Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 565 Page :    Next Page >

Visit VIP Area

1. VIP Area (1)

Pay
Active
90
wally (8) 10-11-14  11:50pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of the best solo or lesbian erotica you can find anywhere. Quality of the photography is rarely equaled.

Models look stunningly beautiful

Current updates have many download options, including 1920x1080HD

Update frequency has been great for the past several months

Access to a sister site "ikissgirls.com" featuring lesbian erotica of similar quality
Cons: Streaming and downloads are slo-oh-oh-oh....

Sets may be exclusive to the net, but some may be available on DVD as part of Girlfriends Films Glamour Solo series (not much of a negative considering the series has won AVN awards three years running)

A nitpick: would love it if updates were more frequent.

An odd nitpick: is it possible to be too perfect?
Bottom Line: In the field of females-only erotica, Tammy Sands may be the best photographer working today. I was familiar with her work from Twistys, where her solo sets were always great, often my favorites. She's quoted as saying "I believe solo movies are the most intimate of any adult genre" and I think this belief in what she's doing is reflected in her work - these scenes are put together with loving care, with sumptuous settings and exquisite lighting. The women all look gorgeous - don't know if it's great lighting or tons of well disguised makeup, but I don't think any of the models have looked any better anywhere than they do on this site.

That said, understand that the style is very much in the glamor category, fully explicit but with a fairly soft sensibility - there's more of a focus on sensuality. For my taste they strike a nice balance - they're more explicit than the "no close-ups, please, let's not be vulgar" style of some of the out-and-out softcore sites, but something short of the gynecological "camera always two inches from her clit" approach of a site like In The Crack. A nice mix of full-body long shots and up-close-and-personal shots. Plus, the women all seem to be having a good time doing something pleasurable and natural - masturbation and cunnilingus have never seemed so healthy.

But this whole glamor approach relates to my odd negative about being "too perfect". The portrayal of sex here is so idealized that it can sometimes seem a bit remote - something reserved for these goddesses but not available to mere mortals like me. It can lack some of the charm of a good amateur scene with a cute but seemingly more attainable model (a la Abby Winters) - if you prefer the girl-next-door type of model you will likely be disappointed [and it almost goes without saying that if you like your sex scenes to be "hard" and "nasty" you should look elsewhere].

In earlier years the update frequency was not the best, with maybe one new scene a week and occasional gaps of two weeks, but for the past several months the frequency of updates has been great, with three and sometimes four a week. (Speculation: this may have to do with the fact that Tammy quit producing for Twistys in the wake of the Twistys Treat controversy - possibly scenes that used to go to Twistys are now going to this site).

So if you like seeing beautiful women pleasuring themselves and occasionally each other in beautiful surroundings then this site would be a great choice.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Eternal Desire

2. Eternal Desire (1)

Pay
Active
91
luv lickn clit (21) 10-07-14  08:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: --models are gorgeous!

--photographic and video quality are excellent

--explicit but tasteful posing

--videos are far better than those at parent site Met-Art

--easy site navigation, signup and cancel through CC Bill

--3 sizes of zip files and multiple video resolution and format options

--comment section with participation from the photographer

--good site preview
Cons: the only real cons relate to the relatively small size of the site:

--only 114 models at this time

--updates with about one photoset or video a day (wish it were more)

--some photosets broken into 2 sets of about 60 photos each (applies mainly to older material)

--some sets shot using a lower megapixel camera (6 megapixel)

--the user tags search system doesn't have very much user participation, and as such, isn't very useful
Bottom Line: Eternal Desire is one of the newer sites in the Met-Art family, and consists exclusively of the work of "Arkisi", one of Met-Art's better and more prolific photographers. The site was launched in February 2013, and now features 114 different models.

The models are gorgeous European girls in the 18 to 25 year old age range. Only 8s, 9s, and 10s here, with most of them on the top end of the scale (or off the scale!).

The site consists primarily of photo sets, with a small amount of videos (there were 8 videos released in July, August, and September of this year).

The site looks and navigates very much like Met-Art, which is to be expected as it is one of their sites. I had no problems whatsoever navigating around the site, and my download speeds are always good. I don't know if download managers would work, as I don't use them.

The photographic quality is excellent--lighting, focus, etc are all top notch. One caveat to that is that some sets are shot as low as 6 megapixels. The sets are upscale (often with fine furniture and well appointed rooms), and the girls wear nice outfits and lingerie. The makeup is well done, and not overdone (IMHO). The posing is explicit, but not vulgar, and always seems to include a few good pussy close-ups. Occasionally there is too much fingering and finger spreading in the photos for my tastes, but there are very few sets that actually disappoint me.

The videos deserve special mention and accolades. Any of you who have been a member at Met-Art know their videos are kinda lame. Not so at Eternal Desire. There are explicit lingering views of what you really want to see, and lately, quite of bit of fingering and even finger insertion (though not overdone). The girls interact with camera quite well and seductively. Instead of being a waste of time like many of the videos at Met-Art, these are videos that you actually want to see. The resolutions come in 720p and 1080p, plus a few smaller sizes as well. The HD vids are in MPEG4 format.

The only real cons for the site relate to its relatively small size. 114 models is still small compared to many, and 1 photoset or video day is a lot less than the mega-sites. Eventually I noticed enough of my favorite models there that I had to join. I've been there 2 months now, and I'm finding it difficult to leave (no doubt as soon as I do, several of my favorite girls will have sets published).

Like most of the Met-Art sites, there is a comment section, and Arkisi occasionally participates.

I wish all sites were this good!

The site preview is excellent, so if you are a fan of erotic photography featuring totally gorgeous women, you should definitely check it out! I got the PU discount price by navigating there through their review page.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bikini Pleasure

3. Bikini Pleasure (1)

Pay
Active
84
Monahan (42) 10-06-14  03:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I finally gave in and signed onto Bikini-Pleasure after checking out the free photos they make available. (See www.preview.bikini-paradise.com)It was pretty much as I expected.

The site is totally focused on very nice looking babes wearing (sorta) teeny tiny bikinis ranging from maybe 1 square inch of fabric covering the pussy to crotchless numbers (example, costume pearls arranged in a triangle that leave the pussy totally unprotected.

The site is almost a fashion show of teeny tiny beach wear and in almost every case winds up with the model being totally starkers (that means bare assed naked to you Yanks).

There are a few instances where the babe plays with her labia lips (sometimes where they are flapping around a micro bikini, and other times after the bikini has been removed.

The site is about 50/50 between videos (superbly hi def) and photos (are all hi def with three size options).

Mammaries are also exposed in the same manner as the pussy, usually with fully erect nipples
Cons: Absolutely no insertions of any kind. Makes Met Art stuff seem totally pornographic and salacious in comparison.

Many of the scenes have two or four babes but there's no interaction between them nor is there even a hint of any sexual interest.

The majority of videos are of photo sessions and include a lot of camera clicking and flashes which becomes somewhat distracting.

I saw no models with whom I'm familiar, with the sole exception of the always lovely Blue Angel who has a batch of material.
Bottom Line: The standard scene is on a beach and many scenes are in the same venue with the same babes. Most show people in the background ranging from naked old gents (reminds me of the old nudist park material back in the day...without the volleyball) to little kids and normal (not physically attractive) middle aged ladies.

Even with the featured ladies walking around with their boobs and twats on full display for all to see, no one seems to notice. Thus I suspect the shooting venue is probably a Mediterranean beach somewhere like the Costa Del Sol (Spain) or the French Riviera.

In no case is there any blurring out of the faces of the folks who were on the beach.

The site has a very large volume of material and zipped photo groups so draining the site is not a real possibility except if you want to devote an entire month to the project.

In summary, if you enjoy great looking babes (almost) wearing scandalously teeny-tiny bikinis and enjoy closeup shots of pussy and some titties, you may enjoy the site. But you won't see much in the way of ass shots or any fingering or toy activity.

The material would easily pass the censorship limitations of Playboy in the 70's and 80's and would be totally OK for any other soft core publications back in the 20th Century.

I like the site and was not expecting anything more than I got when I signed up. Navigation is simple and downloading is clean and efficient.

My score of 84 is based on the site delivering exactly what it promised, providing content with consistently very high quality stuff and a very large bunch of stuff to choose from. The site updates frequently, usually daily.

