans between 18 and 25.There are a few Asian, Black and Latina models and they are exceptionally beautiful. I just wish there were more.
Bottom Line:
I don’t usually sign up for big well known sites that have many reviews as I prefer niche sites. However, I felt in the mood for a photo site that had so many nice reviews, as well as a very low discounted price. I love the quantity and quality of the models and the photo sets. This is overall a truly great site that deserves the many wonderful reviews. I will focus primarily on the videos as I am much more a into them than photos anyway. The previous reviews were much more focused on the photos and I feel did notappreciate the videos.
I was impressed by the videos here. The models are almost without exception drop dead gorgeous. At present there are 1077 videos and are now being updated more so than in the past. As of today, 30 new videos have been posted this year. They added 106 in 2011.
The quality is HD, DVD level stunning and most videos are outdoors. Usually lighting is a negative in outdoor photos and videos, but mostly that is not a problem here. There are a few videos of public nudity that were just ok. Some were not really public, as you are directed to scenes in a forest or a deserted beach. Some of these were hot, but the majority were not very effective at creating eroticism.
Across the board, the camera work is outstanding and the videos are generally shot by the same photographers who shoot the photosets. This leads in many cases to the videos being either a video of a photo shoot, very boring, or suffer from a lack of direction that makes the videos look like moving photo sets, also some what boring. But there are also many that do work and are very erotic.
I like the work done here by Luca Helios. He generally gets the models to flirt with the camera in most of his videos. There is also a little teasing and even a few showcase a bit of stripping. No dancing though. They have a rating system on the site and he has the number one slot with a video featuring Dominika A called "Parusa". She walks past some shops, enters a room, and slowly removes her clothing, piece by piece. She gets to total nudity at 3:37 and spends the rest of the video, about four minutes, in a chair and on a bed showing us her body in slow motion. No masturbation here, this is all for our pleasure. She shows everything and is very explicit. Nothing artsy about this; it is the good stuff. He also has a video starring Jenni A called Carefree that I really like. She comes walking down stairs inside a house, bottomless, and walks towards the camera and teases. This goes on for about ten minutes. She is simply gorgeous and knows how to create a mood. Great direction in a video that works.
I also appreciated the videos by Goncharov, especially Ksucha C in a video called Lathin. She is not much to look at, but is great at teasing. She goes to a home in the forest wearing a short skirt. She teases us continually with pussy peeks up her dress, while not wearing panties. Very hot.
While many videos are not worth downloading unless you just love a particular model, there are some true gems here. I appreciate eroticism that focuses on putting on a good show.
As a total package, I would give this site at least a 95 for the sheer quantity and quality.
As a video site, I think it is fair to compare it to the videos on other photo sites. It is number one in that category in my book. Compared to other soft core sites, in the area of videos of solo females without masturbation, I think it can hold its own. I would give it at least an 85. There are just too many videos of photo shoots and posed videos to go for a higher score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Over 1000 models, 570,000+ pictures, 5400+ movies
+ Navigation options galore - Model Directory, Videos, Favorites, Niche Models, Top Rated, Tags, etc.
+ Search by category with attributes, outfits, "include/exclude actions" and environment options
+ Allows user votes and comments on sets and videos
+ Allows users to set tags (see cons and bottom line)
+ Allows users to set global viewing preferences
+ "Tag cloud" search (see cons and bottom line)
+ Newest files available in HD wmv, High avi, mpg & mp4, Medium Mobile, Low Flash
+ Zip files for picture sets in 2 sizes
+ Download manager compatible, with single download speeds of ~2.5MB/s
+ Bonus Girls - archived models from the earliest years of the site
+ Bonus material based on length of membership, including some slightly better-than-usual quality freebies - not "flash crap"
+ Links to models on other sites
+ Links to other sites include some discounted signups
Cons:
- A tag cloud instead of a keyword search
- The tag cloud includes user set tags with bizarre and useless words
- Not many girl/girl scenes (a personal disappointment?)
- Some searches for specific content brings unexpected/unwanted results (see bottom line)
- Some camera work issues - Stop moving! (minor complaint)
- Kept crashing Opera's latest browser - my "speed browser"
Bottom Line:
I can't believe this was my first time on this site, but I'm glad I joined. While it doesn't strictly fit into my amateurs-only ideology, there are hundreds of attractive no-names interspersed with dozens of faces (and "yummy parts"!) you've seen elsewhere. The overall quality of the pictures and video is well in line with the time that the scenes were shot. And, like others have mentioned, some of the older content seems to have been reworked - a nice touch!
