Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-- Extremely large amount of photo content.
-- High-quality photos/videos.
-- Outstanding site layout and user interface.
-- Custom features--user-defined zip files, preferences, settings etc.
-- Daily, high-quality updates.
Cons:
-- Could use a little more diversity in ethnicity(latin, afro, etc.)
Bottom Line:
I would classify this site as tastefull and traditional erotic nude photography. There are hardcore photo and video sets but the main emphasis is on erotic/nudes and exposing the model's natural beauty. No extreme stuff here and everything is in good taste.
Most of the models are of the young, early twenty-something variety. Although the majority fit a cerain profile--thin, well-toned etc, you can find a large diversity of model types spread around the very large number of photosets, once you discover the search feature. This is one of those sites that could keep your interest for quite a long time. There is no way you could manage to get through all of the content in a one-month period.
The only thing lacking is a more diverse representation of ethnicities. If it wasn't for this, I would not hesitate to give the site a perfect score.
The site layout and design is about as good as it gets. Serach utilities, custom zip downloads, and a number of other features are available. Everyting seems to be where it should be and you won't get lost in the large amount of content available.
The videos are of high quality and available in HD, but the emphasis is on photography. The quality of the photography ranges from semi-pro to professional, with most belonging to the latter category. The technical quality of the photos themselves ranges from eye-popping, HD quality to so-so, depending on the skill and experience-level of the photographer. There were times I was thinking, 'I would love to see this or that photographer shoot this model.' It is hard to classify this as a negative, however. It is unrealistic to expect every photoset and photographer to meet one's own personal demands regarding tastes and likes.
The number of photographers is also pretty diverse and you get a good range of styles. You can use the search function to display all sets from the photgraphers you like. In fact, there is so much content that, after a while, you can pick out the photographer just based on poses, settings, lighting, etc.. Most of the photographers seem to be into their work and are not just running around with a camera, trying to churn and burn content.
You will come across a few poorly-done photosets(blown-out images, overexposed, poor lighting, etc). But these are usually older sets and are the rare exception, rather than the norm.
The content is mostly unique. Although you will find a number of professional models here that you have seen elsewhere, the majority will likely be completely new to you.
The only people that probably would not like this site are those into extremes, either in model types or images. There is hardcore action, but no action like atm or other in-your-face kind of stuff.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Huge collection of photos going back over a decade.
Most of the girls are very attractive and can not be found on other websites.
For fans of cute girl next door british amateurs, Simon's earlier work is unmatched.
Cons:
In the last several years, the type of girls found on the site has shifted radically. Less cute british amateurs, more Eastern European, or Spanish babe types in glamour photos.
Many of the photos are oversaturated (Too much red).
Bottom Line:
Several years ago Simons Scans was one of my two favorite amateur sites, alongside Abby Winters. Simon used to feature numerous never before seen cute british amateurs photographed beautifully. How the times have changed. Now most of the girls are from other countries and the style of photography is less amateur and more glamour. This may or may not be a positive depending on your tastes. A few years back I posed a question to Simon as to the reason for the declining numbers of british girls on his site and he replied they are getting harder to get. My hunch is they were more expensive and he decided to go where labor is cheaper. Here is my bottom line advice. If you are a fan of cute looking british amateur photos, and have never subscribed to Simons Scans, I would highly recommend the site for the older collection which is very substantial. On the other hand, if you are a former member looking to see some new content of british amateurs, I would not recommend you do so. Even if you have been away for 2-3 years. It's not worth it! For fans of babe type girls in glamour photos, you should find enough content 4-5 years to justify the subscription price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good idea for content. Unique models (AFAIK), good variety, from soft through to semi-hard solo scenes.
Does include "discounted" membership to two sister sites, mature-underwear.com and cupsclub.com, again, sites with a "good idea" for their content.
Cons:
Quality is WAY out of date - videos are small, low quality, and often poorly lit. They are listed as having sizes of small, medium, large, and very large, but "very large" is quite small by today's standards on the main "Mature Erotic" site. On the other two sites it is smaller, and the quality is generally worse.
Navigation is dreadful - models appear in a long list with no names or identifying information, and as videos are posted in parts (and separated by other models) it is put luck as to whether you can get the whole video. Only the main site has a "search" function, and that is only useful after you work out the models name from a video.
Videos all appear in maximized pop ups, and whenever a link is clicked the original page resets to the top, so you lose your place.
From the dates the video files were created (no dates are given on the update page), there is a new segment about every two weeks. Makes it a long time to get a full 4 part movie!
Bottom Line:
Good idea for content, and if the quality of the videos and navigation lived up to the "idea" of the videos, it would be great.
As it is, it is more frustrating than satisfying, and the price is too high for the low quality of content and dreadful navigation. Downloading the videos is harder than it needs to be as well.
So, while I would have really liked to have enjoyed this site and passed it on as a place to go for mature amateurs, overall, it is not worth it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-13-1201:14pm (Update History) Reason: had a chance to download site.
Pros:
HD 720 videos ( average 5-10 minutes in length )
Zipped Photos ( 100 average per set )
Great Search Engine
Nice pretty look to site.
Amazing women most are stunning,
Unique Content !
Cons:
Site says Not Download manager friendly,
Getting to download to many steps.
Navigation is oldschool hard to use.
Inconsistent file format.
No bonus sites.
Bottom Line:
Over View:
I have not done a review in over 4 years on this site, since then some things are better like 720p HD in many of the videos. However the formats are varied and some scenes are MP4 some WMV some DVX, flv etc. But most have cells phone formats. So thats good an bad
I was happy with the amazing women that continue to bless this site. The site has migrated to better quality of shots. The pics are amazing and great quality. But again the sizes vary making inconsistent downloads in video and pics alike!
Good:
The site remains a quality site in that they stage and film very well and the concentration seems to be on this. I signed up with an 18.00 discount price, normally is 29.95 . lots of pornstars and scenes appear unique to this site. I loved the new talent that is only seen here first.
Bad :
Why if they do not allow download manager do they make it so hard to download a file. To many steps for this. Should be easier since they limit the use of other software. Navigation is ok at best and remains a sore spot if you are looking for something use the search, problem is if you have no idea what to look for it will not be fun just to try and surf the site. Many videos are absent quicktime support anymore.