Using the PU scoring criteria, the site had no variety in terms of shooting venues and themes and was too "puritan" in how they had the models behave.

Also the only males in any of the scenes were older gents lounging nearby totally oblivious to the naked ladies in their vicinity.

One last thing. I've never seen a bikini bottom with a zipper. in a few cases the damn thing was so small, the labia lips hung out on the sides even when zipped. I can only imagine who it must have felt if the model was careless when zipping up.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Digital Desire

4. Digital Desire (2)

Pay
Active
88
graymane (31) 07-06-14  04:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Big collection of exclusive content.
Zip ==200mb wmv = 300mb mp4 =300mb (whatever)
Seemingly all shoots are done on DD's own turf.
Ample Photo gallery featuring each model.
1,055+ video Scenes (approx. 15 min. each).
Video HD. Sharp images. Streaming with flash player. 2-3 second buffer. although this observer might argue that point.
Very nice playbacks. might even win you over from downloading.
7 day updates (With no less than 5 image galleries; four full videos.
Soft core,...no hard stuff; all solo, but acted out by women so incredibly beautiful that
hardcore fanatics are left not giving a f...k ....
Few scattered tattoos. Ample Space allotted for viewer comments on each model
Primary niche: Photography: which is quite Plentiful. videos: also in the high numbers.
Attractive TBP introductory discount at the time I joined.
Download managers (yes)
Cons: Wildly popular with the gals here is one of my greatest peeves ... that of endless insertion of their their little hands and fingers in their mouths .... all whilst vigorously wanking away as if these digital appendages were lollypops laced with opium based sweeteners.
Might wanna Look out for tricky buddy-sites that sparingly dwell within corners of some pages, beckoning you in.

I ultimately found cancelling a bit un-nerving:
Although could very easily be my own shortcoming -- but I did seem to experience some tenacity on the part of saying Bye-Bye to these folks. Finally had to call epoch billing to get the results I wanted.
Bottom Line: This site looks every bit to live up to its title: "Desire" is everywhere. Some of these gal's acts are piling up such gun-powder one has to hold down the artillery.
Girls are from 18 to 30yrs, and wields the kind of glamor and curves that look hand-made by the Gods.
I was looking at this site for a long time before reaching for the plastic. Luckily helped along by DD with being given a deal I couldn't refuse.
And I gotta say ..... I'm really not the least disappointed I choose to jump in.

Caveats ???? ......OH YEAH!
Here's another bunch hung-up on Superfluous Vaginal close ups.
Geeeze! When will they ever listen and learn? Enough is enough!
Thanks to vaginal-obsessed cameramen, I'm now an expert on every aspect of the female genitalia.... including even the behavioral habits of amoebae-like creeper-crawlers that roam the epidermis and love dining on the unique women's aromatic sheading .
How much further can the lens go? ....lest the camera territorially eventually wind-up scouting the ovaries.

Would I recommend Digital Desire? Yes I would.
However, if you've been to those sites, Twisty and the likes thereof offer some of the same kind of heart-thumping power!
But DD does have those selected gals who look so much to be uniquely hand-made by the Gods.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Curved FX

5. Curved FX (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
CarolinaCock (0) 06-25-14  08:41am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Wonderful models I knew from Onlytease
* Good photography
Cons: * Amatuerish site design and poor navigation(frames!)
* low res, small images for the most part
* Vids are unprofessional and small - Quick time only format.
* Need a browser extension to download sets. Apparently he ha some problems with copyright theft but that doesn't explain away all the deficiencies of this site.
Bottom Line: I created a login just to share how bad this site is. That should tell you something. He has some good content, but its not worth the cost.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Voy Zone

6. Voy Zone (0)

Pay
Newbie
67*
TheMoreYouKnow (4) 06-05-14  07:13am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Update Frequency: Updates Daily

Video Resolution Quality: Fairly decent ranging from 720X576 to 1280X720.

Image Quantity: There are an incredible amount of photos on site.

Subject Matter: Some gorgeous women captured in the available content.
Cons: Image Set Quality: Images are random, not at all visually tied together in a given scene and are by average 4X6Ē in size, pretty small for a pay site. Also to note many of the images are low res versions from other pay sites, such as BeachVoy.

Overall Business Practice: Incredibly poor due to blatant deception in advertisement in updates and distribution/recycling of material.

Video Quality In Terms of Content: Majority of the videos are in dire need of editing, since many of them have minutes of inactivity.

Price: Way over priced considering the content given quantity and quality of material.
Bottom Line: Before even deciding on investing 30 bucks on a month with Voy-Zone.com, I noticed the ďLast UpdatesĒ indicated on their non-member main page were all given (current month/year, but no exact date of entry) when hovering over them individually with the mouse. Suspicion ran over me, telling that these images/videos were not really updates at all, rather these images were the same and the dates were automatically set to change with the current month. So I waited till the next month passed and sure enough, the same images stayed on page, but their attached month auto-adjusted to the current month.

Video Count: 462 video clips (some are however repeats).

Despite this blatant deception toward prospective customers, I was still curious what content was held within their site, and thought maybe Voy-Zoneís page intro was simply a by-product a lazy web management and thought perhaps they still held some exclusive fresh content that maybe worth while, so I still forked over my 30 bones to see whatís up.

First impressionsÖ Once joining Voy-Zone.com, and logging in, the siteís main page was completely different, filled with actual updates with complete dates of when they were posted. As to whether this material has been recycled from any previous posts, I would consider to be quite feasible, due to the fact thereís a huge gap of time where no posted material is to be found on site! Strangely enough between September 9, 2011 and February 5, 2014, there was absolutely no material to be found inside their video collection. Also to note, what little material that has been left on site posted in 2011 has been reposted in 2014! With this in mind, itís an easy guess that periodically material is withdrawn from the site, then probably reposted later in the site in order to keep material fresh as well as keeping customers from downloading the majority of their archive in a monthís membership. Also if youíre more into high quality image sets (i.e. related pics of a particular scene), than movies of beach voyeurism, stay clear from this site, the image ďsetsĒ here are pretty much random unconnected pics, by average 4X6Ē in size, fairly poor in resolution given their from a pay site.

EDITING: Many of the movies are riddled with mouth breather moments, that being many of these 3 plus minute clips contain women on their backs barely fidgeting an inch, all the while they could have simply taken a photo which wouldíve consumed hundreds of megabytes less than a videoÖ Itís often a wonder at times to think if these guys ever consider the topic of conceptual editing; meaning if nothing is happening in a half minute or so through a scene, hit the pause button or at least edit it out the inactivity in the material later when the footage has been captured. And these guys definitely have plenty of experience in editing software, since much of the footage has been divided into individual clips in order to increase appearance of having more content, a common practice among voyeur sites.

QUANTITY VS QUALITY: To say that all Voy-Zone films are like the ladder would be unfair, there are some nice gems scattered through out and about 1 out of 10 films are hard drive keeper worthy, at least to my standards not sparing the smiles and womanly curves, while the rest are simply mouth breather fillers kept on site, just so that it would appear their collection is immense in size: mission accomplished. As of June 04, 2014, to my count there were 462 video clips, including some repeated material peppered within the sets.

De ĎRena, who has distributed content on other sites, actually captures the best material on site, but still at times have moments of stagnant mouth breather scenes, also having tendencies of attention deficit disorder (ADD) moments with the camera shifting away from main subject at hand toward random uninteresting views, then shifting back toward main subject; this probably is due to the lack of activity with subjects not being in motion, but for the viewer (at least to me) these odd shifts get quite annoying, and the answer again to resolve these mouth breather moments and odd off-base subject shift, is that good olí fashion pause button, patience, and/or perhaps the use of editing software as well. Also repeated posts of the same material are not uncommon to find.

VOLUME: Also another tip, lowering the volume is quite an effective measure in reducing self-noise which is another annoyance entirely on its own.

RATING SYSTEM: Each page does provide users a means to rate the material, however there is no way to see the accumulation of others' ratings. The accumulation of these ratings apparently determine the ďTop 7 Video SetsĒ of the site, but unfortunately thereís no optional page viewing system given to see material rated from best to worst, which would be an ideal feature as well.

