Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good value for money at $19.95
Payment processor CCBill with no regional pricing
Good sized site with 263 models, 930 photo sets and 860 videos.
Updated 7 days a week with a new photo set or video
Nice sized 1067 x 1600px photos complete with zip downloads
Latest videos come with a choice of 3 streaming quality levels and 4 download formats from ipod to hd 720p.
Model info and scene descriptions provided.
You can rate the models and leave comments
Cons:
Much of the content is very softcore with over half the models being tagged as either “non-nude” or “topless”.
Some models don’t have photos and some don’t have videos.
When you click on a video it starts streaming automatically in your browser.
Videos released prior to 2012 usually have only 1 streaming size and a single wmv download option.
No file sizes listed for zips or videos
Whilst they do provide clickable tags and keywords there is no actual search engine.
Bottom Line:
After a couple of months of browsing the highly polished glamour content at DDF I really fancied something different so ended up here at Cosmid attracted by the lure of some real amateur girl next door type models and I have to say I’m thoroughly enjoying this site so far. According to the site these girls are not models or porn stars, just ordinary girls with normal day jobs, students, waitresses, bar tenders, office girls. I’d estimate around 75% of them are from the US with some British and Prague based models thrown into the mix. Whilst there is a good variety in model type from petite to voluptuous and even a little bit chubby, anyone who likes large breasted girls will surely be in their element here. When God was handing out tits many of these girls must have been at the front of the queue. There are a few heavily tattooed and pierced models as is the trend amongst young women these days. Most models are aged 18 to mid-20s with just a few older ones.
The content is nearly all softcore solo posing, teasing and stripping although many of the models don’t get fully nude. Some of the more recent content has become a little raunchier with some models like Brittany Burns and Larkin having some toy masturbation videos. I’ve also come across the odd lesbian video and a blowjob video but they are difficult to find and I certainly wouldn’t sign up expecting to see a lot of that type of content.
You can browse all the updates in chronological order or by highest rated and also select just photos or videos. There’s also a model index which can be sorted by most recent, alphabetical, age, hair colour, model type (non-nude, topless, nude), boob or butt size. Each model has a short bio listing their age, occupation and location with a short paragraph of background info. She also has a list of physical attributes such as hair colour, body type, boob size which double as clickable tags so if she has large boobs click on that and it will bring up a list of other models with large boobs. Individual photo sets and videos also come with additional clickable keywords often relating to the outfits and lingerie to help you find similar type sets. They could really do with a proper search engine to allow you to search by more than one criteria though.
The photo quality is pretty consistent throughout the site. I only found a handful of the earliest sets with a resolution below the standard 1600 px size. They did announce in the blog last August plans to upgrade the photos to 3000 px and offer them in 3 different sizes which would be cool if they get around to doing it. They don’t provide the models with a wardrobe or make-up artist so you see them as they are stripping out of normal every day clothes. The photography is generally of a good professional standard with nice sharp well lit pictures but they do post the complete shoot without any editing or photo shopping so you will find the odd photos here and there where the lighting is not quite right or there might be some out of focus or blurry shots or the model is pulling a funny face but it all kind of adds to the amateur appeal. Overall I found the photos quite tame, even with those models that do nude shoots you will find the nudity is not that explicit.
I normally find solo videos boring and don’t spend a lot of time watching them but I did however find them a little more entertaining here than normal. I particularly liked some of the amateur style self-shot videos where the model is on her own in her bedroom or the bathroom, chatting to the camera, teasing or dancing, sometimes stripping followed by masturbation or toy play depending how far the model goes. The videos normally last about 6 to 10 minutes. There does seem to be a bit more explicitness in the video collection than the photos. Videos can be downloaded in 1280x720 wmv or mp4, 976x548 mp4 or 480x272 mp4 for ipod or psp. Prior to 2012 you only get the one download option which is 1280x720 wmv.
Overall a highly enjoyable site and these amateur US models made a refreshing change from the same old Euro models I keep seeing on nearly every site I join.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Bryci is simply gorgeous! She poses in many different ways and looks great in them all!
Cons:
As other have already indicated, the webmaster is terrible. If you exceed the down limit, (which is not really that high (9GB per 24 hour), with some on the videos at over 1GB you can hit 9.0GB pretty fast), you will be banned from the site. It indicates for 1 week, but you may not get back on at all. The best thing to do is just request a refund from the subscription company (cc bill).
The worst part is the webmaster will not respond (even if you are trying resolve the issue). The subscription company (like ccbill) will try to correct the problem, but you will never hear from the webmaster.
I rating the site a 70 (all because of Bryci). The other models in the site are attractive, but not to the level of Bryci. The grade would have been considerably higher if the webmaster was not so bad!
Bottom Line:
As I mentioned, Bryci is a natuarl beauty. It is just such a shame that the webmaster is so bad. I can see the setting of a limit, but not responding to inquires, especially when you try to resolve the problem is not excusable!
There are so many other sites that offer great looking models. Stay away from this one, and if you join, be really careful (read all the terms, I know like anyone ever does that?)!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Focus on Camming with a big network to support live shows everyday. There are generally 2-4 shows a day with Deauxma on once a week.
- Deauxma is a hot MILF (some might say GILF?) who can put on a hot show time and time again. If you're a fan of the MILF genre not only does she deliver but you also get fellow milfs: Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Francesca, Charlee Chase, Sara Jay, Curious Gabby, Bobbi Eden, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Angelina Castro, Nikki Benz
- Good variety of content: anal, interracial, solo, girl/girl, orgy, feet, smoking, lite bondage, taboo incest, hero parody, squirting. Clearly a little bit of everything.
- live shows are available in archive (but only in non-downloadable flash format)
- vids available in .wmv and iOS friendly .mp4. :)
Cons:
- Only about 50 videos. I'd like to see more (who wouldn't? lol).
- Vids started in 2010 - despite that much of the encoding is poor at: 640X480 1 mbps and 720X480 1.5 mbps
- The organization is lacking. The files are available in chronological or best rated order - that's it.
- no zip downloads for pix. About 40 pix in a set. About 145 sets in all.
- big boob job (I know some will be turned off)
Bottom Line:
I'm really enjoying this site and the whole network for that matter. If you're a fan of hot older women - this is a great site. Dauxma films for other studios so she has a sexy look that mixes pro and amateur. She has the fake tits and the real stretch marks - which is sort of an old visual mix - but I like it. I think she's sexy as hell.
My biggest knock on this site is the lack of good quality videos. I feel like I'm back in the last decade of the internet. With today's technology it's really bad to be lagging so far behind your competitors. That said the talent and action is top tier.
Bottom Bottom Line:
Is this site a buy? Yes if you're a Deauxma fan. Yes if your a MILF fan (especially considering the network that's included).