Toads Take :
I joined because of the discount I got, I would not have otherwise done so. The site has not changed to much in 4 years, It was a pain to use back then and is now. However all that said the women and scenes are stunning and there is a good amount of content at a guess 500 plus videos and more sets of photos the site makes it hared to figure out how many they have, which ads to the pain in using it.
But I digress, the women are amazing and nice rocking hard bodies along with natural and implants alike. The age is from about 18- 35 from what I could tell. They use good backgrounds and the only complaint is the music sometime goes on and on way into the masturbation scenes very distracting but seems to be more the exception.
I would say join for the porn and women, but be Leary about the access an be prepared to spend time clicking and clicking and clicking to download.
They do need to get their formats in order and have the same formats for every videos. Nothing like clicking on a video and it was not Mac compatible glad I do not have a Mac as some would not show without proper codecs.
CT
( update 5/13 2012)
After addressing my own concerns with this site I changed 80 to a 78 to fit in the average site areas.
After downloading the entire site at a huge time consumption.
Comparing the entire site :
More then not I found models with no videos, and many old poor \quality videos maybe a 1/3 of the collection old and grainy. No attempt seems to be made to improve anything older however the site does not claim any kind of quality standards. Most photo sets were from good to outstanding.
I have to say there has to be a better way to download.
1. pick a model
2. pick the scene
3. Click the icon
4. save the file.
If the site was faster this would not be as much and issue and the limits set for downloader make users stuck to their pc's. I realize they are trying to save bandwidth, and the site is not all that fast to begin with. I like that the site has original content and smokin hot models. But the site experience was barely ok. If it was not for the photo's being very good I would have rated it lower. I tend to see this site as more a photo site then video. I do have to say the lack of consistency makes video downloading like buying a grab bag and hoping it turns out well. Some Icons for videos were duplicated by some script error as much as 30+ times. And names were often not what the video says. I hate to be so critical but as I said previously I had a much better experience with this site years ago.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Decent amount of content, there's plenty here to keep you busy for a long time.
Clearly amateur-ish. "Amateur" is such a subjective term, but the girls and guys here are clearly not professionals, thought hey are certainly not virgins to porn after their first shoot.
More natural women, less make-up and porn-like qualities.
Cons:
Video quality is relative to whatever they shot it with. I'm not sure they aren't using Super * in some cases, the quality is that bad.
Amateur porn, you get what you expect, amateur quality.
Selection of content is all pretty much the same. Apparently Aussies aren't into exciting or passionate sex. The lesbian sex here is really just masturbation with a little kissing. Tame by reality standards.
Bottom Line:
This site wants to e Abby Winters so badly they think they can just coast off that business model. Unfortunately they fail in this regard, and realistically, if their is any real talent they tend to wind up at Abby Winters anyway. Not that these are the only two Aussie sites, but they do seem to be closely linked in terms of style, content, and even models.
You're better off spending the extra money at Abby Winters. You will get about the same amount in terms of diversity, maybe a little less m/f than GOW, but the quality of GOW m/f hardcore, if you can call it that, was so lame you're better off without it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I love checking out sites, where you get amateur models showing what they have in front of the cam. And at Amateur Model, I exactly get that. They have some of the best gals on their lineup. And it has been a pleasure with the time that I have spent there. More often than not, they have new videos lined up to be viewed. Again, I love the way these photoshoots are done. It makes you drip the last thing left in your body out.
Cons:
If there is any con in the site, it may be that the video quality can be better and you can get better process to know about the updates of new videos, or models to watchout for.
Bottom Line:
Being a member in a few of these amateur video sites, I find amateur models to be right up there with the best.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I have been in this website for more than a month and have found the videos to be of high quality. The models are quite hot and their moves will get you hard in no time. Amazing amateur video collections, which will never let you bore for a single second.
Cons:
It would have been great, if there was a scope of more videos there. Even a better way of knowing the arrival of new videos, as they were uploaded on the site, would have been great.
Bottom Line:
A thumbs up for the collection that they have, hoping to get more in the future.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Relatively large network of sites 24 sites, 801 models on the network, and over 1000 total sets on this site alone.
-Many attractive, euro ladies
-Price is not bad if you join the network through this site, not sure why it is more expensive via other entry points
-Good download speeds, maxed my connection at 2MB/s
-Decent variety, hardcore, some midcore, anal, and a bit of lesbian
-Download managers work (DTA), no DRM, logins don't appear to timeout very fast if at all
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Video quality is mediocre-to-good depending on age of the scene, worst I saw was a pretty old Zuzana Z scene that was 384x288 1400 kbps wmv, best 1920x1088 8000 kbps wmv
-Billed through Epoch for me
Cons:
-At least partially not exclusive, seen some of these scenes at other euro sites
-Browsing is pretty bland, there are some site glitches
-Set ratings are provided, but participation isn't high. For some reason when I rated a set or listed it as a favorite, I got logged out, so I stopped doing it
-Older videos have substandard video quality
-Update schedule is inconsistent across the network, and it seems like they may be recycling content
-Photo quality is substandard for most sets I looked at, 1200 pix long end was typical
-Only one video size available for download, on newer HQ scenes file sizes can get quite large, and I would have liked a 720 option that was smaller.
Bottom Line:
Overall, I think this is a decent site, it could definitely use some improvements, but may be worth looking into if you are into mostly younger euro ladies. I would like to note that this review is for the entire network, not just this site (as it is dead, I would probably give this site along a 70), and I am just posting it here since it is the cheapest entry point into the network at this time, and there is no "main site" that I am aware of.
The network itself has a decent variety of material, including old/young, lesbian, group, anal, and even some pegging (I think, I didn't look to close). Most of them are pretty straightforward euro-style gonzo porn, some sites have a bit of setup (like a teacher talking to a student in Tricky Old Teacher, or a dude breaking into an apartment in Horny Thief).
I think it is worth considering if you haven't been here before, although the update schedule would prevent most from hanging around past a month, and the non-exclusivity would likely prevent many from joining again. I enjoyed many of the scenes, like a Pinky June one who is my new favorite no I suppose, and will be adding them to my favorites, although I wouldn't be surprised if I run across them elsewhere further down the line.
If they improved video quality on the older sets, updated their photo quality, and improved navigation and user interaction, it could be a very good site (though not great).