In short, this is a pass due to their price is a bit steep considering the limited quantity of quality movies on site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Naked Gym Girls

7. Naked Gym Girls (1)

Pay
Active
69
rearadmiral (328) 02-18-14  03:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 9 videos, 7 picture sets
- Unique niche
- $20 membership
- Videos in three resolutions
- Photos in zips or singles
- Photos in two resolutions
- High-res photos look amazing
- Supports download managers for queuing files
- Definitely all exclusive
Cons: - Small site
- No obvious update schedule
- Music replaces sound
- Would be much better value packaged as part of a network
Bottom Line: Leave it to the folks at The Best Porn to expose me to a niche I neither knew existed or liked it: girls getting naked while working out. There is really only one reason why I joined, and thatís to get access to a scene by a model I like who has only done a small amount of stuff. The fact that the site isnít terribly expensive at $20 and billed through CC Bill sealed the deal.

The site is very small, with only nine videos and seven photo sets offered. While thatís definitely small, you need to keep in mind that many of the scenes are well over an hour long and one falls just short of two hours.

The site has a very narrow (and unique) focus: girls at a gym, solo, who begin a workout, strip off their clothes while working out and complete the workout while naked. There is little variation: there is one scene with two girls with some sex, and one scene is shot outdoors, but other than that it follows the same formula. Consider this more a nudist site than a sex site.

The scenes are undated so I canít determine what update schedule, if any, exists. The site allows member comments on the scenes and the most recent scene has comments. Yesterday when I checked the comments the most recent said it was posted three months ago. Today it says it was posted on December 2, but doesnít give a year. I think it is safe to assume that if the site is updating there is no set schedule beyond glacial.

The site offers videos in three resolutions: 1920x1080 (9000 kb/s), 1080x720 and 640x360. While I found most of the video to be crisp and clear, I did find in some of the videos that where there is fast movement the edges become slightly pixilated. I donít understand the tech side of this so I donít know if this is something the site could even avoid.

A unique feature is that you can download an ISO version that can be burned to a DVD to watch on TV.

The site permits download managers for queuing scenes and zips.

The photos are available as singles or zips and in two resolutions: 3744x5616 and 1200x800. The high-res pics look incredibly good. If youíre a photo collector these might be worth joining to get. Photo sets range from 100+ photos to 800+ photos.

My biggest complaint about the scenes may be subjective, but I suspect that many others will agree with me. Iíll let any potential members decide on their own. The site has chosen to overdub the sounds of the workout with music. This isnít that there is music playing over top of the sounds; the sounds are gone and completely replaced by music. To make matters worse, in my opinion, is that the music is that techno-shit that seems to be overplayed in gyms. You might be able to convince me that this crappy music belongs in a gym (but donít bet on it) but youíll never convince me that it belongs in a porn video. Even a solo video where the intention may be to create a sort of gym atmosphere. Iíd rather hear the interaction with the crew than the music.

This site is one of ten that was added to TBP recently from a company called David Weisenbarger (David Nudes, HD Studio Nudes and more). I do not have memberships at any other of these sites but it appears that they are all relatively small (though some are fairly big), that they feature mostly solo models with rare g/g sex. My role in the porn biz is as a customer, and as a customer I am unlikely to join any of their other sites simply because they arenít a good value at $20 to $25 per site. (And keep in mind that production costs here are at the low end of the spectrum: no expensive locations, solo nude, no sex, no masturbation.) All the sites added together would make a fair-sized network and by charging a fair price theyíd probably generate exponentially more business. This has nothing to do with the review, and Iím obviously only speculating.

The bottom line? the site is small, but it is relatively inexpensive at $20. It bills through CC Bill so you can join in confidence. If this is a niche you like or there is a model here that you want to see then you may be willing to spend the $20 to join. For everyone else, the site is too small with no predictable growth to make this a good choice. As it stands now, and with no obvious changes coming, this site isnít a good value. If this site ever becomes part of a network or package deal Iíd reconsider my opinion.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Goddess Nudes

8. Goddess Nudes (2)

Pay
Active
82
skippy (42) 11-30-13  12:49pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Decent collection (about 1000 sets, I think)
Generally very attractive models
Many familiar models
Excellent value for the money
Photography is generally very good
Images available up to 3200x4800
For the price, you will not be disappointed!
Cons: Navigation is extremely basic
Site formatting is also very basic
Only a couple of videos (it is a photo site...)
Only 2 zip file sizes (but good choices)
Only 2 image file sizes (but big enough)
Bottom Line: For less than $10, I figured I didn't have much to lose and I ended up getting MUCH more than I expected.

This site has several years worth of about 5 updates a week. The models are generally Eastern European. Many have been in Femjoy or MetArt, but there were also many, some quite beautiful, that I had not seen before. Some of the best European models on the planet are on this site, although most have different names. If you like Dominika, Katya or Mila on Met Art, they are all here. There are even a few nice sets of the now-retired but forever revered Marketa.

Neither the site nor the sets are quite as polished as some of the more expensive softcore sites, but I guess that is to be expected in this price range. There are many models that I've seen elsewhere and I just cant tell if the sets are from when they were younger, or if the girls just aren't wearing make-up. The tendency here is to use less or no make-up, so if you are not into the glam look, this is another treasure-site.

The sets are generally good quality, both indoors and outdoors. Lighting is good. The amount of "reveal" depends on the models, but most sets start out in lingerie or fully nude and about half have close-ups. There are no toys, insertions, etc., although there are a few scenes with two girls. This is not an "in your face" site...more of a girl-in-the-woods or girl-in-her-bedroom thing. Interaction with the photographer is generally very good, depending on the experience of the model, and many look like they are having a pretty good time. Kudos to the photo crew for that.

All sets are dated on the main thumbs page for each year. File names are reasonable for both the images and the zip files, so you don't have to go through hoops to save them. Since each set is listed since the site was created, you can tell that there is no recycling going on like at some other sites.

The navigation on the site is very, very basic. The update page is not formatted, so the update thumbs just go down the left side of the screen for ever. The two choices under each thumb are "screen sized" (currently 934x1400) or "print sized" (currently 3930x5988) older images are slightly smaller, but still pretty big.

So for navigation, you click on an option under a set image (screen or print) and then click on an image. To get back to the main page, you back out with your browser. There are no pop-ups or viewers. Once in a set, you can also download a zip file of images in the size you chose to get into the set (screen or print). NO toggling between image sizes or even choosing multiple zip file sizes once you commit to screen or print for the image sizes. No forward or backward movement once you chose an image to look at. Just page back and pick another image (or shift-click to open a new window). This works, but it seems so 1990. Perfectly acceptable, though, for the no-frills price.

I would have scored this site a little higher if it were not for the navigation. It is an honest site that is in the business of providing quality softcore images. They don't fluff it up and they don't steal your money. That is a rare and terrific thing in this industry and I will be back both for the images and to help ensure they stay around.

Bottom line? This site is a terrific deal! If you are tired of paying $30 to get into a new site only to be disappointed with quality or quantity of content and you like the softcore genre, then this site is a must-visit. C'mon! for under $10, you've got absolutely nothing to lose!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jodie Gasson

9. Jodie Gasson (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
bigcocktrans (0) 11-27-13  08:52pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: First: There is no 'gay' material on this website, don't understand why someone said that!!

Jodie Gasson is one of my favorite glamour girls. She comes from the new wave of UK glamour models, a beautiful busty blonde/brunette (depending on her mood) with a sweet personality.

I love her site because every day I can check in with her on the forums, view her 'selfie' pics from her phone that she uploads, and she is constantly updating her site (almost every day!) You can tell she really cares about her members and giving us what we want.

