Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-75 of 141 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Virtual Fem

51. Virtual Fem (0)

Pay
Active
79
Capn (28) 01-29-10  12:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: Unusual site. Very different to the norm.
Software AI plays looped live action first person perspective videos.
Interactivity. It is quite entertaining to find out what she will do.
Can be customised to a limited extent, by editing text files.
Over 70 models.
Regular update. 1 new girl monthly.
Good value for money if it is your 'thing.'
No DRM. Software & downloads are yours to use for good.
Non-renewing subscription
Webmaster listens & reacts to member input & suggestions.
Cons: Interface & AI are a little clunky.
Synthesised voice is not good, but can be quite amusing at times.
Earlier uploads are not great quality video &
the early AI is ermmm.....Quirky ;0)
Not all girls do 'everything.'....Just like real life really! LOL!
Bottom Line: If you like 'Adult' games this is worth a try.
Generally it is more of a simulation than a game.
Only one of them is coy and takes a lot of tiresome persuasion.
All the rest are very cooperative. ;0)
Especially on later uploads there is a reasonable variety of 'activities.'
Even anal is catered for with some.
The non-member area gives you a pretty good idea of what you are likely to get.
Video file sizes are pretty substantial.
Each VirtuaFem typically ranges in size from c.300MB up to 450MB
Very early ones are nearer 150MB
Later ones tend to be getting bigger.

To sum up.
Not up to game console standards, but a novel concept.
Quite well done, & has ongoing refinements.

I quite like it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Whore Lore

52. Whore Lore (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
Randamaster (0) 10-15-09  04:06pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Nice pictures from the movies
- Nice setting and a great idea
Cons: - You can only watch the movies online because the download didn't work, maybe you are lucky and the movies is running on you system, but most of them only in some crap AVI format

- the bonus sites are a shame
Bottom Line: I like fantasy and the Idea from this site is very great, I can also live with this 10 episodes because most of them are great, and yes now you have a chance to download the movies BUT this didn't work very well. You can donwload most of the movies only in some crap avi format with no sound. It works when you convert them in an other format, maybe mpeg4, but why I have to do the work I pay for? I never have any problems with any movies in the net but here I have no sound and there is nothing I can do to fix this. You can download some movies also in an Windows Media file but this didn't work also, the movie interupt in the middle then. Hey when you offer something in the net then it have to work, there are only 10 episodes so this isn't so hard! The pictures are great, but better save your money for something else, or throw it out of the window. Then you can see it when it flys away and so you have still a little bit of fun because this here is crap.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Naked News

53. Naked News (0)

Pay
Active
74
Capn (28) 09-06-09  08:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Unusual, not totally unique site.
Some attractive presenters who strip naked.
Reporting is of a quite decent standard.
Guest presenters add variety.
Large archive
Cons: Some presenters are sporting too much silicon for my taste.
Sometimes the banter between the presenters is tiresome.
Not enough stripping.
Guest anchors generally appear nude then do a clothed interview? Why not the other way around!
Bottom Line: OK I know it is Naked News, but starting a segment nude spoils the trip. Perhaps if they want to strike a balance they should have the presenter strip on her first item in the show & appear naked later if she is doing a subsequent spot?

It is not really erotic, but I don't really think it sets out to be. It would detract from their attempts to be a legitimate news service.

In all good value, but the novelty does wear off.
I think they ought to revert to their initial format of fully clothed for longer stripping & rotate the anchors more.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Special Examination

54. Special Examination (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
gwstug (0) 08-22-09  08:14am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some good content for a gyno fetish site, but alot of crap too, if gyno exam content is what your looking for.
Cons: Alot of jumping jacks and other shit in every video. I want medical fetish and gyno content. Foreign language is a con too, for a USA guy like me.
Bottom Line: Worth the price for a month, but I wouldn't likely ever renew my membership/
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cock Competition

55. Cock Competition (0)

Pay
Active
75
dracken (246) 08-05-09  09:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (63), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - interesting/original concept. A competition where girls spin a wheel to see what they will do with OG who owns a huge (plastic) penis and can cum gallons.

- fun atmosphere. In all the videos the girls joke around, the male character is funny and makes weird faces. Overall the videos here are pleasant to watch because of the feel good vibe they have.

- hot girls. Most of the models are young, big breasted, cute and willing to joke around as they try to deep-throat a huge fake cock

- around 59 scenes that can be downloaded in high resolution either as wmv or mpg. DVD, ipod and other formats are present too but I never bothered since the HD download went with about 1-2 mb when downloading a single video.

- each scene has a photo set of about 450-500 photos that can be downloaded as a zip.

- camera angles tend to be a bit too close for my taste but are overall well done. The technical aspects of the videos being good.

- the content is all exclusive

- you get access to a network
Cons: - the concept of a huge fake cock and gallons of "semen" can get boring/ annoying/ why don't they find a guy with a real dick? (I looked at it as girls doing stuff with a huge dildo and it worked much better)

- could never get the streaming player to work. It might be my stupidity but I could watch videos on any other site adult or not, except the Porn Pros network. Good thing they don't have any download restrictions.

- ads on the pages. There is a big banner for some live chat site at the top. It flashes and cannot be disabled. There is also a banner at the bottom but that never bothered me as it's not flashing five little "live" buttons

- website can be slow at times. Maybe it's the flashing adds, but sometimes the page loads ridiculously slow, especially when you're already downloading a video.
Bottom Line: It all depends on how you feel about the concept. Can you get over (or turned on by) the huge cock and ridiculous cum-shot at the end? I for one found it funny and entertaining. Seeing a girl try to do anal with the monster thing or seeing Shawna Lee thank her fans while covered in fake man-goo was hot and amusing at the same time.

Others may find it awkward and annoying (the site does have a bit of a jock doing cheerleaders attitude around it). It really depends on your tastes. But be warned the giant cock theme repeats itself in the network several times (freak of cocks and cum shot surprise for example) as does the whole jock / high five, dude feeling.