Network Statistics: I Fucked Her Finally - 78 combined photo/video sets (156 total)
18 Virgin - 223 combined sets Amour Babes - 1000 total sets Creampied Sweeties - 68 combined sets
Dirty A2M - 20 combined sets
Horny Thief - 44 combined sets Spoiled Virgins - 211 combined sets
Tricky Old - 128 combined sets
Most of the other sites were 20-30 sets of primarily non-exclusive content so I didn't look at them too closely.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nice Models.
Well lit sets
More videos posted: Some will see this as a plus, so I listed it as one.
Regular updates. Once every couple of days or so.
Site now features more glamourwear, again some will see this as a plus.....
Content has shifted with a new photographer to midcore with the dildos. ( Again I posted this as a plus, despite the fact I regard this as a minus) .
Cons:
Partial strips are now the order of the day.
A real yawn type of mainstream for me.
More videos posted: Not what you want to see at a photography site, really.
Site now features more glamourwear...A minus for me.
Content has shifted with a new photographer to midcore with the dildos, certainly not softcore anymore!!
Bottom Line:
In many ways I wish I had posted a review when the site was at its peak for me. I regret now that I didn't. I never guessed the site would end up going this way. I am deeply disappointed that this has happened, because I always liked the content previously, now it has gone bland identityless mainstream. A great shame.
Whilst my image of this site is now shattered, I don't doubt that it may appeal to a more mainstream audience, so don't take my disillusionment with it as anything other than a personal disappointment. Many may like the way it has turned.
I certainly do not.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Multiple video download options
- Huge site with diverse models
- Good mix of softcore and hardcore
- Mix of porn stars and ‘lesser knowns’
- Photos of all Monthly Pets back to 1973
- 3700+ photo galleries
- 2200+ video scenes
- Full length movies available (340+)
- Access to Penthouse Forum and Variations
- Some videos are available in 3D
Cons:
- Download speeds can vary and sometimes can be a bit slower than average
- Links time out after 10 minutes or so
- Video scenes stream automatically on opening page
- Picture galleries tend to be small (less than 50 photos is common)
- Some pictures appear to be airbrushed
- Even on HD many of the videos don’t look great
Bottom Line:
I find that if I join a studio site I’m best served if I go in with low expectations. That way I’m not too disappointed when the site barely meets what I expected. But I have to admit that I was pleasantly surprised at how good a site Penthouse is. This is a very well done adult site.
Penthouse likely needs no introduction to anyone reading this review. The magazine was my introduction to adult stuff back in 1980. The site is much more than the magazine though because the Penthouse empire has grown to include softcore and hardcore videos. The site gives access to a huge amount of PH material and all of it is very good quality.
There is a search function but I didn’t use it much since the site is so well organized. There are links to sort material by porn stars (which gives you access to all the photos and videos with those models) and Pets (which again is an easy way to access photos and videos). If you’re looking for specific themes in videos the video scenes are tagged with the most common themes. Finding them is as easy as using the pull-down menu.
PH does a disservice to itself by not allowing prospective members the opportunity to get a good idea of what the site has to offer. I can’t see what harm it can do to any site to allow non-members the ability to see what’s on offer. (It was mentioned here on an earlier comment and it still happens: when you go to join the offer is for a free membership. It’s only when you click through the non-existent free membership that you have to enter payment information. Most porn buyers are sophisticated to know that they have to pay to get access to a site like this so why hide behind a trick that fell out of favour years ago?)
Most models have pictures and videos available. PH has certainly become more hardcore in the past decade, but there is a good amount of soft stuff too. Video downloads are available in a wide array of formats and sizes. MP4 HD, WMV HD, MP4, MPEG, Mobile and WMV SD are all offered on most scenes. I downloaded WMV HD and SD. HD came in at 1280x720 8000+ kb/s 24fps. SD is 768x432 3200+ kb/s 24fps. Both use WMV Codec 8. Subjectively, the videos don’t look that great even though the numbers would suggest otherwise.
Huge pet peeve of mine with this site (which is becoming more common too) is that when you open a link to a scene the scene starts to stream immediately. If you have your speakers on this can be a problem, but what I dislike about it is that it hogs bandwidth for something that I don’t want. To make matters worse with PH is that the scene continues to download even after you pause it. I open scenes I want in new tabs and wondered why my download speeds were so slow until I realized that most of my bandwidth was being sucked up loading streams for scenes that I was going to download. Webmasters: please stop doing this!!!
Apart from offering scenes with various porn stars and Pets, PH also offers about 340 full length DVDs. These are mostly PH-produced with a lot of Jill Kelly Productions thrown in the mix too. The problem with the full length videos is that they are full length. They are broken up into approximately 3-minute clips but those clips don’t necessarily begin and end with the one scene you want to see. With many of the titles added 5+ years ago there are no star names associated with them but many of the titles are listed on IAFD so you can get that information.
Photos are available in multiple resolutions, listed as being small, medium, large, extra large and extra extra large (no actual resolution sizes were listed). I downloaded the extra extra large and they came in at 2667x4000. Subjectively they look great. One beef I had with the zipped sets is that many (likely most) that I downloaded were buried six folders deep before you got to the pics.
I’m not a big photo collector but I always take the opportunity to get photos of favourite models. It was going through some of these photos that I realized that some of them have been airbrushed. I noticed this when I was looking at a high res photo of Faye Reagan and realized that they airbrushed out her anus. I know she doesn’t do anal, but I’m pretty sure she has an anus. Websites: please don’t doctor the photos!
The absolute bottom line? I really liked this site. PH is synonymous with stunning women and great photographers and the site carries on that tradition. PH has branched out into hardcore to follow the money, but there is a lot here for most people to like. There are models of different ages and body types and there’s hardcore, softcore and solo. And given the amount of older PH photos there’s also lots of hair for guys who remember those days. I’d definitely recommend giving PH a try.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Attractive ladies
-Decent photo quality
-Good video quality (technically speaking 3Mbit wmv is largest size available)
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Download managers work
-Good download speeds (maxed my 20 Mbit connection) with DL manager
-Okay sized site, 114 models on "Studios" site, maybe 3 photosets and 1 video on average per model
-6 sites, although only one appears active - Studios, and I am not sure how active it is
-Camerwork in photos is pretty good for the most part
-Navigation is okay, pretty straightforward. No search function but there is a model index
Cons:
-Photosets are small in quantity
-Camerwork in videos is pretty bad
-The guy is just annoying in the video, hey just sounds like a slimeball, and will not shut up.