I also love all the bonus sites. There are a lot of other beautiful models in her network, like Anastasia Harris and Melissa Clarke.
Cons: The only thing I'd like is if she would go on webcam more.
Bottom Line: If you are a fan of beautiful glamour girls like I am, and want to actually get to know them and their personalities beyond just their pretty faces, JodieGasson.com will definitely please you! :)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Life Erotic

10. The Life Erotic (2)

Pay
Active
88
Parsnip (10) 10-31-13  01:30pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Recent material very well made and very stylish, beautiful standard of films.
- Recent photo sets very interesting & original.
- Greater variety of models than normal, including some a little older, and some latin girls.
- There seems to be a lot of genuine sexual excitement in the models, they really looked turned on and I often can believe that they have orgasms.
- Very quick and reliable downloads, always maxes out my internet connection (around 2 MBytes/sec).
- Multiple sizes and resolutions of photos & videos, up to 1080p, although I only ever download the highest.
- Site doesn't seem to time out. When I first joined I stayed logged in for several days while downloading the old material.
- Quite a few Paul Black movies - my all time favourite. You wouldn't believe a film with just one girl in it would be so exciting and different.
- Most films are relatively short - 5 to 10 minutes - and well edited.
Cons: - The earlier material is rather uninspired, and quite a lot isn't exclusive.
- Some of the earlier films are a bit pixellated - claim to be HD but I'm not so sure.
- Rather too many models with tattoos and piercings for my tastes.
- Some of the older photo sets are far too long, with endless almost identical photos.
- The logo on the films is a bit intrusive although it is a bit better on the recent films, the logo on the photos is much smaller.
- The cross-site advertising is a pain.
- It is possible to vote, but there is no comment mechanism so there is no feel of any community membership.
Bottom Line: The basis of The Life Erotic is stylized female masturbation - there is some g/g material but that also concentrates on the act of masturbation rather then regular lesbian sex. These days there are daily updates, 2 films and 5 photo sets per week, earlier there were 4 updates per week with rather fewer films.

I really like the current material, even when it is a bit dark for my tastes or when the girls have a few too many tattoos or piercings, it is so imaginative and well made that I still enjoy it. The earlier material isn't as good. Concentrating on solo female masturbation is a bit limiting, and it obviously took a while to find the right style. The current material is amazing, but pre-2012 isn't great. With 2 films produced per week, this means there isn't a huge amount of top quality material. That's really the only thing I can mark the site down for.

It might seem a bit limiting to concentrate on solo masturbation, but they are managing to make it very varied and interesting with some great scenarios. It may be all solo or GG, but in my experience the scenarios make it genuinely for couples too. Personally, I like to see member comments on sites, although I rarely join in as I tend to be downloading the material a week or two late, and I definitely miss having comments on this site - I think they are missing a trick here as one of the ways to encourage membership rather than piracy is to make a community of the site. I joined relatively recently for a year, and am almost certain to renew.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit MC Nudes

11. MC Nudes (2)

Pay
Active
84
skippy (42) 09-22-13  02:02am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Excellent selection of models (350+)
Mostly 18-26 or so.
All shapes and sizes but mostly petite
Very large collection (650+ vids, 200k+ images)
Exclusive content
A few of the most popular European models
Older sets of spectacular popular models
Navigation is good
All galleries are dated
Generally very good photo quality
Newer sets use good file naming convention
Videos have been in 720p for several years
Newer sets up to about 5800x3500 pixels.
Lots of new models you've never seen before
Cons: The site is often slow.
I had difficulty logging in a few times
All zips named small.zip,medium.zip,large.zip
(meaning zip files are not unique)
Videos are mostly from photo shoots
Good lighting/imagery, but not consitenly great
Color/white balance on some of the sets is off
Some of the sets are pretty short
Top rated model, though beautiful, is from 2005
Not that many new stand-out models
Lots of models you'll never see again
Oddball, quirky 3D sets
Bland color scheme
Bottom Line: This is a very good site that anyone who is into solo or two-girl modeling should absolutely visit. It has tremendous variety of mostly eastern European girls that are perhaps a tad more natural than what you might see elsewhere.

That said, I find it very difficult to rate this site up there with the best of this class. I've been a member of this site off and on for about 8 years. When I first joined, the site was way up there with the best. It is still very good, but there is just a little something that makes it less appealing for me personally. The folks at MC-Nudes put together a very nice site and I know from my experiences with them that they are conscientious enough to read this, so I'll explain as carefully as I can.


The first thing I notice are the colors...or rather the lack of them. Everything is in tan or cream or some color of rice, wheat or straw. Everything. Even the sets are mostly in these nuetral colors with very low color saturation. I am pretty sure that this is because they think they might want to convert sets into 3D and the red-blue 3D doesn't work well if there are bright colors. But sadly, it is detracting from all the sets and the entire site. Go look at Met Art or Watch4Beauty and the colors on the site and in the sets leap off the page. MC-nudes? The colors stick to the page like this mornings oatmeal sticks to the bowl. If this reduced band of colors is to support 3D, I really think you should dump 3D. The site needs more POP.

OK, next. Years ago, MC-Nudes utilized mainstream models that were among the most beautiful on the planet. Marketa, Monika Vesela, Bambi, Zafira, Eufrat, etc. There are some fantastic sets here if you are into these mainstream models from 2004-2010 or so. They still have several models that have recently become very popular (like Nika and Dominika).
At the same time, they managed to find some ungodly beautiful models that you'd never seen before or since. This unknown but beautiful girl Simona is still their top rated model (from 2005 and with only 3 sets...)

More recently, I think they've gotten into using new and unknown models a little more. This is a great thing for those of us who like a lot of variety, but you have to go through a LOT of girls to find one or two true stars in this field. Nearly all of the MC-Nudes models have spectacular figures, but because of either the lighting, the make-up, the inconsistent eye contact with the camera or perhaps because they are new and don't seem to be having much fun, many of these girls just aren't as appealing as they could be. Some of the brighter or more popular models have figured out how to tease and play with the camera a little. But a really good photography team should be teaching them ALL how to be playful. It makes a huge difference.

Couple of peeves. The site is often very slow. I also could not get in a few times, getting an Apache server-type error message instead of the web site. I know that account management is tricky, but I have several subscripions (and several computers) and I have not had this kind of trouble before...pretty much ever.

Although the file management is better than it used to be, the zip files still need to be named and dated or coded in such a way to make them unique. Webmaster, if you do that once for each set, your thousands of customers won't have to do it at all.

Bottom line? Go check it out! If you like what you see in the samples, sign up! There is enough quality material to keep you busy and happy for quite a while. If you don't stay, check back every year or so. With daily updates, it will be worth your while.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Body In Mind

12. Body In Mind (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
Arlen84 (2) 09-21-13  08:09pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: (*)Very attractive, classy-looking ladies
(*)Extra large resolution photos (for recent sets)
(*)No over-the-top post-processing (may not be a positive for some, but suits my tastes)
Cons: (*)Unadvertised 3GB 24 hour download limit, cannot even log into the site once you exceed it
(*)Unadvertised LARGE format-only (i.e. no EXTRA) ZIP downloads
(*)Slightly tedious ZIP download process (have to agree to never share)
(*)Softness in a lot of photo sets
(*)Photo sets from before 2009 can have the photos chopped up into separate images to prevent you from downloading the entire image
(*) Site can be slow
Bottom Line: Overall, I was both intrigued and disappointed by this site. It features some of the most attractive ladies that I've seen to date, and generally the style suits my tastes greatly (no over photoshopping, no harsh lighting, etc.) But the downsides simply outweigh the pluses for me. For starters, the advertised EXTRA LARGE resolution is NOT available for download in zip. You can certainly open each of them in your browser and download manually, but that is quite cumbersome. Second, once you hit the 2008 and before sets, all those photos of all resolution are chopped up into 6 or more separate images, thereby preventing you from getting the EXTRA LARGE sizes manually. Also there is a 3GB per day quota that they don't tell you about until you hit it, and once you do you're locked out of the site for 24 hours. Not to mention that if you're downloading a few zips at the same time, the site slows down to a crawl. Lastly, the LARGE sizes are really quite pitiful, not even 1920px standard.

This is really disappointing as some of the hottest ladies grace this site, yet some of the best photo sets are pre-2009, meaning that I can't have them in resolutions sufficient for turning into HD wallpapers.

With increases in bandwidth, image resolutions in zip format, and also better lenses to reduce the softness of certain sets, this site could be a real gem. Pity.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Jack Off To Me

13. Jack Off To Me (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
NoHagsHere (Disabled) 09-03-13  06:27am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lola is hot as fuck; I would pay a lot of money for an hour alone with her, so that says something. It's nice to see a naturally thin performer who looks healthy and doesn't have unnatural breast balloons. The quality of the video footage is high.
Cons: Lola is one of my top 10 favorite porn ladies but the technical aspects of the jack off to me work is marginal (as with most porn). The camera work is awkward (complete with handling noise) and draws way too much attention to itself. The audio quality is marginal and almost always features annoying AC noise. The lighting often features a nasty blue cast due to use of cheap LED lighting.

