Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-75 of 130 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Bullet Time

51. Bullet Time (0)

HeyManNiceShot (6) 05-21-09  09:46pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very unique interesting content
- bullet time 3-d (spin the set)
- stereo anaglyphs (presumably blue/red glasses required)
- Inexpensive ($2.95 for 30 days, no re-bill)
- Signup through CCBill
- Nice looking models I haven't seen before
Cons: - Updates stopped (last evidence of an update is "Coming Summer 2007", it is now Summer 2009)
- Content loses its novelty value quickly
- Very little content: 4 models, 1 scene each
- Navigation is terrible:
Apparently there's thousands of HD pics, but I can't find them.
- Painfully slow to load
- Bullet time images not downloadable
- errors in some of the bullettime images
- No explantion of how the bullet time pics were made, or how to view stereo anaglyphs
- No video
- No bonus access to other sites
- Lack of quality control
Bottom Line: This site features girls posed in the soft porn genre in "bullet time" (remember the fight scenes in The Matrix?). A Shockwave app loads, and you control the left and right arrows to view the model from left or right in a about a 180 degree arc. Good luck if you try to download that though. I tried two different applications to grab it which both failed miserably.

If only the execution was as good as the concept! I like soft porn, and this was even a little soft for me. The errors made in producing these images created warped body parts on some of them which is distracting as well.

The site needs work... Maybe it just needs some love? I'm hoping the webmaster isn't a native English speaker, but someone needs to work that site over a bit- just editing text. It needs updates, a way to download the bullet time images, and a way to find the thousands of HD images they claim to have. But they do get mad props for giving this concept a shot.

Bottom line of the Bottom Line:
If you're looking for something different on the net, maybe this site could be worth looking at, but don't expect much. But hey, how many porn site are there that cost less than $3 for a month and don't rebill?
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Ultimate Surrender

52. Ultimate Surrender (0)

asmith12 (124) 04-19-09  11:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ absolutely unique concept
++ unscripted real wrestling
++ girls are mostly friendly to each other during the wrestling (though not in last round)
+ nice girls
+ good video quality (up to HD 1280x720 at about 1.5Mbit/s)
+ updated 5 times a month (with FULL episode every time)
+ user feedback and comments
+ easy site navigation
+ full movie download (instead of ZIPs).
Cons: - action in the last round is scripted
- not too much variety in the last round
- ZIPped video download seems to be gone (replaced with full movie download)
Bottom Line: Recently I re-joined UltimateSurrender and found that now it became even better (sorry for marketing-speak, but that's exactly my feeling).

The site is about girls wrestling almost nude to nude while getting extra points for actions like opponent pussy fingering, smothering her face with pussy and so on. Every match starts with girls wearing panties (recently bikinis were introduced), but they are removed very quickly (panties removal of the opponent means 5 points, so they have an incentive to do it). After the wrestling, winner (with the most points) gets to punish the loser in the so-called "final round", which usually includes mild humiliation, strap-on action (sometimes anal), forced pussy licking and so on.

Kink.com says that wrestling is unscripted, and I do believe it (they're about the only site I believe is unscripted); recently they even started to do some matches in front of live audience. Final round though is scripted almost for sure (or at least very strict restrictions are placed on the winners), which obviously reduces variety of final round a bit.

Video quality is very decent (up to HD 1280x720 at about 1.5Mbit/s; non-HD is also quite good with 960x540 at about 1MBit/s, pictures can be downloaded as ZIPs, recently an option to download whole video has been introduced (instead of ZIP with video parts).

Since my previous review UltimateSurrender has made several improvements, which contributed to making the site "even better". Most importantly,
they introduced tag team matches; one cannot overestimate their importance, they change the game and overall feeling COMPLETELY. The next thing was that they have made tag team matches translated 'live' and in front of live audience (which added some additional twist and adds a bit of variety). As for more minor changes, they have introduced bikinis (IMHO nice touch, but would be nicer if points are given for top removal too), provided a bit better video quality and
fixed problems with their previous crappy login system (now it works like a breeze, no need to relogin after leaving session unattended for a few hours).

Overall, after coming to this site once again, I almost lost doubt that as of now, it is THE VERY BEST site on the net for me personally, so I've upgraded it's rating to 98 (the very first 98 I've ever set on PornUsers).

Bottom line: if you are not scared by "girls-only" action and by the very concept of female wrestling, you shall at least take a look at their tour pages; BTW, better samples about this and the other kink.com sites can be found on free-hardcore.com . Admittedly, it is so unusual, that it can be "love-it-or-hate-it", but if you like the tour and samples, I think you will like it inside too.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naked News

53. Naked News (0)

Xororos (14) 04-02-09  12:38am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: If you're a fan of softcore erotica and you're looking for something different, this could be it. If you log on and watch the intro video, you'll have a pretty good idea of what to expect. A woman reports on the news and slowly takes off her clothes (or sometimes it's lingerie, or even costumes). If that sounds intriguing, you'll love the site. If not, well, that's pretty much the entire site.

Surprisingly, the news reporting is actually decent. It's a fun way to stay up on current events. The video quality is excellent and available in a variety of formats for both Mac and PC. You can download the two most current programs in very high resolution, or you can download the last 150 days shows in your choice of low/medium/high resolution. However, you'll need to buy the "gold" membership to get the very high quality videos.

Additionally, various years old segments are available for streaming, but not downloading.
Cons: I'll try to address some common complaints so that prospective subscribers know what they're getting:

The show is not really about sex. Some people may not find it erotic in the slightest. There's no romantic component and, more than anything, it feels kind of silly and carefree. It's actually a fun site, but it's not about sex.

There are about 20 downloadable pictures for some of the anchors, but for some bizarre reason, they're only semi-nude. You won't see things that you see in the video. Think of Demi Moore on the poster for "Striptease." The pics are really more like a bonus than anything else.

