Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-75 of 565 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit St. Mackenzie\'s

51. St. Mackenzie's (1)

Pay
Active
80
tangub (151) 10-04-12  01:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 82 Gorgeous models
100% Exclusive content
Updates with a new photo set or video every other day
High resolution 2300 x 3500 photos
Zip downloads for all photo sets
Videos available in a choice of HD and Low resolution wmv
All content date stamped
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Cons: Very softcore, mostly topless and some mild nudity
These hi res photos don’t look as sharp as you would expect when blown up to full size, too many look out of focus, blurred or grainy as previous reviewers have mentioned with little sign of any improvement in recent updates.
Every zip download has the file name “photo_zip” so you need to rename everything yourself.
File names of the videos are just a date so will also need renaming if you want to know who is in the video when you come to view it.
No file sizes given.
Around half the videos don’t have download options.
The older videos without the HD option look grainy on full screen.
Only one photo size, no small or medium options.
Primitive site design and navigation
No search tools.
Bottom Line: I received a $9.95 email promo offer to this site and after checking out the tour and spotting some of my favourite Only Tease models here like Hayley Marie and Lucy Anne I couldn’t resist signing up for a month to check it out at that price. St Mackenzie’s describes themselves as the most unruly institute of learning in England where it’s sexy students and equally sexy teachers get up to all sorts of mischievous antics. Only problem is they never really get as naughty as you might have expected or hoped for. This is only really a very softcore teasing site about the same strength as Only Tease where you will see the girls posing in their sexy uniforms, stockings and lingerie before stripping and posing topless or nude. A small minority of the models have some open leg shots but most will only give you the occasional glimpse of pussy. There’s no masturbation or toy play and even though there are lots of sets and videos featuring two, three or more girls there’s no real sexual contact between the models other than removing clothes and occasional touching.

St Mackenzie’s has been online since January 2009 and with consistent updates has grown into a reasonable sized collection already. A new update is added every other day and a typical month’s updates consist of 9 new photo sets and 6 new videos. As of today the site has a total of 382 photo sets (35,304 images) and 222 videos. A word of warning: only 107 of the videos come with download options, the rest can only be viewed online.

The navigation is fairly basic with not many options. You can browse “updates” which lists all the content by year and month starting with the most recent or via the model index which is split in to two parts, “pupils” and “teachers”. The only problem with browsing via the “updates” section is that the videos there have no download links. Going into the pupils and teachers listings on each model’s page you will find her 5 most recent updates listed with a scene description and links to download the picture zip and video download options. Videos and picture sets beyond the 5 most recent are listed below under “more updates”. Click on the picture sets here and they will open in a new window with the zip download link. Click on the videos here and Windows Media Player will open and after a few seconds buffering will stream the video online. They don’t provide any download links for videos beyond those that appear within any model’s 5 most recent updates. You can pretty much see the site layout for yourself prior to joining as the tour has the same site layout as the member’s area with the exception of the download links.

The videos that can be downloaded usually have two options, a HD 1280 x 720 wmv @ 8000 kbps and low res 640 x 480 wmv @ 900+ kbps. A few of the older videos only have the low res option. The videos are usually around 5 minutes long and usually consist of the model’s posing and teasing in their uniforms with some upskirt views and panty flashing before removing their clothes. It’s another one of those sites with mostly silent movies, there’s no background music and the model’s seldom talk, at least not in any of the one’s I’ve watched so far.

As for the photos which is my preferred niche, they look fine when viewing them downsized to monitor size in a slide show but when opening them up and viewing them in their full size resolution you can certainly see some flaws as I mentioned in the cons above. I get the impression this is the work of the same photographer from Breath Takers. The photo shoots are pretty much all taken inside the same house recognisable from Breath Takers and the style of photography is pretty much the same where in most of the shoots the models are stood in front of or close to a window making use of the natural light as it penetrates the window.

Overall I did enjoy the collection of gorgeous British models and their sexy outfits in spite of the site’s flaws and it was certainly helped by the fact I only paid $10 to join so the site just about scrapes a probably over generous 80 from me. It’s an ok site if you have a fetish for girls teasing in uniforms, mini-skirts, stockings, tights with plenty of upskirts and panty flashing but if you require explicit nudity or sexual action then probably best to avoid this site.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Erotic Beauty

52. Erotic Beauty (2)

Pay
Active
83
skippy (42) 09-23-12  05:17pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Erotic Beauty, formerly MetModels, leans a little more toward old-style softcore nude photos in natural settings. The models are generally not mainstream, so you find a few that are very interesting and different. The site is billed as "Naturally Beautiful amatuer nudes" which probably says it better than I can.
Cons: Hmm. Can't quite put my finger on it.... a little slow, maybe. Nothing major wrong.
Bottom Line: This is a really good amatuer nude site. It is good because the photography is good, the models are generally attractive and typically squeeky clean (can't tell if they are photoshopped..), and there is a tremendous quantity of stuff going back to 2005. And remember, this USED to be the site where the Met-Art network put its most beautiful models so even the old stuff is pretty good. (The new stuff is good, too!) Many of the sets are outside.

Navigation is average or a little better than average. You can search by model, most popular, date, etc. Images do not open in a new window, so you have to remember that if you are used to some of the other sites like this.

There is a HUGE variety of models here, all apparently european. They are also all natural. I don't recall a single enhancement. And the models mostly seemed to be enjoying themselves, or at least comfortable with the set and the photographer.

I got into the site this time on a $12.50 special because I was already a member of Met-Art.

Absolutely worth a visit, especially if you like natural nude photography.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Melanie

53. Only Melanie (0)

Pay
Active
79
tangub (151) 09-08-12  03:21pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive model
Exclusive content
Good sized solo site
Included as a free bonus site when subscribing to Only Tease or any of the “Only” sites.
Photos available in two sizes with zip downloads for each
Customizable browse options.
All content date stamped
Billing by CCBill
Cons: Regional pricing
Last updates were February 2009
Very softcore, topless only
Video quality mediocre (no HD)
Bottom Line: This is a solo site featuring British model Melanie Walsh, one of the popular models from Only Tease, an attractive slender blonde with 32C natural breasts although she did change her hair colour and appear as a brunette in a few of the latter sets. Melanie first appeared on Only Tease back in 2003 and then in May 2005 was given this solo site which updated regularly until February 2009 growing in to quite a sizeable collection. In total there are 447 photo sets (approx 46,000 images) and 174 videos.

The content here is very softcore. In both the photo sets and videos you will see Melanie modelling a good variety of outfits and lingerie before stripping and posing topless. Don’t expect to find any explicit nudity within the site.

Most of the photos come in two different sizes, 711 x 1066px and 1366 x 2048px although a few of the earliest sets up until around August 2005 don’t have the larger option available. The browsing of the photo galleries is via a month and year listing and you can customize your browsing options via “My OM”, number of thumbs per page, whether you want to display the standard or large photo etc. There’s also a basic search facility that lets you search by type of clothing but it only has the single filter so not as comprehensive as the search engine at Only Tease.

Most of the videos are only available in AVI format, a high res 640 x 480 and a low res 208 x 160. The quality of the high res videos was probably fairly decent back when it was released but by today’s standards it is mediocre really although not so bad as to make it unwatchable.

Only Melanie is available as a standalone site but if you’re a fan of hers you’d probably want to pay the few extra bucks and join via Only Tease or even the Only All Sites package where Melanie has a load more content and continues to have regular updates despite finishing with her solo site.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Carla

54. Only Carla (0)

Pay
Active
78
tangub (151) 09-05-12  02:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A good sized solo site with 170 videos and 403 galleries (46,000+ photos).
Included as a free bonus site when subscribing to Only Tease.
Photos available in 2 sizes, 711 x 1066 and 1366 x 2048
Zip downloads in both sizes.
All content date stamped
Billing by CCBill
Cons: No updates since 2009.
Very softcore, no explicit nudity.
Video quality mediocre by today’s standards (no HD)
Search facility is a bit basic
Regional pricing
Bottom Line: This is the solo site of UK model Carla Brown, one of the popular models from Only Tease. She has a petite but curvy figure standing 5ft 2 with 32B breasts and a great ass, has brown hair, blue eyes, a small tattoo on her lower back and a naval piercing.