Also it depends on whether you like streaming or downloading videos. While there are multiple options of streaming they never worked for me, so either some technical know how might be needed or just settling for downloading stuff. (as I'm typing this I'm downloading 3 videos from them and the downloaded is going steady with 3.29 mb)

Finally, remember that the cost of membership gives you access to another 20-ish sites many of them focused on teens, cum-shots and deep-throat so if you like that kind of porn this could be a good place to find it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dare Ring

56. Dare Ring (0)

Pay
Active
79
BabyGetReal (32) 07-28-09  12:42pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 07-28-09  01:27pm  (Update History)
Reason: Completed the review.
Pros: Uniquely creative with many things that I love. See my profile for why, and the forum "Against the grain".

As stated in previous reviews, each of the 12 games has seven rounds/scenes. There are typically 5-6 players, sometimes all girls, sometimes girls with a couple of guys. First round is spin the bottle and answer questions about their sex lives. I liked the one I watched but I watched only one. The last round involves players having the chance to choose one or more other players to "satisfy" them with oral sex. Typically the next to last round involves semi-random giving of oral sex ltd to 30 sec per turn, but no orgasms.

Everything is consensual. Everything is kind. Nobody is hurt. There is sometimes real chemistry. Sometimes there is sex and it is fun. These are real girls, not models, with a range of average builds. Maybe they have chosen their partners in advance, but maybe not -- there appears to be some sexual tension because of the ...

[CONTINUED BELOW, OUT OF ROOM HER
Cons: - Apparently there will never be any updates.
- Very limited amount of content.
- Mediocre videography.
- Fake male orgasms.
Bottom Line: PROS CONTINUED:
... uncertainty of what will happen next. The guys are disappointing -- few of them manage to come, and some fake it! When there is good sex, the non-participants sitting in the background looking awed are a turn-on. Editing seems minimal, making for charming realism. I watched all 12 of the round 7's, and some of the round 6's. I watched all only 1 game in its entirity (Game 1, figuring that the quality would deteriorate in later games, which in general it did!). The intermediate rounds mostly involve disrobing, kissing, sucking nipples, and such -- fun to watch once. My personal opinions:

Best round 7: Game 5: 5 out of 6 players get off for real. Round 6 of Game 5 is a hot teaser.

Other good round 7's:

Game 6: Strap on orgy. Only two give and two receive, but the others watch in awe. Both receivers come quickly and more than once. Hot!

Game 8: 5-girl orgy. Several of the girls come several times. Very hot.

Game 10: Several girls come. Round 6 is hot too.

So-so:

Games 2 and 4, round 7, each starts out OK with 2 or 3 girls getting off with oral roulette (game 2, 30 seconds rounds of oral by different players) or untimed oral by one player (game 4), but end lamely with lots of oral on a guy who never gets off, or fakes it.

Unexciting round 7's:
Games 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 12.

There are also some short "bonus games". BJ roulette is sort of fun. The best scene is "Topless pie eating, camera 1" which ends with the only actual fuck on the site. After a long BJ with pie cream smeared around, he gives her oral and then fucks her for only about 4 minutes (realistic!). The other players leave the room, apparently to give them privacy. She doesn't appear to come, but seems into it; he does, and uses a condom without hiding the fact. Its a very sweet amateur scene with lots of kissing, hugging, and tenderness. I found it very hot!

BOTTOM LINE:

Although this site has not been updated for over two years, it is so unique that I found it worthwhile. I joined for $20 then canceled a day or two later, after I had downloaded the scenes I wanted. CAREFUL, it used CCBill which says billing will recur after 30 days unless you cancel.

It is really too bad that this idea wasn't developed further, or even simply continued for more games. It was a great start. I hope someone else will pick up this idea and develop it!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Special Examination

57. Special Examination (0)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (356) 07-09-09  07:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Inexpensive full access trial option of 3 days at $9.95.
-Excellent video quality at 1280x720, 2500 kbps. 29 videos about 20 to 30 minutes.
-Excellent quality screenshots at 2136x3216. One set for each video. Not zipdownloadable.
-Attractive Russian models. Not one was not worth watching. Look to be in their early twenties.
-No DRM or other download restrictions.
-Can use download managers.
Cons: -Not enough variety in the scenarios. Every one is exactly the same. Girl strips, has her temperature taken anally, does some calisthenics, probed by doctor manually, check out pussy with speculum then she gets dressed and leaves.
-No sexual interaction with the doctor. Some doctors are male, some female.
-Not part of any network, no bonus material.
Bottom Line: This site is from the same people as nudesportvideos.com and has a lot in common with it. The girls are mostly thin and mostly very close in age, which looks to be in their early twenties. Unlike nudesportvideos, there are a few girls with nice curvy bodies and tits that have some size. Mostly the girls look really good, kind of like the girl next door real amateurs, but Russian style. No fake boobs, tattoos or even bleached blond hair. I would not have complained if they had some makeup used tastefully though.

Nudesportvideos has a primary focus on the girls moving in various ways to show off their bodies. This, in contrast, is basically a medical fetish site. The girls do some calisthenics for the doctor, but don't really put effort into showing off their bodies a lot. The scenario starts with the girl entering the room and then stripping. The balance of the video is completely nude.

The doctors do some ordinary tests such as eye exams or taking blood pressure. There is also some manual vaginal probing, but not any anal. The only anal activity is that each girl takes a thermometer rectally.

There is nothing very sexy about the doctor/patient interaction, but there is quite a bit of pussy on display. Totally softcore, but nonetheless explicit posing.

There are both male and female doctors, but it doesn't really matter. In only one video the female doctor changed her clothes before putting on a lab coat. More of that kind of thing would be a distinct improvement. Some great looking female doctors are wasted here.

A bit more variety in the scenes would also be a plus. Pretty much every scene is the same. The tiny amount of dialog is in Russian, so it is not clear why the girl is there. A suggestion for other scenarios could be having a group of girls being examined at the same time, perhaps taking off uniforms.

Some variety in age would also help.

This site can definitely be improved, but it is true to its niche and it does deliver softcore interesting nudes. I would also think being part of a network would make it a better value for the money. As a trial, it is an ok price, but not at the full price of $29.95 without a lot more content.