It's impossible to tell who the actual current anchors are. You'd think Michelle and Yukiko were still involved, but they're not. This is a bit frustrating. Not all of the anchors are amazing. Some have fake breasts and some are very skinny, but mostly they're pretty hot.

Finally, not everyone is nude all the time. If that's a problem, you'll be frustrated by the site.
Bottom Line: I've subscribed off-and-on for years and I've always been pleased with the content. There is a real sense of teamwork and friendship between the anchors, and you get a real sense of their personalities.

The video quality, as I said, is outstanding and the download speeds are fast. Add to that the extremely low cost of membership, and you can't lose.

The fundamental question is, do you find the content stimulating? I suspect that for many, the answer is no - it's just too soft and has nothing to do with sex. However, you may find it irresistible.

There are a few specious notions floating around this forum, so please post a response if you want clarification on any point.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Free Janine

54. Free Janine (0)

80slover (0) 04-01-09  09:05am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Almost none, unfortunately.
Cons: No new video content.
Video encoding is poor.
Almost no updates.
No zip files for downloading pictures.
Bottom Line: Not worth the money. She was on Howard Stern promoting her site with (as of now) non - existent content; there is actually almost no content. For those of you who wish to follow Janine's tribulations in prison, I suggest writing her a letter and wait for a response.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Sexy Slow Motion

55. Sexy Slow Motion (0)

HeyManNiceShot (6) 03-16-09  09:27pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is a site with a unique niche- all scenes feature the use of a 600fps (high speed) video camera. Though there is the usual monthly recurring membership which is available, the site does not demand a monthy membership. You can buy individual scenes a la carte for a few (~$4) dollars. You can get a pretty good preview of all the clips available on the site without paying a dime. It's also very exclusive content. Even with having this unique niche video, they didn't forget about high res picture buffs. Each shoot has a series of "high res" (1000x1500) images that compliments the video. Their models are all attractive early 20ish looking models of various figures.
Cons: The site is a bit small, but it seems to be growing. The video is at a lower res than I like (512x384), and filmed a bit amateurishly (framing problems, camera shake, etc). A tripod or image stabilization on their video is desperately needed. Some of the clips are just entertaining things done in slow motion rather than erotic. But my biggest gripe with this site is that all the clips are in download-resistant Flash video format, which is certainly an annoyance.
Bottom Line: Every scene features something in slow motion. If you like watching girls running in slow motion on the beach, or butt slaps rippling through a tight body in super slow mo, or water splashing all over some hot bodies, this is your site! The site is generous enough to let you make your own determination with their preview clips of every scene, so you know what you're getting into. This is a novelty site more than a hardcore one. Overall, I enjoyed it for the most part- it's a lot of fun to watch. If the site had higher resolution video in an easily downloadble format, I would give a much higher score.

If you're bored of the same old porn sites, it's a nice change from the norm. This is a soft core site for sure. I would certainly recommend taking a look at it, maybe join for a little while, but if you're looking for hard core porn, keep looking.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Mastasia

56. Mastasia (0)

xyzzy (11) 03-02-09  09:43am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - enormous, unreal, comic-book boobs!
- enormous, unreal, comic-book nipples!
- the "added-on" boobs are pretty darn impressive. I can't even tell if it's plastic, CGI, or both
- lots of lactation (albeit fake)
- models are on the whole slender and attractive
- some girl-girl action too (softcore)
- kinky costumes
- clean, well-designed, easy-to-navigate site
- billing using CCBill so easy cancellation etc
- you get what you expect from the preview page, no bait and switch tactics here
Cons: - no full nudity or hardcore, as far as I could tell
- arguably, not even any topless models! since the boobs are all faked...
- lack of real eroticism. Even the lesbian scenes are pretty tame
- not a huge amount of content
- gets a bit repetitive after a while
- the videos get "rotated" off the site. To get ones not currently listed, you have to buy them individually from a different site
Bottom Line: Okay, this is one of those sites where you get pretty much what you expect from the free tour. It has a very simple premise: pretty girls in bright, colourful sets, with bright, colourful clothes, with enormous, added-on boobies.

The content consists mainly of pictures and videos of the girls strutting their enormous udders both solo and with each other, with a healthy dose of lactation and liquids thrown in. There's a small additional area on the site with some token boob-related cartoons and animations too.

The "extra boobage" on the models is very well done and surprisingly realistic, and if you're a bit of a breast fanatic (and let's face it, if you're not, why on earth have you signed up to this site?!?) it is a genuine turn-on.

The problem is, there just isn't enough variety to really keep your interest. Download a few picture sets and videos and you'll realise they're all pretty much the same - same studio setup, same poses, etc. The lack of harder content doesn't help, and also the fact that the models always just look like they're models playing a silly game. If the site had some harder content with a little bit more "mood" I think it would be a lot better.

So, if you're a big boob fanatic, it's definitely worth signing on for a month to see slender young women with the proportions we can only dream of - but I don't think it's worth staying longer. They just need more variety, pure and simple.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naked News

57. Naked News (0)

polacrilex (13) 01-24-09  08:50pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good Looking Models
-Good Programing
-Decent Quality Video
-Some Amateur Models
-Price is Low ($14.95/month)
Cons: -Daily/Hourly Download Limit
-Very Few Pictures with NO NUDITY
-Archives are Limited (See Below)
-No Close-ups of Models Naked Parts
-Videos are Quick Time ONLY
-Some FAKE BOOBS (Not to my liking)
Bottom Line: I have been a member of this site for on and off over the last 7 years (this is my 7th time joining). While they have improved the programming of the show a great deal, the site quality is lacking compared to what it could be. Placing limits on the number of downloads you can do in an hour/day is ridiculous given that the largest videos are 30MB and most are under 10MB. I was restricted after downloading only 4 days of material! That is about 28 2min clips at moderate resolution. That is simply crap given that only 1/3 of that contains nudity(-10pts)!