The only real issue I have with this site has to do with the search functions. This site has a tag cloud instead of a keyword search, and the advanced search options seem to be based on the tags in the cloud. On other sites, the tags are set by the site and emphasized by the number of user hits on a particular word or phrase. I'd like to see that here. On Nubiles, the tags are user set and it seems to have degenerated into something less than reliable. For instance, searching for lesbian videos also brings up some solo and boy/girl material. There are useless tags in the cloud like, "wowwykazoowee", "ws wetspeck gt", "staysclothedsoisspam" and "xkjxjkxjkl". The worst offense is where one evidently very bored user decided to set literally dozens and dozens of crazy and similar tags based on the words "fringers" (yes, with the extra R), "pussy hole" and "milkie". All of that makes the tag cloud excessively long which, in turn, makes the page load VERY slowly. I do, however, have to give credit to the clown who tagged something with "what was abe lincolns wifes name". A nice chuckle, even if it did add to the crap.
Tagging issues aside, I think the list of positives above speaks volumes about the site. For it's niche, I don't see it getting much better than this. If you like 18 to 27 year-old models (heaviest on the younger side of things), this is a must join. Although there are few ethnics, the girls on this site are basically all natural, girl-next-door types. You'll find just about every body type short of fat, with almost non-existent silicone (if any) and, maybe most amazingly in this day and age, relatively few piercings. In my opinion, even the least attractive girl wasn't UNattractive. That's damn good for a site this size. I'd say that this is a site to hang around on for a while. If not that, one to definitely come back to once in a while. If you've ever been debating whether or not to join, I'll say, "Do it!"
(Edited for clarification of the tag cloud concern)
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Beautiful girls (988 of them at the latest count). I have yet to rate any of them as less than 9 out of 10. Half a million pictures plus over 5000 movies. This is indeed a mega site.
Videos: I downloaded only HD videos at 1280x720p in wmv format but there are other choices, AVI and MPG in High Quality, MP4 in Medium as well as a mobile version in Low Quality, available to those with less available storage space or with a slower connection.
Talking about the latter, videos can also still be downloaded in parts.
Streaming is excellent and also available in three different screen sizes for the newer videos (and there are a lot of them): Low, Medium and High. Some of the older videos stream at Low and Medium only.
Pictures are available in two sizes: Hi Resolution at 2400x1600px as well as in 800x1200px.
Excellent Search Engine*, excellent Members' Page Layout with many choices to study the girls and material from every angle. Models, Picture Sets and Videos can be rated.
Cons:
One Con, in my subjective eyes, is the lack of erotic underwear on most models, but I do understand that times have changed and girls dress much more casually these days, so even though I regret the scarcity of sexy satin or nylon undies, like teddies and full back panties and flimsy nighties. I will not hold this fact against the site. They cater to a younger generation and they do that well.
Another con for me is the Bonus sites. Again, this won't effect how I score Nubiles but I really do wish that if a site offered Bonus material it wouldn't always be from outdated, left-way-behind sites like: “Spring Break Fuck Adventures” and “Katrina18.” Their videos are completely inadequate in this day and age.
I decided to download test videos from both and ended up with mpg videos that were in 320x240p at 800kbps, incredibly blurry in full screen, and could only be downloaded in four parts. My preference: rather no bonus than one that is grossly outdated. It cheapens a great site.
Bottom Line:
I did a review of this site a few years ago and found it very good. In the meantime it has become even better, in my eyes. As I stated earlier the models are a joy because there is not one who is less than beautiful in the whole bunch of 988 of them.
I find all the choices listed on their members' page irresistible and spend as much time browsing as I do downloading .. a rare thing for me.
I would highly recommend Nubiles to all those who like beautiful models from approx. 18 – 23 years of age.
This site contains a fine mixture of European and American models. Exotic models (Blacks, Latinas, Asians) are a bit under represented, though and I would like to see more of them as well.
I almost forgot but I had problems with download speeds when I first joined this site and tech support bent over backward to help me. They were prompt to reply and very friendly ... a very huge plus for a site.
* Edit Nov.16: I downgraded my score by 3 points because the "excellent" search engine proved to be far from excellent. I got highly inaccurate search results when searching for "stockings", just as one example. Tons of hits, yet very few contained nylons.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