-Videos are generally pretty boring, behind the scenes type stuff often. Not very erotic in my opinion - regardless of what Playboy says.
-Videos are short
-No real bonus content
-Update schedule is unknown, but I don't think it is frequent, nothing looks new since I was here two weeks ago
Bottom Line:
I think this site is an okay softcore-midcore site (toys and some lesbian), and it definitely has some attractive ladies. Although, I think it has far too many detractions to be worth recommending. There are plenty of other sites that offer more content and better quality.
If you are a video person, this place is certainly not for you. The videos are frequently poorly shot, some are interviews or behind the scenes, and the large majority that I downloaded featured some slimeball (I assume Ron Harris) making stupid comments for pretty much the entire video. There is one with Kara Duhe that is just generally uncomfortable, it reminded me of some dirty old uncle gawking at a young lady (not that there is anything wrong with being a dirty old uncle, I just don't need to hear it in my porn).
While the camerawork in the still photography may be good, the camerawork in the videos is the exact opposite (humorous since they have a link for lessons at the bottom of the page, perhaps he should sign up himself?) So if you are a fan of particular ladies you see in the preview and like short photosets, this might be okay for you, otherwise I'd look elsewhere.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Beautiful African models. Some are thin, but most are amazingly voluptuous with beautiful faces and extra large breasts. Nothing fake or artificial here.
-Amateurs. All the models appear only on this site.
-The videos are nearly all stripping from either lingerie or ethnic African outfits. Very exotic.
-No DRM
-Works with download managers
-No interviews. The models don't even speak. The videographer is never in the video nor do you hear them.
-The models look directly at you and don't ever look bored, jaded or mechanical.
Cons:
-Billing is through an unusual biller and no billing choices are available.
-Your password is sent to you at your email address. This concept worked, but every time you log in, you must reenter the password.
-The photos are small at 1024x768.
-No zipdownload option.
-The picture sets are small. Most are less than 50 photos, some as few as 10.
-The videos download, but with only one option. They are in WMV 640x480, but reasonably sharp considering they are not HD.
-Barely updating. See below.
Bottom Line:
This site is of softcore photos and stripping videos of natural African women. The focus is on some of the most beautiful women on the planet.
I was last a member in August of 2008. In the nearly three and a half years that have passed, I have found my appreciation for the videos has remained. I really want to love this site as its content is wonderful.
How can I describe its contents? I love what they have. The women make the site. However, there is no sex, not even masturbation. The nudity is very tasteful, something like Playboy style. Tease is a key word here. Personally, I would prefer a litle more explicitness, but the site is made so that it leaves some to the imagination.
However, it has some very serious negatives. The worst is that it almost is a zombie site, with only three updates in 2011 and three in 2010. In the past, there were 11 in 2009, 16 in 2008, 20 in 2007 and 22 in 2006.
Further, the video quality is only 640x480. They were watchable, but I hope for better. The photos are also out of todays expectations, coming in at 1024x768.
I get the feeling that the site's owners don't care much about making the site better.
I would definitely recommend the site if you love this type of content. However, I waited three and half years between sign ups and the site is almost the same with about 20 updates. I can't see joining in less than another few years.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Models on the average are easy on the eye. Not porn star quality but not ugly either.
Site updates videos once every eight days. Not great but mentioned under the pros because other Ferro Sites are so much worse when it comes to updating.
Picture sets appear to update every two days.
Videos since 2009 (I counted 114) have been shot in HD at 1280x720p in wmv at a total bitrate of 3320kbps. Videos before that are at 640x480p.
Picture sets can be downloaded zipped, with the individual picture weighing in around 1000x1500px.
Cons:
Separate sign-ins required for pictures and videos, because the username and password are generated by Ferro and therefore very convoluted, it is an impossibly aggravating extra task to have to sign in twice to every site you receive as a bonus that also contains pictures.
The huge watermarks in the bottom right hand corner as well as in the left top corner I've remarked upon in previous previews of other Ferro sites, are present here, too, and manage greatly to add to the aggravation factor. I almost didn't bother adding this site because while the technical quality of the videos isn't too bad, they are not worth looking at with that intrusive logo staring you in the face all through the video.
Picture sets are small and not very erotic.
Download and streaming are highly erratic. My downloads started at around 1MB/s, gradually reduced to 200K/s, and then see-sawed back and forth between those two values.
No proper search engine, no model directory or bio.
Bottom Line:
This is a site I was prepared to love. After all, who, over fifty, does not like to see models dressed in nylons and garter belt?
And you get plenty of that in this site. For once pantyhose was not substituted in someone's mind for stockings and they stick to the old definition when it comes to nylons.
One idiosyncrasy of this site, or maybe two:
Most models start out naked and then get slowly dressed, rather than the other way around, also very few of them wear panties but walk around commando style under their lovely dresses instead.
This anachronism is jarring to an old-timer because nylons and garter belts belong to an era where no woman would have thought to get dressed without panties and slip.
Both picture sets and videos lack imagination, with the models looking stiff and uninvolved. Of course, it doesn't help that the videos are in a foreign language (Russian? Hungarian? Czech?) so you miss out on the context of the video as well.
Let me sum things up in a highly subjective way (in other words don't take every negative thing I have to say as the Gospel truth):
A. I wouldn't bother with the pictures. The quality is too uneven and the sets are too small. Plus the logo, even if it has been reduced to one only, is still too intrusive.
B. I wouldn't bother with the videos because they lack erotic heat as well as the tease factor, and on top of that they are being ruined by watermarks that are meant to protect their copyright but manage instead to aggravate purists like me who like to look at a clean picture with no, or at most, with a discrete logo.
The separate sign-in for the various sites is just plain dumb. Especially if a distinction is being made between pictures and videos requiring authorization by both.
If I judged this site, or any other Ferro site I got during this past month, for myself I wouldn't give any of them more than a 69 because I look and then throw away ... see humongous watermarks.
However because of their relatively good rate of update, plus the basically decent TECHNICAL quality of the videos, plus the fact that one monthly subscription will give you four sites eventually, I will give it a 79. Of the four Ferro sites I reviewed during the past month this site, despite its flaws, is the best.
BTW, the site is softcore with some toy play thrown in. A plus for me (the softcore part), might be a minus for others.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Unique fetish content.