The site is run by the same people who run Only Tease so the content here runs pretty much along the same lines featuring Carla stripping out of lots of sexy outfits and uniforms. There’s also plenty of stockings and sexy lingerie on display. Unfortunately it’s all very softcore and Carla never really goes further than topless. Occasionally she might remove the panties and give you an ass shot but you won’t see any explicit open leg pussy shots.

The site was active from September 2005 up until April 2009 and the photo quality is consistent throughout that time with the nice sized 2048px photos available from the start. The video quality was probably ok at the time it was released but is lagging behind today’s standards. Mostly you get a high and low resolution AVI download option. The high option is usually 640 x 480 and is a reasonable enough quality to make it quite watch able. Don’t even bother with the 208 x 160 low res versions.

It’s possible to subscribe to Only Carla as a standalone site but if you like Carla enough to consider that I’d recommend just paying the extra $5 to join Only Tease where you’d get this as a free bonus site and in addition you’ll find another 15,000 images and 24 videos of Carla within Only Tease where she has continued to have regular updates added since 2009 despite being no longer active in Only Carla. You can of course also get this site included in the more expensive Only All Sites package. I really liked Carla and thought this site was a nice additional bonus to my Only Tease subscription but as with any solo site I’d only really recommend it if you like the model and in this case don’t mind the fact it’s only a topless site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Teasers VOD

55. Teasers VOD (0)

Pay
Active
92
rearadmiral (322) 09-04-12  06:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Among the best Public Nudity sites on the ‘net
- Many well-known porn stars
- Simple and effective site design
- Good lighting and editing
- Multiple formats available
- Videos and photos available
- Very daring
Cons: - Forced to stop updating
- Photos seem to be a bit of an afterthought
Bottom Line: This is my second review of this site. I returned to it to see what was new and to download the videos and photos that were uploaded since I was last a member. I expected some changes, but one of the changes that I found was definitely a negative. I’ll get that one huge, negative change out of the way first: the site is no longer updating and hasn’t updated since early November of 2011. According to the news posted on the site the owners didn’t make this decision, rather it was forced on them through a cease-and-desist order from the City of Los Angeles. (As an aside, I see that a similar site, Nude in L.A. doesn’t even exist now. They were a decent site in that they were more daring than most, but also managed to strip out a lot of titillation – pun not intended. So full marks to the guys at Teasers who are still keeping the site alive.)

The other significant change was just starting as I wrote my last review. At the time of that review they had only posted two scenes with the new format so I wasn’t in a position to do much more than simply note the change. The site now has 13 shoots with the new format. The old format consisted of breaking a model’s scene down into various parts and labeling those parts accordingly. The new format seemed to be an attempt to create a quasi-reality-show feel to shoots. They are still on the Teasers site, but they’re in a separate tab. They’re branded as “Real Girls of Porn Valley.” I’m not opposed to the new format (with one major exception being that there is an opening screen on each segment) but apart from the labeling of the shoot, and of the individual scenes, there really isn’t much of a change, and there certainly isn’t any major improvement over the older format. If there is a positive, and this is subjective, it is that the scenes seem to push the limits a bit more under the new format. Because that tends to be model-specific that could just be luck though. (I suspect that some of the more daring shoots are what caused the City’s legal response. Seeing Jennifer White standing naked in front of my house certainly wouldn’t cause me to complain, but I’m probably not a good example in this case…)

The format for both the older and newer shoots follows a bit of a formula. Most shoots follow the formula. The model is filmed as she tries on outfits and we see her changing; there is usually a scene with the model in a short skirt or dress and the camera follows her around in public areas as she flashes. There is a scene in each shoot where the model parades around in a skimpy bikini. There are also two or three clips of the model at a café (usually outdoor) where she is interviewed and asked to remove some clothing. Finally, there is usually a clip where the model is in a secluded, but still public, location where she strips nude and masturbates. In many shoots there is bonus material of the model masturbating back at the photographer’s house. In the public scenes people and cars can be seen going by. This is subjective, but I really like that the site usually doesn’t edit out the interaction between the model and the guys filming.

The models are the site’s main asset. There are many big porn stars here, and seeing them in the wild can be pretty interesting. Alexis Texas, Eden Adams and Katie St. Ives, among many other big names, have scenes here. If there is one downside to having such a model-centred site it is that the heat of the scene is really up to the model: if the model is daring and adventurous the shoot will be more fun to watch than if the model is shy and reserved. But a huge advantage to this is that this is one of the few public nudity sites that does show the models being nervous.

The technical stuff hasn’t changed since I last reviewed the site, except now there are now more scenes posted. There has been some new BTS material added too. The videos are available as WMVs (resolution depends on when they were added but maxes out at to 960x540 @ 3000 kb/s). MP4 videos are available in high and low resolution.

Photos are available, as singles and zips at 800x1200 but the main thrust of the site are the videos.

Some readers will disagree with my position that a site that no longer updates still has lots of value. This is subjective, but given that this site does contain a lot of material, serves a rare niche (American public nudity), and that political authorities seem to be closing in on that niche, I think the site is an exceptional value. The way these guys shoot their scenes puts them in the top few public nudity sites, and maybe even the best out there. Given that the site is under attack and others have closed, if you have any interest in this genre my advice is to join now before they disappear.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Puffy

56. Wet And Puffy (3)

Pay
Active
85
oldfizzywig (8) 08-26-12  05:43am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Provides what it advertises.
- Video download formats: FLV, MP4, WMV, MP4-HQ
- Video download example: 17'46": FLV 301mb 720x406, MP4 225mb, WMV 806mb 1280x720, MP4-HQ 1035mb 1920x1080.
- Picture downloads - ZIP file. Usually two sizes 1027x769 or 2800x1867, but sizes do vary.
- Crisp clear images and videos
- Statistics 418 Models, 540 scenes, 547 videos, 28458 pictures
- Natural breasts - many are A or B cup.
- Non-Member intro shows a full face picture (topless with small pussy insert) of each model.
- Trusted billing - CCBill or Epoch.
- Appears to update 3 times per week.
Cons: - All videos seem to follow same theme: Musical background, model strips, model plays with pussy, may use toys
- Sort by Newest or "most popular", Select by All or "pussy type", most videos have tags but one can not select or sort by tags
- Older videos are 640x480 WMV
- Some of the Girls seem uninterested
- Interview section is very says almost nothing, and is text not video/audio.
- There is a tab on most pages for "CAMS" but it is a dead link.
Bottom Line: Good clear images and videos. Lots of closeups.

Most models are Eastern European. Of the 24 most recent updates the Country of Origins are: England 1, Czech Republic 10, USA 1, Poland 2, Hungary 2, Romania 1, Austrira 2, France 2, Netherlands 1, Switzerland 1, Greece 1. Models appear to be in the 18 to 25 year age range.

Lots of Dildo play. Many Pussy pumps, I suspect this may be why its "puffy". Most girls either use a lotion or spit on their fingers, this must be the "wet" part of the name.

There are a number of videos of the girls pissing. For fans of this, like me, it will be a turn on, as these are often closeups.

This is part of a three site network consisting of: WetandPuffy.com, WeLikeToSuck.com, WetandPissy.com

Works well with Free Download Manager.

Lower price for linking from PornUsers.com is 19.95 USD, normal advertised price is 29.95/mth.