This brings me to my other point. While the site advertised .H64 high rez video (which isn't all that great), they do have it---but only for the last two days are available for download(-10pts).

Next we have the Quick Time only video. Although QT is not horrible the videos should be in multiple formats given that this site is basically a TV show. Video is their thing and they are failing with presenting it (-5pts).

Finally, the models may be hot but by the time you wade through the limited downloads, the so-so video quality, and the QT only you essentially get to see a pussy that is composed of about 10-15 pixels. This would not be a problem IF there were quality pictures of the models to accompany the videos. And there are, but they are NON NUDE (-15pts).

So why have I rejoined. Long story short, besides Lily Kwan and April Torres, in 2001 the quality of the video was good for the time and there were no download limits. By 2005 the models had changed and the video quality was somewhat better. Last year the video quality was starting to suck and I was told it was going be HD soon. Now that they have the .H64 QT video they have imposed limitations that are ridiculous for the user.

If you want to check the site out it may be worth it if it is your first time. Too bad you will not be able to see the older anchors since the archive is pitiful (i.e. the older videos have NOT been improved but rather are shown AS IS circa 2000 like 100 X 70). This site is in need of a major reality check given how well other adult sites treat their material. This will be the last time I join given the restrictions imposed which ruins the experience.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Sperm Swap

58. Sperm Swap (0)

morgentau (12) 01-11-09  05:59pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - very good video quality
- many hot girls
- intense action
- good camerawork and lighting
- original scenes have two girls in every scene (some even have three girls)
- about half of the video content is available in 320x240,640x480,960x540 and 1920x1080 pixels resolution
- streaming is also possible but not in HD
- decent download speed. I maxed out my 6 Mbit connection consistently
- good site navigation
Cons: - new 'updates' since mid 2008 are from the sister site Asstraffic
- site doesn't justify a recurring membership - sign up for 30 days and download everything
- 3 day trial is worthless as it doesn't let you view full scenes
-older half of the video content is only available in 512x384 resolution at 1500 kbps. Picture quality is still ok though.
Bottom Line: This is one of my favorite sites and I'm somewhat sad that they no longer update with new content. Each scene starts with the girls showing off their assets with occassional instructions from the cameraman. After a bit of light lesbian play one or two guys join in for some intense action. The girls are treated less rough than on Asstraffic but if you're more into the romantic setup this site might not be your cup of tea. For fans of gonzo-style porn with multiple girls however this site is almost a must. The girls are hot and the cameraman almost always gets the best angle to highlight their features. The content could be a bit more varied but at least I know what I get when I open a random video from this site ;)

For 29.95$/29.95 you get:
- 189 spermswap scenes with a runtime of ~35 min each
- some scenes from Asstraffic (19 as I'm writing this review)
- a picture gallery for each scene. The pictures are ok but not much of a reason to join the site.
- some generic bonus scenes (non-exclusive)

The price seems to depend on the IP you are connecting from rather than the country you select during signup. I signed up from a European country but was charged 29.95$ since my IP was from the US. (not that I complain =) )

The scenes can be browsed by actress, date or by specific types of action (Anal, AtM, Toys etc). However, since you will probably download the entire thing to your harddrive this feature might not make much difference. I recommend downloading at least one screenshot or image for each video so you can browse the thumbnails after your subscription expires.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naughty Little Nymphs

59. Naughty Little Nymphs (0)

ramscrota (12) 12-30-08  08:12pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good pics, a rarity for this group of sites
Cons: - Absurd scenarios which completely rob the scenes of any of their erotic potential
- Males dressed in ridiculous costumes as they ravage the female. wolve's custume, etc. There isa logistical difficulty in getting his member through the gap in the custume, or balancing a giant owl's outfit as he roots away. Also many of these outfites make the guy's cock look tiny.
Bottom Line: Another example of this group of site's absurd attempts to be interesting. Their work is usually characterized by crass 'in your face' sex. Their time and energy would be better spent developing some sensitivities for genuine erotica.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Ultimate Surrender

60. Ultimate Surrender (0)

ramscrota (12) 12-28-08  01:23am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Lovely models (mostly)
- HQ pics & vids
- Site well organized
Cons: - Too much the same formual
- Fight rounds too long, hence total shoots FAR too long. Should be cut by half and spent more time on final round where trhe victor has her way with the loser.
- Too many scene have rough sex, I understand that this is a BDSM site, but for me, gagging, sudden spinal jolting, hair pulling, has no erotic appeal. Spanking is fine, but anything which endangers the sub's spinal alignment or her airway is a no-np
- Instead of the current MC (Matt), I would prefer to see one (or two) super-fit, leanly built mean-looking guys, dressed up to the nines.
Bottom Line: Site has good potential, but makes serious and pnvious blunders, which rob it of real erptic spice.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Village Ladies

61. Village Ladies (0)

WeeWillyWinky (90) 11-11-08  03:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A fair amount of nice pictures.
- Site is mature and contains nothing sleezy or trashy.
- The basic premise of the site is good.
Cons: - A large percentage of the pics have been moved into a separate archive, which requires a separate membership.
- No videos.
- No zip-files.
- Small pictures (avg. 600x800 up to 749x1123), of fair to middling quality.
- Very small thumbnails.
- Pages load slowly.
- Sliding sidebar which moves as the scroll-button is moved. Very annoying.
- Some models in dire need of a dentist.
Bottom Line: Woody Allen opens one of his films with an old joke: Two women are at a restaurant and one says, "the food here is lousy.", and the other replies, "Yeah, and such small portions."