If no to either of those questions skip this site. The quality of the encoding, and lack of extensive catalog make this one a skip.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The video quality is excellent, especially with the newer videos! Models are very attractive and young (18 to 25). Photo sets are very good quality, and do not appear to be vid caps. Site navigation is good. Updates with 2 new models a week on average. The site is a little different than most porn sites. They claim to be the only pussy classification site on the web, which is probably true, although I think maybe there should be more than 3 types (LOL). The 3 categories they have are the "puffy peach" (model has fat labia majoria that hide her clit and labia, and create "pussy cleavage"), the "big taco" (model's clit and labia are visible in a standing pose), and the "juicy cherry" (model's clit and labia are long and hang down). Each model starts out with one video and one or two photo sets. The videos involve a sexy strip and then some pussy play, either with fingers or toys. I had no problem logging into the two bonus sites.
Cons:
Many models have only one video and one photo set. I don't understand why--maybe they dont book them for a full days shoot. I would definitely like to see more sets of many of their models shot in their style. The videos do seem to get a bit repetitive and similar after a while. It would be nice to see more of the girls masturbating to orgasm. There is a little more pissing than I like--thats not something I'm into.
Bottom Line:
Excellent video quality with attractive young models. A lot of archived content. Some of the bigger names in Euro porn stars can be found here including the gorgeous Caprice. A few of the things you will find here with regularity are pussy close ups, pussy pumps, camel toe panty play, labia stretching, anal beads used up and down on the pussy, and pissing. A pussy focused site that is pleasantly different from the standard photo/video porn site. That along with the beautiful girls and high video/photo quality make Wet and Puffy definitely worth joining for a month. The free tour is pretty good if you've never been there before.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the net's most beautiful imagery
Many, many US models you've heard of.
Some files back to 2003 and beyond
Zip files in many sizes for most sets, some up to 3000k.
Many videos now in 720P
Good layout and consistent navigation
Many of the best US models in the industry have their roots here.
Very good variety of models, most of whom have exceptional proportions.
The download process isn't bad if you aren't trying to download every image on the site.
It seems like they may be rescanning older 35mm sets in higher resolution when they re-release them, but I can't tell for sure.
Some content goes back as far as 2003. That's ALOT of images.
No cross selling!
For the price, you can't go wrong. (Part of why I rate them so high)
Cons:
Site seems a bit slow to load compared to others
Recycling of old images cheats number of new releases.
Only 1 release per day and almost ALL of them are re-releases. (Less than 1 new set per week)
Quantity of new releases really seems to be dropping (Quality is good, though).
No original dates on sets so you can't tell if it is old. Chance are very good that it is.
Older videos in 480P or less and with no original dates for the models, you can't tell until you click down.
Bottom Line:
Important bits:
Mostly solo scenes with a few very good girl/girl softcore scenses (good because the girls are usually into each other and not just standing there.)
No boy/girl scenes that I recall.
Very few toys....but a reasonable number of fingers.
Good mix of outdoor and indoor scenes. These guys love sunlight (a very good thing for the images and girls, apparently) so many of the indoor sets are actually set up outdoors.
Nothing hardcore, but if you are the type that likes "unobstructed views", there are a lot of those.
Sorry, but I can't just bullet point this one. There's somehow more to it. As a frame of refgerence, my taste is for well done images.
This site has an ambiance about it that is somehow different from the the other, mostly european softcore sites. One of the fun things is looking at how the girls are transformed from the initial Audtion shoot. When they come in, they are good looking and trim. For the shoots, most are OMFG awesome! Now, it takes a good model to make this formula work. A good recent example of this is Amber Sym. In the audtion shots, she is hot, with a well toned, cheerleader type body. In the photo sets, she is simply ungodly beautiful.
Many models shoot stills well, but are really awkward in videos. The folks at DD (I still want to call it DDG) really know how to shoot video to bring out the grace and beauty in a girl. There are dozens of examples like this.
Another thing this site does is understand what the typical male, um, comes here for. I think the word I would use to describe these types of sets is Inviting. The models are aware of the photographer and use that element to tease or play with the camera a little in a very subtle way. Imagine if a really hot girl said to you "Hey, I'm going to take my clothes off and maybe fool around with myself a little. Stick around and watch if you want because that makes it more interesting for me." It is subtly different from how the European sites do it. "Flirt" sets even have th egirls talking at you...but sometimes less is more. Very good directing on the photography team's part.
Most of the sets include an ample number of really nicely (as in tastefully) done close-ups. And sometimes there is a tiny bit of Astroglide..I guess..in the right place to make things more interesting. It seems somehow more personal...sharing...inviting than the "girl frolicking in the woods" shoots you see elsewhere.
Another subtle thing that makse the experiance nicer is that there is very little cross selling or other advertising going on. This is a freestanding site, so you get what you get. It just seems so much more respectful of my time and privacy to NOT be mentioning that there are also sets of this girl on the blah-blah-blah sister site. (Compared to, say, Met-Art, that accosts you with ads for sister sites.) I guess the reason they don't have more cross-selling is because nobody else does some things the same way that they do. Kudoos for both.
Once a set appears (or re-appears) they are placed into specific categories that you can browse through. Categories include Dreamgirls, XXX Stars, Young and Fresh, Flashback, Interviews, etc. This helps if you are searching for a particular look or Genre, but it appears that they are not producing a lot of new material for many of these categories.
Now that you can tell that I'm clearly enamored with the models and photography, let me tell you a few of the more frustraing things about this site.
It is slooooow, mostly slow for pages to load. Downloads seem to be about average in speed. Not sure what that is about.
As I mentioned above, many of the older sets get recycled, apparently more than once. I don't have a major issue with that as many sites do it, but this site passes them off as new every time they come back around (sometimes multiple times). Fricking QUIT THAT! Introduce them in a different category and include the original dates for the shoots as well as the original dates for the models introduction to the site. Yes, some of the sets are the best they've ever done and deserve to be re-introduced (take a look at Alyssa Lovelace, for example), but re-datestamping them is just plain wrong. It destroys the model timelines and, at best, seems deceptive.
And here's another thing. As I looked back through my 12+ year collection of DDG/DD images, I noticed that a lot of material from the late 1990s and early 2000s is no longer there. Some of it is big-hair and bushy, but a lot of it is completely timeless. You should consider putting more of the images back on the site in the appropiate area so your subscribers can enjoy them.
Ok, bottom line. If you are into softcore, this is absolutely, positively one of the sites to visit as there is over a decade's worth of material. If you were here less than a year ago, there is not much new content, but it might be worth it to visit for the new lower price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
12-01-1202:09am (Update History) Reason: Ran into another con.
Pros:
-2000x3000 resolution on latest photo sets
-Around 720 of those photosets are 3000px.
-Around 540 720p videos
-Interview videos
-updates once a day video every 5th update.
-Low price
Cons:
-Older sets 1600x1024 or under.
-Around 1900 of the photosets are 1600px or under.
-Around 500 videos are 420p.
-Videos have music.
-Majority of pictures are in the outdoors with natural lighting which I'm not a fan of but is personal taste
-Video links expire when using download manager. Makes downloading videos exponentially time consuming.