+ Creative photography.
+ Good nostalgic value.
+ Low subscription price.
+ One-month non-reccuring costs the same as ongoing monthly subscription rates.
Cons:
- Low resolution images only.
- Primitive site navigation and layout.
- Site does not appear to be growing much.
- Videos are just a novelty.
Bottom Line:
I can give all the reasons why you might or might not find this site attractive. However, If you know who hese models are without Googling, my guess is that there is a high probabilty that you would enjoy viewing the models at this site--Maria Moore, Denise Davies, Bunny De La Cruz.
If you don't know these names but have a breast fetish or enjoy viewing images of women with truly oversized and natural breasts, meaty nipples, and saucer-sized areola, this site would also be worth a one-month subscription.
If none of the above is true, you should look elsewhere. That's it in a nuthsell. This is a very simple site oriented towards photography. There are videos, but they are simply small low-resolution clips. The videos serve more as a novelty of sorts and really are not worth commenting on.
The site is entirely sofcore. Most of the photosets are of the slow tease variety. They start with the model fully clothed and proceed to various states of undress, with the emphasis always placed on the breasts. You see a lot of images of huge boobs jutting through bras, dangling in the air, or spilling out of clothing items. Many of the sets were taken in natural lighting, outdoors and in pools.
I did come across some full nudes, but this is the exception, not the norm. This is conservative, old-school erotic photography. It is the opposite of today's in-your-face erotica, although there is a section called juggs-eye view, where there are many images of breasts dangling in front of the camera, as if in your face.
IMO, the photographer does a wonderful job with posing. You can tell that he is into the subject. He is just not going through the motions. The photographer has a talent for bringing out the best features of the models and does a good job with angles. The natural lighting and the lack of intense post-processing adds to the natrual appeal of the models. Many of the churn-it-and-burn photographers in this genre simply have the model strip nude and take straigh-on shots of breasts. Post-processing is overused and images suffer from harsh artifical lighting. The approach is very forumlatic. If you've seen one photo, you've seen them all. The photographer here is always creative and uses various angles to capture and profile the breasts-- from the side. the rear, the front, arms in the air, etc.. These won't be the most professional-looking images in terms of lighting and studio backdrops. However, this is more than made up for with the way that the photographer deals with the models.
You will see many of the mdoels elsewhere at the classic breast sites. The sets themselves are all unique, howeve. I know many of the models well from my years of viewing this genre and have never come across these images. Many of the photo sets contain images of popular Big Breast models in their younger years-- Maria Moore, Denise Davies, etc. If you are a fan of these models, you might think this is worth the cost of admission, simply for their nostalgic value.
Where content starts to drop in quality is in image resolution, and this is my only beef about the galleries. This content represents a very unique and sometimes nostalgic cdollection. The photographer should offer these images at higher resolutions. They appear to max out at around 11100x710 and many of the older sets appear to be old chrome scans of low resolution around 700x400. As this is primnarily a photo site, there should be high-resoltion images available.
The site design and navigation is very primitive and has an amateur look to it. I never had any trouble getting to content I wanted to view but the site should be cleaned up a bit to supply it with a more modern interface.
This site obviously wont be for everyone. Unless you can find a way to place natural-looking, ten-pound each breasts on the frame of a ninety-pound runway model, you are left with finding them on women of the voluptuous and BBW variety. If this turns you off, you will likely not find the content appealing. Also, if you cannnot live without high resolution images, you also will be dissapointed.
It was somehwat difficult to provide a score as this site doesn't claim to be a slick and professional studio and is basicallty the work of a single photographer displaying a photo collection that has been accumulated throughout the years. Please take this into consideration when viewing the score. I ended up rating it based on what it meant to me as someone with a breast feitsh and lover of voluptuous women. I would rate it even higher if the not for the relatively low resolution galleries. As a one-month only quick stop for those with a fetish for oversized breasts, its worth a try, especially given the modest price and the unique content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of different women - the non-membership page shows a lot of what you will be able to watch in the members-area
Affordable and cheap!
Lots of content.
Easy to download sets or videos using download-managers
Cons:
Old image content isn't very high-res. (but new content is OK!)
Old videos aren't in particularly high quality (but new content is OK!)
Site navigation is a little bit "creative" but OK overall. No surprises.
Bottom Line:
Very enjoyable considering that the membership fee is in the sub-20 USD range and there is lots of content.
Although keep in mind: there's only softcore, so don't expect more.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Unique as well as exclusive amateur stuffs. They have some of the amateur girls, whom you are not just going to find anywhere else. They are doing everything from masturbation to complete hardcore.
Regular updates in their websites: They keep updating their stuff, which is what I personally loved about them.
Excellent quality: I know some have complained about the video quality being average. However, I feel their video quality is top notch to say the least. And the interactive nature of some of their videos are simply amazing.
And I love their models, especially Ally. She knows how to turn the viewer on in a very short time
In my time with them, I even loved their communication about the updates in the site.. Don find much of that elsewhere
Cons:
The only issue, which I find at the site is that the navigation option can be further improved. Yes, finding a random video is fine, but the ones with the naughtier shoots are what I would love to find at a single click ;)
Bottom Line:
Its a site to be, if you want something new almost all the time and that too from fresh faces :) ....
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Over 500 amateur models featured.
They do mean amateur too. There is everything here from petite boyish to BBW, barely legal to mature, stunningly pretty, through 'next door' to downright scary!
+ Models seem to enjoy themselves. Always a plus to me.
The Webmaster seems to be directly involved in the shooting & whilst encouraging going to full body nudity, does not press the models to do anything they are not comfortable with.
The flip side of this is that he doesn't stop them if they are enjoying themselves. ;)
+ The models are treated with respect
+ Full strips to nude appears to be the norm, sometimes a variety of outfits are featured(..briefly).
+ Zips available
+ HD Video available.
Not being a video guy I really can't give a view on this other than they look OK to me.
+ Site is nicely presented & functional, especially so given this is not a big budget operation.
+ Friendly & communicative Webmaster, who also does the photography.
+ Comprehensive FAQ page
Cons:
-Some info. seems fragmented & conflicts. At writing, the header on the Amateur page says 44985 pics/651 videos/402 Amateurs. Very out of date. Same page lower down 581 Sessions 76337 Images 2237 Videos. No mention of the currently 517 models.