That joke applies pretty well to Village Ladies. For instance: I could complain that a considerably large percentage of the pictures have been moved to a separate archive which I can't access; but at the same time it would be silly to complain since ninety percent of those pics would do nothing for me anyway. But complain I will, hence the reference to Woody's joke.

As soon as I entered the member's section, disappointment and tedium ensued. First, no zips. Second, the thumbs loaded slowly and were so small I could hardly make out the image. Third, I clicked on one link in the model's index and was taken to a page which invites you to join a separate site where the older pics are now stored. On return to the model's index, that link was now yellow (visited) as were all the links to sets I would not be able to access. The sudden over-abundance of links to sets I could not access was somehow insulting, as if a joke had been pulled on me.

While beauty is certainly in the eye of the beholder, I found *very few* attractive models here. There's nothing wrong with being homely, but if you agree to being photographed, and to having those photos featured on a site where people are paying to obtain access to those photos, and if the intention of those photos is sexual titillation, then you should be prepared to hear some unflattering comments. Unflattering comment follows:

If you have broken teeth, missing teeth, gray teeth, or brown teeth, keep the smiling to a minimum, visit a dentist, or re-consider posing for adult pictures. This comment refers to some of the models, not all of them, of course.


This site has been online for a number of years and now costs more than a lot of premium sites. If you have a yen for less-than-glamorous mature amateurs, Aunt Judy's is a much safer bet than this.

Read Duke's review (TBP reviewer). He does a lot less pussy-footing than me, and his five year old review needs precious little updating.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Virtual Fem

62. Virtual Fem (0)

xbigvmanx (14) 10-30-08  12:40pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Interactive A.I. a great idea (shows potiential)
(Artfiicial Intelligence)
Cons: Lacks content
Poor Video quality
AI needs a lot of work
Software tends to be buggy
Not worth your money
Lack of updates
Bottom Line: This web site is pretty poor on everything. The software alone has bugs and the women you download might not work when you upload it to the interactive software you install on your computer. Video quality is very poor and they only have about 48 women available. And not all of them are very attractive IMHO. Sometimes the women don't really respond too well when you try to talked to them. This website is not worth your time and money.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Visit 3D Sex Games

63. 3D Sex Games (0)

asmith12 (124) 10-09-08  02:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ quality of graphics is good
++ variety of actions is large
++ variety of toys is HUGE (including sex machines)
++ variety of outfits is large
++ variety of locations is HUGE
+ customization of almost everything (vagina,penis,body,...)
+ "Sex Coins" pseudo-currency to keep things interesting
Cons: -- animation isn't so good
-- out of all the actions, a few are duo and VERY few are 3-some
- VERY few pose changes are animated
- undressing is not animated
- convoluted interface (tutorial and "hints" required to play sex game? Come on).
- need connection to play
- slow web site
- Downloading 65M update right after download? Gimme a break.
Bottom Line: Continuing my quest in looking for a good 3D sex game, I've tried 3D Sex Villa (this is the game which you get when subscribing to the site). Well, after all the good reviews about it on PornUsers I was quite disappointed (it's definitely not bad, but IMHO doesn't warrant 90+ score).

First of all, to clarify - it is yet another "3D sex game" along the same lines as ActiveDolls and PlaySexGame - you have models, put them into some location, choose position and tell them to have sex. That's fine. At the beginning most positions, locations and models aren't available, and you need to fuck around a bit (literally) to get more (when having sex, you earn so-called "Sex Coins" to spend on "sex packs" which include positions or
toys or models). That's IMHO even better to keep things a bit more interesting.

But then comes a worse part. First of all, controls are convoluted; while the game has tutorial on controls, it's not really what I expect from rather primitive sex game. Also while graphics itself is good, animation isn't IMHO so good; I even doubt if they used motion capture to animate things (it looks more as a good imitation of physical model, than mo-cap), and faces have VERY limited animation. Outfits don't always fit good, and penetrations aren't always "clean" too. Overall, IMHO 3D Sex Villa's 3D graphics+animation feeling is SIGNIFICANTLY worse than that of ActiveDolls.

On the plus side, overall variety is HUGE: you can choose from REALLY HUGE set of models, outfits, locations, plus can customize almost everything (most of variety comes in "sex packs" but as long as it costs nothing rather than playing, it's perfectly ok with me). As some drawback to this variety, I want to mention that while they've added threesomes, they're EXTREMELY limited (formally there are 5 threesome actions, but some are so similar, that I'd say there are only 2).

And IMHO all that variety didn't make it significantly more interesting - it's still all the same routine of selecting location, moving to position and asking the girl to fuck. Models lack personality, so changing them doesn't really help, positions aren't too different, and outfits don't look too "natural", so apparently despite all the variety it still looks pretty much the same all the time, with some real variety added only by a few special locations like "Fetish Club".

Bottom line: while this game definitely outperforms ANY other 3D sex game I've seen in number of available options, action still looks pretty much the same. Overall, my feeling is that it's "entertainment value" is about the same with "ActiveDolls" (3D Sex Villa has MUCH more options to choose from, but ActiveDolls have IMHO SIGNIFICANTLY better 3D graphics+animation). So I've rated it the same as ActiveDolls.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naked News

64. Naked News (0)

asmith12 (124) 10-06-08  07:56am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ very original idea
++ video quality is EXCELLENT
++ mood/attitude/personality of the girls is EXCELLENT - they enjoy it
+ fun to see news anchor undressing
+ different outfits and strip patterns
+ pussy haircuts
+ cheap
Cons: -- about 50% of the time there is no undressing, girls start nude
-- there is at least one girl which is outright UGLY
- very few REALLY good-looking girls
Bottom Line: I've re-joined "Naked News" recently, and shall say I've got mixed feelings about it.

It is still news and the girls are still stripping while reading them, and it is still one show every day. The girls are still stripping to all-nude, but not more (not even anything "pink", no teasing, nothing). That's what the site is about, and I don't see any problems with it, just want to be clear.