This is my first review - please provide constructive criticism and I will do my best to improve.
Respond: 15 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Only Tease

57. Only Tease (0)

Pay
Active
90
tangub (151) 08-22-12  11:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A huge site with an archive going back 10 years featuring 792 models in 9900+ photo sets (almost 1.2 million images) and 2300+ videos.
A huge array of outfits, costumes, lingerie, leg and footwear.
Exclusive content
Bonus sites Only Carla and Only Melanie included.
Photos in choice of 3 sizes, 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048 and 2000 x 3000px
Zip download for each size.
Video download options are HD 1280 x 720 and High Res 640 x 360 wmv, HD and High Res streaming options plus an m4v download for ipod.
At least 3 updates every day of the week, some days can be up to 6.
All content date stamped right back to 2002.
All file sizes shown and video run times.
No apparent download limits.
Customizable browse options and excellent search engine.
10 free Fast Track credits provided allowing you to view forthcoming releases of your choice before they are officially released.
Choice of Epoch or CCBill for credit card payments.
Cons: The site is very softcore, any nudity is fairly tame and many models don’t go any further than just topless, some not even that far.
Some repetition of outfits and shoot locations.
Oldest videos poor quality.
Videos quite short averaging 5-6 minutes.
If you prefer your HD videos in a format other than wmv you will be disappointed.
The most irritating thing for me were the zip downloads of the older photo sets (released up until about 2008 I think), after downloading and extracting the zips you have to click your way through 7-8 folders before arriving at the photos, really annoying.
Poor file naming, seemingly random meaningless numbers and letters so renaming required.
Ads in member’s area
Minimum 4 months subscription required to access “VIP member’s area”
Regional pricing with both CCBill and Epoch.
Bottom Line: For anyone considering a membership at Only Tease the main thing to consider is that it is a very softcore site containing very little explicit nudity. The site is all about the clothing, costumes, lingerie and hosiery being worn by the models, teasing and tantalising you with that flash of stocking top or suspender belt, catching a glimpse of their panties up their short skirts or a view of their cleavage down that tight blouse before she slowly removes the items of clothing one by one. You will find almost every type of outfit you could possibly think of from casual wear to business suits, glamorous evening gowns to clubbing wear, various uniforms like college girl, cheerleader, nurse, French maid to sports outfits and even some fictional characters such as Snow White and Alice in wonderland.

Amongst the near 800 models you will find some well known US and Euro models but what I really liked was the amazing collection of British models. Despite being from the UK I don’t buy magazines or patronise the sleazy tabloid press so most of these page three models were completely unknown to me. I was planning to just stick around for 1 month and try to be selective about what I downloaded but there are so many gorgeous models I found it almost impossible to deny most of them space on my hard drive so as a result I’m already well in to my 2nd month. Some of the more popular models have a huge amount of content, in some cases well over a hundred updates, almost like having several solo sites within the site. I loved the collection of Hayley-Marie here with a whopping 171 updates. Bryoni-Kate was another favourite of mine with 90 updates.

With such a huge amount of content you need to be able to navigate around it easily and they do provide plenty of browse and search tools. You can browse either photos or videos by a month and year listing or use the A-Z model index. They also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search for any type of outfit with several filters to refine your search. For example a basic search for “miniskirt” will bring up over 4000 results and you can then narrow your search by adding various filters such as the type and colour of stockings, tights or socks you want to go with it and also the type of lingerie required and then add in some model criteria like hair colour and breast size and whether you require nudity or just topless.

In addition they also have several features in the browse options like “behind the scenes”, “model of the year” and “model of the month”. There’s also a “prestige tease” section where you will find some of the top name models in slightly more glam and photo shopped galleries than the regular OT galleries although they’ve not updated that section since May of this year. There’s also a feature called “Tease at Home” which allegedly features the model being shot in her own home and being allowed to choose her own outfits. You also have the ability to rate the models, outfits and tease factor of every shoot and they have “Top lists” showing the highest rated in each category. Other extras include Wallpapers and there’s a very active forum where members can discuss models and outfits.

I’m not particularly interested in the videos, I did however find the videos here slightly more interesting than those on their sister site Art-Lingerie that I reviewed recently mainly because the videos here start fully clothed so you at least have a bit of anticipation and build up with some teasing and a striptease. They did however suffer from the same flaws IMO, having that awkward silence again with no back ground music and rarely any chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start. I just find it really irritating and amateurish when you can hear every little background noise. Some models do have separate interview videos where they talk about themselves…yawn….boring.

In addition to the regular daily updates, every Tuesday and Thursday they add an additional update which is designated as a “VIP Members” update. Clicking on these tells me I am not eligible to view them until the 1st day of my 4th month of membership so clearly these extra updates are designed to try and incentivize members to stick around longer and spend more money. The VIP updates look to have started around September 2011 so you’d be looking at around an extra 90 updates if you stick around long enough. I’m not sure these extra updates are enough incentive for me to stick around, after nearly 2 months of softcore teasing I’m ready to move on for some naked pussy. A highly recommended site though if you love softcore stripping, teasing, stockings and lingerie as I do.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Hanna Hilton

58. Hanna Hilton (0)

Pay
Active
60
marcdc1 (165) 08-18-12  04:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I'm a push-over when it comes to reviews and I'm having a hard time focusing on the good. Be aware other reviewers may have scored lower then my rating.

- Super hot girl. Early 20s(?), big boobs (enhanced I'm guessing), slight frame. Truly what an angel would look like.
- Multiple formats (wmv, flash, iOS, PSP, mp4, mpeg)
- zip downloads for pix usually over 100 pix in a set.
- Includes network of about 15 girls including: Dylan Ryder (active), Ashley Fires (active), Abbey Brooks (inactive), Sweet Lea Luv (inactive), Tara Lynn Foxx (inactive), Puma Swede (inactive))
Cons: - No longer updating and hasn't since July 2010!
- There's no personality here. What gets Hanna off? What's her fantasy or which scenes does she get into? None of this is shown by the way she carries herself in these shoots.
- While some video is available in large file formats There are very few vids in 1280X720 5 mps, most is 640X480 2 mps. Most videos are 640X480 1mbps.
- About 55 movies - too many are Behind the Scenes for my tastes (almost 1/8 are BTS)
- About 77 images sets
- Ads in member site (I don't care - but some object
- There's a link for cam archives, but I can't find anything for Hanna
- Only 4 M/F shoots. Most are solo and girl/girl.
Bottom Line: To me this site was a bore. While there's a rare gem or two there's only one or two. Many of the solo shoots are her being photographed while we hear the director telling her what to do (yawn) or a sexy panning of her with music playing instead of hearing her soft moans (I hate that).

I had such high hopes for Hanna, she is smokin' hot! But I'm a big fan of dirty talking girls and "oh god," and "fuck ya" just don't cut it. It seems like the few M/F shoots were from the very start of her career, hopefully she finds her comfort zone and puts more of who she is into her videos.

I know I'll be asked about anal so here's her response when a fan asked her (back in 2010)
asks: Do you like anal sex ? you have any plans doing an anal scene soon ? :)?
Hanna Says: No way


The Bottom Line:

Skip this site. If you're a fan of Hanna Hilton's pictures and you're looking to find those in 1 spot - this is a fine site. If you're interested in a best of Hanna, this is not the place to find that.

I always find something I like to download to my HD for later :), this time I downloaded NOTHING. Hanna's great - but this site needs her personality and (in my opinion) much more boy/girl shoots.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XX Cel

59. XX Cel (1)

Pay
Newbie
99*
magrury (1) 08-01-12  09:41am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Girls vary in size, country, dress and attitude.
they are all Huge breasted, and if they're not,Cel will tell them, and they'll STILL let him grope them.
He speaks MANY launguages but mostly converses in English. Cel puts the girls at ease and that makes them do anything for him. Video and Photo options
New vids are labeled as such
Cons: the available girls are shown but you cant open their boxes in new tabs, you have to click on each girls pic and go from there. Many of the clips appear to be in FLV format, which sucks. Real Player is buggy. Cel whould really start ANOTHER site. With the videos he takes AFTER the groping's over, if you know what i mean
Bottom Line: I am Such a fan of this guy Cel. Which i guess his name is. I joined a few years ago and loved it then too. Only now, it's different. years ago he would photograph a model and have her try on clothes, jump up and down and play with their own tits. I was amazed then that he got amateur girls to just do this for him. Now Cel is a lot more confident. He often gets in the shot with the models and even starts to make out with them. Holy Shit and these girls LOVE him. It is Amazing to watch. He's an average looking guy, even a bit , well, overweight, but these hot chesty girls can't WAIT for him to start kissing them. He's found the secret to dealing with good looking girls, i don't know if it's telling them they're nice, cute, have good manners or what, but they are his. He is everyman and that's all right with us. I wish he had a Facebook Page or something. He needs to Know that he's appreciated
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit La Zona Modelos

60. La Zona Modelos (0)

Pay
Active
79
tangub (151) 06-25-12  07:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Part of Latin Teen Pass giving access to a network of 8 sites
Large archive of mostly exclusive content
Site still updating (but see also cons)
Latest photos a nice size at 1067 x1600 px
Zip downloads for newer photo sets
Firefox DTA works for grabbing the older unzipped photo sets
Multiple download options for videos
Model info provided
Videos have scene description, show date added and run time
Billing by CCBill
Cons: Regional pricing
Update schedule has slowed right down, recent and forthcoming update schedule shown as 1 new photo set every 2 weeks and no new videos have been added for 2 months.
Photo sets not date stamped apart from most recent updates on home page
Some duplication of content between company sites
About half the photo content doesn’t have zip downloads
A lot of the content is non nude or topless only.
Oldest videos only have a single wmv download option
No file sizes listed for videos
No in browser streaming
No search or sort tools to help with navigation
Banner ads on virtually every page in member’s area
Bottom Line: This is a multi model site featuring a collection of over 120 models with the main themes being Latina teens in solo softcore action. Most of the models are in the 18 to early 20s age range with most of them originating from South America and a few US, European and UK based models here and there. The site has been online quite a number of years and originally started out as a non nude site but over time the content has become gradually more explicit with the newest content featuring full explicit nudity along with some masturbation and toy use with the odd bit of lesbian action here and there.