The site offers nice video and photo quality and the girls are attractive. The poses can be quite explcit. Overall I can recommend the site, despite its few weaknesses.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Flash for Adults

58. Flash for Adults (0)

Pay
Active
70
asmith12 (124) 06-23-09  06:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + surprisingly funny
+ surprisingly entertaining
+ no outright "glitches"
+ interactive Flash clips
+ nostalgic games like arcanoid and pacman (don't confuse with Pokemon).
Cons: --- non-exclusive content
-- pre-checked cross-sales
-- interactivity of clips is limited
-- erotics is not always properly integrated into games
Bottom Line: Recently I've joined RussianTeensClub, but was severely disappointed (see my review). The more reason I had to try the other sites included into the same membership. One of them was FlashForAdults.

Originally (especially given disappointment about RussianTeensClub) I've expected FlashForAdults to be a completely useless garbage, but it was substantially better then that.

I've spent some time trying to understand why I feel not so bad about this site, and I think I've found the reason. While the content is not exclusive (a HUGE minus as such), and there isn't that much content that you can find on some free adult flash sites, content quality is quite consistent (at least better than on free sites).

On free flash sites (at least those which I've had a misfortune to run into) amount of content is usually huge, but unfortunately 90% is complete b/s, and it takes a while to find something decent. FlashForAdults IMHO provides more balanced feeling, with most of stuff which one can look at without disgust. Content consists of clips, interactive clips and games. Most of the clips could be more interactive, most of the games could have better integrated erotics element, but overall it was surprisingly entertaining.

Bottom line: while such a non-exclusive site IMHO can't stand on it's own, I was pleasantly surprised with the selection and quality of the implementation of the games and clips, and would rate it as a "75" (which is not bad for non-exclusive site), but needed to deduct 5 points for pre-checked cross-sales, making it 70.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ultimate Surrender

59. Ultimate Surrender (0)

Pay
Active
85
mbaya (356) 06-15-09  07:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through Epoch.
-Very original and creative concept of mixing realistic competitive nude wrestling with lesbian sex.
-Videos as good as 1280x720, 7158 kbps. Advertised as HD and very crisp.
-298 hour long videos. The archive goes back to August 2004.
-Streaming available. There are four download options-HD WMV, WMV, MP4 and Ipod.
-No DRM or download restrictions. I downloaded most of the site in one day with no problems.
-Download manager friendly.
-Updates are five times a month.
-Photo sets for each video. Zipdownloadable, both high and low resolution, about 200 per set. 1200x675, but fairly sharp.
Cons: -Not part of any network. All kink.com sites are priced individually, but there is a discounted price for second and more websites joined at the same time.
-Only occasionally clear explicit nudity. The videos mostly are shot from too far away with no closeups.
-The penalty of getting fucked with a dildo is not much of an incentive to avoid losing. Try to imagine if you were wrestling and the penalty was a handjob. Would you try hard to avoid such a fate? In the post scene interviews the girls sometimes mention how much they enjoyed the fucking they got. One girl had a big smile and said she is in love. She went further to say she wouldn't mind a repeat as long as she loses.
Bottom Line: I knew it was a long time since I was last a member, but I did not realize it was three years. The site has dramatically changed for the better in that time.

The most obvious change is growth. With five updates a month, there is a lot to see here. Next, there are now fine quality HD videos. This is a distinct improvement as some of the oldest videos are not up to today's standards. Additionally many of the older videos have been recoded and play much better than they did years ago.

Another area of improvement is in the quality of the girls. In the beginning, many of the better wrestlers had that look that is the stereotype of lesbians-short hair with tattoos, mean and tough looking. In essence they were not sexy unless that is specifically your taste and I doubt most guys would prefer that look. My how things have changed. Mostly the girls are much sexier than in the past. Many are pornstars, with the looks and bodies that most guys like(I can't speak for lesbians who may like this kind of site).

Another change is that anal scenes have become much more common. About 25 feature anal. Since many scenes are very similar I feel that adds some variety.

There are also many more videos where the matches are more even. In the past most scenes had a weak wrestler being paired with a much better one. Too predictable for my taste. Now, some of the girls beat others of equal proficiency level. It is boring to never get to see a girl you like to win, or to lose for that matter.

The biggest change for the better is that there are many tag team scenes. When last I was a member, there were none. Now there are 26. Recently these scenes are being filmed in front of a live audience that reacts to the action and occasionally interacts, but only to a small degree. The tag team concept gives the weaker girls a chance to go after the better ones with some pussy fingering, pussy rubbing etc.

The action is much more about wrestling than it is about lesbian sex, but that is my only real criticism. That is the niche that the site has chosen, so it really does deliver what it promises. Overall recommended, but not necessarily the sexiest site you have ever seen.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Futanaria

60. Futanaria (0)

Pay
Active
78
GCode (101) 06-04-09  11:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of real females portraying anime style futanari or shemales in both videos and photos.
- No DRM protection.
- No Download limit.
- Updates often, usually twice a week with either a photo shoot or a video.
- Price is decent at $16.95 for a one month stay and goes down in price afterwards.
- Videos are available in WMV format (720 X 480, ranging from 984 to 2004 kbps) and quicktime MOV format for download only. At the time of the review, there are currently 32 different videos.
- Pictures are in an average resolution at 1000 X 667, with one of the most non-intrusive watermark I've seen (it's extremely small). At the time of the review, there are currently 35 shoots totaling about 2,950 photos.
- Diary entries for dated updates with a small captioned story describing the scene.
- Model bio page with some comments describing the model and stats such as height, weight, boob size, and cock size.
Cons: - Photo sets are not available in easy zip format for downloading.
- Photo sets are accompanying photos of the videos. While they are true shoots, they are almost identical in terms of location, content, and outfits of the videos.
- Site navigation is a bit dreadful, while once you figure it out you can find the content easy, but there is a 10-15 minute learning curve to find it.
- No bonus features or scenes at all.
- No forum for communication. This would be a perfect feature for user input in to the scenes because it is so fantasy based.
- Model index bio page is nice but there are no links to their content from there, an easy model index would really help navigation.
Bottom Line: Futanaria portays real female models as dick girls in anime style futanari ("new-half, shemale") scenes. The penises are obviously fake and stay true to the anime style by being extremely exaggerated. Yes, these prosthetics are so big that they can usually suck them. Plus, they are actually molded quite well and look quite real. They do not look like just pieces of plastic attached to the model. Also, staying true to the anime style, these prosthetic penises actually shoot a load and boy, do they shoot a lot. If you have ever seen futanari style or even anime hentai, the ejaculations are usually largely exaggerated. This place stays true to those type of cumshots with them spurting massive amounts of white substance. But, they do go in to the cornfactor by giving some models in sets this extremely large boob vest. I know that they are trying to stay somewhat true to anime because a lot of anime girls have extremely large breasts, these 'boob vests' bring in too much humor and corniness that it actually destroys some sets in my opinion. But, they actually spray 'milk' which may add to the fantasy.