Regarding performance, Lola doesn't talk nearly enough. She really needs to work on her dirty talk and throw out some more sexy and titillating banter. "Oh, oh, oh, oh," and "mmmmmmm" doesn't count as good dirty talk.

Also, the whole cock stroking thing is ludicrous. Please stop.
Bottom Line: I would renew my subscription beyond the recent Labor Day special rate if Lola had at least one good new video up per month, but I don't see that happening. And I couldn't care less about the other performers on the site except the demeaning blond from September 1st 2012. I would pay money to see her talk dirty without the nasty mistress bullshit.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Fame Girls.net

14. Fame Girls.net (1)

Pay
Active
87
Marcus (45) 08-26-13  07:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Extremely high-quality photography and HD videos
- Already plenty of content despite it being a relatively new site
- Exclusive content and exclusive models
- Regular updates, all dated (3 galleries and at least 1 vid a week)
- All content is downloadable, with ZIPs available for galleries
- Two super, super-sexy models who are both very confident
- No ugly tattoos, fake breasts, lots of piercings etc
- Great quality photography and slickly-edited video
- Lots of variety in terms of shooting locations, gallery themes etc
- Nice, clean (if basic) navigation and previews of future updates
- Well-used comment and gallery/video rating system
- Ability to bookmark your favourite photos/sets
- Both models are outstanding teases without showing too much
- Billing by CCBill with reduced cost rebills
- Simple login with ability to choose own username/password
Cons: Points marked with * don't bother me personally:

- Search system doesnít seem to work
- Previews are a bit too vague, particularly for video updates
- Videos are a bit too arty-farty and can be slow-moving
- Daily bonus photos arenít varied enough
- No interaction with/from the models (eg, blog)
- Currently only two models*
- Some might not be happy Katie/Ella arenít totally nude*
- Pricey compared to some sites*
Bottom Line: I nearly didnít review this as I know a lot of people donít Ďgetí non-nude sites, but for me a good tease site can definitely hold its own against even a lot of porn sites as for me the thrill of the chase, and the art of tease can be extremely sexy in my opinion.

A quick bit of history first: Famegirls.net replaces Fame-Girls which is now an archive site. Previously there were three models; the famous Sandra, Virginia and Ella. Sandra retired, and recently Virginia also retired. Vlad, Ellaís photographer, decided to start a new site on his own, and introduced Katie, who is new to modelling.

The site is only a few months old, but already it has 36 galleries (5,000 pictures), and 19 videos, and with three galleries (averaging 100-150 photos) and at least one video every week, itís growing fast.

Both Katie and Ella pose nude, with very little being left to the imagination apart from between the legs. They come very close to showing everything, though, particularly Ella. They are both supreme strip teases, though, and for me, little is sexier than a beautiful girl, slowly, sensually taking her clothes off and having fun as she does.

The galleries are set in number of locations; either in the studio, normally with a plain background and props, or often outside on a deserted road, beautiful meadow or idyllic river. Even on the outside shoots, the image quality and lighting is exceptional.

Itís a lot more sexual than the previous site in terms of poses, the style of photography, the detail and things like the Ella pouring milk over herself in one set, or Katie smothering herself in oil in another Ė itís more than just glamour now.

Although sets are generally the same format, each gallery brings something new to the table. Thereís always a strong narrative, the costumes vary from bikinis to dresses and everything in between, and both Ella and Katie seem to have a huge variety of poses so it somehow never gets repetitive.

Currently there are 35 galleries and around 4,500 images.

Images are 5760px on their longest side, and have a
translucent simple white logo in the corner. Each gallery is downloadable as a zip file. You can also choose to download the zip file with six different image dimensions from 640px on their longest side all the way up to their original size.

There are also 20 videos available. All are 1280x720, HD, MP4 and are around 5-10 minutes long. Theyíre beautifully shot, but generally a bit too arty-farty and slow-paced, although there are exceptions (eg, the latest Katie video where sheís in a sauna). At least one video is added every week.

Members can rate and comment on both videos and galleries. These seem like well-used features, and comments arenít censored or even moderated from what I can tell.

Navigation-wise, you can view Ellaís sets, Katieís sets, or videos. You can also add sets and photos to your favourites and view just those. There is also a search function, but Iím not sure it actually works Ė it would be nice if you could search for Ďlingerieí or Ďbikinií or some kind of tag, but every search term I tried didnít return any results. The navigation is fairly simple but definitely fit for purpose.

Another little criticism is the daily bonus photo, which is not included in normal sets, Ďsuch as pictures from real life, artistic shots, or working momentsí Ė since Iíve been a member, every day itís been a picture of Katie from the same shoot, albeit a different picture. It would be nice if these could be more mixed up so one day it might be (for example) Ella at the beach, then Katie on a shoot, then Ella shopping etc... at the moment itís just like being slowly drip-fed a gallery day-by-day.

At the moment it is only Katie and Ella modelling. I know the webmaster is looking for another model, though. Both Katie and Ella compliment each other with both being extremely svelte, with incredible figures. Ella is blonde, while Katie is raven-haired. Neither have lots of piercings or any tattoos which is good to see. So far, thereís only been one video with the pair in, so fingers crossed for more.

My last criticism, possibly my biggest, is that thereís no interaction from the models in terms of behind the scenes footage or candid photos. I know a lot of people donít care for this, but on a site like this I think itís important. I donít blame them for not getting involved with comments etc, but maybe Vlad (the photographer/webmaster) could consider a blog with more of a behind-the-scenes/off duty look at these gorgeous girls?

This is a great website with great photography and is incredibly sensual. The girls are both gorgeous, Ella is incredibly experienced and Katie is already confident and exciting in front of the camera. At the moment it is on the pricey side, but Vlad has a long history of being extremely reliable with updates, and content is continually being added and I definitely feel like Iíve got value for money compared to a lot of smaller amateur model sites.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Dreams

15. Teen Dreams (1)

Pay
Active
79
RLane (16) 07-30-13  01:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Lots of models
+Zip (large size only)
+Updates weekley
+HD videos
+Quick download speed
Cons: -Not a popular billing company
-few low resolution images for newer sets
-okay site navigation
-slow navigation
Bottom Line: First of all this was a pretty good site a few years ago, but now they haven't given the same effort as before. The site has an okay navigation with very poor loading times at certain times of the day. I like the favorite and rating system on the site, but when you have to dislike something it takes you back to the main members page and then you have to go back to the favs page.

There are about 2000 models on the site with an update weekly. They update at three times a week with about three or four new content every update. The download speed is quite fast including a download of a 500MB video. Now the billing company is Pure Web Power, but I haven't contacted them yet but when I do I'll add to my review. You do have access to their bonus sites using your TeenDreams login, but I think the majority is the same content on TDs

For the videos they do offer HD for NEW content. They only offer MP4 with no other type of media. The sizes they offer vary between old to new, the new offers 1080 (Full HD), 720 HD), 360 (med) and 180 (mobile) with the old videos vary but most of them only have the medium size. The videos download pretty quick with an average of 200MB for HD videos. There are about 1800 videos on the site.

For the galleries, there are about 7000+ sets ranging from solo, lesbian to boy/girl. The quality of most of the images are quite good ranging from 2013 to 2006. For the sizes, they do vary from year to year, but for recent sets their largest I've seen is 2040 for tall images and for long there is 1360x907 which is a huge disappointment; although, the quality of them are great. Most of the older images are usually 1728px and sometimes 2046px or 2000px from 2007 to 2012. Images in 2005 are usually 1752px. As for the zips they only offer Large size with no other sizes to select and when you also select an image it gives you the large without any other size.