The navigation options are fairly limited with the only real way to explore all the content being via a nicely presented alphabetical model index which lists the models name with a nice 150 x 225 preview picture and clicking on that will take you to a page where you can find some basic info on her such as age, country, height and measurements along with a paragraph of background info on the model and shoots and a listing of all her photos and videos on the site. There are no other search or sort options for the models. The only other navigation category provided is a separate listing for videos in chronological order from the most recent added.
Whilst the latest photo sets come in a nice 1600px resolution that size is in the minority here, I would estimate somewhere around 80 to 90% of the photo content comes in sizes 798 x 1200 and 685 x 1024 px. It’s also hit and miss as to which sets have zip downloads. I was able to grab the unzipped sets with Down Them All but it’s a lot more time consuming than simply downloading the zips. The site would be greatly improved if the owners would zip all the content for easy download.

Videos added since 2009 generally have a choice of 4 download option which are hi and low quality wmv, high quality quicktime mov and ipod mp4. The latest added video of Kami Li was in 1280 x 720 but sadly that is not the norm and was the only one I found in that size. The average spec for the hi quality wmvs was 720 x 540 @ 4000 kbps. There are currently 192 scenes in the main video section and they can range in time anything from around 5 to 20 minutes in length. The videos vary from behind the scenes photo shoot type to striptease with masturbation with or without toys. Some videos contain music and in some you get to hear the chit chat between model and photographer so it’s a bit of a mixed bag really.

Most of this company’s models who also have their own solo sites such as GiGi Spice, Tania Spice, Natalia Spice etc also have content here so this is quite a good site if you want to check out all their models but don’t want to pay out $25 -30 each on separate subscriptions to all their sites. Overall this is a fairly nice site for anyone who likes cute Latin teens and along with the bonus sites that make up the Latin Teen Pass there is a lot of content to see but you just need to be aware that much of it is very softcore or non nude.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Galleria

61. ATK Galleria (0)

Pay
Active
96
Claypaws (44) 06-21-12  08:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -2500 models (no silicone), 24750 photo sets, 2,690,000 photos, 7835 videos. -80% exclusive (see bottom line).
-Many attractive models and lots of total stunners (but I do not like more than 10% of the models here or anywhere else).
-10 softcore photo sets per model per photographer per shoot plus some hardcore.
-Many repeat visits from models.
-Photosets in three resolutions (Not all on older sets): 1024, 1500-1600, 3000 with full and custom zips.
-Updates: 5x12 photosets (80-200pics each) and 2x14 videos (10 to 20 min ave 15min each) videos per week. i.e. 60 photo sets and 28 videos per week,
-Videos in several formats, inc "HD mp4" (1280x720 @ 6Mbps. 1920x1080 starting to appear) and streaming.
-Good model directory and search facility.
-Opt-in for newsletter and promos.
-Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
-Works with Firefox and DownThemAll and FDM (see Reply #1).
-Bills via CCBill - no regional pricing
Cons: -Links time out after a few hours.
-Some technically flawed colour (but most is good).
-Size not indicated on video download links. So, if you go for "HD mp4", you do not know if it is 720p or 1080p until you have downloaded it.
-Pages can be very slow to load, especially the thumbnail pages, but zip download speeds are good. It is best to choose 20 thumbs per page rather than "all".
-Although download managers are allowed and work fine (tested with FDM), see Reply #1 for some cautions.
- No "mature" models (but site does not claim to have them)
-"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central.
-Some non exclusive content for some photographers such as Fred or Defrancesco.
Bottom Line: ATK Galleria (ATKG) has been my "gold standard" for about 12 years and it still is. There are a lot of statistics in the pros and cons, above, so it might be more useful if I explain here why I like Galleria so much.

I collect photos and I see it as primarily a photo site, despite its huge number of videos. Nubiles is stronger on video quality. If you prefer softcore teen video, with masturbation or toys, and are happy with 4 vids per model, Nubiles is the place. You might come to ATKG to add to those.

As far as photos go, ATKG operates in the same general genre as KarupsPC, KarupsHA and Nubiles but it has generally better quality and a very much larger quantity: four times as many images as Nubiles, twice as many as MetArt. It seems reasonable that signup gives you access just to ATKG and not to the ATK Network.

One thing I really love is the many repeat shootings for a lot of its models. You get 10 softcore photosets whenever a photographer shoots the model. If she is shot again, and she often is, you get another 10 photo sets. Those may be from the same photographer a year later or from a different one. Hardcore sets, if any, are on top of that count. Riley Reid, for example, has 43 photo sets and 9 videos here. That is 13 hardcore photo sets plus two separate shoots of 10 softcore sets from one photographer and a 10 set shoot from a second. Her videos span the same two photographers and include toys, hardcore, lesbian, behind the scenes and a camshow recording.

All photo sets for each model go up between one day and a week apart. Videos are less predictable and not all models do them.

Of the nearly 25000 photo sets, photographer Fred's 1600 sets and Denys Defrancesco's 1000 sets are largely not exclusive. But the rest are, as far as I can tell. So I guess 80% exclusive overall.

ATKG is nothing like MetArt, Femjoy or any of the artsy sites. Shoots are amateur in style, professional quality but not glossy. Girls are committed and enthusiastic and engage with the viewer. Some toy use but most sets do not involve toys. Almost all start clothed, if sometimes scantily, and end full nude but sometimes get there after 20 images of a 150 image set. The journey is less important than the destination at ATKG but you do get some tease in most shoots and explicit shots with direct eye contact, provocative facial expressions, minimal looking down or away and plenty of finger spreading pussy.

There are "themes" such as Uniforms, Lingerie, Upskirts and Panties, Babes, Amateurs, Coeds, Masturbation, Toys, Foot fetish, Nudism, Lesbian, Watersports, Action. But some of those are pretty loosely defined. I often cannot even tell what the softcore theme was when I look at the downloaded set.

Take lingerie. The girl may be wearing some under some everyday clothes or she may start in it. She strips via a short tease but without the emphasis on the sensuality of the lingerie that you would get on a fetish site.

ATK's tour gives away a massive amount of actual content. Click the "visit site" link from this PU page, go to the bottom right of the page you arrive at and click the ATKingdom thumbnail. It takes you to their free site on which you will find about 80 full size (3000x2000) images from Galleria, 80 from ATK Hairy and some from Premium, all from their most recent sets and changed every week. There are no sample videos there, suggesting a bias towards photos. At the top of the page from "visit site", you have the whole model directory, which shows how many photo sets and videos every model has.

ATKG shows the work of 97 photographers from around the world. Its women are shaved, aged between 18 and 45, but most are young. There are only 15 models aged over 30. 1300 aged 18-20, 1030 21-23. Some models have tattoos or piercings but there is no silicone here. Most are Caucasian girl-next-door types (only 5 black and 11 Asian) and there is a separate site for ethnics - ATK Exotics - with a separate subscription. Some of the Galleria models also appear on the other ATK sites but without duplication of actual photo sets or videos. e.g. she might be shaved here but have hairy sets on ATK Hairy. Note that, if a model is on ATK Petites, membership there gives you her Galleria content too. But not vice versa.

I highly recommend ATKG as a large and high quality source of explicit softcore photo sets, in overtly sexual and amateur (but not amateurish) style. It will specially appeal to anyone who wants everything they can find of a loved model. I believe 96 is valid for what the tour area makes clear you will find.