The first problem I see with it is that while they have some variety by adding different outfits and strip patterns, about half of the time girls start nude, so there is no room to strip further, and no variety :-(.

The second problem is while they're hiring girls who enjoy it, and that's perfectly fine, but there shall be some minimal look standards; there is at least one regular girl which is IMHO OUTRIGHT ugly, and for me it is a major turn-off. I don't have problems with "average-looking" girls there (most of their girls are average-looking and I'm ok with it as long as they have nice personality, and they usually do), but this one is different.

On the positive side, it looks that site has started to pay some attention to make it a bit more erotic: while there is still no "pink" and no "teasing", it looks that girls have started to make nice pussy haircuts :-) (warning - you won't see any close-ups of it, the view is always like in the "normal" news - either full-height or above-waist).

Bottom line: a site which can be fun to see for a month (if you're ok with "just nudity"), but as a long-term fun I don't really see it happening. It IMHO even became a (tiny) bit worse than a year ago because of problems outlined above, and it's reflected in the score. If they would add more stripping variety (outfits, stripping patterns and so on), and pay a BIT more attention to girl looks (I REALLY like girls smiling and have no problems with "average looking" girls, but there shall be some minimal standard) it IMHO could help significantly.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 3D Sex Games

65. 3D Sex Games (0)

atrapat (112) 09-28-08  09:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Access to 3D SexVilla 2 sex simulator PC game.
-Great graphics: no glitches running at maximum resolution.
-Animation looks natural; movements in the different poses aren't repetitive.
-Good tutorial shows basics of controlling the action with the mouse only.
-20 female, 10 male natural-looking models which you can further customize.
-60 customizations for face (cheek bones, eye spacing), 6 for breast (size, spacing).
-Other customizations: skin, outfits, tattoos, piercings, jewelry, make up, penis length, ...
-18 locations: plane, photo studio, classroom, pirate ship, ...
-Poses: 30 solo (masturbation or posing), 20 1-on-1 (boy-girl or girl-girl with strapon), 3 threesome.
-Sequencer lets you create your own scenes using all game elements plus expressions.
-You may take screen captures or record videos during the normal game.
-Monthly updates: new location, characters, accessories or customization option.
-Customer support is responsive both with game help or technical problems
Cons: -Advanced game mechanics aren't that well explained.
-Achievements are tied to active membership: you start from scratch every time you join.
-You have to stay connected to the internet to play.
-Story mode is very simplistic and doesn't suppose any challenge at all.
-Models can be brought to orgasm repeatedly using any position in autopilot.
-Website is slow, unpleasant and hard to navigate.
-There are other downloadable games in the site which have little interest.
-Recorded videos or generated sequences can only be played in game.
-No user forum to ask for help or share experiences and tips.
Bottom Line: You will probably visit the site only once to download the 3D SexVilla 2 game and never come back again. The game asks you to enter the website login and password and will work as long as you have a standing membership to the website.

The game has several different modes. You usually start by picking your character, your partner character and a scenario. Story Mode puts you through a short intro where you have to pick the right action/answer to your partner in order to move to the sex part. Once in the scenario, you go on choosing the poses for your characters and they perform it at the stated speed until you choose another one. Each pose is always available only in 1-2 places at each scenario. Sequencer Mode gives you a timeline where you can put all the poses, outfits, expressions, camera positions, etc; you then hit the play button and the characters do all the things you asked them to.

The game uses a "sex coin" currency which you can get in two ways: by bringing characters to orgasm (maxing up their pleasure meter) while in Story Mode or by staying a member of the site for a certain period of time. Sex coins are spent in "sex packs". Some typical sex packs: a scenario (including related outfits, toys and sometimes poses), 2-3 models (1 male + 1 or 2 females usually of the same ethnicity), 3-4 sex toys, a character customization option, 3-4 related poses (there is a sex pack for titfuck, threesomes, footjobs, blowjobs or lesbian only poses).

There is, though, a maximum to the total number of earned coins that increases every certain hours; so, if you are using the trial membership, there's no way you can get absolutely every single "sex pack" even if you put your models on a 48 hour fuckathon as the coins cap for the first 48 hours won't allow more than 10-12 sex packs (prices vary). A bit of advance planning is advisable so you can get the specific pack you want.

Despite its technical excellence, I probably used it more while I had a trial membership earlier this year than during my just finished 3-month membership. Having to go through the same lame stories (=choosing the right multiple answer for 2-3 questions) and knowing that, whatever position I put them in, the models will orgasm and give me the coins made the experience less enjoyable this time. Models have some sort of personality (giver, taker, passive) and they some times complain ("I want to try another pose!", "Slow down", "Faster, faster!") but if you stick to the same position and speed you will get the coins anyway.

It's certainly worth a try, probably the best sex simulator. But, unless they solve the returning members issue, come up with decent stories, make the game a bit more challenging and allow some kind of interaction between site members I will only recomend the trial membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Active Dolls

66. Active Dolls (0)

asmith12 (124) 09-28-08  05:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ 3D virtual photostudio with girls willing to pose
++ 6 different girls
++ EXCELLENT 3D graphics quality
++ WILD variety of outfits
+ option of g/g strap-on action
+ movements between poses are animated
+ free download to get an idea (no nudity and only one girl in free version, but quality is the same)
Cons: -- limited variety of actions
-- duo (g/g) action seems to be added later and not so-well developed or integrated
- no b/g
-- undressing is not animated
- movements between poses sometimes look wierd.
Bottom Line: This site is both quite similar and quite different from other 3D games I've recently seen (see my reviews of 3DPlaything and PlaySexGame). It is similar because it is downloadable real 3D game with ability to control camera angle, zoom, lighting and so on. It is different because of quality of implementation - ActiveDolls IMHO presents MUCH better 3D graphics, attention to details and overall experience.