A large perk of the site that I was pleasantly surprised was the attractiveness of the models. I really thought that models that were willing to be involved with this type of site would be far in between, they actually picked up a few hotties. While there is not a huge index, the site does contain 9 with bios and a few new ones without one up yet. I'd say around 10-12 at the time of this review. The models do a pretty good job at acting and are really in to the scenes which is a plus. I really thought they would be laughing and doing a poor job doing these scenes, but they are actually quite erotic.

The videos vary in content with some solo masterbation scenes and girl on girl. A large plus for the site is they take certain themes and do a good job at portraying them. Some examples are a wedding night with two futanari girls, mud wrestling, and geishas having sex. The sex is always with two girls with the fake cocks and they do have sex with these massive cocks. The videos, while being a bit low in bitrate, actually look pretty good in terms of low grain and average lighting. While they are a bit amatuerish in style, there is no extreme jiggling of the camera or a lot of chitter chatter amongst the camera man and model.

The photos are average. I can't say they are the best or the worst I have ever seen. They could be a bit larger but the watermark is almost non-existant. Since they are accompanying sets, they are almost identical to the videos so you get almost the same content.

This site is strictly fantasy based and actually interesting if you are a fan of anime style porn and would like to see it portrayed in real life. The props are well made, the models are in to the scenes, and can actually be highly erotic. It's the technical stuff that kills this site such as no zips, bad navigation, below average res of photos, and bitrate of vids.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bullet Time

61. Bullet Time (0)

Pay
Active
67
HeyManNiceShot (6) 05-21-09  09:46pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very unique interesting content
- bullet time 3-d (spin the set)
- stereo anaglyphs (presumably blue/red glasses required)
- Inexpensive ($2.95 for 30 days, no re-bill)
- Signup through CCBill
- Nice looking models I haven't seen before
Cons: - Updates stopped (last evidence of an update is "Coming Summer 2007", it is now Summer 2009)
- Content loses its novelty value quickly
- Very little content: 4 models, 1 scene each
- Navigation is terrible:
Apparently there's thousands of HD pics, but I can't find them.
- Painfully slow to load
- Bullet time images not downloadable
- errors in some of the bullettime images
- No explantion of how the bullet time pics were made, or how to view stereo anaglyphs
- No video
- No bonus access to other sites
- Lack of quality control
Bottom Line: This site features girls posed in the soft porn genre in "bullet time" (remember the fight scenes in The Matrix?). A Shockwave app loads, and you control the left and right arrows to view the model from left or right in a about a 180 degree arc. Good luck if you try to download that though. I tried two different applications to grab it which both failed miserably.

If only the execution was as good as the concept! I like soft porn, and this was even a little soft for me. The errors made in producing these images created warped body parts on some of them which is distracting as well.

The site needs work... Maybe it just needs some love? I'm hoping the webmaster isn't a native English speaker, but someone needs to work that site over a bit- just editing text. It needs updates, a way to download the bullet time images, and a way to find the thousands of HD images they claim to have. But they do get mad props for giving this concept a shot.

Bottom line of the Bottom Line:
If you're looking for something different on the net, maybe this site could be worth looking at, but don't expect much. But hey, how many porn site are there that cost less than $3 for a month and don't rebill?
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ultimate Surrender

62. Ultimate Surrender (0)

Pay
Active
98
asmith12 (124) 04-19-09  11:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ absolutely unique concept
++ unscripted real wrestling
++ girls are mostly friendly to each other during the wrestling (though not in last round)
+ nice girls
+ good video quality (up to HD 1280x720 at about 1.5Mbit/s)
+ updated 5 times a month (with FULL episode every time)
+ user feedback and comments
+ easy site navigation
+ full movie download (instead of ZIPs).
Cons: - action in the last round is scripted
- not too much variety in the last round
- ZIPped video download seems to be gone (replaced with full movie download)
Bottom Line: Recently I re-joined UltimateSurrender and found that now it became even better (sorry for marketing-speak, but that's exactly my feeling).

The site is about girls wrestling almost nude to nude while getting extra points for actions like opponent pussy fingering, smothering her face with pussy and so on. Every match starts with girls wearing panties (recently bikinis were introduced), but they are removed very quickly (panties removal of the opponent means 5 points, so they have an incentive to do it). After the wrestling, winner (with the most points) gets to punish the loser in the so-called "final round", which usually includes mild humiliation, strap-on action (sometimes anal), forced pussy licking and so on.

Kink.com says that wrestling is unscripted, and I do believe it (they're about the only site I believe is unscripted); recently they even started to do some matches in front of live audience. Final round though is scripted almost for sure (or at least very strict restrictions are placed on the winners), which obviously reduces variety of final round a bit.

Video quality is very decent (up to HD 1280x720 at about 1.5Mbit/s; non-HD is also quite good with 960x540 at about 1MBit/s, pictures can be downloaded as ZIPs, recently an option to download whole video has been introduced (instead of ZIP with video parts).

Since my previous review UltimateSurrender has made several improvements, which contributed to making the site "even better". Most importantly,
they introduced tag team matches; one cannot overestimate their importance, they change the game and overall feeling COMPLETELY. The next thing was that they have made tag team matches translated 'live' and in front of live audience (which added some additional twist and adds a bit of variety). As for more minor changes, they have introduced bikinis (IMHO nice touch, but would be nicer if points are given for top removal too), provided a bit better video quality and
fixed problems with their previous crappy login system (now it works like a breeze, no need to relogin after leaving session unattended for a few hours).