But if your main thing is softcore video, score 86. There is bg and gg but it does not come over as a hardcore site. If you prefer those, score 80. And there is none with a story line here. It is plain sex. As I am not interested in bg, gg or video, it is hard for me to evaluate them. If you want fetish themes, score 76.

I have joined many times over 12 years. "member < 1 month" applies just to this join.
Respond: 13 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Pamela Spice

62. Pamela Spice (0)

Pay
Active
74
tangub (151) 06-06-12  02:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Part of the Latin Teen Pass giving you 8 sites for the price
Exclusive content
Nice photo quality
Zip downloads
Choice of video download options
Billing by CCBill
Cons: Expensive with regional pricing
An archive site, nothing new added for several years
No dates on the content
File sizes not shown
Brightly coloured medium sized watermark on photos is a little distracting
The colour looks a little washed out in some of the videos
Bottom Line: The Model: Pamela Spice is an incredibly cute 18 year old Latina from South America who has a youthful appearance, an all natural body with nice medium sized breasts and wears braces to complete the sweet innocent teen look.

The Content: Unlike some of the other sites in this network Pamela Spice contains full explicit nudity, masturbation and toy use. You will also see Pamela in some hardcore lesbian action with various girl friends including the use of toys and strap-ons. In addition there are some photo sets and videos featuring public flashing in a bar, restaurant, park, by the side of the road which is a niche I quite enjoy when I come across it but I have to admit I didn’t find the flashing here particularly exciting or adventurous.

The Navigation: Pretty simple navigation really with just a separate listing for photos and videos which is really all you need for a solo site of this size.

The Photos: There are 68 photo sets (9865 pics), all photos are 798 x 1200 px in size and all come with a zip download. There’s a good mix of indoor and outdoor shoots and they mostly start out with the model fully clothed. The outfits keep in line with the innocent teen theme and mostly consist of casual everyday type clothes. Expect to see lots of Jeans, sweat pants, jean skirts, shorts and t shirts and of course the obligatory school girl outfit. Don’t expect to see any glamorous lingerie or stockings.

The Videos: A decent sized video collection for a solo site with 108 videos online. They give you 3 download options, a high and low quality wmv plus an ipod mp4 version. The average resolution of the high quality wmvs I checked out looks to be around 720 x 480 with approx 4000 kbps bitrate so they generally look ok on full screen. I did however notice the colour looked a bit washed out in some of the videos which I presume is the “milky” effect I’ve seen Denner mention before in relation to Pacino videos. Each video comes with a screen cap, a scene description and shows the run time and they also provide a short preview video so you can get a fair idea of the video’s content before deciding to download.

Conclusion: Nothing has changed here since the previous reviews; it’s just an archived photo and video collection, no updates, no model interaction and no extras apart from a few wallpapers and friends promo galleries. Pamela is probably my favourite model in this network so I was a little disappointed the photo collection was not larger. If you prefer videos you could possibly add 5 points to my score.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit ATK Galleria

63. ATK Galleria (0)

Pay
Active
95
BubbaGump (18) 06-03-12  01:36pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -- Extremely large amount of photo content.
-- High-quality photos/videos.
-- Outstanding site layout and user interface.
-- Custom features--user-defined zip files, preferences, settings etc.
-- Daily, high-quality updates.
Cons: -- Could use a little more diversity in ethnicity(latin, afro, etc.)
Bottom Line: I would classify this site as tastefull and traditional erotic nude photography. There are hardcore photo and video sets but the main emphasis is on erotic/nudes and exposing the model's natural beauty. No extreme stuff here and everything is in good taste.

Most of the models are of the young, early twenty-something variety. Although the majority fit a cerain profile--thin, well-toned etc, you can find a large diversity of model types spread around the very large number of photosets, once you discover the search feature. This is one of those sites that could keep your interest for quite a long time. There is no way you could manage to get through all of the content in a one-month period.

The only thing lacking is a more diverse representation of ethnicities. If it wasn't for this, I would not hesitate to give the site a perfect score.

The site layout and design is about as good as it gets. Serach utilities, custom zip downloads, and a number of other features are available. Everyting seems to be where it should be and you won't get lost in the large amount of content available.

The videos are of high quality and available in HD, but the emphasis is on photography. The quality of the photography ranges from semi-pro to professional, with most belonging to the latter category. The technical quality of the photos themselves ranges from eye-popping, HD quality to so-so, depending on the skill and experience-level of the photographer. There were times I was thinking, 'I would love to see this or that photographer shoot this model.' It is hard to classify this as a negative, however. It is unrealistic to expect every photoset and photographer to meet one's own personal demands regarding tastes and likes.

The number of photographers is also pretty diverse and you get a good range of styles. You can use the search function to display all sets from the photgraphers you like. In fact, there is so much content that, after a while, you can pick out the photographer just based on poses, settings, lighting, etc.. Most of the photographers seem to be into their work and are not just running around with a camera, trying to churn and burn content.

You will come across a few poorly-done photosets(blown-out images, overexposed, poor lighting, etc). But these are usually older sets and are the rare exception, rather than the norm.

The content is mostly unique. Although you will find a number of professional models here that you have seen elsewhere, the majority will likely be completely new to you.

The only people that probably would not like this site are those into extremes, either in model types or images. There is hardcore action, but no action like atm or other in-your-face kind of stuff.

This site is definitely a photography-lovers gem.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Simon Scans

64. Simon Scans (0)

Pay
Active
80
qualsite34 (33) 06-03-12  09:39am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (2)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Huge collection of photos going back over a decade.
Most of the girls are very attractive and can not be found on other websites.
For fans of cute girl next door british amateurs, Simon's earlier work is unmatched.
Cons: In the last several years, the type of girls found on the site has shifted radically. Less cute british amateurs, more Eastern European, or Spanish babe types in glamour photos.
Many of the photos are oversaturated (Too much red).
Bottom Line: Several years ago Simons Scans was one of my two favorite amateur sites, alongside Abby Winters. Simon used to feature numerous never before seen cute british amateurs photographed beautifully. How the times have changed. Now most of the girls are from other countries and the style of photography is less amateur and more glamour. This may or may not be a positive depending on your tastes. A few years back I posed a question to Simon as to the reason for the declining numbers of british girls on his site and he replied they are getting harder to get. My hunch is they were more expensive and he decided to go where labor is cheaper. Here is my bottom line advice. If you are a fan of cute looking british amateur photos, and have never subscribed to Simons Scans, I would highly recommend the site for the older collection which is very substantial. On the other hand, if you are a former member looking to see some new content of british amateurs, I would not recommend you do so. Even if you have been away for 2-3 years. It's not worth it! For fans of babe type girls in glamour photos, you should find enough content 4-5 years to justify the subscription price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mature Erotic

65. Mature Erotic (0)

Pay
Active
60
Mort (5) 05-13-12  04:12am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good idea for content. Unique models (AFAIK), good variety, from soft through to semi-hard solo scenes.
Does include "discounted" membership to two sister sites, mature-underwear.com and cupsclub.com, again, sites with a "good idea" for their content.
Cons: Quality is WAY out of date - videos are small, low quality, and often poorly lit. They are listed as having sizes of small, medium, large, and very large, but "very large" is quite small by today's standards on the main "Mature Erotic" site. On the other two sites it is smaller, and the quality is generally worse.
Navigation is dreadful - models appear in a long list with no names or identifying information, and as videos are posted in parts (and separated by other models) it is put luck as to whether you can get the whole video. Only the main site has a "search" function, and that is only useful after you work out the models name from a video.
Videos all appear in maximized pop ups, and whenever a link is clicked the original page resets to the top, so you lose your place.
From the dates the video files were created (no dates are given on the update page), there is a new segment about every two weeks. Makes it a long time to get a full 4 part movie!
Bottom Line: Good idea for content, and if the quality of the videos and navigation lived up to the "idea" of the videos, it would be great.
As it is, it is more frustrating than satisfying, and the price is too high for the low quality of content and dreadful navigation. Downloading the videos is harder than it needs to be as well.
So, while I would have really liked to have enjoyed this site and passed it on as a place to go for mature amateurs, overall, it is not worth it.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Digital Desire

66. Digital Desire (2)

Pay
Active
78
Cybertoad (104) 04-29-12  05:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-13-12  01:14pm  (Update History)
Reason: had a chance to download site.
Pros: HD 720 videos ( average 5-10 minutes in length )
Zipped Photos ( 100 average per set )
Great Search Engine
Nice pretty look to site.
Amazing women most are stunning,
Unique Content !
Cons: Site says Not Download manager friendly,
Getting to download to many steps.
Navigation is oldschool hard to use.
Inconsistent file format.
No bonus sites.
Bottom Line: Over View:
I have not done a review in over 4 years on this site, since then some things are better like 720p HD in many of the videos. However the formats are varied and some scenes are MP4 some WMV some DVX, flv etc. But most have cells phone formats. So thats good an bad

I was happy with the amazing women that continue to bless this site. The site has migrated to better quality of shots. The pics are amazing and great quality. But again the sizes vary making inconsistent downloads in video and pics alike!