-Sets seem rushed, there are very few fully clothed shots, often even the fleeting one or two often are not full body shots. It would be nice to to have ten or a dozen or so fully clothed shots before the stripping just to assess & build up anticipation.
-When the model has come with a variety of outfits, there is very little material featured of each. That rushed feeling again.
-Not a lot of material of each model available. A few return for another shoot, but not many. The studio location is something to do with that. Thumbnails crop the full image. Sometimes a vert. format thumbnail hides a hor. format shot.
-Only 1 pic res. available typ.1200x800
-Zip files need renaming, they come with a sequential number only.
-Barely any model bio
Bottom Line:
Well, owing to a neat trial deal I took the plunge & thought I would share my findings.
Updates are 2 - 3 a week.
Split between photoset & video is roughly 50/50
Possibly because of the specific naming & targetting of this site it had slipped under my radar. Whilst the material is almost exclusively softcore, it features quite a bit more than the just topless material the site naming implies.
I am pleased I tried it, because it is pretty much on topic for my FC2N fetish! ;)
( Fully clothed to nude...An acronym coined by my friend Auxilia )
For me, the style needs to be expanded. Specifically, the rushed feeling needs to be addressed.
The Webmaster is aware of it and has lengthened the shoots from 1 hour to 3 IIRC
I do feel, the uploaded sets still need editing more benignly though, as I mentioned above.
As it stands there are only a few shots in each set which hit the spot for me.
They are there, in ones & twos but I just need a lot more of that style in each set.
If you are looking for anything other than solo softcore then really this site is not for you.
If however, you like me, like seeing geniune amateurs strip naked....it is certainly worth a punt.
I should also mention that some of the models featured are in advanced stages of pregnancy, in some cases I quite like that, but know others don't.
It is so near.
Another nearly, but not quite for me.
In case you didn't realise, both the pros & cons would have been longer but in both cases I ran out of space! :0(
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice attractive free tour.
-Price for exclusive material.
-Zip files
-Available prints
-CC Billing
-Member only discounts
-Helpful and interesting links
-Very beautiful models
Cons:
-Site lay out !
-1.5 Gb down load limit a day. Ya you read that right.
-Model posture becomes redundant.
-Tags are a bit to open or vague.
-Very small sets.
-Majority of sets displayed 15 pics at once.
-Broken or missing sets.
-Lack of and quality of videos.
Bottom Line:
Morey is a discount site with a few perks but i feel it doesn’t stand up taller against most sites in the same price range and style.
The free tour has 99 samples of the site's models which is more then enough of a nice taste of what it has to offer. It's a well laid out and tempting set up but my first log in into the member area brought me to a boring, drab all around 'blah' lay out. It's lay out really kills the erotica feel through it's set up and colour scheme. Most sites have a sophisticated feel or clean and classy yet with a hint of sleeze, or even a full blown out filthy vibe but This site doesn’t fall in any of those of categories.
The photographer has a side blog in the members area page covering the models he shoots with a few details, which is nice if you are into that sort of thing. The other side of the page is designated to all the models and tags for sets. The middle has the updates and when a model is selected her sets will be presented there also.
There are some helpful and interesting links on the main page like a website break down, site info, offers and even a suggested program to use for unzipping zip files. The tags option are your basic and typically most used but some like "Just perfect", "All nude" and "Famous" don’t really do anything for a pinpoint search.
Morey's Models are Beautiful. When i mentioned very beautiful models in the pros it may sound a bit Over done in a review, but to me the models are a good 75 percent of why i join a site in the first place. I find i can only appreciate Erotica so much until i need that extra "and she is really hot" feeling. The models of Morey are fairly diverse, from hair style to race it has a nice selection. It has quite a bit of Asian material next to a lot of European Women, Which is never a complaint for me. It features your mainly all around themed erotica but also has a bit of bondage and fetish themed sets as well.
The Site offers Zip Files although there is a 1.5 GB download cap per day, i find this horrendous. Also if you download more then 1.5 GB per day you could get blocked and therefore would need to contact the webmaster and get your account reset. I can understand the concept of download caps being in favor for the webmasters but 1.5 GB a day ? That Isn't Very much. On a side note, my rebellious nature (haha) lead me to download a lot more then 1.5 in a single day and my account did not lock on me.
Another disappointment is some sets are very small, they need more content. This is quite opposite from the sites that use filler pics in sets that make them way to large. Some sets are presented in a collection, usually in which is 100% focused on the artistic side of things... this meaning there might just so happen to be a naked woman in it. The selection of set locations Isn't bad at all. Indoor or “studio” Is more predominant then outdoor but both locations always seem to lack atmosphere in most sets. The sets more then often really portray themselves like a photo shoot rather then something erotic, sexy or even exciting. The site features a few Videos, but are below average quality and are obviously not very focused on since it's more of a picture site.
After getting through most of the site's material you will find that the model's sets and their pose gets a bit redundant and boring even in the hot explicit sets. Morey also suffers from a few glitches such as the guest model section. This section is more then broken. 6 galleries broken and the 7th one is missing entirely. Within the navigation, the site will take you away to a separate page once a particular set is clicked on. I'm not a very big fan of this and the majority of the sets are displayed at only 15 pictures at a time.
The photography in itself is alright, This is all opinion based of course and Morey who has a solid reputation out there and is known for his black and whites still doesn’t catch on to be one of my favorites or even talked bout. The photo sets can be chosen in "gallery" which is all over the place in size, small (800mp) or large(1200mp) and if zipped they become much larger ( 2000 + mp). I find downloaded pics to some times lack a bit in quality and not come off as very sharp but over all they are very nice and satisfactory.
Morey's prints and works are available from the photographer and also boast a discount if you are a member which is great. I really do like that aspect of the site, When a photographer exhibits more material that is limited and exclusive then what is just on the site. I can only wish my favorite photographer would start to do the same !
Bottom Line is: If this site cleaned up it's terrible unpleasing navigation and also portrayed it's self more like a erotica site and not as some ones personal portfolio, i think it would be doing a lot better. Especially with the price perks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mostly good quality videos
Fairly well polished site
Good variety, nice mix of girl/girl and boy girl
Girl/girl stuff is genuine! Have joined some sites where its faked - it's all good on Girls out west
Cons:
The major problem is that most of the girls are either fat or unnatractive. This is a major issue for me. Most other sites have stunning girls, there's no excuse for all these fat women.