Overall, after coming to this site once again, I almost lost doubt that as of now, it is THE VERY BEST site on the net for me personally, so I've upgraded it's rating to 98 (the very first 98 I've ever set on PornUsers).

Bottom line: if you are not scared by "girls-only" action and by the very concept of female wrestling, you shall at least take a look at their tour pages; BTW, better samples about this and the other kink.com sites can be found on free-hardcore.com . Admittedly, it is so unusual, that it can be "love-it-or-hate-it", but if you like the tour and samples, I think you will like it inside too.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naked News

63. Naked News (0)

Pay
Active
87
Xororos (14) 04-02-09  12:38am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: If you're a fan of softcore erotica and you're looking for something different, this could be it. If you log on and watch the intro video, you'll have a pretty good idea of what to expect. A woman reports on the news and slowly takes off her clothes (or sometimes it's lingerie, or even costumes). If that sounds intriguing, you'll love the site. If not, well, that's pretty much the entire site.

Surprisingly, the news reporting is actually decent. It's a fun way to stay up on current events. The video quality is excellent and available in a variety of formats for both Mac and PC. You can download the two most current programs in very high resolution, or you can download the last 150 days shows in your choice of low/medium/high resolution. However, you'll need to buy the "gold" membership to get the very high quality videos.

Additionally, various years old segments are available for streaming, but not downloading.
Cons: I'll try to address some common complaints so that prospective subscribers know what they're getting:

The show is not really about sex. Some people may not find it erotic in the slightest. There's no romantic component and, more than anything, it feels kind of silly and carefree. It's actually a fun site, but it's not about sex.

There are about 20 downloadable pictures for some of the anchors, but for some bizarre reason, they're only semi-nude. You won't see things that you see in the video. Think of Demi Moore on the poster for "Striptease." The pics are really more like a bonus than anything else.

It's impossible to tell who the actual current anchors are. You'd think Michelle and Yukiko were still involved, but they're not. This is a bit frustrating. Not all of the anchors are amazing. Some have fake breasts and some are very skinny, but mostly they're pretty hot.

Finally, not everyone is nude all the time. If that's a problem, you'll be frustrated by the site.
Bottom Line: I've subscribed off-and-on for years and I've always been pleased with the content. There is a real sense of teamwork and friendship between the anchors, and you get a real sense of their personalities.

The video quality, as I said, is outstanding and the download speeds are fast. Add to that the extremely low cost of membership, and you can't lose.

The fundamental question is, do you find the content stimulating? I suspect that for many, the answer is no - it's just too soft and has nothing to do with sex. However, you may find it irresistible.

There are a few specious notions floating around this forum, so please post a response if you want clarification on any point.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Free Janine

64. Free Janine (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
80slover (0) 04-01-09  09:05am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Almost none, unfortunately.
Cons: No new video content.
Video encoding is poor.
Almost no updates.
No zip files for downloading pictures.
Bottom Line: Not worth the money. She was on Howard Stern promoting her site with (as of now) non - existent content; there is actually almost no content. For those of you who wish to follow Janine's tribulations in prison, I suggest writing her a letter and wait for a response.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Sexy Slow Motion

65. Sexy Slow Motion (0)

Pay
Active
79
HeyManNiceShot (6) 03-16-09  09:27pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is a site with a unique niche- all scenes feature the use of a 600fps (high speed) video camera. Though there is the usual monthly recurring membership which is available, the site does not demand a monthy membership. You can buy individual scenes a la carte for a few (~$4) dollars. You can get a pretty good preview of all the clips available on the site without paying a dime. It's also very exclusive content. Even with having this unique niche video, they didn't forget about high res picture buffs. Each shoot has a series of "high res" (1000x1500) images that compliments the video. Their models are all attractive early 20ish looking models of various figures.
Cons: The site is a bit small, but it seems to be growing. The video is at a lower res than I like (512x384), and filmed a bit amateurishly (framing problems, camera shake, etc). A tripod or image stabilization on their video is desperately needed. Some of the clips are just entertaining things done in slow motion rather than erotic. But my biggest gripe with this site is that all the clips are in download-resistant Flash video format, which is certainly an annoyance.
Bottom Line: Every scene features something in slow motion. If you like watching girls running in slow motion on the beach, or butt slaps rippling through a tight body in super slow mo, or water splashing all over some hot bodies, this is your site! The site is generous enough to let you make your own determination with their preview clips of every scene, so you know what you're getting into. This is a novelty site more than a hardcore one. Overall, I enjoyed it for the most part- it's a lot of fun to watch. If the site had higher resolution video in an easily downloadble format, I would give a much higher score.

If you're bored of the same old porn sites, it's a nice change from the norm. This is a soft core site for sure. I would certainly recommend taking a look at it, maybe join for a little while, but if you're looking for hard core porn, keep looking.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mastasia

66. Mastasia (0)

Pay
Active
78
xyzzy (11) 03-02-09  09:43am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - enormous, unreal, comic-book boobs!
- enormous, unreal, comic-book nipples!
- the "added-on" boobs are pretty darn impressive. I can't even tell if it's plastic, CGI, or both
- lots of lactation (albeit fake)
- models are on the whole slender and attractive
- some girl-girl action too (softcore)
- kinky costumes
- clean, well-designed, easy-to-navigate site
- billing using CCBill so easy cancellation etc
- you get what you expect from the preview page, no bait and switch tactics here
Cons: - no full nudity or hardcore, as far as I could tell
- arguably, not even any topless models! since the boobs are all faked...
- lack of real eroticism. Even the lesbian scenes are pretty tame
- not a huge amount of content
- gets a bit repetitive after a while
- the videos get "rotated" off the site. To get ones not currently listed, you have to buy them individually from a different site
Bottom Line: Okay, this is one of those sites where you get pretty much what you expect from the free tour. It has a very simple premise: pretty girls in bright, colourful sets, with bright, colourful clothes, with enormous, added-on boobies.

The content consists mainly of pictures and videos of the girls strutting their enormous udders both solo and with each other, with a healthy dose of lactation and liquids thrown in. There's a small additional area on the site with some token boob-related cartoons and animations too.