Good:
The site remains a quality site in that they stage and film very well and the concentration seems to be on this. I signed up with an 18.00 discount price, normally is 29.95 . lots of pornstars and scenes appear unique to this site. I loved the new talent that is only seen here first.

Bad :
Why if they do not allow download manager do they make it so hard to download a file. To many steps for this. Should be easier since they limit the use of other software. Navigation is ok at best and remains a sore spot if you are looking for something use the search, problem is if you have no idea what to look for it will not be fun just to try and surf the site. Many videos are absent quicktime support anymore.

Toads Take :
I joined because of the discount I got, I would not have otherwise done so. The site has not changed to much in 4 years, It was a pain to use back then and is now. However all that said the women and scenes are stunning and there is a good amount of content at a guess 500 plus videos and more sets of photos the site makes it hared to figure out how many they have, which ads to the pain in using it.
But I digress, the women are amazing and nice rocking hard bodies along with natural and implants alike. The age is from about 18- 35 from what I could tell. They use good backgrounds and the only complaint is the music sometime goes on and on way into the masturbation scenes very distracting but seems to be more the exception.

I would say join for the porn and women, but be Leary about the access an be prepared to spend time clicking and clicking and clicking to download.
They do need to get their formats in order and have the same formats for every videos. Nothing like clicking on a video and it was not Mac compatible glad I do not have a Mac as some would not show without proper codecs.

CT

( update 5/13 2012)

After addressing my own concerns with this site I changed 80 to a 78 to fit in the average site areas.
After downloading the entire site at a huge time consumption.
Comparing the entire site :
More then not I found models with no videos, and many old poor \quality videos maybe a 1/3 of the collection old and grainy. No attempt seems to be made to improve anything older however the site does not claim any kind of quality standards. Most photo sets were from good to outstanding.

I have to say there has to be a better way to download.
1. pick a model
2. pick the scene
3. Click the icon
4. save the file.
If the site was faster this would not be as much and issue and the limits set for downloader make users stuck to their pc's. I realize they are trying to save bandwidth, and the site is not all that fast to begin with. I like that the site has original content and smokin hot models. But the site experience was barely ok. If it was not for the photo's being very good I would have rated it lower. I tend to see this site as more a photo site then video. I do have to say the lack of consistency makes video downloading like buying a grab bag and hoping it turns out well. Some Icons for videos were duplicated by some script error as much as 30+ times. And names were often not what the video says. I hate to be so critical but as I said previously I had a much better experience with this site years ago.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Girls Out West

67. Girls Out West (1)

Pay
Active
65
xexbot (36) 04-20-12  05:14pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Decent amount of content, there's plenty here to keep you busy for a long time.

Clearly amateur-ish. "Amateur" is such a subjective term, but the girls and guys here are clearly not professionals, thought hey are certainly not virgins to porn after their first shoot.

More natural women, less make-up and porn-like qualities.
Cons: Video quality is relative to whatever they shot it with. I'm not sure they aren't using Super * in some cases, the quality is that bad.

Amateur porn, you get what you expect, amateur quality.

Selection of content is all pretty much the same. Apparently Aussies aren't into exciting or passionate sex. The lesbian sex here is really just masturbation with a little kissing. Tame by reality standards.
Bottom Line: This site wants to e Abby Winters so badly they think they can just coast off that business model. Unfortunately they fail in this regard, and realistically, if their is any real talent they tend to wind up at Abby Winters anyway. Not that these are the only two Aussie sites, but they do seem to be closely linked in terms of style, content, and even models.

You're better off spending the extra money at Abby Winters. You will get about the same amount in terms of diversity, maybe a little less m/f than GOW, but the quality of GOW m/f hardcore, if you can call it that, was so lame you're better off without it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amateur Model Site

68. Amateur Model Site (0)

Pay
Newbie
86*
soni (0) 04-17-12  11:44am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I love checking out sites, where you get amateur models showing what they have in front of the cam. And at Amateur Model, I exactly get that. They have some of the best gals on their lineup. And it has been a pleasure with the time that I have spent there. More often than not, they have new videos lined up to be viewed. Again, I love the way these photoshoots are done. It makes you drip the last thing left in your body out.
Cons: If there is any con in the site, it may be that the video quality can be better and you can get better process to know about the updates of new videos, or models to watchout for.
Bottom Line: Being a member in a few of these amateur video sites, I find amateur models to be right up there with the best.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amour Babes

69. Amour Babes (0)

Pay
Active
81
slutty (111) 03-21-12  05:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Relatively large network of sites 24 sites, 801 models on the network, and over 1000 total sets on this site alone.
-Many attractive, euro ladies
-Price is not bad if you join the network through this site, not sure why it is more expensive via other entry points
-Good download speeds, maxed my connection at 2MB/s
-Decent variety, hardcore, some midcore, anal, and a bit of lesbian
-Download managers work (DTA), no DRM, logins don't appear to timeout very fast if at all
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Video quality is mediocre-to-good depending on age of the scene, worst I saw was a pretty old Zuzana Z scene that was 384x288 1400 kbps wmv, best 1920x1088 8000 kbps wmv
-Billed through Epoch for me
Cons: -At least partially not exclusive, seen some of these scenes at other euro sites
-Browsing is pretty bland, there are some site glitches
-Set ratings are provided, but participation isn't high. For some reason when I rated a set or listed it as a favorite, I got logged out, so I stopped doing it
-Older videos have substandard video quality
-Update schedule is inconsistent across the network, and it seems like they may be recycling content
-Photo quality is substandard for most sets I looked at, 1200 pix long end was typical
-Only one video size available for download, on newer HQ scenes file sizes can get quite large, and I would have liked a 720 option that was smaller.
Bottom Line: Overall, I think this is a decent site, it could definitely use some improvements, but may be worth looking into if you are into mostly younger euro ladies. I would like to note that this review is for the entire network, not just this site (as it is dead, I would probably give this site along a 70), and I am just posting it here since it is the cheapest entry point into the network at this time, and there is no "main site" that I am aware of.

The network itself has a decent variety of material, including old/young, lesbian, group, anal, and even some pegging (I think, I didn't look to close). Most of them are pretty straightforward euro-style gonzo porn, some sites have a bit of setup (like a teacher talking to a student in Tricky Old Teacher, or a dude breaking into an apartment in Horny Thief).

Several of the '24' network sites here appear to be dead, the only sites that have scheduled updates are She Made Us Lesbians and Horny Thief Tales (once a month); Tricky Old Teacher, Spoiled Virgins, Young Anal Tryouts, and 18 Virgin Sex (all twice a month). Most of the rest of the sites haven't updated in almost a year if not longer, including this one (Amour Babes).

I think it is worth considering if you haven't been here before, although the update schedule would prevent most from hanging around past a month, and the non-exclusivity would likely prevent many from joining again. I enjoyed many of the scenes, like a Pinky June one who is my new favorite no I suppose, and will be adding them to my favorites, although I wouldn't be surprised if I run across them elsewhere further down the line.

If they improved video quality on the older sets, updated their photo quality, and improved navigation and user interaction, it could be a very good site (though not great).