Bottom Line:
Based on the latest 3000px photos, technically the photo sets are well shot and composed. Personally I'm not a fan of the lighting. Most photosets are outdoors and most of the indoor sets have natural lighting from outside through the window. This might be a plus for some but for me it is not my style. I prefer the controlled lighting and indoor scenes.
Based on the latest 720p videos, the videos have a hazy dream sequence look to them. The videos have a music track to them. Both of which are not my style. Aside from that there are interviews with some of the models which are always a plus.
Search is done by broad categories hair color, breast type, shaved/unshaved, styles(wet,girlfriends, backstage, xxx stars etc). You can organize sets by publishing date or rating. There is also a checkbox for hd only so you only see 720p videos.
The models are more playboyesque type of models and they are photographed in that style. If you are looking for this style then this site is worth a try for the price offered. If you are looking for the amateur girl next door style this is not it. Whether or not you like this site depends on what style you like.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-High end, glamor style photos of teen and early twenty models.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Access to live cams.
-Good download speeds. I usually max out my download speed of 1.3MB/sec.
-Easy site navigation. There are a lot of photosets, but it's fairly easy to look through the site to see what you like.
-Each photoset comes in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-Download managers work. I use DownThemAll, which works here.
-If you are a member, you can get a discount to other sites in the network through their upgrade option.
-Content is exclusive.
-No watermark on their photos.
-You get a large number of photographers contributing to this site. I think they are
all basically high-end glamor style shoots, with not a large variation in styles, but you get to see how different photographers use this approach.
-The models are clean. Almost no tatoos. Very little piercing.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor. If you like high-end teen softcore glamor photosets, you will probably like this site.
-No videos. Photosets only.
-A few models have more than one name. So if you want to set all their sets, you need a bit of luck to find them.
-The site advertises itself as using amateur models. I think that's misleading. You get a large number of models who have appeared at different porn sites. I think a better description would be that these are attractive young girls that you would like to see more of.
-You get a model bio for each girl, but the bio is very short, with few details.
-Site advertises "Over 10,000 Breathtaking Beauties". I doubt that. MetArt, which has
been around about 6 more years than Erotic Beauty, advertises 2,730 models, and MetArt
updates about 4-6 photosets per day, compared to 1 per day for Erotic Beauty. So Erotic Beauty might have 1,000 models at the site, or less.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 0
Number of models: hundreds+
The dimensions of the recently posted photosets:
low definition: 680 x 1024 pixels
medium definition: 1361 x 2048 pixels
high definition: 2000 x 3008 pixels or 2832 x 4256 pixels
You have to join each site separately. You can't join one, and automatically get access to another site in the network. But as cjd2004 pointed out, there is an option to join all the sites in the network at once at signup.
Erotic Beauty used to be called Metmodels. I assume they changed the name to further distinguish itself from MetArt, so people won't automatically compare the two sites to see which site offers the better value.
Erotic Beauty is actually like a smaller sister of MetArt: MetArt offers up to 6 new updates per day. Recently they have been offering around 4 updates per day. Almost all the updates are photosets, but they usually offer 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Erotic Beauty offers 1 new photoset per day. No videos at the site.
MetArt has a huge collection of models and photosets (and videos, but the videos basically have little value, because they are almost all boring, in spite of featuring lovely young models in the nude).
Erotic Beauty has a large collection of models and photosets, but much smaller than what MetArt has.
If you haven't been a member of either MetArt or Erotic Beauty, the better value is obviously MetArt, because of the greater amount of content at MetArt. But if you've already seen MetArt, and haven't seen Erotic Beauty, and if you like the MetArt content, then Erotic Beauty is definitely worth a visit, because you will find similar content in the photosets at Erotic Beauty.
Almost all the models are in their teens or early twenties. Most are Causcasian. You have a pick of attractive to lovely or gorgeous girls to look at. This is a high-end teen glamor softcore photo site. It doesn't get much better than this. MetArt, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy are some of the best in the field.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Good diversity of models; most (if not all) natural
- Plenty of unshaved models (a pro for me, at least)
- Lots of nylons and sheer underwear
- Interesting mix of amateur and glamour styles
- Good value with no regional bias on price
Cons:
- Undated content - no idea if updating (suspect not)
- Pictures fairly low res; videos derisorily so
- Some sets continuations of a previous one
- Some models' sets mixed with others; or some duplicate sets
- Bad lighting may be a turn-off for some
- Quite a few teen models (I know a pro for many!)
- A couple of fetishes which don't appeal
- No zip sets
Bottom Line:
New Nude City is the last of a few sites I've been meaning to join for ages, and finally got round to trying it. It features the work of Richard Kern; one-time underground filmmaker, latterly occasional music video director and more often nude photographer; I'm quite a fan of his photographs, owning a couple of his published books, and so wanted to take a look at his site.
There are approx 170 models here, almost all of them exclusive, amateur girls; I only happened across three I recognised - Joanna Angel, Karlie Montana and a very young Sasha Grey. Roughly 700 photo sets of 20-120 pictures, maybe 50 as an average; and resolution is fairly low at 1400px. No zip sets, but downloading a set with a manager - I use DownThemAll - is very straightforward so I do not penalise the site for that. Sets are not dated, so there's no way to know if the site is being updated - I suspect not since the total picture count on the home page did not seem to change while I was a member; but the material stretches back over ten years; I recognise some from the books I have. The material is only moderately explicit; there are plenty of spread legs, but only a few sets feature fingers or toys being inserted. There are also some girl-girl sets, but most of the content is solo.
The theme of the site - the city - sees the sets split into categories named after New York areas - Soho, Greenwich, Wall street, etc. I apologise to Mr Kern if I'm missing the point here, but this seems entirely a conceit; I couldn't see any commonality within each category and some sets continue a single shoot but in a different category. There is a model index, though - with a brief bio paragraph of each girl, which is interesting - and a more traditional theme index allowing you to search on eg panties, nylons, blondes, etc. There is a very clear divide into two broad themes, though, even though the site doesn't define it that way; it is probably a by-product of Kern's magazine work - photos from which I suspect feature heavily on this site - having, I believe, shot for Barely Legal and Leg Show.
The first theme, then, is younger amateur girls. Normally I prefer older models and there are a number of models here who are just too young - and too young-looking - for my taste. Having said that, they are interesting; we see them not only posing for the camera; but in the kitchen, brushing their teeth, eating or drinking. Combined with the locations - very ordinary apartments, perhaps the models' own (some are quite messy!) and hotel rooms, there is an intimacy that you don't get with more slick material. All of the models look engaged, as if they are having fun - Kern definitely gets the best out of them. Most sets feature clothing of some sort - again, usually prosaic, apart from the fact that (like me) Kern has a fetish for and fixation with panties, especially the sheer kind - you'll see lots here. Sometimes the lighting is not good; but because of the nature of the pictures, it's forgiven, this isn't a sight that you judge on mere technical prowess, and it fits in with the underground/amateur feel.