Some of the videos are in several parts
Bottom Line:
A good quality site, with good quality videos. However, there are only a few videos that really did anything for me, due to a lot of the videos containing unnatractive or fat girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Billing by CCBill
260+ models
Daily updates since 6th December 2011 usually 6 photo sets and 1 video per week, prior to December was updating 4 times per week
Currently 423 photo sets and 114 movies online
Photos offered in 3 sizes, 1024px, 2048px and the largest size varies quite widely from around 3000 to 5000+ pixels on the long side.
Zip downloads offered in each size.
Several video options including HD 1080p MP4s, WMV, AVI, mobile downloads and Flash Streaming
Model info provided
Cons:
Lots of non exclusive content
Those looking for anything other than softcore solo content will find little of interest here apart from a handful of lesbian photo sets/videos
Some older vids don’t look HD quality
Most videos contain music backing track
No file sizes listed for zips or video options
No scene description or preview for videos, all you get is 1 thumbnail picture to decide if you want to download a scene.
Some small photo sets, only 30-40 photos
A lot of models only have 1 or 2 updates
Bottom Line:
As a current member of Met Art I was able to add a membership here for less than $12 so couldn’t resist the chance to see what’s on offer here for that kind of price. The Life Erotic claims to be a nude art site with an erotic explicit edge to it. The archive here goes back to May 2009 so there’s a little over two and a half years worth of content already online.
The models here tend to be a little older than the nubile teens you will find at Met or MPL, most here according to the ages given in their model info tend to be early to mid 20s. You’ll find quite a few established models who have been around for years such as Ariel, Eve Angel, Nella, Lucky and Peaches to name a few.
The navigation is fairly basic with the usual options to browse by updates, images, movies or via an A to Z model index. No other categories or options to search the models by age, location or breast size etc as far as I could see.
My primary interest in any site is always the photo collection and I must admit as I browsed through the collection here I was struggling to see the erotic and explicit side that they promised in much of it. Admittedly they do have a few sets that contain some pussy play, toy use and even a couple of fetish wear and light bondage theme sets but 90% of the photo sets I would say are not much different to the kind of content you would find at Met Art or MPL Studios. Take today’s update of Nika N, 120 photos and not even a decent spread shot, Thursday’s update of Kira, 55 photos standing against a rock face, barely a glimpse of her pussy. Where is the erotic or explicit in that?
Many of the videos however do contain a little more erotic action with many of them featuring some masturbation and toy use. The wmv files I downloaded came in at 1280 x 720 @ 4128 kbps and mostly looked pretty sharp. Average run time of videos is usually between 5 and 10 minutes and overall they look professionally shot with decent lighting and camera work. All the videos I’ve watched so far have a musical backing track to them.
The most disappointing aspect for me was the amount of non exclusive content I recognised from other sites. Anyone who has had a membership to the old Eve Angel solo site will instantly recognise some of her content here as Exotics4me mentioned in a recent comment. There’s also stuff here I’ve previously downloaded from Teen Dreams, Viv Thomas, even some old licensed content seen on Eurobabez that must be nearly 10 years old and my initial excitement on discovering the model named Elise here is actually Young Legal Porn’s Gloria soon turned to disappointment when I realised her sets here are the same ones I already downloaded from YLP. There’s also a lot of content here carrying the Walter Bosque copyright mark and although I’ve never had a membership at Walter Bosque Art a quick browse of the tour there would indicate that there seems to be some duplication of sets between the two sites.
Overall some nice content and can’t really complain too much for the $12 it cost but 79 is the best score I can give for a site padded out with so much non exclusive content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Good amount of content.
* High quality pictures and HD videos.
* The prettier girls have their own network website.
* No download limits.
* Some girls from BustyPass, like Abi Louise, are on here too.
Cons:
* Girls are not very pretty.
* Many girls have nasty stretch marks.
* Boring picture and video sets.
* Most girls do not show bush. Softcore website.
Bottom Line:
Boring! This is one of those web sites where the photographer refuses to go outside lol! All girls are pretty much shot in the same damn room or the same damn shower in the same damn house at the same damn time of day using the same damn reused clothing. You will fall asleep watching these videos as there is nothing to keep your interest unless you like staring at big boobs with stretch marks. There is no originality here, no creativity, just some guy using his bedroom with a limited amount of female clothes in his closet, shooting pics and videos of some average looking girls.
My recommendation is if you like this kind of stuff is to get it for only a month and download it all and then cancel. Entire network site content can be downloaded within a couple of days.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Official site of UK glamour model Melissa Debling.
- 5’3”, blonde, curvy, big boobs, no tattoo.
- 50+ photo sets. Average 100 photos per set.
- 1200x800 (75%), 1600x1050 (25%). 75% are portrait.
- Solo teasing in casual clothes. Up to topless.
- 60+ videos. 60% photo-shoot BTS, 40% camera teasing.
- Flash format, 720x400. Avg 5 Mbps video rate, 5 minutes long.
- Lots of closeups on boobs and ass in videos.
- One new photo gallery and one new video per week.
- A little bit of interaction: forum, short blog entries.
- Free tour makes me think it’s still updating.
- Free tour claims you may now also access other solo sites.
- Shop offers prints, posters and other merchandising.
- Billed by epoch. No regional pricing.
Cons:
- Model has recently been tweeting against joining this site.
- Most likely they won’t be updating/online for much longer.
- No metadata on photo galleries, videos (no release date, etc).
- Galleries compressed in RAR format instead of ZIP.
- RARs become available some days after gallery release.
- Slow motion segments, unrelated new-age music on every video.
- Videos are streaming only. No downloads available.
- No link between same scene’s photos, tease video and BTS.
- No webcam chats despite free tour lists the feature.
- No way to privately message the model.
Bottom Line:
This is or, more precisely, was the official site of UK glamour model Melissa Debling. Melissa Debling is blonde, petite, curvy and has a phenomenal rack and no tattoos. She has appeared in UK men’s Magazines like Nuts and Zoo, on the page 3 of tabloids and also on UK glamour websites like Only All Sites. I was reluctant to join this site after my experience with Official Lindsey Strutt from the same company but her looks made me take the plunge.