Network Statistics:
I Fucked Her Finally - 78 combined photo/video sets (156 total)
18 Virgin - 223 combined sets
Amour Babes - 1000 total sets
Creampied Sweeties - 68 combined sets
Dirty A2M - 20 combined sets
Horny Thief - 44 combined sets
Spoiled Virgins - 211 combined sets
Tricky Old - 128 combined sets
Most of the other sites were 20-30 sets of primarily non-exclusive content so I didn't look at them too closely.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Penthouse

70. Penthouse (0)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (322) 03-05-12  04:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Multiple video download options
- Huge site with diverse models
- Good mix of softcore and hardcore
- Mix of porn stars and ‘lesser knowns’
- Photos of all Monthly Pets back to 1973
- 3700+ photo galleries
- 2200+ video scenes
- Full length movies available (340+)
- Access to Penthouse Forum and Variations
- Some videos are available in 3D
Cons: - Download speeds can vary and sometimes can be a bit slower than average
- Links time out after 10 minutes or so
- Video scenes stream automatically on opening page
- Picture galleries tend to be small (less than 50 photos is common)
- Some pictures appear to be airbrushed
- Even on HD many of the videos don’t look great
Bottom Line: I find that if I join a studio site I’m best served if I go in with low expectations. That way I’m not too disappointed when the site barely meets what I expected. But I have to admit that I was pleasantly surprised at how good a site Penthouse is. This is a very well done adult site.

Penthouse likely needs no introduction to anyone reading this review. The magazine was my introduction to adult stuff back in 1980. The site is much more than the magazine though because the Penthouse empire has grown to include softcore and hardcore videos. The site gives access to a huge amount of PH material and all of it is very good quality.

There is a search function but I didn’t use it much since the site is so well organized. There are links to sort material by porn stars (which gives you access to all the photos and videos with those models) and Pets (which again is an easy way to access photos and videos). If you’re looking for specific themes in videos the video scenes are tagged with the most common themes. Finding them is as easy as using the pull-down menu.

PH does a disservice to itself by not allowing prospective members the opportunity to get a good idea of what the site has to offer. I can’t see what harm it can do to any site to allow non-members the ability to see what’s on offer. (It was mentioned here on an earlier comment and it still happens: when you go to join the offer is for a free membership. It’s only when you click through the non-existent free membership that you have to enter payment information. Most porn buyers are sophisticated to know that they have to pay to get access to a site like this so why hide behind a trick that fell out of favour years ago?)

Most models have pictures and videos available. PH has certainly become more hardcore in the past decade, but there is a good amount of soft stuff too. Video downloads are available in a wide array of formats and sizes. MP4 HD, WMV HD, MP4, MPEG, Mobile and WMV SD are all offered on most scenes. I downloaded WMV HD and SD. HD came in at 1280x720 8000+ kb/s 24fps. SD is 768x432 3200+ kb/s 24fps. Both use WMV Codec 8. Subjectively, the videos don’t look that great even though the numbers would suggest otherwise.

Huge pet peeve of mine with this site (which is becoming more common too) is that when you open a link to a scene the scene starts to stream immediately. If you have your speakers on this can be a problem, but what I dislike about it is that it hogs bandwidth for something that I don’t want. To make matters worse with PH is that the scene continues to download even after you pause it. I open scenes I want in new tabs and wondered why my download speeds were so slow until I realized that most of my bandwidth was being sucked up loading streams for scenes that I was going to download. Webmasters: please stop doing this!!!

Apart from offering scenes with various porn stars and Pets, PH also offers about 340 full length DVDs. These are mostly PH-produced with a lot of Jill Kelly Productions thrown in the mix too. The problem with the full length videos is that they are full length. They are broken up into approximately 3-minute clips but those clips don’t necessarily begin and end with the one scene you want to see. With many of the titles added 5+ years ago there are no star names associated with them but many of the titles are listed on IAFD so you can get that information.

Photos are available in multiple resolutions, listed as being small, medium, large, extra large and extra extra large (no actual resolution sizes were listed). I downloaded the extra extra large and they came in at 2667x4000. Subjectively they look great. One beef I had with the zipped sets is that many (likely most) that I downloaded were buried six folders deep before you got to the pics.

I’m not a big photo collector but I always take the opportunity to get photos of favourite models. It was going through some of these photos that I realized that some of them have been airbrushed. I noticed this when I was looking at a high res photo of Faye Reagan and realized that they airbrushed out her anus. I know she doesn’t do anal, but I’m pretty sure she has an anus. Websites: please don’t doctor the photos!

The absolute bottom line? I really liked this site. PH is synonymous with stunning women and great photographers and the site carries on that tradition. PH has branched out into hardcore to follow the money, but there is a lot here for most people to like. There are models of different ages and body types and there’s hardcore, softcore and solo. And given the amount of older PH photos there’s also lots of hair for guys who remember those days. I’d definitely recommend giving PH a try.
Respond: 14 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ron Harris

71. Ron Harris (0)

Pay
Active
70
slutty (111) 02-25-12  10:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Attractive ladies
-Decent photo quality
-Good video quality (technically speaking 3Mbit wmv is largest size available)
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Download managers work
-Good download speeds (maxed my 20 Mbit connection) with DL manager
-Okay sized site, 114 models on "Studios" site, maybe 3 photosets and 1 video on average per model
-6 sites, although only one appears active - Studios, and I am not sure how active it is
-Camerwork in photos is pretty good for the most part
-Navigation is okay, pretty straightforward. No search function but there is a model index
Cons: -Photosets are small in quantity
-Camerwork in videos is pretty bad
-The guy is just annoying in the video, hey just sounds like a slimeball, and will not shut up.
-Videos are generally pretty boring, behind the scenes type stuff often. Not very erotic in my opinion - regardless of what Playboy says.
-Videos are short
-No real bonus content
-Update schedule is unknown, but I don't think it is frequent, nothing looks new since I was here two weeks ago
Bottom Line: I think this site is an okay softcore-midcore site (toys and some lesbian), and it definitely has some attractive ladies. Although, I think it has far too many detractions to be worth recommending. There are plenty of other sites that offer more content and better quality.

If you are a video person, this place is certainly not for you. The videos are frequently poorly shot, some are interviews or behind the scenes, and the large majority that I downloaded featured some slimeball (I assume Ron Harris) making stupid comments for pretty much the entire video. There is one with Kara Duhe that is just generally uncomfortable, it reminded me of some dirty old uncle gawking at a young lady (not that there is anything wrong with being a dirty old uncle, I just don't need to hear it in my porn).

While the camerawork in the still photography may be good, the camerawork in the videos is the exact opposite (humorous since they have a link for lessons at the bottom of the page, perhaps he should sign up himself?) So if you are a fan of particular ladies you see in the preview and like short photosets, this might be okay for you, otherwise I'd look elsewhere.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit African Goddesses

72. African Goddesses (0)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (356) 02-22-12  11:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Beautiful African models. Some are thin, but most are amazingly voluptuous with beautiful faces and extra large breasts. Nothing fake or artificial here.
-Amateurs. All the models appear only on this site.
-The videos are nearly all stripping from either lingerie or ethnic African outfits. Very exotic.
-No DRM
-Works with download managers
-No interviews. The models don't even speak. The videographer is never in the video nor do you hear them.
-The models look directly at you and don't ever look bored, jaded or mechanical.
Cons: -Billing is through an unusual biller and no billing choices are available.
-Your password is sent to you at your email address. This concept worked, but every time you log in, you must reenter the password.
-The photos are small at 1024x768.
-No zipdownload option.
-The picture sets are small. Most are less than 50 photos, some as few as 10.
-The videos download, but with only one option. They are in WMV 640x480, but reasonably sharp considering they are not HD.
-Barely updating. See below.
Bottom Line: This site is of softcore photos and stripping videos of natural African women. The focus is on some of the most beautiful women on the planet.

I was last a member in August of 2008. In the nearly three and a half years that have passed, I have found my appreciation for the videos has remained. I really want to love this site as its content is wonderful.

How can I describe its contents? I love what they have. The women make the site. However, there is no sex, not even masturbation. The nudity is very tasteful, something like Playboy style. Tease is a key word here. Personally, I would prefer a litle more explicitness, but the site is made so that it leaves some to the imagination.

However, it has some very serious negatives. The worst is that it almost is a zombie site, with only three updates in 2011 and three in 2010. In the past, there were 11 in 2009, 16 in 2008, 20 in 2007 and 22 in 2006.

Further, the video quality is only 640x480. They were watchable, but I hope for better. The photos are also out of todays expectations, coming in at 1024x768.

I get the feeling that the site's owners don't care much about making the site better.