Then there are the more glamorous sets; featuring girls with a bit more make-up, perhaps a little older, usually a a bit better lit - and focused more on legs, nylons and lingerie, and more pin-up style poses. There are also a few other fetishes in the mix - eg bondage, smoking, peeing; these don't necessarily work for me but are in the minority. Although they are a bit more glam, they retain the same feel as the amateur girls - the girls are still natural, and engaged with the photographer... and still fixated on sheer bras and panties. Granted, some are a bit dated and look like retro magazine shoots - likely because that's what they are - but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The split between these two themes is roughy equal; I saved a similar number of sets in each - and although some models appear in both kinds of set, the majority are either one or the other.
I haven't yet mentioned the videos - the site states 136 available. The theme is similar, although there are some slightly more explicit ones featuring masturbation and toys. I like the feel of them, the way they are shot... but they are let down technically even more than the pictures, being only a couple of minutes long, and just too small - some at approx 640x360, some at 400x300. The graininess of them fits in with the theme of the site... but they really need to be bigger.
This is another tricky one to score; for me it's very much like Ed Fox's Foot Factory - I love the material, it's unique, quirky and appealing; but let down a bit by low resolution pictures and lack of updates. I'll therefore give it the same score; and say it's definitely recommended - but if you do want something a bit different, I'd suggest Juliland first, which wins over mainly in technical quality and update frequency.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- There is a cross-sell on the sign up page but it isn’t pre-checked
- Bills through CCBill
- Great chance to see some new models
- Many familiar porn models appear
- Many download options for newer videos
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- No zips on pics
- Pics relatively low resolution
- No search function
- No specific tags
Bottom Line:
I have to confess that I never expected to be writing a review of a site featuring models with tattoos and piercings, Goth models, punk models and others along that theme. I’m as anti-tattoo as the next guy, except that it turns out I’m not. I’m still anti-tattoo and piercing unless the model goes all the way.
The biggest surprise for me was how conventional the porn here actually is. I don’t know what I was expecting, but whatever it was I was wrong. This is a typical porn network that just happens to showcase models with a look that is slightly out of mainstream.
The main page is laid out as you’d expect with any network: there are tabs for going to pictures, videos, the individual sites, or sorting by model. One choice conspicuous by its absence is a search function. If it exists on the network I haven’t found it yet. (This lack of search is further worsened by the lack of scene tags. Tags exist, but are too broad to be of a lot of use in specific searches.)
The network is made up of eight individual sites. (Cum on My Tattoo, Fuck me in the Bathroom, Heavy Metal Pussy Party, Joanna Angel, POV Punx, Punk Porn, Punk Schoolgirls and Big Boobs are Cool – I’ll post some stats as a comment on each site’s PU page.) While several of the sites have a reason for being stand-alone, several others could just as easily be grouped together. This is neither positive or negative, it’s just a fact.
Each site is laid out in the same way: the site opens into a page where there are thumbnails for 20 scenes per page. Under each thumbnail is some basic information about the scene, including a scene name, the genre (girl/boy, solo, etc.), the running length, user ratings and the female star.
When you select a scene you get a larger thumbnail and four small thumbnails to give you some idea of what’s in store. Each scene has multiple options for downloads. You can download a trailer, the full scene or the full scene broken down into parts. I have to question the value of offering the scene in parts in 2012, but maybe there are still people with slow internet connections. For each of those options there are usually some choices for file type and resolution. MPEGs are offered (in resolutions up to 1400x800 – 5000kb/s and 24fps – depending on the upload date, of course), as are WMVs in high and low resolutions and a mobile version. These options decrease as you get into older files. Prior to 2010 MPEGs weren’t offered but Quicktime files were. The oldest scenes on the network, which date back to 2007, are often only available in one resolution and only in WMV. The resolution on the oldest scenes is low at 480x360, 1800kb/s and 30fps.
This is being a bit picky, but the way the download options are laid out with the trailer as the first option made it too easy to select that instead of the full scene. It didn’t happen to me, but it required that I pay more attention than I’d normally do when just downloading porn. Even having a trailer as a download option seems odd to me, but at least they could put it lower in the option list.
The site supports download managers and I had no problem with the links timing out.
The network bills through CCBill so you have confidence in that. There is a cross-sell, but it isn’t pre-checked.
If the site has a major flaw it is how they provide pictures. I don’t normally download photos but in this case I was looking forward to doing so. I had flagged several models that I really liked that are rare on more mainstream sites and wanted photos too. I was disappointed to see that zips aren’t available and that even if they were, the resolution isn’t great. The newest photos are 1080x720. I know that isn’t bad, but they could be better. Older photos are obviously a lower resolution. I gave up on getting photos since having to save each one individually seems like too much work for porn. The lack of zips really needs to be addressed.
I know this is highly subjective, but I found most of the models on the site to be very attractive. I do question why some models appear on the site though. Katie St. Ives has a few scenes here and I’d not normally think of her when I think tattoos, piercings, Goth or punk. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll take any of Katie’s scenes when I can get them, but it just doesn’t seem to be a good fit.
Dracken posted a comment back in ’09 that the network appeared to be a ‘community’ site for people who like the Goth / Punk / etc. look and lifestyle. That is true. There are blogs and forums for the look, the music and the life. I’m only interested in the naked chicks so I really can’t comment on the non-porn parts of the network.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent network. It is well laid out, easy to use and offers some great porn. If you’re like me and want to push your porn boundaries a bit then I’d highly recommend starting with Burning Angel. The models are beautiful and the scenes are hot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- She is cute.
- Videos avail in at least 720p (h264 or wmv)
- Photo sets download in Zip files
- Updates about 1 or 2 times per week.
- Navigation & Use of web site is easy.
Cons:
- SHE is cute - the operative word is SHE, this site is based on one young lady only.
- Updates, appear to always be a set of photos as a “movie teaser” followed by a video. Thus maybe 2 updates per week.
- not much variety here.
Bottom Line:
This is the “bonus” site which one receives with a subscription to Young Legal Porn. Both of these sites are controlled via Dieselaccess.com. Their advertising suggests that the longer one keeps re-subscribing, the more bonus sites that will be added, I have not been a member long enough for that to happen, and following my usual pattern I am dropping my subscription after only one month. Nothing wrong with the two sites, but I just want to move on.
As of Nov 2012 there were 77 videos available on this site, all featuring Gloria, a cute and quite skinny young lady. Most vids are Solo, Striptease. There are 87 photo sets, also of Gloria. A few videos were lesbian, and I found one photo set with Gloria and a man.
The site also links to the same live shows that one can access from Young Legal Porn. While they are live shows, I found the video of the shows to be very small, and difficult to see.
Billing for this (as for Young Legal Porn) is through CCBill, and as I have found with other sites using CCBill, signup and cancellation proved easy.
Diesel Access provides you with a password of their choice at signup, 16 random characters and numbers, so you must save the email or password somewhere, as it is virtually impossible to memorize. This does provide good security, but is difficult to remember if you don’t let your pc remember passwords for you. There has been discussion of this topic in the Porn Users Forum.