The "extra boobage" on the models is very well done and surprisingly realistic, and if you're a bit of a breast fanatic (and let's face it, if you're not, why on earth have you signed up to this site?!?) it is a genuine turn-on.

The problem is, there just isn't enough variety to really keep your interest. Download a few picture sets and videos and you'll realise they're all pretty much the same - same studio setup, same poses, etc. The lack of harder content doesn't help, and also the fact that the models always just look like they're models playing a silly game. If the site had some harder content with a little bit more "mood" I think it would be a lot better.

So, if you're a big boob fanatic, it's definitely worth signing on for a month to see slender young women with the proportions we can only dream of - but I don't think it's worth staying longer. They just need more variety, pure and simple.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naked News

67. Naked News (0)

Pay
Active
60
polacrilex (13) 01-24-09  08:50pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good Looking Models
-Good Programing
-Decent Quality Video
-Some Amateur Models
-Price is Low ($14.95/month)
Cons: -Daily/Hourly Download Limit
-Very Few Pictures with NO NUDITY
-Archives are Limited (See Below)
-No Close-ups of Models Naked Parts
-Videos are Quick Time ONLY
-Some FAKE BOOBS (Not to my liking)
Bottom Line: I have been a member of this site for on and off over the last 7 years (this is my 7th time joining). While they have improved the programming of the show a great deal, the site quality is lacking compared to what it could be. Placing limits on the number of downloads you can do in an hour/day is ridiculous given that the largest videos are 30MB and most are under 10MB. I was restricted after downloading only 4 days of material! That is about 28 2min clips at moderate resolution. That is simply crap given that only 1/3 of that contains nudity(-10pts)!

This brings me to my other point. While the site advertised .H64 high rez video (which isn't all that great), they do have it---but only for the last two days are available for download(-10pts).

Next we have the Quick Time only video. Although QT is not horrible the videos should be in multiple formats given that this site is basically a TV show. Video is their thing and they are failing with presenting it (-5pts).

Finally, the models may be hot but by the time you wade through the limited downloads, the so-so video quality, and the QT only you essentially get to see a pussy that is composed of about 10-15 pixels. This would not be a problem IF there were quality pictures of the models to accompany the videos. And there are, but they are NON NUDE (-15pts).

So why have I rejoined. Long story short, besides Lily Kwan and April Torres, in 2001 the quality of the video was good for the time and there were no download limits. By 2005 the models had changed and the video quality was somewhat better. Last year the video quality was starting to suck and I was told it was going be HD soon. Now that they have the .H64 QT video they have imposed limitations that are ridiculous for the user.

If you want to check the site out it may be worth it if it is your first time. Too bad you will not be able to see the older anchors since the archive is pitiful (i.e. the older videos have NOT been improved but rather are shown AS IS circa 2000 like 100 X 70). This site is in need of a major reality check given how well other adult sites treat their material. This will be the last time I join given the restrictions imposed which ruins the experience.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Sperm Swap

68. Sperm Swap (0)

Pay
Active
88
morgentau (12) 01-11-09  05:59pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - very good video quality
- many hot girls
- intense action
- good camerawork and lighting
- original scenes have two girls in every scene (some even have three girls)
- about half of the video content is available in 320x240,640x480,960x540 and 1920x1080 pixels resolution
- streaming is also possible but not in HD
- decent download speed. I maxed out my 6 Mbit connection consistently
- good site navigation
Cons: - new 'updates' since mid 2008 are from the sister site Asstraffic
- site doesn't justify a recurring membership - sign up for 30 days and download everything
- 3 day trial is worthless as it doesn't let you view full scenes
-older half of the video content is only available in 512x384 resolution at 1500 kbps. Picture quality is still ok though.
Bottom Line: This is one of my favorite sites and I'm somewhat sad that they no longer update with new content. Each scene starts with the girls showing off their assets with occassional instructions from the cameraman. After a bit of light lesbian play one or two guys join in for some intense action. The girls are treated less rough than on Asstraffic but if you're more into the romantic setup this site might not be your cup of tea. For fans of gonzo-style porn with multiple girls however this site is almost a must. The girls are hot and the cameraman almost always gets the best angle to highlight their features. The content could be a bit more varied but at least I know what I get when I open a random video from this site ;)

For 29.95$/29.95 you get:
- 189 spermswap scenes with a runtime of ~35 min each
- some scenes from Asstraffic (19 as I'm writing this review)
- a picture gallery for each scene. The pictures are ok but not much of a reason to join the site.
- some generic bonus scenes (non-exclusive)

The price seems to depend on the IP you are connecting from rather than the country you select during signup. I signed up from a European country but was charged 29.95$ since my IP was from the US. (not that I complain =) )

The scenes can be browsed by actress, date or by specific types of action (Anal, AtM, Toys etc). However, since you will probably download the entire thing to your harddrive this feature might not make much difference. I recommend downloading at least one screenshot or image for each video so you can browse the thumbnails after your subscription expires.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naughty Little Nymphs

69. Naughty Little Nymphs (0)

Pay
Active
50
ramscrota (12) 12-30-08  08:12pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good pics, a rarity for this group of sites
Cons: - Absurd scenarios which completely rob the scenes of any of their erotic potential
- Males dressed in ridiculous costumes as they ravage the female. wolve's custume, etc. There isa logistical difficulty in getting his member through the gap in the custume, or balancing a giant owl's outfit as he roots away. Also many of these outfites make the guy's cock look tiny.
Bottom Line: Another example of this group of site's absurd attempts to be interesting. Their work is usually characterized by crass 'in your face' sex. Their time and energy would be better spent developing some sensitivities for genuine erotica.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ultimate Surrender