I would definitely recommend the site if you love this type of content. However, I waited three and half years between sign ups and the site is almost the same with about 20 updates. I can't see joining in less than another few years.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lacy Nylons

73. Lacy Nylons (0)

Pay
Active
79
messmer (137) 02-05-12  08:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Models on the average are easy on the eye. Not porn star quality but not ugly either.

Site updates videos once every eight days. Not great but mentioned under the pros because other Ferro Sites are so much worse when it comes to updating.

Picture sets appear to update every two days.

Videos since 2009 (I counted 114) have been shot in HD at 1280x720p in wmv at a total bitrate of 3320kbps. Videos before that are at 640x480p.

Picture sets can be downloaded zipped, with the individual picture weighing in around 1000x1500px.
Cons: Separate sign-ins required for pictures and videos, because the username and password are generated by Ferro and therefore very convoluted, it is an impossibly aggravating extra task to have to sign in twice to every site you receive as a bonus that also contains pictures.

The huge watermarks in the bottom right hand corner as well as in the left top corner I've remarked upon in previous previews of other Ferro sites, are present here, too, and manage greatly to add to the aggravation factor. I almost didn't bother adding this site because while the technical quality of the videos isn't too bad, they are not worth looking at with that intrusive logo staring you in the face all through the video.

Picture sets are small and not very erotic.

Download and streaming are highly erratic. My downloads started at around 1MB/s, gradually reduced to 200K/s, and then see-sawed back and forth between those two values.

No proper search engine, no model directory or bio.
Bottom Line: This is a site I was prepared to love. After all, who, over fifty, does not like to see models dressed in nylons and garter belt?

And you get plenty of that in this site. For once pantyhose was not substituted in someone's mind for stockings and they stick to the old definition when it comes to nylons.

One idiosyncrasy of this site, or maybe two:

Most models start out naked and then get slowly dressed, rather than the other way around, also very few of them wear panties but walk around commando style under their lovely dresses instead.

This anachronism is jarring to an old-timer because nylons and garter belts belong to an era where no woman would have thought to get dressed without panties and slip.

Both picture sets and videos lack imagination, with the models looking stiff and uninvolved. Of course, it doesn't help that the videos are in a foreign language (Russian? Hungarian? Czech?) so you miss out on the context of the video as well.

Let me sum things up in a highly subjective way (in other words don't take every negative thing I have to say as the Gospel truth):

A. I wouldn't bother with the pictures. The quality is too uneven and the sets are too small. Plus the logo, even if it has been reduced to one only, is still too intrusive.

B. I wouldn't bother with the videos because they lack erotic heat as well as the tease factor, and on top of that they are being ruined by watermarks that are meant to protect their copyright but manage instead to aggravate purists like me who like to look at a clean picture with no, or at most, with a discrete logo.

The separate sign-in for the various sites is just plain dumb. Especially if a distinction is being made between pictures and videos requiring authorization by both.

If I judged this site, or any other Ferro site I got during this past month, for myself I wouldn't give any of them more than a 69 because I look and then throw away ... see humongous watermarks.

However because of their relatively good rate of update, plus the basically decent TECHNICAL quality of the videos, plus the fact that one monthly subscription will give you four sites eventually, I will give it a 79. Of the four Ferro sites I reviewed during the past month this site, despite its flaws, is the best.

BTW, the site is softcore with some toy play thrown in. A plus for me (the softcore part), might be a minus for others.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jugg Master

74. Jugg Master (0)

Pay
Active
85
BubbaGump (18) 01-29-12  01:34pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Unique fetish content.
+ Creative photography.
+ Good nostalgic value.
+ Low subscription price.
+ One-month non-reccuring costs the same as ongoing monthly subscription rates.
Cons: - Low resolution images only.
- Primitive site navigation and layout.
- Site does not appear to be growing much.
- Videos are just a novelty.
Bottom Line: I can give all the reasons why you might or might not find this site attractive. However, If you know who hese models are without Googling, my guess is that there is a high probabilty that you would enjoy viewing the models at this site--Maria Moore, Denise Davies, Bunny De La Cruz.

If you don't know these names but have a breast fetish or enjoy viewing images of women with truly oversized and natural breasts, meaty nipples, and saucer-sized areola, this site would also be worth a one-month subscription.

If none of the above is true, you should look elsewhere. That's it in a nuthsell. This is a very simple site oriented towards photography. There are videos, but they are simply small low-resolution clips. The videos serve more as a novelty of sorts and really are not worth commenting on.

The site is entirely sofcore. Most of the photosets are of the slow tease variety. They start with the model fully clothed and proceed to various states of undress, with the emphasis always placed on the breasts. You see a lot of images of huge boobs jutting through bras, dangling in the air, or spilling out of clothing items. Many of the sets were taken in natural lighting, outdoors and in pools.

I did come across some full nudes, but this is the exception, not the norm. This is conservative, old-school erotic photography. It is the opposite of today's in-your-face erotica, although there is a section called juggs-eye view, where there are many images of breasts dangling in front of the camera, as if in your face.

IMO, the photographer does a wonderful job with posing. You can tell that he is into the subject. He is just not going through the motions. The photographer has a talent for bringing out the best features of the models and does a good job with angles. The natural lighting and the lack of intense post-processing adds to the natrual appeal of the models. Many of the churn-it-and-burn photographers in this genre simply have the model strip nude and take straigh-on shots of breasts. Post-processing is overused and images suffer from harsh artifical lighting. The approach is very forumlatic. If you've seen one photo, you've seen them all. The photographer here is always creative and uses various angles to capture and profile the breasts-- from the side. the rear, the front, arms in the air, etc.. These won't be the most professional-looking images in terms of lighting and studio backdrops. However, this is more than made up for with the way that the photographer deals with the models.

You will see many of the mdoels elsewhere at the classic breast sites. The sets themselves are all unique, howeve. I know many of the models well from my years of viewing this genre and have never come across these images. Many of the photo sets contain images of popular Big Breast models in their younger years-- Maria Moore, Denise Davies, etc. If you are a fan of these models, you might think this is worth the cost of admission, simply for their nostalgic value.

Where content starts to drop in quality is in image resolution, and this is my only beef about the galleries. This content represents a very unique and sometimes nostalgic cdollection. The photographer should offer these images at higher resolutions. They appear to max out at around 11100x710 and many of the older sets appear to be old chrome scans of low resolution around 700x400. As this is primnarily a photo site, there should be high-resoltion images available.

The site design and navigation is very primitive and has an amateur look to it. I never had any trouble getting to content I wanted to view but the site should be cleaned up a bit to supply it with a more modern interface.

This site obviously wont be for everyone. Unless you can find a way to place natural-looking, ten-pound each breasts on the frame of a ninety-pound runway model, you are left with finding them on women of the voluptuous and BBW variety. If this turns you off, you will likely not find the content appealing. Also, if you cannnot live without high resolution images, you also will be dissapointed.

It was somehwat difficult to provide a score as this site doesn't claim to be a slick and professional studio and is basicallty the work of a single photographer displaying a photo collection that has been accumulated throughout the years. Please take this into consideration when viewing the score. I ended up rating it based on what it meant to me as someone with a breast feitsh and lover of voluptuous women. I would rate it even higher if the not for the relatively low resolution galleries. As a one-month only quick stop for those with a fetish for oversized breasts, its worth a try, especially given the modest price and the unique content.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jugg Master

75. Jugg Master (0)

Pay
Active
84
Jutti24 (12) 01-26-12  03:56am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of different women - the non-membership page shows a lot of what you will be able to watch in the members-area

Affordable and cheap!

Lots of content.

Easy to download sets or videos using download-managers
Cons: Old image content isn't very high-res. (but new content is OK!)

Old videos aren't in particularly high quality (but new content is OK!)

Site navigation is a little bit "creative" but OK overall. No surprises.
Bottom Line: Very enjoyable considering that the membership fee is in the sub-20 USD range and there is lots of content.
Although keep in mind: there's only softcore, so don't expect more.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-75 of 565 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Wet And Puffy (3)
2. Goddess Nudes (2)
3. The Life Erotic (2)
4. Bryci (2)
5. Erotic Beauty (2)
6. MC Nudes (2)
7. Digital Desire (2)
8. Naked Gym Girls (1)
9. Fame Girls.net (1)
10. Microminimus (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.29 seconds.