Over all thoughts and score: As a bonus site, this is worth looking at for a day or so, but that is the end of it. As a stand alone site, I wouldn’t find it worth the price of admission. There is just too little content here to make it valuable. I am giving it a 60 because it is technically good. The lack of variety and content cause it to get a low score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Autumn is definitely very attractive. (Though, I HATE tatoos, and she's got some -- but they aren't too horrifying. And I don't like glasses, which she wears in some sets, never taking them off.)
There is at least SOME content here.
There is SOME high-resolution content.
There are now links to zip files you can download for MOST photo sets.
There are links to download MOST of the video files.
Cons:
I give this a "Don't waste your money" rating.
In fact, I consider this an "insulting to paying customers" site.
The problem is that about 20% of the videos DO NOT HAVE DOWNLOAD LINKS. And it doesn't look like they will ever be added.
The videos are BORING: They are all of the "For crying out loud, if you could take your hands off of your body for TWO SECONDS, perhaps WE could see it" variety. Usually one minute with some clothing on, hands all over body, one minute with clothing off, hands all over body, then down to masturbate, then done. They sure don't float my boat very much.
Posting has been very irregular -- only FOUR videos have been posted in 2012, as I write this.
Photo sets at 4000 pixels are very good, but perhaps only half are at that size. Many others are at only 2000, and some are 1200.
Apparently new photo sets don't get zip files you can download for some period of time. I've seen one "new" set, and no zip files, so far.
Bottom Line:
The bottom line is simple: DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY. There is a LOT of Autumn Riley content on the free sites -- if it's not "most" photo sets, it's a very substantial cross-section of them. Obviously, though, you don't get the "full nude" shots. But I would call most of those "boring," anyway.
I consider the lack of downloading links to be "customer hostile" -- dang it, I PAID FOR THIS CONTENT, and it's downright insulting to find no downloading links for a substantial amount of the content.
Yes, you can muck about and download stuff without links, but, "dang it, I PAID FOR THIS CONTENT" and so on.
As I write this, there are 29 videos. 7 lack download links, and 1 is broken -- it stops halfway through. Notably, the videos without links are substantially lower-quality than the ones with links.
The "new" photoset without zip files proved that going through the gallery to download files was TEDIOUS at best -- most of the pictures wouldn't actually load until I hit the "stop" button on my browser.
So, what's worth paying for? If you MUST have videos, you can download the lame videos.
If you MUST have the "full nude" shots, you can get those. But, many tend to be "close-up shots of vibrators." Doesn't float my boat. And for those without vibrators, well, "you've seen lots of these before."
If you MUST have everything you can find, or if you MUST have the high-resolution 4000 pixel files, well, you can get those.
In any case, if you're a competent downloader (equipped with a fast connection and productive downloading tools) it really shouldn't take you much more than a couple of hours to download the entire site. There's just not a lot of content here. And again, you can get a very good taste of Autumn Riley on the free sites.
Technically, I used the Opera browser's right-click "save to download folder" for efficient zip file and video downloading. But, for scientific purposes and to report in this review, I just fired up my favorite auto-downloader, "NeoDownloader," and it's cranking away on the site just fine. So, downloaders will work, but it remains to be seen whether I'll suffer any consequences. Doesn't matter, since "I'm done" with the site at this point, anyway.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PREVIEW LOOKED OK AND THE $10 FOR A 10 DAY TRIAL ATTRACTED ME. ALSO THE SITES OWN PROMO:
"Be taken away to a world where beautiful women abound. We like to call this the world of KissaK. It is a place where confident, sexy, and erotic young girls pose provocatively and wait to be worshipped by you. KissaK models are hand picked and shot exclusively for this site.
It is with your continued support that allows us to continue with our passion and to scour the globe to locate some of the most exotic young women. KissaK is new brand of erotica. We encourage member input to ensure that we have your needs met.
Please enjoy!
I DID NOT ENJOY DO NOT BE CONNED BY SWEET WORDS
Cons:
92 KISSAK MODELS CERTAINLY NOT EXCLUSIVE TO THIS SITE
15 KISSAK VIDEOS. GIRLS NOT EXCLUSIVE
10 OLD VIDEOS OF EUROPEAN GIRLS SEEN EVERYWHERE.
NO DOWNLOADS
NO PIC DOWNLOADS
NO MOVIE DOWNLOADS
ONLY STREAM AND SO SLOW ITS PATHETIC
Bottom Line:
FORGET IT.
A WASTE OF MONEY.
A SITE CREATED BY A DREAMER FOR HIS OWN FANTASY OF HAVING THE BEST EROTIC SITE ...
THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN !
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful Models
Good shoots
good videos
low price
Cons:
no downloads
false advertising (advertising a section that has not been completed)
poor navigation
Bottom Line:
Mixed mag has some great models with lots of curves and some decent production values. However, not being able to save any images or videos is a huge detractor for any porn/glamour site.
In addition, I do not like being told something is on the site (nude glamour in this instance) and then signing up to find that section "under construction".
That's a poor way to conduct business, and a poor way to retain any customers.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site.
-The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename.
-There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color.
Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed).
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less.
Cons:
-On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in?
-Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009.
-Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format).
So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about.
-Navigation is very basic.
-No search function.
-Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models.
Bottom Line:
This is a very softcore teen site.
Their model listing consists of 3 models:
Diana, brown hair
Liza, black hair
Nika, blonde hair
I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you
like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them.
There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very
softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers.
In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens.
No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site.
In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls
hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This
is the very softest of softcore.
Site statistics:
Photosets
Number of photosets: 167
Number of photos per set: around 70+
Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res.
Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels
Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size.
Number of videos: 88
Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes.
Frame width x height: 720 x 480
Total bitrate: 6096 kbps
You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files.
There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only.
The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4
minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less.
The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very
little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass.
The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just
can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional.
There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent.
The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying
random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music.
The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages
listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the
photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or
story.
I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some photo sets are good.
-All sets are high resolution 2000x3000
-Videos are 1280x720
Cons:
-Video quality is not very good and the videos are poorly directed. Ultra softcore.
-Videos have interlacing issues.
-Videos are dubbed with music.
-Some photosets are grainy.
-No updates. Last update was in 03/10/12. Before that date updates were weekly.
-Limited content.
Bottom Line:
The amount of content offered for the 4 years this site has been running would have been covered in a couple of months of updates on other sites.