70. Ultimate Surrender (0)

Pay
Active
60
ramscrota (12) 12-28-08  01:23am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Lovely models (mostly)
- HQ pics & vids
- Site well organized
Cons: - Too much the same formual
- Fight rounds too long, hence total shoots FAR too long. Should be cut by half and spent more time on final round where trhe victor has her way with the loser.
- Too many scene have rough sex, I understand that this is a BDSM site, but for me, gagging, sudden spinal jolting, hair pulling, has no erotic appeal. Spanking is fine, but anything which endangers the sub's spinal alignment or her airway is a no-np
- Instead of the current MC (Matt), I would prefer to see one (or two) super-fit, leanly built mean-looking guys, dressed up to the nines.
Bottom Line: Site has good potential, but makes serious and pnvious blunders, which rob it of real erptic spice.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Village Ladies

71. Village Ladies (0)

Pay
Active
63
WeeWillyWinky (88) 11-11-08  03:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A fair amount of nice pictures.
- Site is mature and contains nothing sleezy or trashy.
- The basic premise of the site is good.
Cons: - A large percentage of the pics have been moved into a separate archive, which requires a separate membership.
- No videos.
- No zip-files.
- Small pictures (avg. 600x800 up to 749x1123), of fair to middling quality.
- Very small thumbnails.
- Pages load slowly.
- Sliding sidebar which moves as the scroll-button is moved. Very annoying.
- Some models in dire need of a dentist.
Bottom Line: Woody Allen opens one of his films with an old joke: Two women are at a restaurant and one says, "the food here is lousy.", and the other replies, "Yeah, and such small portions."

That joke applies pretty well to Village Ladies. For instance: I could complain that a considerably large percentage of the pictures have been moved to a separate archive which I can't access; but at the same time it would be silly to complain since ninety percent of those pics would do nothing for me anyway. But complain I will, hence the reference to Woody's joke.

As soon as I entered the member's section, disappointment and tedium ensued. First, no zips. Second, the thumbs loaded slowly and were so small I could hardly make out the image. Third, I clicked on one link in the model's index and was taken to a page which invites you to join a separate site where the older pics are now stored. On return to the model's index, that link was now yellow (visited) as were all the links to sets I would not be able to access. The sudden over-abundance of links to sets I could not access was somehow insulting, as if a joke had been pulled on me.

While beauty is certainly in the eye of the beholder, I found *very few* attractive models here. There's nothing wrong with being homely, but if you agree to being photographed, and to having those photos featured on a site where people are paying to obtain access to those photos, and if the intention of those photos is sexual titillation, then you should be prepared to hear some unflattering comments. Unflattering comment follows:

If you have broken teeth, missing teeth, gray teeth, or brown teeth, keep the smiling to a minimum, visit a dentist, or re-consider posing for adult pictures. This comment refers to some of the models, not all of them, of course.

***

This site has been online for a number of years and now costs more than a lot of premium sites. If you have a yen for less-than-glamorous mature amateurs, Aunt Judy's is a much safer bet than this.

Read Duke's review (TBP reviewer). He does a lot less pussy-footing than me, and his five year old review needs precious little updating.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Virtual Fem

72. Virtual Fem (0)

Pay
Active
50
xbigvmanx (14) 10-30-08  12:40pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Interactive A.I. a great idea (shows potiential)
(Artfiicial Intelligence)
Cons: Lacks content
Poor Video quality
AI needs a lot of work
Software tends to be buggy
Not worth your money
Lack of updates
Bottom Line: This web site is pretty poor on everything. The software alone has bugs and the women you download might not work when you upload it to the interactive software you install on your computer. Video quality is very poor and they only have about 48 women available. And not all of them are very attractive IMHO. Sometimes the women don't really respond too well when you try to talked to them. This website is not worth your time and money.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit 3D Sex Games

73. 3D Sex Games (0)

Pay
Active
78
asmith12 (124) 10-09-08  02:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ quality of graphics is good
++ variety of actions is large
++ variety of toys is HUGE (including sex machines)
++ variety of outfits is large
++ variety of locations is HUGE
+ customization of almost everything (vagina,penis,body,...)
+ "Sex Coins" pseudo-currency to keep things interesting
Cons: -- animation isn't so good
-- out of all the actions, a few are duo and VERY few are 3-some
- VERY few pose changes are animated
- undressing is not animated
- convoluted interface (tutorial and "hints" required to play sex game? Come on).
- need connection to play
- slow web site
- Downloading 65M update right after download? Gimme a break.
Bottom Line: Continuing my quest in looking for a good 3D sex game, I've tried 3D Sex Villa (this is the game which you get when subscribing to the site). Well, after all the good reviews about it on PornUsers I was quite disappointed (it's definitely not bad, but IMHO doesn't warrant 90+ score).

First of all, to clarify - it is yet another "3D sex game" along the same lines as ActiveDolls and PlaySexGame - you have models, put them into some location, choose position and tell them to have sex. That's fine. At the beginning most positions, locations and models aren't available, and you need to fuck around a bit (literally) to get more (when having sex, you earn so-called "Sex Coins" to spend on "sex packs" which include positions or
toys or models). That's IMHO even better to keep things a bit more interesting.

But then comes a worse part. First of all, controls are convoluted; while the game has tutorial on controls, it's not really what I expect from rather primitive sex game. Also while graphics itself is good, animation isn't IMHO so good; I even doubt if they used motion capture to animate things (it looks more as a good imitation of physical model, than mo-cap), and faces have VERY limited animation. Outfits don't always fit good, and penetrations aren't always "clean" too. Overall, IMHO 3D Sex Villa's 3D graphics+animation feeling is SIGNIFICANTLY worse than that of ActiveDolls.

On the plus side, overall variety is HUGE: you can choose from REALLY HUGE set of models, outfits, locations, plus can customize almost everything (most of variety comes in "sex packs" but as long as it costs nothing rather than playing, it's perfectly ok with me). As some drawback to this variety, I want to mention that while they've added threesomes, they're EXTREMELY limited (formally there are 5 threesome actions, but some are so similar, that I'd say there are only 2).

And IMHO all that variety didn't make it significantly more interesting - it's still all the same routine of selecting location, moving to position and asking the girl to fuck. Models lack personality, so changing them doesn't really help, positions aren't too different, and outfits don't look too "natural", so apparently despite all the variety it still looks pretty much the same all the time, with some real variety added only by a few special locations like "Fetish Club".