Bottom line, this is a good mega site with tons of content with great quality, but is very slow at times and is a little bit hard to navigate. Overall this is a site I would recommend.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Feel Myself

16. I Feel Myself (0)

Pay
Newbie
100*
WLV612 (1) 06-25-13  05:50am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: High production values.
Great contributors.
Forum interaction.
Well moderated.
Cons: Like most sites, the older contributors aren't in HD but that's not a con, just a limitation of the time when the earlier vids were filmed.
Bottom Line: IFM is geared toward the female orgasm so hardcore fans would be left wanting. For me, the reward is in the site's honest effort to produce something a bit more artistic and personal.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Kiss Me Girl

17. Kiss Me Girl (0)

Pay
Newbie
92*
Bdot (3) 06-08-13  12:22pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Amazing scenes. You simply won't find raw girl-girl passion like this anywhere.
-Lots of content. The scene count has grown immensely since the last reviews noted here.
-Great variety of girls. Could definitely use more blacks and european girls, but not really a complaint.
-Great quality. Scenes available in HQ (mp4) or standard (wmv). Standard scenes are 1280x720 as well while being significantly smaller than mp4s.
-Solid download times. 4mb per second seems average but I've noted up to 7mb per second.
-Bonus to Sloppygirl.com (spit kissing/play) comes at half price ($12.95). It appears that most of the girls that film a scene at kissmegirl simply film an extra scene filled with lots of spit kissing and play. Amazing stuff.
-The site seems to pay attention to suggestions made by users on its forum, such as pairing one popular girl with another.
-Each clip comes with behind the scenes interviews with the girls involved.
Cons: -While I didn't notice a download limit, I was kicked off the site after dl'ing about 20 scenes (22gb). Access was restored later.
-It's niche, as the site's name suggests. While the kissing is beyond hot and heavy, everything else is pretty softcore.
-Would like to see an option to download segments of scenes. File size can be rather large, especially for the mp4s, sometimes over 2gb per file.
Bottom Line: There seriously needs to be a site update on this site. The number of vids has grown immensely (probably between 10-15 pages with 20 scenes per page) as has the quality and girl count. If you can't resist beautiful women kissing each other passionately, holding nothing back, sucking tongues and tons of deep deep kissing, this site will be nothing short of a dream for you. The variety of girl matchups is simply awesome, as is the quality of the material and video. There's just not much acting possible in a format like this - these girls love what they're doing and seem totally into each moment - the realism is perfect. For those that love spit kissing and spit play, sloppygirl.com comes at half price (or vice-versa) and involve many of the same scenes from kissmegirl. No hardcore on this site, but the uninhibited kissing along with the stripping and beautiful naked bodies all over each other is amazing. One of the best niche sites I've ever joined.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Girls Out West

18. Girls Out West (1)

Pay
Active
60
RagingBuddhist (65) 06-01-13  12:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (63), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Lots of amateur content
+ Different file types available
+ Tabbed navigation
+ Pictures: 1026, 1280, 1600 pixels long side, Some available @ 2000
+ In browser flash video
+ Bonus material from Yanks and ATK Hairy
Cons: - File types are ridiculous to figure out
- File naming is another pain
- Split files in 2013?
- Minimal previews/ descriptions on videos
- Picture/video quality varies, often for the worse
- Site crashes while using Opera browser
- Not compatible with FreeDownloadManager
Bottom Line: I'll preface this by saying that this will be, without a doubt, the most disjointed bottom line I've ever written. I'm just going to call it, "Issues". Joining this site was a major disappointment and what follows might tell the story.

I will say that the speed issue I commented on was somewhat resolved. I still can't use FreeDownloadManager, but the "Save As" speed is up to 1.2 mb. Not great, but certainly better than the 200kb I saw in the beginning. Other than this being a strictly amateur site which I absolutely love, that pretty much ends the positives. Here we go...

Normally, I would go into detail about the various file types. GOW seems to go out of their way to make that confusing as hell. You get columns labeled mp4, mpg+wmv and wmv. Then, quite often, you face a cryptic list like this: Source MP4 1080p, Source MP4 720p, High (1024x576 @ 3200k), High (1024x576 @ 3200k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), Low (512x288 @ 600K), Low (512x288 @ 600K). On top of that, there are sometimes 5 links that say the same exact thing (e.g. Medium (1920x1080 @ 1500K)) Seemingly duplicate links that link to different files? Same file with slightly different names? I have no clue. I'll just leave it as this - I tried to download only the highest resolution video and was frequently disappointed in the quality of even the newest scenes. Lighting quality, especially on the outdoor scenes was hit or miss.

File naming. Fine on pictures as the name of the model and the set are used. On video? Another nightmare. A lot of the B/G and G/G videos download using the couple's names with no mention of the scene/episode. So, even though a couple has done more than one video, each one has to be renamed so you can download the different videos.

Opened a solo girl video that showed it was the second of 3 parts. Went to the model index to get the other two parts and there were only two videos listed. WHERE'S THE THIRD? Guess I can browse the entire site to see if it's there.

Clicked on the thumbnail for part 3 of a video and the flash preview shows part 2

Picture sets showing up in the video section.

Thinking there might be a browser issue in how the site was displayed, I tried Opera. That kept crashing so I went back to Firefox.

It's pretty bad when the bonus sets are better quality than most of the host site's material - higher resolution and better lighting.

Preview thumbnails for several full length videos open to a page with no download links.

*********************
I actually got a headache trying to figure out how to write all of this, so I'm going to stop writing and just leave it at this - For such a well known site, it's a mess. If you really like amateurs, in all their non-glamorous glory, and don't mind digging for files and renaming almost every video, go for it. Otherwise, avoid this site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Bikini Riot

19. Bikini Riot (1)

Pay
Active
88
luv lickn clit (21) 05-28-13  04:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: --Lots of beautiful girls in and out of hot bikinis!
--Generally upscale locations for the photo/video shoots
--The video is 720p HD for the last approximately 4 years, and looks great!
--Photos and videos are explicit...nothing left to the imagination, and always have good close ups.
--Some very good masturbation vids can be found here, though not enough with just fingers for me.
--I had no problems with site navigation (it's fairly basic), and I got good download speeds.
--unique file names for both photo zip files and videos that do not require renaming.
Cons: --Way too many girls with fake boobs. Also too many with natural Ds for my taste.

--Update frequency is low (13 to 14 updates a month).

--Too many vibrators for me; I prefer to watch a girl masturbate with her fingers.

--Current photo resolution is 2000 pixels on the long dimension, which is a pity because they are very good. Older material is less than that.

--Almost all of the shoots are done at pools. I would love to see more done at nice beaches.
Bottom Line: I have always had a thing for hot girls in skimpy bikinis! For me this goes all the way back to junior high when a friend brought his dad's Sport's Illustrated swimsuit issue to school, back to my teenage days at the local pool, spring break craziness in college, and several ex-GFs and my ex-spouse who indulged my love of bikinis.

There are a number of bikini sites out there. I like skimpy bikinis, but not bikinis that leave nothing to the imagination, like the ones that are only strings. I checked out the free tours at several sites, and settled on Bikini Riot.

Right away there were several things that I really liked. First, no pre-checked cross sells when signing up, & they let you choose your username and password. Once into the site, it was easy to get around, and I quickly discovered the good file naming protocol: all zips and vids have a unique name that incorporates the model's name, usually some reference to her bikini, and the resolution (for videos)--no renaming necessary! Little things like this tell me that the site owners care about customer satisfaction.

There are approximately twice the number of videos as photos. Basically each photo shoot has a video shot simultaneously, and then they do a separate video with the girl in the same bikini. In the stand alone video, the girl plays in or around the pool for a little while, strips out of her bikini (sometimes a little too quickly), and then masturbates, usually with a vibrator. I would like to see a little more time with the girl in the bikini, maybe walking along the pool (front and rear views). The photos and videos always incorporate some good close up views--nothing left to the imagination here! Some of the videos of the photo shoot don't really add much, but at other times they provide an interesting behind the scenes perspective.

The videos have been exclusively 720p HD since 2010, and a majority from 2009 are also 720p. The videos look great, and whoever shoots them does a good job balancing whole body and close up shots. Another thing worth noting, the sound quality is excellent, and really gives the ambiance of being right there. Almost all of them are at pools, and they seem to always have some type of blow up plastic raft around.

The photos are very good quality...well focused and with good depth of field, and they use flash to reduce strong shadows (some of the videos do have objectionable shadows, since obviously they don't use flash when shooting a vid). The only downside to the photos is the resolution--only 2000 pixels on the long dimension. I would definitely like to see that between 3000 and 4000.