For the amount of content I would say this website worth it for a one time payment of $10. Since they no longer update and their updates were slow before that. It is definitely not a site I would recommend a subscription to for more than a month.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-most beautiful women on the net
-huge selection of models
-not very repetitive
-tons of models ive never seen before
-updated every weekday
-tons of sets
-zip files
Cons:
-should be only $10 per month
Bottom Line:
having read other reviews and the tbp review, i knew going in what kind of site it was. no vids, tasteful nudes, older stuff lower resolution. that out of the way, this is best site on the internet other then 21sextury (tho complete opposite site). the models are amazing, spread out enough that its not the same girl 2 weeks in a row. every morning i wake up and check out a new exciting beautiful girl (other then my own). im on my 3rd month and rarely do more then 1 month memberships. i do look forward to seeing the goddessnudes site that show a bit more
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Very low price
* Good range of models
* Small galleries
* Great, atmospheric photography
Cons:
* Infrequent updates
* Small collection
* No zip sets
* Small galleries
* Fairly tame, and little tease or lingerie
* Regional pricing
Bottom Line:
Ethernudes has been on my radar for a while, and I finally got round to joining for the bargain price of $5 (or ostensibly a little more - regional pricing kicks in even at this level :|). It's the nude photo site of photographer Olivier re Rycke, so there is a consistent style and quality of work here that you get from a single photographer site.
It's a photo-only site with currently 116 galleries; seemingly about one new one added per month (just one while I was a member). Picture sets are anywhere between around 5 and 50 pictures at 3K size, with perhaps 30 being the average, and more recent sets are larger. They are presented with a stock gallery package (coppermine in this case) so not really any fancy features - notably zip sets are nowhere to be found but it's extremely trivial to grab the set with a DM so I don't take marks off for that.
I've noted the small galleries as both a plus and a minus since although most folk would feel hard-done-by, I like smaller sets; by subscribing to a site, we are buying into the vision of the photographer and part of that vision is knowing what to get rid of! 200+ picture sets bore me, it's hard to know where to stop; 20 well-chosen pictures are better every time, as long as the photographer has the skill to take and choose the best ones. (Stagg Street and Juliland are other sites which are benefit from ruthless editing.)
And in this case, he does - the photography here is excellent. It's not particularly explicit, about the same or even less than you might see at Met Art; but with somehow more depth, atmosphere than what I found at MA. The locations - both indoor and out - and framing are good, and different; and the colours are really nice - they seem a bit processed, but it's done to set the mood, eg to give it a subtle vintage tint, rather than interfere with the models.
The choice of whom is also very good - European models from 19-30 rather than just the 18-21s on many nude sites - including some familiar girls such as Ariel, Suzie Carina and Melisa but most I suspect are exclusive here - but all stunning and natural. And although it's perhaps a bit too art-nude-y for my taste (I'd prefer just a little more undressing/tease/sleaze) - the photographer gets the best out of all the models and they somehow just seem sexier, more relaxed, more intimate than they do elsewhere.
The fact that the site is so small is balanced by the price, I feel - and although it's left me wanting something a bit more explicit again, I still enjoyed the evocative models and locations. Definitely recommended to anyone who likes Met Art, Femjoy etc; you'll get through the small collection in no time, but I also think you'll get a taste of what is missing from the bigger sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
82 Gorgeous models
100% Exclusive content
Updates with a new photo set or video every other day
High resolution 2300 x 3500 photos
Zip downloads for all photo sets
Videos available in a choice of HD and Low resolution wmv
All content date stamped
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Cons:
Very softcore, mostly topless and some mild nudity
These hi res photos don’t look as sharp as you would expect when blown up to full size, too many look out of focus, blurred or grainy as previous reviewers have mentioned with little sign of any improvement in recent updates.
Every zip download has the file name “photo_zip” so you need to rename everything yourself.
File names of the videos are just a date so will also need renaming if you want to know who is in the video when you come to view it.
No file sizes given.
Around half the videos don’t have download options.
The older videos without the HD option look grainy on full screen.
Only one photo size, no small or medium options.
Primitive site design and navigation
No search tools.
Bottom Line:
I received a $9.95 email promo offer to this site and after checking out the tour and spotting some of my favourite Only Tease models here like Hayley Marie and Lucy Anne I couldn’t resist signing up for a month to check it out at that price. St Mackenzie’s describes themselves as the most unruly institute of learning in England where it’s sexy students and equally sexy teachers get up to all sorts of mischievous antics. Only problem is they never really get as naughty as you might have expected or hoped for. This is only really a very softcore teasing site about the same strength as Only Tease where you will see the girls posing in their sexy uniforms, stockings and lingerie before stripping and posing topless or nude. A small minority of the models have some open leg shots but most will only give you the occasional glimpse of pussy. There’s no masturbation or toy play and even though there are lots of sets and videos featuring two, three or more girls there’s no real sexual contact between the models other than removing clothes and occasional touching.
St Mackenzie’s has been online since January 2009 and with consistent updates has grown into a reasonable sized collection already. A new update is added every other day and a typical month’s updates consist of 9 new photo sets and 6 new videos. As of today the site has a total of 382 photo sets (35,304 images) and 222 videos. A word of warning: only 107 of the videos come with download options, the rest can only be viewed online.
The navigation is fairly basic with not many options. You can browse “updates” which lists all the content by year and month starting with the most recent or via the model index which is split in to two parts, “pupils” and “teachers”. The only problem with browsing via the “updates” section is that the videos there have no download links. Going into the pupils and teachers listings on each model’s page you will find her 5 most recent updates listed with a scene description and links to download the picture zip and video download options. Videos and picture sets beyond the 5 most recent are listed below under “more updates”. Click on the picture sets here and they will open in a new window with the zip download link. Click on the videos here and Windows Media Player will open and after a few seconds buffering will stream the video online. They don’t provide any download links for videos beyond those that appear within any model’s 5 most recent updates. You can pretty much see the site layout for yourself prior to joining as the tour has the same site layout as the member’s area with the exception of the download links.
The videos that can be downloaded usually have two options, a HD 1280 x 720 wmv @ 8000 kbps and low res 640 x 480 wmv @ 900+ kbps. A few of the older videos only have the low res option. The videos are usually around 5 minutes long and usually consist of the model’s posing and teasing in their uniforms with some upskirt views and panty flashing before removing their clothes. It’s another one of those sites with mostly silent movies, there’s no background music and the model’s seldom talk, at least not in any of the one’s I’ve watched so far.
As for the photos which is my preferred niche, they look fine when viewing them downsized to monitor size in a slide show but when opening them up and viewing them in their full size resolution you can certainly see some flaws as I mentioned in the cons above. I get the impression this is the work of the same photographer from Breath Takers. The photo shoots are pretty much all taken inside the same house recognisable from Breath Takers and the style of photography is pretty much the same where in most of the shoots the models are stood in front of or close to a window making use of the natural light as it penetrates the window.
Overall I did enjoy the collection of gorgeous British models and their sexy outfits in spite of the site’s flaws and it was certainly helped by the fact I only paid $10 to join so the site just about scrapes a probably over generous 80 from me. It’s an ok site if you have a fetish for girls teasing in uniforms, mini-skirts, stockings, tights with plenty of upskirts and panty flashing but if you require explicit nudity or sexual action then probably best to avoid this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Erotic Beauty, formerly MetModels, leans a little more toward old-style softcore nude photos in natural settings. The models are generally not mainstream, so you find a few that are very interesting and different. The site is billed as "Naturally Beautiful amatuer nudes" which probably says it better than I can.