First of all, you get six girls to play with. And variety of outfits to dress them is HUGE - I'd say it's at least a few hundred of different items. Then, you get a girl into some setting where you can tell her to change pose (moving is animated, but sometimes looks strange) or to undress (undressing is not animated). Then you can either to control her movements, or tell her to please herself, and then you get your virtual camera (even with lighting control and some effects, like sepia) to take shots of the girl and make an album out of them. Girls look VERY good, and all the details and UI are well-organized and convenient. What makes this game not so interesting is lack of sex and lack of variety; poses are the same in every setting, there is no b/g sex, and g/g sex is VERY limited (looks that it was added later and it isn't as integral part of the game as the rest).

Bottom line: so far clearly the best out of all the games of similar nature I've seen; still, lack of different actions limit it's attractiveness. On the other hand, if running photo studio with beautiful girls willing to strip and perform solo actions according to your wishes has always been an unsatisfied dream of yours, this game can be just for you.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Ultimate Surrender

67. Ultimate Surrender (0)

The Clyde (26) 09-24-08  03:01pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Great idea
- Attractive Models and Participants
- Video Quality is Better
- Believable Action
Cons: - Repetitive in Nature
- Better Photos
- Large Files - not segmented
Bottom Line: This is a very cool idea and it may be great for those into this type of action. It was decent at first, but really missed on the editing and action. There was way too much holding and not enough take downs and action.

The penalty phase at the end of the match didn't seem to be much of penalty. It may have been better if losing the match actually cost the participants a true "hardship" not sure what would work, but getting drilled by a strap on didn't seem to much of a penalty.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Cock Sucking Championship

68. Cock Sucking Championship (0)

mbaya (366) 09-24-08  07:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing by CCBill.
-Nice variety of pornstars of the 2001 to 2002 era, both American and British.
-Many attractive well known pornstars. This can also be a con.
-There are pre-contest interviews where the stars talk about blow jobs and how much they want to win. Helps create a contest atmosphere.
-Interesting concept of a contest for blow jobs. Has at least a touch of originality and realism.
-Part of Dirty DS Adult Web Ring of 15 sites.
Cons: -Mostly low quality scenes 500kbps, 320x240.
-Most videos are shot from too far away.
-The site is too small and does not have enough to join just for this one site. Part of network though.
-No updates. The DVD series that these came from ended and so did the site updates.
-There is no point to the contest without some kind of prize.
-Nonexclusive. Check out americascocksuckingchampionship.com
The same DVDs, but part of a different network, Pornconverters.
Bottom Line: These scenes are from the DVD series American Cocksucking Championship by Legends Films made between 2001 and 2002. There were 10 DVDs with each having 2 scenes and this website has all 20. Unless they revive the series, this is all they will ever have, there will be no updates. Having been a fan of the series as well as loving blow jobs and contests, I basically like the site. The contest uses a boxing ring and seems real enough. However, it is never mentioned what rules the contest uses or what prize is received by the winner. Often there really is no winner as both contestants get praise and the contest continues until all the guys cum. A contest without winners is not a contest, but it can be fun anyway. It does not have the same feel of realistic effort to win that you get with Ultimate Surrender, where there is an incentive. My major complaints are too many unclear videos and too many shots taken from so far away that the action becomes lost. The bottom line is that the site has some fun videos as long as you don't take too seriously that this should be a contest.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 3D Plaything

69. 3D Plaything (0)

asmith12 (124) 09-24-08  07:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ decent 3D virtual setup
+ 4 different action spots (but in the same room)
+ variety of dildos
+ skin/hair/breasts modifications for the girl
Cons: --- not much to do
--- the only action allowed (in addition to asking girl to take some position) is moving dildos (mouth, pussy or anal)
- single girl only (with toys)
-- it's THE SAME girl despite modifications (face is always the same :-( ).
- the only clothing is bikini
- removing bikini is one-step without animation
- need to keep subscription to play (not that I think somebody will need it)
Bottom Line: When I've played Digamour (see my review) by the same SomaVision company, one of my thoughts was "oh, it cannot possibly become any more boring", but my recent experience with 3DPlaything by the same company has proven I was wrong :-(.

The beginning of the game is fine - you can "build" your girl, selecting skin tone/breast size/hair and so on, so there are quite many variations you can build. But on the next step comes the disappointment: all you've got is a girl which you can ask to take different positions (and position change is NOT even animated), ask her to remove bikini (NOT animated too), and move dildo in and out of any of her three orifices (this IS animated). And that is all the "game" you get for 19.95/month! Ok, as usual in 3D, you can move your "camera" to look from different angle, and you can also move to one of 4 different spots in the same room, but the action is always the same - girl in some position and all you can do is to move dildo in and out of her, that's it.

Bottom line: while I can't say it's completely useless and rate it at 50, I honestly see that only VERY few people would want to pay this kind of money for this kind of entertainment.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Digamour

70. Digamour (0)

asmith12 (124) 09-23-08  04:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ quite realistic 3D sex
++ movements are natural
+ 4 types of girls ("Brazilian", "Japanese", "South African" and "German")
+ each can have different haircuts, complexity, and skin tone
+ one round of arcade play is quite interesting compared to the other similar games
Cons: --- booooring gameplay
-- clother to "arcade" game, not really RPG as advertised
-- no clothes
-- when starting the game, have only 4 different actions
- no toys
-- active subscription is required to play
-- no "extras", except for "bulk" membership with 2 other SOMA sites (3DPlaything and SexStation7).
Bottom Line: This site is another site built around "virtual 3D sex" game. And while the graphics (IMHO) isn't bad, gameplay is unbelievably booooring.

First of all, it is NOT MMORPG, as it erroneously stated in some places on the Internet (not a fault of the site itself), it's a single-player game, period. And IMHO it's not really an RPG at all, but more of arcade game.