Bottom line: while this game definitely outperforms ANY other 3D sex game I've seen in number of available options, action still looks pretty much the same. Overall, my feeling is that it's "entertainment value" is about the same with "ActiveDolls" (3D Sex Villa has MUCH more options to choose from, but ActiveDolls have IMHO SIGNIFICANTLY better 3D graphics+animation). So I've rated it the same as ActiveDolls.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naked News

74. Naked News (0)

Pay
Active
78
asmith12 (124) 10-06-08  07:56am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ very original idea
++ video quality is EXCELLENT
++ mood/attitude/personality of the girls is EXCELLENT - they enjoy it
+ fun to see news anchor undressing
+ different outfits and strip patterns
+ pussy haircuts
+ cheap
Cons: -- about 50% of the time there is no undressing, girls start nude
-- there is at least one girl which is outright UGLY
- very few REALLY good-looking girls
Bottom Line: I've re-joined "Naked News" recently, and shall say I've got mixed feelings about it.

It is still news and the girls are still stripping while reading them, and it is still one show every day. The girls are still stripping to all-nude, but not more (not even anything "pink", no teasing, nothing). That's what the site is about, and I don't see any problems with it, just want to be clear.

The first problem I see with it is that while they have some variety by adding different outfits and strip patterns, about half of the time girls start nude, so there is no room to strip further, and no variety :-(.

The second problem is while they're hiring girls who enjoy it, and that's perfectly fine, but there shall be some minimal look standards; there is at least one regular girl which is IMHO OUTRIGHT ugly, and for me it is a major turn-off. I don't have problems with "average-looking" girls there (most of their girls are average-looking and I'm ok with it as long as they have nice personality, and they usually do), but this one is different.

On the positive side, it looks that site has started to pay some attention to make it a bit more erotic: while there is still no "pink" and no "teasing", it looks that girls have started to make nice pussy haircuts :-) (warning - you won't see any close-ups of it, the view is always like in the "normal" news - either full-height or above-waist).

Bottom line: a site which can be fun to see for a month (if you're ok with "just nudity"), but as a long-term fun I don't really see it happening. It IMHO even became a (tiny) bit worse than a year ago because of problems outlined above, and it's reflected in the score. If they would add more stripping variety (outfits, stripping patterns and so on), and pay a BIT more attention to girl looks (I REALLY like girls smiling and have no problems with "average looking" girls, but there shall be some minimal standard) it IMHO could help significantly.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 3D Sex Games

75. 3D Sex Games (0)

Pay
Active
89
atrapat (112) 09-28-08  09:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Access to 3D SexVilla 2 sex simulator PC game.
-Great graphics: no glitches running at maximum resolution.
-Animation looks natural; movements in the different poses aren't repetitive.
-Good tutorial shows basics of controlling the action with the mouse only.
-20 female, 10 male natural-looking models which you can further customize.
-60 customizations for face (cheek bones, eye spacing), 6 for breast (size, spacing).
-Other customizations: skin, outfits, tattoos, piercings, jewelry, make up, penis length, ...
-18 locations: plane, photo studio, classroom, pirate ship, ...
-Poses: 30 solo (masturbation or posing), 20 1-on-1 (boy-girl or girl-girl with strapon), 3 threesome.
-Sequencer lets you create your own scenes using all game elements plus expressions.
-You may take screen captures or record videos during the normal game.
-Monthly updates: new location, characters, accessories or customization option.
-Customer support is responsive both with game help or technical problems
Cons: -Advanced game mechanics aren't that well explained.
-Achievements are tied to active membership: you start from scratch every time you join.
-You have to stay connected to the internet to play.
-Story mode is very simplistic and doesn't suppose any challenge at all.
-Models can be brought to orgasm repeatedly using any position in autopilot.
-Website is slow, unpleasant and hard to navigate.
-There are other downloadable games in the site which have little interest.
-Recorded videos or generated sequences can only be played in game.
-No user forum to ask for help or share experiences and tips.
Bottom Line: You will probably visit the site only once to download the 3D SexVilla 2 game and never come back again. The game asks you to enter the website login and password and will work as long as you have a standing membership to the website.

The game has several different modes. You usually start by picking your character, your partner character and a scenario. Story Mode puts you through a short intro where you have to pick the right action/answer to your partner in order to move to the sex part. Once in the scenario, you go on choosing the poses for your characters and they perform it at the stated speed until you choose another one. Each pose is always available only in 1-2 places at each scenario. Sequencer Mode gives you a timeline where you can put all the poses, outfits, expressions, camera positions, etc; you then hit the play button and the characters do all the things you asked them to.

The game uses a "sex coin" currency which you can get in two ways: by bringing characters to orgasm (maxing up their pleasure meter) while in Story Mode or by staying a member of the site for a certain period of time. Sex coins are spent in "sex packs". Some typical sex packs: a scenario (including related outfits, toys and sometimes poses), 2-3 models (1 male + 1 or 2 females usually of the same ethnicity), 3-4 sex toys, a character customization option, 3-4 related poses (there is a sex pack for titfuck, threesomes, footjobs, blowjobs or lesbian only poses).

There is, though, a maximum to the total number of earned coins that increases every certain hours; so, if you are using the trial membership, there's no way you can get absolutely every single "sex pack" even if you put your models on a 48 hour fuckathon as the coins cap for the first 48 hours won't allow more than 10-12 sex packs (prices vary). A bit of advance planning is advisable so you can get the specific pack you want.

Despite its technical excellence, I probably used it more while I had a trial membership earlier this year than during my just finished 3-month membership. Having to go through the same lame stories (=choosing the right multiple answer for 2-3 questions) and knowing that, whatever position I put them in, the models will orgasm and give me the coins made the experience less enjoyable this time. Models have some sort of personality (giver, taker, passive) and they some times complain ("I want to try another pose!", "Slow down", "Faster, faster!") but if you stick to the same position and speed you will get the coins anyway.

It's certainly worth a try, probably the best sex simulator. But, unless they solve the returning members issue, come up with decent stories, make the game a bit more challenging and allow some kind of interaction between site members I will only recomend the trial membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-75 of 141 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Sex Underwater (1)
2. POVD (1)
3. Pulp Toon (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.16 seconds.