The type of content is very similar to that on Official Lindsey Strutt: very tame posing up to topless in casual clothes (almost no pantyhose, thank God). Videos are somewhat better here even though a bit repetitive. You get almost every video twice: as BTS of the photo shoot and as a tease segment. The only difference between the two is that in the tease segment the model looks at the camera while in the BTS she looks at the photographer. Melissa Debling seemed slightly more involved with the site, periodically replying to forum messages and posting short blog entries regularly but I’m pretty sure that has stopped.
It’s unclear whether this site will stay much longer online. Melissa Debling has for some time been warning on Tweeter not to join this site anymore. Even though, I see the site is now offering 3 and 6 month memberships. Free tour shows photo sets that have been released since my membership expired, but it seems unlikely they have enough new material to fill the next 6 months if the model is no longer shooting with them. You do get access to other sites from the company, which I didn’t get when I was a member.
I honestly don’t know what’s wrong with this company that keeps closing its sites after just a few months life. I was a member of a site from this company that closed without any explanation shortly after I knew about it as a new listing on TBP. Several sites from them are no longer accepting memberships or are plain and simply deleted after a very short time online.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-10-1204:12am (Update History) Reason: Comprehensive rewrite as am a current member
Pros:
- Good balance of photos and videos, all of which is downloadable
- Patty is a very pretty, young-looking blonde non-nude tease
- Gets very close to nude while leaving something to the imagination
- Website takes full advantage of her eternal youthful looks
- Features forum and blog, both of which are active
Cons:
- Website seems stuck in the 90s in many respects
- Most videos are short and poor quality
- Photo galleries are tiny, normally with only 30-40 pictures
- Slow update schedule compared even to other sole tease sites
- Some content is 'limited time' so won't appear in archive
- Best content is saved for overly expensive downloadable ZIPs
Bottom Line:
I must admit I have a soft-spot for Patty, but this a hugely disappointing website offering content that might have been acceptable 10 years ago, but is definitely a long way behind what I'd expect in 2012, even bearing in mind this is a solo website.
Membership costs $29 via CCBill. Do not get fooled by the offer of discounts for long-term members - you save only $2 for every six months you remain a member (maximum two discounts).
Frankly, the content and number of updates don't warrant a six-month membership, and if you do want to remain a member for several months, then you can save $22 by buying their 90-day membership.
Their preview area is probably a fairly accurate representation of their member's site. Once inside, you have options at the top for a blog, bio, photos, videos, webcam and forum.
The bio has full stats for Patty (height, weight, vital stats), favourite films etc, plus a short introduction. The blog is a relatively new addition to the site and is updated occasionally with thoughts from Patty and a few candid pictures.
There are around 200 galleries, but not a single gallery I viewed had over 50 photos. The photos themselves are only 1024px on their longest side, which is pretty low-fi nowadays, even on my little monitor. I can't think of any other website that consistently offers such low-res photos in such small galleries. The photo content is good, but you feel like you're only getting half of the story as there are so few photos.
Navigation-wise, galleries are arranged onto 13 pages with a thumbnail gallery of photos. You can save all pictures, but there are no downloadable ZIPs.
Content-wise Patty is a great tease. She must be in her late 20s now, but hasn't aged at all. Most galleries have her removing her underwear, there are handbras, implied nudity and often slips here-and-there. Sometimes she'll have a dildo or something, but from what I've seen there's no insertion.
They definitely take advantage of her youthful looks. Lots of candy colours, Patty wearing bunny ears, posing in front of cuddly toys, lots of Hello Kitty backgrounds etc.
Video-wise, there are around 250 videos, which - at best - are only OK quality-wise. The very best quality is 768px wide which, again, is very low quality for 2012. Most videos (and I mean around 200 of the 250 available) are 352px which, for videos released in 2010, is very bad (and I don't have particularly demanding standards, either).
Most of the videos are her stripping on a bed, playing in the shower or doing a strip tease to teeny bop music. She's pretty good, and there are nip slips scattered throughout the latter videos, but the quality is poor to the point there's little-or-no pay-off in that respect.
Most of the scenes are split into two-or-three parts. With other updates in between, along with a pretty pedestrian update schedule, it's likely to be several months until you manage to download the whole scene.
The videos are arrange chronologically, with a thumbnail preview and an option to stream a few of the newer ones. Only one format is downloadable (MP4 for newer videos, MPG for the majority), no indication of file size (although most are 50-200mb) or running time (most are 5min long), and no description other than the video title.
There is a section for webcams, which is an archive of screenshots from her webcams. Most of the webcams seem to just be the same as her videos or galleries, but there are hundreds and hundreds of small (600px wide), blury screenshots. No videos and no clue as to where her webcams are available or when the next show is.
The forum is active, and Patty clearly has passionate fans. No input from what I can see from Patty herself though, and although there's a 'Patty Tweets' thing on the membership homepage, I'm not sure if she's on Twitter or not as there's no link to it, so I think it's just a kinda member's only news feed. No sign of interaction here, either.
Unfortunately, the best content is saved for ZIPs which have to be bought on top of membership. There are discounts for members, but at $35, it's still hugely expensive and 'In Training', though hot, was hardly on another level to what's available on her site. Another cynical aspect by her webmasters is splitting member's videos into 3 parts, so with updates in between, you have to remain a member for months to get a whole scene.
To summarise, Patty is wonderful, but her website is hugely disappointing, particularly compared to other solo tease websites. A lot of the content is pretty samey, the update schedule of one update a week maximum is pretty disappointing, as is most of the content.
680x354 videos, 1024x680 pictures and 30 pictures per gallery might have been OK ten years ago, but definitely aren't in 2012.
Patty's site is a jack of all trades, master of none. The video content, pictures and interaction from Patty are all below average. Patty is great, but her website has hardly moved with the times.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Bryci is incredible hot with a great body
- Lots of content, good balance of pics and vids
- Good value with lots of other girls too
Cons:
Awful webmaster. I had problems with my ADSL and my IP number was blocked. No problem I thought, and emailed the webmaster. He basically called me a liar and a thief and wouldn't humour me at all. I understand the need to protect content, but the way it was dealt with was totally over the top. I explained what happened, even listed the 10-or-so videos I had downloaded to prove only I had been a member but he wouldn't even listen. A huge shame as it's a great site
Bottom Line:
An incredible website but let down by an incredibly arrogant webmaster. It was a huge shame because it was definitely the kind of website I could see myself joining and rejoining constantly.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