The plot is almost non-existent (you need to fuck as much as possible with cyber-girls) but that's not a problem. And the first rounds don't pose a real problem too - it's some fun to understand how it works, and to see pretty realistic 4 positions. But the problems start a bit later. To get experience to get to level 2 (to get another 4 positions), you need to fuck 50 times, and each time it's 5 mini-fucks, each of mini-fucks representing one of original 4 positions. Ok, there are a bit different settings, and somewhat different partners, but to fuck 50*5=250 times with THE SAME 4 positions (making it 62 fucks per position) is unbeleivably boooooring for me. And when I was promoted to level 2 and got 4 new positions, totaling to 8, I've found that to go further it's necessary to fuck 100 times to get to level 3 and another 4 positions. This was too much for me and I gave up.

Bottom line: 3D engine isn't bad, and movements are natural, the game works ok without crashes, and arcade actions are much better compared to simple "press it harder to win" style of arcade, but complete lack of balance between time spent and benefit for it make it very difficult to recommend this site or this game. But should the guys listen and shorten the number of fucks required per level 5 times or so, it could become quite an enjoyable game.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 3D Stripper

71. 3D Stripper (0)

asmith12 (124) 09-23-08  05:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ virtual 3D stripper as advertised
++ movements are surprisingly natural
++ clothing "fits" the girl surprisingly naturally
+ different outfits
+ several dozens of movements
+ "queue" of movements to make continuous dance
+ "stripper time" to keep "game" feeling
Cons: --- only one girl
-- removing clothes is not animated
- sometimes there are "jumps" between different segments
- somewhat confusing interface
-- no site value except for the game
- complicated game activation procedure
Bottom Line: This site proposes subscription, but obviously it's not about subscription at all. It is just selling of the downloadable 3D game, that's it. Site "extras" in addition to the game itself include only a few 3D toons and several "same old" video feeds of dubious quality.

Now about the game.
The good. On the first glance it is surprisingly entertaining. After getting through download and all the registrations and activations, you can see a girl which dances some random dance, and you can tell her what to do next. Actions are placed into the "queue" so you can make long dance sequence. You can change girl outfit, or ask her to remove some or all clothing. To keep things more interesting, there is "stripper time" which requires some attention (not too bad to distract from the girl). Girl movements are surprisingly natural (obviously somehow scanned from some real dancing girl), and clothes fit her naturally too. There are a few dozens of different movements, and 4 or 5 different outfits (each consisting of 4 items, and each item can be taken off separately).

The bad. On the second glance, it starts to become boring. There is only ONE girl, and number of outfits and movements, while pretty big, still starts to become boring in an hour or so. When the girls takes something off, it is not animated (item just fades away) and it doesn't help too.

The ugly. There some minor but annoying things with the site and game: my login wasn't activated until a few hour after paying, activation procedure was complicated and confusing, and UI isn't too obvious. But these issues were quite minor and don't affect bottom line much.

Bottom line: while there is definitely NO value in recurring subscription, one-time "subscription" (to purchase the game @19.95) MIGHT make some sense if you're turned on by the girls merely stripping. While usually I don't include pricing into consideration, in this case I can't help but to say that value for money isn't good here. If the site would throw in more girls/outfits/movements (or at least include their 3D Girls), I would rate them higher.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 3D Girlz

72. 3D Girlz (0)

Cybertoad (Disabled) 08-17-08  12:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Sex Simulator Auto or Manual User interface.

Good strong computer generator engine
multible settings
Average Graphics Engine.
Choose from solo to threesome
You download the whole game not needed again.
Low Cost $19.99.
Body size changer.
A few videos to download, but not animated.
Some animated still about 50 on site.
Can Save Stills.
Easy game use and controls.
Cons: Animation Choppy and bouncy ( not in a good way)
No updates
Slow to download 144mb program to play.
Site is dead old dirt slow. I couldnt push 100k out of it.
Twintchy look in program.
Short repetative sexy voice.
Menu on Website only half the links work.
Bottom Line: This is a trick or treat site and its not holloween. You join looking at what seems a huge data-base only to get 15 body commands a few camera views and the worst 2008 Animation to see. If this was 1999 I would think it was awsome, but there are so many sites other then this where graphics far exceed what this site. This is old school graphics maybe three year old at best.

Speaking of this, it is not a website to join. You donwload the program and use it on your PC, they entice you to join and stay by promising video downloads each month. However these are not animated videos these are cheap porn B movies. Very misleading. So if you still want to blow $19.99, you might as well quit after you join the site has nothing worth staying a member for once you download the program.

3D Girlz, is not total crap and its fun to try out a simulator if you never have. The controls are simple, but not much in the way of things to do. Mine wouldnt zoom in unless I reset the view.
They do allow you to save stills which is kinda cool to bad the animation is only average, as you could make a nice collection. But default file savings area is your C drive, in Vista that wont work.
The other good thing that unlike many other simulators that trick you into staying a member to use the game, it appears that this game doesnt need the site once downloaded. I am surprised its not hacked and passed around with a code. Sites like Vitual Jenna look and act just about like this, but even the others have more content and update.
I rated the site a 62, the site is lacking so much its depressing, I wouldnt felt better watching the shrredder in my office tear up that $20.00 bill. Glad they do not offer a refund I would be asking.
The Website says the following: I do not agree
3d Girlz is one of the most advanced adult 3d sex games on the planet. Fulfill any fantasy with life-like virtual sex graphics that look so good, you'll swear they're real! 3d Girlz is the only 3d sex game that allows you to choose your partner's hair color, eye color, skin color, and piercings.
Numerous high detail locations can be selected for you and your virtual sex partner to act out all your fantasies! Solo, girl on guy, lesbian and even threesome action available!