The models are mostly US girls, and as I noted above, there are way too many fake boobs for me (maybe as many as half). Most of the boob jobs were good as far as that goes (no bad scars, etc), but I strongly prefer natural girls. They also have a lot of girls with natural big boobs, so if you're a big boobs lover, you will really like this site. I would say that many of the models conform to what you would think of when you think about Los Angelos based porn stars--lots of big boobs and good bit of fake blonde hair too. From a facial beauty standpoint, they are all 8s, 9s, and 10s. Quite a few well known US porn stars can be found here. I found at least a dozen of my favorites, and for me, the numerous vids and photos of Carli Banks were almost worth the price of admission alone.

I counted 111 different models on the model page. Most girls have at least 3 or 4 videos and photoshoots. The update frequency is one of the more disappointing things at Bikini Riot...only 13 or 14 updates a month (an update is either a photo or video set). Their material is very good, but this is not enough to keep me around for the long term. I have been busy in the month that I've been there, so I'll probably check in every couple of years or so.

I had no problems with site navigation. They have pages for updates, models, photos, and videos. No search feature, but with only 111 girls, it's not too hard to find what you're looking for. Models use their most common name here-another little plus. I got good download speeds. Not sure if a download manager would work, as I don't use one.

There are two bonus sites, both of which are fairly small. Riot Girls has about 12 models and a total of about 75 sets. These are done indoors, and usually have the girl in lingerie at the beginning, and end with a masturbation scene. Euro Sinsations has about 40 models, most with only 1 video and photo set. There were some navigation issues with that site, and it could use a little work. Overall, the 2 bonus sites add some value, but the main site is really most of what you get.

Bottom Line: Some gorgeous girls in and out of hot bikinis! Great looking HD vids. Too many fake boobs, and a low update frequency were the main cons. Overall though, a high quality site, definitely worth checking out for a month
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mr. Skin

20. Mr. Skin (1)

Pay
Active
100
littlejoe (23) 05-12-13  02:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -tons of movies clips. barely even touched the surface of what they got
-downloadable clips, new ones in 720p HD!
-screen grabs as well
-fun site design
-tons of searching and sorting options
-each clip clearly labeled what is in the clip, ie sexy, boobs, ass, bush
Cons: -not all HD clips
-some movies have frame grabs but not movie clips
Bottom Line: what a great site. i can be watching netflix and see a boob and go right over to mr.skin and usually its there.

site design is fun. they have "best of" type compilations, polls, playlists. the search feature is great. you can search for a title or celeb, or filter movies by just about everything you can think of.

newer movies have 720p HD clips, older ones have SD. mp4 and wmv are there for download

my only negative other then some titles not being there, is sometimes they have screen grabs of a scene but not a clip
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Body In Mind

21. Body In Mind (0)

Pay
Newbie
69*
nipplestrech (1) 05-09-13  12:14pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: First of all the contend was what was expected.
Many good photographer contribute to this side.
New photos can be shown in medium large and extra size, zip file is only available for one size only.
About 8 pictorials per month, more or less.
Cons: Downloading the zip file is long-winded and time consuming. The zip link brings you first to a site where you have to accept these (shortend) agreements:
"Dear Body in Mind Member,
To protect the women who share their beauty with all of us from photo piracy we ask that:

1) You agree not to share, email, post ...
2) You agree to allow the photos in your zip to be watermarked ..
..
6) You understand the penalty for copyright infringement is $150,000 ...
7) You understand the criminal penalty ... is 5 years in prison.
..

[x] Yes, I agree not to post photos or share zips"

This has to be done when downloading EVERY, really, every time before you can click the "Download ZIP Now" button.
The second annoying thing is when trying downloading zips in parallel you got the message: "Service Temporarily Unavailable"
Bottom Line: I can recommend this site only for patient people, someone having plenty of time (retiree) or not interested in downloading images as zips.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nude In SF

22. Nude In SF (1)

Pay
Active
65
rearadmiral (328) 04-29-13  06:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - One of only a few remaining American public nudity sites
- Low price
- Offers zips for photos
- Bills through CCBill
- May still be updating
Cons: - Small site
- Very few videos
- Video resolution is low
- Most video links are broken
- Updates may be recycled
- No recognizable models
- Photo sets broken into several zips
Bottom Line: This is a small site in a rare niche so I thought it would be worth joining at least once. The niche is public nudity in an American setting and those sites are getting harder to find, likely because the material is getting harder to make. Nude in LA doesnít even exist any longer, and the best American public nudity site Ė Teasers VOD Ė was ordered to stop producing scenes by the LA city government a while back so there will be no more updates from them.

This site is definitely small. There are only 33 models here with the look being more to the amateur side of the business. Thatís neither a pro or a con, but merely a fact. You wonít find porn stars here like you used to be able to at some other public sites. The models appear to be all in their 20s with varying body types and few with tattoos. Overall, the models are pretty attractive.

There is truth in some advertising, and the name of the site follows that rule: there is only one theme here: models in San Francisco shed their clothes and walk around in public areas being photographed.

For a video collector, this site doesnít have a lot to offer. Actually, thatís being far too generous. Of all the photo shoots it seems odd that there are only a dozen videos available. Thatís bad enough, but it actually gets worse. Of the video links less than half actually work. But that may be the best news because the resolutions are so poor that even what is here is almost unwatchable. The resolution is only 640x360 at 1200kb/s and 15fps. Subjectively they look terrible. They look so bad on a 23Ē monitor that the watermark is almost unreadable. The technical aspect of the videos is so bad that I havenít watched them so I canít comment on their artistic merit. I should also add that the videos are also short Ė most are about 3mins long.

Things are better with the photos. The number of photos for models varies from less than 50 to just over 1000. The average is about 300 photos per model. The resolutions arenít too bad with the majority at 1752x2628. Newer photos are higher at 3744x5616, but there arenít many of those.

The site allows download managers but they arenít really effective or necessary since the zip files are so small, with most being approximately 6MB. The problem is that for each photo set there may be 10 or more zips. If a model has a lot of shoots then youíll be downloading a lot of zips Ė one model has over 60 zip files for her photos. Some of the zips have only two photos in them.

There appears to be a relatively new feature called a ďNude MapĒ where the modelís route through public areas is mapped on Google Maps. This would be an innovative idea for a public nudity site but I canít figure out how to get it to work. There is some evidence that this feature isnít live yet even though it is being heavily promoted.

The big question I have about the site that I canít give a definitive answer to is whether the site is still updating. I think it is, but it appears that it is updating with mostly older material and whether that was shot a while ago and only made available now or whether it is recycled material I canít say. The latest update was today (April 29) and the copyright on those photos is 2013, but most of the more recent updates have copyrights in 2010 and older. The latest video was uploaded in February and it looks as bad as the rest, which may indicate that it was actually recorded a long time ago. But in fairness to the site, they do have a list of updates and there are updates added at least twice a month. Whether those are really Ďnewí photos though could be open to debate.

The site does actually offer a fairly good value, but only because it is cheap and not because it offers a lot of good material. They offer a $4.95 fee for a week of access that will rebill higher. The good news is that unless you still live with dial-up from the 1990s you can download everything they have in that time. With a decent internet connection you can have everything you want in under an hour. It also bills through CCBill so you can have some confidence that cancelling will be easy. (The page at TBP says that the membership is $4.95 for two weeks, but that isnít what the site is offering now.)

So can I recommend this site? Yes, but only to someone with a narrow interest in this niche who prefers photos. As a video collector I was badly disappointed, but the photos are decent. (Actually, theyíre not Ďdecentí since they feature young ladies naked in public, but you get what I mean.) The small site size and limited offerings are offset by the low price, so if you need a fix of photos of nude models in the streets, this might scratch an itch for you.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Melina.com

23. Melina.com (1)

Pay
Active
85
tangub (151) 04-29-13  07:19am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Reasonable price of $19.95
Exclusive content.
The 59 gorgeous models include a wide variety of ethnicities from Asia, Africa, South America and Europe.
Site updates consistently every 2 days.
Stunning high resolution photos available in 3 sizes.
Zip downloads.
Photo set covers included in zip files.
Some nice background info on the models included.
Additional features include model ratings, comments and add to favourites.
Cons: The video section is very small; only 13 videos total and only 1 new one added in the last 12 months.
Videos are streaming only.
Many of the photo sets are split in to two parts although they do generally come as consecutive updates.
Zip file naming could be better; model name plus number (e.g. emilya_1_m, emilya_2_m), would be nicer if they could include the photo set name.
Navigation could be better.
Search tool is rather limited.
No file sizes listed for zips.
Download speed seemed a little slow; single downloads seemed to be limited to about 600 KB/sec.
Bottom Line: Melina.com claim to be professional photographers who travel the world to find the best looking girls whom they claim to be exclusive to the site and 100% newcomers. I certainly didnít recognise any of the models as being familiar from other sites and even tried cross referencing a few at thenude.eu but came up with a blank so have no reason to doubt their claims. This is primarily a Teen site with the models mostly being aged 18-21. The big attraction for me in this site was the varied ethnic diversity of the models which you seldom find on multi model sites. I loved discovering the dark skinned, dark haired exotic beauties from places like India, Thailand, Philippines, Chile, Venezuela and Brazil to name a few. The site has been online a little over 2 years and to date has 414 galleries (31,000+ photos).