Cons:
Hmm. Can't quite put my finger on it.... a little slow, maybe. Nothing major wrong.
Bottom Line:
This is a really good amatuer nude site. It is good because the photography is good, the models are generally attractive and typically squeeky clean (can't tell if they are photoshopped..), and there is a tremendous quantity of stuff going back to 2005. And remember, this USED to be the site where the Met-Art network put its most beautiful models so even the old stuff is pretty good. (The new stuff is good, too!) Many of the sets are outside.
Navigation is average or a little better than average. You can search by model, most popular, date, etc. Images do not open in a new window, so you have to remember that if you are used to some of the other sites like this.
There is a HUGE variety of models here, all apparently european. They are also all natural. I don't recall a single enhancement. And the models mostly seemed to be enjoying themselves, or at least comfortable with the set and the photographer.
I got into the site this time on a $12.50 special because I was already a member of Met-Art.
Absolutely worth a visit, especially if you like natural nude photography.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Attractive model
Exclusive content
Good sized solo site
Included as a free bonus site when subscribing to Only Tease or any of the “Only” sites.
Photos available in two sizes with zip downloads for each
Customizable browse options.
All content date stamped
Billing by CCBill
Cons:
Regional pricing
Last updates were February 2009
Very softcore, topless only
Video quality mediocre (no HD)
Bottom Line:
This is a solo site featuring British model Melanie Walsh, one of the popular models from Only Tease, an attractive slender blonde with 32C natural breasts although she did change her hair colour and appear as a brunette in a few of the latter sets. Melanie first appeared on Only Tease back in 2003 and then in May 2005 was given this solo site which updated regularly until February 2009 growing in to quite a sizeable collection. In total there are 447 photo sets (approx 46,000 images) and 174 videos.
The content here is very softcore. In both the photo sets and videos you will see Melanie modelling a good variety of outfits and lingerie before stripping and posing topless. Don’t expect to find any explicit nudity within the site.
Most of the photos come in two different sizes, 711 x 1066px and 1366 x 2048px although a few of the earliest sets up until around August 2005 don’t have the larger option available. The browsing of the photo galleries is via a month and year listing and you can customize your browsing options via “My OM”, number of thumbs per page, whether you want to display the standard or large photo etc. There’s also a basic search facility that lets you search by type of clothing but it only has the single filter so not as comprehensive as the search engine at Only Tease.
Most of the videos are only available in AVI format, a high res 640 x 480 and a low res 208 x 160. The quality of the high res videos was probably fairly decent back when it was released but by today’s standards it is mediocre really although not so bad as to make it unwatchable.
Only Melanie is available as a standalone site but if you’re a fan of hers you’d probably want to pay the few extra bucks and join via Only Tease or even the Only All Sites package where Melanie has a load more content and continues to have regular updates despite finishing with her solo site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A good sized solo site with 170 videos and 403 galleries (46,000+ photos).
Included as a free bonus site when subscribing to Only Tease.
Photos available in 2 sizes, 711 x 1066 and 1366 x 2048
Zip downloads in both sizes.
All content date stamped
Billing by CCBill
Cons:
No updates since 2009.
Very softcore, no explicit nudity.
Video quality mediocre by today’s standards (no HD)
Search facility is a bit basic
Regional pricing
Bottom Line:
This is the solo site of UK model Carla Brown, one of the popular models from Only Tease. She has a petite but curvy figure standing 5ft 2 with 32B breasts and a great ass, has brown hair, blue eyes, a small tattoo on her lower back and a naval piercing.
The site is run by the same people who run Only Tease so the content here runs pretty much along the same lines featuring Carla stripping out of lots of sexy outfits and uniforms. There’s also plenty of stockings and sexy lingerie on display. Unfortunately it’s all very softcore and Carla never really goes further than topless. Occasionally she might remove the panties and give you an ass shot but you won’t see any explicit open leg pussy shots.
The site was active from September 2005 up until April 2009 and the photo quality is consistent throughout that time with the nice sized 2048px photos available from the start. The video quality was probably ok at the time it was released but is lagging behind today’s standards. Mostly you get a high and low resolution AVI download option. The high option is usually 640 x 480 and is a reasonable enough quality to make it quite watch able. Don’t even bother with the 208 x 160 low res versions.
It’s possible to subscribe to Only Carla as a standalone site but if you like Carla enough to consider that I’d recommend just paying the extra $5 to join Only Tease where you’d get this as a free bonus site and in addition you’ll find another 15,000 images and 24 videos of Carla within Only Tease where she has continued to have regular updates added since 2009 despite being no longer active in Only Carla. You can of course also get this site included in the more expensive Only All Sites package. I really liked Carla and thought this site was a nice additional bonus to my Only Tease subscription but as with any solo site I’d only really recommend it if you like the model and in this case don’t mind the fact it’s only a topless site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Among the best Public Nudity sites on the ‘net
- Many well-known porn stars
- Simple and effective site design
- Good lighting and editing
- Multiple formats available
- Videos and photos available
- Very daring
Cons:
- Forced to stop updating
- Photos seem to be a bit of an afterthought
Bottom Line:
This is my second review of this site. I returned to it to see what was new and to download the videos and photos that were uploaded since I was last a member. I expected some changes, but one of the changes that I found was definitely a negative. I’ll get that one huge, negative change out of the way first: the site is no longer updating and hasn’t updated since early November of 2011. According to the news posted on the site the owners didn’t make this decision, rather it was forced on them through a cease-and-desist order from the City of Los Angeles. (As an aside, I see that a similar site, Nude in L.A. doesn’t even exist now. They were a decent site in that they were more daring than most, but also managed to strip out a lot of titillation – pun not intended. So full marks to the guys at Teasers who are still keeping the site alive.)
The other significant change was just starting as I wrote my last review. At the time of that review they had only posted two scenes with the new format so I wasn’t in a position to do much more than simply note the change. The site now has 13 shoots with the new format. The old format consisted of breaking a model’s scene down into various parts and labeling those parts accordingly. The new format seemed to be an attempt to create a quasi-reality-show feel to shoots. They are still on the Teasers site, but they’re in a separate tab. They’re branded as “Real Girls of Porn Valley.” I’m not opposed to the new format (with one major exception being that there is an opening screen on each segment) but apart from the labeling of the shoot, and of the individual scenes, there really isn’t much of a change, and there certainly isn’t any major improvement over the older format. If there is a positive, and this is subjective, it is that the scenes seem to push the limits a bit more under the new format. Because that tends to be model-specific that could just be luck though. (I suspect that some of the more daring shoots are what caused the City’s legal response. Seeing Jennifer White standing naked in front of my house certainly wouldn’t cause me to complain, but I’m probably not a good example in this case…)
The format for both the older and newer shoots follows a bit of a formula. Most shoots follow the formula. The model is filmed as she tries on outfits and we see her changing; there is usually a scene with the model in a short skirt or dress and the camera follows her around in public areas as she flashes. There is a scene in each shoot where the model parades around in a skimpy bikini. There are also two or three clips of the model at a café (usually outdoor) where she is interviewed and asked to remove some clothing. Finally, there is usually a clip where the model is in a secluded, but still public, location where she strips nude and masturbates. In many shoots there is bonus material of the model masturbating back at the photographer’s house. In the public scenes people and cars can be seen going by. This is subjective, but I really like that the site usually doesn’t edit out the interaction between the model and the guys filming.