The above they state is false, there are three locations not numerous locations three. And it is not the most advanced on the net. This site ads B porn videos monthly copyright is current so the designers know the are not telling the truth about the site. They do not look real, they barely are animated. (MHO)
Bottom line, take $20.00 to just toss out and see what its like? The only good thing about the site and program that its cheap and easy, and not in good way. Should ya Join, id have to say pass on this one, the first ever for me to say on a review its maybe worth 5.95 maybe!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Flexible Positions

73. Flexible Positions (0)

atrapat (112) 08-08-08  04:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Scenes shot at a couple different private gyms.
-Models are dressed in work out clothes.
-Focuses more on the workout theme than flexibility.
-10 scenes so far. Launched recently.
-All models are well known USA porn stars. Big fake boobs on all of them.
-If you want flexibility, check Angelina Valentine or Maya Gates' scenes. Little flexibility in other scenes.
-Audrey Bitoni or Rachel Roxxx aren't that flexible but put up very naughty performances.
-Accessible from Porn Pros Network. Check my review there for further pros and cons.
Cons: -Scene structure and the type of workout are always the same. It can get repetitive.
-Last scene was released almost a month ago.
-Most models aren't flexible at all. Most don't know how to use the gym machines.
-Viewer should be flexible too. The camera is often rotated 90 degrees.
-Lots of attention to boobs, little to asses. Strange for a workout site.
-Cameraman/director talks a lot and gives instructions aloud during the scene.
-Male performer (Anthony Rosano) is the same in 90% of the scenes. He does OK but he's all over this network.
-Check Porn Pros Network site tour for a quick list of scenes with dates.
-The usual drawbacks of Porn Pros Network.
Bottom Line: This site is somewhat of a misnomer. The Flexible Positions are rarely little more than a leg in the air or laying on a big soft gym ball during the sex. The scenes aren't that bad, though. The models are top porn stars and they look great. But the sex in most scenes wouldn't look out of place in a different setting: instead of fucking on a couch, they do it on the bench of a gym machine. A gym floor is just like any other floor. The big soft ball is probably the only unique element and certainly makes for a couple new and interesting positions.

The scene structure is always the same:
1) Girl works out alone on various gym machines; usually while talking to cameraman.
2) The "trainer" joins in and shows her "how to do it", groping and licking a bit more than a real trainer would.
3) Regular sex scene using the gym elements and a few more flexible than usual positions. The big soft ball is quite a find.

Parts 1 and 2 take up usually a third of the scene and are what set apart the site. You get to see several of the models running for a short while with their tits flying free. Quite a nice and unusual view. They also seem to do it for real getting to pant and sweat a bit. They also work on other machines trying to showcase their best assets (tits, mainly; why not the asses too?). Nice use of the thighmaster. When the male performer enters the stage, they often repeat some of the exercises while he gropes or directly licks them as they work out. There's no kind of script at all. Scenes usually get stuck in a middle point between acting and not acting. The male performer is always introduced as a trainer and he uses lots of gym jargon but the girls never pretend to be surprised when he goes straight to lick their tits or pussy. They know from the start what they are here for. They should script their scenes a little more or leave aside this trainer fallacy.

The site would be much more interesting if the scenes were more like the one with Angelina Valentine. She displays her usual enthusiasm and pulls some nice tricks: she does splits to the guys cock, gives him head while hanging upside down from one of the machines or gets licked while doing a back bent. Maya Gates has never done if for me, but she puts up what's probably the most remarkable scene: a very flexible performance with lots of different positions; she and her "trainer" make good use of her ability to sustain a back bent.

I have a soft spot for Audrey Bitoni and Rachel Roxxx. Both aren't that flexible but they put up some pretty good scenes here. It would make sense if they got their own Deep Throat Love scene (very recommendable site in this same network) as they show here they have what it takes to be there. Just as Deep Throat Love only hires models who can deep throat, maybe Flexible Positions should consider hiring models who can honor the site's name.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naked News

74. Naked News (0)

furry feet (5) 07-05-08  03:21pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: unique and outrageous concept

convincingly performed by attractive women

high quality video

Cons: hourly/daily download limits

unhelpful file names in zip files

can only download last 6 months

can only download 1 scene at a time
Bottom Line: I love the concept of nude women stripping and reading the news naked, I couldn't quite believe it when I saw a clip on TV. The news is real and probably better quality than that in the English tabloid press. The models are attractive and many of them are shaved which is a big bonus when they aren't opening their legs.

When I join a site I aim to download a lot and watch it at my leisure, this is where I had difficulty. Only the last 6 months are available to download, and each day's news is only available as around 8 separate zip files, one for each news item which is rather tedious to download, and the zip file names aren't unique so you need to create a folder for each day. If I spend some time downloading I often run into a daily or hourly download limit which is frustrating.

If you want a daily ritual of watching the latest news then the site is perfect. Even if that's not your plan then the fun and well produced content is still worth a membership.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Ultimate Surrender

75. Ultimate Surrender (0)

careylowell (18) 05-24-08  08:11pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Some models perform with spunk, devoting much energy into their time on camera, be it wrestling or screwing.
-Pre and post-match interviews were a hoot.
-Everyone is breathing hard & sweating by the end of each clip. Lots of legit sounding gunts, groans and moans.
Cons: -Sex loses some spark when its always occuring on that hard floor.
-The site had five Black models, all of whom had their clocks cleaned by their White opponents. I know the outcome is rigged but how about some variation to this theme?
-The location has the same charm as a Greyhound bus station.
Bottom Line: Certainly an acquired taste, the single malt whiskey of the sapphic porn. Download limits dulled my m'ship experience, but I am led to understand these speedbumps have been revoked.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-75 of 130 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. Female Muscle Network (1)
2. Sex Underwater (1)
3. POVD (1)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.23 seconds.