The navigation options are rather limited with a choice of models, galleries or videos. The models page is nicely presented with a good sized preview photo of each model along with her name and number of galleries, pics and videos. The models are listed by rank starting with the highest rated. You can also click on a letter of the alphabet to find models by name alphabetically. There is a basic model search that allows you to search by eye colour, hair colour, ethnicity, tattoos and piercings. The annoying thing about using the search engine or the alphabetical listing is that after you select a model in your results and hit the back button you are always taken back to the default models page so have to click back to the letter of the alphabet or search again. If you select galleries the whole 2 yearsí worth of photo sets will be presented on a single page with a preview photo of the set cover so a lot of scrolling involved. Down the right hand side there is a month and year list but clicking on it doesnít actually take you to that monthís updates. It just expands a list of text links for the dates in that month when there was an update, not very helpful really without a preview pic.

The strength of the site is the photo collection; this is top quality professional photography equal to anything you would find on top photography sites like MetArt. In fact in some ways I preferred the photo sets here to those at Met because the models almost always start off wearing some clothing, lingerie or swimwear so you nearly always get some tease before the nakedness. I donít really recall seeing any of those plain vanilla nude sets you get a lot of at MetArt. There is a good mix of indoor and stunning outdoors locations. The models here get fully nude including some spreading and close up shots but donít go as far as masturbation or insertions. The photos are offered in 3 sizes (+1000px, +2000px and up to 5000px).

Anyone who joins this site for videos Iím afraid would end up sorely disappointed. There are only 13 videos and they are streaming only. There are 4 quality levels of streaming; HD720p, 480p, 360p & 240p for mobile. I didnít find the 720p very sharp when viewed full screen on my 24 inch monitor so have my doubts that itís true hd. The videos are mostly 2-3 minutes long and are just basically the model dancing around and stripping with background music. I didnít find them very erotic at all.

For anyone who loves high quality photography I would recommend this site particularly if you have a passion for dark dusky exotic beauties. If youíre only interested in videos I would advise against wasting your money on this site. The poor video section wouldnít adversely affect my rating of the site as I have little to no interest in them anyway.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Mandy Roe

24. Mandy Roe (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Crispin (1) 04-18-13  09:23am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Mandy is very cute. The sets have a professional feel and Mandy is fully nude.

There is an option to email her with suggestions for sets.

There are a little over 40 sets on the site at the time of this review and seven videos.
Cons: There have only been three updates since March 14 2013.

There are only seven videos on the site and they are short and are photoshoot type videos.

On the main page there is a section titled "Next Updates", however it is blank -- I don't know if any updates are coming up. Last update with April 2, so more than two weeks ago.

There is an option to email Mandy. I sent a message a couple of days ago and I haven't received a reply. The site appears to offer some interaction with the model, but in reality there is none.

The price is around 30/month. I find that a little steep considering the sparse updates and softcore content.

There is a download limit. It seems to top out at about 10 sets a day. Each set is about 25-50 megabytes.

Download options for sets are normal and middle. Normal is about 25-40mb/set and middle is 10-15mb/set, with around 80-100 pics each. Fairly low resolution.
Bottom Line: Yes Mandy is cute but the site doesn't appear to be updating. Other sites offer some interaction with the model, with messaging, webcam, etc, but this site doesn't seem to have anything like that.

If the site were cheaper I might consider being a member, but it's a higher than average price with below par content.

It's not worth it.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Love UK Glamour Girls

25. Love UK Glamour Girls (1)

Pay
Active
69
tangub (151) 04-14-13  03:24pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Fair amount of content; 121 models, 178 videos, 575 photo sets (approx. 29,000 pics)
Some nice high resolution photos up to 2333x3500px in size
Photos available in zips.
Videos can be streamed or downloaded.
Some basic model info provided.
Cons: Updates are being rotated.
Zips all have the file name ďphoto_zipĒ so you are required to rename every single download yourself.
Only 1 photo size available.
Small square thumbnails donít properly preview the images.
Photo sizes are inconsistent. The high resolution photos mentioned under pros only make up about 20% of the sets, more than half the sets are a meagre 533x800px or 669x1000 px.
Videos short with the average of the ones I watched being about 3 minutes.
Only 1 download option available for videos usually around 720x576 wmv @ 2000 kbps. (A few of the newer ones come in at 1280x720 @ 8000 kbps)
I had a high failure rate on video downloads, (maybe it was just a bad day)
Very basic site layout and navigation.
No way to search or sort the models or updates.
Typical of most British sites this site is also very soft being mostly topless with occasional mild nudity.
Bottom Line: The only reason I joined this site was due to a half price email promo offering a membership for $12.50. I thought for that price I canít really go wrong considering the site featured many of the same British models I enjoyed collecting from sites like Only Tease and St. Mackenzieís. The content here is typical of the softcore tease type of content you find on most British sites which is what I expected with the emphasis on sexy teasing and stripping rather than explicit nudity. Thereís plenty of sexy lingerie, stockings, heels and pantyhose on show here.

Although the site is named Love UK Glamour Girls only about 20% of the content is marked with that site name. When I first joined up I started downloading the oldest updates first from August 2010 which were the nice 3500px photo sets carrying the Love UK site name. As I worked forward through the archives I was surprised when I reached August 2011 and the photo sizes suddenly dropped down to 800px and carrying the site name Mackenzie Girlfriends. I guess they must have stopped shooting new content and started padding the site out with low resolution filler content from another site. Everything dated from August 2011 up until March this year is Mackenzie Girlfriends branded content so in summary you end up with 114 nice sized Love UK Glamour Girls photo sets and 461 Mackenzie Girlfriends sets in much lower resolution. The Love UK sets are all solo shoots while much of the Mackenzie GF sets are shoots featuring two or more models as the name would suggest. Around 145 photo sets on the site feature Mackenzie who is the British model Mackenzie White who also plays the part of Head Mistress Mackenzie at St. Mackenzieís.

The video quality is fairly mediocre by today's standards apart from a few of the latest ones which play at 720p. As with the photos they are mostly just stripping and teasing and although quite a few videos contain two models donít expect any hot lesbian action, thereís only a bit of kissing and touching. Many of the videos I tried had a musical backing and in some I could see a flash bulb going off.

Navigation is very basic, you only have ďupdatesĒ or ďmodelsĒ. Click on updates and you get all the updates listed on one page from the current date at the top to the oldest at the bottom. When I first signed up the oldest updates were from August 2010 but today the archives only go back as far as November 2010. The reason? In their attempt to deceive you in to believing the site is still updating daily each day they are simply removing an update from the bottom of the page and placing it back at the top with the current dayís date. On the model index page the Mackenzie Girlfriends models are listed separately from the main models. Click on a model and you will find a very brief bio listing just her name, height, measurements, hometown and star sign followed by a thumbnail listing of her photo sets and videos and at the bottom of the page a list of links to other sites that she appears on.

Overall I thought there was some ok content for the $12.50 that it cost me but for the full price of $25 quite frankly there are plenty of better sites where you can spend your money if you want to see some of these British girls.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 565 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Wet And Puffy (3)
2. Goddess Nudes (2)
3. The Life Erotic (2)
4. Bryci (2)
5. MC Nudes (2)
6. Digital Desire (2)
7. Naked Gym Girls (1)
8. Fame Girls.net (1)
9. Eternal Desire (1)
10. Microminimus (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.22 seconds.