The models are the site’s main asset. There are many big porn stars here, and seeing them in the wild can be pretty interesting. Alexis Texas, Eden Adams and Katie St. Ives, among many other big names, have scenes here. If there is one downside to having such a model-centred site it is that the heat of the scene is really up to the model: if the model is daring and adventurous the shoot will be more fun to watch than if the model is shy and reserved. But a huge advantage to this is that this is one of the few public nudity sites that does show the models being nervous.
The technical stuff hasn’t changed since I last reviewed the site, except now there are now more scenes posted. There has been some new BTS material added too. The videos are available as WMVs (resolution depends on when they were added but maxes out at to 960x540 @ 3000 kb/s). MP4 videos are available in high and low resolution.
Photos are available, as singles and zips at 800x1200 but the main thrust of the site are the videos.
Some readers will disagree with my position that a site that no longer updates still has lots of value. This is subjective, but given that this site does contain a lot of material, serves a rare niche (American public nudity), and that political authorities seem to be closing in on that niche, I think the site is an exceptional value. The way these guys shoot their scenes puts them in the top few public nudity sites, and maybe even the best out there. Given that the site is under attack and others have closed, if you have any interest in this genre my advice is to join now before they disappear.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Provides what it advertises.
- Video download formats: FLV, MP4, WMV, MP4-HQ
- Video download example: 17'46": FLV 301mb 720x406, MP4 225mb, WMV 806mb 1280x720, MP4-HQ 1035mb 1920x1080.
- Picture downloads - ZIP file. Usually two sizes 1027x769 or 2800x1867, but sizes do vary.
- Crisp clear images and videos
- Statistics 418 Models, 540 scenes, 547 videos, 28458 pictures
- Natural breasts - many are A or B cup.
- Non-Member intro shows a full face picture (topless with small pussy insert) of each model.
- Trusted billing - CCBill or Epoch.
- Appears to update 3 times per week.
Cons:
- All videos seem to follow same theme: Musical background, model strips, model plays with pussy, may use toys
- Sort by Newest or "most popular", Select by All or "pussy type", most videos have tags but one can not select or sort by tags
- Older videos are 640x480 WMV
- Some of the Girls seem uninterested
- Interview section is very says almost nothing, and is text not video/audio.
- There is a tab on most pages for "CAMS" but it is a dead link.
Bottom Line:
Good clear images and videos. Lots of closeups.
Most models are Eastern European. Of the 24 most recent updates the Country of Origins are: England 1, Czech Republic 10, USA 1, Poland 2, Hungary 2, Romania 1, Austrira 2, France 2, Netherlands 1, Switzerland 1, Greece 1. Models appear to be in the 18 to 25 year age range.
Lots of Dildo play. Many Pussy pumps, I suspect this may be why its "puffy". Most girls either use a lotion or spit on their fingers, this must be the "wet" part of the name.
There are a number of videos of the girls pissing. For fans of this, like me, it will be a turn on, as these are often closeups.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I'm a push-over when it comes to reviews and I'm having a hard time focusing on the good. Be aware other reviewers may have scored lower then my rating.
- Super hot girl. Early 20s(?), big boobs (enhanced I'm guessing), slight frame. Truly what an angel would look like.
- Multiple formats (wmv, flash, iOS, PSP, mp4, mpeg)
- zip downloads for pix usually over 100 pix in a set.
- Includes network of about 15 girls including: Dylan Ryder (active), Ashley Fires (active), Abbey Brooks (inactive), Sweet Lea Luv (inactive), Tara Lynn Foxx (inactive), Puma Swede (inactive))
Cons:
- No longer updating and hasn't since July 2010!
- There's no personality here. What gets Hanna off? What's her fantasy or which scenes does she get into? None of this is shown by the way she carries herself in these shoots.
- While some video is available in large file formats There are very few vids in 1280X720 5 mps, most is 640X480 2 mps. Most videos are 640X480 1mbps.
- About 55 movies - too many are Behind the Scenes for my tastes (almost 1/8 are BTS)
- About 77 images sets
- Ads in member site (I don't care - but some object
- There's a link for cam archives, but I can't find anything for Hanna
- Only 4 M/F shoots. Most are solo and girl/girl.
Bottom Line:
To me this site was a bore. While there's a rare gem or two there's only one or two. Many of the solo shoots are her being photographed while we hear the director telling her what to do (yawn) or a sexy panning of her with music playing instead of hearing her soft moans (I hate that).
I had such high hopes for Hanna, she is smokin' hot! But I'm a big fan of dirty talking girls and "oh god," and "fuck ya" just don't cut it. It seems like the few M/F shoots were from the very start of her career, hopefully she finds her comfort zone and puts more of who she is into her videos.
I know I'll be asked about anal so here's her response when a fan asked her (back in 2010)
asks: Do you like anal sex ? you have any plans doing an anal scene soon ? :)?
Hanna Says: No way
The Bottom Line:
Skip this site. If you're a fan of Hanna Hilton's pictures and you're looking to find those in 1 spot - this is a fine site. If you're interested in a best of Hanna, this is not the place to find that.
I always find something I like to download to my HD for later :), this time I downloaded NOTHING. Hanna's great - but this site needs her personality and (in my opinion) much more boy/girl shoots.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Girls vary in size, country, dress and attitude.
they are all Huge breasted, and if they're not,Cel will tell them, and they'll STILL let him grope them.
He speaks MANY launguages but mostly converses in English. Cel puts the girls at ease and that makes them do anything for him. Video and Photo options
New vids are labeled as such
Cons:
the available girls are shown but you cant open their boxes in new tabs, you have to click on each girls pic and go from there. Many of the clips appear to be in FLV format, which sucks. Real Player is buggy. Cel whould really start ANOTHER site. With the videos he takes AFTER the groping's over, if you know what i mean
Bottom Line:
I am Such a fan of this guy Cel. Which i guess his name is. I joined a few years ago and loved it then too. Only now, it's different. years ago he would photograph a model and have her try on clothes, jump up and down and play with their own tits. I was amazed then that he got amateur girls to just do this for him. Now Cel is a lot more confident. He often gets in the shot with the models and even starts to make out with them. Holy Shit and these girls LOVE him. It is Amazing to watch. He's an average looking guy, even a bit , well, overweight, but these hot chesty girls can't WAIT for him to start kissing them. He's found the secret to dealing with good looking girls, i don't know if it's telling them they're nice, cute, have good manners or what, but they are his. He is everyman and that's all right with us. I wish he had a Facebook Page or something. He needs to Know that he's appreciated
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
